From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 | This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD. |
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Badly-written rubbish about some Mexican band. Rabbi Techno
kvetch Contribs FOXES 14:47, March 6, 2010 (UTC)
Retarted. And with nearly no relation to reality, or pictures. (But can't RDB defend himself?!) Spıke ¬ 17:15 6-Mar-10
Roman Bird Dog? Ohnowait its Real Bad Dancers. Darn. —Paizuri MUN ♦ Talkpage ♦ My Contributions ♦ 18:28, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
Delete. per above. --Mn-z 19:44, March 6, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep. It is a train wreck but an unusual one. I agreed AT-ST was just too weird to keep but this isn't that bad if somewhat littered with stubby paragraphs. In fact it would be a feature of the week at the Padded Cell (a.k.a. illogicopedia) . A mild clean up suggested. --
RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:38, March 3, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* (talk) (stalk) Π ~ ~ 04 Mar 2010 ~ 07:55 (UTC)
|
Delete |
Delete. This is the other contribution by Darth Dominus, who gave us AT-ST, at least he did until we voted it into oblivion today. I would nominate and throw it into youse's laps, as I really don't know what the hell this author is doing, but that isn't allowed any more, so I'll nom and delete and just say: It is a bit surprising that he blinded me--with science! Spıke ¬ 01:02 3-Mar-10
Delete. As per Spike. What the hell is the author trying to do? —Paizuri MUN ♦ Talkpage ♦ My Contributions ♦ 01:05, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
- don't care don't care don't care. --Roman Dog Bird 01:07, March 3, 2010 (UTC)
They started out with a Locomotive article Image removed by order of Mordillo but they ended up with a trainwreck. (Yeeaaaaaahhhh!!!)
No. --High Gen. Meganew (Stuff I've Done) (Chat With Me) (Get an Award!) FORCES ENLIST MUN 17:06, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
Send this to hell. --Wilytank 18:43, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Everybody's doing a brand new dance now; and it sure as hell isn't 'The Locomotive'. mAttlobster. (hello) 12:23, March 6, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- What? No more planting cartoons in vote boxes? I'm going back to
/gif/ where they're nice! Spıke ¬ 12:26 5-Mar-10
|
Keep |
- Weaker keeper. Not the best page, but far from the worst. Population, "not many, because of the wolves" funny while uncorrect (never a recorded case of a wolf attacking a human). This is another page where a few minutes fix-up and edit sweep would get the patient out of bed. I bet you two otters that it could be done. Aleister in Chains 15:16 25 Feb. MMX
- Tell you what, let me play with it. Hiatus and I were saying how much each of us likes broken English pages, if done well, and I thought of doing one on purpose. This could be it! Al in Chains, few minutes later
Weak Keep. Thank you for defending wolves, but don't change that line--It is funny and plays to stereotypes of Transylvania. SkinFan complained about one of my several one-sentence, crap explanations of the US Constitution in UnNews, but funny beats correct. I have now given the article a heavy copy-edit, unfortunately deleting all the endearing foreigner-speak I raved about in Comments. The article is not bad now, though I don't insist we need a second article on Croatia. Spıke ¬ 13:03 2-Mar-10
- Sterotypes are my favorite food, so of course. Spike, I need you over at talk:unununium. Al in Chains, a few minutes later
weak keep for now and add the merge template. --Mn-z 03:54, March 6, 2010 (UTC)
|
Delete |
Delete. Otters as currency? Funny. Otters are awesome. Rest of article is shit and 1-star-rated. Wild at Heart 17:15, February 22, 2010 (UTC) Neutral per cleanup. Wild at Heart, he who cleans up (Yell at me) 23:02, March 3, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. --
Roman Dog Bird 20:46, February 22, 2010 (UTC)
Otters Never a good sign when Uncyclopedia and copies thereof are the majority of the Google hits on the word.--Count of Monkey Crisco 20:52, February 22, 2010 (UTC)
Countrycruft – Kip > Talk • Works •• 04:16, Feb. 23, 2010
Death to it. --High Gen. Meganew (Stuff I've Done) (Chat With Me) (Get an Award!) FORCES ENLIST MUN 17:02, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. (Formerly Keep.) Pursuant to the Comment by Mnbvcxz, I have moved everything good into Croatia (notably otters and wolves), except for the phony name and the etymology that suggests that Kurvats are descendents of whores. What's left is unremarkable. Spıke ¬ 04:48 6-Mar-10
- Delete Based on what is there now - delete this and never mention it again EVER. mAttlobster. (hello) 12:25, March 6, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. spike said he already moved everything of value over to Croatia. --Mn-z 03:32, March 7, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I have a soft spot for botched foreign English. "It would be quite a nice country to live there." Someone tell me where this article fits with Croatia, slightly listy, slightly vandalized. Kurvatia is essentially unchanged since Sep-07. Spıke ¬ 18:20 22-Feb-10
- Correction, Croatia was full of vanity, pidgin English (not as endearing as Kurvatia started), and inscrutable grammar. It's better now; and Aleister promises to move the overlong, bilingual parody of Night Before Christmas to a final resting place in UnPoetia. Spıke ¬ 03:34 5-Mar-10 Correction, Aleister evidently promised that I would do it. Now done, but I am not going to try to make that poem use meter, nor have it on my Watch list; and none of us are going to decide whether the Croatian parts are really funny. Spıke ¬ 23:08 5-Mar-10
- Should this be merged anywhere with the Croatia article? I am guessing the original writer of this was possibly Serbian.--
RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:39, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
- If it loses, please move it to my user space and I'll add more botched english to it to make it so cute you can spit rose buds. ~

2:12 1 3 mmx
- Article incorporates {{Europe}}, but is not mentioned in {{Europe}}. If it is kept, the template should be revised. (I'll do so if I see this table after Keep and before archiving.) Spıke ¬ 20:32 2-Mar-10
- Ideally, this should be merged with Croatia. I dislike adding fake nations or redundant versions of real nations to sectional templates, as it encourages people to create several weak articles on the same subject, instead of working together to create one good article. In fact, as a general rule, I dislike articles about fake subjects or redundant versions of real subjects. But I digress. --Mn-z 03:52, March 6, 2010 (UTC)
- You have a valid point; Croatia's residents are said to be coffee-drinking gossips, whereas Kurvatia's are merely descendents of whores. But the take is not that different and I see no special reason for multiple Croatia articles. Then again, I'm not one.... Spıke ¬ 04:17 6-Mar-10
|
Keep |
Keep?There's a good skeleton to work with here... give it to me if it doesn't survive. ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* (talk) (stalk) Π ~ ~ 05 Mar 2010 ~ 07:22 (UTC)
Keep. --Wilytank 12:30, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
Commit to Happytimes--There is indeed a base to build on. Spıke ¬ 12:32 5-Mar-10
Keep. It caught me laughing. I personally, if I vote 'keep' on a work-needed page, often go onto it and do at least some clean-up or additions, and maybe should always do that. So I'll put in a few minutes, but it looks like Happytimes likey this pagey. ~ 
15:22 5.3.mmx
|
Delete |
Delete. I thought I'd see if we have an article on this book, since my class is reading it right now. Boy, do we ever... —Paizuri MUN ♦ Talkpage ♦ My Contributions ♦ 04:59, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- May be there is something to work on here but there is a heap load of droppings in there to clear out first. Otherwise it will remain guano. --
RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:13, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Kept. --
Roman Dog Bird 09:20, March 6, 2010 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. It hasn't been used anywhere, and serves no purpose.--UnEditor510 drop us a line, mate 21:01, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Does nothing but invoke an illustration. Another greeting-card template. Spıke ¬ 21:20 5-Mar-10
- der --Roman Dog Bird 22:13, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. actually, this is unused, so it should have been taken to QVFD. --Mn-z 03:44, March 6, 2010 (UTC)
- oh yeah --der 05:22, March 6, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Looks like The Score Image removed by order of Mordillo is about to get settled. (Yeeaaaaaahhhh!!!)
- Delete. --
Roman Dog Bird 02:53, February 28, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Unfunny random wank. And that template is awesome, Monkey Crisco. Wild at Heart//Yell at me 20:26, February 28, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Author seems delighted that, by failing to say anything coherent, he might keep us reading further. Spıke ¬ 02:32 2-Mar-10
Delete. Not going to work. Final score is zero. --Wilytank 16:53, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. --High Gen. Meganew (Stuff I've Done) (Chat With Me) (Get an Award!) FORCES ENLIST MUN 17:03, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Comment. Like so many articles that end up here, I suspect newcomers have been reading some very old uncyclopedia links which may explain works like this. --
RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 20:54, February 28, 2010 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- who cares --Roman Dog Bird 00:15, February 28, 2010 (UTC)
He's gay! You see, the male members of the band are gay emo's, and the female lead is a slut. This is bandcruft; it isn't horrible bandcruft; but from that intro to the sex-organ puns at the end, it has no cleverness. Spıke ¬ 12:26 2-Mar-10
Delete. --Wilytank 14:50, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
Rape --High Gen. Meganew (Stuff I've Done) (Chat With Me) (Get an Award!) FORCES ENLIST MUN 17:03, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
Bucket full of fuck. The Man In Black. 23:22, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- It's the work of many anons according to the history. Seems to act like fly paper for a pile of unfunny rant crap. --
RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 21:00, February 28, 2010 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. Take an unnotable cartoon from about 10 years ago, add Beavis and Butthead and... well nothing happens really. You get a lot of boring plot synopses of the original show with Beavis and Butthead awkwardly inserted. --Count of Monkey Crisco 21:40, February 26, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. per Crisco. Wild at Heart//Yell at me 22:23, February 26, 2010 (UTC)
Delete.. Doesn't work and a chore to wade through. -- RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:23, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
- I fucking hated this show. --
Roman Dog Bird 00:18, February 28, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. probably can't come back worse. --Mn-z 23:32, March 3, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. Randomness. Profane. Cliché. I got it. This ain't funny, not the market. I'm talkin' bout Flea Market. Uncyclopedia. It's just like, it's just like an epic fail. Wild at Heart//Yell at me 23:45, February 28, 2010 (UTC)
Delete.--Count of Monkey Crisco 02:20, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Randomness. Profane. Cliché. This is not Uncyclopedia, this is really bad stand-up. Spıke ¬ 02:29 2-Mar-10
- Delete. --
Roman Dog Bird 00:40, March 3, 2010 (UTC)
Obliterate. I love real life flea markets. Excellent place to pick up cheap music. This, however, isn't worth a penny. --Wilytank 21:17, March 3, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. This survived deletion three years ago, but that was probably a fluke. The concept is almost sort of workable in a fluffy, punny way but the writing after the first sentence lacks any merit. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:43, February 26, 2010 (UTC)
- lol --Roman Dog Bird 01:04, February 28, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. The writing does lack any merit; as for the alleged concept, how do you turn a single pun into an article? Spıke ¬ 02:40 2-Mar-10
- Delete. Second paragraph about Ronald Custer and an invasion of Mexico diverted me briefly. Like - what the hell has that idea got to do with this article? --
RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:25, March 2, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Urrrgh... This is beyond saving, even in ICU. Delete it and start over. This article has just been ruined edited by an idiot a genius.18:52, 03 3 18:52, March 3, 2010 (UTC)
EXTERMINATE! NO NO NO! Please No! --Wilytank 21:11, March 3, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep Some good lines. I removed the carp, and tarted it up. It's kinda deadpan and I like it. MrN
01:23, Feb 27
- Keep. --
Roman Dog Bird 01:04, March 3, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 19:33, March 3, 2010 (UTC)
|
Delete |
Delete. One or two good lines but it's mostly desperate, listy padding on a subject without enough complexity to warrant more than one or two good lines. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:36, February 26, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Kept MrN 22:37, Mar 3
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. Made up nonsense about a made up nonsense subject. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:36, February 26, 2010 (UTC)
Delete.. Possible work of kids. If the basic idea doesn't work in the article, why carry on?-- RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:33, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
- dohohohoho --Roman Dog Bird 01:13, February 28, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Started to get interesting when they "finally reach Hitler's obsidian fortress [and] battles Hitler through 167 alternate universes." Not! Spıke ¬ 02:38 2-Mar-10
EXTERMINATE! O_o My jaw dropped --Wilytank 20:55, March 3, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
Keep. I dunno, I've always kinda liked this article. Well, the section on "Bob's disgusting habits" can go, but...yeah. —Paizuri MUN ♦ Talkpage ♦ My Contributions ♦ 05:36, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
Keep. He shits demons. Let's face it: Bob Barker is notable. This is one of those articles where a rewrite rather than deletion is the better initiative. Also, libel is always welcome and appreciated in my opinion. If this were written by Bob's classmate or ex-wife or something it'd be cyberbullying, but it's not, so it's funny, because people ranting about how much they hate a celebrity they've never met is always funny. Also, he shits demons. --EMC [TALK] 12:47 Feb 25 2010
Keep. It's decent, not feature worth, but I don't think its terrible --Uncle J 15:39, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. The article is crappy, but in need of a re-write or cleanup, not deletion --Sir Skinfan13 Talk {< CUN RotM FBotM VFH ΥΣΣ Maj. SK >} 00:08 EST 2 Mar, 2010
Keep. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 19:34, March 3, 2010 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete. Game show cruft. Unfunny, mean spirited and a bad case of tl;dr. Wild at Heart 03:24, February 24, 2010 (UTC)
-
- It isn't per se, but unfunny and mean spirited are. This is just shit. Wild at Heart 03:35, February 24, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Yes, it is hateful, from the initial quotes and intro on. "If you don't agree, kiss my ass." Excessive length of Section 1, Bio is a factor. "He shits demons." I don't care if the author hates the subject, but an endless stream of libel is not funny. There is nearly nothing in here that is apropos of anything in reality. Spıke ¬ 04:00 24-Feb-10
- derp derp derp --Roman Dog Bird 04:30, February 24, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Ranty pants. Full tilt hatred/abuse doesn't equal funny. -- RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:13, February 24, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Kept MrN 22:40, Mar 3
|
Keep |
Keep. Fullerton is evidently Belfast's analog to the late Johnny Most of Boston. It is a real article, about someone real, poking fun at real idiosyncracies (Fullerton's craze for Chinese food), and overusing an arcane word (that could, indeed be a bird) so artfully as to excuse the inevitable toilet humor. Spıke ¬ 21:06 23-Feb-10
Keep.. Borderline though I guess laying a turbit means a different sort of bird. -- RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:10, February 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Irish humuor, about an Irish personality. People in Ireland may get it just fine. ~

5:25 27 2 2MX
Keep. Some cleanup needed, but this isn't beyond help. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 19:36, March 3, 2010 (UTC)
|
Delete |
Delete. Looks random and short. Note: a "turbit" is a sort of bird. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:03, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
EXTERMINATE! Where's the humor? Wild at Heart 20:38, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. --
Roman Dog Bird 21:47, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Kept MrN 22:41, Mar 3
|
Keep |
- Keep Just because I hate McDonald's, the most facist environmental destroying corporation in the world. They deserve this article, they deserve this page advertised on all of their napkins and bathroom walls for the morons that eat there to edit. Let's take out the vanity, feature it, put it on wikipedia for them to feature, and then someone here make a full-length motion picture of it and McDonald's can sell the characters from the movie in their poison factories. I rest my case, your honor. ~

20:35 2 3 mmx
- You lose the case, Counselor! Rants aren't funny, and Keeping an unfunny article backed by a rant means there's another unfunny article on the site, and we have failed in our purpose here. If you dislike McDonald's (despite its cloying pamphlets on its Corporate Rain Forest Policy etc etc), act on that dislike by writing a clever, reality-based replacement for this awful article. (Extra credit: Do it without mentioning excrement.) Spıke ¬ 20:41 2-Mar-10
- PS--I don't hate Burger King, but you might consider whether you can do to McDonald's characters something like what I did to Chicken McNuggets. Spıke ¬ 20:43 2-Mar-10
- Whether you hate McDonald's or not doesn't affect the fact that this article is shit. Vote on the quality of the article; not based on your personal opinions. —Paizuri MUN ♦ Talkpage ♦ My Contributions ♦ 23:42, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
- My "yes" vote was itself a joke, of course I knew the article was biting the dust when I wrote it, and as it reads it is really a "delete" vote turned into a rant for a "keep" vote. If we can't play among the tombstones of VFD, then what good are courtrooms waiting for reprieves or tombstones? ~

1:33 3 3 2Mx
- In retrospect, the final sentence had no purpose other than to be a hint, which we all ignored. Spıke ¬ 02:14 3-Mar-10
|
Delete |
Delete. I just reverted an IP who rickrolled the page, only to realize it was probably better off rickrolled. —Paizuri MUN ♦ Talkpage ♦ My Contributions ♦ 02:47, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
Delete. The work of nothing but Anons for over a year, surely none of them having attained Junior High School. Let's see if we can cut down McDonald's characters!!!!! Spıke ¬ 02:51 2-Mar-10
get rid of it --Sir Skinfan13 Talk {< CUN RotM FBotM VFH ΥΣΣ Maj. SK >} 00:01 EST 2 Mar, 2010
- Delete. If this had a humorous point, it soon loses in that old standby for a failing article - a long, dull list. --
RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:14, March 2, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. I can't say enough bad things about this piece of shit. The random insertion of the word "Poop" is a great summary of this page's whole content. It's as though a special ed. class's honor roll students were given computers with intrawebs with which they proceeded to create this page in between snack time and drooling on their coloring books. I've fucked black chicks with more redeeming qualities than this article. --EMC [TALK] 17:07 Mar 2 2010
- Many retarded kids are respectful, and some are clever (understanding what works in interpersonal relations more than they do in book-learning). This article is neither. (Black chicks? any one who puts out would have one more redeeming quality than this article.) Spıke ¬ 20:26 2-Mar-10
- You're right. My comment wasn't fair to retarded people. --EMC [TALK] 20:28 Mar 2 2010
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
I laughed and laughed, this was really good, thanks for pointing it out. I went in, took out any possible vanity stuff, built up a few sentences, and it may be good to go. Have another look, but in any case, Keep.. ~ 
13:02 1 3 mmx p.s. I put in even more edits (a 'safe word' etc.) and a photo with caption. Better, I thunk.Naw, I realized that this could hurt someone somewhere. Funny to me, but it's not my friend who will end up in traction, nature take its course and all that. ~
11:02 2 3 mmx
|
Delete |
Delete. You probably shouldn't admit you do something this stupid, much less post it on Uncyclopedia. It's probably vanity. --Count of Monkey Crisco 03:05, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. I read it after Aleister's edits: It's still got no reason to live except to document someone's drinking game; and still got no joke except how crazy we get when we're drunk. Spıke ¬ 02:18 2-Mar-10
- Delete. You'll will be taken hence from this court to a place of deletion where sentence will be passed:This claimed to be funny and wasn't. God Awful in my view . --
RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:18, March 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Too short, unfunny. Wild at Heart, he who cleans up (Yell at me) 21:45, March 2, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Am back with you after 93 hours with nothing but a flashlight and a transistor radio (US East Coast ("snow-a-cane"). Spıke ¬ 02:18 2-Mar-10
- Beware of The Fog! --
RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:20, March 2, 2010 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. There's a reason why calculus comedy never took off. --Count of Monkey Crisco 02:02, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. WTF? I think the writer misunderstands the concept that if you want your stuff to be read by other people, try and knock the damned thing into shape! --
RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:43, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Incoherent. Wild at Heart (Yell at me) 19:48, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Oh wow, a technical specification for a special effect from Star Wars. The article is the recent and sole creation of Darth Dominus, who has also created Locomotive. It shows the same technique (dementia as a placeholder for humor). Spıke ¬ 02:26 2-Mar-10
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Huh? Keep This is actually a very good and funny page. If something needs fixing, fix it. Just because one article may be huffed it doesn't mean, I would think, that anything related to it is like a Siamese Twin and has to die too. ~

00:36 1 3 mmx
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
Kept MrN 01:17, Mar 3
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- It's gone. If there is a better version, the author can move it over if they want to. MrN
12:51, Mar 1
|
Keep |
FEATURE! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:24, 27 February 2010
Keep. It's not so bad. —Paizuri MUN ♦ Talkpage ♦ My Contributions ♦ 04:48, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
Keep. Have spent the last 15 minutes going over its history, people who voted for it for VFH--as a joke, but they liked it--wrapping my head around the concept, and what a waste of 15 minutes (although the TV is on too, enjoying that). It needs a fix to "hang" (the hang isn't linked, "picture" is, and I'll find a link. But long story longer, it should stand and if it attracts copiers maybe they should be huffed, and not the original. ~ 
5:03 27 2 2MX
Keep. As per above reasoning. Just because someone tries to copy this shouldn't mean it gets deleted. We can always vote on the imitators. -- RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:03, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. Not stellar but not worthless. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 04:07, February 28, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. Okay, I grinned. --Wilytank 18:46, February 28, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. just to prove I don't want EVERYthing deleted. Wild at Heart//Yell at me 19:38, February 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Do my eyes deceive me? Wild, you like one! And here I thought you were trying to bring Uncyclopedia back to its origins on Jan. 5, 2005. Think of your reputation as The Terminator, Are you sure you want to go through with this? ~

2:09 1 3 mmx
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
mahogany, mahogany, mahogany, mahogany, mahogany, mahogany, mahogany, mahogany. Apparently. MrN 12:52, Mar 1
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Haha. More eaten by a Grue jokes. -OptyC Sucks!
CUN18:30, 19 Feb
- Delete. Zap 'em Danno. --
RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 21:00, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
Delete.I don't get it and I don't blame myself. --Wilytank 21:36, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Saturday, 02:01, Feb 20 2010
Delete. - We don't need a Zork3. – Kip > Talk • Works •• 09:12, Feb. 21, 2010
- Delete Just shit. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:17, February 21, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. --
Roman Dog Bird 20:05, February 24, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Kept MrN 12:58, Mar 1
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Terrible sequel to something that doesn't need a sequel. What does this really add to the original that couldn't just be added to the original? -OptyC Sucks!
CUN18:11, 19 Feb
- Delete. Zorking 'ell. What the..--
RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 20:59, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Saturday, 02:01, Feb 20 2010
Delete. - We don't need a Zork2. – Kip > Talk • Works •• 09:10, Feb. 21, 2010
- Delete Just shit,. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:17, February 21, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. --
Roman Dog Bird 20:07, February 24, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Kept MrN 13:00, Mar 1
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. Yes, we get it. You hate Fred. Just like every. Other. Fucking. Person. On. YouTube. —Paizuri MUN ♦ Talkpage ♦ My Contributions ♦ 05:05, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
Delete. More randimbo than randumbo in this case. Crap. -- RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:08, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Ranty pants. Wild at Heart//Yell at me 18:17, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. I've never heard of Fred Figglehorn, but there's no way in hell this is about him.--Count of Monkey Crisco 20:06, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
- Then you're the luckiest of all of us. --Wilytank 20:38, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. --Mn-z 23:14, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. random mess that probably isn't going to get better, and not the good kind of random mess either. Delete and replace with the footnoted vandal-rant here. --Mn-z 04:24, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete It's a festering pile of shit. —Paizuri MUN ♦ Talkpage ♦ My Contributions ♦ 04:47, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- Are we Encyclopedia Dramatica? Oh, we're not? Then
Delete.. —Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! NOTM 07:30, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete MrN
10:55, Feb 27
Smite. Ranty pants ED-esque. Wild at Heart//Yell at me 18:18, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete and protect for all eternity. I hate this article, I hate the previous ones and I will probably hate the future one. I think we can live without an iCarly article. ~
18:25, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
- Someone should make Mordillo an admin! MrN
23:12, Feb 27
- We already tried that, it didn't work some reason. --Mn-z 23:15, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
- What seriously? Sysop protect this from being created???? I gave it a semi? Not that sort. No. MrN
23:18, Feb 27
- What happened was, Moridllo have it full creation protection after the womb-newt version got deleted. Then, several months later, a noob created an article called "I Carly", and Madmax moved that to "ICarly". --Mn-z 23:25, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
It's Sysop protected now... MrN 23:30, Feb 27
|
Comments |
Huffed and did the thing Mnbvcxz wanted It's better than sysop protection. Mnbvcxz you better look after this page. MrN 23:37, Feb 27
|
Keep |
4:03 27 2 2MX
|
Delete |
Delete. Shitty spinoff of Midkiff Land, which is up for VFD too. Wild at Heart//Yell at me 22:26, February 26, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Fuckin' sojurns... --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:31, February 26, 2010 (UTC)
Get that shit out of here! seriously. WTF? --Wilytank 00:00, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
Huff or move to userspace, ffs EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) 00:08, Saturday 27 February 2010
Delete. A sacred cow to some here. In all other cases this would have long been put down. -- RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:11, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Comment. Remember to to vote against the equally bad Midkiff Land further down the page. --Count of Monkey Crisco 00:10, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
Comment. For me a big part of the humour is in the barefaced shameless vanity. We do have various other examples of vanity in the mainspace, but nothing in this class IMO. MrN 01:11, Feb 27
Comment. Bitch please! Vanity usually seems more personal. This looks like trying to insult another uncyclopedia user on its lowest and most pathetic incarnation. --Count of Monkey Crisco 03:25, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
- Again, looking at the keep votes from the last VFD, this is not an attack page directed at another user. It's just an In-Joke within another In-Joke (My Sojourn). —Paizuri MUN ♦ Talkpage ♦ My Contributions ♦ 03:49, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
Comment. Not talking about what it is, I'm talking about what it looks like and it looks like crap. I'm sure it's hilarious to the 5 or 6 people who know what Midkiff land is and why utterly cliché cock jokes become komedy gold when Dexter111344 is involved but there's no way this shit would be considered up to snuff by HTBFANJS, the vanity guide, 90% of people who use Uncyclopedia or any other guideline on the entire site. This is the kind of thing that makes ED such a trudge to read. Sojurn is becoming Uncyclopedia's mudkip/shoop-da-whoop/any other meme with zero integral comedy value.--Count of Monkey Crisco 04:22, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
Comment. Much of what you said is true. That would be the case for all in-jokes. That's why they are in-jokes. It's probably more like 99.9% of the people who read Uncyclopedia actually, not 90%. The Sojurn category was featured ya know so clearly it's more than just those who vote on VFD who like it. You saying that it has zero integral comedy value is clearly wrong as many disagree with you on that point. MrN 10:21, Feb 27
Comment. Not sure there's any sign of integral comedy value. This is like a third generation in joke. As you said, it's a spin off of a spin off. What event occurred that connects this pile of cruft to something actually funny in the minds of the "keep" voters. --Count of Monkey Crisco 19:40, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
- I don't know. I just laughed when I read it. MrN
23:10, Feb 27
Kept MrN 23:10, Feb 27
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
Comment. Lists are a useful method of efficiently conveying data. That's why they're perfect for Wikipedia but potential joy killers on Uncyclopedia. Different goals and standards you know. --Count of Monkey Crisco 00:21, February 28, 2010 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. Listcruft. This whole interstate thing is a tragic, tragic failure of an idea. --Count of Monkey Crisco 21:05, February 26, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Full of fail. Check the other interstate articles too, they all seem to be equally failtastic. Wild at Heart//Yell at me 22:24, February 26, 2010 (UTC)
Huff and redirect them all to Freeway or something. EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) 00:10, Saturday 27 February 2010
Delete. per aboves. --Mn-z 23:22, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. Listcruft. This whole interstate thing is a tragic, tragic failure of an idea. --Count of Monkey Crisco 21:05, February 26, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Full of fail. Check the other interstate articles too, they all seem to be equally failtastic. Wild at Heart//Yell at me 22:24, February 26, 2010 (UTC)
Huff and redirect them all to Freeway or something EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) 00:10, Saturday 27 February 2010
Delete. I really can't see how anyone could write a funny article about a highway. Except how that town along the highway is gay and retarted and fat. --Mn-z 23:22, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. Wibble, nonsense and random words blended, melted and poured over a corn tortilla. --Count of Monkey Crisco 21:00, February 26, 2010 (UTC)
EXTERMINATE! Tries way too hard to be random. Wild at Heart//Yell at me 22:30, February 26, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Usual randumbo mix including Diego Rasputin as the only thing that caught my lazy eye. And then ends in a shit shower of lists. Pretty much structured for the short walk to the long drop -- RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:27, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
- A brain dead retard on Nachos --Roman Dog Bird 00:59, February 28, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. Short, unfunny and a bit random. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:44, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
- lolololplolololololo --Roman Dog Bird 23:55, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Pompous piffle. -- RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:11, February 24, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Happytimes, when an author sets out to write a section on a topic, and the only thing he can come up with is a single word, that is bad writing (non-writing). To say this is one of those cases where bad is funny means you are claiming this article is so bad it's good. I say it's just memes and lists. Spıke ¬ 01:58 25-Feb-10
- I respectfully disagree. Yes, the majority of the time you are correct. But sometimes it works for comedy. In this instance the one word section drew a chuckle from me. Indeed, it was the only laugh I got (aside from some smirks at the fan-cruft, but I'm a fan so those don't count). Article is still pants though. -OptyC Sucks!
CUN23:37, 25 Feb
- I actually like the article as a short stand alone, and as a supporting stub. Expanding this would ruin it, although it could use a little clean up. ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*
(talk) (stalk) Π ~ ~ 25 Feb 2010 ~ 05:05 (UTC)
Delete. Too short, unfunny. Wild at Heart//Yell at me 15:11, February 25, 2010 (UTC)
- One shall stand, one shall fall. I'll give you three guesses as to which one is which. -OptyC Sucks!
CUN23:34, 25 Feb
- Delete Minimum effort put in, lumps of lard caught in your teeth. mAttlobster. (hello) 15:50, February 26, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. Papa Smurf was captured and sent to a concentration camp in Caesar Palace, and was tortured by pictures of mating sheep. It just goes on like that. --Count of Monkey Crisco 23:25, February 25, 2010 (UTC)
Flush! - Down to Illogicopedia it goes. – Kip > Talk • Works •• 01:20, Feb. 26, 2010
Delete. No intro; Section 1 reveals that it's about nothing; readers who continue onward receive babble. Spıke ¬ 01:22 26-Feb-10
Delete.. Unfunny randumbo. The worst sort. -- RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:25, February 26, 2010 (UTC)
Smite. as unfunny. Wild at Heart//Yell at me 22:25, February 26, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. Uncyclopedia in-joke? It's four months old. Bitch, please! --Count of Monkey Crisco 23:16, February 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Um. I reckon this was a response to some cyber-bullying aimed at Roman Dog Bird. It's funny, but it's also clearly vanity and an in-joke between a couple users. Move it to their userspace or something. -OptyC Sucks!
CUN23:31, 25 Feb
- Userspace.
pillow talk 01:04, February 26, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. - This is the kinda thing that should reside in Userspace Land. Also, this should be taken with it. – Kip > Talk • Works •• 01:16, Feb. 26, 2010
Delete. I don't care where it winds up. Spıke ¬ 01:25 26-Feb-10
Delete.Put their toys back in the pen. -- RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:26, February 26, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Not in the same class as That time I was nearly raped by Dexter111344's giant cock during my sojourn in Midkiff Land MrN 01:02, Feb 27
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. Bob Marley was born the son of the mythical Medusa. You know the one with the snakey hair? Not the character in The Rescuers. Yeah. It is still unknown who fathered it. It was a creature of many interests, and is mostly popularly known as a musician, although that was by far not its greatest accomplishment. Its greatest accomplishment was the creation of those plastic things that go on the end of shoelaces that fall off after a few months. A very rare user 23:29, February 25, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Not so good. I scanned a few older versions but they seem to expand the wibble more then the solid themes. If anyone finds a decent version please tell me. --Count of Monkey Crisco 00:26, February 26, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. - Unless the joke is that this article was written by someone high on pot at the time, it must go. – Kip > Talk • Works •• 02:51, Feb. 26, 2010
|
Comments |
- My Spidey-sense is now going crazy. Spıke ¬ 01:28 26-Feb-10
Kept Wake up kids. UN:BP next time. MrN 04:37, Feb 26
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. SpongeBob SquarePants was a gripping Academy-Award winning Dramatic Television Series following the story of a War-Torn Undersea Nation known as Bikini Bottom. Known for its overzealous non-human emotion and stunning visual effects, S.B.S.P. is set in the Northern Atlantic Ocean Undersea Nation of Bikini Bottom, where the U.S. Navy rules the poor sea creatures with an Iron Fist, much like is so in Iraq. It stars Slim Shady as SpongeBob, Samuel L. Jackson as Patrick (he's in everything), Jackie Chan as Squirdward, George Dubya Bush as Sandy, Former United States Gov. of Texas and Ronald McDonald as Mr. Krabs, Homer Simpson as Plankton, and Rosie O'Donnell as Mrs. Puff. Also guest-starring Ricki Lake as Pearl (P.E.A.R.L.). It should also be noted that the show took place during an era of time in which really obscenely long names were popular. He is currently a member of the Legion of Doom. Since 2005, Spongebob is the Vice President. A very rare user 23:25, February 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete, though I'm sure something equally terrible will be created in its place almost immediately. -OptyC Sucks!
CUN00:45, 26 Feb
Delete. Article is every bit as defective as this nomination. Spıke ¬ 01:24 26-Feb-10
|
Comments |
- I really love how you only provide a synopsis of the article instead of reasons why it should be deleted, new user. </sarcasm> --Wilytank 01:02, February 26, 2010 (UTC)
- It's not a synopsis; it is a cut-and-paste of the article's own intro. We are dealing with a nominator who, at the least, cannot write. Spıke ¬ 01:24 26-Feb-10
Kept Sockpuppet. Wake up kids. MrN 04:37, Feb 26
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. He is best known for his first album The Lion King and the many female lions in his pride that he has slept with. He is the son of King Mufasa and Queen Salami, and the nephew of Scar. His name is Siamese for Spongebob. Like all rappers, he owns a cadillac which he named Pumbaa and has a protege called T-Pimp. A very rare user 23:23, February 25, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Kept MrN 04:37, Feb 26
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. Something stupid this way cometh. A very rare user 23:23, February 25, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Kept MrN 04:37, Feb 26
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. While many people will have heard of the live action Teletubbies television show for children, few people have ever heard of the little known book on which the series was based. The story follows anti-establishment themes making strong use of paranoid imagery and by association is considered by many to be a particularly dark insight into the secrets of government that do not normally surface. The book slid into obscuirty shortly after publication but has recently been re-discovered and hailed as one of the previously un-found gems of narrative skill created under the communist soviet regime. A very rare user 23:53, February 25, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Comment. Who is this A very rare user, anyway? You can't nom a user space article for VFD. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 23:56, February 25, 2010 (UTC)
Comment. User space is work in progress or personal vanity projects that are kept away from the general populace. They're generally disqualified for VFD nomination. I know Uncyclopedia is a vasta and exciting landscape of comedy but slow your roll, n00b. --Count of Monkey Crisco 00:15, February 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Invalid nom per above. —Paizuri MUN ♦ Talkpage ♦ My Contributions ♦ 00:18, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
- But, is it funny, should it be adopted, and why hasn't the user who's space it's in not edited since 2008? A very rare user 00:25, February 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Doesn't matter, anything in user space is safe from deletion. Period. -OptyC Sucks!
CUN00:30, 26 Feb
- If Socky Says It's Great, then could he adopt it or at least do something similar? Why is it that apperently when someone else tried to move it to the mainspace that wasn't allowed and now it's locked. But then, the log says that user was someone's sockpuppet. A very rare user 01:02, February 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Oh lol. I'm just kidding. But honestly, if it's not cyberbullying or other policy-violating crap, we don't delete stuff in userspace. Also, edits by obvious vandals and trolls are almost indiscriminately reverted. —Sir Socky
(talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:08, 26 February 2010
- What a grandiloquent nomination! This wouldn't be a sockpuppet humping his own article, would it? Spıke ¬ 01:18 26-Feb-10
- Obviously keept. Invalid nom. -RAHB 01:24, February 26, 2010 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. A small but brutal criminal syndicate who operate globally and stem from Teletubbyland, The Notorious Teletubbies are suspected to be led by arch-criminal "Babyface", who is said to take the form of a baby in the Sun. In the gang's first years, early 2000s, they began recruiting new members through a popular children's TV show, Teletubbies. The show taught children to respect their "homiez" and disobey the "pigz", the "pigz" (police) being shown as shower-like speakers that grew up out of the ground and threatened the Teletubbies with the phrase "Time for Tubby bye bye". In retaliation, this phrase has been adopted by members of the gang as a final motif before a murder. It was reportedly said to the leader of a rival gang, Jake of The Tweenies, before he was shot 18 times in the face by a Teletubbies member. A very rare user 23:53, February 25, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Comment. This is active article #21 on the VFD page. Avert your eyes gentlemen, this shan't be pretty. --Count of Monkey Crisco 00:17, February 26, 2010 (UTC)
- New user, probably honest mistake. He's been warned on his talkpage. -OptyC Sucks!
CUN00:21, 26 Feb
- Poopsmith has been by and it's not currently a problem. Spıke ¬ 01:27 26-Feb-10
Kept Nominator was a sockpuppet troll. MrN 04:28, Feb 26
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. Worse than his talk show. Time for this magic to do a disappearing act. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:44, February 25, 2010 (UTC)
EXTERMINATE! heh, magic johnson = magic penis. heh heh heh. Die. Wild at Heart//Yell at me 22:56, February 25, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Magic Johnson is eminently notable: Basketball star of typical promiscuity and self-appointed "spokesman for the [AIDS] virus." This article does nothing with that, but mostly gives him the treatment we saw earlier in the week for Bob Barker. Contains a little vandalism; the stuff about Wilson Chung must be vanity or cyberbullying. If no one is going to take care of it, let's throw it away. Spıke ¬ 23:14 25-Feb-10
AIDS – Kip > Talk • Works •• 01:06, Feb. 26, 2010
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. Excerpt: Sneezing is considered an act of treason. Execution by kittens is the most common punishment. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:21, February 25, 2010 (UTC)
EXTERMINATE! Short and stubby and unfunny. Wild at Heart//Yell at me 22:57, February 25, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Executing the concept of an Islamic invasion of Scotland is unbegun, especially how that would differ from the current Islamic invasion of the rest of Europe. In addition to all the deficiencies others will note, the article is swimming in malapropisms and encyclopedia clichés: "was voted....it is advised by the government....Needles [sic!] to say....infamous [sic] last words....Contrary to popular belief...." When you have nothing to say, try not to do it so pompously. Spıke ¬ 23:00 25-Feb-10
Delete. Carp carp crap —Paizuri MUN ♦ Talkpage ♦ My Contributions ♦ 23:20, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
Delete. - Bollocks to the highest degree. – Kip > Talk • Works •• 00:59, Feb. 26, 2010
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- DUFF - Dumb + Unfunny + Forced = Fail.• FreddCan Shredd •
• • 18:03 • Thursday, 25-02-2010
Delete. Usually there is nearly no cleverness when an author writes a rock band's song anthology, planting a pun in each line; and there is utterly no cleverness involved in translating chat acronyms into dirty phrases. Spıke ¬ 18:20 25-Feb-10
Delete. per spike. Wild at Heart//Yell at me 18:47, February 25, 2010 (UTC)
D3|_373 |_U|_2 – Kip > Talk • Works •• 01:01, Feb. 26, 2010
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. Only one of those seems fun at all. The others are a depressing testament to a tedious and shallow life. --Count of Monkey Crisco 05:00, February 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Was it "Ask an employee for help in the deli." ? ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*
(talk) (stalk) Π ~ ~ 25 Feb 2010 ~ 05:14 (UTC)
- And here I thought being a panelist on VFD was a depressing testament to a tedious and shallow life! Spıke ¬ 18:57 25-Feb-10
Delete. As a list and a regurgitation of that moronic list of fun things to do at Wally World found all over the internet (which is similar in comedic value: more fun to do, not-so-fun to read about; if you have to make a list for it, you've been trying too hard for too long), it fails to bring any laughs. As per above, nearly none of these sound fun. --EMC [TALK] 12:40 Feb 25 2010
Delete. Not only doesn't it sound like fun, it reminds me how shopping involves encounters with other people's spoiled brats so much more often than it actually finds something to buy. Churls don't need help being churls and it's not funny when one writes gloating about it. Spıke ¬ 14:27 25-Feb-10
Delete. As much as I love lists, this is pretty ridiculous. --Wilytank 14:32, February 25, 2010 (UTC)
EXTERMINATE! Terrible. Wild at Heart 15:02, February 25, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. This does not rule. --Count of Monkey Crisco 02:37, February 25, 2010 (UTC)
EXTERMINATE! I agree with Oscar. No. Just no. Nominally Humane! some time 02:43, 25/02/2010
Delete. Today the ten-year-old was asked to speak extemporaneously on the subject of...rules. Spıke ¬ 02:45 25-Feb-10
Delete. MICROSOFT INVENTED RULES LOLOLOL SO FUNNY. --EMC [TALK] 12:43 Feb 25 2010
EXTERMINATE! Wild at Heart 15:02, February 25, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
WTFKeep I believe this page is kind of an Uncyclopedia in-joke. Besides, the pictures alone are worth keeping. —Paizuri MUN ♦ Talkpage ♦ My Contributions ♦ 02:29, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
Keep. I'm too new to know about in-jokes. The article is endearing (the pictures are a big part of this!) but the writing is childish, heavy with stereotypes and lechery. It might be fun to smirk along with the author, but it would be funner if he had a bit of subtlety. Spıke ¬ 02:48 25-Feb-10
- Keeper Some writing help needed, which is maybe what Puppy is telling us. If he had said "And then I undid my undo" he should have won the Nom. of Nom. of the month award. ~

a few minutes later
|
Delete |
Delete. I just undid a blanking on this page, and then wanted to undo my undo. Nominally Humane! some time 02:24, 25/02/2010
Weak Delete Not quite not annoying enough. If anyone thinks it's worth keeping for the pictures let me tell you about something we call "The Internet". Not only can you get pictures of Asian chicks there with zero effort, some even show their boobs! --Count of Monkey Crisco 05:26, February 25, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Kept someone pass the tissues. MrN 11:46, Feb 25
Keep. - I don't care if I did miss the voting period. – Kip > Talk • Works •• 01:27, Feb. 26, 2010
|
Keep |
- Keep I wonder if you know what BJAODN was/is Wild at Heart. MrN
18:35, Feb 23
|
Delete |
- Delete. Too short and unfunny, cites clichéd memes such as "all your base are belong to us." Wild at Heart 18:32, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
- Your user page has consisted of nothing but a queue of articles that "someone" should bring to VFD. If this one goes, your user page will be blank. What you gonna do then?! Spıke ¬ 21:11 23-Feb-10
|
Comments |
- Pray tell, o ye olde-tyme gods of Uncyclopedia, what is BJAODN and why is it worthy of salvation? Is it an in-joke, and further, are in-jokes worthy of salvation? YouFang 19:34, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
- I too would like more inside information before voting. (Hint: If this article is funny, and if its jokes need such an explanation, it fails.) One interpretation is that it is an attempt to write down an episode in the history of Wikipedia, which presumably Wikipedia would view as outside its own scope. In this case, it doesn't belong in Uncyclopedia either. Although the tale is told whimsically, the point is not humor. Different interpretations are welcome. Spıke ¬ 21:09 23-Feb-10
- These days chaps, there is this wonderful thing called "The Internet" you should try using it sometime! It's got stuff like this thing called "Google" and something else called "Wikipedia". :P ... Anyway. look here. Uncyclopedia itself actually came from (in many ways although not exactly) BJAODN. The idiots at WP killed it a few years ago unfortunately. Bye the way SPIKE your comment "If this article is funny, and if its jokes need such an explanation, it fails" is wrong in my opinion. You are obviously entitled to yours... We are more strict with town/band cruft, but there is no "rule". On another note... If you are going to make nominations in the future it's best to check the internet first to see what it is you are talking about/voting on. Some things are based on nothing, others are not. Perhaps people will still think this article is pants if so, vote delete. However to make an informed decision on voting/nominating you need to know what you are talking about first. MrN
23:36, Feb 23
- To conclude/extend my rant... Uncyclopedia is a humours parody of Wikipedia. When Wikipedia is off the mark, we should be more on it. When Wikipedia is closer to the truth, we should wander further from it. That's just the way I think Uncyc should work anyway... MrN
00:25, Feb 24
- I would not try to assert a rule covering funniness, though yes, if you write a joke and have to buttonhole me to explain it before I get it, then in my opinion, your writing fails at its purpose. The article refers to a Wikipedia repository for jokes, including those that were products of vandalism; the Uncyclopedia article portrays it as truth they couldn't handle. I don't agree with the implication above that we have any mandate to fill gaps in Wikipedia, nor joust with it, unless doing so is funny. I'll continue to abstain, as the article might be funny to its very small target audience. Spıke ¬ 03:20 24-Feb-10
- I was not implying that we have a mandate to fill gaps in Wikipedia. However truth is often funnier than nonsense. I do think we should joust with it. That's what parody is. It should always be funny though. If it's funny or not... That's up to personal judgement. MrN
16:01, Feb 25
Kept MrN 13:14, Feb 25
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. It's a list. It ain't funny. MrN 09:17, Feb 24
Listcruft - Although replacing Jesus Christ with Ed Wood gave me a small chuckle. – Kip > Talk • Works •• 09:20, Feb. 24, 2010
Delete. Lists full of shit. --Wilytank 12:42, February 24, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Coulda been okay, but they fucked up with the lists... —Paizuri MUN ♦ Talkpage ♦ My Contributions ♦ 15:19, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
Delete.. Listing badly. Abandon article. -- RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:16, February 24, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. Not only does the article contradict itself; it's stubby and a very bad topic for humor. Ooooooh okay I see what you mean. It was late and I was tired...gotta start thinking more before I post... —Paizuri MUN ♦ Talkpage ♦ My Contributions ♦ 07:36, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Well, it's crap I give you that. As for it being a very bad topic for humour??? WTF? MrN 09:20, Feb 24
Delete. - I disagree with Pely. This could make very good religious humo(u)r if executed correctly. Unfortunately, as it stands it's simply random bollocks. – Kip > Talk • Works •• 09:22, Feb. 24, 2010
Delete. An abandoned work. No chance this one is going to be carried on. -- RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:15, February 24, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
EXTERMINATE! So bad that I nominated it. (Moved relevant bits to Universe which itself is a work in progress.) ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* (talk) (stalk) Π ~ ~ 24 Feb 2010 ~ 06:56 (UTC)
Delete. - A promising title, a plausible concept, but content doesn't live up. – Kip > Talk • Works •• 09:25, Feb. 24, 2010
Delete. Slides effortlessly into randumbo. -- RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:14, February 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. --
Roman Dog Bird 20:03, February 24, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Section 1 gives us a rare form of bad writing: Sudden and inconsistent use of the "vivid present" tense (using the present tense to describe the past). Most of the other forms are already there: Nonsense numbers, overemphasis on the storytelling rather than the story. If you're going to use a Kansas State Board of Education template, you'd better be ready with some sly allegory ridiculing Creationists and Evolutionists. This author won't be capable of this for a decade. Spıke ¬ 02:02 25-Feb-10
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. Antifunny. --Count of Monkey Crisco 02:43, February 24, 2010 (UTC)
- poop --Roman Dog Bird 02:44, February 24, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. It is a fart joke pretending to be an article. Spıke ¬ 02:51 24-Feb-10
Delete. It is a fart joke pretending to be an article. – Kip > Talk • Works •• 09:26, Feb. 24, 2010
Delete. It is a fart joke failing to be an article. --Wilytank 14:35, February 24, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. 5 letters needs 8 more letters: HTBFANJS. --Count of Monkey Crisco 23:28, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. --
Roman Dog Bird 23:37, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
Obliterate. Unnecessarily stupid and really pointless. --Wilytank 00:22, February 24, 2010 (UTC)
Chink! Is it a character from anime? A humble Glaswegian boy? A bit player in Star Wars? Or Chuck Norris? Nimble imagination, unaccompanied by any coherence. Spıke ¬ 00:31 24-Feb-10
EXTERMINATE! per above. Wild at Heart 03:18, February 24, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. Oh heyyyyyllll no. --Count of Monkey Crisco 23:17, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
- what --Roman Dog Bird 23:53, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Effortlessly makes the transition from Ebonics to listcruft to an incoherence finale. But never manages to work in Shrek. Spıke ¬ 00:39 24-Feb-10
EXTERMINATE!. Listy. Wild at Heart 03:19, February 24, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. - Pointless drivel. – Kip > Talk • Works •• 09:29, Feb. 24, 2010
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. A shitstorm of random 2006cruft --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:44, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. --
Roman Dog Bird 21:14, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
Weak delete because I didn't read the whole thing. The overlong WARNING and all of Section 1 are hype about what a great story author is going to tell me. Like the drunks at Karaoke who cannot revel in their drunkenness until they force me to appreciate it. Intro itself is mostly about vagina. I did see listcruft at the end, and in the several places in the middle where my eyes alit, they quickly told me to take flight again. Spıke ¬ 21:17 23-Feb-10
EXTERMINATE! tl;dr. Wild at Heart 02:45, February 24, 2010 (UTC)
Flush! - Down to Illogicopedia it goes. – Kip > Talk • Works •• 09:18, Feb. 24, 2010
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
3/4 Keep From what I see, this has potential. Just a bit of a clean up and it should be fine. --Wilytank 23:24, February 18, 2010 (UTC)
- We are not looking at the same article apparently. -OptyC Sucks!
CUN23:26, 18 Feb
- Keep Seems interesting and with editing, savable. How many articles about obscure elements are on Uncy? We need more, not less, imnho. Unununium fanboy 19:37 20 Feb. MMX
- Did an edit and addition sweep of the page, removed the infections and now needs some bedrest. as do I. Aleister in Chains 15:58 24or3 2 2MX
Keep. Formerly Delete. You've already brought it up to baseline article quality, and it seems you're not done. Spıke ¬ 16:29 23-Feb-10
Keep. Aleister appears to have taken it into his element. MrN 17:10, Feb 23
|
Delete |
- Delete. I hate this article so much!!!! >.< -OptyC Sucks!
CUN23:15, 18 Feb
EXTERMINATE! Unununfunny. Nothing salvageable. Wild at Heart 02:48, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. This article does everything wrong; total, pointless babble about a made-up element. Wilytank, you are risking becoming the new Jupiterfox--our canary in the coal mine whose collapse proves it is safe to rush in. Spıke ¬ 15:11 19-Feb-10
- For the record, Unununium is the theoretical name for element 111 on the periodical table and is synthesized by bombarding Bismuth-209 with nickel-60. --Wilytank 16:53, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
- Not in my frickin' house!!! I'll take your word for it; then, total, pointless babble about a real element with a made-up name. Spıke ¬ 02:49 20-Feb-10
|
Comments |
- Attempting a rewrite and save because the table of elements up in this number range has a weird assortment of uuuu names, so this has potential as a humourous take on that strange ungodly fact. Changed the atomic number to 119, as 111 is already taken. Aleister in Chains|Element fanboy 16:02 23 2 2MX
- In addition, our Periodic table, though funnier, could be even better if one of the periodic tables in the text were a clickable HTML image by which to get to other "relevant" Uncyclopedia articles. Pie, for example, declares that it is the 92nd element (symbol
Pi ). Spıke ¬ 16:21 23-Feb-10
Kept MrN 17:10, Feb 23
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
EXTERMINATE! Unfunny, attacky, bitchy. Reads like an ED page only less funny. Wild at Heart 04:24, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
EDelete - Wow, that sucks. – Kip > Talk • Works •• 04:26, Feb. 23, 2010
SMITE THIS!!! I have no idea why I used that template. —Paizuri MUN ♦ Talkpage ♦ My Contributions ♦ 04:47, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. --
Roman Dog Bird 05:23, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. From Line 2: "Its [sic] mainly about mispelling [sic]." I might abstain on a parody of a book I haven't read (especially one about a "parallel universe" with attacking jew forces), but this writer needs to be diverted to his true calling: Street-sweeping. Spıke ¬ 12:14 23-Feb-10
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 03:01, 23 February 2010
- Why? It's total shit. It's whiny and reads like an ED article. Wild at Heart 03:01, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
-- Roman Dog Bird 03:09, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 03:10, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. Something's really wrong when good articles, articles that were FEATURED by the way, are nominated for deletion. Some of us happen to think obscene humour is funny. Don't enforce your puritanical nonsense on us. YouFang 04:01, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. It's kinda pathetic by today's standards, but it was featured, and we don't delete those. —Paizuri MUN ♦ Talkpage ♦ My Contributions ♦ 04:03, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Oh hell naw - One of my top favorite articles from the old days. – Kip > Talk • Works •• 04:05, Feb. 23, 2010
- Actually, Wild at Heart makes a strong point about it being ED-style crap. Considering I actually haven't read this article in 2 years, and WaH seems very passionate on this stance, I withdrawal my keep vote. – Kip > Talk • Works ••
04:51, Feb. 23, 2010
|
Delete |
Delete. I don't care if it was FA. OMGWTFBBQLOL Garfield strips shooped to include shit and sex jokes. Hahaha. I thought this was Uncyclopedia, not Encyclopedia Goatsematica. The rest of the text is just shitty attack in ED style. Quote: "The art in Garfield is very minimal, usually just the same exact frame of Jon and Garfield sitting at the counter (actually just a line) with bored expressions on their faces. This strip is drawn by a committee - that's how much work this stuff takes." Or "Also, [Jon]'s a depressed homosexual loser whose only aim in life is to find female companionship, which he is unable to do, which is also hilarious." Yeah, that's not funny, that's whining. Wild at Heart 02:58, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
Pathetic. Author talks about himself in the first photo caption. First two sections (12 words total) are about the author impressed by being an author. Rest of Section 1 is moralizing (in addition to a little nagging in the intro) and then listcruft. Section 2 proceeds apace--Don't know anything about Davis, but what a loser he must be! Section 3, the examples, has only one joke: Twist the comic so that everyone is always talking about shit. Awful--Trade it to ED for future draft choices. Funny is leading the reader to a conclusion so slyly that the reader thinks it is his own. Just running the comic strip down yourself is unfunny stand-up, and Don Rickles isn't walking through that door. Spıke ¬ 03:27 23-Feb-10
- LISTEN TO THIS MAN. HE SPEAKS TRUTH. Wild at Heart 04:22, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I HATE MONDAYS. – Kip > Talk • Works ••
04:32, Feb. 23, 2010
- Kept. It's featured. If you don't like it, revert it to the featured version or rewrite it, don't bring it here. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 09:42, 23 Feb 2010
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. Using the classic fail formation of Oscar Wilde quote, paragraph, list, list, list, list, list, list, list, paragraph. --Count of Monkey Crisco 21:00, February 22, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. That's its format; and its only humor is oh, wow, Man, I am really wasted! Spıke ¬ 21:20 22-Feb-10
Delete and redirect to Drugs. —Paizuri MUN ♦ Talkpage ♦ My Contributions ♦ 23:24, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
- pdblpdlbdpldlbdbldpbldpbldpbldpbldpbdpbldpbldbpdlbdlbpdlbdlbpdblpdbldpbdpbldpbldpbldpbldpbldpbldbpdlWAAAHHHHHH!!
00:31 17 Feb MMX
- After the swap, we'd need a new vote on deleting it under its new name, as it would still be just as bad! Spıke ¬ 04:28 17-Feb-10
- Delete. Some articles here act like fly paper , attracting all the ugly insects to leave their unfunny deposits. This is one of them. --
RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:13, February 17, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Kept That was a truly pants nomination, so I'm closing it. CHECK THE FUCKING HISTORY BEFORE NOMINATION You guys voting should also know better. It took me 1 min to find a FAR better version. I'm going to start giving out bans at some point if people don't bother to check the page history for a better version before nomination. MrN 19:13, Feb 17
|
Keep |
- Keep. If the pointless list is lost and some excess fungi removed, this isn't mind crunchingly awful. --
RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:11, February 16, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. Good to see you in this box! This article does everything wrong--anthromorphizes a piece of food, freeing the author to have anything both ways, it's written in the spirit of a 10-year-old wanting everyone to notice he's writing his first real article, memes, lists, SHOUTING, choice of topics (war and mating, obviously). There is only one good thing about it: the title. Here is how I see it: Modern society is rebelling against processed foods and people are going back to whole-grain and multi-grain toast. This article is Uncyclopedia's way of putting us in touch with our past, before toast was domesticated at all. Spıke ¬ 12:59 16-Feb-10
Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:42, 17 February 2010
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- The above theme is now a new intro of Wild Toast. As usual, I await the addition of a new History section from Romartus, upon which things will snowball. Additional section headers are carved out to extend the article to other ways of politically correct eating, and back to Jam Jesus. Spıke ¬ 00:30 17-Feb-10 post-edited
Kept MrN 19:19, Feb 17
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. About as funny as the horrible cartoon it's based on. --Count of Monkey Crisco 08:21, February 17, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Author MrCleveland recently told Mr.N. he never reads HTBFANJS, also threatened to boycott Uncyclopedia until Easter. He understands what an article should do; he's just not good enough to make it do it. And this one won't be missed. Spıke ¬ 12:59 17-Feb-10
- Not sure how I missed that one. MrCleveland requested that his account be removed, and I thought I had huffed the lot. Well, all those which were not significantly edited by anyone else anyway. If there are any others which I missed post a link on my talk page. MrN
13:24, Feb 17
|
Comments |
- The article does attach Dixie to the Winn-Dixie supermarket chain, as I linked game-show host Bill Cullen to the King Kullen chain. (This could be done at Dixie Chicks, but somehow we have no such article.) Spıke ¬ 13:02 17-Feb-10
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. Listcruft plus four unremarkable paragraphs. The core joke is already used in Cereal killer. --Count of Monkey Crisco 17:10, February 15, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Indeed, there's no point in having two of these, and this one should go. Spıke ¬ 17:20 15-Feb-10
- Delete. --
Roman Dog Bird 21:51, February 15, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. - Should redirect to Pointless drivel. – Kip > Talk • Works •• 22:58, Feb. 15, 2010
- Delete. Out damned lists!!!--
RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:16, February 16, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Another Runescape vanity page created by IP's. -OptyC Sucks!
CUN20:15, 16 Feb
Delete. Spıke ¬ 20:35 16-Feb-10
- Rescinded. Upon further review, this useless page was not created by IPs but by the user "Zith Melle" who also contributed on the Runescape-cruft we voted on below. I don't care what he has on his user page. Spıke ¬ 20:37 16-Feb-10
|
Comments |
- Yeah, I found User:Zezima because this guy contributed to the page in recent changes, so it's invalid. —Paizuri MUN ♦ Talkpage ♦ My Contributions ♦ 20:39, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
- Let's not go and nominate userpages for deletion, shall we? ~
21:21, February 16, 2010 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Okay, before you all go off on me, I'm pretty sure this isn't an actual user as the page was created by IPs and it has no contributions. The page itself consists of RuneScape vanity cruft about some guy nobody cares about. —Paizuri MUN ♦ Talkpage ♦ My Contributions ♦ 20:09, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. -OptyC Sucks!
CUN20:11, 16 Feb
Sure. Any time. Spıke ¬ 20:33 16-Feb-10
Delete. What Pelagonium said. Really conceited shit about a person nobody's heard of on an internet game that a lot of people don't really like. --Wilytank 21:12, February 16, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- And that one as well. You don't think there is actually a user? Go to QVFD or talk to an admin, don't waste precious VFD space over this. ~
21:22, February 16, 2010 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. A mutual link with Eric Theodore Cartman this article... well it's just bullshit. That's all I need to say. It's bullshit. --Count of Monkey Crisco 17:34, February 15, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Vanity or cyber-bullying. Spıke ¬ 18:40 15-Feb-10
- Delete. --
Roman Dog Bird 21:46, February 15, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. - I assume Lance Falcon is some unnotable superhero character. Too lazy to google it. – Kip > Talk • Works •• 23:01, Feb. 15, 2010
- Delete. No illustrations, no explanations..just dives in as if this person needs no introduction. --
RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:12, February 16, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. Over the years it's evolved from a regurge of Southpark catchphrases into a tower of epic cruft with Southpark catchphrases sprinkled in liberally. At no point did it seem to be very good. --Count of Monkey Crisco 17:34, February 15, 2010 (UTC)
Fat-ass homo sexuals. If Cartman was a South Park character, he can only be done justice to if someone starts over. Spıke ¬ 18:47 15-Feb-10
- Delete. --
Roman Dog Bird 21:47, February 15, 2010 (UTC)
This is stupid! - Screw you guys, I'm going home! – Kip > Talk • Works •• 22:52, Feb. 15,
2010
- Delete. The opening paragraph perfectly introduces you to the style of the following article:It's going to be shit all the way down to the turgid bottom. Thanks author for the warning. --
RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:14, February 16, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep Again, a good edit sweep, some photos, quality writing, etc. would cure the illness. As mentioned, this is a popular title, so a couple of people working on it should pop its cork. IP's must enjoy adding in a title or two once in awhile, why not leave them this pond to swim in. Aleister in Chains 19:25 14 Feb. MMX
- Keep As usual there was a version in the history where someone with a mind had edited it. Why was that version not nominated? Still the same format mind, but with far less shit. MrN
20:25, Feb 14
Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 03:59, 15 February 2010
Keep. Perhaps there should just be a section here for lists (good ones) as I did laugh at 'The Lion, the Bitch in a Wardrobe'. -- RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:22, February 15, 2010 (UTC)
Strong keep. It helps me write my screenplays. ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* (talk) (stalk) Π ~ ~ 16 Feb 2010 ~ 05:55 (UTC)
|
Delete |
Delete. No. —Paizuri MUN ♦ Talkpage ♦ My Contributions ♦ 18:23, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
Delete. This is everything bad about listcruft, plus everything bad about bandcruft when it endeavors to amuse by converting every song title to a pun. It is funny when authors devise a horrible movie title, then realize that the horrible porn industry had already stooped that low. But authors are often explaining their own jokes to the reader. Spıke ¬ 19:20 14-Feb-10
- No. --
Roman Dog Bird 19:28, February 14, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Who would ever look at this and be entertained? mAttlobster. (hello) 19:30, February 14, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Nominator is going to get heavy pushback, as this is the 297th most-read article on Uncyclopedia (683 hits), well ahead of the National Hockey League and the PlayStation 3. Spıke ¬ 19:20 14-Feb-10
- Hi. Where are the number of hits listed? I really like the Wikipedia daily hit-count, that makes edited there really enjoyable when the right article is worked on and improved. Aleister in Chains
- The above stats are from Special:Mostpopulararticles, a report run once a day. Spıke ¬ 19:50 14-Feb-10
- Thanks. Are those daily, weekly, monthly, or total Uncy history? Will look at them later, off to see the Wizard now, as well as my Valentines Day
crap duties. Al, few minutes later.
- Those stats are a load of crap IMO. I doubt they are accurate. It's probably old data. MrN
20:28, Feb 14
- Good question, Aleister; I'd say they are monthly hits as they don't bounce around from day to day. I disagree that good editing, or anything else short of Full Frontal Nudity, induces a lot of non-Unc fans to start visiting an Unc page. I've improved a couple of the pages on the list; the rest of the world is pleased, and moves on. Spıke ¬ 14:01 15-Feb-10
- Hey people, check this out: Special:Mostpopulararticles = Special:MostRevisions. By "most popular" they just mean "most edited". —Sir Socky
(talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:41, 15 February 2010
- So that explains why, after I fix up an article, its "popularity" drops off. It would be a stronger statement not to be on this list, as a really good article convinces Mr. I.P.Anon that he can't improve on it. Spıke ¬ 17:46 15-Feb-10
- Well, we rewrote Stereotype and deleted List of Stereotypes, the most popular article on Uncyc. We should delete this before it gets overwhelmingly huge and unfunny like the former List. —Paizuri MUN ♦ Talkpage ♦ My Contributions ♦ 20:06, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
- If you want to rewrite this, that's fine. But it's completely absurd to delete an article to prevent it from being edited, when articles can be protected. —Sir Socky
(talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:45, 15 February 2010
Comment. - This is a situation where I want to vote keep, similiar to the vote on List of Profanity, but with a stronger urge, yet I'm worried it's the ol' snickering 13-year-old in me talking, of whom I must keep under warps due to concern over the welfare of Uncyclopedia's quality, as releasing him would cause an immediate merge with my subconscious Id, creating a disaster of monster movie proportions, also, a run-on sentence. – Kip > Talk • Works •• 04:49, Feb. 15, 2010
- Where the hell is Kip the Dip? The man who seriously and genuinely thinks Fisher Price is actually a good article? Who is this imposter? I'm calling the police. MrN
18:07, Feb 15
Kept MrN 12:22, Feb 16
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- Comment. As Orion Blastar is still around, I suggest it is given back to him before It is removed. --
RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 01:21, February 14, 2010 (UTC)
|