This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read.
05:48, 1 May 2009 (UTC)05:48, 1 May 2009 (UTC)05:48, 1 May 2009 (UTC)05:48, 1 May 2009 (UTC)05:48, 1 May 2009 (UTC)05:48, 1 May 2009 (UTC)05:48, 1 May 2009 (UTC)05:48, 1 May 2009 (UTC)05:48, 1 May 2009 (UTC)05:48, 1 May 2009 (UTC)05:48, 1 May 2009 (UTC)05:48, 1 May 2009 (UTC)05:48, 1 May 2009 (UTC)~~
For Votes: 0
TicklerLeon11
Against Votes: 4
I think you have descended to a new dimension of shit. Thanks for that. --SirDJ~Irreverent 10:14, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Against. Self-portraits are a popular style nowadays, but quite frankly it's overdone. Not to mention that this particular picture is overpeopled. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 10:30, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
lololollolo No. Sticking a caption on a picture is not manipulation. --SirDJ~Irreverent 10:48, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Not original. Saw this yonks ago. Furthermore, it's a shitty image and meme. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 12:46, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Fuck off. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 12:47, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
No. It's a Lolcat image. From the Lolcats site. As such, it's not original, not manipulated, and not one of their best either. No fucking way, to quote someone or other. --UU - natter16:08, Mar 30
Comments
Abstain Although it made me smile, I can't see how it would work in Uncyclopedia --CrabPope 13:10, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Not original, so not eligible. Also -3. Failed, whichever way you look at it. --UU - natter16:15, Mar 30
against again Without reading the text, I thought those are fingers picking up a tiny cookie. However I now figure out that it's an ass. --SunnyChow 15:38, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Against.: NO NO NO and NO - As much as I love this image, this is old and more importantly, NOT ORIGINAL! Rbpolsen♦☺ 02:17, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Comments
I first saw this image in 2004. It wasn't funny then and it isn't funny now. Thank god it's ineligible anyway. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 20:12, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Against. Okay I'll use proper reasoning this time. 1. US president. 2. I'm not exactly favourable about RadX's Mr T version, and this is of the same line, IMO. 3. Cowbell is an unfunny meme. 4. The website on the lower right corner would hint that this is not original, and is probably licenced. Not that I care about licences. I just wouldn't go that far when nom'ing images. 5. US president. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 14:33, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Against. It's better done than the initial nom, but still, it's meme-y and not that well done. --Asahatter (annoy) 23:56, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Against Per Socky. Also, a real card would have rotational symmetry. This one has foldy symmetry. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 02:25, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Against. This kind of joke is about as overdone as a roast chicken reduced to soot. Yeah. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 20:26, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Against We should have a gallery of these or something. People are still making clever ones, but obviously it's quite overdone as far as VFP goes. -RAHB 18:57, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
N+F I liked all of this. The image itself, the text, the immature rating and very illegal pony fighting. --Docile hippopotamus 09:45, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Image prejudice based on in-jokes makes God cry. Don't make God cry. Besides, the joke was mainly the number of next-gen console games that are really just crappy remakes of old games with pretty graphics. SirNotA Good Username360KUN 21:56, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Against Votes: 8
Against. Very well done, but doesn't make me laugh. It's one meme too many, for instance. Aren't there better topics than memes? ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 20:27, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Well, what I mean by it is that I suspect strongly that another admin (who was called Zombiebaron) would have voted against this on the grounds that it was a text based image, and he didn't like such things. I happen to agree with that standpoint, and feel that it applies in this case. He regularly voted with the reason of Zombiebaron, and others have also done so, making it somewhat of a site in-joke. Therefore I was trying to indicate my opposition to the featuring of this image largely because it is text-based by using a fairly widely known site in-joke, in the interests of being concise. I hope this non-concise explanation helps. Seeing as I'm already taking so long, I'd add that putting the Zork logo over a Grue image on a game box, however well done, is not actually funny, as such. Oh, and the joke about remakes that you mention in your for vote really doesn't come across from this image, for me. So, to sum up: Zombiebaron. --UU - natter13:16, Apr 17
Actually, it isn't text-based. I just included the back because that was on the PS3 game template. I'd hoped that the front would be the main attraction, but evidently I was wrong. Still, you're entiltled to your opinion. SirNotA Good Username360KUN 22:04, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Longcat doubles as a flag! This is an awesome photoshop. --CopperCore(Talk)(Contribs) 18:54, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Against Votes: 3
Against. Come back when it doesn't feature a meme. We're on the verge of a new decade for christ's sake. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 11:01, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Against. McDonalds food doesn't need a scary face. Anyway, I don't find it funny, neat the work is. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 12:42, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
You Have APoint There.McDonaldsTM itself is scary. »ZhelielTalkContribsCow» 13:06, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
No need to do that with the text. Yellow is a horrible colour. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 13:50, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
BENSON IS BETTER THAN THIS IMAGE which isn't hard --SirDJ~Irreverent 12:26, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
KILL ALL BENSONITES. ~ 12:32, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
Comments
That's not the one that Benson prefers. From what I hear, he's better than you. You, specifically. Just you. Also, abstain. Y'know, for the memories. I wish I had them. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 12:24, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
The head matches the image somewhat. Apart from that, I don't find it funny. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 10:19, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
No. Now, if he was holding the backwards gun maybe... -OptyCSucks! CUN14:37, 30 Apr
Against. You can see where the artist pasted Bush's face right over Redfield's. •••Necropaxx(T){~}15:16, Apr 30
Against Poorly done. --A.Z?MUN123 •T•C•E 20:35, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Comments
i love this one its so great--TicklerLeon11 06:59, 30 April 2009 (UTC)--
May I recommend Reefer Desk? Also, the caption isn't generally personal commentary. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 10:00, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
You were never going to get out of your Symbolism slump. Every painter in this kind of situation would simply shoot themselves. Have fun! ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 10:26, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
05:42, 1 May 2009 (UTC)05:42, 1 May 2009 (UTC)05:42, 1 May 2009 (UTC)05:42, 1 May 2009 (UTC)05:42, 1 May 2009 (UTC)05:42, 1 May 2009 (UTC)05:42, 1 May 2009 (UTC)TicklerLeon11
Against. And this one... It's more of a camera-based photograph that's been doctored, rather than a painting. You'll never fool me! ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 10:29, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Rape For. —
Comment. Just.—
Against. Captioned cats. --
02:58, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
13:58, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Not gonna happen Sorry man. Actually, I'm not. --
Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 02:20, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
