This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read.
For I do not car if it costs a million bajilion zillion dollars, I NEED this to get the mentaly retarded fat kid off my back... Seriously he wont leave me alone.Wilhelm screamer 17:16, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Against Votes: 9
Against text text text text text text text. -- TheZombiebaron 19:57, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Against. Text-based. Plus the top half of the lettering looks flat, on a round surface, which looks kinda wrong. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 09:55, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Nope, sorry. Also the lettering at the top is a little off. --§.|WotM|PLS|T|C|A 14:54, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Against Didn't really do it for me, I'm afraid. Plus what Squiggle said. --Sir Seeker(Call me?) |KUN|VFP| 14:45, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Against - Zombiebaron based. Also it doesn't look right (Bonner) (Talk) Feb 16, 22:42
Zombiebaron --AAA! (AAAA) 16:30, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Comments
rm, -2 after almost a month -- TheZombiebaron 00:37, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Conditional Against If you really tidy up the chop a bit, you've got my for. •••Necropaxx(T){~} 00:37, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Per Necropaxx. Try the Reefer desk, it's pretty funny (I think so, anyway), but looks a bit choppy right now. - P.M., WotM, & GUN,Sir Led Balloon(Tick Tock)(Contribs) 02:05, Feb 28
Against I like the idea, but I agree with the above comments. --Sir Seeker(Call me?) |KUN|VFP| 13:42, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Even with the hilarious caption that it does not have, it's...Against. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 08:00, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
against Err...Isn't there a rule about unregistered users voting/nominating? Either way, against --Sir Seeker(Call me?) |KUN|VFP| 10:01, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Neh Errr. the font/background need to be turned up and it was by an unregistered person. --User:KoRoBeNiKI/sig 012:23, 8 March 2008
Unbeknownst to many, Hitler, Stalin, and Mussolini tried to make it big as a rock band in the 1920s, producing many hit songs over the years, including the platinum-selling album Mein Kampf. However, in the late 1930s, the band broke up, chiefly because of Stalin's and Hitler's differing views on politics and Eva Braun.
Self-Nom and For This image went under extensive review on Reefer Desk, with the goodwill from both reviewers. So, I am surrendering my image to the public eye. •••Necropaxx(T){~} 00:34, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Against Votes: 4
Against It's been fixed up since the last time I saw it, but I can't help but notice that Mussolini's head stands out too much. --Sir Seeker(Call me?) |KUN|VFP| 13:44, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
A Heady Dose of Against. Yeah, the spot where that one guy's head ends and Hitler's starts is too obvious. Perhaps if Hitler's hair were greyer, or if the bottom guy's head were more blackier. Also, as has been said by Seeker, Mussolini's head is way way out of place. Plus, the concept of people's heads being on other people's bodies has kinda been done way too much, and just really make me go "Yuck!". -- TheZombiebaron 01:16, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Against. Concerns about the quality of the 'chop aside, it's not a funny image, I'm afraid. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee13:35, Feb 29
Picture yourself on a train in a station, With plasticine porters with looking glass ties, Suddenly someone is there at the turnstile, de Gaulle with kaleidoscope eyes...
SN+F, partly for the Beatles fans out there, mostly to clear the smootz of Zb's shit cross from here. Poo is icky! SirModusoperandiBoinc! 05:28, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
For. I love bad puns. This is my favourite on the site, and it's in the form of an image. I like lots. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 11:30, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Charles in the Sky with Diamonds!--Vana 20:19, 8 March 2008 (UTC) (p.s.: you goofballs, Google Charles de Gaulle if you don't know who he is!)
Against Votes: 10
Against - For some reason, I don't recognize Degaull when I see him. Which makes this a text based image, because I needed to both read the caption and image name. And even then, it wasn't very funny. -- TheZombiebaron 04:06, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Against while I'm all for somehting that may be a slight apparent reference to The Beatles... I don't get it. Or like it. At least, no more than thinking "ooh kaleidoscope". :P ~FagxFS 15:08, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Nom and For - a QFA image which should've been featured ages ago, and it's about time we don't have an image authored by MO or ZB--Æ 15:11, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
For It seems funny, I can't remember why anymore (I blame this Hay fever), but I laughed. --Sir Seeker(Call me?) |KUN|VFP| 14:42, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
For - Nice job, should read 'Coca Cancer' though. That'd be better (Bonner) (Talk) Feb 16, 22:44
Uh... This comes from a well of humour from which I don't get my water. That is to say, whaa?!. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 03:13, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
No As per sooooo many people here on the against side-there are so many reasons that this shouldn't be featured: its a text-based joke, its nowhere near rofl funniness (in fact id give it a single "ha" then move on), and it really should read "Coca-Cancer". I must admit, it is a well done photoshop job, but, as I said, nowhere near feature-worthy. Robertodole 19:45, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Retarded and sick You twisted psychopaths. WEll-done but the most idiotically psychotic thing ever. Ever. SpockEzri
Against. The linky is broken, but it's this, apparently...and by this, I mean this. Aren't links fun? I think so. Why, I was just telling the Missus about both links and the enjoyment I get from them the other day... SirModusoperandiBoinc! 06:14, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Against. Text-based
LOL txt based. --Nekami 17:44, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Reeling after the horrendous performance of Saw IV. The producers decided that the next sequal should focus on something really, really horrendous. Goatse, This poster depicts the puppet as an ass without a nose and included one of the movies taglines. "Once you see it, you can't unsee it". The movie bombed after people suffered through 2 hours of the movie knowing that they've seen Goatse before, because once you seen Goatse. You've seen it all.
Nom & For - Originally, Kakun made this and it was fugly to say the least. What I did was improve it, and trust me, it's better looking then before. --Nekami 18:15, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
For + fu nekami~Kakun·talk 23:26, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Against Votes: 7
The fact that you need to say "I'm so much better than the other guy and he can't chop shit" as your nom, will guarantee my against vote. ~ 19:54, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
For Well, it's not text based even though it's got text on the page...And I like it. It's Gandhi and he's got a gun, what more could you want? --Sir Seeker(Call me?) |KUN|VFP| 13:40, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Against Votes: 5.5
Against, While the whole joke is text based, the image itself has been around since April 2006, and can also be seen in a November 2006 image, and really was never funny. I do, nonetheless, find it comforting that Electrostatic is making Potatochops again, and look forward to seeing more of his work on VFP in the future. -- TheZombiebaron 15:49, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Against. Actually, I noticed the text only after I "laughed", so I wouldn't say it's text based. However, it's not very easy to see the gun, and the joke is a bit weak. --Kaizer the Bjorntakkun(nya nya)(1961 model!)Check out T61! 19:44, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Against. Gandhi. With a gun. Sorry, I'm not finding it that funny. Gandhi with a gun running across a field kamikaze fashion as in one of my fave episodes of Red Dwarf - that's betterer! --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee10:29, Mar 10
Weak Against. The pic of the gun is terribly hard to see still, but i like the concept
Well, I did clean up the gun more so it looks more real. And I would also beg to differ that the entire joke is not text based, as long as one knows what Gandhi looked like and what his feelings about guns were. Just because an image happens to have text does not make it text based. As a matter of fact, the only reason I put text in there was to make it look like a professionally done poster. ---ɔıʇɐʇsoɹʇɔəʅə-- ϞϞϞ - 22:19, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Although I do respect the fact that not everyone will actually find this "humerous"... That is different. ---ɔıʇɐʇsoɹʇɔəʅə-- ϞϞϞ - 21:21, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Barack Obama, pictured in a rare photo taken before his 2007 minoritoplasty. Obama rose to recognition while a Republican senator for Illinois, but his popularity hit new peaks when he became a liberal African American in an advanced new cosmetic surgery. Although briefly considering into a hispanic, preliminary polling opposed the idea of two Bill Richardsons.
For After seeing the original picture, I have to say "good job" even if it's slightly scary. This is something everyone should see. --Sir Seeker(Call me?) |KUN|VFP| 07:38, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Pretty fly, for a white guy. -->:( 04:39, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
For. OK, as a 'chop it's not perfect, but it's good enough, and it works. And it made me chuckle. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 15:50, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Against Didn't find it funny at all. Ethereal 17:03, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Comments
God that's fucking scary. -->:( 05:42, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Abstain. I want to vote against because the image isn't really that good, and it's a racist/crap concept, but I dare not because I'm noticably turning into one of those people. -- Thankful KippyShare blessingsBountiful harvest 05:35, Feb. 15, 2008
Abstain - great concept, poor execution. If you make the manipulation a bit more professional, I'll change my vote to for--Æ 22:51, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Strong Abstain. I'd be all over this picture if the hair was executed better. Alas... --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:41, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Abstain. Please fix the hair and eyebrows so I can vote for! This is so almost-awesome!--<<>> 12:57, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Abstain. needs a bit of fixin' up
OK, I had a go at fixing it up a little. Better? Better enough to change any votes? Or not good enough? --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee19:17, Mar 11
rm, +3 after over a month -- TheZombiebaron 16:39, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
against Are you sure whatshisname made this? I've seen this image everywhere on the net --Sir Seeker(Call me?) |KUN|VFP| 09:03, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Likewise. Also, I always hated this one. ~ 09:04, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Unorginal. Period. I'm not even going to link you, because, basically, I'm too lazy to figure out where it came from. But, rest assured, that it was not here first. -- TheZombiebaron 21:42, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Quite often during the Vietnamese war, these awards would of been given out to a briefing officer for getting insulted briefly after holding an average speech. – – – YOU SUCK!
against I was tempted to put "You Suck" as my reason, but I'm not an ass, so instead I'll say: Good try, better luck next time. --Sir Seeker(Call me?) |KUN|VFP| 11:22, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Against. While I not only do not get it, it is not, in my opinion, VFP material. Mainly because it wasn't funny, but also because it doesn't give off that crackling aura of a fire. You know. A crackling aura. -- TheZombiebaron 20:57, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Against. There's nothing about it that screams, "Look at me. I'm funny." --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 07:14, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Against. This image is terrible and lacks any original material. Surely this was a self-nom. KingdomAlaska 6:27, 25 March, 2008
'gainst - Sorry, didn't cut it. --AAA! (AAAA) 13:14, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Against Seriously, the first thing I thought when I went to VFP just now and saw Stalinbear was, "I'm glad we're not featuring crappy images like these." --Syndrome 19:46, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
For Againstbaron based image -RAHB 22:51, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Against. Still, I can't seem to lose this erection. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 06:05, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Against It needs more Againstbaron. -- TheZombiebaron 21:51, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
No way! How is it that Stalinbear is at -2, but this is at +2? People, just because Mhaille made it doesn't mean it's automatically feature-worthy. Amusing, yes, but feature-worthy? If this is, then any poorly drawn bear with a vaguely recognizable symbol on its chest is. And Stalinbear doesn't deserve feature either.-SirLjlego, GUNVFHFIYCWotMSGWHotMPWotMAotMEGAEDMANotM+ (Talk) 15:13, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Comment: Don't listen to LJ. The rules state that you DO have to automatically vote for anything I produce. Rules are rules.... -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
Against. I dont even see a nom, and this is completely text based, not to mention not funny enough to be feature-worthy. Sorry to be so harsh Robertodole 03:30, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
EXTREMELY STRONG FOR! I guess. -- TheZombiebaron 04:06, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Against. I think there's a good image to be made with the whole "horrible stupid banner ad" theme, but I don't think that's it. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 11:25, 28 March 2008 (UTC)