User talk:ChiefjusticeDS/Archive 7
 | This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at User talk:ChiefjusticeDS. |
Seriously Violent Destuctive Rape
You'll be in a mental hospital for weeks now. Have a nice day!--
Director
WILL
YOU 333 22:17, June 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Bless you. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:22, June 25, 2010 (UTC)
By the way
When you going to start that review, or are you busy? I can wait, Im just wondering. By the way, look at this proposal. I like to see what you think--
DirectorWILLYOU 333 00:47, June 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Never mind, Dr.Skullthumper already told me it had already been covered. I was hoping it was you who was going to crush my idea to dust, but you arrived too late--
Director
WILL
YOU 333 05:44, June 26, 2010 (UTC)
A favour
Could you do me the biggest favour ever and semi-protect Justine Bieber? I think every single IP edit so far has been vandalism. —Pelozurian (talk) 10:25, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
- I love you. —Pelozurian (talk) 20:35, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Civility on VFD
I agree with your request to the voter to avoid insults. But he will never see it in the freshly archived page. Spıke ¬ 15:22 26-Jun-10
- You want that I should whack him for ya'? In all seriousness I was about to leave him a quick message about it and then forgot, so cheers for reminding me, I will do so now. --ChiefjusticeDS 15:27, June 26, 2010 (UTC)
I'm not the one he insulted--just wondered whom you thought you were writing to! All is well. Spıke ¬ 15:31 26-Jun-10
lift on my limit
Since I been doing better in pee review, can my 12 hour limit be lifted, and I can resume a 24 hour review? I've learned my leason after many warnings and 2 bans, so I think I no longer need this restriction--DirectorWILLYOU 333 16:02, June 26, 2010 (UTC)
ROTM
I've noticed you haven't voted yet. I'm not trying to vote whore, as I really don't care too much if I win. I care more about the recognition- I see it as a shout-out that says "Hey, you're a good reviewer". But I value your opinion most, so I must ask: Do you think I deserve it?-- On Saturday, 09:06, June 26 2010 UTC
- I do, but in the time honoured tradition of Pee captains (Boomer used to do it) I am waiting until the end of the month to cast my vote, simply to ensure that should a tie occurs I can make sure it goes one way or the other. Obviously this month you are the stand-out winner and common sense would suggest it wouldn't be necessary, but common sense never stopped me playing on combine harvesters as a small child so I'm not convinced by it. I do think you deserve it and my vote will materialise shortly, don't you worry. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:10, June 26, 2010 (UTC)
- OK, good. I expected the response to be something along the lines of "You are not ready, young Jedi. SO FUCK YOU FOR DISTURBING ME YOU STUPID UGLY VOTE WHORE!"-- On Saturday, 09:14, June 26 2010 UTC
Sorry
I had no idea that I was being insulting. I was just pointing out something and 'you fool' came out along with it. Don't feed me to the grues!--UnEditor510 drop us a line, mate 23:00, June 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Not to worry, glad you understood. --ChiefjusticeDS 23:03, June 26, 2010 (UTC)
- (:--UnEditor510 drop us a line, mate 11:13, July 4, 2010 (UTC)
Woody Allen
Not sure what you didn't like about it. Did you read it? I'm sure you're an experienced editor, but maybe you could be a little more explanatory; telling new users to go read policy after they make an attempt to rewrite an article is not that welcoming. Jokerwitz 01:02, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
- It may not be nice, but it makes users take a look at it and helps them from making the same mistake--If you're 555 then I'm
01:07, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Showing people policy or advice isn't a problem; doing it in a terse edit summary is. I'm not convinced the rewrite was flawless, but I didn't see its obvious unsuitability. Anyway, I thought Admins would give new editors their opinion a little differently.Jokerwitz 01:29, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Well 1) Admins arent always friendly, and I learned that the hard way. And 2) You didn't put much effort in it, as I viewed what you did, and not tring to offend you, but you made it worst.the firsrt version was bad, but it was better than your rewrite. Once again, not trying to offend you. And third, you prbaly need to look at it and get it to your mind for future writing--If you're 555 then I'm 01:42, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
- I think that's my point. What was it about the rewrite that was good, bad or otherwise. Blanket criticism isn't very useful.Jokerwitz 01:49, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Well after looking both of the versions, the first one was at least well written and had actually info on him. What you done was made something up completeley. Although nonsense can be funny sometimes, it states in the HTBFANJS, The truth is usually funnier than nonsense. The funniest pages are those closest to the truth, and, A longer, but still clever, article is better than spamming the index full of thousands of small one liners about giraffes and bathtubs. Read HTBFANJS, and you'll know what I mean. Also, never revert something a admin undos. That can lead to a ban, so don't do it again if you want to avoid trouble.--If you're 555 then I'm 02:31, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Perhaps you're not familiar with Woody Allen's movies, but the content was very much a parody of and commentary about them. Satire can be as close to the truth as fact, if not closer.
- Well 1) Admins arent always friendly, and I learned that the hard way. And 2) You didn't put much effort in it, as I viewed what you did, and not tring to offend you, but you made it worst.the firsrt version was bad, but it was better than your rewrite. Once again, not trying to offend you. And third, you prbaly need to look at it and get it to your mind for future writing--If you're 555 then I'm
- Showing people policy or advice isn't a problem; doing it in a terse edit summary is. I'm not convinced the rewrite was flawless, but I didn't see its obvious unsuitability. Anyway, I thought Admins would give new editors their opinion a little differently.Jokerwitz 01:29, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
- As for reverting admins, they are not immune from disagreement. I assume that as long as I don't get into a reverting war, it's acceptable to have a difference of opinion, and take a different course of action. I made attempts on both this talk page and the article talk page to address actual comments. I still haven't gotten any. besides links and quotes from policy.
- Also, if the Admin cares, perhaps he can respond to this himself? You're probably trying to save him time, but it comes off a bit like speaking on his behalf.Jokerwitz 03:14, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Well, it may be a parody, but you probaly didn't write it the right way,and made it appear stupid unintentionaly, so ifyou would had wrote it differently, it would look better. Also me and HELPME usual like to come on Chief's talk page and answer any questions for him It a habit we like to do.--If you're 555 then I'm 03:24, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Well, it may be a parody, but you probaly didn't write it the right way,and made it appear stupid unintentionaly, so ifyou would had wrote it differently, it would look better. Also me and HELPME usual like to come on Chief's talk page and answer any questions for him It a habit we like to do.--If you're 555 then I'm
- Since I took the time to write it, perhaps you could take the time to read it, rather than assume what it probably said. If you compare it to the older version, I think you'll reconsider whether the original was actually any more based in fact, or for that matter, funnier. Also, I'm pretty sure there's a better way to say it could have been improved than "appear stupid, unintentionally". Any details about what you think would improve it would still be helpful. Jokerwitz 03:47, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
- I reverted your edits simply because, in my judgement the article was not better for it, I welcome your contribution to the site and I'm not here to stamp out the the light of your creativity. You are completely welcome to rewrite the article in your userspace and then ask for approval to replace the present article with it. With yours you rewrote in mainspace and significantly reduced the length of the article, of course I read your rewrite but what you have to understand is that we have lots of users do similar things every day and it is somewhat wearing to go through each and every one. The links to HTBFANJS are an attempt to help you improve your writing by explaining what has been seen lots before and what will get removed quickly. Reverting admins is covered in the beginner's guide and some of our stricter admins would have dished out a block for just that.
- Since I took the time to write it, perhaps you could take the time to read it, rather than assume what it probably said. If you compare it to the older version, I think you'll reconsider whether the original was actually any more based in fact, or for that matter, funnier. Also, I'm pretty sure there's a better way to say it could have been improved than "appear stupid, unintentionally". Any details about what you think would improve it would still be helpful. Jokerwitz 03:47, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
- As for your article the issues in general are that the jokes, are coming off quite lamely with some unnecessary sexual profanity in a few places, for those who edit here a great deal encouraging humour in such a way is very old hat, also, the lack of an image does not help matters much. I think that with some work it will be a very solid rewrite, but that it cannot sit in mainspace at the moment. What I will do is revert the mainspace version back to before your rewrite, but I will put the rewrite text into your user area where you can continue to work at it and even put it up for Pee Review for some more in-depth criticism. Once you are satisfied with your work, just check with an admin that it is ok to replace the old article and then copy and paste it in. Finally I apologise if the edit summary seemed rather cold, but we deal with a lot of articles each day and it is difficult to discern which people intend with an article. I hope this makes things clearer. I'll drop a link to your rewrite text on your talk page. --ChiefjusticeDS 06:00, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
- That response is really on point and much clearer all around. Thanks. Though my efforts may have trod on the wrong feet, they were intended to improve the article, and to get some feedback.
- As for your article the issues in general are that the jokes, are coming off quite lamely with some unnecessary sexual profanity in a few places, for those who edit here a great deal encouraging humour in such a way is very old hat, also, the lack of an image does not help matters much. I think that with some work it will be a very solid rewrite, but that it cannot sit in mainspace at the moment. What I will do is revert the mainspace version back to before your rewrite, but I will put the rewrite text into your user area where you can continue to work at it and even put it up for Pee Review for some more in-depth criticism. Once you are satisfied with your work, just check with an admin that it is ok to replace the old article and then copy and paste it in. Finally I apologise if the edit summary seemed rather cold, but we deal with a lot of articles each day and it is difficult to discern which people intend with an article. I hope this makes things clearer. I'll drop a link to your rewrite text on your talk page. --ChiefjusticeDS 06:00, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
- As for your page bouncers, I don't know if they help the vibe. By acting like new editors are some kind of pest that needs to be stomped out or put in line, they make this more contentious than it otherwise could be.69.142.154.10 10:25, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you Chief for helping me out with this guy--If you're 555 then I'm 06:04, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
Yes
I want a copy back. On paper. Handwritten in the blood of goats from Sweden, Comic Sans 12-pt font. Have it on my desk in Sioux City, Iowa, by Friday. Thank you and have a day. Not necessarily a good one. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 14:00, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Comic Sans?! You demanding monster. --ChiefjusticeDS 14:05, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Well, you answered my Craigslist ad saying, and I quote, "I'll b ur sub, master. Make me do naughty thingz." Now get to it! MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 14:10, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
Link help
I am unable to link an internal page to another. I'm trying to link http://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Bits_goa to this page - http://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Bits_pilani. But I'm just not going to that link. What is the procedure? I clicked on "internal link" while editing, and then typed the title of the linked page inside. But it's not working. It says page doesn't exist.
- I added the link to the bottom of Bits goa for you. Hope this helps. --ChiefjusticeDS 16:53, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
- The problem lay in Caps! Didnt realise it was case specific. I couldnt find a help that tells us how to post links etc.
- Try this for link help. Also sign your posts on talk pages with four tildes like this ~~~~. --ChiefjusticeDS 17:06, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
You sir!
Are you available tomorrow night to lend a hand with regards to running the SUDDEN DEATH - EUROPEAN EDITION contest? You know, protecting deleting and smacking and such. ~
07:58, June 29, 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah sure, I'm always available to help with deleting, smacking and protecting. I just hope my pants can take the strain. --ChiefjusticeDS 08:01, June 29, 2010 (UTC)
- Great, I'll give you your badge and enema tomorrow evening. ~
11:47, June 29, 2010 (UTC)
- Great, I'll give you your badge and enema tomorrow evening. ~
VFD Question
Is it wrong to put alot of articles on VFD? I put three on there, and I think they're valid for VFD, but I don't want get another week long ban, so I want to make sure I'm not breaking any rules of VFD--If you're 555 then I'm 
18:12, June 29, 2010 (UTC)
- Just don't increase the number of articles on VFD to over 20. --ChiefjusticeDS 18:14, June 29, 2010 (UTC)
- Ok, I'll avoid doing that. Who does that anyways?--If you're 555 then I'm 18:18, June 29, 2010 (UTC)
- It was actually a major problem way before you kiddies came along. Back then, the limit was only 15 on there at once... Then I bitched. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 20:04, June 29, 2010 (UTC)
- Nice. Do it again, and maybe we can extend it to 30.--If you're 555 then I'm 01:05, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Nice. Do it again, and maybe we can extend it to 30.--If you're 555 then I'm
- It was actually a major problem way before you kiddies came along. Back then, the limit was only 15 on there at once... Then I bitched. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 20:04, June 29, 2010 (UTC)
- Ok, I'll avoid doing that. Who does that anyways?--If you're 555 then I'm
Another VFD Question
Do I get anything for contributing to VFD, or is that a job for free thing--If you're 555 then I'm 08:31, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Also, monika isnt going to be happy that you caused the deletion of that Lars article--If you're 555 then I'm 08:35, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
- You get the same as you get for contributing everywhere else, a sense of well-being and happiness. Why would you desire more? Also, how terrible. --ChiefjusticeDS 08:36, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Thats good enough for me. I was just curious. And yes, it terrible--If you're 555 then I'm 08:38, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Thats good enough for me. I was just curious. And yes, it terrible--If you're 555 then I'm
- You get the same as you get for contributing everywhere else, a sense of well-being and happiness. Why would you desire more? Also, how terrible. --ChiefjusticeDS 08:36, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
Mind Voting for this
Mind voting for this. Appreciate it!--If you're 555 then I'm 01:05, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
Hey
That guy's name in Vietnamese means "hate hate hat." I'd perma-ban. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 11:25, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Well I guess my Vietnamese is a bit rusty, the name doesn't seem enough for a perma-ban though, especially since they didn't even manage to blank that page, we'll keep an eye on him though. --ChiefjusticeDS 11:28, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
I'm an idiot
While attempting to move this to mainspace, I accidently moved the talk page instead. Now I need help. More than before. --—John Lydon 16:24, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
- How is that? --ChiefjusticeDS 17:07, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
- That is why you're the man--—John Lydon 19:34, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
- How is that? --ChiefjusticeDS 17:07, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
In need of a review
I would like to have this reviewed so I can fix it up.--If you're 555 then I'm 19:19, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
Would you mind?
Adding Decentiousness to the VFD thingy for the Euro sudden death? On my way to work and the page is still locked. And I may want other's scones, but I can't go past your French style pancakes. Nominally Humane! some time Wednesday, 22:33, Jun 30 2010 UTC
Thanks
|
Thanks! I, HELPME, thank you for voting me to be ROTM for June 2010. Your support is appreciated. Now that I have ROTM, I have an excuse to do nothing, so I'm even happier! My master procrastination plan is working! YES!!! |
Your support is most important to me, honestly.-- On Thursday, 01:13, July 01 2010 UTC
Two Questions
- On many Userpages I see the Uncyclopedia logo has been replaced by a picture of their choice. I know how to remove the logo, but how do you replace it with another picture?
and
- How do you lock pages, or is this only available to admins?
Thanks, --Some Idiot 09:46, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
- The code that I use on my userpage for removing the logo and replacing it with an image is: {{nologo}} <span style="position:absolute;top:-40px;left:-150px;z-index:1;">[[File:JUDG'd.jpg|150px]] </span>. If you copy and paste that to the page you want to use it on and change the bit that says "File:JUDG'd.jpg" to the image title you want to use then that will put an image in the place of the logo. As for locking pages, yes that is an admin only action, if you want a page protecting then you should ask an admin and explain why the page needs protecting. I hope this helps. --ChiefjusticeDS 09:55, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
Banning Joe
Not that I am complaining, but last person to edit usually works on a semi-vandal basis, as the idea is that it takes so long for the page to load the next person can't edit. Of course, repeating the same image ad infinitum, so that it only really slows down because it loads the text pointing to the image and then loads the image once, doesn't actually really slow anyone down, but it's the thought that counts. Again, I'm not going to argue, but I would have thought a friendly "don't do that again" would have been more appropriate than an insta-ban. Nominally Humane! some time Thursday, 10:30, Jul 1 2010 UTC
- He already had a friendly "don't do that again" from UU last time he did a similar thing. He got 10 minutes from UU, he gets 30 from me, so everyone is a man of their word, except for Ethine, who is in fact a woman. --ChiefjusticeDS 10:40, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
- OK, I'm sorry, I won't do that again, I was so desperate to win, so I repeated the image ad infinitum.
|Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Aussie CUN|IC Kill 
| 10:54, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
- OK, I'm sorry, I won't do that again, I was so desperate to win, so I repeated the image ad infinitum.
All the news that's unfit to print!
The Newspaper With No Ambitions, Goals, Hopes or Dreams!
Jul 1st, 2010 • Issue 87 • More news than something with less news than us
|
Things getting boring on the wiki? Time to write at speed!
 We're still waiting for that, but until it arrives, Skull's hour-long writing contest will do nicely. Shamelessly pinching Cajek's idea of time-limited writing competitions (which brought us such classics as HowTo:Sexually Stimulate an Ant, lest we forget), but putting his own distinct spin on it, Uncyc's own mad Doctor challenged Uncyclopedians to write an article in a single hour that would survive VFD. Given Uncyclopedia's well-known exacting quality standards, this promised to be a tough task, but a surprising number of people were up for it. And so it was that a frenzy erupted across the wiki, and baffled Europeans and other users not around at the time awoke the next day to a slew of brand new articles, not all of which ended up being deleted. They liked the idea so much, they held their own a couple of days later. When asked to comment on his brainchild, the commotion and excitement it had caused, and the size of his penis, Dr. Skullthumper exclusively told us "Sure. I'll get on that. I swear". Things getting boring on the wiki? Time to start pointless drama! Giant evil multinational wiki-hosting conglomerate Wikia won a major victory last month, when a rebellion by a small but dedicated band of anti-capitalist radicals was brutally put down by a bunch of fascistic Wikia-collaborators. Or at least, that's what happened in the heads of Carlb, Roye7777777 and CartoonistHenning after they nailed their anti-Wikia manifesto to the metaphorical door of Uncyclopedia's metaphorical Wittenberg Cathedral. The 1,000-word anti-Wikia tract, despite the shocking and previously unknown revelation that Wikia was not in fact the wiki-hosting charity that it claimed to be, but rather a commercial company, failed to ignite a spontaneous revolt against Wikia among the Uncyclopedia community. A heated and sexually-charge discussion ensued, with strong arguments offered by both sides. However, it seems that some people were unable to grasp the enormity of the revelation that Wikia's motives were less than altruistic. Eventually, the thread descended into an all-out flamewar and a waaaaaaaaaaaaaahmbulance was called to treat the injured. "We may have lost this round," Carlb told UnSignpost reporters "but it is only a temporary setback. One day, the tyranny of Wikia will be no more. Our revenge will be the laughter of our children." It is rumoured that Carlb, Roye7777777 and CartoonistHenning will employ Black Bloc tactics at the next Wikia conference in an attempt to escalate the struggle against Wikia oppression. |
| ||||
| UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox | |||||
--ChiefjusticeDS 12:20, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
You want me to close WotM?
Seeing as you didn't? I think two winners is in order. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 13:25, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Was kinda hoping for an extra vote to swing it one way or the other, but since it hasn't happened. I'll close it now, with two winners. --ChiefjusticeDS 13:28, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Mkay. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 13:30, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
You deleted one of my posts
Um hey, i started a page a few hours ago, had to leave so i put construction on the top and left...to find out that it was deleted...by you. You said "construction doesn't save two lines of text".
I don't wanna seem like I'm talking with attitude...but it kind of does. I was going to work on it more today...plus construction gives me a week to finish whatever it is.
So please man just don't do that again.
And i understand its just a few sentences, but please, give the people the week, or at least check the date and see how long it has been, i would understand if it was like 4 or 5 days, but not 3 hours cmon :P. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Happymonkey39 (talk • contribs)
....
o wow, you deleted the Weegee too.
I don't blame you for that one...my friend was supposed to start it...but for some reason he didn't.
Sorry about that one...but again, give the user at least, at least, a day to start it :P
- Here's the thing, we get hundreds of articles created everyday and a lot of them are pretty useless in general, and many people have clued into the fact that the construction tag saves them from deletion and add it onto those articles. For future reference your article needs more content to be protected by the construction tag. A word of advice also; don't start telling us the rules or telling us what we should and shouldn't be doing. If the article was just two lines then it is a very simple matter for you to recreate it and add more content so that it can be saved by the construction tag. --ChiefjusticeDS 07:39, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Oh i completely understand, it's just that i find if its only been up for a few hours, just give them some more time. I mean i know that your in charge, but just like in the real word, some rules are stupid, most useful and good, but not all of them...speaking of which is there an article on stupid laws?
- Not as far as I know, perhaps you could write one, the only issue there would be going beyond the humour that the laws themselves provide in the first place. Good luck with your article. --ChiefjusticeDS 19:42, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Oh i completely understand, it's just that i find if its only been up for a few hours, just give them some more time. I mean i know that your in charge, but just like in the real word, some rules are stupid, most useful and good, but not all of them...speaking of which is there an article on stupid laws?
Virginia issues
I'll drop the guy a line on his talk page. He made a ton of edits that I think don't really add anything to the article. If I don't hear back from him after a while I'll contact you again. -- 
GUN WotM RotM FBotM VFH SK Maj. ΥΣΣ 05:48 EST 2 July, 2010
- I did contact the guy on his talk page, he indicated he was ok with the edits being reverted. Could you go ahead and do that for me because I am unable to and/or don't know how because of "intermediate edits"? -- Sf13
00:30 EST 29 July, 2010
- That's done for you now. --ChiefjusticeDS 07:09, July 29, 2010 (UTC)
Award thing changed
I took your advice and decided it was not reallly worth it. But instead of scrapping the page, I just changed it to something actually worth someones time. Take a look yourself--If you're 555 then I'm 21:04, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
Decentiousness
Hey. I'm not happy with a PEE review I have received - how do I go about getting it re-reviewed? Nominally Humane! some time Saturday, 07:17, Jul 3 2010 UTC
- What? Whats wrong with it?--If you're 555 then I'm 07:18, July 3, 2010 (UTC)
- Nothing wrong, just didn't help me find a direction. I also don't use US English. Nominally Humane! some time Saturday, 07:58, Jul 3 2010 UTC
- That's because you're a commie. Also, actually being helpful for a second, you could just request another one. Also, I am a talk page stalker. Sue me.-- On Saturday, 08:07, July 03 2010 UTC
- Yeah, just submit a new request. --ChiefjusticeDS 09:57, July 3, 2010 (UTC)
- That's because you're a commie. Also, actually being helpful for a second, you could just request another one. Also, I am a talk page stalker. Sue me.-- On Saturday, 08:07, July 03 2010 UTC
- Nothing wrong, just didn't help me find a direction. I also don't use US English. Nominally Humane! some time Saturday, 07:58, Jul 3 2010 UTC
Adopt-A-Noob
- Hey, I'm an "orphan" in need of adoption, you seem
worthyresponsible enough to adopt me. I need a bit of advise at pointers, plus I'm gonna try to do that contest starting July 5th... dammit thats today -_-".What do ya say? I saw you name on the adopt-a-noob thingy...--Happymonkey39 03:00, July 4, 2010 (UTC)
- Hey, I'm an "orphan" in need of adoption, you seem
P.S...in case you didn't notice im the dude that made the page with two sentences...
- I'd love to, but I'm not going to be around for the next couple of weeks, so you would be best asking somebody else if you want help sooner. --ChiefjusticeDS 06:59, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
- Ah too bad, the compotion is on for 2 weeks and started yesterday :P. Well nice knowing ya!--Happymonkey39 14:19, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
Deleted article.
I noticed you deleted one of my articles and when I checked out the help pages I realized you had a point. I was just wondering if you could get me the original text of the article (the article was Cake (band)) so I can edit it at home and make it, as it is so gracefully put, funny-and-not-just-stupid.
Thanks!
- Make an account and then I can do something for you. --ChiefjusticeDS 06:41, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
Alright, done. Username is Mewthriii
I can't do pictures
I'm lonely and I miss you.--Ohnogodnotagain 15:35, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
Signpost: normal service resumed
May contain traces of humor!
Jul 8th, 2010 • Issue 88 • Hand-stitched for comfort
|
Conservation week: how's it going, and what is it anyway?
 Conservation week has been running since autumn 2007, starting life in Jocke Pirat's userspace, and spending a confused few hours being called the rewrite-a-thon in an early attempt to get around the whole week-fortnight thing. The first iteration was a resounding success, and about 38 people signed up to rewrite over 50 articles (with Zombiebaron hilariously missing the point and going on a deletion spree instead), making the current iteration look like it has some work to do. However, there was no quality control at the outset - if an article was rewritten in any way, that was deemed good enough. Some of those early articles may well have been made worse, we just don't know (or can't be bothered to check). Quality control arrived later on, when erstwhile gentleman editor of this very organ Gerrycheevers stepped up to run the first 2009 CW, and ran the rule over all the rewrites personally, so that the attendant award was only bestowed on those doing quality rewrites. That task this year falls to Dexter111344, who has promised to be "harsh but harsh". Probably. So, with a prize on offer to the person with the most high quality rewrites, and plenty of time left in which to do said rewrites, the only question left is: "why haven't you entered yet"? We asked this question of one completely random user, and he exclusively told us "because I'm busy writing this week's issue of the UnSignpost, duh!" Image Request: A Retrospective
 Established in March 2005 by a user called Machinecurse, this page has been the domain of most of the legends of Uncyc image manipulation at one time or another - as one 'chopper has left, another has arisen to take their place, in some kind of Potatochop Royal Succession stylee. Or something. Whatever, the likes of Paulgb, Zombiebaron, Seeker, Sonje and, more recently, KneeChee27 and MeepStarLives have slaved over hot image editing software to fulfil the esoteric image requirements of the Uncyclopedia populace. The response time has always varied on the page, as it largely depends on how active the 'choppers are at the time, how achievable the requests actually are, and how polite the request is. But for those with a little patience, it is undoubtedly a useful resource in the ongoing quest for that perfect image of Mario and Master Chief riding Pikachu down the Death Star Trench run. Or something. Have a look at the gallery to see some of the more recent work. |
| |||||
| UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox | ||||||
Oh dear god, am I really doing this again? Why did you have to take a holiday? --UU - natter 
11:00, Jul 9
I'm suffering from abandonment issues
You shall cease and decist all vacation, sabattical, and spirutual journey activities at once and return to Uncyclopedia immediately or I will smite you with my smiting stick. Just got it. On sale at Target for $7.99. That store really does have everything. Back to the point. I haven't been told how bad I'm screwing things up for like 2 weeks now and I'm starting to let it go to my head. You need to come back and crush my spirit immediately! --—John Lydon 13:51, July 13, 2010 (UTC)
- I'm still not here, however, since you asked so nicely: 'omg you should like really read our policies and shit as you are like shit at doing a lot of stuff'. Always happy to oblige, I will return properly soon enough...--ChiefjusticeDS 14:34, July 13, 2010 (UTC)
When you get back
You should graduate John. He has two features, has won NOTM, and is nommed for ROTM right now. I think he's ready.-- On Friday, 05:35, July 16 2010 UTC
- Also when you get back, take a look at this. —fj0j3ddjoaw;rfjaew (r30qjd) 05:58, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Another UnSignpost! Rejoice!
Good things come to those who wait. So does the UnSignpost.
Jul 15th, 2010 • Issue 89 • Made with 100% recycled vuvuzelas
|
The 40+ club expands
 We asked them all for quotes, and Mhaille exclusively told us: ""Go eat more shit, fuckers"...obviously I am excited to have reached the BIG 4-0, and am delighted that enough of my peers deem the quality of my work good enough to have reached that figure, although I have to say I'm a little pissed that at least 10 other of my articles are feature-worthy and are constant overlooked (lengthy bans will ensue, I'm sure), I am equally as proud of my featured images, as well as many of my other contributions that I hope that my peers feel have augmented the work of others. That I am still here after five long years, and still contributing says something about Uncyclopedia itself. What that is, I wouldn't like to speculate. But sometimes you have to in order to accumulate. Apparently." Which is such a long quote we're going to need at least one blatant filler box in the right-hand panel. Bastard. Meanwhile, Modus exclusively told us "It's not that myself and Mhaille have written so very many great and fantastic pages that have, and will continue to, entertain the people for years to come. It's just that Mhaille did. "I" am one of his many sockpuppets. He writes as "Modusoperandi" when he needs a page without a "foreign" accent. Look around. There are a bunch more Mhaille sockpuppets here, too. Hyperbole, for one. Mhaille is like a wet Mogwai." Which is more concise, and therefore OK. Finally, Hype exclusively commented: "I'd like to say thank you to Uncyclopedia for voting to feature my many excellent, high-quality articles, including the drunken insistence that you accept a diseased poodle, the song about having sex with sporting goods, and the blatantly racist tirade about having to wait too long for a Pee Review. Writing 39.5 features has been literally the most important accomplishment I will ever have in my life. I look forward to continuing to service each and every one of you in the future." Which was nice of him. So, the burning question now has to be: who will be first to 50? Modus obviously has the lead, but Mhaille is writing in greater volume than he has for some time, and if Hype keeps up the pace, he's probably a good bet. But they're not the only candidates - Sog is coming up the rails rapidly, and could reach the 40 mark even quicker than Hype - could he overtake the lot of them? The only thing certain is that with these guys around, Uncyc should be assured of some half-decent articles amongst the dross. World Cup over - Romartus struggling for UnNews inspiration
 The scourge of Junior Uncyclopedia has discovered his muse in the planet's biggest sporting event, and has been cranking out UnNews articles on the subject at an alarming rate. Now, without Jabulani balls, biting tackles and Messi long shots to inspire him, what is there to inspire him to maintain such prolific standards? Suspicions abound that the Tour De France is passing him by, he seems far too English to care about the various draft and transfer shenanigans in the NFL and NBA and the like, and as the only story to emerge from golf's Open Championship so far is Tiger Woods changing his putter (wow, someone hold me back), that seems unlikely to unleash his inner news-hound. With a worrying lack of global sporting tournaments on the horizon, will we have to wait another 4 years for the next Romartus article splurge? Stay tuned to UnNews to find out! |
| |||||
| UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox | ||||||
—Sir Socky
(talk) (stalk)
GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:22, 16 July 2010
Pee Queue thing
So yeah, at least one person has bitched in the forums that the queue is getting lengthy - it must be time for action! I'm respectfully requesting that every active peeing member do one or two reviews this week to hammer that sucker right down. You may already have done some, I'm just copy/pasting this message on to your page, so don't feel slighted, just feel I'm lazy - you'll be right. But if you haven't done any, do you think you could rattle a review or two off this week? Let's show 'em what we can do when we can be arsed! Just because you're on holiday, don't think you have an excuse! --UU - natter 20:42, Jul 19
- I'm back shortly and I think my review drought has lasted enough time. I'll get a few done before the month is out. --ChiefjusticeDS 14:45, July 20, 2010 (UTC)
- Lazy fucker...also get your hair cut and get a job... -- Sir Mhaille
(talk to me)
- Lazy fucker...also get your hair cut and get a job... -- Sir Mhaille
Holy shit
You're alive! Brilliant! --Andorin Kato 19:06, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
You mean you're back a day ahead of schedule?!
And here I was, thinking that being back 51 years ahead of schedule was a bit late! Welcome back! 
Sir MacMania GUN—[13:37 22 Jul 2010]
- Also, Portal 2 is going to be awesome.
Sir MacMania GUN—[13:38 22 Jul 2010]
- A whole day ahead, nobody else gives you that kind of value for money. Good to see you editing again as well, and yes, yes it is. --ChiefjusticeDS 13:39, July 22, 2010 (UTC)
Oh - have you been away?
I thought we'd been using a lot less Glade air freshener than usual.
No, seriously - great to have you back. Not least of all because the little bastards kids break up for the summer tomorrow, so vandalism will probably increase somewhat. Hope you had a good holiday! Rabbi Techno 
kvetch 
Contribs 
FOXES 13:41, July 22, 2010 (UTC)
- I've been off for summer for over a month, as has most of the rest of the US...-- On Thursday, 04:25, July 22 2010 UTC
- I got blocked for that comment for being a "Goddamn Yank". Well, you know what? You're all racist! That's right, I said it! Racists!-- On Thursday, 04:36, July 22 2010 UTC
Read all about it! The UnSignpost rides again!
The Only Newspaper That Is Not Controlled By The Cabal Who Are You What Are You Doi- AAAAHHHHH
Jul 22nd, 2010 • Issue 90 • Suddenly, Signpost!
|
UnNews hits warp factor Whore
 That bastard child of Uncyclopedia and WikiNews, UnNews, is in full-on whoring mode. Tired of being relegated to the bilge hold of Uncyc, staff have collectively and to a man, woman or it, decided to resort to the time-honored tradition of whoring themselves for attention. 2010 is shaping up to be a record year for lots of stuff, which I am too lazy to actually reference. We've had lots of cool coding happenings, resulting in a facelift to the Main Page, and a really cool navigation bar giving access to a plethora (well, 7 sections in fact) of sections including Sports, Comics, Editorials, and special coverage of the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Contributors to UnNews of note are Funnybony, SPIKE, Romartus, Modusoperandi, Mordillo, Multiliteralist, PuppyOnTheRadio, Happytimes, Matt lobster and MrN9000 (when the bugger's here). Apologies to anybody I've missed. The Newsroom, home to nefarious plots and odd ideas, has once again become an active core of resistance against Uncyc's unofficial policy of ignoring us. Always leading edge, UnNews is acquiring a stable of notable personalities for a new series of Uncolumns called "Reductio ad Hitlerum", a guest column that invites persons of note to do an article for us, usually under threat of blackmail. Discussion here, first RaH column here by guest Sarah Palin. Techno gets Mhaille'd
 The award is, unusually on vote-happy Uncyclopedia, not decided on by voting, but is bestowed at the sole discretion of feature-monster, bureaucrat, whoring legend and token Liverpool fan Mhaille, according to his own criteria. Looking down the list of previous winners - Shandon, ENeGMA, Tompkins, Zombiebaron, Prettiestpretty, Savethemooses and the rest, it's pretty clear that the good Rabbi is a) in good company, and b) not going to be here much longer. |
| ||||
| UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox | |||||
--ChiefjusticeDS 14:05, July 22, 2010 (UTC)
Cookie
|
ChildeatingTeddybear has awarded you a cookie! For your polite welcome. |
Missile
|
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
has awarded you a Nuclear missile |
~ 15:21, July 22, 2010 (UTC)
- This shall hang on the wall of my shelter until those men in helicopters come and "ask" me to take it down. --ChiefjusticeDS 15:25, July 22, 2010 (UTC)
Since it's apparently "give ChiefjusticeDS an award" day
 |
Congratulations!! awarded you with the prestigious Herpes Simplex virus. |
pillow talk 16:51, July 22, 2010 (UTC)
- Why thank you, I shall display it proudly where everyone can see. --ChiefjusticeDS 04:06, July 23, 2010 (UTC)
Cool People Add Wanted Articles
I noticed that this lovely wiki does not contain an article to Luigi(the links always redirect to Mario), and that the article is in great need. I just wanted to run by you what I have so far because I want to make sure it makes it through Pee Review when the time comes.
http://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/User:ObeyWeegee666/Luigi%28article%29
And before I get banhammered, you did say I could ask you anything. ObeyWeegee666 20:26, July 22, 2010 (UTC)
- If you want my two cents, I am 99% sure that article would face deletion if moved to mainspace. But, you don't have to move an article to mainspace to put it up for Pee Review. pillow talk 21:55, July 22, 2010 (UTC)
- That's what I was worried about. Of course, it's unfinished, but still. What should I do in order to get it
up to the quality standardsto not get killed?
- That's what I was worried about. Of course, it's unfinished, but still. What should I do in order to get it
ObeyWeegee666 02:02, July 23, 2010 (UTC)
- My recommendation would be that you take a look at some of our featured articles and then submit the article to Pee Review, someone should then be able to give you constructive advice on working on it. If you don't want to submit it there then HTBFANJS has some excellent tips on how to make stuff funny, and you can take hints on style from featured articles. Hope this helps. --ChiefjusticeDS 04:04, July 23, 2010 (UTC)
Julia Gillard
Why was the page julia gillard deleted?, there is no page with the same name.
- Julia Gillard used to exist, but was deleted. This is as opposed to the Julia gillard page, which was deleted before Julia Gillard was. --Andorin Kato 21:48, July 22, 2010 (UTC)
What The Hell?
So you go on Vacation, come back just to ban me, then leave again, then come back and kick me out of your basement?! What do I do now? Can I do this now? Anyways, I'm moving out of your basement so you can go back to having your weird sex parties or whatever it is down there now. Just an FYI, I sanitized the matress down there. I shudder to think about what was crawling all over that thing. --—John Lydon 12:23, July 23, 2010 (UTC)
Can i have a 5 minute ban?
I smoked a cigarette--If you're 555 then I'm 17:49, July 23, 2010 (UTC)
- Nah, you smoke enough of them you get an indefinite ban for reasons of cancer and painful death. --ChiefjusticeDS 20:57, July 23, 2010 (UTC)
- I stole $2000000--If you're 555 then I'm 01:10, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
- I stole $2000000--If you're 555 then I'm
unbook
Dear chief, I recently discused an idea on IRC about a unbook idea. I went with it it still needs a few touch ups but i put it in for pee to get input on the final draft. Hope it is a good effort. Lordarcadian 20:19, July 23, 2010 (UTC)
- Also on an unrelated note why is the VFH section all stretched out thin? I thought it used to be wider and easier to read. Lordarcadian 21:39, July 23, 2010 (UTC)
- that just looks so funny. you are like the U.N., protecting Croatia. Lordarcadian 17:57, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Unlike the UN in that I have actually managed to do it within 5 years of the problem becoming apparent :-). --ChiefjusticeDS 18:06, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
- I'll send rice Lordarcadian 19:01, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
- I'll drop it into the ocean by mistake. --ChiefjusticeDS 19:02, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Then I will get BP executives to claim it is not there! Lordarcadian 21:14, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
- I'll drop it into the ocean by mistake. --ChiefjusticeDS 19:02, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
- I'll send rice Lordarcadian 19:01, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Unlike the UN in that I have actually managed to do it within 5 years of the problem becoming apparent :-). --ChiefjusticeDS 18:06, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
- that just looks so funny. you are like the U.N., protecting Croatia. Lordarcadian 17:57, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
Umm... Why?
Can you please explain to me why you deleted my page? It was my first page, I was still working on it and it had been up for about an hour. If you gave it a chance, it would have been improved by other people. Look, I'm a noob, I created my account a few hours ago and the first article I write gets huffed. I go a way for a second, and then I see Warning: an administrator deleted this page since you started editing it. Why? --Danny300 21:02, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
- I deleted your article because it was not particularly amusing. We have hundreds of such articles created every day and while they may be amusing to people who are new to the site a lot of the jokes in them are so old that they are just dull for regular users of the site. I strongly recommend that you read through the beginner's guide and HTBFANJS to get a feel for the sort of thing that is acceptable here. I am quite happy to help you out with any other article problems you have, just ask if you are unsure about anything. I hope this makes things clearer. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:11, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
Cheers mate, I just thought about it and it was really something I did because I was bored. I just thought that, I have an account, I'll make an article. I started writing, couldn't be arsed, and just kept writing for the sake of it. I'll try and write something better in future. --Danny300 21:17, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Glad to hear it, I hope to see more stuff from you in future. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:19, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
Yes! A REVIEW! From YOU!
And I thought the month was going to end without another one. Karma happens eventually, I guess.
- Yeah, not a fan of the video game infobox either (the borders and stuff look kind of different from the other ones too). I'll replace it with a more formal infobox.
- Concurred on the image stuff.
- Huh, you know, I didn't think of the whole story being a giant extra thing, but you're quite right about it. Will look into expanding Extras in general.
- I don't think I was entirely clear on what Aperture was when I wrote the first draft of this two years ago either. Perhaps it would make sense if AS were a subsidiary of Valve or the other way around ... or your idea works, too. I'll see what I can do on consistency—always thought the old blender was a bit rusty.
It's hard to overstate my satisfaction on getting a review at all, let alone such a generous and helpful one. Thanks! Sir MacMania GUN—[14:39 27 Jul 2010]
- OK, did some stuff. Layout is probably still problematic if you're working with a screen wider than 1024, but tried a few tricks on the other points. Any further comments? Sir MacMania GUN—[23:05 27 Jul 2010]
- That is excellent, the images are much better and I like the new piece of text that moves the black box further down the page. I also like the way you have cleared up the minor issue over the Aperture Science name which I rambled on about at great length. To conclude I think the only issue now is in the extras section where your tone seems to transition quickly from discussing the lengths fans go to in order to enjoy the game to discussing how much processing power the game needs to run very abruptly; I wouldn't like to see either of these jokes removed, but perhaps you could consider creating a new section, entitled something like "Technical issues" for the "Crash every 10 minutes mode" which may even allow scope for a couple more jokes on the subject. That is my only extra suggestion, really good work otherwise. --ChiefjusticeDS 17:33, July 28, 2010 (UTC)
Street Fighter article
Why are you revert the facts about Vegas femininity and the pie throwing of Sagat? Both these things are common facts and should be included at the uncyclopedia.
About the comment regarding free edit and abuse, please look at uncyclopedia's Help:Contents
- I'm sorry are you telling me how the site works? It is generally agreed that you do not start changing the text of an article someone has gotten featured when they have already said they do not want you to. I hope this clears things up, also I take a very dim view of ban evasion, don't do it again. --ChiefjusticeDS 19:29, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
- Sigh.. Sandra Day O'Dual Screen, I'd like to refer you to Uncyclopedia:Style Guide, where it clearly says "WHEREWOLF: May god palsy the Hand where writing is bad." Tut, tut. pillow talk 19:33, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
- Er, sure. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:04, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
- Sigh.. Sandra Day O'Dual Screen, I'd like to refer you to Uncyclopedia:Style Guide, where it clearly says "WHEREWOLF: May god palsy the Hand where writing is bad." Tut, tut.
You Son of a Bitch
Why did you remove the quote from Bat Country which is something I put in there? It does relate to the article by the way, as it is said in the song itslef?--If you're 555 then I'm 20:10, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
- As a by product to removing something else, it didn't seem particularly relevant. Put it back if you feel it quintessential to your being. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:02, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
Nice move
...removing the link to the blog, if people wish to be cyberbullies that it their business, but when it impacts upon the site and the community then it is a big no no. I have gifted Ape with a week long ban, believe me that is an act of kindness as I was toying with a month. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
- Oh, glad to hear it, it's nasty business.... to cheer you up; perhaps you would like the rocket powered roller-skates I was saving for your birthday now instead of then? --ChiefjusticeDS 09:34, July 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Oh.... /feigns surprise whilst hiding the disappointment of not receiving a hoverboard for yet another year.... -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
- Oh.... /feigns surprise whilst hiding the disappointment of not receiving a hoverboard for yet another year.... -- Sir Mhaille
RVCE
Why was the rvce page deleted? it had a lot of visitors, and was even edited by a few people!
- From what I can tell it was deleted for violating our vanity policy. --ChiefjusticeDS 10:32, July 28, 2010 (UTC)
- In other words, this is not facebook or myspace so it doesnt belong--If you're 555 then I'm 19:36, July 28, 2010 (UTC)
- In other words, this is not facebook or myspace so it doesnt belong--If you're 555 then I'm
Help!
Can you lock this page?
--Gamma287. Click here for his talk. (Unless you're a vandal.) 21:38, July 29, 2010 (UTC)
Please DO NOT Delete Playstation 5!
There Is A Reason Why I Made That Page, Because Of It's Humor, If I Am Still Doing Something Wrong, Please Email Me& Tell Me What I'm Doing Wrong (With Detail, Please). --*-User:S1312-* 20:36, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Well, if he doesnt like it, he'll do it. Nothing tells him what to do--If you're 555 then I'm 20:37, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
- You need to read HTBFANJS and this. Don't link to the article until it is done either, it is rather irritating, you can have a week to fix the page up, good luck. --ChiefjusticeDS 20:39, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
- I Understand What You Mean Now, It Is Too Short. --*-User:S1312-* 20:44, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Another Thing You're Doing Wrong Is Capitalizing Every Goddamn Word; Why Are You Typing That Way? pillow talk 20:45, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
- I'll Try To Fix That --*-User:S1312-* 20:47, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Another Thing You're Doing Wrong Is Capitalizing Every Goddamn Word; Why Are You Typing That Way?
- I Understand What You Mean Now, It Is Too Short. --*-User:S1312-* 20:44, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
- You need to read HTBFANJS and this. Don't link to the article until it is done either, it is rather irritating, you can have a week to fix the page up, good luck. --ChiefjusticeDS 20:39, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
Piss review review
You marked my review a "borderline yes". I was just curios if the borderline yes was for the fact that he said "No in-deapth" or over it would be borderline.
Like if he didn't say that would it still be a borderline yes? --Happymonkey39 
Dah Meme Master 21:02, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
- It would have been closer to a no if he hadn't requested less depth, but I may still have given you the benefit of the doubt. You never know, I'm very unstable these days. Your reviews are good and it is difficult to review an article that is very good, you have little need to worry. Thanks for the reviews! --ChiefjusticeDS 21:11, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, but just for future reference would it have been yes or no. Because I'm in the USS and the more in-depth the better, and i want to know what is considered normally in-depth or not. --Happymonkey39
Dah Meme Master 22:04, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Would have been a very borderline yes. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:10, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Aight thanks...so am i in now, just wrote another one....and have 4 in depth...so far...
- Would have been a very borderline yes. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:10, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, but just for future reference would it have been yes or no. Because I'm in the USS and the more in-depth the better, and i want to know what is considered normally in-depth or not. --Happymonkey39
- Oh and sorry to babmard you with questions. But i just reviewed a article that was just a giant, keyboard drawn middle finger. I actually wrote a bit, but not a ton. Will it count as in-depth, because if it doesn't, id rather it not count at all -_-", want a good in depth percentage. --Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 22:26, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
- I check the articles as well. I'm afraid I won't be checking that particular review in, as the article isn't exactly an article, and I can't call what you put in-depth. If you come across any articles like that; that are particularly incomplete or just a single image then let me or UU know and we will deal with them and the submitter appropriately. Sorry that you wasted some time on that particular article. Also don't worry about asking questions, here to help. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:33, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Eh, i was watching a show at the same time anyways...i do that with most reviews however. And what does it take to get in PEEING! Or at least the top five of July, there are only 3 up there...can i add myself on the list? --Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 22:37, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
- ...o wait...nevermind there are 5 up there -_-"...i will get up there! I must make another good review!--Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 22:39, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Another good review and I will pop over to your talk page with your Peeing welcome pack. ;-) --ChiefjusticeDS 22:41, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
- But can't my efforts on the pointless piss of the pointless article...there were all for nothing, can't they be enough to get me! why! whhhhhhhY!....or why not...--Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 22:46, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Ignore my randomness...it's hard to think of what your typing while watching Friends on T.V...hahah! That chandler and his ironic sarcasm...i love ironic sarcasm...anyways ill get on that review later, i better have a party waiting! --Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 22:48, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Ignore my randomness...it's hard to think of what your typing while watching Friends on T.V...hahah! That chandler and his ironic sarcasm...i love ironic sarcasm...anyways ill get on that review later, i better have a party waiting! --Happymonkey39
- But can't my efforts on the pointless piss of the pointless article...there were all for nothing, can't they be enough to get me! why! whhhhhhhY!....or why not...--Happymonkey39
- Another good review and I will pop over to your talk page with your Peeing welcome pack. ;-) --ChiefjusticeDS 22:41, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Eh, i was watching a show at the same time anyways...i do that with most reviews however. And what does it take to get in PEEING! Or at least the top five of July, there are only 3 up there...can i add myself on the list? --Happymonkey39
- I check the articles as well. I'm afraid I won't be checking that particular review in, as the article isn't exactly an article, and I can't call what you put in-depth. If you come across any articles like that; that are particularly incomplete or just a single image then let me or UU know and we will deal with them and the submitter appropriately. Sorry that you wasted some time on that particular article. Also don't worry about asking questions, here to help. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:33, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Oh and sorry to babmard you with questions. But i just reviewed a article that was just a giant, keyboard drawn middle finger. I actually wrote a bit, but not a ton. Will it count as in-depth, because if it doesn't, id rather it not count at all -_-", want a good in depth percentage. --Happymonkey39
Did you
just make a reference to Red Dwarf while joke-banning UU? Just asking.
Also, this would mean UU jumpstarted the second Big Bang... I always knew it would somehow be him. Sir MacMania GUN—[21:25 30 Jul 2010]
- Yes, take a look at my block log, we did it back and forth for a long time. Now smoke me a kipper skipper, I'll be back for breakfast. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:27, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
Question...yes another
If i made one more "in-depth" review, would i beat the guy currently in 5th place? he has 5 out of 5. I would have 6 out of 5...who wins? Shouldn't I...yet again his percentage is higher...and i need this answer quick, cause i only got one more day...--Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 06:45, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
Oh and cause this one is urgent please reply on my talk page thanks!--Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 06:46, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
- Chill. It's just the top five reviewers of the month. It's not a contest.--HM (T)
- NOOOOOOOO! You have to be in it! I've aged 10 years for every month I haven't appeared on it. --ChiefjusticeDS 07:10, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
- Dude, Happymmonkey, just do two Pee Reviews. It's not gonna kill you. It's not like the queue isn't seven trillion fucking reviews long. pillow talk 07:44, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
- Eh ima do 1 in deapth, i just was curious on how many i needed --Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 19:58, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
- Eh ima do 1 in deapth, i just was curious on how many i needed --Happymonkey39
Now Chief
I can see you're really upset about this. I honestly think you ought to sit down calmly, take a stress pill, and think things over. And then realize that the pages I listed had a dot behind them. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:28, 31 July 2010
- NOOOOOO! DRAMA AND BANZ!! NAO! --ChiefjusticeDS 14:31, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
Proofread
This?. Its not finish, but I don't like missing mistakes when I go over it--If you're 555 then I'm 17:11, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
Turku
You huffed the article on Turku I had started writing because of "wikipedia copy/paste". Ok, if less than one sentence is considered copy/paste it was my bad, but could you please give back the article so I can rewrite that sentence in that case? I was planning to make that article better... --77.188.14.123 18:42, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
- If you want to work on the article, get an account and then I can do something for you. --ChiefjusticeDS 18:57, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
Pee Review
Ok I did everything i need to do to get FBI Ten Most Wanted Fugitives Pee Reviewed. Why is it not on the list. --The Dragon Lizard 21:25, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
- It's there now, in future use the box on the bottom of this page. Your review request is here. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:31, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
OMG!
Ok i did the review, but it has to be checked before th end of today for me to get 5th! And im making too big of a deal. So, will you please check, because i put some hard wok into it!...sorta. --Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 21:34, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
|
|
Happymonkey39 has awarded you a cookie! For being so helpful and supporting my rise to the Top Five Reviewers of July |
You shall cherish that, you have no idea how hard it was for me to get that, let alone give it away.
Anyways on a serious note, you're clearly a great reviewer, i was wondering if you wanted to review truth for me. If not it's fine, just would be handy to get the best reviewer of them all to review mine....... No, I'm not sucking up, your just that awesome, and cool and... and...ok im sucking up.... --Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 21:54, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
- If your article is not reviewed by Tuesday then I would be happy to take a look. Also, no problem, happy to help out. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:58, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
- Well my Weegee has been up over half a week, but the truth only 2, so it's all good....so you gonna eat that cookie or what? Cause ill eat it if your not gonna, i ain't not god damn cookie waster. --Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 22:07, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
- Well my Weegee has been up over half a week, but the truth only 2, so it's all good....so you gonna eat that cookie or what? Cause ill eat it if your not gonna, i ain't not god damn cookie waster. --Happymonkey39
And shouldn't there be some kind of plunger award for people like you...yah know cleaning up peoples poorly pissed piss? --Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 22:07, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
- Nobody ever got one before me so I don't see a particular need to be awarded for it, if it's helping improve the quality of reviews and thus articles (in theory) then I'm happy. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:13, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
Follow-up questions on anal sex
Alrighty, so as you know, I perused your very helpful Pee Review of anal sex. I expanded the page a bit, introducing content related to anal sex between gay people, and how partners prepare for the act. I enlarged the images (hopefully not too much), adjusted wording here and there to better suit an encyclopedic article, and eliminated the {{Wikipedia}} template. Without asking for anything too in-depth, do you feel like I adequately met your major concerns with the article? --Andorin Kato 23:37, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, I think that you have made steps forward there by especially by expanding the joke about people with OCD and sex. My main issue now is that you go back and take another look at the "Characteristics of Anal Sex" section and try to make the tone a bit less abrupt and make it less obvious when you have changed topic. Look at where you say " the act is returned in kind (this sometimes causes difficulty for couples of opposite sexes). Anal sex is safe in the sense of personal health" The abrupt change in topic makes it very obvious that a joke as been added in here and this does make it a bit more difficult to read, my advice would be to try and group the things in the paragraph together according to what they are about and try and segue between the points rather than abruptly changing. I'm being very picky here, as otherwise the article is looking much better. --ChiefjusticeDS 07:52, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
completely offtopic... but I love the fact you of all people have a heading on their talk page entitled follow-up questions on anal sex -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 07:54, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Here to help as I always say! --ChiefjusticeDS 08:04, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
Hi there Chief!
I had a little Question for you. A recent article I wrote AAAAAAAAA! 2010 Remix (Hosted by Kanye West) was recently huffed by you with the phrase "unsuitable for pee review" on it. Could you elaborate on that? Is that to imply that you thought the article was so crap that it didn't deserve a review, or where were you coming from there? Surely, even a "crap article" can use a review, right? If you're thinking it's just another AAAAAAAAA clone, I would appreciate if you gave it a second glance over. There is new stuff there, although the joke is kind of subtle. I still think it is reviewable, but either way, could you explain it to me? User:Mrthejazz/sig 03:15, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
- My main concern is that the article is very like AAAAAAAA which is in-of-itself not possible to review. My main issue was that I personally wouldn't have known what to write for a review even after listening to the audio. It was on the grounds that I did not think a reviewer would be able to comment effectively on what you had written that I deleted the request. I still have my reservations about returning it Pee review, but if you are confident that a reviewer will be able to help you out then I won't stop you resubmitting the request. --ChiefjusticeDS 07:43, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
Croatia
I'm not sure AssasinPetronije is exactly re-adding deleted content. My beef with him is otherwise, and expressed to him on his talk page. Spıke ¬ 14:33 31-Jul-10
FYI--He's back, he hasn't replied to my message, he is further tweaking the Infobox (also, surprise!, Croatia and Slobodan Milosevic) in ways that I can't evaluate except that some are introducing red-links. Spıke ¬ 12:57 1-Aug-10
Somewhere in the Enrichment Centre...
Maybe you should marry that thing since you love it so much. Do you want to marry it? WELL I WON'T LET YOU! How does tha—
Er, GLaDOS?
What is it?
You do realise that you're regurgitating quotes from the original game.
Is there something wrong with that?
As a matter of fact, yes, GLaDOS, there is. Quite a few of us are waiting for the new, creative, inventive quotes that are to come in Portal 2, and actually are sick and tired of people who regurgitate quotes and memes from a two-and-a-half-year-old game.
You're right. I can't become just a soundboard of tired old quotes.
Exactly.
Thank you for helping us help you help us all.
*sigh*
Thanks for voting for Portal! (Still no cake. I think the reason is written on the walls a dozen times already.) Sir MacMania GUN—[13:42 1 Aug 2010]
In case you didnt see
Proofread This?. Its not finish, but I don't like missing mistakes when I go over it--If you're 555 then I'm 15:56, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
- I'll do it this evening. --ChiefjusticeDS 15:59, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
You keep forgetting
To temporarily semi-protect articles after you feature them. Just thought I'd let you know.--HM (T)
- Well imagine my embarrassment. --ChiefjusticeDS 06:45, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
- I know, getting corrected by an underling like myself. You didn't even get told off by an admin. Man, your life must suck now.--HM (T)
- That hadn't even occured to me. I must now go into the wild and fight animals until I die a noble death by falling down an old mineshaft. --ChiefjusticeDS 06:52, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
- I know, getting corrected by an underling like myself. You didn't even get told off by an admin. Man, your life must suck now.--HM (T)
Right
You reverted my edit of a pee review done on my article. Thing is, i want it re-reviewed cos ive edited it alot since then, but now i dont know where to go to make it better. So how do i go about re-submitting it?
- You can simply type it into the box at the bottom of the main pee review page, just put (3) after the title, as to my knowledge it will be the third time it gets reviewed. If you blank an old review it won't have any effect, so just resubmit it to the queue. If you are having any problems let me know and I will do it for you. --ChiefjusticeDS 14:36, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks Chief Ragnarok 14:37, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
- No problem. --ChiefjusticeDS 14:38, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks Chief Ragnarok 14:37, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
It's new and it's news! It's the latest UnSignpost!
Sucking Journalism's Fat Wang. Badly.
Aug 5th, 2010 • Issue 91 • I love it when the news comes together
|
VFD minimum time limit introduced
 Further to that, the minimum score required for deletion is in the process of being clarified, so that either a score of at least +5 in favour of deletion will be required before the trigger-happy admins fire up their huffing devices, or 5 keep votes will automatically exempt an article from deletion. One of those. Probably. The number 5 seems certain to be involved, whatever the outcome. Hopefully, this will ensure that BUTT POOP is never deleted again. At least, such is our understanding. Sorry about that. We will now follow this with an article with no relation to news whatsoever, to try and make it up to you. Uncyc Fantasy Football draft off to racing start
 So far, the results have surpassed the expectations of all except noted optimist Bradaphraser. Three days in, and seven of the record fourteen competitors have picked a single player each, making this the slowest process since BP started trying to cap that goddamn oil leak. This year's competition promises to be more open than the last, including as it does Joe9320, who admits to knowing nothing about the sport, preferring AFL, and noted British namby-pamby "soccer" fan UU, who has somehow agreed to become an Indianapolis Colts fan for the duration of the season. Hence his adding a picture of what he is assured is the awesome Peyton Manning into this very article. With the likes of the here-one-week-gone-for-a-month Gerrycheevers also involved in the process, it could well end up taking long enough to be ready by the start of the 2011-12 season. |
| ||||
| UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox | |||||
—Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:06, 5 August 2010
Remember that conversation about your pet brick?
Remember how UU and I digressed into talking about the review queue? Would you perchance be able to just give me some thoughts about 2-3 articles of mine of your choice? (I have the ones on the review queue, plus Cuban Missile Crisis.) If you don't have the time for full-on reviews (which would be preferable but quite the time-consuming task), that's perfectly fine—you could just leave a few general thoughts/suggestions on my talk page. Hope that made the slightest glimmer of sense— Sir MacMania GUN—[22:25 5 Aug 2010]
Why hello thar...
Hello ChiefjusticeDS (what, is that a Nintendo thing you've got going there?),
I noticed you have decreased a block I had placed by a factor of infinite, and would like to point out several faults in your logic.
- He goatse'd the front page;
- You smell;
- I'm awesome;
- Your mom;
I realise the irony of this incident and am confident you will too.
Thank you and kind regards, ~ sin($) tan(€) 20:08, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
- Hello MoneySign (I like money)
I decreased the block for a number of reasons
- Colin is an ass but occasionally does useful stuff for us, two weeks seemed more apt to make the point to him;
- I'm awesome;
- Your Dad;
- Colin smells and he stops people noticing me;
I don't like perma-banning regular users and while Colin as I already mentioned is an ass-cake, two weeks aptly punishes him for his mis-deed. If you choose to re-block him forever, I will not oppose it. --ChiefjusticeDS 20:14, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
- Whilst I understand your logic, and I admit it has been a while since I have done pretty much anything around here, I am not content with a 2 week block and have increased it to 2 months. He IS an ass-cake. ~ sin($) tan(€) 20:21, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
For. --ChiefjusticeDS 20:22, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
For. --So... I decided to hug a random active user...
Congratulations. Wound up being you.
*hug*
Now I really need to come up with a better way for find someone for next time... ~ 
Apheori *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100807 - 15:17 (UTC)
Main page
Hi. The Bettie Page, I'd written Mordillo when it was nommed that it should be the whole main page, and someone on the nom mentioned that too. Can we do that for the one-day it's up? That would be very nice, and fun, and a tribute both to Page and to Socky (his first feature). I feel readers will appreciate it when they come to uncy. Beans. Aleister 15:25 8 8
- See Mordillo's talk page. Also, I'm not Chief, and I'm too lazy to log in. 68.38.116.95 15:26, August 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks 68.38.116.95. Are those your height in inches, breast measurement, IQ, and weight? Subtle hint in IP code? Is that you Ethine! Aleister 15:38 8 8
- No, they are my measurements in ray gun ammunition remaining, ray gun cartridges remaining, people exterminated today, and days since I last rebuilt myself with God as machine. 68.38.116.95 15:39, August 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Ah, TheKillerFroggy, aye known ye anywheres maan. Aleister 15:42 8 8
- It is MacMania, and he has to go now as he must start polishing my shoes..... MORE POLISH! I want to see my face! --ChiefjusticeDS 15:44, August 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Hm, I don't think I've ever been called an open-source competitor to Photoshop. [replaces Chief's shoes with mirrors and calls it a day] Sir MacMania GUN—[16:02 8 Aug 2010]
- Hm, I don't think I've ever been called an open-source competitor to Photoshop. [replaces Chief's shoes with mirrors and calls it a day]
- It is MacMania, and he has to go now as he must start polishing my shoes..... MORE POLISH! I want to see my face! --ChiefjusticeDS 15:44, August 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Ah, TheKillerFroggy, aye known ye anywheres maan. Aleister 15:42 8 8
- No, they are my measurements in ray gun ammunition remaining, ray gun cartridges remaining, people exterminated today, and days since I last rebuilt myself with God as machine. 68.38.116.95 15:39, August 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks 68.38.116.95. Are those your height in inches, breast measurement, IQ, and weight? Subtle hint in IP code? Is that you Ethine! Aleister 15:38 8 8
Adoptee mewling for help
Hi Chief! Wait till you see what I've done now. Not only unsuccessfully downloaded anything, I don't even know why, and also I can't get back in try something else as the edit button has disappeared. Ha! ha! Missed you x--Ohnogodnotagain 21:50, August 8, 2010 (UTC)
p.s.
I have done the links, though. Can I have a badge, please?--Ohnogodnotagain 21:56, August 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Hi again. Do you actually have an issue or can I chuckle and put my feet up again? Also no, badges are for winners, you may have one when you manage images. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:58, August 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, I have so many, many issues.... but you can, in fact, put your feet up, as I have just discovered the jpg. or whatever thingy list. I'm off to find some images with jpg. or something on them this time; so dont chuckle just yet! Put the badge somewhere safe for me, dearest Chiefster, you'll be needing it soon... see you on the other side of winner, honey x--Ohnogodnotagain 22:47, August 8, 2010 (UTC)
- p.s. Edit button has re-appeared! Everythings going my waaaayyyy, tra la la!--Ohnogodnotagain 22:49, August 8, 2010 (UTC)
Progress Report, gratis
Dear Chiefie, am currently in conflabberation with a Sonje, a Fellow of the Potato Choppers Guild, no less. So, things are looking up considerably. I have also added a Summary to the article, but I think it's shite, but we'll see. That badge...I'm so close...I can smell it.--Ohnogodnotagain 13:59, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
- p.s. Is this chirpy mood irritating? Shall I put my turnip head on instead? I will if you like. --Ohnogodnotagain 13:59, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
Just Thinking
So I was out on the lake last week, when I decided to go for a swim.... actually the other guys on the boat threw me in and headed for shore, but I digress.... when a thought occured to me. If England is an island, Why isn't your olympic swim tea any good? You would think that being surrounded by water would lead to superior swimmers. I'll hang up and wait for your response. --—John Lydon 15:04, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
- Just quickly shuffle in here and say Hi, fellow adoptee! (Hope Chief doesn't tell you it's because of the turds. But it might be). --Ohnogodnotagain 15:14, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
- Isn't America an island too? In fact, isn't everywhere an island, technically? --Black Flamingo 17:04, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
- We don't swim because Johnny Foreigner is somewhat vulgar and not to our highly refined tastes at all. --ChiefjusticeDS 17:08, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
- Nothing to do with the turds then? I agree, he is vulgar. Not like me. Us.--Ohnogodnotagain 17:19, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
- We don't swim because Johnny Foreigner is somewhat vulgar and not to our highly refined tastes at all. --ChiefjusticeDS 17:08, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
- Isn't America an island too? In fact, isn't everywhere an island, technically? --Black Flamingo 17:04, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
Self-blocking morons
Glad I could brighten your day. Cheers! 
Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 20:36, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
Fails QA
I'm a n00b and your a self-proclaimed bastard, and i'd like to know what that means - Fails QA. My article was huffed and you listed it as the reason. whats it mean and how do i fix it?--Xpdr 01:31, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
Change it?
Chief, I've read a lot of brilliant articles; they share a common theme in that they have a light feel and move along swiftly with lots of clever funnies. Looking again at my article, it seems heavy and boring in comparison. Or is it just me? It's hard to see your own stuff objectively. Do you think I should try & lighten it & put more funnies in, if I can? After all this effort, I just don't want to get immediately nominated for deletion upon entry to mainspace (if it ever gets that far). What do you think please? --Ohnogodnotagain 06:51, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
- Try getting your article reviewed before main spacing it. The Pee Review usually does a good job of giving you an outsiders look at your work. If you still aren't certain what to do with your article after that.... well... I got nothing. On a seperate topic, yes Chief I'm officially stalking you now. --—John Lydon 12:31, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, John, I was going get it Pee reviewed first. I think that would be essential to avoid being killed completely! Where's Chief? Can he not hear his children calling him?--Ohnogodnotagain 14:59, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, do what he said, submit it to Pee review, ask some people informally on their talk pages, try John and people like BF11 and MacMania; they are all pretty good writers and reviewers and will be able to help you out. I can also give you a hand if you like. Also I wasn't here because someone has to pay for the roof over your head, the food you eat and all those trading cards you insist on collecting. --ChiefjusticeDS 19:21, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
YES!
--Ohnogodnotagain 17:31, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
John Lyndon
...so... he GRADUATED??! Well, He'd no business getting out of the bloody COT and leaving me on my own in here. He's my sibling, for God's sake!--Ohnogodnotagain 00:21, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
- p.s. And he's got badges, and everything!--Ohnogodnotagain 00:21, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
- Scandal! If that's not motivation, I don't know what is. --ChiefjusticeDS 06:31, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
- Technically we're step brothers. I told you that you should have put down the video games and studied more. But noooo, you had to pick on me and call me names. See what happens. --—John Lydon 13:09, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
- p.s. - It's Lydon.
- Technically we're step brothers. I told you that you should have put down the video games and studied more. But noooo, you had to pick on me and call me names. See what happens. --—John Lydon 13:09, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
- Scandal! If that's not motivation, I don't know what is. --ChiefjusticeDS 06:31, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, but I'm brilliant at games now, and it was YOU who used to pick on me, and call me names. Just cos you're bigger than me. And cleverer.
- p.s. It's step-sister. All that time in that bloody cot, and you never even noticed THAT! Tah! Bruvvers.....--Ohnogodnotagain 14:33, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
Ur gay
Ur gay Ur gay Ur gay Ur gay Ur gay Ur gay Ur gay and you suck big blue whale dick--If you're 555 then I'm 00:44, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
What the hell is wrong with you?!?!
You put color in your sig! Now we can't laugh at you for having a drab, boring signature anymore! --HM (T) 07:21, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
- Is colour all I needed to stop being drab and boring? I had my face painted once.... --ChiefjusticeDS 19:31, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
Look!
Hey, Chief! Check out my userpage....... I got a BADGE!!!!
- p.s. Oh, and er.....ahem....(cough)....did you notice that I have, in fact, mastered images.......?--Ohnogodnotagain 11:44, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
- p.p.s. You know your picture of the bobbies? The one behind the one with the truncheon? Well, he's my Uncle Bobby.--Ohnogodnotagain 14:58, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
- Ah, that explains why he kept saying your username as they were hitting him. --ChiefjusticeDS 19:33, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
- I assume you mean the person, not the officer, because impersonating a police officer is a very serious offence. --ChiefjusticeDS 19:34, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
- No, I meant the officer. My Uncle. Robert Bobby. How did you know he impersonates police officers?? That's a family secret. It's a very serious offence - you just ask my Uncle Bobby. Anyway, I wanted to tell you I asked Black Flamingo if he would review my article like you said, and now I'm getting nervous; could you give me something useful to do (bearing in mind my limited skills) to take my mind off, please? Yours sincerely, Damocles--Ohnogodnotagain 23:03, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
- p.s. I'd really like to be given a task that's got a nice BADGE attached to it!--Ohnogodnotagain 23:06, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
- p.p.s ............I .....I......mastered images???.--Ohnogodnotagain 23:09, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
Pee Review
Chief, Black Flamingo says he's happy to do it, but he's very busy weekdays and it might get delayed, but will start it tonight. I'm fine with that, but we wanted to run it past you first. Would you be happy to OK this, please? --Ohnogodnotagain 23:31, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
- If you are both fine with that then it is OK. Just leave a note on the review request saying that you have both agreed on Black flamingo taking a bit longer with it and that you are want to get the review from him specifically. This should save him from the wrath of UU. --ChiefjusticeDS 06:43, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
- OK, thank you. --Ohnogodnotagain 06:48, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
- Wrath... restrained... for now... --UU - natter
14:08, Aug 12
- OOOhher!!--Ohnogodnotagain 16:17, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
- Wrath... restrained... for now... --UU - natter
- OK, thank you. --Ohnogodnotagain 06:48, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
What form of madness is this!?
What's with the Chiefbox360 moniker? It makes you sound hip and edgey, like one of those old guys on the Viagra commercials. --—John Lydon 13:45, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
- Wouldn't that logically make him ChiefWii? Or ChiefJustice3DS? --—John Lydon 14:26, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
- And does it mean there's no justice anymore?--Ohnogodnotagain 16:19, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
- Justice? There is only the Box. He is the lahwr. Sir MacMania GUN—[16:21 12 Aug 2010]
- p.s. You mean they actually have old giffers advertising viagra on T.V in America? Iccckk. Highly watchable--Ohnogodnotagain 16:42, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
- Of course, of course; he's the lahwr no matter what, isn't he?--Ohnogodnotagain 16:42, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
- p.s. Sorry, MacMania, I p.s'sd on your post when I actually thought I was p.s.sing on mine. How did that happen then? (you must have dodged in front of me while I was doing it).--Ohnogodnotagain 16:53, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
- Of course, of course; he's the lahwr no matter what, isn't he?--Ohnogodnotagain 16:42, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
- p.s. You mean they actually have old giffers advertising viagra on T.V in America? Iccckk. Highly watchable--Ohnogodnotagain 16:42, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
- Justice? There is only the Box. He is the lahwr.
- And does it mean there's no justice anymore?--Ohnogodnotagain 16:19, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
- Wouldn't that logically make him ChiefWii? Or ChiefJustice3DS? --—John Lydon 14:26, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
Weeds
Yes, and thank you, I would like a copy of "Women in the weeds" for my user space. I forgot about that one, and will have to learn to put things in my user space--unless I know I'm going to gung-ho a page and write it within a few days. Thanks. Aleister 16:25 12 8
- Done for you. --ChiefjusticeDS 17:18, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks and salutations. Al 22:38 12 8
The mundane - I can do that
Chiefie, I was just thinking, I'm quite good at spelling and grammar and such, perhaps there may be some stuff that just needs correcting that I could do? I can't do too much damage there, yes? Are noobs allowed? It's just that I'm sat here twiddling my thumbs when I could perhaps give a bit back for all the take I've had.--Ohnogodnotagain 21:33, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
- Swing on over to UN:PS and investigate such things. Try proofreading this to start with, I believe he asked and I never got a chance to help out. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:36, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
Erm...
Why did you revert my nomination of Oskar Schindler? If you're referring to the deletion, I accidentally misspelled "Oskar" as "Oscar"; I corrected it shortly thereafter. Saberwolf116 21:54, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
- That was pretty much why, it was showing as a red link so poof. Sorry, my mistake. --ChiefjusticeDS 05:39, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
- Chiefjustice the Rat's Ass. Heh. ~ Mordillo where is my JOHNNY? 06:10, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
- As I look at it now we are both Gobshite, this proves we are meant for each other. --ChiefjusticeDS 06:11, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, I see. Don't worry about it then; I'll just renom it. Now, who is that talking to y...MORDILLO? WITH NO JEWRIKEN! HOLY...! Saberwolf116 19:58, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
- As I look at it now we are both Gobshite, this proves we are meant for each other. --ChiefjusticeDS 06:11, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
- Chiefjustice the Rat's Ass. Heh. ~ Mordillo where is my JOHNNY? 06:10, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
I just used a template!
Done that for you. You'll want to check it before letting me loose on anything else, yes? --Ohnogodnotagain 23:03, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
- p.s. If I pass, can I be a member of the Comma Brigade, please?--Ohnogodnotagain 08:36, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
Formatting Thing
I was trying to make a modified version of the main page for my userpage here, but something went horribly wrong with the sidebar. Check it out, and if it doesn't take too much effort, could you fix it up? Thanks. --Some Idiot 
09:20, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
- Fixed for you now. --ChiefjusticeDS 17:10, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
We got a problem
See Forum:BUTT DRAMA!!!! for details. They wanted the VFD policy changed and Socky is denouncing the deletion of BUTT POOP!!!! as unfair. 
|Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Aussie CUN|IC Kill 
| 07:00, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
- Go to Forum:More VFD stuff for a more up to date discussion on VFD policy, Joe. —Sir Socky
(talk) (stalk)
GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 07:03, 14 August 2010
- I understand the issue and the situation, and I will by all means provide my thoughts on it shortly, unfortunately I have to work so it will be this evening before I can speak meaningfully about it. I trust nobody is killing themselves or otherwise leaving the land of the living before that happy time. --ChiefjusticeDS 07:07, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
- I was planning on it if I didn't get my way, but you've talked some sense into me here and I'll put the blades back into the garbage disposable now. Thanks! ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*
(talk) (stalk) Π ~ 
~ 14 Aug 2010 ~ 07:51 (UTC)
- I was planning on it if I didn't get my way, but you've talked some sense into me here and I'll put the blades back into the garbage disposable now. Thanks! ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*
- I understand the issue and the situation, and I will by all means provide my thoughts on it shortly, unfortunately I have to work so it will be this evening before I can speak meaningfully about it. I trust nobody is killing themselves or otherwise leaving the land of the living before that happy time. --ChiefjusticeDS 07:07, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
Pee Review
Hi Chief, I just wanted to tell you that Black Flamingo has done my review and it's stunning. He must have spent an age on it. Everything he flagged up was valid, the advice is detailed and clear and it's given be a much better feel of how the thing should be. Isn't he excellent?Thanks for the recommendation.--Ohnogodnotagain 17:06, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
- p.s. What the hell is happening with your sig? It's very untypical of the classy, cool Cheifjustice I've come to know and admire!--Ohnogodnotagain 18:44, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
- Market pressures and a new-found love of the {{expletive}} template. I will resume normal service as and when the idols demand. --ChiefjusticeDS 18:58, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
- Such is the lot of the hierarchical.--Ohnogodnotagain 19:27, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
Dead article dead
What part of the HTBFANJS did my Morshu article fail to meet?--Marcuswilliams700 19:47, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
- The funny and not just stupid part. Your article wasn't appalling but it did contain several overused jokes which are very old hat for people round here. As a compromise, if you are very keen to get the article back, I will restore it to your userspace where you can edit the article at your leisure without fear of it being deleted. If you are writing on such a subject then I would recommend you take a look at this. --ChiefjusticeDS 19:57, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
Thanks ^^ I'll try to come up with some more original jokes to add (by the way, how do I access my userspace? do I need to create a page for my username first?)--Marcuswilliams700 00:27, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
- It isn't essential, but almost all our regular users have a userpage in some form or another. I will restore it for you and drop a link on your talk page. --ChiefjusticeDS 07:50, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
Expert
I know it reached 4 delete votes, but Aleister had just pruned it heavily and in my opinion it was now keepable. I'm not saying its deletion was unwarranted, but I'm not wholly sure all the delete voters would have voted to delete the current version. Coincidentally, we're having a huge discussion and vote about VFD here where this subject also comes up. I'm not asking to restore it, but if you could have a look at it and could give me your opinion about the article (and vote keep or let it stay deleted based on that opinion), that'd be a huge reassurance. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 06:20, 14 August 2010
- My feeling on the article is that I would have voted delete. It doesn't seem to go anywhere nor does the author seem to adhere too strongly to the subject, and I feel that some kind of grasp of the subject matter is essential for any article. The presence of several in-jokes with few real reasons for their inclusion also puts me off the article. While I'm sure it was worse before I still feel that it wasn't worth keeping. I hope you understand my reasoning here. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:15, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
You may have missed
just a few reviews while filling out this. Just a heads-up. Sir MacMania GUN—[22:24 14 Aug 2010]
- Feck. I'll add them tomorrow. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:36, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
Croatia bis
The "ass-hat" is back and he picked up exactly where he left off. You may want to keep an eye on it. Spıke ¬ 01:05 15-Aug-10
- He is banned now, I doubt he was going to be anything but disruptive unless he got his way, so a block it is. --ChiefjusticeDS 07:52, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
Excuse the Noobiness
24.255.191.89 <-- this IP has done some rather.. questionable.. edits lately, I can't use the ban-patrol option yet (I assume cause I'm a noob) but felt you may want a heads up --Inferno-Mouse 17:45, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot, dealt with now. --ChiefjusticeDS 18:04, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
another nooby question - is it possible (or wise) to move an article from a userpage to the main-site? --Inferno-Mouse 07:45, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
- It's common practice, which article are you wanting to move? --ChiefjusticeDS 07:52, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
- I'm planning on moving my Dracula, Dead and Loving It spoof - it's slightly tasteless but that's kind of the point, I just put it up on my userpage so I'd be able to work on it away from the public eye (and so as not to clutter the mainspace with unfinished work) --Inferno-Mouse 07:55, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Do you have a move tab at the top of your screen? If you don't it means you aren't autoconfimed yet, but I can still move the article for you. Let me know. --ChiefjusticeDS 08:00, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
- checked and it seems I'm still ultra-noob for a while (no move option for me) - if you could move the article I'd be grateful (providing it doesn't suck monumentally - it is a bit of an expert on my behalf, trying to make a parody of a parody-film..) --Inferno-Mouse 08:08, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Do you have a move tab at the top of your screen? If you don't it means you aren't autoconfimed yet, but I can still move the article for you. Let me know. --ChiefjusticeDS 08:00, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
- I'm planning on moving my Dracula, Dead and Loving It spoof - it's slightly tasteless but that's kind of the point, I just put it up on my userpage so I'd be able to work on it away from the public eye (and so as not to clutter the mainspace with unfinished work) --Inferno-Mouse 07:55, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
Also one final pester (I promise!) - could you (or someone else) please unprotect my userpage? I can't edit it - if not that's okay.. just can't seem to do anything with it and would like to add some info on myself (because I'm vain like that) --Inferno-Mouse 17:05, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
(Title Here)
Hey just wanted to apologize for my whoring on the nomination page, i was just kidding, but w.e.
But seriously, i really want this award, mainly because it's the only award i really can get, and when school starts again I wont be on as much. So i just wanted to tell ya that i recently did do a review...and HELPME was too lazy to check it out. And the only way to actually be nominated is if i have one done, so is it o.k if you can check it out, and see if its in-depth or not. I know you have you schedule and all but it's just a favor i ask. If not that's fine, someone will eventually i guess. But i would say that it's in-depth...actually my fingers are still soar from the review, and i wrote it last night.
Well sorry to blabber on like this and waste your time, but i see that you are online so...ya...um bye --Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 17:57, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
- I don't know if I'll have time tonight, but you needn't be concerned, it will get done eventually. As for the award, just do good reviews and do as many as possible and a nomination will come. --ChiefjusticeDS 18:12, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
- But being put up against PF999 and Lydon...I dunno...wait it's knight where you live? Huh, where do you live. It's 2 in the afternoon in eastern Canada --Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 18:15, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
- But being put up against PF999 and Lydon...I dunno...wait it's knight where you live? Huh, where do you live. It's 2 in the afternoon in eastern Canada --Happymonkey39
- Oh i don't want to sound cocky or anything, but take my word, you wont even need to read it, the length alone is over the top. I felt as if i owed him for not doing the other two i said i would. But whatever, your right, i shouldn't be too eager. --Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 18:20, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Most of the time, a person doesn't win ROTM until they have about 20 reviews. Black flamingo11 and Hiatus Hernia won before that because their reviews have an astounding amount of depth.--HM (T) 21:40, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
- HELPME, I heard you were leaving. It's nice to see you're still around. --Black Flamingo 22:06, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
- You're just saying that because I complimented you, you bastard.--HM (T) 22:10, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
- I don't think people around here say this that much but ROFL! That literally made me lol...not quite sure why though... And i understand, but Chief has won, and he has only done one review this month, if anyone, PF999 should win this month. After all, it is Reviewer of the MONTH. --Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 23:58, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
- I don't think people around here say this that much but ROFL! That literally made me lol...not quite sure why though... And i understand, but Chief has won, and he has only done one review this month, if anyone, PF999 should win this month. After all, it is Reviewer of the MONTH. --Happymonkey39
- You're just saying that because I complimented you, you bastard.--HM (T) 22:10, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
- HELPME, I heard you were leaving. It's nice to see you're still around. --Black Flamingo 22:06, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Most of the time, a person doesn't win ROTM until they have about 20 reviews. Black flamingo11 and Hiatus Hernia won before that because their reviews have an astounding amount of depth.--HM (T) 21:40, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Oh i don't want to sound cocky or anything, but take my word, you wont even need to read it, the length alone is over the top. I felt as if i owed him for not doing the other two i said i would. But whatever, your right, i shouldn't be too eager. --Happymonkey39
'scuse me
The honours - can you do them, please? --UU - natter 12:02, Aug 17
Sorry
I didn't realize someone already wanted to write the Guile article. My apologies! S3ahawk 20:49, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
- I don't want to write it personally, the thing is you cannot reserve articles for yourself in that way, nobody owns articles, so no user has the right to prevent another starting an article on a subject simply because they wanted to do it first. So feel free to write the article, but mark it with the relevant templates and do not discourage others from contributing to it. I hope this makes things clearer. --ChiefjusticeDS 20:56, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
Ahh, thanks for the clarification. I just meant to put that there so I could access the article with the search when I start it later tonight. Your reasoning is sound though, and I will make sure not to make that mistake again.
A Song of Ice and Fire WIP
Hello, I wrote that article right before going on vacation and then forgot about it. Could you please restore it someplace (my user..space, I guess? Total wiki-n00b here, all apologies) where I can get at it? Thanks! Sotrain515 01:33, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
Ta
Your usual stellar work on the review (although I am going in to bat for that final image caption as well - I can't imagine anything that would work betterer). Have one of these. --UU - natter 14:19, Aug 18
- I wanted to give you cash, but you were late by 7 minutes and then claimed you have "an excuse". Bah.
|
Don't Panic Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz wish to read for you one of his poems |
~ Mordillo where is my JOHNNY? 17:34, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
- No problem UU, Mordillo you thought you were clever vandalising my signature, but I fixed it, and now who looks the fool??? --ChiefjusticeDS 05:49, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
Inferno-Mouse
While not questioning your very fine judgement, I was just wondering why you banned him? He's asking me to delete all his contributions which I'm reluctant to do because a, some of them are ok and b, I can't be bothered so I was going to tell him to think again once his ban expired - then noticed you banned him permanently. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 10:49, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
- He is a sockpuppet of a recent vandal who is making a rather pathetic attempt to "troll" the site. I would appreciate if you did not grant his request. --ChiefjusticeDS 17:15, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
My page
Excuse me, you deleted Trans Cat without allowing it to be online for more than 10 minutes on the basis that YOU had never heard of it. Are you God? Do you know of everything? I thought that this was the Anti-Wiki, a place to put informative, entertaining articles without immediate deletion- you didn't even give it a week or a warning. I guess you're transphobic/ anti-gay or something? How immature. Just because it doesn't have pornographic or willy-wanking content like most of this site doesn't mean that adults don't find it entertaining. So stop interfering, and let the page go back up please?
Andrew.
- One, read this and see if that explains it. Two, if you want something a better way to approach someone who can provide you with it is to politely request clarification rather than hurling accusations and insults. The page had just been deleted on wikipedia for being non-notable, and if that is the case then it is unlikely to be notable here. If you would like the page back and you feel it does not contravene the above then I suggest you ask politely, and I will re-read it and make a decision based on that. --ChiefjusticeDS 20:18, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
Ruddy hell! It's the UnSignpost
The edition that's black and white and dead all over
Aug 19thish, 2010 • Issue 92 • Does anyone actually read this bit?
|
UnReviews - get involved!
 So how can YOU help? Well, we would have thought that was obvious, to be honest, but as we're dealing with Uncyclopedians here, we'll make it a little clearer: write an UnReview! You could go down the road of Modus's magnum opus UnMovie Review: The Dark Knight, and make a movie review, you could get all cultured on our asses, and go Shakespearian, or you could review something else entirely. The choice is, quite literally, yours! Something helpful this way comes
 TKF has already started the ball rolling with a challenging audio request which is likely to be an early acid test for the project. If you have a Casio keyboard and some decent audio skills, get across there and get this thing working! So, how can you get involved? Well, if you are skilled at adding awesome to pages in some way, watchlist the page, check it regularly, and stop hogging your wiki-fu to yourself! If you are in need of added awesomeness on your page, pop in a request and see what happens. If nothing else, it'll make Meep feel good about himself, and that's what it's all about, when you get right down to it. Right? |
| |||
| UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox | ||||
--ChiefjusticeDS 12:07, August 20, 2010 (UTC)
What to do
Hello, I finally made an account on the site. However, I have no idea what to do... can you explain how to be funny on the site? HINATA 15:44, August 20, 2010 (UTC)
- Take a photo of your genitals with a pair of sunglasses resting on top of your willy and upload it with the name of trouserelephant.jpg, and then write an article about it stating that it likes to huff kittens and has ten Oscar Wilde quotes at the start. Or alternatively, on the left of your screen is a link that says "Things to do" - start there. Oh, and read BGBU and HTBFANJS. Nominally Humane! some time Sunday, 14:35, Aug 22 2010 UTC
On a side note
Added something to BP - I'm sure that this is only one of the things he's done. I'm all for encouraging n00bs, but I wonder if that includes serial pests. I'm harping over old ground probably being a little out of the loop, so as always it's admin call, but thought you'd prefer to understand my rationale. Nominally Humane! some time Sunday, 14:35, Aug 22 2010 UTC
That Feature
I've noticed this a lot recently. Sub sections and titles are included in the feature thing. To me that looks ugly and just plain weird. I don't know. But it would look a lot better, I think, if the bold titles were simply removed. To me, it just seems strange. I saw you in recent changes and so assumed you were around right now. Just sayin' an' all. —SCUMBUCKET WHORE 
Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [15:15 22 August 2010]
- It doesn't bother me unduly, if it bothers you then I have a sheet you can hide under until Tuesday when it will be gone. --ChiefjusticeDS 15:51, August 22, 2010 (UTC)
Islam
hey, what the heck? You just banned me for making it simple and right? I transferred (without touching) the content from the previous article as well, what's the deal? Check this out. Why is there need to be mess when everything could be just written in one single page, as in other "humor" wikis 1 (translate the title from russian to english), also check ed (you know what I'm talking about?). If you hate me - hate, but you can't deny that what I did wasn't that wrong. I'm not even saying that Jews is being redirected to absolutely different article. Dramadeur 19:30, August 22, 2010 (UTC)
- I banned you for a couple of hours for undoing my edit and creating work for me. SPIKE has already spoken to you and I agree with what he said, create a new article for your stuff as it is not in character with everything else. Secondly, I do not hate you, I am not so desperate for entertainment as to try and get on people's nerves because I can. I have to speak to lots of users each day and occasionally I make errors of judgement, one of which I concede was blocking you for attempting to help us out, I apologise for this. What I will say is that you should always try and discuss changes like that one with administrators before you carry them out, as we get a lot of vandalism, and when you do not include edit summaries it is very difficult immediately to discern an attempt to be helpful, like yours. from vandalism, especially on high traffic pages like those, add to that you undoing my edit, produced the conditions in which you were blocked. I hope this is understood. --ChiefjusticeDS 20:44, August 22, 2010 (UTC)
- Wow, dude I thought it's because of hatred (well, you know), I'm already used to it. However, this time you won't undo my edit? I will just merge these two articles as it should have been done already. And no, why would I create my own article? Dramadeur 21:26, August 22, 2010 (UTC)
- I would discuss it with Spike if I was you, since he reverted your main change last time, see if you can work something out with him, if you can mutually agree on something then I will not obstruct it. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:28, August 22, 2010 (UTC)
- Since you're the admin, let it be upon you to decide, I don't understand why can't the content of this article transferred to this, just like in this, this. If someone wants to be so nitpicking, then he should first remove the direction from jews to some "Jewish History: The Big Picture". I mean it should be equal for everyone, no? and nothing should be preferred over something else. Besides arguments not for merging these two "articles" is very weak, if not say biased. Dramadeur 16:35, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
- Dramadeur, my take here is that Islam is already too long. It's a 22,000 byte article - that's a lot to chew on in one sitting. The average feature is probably about 12,000 bytes - that's the usual length of a consistent, funny article that can keep the audience smiling the whole way through without becoming bored. You took it all the way up to 41,392 bytes - that's probably four times longer than it should be. So, I agree that the most of the material belongs elsewhere, unless we move something else out to make room for it. pillow talk 20:21, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
- And whose fault is that? Rewrite, remove unnecessary mess, I just can't understand why is it for this thing should be 2 articles, while for the same religions - one. You can easily write anything related to both muslims and Islam in that single article, I really don't see why you're so against merging it, it's everywhere so. Check out my first comment. Dramadeur 23:06, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
- Dramadeur, my take here is that Islam is already too long. It's a 22,000 byte article - that's a lot to chew on in one sitting. The average feature is probably about 12,000 bytes - that's the usual length of a consistent, funny article that can keep the audience smiling the whole way through without becoming bored. You took it all the way up to 41,392 bytes - that's probably four times longer than it should be. So, I agree that the most of the material belongs elsewhere, unless we move something else out to make room for it.
- Since you're the admin, let it be upon you to decide, I don't understand why can't the content of this article transferred to this, just like in this, this. If someone wants to be so nitpicking, then he should first remove the direction from jews to some "Jewish History: The Big Picture". I mean it should be equal for everyone, no? and nothing should be preferred over something else. Besides arguments not for merging these two "articles" is very weak, if not say biased. Dramadeur 16:35, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
- I would discuss it with Spike if I was you, since he reverted your main change last time, see if you can work something out with him, if you can mutually agree on something then I will not obstruct it. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:28, August 22, 2010 (UTC)
- Wow, dude I thought it's because of hatred (well, you know), I'm already used to it. However, this time you won't undo my edit? I will just merge these two articles as it should have been done already. And no, why would I create my own article? Dramadeur 21:26, August 22, 2010 (UTC)
Okay, ChiefdusticeJS, you gave me to understand that you aren't actually against merging these two articles, so I will do it with transferring the current content without touching / adding something new, I'm not deleting anything, just merging how it is supposed to be, this is even out of question. So this time you know, I'm not vandalizing. Everyone who would want to write further could do with the same success in that article, no one is obstructing you from enriching this article with humor. Dramadeur 23:10, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
- Well, this article made me reconsider my opinion, however, I still think that either Christians and Muslim should be merged with their corresponding articles. Anyhow, there's a new issue I did the right thing which was reverted, who I believe by a biased jew, I explained the reason in my talkpage.
- Dramadeur, I would strongly advise against reverting that page again. Although I'm not an admin, I've been around long enough to know what the admins take a very dim view of, and it's exactly the kind of thing you're doing. Let me explain. The old "Jew" article was rewritten, not because of its message, not because of its political content, but because it was amateurish and unfunny. Restoring it right on top of the rewrite causes a ridiculous overlong article that no one will read, that's collaboratively edited at the top and shifts tone at the bottom. In other words, what you're doing ruins the article. Knock it off. pillow talk 02:27, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Eh hyperdole, hyperdole.. I know why you're against the article "jew" to be written about the "jews", because you're a jew himself, but more importantly, you want that in the article "jew" was some unfunny written text "jewish history" which most likely was written by a religious jew in order that this article would be presented less funnier and more lenient about jews. Look up at most articles about nations and you would see that there is written about these nations, and why should the jews be an exception from being ridiculed in its supposed page. See again, Irish - written about this nation and everything related to it. So stop being a butthurt kid.
- Well it's too long because of "the jewish history: big picture" in any other case it would look like at max like this article, but here's the thing, the article Jewish History: The Big Picture was deleted, and now it's in Jew article, and the article's title renamed to it, and you can see people don't find it to be funny or against this "jewish history written burble" here, here (a jew himself tells you!), here, here, here, here, hell almost every section in the article's current talkpage! Also, ChiefjusticeDS, note that this article used to be written about this article's subject, then butthurt jews came in and decided to rewrite it and make it less funnier, now tell me, if muslims came in and rewrote this article and made it less funny for a stranger but funny to themselves - would you be ok with this? If not, why should any adequate person be ok with this article, you see people are against the current article's content and how it's written. Everyone who brings up some 3-rd party reasons like "then it'd be too long", or "no, in this article should be written what we want" - just jews who don't want this article to ridicule jews, nothing more. You see hyberdole, if some muslim showed up and just like you wanted to change title of the muslim article to something like "Islam history: the huge history" - he would be turned away too in this wish. Everyone equally is ridiculed here. Here's the quote "We are proud of the fact that we insult everyone equally". Dramadeur 05:15, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Just to set you straight, I would be delighted if some Muslims came in and rewrote Muslim so that it contained actual jokes instead of a long right-wing political screed. I think Muslim is a shitty article. Islam was also a shitty article, but I've spent some time rewriting it, and I think it's starting to show some signs of humor - not that it's a featurable article, by any stretch of the imagination. I'm sorry if you think Jew is "less funnier" than when it said that Jews were vampires who could transform into pianos and Eric Cartman of South Park thinks they're gay. Frankly, I have a hard time imagining anything less funny than that. My divorce was funnier than that. pillow talk 05:26, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, and not that it's any of your business, but if you're curious about my religion, I'm a Unitarian Universalist. pillow talk 05:28, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
- How tricky, but in your userpage [still written] you're a jew. Dramadeur 06:15, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
- The "honorary jew" template was given to me as a "reward" for writing Schindler's Listcruft. It's a joke. Telling jokes is what we do here. pillow talk 15:07, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
- The "honorary jew" template was given to me as a "reward" for writing Schindler's Listcruft. It's a joke. Telling jokes is what we do here.
- How tricky, but in your userpage [still written] you're a jew. Dramadeur 06:15, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, and not that it's any of your business, but if you're curious about my religion, I'm a Unitarian Universalist.
- Dramadeur, be polite next time you post on my talk page or take your discussion off site, as I will ban you if you continue to say things like "butthurt kid", try and remember that other people are entitled to a view and that your is not the only one that counts, especially here when you are arguing with an editor who has been on the site years. --ChiefjusticeDS 06:03, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Well his "knock off" is ok, anyhow, ok I will try to refrain myself from saying such things here. However, you may not like me, but what is current in the article "jew" - isn't funny, read comments to this article, there used to be material which was more relevant and funnier, but it just recently got changed to "the big picture" thing. And now when I'm just trying to return it without even trying to delete "the big picture thing" which needs to be put in its own article if it's needed in the first place (but when there was a try to create this article an admin deleted it, so I suppose this unfunny text doesn't need at all, and if Hyperbole wants he can put it in his youserpage as User:Hyberbole/the big picute), he hyperbole just keeps reverting me, like he owns this article. Dramadeur 06:15, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Dramadeur, Jew had undergone a massive rewrite by UN:IC and got the wide concensus of most editors around here. You can either write a new article under a new name or edit the old version of it. But to be honest, the Jewish themed articles are getting old and repeatative and I'd recommend finding another subject or look at UN:REQ, we have loads of article that need to be written. ~ 11:15, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
- How tricky of you, while Islam and Muslim articles are definitely offensive for muslim readers or to just adequate persons who're familiar with Islam, it's ok, but when it's about to put up an earlier version to the article Jew and put the current "the big picture" either in the above of the page or just move to another article (which was deleted btw) or just simply delete due to lack of humour, it's not ok. Everyone should be insulted here equally, why is "jews" an exception? Stop bringing up 3-rd side motives, answer directly. Dramadeur 17:35, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Your search for ulterior motives start to tire me. Look at Israel, look at Holocaust Tycoon, look at Jew Claw. Get the picture? Islam was never rewritten in an organized way because that specific group never got to it, period. If you're looking for a political agenda, you're at the wrong place. So either MOVE ALONG and write something that fits your fancy or go find a politics related site. Either way I think this argument has ran its course. ~ 17:40, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, again you're bringing up 3-rd side motives, and I would like to hear what ChiefjusticeDS thinks, because I know you're a jew and of course you'll find out everything that won't let this article to be more of making fun of jews (in a matter how it's made fun of muslims on both Islam and Muslim page), almost every comment in the talkpage is about how unfunny the current text, and let's admit it the previous versions that used to be, were funnier and relevant to this article. It's obvious how some jews grabbed this article and prompt up in its defending from being actually ridiculed. Dramadeur 20:54, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Your search for ulterior motives start to tire me. Look at Israel, look at Holocaust Tycoon, look at Jew Claw. Get the picture? Islam was never rewritten in an organized way because that specific group never got to it, period. If you're looking for a political agenda, you're at the wrong place. So either MOVE ALONG and write something that fits your fancy or go find a politics related site. Either way I think this argument has ran its course. ~
- How tricky of you, while Islam and Muslim articles are definitely offensive for muslim readers or to just adequate persons who're familiar with Islam, it's ok, but when it's about to put up an earlier version to the article Jew and put the current "the big picture" either in the above of the page or just move to another article (which was deleted btw) or just simply delete due to lack of humour, it's not ok. Everyone should be insulted here equally, why is "jews" an exception? Stop bringing up 3-rd side motives, answer directly. Dramadeur 17:35, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Dramadeur, Jew had undergone a massive rewrite by UN:IC and got the wide concensus of most editors around here. You can either write a new article under a new name or edit the old version of it. But to be honest, the Jewish themed articles are getting old and repeatative and I'd recommend finding another subject or look at UN:REQ, we have loads of article that need to be written. ~
- Well his "knock off" is ok, anyhow, ok I will try to refrain myself from saying such things here. However, you may not like me, but what is current in the article "jew" - isn't funny, read comments to this article, there used to be material which was more relevant and funnier, but it just recently got changed to "the big picture" thing. And now when I'm just trying to return it without even trying to delete "the big picture thing" which needs to be put in its own article if it's needed in the first place (but when there was a try to create this article an admin deleted it, so I suppose this unfunny text doesn't need at all, and if Hyperbole wants he can put it in his youserpage as User:Hyberbole/the big picute), he hyperbole just keeps reverting me, like he owns this article. Dramadeur 06:15, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Just to set you straight, I would be delighted if some Muslims came in and rewrote Muslim so that it contained actual jokes instead of a long right-wing political screed. I think Muslim is a shitty article. Islam was also a shitty article, but I've spent some time rewriting it, and I think it's starting to show some signs of humor - not that it's a featurable article, by any stretch of the imagination. I'm sorry if you think Jew is "less funnier" than when it said that Jews were vampires who could transform into pianos and Eric Cartman of South Park thinks they're gay. Frankly, I have a hard time imagining anything less funny than that. My divorce was funnier than that.
- Dramadeur, I would strongly advise against reverting that page again. Although I'm not an admin, I've been around long enough to know what the admins take a very dim view of, and it's exactly the kind of thing you're doing. Let me explain. The old "Jew" article was rewritten, not because of its message, not because of its political content, but because it was amateurish and unfunny. Restoring it right on top of the rewrite causes a ridiculous overlong article that no one will read, that's collaboratively edited at the top and shifts tone at the bottom. In other words, what you're doing ruins the article. Knock it off.
I think that Mordillo is correct, perhaps you think this is naive and unfair, and in response I'd say lighten up and leave it out, this site has no political or religious agenda (us disagreeing with you is not a cabal or something we all agreed on in some shadowy council.... OR MAYBE IT IS!?). I really don't think it is a matter of monumental importance whether or not the Jews are being unfairly favoured by the humour on this site, I mean honestly, that's utterly trivial and unimportant to anything except you being ultimately in the right in this argument. What I do know is this, you are making our lives more difficult by continuing this futile debate, desist or I will ban you, post a message on your user page decrying the sorry state of things if you must but do not continue this debate anywhere else, the matter is closed, you have heard the bottom line from Mordillo (an evil Jew with only wickedness in his heart) and now you are hearing it from me (a deplorable atheist who insists anything he eats is coloured red to remind him of the blood of innocents). Walk away and/or move on, if you refuse to do either, then I will ban you, something I will not particularly enjoy. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:14, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
Hyperbole
Having turned away this massive reorganization and a visit from an Anon this morning, Hyperbole has taken it upon himself to rewrite Islam entirely, moving it distinctly sideways. He has informed me on the talk page that he represents the Community and if I object, I am "blindly" practicing "edit warring," and has proceeded with 33 edits (so far). Some are sensible, some delete stuff that predates me that I left in out of respect for my predecessors, some are just randumbo. Don't know how to proceed, but I really don't need the drama. Spıke ¬ 20:07 23-Aug-10
- Wow, what a massive mischaracterization, SPIKE. First of all, I'm not "rewriting it entirely"; I removed about 30% of the content and added back about 20% new content, leaving it 10% leaner. The stuff I removed consisted of listcruft, poor formatting, repetitive jokes, juvenile sex jokes, and pictures unrelated to the article. It's about the same thing you did in your first round of edits, which you called a "rewrite," but wasn't - it was just cleanup.
- Second, I never said I represent The Community; I just said that Uncyclopedians rarely tell each other "I disagree with your edits and so I'm reverting them," and to do so is rude and overstepping your authority. You're not the sole gatekeeper of the Islam article just because you did a bunch of cleanup on it a year ago. It needed another round of cleanup (badly), and I just did it. Honestly, it probably needs another round still, since there's a shift in tone midway through from encyclopedic to extremely sarcastic. pillow talk 20:12, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
- Guys, you are both mature enough to discuss this independently of me, try and work out a compromise that suits both of you, by cooperating and coming up with a solution you both find at least partly acceptable. I don't dispute anyone rewriting or cleaning up an article especially one of such questionable quality as that. I hope that whatever is decided you ultimately improve the article. Discuss it rather than edit warring, neither of you has primacy over the article, try and bear that in mind. --ChiefjusticeDS 20:44, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
Tinkerbelle
may want to delete this article's talkpage - it is crap (I know, I didn't help - but still.. should probably remove it): unless you already have, in which case I'm an idiot --Uglychick 20:57, August 22, 2010 (UTC)
- Do you mean Tinkerbell? It's huffed and dead. —SCUMBUCKET WHORE
Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [21:34 22 August 2010]
Belgium map
It's a common knowledge that Belgium is a non-country, what's your problem, dude? Or would it be more fun if I just posted a map of Belgium from wikipedia? Lesliyob 14:43, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
WATCH THE FOOTBALL IT'S GONNA MOVE
On a more serious/pedantic note, Uncyclopedia:VFH/Failed has a purge link, and Uncyclopedia:VFH/Featured does not. Would it be possible to add one? Sir MacMania GUN—[15:13 23 Aug 2010]
Guns n' Roses
I don't understand why you removed the opening quotes on the Guns n' Roses page. Any Guns n'Roses fan would have found them funny. Even my brother who isn't a fan laughed at the Slash on heroine joke. I didn't write the quotes nor the rest of the page, but I thought these quotes, with maybe the exception of one, where good.
- Oscar Wilde jokes are pretty old hat here, by all means re-add one of your quotes, but make sure you are editing in accordance with HTBFANJS, what you see as humorous and new has been done hundreds of times already. One quote would be fine, preferably not including Oscar Wilde, I hope that explains it. --ChiefjusticeDS 19:54, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
You're probably not around now
but if you are, this is outright plagiarism of this as far as I can tell. Sir MacMania GUN—[23:13 23 Aug 2010]
- Socky QVFD'ed it. pillow talk 23:16, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
CAPERCORN AWARD
Seeing as I JUST decided to come back, and I wish to reannounce my belief that all the SYSOPs are sexy, I present...
|
The Capercorn Award |
--Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 06:11, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
- I'm just too sexy for my own good sometimes. Cheers! --ChiefjusticeDS 06:15, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
I mostly eat pink things to remind myself of the flesh and guts of innocents, but roughly on the same boat
On an unrelated and more serious note, you (or anyone passing by) may want to keep an eye on Metalguitar666 in case he's yet another sock of those metalhead folks. Sir MacMania GUN—[23:34 25 Aug 2010]
- Will do, --ChiefjusticeDS 08:16, August 26, 2010 (UTC)
Return
Thanks for the initial contact. Sorry for my poor English. I am Brazilian and I am a member of the Uncyclopedia Brazil. The article I just created here, I also created the version in Portuguese. Here I am extending my article for a new language. Cordially, ABS-007 01:08, August 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Good to hear, keep up the good work! --ChiefjusticeDS 08:18, August 26, 2010 (UTC)