This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read.
Claude Monet's love for capitalism was visible in his many impressionnist paintings. "Pont du Trolley (Bridge with Sunken Shopping Carts)," one of his most famous works, is an homage to modern consumerism.
If this were original, it'd be a for. But considering the template on the image page admits it is swiped from elsewhere, it's not eligible. --UU - natter10:47, Jun 7
Is it not? Aw, dang. Well, my bad. --Zig 13:56, June 7, 2010 (UTC)
Against. As the author states (albeit not overly clearly) the base image is unoriginal, the author only added text. The text the author did add is not that funny, and 90% of the text is unreadable except at full resolution, where it's just barely readable. --Mn-z 00:40, March 8, 2010 (UTC)
I can haz POSSIBLE invalid nom this image is only a captioning, so it may or may not be an invalid nomination. --Mn-z 00:40, March 8, 2010 (UTC)
So, the picture isn't original but the text is? I don't have a problem with that. Granted, I do love lolcats. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 07:51, March 10, 2010 (UTC)
Greets me with little or no humour. --nldr 13:17, March 11, 2010 (UTC)
Technically sound, but doesn't vibrate the humor chords. •••Necropaxx(T){~}Friday, 00:42, Mar 12 2010
Against. Yeah, as with the others really, it's just not really funny as a stand-alone image. Plus, while it's integrated well enough, no outlines, and a good match, it's a photo on a painting, which always jars with me, somehow. --UU - natter12:06, Mar 12
GEEEEEEEEEEEEOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGEEEEEEEEEEEEE BUSH! --Roman Dog Bird 20:41, March 12, 2010 (UTC)
Against. not badly done, but its not funny. Also, Bush isn't president anymore. --Mn-z 03:57, March 13, 2010 (UTC)
Against. This could be worth something when used in the correct context, no satirical value on its own. RiftingContribs ... dont fall in....Complain - LOB 15:58, March 13, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
I'm torn. It's really good work, but it just doesn't provoke any laughter. So here I'll be until I can make up my mind. -OptyCSucks! CUN00:45, 12 Mar
The way I see it, it's yet another twist on a Michelangelo painting BUT, this time, it's got GEORGE BUSH!! I think it works in it's intended environment, but on it's own it's like a kosher car park in Tehran. --nldr 01:47, March 12, 2010 (UTC)
Uncharacteristic for. Got a giggle and I think it would be pretty appropriate for the front page. No testament to its originality or necessary skill level, but...well...sentence. -RAHB 09:36, March 15, 2010 (UTC)
Against. - Zombiebaron, the symbol of Uncyclopedia's historic benchmark of how we've entered our Post-Famine depression, hubris and ennui.--Sycamore(Talk) 11:59, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Why are there so many songs about rainbows, and what's on the other side? --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 02:21, February 6, 2010 (UTC)
Delete, I mean, Feature! The sweep of the lines, the vibrating bow tie, the way the words run outside the dialogue balloon, this work of art can only do Uncy proud if it appears on the front page. Six thumbs up! Al sans chains 2:07 10 4 mmx
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha look i am laughing ah ha ha ha ha ha ha, dull --nldr 12:52, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
Resentful Against I spent hours on my iPad image, this shit doesn't deserve the light of day if mine doesn't. --SirSF13(Talk)GUNWotMRotMFBotMVFHSKMaj.ΥΣΣ20:58 EST 11 April, 2010
Against. I mean, c'mon! The picture is great, but it's a GIF. A GIF! SirModusoperandiBoinc! 04:01, April 12, 2010 (UTC)
Against. It's no Stalinbear. --UU - natter13:32, Apr 12
Against. The right arm is way longer than the left. This is unacceptable. Ellemonopy 00:18, April 13, 2010 (UTC)
Against. per Modus. We should not have featured non-animated .GIF files. Do you realize how much color information was lost by that format? In the future, you should upload in .PNG format. --Mn-z 15:08, April 15, 2010 (UTC)
Against.How many 5 seconds did that take? You should have typeed the text first --User:Micro Bit/sig
Against. Per UU. --ChiefjusticePS2 22:40, April 25, 2010 (UTC)
The world was treated by Steve Jobs on the 27th of January to the next generation of iProducts: the world's most technologically sophisticated maxipad.
For: Why not, it took me forever to do this in MS Paint, perhaps I should be rewarded for the work...--SirSkinfan13Talk{< CUNRotMFBotMVFHΥΣΣMaj.SK>}20:35 EST 8 Feb 2010
Against. Good idea. Bad job. Maybe you should, y'know, pay someone better than you at MS Paint next time? 70.243.154.177 02:41, February 25, 2010 (UTC)
Meh Here we are a month after the nomination, and the joke's already stale. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 04:25, March 7, 2010 (UTC)
Against. Joke was done to death the day it came out. For Paint, it's a good job, but this joke got really old really fast. --UU - natter12:01, Mar 12
Comment. I like it, but the pad looks a little too bright to me and the edges of the pad don't blend into the box--it looks like the pad is floating in front of the box. If it were a little less bright and blended in a little more, I'd probably vote for. King of the InternetAlden Loveshade???(royal court) 18:59, April 8, 2010 (UTC)
whos that guy who cares --Roman Dog Bird 23:17, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
Against. per above. --Mn-z 04:50, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
Against.. I know him, personally, but wouldn't expect many across the pond to - but that aside, this just doesn't work as a gag --Asahatter (annoy) 23:21, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
These are the voyages of the USS Sophia, her continuing mission, to write strange new humor, to seek out new insults and tomfoolery, to boldly joke about about things no one has joked about before.
Against. The blurb is a better idea than the 'chop, which isn't all that spacey. A ship shaped like a potato, maybe? A potato shaped, Startrekified logo? Or Wilde with a phaser and Sophia with a tricorder? SirModusoperandiBoinc! 02:11, May 8, 2010 (UTC)
Against Just isn't that funny. -Vcelloho 02:17, May 9, 2010 (UTC)
Against. per Modus, and my policy of almost always voting against anything that could be done in MSPaint. --Mn-z 03:50, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
I don't get it. —Pelozurian (talk) 03:53, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
I smiled. A good breaking of the fourth wall. I like the looks on their faces as they stare out at me. I want to have a threesome with them. Aleister sans chains 1:06 12 5 MMX
Against. I've done what I can to make this a little more bearable, but it still fails. Also I have significant doubts about originality. Nominally Humane!some timeFriday, 04:47, May 28 2010 UTC
SelfNom+For. I just recalled my only featured image being that of a nice chap who listens to the name Muhammad savoring the taste of one fine sausage. I also recall a couple of people telling me that this one image I'm talking about was not of sufficient quality to warrant a feature. Hopefully, those people won't be disappointed by this image. If you happen to come up with a funnier caption, please replace the current one. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM17:14, 11 May 2010
For. This was used in Bruce Wayne, and was a key illustration there. Nice pic. Al sans chains 1:01 12 5 MMX
Against Votes: 6
Against. Kinda edited poorly. The head looks raised over the body, and the light difference doesn't help either. --Wilytank 13:47, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
Against. per above. --Mn-z 03:49, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
Against. Not funny. Works for the article, but on its own, it's nothing. --UU - natter15:34, Jun 4
Keeping in mind how some people idolize fictional superheroes which are emotionally unstable, clinically crazy and worse, I find it a lot more hilarious than "nothing". Of course, I'd need a good caption actually referencing that fact to put it into the appropriate context, instead of the current one provided by Aleister. Well, that's my opinion anyway. Sorry if I sounded like a total jerk just now. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM21:35, 5 June 2010
Which is how you see it, and why you voted the way you did. But for me, it lacks humour value outsode of the article, like a lot of images on this site. Merely slapping a straitjacket on Batman does not make fot an inherently funny image, to me, which is why I voted the way I did. Mind you, the comment "it's nothing" does, on reflection, sound a lot more insulting than I meant it to, so how about "on its own, it's a picture of Batman in a straitjacket, which doesn't make me laugh"? --UU - natter18:28, Jun 6
Well, okay. Though a lot of the featured images are not inherently funny, and instead rely on an appropriate caption. The current caption doesn't achieve that because it doesn't reference any aspect of Batman at all. The previous caption did refer to Batman, but it definitely wasn't that good either. I'm basically just a bit disappointed thinking that there could be a lot more for votes if I could just come up with a nice appropriate caption. You're free to vote whatever way you choose, of course. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM19:13, 6 June 2010
Personally, I've seen and even voted for images that I did not think were funny. In fact most of the images I voted for I didn't find funny without a clever caption--I rarely find a picture funny by itself. But I voted for ones where I found the image and caption combined to be funny. King of the InternetAlden Loveshade???(royal court) 01:43, June 7, 2010 (UTC)
"I will pay someone to scratch my balls! I will pay! Someone, please, scratch my balls!" --Roman Dog Bird 20:25, June 7, 2010 (UTC)
Against. I actually found this funny... but along the lines of poorly edited... *shakes head* Head's just plain too big, especially for a man of Mr. Wayne's musculature. *shifty eyes* - Athyria 03:47, June 8, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Comment. I agree the lighting is different on the head than the outfit, but hey, this is a comic book character and I think in that context it works for emphasis. And it could actually be sunlight at an relatively horizontal level coming through a very small secured window. I've seen effects like that in real photos. (I plan to vote for when there's a caption I like). King of the InternetAlden Loveshade???(royal court) 05:54, May 14, 2010 (UTC)
Against. It's not even actually called that... Nobody would laugh without a caption.--SirHELPMETalk(more? --> CUNROTMNOTMPlebUSSPeesSK)On Saturday, 10:21, June 19 2010 UTC
Against. Just stupid. Loneshark8301990 20:47, June 19, 2010 (UTC)
For America Damnit! I'm not sure what kind of world it is where a fat kid is no longer funny, but that's not where I wanna live. USA! USA! --—John Lydon 15:03, June 15, 2010 (UTC)
Please read the against votes Mr. Rotten. Dear God, has this really been up for over a month? Can we just get rid of this section? --Roman Dog Bird 00:30, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
half a for because the idea and exectution are both passable if not inspired - jack mort |cunt| talk - 23:52, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
Against Votes: 8
against per my policy of disliking vorarephilia except when it intersects with maiesiophilia. --Mn-z 05:39, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
0.8 against partly because I hate fractions. ,':-(sirCh00_Bakka)-:', 0000, Frankuary 3, year 29.
Old Family Guy thing. --Roman Dog Bird 07:11, May 6, 2010 (UTC)
Bad 'chop and not really giggle-worthy Nominally Humane!some timeFriday, 04:52, May 28 2010 UTC
Against. Not an original idea, and badly executed. --UU - natter15:36, Jun 4
Against. This is an old Family Guy thing, and it really isn't a good 'chop. Plus, it's not really all that funny.--SirHELPMETalk(more? --> CUNROTMNOTMPlebUSSPeesSK)On Thursday, 06:29, June 17 2010 UTC
Invalid nom. Not original. Saberwolf116 01:25, July 3, 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, and it sucks too. --Roman Dog Bird 23:04, July 3, 2010 (UTC)
Um. Yeah. Going by the metadata, this chop was made "10:29, August 30, 2007". Since PeregrineFalcon999 didn't join Uncyc until 2010, I'm going to go with "not original", unless somebody sways me with icecream. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 07:10, July 4, 2010 (UTC)
Oh it's definitely not original - this is from Failblog. --UU - natter09:03, Jul 5
I would have, except for one small detail: I really, really couldn't be arsed. I would have thought my utterly authoritative knowledge of everything ever would have been sufficient proof, frankly. --UU - natter09:58, Jul 5
Except that you're the third person on this page who wasn't helpful at all. Being useless is my job! *Harump!*SirModusoperandiBoinc! 10:03, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
Self-Nomfo Well, I wanted this to be nommed after the article was done, but it's been in Pee Review for quite a while, and I'm bored. I like this pic better than I do the article, and I think it's probably my best 'shop to date. However, to avoid being a complete stuck up douche, I won't vote. Yet. Ya know what, if everyone's gonna keep changin the score anyway, I might as well. += 16:33,10April,2010
For. I saw this earlier and thought it was the real cover. Nice work! Aleister sans chains 16:38 10 4 MMX
For. I don't like the picture, I mean it'll never hang on my wall, but it's a comvincing enough copy that I looked online to check that you hadn't just piked it from CC - jack mort |cunt| talk - 00:04, June 18, 2010 (UTC)
Against Votes: 7
Against. Let's go with "I didn't laugh." •••Necropaxx(T){~}Wednesday, 05:45, Apr 21 2010
Against. Not nearly graceless enough in its insult of religion. It needs gaymansex and defecation and naughty words and maybe a few neon penises. --Mn-z 03:34, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
I'll go with Necro's reason alongside a couple of WTFs? ~ 15:09, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
Cannibal Corpse can suk mah mutha fuckin dick what necropaxx said --Roman Dog Bird 07:14, May 6, 2010 (UTC)
Against. As far as I can see, this only has any humour value (and then I still question how much) if you're familiar with the works of Cannibal Corpse. That's not exactly a large demographic there, is it? Most people won't get it, and even if they do, it's not actually that funny. --UU - natter15:40, Jun 4
The album cover this is based on is... wow, very brilliant. I'm tempted to look for a poster of it. But didn't laugh (I did laugh at the original though... just, wow. Love it.) --nachlader 01:38, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
For.Nomination and for, well i think i did a good job on it...not really, but read the description, and it has never been done before for all i know! --Happymonkey39Dah Meme Master 04:09, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
Oh yeah! Food fight! When I see eight against two I'll jump in on the side of the two and grab a hunk of plywood. Come on, bring it on! And look what Happymonkey says, it's never been done before. I'll take the three guys on the left, Happymonkey, get those naysayers on the right, and EMC, go down the middle and kick some ass! Aleister 19:44 16 7
I want my cookie. --Happymonkey39Dah Meme Master 21:54, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
Against Votes: 8
Are you like, 12 years old or something? --Roman Dog Bird 04:32, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
Well im 14, got the highest grade in Cyber-Arts in my class, the majority of the class was on photoshop and no the class wasn't retarded. Apparently you can't read comments however. Plus the edge is PURPOSELY CHOPPY,i was trying to QUICKLY make it look realistic. Of course its not easy to rip half a guys face of in five minutes. But that's fine, apparently I'm only 12 and am on a site like this. You do know that the edge is uneven to try and represent the torn skin like in the game right? That's why there's that long line sticking out. --Happymonkey39Dah Meme Master 04:50, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
Has ANY relationship ever worked with YOU!?!?NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!! --Roman Dog Bird 05:26, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
Chodes this is a joke nom right? ~ Readmesoon 05:54, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
HAHAHAHAHAH no. Love,
Nope An image without sexual undertones? That just can't be. --—John Lydon 11:53, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
Against. Badly done, and ohboy a collision of memes, wow. --UU - natter15:39, Jul 16
Against. Massively shit. --nachlader 19:21, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
"I you don't think it's dunny."+= 19:23,16July,2010
Comments
I AM AWARE THAT IT ISN'T PHOTOSHOPED WELL! I DID IT IN LIKE 5 MINUTES CAUSE I WAS IN A HURRY!
Comment. I won't vote against cause we've been friendly, but lemme explain why this wouldn't get featured here: a) Internet memes (outside of articles about them) are very cliched and looked down upon here. We generally like more high-brow humor here, or parodies of low-brow humor. b) Weegee and CATS aren't original concepts and have been done to death everywhere else on the internet, sorry. —fj0j3ddjoaw;rfjaew(r30qjd)05:47, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Yes weegee and cats or common, but never weegee with cats. I mean i know the picture is badly done, but you don't think the concept is funny. I you don't think it's dunny, say it straight up and vote against, i don't mind. If you think it is funny then vote for it, who cares about "how its done around here". If it's funny, vote for, if its dumb, vote against, i really don't mind. --Happymonkey39Dah Meme Master 15:31, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
Comment. Paizuri, "I won't vote against cause we've been friendly" is the worst thing you can say. Don't vote based on friendships.--SirHELPMETalk(more? --> CUNROTMNOTMPlebUSSPeesSK)On Friday, 05:52, July 16 2010 UTC
Well he's noobish and only 14, and I don't wanna discourage him from anything. Besides, this nom isn't going to make it anyway. —fj0j3ddjoaw;rfjaew(r30qjd)06:05, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Hold on, helpme if you said you like it why did you vote against?...or were you being sarcastic. --Happymonkey39Dah Meme Master 15:23, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
I think you just answered your question quite nicely there. --UU - natter15:39, Jul 16
And guys look at the one below me, it's pointless and makes no sense, yet it has a higher score than me! Really? God i don't get this site sometimes...although, i think that's sort of the point of it :P --Happymonkey39Dah Meme Master 15:31, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
The one below you isn't trying to be taken seriously. It was nommed knowing fully well that it had no chance of passing. Plus, no memes. += 19:23,16July,2010
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah mmm heheheheeheh --Roman Dog Bird 19:56, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
Against Votes: 5
it's a man with a gun. --nachlader 20:06, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
Against. ah ah ah, it's a black man with a gun, this bastard is racist! --Happymonkey39Dah Meme Master 21:58, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
Uhhhhh, no? The fact that you're pointing this out makes YOU the racist son. Sorry to break it to ya. I'd still laugh at this (for how lame it is) if it were a gook or a red man or some cracker such as myself. --Roman Dog Bird 05:22, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
I was just kidding, but it would be more funny if it was some redneck screaming. --Happymonkey39Dah Meme Master 16:08, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
Wow. Way to be racist against white people. += 20:46,17July,2010
No way. Unfunny. Terrible photoediting. The fact that this is on VFP sucks.--SirHELPMETalk(more? --> CUNROTMNOTMPlebUSSPeesSK)On Saturday, 05:31, July 17 2010 UTC
Against. per HELPME --Wilytank 13:05, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
Against. Why is the gun floating next to his hand? —fj0j3ddjoaw;rfjaew(r30qjd)16:50, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
For.Perfectly safe for work. Unless you have a boss with a foot fetish. Al sans chains 1:07 30 5 MMX
For - I have independently come to the conclusion that this would be a worthwhile and in every sense appropriate addition to the Featured Images category, as well as the front page itself. Rbpolsen♦Come Rant·Come Look at all My Crap 02:23, May 30, 2010 (UTC)
For. but only for the tits :) Ervinutz 13:51, July 20, 2010 (UTC)
Against Votes: 16
No tits. Hey guys, I'm going to Uncyclopedia to make an image of two girls that attract the straight men! lol it has no humor but it's sexy lol. It'll get featured for sure!--SirHELPMETalk(more? --> CUNROTMNOTMPlebUSSPeesSK)On Sunday, 01:27, May 30 2010 UTC
Your vote sucks dingoes. You lol twice, and yet vote against it. You claim no tits, yet the four tits are pushed together just beyond the arms. You, sir, with your lol'ds echoing through the hallways of work and school. Al des chains 1:32 30 5 MMX
His face? That's not "ha ha" funny. It's not the other kind, either. It seems to be a new branch of funny; the kind that's neither funny because it's funny or funny because it's not funny. It's like watching a video with the Yakkity Sax tune dubbed over a loop of bunch of elderly paraplegics tumbling down the stairs. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 04:23, June 8, 2010 (UTC)
For. Heh. —
Against. It's a flag. Presumably comparing islam to Naziism. Hahaha. —
+
=
00:44,6March,2010
Minty. I was very offended. 
Comment. It's Kurt Cobain. 
Absolutely. 
BRILLIANT! 
hehehe —
06:56, May 6, 2010 (UTC)
(talk) (stalk)
GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:14, 11 May 2010
Pacman. I laughed. 
ROFLCOPTER! I laughed. ~ 
Weak against (0.7). Don't like the text, poor font choices & lack of punctuation where it counts. ~ 
WTF? Per above. ~ 
TKFU
U
07:48, July 13, 2010 (UTC)
Zombiebaron 
Dah Meme Master 04:07, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
"I you don't think it's dunny." 
