User talk:ChiefjusticeDS/Archive 6

See below for review stuff, autoblock issues, me fucking up at being an administrator and, invariably, wibble.

Not rape

Just kidding. —Pelozurian (talk) 14:16, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Twice in a row?? That's just selfish, it is the sort of stalker-esque behaviour I would expect from Orian or that guy. --ChiefjusticePS3 14:23, April 20, 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, you're just the first admin I've ever raped. I got kinda excited. —Pelozurian (talk) 14:34, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

But you didn't rape him. It says quite clearly on the header you wrote "not rape". So whatever it was it wasn't rape.    Orian57    Talk   14:48 20 April 2010

Orian should totally show you how. --ChiefjusticePS3 14:52, April 20, 2010 (UTC)

I am quite stalkerish, yes! But HH is still more of a stalker than me.--Sir ~HELPME~ ^{Count! Awards! Pee! Help!} 18:51, April 20, 2010 (UTC)

What??? ~ 03:16, Apr 21, 2010

You heard me. --Sir ~HELPME~ ^{Count! Awards! Pee! Help!} 19:21, April 21, 2010 (UTC)

Titanic

Thanks for the heads up. I usually don't criticize people's sense of humour, but this article is painfully unfunny. By the way, I just deleted it because I was told to "Steam Roll" it. I thought that meant to delete it in its entirety. I'll watch out in future. I am Les ClayPool's younger, less recognized brother, Sel PlayCool. That is all you need to know, for now.

Discord

Thanks for agreeing to do Discordianism. The gang at the colonization should be enthused. Speaking for myself alone, take as long as you need, no rush. Al sans chains 16:19 4 20!!! MMX

Sorry I couldn't do it, it's just that I have only a very small amount of Uncyclopedia time because of something very personal. Again, sorry.--Sir ~HELPME~ ^{Count! Awards! Pee! Help!} 18:52, April 20, 2010 (UTC)

Just read your review. You brought out some things "I, like totally missed," such as keeping Minnie Rae's character visible throughout the article, setting up jokes for outsiders, and tying photo captions in more with the article. In this case, I think it helped that you weren't very familiar with Discordianism because many of the readers won't be either. Thanks! King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  17:38, April 21, 2010 (UTC)

Right, thanks very much. Miley did a good job with the page, and I knew that if you reviewed it that the article would be greatly assisted. The verdict was a just one, and may have created new case law. Thanks again. Al sans chains 18:38 21 4 MMX

My biggest issue with that article is that someone put "cuz" in it. Come on. That was my one sentence review.--Sir ~HELPME~ ^{Count! Awards! Pee! Help!} 19:20, April 21, 2010 (UTC)

Sketch Sawyer

Yo! I created my page and it got deleted about 5 mins later because it "Lacked QA"..? I was just getting started. Sketch is a legend in the Northwest Arkansas area. Could I please at least have a day to edit??

Thanks! PermNasty

I'll move it to your user space for you and drop a link on your talk page. Try to avoid creating short articles in mainspace without adding maintenance tags to them as they may end up deleted as that one was. --ChiefjusticePS3 18:35, April 21, 2010 (UTC)

Thank you very much! PermNasty 18:53, April 21, 2010 (UTC)PermNasty

Thanks!

FROM THE DESK OF GUILDENSTERNENSTEIN

Thank you for supporting my recently featured article.

I, like, appreciate your support, or something.

—Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 05:15, April 22, 2010 (UTC)

---

How would you feel...

...if I were to replace this with this? Nominally Humane! some time Thursday, 07:27, Apr 22 2010 UTC

Yo

Hey Chiefy, I think you should semi-protect the skaters article as it appears to be an idiot magnet, and I'm left cleaning up IP cyberbullying and stuff. —Pelozurian (talk) 22:41, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

I'll take a look. --ChiefjusticePS3 22:45, April 22, 2010 (UTC)

Short, generic pee review

FYI: In regard to this I posted that. Ironically my comment on the review is longer than the review. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  04:39, April 23, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know, they seem to be pretty sound words of advice, though next time rather than recommend that the user look at a review, link them to one that you think is particularly good, I find it makes it easier, especially if the user isn't too familiar with Pee review yet, or is just lazy. --ChiefjusticePS3 08:48, April 23, 2010 (UTC)

Well, I would have provided a link, but I was too lazy. (Will do next time). King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  20:32, April 23, 2010 (UTC)

That's a lie. He just didn't know Why did he need to provide a link?--Sir ~HELPME~ ^{Count! Awards! Pee! Help!} 21:15, April 23, 2010 (UTC)

Message from Criminalpimper (moved from userpage)

hello!! i most probably shouldnt write this here but if you remember an article i wrote that you deleted well i added pics and changed a few things round ect. and most people i have shown think it is very funny, well i now think it is worthy of being moved off my user page and onto the big wide world, thing is i dont know how, so i've come to you. if you can get back to me i would be very grateful thankyou! http://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/User:Criminalpimper/Daft_Spunk – Preceding unsigned comment added by Criminalpimper (talk • contribs)

--Sir ~HELPME~ ^{Count! Awards! Pee! Help!} 19:22, April 23, 2010 (UTC)

Show me a couple of people who are fond of it and I'll be happy to move it for you. --ChiefjusticePS3 19:27, April 23, 2010 (UTC)

ah, see the people i have shown are friends, poeple that dont have uncyclopedia accounts, but i'll try! – Preceding unsigned comment added by Criminalpimper (talk • contribs)

It's a shame that it's in user space, because this would be perfect for VFD. Nominally Humane! some time Friday, 21:37, Apr 23 2010 UTC

sorry i dont understand that? please explain in retard. what is VFD?

As it stands at the moment if this went to main space I would nominate it for being deleted (VFD stands for "Votes for deletion", more of which you can see here.) First of all you have added in a first person element in the first section by referring to yourself, which makes this un-encyclopaedic. Secondly because you've pointed out you've made this up it ruins the illusion that it is about something real, which destroys any parody. You've made mention to three individuals who I've never heard of before, which makes this vanity or cyberbullying, which is against our vanity policies. Fourthly it's random stupidity, which does not substitute for funny, and I had no laughs out of it. In short, this is the perfect example of exactly how not to write an article. Read HTBFANJS and BGBU and then completely rewrite. Nominally Humane! some time Friday, 22:17, Apr 23 2010 UTC

I have a couple of things to say to that, 1.) the 3 people mentioned are not real people, they are simply made up names, i admit maybe it would be better to use some random celebrities. 2.) i was wondering if you were american or somewhere? as i am english, maybe the humour got lost there. i do need to improve it slightly however it is clear you have a complete different humour than me, for example i posted the link to the article on facebook and at least 10 of my friends read it and loved it.

Rollback Rights

Now that I'm no longer head of IC, I need something to give me the illusion that I'm still important and a worthwhile human being. So could I have rollback rights, you think? Seriously, I think it would be useful to have. I don't revert vandalism as much as some people here, but it would be handy to be able to use when I do. A few times I have reverted a number of edits of a user who signed on just to vandalise, and I just started doing it on a vandal but someone else with rollback apparently beat me to it. And I understand that before using rollback you have to be very, very sure you're reverting obvious vandalism. And as you're a new admin, I thought I'd ask you first. Plus I think you're swell. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  03:26, April 24, 2010 (UTC)

Chief can't, only bureaucrats can. Ask 'dillo.--Sir ~HELPME~ ^{Count! Awards! Pee! Help!} 03:27, April 24, 2010 (UTC)

There is a rollback script I could give you. It's slower than actual rollback, but it shouldn't matter if another user beats you to the revert. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 03:33, April 24, 2010 (UTC)

I appreciate the thought, but you're assuming I want this for practical reasons as opposed to being able to say "I got rollback rights and you don't HA HA!" King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  03:35, April 24, 2010 (UTC)

Well, your own son got it before you. You should feel like the truck driver father of a movie star.--Sir ~HELPME~ ^{Count! Awards! Pee! Help!} 03:37, April 24, 2010 (UTC)

That's only because you asked for it and I didn't. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  03:55, April 24, 2010 (UTC)

You just did, stupid.--Sir ~HELPME~ ^{Count! Awards! Pee! Help!} 04:36, April 24, 2010 (UTC)

You know, maybe I'll ask for the right to block annoying kids too. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  06:14, April 24, 2010 (UTC)

I think you might want to revert a bit more and be a bit more active on recent changes just so that Mordillo has something to look at. Also come up with a 20 word essay on how you intend to abuse rollback. Thanks to my automated answering service for getting all the questions while I was not here. --ChiefjusticePS3 08:11, April 24, 2010 (UTC)

It's what I do, Chief.--Sir ~HELPME~ ^{Count! Awards! Pee! Help!} 14:16, April 24, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, Chiefster. I get what you mean by reverting more but I'm not sure I know what you mean by "be a bit more active on recent changes." But then sometimes I'm a little................slow. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  05:30, April 25, 2010 (UTC)

I can get you some tablets to help with that. --ChiefjusticePS3 07:10, April 25, 2010 (UTC)

What are rollback rights--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 15:28, April 25, 2010 (UTC)

I have them, it's where I can revert a bunch of edits at the click of a button. I can also suppress redirects when moving pages.--Sir ~HELPME~ ^{Count! Awards! Pee! Help!} 15:32, April 25, 2010 (UTC)

Awesome! I want them!--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 15:42, April 25, 2010 (UTC)

I had to do about 300 vandalism reverts before I got them, so yeah...--Sir ~HELPME~ ^{Count! Awards! Pee! Help!} 15:44, April 25, 2010 (UTC)

The way I've done it is go back to the edit you want to keep, make a minor edit on that page (spacing between a sentence or at the bottom, or a needed comma or spelling fix, there's always something), and then save. This reverts to that edit. Is this similiar, or are you talking about picking a specific IP's edits out of many pages at once? Aleister sans chains 20:37 25 4 MMX

Being a dick

your gay your gay your gay your gay your gay your gay your gay your gay your gay. And I did your mom last night I'm evil muhahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahhahahahah--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 20:09, April 24, 2010 (UTC)

lol chiefjusticeDS is a big fat nazi nigger-jew admin who sux cocks for breakfast lolollolololooloo0ool —Pelozurian (talk) 20:34, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

I be you going to ban me know. But I guess your too chicken to do that with me. muhahahahahahahahahahahahaaahahaahahahaahaahahahah--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 22:05, April 24, 2010 (UTC)

I heard this guy was too slow to lolololololololol--Sir ~HELPME~ ^{Count! Awards! Pee! Help!} 00:06, April 25, 2010 (UTC)

Say, you know those kind of jokes were really funny back in 1995. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  05:31, April 25, 2010 (UTC)

Rape

Technically, nobody has done this yet.--Sir ~HELPME~ ^{Count! Awards! Pee! Help!} 15:45, April 25, 2010 (UTC)

Sun-Landing

Technically, nobody has done this yet, either. SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 17:54, April 25, 2010 (UTC)

Is it piss hat time yet?

Yes. Love,  

I'm on constant alert. --ChiefjusticePS3 22:31, April 25, 2010 (UTC)

This weekend have a push for regular reviewers to pick up a couple of reviews to try and cull the queue? I'm getting sick of waiting. Nominally Humane! some time Tuesday, 06:54, Apr 27 2010 UTC

I shall make the pee queue shorter than it currently is as well.--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 04:02, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

I suppose a push for reviews isn't a bad idea. I'll send a message round on Friday. --ChiefjusticePS3 12:05, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

Reverted Edit on Freeport High School

Due to "circumstances", that dude with the girlfriend is no longer with the girlfriend of that dude with the girlfriend. I am reverting the edit, I would appreciate it if you do not edit it again. Legacyme3 11:55, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

The issue you mention above is absolutely fine in that case. I have removed the notable people section you added to the article as it was rather poor and we have hundreds of them in other articles. The reason for this is that they don't add much to the article and unless particularly spectacular contain jokes that are nothing but tired and unoriginal. If you want more information on that take a look at HTBFANJS. I hope this is understood. --ChiefjusticePS3 12:04, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

Clare GAA

Did you write the article on Davy Fitzgerald on the Clare GAA page? – Preceding unsigned comment added by Seányg (talk • contribs)

No, remember to sign your posts. --ChiefjusticePS3 13:30, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

Ok sorry,Seányg

Ban

This has happened twice now, this time with ban #49420. The ban notice says it's the same IP address as mine, but it isn't, maybe an overlap on the wireless wave. I don't known anyone else in my 'hood who edits uncy, let alone act's stupid on it. But I get through the ban just by clicking a few times or by backspacing, so it's just a nusiance now but I'm wondering if it will affect my edits at some point. Thanks, Aleister in Chains 20:36 28 4

Well that was the first time that person has been blocked. Have you definitely been logged in when you received this message saying you had been autoblocked? If happens again and you cannot get round it then you should email me to get the block undone and then drop Sannse an email or message to ask about it. Apologies for not being able to help further. --ChiefjusticePS3 20:48, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. Def. logged in. The first time I was blocked because of this (and that too was easy to work around, which makes me think it's on the same wireless in my neighborhood or something crosses somewhere) was a few days ago, and then it was an IP with what I remember was that same IP. This time he gave himself a name, so he's evolving. Thanks for the advice. Aleister in Chains 21:39 28 4

Same has happened to me. Today, I got something that said "autoblocked because your IP has recently been used by Manny the clown" and then it showed an IP that wasn't mine in "your current IP address is".--Sir ~HELPME~ ^{Count! Awards! Pee! Help!} 22:06, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

Well you two are buggering up what was a completely foolproof system. He is foolish user, I mighty admin, he break rules, I wield mighty banstick. Nowhere in the above does it say other people end up autoblocked by accident or that I have to do any thinking. --ChiefjusticePS3 22:11, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

Yep, same guy, Manny the clown. And I checked and the IP isn't even close to mine. Ghosts in the machine. Al des chains 22:16 28 4

Post feature whoring? Is the front page not obvious enough for you? --ChiefjusticePS3 22:19, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

I knew that, which is why I linked. Wouldn't have whored, to an admin at least, unless I knew you better of course, and knew that your money was good. Aleister in Chains 22:22 28 4

My money is always good, that's why I spend it all on drugs. --ChiefjusticePS3 22:23, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

While you're fixing random nonsense, it might be wise to semi-protect Will Smith for a couple of days, as this IP seems adamant in placing the whoops/black Jesus template on it, and they're using a dynamic IP, so banning them won't do much good. Thankx. --Matfen 22:27, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

Banning always does good, some people just have to be banned more. As for protecting the page I have done so for 24 hours, I would like to see some effort on your behalf to talk with the person making the conflicting edits on the article talk page or elsewhere rather than fighting it out to the bitter end. If they ignore that then get back to me. --ChiefjusticePS3 22:38, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

I've just been banned in the name of this Manny the Clown guy too. What the heck is going on? "Your current User:Mrthejazz/sig 04:33, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

Ummm... 10.xx.xx.xx is a private IP address, which means that you shouldn't be able to access Uncyc from that unless you are on an internal network connected to the Uncyc server itself. I am 1000% confident that that is not his public IP address. Nominally Humane! some time Thursday, 04:42, Apr 29 2010 UTC

Well, for whatever reason, it's working again just fine. It was weird to be temporarily blocked like that though, for apparently "reverting an article three times. I'm editing my I.P. out now. Just a heads up. User:Mrthejazz/sig 05:01, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

In that case it might be worth dropping Sannse a line. --ChiefjusticePS3 08:32, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

Sounds like this was a server error. As Puppy says, the 10.... IP is an internal one. Sometimes, if there are server changes, that gets assigned to users in error. Then if one of those is banned, it can affect others. If this happens again, please use Special:Contact to let us know urgently. I try to keep up with talk pages, but I don't get notified of Uncyc messages when I'm on the rest of Wikia (because of the not-shared user database). So sorry for the slow response! -- sannse (talk) 01:40, May 9, 2010 (UTC)

Borderline?

Seriously? Re-reading I'd say brief but constructive criticism on various areas with plenty of encouragement for a n00bish writer without becoming swamped in too much confusion. I was proud of that one. Seriously borderline? Nominally Humane! some time Thursday, 01:33, Apr 29 2010 UTC

I tend to go with my gut feeling at the time of judging and I agree that there was plenty of good advice in the review, my feeling at the time was that it was still relatively short and didn't contain as many examples of implementation of advice as I would have liked. Borderline yes still gets a point for being in-depth so it isn't really worth losing any sleep over, it just demonstrates that when I looked the work over, I thought the review went most of the way towards being in-depth but falls short on a couple of occasions and that was my feeling from yours. I hope this makes my intent clearer. --ChiefjusticePS3 08:28, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

Grumble grumble mutter mutter... Give some people power and it goes straight to their heads... mutter mutter... just you wait until I become head of IC and see how you like it... mutter mutter... Nominally Humane! some time Thursday, 08:33, Apr 29 2010 UTC

Well quite, until then pedal harder, the bubbles in my bike-powered jacuzzi are growing weaker. --ChiefjusticePS3 08:36, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

Removed a Pee article

I removed this as it has been featured on the front page already, and I highly doubt its needed anymore. And in case you forgot, you gave me permission to do so as long as I tell you about it as part of our compromise made earlier. Just to let you know so you don't get pissed at something you allowed me to do and forgot about it. You know what I mean.--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 05:32, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

I remember and it is absolutely fine, let me know again the next time you do so. --ChiefjusticePS3 08:29, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

Alrighty--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 20:36, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

I think Iwillkillyou was right when he reviewed the ghost page and gave it a score of 0. Seems about right. Aleister in shame with a score of 0 21:19 29 4 MMX

Don't be shamed, with an feature article, you don't need a score from pee review. The article already gives you money and bitches, so be happy with that, ad I got you some cake in case you think what I said was complete bullshit--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 04:33, April 30, 2010 (UTC)

A ruling needed

I come before the court again (presents his papers to the clerk), and beg the court's indulgence. Your honor, since no other admin is on duty, a question. There is a user page which consists solely of a priceless article which both Hiatus and I want to nom for feature. The user hasn't been back in awhile, but he did post the page with the name of the article on a template. This is evidentiary of an intent to mainspace the page and not just leave it as a user page. May we go ahead and nom it, and let the chips fall where they are laying anyway? Aleister in Chains 21:25 29 4 MMX

The VFH rules say you can't nom the article for VFH if it is in userspace, and we cannot move this persons user page into mainspace without their consent. As far as the evidence for intending to mainspace the article goes, I'm pretty sure that the user page is intended to be an article, but we cannot take liberties with this persons user page. However, practically I doubt anyone would have that much of a tizzy if you go ahead nom it for VFH since user pages have been nommed in the past, just explain why you think it is exceptional if you nom it. --ChiefjusticePS3 21:42, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

A Solomon-like decision. I'll check with Hiatus. My bribe is in your clerk's top drawer, on the left behind the candy and fishing tackle. Aleister in Chains 21:53 29 4 MMX

Helping a n00B

OK, I tried. I don't want to seem dumber than I may be, but where did I miss? Do pages need to be based in fact, or can an article start with things that just don't exist, and go on from there? Also, can the huffed pages be moved to my private area? I promise I won't repost until/unless cleared. OryxConLara 23:01, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

Well, depending on what your writing, you can choose either one or both, as long as it does not violate HTBFANJS in any way, shape, and form, and it must include a construction tag (if you haven't known already). As for you second question, yes, but an administrator is the only one that can do that, so simply asking one (especially if they are the one who huffed it) when moved that page to your userspace, and you can work on it all you want until you don't need it anymore. I hope this helps.--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 04:39, April 30, 2010 (UTC)

The issue is that making something up is rarely amusing and some people simply find it tiresome, as for me, I deleted the pages because they made little sense even with context of the other. I understand that you may not have been finished and will move the pages into your userspace as you have so politely requested. I will drop links to them on your talk page, feel free to get back to me with any other questions you may have. --ChiefjusticePS3 09:07, April 30, 2010 (UTC)

Um

Is this valid for pee review?--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 04:41, April 30, 2010 (UTC)

Yes. Why wouldn't it be? Nominally Humane! some time Friday, 05:20, Apr 30 2010 UTC

I'd like to hear why you think we can critique it POTR, is there any way for you to change it in response? --ChiefjusticePS3 09:01, April 30, 2010 (UTC)

Yes. Similar to reviewing an UnTunes - I made it and I can change it. There's 1000 frames worth there as well as about 5 audio tracks involving about 200 individual sounds that also includes a song that has been significantly edited to fit with the ad. Timing, volume levels, production values, concept, humour, the page itself can all be critiqued. I'm after feedback on it and although PEE template is not perfect for it, the idea of a review from a contemporary is exactly what I need. If there is no feedback that can be given to improve it then give "Good job, 35 points" or something similar as a review. Nominally Humane! some time Friday, 10:04, Apr 30 2010 UTC

Put a similar explanation on the review request page and I have no objections in that case. --ChiefjusticePS3 10:11, April 30, 2010 (UTC)

Yo.

IRC is IRC, Wiki is Wiki. Plus, he said he put NSFW before/after the link. Which technically makes it allowed. I've got ops right now in #uncyclopedia, and I'll be willing to unban you and mediate if you want to discuss the situation there. - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 16:02, Friday 30 April 2010 -

The ban is staying in place and I will explain why, he placed SFW after the link and then later corrected the error, on my admonishing him for posting it (while aware I had already done so when EMC posted it, he opped himself, removed my ban exemption and banned me from the channel. I would be willing to discuss the block with him except I have already attempted to do so and he decided that that was the appropriate time to act like a jackass. Since I recognise that I am relatively new to adminship, and Dexter may feel wronged by that, I have let Mordillo know of the situation and he will undoubtedly take remedial action if he feels it is necessary. For now however Dexter's ban is staying in place. --ChiefjusticePS3 16:14, April 30, 2010 (UTC)

Colin, allow me to respond in kind, bollocks is bollocks. This is the #uncyclopedia IRC, not the goatse IRC, and the rules that apply in the wiki apply in the IRC. The next time I see someone banning an wiki op from the channel and preventing him to enter the channel for whatever reason, everyone involved will get very long bans and will lose any technical privelges they have, wheather it's rollback in the wiki or IRC ops. Also, please deliver the message that I better not see Dexter opped again in the IRC. ~ 16:48, April 30, 2010 (UTC)

My point isn't that there aren't rules in IRC, it's that we don't traditionally ban people on the wiki for activities on IRC. If he had put goatse on the main page, as an example (like some jackass did), I can see him being banned on-wiki. But it wasn't. It should have been something dealt with in IRC (even if Dexter acted immaturely, but it's because some people don't take it as seriously, some interpret humor wiki a bit more liberally than others). I remember this issue coming about (with some jackass, once again) when a wikipedia page was vandalized. I'll ask the same question now that I asked then. Since when do we take action on-wiki for actions off-wiki? - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 18:09, Friday 30 April 2010 -

Antennapedia

Antennapedia: I hope you at least looked it up on Wikipedia before consigning it to oblivion. Someone even requested the article... 94.173.17.23 20:43, April 30, 2010 (UTC)

I did look it up, but given the article was a couple of lines long and created by someone who was not registered, I decided it was inappropriate for the wiki in that form. If you are going to create an article, please read the beginner's guide first and use a maintenance template if you are not finished. Feel free to start it again if you are prepared to do that. --ChiefjusticePS3 20:52, April 30, 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, those were the only antennapedia-related jokes I could think of. 94.173.17.23 20:56, April 30, 2010 (UTC)

vfhvote template

Happytimes just pointed something out to me that I hadn't thought of previously. Can you change Template:Votevfh so that the line that says:

{|{{prettytable}} class="vote-box"

Instead says:

{|{{prettytable}} style="width:100%;" class="vote-box"

Thanks. Nominally Humane! some time Saturday, 03:16, May 1 2010 UTC

Has such a change been discussed and agreed upon? If not then you would be better running it past one of the admins who deals with VFH stuff before requesting it be changed. --ChiefjusticePS3 07:23, May 1, 2010 (UTC)

Okay, this is the discussion, and if you would rather this go through a different admin then I'll find one. In short, if you create a vfh vote at the moment you end up with a page like User:PuppyOnTheRadio/VFH test until there is enough text in it to stretch it out. Happytimes has been adding a gif image as a spacer to fix this up in the past, however by changing that line as above that will stretch out the template to take up the full width of the page. It's a purely cosmetic change and it will make no difference to any other areas of the vfh process. Nominally Humane! some time Saturday, 09:17, May 1 2010 UTC

OK, I was just looking to know why you want it done since I am not some kind of robot that permits you to edit protected pages by proxy, I'll be happy to change it if that is the case. --ChiefjusticePS3 10:21, May 1, 2010 (UTC)

Um. Now it's not a pretty table an Gymore. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:28, 1 May 2010

Hey Chief, if you replace the style="width:100%" with width="100%" it doesn't mess up the {{prettytable}} stuff. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:52, 1 May 2010

UnSignpost 1 May

The Uncyclopedia UnSignpost: Special Weekend edition

May contain traces of humor!

April 22nd 1st May, 2010 • Issue 85 • Insert penis joke here

The launch of a new and exciting weekend edition. Maybe. By PuppyOnTheRadio "Where is my signpost?" was the cry heard from the world wide masses this week. "There should have been an issue on the 22nd and on the 29th, and nothing seems to have been done about it." Fear not, gentle reader, for the signpost will not go gentle into the good night. We have instead taken a brief hiatus for no reason that we could conceivably come up with, and now we are back in a blaze of glory. For those who are unaware of our proud history, the next issue, coming out this Thursday, will mark the (roughly) 2 year anniversary of the creation of the UnSignpost, the unperiodic periodical started by Dr. Skullthumper and Cajek. The good doctor, at the time of the first issue, was asked what his feelings were towards creating the first formalised forum for spam within Uncyclopedia. It was from this that we now have the immortal words "Those assholes better appreciate this. They'd BETTER." Now, two years on from those words of wit and wisdom, the UnSignpost is still struggling going strong. There have been varied reports as to why the USP has not been released. One suggestion is that regular contributors just "couldn't be bothered writing." Others have suggested that it comes down to the unwillingness of the head editor, who was recently heard to say "I'm so against... this... again... (E)xistence is far more than (it) deserves." One of the more probable reasons for the lack of issues may be that the news has now gone viral, and is available more readily through facebook then it has been previously. One facebook semi-regular, who bears a remarkable resemblance to a Silent Bob inaction figure, has said of this development "Excuse me, but I think your geek is showing." Dexter111344 supported the move to the social networking site by saying "I won't be joining as I don't intend to ever make a Facebook." Another possibility is the number of users now communicating via UnSkypelopedia. When asked for a comment, EMC said "OH FUCKING CHRIST I'VE CUM" Dr.Skullthumper, however, said "I started both of them.", and then wished to make reference to some forum or something. Ethine, however, was somewhat more constructive, informing this reporter that "Since it's getting close to summer, we'll likely have more calls, as most people's schedules are slowing down. As well as calls, we have the neat little chat thing at the bottom, where everyone sexually harasses each other when calls aren't going." Despite several attempts, I still haven't been sexually harassed. One reason why users have not been as distracted recently is due to the enormous amount of work going on at PEE review. At present there are articles waiting for review which have been there for over three weeks. For all those who are looking to get the review process back and alive, please pick up an article for review today. Your time and investment into this proud tradition can create the next great article, like the recently featured A wizard did it or the recently nominated UnNews:Windows 999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999 came out, hailed by some as "the most profound and groundbreaking article to hit Uncyclopedia in over 50 years" Another reason why many users may be distracted is the number of collaborations that are currently in progress. Of those there is Tim Burton, being cleaned up by the team at ΥΣΣ, lead by the fantastic Skinfan13. Also starting to make some ground in the spread of reliable information is the team at Multiliteralist/Summit of Spin, lead by the wonderful Multiliteralist. And of course, coming out blinking from seeing the light of Discordianism is the ever faithful Imperial colonization, lead by everyone's favourite canine, RDB PuppyOnTheRadio. And of course, another reason might simply be that the team here at USP are all running around arranging bake sales to assist with Poo Lit Surprise, the bi-annual competition that actually gives prizes to the winners. The most likely explanation, however, is that nothing newsworthy ever happens on Uncyclopedia

Check out these pages! UnNews:Windows 999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999 came out Looks who's out of the closet. The most profound and groundbreaking article to hit Uncyclopedia in over 50 years From our logs: Flammable blocked 86.171.18.85 with an expiry time of infinite ‎(YOU ARE SO COOL SO COOL AWESOME LOL) ChiefjusticeDS blocked 91.195.183.211 with an expiry time of 1 day ‎(Ah, that may be true, but you are a wanker, so it evens out) Olipro blocked 92.4.117.223 with an expiry time of infinite (YOU EVER BEEN FUCKED IN THE ARSE WHILE WATCHING A YANKEES GAME?) Mordillo blocked 217.28.207.226 with an expiry time of 1 week (time's up! you need to go to the toilet to do some poopy!) RabbiTechno blocked 91.195.183.213 with an expiry time of 1 month ‎(Cyberbullying. Matthew R. would like to point out that while he may be gay, you are banned) Olipro blocked YOUR TOO SLOW! with an expiry time of infinite ‎(your spelling is shit, it's spelt "YOU'RE" ... so that means you're a fucking retard) ChiefjusticeDS blocked God-Is-Cool with an expiry time of 40 days ‎(Blessed be the Uncyclopedia admins for they shall lead us to the promised land, also bye bye!) Mordillo blocked God-Is-Cool with an expiry time of 40 years (It took them 40 years not 40 days you bloody heathen) Biopic of the Week What can anyone say about Maniac1075. There are rumours that he is not an individual, but rather a multinational conglomerate of authors who do nothing but write quality articles on an extremely high rate. Or at least on an extreme high. However you look at it his contributions to date have been fast and furious. There is definitely something odd with him at least. If nothing else, he has a scarily in-depth knowledge of the world of professional wrestling. In fact he has been nominated as both Writer of the month and Potatochopper of the month. There is a particular school of though that says that these fields here should be filled in with any old garbage in order to ensure that both the left and the right hand sides of the USP are of the same length. While we appreciate this sentiment, the truth is that the USP is known to be constantly at bursting point with information that we can't fit into one column, and so this right hand column is essential for the stuff that we can't fit elsewhere. SCROTUM The above section is not a prime example of the statement in the section above. Please feel free to ignore it.

UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox

Brought to you by fucking magic. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:23, 1 May 2010

Karen Gillan page

Greetings from Ingerland sir. My page on Karen Gillan is quite short as she hasn't done much in her career yet. I know its not a long page but its hardly a one sentance article. Must say I like being mentioned on your talk page at the top :-) Cls14 19:24, May 1, 2010 (UTC)

Greetings from the north of England sir, the only reason I tagged the article is to ensure that you know it is not to remain in that form, I did so at that point as it had been unedited for nearly half an hour, I will change it for a more apt tag, since you appear to be working consistently on it. --ChiefjusticePS3 19:36, May 1, 2010 (UTC)

Don't really understand. I know this isn't Jimmy Wales' site but on that one the article would remain. Karen is a relatively new actress who has had a very short career. Surely it's best to keep satire based loosely on fact rather than padding it out with total nonsense? Cls14 19:39, May 1, 2010 (UTC)

Unfortunately on wikipedia a magical article writing fairy would appear and turn it into a longer article, here it would be likely to remain the same length and would likely remain that way, the template I have left on it will shelter the article from deletion and will allow you to do as you please with it. I would strongly advise you read through HTBFANJS and the beginner's guide, as they will help you understand the differences between here and wikipedia. --ChiefjusticePS3 19:45, May 1, 2010 (UTC)

Ok, taken on board. Rules is rules. Cls14 19:55, May 1, 2010 (UTC)

Just remember, we try not to take ourselves too seriously, use common sense and you will get along just fine. Also since there seems to be a humour deficit here: SCROTUM . --ChiefjusticePS3 20:03, May 1, 2010 (UTC)

Bye 'eck tis grim down south this evening with t'rain. Any chance of spying on my page, i've expanded it a bit. Cls14 20:43, May 1, 2010 (UTC)

That is looking much better, keep up the good work. --ChiefjusticePS3 20:56, May 1, 2010 (UTC)

In need of a review

Due to few being reviewed, this article of mine has not been reviewed yet, and i come to you because your like one of the most active users around. Its this.--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 23:15, May 1, 2010 (UTC)

Also I like to be apart of the welcome commitee, you know, where users welcome new users. yeah that one.--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 23:34, May 1, 2010 (UTC)

I'll see if I can take a look over the next couple of days. If you want to join the welcoming committee then you should add your name to this list. Have a read of the stuff on the main welcoming committee page and take a look at the tools available, that's all there is to it. --ChiefjusticePS3 07:15, May 3, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 01:10, May 4, 2010 (UTC)

Leaders Debate Trilogy Copy?

Hey, could you send me a copy of the Leaders Debate Trilogy page you had to delete? My time suddenly got bogged down and I couldn't finish it off.

I can do, you will need to make an account first as I would rather not restore it to an anonymous userspace, make an account and leave your username here for me and I will be more than happy to do so. --ChiefjusticePS3 08:47, May 4, 2010 (UTC)

???

Why am I banned? User:RandomElectrode 11:41, May 4, 2010 (UTC)

That 10.6.30 IP number is croppping up again and randomly banning edits. Aleister in chains 11:48 4 5 mmx (And thanks mucho for the front page write-up!)

You aren't or you wouldn't be able to post on this page. It's some temperamental IP thing, Aleister, could you go whine at Sannse about it please? Since you seem to know the circumstances. Oh and you're welcome. --ChiefjusticePS3 11:52, May 4, 2010 (UTC)

Sannse and I have never been properly introduced, and etiquette denies me the oppportunity of such a correspondence. Since I must sign off in a few moments, at some point later I may breach this lack of introduction, and thusly shame myself and all of my descendents. Al in Chains 12:00 4 5 MMX

Ah, I'll do it in that case, I shamelessly smashed that barrier months ago. --ChiefjusticePS3 12:02, May 4, 2010 (UTC)

Just kidding. We've been lovers for years. Al in chains 12:09 4 5 MMX

blocked from my own namespace?

Explain. --Wilytank 16:38, May 4, 2010 (UTC)

OK firstly I would have believed you, me no want large untidy image on my talk page, secondly it is a weird thing that is happening where some people are being autoblocked, albeit briefly, for no reason. If you take a look you will see that the discussion above is on exactly the same lines, I'm going to talk to Sannse and try and find out what is going on. It'll probably be my fault somehow. --ChiefjusticePS3 16:43, May 4, 2010 (UTC)

I already posted on sannse's page Chief. You can add your input.--Sir ~HELPME~ ^{Count! Awards! Pee! Help!} 01:07, May 5, 2010 (UTC)

I got blocked under 10.6.30 just now too, trying to update the queue, which I'll have a word with you about under a new section. -- Sir SF13 (Talk) GUN WotM RotM FBotM VFH SK Maj. ΥΣΣ 01:58 EST 5 May, 2010

Recent Review

I just thought you ought to know about this. I'm aware of the past problems, but seeing as you are the more legitimate and knowledgeable authority concerning IWKY's past reviewing difficulties, I thought you would be better suited to handling this. What bothers me is that the time between booking and completion was well over 4 days and the effort needed to do this review was obviously only a few minutes worth at best. -- Sir SF13 (Talk) GUN WotM RotM FBotM VFH SK Maj. ΥΣΣ 02:02 EST 5 May, 2010

My main concern was that he fails to complete without saying anything and thus just leaves the tag there. From his messages it does seem as though he was keeping the author waiting, but was letting them know about delays. The review is very short and is certainly not in-depth but my feeling is that we should be thankful a review appeared, regardless of length. Please bring any other instances of this to my attention as I will probably get the banstick out. Hi ho Silver awaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay! --ChiefjusticePS3 08:02, May 5, 2010 (UTC)

Also, The top 5 for May, why was IWKY taken off, he has an in-depth review, just because he isn't 100% this month doesn't mean he should be excluded from the list imo until other users knock him off the list with their number of reviews. -- Sf13 11:09 EST 10 May, 2010

I suspect he was originally taken off in error, but considering the width of the table at the moment and the considerable alterations we would have to make to fit him back on I don't really think the change is worth it. If he does another review then I would be happy to slot him back on and I will likely do it when I swap the tables around at the end of the month. --ChiefjusticePS3 09:55, May 17, 2010 (UTC)

yOU DESERVE THIS

Mega Deletion Award! This Admin has successfully beaten the crap out of many, many articles in rapid succession. Fear them greatly.

aLSO MY sHIFT kEYS BROKE SORRY LOL —Pelozurian (talk) 23:22, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Look! A distraction!

Muahahahaha, I'm distracting you from finding your essay questions!
Love,  

WTF, can't log in

The log in is gone when I log on, and there is only a template for new users, and when I use Aleister in Chains it says no such user exists, so I can't log on. When I type it as all one word it allows me access. Have you or anyone else found this weirdness today when you tried to logon? Thanks. Al all one word 11:49 6 5 MMX

I'd logged off, and now it won't let me log on with that name. WTF (Which is what I've signed in under) Aleister in Chains as What the fuck? 12:52 6 5 mmx

Try double clicking on where it says log in, as it seems to be broken right now and double check your log in details. If that doesn't work then use this and contact wikia. --ChiefjusticePS3 12:55, May 6, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, the log in screen looks all weird. I was able to log in, but it still looked funny. The "create an account" screen was gone.--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) 19:18, May 6, 2010 (UTC)

Al, I just looked at the logs...you still exist...--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) 19:20, May 6, 2010 (UTC)

To anyone reading this, please post your problems at Uncyclopedia:Report a problem. If enough of us post there, maybe they'll fix it. Of course if you aren't reading this, you wouldn't know that, and if you can't edit here, you couldn't do that. (Also I wish they'd stop changing the login. I've been here less than a year, and I've already seem them screw it up a few times). King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  04:36, May 7, 2010 (UTC)

If you cannot login make sure you have tried clicking where it says log in, it doesn't look like a link but should take you to a screen to enter your username and password. If that doesn't work and you are certain your log in details are correct then you should contact wikia using the link above. --ChiefjusticePS3 07:41, May 7, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. People throughout Wikia are having problems, and Mordillo showed me and whoever's interested the link for the main place to post problems--or that you like the changes. It's here. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  19:02, May 7, 2010 (UTC)

The Whore Returns

This article needs your vote, whether for or against. I'll be cracking on with some pee-reviews soon btw. --Matfen 20:04, May 7, 2010 (UTC)

I managed to get so far. Even in some of the dramas I caused/perpetuated and the endless vote-whoring, I still managed to worm my way out of a ban. But that time has come to an end, and a new era of trollish mischief begins. And for that, I thank you. Still, must be some sort of a record for how long I went. --Matfen 21:21, May 9, 2010 (UTC)

Lala land?

When I try to edit one of my works in progress it keeps telling me that my IP is blacklisted due to some fuckwit called Laaaa - or something similar. thing is, I've had the same message at home and at work. Any chance of seeing what's up? --Sog1970 15:31, May 10, 2010 (UTC)

Forgot to include the "Your current IP address is 10.7.10.5, and the block ID is #49684." bit. Also, it let me edit once just now, then re-banned me --Sog1970 15:35, May 10, 2010 (UTC)

It's a server misconfiguration at wikia and the problem is effecting lots of people all over wikia; a server is providing its internal IP rather than that of the user the autoblock is intended for, thus people on that server end up autoblocked mistakenly (this is what they told me when I enquired before). To help wikia sort it they have asked me to ask you to take a screenshot of the autoblock screen and then send it to them using the special contact page. Practically you can bypass the autoblock by reattempting your edits a couple of times. I hope this helps. --ChiefjusticePS3 16:29, May 10, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for that, I'll try that. Do you mean like a page refresh? --SadisticWolf 16:56, May 10, 2010 (UTC)

IP Banned?

Excuse me, you banned me because my IP was used by a vandal? Is there any chance you can un-ban me because I haven't done anything wrong that I know of. --SadisticWolf 16:44, May 10, 2010 (UTC)

See the conversation above and then this, this and this. Also were you blocked you would be unable to post on this page. --ChiefjusticePS3 16:48, May 10, 2010 (UTC)

For some reason I have been on-and-off able to post on pages. However, I made a quote on the Obama page which I mis-formatted and was banned when I tried to correct it. --SadisticWolf 16:51, May 10, 2010 (UTC)

I understand, I apologise on wikia's behalf for the issue, but if you follow the advice I gave to Sog1970 above then it should get sorted relatively quickly. --ChiefjusticePS3 16:54, May 10, 2010 (UTC)

n00b and conf00zd

Er... that Laaa thing - I think this is the same problem but also your username was in a/the message which looked to very uninformed eyes as if you had banned/blocked/something me so please help.

I recently found uncyclopedia and inspired by HTetc and Things to do attempted to edit the WD-40 article. In mid creative create all vanish, I am blocked? I am not me? I am not allowed? Oh dear. Well it might have been all stupid and not funny and even if funny certainly not as important as Nick Clegg's haircut.

1. I apologise 2. halp!!1! 3. please

If not thanks anyway, I have had a really good laugh and sniffed the duct tape. AS. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Absburger Sliderule (talk • contribs)

See my advice to Sog1970 above, it is a minor fault in wikia's autoblock system that will be fixed shortly. --ChiefjusticePS3 16:57, May 10, 2010 (UTC)

Zheliel's guestbook

I think you should semi-protect the talkpage of that because stupid IPs seem to like spamming there. —Pelozurian (talk) 22:52, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Discordianism and Chiefster

You may know that, while Discordianism got 13 for votes, it didn't pass VFH. I'm asking all those who voted no for suggestions for improving the article. Any suggestions you have would be greatly appreciated, and other formal talk. I must admit I was surprised you voted against after we made changes based on your Pee Review, especially when your score indicated it might be ready for VFH before your review. In any case, I'd appreciate your comments--you've been a big help for many articles. If you'd like to post specific suggestions on Talk:Discordianism, that would be great. Thanks! King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  23:09, May 10, 2010 (UTC)

lol

Go back to Africa, Chief Runs with Justice! That's got to be the funniest case of vandalism I've seen yet. --Matfen 22:37, May 11, 2010 (UTC)

It's good to hear from the fans occasionally. --ChiefjusticePS3 09:44, May 12, 2010 (UTC)

I ask for your Judgment

It seems that Pee Review is moving rather slowly these days, and I was wondering if you could review my article HowTo:Part the Red Sea. Funnybony is itching to nom it, and I've been taking advise from both he and Aliester; and Aliester suggested I get a Pee Review so that I can fix up the remaining flaws. Just for quick linking here it is: Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Part the Red Sea. Much appreciated if you could find time in your schedule to review this.--Sirrah CatshirE Chess the Striker2117 17:04, May 12, 2010 (UTC)

I'll see what I can do for you tomorrow. --ChiefjusticePS3 18:06, May 12, 2010 (UTC)

Alright, hope you can fit it in. I will be waiting with enough anticipation to cause a brain aneurysm. (But don't rush, they tend to heal by themselves. Almost magically in fact...) --Sirrah CatshirE Chess the Striker2117 20:10, May 12, 2010 (UTC)

Many thanks on the helpful review. I've attempted to change as much as I could over to a more "manual-like" style and implement some of the other changes suggested without completely eradicating some of the tangential humour. Thanks again. --Sirrah CatshirE Chess the Striker2117 23:09, May 13, 2010 (UTC)

OH!!! THAT ONE ARTICLE YOU JUST HUFFED!!

The Jason Hy-whatever one!! That guy was a vandal from almost three years ago! I'd permaban that IP that made it if I were you. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 06:32, May 13, 2010 (UTC)

Template

Hey there! Just had a question about User templates. I created one and wondered if I need approval to release it into the wild. If not, can I get a manual or schematic or something to detail exactly how I do that? Here is the template in case you need to review it or something. User:John Lydon/Template/Epic Beard Guy --—John Lydon 14:22, May 13, 2010 (UTC)

I'd say you are good to move that to main space, chuck it onto the relevant page here and leave it to rot let people put it on their user pages. Feel free to ask me if you aren't sure how to move it to the mainspace, though you should be good if you just move it to Template:Epic Beard Guy. Hope this helps. --ChiefjusticePS3 14:42, May 13, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the help --—John Lydon 15:40, May 13, 2010 (UTC)

Pee review, Red Sea

I just read your pee review and you write them like you're writing on instructional manual on communicating via the written word. Impressive, educational, and I thank you for the chance to read such good advice. One of these days I'm going to have to put aside a couple of hours and go through many of your pee reviews, it will be well worth the time. Thanks again. Al sans chains 20:09 13 5 MMX

May I ask what is meant by, "Fails QA", when you huff?

Does this mean the article's current humour levels or something else? MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 20:14, May 13, 2010 (UTC)

I think it stands for quality assurance, which just proves it has been stolen from somewhere else as we would never use a word like quality here. I would much rather it stood for something like Quantum Analysis. --ChiefjusticePS3 20:19, May 13, 2010 (UTC)

Okay. And I think it should stand for Quantum Analysis as well. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:15, May 13, 2010 (UTC)

Game

The pages I created were part of Create A Game. The point of the game is to create pages with broken links so that you or other users can go in and then create new pages, please do not delete pages that are part of this game.

What part of my message did you have trouble understanding? I know what the point of the page is, my point was that the page was deleted because it was created and left, as several games are every day here, it is my job to sift through almost all of these, and ensure that they do not simply remain like that, as many of them do. Coming to my userpage and talking down at me like I have no idea what I'm doing is not the correct way of approaching this situation. I strongly suggest that you read HTBFANJS and the beginner's guide before making any further changes. --ChiefjusticePS3 21:01, May 14, 2010 (UTC)

Stupid N00B having Issues

I attempted to move a page by using the move button as you told me and I got a message saying something like, "You are not authorized to complete this action because you are not authorized to complete this action." What gives. Also, I'm extremely suicidal at this point and this isn't helping the cause. --—John Lydon 03:35, May 15, 2010 (UTC)

Which page are you attempting to move, and to where? --ChiefjusticePS3 07:41, May 15, 2010 (UTC)

None of my business but when has that stopped me before?

You infi banned PortuguseOttersTryRadios? I'm really curious as to why. The user is obviously not new here--knows relatively obscure inside jokes and a lot of background about members, plus makes edits with the types of comments I see from regulars. But perma-banned? I'm guessing it's not for that--technically someone could lurk here for a long time and pick stuff up, or edit as an IP for a long time and get the hang of the place. Not likely (and when asked PortuguseOttersTryRadios claimed to be new), but possible. As you're one of the rare reasonable admins, I'm assuming I missed something. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  06:41, May 16, 2010 (UTC)

Obvious POTR sock... Waves, PLZHELPME, and your sock guy are all banned. Also, this isn't my talk page, but I butt in to Chief's affairs constantly, so...--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Sunday, 07:31, May 16 2010 UTC

Sockpuppetry is always a perma-ban offence for the sock-puppet account. I don't mind a brief harmless joke regarding it now and then and I wouldn't block anyone forever (except maybe HELPME) without first being sure they were a sock-puppet. I waited until the Dexter was finished messing about with the account and then I blocked it. You should remember that we can find out if you were using a sock, and anyone who shows and grasps everything that quickly with a name similar to a regular user should generally be investigated. I hope this makes things clearer. --ChiefjusticePS3 08:11, May 16, 2010 (UTC)

At first I thought you used the USERNAME template. You're a bastard, tricking me into thinking I was tricked with your trickery.--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Sunday, 08:41, May 16 2010 UTC

No no, the only bastard on this site is <insert name here>, I hate that tosser. --ChiefjusticePS3 08:44, May 16, 2010 (UTC)

Well, duh, of course that wanker is the biggest bastard. But you're the second-biggest. Or maybe that's Famine.--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Sunday, 08:46, May 16 2010 UTC

Oh. I thought maybe it was because he misspelled "Portuguse." Also my sockpuppet was investigated and APPROVED BY THE ADMINS! (Of course that's just because they realized I use it as a shortcut because I chose a stupidly long user name that takes me forever to type.) King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  03:39, May 17, 2010 (UTC)

You didn't need to create a sock...just redirect the page. You fail.--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Tuesday, 03:26, May 18 2010 UTC

Was never approved. The account is permablocked. But since you used that username and made it unusable for anyone else, I've reinstated the redirect. Remember your own history young padwan. ~ 18:31, May 18, 2010 (UTC)

Come on, I'm trying to brag here. Stop confusing things with the facts--you keep that up, I'll tell Santa Claus to bring you coal for Christmas! King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  05:51, May 19, 2010 (UTC)

I believe Santa doesn't visit Jews anyhow. --~ 05:59, May 19, 2010 (UTC)

You fell for that? That's the oldest trick in the book - your parents just told you that because they didn't want to spend any money on you! Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 06:06, May 19, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, now I think about it, one of my best friends is Jewish and he gets presents for Christmas. Of course I have to pay for them. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  06:08, May 19, 2010 (UTC)

There is, of course, always the possibility that 'Dillo simply got himself crossed off Santa's list by touching himself at night. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 06:10, May 19, 2010 (UTC)

DOH! Boy, I sure screwed up that threat. OK, then I'll tell Hanukkah Harry! King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  06:03, May 19, 2010 (UTC)

It's probably nothing and won't matter in a day or two... but

It seems that the only person who voted against the HowTo:Make a Sandstorm on VFH has no other contribs and gave a rather shoddy reason for voting against. It just makes me wonder if he might be a sockpuppet for someone, and I know that you admins can check that stuff out. If he's a real user, than I guess he's entitled to his strange against voting reasons...--Sirrah CatshirE Chess the Striker2117 04:45, May 17, 2010 (UTC)

Sannse has the All-Seeing Eye. Seek her out! Actually, you did right asking an admin first, even though it takes Sannse or one like her to do it. But that does look rather odd--sockpuppets usually vote for articles. And now there's now two votes against--both by someone who made only one edit, which was their against vote. Doubly weird. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  04:56, May 17, 2010 (UTC)

Sannse would probably send you to an admin besides her for approval for that anyway. I don't think it matters that much in this case as your article looks to be a passing anyway. I will look into it and watch in case it happens again, if it does let me know. --ChiefjusticePS3 07:31, May 17, 2010 (UTC)

Also, "Miniluv" is an Uncyclopedia inside phrase, so the editor probably isn't new.--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Tuesday, 03:23, May 18 2010 UTC

Actually Miniluv comes from George Orwells 1984, and refers to where they tortured Smith until he saw the glorious truth. Just thought I'd clarify that. Nominally Humane! some time Wednesday, 06:52, May 19 2010 UTC

Love Big Brother or rats will eat your face? It's no wonder my little bro has issues.--Sirrah CatshirE Chess the Striker2117 08:04, May 19, 2010 (UTC)

About this review

This isn't my best, but considering the article, is it excused?--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Tuesday, 03:22, May 18 2010 UTC

Should be OK, the main thing with work like that is that you give lots of suggestions for improvement rather than just listing faults, and you seem to be making a reasonable effort to do that. I'll check it in shortly. --ChiefjusticePS3 07:33, May 18, 2010 (UTC)

Formatting

I wrote " Whoops!{{Simple Disambig|something}}" while editing a page but it appears in two lines. how can I make it appear in a single line?--Veita 11:22, May 18, 2010 (UTC)

See my edit summary of the fix in your page's history for the explanation, I hope this helps. --ChiefjusticePS3 11:52, May 18, 2010 (UTC)

Platinum Pisser

Just giving you advance warning; I stand at 49 pees right now. I intend to do number 50 any day now. So you might want to get one of your assistants to go to the warehouse and get a platinum pisser dusted and ready for me. And please don't deliver it COD. The shipping cost on those things is outrageous.

Also the description of Diamond Dumper really needs to be changed--it still sounds like it's the ultimate award, and because somebody went and raised the top pee level through the outhouse roof, it's not anymore. I can reword it if you like--it requires 75 quality pees, right? King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  05:57, May 19, 2010 (UTC)

It will be delivered to you as soon as I check your 51st in-depth review in, as you will note from the text, you must complete over 50 in-depth reviews to get it. As to changing the text of the diamond dumper I don't think it is really necessary considering the award has only been given to about 4 people, so it remains a lofty target for most people. Why not do a few reviews to take your mind off it? --ChiefjusticePS3 07:07, May 19, 2010 (UTC)

I noticed it said over 50, but I always thought that was like saying someone had to be over 21 to buy beer in America--as soon as you hit your 21st birthday, you qualified. Actually, I suspect as worded it was a mistake. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  07:22, May 19, 2010 (UTC)

I'm quite fond of giving it out at 51 because it means that at the very least we get another review out of people, and at best they carry on towards the next target. --ChiefjusticePS3 07:24, May 19, 2010 (UTC)

All right, but right after I did review no. 50, I was going to work on making you a present. But now I'll have to do another review, so won't have time. Too bad. Pfffft! King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  07:26, May 19, 2010 (UTC)

That's OK, I believe I had planned to have that day devoted to watching the proles bow down to me and I hate to be dragged away from that. --ChiefjusticePS3 07:30, May 19, 2010 (UTC)

Sandy Claws

Thanks for your vote on Sandstorm, it's always nice to have your vote because then I know that the article is up to the snuff that you snuff. If I saw you in a sandstorm I'd recognize you from your sand-eatin' grin! Appreciated. Al des chains 16:35 21 5 mMx

What the hell?

I didn't do this. I'm serious. I redirected the page, but I didn't put it on QVFD.--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Saturday, 04:10, May 22 2010 UTC

Liar! He told me he did it, and he did it on purpose, and he'd do it again given the chance. Al des chains 16:12 22 5 MMX

Well the history says you did. A rather costly mistake it would seem. --ChiefjusticePS3 16:12, May 22, 2010 (UTC)

Actually, this might bring up a serious account security question- hm. --Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Saturday, 04:15, May 22 2010 UTC

Or that you accidentally clicked on your QVFD button when redirecting your page. Happily I was on hand to assist and ensure your page remained amusing. --ChiefjusticePS3 16:17, May 22, 2010 (UTC)

You think my user page was amusing? /me sniffs That's the best compliment I've ever gotten!--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Saturday, 04:19, May 22 2010 UTC

Whatever happened to Rob Newman? --Black_Flamingo 16:19, May 22, 2010 (UTC)

Well it's even more amusing now. Also, BF11, I think he is writing stuff now, shame really. --ChiefjusticePS3 16:21, May 22, 2010 (UTC)

It is a shame. David Baddiel's still hanging around like an unwanted smell though. --Black_Flamingo 16:23, May 22, 2010 (UTC)

I suck cocks. ChiefjusticeMF 16:24, May 22, 2010 (UTC)

Rob Newman - who, remarkably, is now 45 - did indeed have a go at writing some books. I read Dependence Day and The Fountain at the Centre of the World and they were both utter crap, which was disappointing as I liked his stand up stuff. He also does socially-conscious pseudo-comedy these days of a quality that seems to suggest he's a bit of a has-been. David Baddiel has also written a few books and whereas they're not fantastic they are at least readable - I wouldn't bother buying any future novels by Rob. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 16:32, May 22, 2010 (UTC)

I'm looking forward to your biography on him, Rabbi. --Black_Flamingo 18:16, May 22, 2010 (UTC)

Don't huff BUTT POOP till a full day has passed please.

I want ample time given to the opposition to state their opinions. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 15:56, May 23, 2010 (UTC)

Huffed now, not undoing it, sorry and all that. --ChiefjusticePS3 15:59, May 23, 2010 (UTC)

Oh well. No skin off my ass. So, how was the archiving of the new design? MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 16:02, May 23, 2010 (UTC)

You know I think it has cured my lower back pain, also kudos to you if you helped with it, I like the big obvious score numbers. --ChiefjusticePS3 16:03, May 23, 2010 (UTC)

Why Dont You Love Me Chief?!

Remember that night we spent together?! no? well... you were asleep, BUT THAT'S NO EXCUSE! If you ever change your mind, Fat Boy Kyle will be sitting here waiting for you, my Lover

Whoops

You know how I just added Template:NavBox1 to QVFD? Well, I kinda messed up. I meant to put Template:NavBar on QVFD. Sorry. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:10, 24 May 2010

Oops!

You counted the HowTo:Reinvent the wheel review for me on User:Cajek/Pee/Stains, when I did the Why? Eat a full English Breakfast one.--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Tuesday, 07:50, May 25 2010 UTC

Help

You huffed my article. I guess I made a mess on the floor, will put more effort into next one and see if I can get it past you. PLEASE tell me how to upload images, PLEASE, PLEASE PLEASE! Thank you. I love you. --Ohnogodnotagain 16:08, May 26, 2010 (UTC)

There should be a link to upload an image under toolbox in the bar at the left-hand side of the screen. If you don't see it now then you should be able to in a couple more days, as the ability to upload images is only given to autoconfirmed users, essentially users who have been editing for a few days. Also, sign after you leave a comment, not before. --ChiefjusticePS3 16:18, May 26, 2010 (UTC)

...

One last thing before Ynis leaves home and goes into the Wilde. I maked me first template!!! Template:Ammo I Just put the link here because you already have ammo. Ynis 13:51, May 29, 2010 (UTC)

Review

Remember that there are two separate reviews on Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Uncyclopedia:Imperial Colonization/project for you to count. Yes, I am a review whore.--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Saturday, 04:32, May 29 2010 UTC

Talk:Lebanon

The "asshattery" continues on the talk page. I've been maintaining this since it was on VFD last fall, but if it continues to draw locals who think that the page must serve their blood-feud, I'll renominate it. Spıke ¬ 19:33 30-May-10

Yo yo yo

Hey Chief, my hella sickass bro! What up in the hizz-nizzle, broski-minawski? You know you're my FAVORITE admin? I hella love you dude. No homo or anything, but it's like, a hella radical bro kinda love? Ya know what I'm sayin? Ya know what I'm sayin? GO AMERICA!!! —Pelozurian (talk) 07:53, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Word up dawg, some honky mo-fo tryin' to style on me. He iz well dizzee tho. I ave sorted hiz punk-ass. --ChiefjusticePS3 13:08, June 1, 2010 (UTC)

Adopt Me !

Saw your name as an available adoptee on the adopt a noob page. Still got a spot open? You've already helped me out here and there but I'm new to the whole Wikia thing and am getting frustrated trying to figure it out on my own. My mom won't help 'cuz she has an appointment with the pool boy (I didn't know pool boys took appointments) and my dad just drinks and swears (which would make for a great article if I could reach the keyboard during the beatings). Anyways, I need some adopting if you're still in the market. Thanks. --—John Lydon 17:58, June 2, 2010 (UTC)

The above post, nom for feature. Vote now and it will be on the que tonight. Al sans chains 18:05 2 6 MMX

The Above Post for Feature

Score: 0

 Nom & For Per Al, that is a phenomenal post. Chief should quote it at the top of his next archive page. -- Sir SF13 (Talk) GUN WotM RotM FBotM VFH SK Maj. ΥΣΣ 21:12 Budapest 2 Jun, 2010 Regretful against. I too enjoyed the post. But in my opinion it's too short for a feature, and it lacks images. We should have at least a photo of mom with the pool boy, if not a full video. And of course one or more pics or drawings of the beating. In my opinion, all feature articles need a combination of images of violence and of mom with the pool boy. I would suggest the writer submit it for Pee Review. In my usual style, I'll be happy to write a review of at least 8,000 characters, 100 of which will actually say something useful. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  19:22, June 2, 2010 (UTC)

Please forgive me my skepticism

I know admins do the impossible on a regular basic, but Under user did 76 in-depth Pee Reviews in 24 hours? User:Boomer/People for the Evaluation of Excrement and Influencing Nominations for Greatness (I told Under user about this too.) King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  19:12, June 2, 2010 (UTC)

Well, it is UU...--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Wednesday, 07:27, June 02 2010 UTC

UnTunes Userbox

I couldn't find a Userbox for UnTunes anywhere so I made one. Do I need to submit it for review or something somewhere or just throw it up and wait for the cash to start rolling in? Anyway, I'll hang up and listen to your answer now. Thanks --—John Lydon 22:04, June 2, 2010 (UTC)

Link me to it, I'll have a look and make sure it is OK for mainspace, then, you can move it to mainspace like the Epic Beard Man one. --ChiefjusticePS3 22:12, June 2, 2010 (UTC)

User:John Lydon/Template/UnTunes --—John Lydon 11:43, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

That looks excellent, move it into main space and list it here and await the royalties. Good work. --ChiefjusticePS3 11:49, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

Hello again!

I see you're on the 'Adopt a Noob' list - please adopt me?? After the disastrous 'British Big Cat' episode, would be grateful for another pop at an article. I have the new one already on my user page, but am having so much trouble uploading pictures onto the page, I wondered if you might take a quick look at it first, and if it's rubbish and you huff it (again!) I won't have to bother with them and it'll save me a load of trouble - if it's worth keeping and tweaking, then I could perhaps get some pointers from you as to how it should be changed, and where I'm going wrong with the pictures (Cardinal Wolsey is floating around somewhere, I can't find him). I really want to do this, please help! (please note the most EXCELLENT header and username now AFTER the message) Oh, please don't ask me to link you to it - I can't do that, either. (yet)--Ohnogodnotagain 02:09, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

Linking is very simple, so simple in fact that I can do it. This is an invaluable guide to links and their use thereof. As for your image of Wolsey, here it is. Hope this helps. --ChiefjusticePS3 08:53, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

LOTS of helpful stuff, many, many noobie thanks. Took it all on board, I think I'll read a dozen or so of the featured articles before I hit the keyboard again. Know what you mean regarding 'random'- unfortunately I'm like that in real life - I'll curb it on paper though, make things better. AAAAAAccentuate the positive, EEEEEliminate the negative...........diddle de deeeedee. --Ohnogodnotagain 09:10, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

Pee Review

I really enjoy doing these. I've read several and am working on making mine better. I tell you all that to ask this; how do I join the Pee commitee? Also, can I put a sweet tag on my articles like Skinsfan13 and others do, or do I need to be a commitee member first? – Preceding unsigned comment added by John Lydon (talk • contribs)

In order to join the Pee committee you should list your membership request here in the section for membership requests. You will need 5 in-depth reviews to get into the committee and you can check up on your number of in-depth reviews as well as all sorts of other fascinating information here. Look for your name at the bottom of the Peeing proletariat table for 2010. There is nothing to stop you tagging articles before you get into the committee. Hope this helps. --ChiefjusticePS3 17:19, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

You have to make your own template, mind you. Mine is {{User:HELPME/Reviewtemplate}}. You did make your epic beard man one, so you probably can do this.--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Thursday, 07:24, June 03 2010 UTC

His word writ large

Thanks for not only the highest pee score I ever received, but also the pithiest comment --Sog1970 22:31, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

You are very welcome. --ChiefjusticePS3 22:33, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

Random Bashing

Mornin' Chief. If you have a minute, I made some alternatives to the ferret randomness and wonder what you think? Would you have any more clean-up ideas, please? That would be good, as I'd have some time today to work on them. --Ohnogodnotagain 05:56, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

I'll have a look when I get a moment; likely this evening. --ChiefjusticePS3 16:20, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

OK, some good work there. What I would suggest is that you try and reconcile what you are trying to do. You are having some issues, still, with randomness and I'm still feeling that you are trying to tell a story rather than explain an event, and on top of that you aren't explaining what the article is trying to do until the middle. Look at some wikipedia articles and investigate how they give context to what they are going to say. Your article badly needs direction and you need to clearly define where you want your article to go and then focus on getting there. You can write the funny stuff so now you need to focus on where you want it to get you. --ChiefjusticePS3 20:51, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

Chief, been thinkin' about what you said. For it to make sense and have a proper direction, I think I need a clear introduction outlining the climate that the event was born out of. Then link the contents of the paragraphs and make them run sequentially in a sort of time/event line down the article. Expand the characters. The 'party' has got to go (and the ferret. The ferret has to go, it most definately has to go). I've got to go and do some more research into the events leading up to the Field of Gold, and after. I'll do this, re-write it and come back to you, and ask if you'll kindly give it another look-see for me. See you later, alligator, and thankyooooooo!! --Ohnogodnotagain 00:25, June 5, 2010 (UTC)

Take This

I'm sure you have a closet full of these but this one is special because it's from me. Your Pee Review was full of great advice. I followed most of it (some of it I couldn't really follow but that was probably the combonation of heroin and Yeager. My doctor warned me about combining those but it tastes like baby Jesus is dancing in your mouth!) Anywho.... I put the article back up for review with the new changes. Check it out if you get a chance, and thanks for the help. – Preceding unsigned comment added by John Lydon (talk • contribs)

It's no problem at all, which bits were you having trouble following? I'd be happy to elaborate. --ChiefjusticePS3 16:24, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

Strikethrough

Chief, I don't agree with the harsh words for HELPME on overuse of strikethrough, on an awards page or any other page. We communicate under conventions by which we can literally not take back our words--or even communicate privately. Strikethrough says, "I wrote it, but now that I see how it looks, I no longer endorse what I wrote." Given these rules, the ability to indicate you've changed your mind is a vital tool. Spıke ¬ 12:56 6-Jun-10

It's just so ugly though. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 13:00, June 6, 2010 (UTC)

Chief, never mind Spike's harsh words here. He is a first class asshole of the worst kind, one who would rape his grandmother if he had an extra moment of free time in between raping his other grandmother. He does a good job, and should be drawn and quartered in the public square, popcorn served free and tee-shirts of the event worn proudly tolerated. Al des chains 13:02 6 6 mmx

My problem is that he struck through other people's votes, by accident or not. That was why I spoke harshly to him. Also I hate free speech and I'm an equal opportunity oppressor. --ChiefjusticePS3 18:11, June 6, 2010 (UTC)

Wut? I don't think the edit summary was harsh...pretty sexy though. Also, I think you misread; I don't think I struck through votes, just my own stupid comments.--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Monday, 09:45, June 07 2010 UTC

I'm not wrong, I don't offer bum sex unless I'm absolutely sure. --ChiefjusticePS3 21:51, June 7, 2010 (UTC)

On an unrelated note, you haven't blocked me in over a month...am I not special?--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Monday, 10:43, June 07 2010 UTC

I've made some changes

Could you have a look please?--Ohnogodnotagain 13:44, June 6, 2010 (UTC)

Looks better, I'll have a more in-depth look at some point today. --ChiefjusticePS3 07:41, June 7, 2010 (UTC)

Thats good! (please note the complete absence of any trace whatsoever of ferrets, monkfish, large cushions, bags of small silver bells and monkey-wool breeches) Many thanks.--Ohnogodnotagain 21:35, June 7, 2010 (UTC)

Okay, would you mind if I go through and make some minor changes to try and improve the flow of the article? You can revert if you don't like the changes; I would just be trying to fix some grammar and some of the humour problems, and I'll still give you feedback afterwards. Is that alright? --ChiefjusticePS3 21:39, June 7, 2010 (UTC)

Chief, that would be great. If I can see the difference, it will be much easier to see what I'm doing wrong (rather than trying to explain it all). Change away! Thank you --Ohnogodnotagain 07:11, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

WHHHYYYYY

My name is peepee poopenstein and i was born in bavaria like four years ago and i am nopt pleasd with the way that you deleted my article on the MOOOOOOHHHIIIT. for obvious reasons. first, you are a ghay fag. second, your mum. third i raped your babies and had weird children with them and theyre gay and now you cant stop them from having gay sex – Preceding unsigned comment added by 153.107.33.152 (talk • contribs)

Cool beans man. --ChiefjusticePS3 06:53, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

Mohit?

Can you please explain why you decided to delete Mr Mophettos page? He was an honourable man in the late 1970's. And since technology has only recently been at such a standard, nothing prior to today has ever been recorded about this almost God like being. Please replace the page, so that fellow beings can live in awe of Mohit Tug-on-my-python.

I will not restore the page partly because the page looks far too much like vanity and is thus not allowed (see here), partly because the only google hit for the page or the person it concerns is the page you have created here and thirdly because I don't restore pages for people who are impolite or otherwise violate rule number 2, which has been done with the entry above. I hope this is understood. --ChiefjusticePS3 08:20, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

UnSkype has been around since mid-08

Just correcting you on that. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 08:48, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

So I'm told, I'm amending it now. --ChiefjusticePS3 08:53, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

And you missed it. RAHB, Ethine, and myself were all pretty much nude. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 12:49, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

My head hurts

I have been working on a new article with a lot of potential. Unfortunately I think It's starting to sound a lot like another article already on Uncyclopedia. I know you're pretty busy, but if you could take a few minutes to look my article over and leave some notes on how to keep it from sounding like this one, it would be mucho aprreciated.--—John Lydon 12:46, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

I'll take a look at it when I take a look at some other articles this evening. --ChiefjusticePS3 13:08, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

You can disregard the above. I found my mothers stash of Percocets and inspiration has sprung anew. If you find time to look it over that would be awesome, but I think I know what direction to take it in. --—John Lydon 13:13, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

HOLA

I am an ambitious Uncyclopedia noob. When my friend and I discovered that Uncyclopedia was lacking a Miss Teen South Carolina page, we felt there was a hole that needed filling. We reserved a weekend and promptly (or actually rather slowly) set forth contructing her article, like such as. We did a little background check on her, using her legitimate wiki page to discover that she had dropped out of college after her snowboarding course was too difficult and had modeled for the donald. Upon completion of our article, we found that it had been huffed like an orange kitten. The reason was listed as "QA". No lo comprendemos. What does this mean, and how could we improve our article in order to get it de-huffed? We were planning on bluelinking some of it later and adding a picture or two, but i feel like that was not the reason it was huffed. Please assist us noobs, oh wise ChiefJusticeDizzleShizzle! --TheGreatOmNom 18:39, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

Your article was huffed because I felt that it wasn't of the correct structure and I noticed a fair number of formatting errors when I looked it over. In hindsight my decision to delete may have been slightly premature because of a multitude of minor errors I saw when I looked it over. I will restore the page to your userspace and drop a link to it on your talk page. While it is in your userspace it can be edited without fear of deletion or interference. When you are finished you can move it into mainspace, feel free to ask me if you aren't sure how to do so. --ChiefjusticePS3 18:49, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

Gracias por su ayuda, Ud. I will perform cosmetics on my article, and i'm sure a little pee review can't hurt. Thank for being a fair Chief Justice, unlike some of the real ones :/

--TheGreatOmNom 14:08, June 9, 2010 (UTC)

Cautious cow

Chief my good man, how are you? I need some adminly advice. I've rewritten Cow, but now I've decided it would work better under a different title. So what do I do? Do I just move it and leave it as a redirect or do I revert it to its original, IP-crafted state and create a new article for my version? Just wanted to check with you so I don't get shouted at. --Black Flamingo 19:57, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

Evenin', I'm not too bad thanks, yourself? As for the page, moooove away and redirect, make sure nothing is presently redirecting to Cow, if something is simply redirect it to your new title. --ChiefjusticePS3 20:00, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

I'm still truckin'. Whatever that means. Thanks for the help. --Black Flamingo 20:40, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

Earlier today there was a guy who added one of TOAST's articles to QVFD and TOAST himself to BP

This guy to be specific. You deleted TOAST's article, but that's not why I'm here. I'm here because this guy removed the article from QVFD and removed TOAST from ban patrol. It is explicity stated that doing that is strictly against the rules and will get you banned for a very long time. Since Moredildoz will get pissed if I tell the guy not to do this again, can you go and do so? Thanks, Chiefy-boy. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:03, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

I had a word with him about the merits of what he is doing here this morning, I didn't want to fill his page with lectures on how best to be an uncyclopedian, as it is likely to prompt him to leave. I thought that him removing the stuff was simply a recognition of his mistake, I will keep an eye on him and will obviously take action should it happen again. --ChiefjusticePS3 21:09, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

Then at least bow and kiss the tip of my penis. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:11, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

I didn't know it was going to be that kind of party. --ChiefjusticePS3 21:13, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

Well, it said so on the flier. Thanks for bringing the booze by the way. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:15, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

No problem, is there any chinese food around we can reheat and make use of before getting on with the bowing thing?? --ChiefjusticePS3 21:20, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

I think Ethine has some in the fridge. If not, we'll just use Chron. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:22, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

HAPPY BIRTHDAY DAY CHIEFSTER!

You're one year old today! Did you know you were born the same day as Miley Spears? Only Miley came out, looked around, and went back into the womb for another month and a half. I guess she liked it there.

So have a Happy Birthday Party and get some beaver!

King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  16:45, June 9, 2010 (UTC)

Chief dances like he has never danced before. --ChiefjusticePS3 20:15, June 9, 2010 (UTC)

Your birthday is too close to mine. It's barely a month away. You'll have to die.--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Wednesday, 09:31, June 09 2010 UTC

Page

Hey man, why'd you delete my page? It was short(3 sections) but sweet and I think quite a bit humorous for those of us who like that kind of (truthful) humour!! If its cause the construction tag was on, well, it was complete but yeah Im a noob and I dont know how to remove that tag cause I couldnt find it in page's edit anymore. Thanks CoolJeka...aka...your mom n all things asian.

P.S. Yeah Id like it back...perhaps Ill get some time to make it fancier.

Thanks alot!

Help!

Chief, some moron has left a horrible message on Ethene's user page posing as me. I've created a new account. How do I scrub the old one before any more damage is done? --Ohnogodnotagain2 06:52, June 10, 2010 (UTC)

I think you're overreacting. Just tell Ethine that it wasn't you and clear everything up instead of making a whole other account. —Pelozurian (talk) 06:58, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

OK, if someone has gotten onto your account don't create a new account just change the password on the old one. If someone else just signed as you then their IP/Username will be stored in the page history and you can report them if you feel it is necessary. --ChiefjusticePS3 08:04, June 10, 2010 (UTC)

Changed my password on this account and Ethine knows it wasn't me, as does naz. Sorry about creating the new account, wasn't sure what I should do.--Ohnogodnotagain 10:42, June 10, 2010 (UTC)

Question on Peeing Etiquette

I recently found myself looking at an article with absolutely zero redeeming qualities. I know you're not supposed to bash someone when peeing on them, and I usually employ the compliment sandwich method when critizing. But what to do when there is absolutely nothing positive about the article? Bad formatting, grammer, no pictures, totally random and unfunny. Can i just put try again?

Also, happy birthday. Just for the record, I'm not late, you were early. --—John Lydon 12:22, June 10, 2010 (UTC)

Best thing to do is try to be as encouraging as possible. If you think that the article is truly cannot be reviewed then notify myself or UU who can make a final decision on that. If it is just very poor then you need to focus more on ways it could be made better, and try and give the author as much to work with as possible. Look at something like this for the way I try and tackle such articles. Hope this helps. --ChiefjusticePS3 17:45, June 10, 2010 (UTC)

Very helpful thanks. I knew there was a reason I came to you for adoption. Speaking of that, I refuse to get you a father's day present. You may be cool and stuff but your still not my real dad. --—John Lydon 18:04, June 10, 2010 (UTC)

Hmm

Thought you'd want to see this. Also, archive your talk page, dude! --SadisticWolf 15:19, June 10, 2010 (UTC)

Thank you, one must remain modest when faced with such worship. Also I make all my archiving decisions on the advice of the sacred idols and they have informed me that the stars are not in position for archiving. --ChiefjusticePS3 16:18, June 10, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for That

Okay.... Judging by the ban I received I'm guessing you're not happy about the fact you won't be getting a father's day present. I think we can work this out. I'll meet you after school for some ice cream and hip hop music or whatever it is kids do these days. --—John Lydon 18:37, June 10, 2010 (UTC)

Fable 2

I see this was voted for deletion and promptly done. How many votes did this get, and for what? Surely some time to redeem any faults was not that hard to allow? – Preceding unsigned comment added by VanMorgue (talk • contribs)

The VFD mechanism works so that if an article drops to 4 delete votes with nobody stepping in to save it then it is deleted regardless of when it was nominated. If you wished for time to continue to work on your article then the best thing to do is post a comment expressing that. If you wish to see the comments on your article you can find them here. If you wish to have your article back so that you may make improvements then I can put a copy of it in your userspace where you can work on it without fear of deletion, returning the article to mainspace after this would be subject to a Pee review of your article. Let me know how you would like to proceed. --ChiefjusticePS3 21:41, June 10, 2010 (UTC)

Hmmm no I think the article only applied to people who had experienced the game and all that related to it, hence it's demise. I'll leave it at that I think, thanks for your time.

Question

Ok, I rewrote this article, but it's on another persons userspace Here's the link. User:HelloByeBye/Grand Theft Auto: Cartoon City Would that be some form of colonization and it could be moved to my page as my creation, or would it be wasted effort because I'd made major, minor, and quickly reverted edits and the user that originally created the article hasn't been on for months. Can you help or at least answer me? Feel free to contact my talk page

--Gamma287 02:36, June 13, 2010 (UTC)

2nd Question

How would I adopt a noob or get a rank? Tell me please. --Gamma287 03:21, June 13, 2010 (UTC)

OK, if you have written the majority of that article then you can copy and paste it over to your userspace, and then change the other persons page back to how it was before you started writing. In future I would strongly recommend you don't touch articles in other user spaces as they are there to be worked on privately. As for ranks and adopt-a-noob you can find information here and here. Hope this helps. --ChiefjusticePS3 08:03, June 13, 2010 (UTC)

It sorta does. Do you think I should join adopt a noob as a noob because my editing skills are good, and I know most of the editing tricks, but i still don't know all of them.

--Gamma287 18:55, June 13, 2010 (UTC)

It all depends, tends to be safest to ensure you know just about everything in case you pick up a noob that needs a lot of attention, but the decision is yours completely. If you feel confident and meet the other criteria then go ahead. --ChiefjusticePS3 20:18, June 13, 2010 (UTC)

Alright. Thanks for answering.

--Gamma287. Click here for his talk. (Unless you're a vandal.) 04:21, June 14, 2010 (UTC)

Review or Something

Hey. I submitted an article called Only for a True Uncyclopedia Fan and it was tagged as an ICU article. So I completely edited it and made it twice as good, and then removed the tag, which is allowed. 2 minutes later the ICU tag had reappeared. Could you read it and see what's wrong with it or something, or at least tell me how I can find out who placed this tag. Thanks. --Some Idiot 01:55, June 14, 2010 (UTC)

It's in the history...I just put it back because you didn't talk to the ICU'er or an admin. That was Ethine.--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Monday, 01:59, June 14 2010 UTC

Ok. It just said on the ICU page that if you've tried really hard to redo the page then you don't have to get permission. But do i still have to redo it any more? Is the page all right now? --Some Idiot 09:07, June 14, 2010 (UTC)

I would suggest a bit more work as the page is presently pretty short and doesn't have that much content. Try reading HTBFANJS which is excellent for tips on how to increase your article's funny and you can also try submitting your article to Pee review if you want some feedback and criticism on it. --ChiefjusticePS3 09:26, June 14, 2010 (UTC)

Ok, I've started making it a bit longer. Just ONE more question. How do you create a Infobox? I've seen these around so I went into the edit the page option for the page that had one, copied the infobox and pasted it onto my page. It was a Infobox President, surrounded by {{ }}. If I changed the content of the infobox and then saved it, it reverted back to it's original content, so I tried to delete the 'President' category and when i saved THAT no infobox at all appeared. Can you maybe tell me what to do, if you understand what i mean. --Some Idiot 10:09, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

Mornin!

Hi Chief, get chance to look at my article yet? I don't want to start messing with pictures or anything till you have for fear of making it disappear or something.--Ohnogodnotagain 07:01, June 14, 2010 (UTC)

Getting to it, really sorry I haven't managed yet, will definitely take a look today. --ChiefjusticePS3 07:09, June 14, 2010 (UTC)

No hurry, when you have time, I know how busy you are.--Ohnogodnotagain 15:30, June 14, 2010 (UTC)

I Stand Corrected

How do you DO that? Delighted! Off to finish it, get back to you then. Thank youoooooooooo!--Ohnogodnotagain 06:14, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

Vacations Over

So it's been about a week since I've approached you with a stupid N00b question. Well, I thought of one. How do I find out how many edits I've done? --—John Lydon 13:43, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

Follow yonder magic link thing and ye shall soon arrive upon the shores of Wikia, thar ye must make yer scrawl in the box, and we be checkin' the pirate roster fer yer name and pillagin records.... Hope this helps. --ChiefjusticePS3 15:06, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

Peed off

I've been waiting 5 weeks for this pee review to be done, the first (and almost certainly last) one for any of my articles. Considering the delay, would it be against the rules to review it myself? English peasant 21:31, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

Yes it would. I'll get on it in the next couple of days for you. I give you my word as a gentleman. --ChiefjusticePS3 21:38, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, it would. I wanted to do that last month, but I know nothing about Brooker. (Edit conflict)--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Wednesday, 09:40, June 16 2010 UTC

That's what I said, except less helpful.... and more gay. --ChiefjusticePS3 21:47, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

It's also what I said before you EC'd me. Jerk.

On a related note, Chief is going to do two reviews in a single month? /me waits for the world to explode --Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Wednesday, 09:50, June 16 2010 UTC

Let me tell you young whippersnapper, I was reviewin' on this site while you was still a glint in your mother's eye, so gerroff my land and go do a review. --ChiefjusticePS3 21:54, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

Didn't you see my userpage? (Actually, my vacation is ending today...)--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Thursday, 01:03, June 17 2010 UTC

I saw that glint in his mother's eye, and jumped right on it. And that was just last night! Aleister 1:22 7 6 MMX

Lost Work

Hey mate,

My browser just crashed and completely lost my work from this evening. I previewed it several times, is there any way of getting it back? English peasant 23:39, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

Didn't you see Chief's header on this page, "Chief's domain of death"? Your mistake was not taking it literally! Aleister 1:24 17 6 MMX

I'm afraid if you hadn't saved the page and you experienced a browser crash there is nothing you can do. As when you preview stuff it doesn't save, but simply displays how it will look on the page. It happens to everyone at some point, I lost an entire review once, that I spent 3 hours writing. My advice is to do what I do: if you are working on a big piece of work, periodically copy it into a word processor and save, that way you retain a copy even if your computer shuts itself down for giggles. --ChiefjusticePS3 08:06, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

Or just accept that the universe didn't want your work to exist and destroyed it in a Final Destination style, before continuing to delete the rest of your contributions. Soon it will be as though you never existed at all... -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

Exactly , I mean what are the chances of- Chief trips and impales himself on a picket fence, and is then killed by ice falling from an aeroplane. --ChiefjusticePS3 11:13, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

Total Chaos!

Not really, but I did notice this. I'm having trouble reviewing it because it doesn't seem to exist any longer. I figured I could handle remedy the situation by leaving a message on the authors talk page but alas, the author doesn't seem to exist either. Did I miss the rapture or something? Anyways, Is there a way to take it off the list? --—John Lydon 12:19, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

The user had linked it incorrectly, I have fixed the link now. The user should exist, if you are having trouble linking through the signature then the page history should provide an easy link to both the user and talk pages. Hope this helps. --ChiefjusticePS3 12:24, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

Wow! You're like a wizard or something! Not even 5 minutes after I ask for something, it has become so. I want a pony! Make with your magic! --—John Lydon 12:28, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

Annoying Orange

I was on vacation at the time and had no acess to a computer, can you please send it to my user space? This'll probaly be the last time I'll use the construction tag.--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 00:03, June 18, 2010 (UTC)

There you go. --ChiefjusticePS3 07:31, June 18, 2010 (UTC)

Gee thanks--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 16:17, June 18, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the vote, chief!

THANK YOU for voting on Hello there! I'm a kite, and I will ruin your day! You are the BEST! I will kill you. What? I didn't say anything.User:Mrthejazz/sig 02:20, June 18, 2010 (UTC)

Most humble Apologies

For abruptly dropping out of IRC yesterday. My computer hiccupped and then I got distracted by something shiny --—John Lydon 11:33, June 18, 2010 (UTC)

No problems. I only wept for a few hours. --ChiefjusticePS3 17:57, June 18, 2010 (UTC)

Lulz.

U mad? U mad cuz im stylin' on u? MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 18:06, June 18, 2010 (UTC)

It was fucking annoying or something. --ChiefjusticePS3 18:07, June 18, 2010 (UTC)

Happy Now?

I did this review on time without delaying, not finishing it on time without giving a reason why, or asking for another day. Am I off the hook now, or that just means that you won't post any death ban threats against me for a while? Besides, I'm a changed reviewer nowadays--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 05:19, June 19, 2010 (UTC)

That should be the general norm, best way to avoid bans in future is not to do it again. --ChiefjusticePS3 07:29, June 19, 2010 (UTC)

I'm sorry

I can't believe I dropped doing a review I booked and I'm sorry. I don't even have a decent excuse--things came up and I simply forgot about it.

On a related note, my time here right now is going to be rather limited. My life is undergoing some major changes, but not all bad. Among them is a chance to work on a book with a collaborator or two. That actually already started, which is why my writing here dropped off.

I will try, however, to never again book a review and then not do it. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  17:46, June 19, 2010 (UTC)

Not a problem, just to let you know that it had escaped your notice. Good luck with real-life stuff, I'm told it's important. --ChiefjusticePS3 18:07, June 19, 2010 (UTC)

HELP

uhh a page was huffed on grueslayer and as a n00b I dont know what to do

link!!!!: [http://en.uncyclopedia.co/w/index.php?title=Game:Grueslayer/ch2/leaveoffice_nd_withmemwaste&action=edit&redlink=1 ] previous functional page of grue slayer:[1] date: 6/19/10

Try and be a bit more coherent as to the issue, the two pages there have no history of deletion, so it isn't much help to me. What exactly are you wanting me to do to help? --ChiefjusticePS3 21:43, June 19, 2010 (UTC)

as annoying as this sounds I played through that game for a good while and well... running into a page saying it doesn't exist is a litle irritating and I don't know what to do... to help others I posted apage saying an admin has been contacted... thats all Im capable of perhaps contacting the grueslayer game creator will help now I just need to figure out who that is...

it may have been put on VFD by a user who found it annoying. Ive seen alot of games on VFD one time so that mbe what happened. And it apears the link doesnt work so you might need to find another one--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 22:07, June 19, 2010 (UTC)

It seems to me that the game is still incomplete as many of our games are, unfortunately you will have to wait until the rest of the game is completed by another user. As I said before there is no delete history for the page so it strikes me as simply being incomplete. I apologise that you have run into a problem playing the game, but unfortunately this does happen sometimes. a further option, since you seem acquainted with what is going on, is to complete it yourself, nobody owns articles or game pages so if you want to have a go at completing the game you are welcome to do so. --ChiefjusticePS3 22:10, June 19, 2010 (UTC)

Mafia review

Cheers for the review.. very in-depth. The main problem with that article is that there are so many equally valid and funny approaches to it; it's also something which has been done oh so many times before. I'm guessing it's probably one of the toughest articles out there, as it easily turns cliche'. Thanks again for your input, I'll see where I can take the darn thing. Godspeed. --SonOfPhyllis 16:06, June 20, 2010 (UTC)

Happy to help, I do appreciate the difficulty in sorting everything out into a coherent piece of work, so the very best of luck. Remember that if you do get stuck with it other users are there to help you out. Just ask. --ChiefjusticePS3 16:18, June 20, 2010 (UTC)

Secularism

sorry the article wasn't up to scratch, i was just working on it, didn't know about the 'construction' feature. can i have another go? or do you have the the article and i will just stick on my blogs as something funny YMMV, and i will get out of here. two days of trying to reg an account with an 'ajax' error, no wonder you huffed me, anyway peace.

Dava

If you want to carry on working on the article I can restore it to your user space where you can work on it for as long as you like without fear of it being deleted. Just give me a shout if that is what you want to do. --ChiefjusticePS3 07:38, June 21, 2010 (UTC)

that would be cool of you thank you :) Dava4444 16:20, June 21, 2010 (UTC)

Pee Review Award

I have done 25 in-depth reviews, the required amount to get an award. So can I have it now so my contribution to pee review isn't gone without appreciation (although the fact that helping a user out is just as good as any award, but still).--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 04:05, June 21, 2010 (UTC)

As I have said countless times... well 3, the award requires over 25 in-depth reviews, so as soon as your 26th in-depth review wings its way onto the list the award will be yours. --ChiefjusticePS3 07:35, June 21, 2010 (UTC)

Oh, seriously? I didn't it like that. Pretty sneaky--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 15:57, June 21, 2010 (UTC)

Mind checking something for me?

I think this is actually recreated crap. Either way, I tagged it with an ICU, but you may wanna just go ahead and huff it if it turns out just to be the same crap that was VFD'd in December. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 09:59, June 21, 2010 (UTC)

An excellent spot, you do have your uses it would seem.... Now back down the mine with you. --ChiefjusticePS3 10:19, June 21, 2010 (UTC)

NO! I am not provided with the adequate oxygen apparatus needed for working in such mine per the United Mine Workers! I'll be seeing you in court before I go back in that mine!! MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 10:24, June 21, 2010 (UTC)

Hey! I saw that first! I just forgot while I was doing a review. So, I wasn't helpful because I was being helpful.--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Monday, 04:55, June 21 2010 UTC

Can you do me a solid?

Yeah, I just went 1930's gangster speech on you. Once your head stops spinning from that totally awesome thing that just happened, can you take a peak at this? I really think it's VFH worthy but I'm biased. I just figured you would be able to offer some suggestions on how to make it VFH worthy. Also, is there a way to get an article nommed without completely whoring myself out. I did that for years before I found Uncyclopedia and I really don't want to fall back into it. Thanks --—John Lydon 13:44, June 21, 2010 (UTC)

I've had a look, my main recommendation would be that you clean-up a bit of the excess profanity as a lot of time it doesn't fit. I would also try and encourage a more coherent series of events leading to the end of the article, since this is a guide I would encourage a less obvious idea than "get a lifeboat" since we have already established that that is unlikely to happen. Those are some of my more general impressions from the article. As for getting it to pass VFH, that's a difficult one, I'd say use the advice you have been given as much as you possibly can, and then, if you are happy the article is as you want it, then you can nominate it on VFH, link any reviews you received. The worst that can happen is that people vote against and if they do, ask them why, then, if it fails, re-nominate at some point in the future. Good luck. --ChiefjusticePS3 15:50, June 21, 2010 (UTC)

Um, is this valid?

This review here was done by an Ip user. Is that legal?--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 16:05, June 21, 2010 (UTC)

Yep, it isn't brilliant, but it is permitted. --ChiefjusticePS3 16:08, June 21, 2010 (UTC)

n00b Help

Me and my friends are sickipedia n00bs, and we created the article Harvington. Unfortunatly, the article we created was deemed offensive by someone from Harvington who stumbled upon it and now we are in deep shit. Is there anything we can do to remove it from easy public finding/delete it? Thanks :)

The first thing not to do is repeatedly blank and remove content from the article as it will just get you blocked, nobody owns any articles here. If you wish to get rid of the article then you are very much at the mercy of the community; the only way that the article can be removed is via the VFD process. If you wish to nominate the article for that then I strongly recommend that you read the guidelines you will find on the page I have linked you to above. --ChiefjusticePS3 19:43, June 21, 2010 (UTC)

Cheers :)

No problem --ChiefjusticePS3 19:48, June 21, 2010 (UTC)

Danke

Thanks for reading, considering and voting on my article for FA, HowTo:Be Reverend Zim ulator. Gay joke? Maybe. Gayest joke ever? Certainly not, otherwise it would be feature-worthy on that merit alone. I'm surprised and amused at the little stir about this article at all, considering how stupid it is. Cheers! Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 22:00, June 21, 2010 (UTC)

Do not count last review as in-depth

The review Queen Jane Approximately got a complaint on my talk page by the writer Iron Lung about not being helpful at all, and though I tried to be helpful, afte looking at the review I agreed with him, so please considered that not in-depth. I apologize for it--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 23:34, June 21, 2010 (UTC)

Also, mind reviewing this? Haven't ask you to review any of my stuff for a while, and I think I rather have a professional review this article.--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 02:07, June 22, 2010 (UTC)

What the actual F, Cheif?

Why can't I mary your whore of a sister? I mean I don't want to, but the offer would be nice.    Orian57    Talk   08:30 22 June 2010

No you can't. I have a brother though and, once the kidnapping charge is dropped, he is all yours. --ChiefjusticePS3 08:33, June 22, 2010 (UTC)

Oh my god! I've always wanted a brother! You're the best Daddy ever! :D    Orian57    Talk   08:35 22 June 2010

This

John Lydon has been watching you and noticed you voted for Stalker to be Featured. Now he doesn't have to kill you.

In case you didn't the sentence in the last section

Mind reviewing this? Haven't ask you to review any of my stuff for a while, and I think I rather have a professional review this article.--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 14:26, June 22, 2010 (UTC)

Userspacify?

Nice userpage trick.

I'd left a redirect to something you "Huffed" (redirected-to-from) University of Edinburgh, Neuroscience building.

I can haz userified as example of what not to write? I'll keep the PhD students below the crease? Mmm'kay? — Rt Hon. LRC (non-MSP) / Humbug! 17:27, June 22, 2010 (UTC)

Moved it to your userspace, you can find it here. --ChiefjusticePS3 17:34, June 22, 2010 (UTC)

Yo

I removed Possession from the Pee list as it has already been featured.--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 03:24, June 23, 2010 (UTC)

It should have been removed because it was a redirect...--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Wednesday, 04:03, June 23 2010 UTC

I promise not to book a review while currently reviewing antoher

But only if you remember to sign your post next time.--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 08:29, June 23, 2010 (UTC)

Question

Do we review articles that are submitted by IP's? I have no problem doing it, just wanted to make sure that it won't violate the laws set forth in the Geneva Convention or anything. --—John Lydon 14:19, June 23, 2010 (UTC)

If they are reasonable then there isn't a problem with it. I'll remove any articles that cannot be reviewed from the queue. --ChiefjusticePS3 14:21, June 23, 2010 (UTC)

i feel rejected

You havent gave me a good ban lately. I feel so rejected. You should be ashamed of yourself--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 23:52, June 23, 2010 (UTC)

By the way, why don't we have anything that tells people how to clean up an article. I've looked and there's nothing--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 23:56, June 23, 2010 (UTC)

The UnSignpost Is Not Dead!

The Uncyclopedia UnSignpost

The Newspaper That Wonders What Happened To You. You Used To Be Cool.

Jun 24th, 2010 • Issue 86 • Oh yeah, the UnSignpost, I remember that...

Conservation Week Approaches By UU Fancy watering Uncyclopedia's forestry? Want to be a good conservationist? Fancy taking up the rewriting sword of justice, and righteously smiting the dragon of shit writing? Actually, the hell with that, do you want to take a bunch of bad articles, and make them suck less? Then you, my friend, are in luck! Conservation Week 2010 starts on July 5th, and actively encourages users to scour the wiki (perhaps through judicious use of Special:Random, or possibly through exploration of Category:Rewrite or Category:Ideas or even Special:Lonelypages), find lame articles that they consider are taking up the very space which could be occupied by something less sucky, and then using their skill and judgement to turn those articles into shining examples of comedic writing. As this is a competition dedicated to simultaneously reducing the number of useless articles on the wiki and increasing the number of good ones, some naysayers believe it to be completely pointless - Uncyclopedia is the worst, they say, and no amount of well-intentioned competitions can change that. But were it to exist, the Cabal would probably beg to differ. They may call it something like "a genuinely good thing", and "a ray of hope, signalling that occasionally, even the most worthless dreck may be redeemed". So if you think what your userpage is missing is a template called the "Greasy Mechanic Award", then prepare to rewrite like you've never re-written before. Just don't forget to make your new version better than the original. Something summarizing the events of the last month or so By PuppyOnTheRadio It has been said by one of our esteemed administrators here at UnSignpost that if it wasn't reported in the UnSignpost, then it didn't happen. As there has been no UnSignpost produced for the last few days, due to one of the editors having a real life, and another one being lazy, there are several things that didn't happen. Yes, the loss of the UnSignpost for so long sent a shiver down the spines of many an Uncyclopedian. So much so that one member of the community decided that it was timely to look at a new way to produce the UnSignpost. One such idea was to release a monthly periodical in the place of USP. Although there has been several attempts by this reporter to obtain a quote from said insurrectional community member, to date no response has been heard. As part of the ongoing struggle to maintain our independent stance from Wikia, several members decided that it would be a wise idea to create a way to cash in on the popularity of the site. As such the UnShoppe has been created, where you may purchase any one of a number of Uncyclopedia-related pieces of merchandise. So far all purchases have been made by the individuals who created the store. However, if you are looking for the place to buy a shirt that shows that your nipples have been featured, that a wizard did something, whatever it was, and that you have an in-depth knowledge of who Dan Kwon is. There was a competition. Congratulations go to mrthejazz, who got the pun. Imperial Colonisation has taken a brief hiatus after the new head of IC became the old head of IC. He was an Australian, and his example has inspired the entire nation so much that the new head of Parliament for the country is now the old head of parliament. Congratulations go out to the new new head of IC. A strange bandwagon has been created by a drunken Bonner, who has challenged all and sundry to ask him anything at all. As such there are various forums dedicated to asking regular Uncyclopedian members things. These previously were known as user talk pages, but who can stand in the way of progress? And that's all that didn't happen. Although now it's listed in UnSignpost that means it actually did happen. Which suggests that by editing UnSignpost I have the power to change the past. If I could change anything about the past, what would it be? I had sex with a real person!

Check out these pages! Modusoperandipedia? Fuck... Uncle Dex needs ideas for business cards Wait, we seriously have a store now?! From our logs: 06:22, 23 June 2010 Mordillo (Talk | contribs) blocked 153.107.33.152 (Talk) with an expiry time of 1 month ‎ (and you are the living proof that school kids are idiots) 00:12, 23 June 2010 Dr. Skullthumper (Talk | contribs) blocked LRC (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 1 day ‎ (The purpose of redirects is to redirect someone to a page that is related to the original page, not separated by six degrees of bullshit logic. Try again.) 09:52, 21 June 2010 ChiefjusticeDS (Talk | contribs) blocked 153.107.33.158 (Talk) with an expiry time of 1 week ‎ (Back after your last block and still loving the penis, have a bit longer to think about that) 15:02, June 17, 2010 Under user (Talk | contribs) blocked ChiefjusticeDS (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 243 seconds (I hear the UnSignpost may be returning, so I'd better make sure I put up at least one decent ban this week so I can get in it!) 05:38, June 17, 2010 PantsMacKenzie (Talk | contribs) blocked 76.109.125.137 (Talk) with an expiry time of a million years ‎ (multiple vandalizations of keitei) Old-School Featured Article of the Week UnMysteries:J'accuse Thank you all for meeting me in the Accusing Parlor tonight. If you're wondering what "j'accuse" means, and why I ran screaming it through the whole house, it means "I accuse" in French, and it's what people say when they accuse people of murder. I trust you know why we're all here. After I was mysteriously invited to this party, and after people started mysteriously dying, I decided to put my internet degrees in Criminology, and Criminography, to good use. But to accuse people of homicide, I have to start at the beginning. International Sporting Tournament of the Week The Swedish Orienteering And Firing A Rat From A Cannon Championships. The World Cup? What's that? Missed anniversary of the week Some time in the last month or so, the UnSignpost completely failed to celebrate its second anniversary. Hey ho. Two years of missed deadlines, desperate filler boxes, flimsy biopics, hand-deliveries and pale imitations of journalism - is it even worth mentioning? Probably not. Reason to leave Uncyclopedia #347 The standard of desperate filler boxes in the UnSignpost remains as low as ever. Oh look - a monkey!

UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox

A new UnSignpost issue, another template spammed onto your talkpage, enjoy! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:02, 24 June 2010

Check

The Pee table needs its daily checking. Don't want to wait too long or else I'll be a long day for you.--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 07:13, June 25, 2010 (UTC)

Daily checking?? You have gotten far too used to people being efficient. Back in the day it used to be that the table wouldn't get checked for weeks then it would get done in one big checking spree. I'll get to it, worry about doing everything that you need to do and far less about what I'm doing. --ChiefjusticePS3 14:57, June 25, 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, I'm so use to seeing it get check like all the time.--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 16:06, June 25, 2010 (UTC)

Um Chief

The article you just deleted. It only had a score of 2. Things only get deleted from 4 and onwards. I'm a bit confused now. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:18, 25 June 2010

It had been on VFD for a week, I tend to delete depending on score after a week; my logic being that if it hasn't gone over 4 by then it isn't likely to do so in the near future. I hope that clears things up. --ChiefjusticePS3 16:26, June 25, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, um. If an article is that long at VFD without getting a score of 4, an admin is supposed to put Closed nomination on the article title and a poopsmith can then archive it. That's how it's been done for the last couple years at least. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:32, 25 June 2010

Well I figure that is very much flying in the face of any consensus on the article, personally I'm not convinced of it. What I did with that article has been my practice on VFD the last couple of months since I started deleting and keeping stuff; I keep if the vote goes towards keep after a week and delete if it goes towards delete. Obviously if there are only a couple of votes on the article overall I will keep, but in the case of that article a reasonably large number of users had voted on it. --ChiefjusticePS3 16:41, June 25, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, but I'd call two votes more hardly a majority. It feels really inappropriate to delete something that quite a couple people have voted to keep without a clear majority. That's why the 4 margin was established. I really don't quite get why you want things differently. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:10, 25 June 2010

Well I wouldn't really see keeping the article as fair when the majority of people have not voted that way. It feels very inappropriate to ignore the majority decision simply because the margin isn't big enough. In the case of that article 2 votes is simply a small majority, common sense suggests that deletion is favoured by the vote, if only by a little, 5 people thought the article should be deleted and 3 did not, I see no reason to favour those 3. That's my reasoning. If you feel the decision was very unfair or if that goes against policy drastically I would invite you to run it past a more experienced administrator, who may restore the article should they feel it necessary. --ChiefjusticePS3 17:20, June 25, 2010 (UTC)

One might say that, but it's not just about respecting the vote's result. I think deleting a not-too-terrible article is worse than keeping a not-that-funny article. Moreover, besides the votes, what's really important are the reasons behind the votes. If some people don't like the article and vote delete, but a couple other people contemplate the article in a more serious way and decide that it just needs a bit of a rewrite, then should the article really be deleted just because there's 1 or 2 more delete voters? What bothers me the most about this, however, is that such a big change has been made to the conditions of keeping an article, while most if not all of the voters are completely unaware of that change. Some voters might be more reluctant to vote delete, knowing that just 2 votes can delete an article. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:38, 25 June 2010

The point is that is simply the way I have chosen to deal with articles that have spent a week on VFD. It is incorrect to say that 2 votes will delete an article, a difference of two can have that capacity should a week elapse since the article was nominated but I feel that 4 or more people should have voted delete before that becomes the eventuality. In this case 5 people voted delete and while the keep voters may have possibly put more thought into their vote it does not, in my view, increase the value of that vote. It is hardly a big change to voting rules anyway, the rule that I can find is simply "An admin will delete the page if a consensus for deletion is reached". --ChiefjusticePS3 17:54, June 25, 2010 (UTC)

It is a big change, because voters have up until now thought an article would only get deleted with a 4 vote majority. That's what has been the rule up until now, that's when a consensus was considered to be reached. Going from 4 to 1 is a huge change. I'm not saying you're not allowed to decide to change the conditions of when a consensus is considered to be reached, but don't you agree the voters should know if such a change has been made? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:17, 25 June 2010

As a voter on VFD I always thought it was five or so, and even then the five only held if the article wasn't being worked on and rewritten. I don't know which page was taken off, but three for votes usually keep a page in my experience esp. if some of he people had rewritten or edited the page in the meantime. I thought that one of the reasons for VFD was to present pages so others could work on them during the time the page was being voted on, and thus save it. Aleister 18:23 6 MMX

I'll think about the suggestion that Socky made and, I'll have a word with some other administrators and see what they think. I understand what you are saying and would rather base any sort of change on a mutual agreement and not simply on what I have decided; I completely agree that it should happen only with voter notification. Thanks for letting me know about the previous arrangement, I was unaware that the previous arrangement was to keep unless the article was at +4. --ChiefjusticePS3 18:28, June 25, 2010 (UTC)

Oh, the breakfast war page, I should have voted delete and shot it through the head. I think the 4 or 5 was only solid if the page wasn't worked on by some of the "keepers", because often a person will vote early in the process and then not come back to see if the page has improved or not. Oftentimes it has, so the earlier vote is often practically a vote for a different page. That's the one and only reason I kicked up a fuss when I saw the format change on voting, that mere numbers very often don't tell the story of the page's progression on VFD. Let this be a learning experience for all of us (and psssstt, kill the breakfast page as soon as you can, it sucks syrup) Al 18:50 25 6 MMX

Insane Men

Okay, how do i make Insane Men more coherent? Because I don't think it should be coherent as it's about insanity. (for example: the Insanity page isn't coherent so why should mine be?) Psychotic Spartan 18:45, June 25, 2010 (UTC)

The main issue is that the insanity article is a one off joke, whereas yours sounds like it could be an easily developed concept. My recommendation would be that you read HTBFANJS carefully and consider submitting the article to Pee Review for a more in-depth look at your article. Let me know if there is a problem with the above. --ChiefjusticePS3 18:49, June 25, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah how do I submit for a Pee Review? Psychotic Spartan 18:55, June 25, 2010 (UTC)

Go here and scroll to the bottom, enter the article title in the box and follow any instructions you are given. --ChiefjusticePS3 19:00, June 25, 2010 (UTC)