This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read.
? I'm not reading you on any channels - I live in your eyes 22:53, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
No I don't get it, I thought people got ever "Your mom" jokes. --Shadowslayer 23:48, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
Against I fail to see how this is original (it looks like a yearbook photo). Also, dangerously in-jokey. Self reference is only good when it's about me. I'm awesome. Seriously! SirModusoperandiBoinc! 19:50, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Damnit, I knew this shit would blow craps. It's predictable, ppl. I nom + fail.—FlutterTuwoolookie! | My History | Brute!01:19, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
In truth, she's the girl I pick on in school; BTW I'm not a bully and do that in a playful matter. I nommed it so I can share it, not men't to be featured, only the caption seems to be the feature material. Pretty vain, huh? If you read my bio you'll know why things like this have begun. And I'm not going to nom every crappy not-men't-to-be images, so don't worry (you better). Its a conquest (with only images)!—FlutterTuwoolookie! | My History | Brute!02:29, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Took me ages finding the pictures and resizing them.
For. Megan fox. nuff said --
Against Votes: 5
Against. I salute the effort. But it's very texty, and while the idea of a Michael Bay remake of The Godfather does tickle me, this poster by itself just doesn't. Sorry. --UU - natter08:45, Jul 7
I hate the People's Teletubby RepublicDonPuttanocHeDDs 15:30,11July,2009
As do I... I should know, I investigated. Glad to see this here. Didn't know y'all like this. I am voting for this because I think we need to forge new jokes that have novelty. This is a step in that direction. Rbpolsen♦☺ 03:39, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Against. Texty. Also, said text is pretty small and not easy to read, plus it's really not worth the effort of reading it - it's not funny. And the image certainly isn't funny of its own accord. No. --UU - natter09:18, Jul 12
Abstain. - I wish people wouldn't nominate things like this. Rbpolsen♦☺
03:40, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Did I call the nomination police? I don't think so. Nominating it was just a mistake. Now, will the douchebags please step down?--Bad Shroom 20:32, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
It's a genuine question - there have been a few pics with Show in them nommed recently, and there have been a lot of unfunny, meme-y images nommed recently as well. Why is that? --UU - natter08:42, Jul 13
Against - Anyone whose seen Robot Chicken knows that this ain't original. I think that Mr. Train has been taken for a ride. (Sorry, nothing personal, I just couldn't resist making that pun) - I live in your eyes 20:37, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
IT'S A TRAP! - Rbpolsen♦☺ 22:39, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Mary-Jane told authorities that she was using the pot as a cooking utensil, however witnesses confirm that she was planted firmly inside of it while it had soil in it.
SelfFor. It went through reefer desk got some suggestions made some edits- HAHAHA Reefer desk get it? SirACROLOKUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 17:06, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Against Votes: 4
Sorry I know I nomm'ed had a drug-referencing image, but I just don't find this that funny. Rbpolsen♦☺ 19:17, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Image credit: Rbpolsen♦☺ , a redo of a crappy image by someone from the Fundação Desciclomídia, the portuguese version of Uncyclopedia. Archive - Discuss this image
For - Because I want to keep it alive long enough to see if their are any other opinions. If no one (or few) vote for it, I'll walk away quite, but I want to see what others have to say, call me selfish, but I'm really curious Rbpolsen♦☺
Against Votes: 5
Against; Ok, so, I'm not really familiar with the "Your Brain On Drugs" line of anti-drug commercials (they were either before my time, or not played in Canada, I'm not sure which), but I'm pretty sure the whole point of that whole brand of persuasion is to make people afraid of the "harmful effects" of drugs. Tigger looks like he's having a pretty swell time. Now, if he was passed out in a puddle of his own puke, eyes rolled back, skinny as a rail, it might be a different story. -- TheZombiebaron 01:30, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
DRUGS!--A.Z?MUN123 •T•C•E 15:41, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Against. It looks like a bumper sticker on a Phish fan's VW bus. And we all know how funny Phish fans are... -OptyCSucks! CUN21:05, 15 Jul
^^^What he said^^^ --Roman Dog Bird 21:12, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Comments
I'm almost tempted to vote For, since the look in Tigger's eyes just freaks me the fuck out. However, as per The Baron, I don't think it's enough by itself. Perhaps if you made it look a little more preachy-anti-drugs advert (like http://drugtrain.net/drugs/heroin/heroin_screws_you_up.html), then you might have something. Watch the text, though. --GuyblesCUN 13:17, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
I have a question, and it's just out of curiosity. Y'all have stated that you dislike this image because it combines the message, "This is your Tigger on Drugs", a satirical spin on a classic message with a wasted but ecstatic Tigger. So my question is, would any of you have voted for if it was just the image without the caption? The whole idea was the the image would be a caption mismatch, adding to the humor instead of killing it. Rbpolsen♦☺ 19:14, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
I would have found it funnier if it didn't have the caption. I'm abstaining for now, but would definitely vote four if there wasn't the caption. -- SoldatTeh PWNerator(pwnt!)
You will obey. I am your master. Stare at the image and you will not vote against. You are feeling sleepy. After you awaken, you have already voted for.
You will obey. I am your master. Stare at the image and you will not vote against. You are feeling sleepy. After you awaken, you have already voted for.
No Not even close. --Shadowslayer 19:49, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Against First off, this isn't a funny picture. Secondly, this isn't an original picture, so the nomination is invalid. MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 01:12, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Against; I think the political messages of this image are too strong, and detract from the overall comedic effect of the image. No wait. I meant "cause it sucks." -- TheZombiebaron 00:46, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Against. The undertones are too objective to be anything but pseudosatirical, and the progressive cultural deviance it implies is too blunt. Yeah it sucks major kawk. --EMC[TALK] 07:47, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
If this is the VFP revolution, then call me a counter-revolutionary. (By that, I mean that I spin counters. Take that, kitchen island!) SirModusoperandiBoinc! 12:05, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
I said "voting revolution" because I meant something like a joint VFH-VFP revolution. I wonder how long it'll take before it reaches VFD. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM12:07, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
I don't know...<lengthy pause>...when are you gonna nom it on VFD? SirModusoperandiBoinc! 12:11, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
If I had to guess, I would say that it's due to the severe neurological damage caused by your nasty and untreated case of syphilis. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 12:17, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Nah Romartus was wrong... it needs to be in article format... Why not nom this voting page on VFH!! Won't that be like a tripple entendre? SirACROLOKUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 13:11, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Against. anything that can be created in MS paint should not be on VFP. --Mn-z 17:47, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
But dude, half the stuff that's featured WAS made in MS Paint. Rbpolsen♦☺ 18:16, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
I think MS Paint images can still be good, so long as it's not as pixellated as it sounds. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 23:42, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Against. I've seen ideas like this before, so it's not original. Plus, it's texty, texty, very very texty. And as such could quite easily be re-created in article form using an image gallery. Plus the quality is low. And just no, really. --UU - natter08:53, Aug 4
Against. Once again, it's a well-made image, (apart from the text, which doesn't look great). But it doesn't make me laugh in the slightest - how is this funny? Also, texty. --UU - natter08:55, Aug 4
Against. Per UU, emphasis on lack of funny. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 10:54, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Against; I'm not even sure what this image is talking about, but I'm pretty sure that it is stupid (text; Oscar Wilde is so 2005) and not funny (rape; Uncyclo-somebody; text; text). -- TheZombiebaron 07:24, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
Um, very nice job and that, but doesn't propel me much in the way of humour. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 01:00, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
Against. In retrospect I was laughing at the image and not with the image, specifically the idea that anything about it makes him look "badass". It really is pretty poor. -OptyCSucks! CUN17:20, 5 Aug
Against. Cheap, etc. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 00:36, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Against — There are a number of good reasons why this doesn't belong on the front page, but I needn't go through them all, Bad Shroom got through quite a few. Rbpolsen♦ 03:43, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Against. per above. --Mn-z 07:16, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
I just realized that this pic cuts off the front of the stylus and the guy's fingertip. 17YEARSOFcHeDDaR 23:05,5August,2009
Maybe he snipped his finger when he was cut+pasting the pentagram? ooh burn ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 00:36, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Self Nom and For I like this image - especially if you know the original sporked image that comes up number 2 in google search... and number 6, 8, 12... Pupt 06:05, 8/08/2009
Withdrawing as per the below comments. If only I had put this forward 20 years ago when everybody knew who laura palmer was... Pupt 06:23, 9/08/2009
Against Votes: 3
Against; Very nice job. Like, really. I wish I could vote for this. But I can't. Because, in the end, the joke is just that you were able to put one ladies face on top of another's face. Oh sure, there's something in the caption about a show called Twin Peaks that I never watched, and yeah, the fact that I never watched it probably means I have no hope of finding this funny, but them's the breaks. Also her hair looks like it's a wig that was put through the wash. What's up with that? -- TheZombiebaron 15:53, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
Against. Not funny on it's own. Which is what Zombiebaron said, only with less word thingies. -OptyCSucks! CUN15:56, 8 Aug
Smite. Per them, with even less words. 17YEARSOFcHeDDaR 01:56,9August,2009
Comments
You 'shopped it so well, I can't even tell it's Sarah Palin. 17YEARSOFcHeDDaR 14:40,8August,2009
Against; but everything else is leaning (like that building to the right...) -- TheZombiebaron 17:34, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Against. per TLB. Looking closely, it appears that the background wasn't moved, but wasn't that straight to begin with so it looks like it was a simple tilting. --Mn-z 04:52, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Good point - to be honest as I'd seen the original that didn't even occur to me as a potential issue... might have to go back to the drawing board and re-tweak. Pupt 08:14, 10/08/2009
A new type of photoshop manipulation for celebrities have taken the world by storm. This new treatment promises to remove all defects from the person. So far, it has worked on this happy celebrity
Against; When I got to play around with a new version of Photoshop, that new "band-aid" tool caught my eye too. I first started off by making people with no mouth, then no eyes, and eventually I made people that looked like this. It's actually very easy. However, it's hard to do properly. If you look closely, you'll see that there are three glare spots that are all the same shape, and that part of the left eye and eyebrow are still visible. If more time was spent, I'm sure this image could look better, but that still wouldn't solve the problem of me not really understanding how someone without a face is funny. -- TheZombiebaron 20:30, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Against. as above, but too lazy to do independent count. Pupt 00:07, 16/08/2009
Per 1st — and per the fact that this is such a common theme, even if it was done well, it would still be very cliché. Rbpolsen♦ 04:13, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
Flutter 
Tuwoolookie! | My History | Brute! 
19:06, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
Eh. 
Against. didn't laugh. 
I hate the People's Teletubby Republic 
As do I... I should know, I investigated. Glad to see this here. Didn't know y'all like this. I am voting for this because I think we need to forge new jokes that have novelty. This is a step in that direction. 
No Way, Bro - I don't get it, sorry. --
Abstain. - I wish people wouldn't nominate things like this. 
For. It went through reefer desk got some suggestions made some edits- HAHAHA Reefer desk get it? 
22:33, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
(talk) (stalk)
GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:37, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Heh, we should feature zombiebaron still. 
17YEARSOFcHeDDaR 
22:51,5August,2009
![5 [[:File:Mickey Mouse - Hate haet hat!.png|User:Bad Shroom]] (history, logs)](#[[:File:Mickey_Mouse_-_Hate_haet_hat!.png|User:Bad_Shroom]]_(history,_logs)){kind=link}
