This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read.
The Mortal Kombat series is often praised among fighting games for its unconventional special moves and its uniquely humiliating death animations. Here an opponent is stunned by the fighter Mileena's reproductive prowess.
SN+F Per comments on Bottled Water's entry. Also, I don't think we've ever featured any animations, although I could be wrong... KUNVFHPOTMVFP(IMAGES⇔TALK) 19:06, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
I voted against it after I voted for it, and then Kingkitty came to my door and is holding a knife on me as I type this. So, yeah, great pic, one of the best I've ever seen is that ok? you want me to say anything else?. Please do more of these. Aleister 19:36 16 7
0.718281828459 of a for for great e. --Skizzerz 19:54, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
For! Did I do it right? --StyleGuide 20:01, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
For.Because it looks like an actual anti-drug ad. Send it to the government funded folks at Above the Influence and they'll probably run it. Because they're too stoned to care.--KUNVFHPOTMVFP(IMAGES⇔TALK) 21:53, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
Against.. I second what HELPME said, this is retarded. --Happymonkey39Dah Meme Master 04:14, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
Anti smoking propaganda I was ready to vote for until I realized they were smoking non-filters. Those things will kill you. --—John Lydon 11:56, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
Against. Ha ha ha! Er... no. Funny and slightly retarded - but not a feature. Just no. --Some Idiot 10:47, July 28, 2010 (UTC)
Subtractaction. If anything'... My doodles are better than the random shit Barack Hussein Osama Obama doodles. Right? Right... ~User:Mad Scientist Adam Mada 23:12, July 29, 2010 (UTC)
Against. Isn't VFP a place where you put good pictures? because, this is not a good picture. At all. --Yours Falsely, . . . . 10:42, July 29, 2010 (UTC)
Is it still self-nom your first Image Request time? Or is the great JokeNom/VanityNom Rush of July 2010 over already? Because this right here is a piece of history: one of my few submissions that hasn't been tagged with the pejorative additive "Text Images". And I think it was my first request fulfilled. First or second... They all blur together now.KUNVFHPOTMVFP(IMAGES⇔TALK) 21:07, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
uhuhuhuhuhuhuhuh --Roman Dog Bird 23:18, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
I've never been so proud in my life.I requested this image! Also, when I first saw it I laughed my ass off -- SoldatTeh PWNerator(pwnt!)07:04, Aug 19
Love. So many people insisted that the original was racist for looking too white, and yet doing the opposite is even more racist. Yes. Good parody. pillow talk 00:56, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
For some reason, even though it is rather stupid, this just cracks me up. ~*sqlorsh*(harass) (stalk) -- 20100827 - 03:37 (UTC)
I like it. --BlackFlamingo 19:47, September 24, 2010 (UTC)
Against Votes: 7
Against. His penis is rather small for a black persons. Make it more realistic. --Happymonkey39Dah Meme Master 04:40, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
I don't know about that... It's actually rather big for a black woman's penis. Proportionally though, it's still quite the improvement over that though. He's still beating out whitey in that department, and that's what counts! Actually, I shudder to think of what we'd be contending with here if Japan had been in the Space Race.--KUNVFHPOTMVFP(IMAGES⇔TALK) 18:19, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
Against. because I an a nipple nazi. This isn't wikipedia. --Mn-z 23:21, August 10, 201(UTC)
Against. because its just stupid --Elassint 14:46, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
Against... but only just. I find this funny myself, but the quality itself is not so good. Also, I find this is very esoteric - only someone who has actually seen the original picture will get the full joke. They're my only gripes, and why I have voted against here. -- 05:53, August 30, 2010 (UTC)
Against -- TheZombiebaron 23:01, September 12, 2010 (UTC)
Against. This is funny at first but very wrong. You probably shouldnt try something like that next time. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Sephirothxxxx (talk • contribs) diff
I'm not disguised. Neither are you. Neither is anyone! I'm not disguised! Although I really didn't know which one to stick here, since they're pretty much the same. I bet this was the wrong one. Except it's not here anyway. There's nothing here. Certainly not anything disguised. ~*shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100920 - 04:29 (UTC)
Against Votes: 4
Against. Yeah...it's not really...funny... -- TheZombiebaron 21:21, September 20, 2010 (UTC)
Zombiebaron would have been funny in 1938. --Mn-z 23:29, September 20, 2010 (UTC)
Ha ha ha ha ha-*chokes on hamburger* I think the other one would be better, with the disguise actually over an Uncyclopedia page.-- (CUN) 05:40, September 24, 2010 (UTC)
Er, no, for what I already said... not sure I'd even vote for the other one, though. Or would I? ~*shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100929 - 17:15 (UTC)
Comments
Okay, this is odd. Clearly I put this here, but I don't remember putting this here, let alone why. Folks are right; it's not even funny. The other one might be, but... oh well. Not that it matters. ~*shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100924 - 06:02 (UTC)
rm; -4 -- TheZombiebaron 20:09, September 29, 2010 (UTC)
Against. there are some quality issues. It looks like it was made on MS Paint. Granted, it not mouse-drawn scribbles, but the image looks blocky. Also, the text is not in English. --Mn-z 20:53, October 12, 2010 (UTC)
while i do like the picture, i feel like it could be better done, quality wise, especially since it appears just the text was changed. -- SoldatTeh PWNerator(pwnt!)19:07, Aug 22
Self-Against? I'm going to have to go with the other two here. While you can rest assured that I very much appreciate the recognition and the sentiment, I have other pictures whose quality I'm prouder of (yes even odder ones like File:CorkscrewAttack.jpg or File:BABALITY.gif, and so do lots of other talented people. Just not so much on the queue lately. --KUNVFHPOTMVFP(IMAGES⇔TALK) 19:27, August 22, 2010 (UTC)
i actually almost nommed babality recently, but was far too lazy. -- SoldatTeh PWNerator(pwnt!)19:31, Aug 22
Against. text based. --Mn-z 13:23, August 27, 2010 (UTC)
Against. Mildly clever and not a half-assed MS Paint mess, but I fail to see the humor in it. --Mn-z 01:18, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
Zombiebaron -- TheZombiebaron 01:20, September 19, 2010 (UTC)
Meh, mild sarcasm and a simple point do not a featured image make. Or some such. Doing what those two said *points down* should help, though. ~*shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100929 - 17:13 (UTC)
Against The funniness isnt finding me. --Dame 11:26, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Comment: I think this image would be funnier if you had some more complex words such as "nuclear weapon" or "white people". If you make some changes I will reconsider my vote. -- TheZombiebaron 01:23, September 19, 2010 (UTC)
On a related note, I do believe that is how writing actually developed: the earliest writing had picture-like symbols representing whole words. And, if I'm not mistaken, Korean has an alphabet that iz moer foenetik than English. Relabeling it Chinese, Ancient Egyptian, or something related might help. --Mn-z 22:22, September 19, 2010 (UTC)
Zombiebaron. Featured images must be funny by themselves and out of the context of the articles they were created for. This is not that. At all. -- TheZombiebaron 04:45, October 21, 2010 (UTC)
Against. Ooo, new vfp I can say no to... NO! Because I don't get it, and it really isn't. ~*shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101021 - 04:56 (UTC)
Against. I don't get it. --Dame 10:57, October 21, 2010 (UTC)
Against. --BlackFlamingo 14:39, October 28, 2010 (UTC)
Against. I don't like black people. --Mn-z 23:46, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
Both Hawaii and Islam touch the ocean. That's how Obama’s parents ended up in Hawaii. But, making it across the Gulf of Mexico to Chicago was the challenge. Obama couldn’t have swam across the gulf without getting eaten alive by sharks! The only logical explanation is Obama hijacked a boat. How shocking for someone whose middle name is Hussein!
For. I like it, because of the funny hat religious people think makes them look apart-from-the-crowd, and the name of the dino Christosaurus kills, Sinosaur. I'll capitalize Sinosaur if you don't mind. Sinosaur is worth a whole page by himself, in his epic fight with Christosaurus. Aleister 13:20 30 10
Against. Although this one at least is consistent, I don't like it, either. ~*shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101028 - 20:49 (UTC)
Against. The lighting of Jesus's face doesn't fit in with the rest of the picture; there are weird white bits around the edge of his face. Also just adding Jesus's face to an image does not automagically make it funny. -- TheZombiebaron 21:00, October 28, 2010 (UTC)
Against. Just adding a dinosaur's body to an image does not automagically make it funny. Unless it's to Mao. That guy was comedy gold. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 08:04, October 29, 2010 (UTC)
This images represents the fact that English Uncyclopedia is the mother of all other uncyclopedias. Uncyclo-tan's pregnancy represents English Uncyclopedia giving birth, as it were, to the foreign uncyclopedias, represented as fetuses in Uncyclo-tan's sexy uterus.
nom + for I saw this other picture of a poorly done head replacement on VFP, so I thought maybe some people would like this one too. Also, SunnyChow, the illustrator of the head, can have full credit for it to prevent any possible drama. --Mn-z 13:06, October 30, 2010 (UTC)
Er, that was me, that IP. It wouldn't let me log in... so now that I have, per myself, more against! ~*shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101109 - 19:46 (UTC)
Comments
One thing is, is that I dont know where the hell it came from. The uploader is not here as well anymore. SpecialCasestalk /sign 19:41, November 9, 2010 (UTC)
I have crossed out the IP one if it is you, cus' that's rigging the vote! SpecialCasestalk /sign 20:22, November 9, 2010 (UTC)
Rm, there's no way this is original. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 06:48, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
A frame from Bettie Page's bestiality stag film, Egad! She Gave It Up To A Knuckle Walker!
Image credit: Photoshopped by --Dime IV 05:50, October 31, 2010 (UTC) (specifically for inclusion in the Bestiality section of the Pornography article.) Archive - Discuss this image
For. Nice work! Bettie and The Beast. Is that Bettie Page, I thought she always lifted her foot up in all her photos to make her leg look longer. If so this is a rarity. Aleister 00:35 1 11
Against. per above. Also, the gorilla is more blurry than Bettie Page. --Mn-z 00:00, November 1, 2010 (UTC)
Against. It doesn't really look like the gorrilla is even going to land on Bettie. And even if it did that's just nonsensical. -- TheZombiebaron 00:26, November 1, 2010 (UTC)
Against Makes me feel like I have my glasses off. But gets an "A" for effort. DameGUNPotYWotM2xPotM17xVFHVFPPooPMS•YAP• 17:14, November 8, 2010 (UTC)
Is that even Bettie Page? --BlackFlamingo 19:50, November 9, 2010 (UTC)
Nom+For I think it is (sadistically) funny and that I did a good job crafting it.
For. An unusual concept, I've never seen it before. Then again, I don't get around the base much and don't know who they have manning the hammers on the big birds, as we like to call them when we drink. Aleister 15:40 30 10
Against Votes: 7
Naw. The blurriness doesn't match, the thing doesn't even make sense, and it's not actually that funny, either. ~*shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101030 - 14:57 (UTC)
I didn't even notice the blurriness until now; You've ruined everything, you non-sadist! While there is no specific "meaning", it is iconic that a nuclear weapon in the hands of anyone might as well be the hands of a baby. ◄► UnUnUn ium ◄► 15:27, October 30, 2010 (UTC)
Against. -- TheZombiebaron 00:40, November 1, 2010 (UTC)
wocka wocka wocka --Roman Dog Bird 21:58, November 4, 2010 (UTC)
Against. per above. --Mn-z 03:06, November 6, 2010 (UTC)
Per RDB's reasoning especially, I assume? ~*shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101106 - 05:01 (UTC)
Per sideways. --BlackFlamingo 19:51, November 9, 2010 (UTC)
Against. Funny in context but not vfp material. --Dame 19:07, November 12, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Well pff... seems no one 'round here (except Al) likes sadistic jokes. I guess it is only good for the context for which I created it. ◄► UnUnUn ium ◄► 20:23, November 11, 2010 (UTC)
Probably invalid nom There are several other images of this on the internet. I'm guessing its from an online retailer or something. here is the same gnome a different angle. This image is identical to File:Mooning gnome.jpg which was uploaded in 2005 by User:Wiki Tiki God. Unless Wiki Tiki God took an image of said mooning gnome, some random person uploaded it somewhere else, and someone copied that image and re-uploaded it here, the image is not original. Even if it is, its still merely a 2-D copy of another work, which can't be copyrighted. And even if you count mere images of 3-D works are original, the documentation of this image is wrong. --Mn-z 02:38, November 14, 2010 (UTC)
Eh, it got hit by a vandal. The image is now back to the something else... also invalid. Whoo! ~*shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101114 - 03:23 (UTC)
'Against. What the hell is going on here? --Dame 18:25, November 13, 2010 (UTC)
Against. Idiot on a spree. Yes, I called someone an idiot. Coming from an idiot, that's an insult, right? ~*shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101113 - 18:37 (UTC)