VFH changed. This page is kept for historical purposes. See the new VFH at
Uncyclopedia:VFH.
- Vote for an article you find excellent. Please add new nominations on the top.
- Initial nominations do not count as a vote For. Please use "Nomination and For" or some iteration thereof if you wish to vote for your nomination.
- When voting For or Against, please change the score number accordingly—this saves a lot of time later.
- IP votes carry half the weight of registered votes.
- Nonsigned votes and votes without timestamps will be struck out, so make sure you sign your votes with ~~~~ or press the "your signature with timestamp" button () above the edit box.
- When nominating an article, the template Template:VFH should be added to the end of the article using {{VFH}}. Anything you add {{VFH}} to also shows up in Category:Feature nomination.
- Failed VFH nominations should only be archived/removed by the sysops who pay attention to this sort of thing.
- Previous featured articles can be found on the archive pages.
- Voters: don't be dicks and do be constructive with criticism. Writers: Don't be prima donnas. Be open to criticism.
- Articles from all namespaces (including UnNews, HowTo, UnBooks, etc.) are eligible for VFH. Votes against articles based on namespace prejudice will be discarded.
- If your article doesn't make it to the front page, don't despair. It may be eligible to be Quasi-featured so long as it meets certain criteria.
THIS IS A VOTE, NOT A DISCUSSION.
If you feel the need to whine or start flamewars please do it
HERE.
Violators of this policy will be touched by Michael Jackson.
Current Nominations (new stuff at top, prefix votes with * )
SELF-NOMINATION REGULATION: self-nominated articles (i.e. you write an article and then decide to nominate it yourself) must receive at least one critique via Pee Review before nomination (or at spend a week on Pee Review if you can't get anyone to look at it). Articles nominated by people other than the author can still be nominated at any time and require no review (though it is still recommended).
VFH IS NOT A DISCUSSION PAGE. If you'd like constructive criticism for your article, please submit it to Uncyclopedia:Pee Review.
Vote: U.S. Presidential Election, 1840
|
Score: 2 drunk voters
|
Nomination:
|
<<>> 02:21, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 2
|
- N&F. Another classic by the late Kwakerjack, back from the dead for your viewing pleasure. (This one is actually my favorite of the bunch, but I suspect that's because it's the first of his great series on the quirks of American politics).--<<>> 02:21, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
- For, but I resetn the acusatino that I am vtoing drunk! — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 05:12, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 0
|
No against votes
|
Vote: But Seriously...
|
Score: 7 moments of sanity on this wacky site
|
Nomination:
|
<<>> 14:41, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 7
|
- N&F, from the annals of QFA comes a winner from the Fundlebuggy.--<<>> 14:41, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- For--Dr. Fenwick 15:12, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- For. Where did he go, anyway? -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 16:21, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- For. Another well written oddity from HF. He's off becoming a famous author, I hear. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 17:07, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- For, because I wanted to vote for last time as well. --~
Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p. 17:42, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- For --EMC [TALK] 19:39, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Didn't get this last time, but I must have been in a bad mood or something. For. Only "The Hardwick" could have pulled it off, though. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 05:12, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 0
|
No against votes
|
Vote: HowTo:Write a Stephen King Novel
|
Score: 3 copyright infringements
|
Nomination:
|
Vana 21:23, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 3
|
- Nom and For--Okay, kiddies, I figure its about time. Vana 21:23, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Dig good job, fun article --THINKER 21:50, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Had to think about it for a while, but sure why not. -RAHB 00:42, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 0
|
No against votes
|
Comments
|
It's been peer reviewed and edited many many many times. In my (slightly rose-colored spectacle-covered) eyes, I've done pretty darn well.
|
Vote: HowTo:Beat the Odds
|
Score: 13.5 Beaten odds
|
Nomination:
|
Nom P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:52, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 16.5
|
- Nom + For Re-nomming an older piece of Ljlego's work I remember from "back in the day." P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 20:18, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Cajek 21:43, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Dig I liked it enough to vote for it the first time, why not again? ;) --THINKER 21:52, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Because this is pretty much the last remaining article with a UQG quote. And its funny. That too.-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 02:53, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah sure, why not Another testament of his deserving the WotM -RAHB 04:48, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Beats an Odd in spite of the VOTE-WHORING. --Ekashp 15:07, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- For I reviewed this article about 90 times, and would love to see it featured. oh yeah and it's funny too. --THE 15:09, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Greatest article ever.
kingkitty ~Fuck you~ 15:09, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Catchy soundtrack for evil I'm Lovin' it, padapapapa 195.241.149.38 20:42, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R, 09:08, 09 July 2007
- For. I thought it was funny, and we all know that's all that matters -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 21:21, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- For. Politics...or something. No, I legitimately enjoyed this article and wasn't bribed with Monopoly Money or chocolate bars. AT ALL! User:Mrthejazz/sig 21:39, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Hey that's funny, neither was I! ...hehe. >_> --Señor DiZtheGreat CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 23:43, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Self-For -Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:26, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Finntastic 17:34, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Frosted Wow. That's the good stuff. a-slice-of-cake 13:53, 10 July 2007 (EDT)
For --Ekashp 21:05, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Not because of bribery, the concept is clever! --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 01:29, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 3
|
- Weak Against - Sorry, just don't think that it is funny enough. {Ikabu}BUZZ...FLICK...GURGLE... 02:10, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Against. Same as Ikabu. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 21:16, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Against. Some good lines but, overall, it's not a standout page. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 17:11, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments
|
- Oh dear.
I believe I may have been zorked that night. Terribly sorry. I'll try not to do it again. --Ekashp 02:22, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
- Update: I looked at the timestamps. I'm sure I was pasted. Small wonder I forgot I'd voted. --Ekashp 02:33, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Vote: Afairyism
|
Score: 2 afairyisms
|
Nomination:
|
Weri long wang
|
For Votes: 2
|
- Nom and for I don’t know what people think of this article, but I got a 41 in the pee review (after adding some pictures), so I might as well put it up. --Weri long wang 17:00, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Enough jokes to keep me reading it. -RAHB 04:25, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 0
|
No against votes
|
Vote: Commercial
|
Score: 16 commercials
|
Nomination:
|
Ljlego
|
For Votes: 16
|
- N+F e|m|c keeps making humorous pages. Fucking e|m|c.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:31, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Slithy Tove 02:29, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- For --THE 13:00, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- For --vyvyan 13:26, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- For --BurekSP 14:32, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- For --Wizardman 15:14, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- HeadOn! Apply directly to the forehead! -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 16:10, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- HeadOn! Apply directly to the forehead! -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 17:07, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- HardOn! Apply directly to the forehead! Err...I mean. Crap. For. --EMC [TALK] 20:16, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- HeadOn! Apply directly to the forehead! --General Insineratehymn 23:13, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- HeadOn, Apply directly to the... Penis??? ----Mgr. Sir Sonic80☭ 02:58, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Test-i-cleez mmmm -RAHB 04:20, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- HeadOn! Apply dir...HEADON! HEADON! HEADON! I HATE your commercials, but your article is amazing!--Mr.Vib 14:07, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Commerical! Apply directly to Main Page! I HATE your commercials, but your article is amazing! --Ekashp 16:02, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- For--General And Min. THEDUDEMAN 21:09, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Well written. Also, apply directly to forehead. Or else! P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:42, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 0
|
No against votes
|
Vote: UnNews:Uncyclopedia is better than Wikipedia
|
Score: 7 rivals beaten down
|
Nomination:
|
Andorin Kato 00:50, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 11
|
- Self-Nom & For. Nobody can argue the title. Built like an actual journalism article, and it did well in Pee Review. --Andorin Kato 00:50, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Whee pah! THE TRUTH MUST BE REVEALED --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 01:31, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Yes!--Dr. Fenwick 03:21, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- For - Because it is better than Wikipedia, duh! A while ago, I wrote a sequel to this UnNews:Wikipedia will merge with Uncyclopedia which failed on VFH.--Sir Manforman 12:18, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- For--Lt.Wyoming 17:39, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- For P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 19:54, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- For-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:57, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- For!--K-Gamer_B29 | Discussion | Station Square 20:22, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- For. I'm a fan of smoking and collecting asses. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:41, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- For, but I may need to change my vote. After all, its true. -- --Mgr. Sir Sonic80☭ 02:35, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- F0R! Yes. --Trar (talk|contribs|grueslayer) 11:33, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 4
|
- --L 05:19, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- There's no need to suck up to the hometown crowd, even if it is nice to have smoke blown up our collective asses. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:16, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Against Never really laughed. -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 02:54, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Against A nice thing to have on the site, but not funny enough for main page glory. -RAHB 04:18, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Vote: HowTo:Deceive people on eBay
|
Score: 9 smart eBay sellers
|
Nomination:
|
Sir Manforman
|
For Votes: 10
|
- Self Nom/For--Sir Manforman 14:12, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- sDig I did a lot of work on this one, and I must say, it came out pretty damn good. :) --THINKER 16:44, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Who cares if it's listy? -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 18:26, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- For. Lists work sometimes. Also: two self noms? What is dis shiznit? -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 18:45, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Slithy Tove 19:38, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- For This shows the exact reason why my parents are broke. -RAHB 01:12, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Yah, yah.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 12:58, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Yes, you gotta love it really. Cause it's good. I like the lists. The lists make me want to dance. I'll dance because of those lists. The Oblong Lobster 14:25, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Definite For'd - Wow, I may actually make some money off eBay. -- --Mgr. Sir Sonic80☭ 21:22, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- ForUser:Mrthejazz/sig 22:17, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 1
|
- Against, a bit too listy in the middle IMO, and it didn't really make me laugh all that much. –—Hv (talk) 6/07 17:44
|
Comments
|
- One self-nom, two self-fors. :) And for the record, there is a difference between an article containing lists and an article being listy: in the first, an article has detailed lists which are jokes themselves, and help facilitate the humor of the piece. A listy piece has lists with little to no detail that just take up space and generally do not serve the humor of the work. Of course, this is perceived differently by different people, so I have no qualms about Againsts for such a reason. --THINKER 18:53, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- I'll be gone tommorow so there will be a delay in returning favors for votes--Sir Manforman 23:28, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Vote: 667:Neighbor of The Beast
|
Score: 12 wacky neighbors
|
Nomination:
|
nom P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 16:10, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 14
|
- SN+F -- I have no idea as to how this will fare, but it's worth a shot P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 16:10, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- For. --Andorin Kato 18:45, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- Most Definitely For. // Sgt.Montez 19:41, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R, 02:11, 06 July 2007
- For --~
Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p. 02:12, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- For--Dr. Fenwick 14:24, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- For 1) The title 2) The TV Land line 3) The article -RAHB 01:23, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Needs a theme song by Iron Maiden, called "Neighbor of the Beast" (A rip off of "Number of the Beast", of course! --FumbDucker 02:03, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- For --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 04:04, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Fo very funny --THE 12:59, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- For-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:14, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- For. Sure, why not. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 21:07, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Marmalade, indeed. Truly a classic. -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 01:25, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- For --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 01:19, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 2
|
- Against, didn't really make me laugh. –—Hv (talk) 5/07 19:32
- Against Cajek 06:20, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Vote: UnBooks: The Diary of Sir Humphrey Watermelon
|
Score: 7 Arabs, Zulus and all other manner of uncultured barbarians
|
Nomination:
|
The Hunt A dash of Dickensian 06:45, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 7
|
- For Enjoyed it more than I'd like to admit. -RAHB 08:00, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- Dig rather funny. --THINKER 00:27, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:44, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- For the Queen of England--Nytrospawn 19:57, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- For--SIR T H A T G U Y H U F F E D M E throw a snowball 08:01, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- For --Winstanley1 11:23, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- And now I don't feel so bad about not being British. Ж Kalir, Awesome Author(alliteration affords additional awesome) 17:35, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 0
|
No against votes
|
Vote: UnNews:Poor planning ruins Rapture
|
Score: 12 pious appendages
|
Nomination:
|
» Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 2007.07.04.02:40
|
For Votes: 12
|
- N+F This one actually made me laugh. Amazing. Good work here. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 2007.07.04.02:40
- For -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 03:11, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Slithy Tove 05:07, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- For. My left ear got Raptured. Now my glasses are crooked. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 06:46, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- For unfoturnately the ratpier left jme with no eys -!!RAHB 07:05, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- --L 09:54, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:22, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- For --Pie-tony 19:57, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Hilarious! Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 00:26, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- For P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:19, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- For. –—Hv (talk) 6/07 18:02
- For -- ~ GCD 03:51, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 0
|
No against votes
|
Vote: UnBooks:Tuesdays with Maury
|
Score: 10 bold, brazen journalists
|
Nomination:
|
THINKER 01:03, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 10
|
- Nom+sDig Prettiestpretty hit the nail on the head as to why this one probably wont make it to feature, but I'm going to nom it anyway; its a 100% satire, and I love it. :) --THINKER 01:03, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Satire at its best. -RAHB 05:37, 3 July 2007 (UTC)#
- For --Sir Manforman 12:07, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- For --vyvyan 01:40, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- I've never voted on an Unbook before, but this one is damn funny. --So So 07:28, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- Strong For I believe I pee reviewed it. Very good.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:11, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- For. I'm not very happy that I'm not the father of this one :( -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 16:29, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- For (I pee reviewed it...) Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 21:59, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- For. What's great is that it touches on something that a lot of us have wondered for a long time: WTF happened to Maury Povich?--Mr.Vib 14:13, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- For --THE 15:11, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 0
|
No against votes
|
Comments
|
RE Prettiestpretty:
Whoops. What did I do then? /me thinks long and hard (and checks his contribs) Don't worry, guvn'a, I'll figure out this mystery.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 14:45, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- I REMEMBER NOW! I read the whole thing, wrote out a super kind Pee Review page, then my computer crashed. Stupid iTunes, F@H, and Facebook wall post all happening at the same time!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 15:53, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- This is further proof that F@H is inherently evil (besides the fact that no one really knows what it is or how it works) --THINKER 17:44, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Vote: The Muffin Man
|
Score: 10 Psychopathic Muffin Men
|
Nomination:
|
Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 15:57, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 11
|
- I like. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 15:57, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
- For, because I wrote it. --~
Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p. 16:58, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
- For, because Jocke Pirat wrote it. --EMC [TALK] 17:28, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
- I knew him, Horatio, he used to live in Drury Lane. ~ 20:02, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
- Dig because the Zappa bullet in the trivia is there, and made me lolz. :) --THINKER 02:40, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- for Several years later he would die of prostate cancer. And even that didn't stop him from releasing five albums a year. -RAHB 07:27, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R, 01:15, 06 July 2007
- For, probably the funniest thing (in my opinion) on this here Uncyclopedia. // Sgt.Montez 19:02, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 14:26, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- For--K-Gamer_B29 | Discussion | Station Square 20:26, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- For P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:20, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 1
|
- Against Muffins were not known in merry old England and the grammar is in short supply. --Andreasegde 20:34, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments
|
*Abs until some Zappa-related humor is injected. Not a single reference to the Utility Muffin Research Kitchen? This is a problem. RAHB knows what I'm talkin' about. ;) --THINKER 01:09, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- I don't listen to Frank Zappa, so I wan't able to put any allusions to those things. If RAHB can add them, he'd be my guest. --~
Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p. 01:22, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- No worries, I'll switch 'er over to a Diggins once some references are infused. :) --THINKER 01:27, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
ABS I have large ABS. But also, no UTILITY MUFFIN RESEARCH KITCHEN?! IT'S BLASPHEMY! I'd add something, but I really have no idea how to make it funny. -RAHB 01:31, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- UPDATE: I lamely added one mention. Also I fixed one typo.....-RAHB 01:34, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- I'll look into this issue a little later tonight. --THINKER 01:37, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Vote: Canadians
|
Score: 9 people who are watching Strange Brew right now, eh. Beauty.
|
Nomination:
|
Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:47, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 10
|
- SN+F. I'm a little scared that this page may be too Canadian, but it's Canada Day long weekend, and this is about as nationalistic as I get. Enjoy! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:47, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
- For I truly enjoyed this. Happy 140th. Slithy Tove 06:22, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
- Because your kind in Germany really annoys me. Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!)
- Your kind everywhere annoys me. ~ 20:03, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
- For eh because I have nothing funnier to say -RAHB 20:29, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
- For If only for the fact that it is funny. --Andreasegde 20:37, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
- Dig It makes being a Canadian sound SO awesome! ;) --THINKER 01:13, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- Weak For, even though we've already got a featured article on Canada, it's funny, I don't want Modus to think I don't like him (we've been butting heads of late), and it's infinitely better than anything on Canada by Michael Moore.--<<>> 03:31, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- For. I swear, there was not a single error in the article that I could find. Also, Rachel McAdams is indeed dreamy. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 04:12, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- Beauty. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 03:26, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 1
|
- No, Eh Tim Horton would be very disappointed by the amount of misspellings, poor grammar, and other un-Canadian things in this article. Sorry, but it doesn't pass QA. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 2007.07.01.06:30
|
Comments
|
- Poor grammar? In a Modus article? I refuse to believe it. Especially since I scanned it just now, lightly but all the way through, and didn't find a single one (that you couldn't call "stylistic," such as speaking in a sentence fragment, a common intentional error). Perhaps you could point some out? — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 08:12, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
- Say, Modus, could it be that this is your first SNF? ~ 20:03, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
- No. The first since the last one, maybe, as I am quite mad. Mad! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:07, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
- Once upon a time, there was a user named Modus, who SNF'd everything he ever wrote. Then, one day, he grew up. That was a long time ago, and those of us that remember that day remember it fondly. It was, of course, just before he went mad.--<<>> 03:12, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- Update. Aw, jeez...now with audio, eh. Sorry for the surprisingly crappy hoser accent... Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:52, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- The audio reminds me of one of those old wise Native Americans who made occasional appearances on Walker Texas Ranger -RAHB 08:35, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Vote: Geocaching
|
Score: 11 sporting imperialists
|
Nomination:
|
TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 01:08, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 11
|
- Nom + For. Found this one way back in the archives. Brilliantly overlooked stuff. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 01:08, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
- A pun this bad cannot go unreleased. --L 03:29, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
- Any article containing a novelty Scrimshaw engraving of a man's penis gets my vote! A work of genius. For. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 11:00, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
- I can give you a deal on the Oregon territories, once I'm done with them. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:43, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
- FOR An awesome article. Anyone who votes against is simply a humo(u)r terrorist! --Kingkitty 16:10, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R, 12:19, 04 July 2007
- I still love the wonderful additions. Good stuff here. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 2007.07.04.02:42
- For P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 04:05, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:32, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah -RAHB 05:21, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Sure, why not? -- --Mgr. Sir Sonic80☭ 02:27, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 0
|
No against votes
|
Vote: UnBooks:The World According to Garm
|
Score: 10 pets escaped souls
|
Nomination:
|
Ljlego
|
For Votes: 10
|
- Nom + For I remember when this was on last time. I liked it. The end.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:05, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
- Strong for as per Ljlego. And promise no drama this time, Shandon! -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 01:06, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
- Fore!!! Darn it, a dog ate my ball! Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
- For this being the last time I have to vote for this damn page. /me crosses fingers. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:56, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
- SUPER FOR! this is the greatest article I have ever read. --Kingkitty 16:08, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 16:11, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R, 12:19, 04 July 2007
- For P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 04:18, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Sheer beauty. Lovely stuff right here. a-slice-of-cake 13:19, 07 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Finally got around to reading this, and I wish I had earlier -RAHB 05:12, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 0
|
No against votes
|
Vote: Bathroom humor
|
Score: 15 corny excrement jokes
|
Nomination:
|
TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:39, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 16
|
- Nom + For. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:39, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- Dig this article's mouth needs a soap-rinsing. --THINKER 23:24, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- For'D! -RAHB 00:59, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- For - Nice images. Social Studiously 11:50, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- For...not bad, not bad.--Sir Shandon (Talk) (Trophy Room) 15:15, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R, 05:37, 27 June 2007
- For - At least this is better than I maed a yuky doody. --AAA! (AAAA) 23:45, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- For. Very clever. I don't understand how it can be considered nasty. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 13:02, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
- For. Quite good, but does need cleaning up a bit. Some bits aren't funny (like about the elements), but generally I like. --Gazco --- hurray for me!!! 18:45, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 19:45 29 June 2007 (GMT)
- For Good images--Sir Manforman 13:14, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- For --Pie-tony 20:01, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- FOAR Gooooood. --Trar (talk|contribs|grueslayer) 01:16, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- For, among other things, original and funny usage of Template:Wikipedia. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 07:00, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- For, even though it's not as good as I maed a yuky doody. --General Insineratehymn 23:19, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Hee • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 21:03, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Just came across this in thee pee, and was gutted to find someone had already nominated it. Don alun 14:40, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 1
|
- No. It's nasty and not funny. Do you all honestly think it should be on the front page? --vyvyan 02:13, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
|
Vote: Vulva
|
Score: 15 Gear Sticks Shoved into Overdrive
|
Nomination:
|
El Zoof
|
For Votes: 23
|
- For I still think I'm funny. Your mileage may vary, depending on the number of passengers in your Vulva. --El Zoof 07:11, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- Dig I say: Funny! --THINKER 07:15, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Too funny. Slithy Tove 07:40, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 13:16, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- For. -- Mitch 16:13, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Sadly enough, I've never driven a Vulva, but I've heard that it's a great ride. The Humbled Master 16:42, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- For I've always liked this article. --THE 17:33, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- Strong For Because I'd love one of these...Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:03, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- For I'd like to take one for a spin myself. -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 19:49, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- For If only for the picture of a Vulva in the swimming pool. --Andreasegde 20:18, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- For --Gaberou 20:34, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- ForI've never even heard of a Vulva until now lol.--Dr. Fenwick 00:47, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- I've driven one for years, steering can be a bit sticky, but they have a nice little engine under the bonnet. For. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 11:42, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- For My husband works on my Vulva frequently Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 16:00, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
- ForLOL nice Inuendo Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service) 17:40, 23 June 2007 (UTC
- For Don alun 20:44, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- For I'm always up for good Vulvaaaaa Lasss Vegas! Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!)
- lol --Pcgamermofo 19:18, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- Drive stick with the kung fu grip, let the banana split and let it go right to your thighs. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 02:00, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- For' LeatherboundbooksTalkContributions 17:51, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R, 05:50, 27 June 2007
- For - I laughed. --AAA! (AAAA) 23:55, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- FOr--Sir Manforman 23:16, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 8
|
- Against -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 17:12, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- That sounds like a delightful car, I don't see why everyone's laughing.--vyvyan 03:54, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- --L 05:01, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Against. There's not a lot there, and what's there isn't making me want to get one. Wink wink, nudge nudge. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:06, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Against -Whats here is good stuff, but thers not enough of it. --WesternLotus 13:38, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Against: A tad short. Needs some more UMPF! --EMC [TALK] 07:00, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
- Against - Just not enough clever parts. Sounds like something from a seventh grade hallway. Slash-dev-slash-random 01:52, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- Against - {Ikabu}BUZZ...FLICK...GURGLE... 10:10, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments
|
- Abstain Could be great, and has good stuff already, but simply can't for it. -RAHB 05:35, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
|
Vote: Old hippie chick who's always collecting money
|
Score: 15 feral kittens
|
Nomination:
|
Leoispotter
|
For Votes: 19
|
- Nom and for Prettiestpretty's best article.-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 01:30, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- For...this is, indeed, funny--Sir Shandon (Talk) (Trophy Room) 04:09, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Slithy Tove 06:41, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- Peace, dude This article is far out. -- CUN PLS VFH (Miniluv•Minitrue•Unsoc) 13:27, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- Dig Because I see her at every show I go to. This state is full of em. --THINKER 21:06, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- Of course I am compelled to vote For Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 22:01, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:25, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- like it --THE 11:58, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- For--Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 13:20, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- For. -- Mitch 16:15, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- For--Gaberou 20:37, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Weak For. Text is great, but could use another picture or two. See comment that I'm about to leave on the talk page. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 22:39, 21 June 2007 (UTC) Full For with new pic. Thanks, PP! :) — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 04:00, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- For--Dr. Fenwick 00:53, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- I actually know plenty of people like this, if only they knew...For. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 11:47, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Don alun 21:04, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- Definitely For'd -- --Mgr. Sir Sonic80☭ 14:37, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R, 05:57, 27 June 2007
- Fore! c • > • cunwapquc? 00:49, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Article featured must! --Trar (talk|contribs|grueslayer) 19:21, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- For --Winstanley1 09:57, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 4
|
- Against -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 05:33, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- Against Thought the lead was funny and the ending but there was a desert of not laughing in the middle. --Andreasegde 14:09, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Against -RAHB 01:09, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- Against --AAA! (AAAA) 23:57, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
|
Previously Featured
Vote: HowTo:Feng Shui Your Computer
|
Score: 19 known harmonious device configurations
|
Nomination:
|
Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 22:26, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 19
|
Featured —rc (t) 06:59, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- N+F --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 22:26, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Strong for. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:05, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Dig very good --THINKER 23:06, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Ja --EMC [TALK] 23:12, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- When I read this a couple months ago, I automatically assumed it had already been featured because it was so good. --vyvyan 23:43, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- oI! Yes... That is it. -- --Mgr. Sir Sonic80☭ 02:41, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- --L 04:24, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Even though I see this as an actually helpful article. I do a lot of this already. – Preceding unsigned comment added by RAHB (talk • contribs)
- Self-for Wow, I didn't even know this had been nommed. How could I not vote for? ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 05:42, 09 July 2007
- For. -- Mitch 07:57, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- For. --Winstanley1 09:55, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- For. Don alun 13:08, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- like it --THE 15:07, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Fixed the vote-count, too. --Ekashp 15:19, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
Fore Four For The.original.joe.shmoe blahMUN Kodak!! 5:38, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- For I remember this article from somewhere. Maybe it's the picture. I didn't know Ceridwyn could write either.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:28, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- For --General And Min. THEDUDEMAN 21:31, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 01:19, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Full of Nernies and Pie. --Xenophage 01:24, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 0
|
No against votes
|
Comments
|
- Ljlego - Its that whole modesty thing again :P I think that my stuff is hilarious but I don't expect others to. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 12:32, 10 July 2007
|
Vote: UnBooks:Only Business
|
Score: 16 axes apologetically put through your head
|
Nomination:
|
RAHB
|
For Votes: 16
|
Featured —rc (t) 05:44, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Nom and For Quite witty I do say -RAHB 14:04, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- For - I simply must for this article. To any other pages here I haven't, you just gotta know, it's not personal, it's just business... P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 18:05, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- For --Winstanley1 20:06, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Such wonderful dark humour. -- CUN PLS VFH (Miniluv•Minitrue•Unsoc) 21:47, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- For At first I thought this was going to be so typical but it really got so good at the end.--Dr. Fenwick 21:57, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- For hilarious --THE 22:25, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Dig Its cool by me; all my friends call me Trotsky with this stylish icepick in my skull! ;) --THINKER 22:44, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Slithy Tove 18:02, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
- For. -- Mitch 09:52, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Yup.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:01, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- Sure. Another great one from Winstanley -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:07, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- For -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 00:48, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R, 05:49, 27 June 2007
- For - {Ikabu}BUZZ...FLICK...GURGLE... 10:10, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
- Yes please. ~ 16:13, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- For --BurekSP 14:52, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 0
|
No against votes
|
Vote: UnNews:6-year-old boy receives $20,000 in government subsidies for insect torture research
|
Score: 19 Insects Tortured since you clicked to this page
|
Nomination:
|
For Votes: 20
|
Featured —rc (t) 06:02, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- For'd. Ok, this was a very hilarious article in my opinion and definitely needs to be on the front page. Seriously. I will kill if it isn't. -- --Mgr. Sir Sonic80☭ 18:19, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- For In the name of science. Very funny article. Slithy Tove 21:34, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- DIG I found this one so hilarious I had to check my user page to make sure I didn't write it. --THINKER 00:21, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- For--Sir Manforman 00:40, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Sure-- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:45, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Roman Dog Bird 01:09, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- For, as per the Thinker. ;) P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 01:53, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- For. Evil, and therefore, worthy of highlighting. Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 02:14, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- I went through half of this article reading "insect" as "incest." This is funny too, though. --vyvyan 02:53, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Charming and short. A good combo. —rc (t) 05:05, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- For as per RC -RAHB 06:21, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- For. I knew that kid. He's in jail now. True story. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 09:02, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
BALLIN'! --So Just Throw A Chair At Me 10:25, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Sockpuppet. --So So 01:59, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- For -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 17:07, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- For but I think that the GAO found that he was awarded $200,000 for his research. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 21:53, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- For, good non-topical humor. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 22:26, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- For -- ~ GCD 03:51, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- For --General And Min. THEDUDEMAN15:11, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Aye!, heck yes! - Prof. Ahh(to the)Diddums[FUCK-A-DOODLE-DOO!] 18:32, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- For In the name of science. Very funny article. User:Qsceszxdwa/sig 15:44, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 1
|
- Against Hate to play Devil's Advocate here, but it just wasn't that great. Not terrible, but I've found Random Pages better. a-slice-of-cake 02:40, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments
|
- This page is proof that the best UnNews pages don't have to come from current events. Just make up something that sounds funny, and you're golden! P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:26, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- UnNews pages normally come from current events? Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 09:02, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, at the bottom under references (sources) there are usually actual news articles, that have been spoofed for the purpose of UnNews. -- --Mgr. Sir Sonic80☭ 16:51, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Never take MO seriously. The guy is dripping with sarcasm. -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 17:07, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, especially when he talks to me..... P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 17:41, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- You're mistaking wide-eyed, innocent confusion for sarcasm. Also, I rarely drip. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:23, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- See, I thought it was put-on naïvete. Silly me.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 15:25, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- About a year ago for some reason I thought it would be fun to have a seperate account for doing occasional Unnews articles. But it seems pointless now, so today we merge. --So So 01:59, 8 July 2007 (UTC) a.k.a.--So Just Throw A Chair At Me 02:01, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Damn, and here I thought we might actually have a new n00ber with writing skills. At least the sockmaester is someone I respect. :) --THINKER 02:05, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Archives