User talk:Lyrithya/archive10

It's quiet in here, isn't it?

Pup 07:46 19 Mar '11

You beat me to it! Spıke ¬ 07:46 19-Mar-11

Took you guys long enough. 1234 ~ 07:47, 19 March 2011

I have a real life too, you know. Pup 07:53 19 Mar '11

You must be the only one. Seriously, what is this 'real' of which you speak? 1234 ~ 07:56, 19 March 2011

It's that feeling of desolation and emptiness you get when your internet connection stops working. And have we all gone anti indent recently? Pup 08:38 19 Mar '11

Sounds lovely. And apparently. Have you something against not indenting? 1234 ~ 19:04, 19 March 2011

Make it a redirect

I was going to make User talk:Maniac mcpee redirect to User talk:Lollipop and then request full-protection. Could you please? - LOL vandalz 10:48, March 19, 2011 (UTC)

But there be history in the talkpages. The userpage proper already redirects. 1234 ~ 19:04, 19 March 2011

Headache

Ouch. pillow talk 17:43, March 19, 2011 (UTC)

I'm sorry, man. And why did you feel the need to put this in my talkheader? o_O 1234 ~ 19:04, 19 March 2011

I put it where?? Wow, I must not have been watching where I was going. pillow talk 03:22, March 20, 2011 (UTC)

Bad headache, eh? 1234 ~ 03:33, 20 March 2011

Image lost

Hey Lyrithya, I just had a chance to check all the articles that I have written or contributed to. On the page: This is not an article there is now missing the File:Notexit.jpg Is is astill too late to bring it back!?!?! --ShabiDOO 19:22, March 19, 2011 (UTC)

Of course it's not too late... but I take it you have the sitenotice turned off. Anyhow, done, although it'd have been a little easier if you'd have linked said article and/or said file. *shifty eyes* 1234 ~ 19:24, 19 March 2011

Thank you so much. Your kindness is bringing me, one good act at a time, slowly out of my depression. did you hear that, life is whizzing by. Sigh....... --ShabiDOO 19:31, March 19, 2011 (UTC)

My... kindness? I'm sorry, you must have me confused with somebody else... *backs away slowly* 1234 ~ 21:03, 19 March 2011

No really, come over, I have a roast in the oven, and its all just for me. I can play you my Benny Goodman records ;) --ShabiDOO 23:05, March 19, 2011 (UTC)

What... exactly are you roasting? 1234 ~ 23:09, 19 March 2011

Lets just say, Im roasting two of them, served with two bay leaves and eaten with chopsticks. ;) --ShabiDOO 23:11, March 19, 2011 (UTC)

p.s. lyrithya when you have a chance, would you be able to put the "old" version of stupid cats on my user space (id like to see what its like and if anything can be incorporated...whenever you have a chance :) --ShabiDOO 23:17, March 19, 2011 (UTC)

And where... did you get them?

You mean 'Stupid cat'? Mon, I told you. It's just 'hello kitty' repeated several hundred times. 1234 ~ 23:32, 19 March 2011

Oh, I seemed to have missed that. Okay. As for the roasts in the oven, lets just say that someone chased them all over town and broke into peoples apartments to find just the right ones :) Its half the fun. And the skin just falls right off! --ShabiDOO 23:37, March 19, 2011 (UTC)

Oh, not this again... you know the last time someone went after those, there was tar stuck to my shrubbery for months! 1234 ~ 03:34, 20 March 2011

OMG! DUKE NUKEM FOREVER IS COMING SOON!!

YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It's officially release date is 6th may, 2011!! I Feel so happy! In fact, Cookies for all!

Another n00b has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic.

Another n00b has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic.

Your all the best!!!! - LOL vandalz 19:30, March 19, 2011 (UTC)

Er, I'm happy for you. 1234 ~ 21:03, 19 March 2011

Nearly forgot to give you this

Mega Deletion Award! This Admin has successfully beaten the crap out of many, many articles in rapid succession. Fear them greatly.

For helping me finally reduce the thousands of unused images down to just three pictures of sexy asian chicks. -- The Zombiebaron 19:44, March 19, 2011 (UTC)

Ooo... so shiny... thanks, mon. Haha, it says I'm an admin. 1234 ~ 23:08, 19 March 2011

A Stupid Question

Why?:Are you huffing pee reviews? Aleister 3:33 20-3-'11

Because I said I'd do a review the other day and still haven't gotten around to it, so I decided to take out my uselessness on other people's reviews.

...okay, not really. I was deleting malformed ones - most of them weren't even review requests, usually just a link, or a bunch of stuff spewed over a page by some IP, or... well... that kind of thing. I blame a DPL idea I got. 1234 ~ 03:37, 20 March 2011

Maybe we can create a bot that quickly spins-out pics, articles and other odds and ends at a dizzying pace, attach it to Uncy's sandbox, and you can chase it around deleting its production for the next 11 days. That should keep you busy, and give the site time to heal after getting a lot of bed rest and ingesting lots of liquids. Both of which sound like a good idea right now. Enjoy, and see you during the one-hour writing thingy later on, if I happen to drop in for that. Bannion de Turin! Aleister 3:54 20-3-'11

I'm sorry. You're right. I make a horrendous admin. It is fortunate that after those 11 days are up, I will go back to being the same powerless user I always was, save for one slight change... the populace will now be aware. They will be aware of what I am apt to do, and they will avoid ever allowing me to do such things again.

Wait, what writing thingy? 1234 ~ 04:29, 20 March 2011

Mmm...in a few more days you'll start writing again no? And reviewing? Creating? I have no clue if you are a good admin (except your moment of tension easing diplomacy) wait (and your ability to admit something and apologise) wait (hours and hours of stuff that someones gotta do). But I think those hours you dedicate to the site are better served (in my humble opinion) with your writing, which I know you are good at ;) ;) ;)

The writing thingy is the 1 hour write-a-thon tomorrow. Im horrified with the prospect of something I wrote in one hour being sent to that (place we will not name) to be trash talked by other members of the com., but competitions are swell arent they? You should do it if you can :) --ShabiDOO 05:17, March 20, 2011 (UTC)

Whatever put the strange notion that I normally write stuff into you people's heads? I've already written more this month than I have last month... but that's not saying much, because I didn't write anything last month. I plead laziness. Writing takes effort, not like doing silly bot-things, and I can do plenty of those with hardly any rights at all. Normally do, in fact... perhaps I should stop. Sort the deathlist. Poor deathlist... it needs it mummy, doesn't it...

Er, I mean... um... oh. Right. That. Um. Crap. 1234 ~ 08:39, 20 March 2011

Last time I did an article in an hour it got renamed and then to compound the embarrassment got put up for everyone to point at and laugh. Pup 05:39 20 Mar '11

The first article I got featured was written in about an hour. That was weird. 1234 ~ 08:39, 20 March 2011

Image huffed

Hello, you huffed the image File:Nailingirlfriend.jpg, used on my userpage? Any chance of it back, please? --Matfen 14:36, March 20, 2011 (UTC)

There you go, mon. 1234 ~ 18:21, 20 March 2011

LOL

Am I the only one to notice that you voted no on all the pages in the contest in one minute? If my page gets huffed because of you, please bring it back to my user space. Probably the funniest thing in the contest, the thing you just did. Aleister I'm done with the timestamps. No more timestamps.

Not the only one. Chief said something menacing in response, and then Socky apparently decided to negate it. Alas. Meh, don't worry. The usual VFDers are staying out of this one, it would seem. 1234 ~ 20:05, 20 March 2011

After a one-hour awful-writing contest, what could be more fitting than a one-minute awful-voting demo? Spıke ¬ 20:07 20-Mar-11

Don't you agree, though? Pretty much all but one or two of the articles are terrible! 1234 ~ 20:10, 20 March 2011

Thanks! I will lump mine within that one or two window. Mine is about the best thing since sliced tofu. Al

No, I dont agree that they are all bad, but I have no problem with you voting against all of them (you didnt verbally trash them and spit acid on them, so whats the big deal). I voted for all of them (well minus one) so would be hypocrytical to cry about it. But a awful voting demo? Thats a realy intense idea of awful and cynical way to see it. --ShabiDOO 20:14, March 20, 2011 (UTC)

No, it isn't. It's a joke. Spıke ¬ 20:17 20-Mar-11

To be fair, there wasn't even time to read all of them properly, let alone get in a wider opinion on the things... although I could blame the voting against all of them on the fact that everyone kept edit conflicting me when I tried to put in actual votes. But that's not the point. There's a yak on the loose. 1234 ~ 20:19, 20 March 2011

Haven't been following, but it's what I expect with a one-hour deadline. Separately, yes, Ammo was much worse, and you need not check. The sporked lists were longer, and the playful segues in Terminology are all new. And the background in the Kudlow UnNews was originally twice as long before it got around to the business at hand (Kudlow). By the way, on Kudlow's podcast off WABC Radio this week, Kudlow with guest Arthur Laffer was really wearing his heart on his sleeve--must have heard how crass he had come off (more likely from the Huffington Post than UnNews). Spıke ¬ 20:15 20-Mar-11

Most of that went completely over my head. O_o 1234 ~ 20:19, 20 March 2011

My page was huffed! A masterpiece, a Picasso on the trashheap, a lost Bach concerto found and used for waste paper. And the Kulow page, I lol when I first saw the headline on the site, thought it was about the best idea I've seen in weeks, that Lisa Kudrow would tell people that everything was all right. Then it was ruined when I saw it was about Kudlow. A true story. Both of them, actually. Aleister 20:19 maybe

Well, in any case, it was no joke for me nor probably most who participated in it and created something. I hope it continues and that people vote honestly and that it produces the beginnings of new and good articles in the making. --ShabiDOO 21:52, March 20, 2011 (UTC)

I never said I voted dishonestly, and Spike didn't even vote. But... er... meh, they do all kind of suck in their current states, but indeed, they should get better. When Aleister moves his back into mainspace, the masterpieciness should be much less questionable.

And UnNews is a mystery to me. 1234 ~ 21:55, 20 March 2011

Ehm, no Lyrith, you were probably the most honest voter ;), seriously. When Aleister moves it back to the main space it will blow our brains off so hard, we will understand even less how much of a masterpiece it is with its briliant briliantnessitcness ;) --ShabiDOO 21:58, March 20, 2011 (UTC)

You huffed VFD

Now how will I express my inner turmoil by getting article deleted?!? (talk) 22:24, March 20, 2011 (UTC)

It's its.... mAttlobster. (hello) 22:26, March 20, 2011 (UTC)

The dozens of joke bans didn't affect me. This is a major fuck-up. The experiment has failed. Spıke ¬ 00:49 21-Mar-11

Spiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiike. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:51, March 21, 2011 (UTC)

There is a brand new VFD system currently running on IRC. Yes it's a little rough around the edges - but so was DI Burnside. What I'm saying is, the job is getting done. mAttlobster. (hello) 00:53, March 21, 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, guys. Yes, I am an idiot, and messing things up does seem to be what I do, but what can be done? I have tried, but restoring the pile seems to be out of my or any admin's scope, so for now I've restored one of the most recent revisions. Please do not make things worse; there has been enough of that already, and do not let what I have done reflect on the other three; they had nothing to do with any of it. I'm the hopeless idiot who should never have been made an admin, even temporarily. Who knows about the others. 1234 ~ 01:00, 21 March 2011

That Socky fella is also kinda douchey. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:01, March 21, 2011 (UTC)

It was sort-of my idea - and a good one - VFD doesn't work anymore as a wiki-page. We should do it by postal vote. mAttlobster. (hello) 01:03, March 21, 2011 (UTC)

I have no idea...

...How to restore that, but I've just grabbed VFD/new from the mirror site, so we can recreate it, and the pertinent parts of the history will be in the archives. Pup 11:00 20 Mar '11

All in your hands now. Pup 12:05 21 Mar '11

Haha, Lyrithya you rule. --Black Flamingo 01:19, March 21, 2011 (UTC)

Eh... 1234 ~ 01:32, 21 March 2011

Panic over, it's all better now. info in the VD -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 02:06, March 21, 2011 (UTC)

Hye!

Care for a cookie? Cat the Colourful (Feed Me!!!)Leave me alone... 12:53, March 21, 2011

Nah, that was`nt the main reason I came here. I came to ask; What is going on with the april reskin? I mean, what the idea of the reskin really is about? Is it about those melons? Or those drugs that Lollipop said? Or is it really about mooses?!! Cat the Colourful 13:15, March 21, 2011

Corea! You spell it Corea! Oh, good; perhaps I wasn't losing my mind, after all... anyhow, the reskin, it's... tradition, I suppose. Pranks in general on April 1st, for that matter. I take it they don't do that where you're from? Or am I misunderstanding? I dunno what we'll actually do, mind. 1234 ~ 22:43, 21 March 2011

Okay... But... Are you sure you did`nt want a cookie? I dont see your name on the list... Cat the Colourful (Feed Me!!!)Leave me alone... 13:07, March 22, 2011

What list? 1234 ~ 23:39, 23 March 2011

Seeing as no one will respond to me

I've decided to take this into my own hands, I'm going to move Dinosaur into mainspace at ten fourty-five EST tomorrow. Anyone who wants to make their final edits can do so within that time frame. Thanks. -- 15:10, March 21, 2011 (UTC)

So why'd you tell all of us? 1234 ~ 22:43, 21 March 2011

I just felt like I should. -- 22:44, March 21, 2011 (UTC)

Weird. 1234 ~ 22:55, 21 March 2011

I know huh? -- 23:15, March 21, 2011 (UTC)

Huh?

Is there a reason for Call of Duty: Black Ops to be redirected? Is it because the ICU tag went out? The last time I checked (when it was an article), the tag said that the article would be re-checked on March 25. --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis?

I don't see that it is redirected. It was nominated for deletion (Archive 232, Sec. 9) and I said the nomination was invalid because of the ICU. It is still tagged with ICU, expiring in a week. Spıke ¬ 22:38 21-Mar-11

Another n00b redirected it. He seems to think the deletion policy, since that's basically what he's doing, deleting articles, doesn't apply to him. Doesn't he know the only one exempt is Zombiebaron? 1234 ~ 22:42, 21 March 2011

Image Huffing

Hello, may I present you with yet another opportunity to prove your complete and utter incompetence as an admin. Word got around that you were recently involved in a project regarding a mass execution of useless images on this site. Well, this image has several old versions which are completely identical to the current version, making them absolutely, entirely, totally, completely and utterly redundant. I had put them up for QVFD twice in the past, but they were ignored, and I didn't care, but now I thought that if you're so into image huffing, you might enjoy this. So for the sake of server space, would you please delete the old versions? Or don't, what do I care. Schamschi, 00:59, March 22, 2011 (UTC)

Honestly, there's really not much point in deleting the old versions as they are indeed the same, and technically admins don't have the power to actually delete anything from the database, just remove it from view. Stuff's still on the server after being delete, and that is why it can be hacked up later. That was probably why folks did ignore it on qvfd. If you don't care, however, why did you enquire then and why are you inquiring now? 1234 ~ 01:55, 22 March 2011

Ah, ok, I didn't know that the stuff isn't technically deleted. I mean, I guessed that it is not immediately deleted (seeing as it can be recreated), but I thought it is put into a trash or something from where it can be recovered for a certain period of time before being ultimately deleted. That's why I requested it for deletion, I thought it would clean up server space. But, seeing as it doesn't make any essential difference — to quote the bot-template on userpages of bots and *cough* some non-bots –, tough fucking shit. Schamschi, 02:16, March 22, 2011 (UTC)

I up loaded another completely identical revison just to piss you off, Schamschi. You're welcome. -- 03:22, March 22, 2011 (UTC)

Well, files go after a few years... but... eh. Magic man, you're a nut. 1234 ~ 03:24, 22 March 2011

How wasteful!! I have been forced to revert you by replacing the image with an earlier, albeit identical, version. pillow talk 08:33, March 22, 2011 (UTC)

I deleted the redundant revisions by Schamschi. However, as he didn't upload the other two revisions, he has no authority to request their deletion. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:45, 22 March 2011

Excellent. 1234 ~ 08:47, 22 March 2011

Call of Duty: Black Ops

I'm just saying, but that article contains plagiarized content from external sources. What the heck, Uncyclopedia isn't EBaum's World! (;*´Д`) - LOL vandalz 08:02, March 22, 2011 (UTC)

Well, I removed most of the content in general; dunno what may or may not have been plagiarised. But even so, when you find things like that, as with any other questionable content, take them to an admin or to VFD. If it is indeed plagiarism, mention that, and link to where it came from. Don't just redirect pages; that's not your call. 1234 ~ 08:52, 22 March 2011

The plagiarised content came from Comedy 23/6. including This, which I remember was taken from a website called VGBoxart, or something. - LOL vandalz 15:19, March 22, 2011 (UTC)

If you have proof of plagiarised content you speak to an administrator about it and they will take action. You are racking up a depressing number of bans for doing things that, while well intentioned, you should not be doing. It needs to stop. In terms of this article provide me with a link to the content along with verification that they have not plagiarised it from here (dates of creation) and I will remove it. --ChiefjusticePSX 16:06, March 22, 2011 (UTC)

Help

Can't you help beginners like us on developing articles instead of putting it in ICU maybe?

If you can't can you suggest anybody who can?!Wacko! 09:44, March 22, 2011 (UTC)

P.S. I need practice. Give me a chance.

P.S.P.S. If you can't, at least help me.

P.S.P.S.P.S. Why does contruction tag expire in a week? Because, as of now, I won't be able to re-check the article every week...

P.S.P.S.P.S.P.S. I'm not God to write an amazingly hilarious and divinely funny article in one go. Perhaps you admins should..umm... give us training or something??

Well, to be fair, most beginners utterly suck and chasing them away is a good thing... but that's not the point. You're here, you've passed the first test, and now the lessons really begin.

Firstly, don't expect too much, and don't be discouraged. Most people here are lazy and never do anything useful, just sit around complaining about all the new users or about all the old users or about all the articles or about all the... well, it varies. I think I had some point, but I forgot what it was.

Secondly, we all need practice, mon. It'll get better with time, though. If you want helps or ideas, you can do what Chief said, for lack of anyone specific willing to help... chat, er... IRC's sometimes an option, too.

Construction tags may expire after a week, but if you need longer, you can also move the page into your userspace and work on it when you get a chance; it's safe there. Put it back in mainspace when it's done. If your account won't let you move it yourself at this point, one of us'll probably be willing to.

Another thing - if you're doing a bunch of PSs or whatnot, it helps to indent them with a :. Also helps to use the preview button to see what you're churning out.

Anyhow, I forgot what I was saying, so... um. 1234 ~ 11:03, 22 March 2011

thanks, that was a lot nicer than I expected..

well, um..my problems are:1) I had exams then, and no time; 2) I don't know the rules and technical stuff, which includes "I don't know how to move my article into userspace". So, could you do it for me?:)

Only 1 P.S this time, how did I pass the first test? (just curious..)

Nice is like a dead squirrel. Don't ask how; it just is. Anyhow, exams are dumb, and I don't think anyone knows the rules, and to move an article, there should be a move tab at the top of the page. Is there? Click on that on the page, then add 'User:Wack Broomhead/' to the beginning of the title. Without the ' things, though. Then tell it to move. Click the button or something. Consider this... training. Especially since I don't even know which article it is. As for what it is and how you passed the first test, it just is, and you just... did. Mind, it'd help if you'd log in and/or sign... 1234 ~ 01:23, 31 March 2011

Oops! Sorry, I'm the same guy who signed in the beginning of thew subtitle. Thanks 4 the advice and the dead squirrel! Want some squirrel stew?*offers one bowl*!Wacko! 15:22, March 31, 2011 (UTC)

P.S. Can I remove the ICU sign now without "Fear of the Dreaded Ban"?!Wacko! 15:26, March 31, 2011 (UTC)

Mmm, if you've fixed whatever it complained about, generally it's fine to remove them. I can't say for sure because you still haven't linked me to the article. *shifty eyes* 1234 ~ 17:06, 31 March 2011

Ban

Yeah, I got a little carried away there. Also, I need to quite rushing April Fools' Day. -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 11:37, Mar. 22, 2011

Eh, just a little. *shifty eyes* 1234 ~ 13:02, 22 March 2011

Are you seriously

considering deleting my article? with the amount of junk/vandalised articles on this site? I guess it has limited appeal for Americans, are you suggesting I turn it into an American newspaper for some deprived ghetto instead? What the hell. 18:50, March 22, 2011 (UTC)

As there was no indication on the page itself that you had intention to do anything more with it, I was going off what was there already, which simply wasn't much. Stubs in general have limited appeal, and things specific to any relatively small region are likewise apt to not have much appeal to those outside, regardless of where specifically, especially if smaller. If you don't build off the fact that this is supposedly an encyclopedia, and use that to develop your concept and jokes more, chances are it'll be lost on most folks, and lose potential effect even on those who do know the subject.

As for the junk on the rest of the site, that's what VFD is for. Vandalised can be tagged various ways as well.

And Jack's got a point about the pee tag; usually you want to put a {{construction}} on these things if you're not done, but that'd work too. 1234 ~ 21:44, 22 March 2011

How dare you. Good day, sir. I SAID GOOD DAY. Mister Victim (talk) 07:36, March 23, 2011 (UTC)

I'm prettier than you are. 1234 ~ 08:22, 23 March 2011

Ok I apologise as ICU seems to attract helpful people anyway. I don't really know how the site works yit 15:32, March 24, 2011 (UTC)

No worries; you'll get the hang of it eventually. Maybe. I mean, I never really did, but... 1234 ~ 20:08, 24 March 2011

I'm sneaky

Sneaks in quickly but quietly and HUGS Lyrithya! Seventh Demigod of Sneaky Hugs, Jnr. 22:05, March 22, 2011 (UTC)

Hail to ye, almighty one! 1234 ~ 22:17, 22 March 2011

Another image to restore

File:Unfortunatekidsinalaundrybasket.jpg needs restoring. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 01:05, March 23, 2011 (UTC)

Done. 1234 ~ 01:16, 23 March 2011

User:Hammerlock the Cock

	All Praise and Glory Be Theirs!
	This user has been promoted to the rank of Queen's Reader.
	Due to their site-topping talents in reading, all other chores formerly assigned to them have been rescinded.
	Unlike other ranks, this one is for life, and they will not be returning to their former tasks anytime soon.
	If you were hoping they would reply to a message, sorry to disappoint,
	but such a menial task is currently outside their job description.

I found him chatting you up on your Wikipedia talkpage. Next thing I knew, he was a sockpuppet, and a vandal, and an indefinitely blocked user. Who the fuck is this guy? --Scofield 10:36, March 23, 2011 (UTC)

Wait a minute, he isn't Lollipop, is he? Oh God! --Scofield 15:24, March 23, 2011 (UTC)

Some people tend not to do so well on wikipedia. 1234 ~ 16:56, 23 March 2011

I was kind of furious when it happened. Nhlrules was actually not my account. And for some reason, my account got dragged into some other user's mess. I'm telling the truth. I had to change an IP range in order to reuse Wikipedia. I checked the other accounts and it apparently was some NHL bullshit. I'm not really a sports guy. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 23:35, March 23, 2011 (UTC)

Okay. 1234 ~ 23:37, 23 March 2011

But I did a horrible job on Wikipedia. I got banned for a different reason because I created vanity. I created Penispenispenis. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 23:44, March 23, 2011 (UTC)

Smart. (?). As I said once before, I can do stuff here because my ego is rubbed and dusted on wikipedia, as pages I either wrote or did major things on and squat get upwards of 70,000 hits a day. So even as I stumble and slobber here I know that "information" I share on a daily basis is doing some good somewhere. This means I can write That time I nearly drowned during my sojourn on the Titanic and still feel like a real live boy. Aleister 22:51 23-3-'11

You're too good for us. 1234 ~ 23:55, 23 March 2011

No, the opposite, almost everyone who works on wikipedia doesn't realize how much fun it is here, they are the stupido ones. We all are the lucky bunnies who are good enough to play here! Aleister 00:00 24-3-'11

You're too good for them, too. 1234 ~ 00:06, 24 March 2011

Hmmmmm. I'll be moving on from these insults and go edit "Evil Jesus". I wish Evil Jesus could be made into a movie. Aleister 00:10 24-3-'11

Perhaps it could. 1234 ~ 00:11, 24 March 2011

Wikipedia sucks. Who wants to create a rival to Wikipedia? Called FACTOPEDIA? -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 00:34, March 24, 2011 (UTC)

Hey lolipop. Totally unrelated. I had a "canadian" experience today. I had a doughnut called a "vanilla dip" and was aparantly the Canadian doughnut featured in a pastry stop. The American one was "boston cream". There was no Australian one. It was so sweet I could barely finish it but it had rainbow sprinkles on it and about 30,000,000 calories. I ate it in your honour. I looked for "tim bits" but couldnt find them. Tim bits are nice. EVIL JESUS! --ShabiDOO 00:46, March 24, 2011 (UTC)

We have Boston Cream Donuts at Tim Horton's too! By the way, I lost again at the ROLL UP THE RIM TO RIM. Oh, and hope you enjoyed the donut. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 00:53, March 24, 2011 (UTC)

I dont want to know what roll up the rim to rim is. My god. Sounds like an article idea though!!! --ShabiDOO 01:14, March 24, 2011 (UTC)

I'll tell you anyway. That's where you roll up the rim of the coffee cup and you can win cars, 3D TV's, motorbikes and many prizes. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 02:15, March 24, 2011 (UTC)

How do you roll up the rim of a coffee cup? --ShabiDOO 02:22, March 24, 2011 (UTC)

Now this may sound stupid,

But I want a copy of another user's userspace in my userspace. Basically, I want to have a copy of a Userspace by Gert5, called User:Gert5/Game/readme.txt. I want a copy of this in my Userspace as this is one of my personal favourite Articles. I would ask him, but he is no longer an active User. I just wanted to ask an administrator if it would be legit to do copy it into my Userspace, even though it is another person's Userspace. - LOL vandalz 18:23, March 23, 2011 (UTC)

What Skully said. 1234 ~ 23:38, 23 March 2011

Yay! （‐＾▽＾‐） - LOL vandalz 08:09, March 24, 2011 (UTC)

Lyrithya...

Can I make you a sig? I'm good at that. I made Another n00b's. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 01:02, March 24, 2011 (UTC)

Are you implying there is something wrong with my current signature? 1234 ~ 01:04, 24 March 2011

Not exactly. I just like creating new signatures to keep myself useful. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 02:14, March 24, 2011 (UTC)

Please don't. I'm sorry, but please... just don't. 1234 ~ 02:58, 24 March 2011

Don't what? Make users sigs or make you a sig? -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 03:48, March 25, 2011 (UTC)

Maybe. 1234 ~ 03:22, 26 March 2011

Protecting the HS

I guess eventually we've got to get into this - does the fact that you protected it when you did mean you agree with Dexter's POV over Aleister's, there? Because, personally, I don't. pillow talk 04:34, March 24, 2011 (UTC)

They kept reverting each other, so I protected it. With any luck it'll remain protected forever... but that's not the point. Actually, might as well unprotect it for now. Even if Skully's right about my notion being completely idiotic, we'll probably have some new setup soonish, but in the meantime... 1234 ~ 04:36, 24 March 2011

I guess it was too much to ask for you to give me an answer that I understood :) pillow talk 04:37, March 24, 2011 (UTC)

Considering the state of confusion in which I currently reside, most definitely. 1234 ~ 04:43, 24 March 2011

Cookies! Get cookies!

I`ll give you a free cookie. I`m so cool.

Cat the Colourful has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic.

Jaah! Cat the Colourful 05:51, March 24, 201

Cool like a muffin. Thankee. 1234 ~ 06:33, 24 March 2011

ICU

Is proving to be really useful when it comes to getting help with an article, shame about the threat of deletion though.. Is there a place where I can put an article and let it be known that others can have their way with it and expand it at will? 19:45, March 24, 2011 (UTC)

Oh, the threat of deletion is always there, at least until they get featured. But even then sometimes they get deleted. Not permanently, but... administrators can be rather silly at times. Anyway, the nice thing here is that even if something is deleted, it is not lost forever. Just ask an admin and they'll usually gladly hack things up for you, I've found. Damned helpful bunch, most of them. 1234 ~ 20:20, 24 March 2011

Oh, as for the other bit, no idea. Can ask around, but... I know on Illogicopedia there be an entire, mostly ignored, system for specifically that, but this place is a little different. 1234 ~ 21:02, 24 March 2011

Shame on the Hall of Shame

Since you are now huffing categories without VFD'ing them (Category:Hall of Shame), and putting in new pages concerning the hall of shame, may I ask what is your final plan? Are you planning on getting rid of the hall of shame in favor of some kind of individual page? Aleister 00:29 25-3-'11

I made that category in the first place as a container for the HoS subpages, but the name was misleading, so I deleted it and recreated the same thing with a more descriptive name. Because yes, that is... basically the intent at this stage - each user has a subpage that they can edit without messing with the overall table. With any luck, this will actually work and it will sort itself automatically, as with the current notion, the main thing will still be there, but it won't be edited directly. This should at least ease the concerns of those with trouble editing it, but as for what to do about it itself, hell if I know. I'm just the tech guy. 1234 ~ 00:44, 25 March 2011

I thought you were a woman... -- 00:51, March 25, 2011 (UTC)

Oh, right. Forgot about that. 1234 ~ 00:54, 25 March 2011

Sounds good! Have you tested it on one of the pages you created, to see if it shows up in the hall of shame page? And hopefully it won't require an edit button on all the hall of shame listings, Puppy tried that and it didn't look good at all, at all. And it's really not much bother to edit the hall of shame, just have to wait a few seconds of loading time which gives people time to contemplate the shame as they wait. Aleister 00:54 25-3-'11

Eh, have to figure out the DPL for that, first. It's definitely doable; should be rather like the VFH summary, but... less insanely complicated. As for where the edit button would be, I'm not there yet, either. Could be like the VFH things with (links), or maybe make the number into a link to the page itself? I dunno. And yeah, I've never had any trouble with it, either, but some people use stupider web browsers, so... 1234 ~ 01:06, 25 March 2011

Happy Sasquatch Appreciation Day

	Happy Sasquatch Appreciation Day! A traditional Sasquatch blessing
	March 24 is Sasquatch Appreciation Day, as decreed by Reverend zim_ulator. Please join me in celebration of the noble Sasquatch and his innumerable contributions to Uncyclopedia.

...still blocked... blimey. As for the day itself, awesome. 1234 ~ 03:39, 25 March 2011

The dud should create an account. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 03:47, March 25, 2011 (UTC)

... (talk) 03:49, March 25, 2011 (UTC)

...? -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 03:50, March 25, 2011 (UTC)

...He's a dud? That's a shame. 1234 ~ 03:51, 25 March 2011

You mean the IP that is obviously just Zim ban dodging should get an account when he has a account creation block? (talk) 03:52, March 25, 2011 (UTC)

Ban dodging? Why in tarnation would an administrator dodge bans? I mean, sure, he banned himself in the first place, but come on... 1234 ~ 03:54, 25 March 2011

I thought Zim wanted to be banned. He benned himself, didn't he? -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 04:00, March 25, 2011 (UTC)

No, that's not what I just said. 1234 ~ 04:17, 25 March 2011

Happy Sasquatch Appreciation Day

	Happy Sasquatch Appreciation Day! A traditional Sasquatch blessing
	March 24 is Sasquatch Appreciation Day, as decreed by Reverend zim_ulator. Please join me in celebration of the noble Sasquatch and his innumerable contributions to Uncyclopedia.

The Chatroom..

Is annoying this dumb noob...how come I was able to log in 3 times over the past week but now I need to register my username? Also...I don't know how to register because it doesn't seem to accept hotmail addresses as a valid ones. 18:50, March 25, 2011 (UTC)

Please see Forum:I'm banned...on IRC?. - LOL vandalz 18:58, March 25, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, that. Although why would you even use a hotmail address? 1234 ~ 20:04, 25 March 2011

Why would I be banned? 22:58, March 25, 2011 (UTC)

You're probably not banned; it just doesn't let unregistered users into the channel. Please, add your thoughts to the forum n00b linked; it's already snowballing to turn the +r (the mode that disallows unregistereds) off, but the more the merrier, right? 1234 ~ 23:04, 25 March 2011

User:Frosty/100 reasons to ban Lyrithya

Wondering why you are actually contributing, when I'm refering to getting you banned... Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 21:42, March 25, 2011 (UTC)

Some of it's pretty funny, man. Also, plenty of folks think I should be banned, for all sorts of reasons, so I'm not terribly fussed, if that's the bit you're wondering about. But that could even help you with yours; I'd suggest asking around, but people might take that the wrong way... hmm. 1234 ~ 22:02, 25 March 2011

User:Egalitarian Aspie/UnNews:Charlie Sheen discovers new element

How is it? Ready for moving? - User:Egalitarian Aspie

Better, but the formatting still needs work - look how other UnNews are formatted and mimic that, mon. Needs a headline-thing, sources, etc, and the {{q}} really sticks out. And say things like it really is a news report - don't just link what you mean, say it. "His show, Two and a Half Men,..." That kind of thing. 1234 ~ 00:29, 26 March 2011

My eyes hurt. Vomit indeed. This article is the joy of putting random words on paper, not relentlessly pursuing a comedy concept. Zim, is it you? Spıke ¬ 00:31 26-Mar-11

IS IT FUNNY AT LEAST? Oh sorry, caps lock. I was just yelling on an Asperger's forum. -- User:Egalitarian Aspie

It is ODD. (That was Shift.) Again, it has no comedy concept. Spıke ¬ 00:38 26-Mar-11

What's a concept? 1234 ~ 00:40, 26 March 2011

King of the Hill on VFD

Lyrithya, I am now in doubt: is nominator gaming the process to get a free review of an awful article that he didn't want deleted in the first place? Spıke ¬ 00:38 26-Mar-11

Hell if I know. But it may well not even be that - he could have genuinely thought his version was significantly better and figured this would have been the way about replacing it... I forgot what I was saying. 1234 ~ 00:46, 26 March 2011

Sorry to bug you again, but...

I changed some things about HowTo:Become a Master of Disguise, hopefully for the better. Anyway, maybe you could give it a look through? I know I'm being really annoying right now, and should shut up. Anyway, I leave you with a gif of MC Hammer dancing.

Enjoy. -- 01:26, March 26, 2011 (UTC)

*twitch* 1234 ~ 01:47, 26 March 2011

*Twitch twitch* -- 01:51, March 26, 2011 (UTC)

*stabs Magic man* 1234 ~ 01:53, 26 March 2011

*Turns into zombie and eats Lyrithya alive* -- 02:29, March 26, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the surprise non-birthday gift

Vandals! (talk) 01:55, March 26, 2011 (UTC)

Whoa, I didn't expect to see Tombstone on VFH. Thank you! I'll keep track of it this time, promise, and will jump on the vandals with both feet and at least one elbow, leaving the other one free for a sucker punch. Vandals! Thanks, very appreciated. Happy Monkey! Aleister 1:35 26-3-'11

Excellent. 1234 ~ 01:52, 26 March 2011

Happy MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONKEY!!! Óle --ShabiDOO 02:50, March 26, 2011 (UTC)

Aliens

Don't like wearing pants. (talk) 05:14, March 26, 2011 (UTC)

Of course you would notice that... but what's your point, eh? Are you calling my humanity into question? Because I'm normal. Of course I'm normal. 1234 ~ 05:18, 26 March 2011

I'm normal too. I like to eat food. (talk) 05:20, March 26, 2011 (UTC)

And smell? 1234 ~ 05:22, 26 March 2011

I can't smell. I have no ears. (talk) 05:23, March 26, 2011 (UTC)

You're... you're an alien?! 1234 ~ 05:26, 26 March 2011

No! Don't be silly. It's a skin condition. (talk) 05:28, March 26, 2011 (UTC)

Oh, good. I was afraid you might blow my c... er... I mean, you might eat my head. 1234 ~ 05:29, 26 March 2011

Annual writing contest: Sign up now!

Are you interested in signing up for the contest? Please do. |Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Aussie CUN|IC Kill | 08:14, March 26, 2011 (UTC)

Mon, you really can't just start a contest so suddenly, especially when there are so many other ones currently in the works. If you want to run a contest, plan it out. See if people are interested in the notion, first. Then get to the specifics and set it all up, and stagger it with the others going on. The way you've tried to do it, you've wound up with a forum page that is more confusing than explanatory and no support at all with about a day to the thing itself; it's not exactly appealing, nor the sort of thing with which folks would want to be involved, myself included. 1234 ~ 08:34, 26 March 2011

Could you please pull/cancel/fail THIS Nom on VFH

Hi Lyrithya, please fail this now at request of author. Thanks much. Hope you are well! Cheers!--Funnybony    09:24, Mar 26

Aye, 'sa done. 1234 ~ 09:35, 26 March 2011

Ur-a-saint!--Funnybony    10:34, Mar 26

Since you are pulling things, can you get rid of Skunk on VFH. It's stinkin' up the place. Aleister 10:36 26-3-'11

Er... okay... 1234 ~ 10:50, 26 March 2011

Ur-a-demon! Aleister 11:16 26-3-'11

Sorry, couldn't resist. Go ahead and revert that if you want, mon. XD 1234 ~ 11:19, 26 March 2011

But I was serious! The handwriting was on the wall (in crayon no less), you hadn't voted for it, so the page was doomed. Like a Picasso thrown upon a trash bin, like a .... Aleister 12:39 26-3-'11

I haven't had a chance to go through the VFH noms at all lately, else I'd probably at least put in an abstain or a proofread... >.< 1234 ~ 19:03, 26 March 2011

Would it be acceptable to move this to mainspace?

I made an article on This, called User:Another n00b/Zombiebaron. Would it be a good choice to move this out of Userspace? - LOL vandalz 12:07, March 26, 2011 (UTC)

Those aren't even sentences. No links or subsections or paragraphs or anything, either. Now, really... 1234 ~ 12:09, 26 March 2011

So I'd take that as a no, LOL. - LOL vandalz 12:13, March 26, 2011 (UTC)

funny?

Is this template funny? Well, a better question is: Can I use it for holyright, then have an article become a success and then the template can be used for actual images? -HumoristEAEgalitarian Aspie

Permission is granted to scripture, crucify, and/or damn this document under the terms of the GOD Public Documentation License 1.0. Holyright is better, but if it's God's property, whatever!

I really don't see how it would have much use outside said article. It definitely fits that, mind, but other than that... eh. It may prove cleaner to just subst it in, but we'll see, eh? 1234 ~ 20:07, 26 March 2011

Give me your bank acount details

The page is actually a very clever joke on todays archipelagic restrictions concerning government fluctuation details.

please restore! Lock'd And Loaded (Shoot!) 19:58, March 26, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah! What he said! Or not. I don't know. -HumoristEAEgalitarian Aspie20:00, March 26, 2011 (UTC)

That's... er, lovely, except I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about, to the point where I suspect you made it up.

Anyhow, I can restore it to userspace if you want. Which of you wants it more? 1234 ~ 20:13, 26 March 2011

I DO!!! It's called Give me your bank account details. -HumoristEAEgalitarian Aspie--Egalitarian Aspie 20:22, March 26, 2011 (UTC)

Alright, it's here. Have fun with your pudding, you two. 1234 ~ 20:52, 26 March 2011

I like these two. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 04:13 Mar 27, 2011

Sure

Sure, I'll get right on it. Thanks for giving me the heads up. Also, hi. --- [talk] 20:06, March 26, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, man. 1234 ~ 20:13, 26 March 2011

Done and dusted. --- [talk] 20:19, March 26, 2011 (UTC)

I was just looking

at what Zana Dark is doing, and saw her adoptee list. She adopted Paizuri. That means she's your grandmother! I bet she'd be proud to know that, or its opposite, if she doesn't already. Aleister 21:08 26-3-'11

Ayup, indeed she is. And she knows. Or knew. I went over and asked and learned some fabulous family history, I did. Such a glorious grandmum... 1234 ~ 21:27, 26 March 2011

Yeah but wasn't her adopter the infamous Nazi sympathiser Hanz Blendrik? She changed her name when she came over to America of course... --Black Flamingo 21:32, March 26, 2011 (UTC)

Shhh. You don't have to tell everyone. 1234 ~ 21:33, 26 March 2011

King of the Hill

Having just stuck this VFD debate into the archives, did you notice the comments? Author and nominator Gamma287 informs us that there is a better version on the mirror site (as, come to think of it, he did in his nomination); I read it and tell him it is better taken care of but substantially the same; he states his intention to roll it in as a replacement after the vote; and I tell him that that is very close to gaming the vote and indeed using VFD to flog his writing. Keep an eye open for this, please. Spıke ¬ 22:27 26-Mar-11

Yeah, I saw. Shame you can't just go threaten to ban him if he tries it. That'd solve everything. 1234 ~ 22:30, 26 March 2011

No, I can't. But.... Spıke ¬ 22:36 26-Mar-11

What? 1234 ~ 22:43, 26 March 2011

Biggest laugh of the week, these last two posts. Aleister 22:47 26-3

A request on joke ban

Block me with an expiry time of 6 minutes, But the block summary should be the most offensive, profane block summary ever. Be imaginative, Go on click that little Ban button and think of the most distasteful thing to say you can think of. Go on, you know you want to. - LOL vandalz 23:50, March 26, 2011 (UTC)

Or I could... not block you. That's pretty offensive. 1234 ~ 23:54, 26 March 2011

All you could say is "You are a <- Insulting word -><- Insulting follow-up word -><- Insulting follow-up word -><- Insulting word -><- insulting racist profanity -> <- Insulting follow-up to insulting racist profanity -> who fucks <- Randomly selected hate figure -> <- Insulting word -><- insulting racist profanity -> <- Insulting follow-up to insulting racist profanity -> because you <- Insulting word -><- Insulting follow-up word ->". Fill in the blanks! - LOL vandalz 23:58, March 26, 2011 (UTC)

Why are you unfunnily requesting an admin to do something unfunny? (talk) 00:00, March 27, 2011 (UTC)

Interesting question. More interesting to me is why he is requesting a joke ban when I am in fact inclined to give him a real ban for apparently never using the 'preview' button, and when Skully keeps also giving him real bans for constantly doing a very similar and entirely related thing... 1234 ~ 00:06, 27 March 2011

Well, just combine these two things. "Use the Preview-button, you motherf*cking son of a b*tch.". Schamschi, 00:12, March 27, 2011 (UTC)

Yes, like that, only uncensored. - LOL vandalz 00:14, March 27, 2011 (UTC)

So are you going to do that? I know it's not funny but I don't care (ﾟ∀ﾟ). 6 Minutes. - LOL vandalz 00:42, March 27, 2011 (UTC)

hey u huff my userpaeg =

<nowiki>Insert non formatted text here</nowiki>

what teh fuckk dood' its MY userpaeg not UR userpaeg and if i wanted that 'PAEG huffed id have do it myselflink text

stupid stpuid dumb ADMNIS GIVE ME MY PAEG

BAC

Insert non formatted text here

NOU

FAGGUTFAGGUTFAGGUTFAGGUTFAGGUTFAGGUT

NOU

<nowiki>Insert non formatte<big><big><big><big>NO U<big><big><big><big>d text here</nowiki>

Silly plebe. 1234 ~ 04:08, 27 March 2011

how much of a FAG do you even have to BE to DO something like that – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 04:10 Mar 27, 2011

Good question. If I ever find out, well... you'll be the first to know. Maybe. 1234 ~ 04:14, 27 March 2011

What idiot is not only unable to insert properly formatted text, they forgot to sign! - LOL vandalz 08:59, March 27, 2011 (UTC)

Stupid Question of the Day

Can I submit an article for Pee Review moar more than once? --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis?

After it's been reviewed you can submit it again. Make sure you submit it to pee as something like "Your article (revised)" (talk) 04:57, March 27, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah. Generally helps if you've put the previous to use first, unless you completely disagree and want another opinion entirely, though. 1234 ~ 05:13, 27 March 2011

Thanks. --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 05:17, March 27, 2011 (UTC)

Animals

with feet. Thanks, the pic does look better on top. I'd say the quotes paragraph should stay as one paragraph, simply because listing all the quotes one after another takes away from the impact of the quick escalation of the arguments between the animals with feet versus the animals with no feet. The drama is in the fast pace of the insults. As scholars study the page they will surmise that each twist in this paragraph adds a particular direction and velocity of the conflict. I don't know why, but that sounds good. With feet 11:39 27-3-'11

Makes sense, except if you shove all the quotes into the same paragraphs, it also makes it a lot harder to differentiate who is speaking. People like me get confused. And frankly, that's just not proper grammar. *hmphs loudly* 1234 ~ 11:42, 27 March 2011

I know, but it seems the pace is thrown off with the quotes separated. The pace is quick within the battle there. The first quote actually is separated. I wrote the thing last night as I went past a computer and logged in, did it ?logic style free-flow without thought, which I like to do but haven't done enough here. Just edited it a bit now, a couple of commas were needed. Thanks for drawing my attention back to it actually, I'd forgotten about it. With no feet 11:48 27-3-'11

More commas? I added a few, myself. o_O And yeah, don't lose things, here. Too easy to lose things here. Not good, not good at all, that. 1234 ~ 11:57, 27 March 2011

Huffing your Userpage

Ah, I see you're getting desperate to indulge in your temporary admin powers and use them to their full extent now that the end of your days as a temporary admin is getting closer and closer. Well, it's now or never, isn't it? Schamschi, 00:08, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

Permanent Adminship is a given, but I will be advocating a one-month hiatus first, so we slower mortals can track down everything she's huffed or pranked. Spıke ¬ 00:26 28-Mar-11

I know! It's going to be odd not having Lyrithya, Socky, and Hyperbole as admins. Puppy did alot, but these three were a constant presence this month. I'll miss them all as admins. Aleister 00:33 28-3-'11

I'll miss Lyrithya as admin. And so will Coronium. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 02:11, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

Recall that, in Impeachment, the question was not whether the guy got his dick sucked in the White House then tried to game a federal judge; it was: "Would you prefer Al Gore?!" Likewise, the question for our betters here will not be whether Lyrithya has made a travesty of Uncyclopedia, but whether those old guys who ceded the banstick were preferable. What were their names? Spıke ¬ 02:15 28-Mar-11

Problem is, the ones that ceded for this weren't exactly active in the first place. Makes the whole affair rather silly, don't it? 1234 ~ 13:46, 28 March 2011

UnNews talk:Voldemort appears in London

Is there a second? Spıke ¬ 02:08 28-Mar-11

Never mind. There was--by JackOfSpades and TheHumbucker--and I mercy-moved it, with a note to the author. Spıke ¬ 12:35 28-Mar-11

You turn around and get back here right now missy

And bring your things with you. Aleister 12:10 28-3-'11

Aw, she's just sleeping. I've checked her Contributions, and she does doze off from time to time. (Can't be dates; none of us are able to make conversation in the world outside Uncyclopedia any more.) Spıke ¬ 12:36 28-Mar-11

Yeah, I do that sometimes. Sometimes I also ban myself, which Aleister has to take as a reason to tell everyone I'm leaving... then Skully had to catch on and start spreading the word on IRC, too... argh... why I ever go along with that guy's mad scheming, I do not know. 1234 ~ 13:48, 28 March 2011

Don't believe everything you read on IRC, I told you it's just a rumor mill. People have to be drunk to log in (a new requirement) and it goes on from there. And I read lots of the Knitwitter stuff, that guy could grow on you. I think we should let him keep Samuel Clemons because he's not hesitant to say that it's him, and that's a great user name. Aleister 18:20 28-3-'11

Oxenford Authorship Answer

[1] Thanks for the speedy deletion. I wasn't finished. I just posted the article a couple of hours ago. Give me a chance please to continue editing. Thank you in advance for your consideration of my feelings. 74.234.112.6 14:57, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

Hello, IP! It's really not in the best interest of the tidiness of the wiki to have an IP copy a Wikipedia article into mainspace and then work on it there. If you register an account, we'd be more than happy to put a copy of the article in your userspace, at User:YourNewUsername/Oxenford authorship answer, and then you can work on it there and move it over to Oxenford authorship answer when it's done. Does that sound reasonable? pillow talk 15:03, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

O' much joy!! Yes, thank you very much! I am a registered user called User:Knitwitted but am currently banned for sucking too much dick until later today. 74.234.112.6 15:07, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

You're ban evading a ban for ban evasion and telling us about it? Gods... I need another drink. 1234 ~ 15:09, 28 March 2011

Yes, My Right Honourable Sock-Puppet-in-chief User:Samuel Clemens got me banned. He's a big dick. Can you tell me how to get on Wikipedia? They're really nice to me over there. They don't hurt my feelings. They've never banned me either. Although they have threatened to sanction my ass if I dare open my mouth again. 74.234.112.6 15:12, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

Knitwitted, I left a note for you on your talk page. pillow talk 15:31, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

Please ban me

Just please ban me. Not a joke ban, A real ban. Please please just ban me. Please? ban me. Preferably temporary. Thanks. - LOL vandalz 16:41, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

In the matter just above, n00b visits the page of a new user accused of trolling and dickery--and puts on a bleepin' clinic. He is asking you for a ban because he knows he will make out worse if Hyperbole gets to him first. Spıke ¬ 16:47 28-Mar-11

No I am not, I just feel bad about it, regardless of who blocks me anyway. - LOL vandalz 16:48, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

You forgot to use the "Minor edit" button again. Dude, you're really slow on the uptake (I see that you have used it a few times recently, so you don't seem to be doing it on purpose). And if you already feel bad about the other matter, you don't need a ban anymore, do you? Schamschi, 17:04, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

Okay, so... why do you want to be banned so badly, anyhow? 1234 ~ 17:09, 28 March 2011

Probably because he recognizes that he made a giant asshat of himself over at Knitwitter's talk page and was apparently determined to completely undermine my attempt to welcome her here and warn her not to fuck around with sockpuppets. SPIKE's right that I have a reason to be pissed off, although I don't go swinging a banstick lightly. N00b, you should recognize that you've been fucking up a lot lately. Maybe you should take some time to think about why you keep making mistake after mistake. pillow talk 17:13, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

N00b should be sent to Uncyclopedian boot camp or something. He is starting to to get on my nerves, which is bad considering lollipops don't have nerves. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 21:04, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

Uncyclopedian concentration camps; or better yet, Uncyclopedian 100% Juice camps. -HumoristEAEgalitarian Aspie

Our juice here is freshly squeezed and certainly not from concentrate. pillow talk 21:09, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

Our JEWS though....sadly we don't have enough to provide you with enough full-bodied, 100% taste. -HumoristEAEgalitarian Aspie

You guys all forget it's a stressful time for him, he said he's from Japan. So everything he knew back there is either dead or dying or decaying or frying or dissolving or glowing. How would you feel? Jeez, have hearts people. Just don't eat the sea"food". Aleister 21:08 28-3-'11

I had Japanese food yesterday. All I have is a tumor in my left testicle. -HumoristEAEgalitarian Aspie

Oh. I thought your left testicle was a tumor. Aleister 21:21 21-21-'21

Tumor on tumor? I've only seen those cases twice...both on Conservapedia. -HumoristEAEgalitarian Aspie

Jimmy Carl Black

Would you infi protect Jimmy Carl Black. Someone may come by and change it, as has happened in the past, and it's one of those stand-alone things with a history here, I've heard. And it's just sitting out there in the wind at the mercy of IP's and well-meaning users and all. Thanks. And if they don't admin you, please torch the place before you're banned. Yay! Aleister 9:43 29-3

But it's already semi-protected; IPs can't touch it. Mind, I really don't like the idea of locking things up; just because we don't know of anything or haven't seen anything, that doesn't mean there won't wind up something worth adding/changing... on the other hand, we do have admins for a reason... *mumbles* 1234 ~ 10:21, 29 March 2011

Thanks. You're right, in most cases, but I've surmised by drifting around here that certain pages are so far into the "in" joke or "in" something category that they are frozen in time. Europods, Mr. Winkler, things like that. Jimmy Carl Black isn't as well known but seems to be in the same category, if there was a category, which there shouldn't be because it would just be adding a needless thing to the page. I saw your note on Vikings about browser, and I'll get back to you later after I 'periment with a couple of things, but signing-off now. Look for that in a few hours if you haven't banned yourself again. Aleister 11:08 29-3-'11

Yeah, things... thanks. 1234 ~ 11:12, 29 March 2011

My own two cents is that I'm fine with semi-protection and I really, really doubt that any established user is going to want to change this. pillow talk 11:15, March 29, 2011 (UTC)

It was already semiprotected. I full-protected it with a note (that got truncated) for anyone who checks the history who wants it changed to go bother an admin. Bloody admins... 1234 ~ 11:19, 29 March 2011

Am I the only one who's noticed that Aleister turned down a pretty clear shot at the 4th "temporary admin" position, and is now asking admins to do things he could have been doing himself on a nearly daily basis? ;) pillow talk 11:35, March 29, 2011 (UTC)

Yes. Can I burn the place down, now? 1234 ~ 11:38, 29 March 2011

Haven't you pretty much been doing that since day one? pillow talk 11:39, March 29, 2011 (UTC)

Uh... no, definitely not. It took me a month or three to realise that I could, see. 1234 ~ 12:01, 29 March 2011

Avril Lavigne

Congratulations, you've just volunteered to be the informal reviewer on that article.

I made a round of changes. Do you think I've reduced the annoyance factor? Do you have any ideas for what should be done with that article? pillow talk 19:40, March 29, 2011 (UTC)

I dunno what I might have said or done, but I really don't have sufficient time/sanity to help right now. I'm sorry. 1234 ~ 20:22, 29 March 2011

Hey, you and I both know what I'd rather you be working on ;) pillow talk 20:24, March 29, 2011 (UTC)

Right. *shifty eyes* 1234 ~ 10:22, 30 March 2011

Engl1shman

Now, this is none of my business, but I saw that Engl1shman had been deleting a lot of content from Rochdale today, and that you have banned him for that (presumably because you thought he is vandal). However, I would like to point out that he added a lot of stuff to the article yesterday, and the stuff he deleted today was just the old content (which also included an unnecessary list) prior to his additions. So what he did was not vandalism, but basically a rewrite. Now, that may not be nice or right either, but I think that his rewrite is a lot better, because it is more consistent within itself (or at least, most of it is). I just wanted to point that out, because your block reason sounds like you banned him for vandalism, when in fact he had contributed valuable content in good faith, albeit at the expense of old content that is, imo, not as good. Maybe it would be better to leave a note on his talk page or something. Schamschi, 16:39, March 30, 2011 (UTC)

Weird... I thought there was less article left after. I also don't recall it being that article. In fact, I'm not even sure that was the one I meant to block... o__o Oops. Er... thanks. 1234 ~ 01:28, 31 March 2011

Ah, very much obliged to you Schamschi! Thank you for your observation. I edited the original, then looked back at it the day after and decided the previous entry as wholly crap, so deleted it. Rightly or wrongly?!? – Preceding unsigned comment added by Engl1shman (talk • contribs)

No, you did fine; it was a mishap on my part, and on the parts of the users who reverted you. Usually you don't want to just remove content if there isn't much left and you don't have anything to replace it with, but in this case, that obviously shouldn't have been an issue, since it was still a full article. Sometimes they ain't afterwards, but... er...

Seriously, keep up the good work, mon. Just don't forget to sign your comments on talkpages and whatnot in the future with tildes (~~~~). 1234 ~ 18:44, 1 April 2011

@Engl1shman: No problem. I had just discovered the joys of watching Special:RecentChanges doing its thing, i.e. changing, and found out to my delight that being on the lookout for and reverting vandalism and reporting vandals to Uncyclopedia:Ban Patrol proved to be quite as satisfactory as boycotting dodgy VFH-entries and slightly more entertaining than browsing through most of the articles on this site (although this might just have been the novelty of it – it might not be as much fun after a few months weeks days), so I was on the watch for vandalism. Of course, your edit stuck out, since it was a pretty big one, and I was instantly on it. I quickly looked over it (including your past edits) and decided that it might not have been vandalism (also because the stuff you had deleted included a list), and did not spend more time on it. Only when you were banned did I look closer into it. I read the old version, chuckled once (I think), and then I read your version, laughed very hard at the cock-fighting-history, the name "Barry Bumhole" and his quotes, then yawned a bit in the section "Tourist Attractions" but laughed again at the second-to-last paragraph in that section, and chuckled a bit in the final section. Coming to the conclusion that your version was not, as you so succinctly summarized the old version, "wholly crap", I decided to point out to Lyrithya that she had failed yet again. Btw, speaking of Lyrithya,

@Lyrithya: Did Evil person by any chance have something to do with that maniac who was fucking up Illogicopedia at that time? Schamschi, 21:00, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

You really have a high opinion of me, don't you? Mon, I don't know what your mother has told you, but generally people do not appreciate effective strangers putting them down beyond what is actually constructive, even if it is intended to be humorous.

And something, yes, but probably not what you expect. Unrelatedly, he's been banned here for months. 1234 ~ 21:27, 1 April 2011

Yeah, you're right, putting people down in an ironic way seems to be a habit of mine. And yes, apparently people often don't get that irony. But I only do this when I assume that the person in question will get the irony and won't take the insults seriously. As it seems, however, I was wrong. Or maybe it's just Poe's law in action. In either case, I didn't mean to insult or annoy you, I just thought that, because you have already taken plenty of (humorous) ridicule in the past month for your, er, faux pas, you would just laugh my comments off and not worry about them. But OK, I'm going to be more serious from now on. Schamschi, 22:30, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your consideration, however I am not saying you necessarily need to be more serious, just... blah, I'll spare you the sociology lecture. Thing is, I have done many things in the past month, and different folks have taken all of them in rather different ways, but people referring to me as various forms of a failure grows tiresome regardless of how true or how serious it may be. 1234 ~ 18:17, 2 April 2011

EMERGENCY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

AT ILLOG WE AN EMERGENCY! COME IMMEADIATLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! – Preceding unsigned comment added by Evil person (talk • contribs) 16:55, March 30, 2011 (UTC)

Do you mind that I like dressing up in your clothes?

GRIN -- King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  06:36, March 31, 2011 (UTC)

Oh, it's ON! Or something. Wait... what's going on? And who are you? Where am I? 1234 ~ 06:44, 31 March 2011

Would you mind if I use that on my page called "Dementia"? Cat the Colourful (Feed Me!!!)Leave me alone... 12:02, March 31, 2011

Are there chickens? 1234 ~ 17:04, 31 March 2011

Hi!

Can you give me the link for that facebook reskin? --~  15:47, March 31, 2011 (UTC)

Apparently I can't. 1234 ~ 17:11, 31 March 2011

I collected the source code, which can be copy and pasted into your Userspace, here. Use of this in non-personal purposes is subject to permission from Zombiebaron. - LOL vandalz 20:43, March 31, 2011 (UTC)

Um, that's a blatant copyright violation on Facebook material; it's protected as parody here, but for what isn't covered by fair use, it would require permission from Facebook folks, not anyone here. The not facebookness is, however, released under the same licence as everything else on the wiki - cc-by-nc-sa 2.0. That gives implicit permission assuming the parameters are met. 1234 ~ 20:50, 31 March 2011

Erm... It's the Facebook reskin, not the actual Facebook. - LOL vandalz 20:54, March 31, 2011 (UTC)

Yes, yes it is. And it is a direct copy of the actual thing, though recreated in wiki formatting; copyrights apply. General use that does not fit their terms or qualify as fair use would violate those. 1234 ~ 21:00, 31 March 2011

Indecent Proposal

Look for it--right after you end your month as temporary admin, hehehehe King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  20:26, March 31, 2011 (UTC)

Huh? Are you Aleister? What did you do this time? 1234 ~ 20:38, 31 March 2011

Am I Aleister? Certainly not! That's just one of my sockpuppets. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  20:43, March 31, 2011 (UTC)

I see. 1234 ~ 20:51, 31 March 2011

User:Why do I need to provide this?/sig15 00:00, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

I think you did that wrong. 1234 ~ 00:13, 1 April 2011

Hopefully I did it right this time. (These April Fool's changes won't let me preview and I'm having a hard time making any edits. Or maybe I'm just nervous). King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  00:15, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

Indeed. And of course I accept, darling! (Yeah, stupid thing. I suspect we may all be a little... giddy, though.) 1234 ~ 00:30, 1 April 2011

Golly Gosh Gee Really? Wow! Does that mean I can, er, kiss your hand or something? User:Why do I need to provide this?/sig15 00:32, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

More than that, darling. *winks* 1234 ~ 02:05, 1 April 2011

Really? (Gets really excited and decides to try to go "all the way." Bends down to the bottom of your skirts, lifts them...and kissed you on the foot). Wow! I think I have to tinkle or something. Excuse me. User:Why do I need to provide this?/sig15 04:54, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

Excuse me as well; I shall have to don some more... proper attire for this. Yes... proper. 1234 ~ 04:58, 1 April 2011

Unservapedia

Dah! How does it look so far? I feel awkward and pervert-like spending so much time in someone else's userspace, but no one else gives a hoot about this. -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 21:12, Mar. 31, 2011

It looks terrible, but again, that's just the format - the content means absolutely nothing to me. I'll see if I can hit it with a mallet now, but I may wind up making it even worse.

And hey, I bet I spend more time in Cajek's userspace, just in general. Silly Cajek... anyhow, at least you're not making heaps of subpages, now are you? 1234 ~ 21:31, 31 March 2011

We could've had more time to work on this if we had just went with my awesome idea. For a community who gets a laugh making fun of conservatives, you sure are a bunch of prudes. -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 21:54, Mar. 31, 2011

Kinda makes me happy to see the "recently featured" articles. Good work, Kip. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:57, March 31, 2011 (UTC)

For the record, I thought both these ideas were dumb. I still do. My idea is better and I am going to implement it regardless of what anyone says, just as soon as I remember what it is... or make up a new one. That can be implemented in under two minutes. Yeah... 1234 ~ 21:59, 31 March 2011

Front page

When I logged onto uncy today from googling "Uncy" it took me directly to the disguise feature article. Did this happen to others? If so, how will it affect the page when it goes up for fools day. And please don't give up your admin tools, keep them and just become an admin. Nobody can take them away from you if your store the codes off site somewere. Do it! Fight the power! Rise up and be the rogue admin, known throughout the land. Aleister 23:34 31-3-'11 (and are you going to do the magick at notm or should I switcheroo? If nobody else comes in, that is.)

I was going to go to the Noob of the Month to tie it up and then this horrid skin popped up, it wouldn't allow me to go anywhere on the site, I had to manuever to get here, no recent changes, so if Noob of the Month wasn't tied at the end of the month I ask that my intent to tie it be held up. This skin is horrible, and ,and, the entire right half is empty!!!! Does Wikia put ads on this, or are they planning to put ads on it!!!! Aleister 00:07 1-4-'11

I can't, man, I can't...

I tied it. That much is done. Hopefully nobody will check the time. The ads will probably comes, since that's what the space is for, I think... um. Er. Eh? 1234 ~ 00:11, 1 April 2011

Are you serious? That's what the space is for? And why do I have this skin now, did someone code this skin in for the entire site? Do you always have it (I can't believe anyone would edit with this skin, I certainly wouldn't). How do I get my old skin back? Is it huffed? I wrote Sonje and asked a bunch of these questions? Damn, there's huge numbers, and a massive icon symbol, and no navigation bar. Why does this even exist? Aleister 00:20 1-4-'11

I don't know, I don't know. Just don't panic... yet. Please. o_O 1234 ~ 00:35, 1 April 2011

Took me three minutes to find a way to get back here, I had to go through pages before I could find a link. Do you use this horrid skin? I'll describe it. The top has "Wikia" on it!! with links to there "Create a wiki" and other things having nothing to do with uncy. Then it has these huge numbers, suppposedly of everyone's edits. Right side is mostly white (my skin the article stretches all the way across except for the navigation bar. I remember once you asking me "You have a rating button?" and I just ignored it, but this skin has no rating button, let alone a thin navigation bar down the left side. The search doesn't work. (My regular search is down the navigation bar on the left). My user page looks a mismash, and nothing looks good with the right-side white space looming there. I have faith I can get my skin back at some point (if not, I'm gone), but I'm wondering if some users user the horrid skin and don't know any better. Not as much panic as anger, anger that wikia would present this as a skin and that my articles are being seen by some people far different than how I write and format them. And mucho thanks too, for the vote on author of the month. That one is really appreciated, as I am proud of The Old Man and LV, which worked out just about what I expected it would when I was procrastinating on it, having just a name, for months. Al 1:04 1-4-'11

Hey Al, April Fools. Also this page could help you navigate a tad.  JackOfSpades

[talk] 01:07, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

I still can't preview, can't edit some pages, can't use my name normally (as of today it sometimes doesn't recognize the ? in my name). Either it's April Fools or I just got married. User:Why do I need to provide this?/sig15 01:18, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

Al, I added you to the opt-out list... but yeah. Bloody awful, innit? Why???, should I add you too? 1234 ~ 02:07, 1 April 2011

Well, thanks. But my question on the forum still stands, does anyone use that skin without knowing that something better exists? Why does wikia even offer it as an option? Do people just googling uncy get that skin, ever? Ads? etc. I think Why? indicates by his comments that he'd like to be opted out, as should the entire site. That is not funny, and if anyone uses it or is forced to use it, then it is not an April fools joke as much as a slap in the face to our users. Iz true! Aleister 2:14

Yeah, I'd like to opt out as well. I actually think that Lollipop's idea of fake sigs for today was more clever, although not as well done in his case.  JackOfSpades

[talk] 02:19, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

Al - some users do, indeed... and this why we had such an uproar when they mucked up the defaults a few months ago. But folks who start out on Wikia wikis and get used to it actually tend to prefer it; hell if I know why, but they do. Perhaps what one knows how to use, or something. But isn't it funny, in a demented sort of way? This is what Wikia would like to do. This is what possibly lies ahead, something that we try to pretend won't happen; we do have so much here based on what people fear or despise, aiming to insult and whatnot... hmm.

Anyhow, I asked Olipro to add you and Why???, since I'm supposed to not be an admin anymore... yeah. 1234 ~ 02:35, 1 April 2011

Thanks, dear. I was really planning on having some fun with this wedding thing, but I'm having an awful time doing anything on the site. I couldn't even log in with my usual browser, tried another and still had to open a separate window to log in. I can't preview pages, haven't yet figured out how to edit some pages, and it's not always recognizing the ? in my name. We actually lost my adopter Miley Spears because of this kind of thing; three times they made changes (not April Fools) that screwed her up and she finally gave up and left the site. If I'm not on here it's not because I chickened out. Really. But in any case, I'm going to get off for several hours. I have to go to bed. Er, um, wait, we're married, and er, um..... King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  05:04, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

Wait, are you still seeing it Wikia-ised? I mean, it's just for a day, but... *goes to yell at Olipro* And yes, yes, I'll come to bed later. Yelling first. Then bed. 1234 ~ 05:06, 1 April 2011

I appreciate it. It's still weird. And, um, about me going to bed on my wedding night and getting off for several hours.... King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  05:09, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

While I was posting that message, my screen changed to something else. Now that I'm posting a response, it's back to wiki format again. It's changed back and forth on me a few times--right now as I'm writing this the Summary says I'm on the front page. Oh, I guess it's supposed to. I'm confused, and I'm going to bed. I'll be waiting for you, sweetie. ;-) King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  05:12, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

Olipro added you to a list of folks that the js will exclude. But if you don't reload the javascript, it'll keep dong it... just do a reload on your browser whenever you come back. 1234 ~ 05:16, 1 April 2011

If I recall right HappyTimes also left because of the reskin. Two major users lost because of wikia fuckups, and we honor that as a joke? Why is the skin still up? Aleister 10:08 1-4-'11

Was that the reason? Fas as I know, he just disappeared... but... yeah. I'd probably leave if this was the reality, too. But it isn't. Sort of like all the other horrible jokes we have around... 1234 ~ 16:16, 1 April 2011

Maybe not. I just looked at his last edits, and they were just regular edits, then he was gone and never came back. I hope he's not hurt or worst. It wasn't like him to just be gone. I do recall, and couldn't find it, him complaining about a reskin, so I thought that might have been his reason but he gave no reason and just, poof. Aleister 16:33 1-4-'11

Why?'s Wedding Ring for Lyrithya

User:Why do I need to provide this?/sig15 01:06, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

I have a ring for you, too! *presents Why??? with a dead squirrel* 1234 ~ 02:09, 1 April 2011

(talk) 20:18, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

Wow, gee, a...dead squirrel. Just what I was, um, hoping for. (Tries to figure out where to stick his finger. Hmm, not the mouth it has teeth). User:Why do I need to provide this?/sig15 04:52, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

Put it around your neck, love, and wear it with pride. 1234 ~ 04:56, 1 April 2011

But... but... I wanted to marry you. And the dead squirrel you're talking about is the one I gave you? --~  12:34, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

I'm sorry. I do not know what to say. If it pleases you, however, I can indeed assure you that it is not the squirrel you gave me. That I treasured for the two hours it took my cat to find it and devour it. 1234 ~ 16:23, 1 April 2011

Ha Ha Mimo&maxus! She's my wife and not yours, and I am the only one who gets to touch her squirrel! Her dead squirrel belongs to me and me alone! But if you want I could sell you some pictures. Also our marriage ends at midnight UTC. If you want to be first in line for seconds, let me know. User:Why do I need to provide this?/sig15 19:50, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

You're not my manager, love. 1234 ~ 21:29, 1 April 2011

I'm not? Then what about that "love and obey" part of the vows? User:Why do I need to provide this?/sig15 21:52, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

Actually, you said that part, not that it matters anymore. 1234 ~ 18:08, 2 April 2011

Oh, I thought you said I was saying that part for you. I am so confused. User:Why do I need to provide this?/sig16 18:30, April 2, 2011 (UTC)

Excellent. 1234 ~ 21:14, 2 April 2011

Wikia reskin

FUCK YEEEEEEEEEEEEAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 01:24, Apr. 1, 2011

/sneaks up on Kip the Dip with straight jacket Aleister 1:31

o__o 1234 ~ 02:19, 1 April 2011

Thank yee for the reskin. But there was a moment ago some problems. I could not log in*! Dammit it was hard to get there. I dont know why, but the login button doesn`t work with me... weird. Cat the Colourful (Feed Me!!!)Leave me alone... 10:16, April 1, 2011

Why would you thank anyone for this reskin? Yech. And I think Kip was actually saying thank you for not using his conservapiedia skin, which was scheduled to be the April Fools joke until I dunno what happened. Aleister 10-19

But... but... the reskin is cool! It really is! *cries loudly* Cat the Colourful (Feed Me!!!)Leave me alone... 10:27, April 1, 2011

Okey dlokely. To each his own. What skin do you usually get here? Does it have a rating button with 5 stars (that may be a good way to tell which skin is being used). Aleister 16:03

Better question is... does it have snacks? No skin is complete without snacks. 1234 ~ 16:27, 1 April 2011

Admin

I done put on my thinking cap and done figured out that one reason we will miss you and Socky as amins is that you are of a new generation of admins, and so many of the users here are semi-new. Socky isn't new, of course, but he fits in with that new generation of users (Lollipop, Mimo, Magic, the list goes on). I hope we have one of those sandwich things this month, so you can be opped for real. Because once all the deleted things get deleted and you're sated, then you can organized some really good projects. And thanks for the strange write-up on the author of some month page, you make me sound like a creep when all I am is a nice guy playing with the children who inhabit the park, and picking the wings off flies who, you have to admit, don't really need them to get around, do they? Aleister 16:08 1-4-'11

Socky is, however, crazy and not jaded in the manner in which most admins are, right? But folks can organise projects without adminniness. Only thing it's really useful for besides maintenance is editing protected things. Making skins and interfaces and pretties and sillies. And Aleister, you're just one of those glorious multifaceted folks. I couldn't help myself. Because they really don't. 1234 ~ 17:08, 1 April 2011

Seeing as It's impossible to get an answer here

How did you fix that Oasis Wikia skin? Please Help me. （・Ａ・） - LOL vandalz 18:53, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

Olipro added you to the opt-out list. If it hasn't disabled yet, try refreshing your browser (hard refresh, ctrl+r or something, depending). 1234 ~ 19:00, 1 April 2011

I am using google chrome, and I THINK it's something like Ctrl+F5, but I'd like to see this list first. - LOL vandalz 19:07, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

It's in the site javascript somewhere. 1234 ~ 19:18, 1 April 2011

Our Wedding Night

In honor of our Wedding Night and our long future together, I have composed the following poem. Ahem.

The Wedding of Why do I need to provide this? and Lyrithya

by Why???

Lyrithya, Lyrithya,
last night was so great,
twas a wonderful tryst,
so much more than a date.

My heart it is beating
so fast I could fly
like the squirrel 'round my neck
when it's flung to the sky.

The ring on your finger
is a sign of our love,
an eternal reminder
of our night in the mud.

As I look to the future
with all of my powers
I see us together
another four hours.

User:Why do I need to provide this?/sig15 20:00, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

Sniff... I always cry at gay weddings. --Black Flamingo 20:57, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

Yes, our wedding was very happy and gay. Wait; do you mean something else? User:Why do I need to provide this?/sig15 21:03, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

Two and a half hours, now... but what else could he possibly mean, than whatever it is he means? 1234 ~ 21:30, 1 April 2011

I looked it up on http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/gay and discovered "gay" has so many different meanings! The list was long so I didn't go through the whole thing, but here's what I found:

—Synonyms

1. gleeful, jovial, glad, joyous, happy, cheerful, sprightly, blithe, airy, light-hearted; vivacious, frolicsome, sportive, hilarious. Gay, jolly, joyful, merry describe a happy or light-hearted mood. Gay suggests a lightness of heart or liveliness of mood that is openly manifested: when hearts were young and gay. Jolly indicates a good-humored, natural, expansive gaiety of mood or disposition: a jolly crowd at a party. Joyful suggests gladness, happiness, rejoicing: joyful over the good news. Merry is often interchangeable with gay : a merry disposition; a merry party; it suggests, even more than the latter, convivial animated enjoyment. 2. brilliant.

Our wedding fits all of those!

And oh, discovering that gay also means merry, this year I hope we all have a Gay Christmas! User:Why do I need to provide this?/sig15 21:49, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

So beautiful... Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 23:07, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

As a last minute gift, please accept these matching Sun Bee head band and tattoos. User:Why do I need to provide this?/sig15 00:00, April 2, 2011 (UTC)

hippies --Roman Dog Bird 01:01, April 2, 2011 (UTC)

Our Wedding Annulled

Our wedding is over,
twas great while it latest,
now give me some booze
'cause I'm gonna get plastered.

User:Why do I need to provide this?/sig16 00:05, April 2, 2011 (UTC)

Mmm, booze... now where's the stuff I stole the other day? You didn't run off with it, did you? Yeesh... 1234 ~ 18:06, 2 April 2011

Divorce Settlement

I'd like to make a quick and easy settlement, and will give you a more than generous offer. I get everything except you get to keep the dead squirrel. I think that's more than fair.

User:Why do I need to provide this?/sig9 00:19, April 2, 2011 (UTC)

I believe that to get a divorce both parties have to agree, or it goes to a long protracted legal case. Lyrithya has not, as I have read, signed a divorce agreement, and as an attorney I'd suggest that not only shouldn't L. sign one but that there are many more considerations to think of here. Be prepared to defend your position, why?, for your dishonorable divorce demand should not be accepted. Aleister 00:25 2-4-'11

Aleister, have you been hired as legal counsel by the divorcee-in-question Lyrithya? If not then you have no say in the matter. And need I remind you of our relative credentials in the Uncyclopedia Legal Department? I am Serjeant-at-Law and am board certified in Law of the Unglican Temple. Marriage and divorce are pro tem religious matters, and as such fall under my primary specialty. You, on the other hand, are a Congressional Liason licensed to practice guitar before the Supreme Court. The marriage did not, ipso facto, include a habeus corpus guitarist nor was it performed before the Supreme Court. Therefore, in legal terminology, Pfffffff! User:Why do I need to provide this?/sig9 00:39, April 2, 2011 (UTC)

I was just giving advice to Lyrithya to not jump into a divorce, and to fight it if need be. If L. wants me to be one of her many attorneys I would be happy to comply. This divorce has no basis in law, uncy or otherwise, without the consent of both parties. To give a divorce so freely would be against L.'s best interests at this time. Aleister 00:42 2-4-'11

I've been studying the case. Although Why? asked L. to marry him, and then added a caveat "For one day", a marriage cannot be agreed upon for a set amount of time. The offer of marriage is, or course, legal, and when accepted and the ceremony performed (ring and squirrel), the legality takes effect. The only way to end the marriage is to go through a formal divorce, which cannot be done lightly. The marriage was performed and, if I read the page correctly, with intent to consumate and then with fucking and sucking and all that. Aleister 1:34 2-4-'11

If you will check your references, you will find that marriage can be agreed upon for a set amount of time. According to The Booke of Commone Wisedom, Chapter 24, "Nikāḥ al-Mut‘ah (Arabic: نكاح المتعة‎ temporary marriage), is a fixed-term marriage in Shi'a Islam. The duration of this type of marriage is fixed at its inception and is then automatically dissolved upon completion of its term. The marriage is contractual and is subject to renewal." User:Why do I need to provide this?/sig9 01:40, April 2, 2011 (UTC)

A Shi'a Islam marriage would not include a squirrel, so your reference has no basis in the real world events which have occurred here. Sir, you are married, so get used to the henpecking, ball and chain, and having no free time from now on in. Aleister 1:48 2-4-'11

It was fixed-term and the term has ended, no divorce... shame; if there was one, I could have dumped all me debts on him. 1234 ~ 18:05, 2 April 2011

Alright, but I am sending you a bill for unsolicited advice, billable at #500 whatever it is you use an hour. Aleister 18:14 2-4-'11

Make sure it goes to Why???; he has a different address now. 1234 ~ 18:18, 2 April 2011

Why??? moved with no forwarding address Heh Heh. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  18:27, April 2, 2011 (UTC)

That's what you though, but I slipped you a little something, and... well, long story short, I have it anyway. 1234 ~ 21:15, 2 April 2011

There is a weird situation

and I wish you were still an admin. Remember that great picture of the virgin mary which fronted and was the basis of Never on Sunday? It's gone, replaced by a pic by Thekillerfroggy, with no evidence that it ever existed (no revert copies). I've asked Froggy to find it again. Do you have any idea about where it could have gone? Aleister 00:28 2-4-'11

Srs biz copyright issues. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 01:00 Apr 02, 2011

Srs biz? I don't know what that means. And what copyright issues? Do you mean the pic was huffed? Who huffed it? And since it was the basis of a feature page, why would it be huffed without a fight? Aleister 1:11 2-4-'11

It means I wouldn't be able to help you even if I was. TKF huffed it because apparently someone actually responsible for the thing contacted Wikia, and fair use does not cover illustrating articles that cover similar matters, only things rather more directly applicable, if that makes any sense. Sorry, Al. 1234 ~ 03:40, 2 April 2011

Did you see the new pic and caption? If you can't have the best (and I'd like to write the person if an address is available) you can have something from the rest. Aleister 18:26 2-4-'11

Which one? The balls one certainly is... interesting, though. o_O Anyhow, I checked the user's deviantART account, and it looks like it completely packed up. Deleted all its art and items and journals and things, hid all of the comments on its profile, and removed all other information, as well, so the chances of that are looking a little iffy. I could try to make you a less iffy replacement, but odds are, that wouldn't go terribly well, either. 1234 ~ 21:23, 2 April 2011

HAHAHAHAHA!

YOUR NOT AN ADMIN ANYMOREEE!!!! POOOOOP!!! U STINK!!! --~  12:36, April 2, 2011 (UTC)

Are you saying I should actually shower and get this blood off? And here I thought it'd be fine if I just let it dry, first. 1234 ~ 18:04, 2 April 2011

The singing muffins are celebrating. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 18:51, April 2, 2011 (UTC)

The singing muffins must still bear my presence. Poor things. 1234 ~ 21:24, 2 April 2011

I'm entering an image of the singing muffins for the ZB image contest. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 23:55, April 2, 2011 (UTC)