This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read.
Are you high? What the fcuk is this? It wasnt even photoshopped! Just taken straight from a TV program! ,':-(sirCh00_Bakka)-:', 00:01, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Invalid nomination, unoriginal gif. --nachlader 00:58, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
Semantic games aside, "Original images" means original images, not this. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 08:38, July 22, 2010 (UTC)
Three things. 1. it's shank, get used to it. 2. you have to put *the stars* 3. It's better than anything else and you know it...oh and *shanks back* --Happymonkey39Dah Meme Master 06:37, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
1. I'm not a ghetto gangster. 2. You're supposed to precede votes on VFP with a number sign (#) 3. No, it's the ultimate text-based image. 4. Precede comments on votes with an asterisk (*).--HM(T)
Against. If anything, [[1]] should be the only image of this type that we feature this month. Or would that be bating her too much? Also, seconding that VFP really needs a good scrubbing. We're running purely on joke noms here, people!--KUNVFHPOTMVFP(IMAGES⇔TALK) 18:20, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
Against. I know they're aren't any good pictures but this still isn't a feature. --Some Idiot 00:32, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
GET OFF MY FUCKIN' BAAAAAAAAACCCCCCKKKK!!!!!!!!!!!!!! --Roman Dog Bird 04:43, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
*Jumps off of his back*...um sorry...i thought you wanted to give me a piggy back ride...(bust seriously who is this guy) --Happymonkey39Dah Meme Master 04:55, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
Fuck yeah! I love it. Like, with hearts. Lots and lots of hearts. Love,
For Very cute, like snugglebunnies in a yellow bed floating among the stars. Sigh. I think I'm in love. Aleister 3:28 30 7
Against Votes: 5
Against. Didn't even smile. In fact I grimaced. What the hell is this? --Some Idiot 05:23, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
Against. I'm going to stab the next person who makes a stupid VFP nomination. Seriously.--HM(T)
Stick it up your mother's ass. --nachlader 09:38, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
Against. Im am going to stab Helpme next time someone puts up a retarded nomination --Happymonkey39Dah Meme Master 05:24, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
Against. Is this what we've come to? already shitty quality images made shittier vis á vis MSPaint? -- Prof. OliproKUN(W)AnchorOpBur. (Harass) 06:52, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Guyz, this is VFP, not VFCP... as in Vote For Cute Pictures, not Vote For Child Porn, you sick person -- Prof. OliproKUN(W)AnchorOpBur. (Harass) 18:20, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
For the cleansing immolation of obvious fan admin service. Also, South Park Character generator. Those annoy me for some reason. Love what you did with the drop shadow though! --KUNVFHPOTMVFP(IMAGES⇔TALK) 18:32, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
Against. Whilst the quality of the work isn't that bad, the actual intended joke just fails to get a laugh -- Prof. OliproKUN(W)AnchorOpBur. (Harass) 06:54, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
Self-nom. Too many joke noms right now. This was my firs picture that I did like a year ago, for Image Request. - ho scopato tuamadre nelculo - 00:45,1August,2010
Castration makes everything funny? --nachlader 03:37, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
Like I said, it was Image Request. I didn't come up with the idea, I just made the picture. - ho scopato tuamadre nelculo - 03:49,1August,2010
but u nom'd it. It's okay, it's just texty. --nachlader 04:11, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
I know I nom'd it. I like it. Also, there isn't much anything good nommed. - ho scopato tuamadre nelculo - 04:25,1August,2010
*nom nom nom*...sorry I'm eating my words, it may not be sexist, but i don't find it that funny. --Happymonkey39Dah Meme Master 04:40, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
Fuck this image in the blood-spewing hole left over from chopping off its junk. --AndorinKato 07:52, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
Against. Without being quite as distasteful as the above, texty texty text. --UU - natter13:12, Aug 2
Errr... Not a feature, somehow. --Some Idiot 05:24, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
Against. Could you do something other than a stick figure? possibly Sarah Palin. -- Prof. OliproKUN(W)AnchorOpBur. (Harass) 08:06, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
For. and Nom. Seeming as the quality on VFP is rather low at the moment, I thought it was time to enter this picture, which I made in about five minutes. --Some Idiot 08:12, July 29, 2010 (UTC)
For., i agree, this is the best ive seen in a while, although not that well made, it made be giggle. But it if it was purple, and called it barney, that may have been even better. --Happymonkey39Dah Meme Master 13:55, July 29, 2010 (UTC)
A picture worth 1,000 words, give or take a few hundred. Aleister 14:54 29 7
Damn, didn't Tineye or license check before voting as I figured somebody already had since I'd seen it around here before. Guess it's too much of a flash of creativity to ask for from a red linked no-page registered user.KUNVFHPOTMVFP(IMAGES⇔TALK) 02:01, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
For. Not bad, not bad at all. And since it was nommed by Saberwolf, and is as if the force itself was driving the nom, it's a must vote. Aleister 18:41 3 7 MMX
Against. Not funny, and not that well done (it really doesn't look as if anything is holding the green saber, and it doesn't exactly look like a lightsaber either). --UU - natter12:13, Jul 7
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZyouallsuckZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ --Roman Dog Bird 03:09, July 11, 2010 (UTC)
Against. While I'm not in the habit of disparaging the time-honoured practice of modernizing ancient art, and as a 'shopper myself I try to avoid being too critical of quality, I'm offputted somehow. I actually think it would be heaps better were the glow around the sabres not so excessively thick. The only problem then would really be that green one, which not only lacks any visible hilt, but also seems to disappear around the midsection. Unlike the typical Wikipedia editor. Zing! Also, per Roman Dog Bird regarding VFP lately.KUNVFHPOTMVFP(IMAGES⇔TALK) 21:27, July 22, 2010 (UTC)
Against. Nah... --Some Idiot 10:46, July 28, 2010 (UTC)
Against. Per Meep. --Dame 01:12, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
Against. per above. --Mn-z 23:15, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Ahem. This is the picture at the top of the right-side philosophers portal template, it is hardly undiscovered. Also, as an avid Star Wars fan, I take offense to having the Force compared to Fucking Magic. :P --SirSF13(Talk)GUNWotMRotMFBotMVFHSKMaj.ΥΣΣ03:20 EST 4 July, 2010
maybe if you put the green saber in the hand that is pointing up, it may look more realistic. --Happymonkey39Dah Meme Master 14:00, July 29, 2010 (UTC)
For. The scoretext says it all. —Pelozurian (talk) 04:39, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
For. I'm just checking out the images here and I see this! MY POORLY PHOTOSHOPPED PICTURE! MADE ON MICROSOFT WORD! The only reason I'm voting for this is because I'm absolutely stunned it hasn't failed yet. --Some Idiot 10:32, July 28, 2010 (UTC)
See UU's note on my talk page- I could've sworn I canceled that booking. So sorry.--SirHELPMETalk(more? --> CUNROTMNOTMPlebUSSPeesSK)On Sunday, 03:09, July 11 2010 UTC
Um...you can't see the legs helpme....That's the strap on his pads. There is no leg or skin showing anywy.... —I'LL RAPE YOU WHOREMr. Antonio Yettie(talk) [00:29 10 August 2010]
I HATE black people with a passion. --nachlader 22:33, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
Against. Not well done, and not funny, caption or not. --UU - natter09:32, Jul 9
Against. The Teabaggers have better ones. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 04:04, July 10, 2010 (UTC)
Reason No. 3,570 why Uncyclopedia sucks. --Roman Dog Bird 03:07, July 11, 2010 (UTC)
Abstain. I feel my political views are hindering my ability to effectively and unbiasedly evaluate your contribution to the VFP. Also, Cricket makes no sense to anyone outside of England. --—John Lydon 12:02, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
Does "outside of England" only consist of the US? Moron. --nachlader 00:32, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
Yes. Yes it does. --—John Lydon 12:48, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
lol this is the best fucking picture in the whole wide world – Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.43.64.67 (talk • contribs)
Abstain. You know, I would vote Against, but I want there to be a prayer of this being archived in Failed with the notation "Score: 0 people impressed by images made in Microsoft Word". I think that would be the most fitting tribute of all for this. Can we just skirt the usual rules? KUNVFHPOTMVFP(IMAGES⇔TALK) 21:37, July 22, 2010 (UTC)
In the face of political correctness the Queen has announced that she will be removing the Royal Seal from packets of Old Fags. The brand, much beloved by those who favour theirs rough and ready rolled has in recent years become the focus of the Westboro Baptist Church's "We Hate Fags" campaign.
Against. Not funny. --Some Idiot 05:37, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
Uh..........................huh. --Roman Dog Bird 05:57, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
You should put the comment across the bottom on the front of the packet as they actually do, would also make it much more readable -- Prof. OliproKUN(W)AnchorOpBur. (Harass) 19:14, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
Nom and For. --Some Idiot 03:22, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
For. I live down in 'straya Fudgemobile 23:35, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
Against Votes: 5
Constructive Against The quality's a tad lacking, and aside from the facial feature distortion that the Liquify feature of Photoshop has come to let us all know and love, the image in and of itself is not incredibly funny. Maybe that's because I'm not Australian, though I've always eminently favored them as a nationality. The main problem for me is the eyeburning textboxes both below and above the subjects, the negative space it entails, and the fact that it might be funnier were the politicians so visibly separated, and the fact that they are politicians made clear some other way than either knowing or saying this. While I'm typically For. oversized noses, perhaps a case for Reefer Desk. --KUNVFHPOTMVFP(IMAGES⇔TALK) 20:44, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
Ok, I'll improve it. And by the way, there's no Liquify here. This was made on Microsoft word. --Some Idiot 05:44, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
I figured, based on your previous works and the fact that the skin tones do not entirely match up in places. Regardless, you should be lauded for doing such work in Microsoft Word! 'Tis an impressive achievement, especially if you didn't use the MSPaint "Edit Picture" tie-in, instead pasting the features with wrapping styles. --KUNVFHPOTMVFP(IMAGES⇔TALK) 19:34, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
sorry, but who the fuck are these people? australians or something? I though you guys just voted kangaroos to be your political leaders. get photoshop, and maybe use some people that are more well known in the global community? maybe i'm just super ignorant of international politics and these guys have been up to some crap lately. idk -- SoldatTeh PWNerator(pwnt!)19:10, Aug 22
Against. The images are quite pixelated, and the morphing has a white border like from a sloppy Ms-Paint copy-paste. Additionally, the images are too small, and the text unnecessarily dominates the pic. Finally, nobody follows the politics of minor nations in the Anglo-Sphere. By minor nations, I mean all nations other than the USA and the UK. --Mn-z 13:29, August 27, 2010 (UTC)
Against. Bad political humor. While I'm international enough to know about Australian politics, I don't think this is very funny. Also, Mnbcxzn the guy above me has some valid points about the image quality. --Elassint 23:46, August 27, 2010 (UTC)
Against Not particularly funny. --Sirgwax (talk) 21:47, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
The iPhone for those cheapos who don't want to buy a real one! The Imaginary iPhone has limitless apps, free calls, and is impossible to lose! Get yours now!
Score:-3 people who would love a non-existant phone
Nomination:
07:52, August 29, 2010 (UTC)
For Votes: 2
Nom and For. I'm happy to say that I have finally made a great image with a great joke. Or so I think it's a great one. -- 07:52, August 29, 2010 (UTC)
Bubba Joe was in need of some cash, and he wasn’t getting enough costumers to feed him and his goats, so he decided to try and appeal to the religious community.
Against. That might have been hilariousten years ago, but come on, its 2010 FFS! --Elassint 17:28, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
Against. Not a good enough 'chop.--HM(T) 19:47, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
Against. Per Elissint. This has been going on since 1998. This is the equivalent of eating a dead horse raw after you've flogged it a million times. Saberwolf116 04:06, August 26, 2010 (UTC)
Christ, and I thought I had an outdated sense of humor. --Roman Dog Bird 04:14, August 26, 2010 (UTC)
Against. What they said, mostly the datedness and the not-well-doneness. ~*sqlorsh*(harass) (stalk) -- 20100827 - 03:38 (UTC)
Against. per quality issues, the shading on the face images is off. --Mn-z 13:22, August 27, 2010 (UTC)
Against: I like the joke but there are serious image quality issues, especially with Hillary's neck and the size of Bill's head. --Sirgwax (talk) 21:46, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
Against.This is funny? --
wut? —
Dah Meme Master 06:04, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
'For.'Nom and for, you know it's epic. --
03:24, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
10:55, July 28, 2010 (UTC)
Abstain. I like the concept but the qaulity is definitely lacking. --
Smite. My neck hurts from trying to read that. - 
07:52, August 29, 2010 (UTC)
BBQ - 
![[1]](http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100727141821/uncyclopedia/images/archive/5/53/20100727142348%21Clubgoers-raccoons.jpg){kind=link}
