User talk:Lyrithya/archive14
Naked
Looks pretty. Pup 07:51 24 Jun '11
- But you still want the barbecue sauce... they always want the barbecue sauce. Is this proper way to eat a kebab? No, I keep telling them, it's nto proper in the least, here I go to all the effort of grilling these for you ungrateful... *mumbles* ...AND THEN YOU WANT TO PUT BARBECUE SAUCE ON IT! ~ 08:09, 24 June 2011
For making the featured / not featured look groove
--ShabiDOO 16:36, June 24, 2011 (UTC)
- I didn't do it. ~ 16:37, 24 June 2011
Screen Come On, There Problem.
I'm having an issue with an image located in this section of this article. I can't change the image size. Is this another stupid cache problem? --Gamma 04:17, June 25, 2011 (UTC)
- Nope. Stupid image problem. It appears wikimedia won't allow you to increase an image that is natively 277px to a size of 1000px. Surprising that. Pup 05:08 25 Jun '11
- Wikimedia has nothing to do with this, I assure you, and neither, in fact, does the mediawiki. Looks like Wikia broke something, though... even if it was deliberate, it's still a case of breaking things. ~ 06:47, 25 June 2011
- Pretty bad. Can't even go 1px larger... --Gamma 16:44, June 25, 2011 (UTC)
One line: Could you change
shares[1] = ['http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?original_referer=' + pathn + '&related=uncyclopedia&text=' + titlen + '&url=' + pathn + '&via=uncyclopedia', 'Twitter', 'd-twitter'];
to
shares[1] = ['http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?original_referer=' + pathn + '&related=uncyclopedia&text=' + titlen + '&url=' + pathn, 'Twitter', 'd-twitter'];
The via Uncyclopedia links to a twitter account that has only ever had the one post and has about 12 followers and I recognise none of them. @TheUncyclopedia, @Uncyclopedian and @Uncyc is also taken. I'm thinking of creating a dummy account as a holding for an official account at some stage, given the time I spend tweeting, but at the moment I'd rather not give credit to an account that as far as I know has minimal relationship to ourselves. Pup 06:00 25 Jun '11
- I have no idea what you just said, but okay. Let me know if any of the others need yonking. ~ 07:07, 25 June 2011
a new blocker to add to my collection
...my collection of people who block me. • <16:32 Jun 25, 2011>
- I don't know if you know this, but you're actually linked on the instructions for the "block user" page. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 16:34 Jun 25, 2011
- There's a block user page? Damn, that would make things so much easier than what I've been doing... ~ 16:35, 25 June 2011
Bat fuck insane
Heeeey - what happened to the bat fuck insane page? Once a masterpiece of unbridled chaos, now nothing but '...The...' Change it back pleeeeeeeease. :) – Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.169.81.63 (talk • contribs)
- But it's crazier like this. Too much like what folks would expect, the other way. ~ 21:36, 25 June 2011
Rollback
Hi! I would like to know about something that could be really helpful since I often spot vandalism that are more than one consecutive edits; how do I get to be able to do rollbacks? Is there an initiation like dancing on hot coals? Seriously, it would be useful, since I am often online, I sometimes see vandalism like I just mentioned, but it's too much of a pain to revert 4 or 5 edits, so I let it go and it likely slips through the cracks. And well, I think I proved that I am trustworthy, I only have a joke ban on my block log. Mattsnow 21:54, June 26, 2011 (UTC)
- Easiest way to do this is to go to the historical version you want to rollback to, edit and then save. No extra privilege required. Pup 09:59 26 Jun '11
- Oh, ok, I hit the undo thing of the FIRST vandalism, is that right? Mattsnow 22:12, June 26, 2011 (UTC)
Haven't seen one of these for a while...
...but one of those reviews was rather good.
For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.
Well, all of them were really, but one in particular I enjoyed. --Black Flamingo 22:08, June 27, 2011 (UTC)
- Really? Seeing as I wrote all of them after being awake a little too long, that's a little... disconcerting. O_o ~ 02:42, 28 June 2011
I don't know what you're doing but...
knock it off! I be trying to figure this place out and you spam RC.--Union of Soviet Socialist Republics 15:10, June 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Wow, abusing Lyrithya and complaining about RC being flooded? You'll fit right in here. 20:44, 28 June 2011
- Many thanks. I just need something to work on.--Union of Soviet Socialist Republics 15:52, July 1, 2011 (UTC)
This is how
Boom 7000 edits, you can troll me again when I approach 8,000 in a couple of weeks Im sure. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:45, June 29, 2011 (UTC)
- I'll look forward to it. ~ 11:45, 29 June 2011
- I apparently have around almost 5300 edits. I combined the Maniac mcpee edits with the Lollipop edits. -- Lollipop - 07:45, 30 June 2011
- n00bs Pup 07:54 30 Jun '11
- So, Pup, still think of me as a newish user? -- Lollipop - 07:56, 30 June 2011
- No. I just don't think of you. Pup 08:21 30 Jun '11
- I used to think of you. I had dreams about you. They were nightmares that you were attacking my arm and that you ripped it off and you were saying "GRRRARRR". I reminded myself not to eat lasagna before bed. -- Lollipop - 08:33, 30 June 2011
- Couldn't be more Freudian unless you dreamt we were running up the side of a tower with fireworks on top. Pup 08:57 30 Jun '11
- I used to think of you. I had dreams about you. They were nightmares that you were attacking my arm and that you ripped it off and you were saying "GRRRARRR". I reminded myself not to eat lasagna before bed. -- Lollipop - 08:33, 30 June 2011
- No. I just don't think of you. Pup 08:21 30 Jun '11
- So, Pup, still think of me as a newish user? -- Lollipop - 07:56, 30 June 2011
- n00bs Pup 07:54 30 Jun '11
- I apparently have around almost 5300 edits. I combined the Maniac mcpee edits with the Lollipop edits. -- Lollipop - 07:45, 30 June 2011
WTF,VFD & IE
Firstly, huh? Although having said that the QVFD tag appears in the same order on my browsing. Would it be better to attach the share tab the same way? (I haven't looked at how it is attached, btw - just thinking).
Secondly, and the reason why I came here, is VFD and the way that is structured. That would make more sense to me if it were set-up similarly to VFH - separate page per entry, a create page inputbox, shown as a dpl. I can probably put that in place without too much issue, but I don't like working unilaterally on a major change to something related to maintenance. What be your thinking?
Thirdly, I'd appreciate an {{browserdata}} function to be able to workaround some of the inconsistencies with IE. Are you able to add a js function that does a browser detect (navigator.appName & appVersion) that can send the results to a template which can then be used to manipulate the page coding? I think that made sense. Pup 03:35 30 Jun '11
- Not really, seeing as it's supposed to go there, specifically there, and nowhere but there... although there's also supposed to be another down menu next to it, but since it won't work, either, the entire thing is even more messed up. Hence why the tabs are all backwards in vector in the first place. Mind, in monobook it adds it the same way as any other added tab, but I don't think it's actually activated for that, so you'd not see it anyhow.
- It'd be doable, but why?
- Uh... seeing as I'm really not sure what you mean, not really... what do you actually want this thing to do?
- Also, did you ever get around to making those USP templates? ~ 04:39, 30 June 2011
- I started on the USP templates, but never finished them. I'll have to get back onto them. I tried being too clever for my own good, and made it difficult for others to use them.
- As to the why - nothing particular at the moment. I've had times in the past where I've wanted to do something that failed at cross browser stuff though - generally relating to my habit of using positioning - but haven't done it for a while. The main issue though is columns. wikipedia:Template:Div_col gives a solution for multi-column stuff, which is useful for layout which works better in columns. Lonely hearts column is somewhere where this would be useful, but it dies when looking at IE or Opera. Having a catch in there that says if (browser = IE and version < 10) or (if browser = Opera and version < 11.0) then do this differently would be useful. Then it could be set up so that rather that having a column start and a column end it would count the characters in a section and divide them neatly into x amount of columns at the next white-space character and pop those in a table of one row and x cells with no borders or other decoration. I've thought about this for a while, as columns works better in some areas than tables do, as tables are sometimes picky with column widths and screen resolutions. It's only one area where can see an advantage in knowing what browser you're using.
- It's a thought, nothing more, and something that I would use only once or twice, but still has an advantage to have the capacity. Pup 07:09 30 Jun '11
- You can't really say "do this differently" because the thing you want done is not supported by earlier versions of IE than IE10. It's a CSS3 thing. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 07:18 Jun 30, 2011
- You can - rather than having it as a CSS thing, force it into a table on non-compliant browsers. Pup 07:21 30 Jun '11
- And if we're going to do that, might as well keep the entire thing in the table in the first place, seeing as keeping that table working would take a fair bit of extra care.
- That said, if you really want a template to check browsers and act accordingly, there are other less silly potential uses, but you'd probably have to make it yourself, as I'm really not that familiar with javascript. I can tell you this, though - you can't use js to pass stuff back to the template. Templates are used server-end, and js is client end. Once the js is activated, the template is already generated. You can, however, use js to toggle visibility of things according to certain parameters, so that might be an approach. ~ 07:27, 30 June 2011
- That's along the lines of what I was thinking. The template was just a dummies way of incorporating it onto a page. Again, there's only been a couple of times when I've wanted to have that implemented, so it's not a big deal. That example was just that - an example, and I've never really used columns in CSS3 before. Once IE10 becomes a little more common place I possibly will. Nevermind - it's not a big issue. Pup 07:48 30 Jun '11
- You can - rather than having it as a CSS thing, force it into a table on non-compliant browsers. Pup 07:21 30 Jun '11
- You can't really say "do this differently" because the thing you want done is not supported by earlier versions of IE than IE10. It's a CSS3 thing. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 07:18 Jun 30, 2011
- It's a thought, nothing more, and something that I would use only once or twice, but still has an advantage to have the capacity. Pup 07:09 30 Jun '11
Doomy doomy doomy
For furthering the
of Earth! Tacos for all!
Tacoooooos!!
Thanks! 06:41, 30 June 2011
- Now you need to write one on GIR. ~ 06:44, 30 June 2011
- Or...just vandalize your userpage with <big><big><big><big><big><big><big>TACCCCCCOOOOOOOOOSS!!!! That's the same thing right? 06:47, 30 June 2011
- Not really, but fancy you'd mention vandalism about now... ~ 06:48, 30 June 2011
- <big><big><big><big><big><big><big> doesn't work. You'd have to use {{big}} or font sized css. just saying. Pup 07:49 30 Jun '11
- If it doesn't work, why'd you have to nowiki it out? ~ 08:00, 30 June 2011
- Lawyer'd 08:40, 30 June 2011
- If it doesn't work, why'd you have to nowiki it out? ~ 08:00, 30 June 2011
- Or...just vandalize your userpage with <big><big><big><big><big><big><big>TACCCCCCOOOOOOOOOSS!!!! That's the same thing right? 06:47, 30 June 2011
- big X 4
- big X 7
Site banner
Odd thing happened when I was visiting this page. It seems to bugger up the VFH vote tally thingy. Thought you might like to know. Pup 12:17 30 Jun '11
- Actually, someone just put their vote in the wrong place on a VFH nom and it messed up the arithmetic. We don't exactly have the best error handling in our parser functions. ~ 12:46, 30 June 2011
This page
Once again was suffering from a lack of me. You really ought to do something about that. --UU - natter 08:35, Jul 1
- And what would you propose? ~ 09:18, 1 July 2011
- Maybe this page needs some SoaUU as well.
- Maybe. ~ 09:42, 1 July 2011
09:22, 1 July 2011
- I propose nothing. I'm a professional tester now. It's my job to find the problem, it's up to others to solve it. --UU - natter 09:51, Jul 1
- Well, perhaps you're not providing thorough enough reports, then. ~ 10:29, 1 July 2011
- Maybe this page needs some SoaUU as well.
Logo woes
I just noticed that with the default change to Vector, we seem to have lost the {{logo}} function again. Though you've probably already noticed, since your userpage uses the logo change like mine does. It worked fine in the gadget version, but it's unhappy again. Is there an easy way to fix it? -- 13:23 July 1, 2011 (UTC)
- We did? What's it doing? Or is it not doing anything? ~ 13:27, 1 July 2011
- I tried clearing Firefox's cache. After which, refreshing the page cured the problem--until I went to my userpage to check it.
- It still wants to replace Uncyclo-tan's head with a potato. -- 13:44 July 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Well, there's your problem... you're using IE. But seriously, do me a favour and go look at the UnNews mainpage, will you? Does it... look right to you? Is the bar thing yellow with a globe, or just plain white? ~ 13:51, 1 July 2011
- I see the normal UnNews logo with no problems, and I see the "Welcome to UnNews" bar in yellow with some globey gradient effects on the right side of it. Maybe it would help to check the page history of the image I uploaded: in the previous version, I forgot the nowiki for "{{logo}}" in the summary and it superimposed the potato on the Commons logo. Does that shed any light on the issue? -- 14:01 July 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Not really... so it doesn't work on your page? Does it work on other ones? You page looks fine to me, but the last time this happened, half the js on the site quit working for firefox. Just firefox, mind. Turned out Dr. Skullthumper broke something, that time.
- I suppose I could probably just upgrade my firefox and look myself, but I'm in the middle of a nice videogame and that computer is quite thoroughly occupied with that... >.< ~ 14:06, 1 July 2011
- Oh, don't worry, I'll be signing off until tomorrow, anyway. Play a game of Zork for me!
- Anyway, from what I can see, it doesn't work on any page that uses a logo replace. I see your userpages that way, too. AAAAAAAAA! for some reason has a completely blank logo with just the "AAAAAAAAA" Featured Article look-alike graphic. Not sure if it's supposed to be that way or not. -- 14:40 July 1, 2011 (UTC)
- You know that comment I made before about using IE? You might as well be using that. Hells, you'd probably have better results if you were; it's a bloody piece of junk. But anyhow, I see what you mean, and we'll try to give it a yonk. Hopefully someone'll come up with something, figure out who broke what (or if the browser really is just completely useless...) ~ 14:48, 1 July 2011
- I see the normal UnNews logo with no problems, and I see the "Welcome to UnNews" bar in yellow with some globey gradient effects on the right side of it. Maybe it would help to check the page history of the image I uploaded: in the previous version, I forgot the nowiki for "{{logo}}" in the summary and it superimposed the potato on the Commons logo. Does that shed any light on the issue? -- 14:01 July 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Well, there's your problem... you're using IE. But seriously, do me a favour and go look at the UnNews mainpage, will you? Does it... look right to you? Is the bar thing yellow with a globe, or just plain white? ~ 13:51, 1 July 2011
zksldj
hi Lyrithya. --Mimo&maxus 16:01, July 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Hello, you. ~ 23:32, 1 July 2011
jdlskz
Aythiryl ih. --ShabiDOO 20:54, July 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Meow. ~ 23:33, 1 July 2011
Something something
Very expired fix tag something something. 23:12, 1 July 2011
- Something sucks a lot more, ironically. 23:16, 1 July 2011
Can I have a copy back?
Hey Lyrithya, this is Thegangstathatlovedme7810, and I would like to know if you can give me a copy back of my article that you deleted, Grand Theft Auto: Konoha City? If you're doing so, then thank you! Oh, and I think you smell like garbage and a pair of underpants (sarcasm)-- ThegangstathatKILLED ME ON THE NIGHT OF NOVEMBER 12, 7810 20:09, 2 July 2011
- It's here. If you want my unsolicited advice, you may want to work on making it seem lass random - either lead up to the pieces more and make them fit or lose some of what really is random - and also perhaps make it read more like and encyclopedia entry, while you're at it. If you get stuck or want more thorough input, you can also request a review, so that option's there. Let me know if you need any help.
- That said, could you also please fix your signature, put it in a template so it doesn't leave code all over the place? If you already have, or when you do, just don't forget the subst:nosubst bit. ~ 03:14, 3 July 2011
Problem
Hetalia: Axis Powers was recently deleted, right? Somehow, it's back. How does this keep happening? Dang weaboos... --Gamma 21:55, July 3, 2011 (UTC)
- I deleted it again. At least, I think I did. I might have deleted the wrong thing, for all I know. Honestly, I'm pretty out of it right now... let's just hope I did that right, shall we? ~ 22:06, 3 July 2011
Good evening
Today, I decided to come out of retirement on Uncle Pete for some odd reasons; namely, Illogicopedia's servers going down and cheerleaders taking over RationalWiki. I don't know whether you're a crat here, but I would like my name changed here to Colonel Sanders, which I use at every other wiki (I still used "ColbertNation" on ?Pedia when I signed up here, and was afraid the guys here would mistake me for a Colbert troll, and that's why I'm asking in the first place). If you can't do it, please take it to the proper authorities. Much appreciated.--Secret Agent 00:32, July 4, 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, hello... annoying, isn't that? But this is on Wikia, so even the bureaucrats can't change names - have to talk to staff for that. You can try sannse on her talkpage; she's the resident staff lady here, or just use the Special:Contact to throw the request at whoever... but they're usually pretty helpful. ~ 10:42, 4 July 2011
- Oh. Could I just create a new account named Colonel Sanders or would I have to go through all that hoopla with Wikia?--Secret Agent 15:23, July 4, 2011 (UTC)
- You could do that, too. Not like you'd lose all that much, since you didn't do that much before... just don't use your old account if you do do that or someone will probably come yell at you. *shifty eyes* ~ 15:27, 4 July 2011
- Colonel Sanders was too similar to the existing name "Colonelsanders", so I had to settle for this.--Colonel H. Sanders 15:36, July 4, 2011 (UTC)
- There is a thing checking for that? O_o Well, er... nice to meat your, Mr. Chicken. ~ 16:36, 4 July 2011
- Thank you. I can't wait until Illogic's servers go back up. In the meantime, I'll come up with something that just may not get deleted (though chances are it probably will).--Colonel H. Sanders 16:45, July 4, 2011 (UTC)
- Different things get deleted at different thresholds, too, so bear that in mind. And indeed, I have a pickley thing to write. Not that I can't write it now, but this whole blark have me down. That, and I want pictures. Pictures seem to break it. ~ 18:01, 4 July 2011
- Thank you. I can't wait until Illogic's servers go back up. In the meantime, I'll come up with something that just may not get deleted (though chances are it probably will).--Colonel H. Sanders 16:45, July 4, 2011 (UTC)
- There is a thing checking for that? O_o Well, er... nice to meat your, Mr. Chicken. ~ 16:36, 4 July 2011
- Colonel Sanders was too similar to the existing name "Colonelsanders", so I had to settle for this.--Colonel H. Sanders 15:36, July 4, 2011 (UTC)
- You could do that, too. Not like you'd lose all that much, since you didn't do that much before... just don't use your old account if you do do that or someone will probably come yell at you. *shifty eyes* ~ 15:27, 4 July 2011
- Oh. Could I just create a new account named Colonel Sanders or would I have to go through all that hoopla with Wikia?--Secret Agent 15:23, July 4, 2011 (UTC)
Eat your vegetables
Just though I’d explain my comment on the vote-o-rama. Don’t take this as a negative attack thingy but it had appeared to me that any article that was based on a specific subject was always dismissed as “cruft”, which I had interpreted to be a bunch of in jokes. It’s like when someone tells a shitty story and concludes it by saying, ”oh, but I guess you had to be there.” I’m not saying that’s always a bad thing. If some unfortunate lost soul stumbles on this little website and searches for their favourite thing in the whole wide world, such as Polish cheese factories, they will understand a lot of the Polish cheese factory references. Conversely, if a different lost soul stumbles on in and sees the featured article is about Polish cheese factories, they may not understand the jokes and be lost to the site forever, which may or may not be a bad thing, depending on the amount of anti-social cave dwelling hermits that inhabit the user space. In essence, I feel the feature articles should be accessible to most people, even Polish cheese enthusiasts, in order to snare a few more return visits. That said, there have been worse things featured in the last couple of weeks or so that don’t even closely resemble a “Wikipaedophile parody article” in the slightest.HauntedUndies. 04:36, July 4, 2011 (UTC)
- I'm not going to say I did a terribly good job of it, because I probably really didn't, but of course an article on a specific subject would be based on that subject, no? It's about the subject, and any parody thereof will naturally speak primarily to those familiar with the subject; thus is the nature of parody and satire. I agree in principle that at least some of such articles should still be generally accessible, but on the other hand, how in tarnation would you make an article about, say, the British National Party funny to someone not familiar with British politics? It's really a toss-up, this humour stuff. Ideally, if people on VFH would just vote on whether or not they think it's good and funny, the voters could serve as a sample representation of the readers - if a majority of the voters find something amusing, chances are a majority of the readers will too. Unfortunately I've found people like to get upset when I vote against everything I don't fine funny, probably because I find almost nothing funny, even though if I'm like that, chances are at least some potential readers are, too.
- Hmph. ~ 11:02, 4 July 2011
- I totally agree with what you say about the content being accessible to the reader without whoreing it out to everyone as a bunch of simple fart jokes. I wasn’t trying to ruffle your feathers or other body coverings, merely stating what I had interpreted as some sort of unwritten law of non-in-jokering-with-features. As with the voting, I personally abstain from articles that are well written and probably funny to some people because I don’t get the jokes. I also abstain from voting on shitty incoherent articles due to their shittyness and incoher… you know what I’m getting at. I feel there should be a way of thumbs upping an article like yours that’s well written, has good tone and pacing without necessarily featuring it, as someone that’s seen the movie would be likely to go looking for it with the searchamacallit.Besides, this is just a personal view, but VFH is just an ego trip wank-a-thon, if people come to the site and want to read a piss take of a certain subject they’ll find it or write their own. You write so other people can enjoy it, even if they don’t wet themselves, and unfortunately most of the people that will read it will never know YOU did it. Anyway, maybe some sort of system with a for or against feature and a mark out of ten in terms of quality. Pretty cheesy I know, but I just had a lobotomy and can’t come up with anything else. Now, back to my drooling, Uhhhhhhhhhhhh. HauntedUndies. 12:15, July 4, 2011 (UTC)
- Ah, I see. When people vote against things for being in-jokes, though, they generally mean Uncyclopedian in-jokes - as in, not accessible to anyone outside of regulars here, as opposed to more general you have to have seen 2001: A Space Odyssey to understand the 2001: A Space Odyssey article. A lot of people have. I haven't; have no idea what's going on in that article. Random example.
- As for the other thing you're describing, a rating of sorts - you saw when we were trying to get rid of the existing one, no? It just doesn't work in practice, is the problem. We can't even get people to vote on VFH, let alone mark a thing on random other articles... and they change so much that any old votes are basically worthless anyhow. And other stuff. ~ 12:38, 4 July 2011
- Other stuff ey? Sounds exiting. You make a fair point about the space odyssey thing, so I take the cruft thing back. Also, I just feel people seeing a big red cross on their vfh may view it as an insult, and likewise, people don’t want to insult others. But then again some people are way to easily insulted, sometimes even by people picking their nose and eating it in public, without offering to share it first. Ah well. Uhhhhhhhhhhh HauntedUndies. 10:56, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
- People see a lot of things as insults. Doesn't mean you oughtn't vote against something if you don't think it should be featured, but it does help to give sensible reasons when doing so, and perhaps even more than that, to be consistent about it, lest some people get the impression you're just out to get them. *shifty eyes* ~ 15:58, 5 July 2011
- Other stuff ey? Sounds exiting. You make a fair point about the space odyssey thing, so I take the cruft thing back. Also, I just feel people seeing a big red cross on their vfh may view it as an insult, and likewise, people don’t want to insult others. But then again some people are way to easily insulted, sometimes even by people picking their nose and eating it in public, without offering to share it first. Ah well. Uhhhhhhhhhhh HauntedUndies. 10:56, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
- I totally agree with what you say about the content being accessible to the reader without whoreing it out to everyone as a bunch of simple fart jokes. I wasn’t trying to ruffle your feathers or other body coverings, merely stating what I had interpreted as some sort of unwritten law of non-in-jokering-with-features. As with the voting, I personally abstain from articles that are well written and probably funny to some people because I don’t get the jokes. I also abstain from voting on shitty incoherent articles due to their shittyness and incoher… you know what I’m getting at. I feel there should be a way of thumbs upping an article like yours that’s well written, has good tone and pacing without necessarily featuring it, as someone that’s seen the movie would be likely to go looking for it with the searchamacallit.Besides, this is just a personal view, but VFH is just an ego trip wank-a-thon, if people come to the site and want to read a piss take of a certain subject they’ll find it or write their own. You write so other people can enjoy it, even if they don’t wet themselves, and unfortunately most of the people that will read it will never know YOU did it. Anyway, maybe some sort of system with a for or against feature and a mark out of ten in terms of quality. Pretty cheesy I know, but I just had a lobotomy and can’t come up with anything else. Now, back to my drooling, Uhhhhhhhhhhhh. HauntedUndies. 12:15, July 4, 2011 (UTC)
- 'Cruft, when used here, is usually a shortened form of the word listcruft, which is a portmanteau of list and the 80's programming term cruft which relates to poor programming. As a broad rule it means an article that is predominantly a list, or has several lists included. Lists often tend to be unfunny. There are some lists that do survive on here (worst 100's for example) but are extremely unlikely to make it to front page. HTBFANJS talks about lists, as well as in-jokes and stale jokes. Pup 11:20 05 Jul '11
Poopsmith
All right. What does it involve? Pup 11:22 05 Jul '11
- Archives. Lots and lots of archives. But TheHumbucker finally took up Zombiebaron on it, so don't worry about it, mon. ~ 16:01, 5 July 2011
paradox
dear lyrithya
i can prove that some rules can be impossable.(by the way thanks for fixing my signature) --(๏̯͡๏)(ಠ_ರೃ)14:57, 5 July 2011
- But can you prove that some impossables can be rules? --ShabiDOO 16:09, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Rules, impossible?! What is this madness? Thanks for not being annoyed at it. ~ 17:00, 5 July 2011
Suppose there is a town with only one male barber; and that every man in the town keeps himself clean-shaven: some by shaving themselves others by attending the barber. the barber obeys the following rule: He shaves all and only those men in town tath do not shave themselves.
therefore we can ask the following question: Does the barber shave himself?
because If the barber does not shave himself, he must abide by the rule and shave himself but if he does shave himself, according to the rule he will not shave himself. --(๏̯͡๏)(ಠ_ರೃ)19:33, 5 July 2011
- Then the rule is stupid, the town is fully of crazy idiots who make rules for no reason, and they sound a whole lot like uncyclopedians :) --ShabiDOO 19:40, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
--(๏̯͡๏)(ಠ_ರೃ)19:59, 5 July 2011
Why is there a giant wrinkly smiley face on my talkpage? ~ 20:46, 5 July 2011
- The town only has one male barber, but 20 female ones.
- The male barber is a native American who cannot grow facial hair.
- The barber travels to another town in order to get a shave.
- What a really stoopid scenario. And all it proves is that when an impossible rule is put into place, you have an impossible rule. I have another scenario. 10 people are sitting in a circle. At a predetermined signal they are all meant to face the person to the left of them and, once they have made eye contact, introduce themselves. They are not allowed to turn any other direction until they have finished introducing themselves.
- Or another one - in the game of two up, played in Australia and only on the 25th of April, the game is played by betting on the outcome of two coins tossed in the air. A particular casino have over-extended it's wagers, and the croupier is advise that he has to ensue on the next toss the coins are not to land on either heads or tails.
- Or again - a Catholic believes according to his faith that during mass on a Sunday the bread transubstantiates into the flesh of Jesus, which he then has to eat in order to remain in the faith. He also according to his faith is not allowed to eat any meat, which includes human flesh, during the 40 days of Lent. So if he eats the meat nee bread he breaks his faith, and if he doesn't he breaks his faith.
- Do we need any more impassabilities? Pup 09:09 05 Jul '11
Tag
You're it. :p--- 01:43, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Huh? But I'm an onigiri... ~ 04:03, 6 July 2011
Tagging infinitely blocked users
So, you keep the content, just add {{Indefinitely blocked user}}? The thing is I have seen content replacing before, whats the story here? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:07, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Depends on the user, really, and the userpage. I figure, if they didn't have a userpage, not much point in making one at all, but if they do... well, people who are just vandals, trolls, and/or completely useless, it makes a lot more sense to replace their userpage seeing as there probably won't be anything worth keeping anyway. Zana Dark, on the other hand, was just... not such a user. Does that make sense? ~ 15:57, 6 July 2011
well over a month
Lyrithya, seriously...WHAT GIVES!?!?!?!?! Its been over a month since youve posted something on my page suggesting how I do things, lightly critiquing me for voting or pee reviews or style or something. While they always at first feel like a nail through my head, I do miss that very much and the advice/suggestions. Now that you are an admin...do you not have time for me anymore :( Do I smell like old pickles? --ShabiDOO 10:12, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
- She can't always treat you like a baby now can she? You're a big boy now.--- 14:21, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Im 14 --ShabiDOO 14:24, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
- ur mum lulz ~ 15:59, 6 July 2011
- Pfft. Your still a big boy. How will you live your life if you have to depend on someone to constantly help you out. Use your brain boy!--- 16:01, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Yes...you are right. We need a much more individualistic system. Why dont we get rid of the pee review while we are at it...nonsense that shit is. And lets stop voting for things...if you want something...you got to make it happen. Maybe we can just fight over whose article gets featured...like UnNews. And while we are at it...lets just ban each other. Infact...I name myself dictator for life of Uncyclopedia. YES!!! ROAAAAAAAAAAAAAR!!! THIS IS THE NEW SHABIDOO!!! GRRRRRRRR!!!!!!! --ShabiDOO 16:27, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, Shabi. I name myself Your Boss. ..Now that we don't vote for anything, I declare you fired, and have instructed my minions to throw you in the Grue Chamber. Aimsplode 16:44, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
- P.S. Thanks a lot for the new system, it's like looking in a mirror in front of you when there is one behind you too, giving the illusion of an endless paradox. Now, all of us under the New System can ban, fire, demote, or become Teh Rulaz of the next guy. Again, I praise you for your lack of intelligence, because the world needs wannabees. Aimsplode 16:50, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, Shabi. I name myself Your Boss. ..Now that we don't vote for anything, I declare you fired, and have instructed my minions to throw you in the Grue Chamber. Aimsplode 16:44, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Yes...you are right. We need a much more individualistic system. Why dont we get rid of the pee review while we are at it...nonsense that shit is. And lets stop voting for things...if you want something...you got to make it happen. Maybe we can just fight over whose article gets featured...like UnNews. And while we are at it...lets just ban each other. Infact...I name myself dictator for life of Uncyclopedia. YES!!! ROAAAAAAAAAAAAAR!!! THIS IS THE NEW SHABIDOO!!! GRRRRRRRR!!!!!!! --ShabiDOO 16:27, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Pfft. Your still a big boy. How will you live your life if you have to depend on someone to constantly help you out. Use your brain boy!--- 16:01, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
- ur mum lulz ~ 15:59, 6 July 2011
- Im 14 --ShabiDOO 14:24, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
If im your wannabe can I get out of the grue box? --ShabiDOO 17:09, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Dictator of Uncyclopedia? That's my title! *strikes shabidoo with a katana* Foolish boy--- 17:04, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
If the Grueish people worship you as a God of some sort, then, under the New System, I proclaim MYSELF as this so-called Grue God (also known as 'Grued'), and have sent you to the Death Chamber, the Penalty Box, or whatever other name you would like to call the Grue Chamber. Double plus: This action starts a huge chain of events that consists wholely of any number of random Uncyclopedians firing and replacing The Next Guy, and sending The Previous Guy to the penalty box to be spanked. Aimsplode 22:05, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
- I dont know what my mum has to do with the fact that Im not actualy 14. --ShabiDOO 17:26, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
- Well, there are two ways this works out.....
1. You are actually 14, because you act like it, or 2. Your mum acts like you're 14, which explains why you have baby powder and chapstick smeared all over your face.... Still works out well for me either way. Aimsplode 22:05, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
Hey
It looks like I'm banned from IRC. Could you fix this? Thanks. -- 17:25, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
- What's your IP? ~ 17:43, 6 July 2011
- Er, pm me or something, I mean. ~ 17:44, 6 July 2011
- I think my IP address is 64.255.180.84. -- 17:53, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Wait, are you banned from Freenode, or from the Uncyclopedia IRC channel? If it's the latter, just go on and pm me. If it's the former, uh... I can't help you. ~ 17:56, 6 July 2011
- Oh, ya know what, I think it is the former. I just don't know why. Sorry to waste your time. -- 18:01, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks also for removing the 'silencer' block I encountered on IRC last night. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:07, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Bloody hell, that was you? Sorry about that, mon... Olipro said you were someone else, and I guess I just got distracted and... er. Because I didn't remove it. Are you being sarcastic? Did someone else? Ghack, I'll try to pay more attention next time, figure out what's going on... ~ 03:01, 7 July 2011
- I wasn't being sarcastic Lyrithya but I had presumed it was you that had lifted the block. Hope you enjoy your break and come back soon. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:23, July 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Mmm, you never were one for that, so I'm not sure why I thought that might be the case. Unfortunately, I wouldn't even know how to remove a block, not that it would help much now... I've decided to try to avoid IRC, honestly. Certain individuals there are less than constructive in terms of interaction.
- Also, thank you for supporting me on the forum... everyone just trying to make me leave, that... eh. It'd be nice if people might actually be willing to say just what it was I did or do in general that irked them so much, but perhaps that'd be too much to ask for. Seriously, man, thanks. I'll probably be back to activity once I get some proper free time again, but meantime... will you look after this koala I stole? ~ 23:18, 14 July 2011
- I wasn't being sarcastic Lyrithya but I had presumed it was you that had lifted the block. Hope you enjoy your break and come back soon. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:23, July 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Bloody hell, that was you? Sorry about that, mon... Olipro said you were someone else, and I guess I just got distracted and... er. Because I didn't remove it. Are you being sarcastic? Did someone else? Ghack, I'll try to pay more attention next time, figure out what's going on... ~ 03:01, 7 July 2011
- Thanks also for removing the 'silencer' block I encountered on IRC last night. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:07, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, ya know what, I think it is the former. I just don't know why. Sorry to waste your time. -- 18:01, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Wait, are you banned from Freenode, or from the Uncyclopedia IRC channel? If it's the latter, just go on and pm me. If it's the former, uh... I can't help you. ~ 17:56, 6 July 2011
- I think my IP address is 64.255.180.84. -- 17:53, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Er, pm me or something, I mean. ~ 17:44, 6 July 2011
Mirror
What's wrong with the servers over there this time? --Gamma 19:16, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Something died, from the looks of things. An image server or something. An unfortunately side effect of being a side project, that. ~ 03:03, 7 July 2011
Banning Socky
I agree with you. He should be ban for unbanning you. Teaches him a lesson.--- 21:08, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Exactly. He had no right. ~ 03:04, 7 July 2011
Vector tab question
Sorry if you're the wrong person to ask but, I was wondering how this wiki managed to extra vector tabs, namely the "share tab". I've been trying to do something similar on another wiki, but with no success.--90.200.52.50 16:27, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
- Well, we're actually using monobook, so we just add them as any old cactions tab. But since you're probably not on a host that's a giant pile of suck and thus using the actual vector skin, you'd just have to add the tab to the p-views instead instead of the p-cactions and then it should show up as a tab. Pretty sure the addPortletLink'll handle that like normal, but if not the function shouldn't take much modification to get to work. ~ 16:41, 7 July 2011
- I'm kind of confused as to what to do. I'm looking at the contents of "User:Lyrithya/share.js" and where would you add addPortletLink and would you change ...getElementById('p-cactions'); into ...getElementById('p-views');? Sorry if I'm being/sound irritating. --90.200.52.50 17:36, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
- How do you add tabs normally? Let's just start there. ~ 17:46, 7 July 2011
- I'm kind of confused as to what to do. I'm looking at the contents of "User:Lyrithya/share.js" and where would you add addPortletLink and would you change ...getElementById('p-cactions'); into ...getElementById('p-views');? Sorry if I'm being/sound irritating. --90.200.52.50 17:36, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
function createTab() { addPortletLink( 'p-cactions', wgArticlePath.replace(.....),... ); } addOnloadHook( createTab );
- Using that.--90.200.52.50 18:09, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
- Mkay... and I assume that adds the link to the dropdown menu? To add it as a tab in vector, do this instead:
- Using that.--90.200.52.50 18:09, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
function createTab() { addPortletLink( 'p-views', etc... ); } addOnloadHook( createTab );
- Mind, if it's something you want to work cross-skin, you should probably make it so it checks if skin == 'vector' before doing that, and do the normal p-cactions thing otherwise. ~ 18:21, 7 July 2011
- I'll try asking someone on a forum as I'm still confused.--90.200.52.50 19:02, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
- If you want to add a tab in vector, don't try to add it to the cactions menu. Add it to the views menu. That's all there is to it. ~ 19:35, 7 July 2011
- I know how you add the tab it's just what to put inside the "etc" bit. Does the whole of
- If you want to add a tab in vector, don't try to add it to the cactions menu. Add it to the views menu. That's all there is to it. ~ 19:35, 7 July 2011
- I'll try asking someone on a forum as I'm still confused.--90.200.52.50 19:02, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
- Mind, if it's something you want to work cross-skin, you should probably make it so it checks if skin == 'vector' before doing that, and do the normal p-cactions thing otherwise. ~ 18:21, 7 July 2011
function createTab() {
addPortletLink( 'p-views', etc... );
} addOnloadHook( createTab );
- go underneath whatever's in share.js? or in Vector.js? --90.200.52.50 19:42, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
- Making the tab and adding the dropdown are two entirely separate things - make the tab first. Then append the dropdown. At least that's how I do it; if you want a less kludged example of this kind of thing, you might want to look at Twinkle on wikipedia. ~ 19:49, 7 July 2011
- I give up.--90.200.52.50 20:04, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
- Perhaps you should ask Zombiebaron instead. ~ 20:27, 7 July 2011
- I've tried asking Zombiebaron and he's clueless about what I'm trying to ask. After asking the same question on a forum, they mentioned something about having to install/link to additional javascript libraries in order to get their code to work, so I'm not sure if the Yahoo js library thing is causing it not to show up
- If you still need it, look in the MediaWiki:Common.js here - you will find a function to add a dropdown matching the name of the function the script for the share links calls; copy that as well and the thing should work. Sorry; I forgot I separated it out. ~ 23:21, 14 July 2011
- I've tried asking Zombiebaron and he's clueless about what I'm trying to ask. After asking the same question on a forum, they mentioned something about having to install/link to additional javascript libraries in order to get their code to work, so I'm not sure if the Yahoo js library thing is causing it not to show up
- Perhaps you should ask Zombiebaron instead. ~ 20:27, 7 July 2011
- I give up.--90.200.52.50 20:04, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
- Making the tab and adding the dropdown are two entirely separate things - make the tab first. Then append the dropdown. At least that's how I do it; if you want a less kludged example of this kind of thing, you might want to look at Twinkle on wikipedia. ~ 19:49, 7 July 2011
Deleted Article
Hi. I just noticed that an article (The Legend of Zelda: Phantom Hourglass) I was working on got huffed five days ago. I was kind of disappointed because I worked hard to write out the rape jokes from that article and get pictures into it. (Never noticed that the maintenance tag was there in the first place). I was wondering, would it be bad form for me to put the article back up? Wolf ODonnell 18:47, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
- I've restored it to your userspace; you may continue to work on it there. I'd also suggest getting a review, mind. And yes, recreating deleted content in mainspace is indeed generally considered bad form, so it's good you asked first. ~ 19:41, 7 July 2011
- Thank you very much for your prompt response. I was actually thinking of having it reviewed, because the development section was really stumping me. Thanks, once again. 20:37, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
- No problem. ~ 05:40, 8 July 2011
- Thank you very much for your prompt response. I was actually thinking of having it reviewed, because the development section was really stumping me. Thanks, once again. 20:37, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
You keep blocking yourself
Are you depressed? I think you need a hug.--- 03:59, July 8, 2011 (UTC)
- *smacks Lyrithya in the head with a mallet* Whatever. You go back to banning yourself. Little miss ban me.--- 05:11, July 8, 2011 (UTC)
- This has inspired me to create another HowTo:Get Banned entry: Question why an admin. bans himself/herself. I still wish the mirror wasn't dead, though. I was just getting started with the recovery... --Gamma 05:25, July 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, wait. I fixed it. Sorry to be a nuisance... --Gamma 05:52, July 8, 2011 (UTC)
This page
Doesn't have enough messages telling you how much you rock on it.
Woo! Yay, go you! Under User has decided that you are "quite a decent sort", which is apparently one of his highest terms of praise! This is therefore a good thing, and in accordance with this, he's throwing a party down the manhole to celebrate. Look at him go! You're not invited though. Don't take it personally. |
See, this time I provided the solution as well as the problem. At no extra cost! --UU - natter 08:08, Jul 8
- I love you, man. ~ 23:21, 14 July 2011
- Thanks, I love me too. In other news, I have some possible free time in a couple of weeks (yes, I have to look that far ahead these days) and have a vague hope I might actually write an article then. The idea I have would work best with some interesting formatting and general layout make-nicing stuff, which I pretty much suck at, but you kinda rock at. Would you be interested in giving me a hand if I actually do get round to this? Details to follow if you express an interest. Also, how are you? --UU - natter 12:18, Jul 17
- May as well put this down on page - I'd love to, mon. Formatting is really all I'm good at, so... yeah. Will what it needs be apparent, or are you good at explaining?
- As for how, well... busy. I never knew coursework could take so much time. Bloody strange. But I'm alive. You seem alive, too. This is good. ~ 16:47, 18 July 2011
- Thanks, I love me too. In other news, I have some possible free time in a couple of weeks (yes, I have to look that far ahead these days) and have a vague hope I might actually write an article then. The idea I have would work best with some interesting formatting and general layout make-nicing stuff, which I pretty much suck at, but you kinda rock at. Would you be interested in giving me a hand if I actually do get round to this? Details to follow if you express an interest. Also, how are you? --UU - natter 12:18, Jul 17
You're still it
You have to tag someone else. And no, you're not a riceball.--- 03:23, July 9, 2011 (UTC)
- *Shifty eyes* Hey, Lyrithya, look over there! *runs away* -- Lollipop - 06:25, 9 July 2011
What the hell?
That template made specifically for the page was kewl.... You.... You.... DOUBLE NIGGER. I'm shitting in your chimney. Fudge packing ass lamp go ride a bike made of dicks. Your cock can't get any smaller you fat fuck. You're stepping on my dick you fat piece of clumpy quail shit. Fucking you, order from my store you dick twaddler. Goddam fat fuck, think with the big head. Knobgobbling fuckshits I'm going to break your head, all because of your shitwaffles. How did you see him then you fucking dumb prick. I'm going to your house tonight to rape you dead!!!! - 78.148.140.199 15:00, July 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Now is that anyway to treat a lady? I don't think so--- 15:03, July 9, 2011 (UTC)
- This guy is my new favorite IP.
Ninjastar
- Thanks. What'd I do? ~ 23:22, 14 July 2011
Much Thanks for making Padmé
Any Chance
You would consider voting for my Zach Braff article now that I've given it an expensive and time-consuming extension? The builders just left and I would no longer consider it to be incomplete 10:01, July 12, 2011 (UTC)
- It appears to have been featured in the meantime, but from the brief glance I took at it, it looks like you did a decent job of it, so... er... well done. I'll read it later. Maybe. ~ 23:24, 14 July 2011
GRRRR
Now that you are on your well needed break...Its my turn to complain here...while you cannot do anything about it. First of all, you are way to frickin fair. I dont like it how you just, inturrupt a good ole conversation and make people realise how stupid they are being. Zheesh, give a bunch of bitchy whiners a break and stop neuturalising the situatino! Second of all, you are way to helpfull. Whats with this whole working all that time just to make the unfeatured thing on my user page infront of the potato. Thats insane...im sure you have sitcoms to watch and horrible world news to catch up on. But mostly, its really over the top how you are all like so "excel in everything you do" and then pretend that you suck. This is insanity...I think you should admit that you are a little better that suck. And the second of the last things, you are a purple four armed thing with shit stuck in your hair. I dont like it ... because its different and different things scare me...so stop being different. So there you go, one of these complaints was serious! Like...seriously! Enjoy your vacation and thanks for not voting against any of my VFH articles yet :) --ShabiDOO 15:17, July 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry. ~ 23:24, 14 July 2011
This is not spam...
...this is the greatest opportunity of your life. Summer extravaganza tournament. Teams of 2 or 3 users. Lasts month of August. Tournament wont be the same without you. Don't be an outcaste. CHECK IT OUT. --ShabiDOO 19:10, July 13, 2011 (UTC)
:) :) :)
You're back! And also, you're still it. -- Lollipop - 19:24, 14 July 2011
- Eh? ~ 23:25, 14 July 2011
Something on my talk page
Btw, I'd love to have a weekly e-mail set up that has links back to the latest USP and the featured articles of the week. Just as a thought. Pup 12:20 16 Jul '11
- In fact, that is a really good idea. A weekly email for anyone who wants a linke to the 7 features and the news-post!!!--ShabiDOO 01:00, July 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Just think, it could be a source of income for Uncyc as advertisers would inevitably want in on the email list. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 01:23, July 16, 2011 (UTC)
- That should be pretty easy to do with php... tried poking Dr. Skullthumper about that one? Seeing as he's the one with a php bot... ~ 16:51, 18 July 2011
Greetings from the Internets
Hello you! I wanted to wish you well on your sabbatical! Even though the place just isn't the same without you here, you've done so much around here that you deserve a break. Hope you're out there enjoying the summer sunshine! Cheers! -- 13:50 July 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Blah. Breaks... what in tarnation are those? If it's not one thing, it's another; there's always things needing doing. Currently, though, you could do my exams for me. Care to do my exams for me? You know you want to. Go on, delve into the intricacies of <insert subject here>... ~ 16:57, 18 July 2011
- Hope you enjoyed you're break. If you really liked it, I'll have Zombiebaron to ban you for another week. Welcome back.
- I'm not back, nor have I broken. At least not that I know of. ~ 18:20, 18 July 2011
18:16, July 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Hope you enjoyed you're break. If you really liked it, I'll have Zombiebaron to ban you for another week. Welcome back.
Request for Pictures
Hey there. I was wondering if you could make some pictures for my articles, HowTo:Be a Purebred American, UnScripts:Son, Go Clean Your Room!, and Zombie Americans.
For HowTo:Be a Purebred American, I'm going to need a picture that looks like a fat man sitting on the couch, watching Fox News; and on the TV screen, I want it to say FAUX NEWS! YOUR SOURCE FOR TOP MISLEADING STORIES ABOUT THE BIASED WARS AND PROPAGANDA!
For UnScripts:Son, Go Clean Your Room!, I would like a series of pictures, such as:
- A family picture; with a dad (make him angry, with a Nazi symbol branded on his head), a mom (mixed with black, white, and purple), and a son (two-buck teeth, multiple freckles)
- Two black guys (one with a grill on his teeth, smiling but with his eyebrows in angry mode, make him bald with a wifebeater t-shirt; (and another one with a bandana on his head, a shirt saying, "I KILL YOU, BITCH!"; and with a stupid, mean look on his face)
- Cheech and Chong
- Two gay guys (one with pink shirt; holding coccane, another with pick shirt holding cosmos (liquir); both of them with a drunk, happy look on their faces)
- A father exploding
TIP: For that article, make them all look very stupid, using claymation mixed with real pictures.
I'll get back to you with the article Zombie Americans in the mean time; for my computer is slowing down like a slug coated with salt.
--Lucyfer & his friend, Wlado! 19:21, July 16, 2011 (UTC)
- I hate to say this, but I'm really not one you should be talking to about doing anything, right now. Just don't have the time, especially for so many so strange requests. Not that there's anything wrong with requesting images, but have you considered using more existing images for things, taking real photographs and whatnot or finding similar notions with a search engine and then using captions to make them fit and/or funny? ~ 17:00, 18 July 2011
Well, I can use Paint on my computer, but that's not going to make good pictures. Besides, I don't have a camera; and I'm flat broke. How about you just finish your other projects and then once you're done with that, you can make my photos? Besides, I'll be patient.
PS. Reply to my talk page, please. --Lucyfer & his friend, Wlado! 22:08, July 19, 2011 (UTC)
Hey
Sabe como mudar o meu nome de Usuário? não entendeu? pois é eu falo português
Alysson (talk) 00:43, July 17, 2011 (UTC)
- Sim...solo tens que falar com um administrativo. Ha varios. Lyrithya, o Chiefjustics sao muito agradavles. --ShabiDOO 00:55, July 17, 2011 (UTC)
- You'll need to talk to sannse about that; need staff for that (admins can't do that here). Just tell her which name you want (Lord Angel, no?) and whatnot and she should do it. Although you may want to use english for that; I don't think she speaks portuguese. I don't either, for that matter. ~ 00:57, 17 July 2011
- Я Lizard King, і я магу зрабіцьшто-небудзь--Kэвилипс MUN,CM,NS,3of7 04:00, July 19, 2011 (UTC)
- Hyvää joulua ja onnellista uutta vuotta! OMG!!! It`s Cat the Colourful, Jesus Christ!!! 10:53 19 July 2011
- 二十一世紀の統合失調症がある人! -- 03:06 August 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Hyvää joulua ja onnellista uutta vuotta! OMG!!! It`s Cat the Colourful, Jesus Christ!!! 10:53 19 July 2011
- Я Lizard King, і я магу зрабіцьшто-небудзь--Kэвилипс MUN,CM,NS,3of7 04:00, July 19, 2011 (UTC)
Office Space
Just idling by and looked at Office space a bit closer. I am puzzled by this line:- ..they moved my desk seven times, seven times, they moved my desk,.. is this correct, scans a bit strangely to me. If the second is a repeat of the first perhaps this instead or they moved my desk, seven times and when they saw what they had done, they moved it seven more...(inspired by the ballad of Lizzie Borden). Just an idea. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:27, July 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Eh, it's just how he speaks. Milton's not exactly a very clear guy. But perhaps folks are right; doing an article like that wasn't such a good idea... that, or I just wasn't the one to pull it off. ~ 17:02, 18 July 2011
Hey, you! Yes, you.
Remember me from Illogicopedia? No? Well, anyway, you probably do remember your annoyingly long sig. Right? Well, could you help me with my annoyingly long sig? It's not doing well on Uncyc. ~ info • discussion • contributions • 17:38, July 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, I know you. That said, your signature is too long. Please shorten it in accordance with Uncyclopedia policy.
- Does that help? ~ 17:41, 18 July 2011
- Yes, actually. I shortened it. How 'bout now? ~ info • discussion • contributions 18:02, July 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Actually, I'm referring to the bit in the sigexpand. ~ 18:11, 18 July 2011
- Yes, actually. I shortened it. How 'bout now? ~ info • discussion • contributions 18:02, July 18, 2011 (UTC)
House Neopowell Salutes You
Even though you said Game Of Thrones was terrible and hurt my feelings (I cried for, like, a week), you voted for it and now it's front-page bound. Thank you muchly. Holy Shit It's powell 12:08, July 20, 2011 (UTC)
- Cheers. But it was terrible in a good way, mon. Terrible subject, terrible article, if that makes any sense. ~ 17:55, 20 July 2011
Team NFC
Hey there,
Yes, it's me, wearing my dress robes. I actually don't really care for the bear suit, it's more the idea that I've been an admin here since the half past the dawn of time, and I might have earned a bit of trust by now? Nah.
Anyway, do you have any topics in your back pocket for the Extravagazelle next month? I have one idea, but we may need as many as four. Definitely two to get airborne. --The Bard of Uncyclopedia 17:34, July 20, 2011 (UTC)
- Maybe it's just me, but I've generally found admins to be the least trustworthy of anyone on here. Well, some of them, anyway. Don't know about you. Are you one of them? So you do have an actual reason, then?
- No matter; as for the dealy, hell if I know. I've a massive pile of half-started sentences in my userspace, but they'll probably want us to be using non-started things, so that won't help. Blargle, been too long since I've written anything, really. Plone forgot how. ~ 17:54, 20 July 2011
- Jesus! Is Todd really alive? I thought you disappeared somewhere! So... Who am I? I`m your bigest idol; ever! I love your Dear John Letter! It`s nice that you came here! Welcome! OMG!!! It`s Cat the Colourful, Jesus Christ!!! 11:42 21 July 2011
- He was alive, at least, but I'm afraid that was apparently the end his stay here... something about not liking some of the populance, or at least their actions. A stance, I might add, that I'm starting to appreciate more and more. ~ 08:03, 26 July 2011
- Jesus! Is Todd really alive? I thought you disappeared somewhere! So... Who am I? I`m your bigest idol; ever! I love your Dear John Letter! It`s nice that you came here! Welcome! OMG!!! It`s Cat the Colourful, Jesus Christ!!! 11:42 21 July 2011
Opinionationator
-salutes- -enters- Is this feature worthy yet? I want to submit it, but I need a final opinion (I know, I know. I'm a coward)... --Gamma 06:51, July 25, 2011 (UTC)
- I'm afraid I really couldn't say; the tastes and whims going into the VFH voting have become a complete mystery to me. I'll say this again, though - do be careful about the lists. They are still pretty much meaningless to those not well-acquainted with the game, and unlike prose tends to, don't provide much for contextual clues. ~ 08:06, 26 July 2011
Hi
Remember that time when we used to plot to take over the world? --ShabiDOO 08:20, July 26, 2011 (UTC)
- What world? ~ 08:23, 26 July 2011
- I remember that time I tried to invade the mirror site... --Gamma 17:41, July 26, 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry...im not speaking your language. This should take care of it : It was that place...you know...off over there...where we once though it was something nameable. But then it was not so nameable. And now, I would give it something, subjectify it, but then...who? Who would? And then I saw cake...and then...that was the answer, or something like that. So yeah, remember that time when we tried to take over the world? --ShabiDOO 03:12, July 30, 2011 (UTC)
- I remember that time I tried to invade the mirror site... --Gamma 17:41, July 26, 2011 (UTC)
Spreading the word
Hey Lyth. Seeing you're online, I need a favor. The USE tournament has had any action since the 20th (after I edited today), can you like, spread the word a little more, get teams all the way full, and get people excited again? 4 days till registration closes, so please act fast. Thanks,
23:49, July 27, 2011 (UTC)- The what? Sorry, man; I really haven't been paying attention of late. And I really need to get back to work now, so you'd probably best find someone less overstressed, actually. Wish I could be of more assistance, but deadlines, you know. ~ 23:52, 27 July 2011
- So, basically to translate what you just said into something more compact: "I want to help you but.... A) I'm too lazy." B) I don't want to."
- This may come as a shock, but some of us do have, ah, what is the thing you might call them? Lives? ~ 13:51, 29 July 2011
- Nonsense.
- Lies.
- And you still haven't told me what this USE is. ~ 15:14, 29 July 2011
- Its use is to turn diamonds immortal, and gold into coal... or so I hear. --Black Flamingo 16:18, July 29, 2011 (UTC)
- I heard it's that thingy linked in the sitenotice. And seeing as it's linked in the sitenotice, there's effectively no point in spreading the word through other means.
- My life is on the Uncyc, so...the USE is the Uncyclopedia Summer Extravaganza! Tornament, in which you yourself have joined.
23:30, 29 July 2011
14:49, 29 July 2011
- Nonsense.
01:19, July 29, 2011 (UTC)
- This may come as a shock, but some of us do have, ah, what is the thing you might call them? Lives? ~ 13:51, 29 July 2011
- So, basically to translate what you just said into something more compact: "I want to help you but.... A) I'm too lazy." B) I don't want to."
Besides, we don't need your ever-so-kind help anymore, all But one of the teams are full. Boo hoo. Now go back to your "life" and I Neva want to see or hear about you again.
02:50, July 30, 2011 (UTC)- Oh, right. Yes, that seems to have been handled... shame, though, I much preferred the flamingo's take on it. That would have been so cool... ~ 07:56, 30 July 2011
Glad you are back!
I agree with most of what you say on the forum, civilty is key and new users take example on admins and other users. I know I did when I was new, with TKF, Frosty and you helping me out. I'd say that from my experience 99% of the people here are nice, but I don't have decisions to make, so maybe that's why. Don't let people discourage you! :) Mattsnow 08:02, July 30, 2011 (UTC)
- What about me? Look at that nice sig there, who made it? Who helped you out and supported you through your early years? *grumbles and drinks coffee* -- Lollipop - 08:18, 30 July 2011
- Am I back? I don't feel back. Usually when I'm back I do things, and I haven't done anything yet. But yeah... mind, folks also act differently toward different folks, often without even realising it. If they like someone, they're more likely to try to agree with them, for instance, and try to be agreeable, and if they dislike someone they'll probably find a lot more of what the other person does distasteful, whether or not they might normally find it so, and that's but one thing apt to affect it. But a fair amount is also just directed, circumstance, reaction, etc, and things the average passerby ain't apt to see or recognise, that kind of thing. Talkpages and forums and weirdnesses and cheese, and shifts over the course of months or even years, for some folks. But you also just seem better with people in general. I'm terrible with people. Can you tell? Doesn't really help that I'm apparently female, either... although a lot of it really is just IRC; main wiki's nicer by comparison, at least. ~ 08:21, 30 July 2011
- LOL, I don't think you're terrible with people at all! I can't think of a particular time, not with me or something I've seen on a talkpage. And the new skin is great! And Lollipop, yes, I forgot to mention you, I hope you'll find it in your heart to forgive me... Mattsnow 08:34, July 30, 2011 (UTC)
- That's because you're so congenial! You see good everywhere, and it's, like, scary or something. *flails madly for a bit* Okay, I forgot what I was doing. How are you? ~ 18:43, 30 July 2011
- LOL, I don't think you're terrible with people at all! I can't think of a particular time, not with me or something I've seen on a talkpage. And the new skin is great! And Lollipop, yes, I forgot to mention you, I hope you'll find it in your heart to forgive me... Mattsnow 08:34, July 30, 2011 (UTC)
Oi!
Let's send PuppyOnTheRadio off with a Feature. 12:42, July 30, 2011 (UTC)
Jimmy Johns
Why did you huff my Jimmy John's article? I realize it wasn't great yet but I just started it. WORK IN PROGRESS. Anyway I'm going to recreate it with more content but I would appreciate it if you did not delete it as I work. Thanks.
- It seemed very random, with no apparent cohesion, and was not marked as a work in progress, so there was no way to know that. In the future, you may want to put a {{construction}} template on articles you're working on in mainspace like that one, or if you create an account (and there are numerous reasons to do so, none of which I can currently think of, but that's not the point), you could also create and work with as many as you please in your userspace.
- Anyway, I've restored what you had so far here and cleaned it up a bit, but you'll want to expand it and upon it for it to stay there, else it'll just get deleted again in a week or so. Go into your ideas with more detail, make jokes that clueless people and others alike might be apt to get, and consider your audience as you go, that should help. Or just... write more in general, I don't know. Best of luck, mon. ~ 21:14, 30 July 2011
So you've returned...
Mr. Fluffinski is most pleased at this news, oh yes, he's very pleased...
--Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა) 15:24, August 2, 2011 (UTC)
- I see. Are you certain he was not... coerced in some fashion to show this pleasure? ~ 17:51, 2 August 2011
- How...do you mean? *shifts eyes nervously* --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა) 21:16, August 2, 2011 (UTC)
- *offers Mr. Fluffinski a bowl of cream* ~ 18:48, 4 August 2011
Why
Are you an admin again? 07:13, 2 August 2011
- Lyrithya slept her way to the top. Like Madonna. The singer, I mean. --Black Flamingo 16:23, August 2, 2011 (UTC)
What
Are you an admin now? Jeepers. Ghosts dance when giraffes shriek. Hi! I'm back for a couple of hours, but will have to stop wandering around and write stuff. Will do that now. Is all okay onsite here? I left some illogicpedia pages floating too, will get on a couple of things here now. Maybe I'll finish one, maybe not. Must go now (pizza later!). Aleister 17:31 4-7-'11
- No, I'm a wizard in a chicken suit. Although now that you mention it... I should get a giraffe suit. Yes. That would do quite nicely.
- As for the state of things hereabouts, no idea. Folks haven't been very on top of archiving things lately, that's all I know. Writing, though, now there's a thought. Maybe they've been writing. Writing is good. ~ 18:52, 4 August 2011
- So does that mean a wizard in a chicken suit did it? (I should make such an article now...) -- 03:10 August 5, 2011 (UTC)
- *slaps the fox with a dead flounder* ~ 02:22, 6 August 2011
- So does that mean a wizard in a chicken suit did it? (I should make such an article now...) -- 03:10 August 5, 2011 (UTC)
Shows what I know
Yeah, that writing I planned to do, and asked you to help with? No chance. All sorts of family strife involving hospitals and the like. Not fun. Spare time all used up. However, at least it's no longer scary stuff, just lots of support needed by important people. Not visiting anyone in a hospital right now, which is good, but zero time for pretty much anything. So once again I have no idea when I will write anything or even joke ban anyone. So can you be a dear and joke ban Socky and one other random but completely non-deserving individual for me please? And keep me a seat at the next cabal picnic, I still hope to be back one day... Although... Keep an eye on my userpage for a good reason I may not be. Whatever, keep doing the good stuff and so forth. Pippings! --UU - natter 10:09, Aug 5
- Such a shame; you're a right wonder to have around, mon. Still, at least things seem better, even if you are busy... but surely you'll have some time between messes to come say hi, yes? Will do, though, mon. Will do, at least for so long as this place has heart. ~ 02:56, 6 August 2011
WTFWTFWTF
Wtf I banned from #uncyclopedia?!
01:07, August 6, 2011 (UTC)- I'm sorry; I really can't help you. Even if I was the only who put the initial ban in place, I did it wrong and someone else, probably Zombiebaron, redid it, so he'd be the one to talk to about why it was done and if it could be removed, seeing as he was the one who suggested a ban in the first place. ~ 02:58, 6 August 2011
- Thanks, now I'm on a Zombie hunt, great.... 13:40, August 6, 2011 (UTC)
Sorry Lyrithya
I feel like a complete idiot after my actions last night on IRC. I apoligize for my immaturity and my noobiness, as I went out of character. That has come to a full stop and will be done no more. Again, sorry, and it won't be done again. As I said, I feel awful about it. To make it up to you, I give you the first lollipop in nearly a month.
YOU HAVE BEEN AWARDED A BLUE RASPBERRY LOLLIPOP
Lollipop has awarded Lyrithya/archive14 a blue raspberry lollipop.
|
-- Lollipop - 14:28, 6 August 2011
- Thanks. Please, keep efforting - even if you do stupid crap, you'll find you'll improve eventually if you work at it. Well, less than eventually, really; it can just take awhile to be noticeable. I mean, you've already improved considerably. ~ 16:29, 9 August 2011
- I'm trying to get rid of that reputation of "that user that's always acting somewhat noobish and is annoying, and has a lot of side projects". I don't do side projects anymore, and i've shed my noobish ways a while back. The roller coaster is picking up speed now. Or is it a log flume ride? -- Lollipop - 17:55, 9 August 2011
:) :) :) :)
<center></center><center></center><center></center><center></center><center></center><center></center><center></center><center></center><center></center><center></center><center></center><center></center><center></center><center></center><center></center><center></center><center></center><center></center><center></center><center></center><center></center><center></center><center></center><center></center><center></center><center></center><center></center><center></center><center></center><center></center><center></center><center></center><center></center><center></center><center></center><center></center><center></center><center></center><center></center><center></center>
Keep up the fine work :) ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:41, August 7, 2011 (UTC)
- Walrus? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:55, August 7, 2011 (UTC)
- Yes. ~ 16:30, 9 August 2011
In regards to your latest feature...
Awesome. :) MadMax 19:51, August 7, 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, man, that... that'd mean something if I had any idea what you were talking about. What feature? ~ 16:31, 9 August 2011
- Oh... right. I hadn't even noticed before. I'm glad you like it. ~ 20:12, 11 August 2011
It's one of my favorite movies so I was happy to see an article on it. It was definitely spot on. So are you planning any more film articles in the future? MadMax 22:06, August 13, 2011 (UTC)
its meh
So you think I am useless.I should be scared right now shouldn't I-- 23:21, August 11, 2011/2111 (UTC)UNmarine777
- Er... sorry? ~ 22:31, 12 August 2011
omgz
Can you please do this man a favor? It's not of the sexual variety, I promise. *shifty penis* Mister Victim (talk) 07:29, August 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Nope. I can't. ~ 22:40, 12 August 2011
Morning Dew
Dear Lyrithya, could you please look at the new ending I wrote for morning dew, its just the last few sentences of the work...the link takes you to the page that shows the difference between the new version and two edits ago. Id like a womans opinion. Thanks :) [1] --ShabiDOO 11:52, August 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Butbut I never read it in the first place. You want me to actually read it now? How could you do this to me?! ~ 22:44, 12 August 2011
- Im not trying to be cruel. Im looking out for whats best for my article, and by that I mean whats best for uncyclopedia, and by that I mean how to make the internet better, and in this way make the world a lovelier place. So...is reading the last paragraph (or hopefuly the whole article) so much to ask, when the result is making the world a lovelier place (before we take it over)? --ShabiDOO 15:25, August 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Well, I'll give it a look at some point. Some point. But only because your hair is so cute. ~ 20:23, 13 August 2011
- Im not trying to be cruel. Im looking out for whats best for my article, and by that I mean whats best for uncyclopedia, and by that I mean how to make the internet better, and in this way make the world a lovelier place. So...is reading the last paragraph (or hopefuly the whole article) so much to ask, when the result is making the world a lovelier place (before we take it over)? --ShabiDOO 15:25, August 13, 2011 (UTC)
I love you.
Thank you so much for fixing my categories on Visual puns. Sorry I did all that other stuff, it's just nobody seemed to know how to do it. Anyway, thanks again. -- 02:34, August 13, 2011 (UTC)
- It's weird; it seems like all the other folks familiar with the stuff seem to have either disappeared or been eaten or something... but anyhow, I'm happy to help when I'm around. Drop me a line if you ever need anything like that again and I'll see what I can do. ~ 03:02, 13 August 2011
- Okay, cool. -- 14:29, August 13, 2011 (UTC)
- No promises about ever having a good response time, though. ~ 20:22, 13 August 2011
- Okay, cool. -- 14:29, August 13, 2011 (UTC)
Hey
That thing you did to my UnTunes page was pretty cool. Thanks for doing that. -RAHB 18:49, August 13, 2011 (UTC)
- No problem, mon. Would have been easier had the text been there in the first place, but... eh. Whatever. ~ 20:24, 13 August 2011
Fox News
Lyrithya, when was fox news huffed!¿? Could you please put the old version in my user space? By the way, are you actually purple/blue in real life with a fork stuck in your hair and with a devils tail!¿? --ShabiDOO 19:19, August 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Okay. ~ 20:29, 13 August 2011
- Thanks Lyrithya. Could you tell me when it was huffed and if it was FFW? Or votes for deletion? Please :=) --ShabiDOO 20:32, August 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Monthly maintenance, apparently. ~ 20:34, 13 August 2011
- Okay. What does monthly maintenance mean? Im not familiar with that. --ShabiDOO 20:35, August 13, 2011 (UTC)
- {{fix}}, {{expand}}, etc. ~ 20:37, 13 August 2011
- Okay...so if someone puts a fix or expand tag on an article it gets deleted without a vote? Im sorry to bug you, I just dont understand. --ShabiDOO 21:06, August 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Umm...on second thought I think I do get it. If nothing changes after a maintenence tag is put on...during a given period, the article is huffed...right? --ShabiDOO 21:33, August 13, 2011 (UTC)
- In effect, though the deleting admin does look at them first to see if they even merited a tag in the first place or if they might have improved, or whatnot, and thus acts accordingly. At least in theory. ~ 21:41, 13 August 2011
- Umm...on second thought I think I do get it. If nothing changes after a maintenence tag is put on...during a given period, the article is huffed...right? --ShabiDOO 21:33, August 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Okay...so if someone puts a fix or expand tag on an article it gets deleted without a vote? Im sorry to bug you, I just dont understand. --ShabiDOO 21:06, August 13, 2011 (UTC)
- {{fix}}, {{expand}}, etc. ~ 20:37, 13 August 2011
- Okay. What does monthly maintenance mean? Im not familiar with that. --ShabiDOO 20:35, August 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Monthly maintenance, apparently. ~ 20:34, 13 August 2011
- Thanks Lyrithya. Could you tell me when it was huffed and if it was FFW? Or votes for deletion? Please :=) --ShabiDOO 20:32, August 13, 2011 (UTC)
Nyet
Boo.--Colonel Sanders 02:43, August 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Hi. ~ 02:44, 15 August 2011
- Came to see what's huffin'.--Colonel Sanders 02:45, August 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Beats me. ~ 02:49, 15 August 2011
- Apparently, moar adolescent bullying from the looks of it. Quite common here, eh? I'd think those kiddies would be more amused by PENISPENISPENIS or Michael Jackson. And CH got your cold cats working on the other site. You're welcome.--Colonel Sanders 02:51, August 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Shiny, thanks. ~ 02:58, 15 August 2011
- Gotta love Billo, eh?--Colonel Sanders 03:01, August 15, 2011 (UTC)
- He has his boons. ~ 03:04, 15 August 2011
- Have you seen his
propaganda machineFaux News show by chance?--Colonel Sanders 03:06, August 15, 2011 (UTC)- I'm not terribly familiar with such newfangled contraptions. ~ 03:08, 15 August 2011
- Have you seen his
- He has his boons. ~ 03:04, 15 August 2011
- Gotta love Billo, eh?--Colonel Sanders 03:01, August 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Shiny, thanks. ~ 02:58, 15 August 2011
- Apparently, moar adolescent bullying from the looks of it. Quite common here, eh? I'd think those kiddies would be more amused by PENISPENISPENIS or Michael Jackson. And CH got your cold cats working on the other site. You're welcome.--Colonel Sanders 02:51, August 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Beats me. ~ 02:49, 15 August 2011
- Came to see what's huffin'.--Colonel Sanders 02:45, August 15, 2011 (UTC)
Pages
Lyrithya....this guy asked me for my help twice now. He has no clue where or what to edit. I didnt even start a user page until someone suggested I did and made a change to mine. --ShabiDOO 04:12, August 15, 2011 (UTC)
- You react too fast, mon. Or maybe I'm just slow. But anyway, userpages really are a kind of... sacred space, so to speak; they're... well, personal, so we normally don't touch other people's ones, end of story, unless expressly invited or some such. You're not wrong about how that should be a subpage, nor in trying to help out, but please, let the users do the actual editing; a little guidance can go a long way and if that doesn't suffice, well, they can ask if they do want you to show them. ~ 04:23, 15 August 2011
Yo, I got an idea
When the holidays come up, we should change the background to fit with the theme of the current holiday. Even make the logo go with the holiday spirit. Reason why I ask you Is because you're so nice and make Uncyclopedia a happy place.--- 04:48, August 15, 2011 (UTC)
- *grumps*
- You may want to talk to Zombiebaron, though, as he'd be one to actually make it happen. ~ 04:57, 15 August 2011
- Ok, I have a word with him ithen, thank you for that. Also, you look grumpy. Perhaps some nice hot chocolate will cheer you up.--- 05:23, August 15, 2011 (UTC)
- But it's so horribly hot. O_o ~ 05:25, 15 August 2011
- Hmmmm. How about some ice--- 05:33, August 15, 2011 (UTC)
- I know what will make Lyrithya feel better. LETS VANDALISE HER TALK PAGE LIKE CRAZY FOR THE NEXT 24 HOURS!!!!! YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!! --ShabiDOO 05:38, August 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Last time I vandalized a admins talkpage I got in trouble (it was another user fault) and Lyrithya doesn't look like she's in the mood for that--- 05:44, August 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Did someone mention banning? ~ 05:46, 15 August 2011
- .....No--- 05:53, August 15, 2011 (UTC)
- *suspicious look* ~ 05:55, 15 August 2011
- Do I have something stuck in my teeth?--- 06:07, August 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Must... resist... urge... to... Uuuurggh! ~ 06:08, 15 August 2011
- Uh oh. You better calm yourself down before you hurt something. How about watching some Doctor Who or something?--- 06:18, August 15, 2011 (UTC)
- All right...thats it...Lyrithya...cheer the f**k up all ready. Go look at the sun and let it shine on your damn solar plexus and smile at the happiness that is our cheery life. If that doesn't work, well then just imagine how all these saps will be forced to do...after we take over the world. There is no limit!--ShabiDOO 06:19, August 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Uh oh. You better calm yourself down before you hurt something. How about watching some Doctor Who or something?--- 06:18, August 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Must... resist... urge... to... Uuuurggh! ~ 06:08, 15 August 2011
- Do I have something stuck in my teeth?--- 06:07, August 15, 2011 (UTC)
- *suspicious look* ~ 05:55, 15 August 2011
- .....No--- 05:53, August 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Did someone mention banning? ~ 05:46, 15 August 2011
- Last time I vandalized a admins talkpage I got in trouble (it was another user fault) and Lyrithya doesn't look like she's in the mood for that--- 05:44, August 15, 2011 (UTC)
- I know what will make Lyrithya feel better. LETS VANDALISE HER TALK PAGE LIKE CRAZY FOR THE NEXT 24 HOURS!!!!! YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!! --ShabiDOO 05:38, August 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Hmmmm. How about some ice--- 05:33, August 15, 2011 (UTC)
- But it's so horribly hot. O_o ~ 05:25, 15 August 2011
- Ok, I have a word with him ithen, thank you for that. Also, you look grumpy. Perhaps some nice hot chocolate will cheer you up.--- 05:23, August 15, 2011 (UTC)
Porcupine. ~ 06:20, 15 August 2011
Advocacy of a sad clown
Hi there. Sorry for having angered the goddess of knowledge with my indulgence in sockpuppetry. The reason I wanted to create another account was purely to build an archetypal persona to add its extra comedic potential in the field with his obsessive infatuation with bad puns, and perhaps eventually switch to that account and drop my current one since I find the name I'm using right now to be a tad fruity. I had announced it on its page to show that I did not intend this to be a secret, and thus hold no sneaky intents. So it was all in good will.
I went over the whole ignorable policies section again and searched a bit in it. It was hard to find an explicit warning that sockpuppetting was punishable by death penalty. This is all I could find and, if I may say so in my defense, I think it's relatively vague. My apologies if I am missing something enormous or if I'm being really stupid for not taking for granted that having more than one account is forbidden. Everything is relative.
Anyway, if I can absolutely not operate two accounts, then I'd rather be active by DreadfulPunMaster than DoctorRainCloud, if that is possible. They're both freshly created so it wouldn't be a big loss nor a source of confusion to drop one account. Thank you. --DoctorRainCloud 22:00, August 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Alright, I've unblocked the other, but please, only use one account. It's too difficult to keep track of everyone in a place like this, and the potential of baddity too great, otherwise. And yeah, Uncyclopedia's policies and whatnot aren't the clearest, I know. ~ 22:50, 15 August 2011
- Well thanks. I'll just be using PunMaster then. Also geeze! How did I not see myself get so wordy here? Sorry about that. --DreadfulPunMaster 00:43, August 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Shiny. And you used words; I assure you you are hardly alone in doing so. ~ 01:29, 16 August 2011
- No way man, Doctor Rain Cloud is a way better name. Not that I'd know anything about that kind of thing... --Black Flamingo 21:49, August 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Another option would be to use something gibberishy and then sign with whatever you prefer at the time, linking to your userpage. --Slightly below average man 17:16, August 17, 2011 (UTC)
- No way man, Doctor Rain Cloud is a way better name. Not that I'd know anything about that kind of thing... --Black Flamingo 21:49, August 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Shiny. And you used words; I assure you you are hardly alone in doing so. ~ 01:29, 16 August 2011
- Well thanks. I'll just be using PunMaster then. Also geeze! How did I not see myself get so wordy here? Sorry about that. --DreadfulPunMaster 00:43, August 16, 2011 (UTC)
Stop Deleting You're Userpage
It's getting annoying--- 01:41, August 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Stop mixing up 'your' and 'you're'. It's getting annoying. ~ 01:57, 16 August 2011
- Stop being a spelling Nazi. It's getting annoying--- 02:14, August 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Well, I imagine being identified with your userpage as illustrated by the sentence "you are userpage" can be kinda annoying.
- Yes. ~ 03:36, 16 August 2011
- When people do annoying things on my user page, it makes me want to send all my rage into the central processor of uncyclopedia and ban everyone for two days or six hours and then make everyone around me feel miserable and horrible and defeated. --ShabiDOO 04:22, August 16, 2011 (UTC)
- *bans Shabidoo* ~ 04:26, 16 August 2011
- *Starts a forum to appoligise to Lyrithya about whatever it was I did* --ShabiDOO 04:28, August 16, 2011 (UTC)
- *neglects to notice it* ~ 04:36, 16 August 2011
- *Gives Lyrithya a hug* :) --ShabiDOO 04:51, August 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Who invited you Shabidoo--- 05:03, August 16, 2011 (UTC)
- That guy. ~ 05:04, 16 August 2011
- *watches entire scene from park bench* *feeds Shabidoo, Lyrithya, and Iwillkillyou333 some bread crumbs* -- Lollipop - 05:11, 16 August 2011
- *Very impressed by Lollipop's comment* stands in awe. Our little one is growing up :) --ShabiDOO 05:12, August 16, 2011 (UTC)
- *watches entire scene from park bench* *feeds Shabidoo, Lyrithya, and Iwillkillyou333 some bread crumbs* -- Lollipop - 05:11, 16 August 2011
- That guy. ~ 05:04, 16 August 2011
- Who invited you Shabidoo--- 05:03, August 16, 2011 (UTC)
- *Gives Lyrithya a hug* :) --ShabiDOO 04:51, August 16, 2011 (UTC)
- *neglects to notice it* ~ 04:36, 16 August 2011
- *Starts a forum to appoligise to Lyrithya about whatever it was I did* --ShabiDOO 04:28, August 16, 2011 (UTC)
- *bans Shabidoo* ~ 04:26, 16 August 2011
- When people do annoying things on my user page, it makes me want to send all my rage into the central processor of uncyclopedia and ban everyone for two days or six hours and then make everyone around me feel miserable and horrible and defeated. --ShabiDOO 04:22, August 16, 2011 (UTC)
02:16, 16 August 2011
- Yes. ~ 03:36, 16 August 2011
- Well, I imagine being identified with your userpage as illustrated by the sentence "you are userpage" can be kinda annoying.
- Stop being a spelling Nazi. It's getting annoying--- 02:14, August 16, 2011 (UTC)
The one from Paris. He said he likes to have a French Revolution of Love tonight--- 05:29, August 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Does he know that Im not in Paris? Does he know where I am? Did you tell him? Im just not in the mood. Seriously. Its that time of the month, and you know...I just am not up for it. There will be hell to pay if you told him anything Iwillkillyou333 (that is if Lyrithya doesnt do something about all this doodling on her talk page first). --ShabiDOO 05:33, August 16, 2011 (UTC)
- *feeds Shabidoo and Iwillkillyou333 LSD-infested bread crumbs* -- Lollipop - 05:37, 16 August 2011
- shoots Lollipop* Oh yeah he told me he'll wait in your room in a sexy French suit with a stentch of French toast, and he shall make you scream "I love Paris!" and he'll do it whether you like it or not. You have an unusual taste in men--- 05:56, August 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Sign your posts. -- Lollipop - 05:52, 16 August 2011
- *shoots lolipop again* Why am I messing up with my post signatures? --- 05:56, August 16, 2011 (UTC)
- You never shot me because one of the asteriks is missing. *shoots Iwillkillyou333 dead* -- Lollipop - 06:01, 16 August 2011
- *shoots lolipop again* Why am I messing up with my post signatures? --- 05:56, August 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Does he know that Im not in Paris? Does he know where I am? Did you tell him? Im just not in the mood. Seriously. Its that time of the month, and you know...I just am not up for it. There will be hell to pay if you told him anything Iwillkillyou333 (that is if Lyrithya doesnt do something about all this doodling on her talk page first). --ShabiDOO 05:33, August 16, 2011 (UTC)
How did we get from asking Lyrithya not to delete her userpage to talking about Shabidoos boyfriend and me and lollipop having an all out brawl with each other? Off topic but funny--- 06:20, August 16, 2011 (UTC)
- becuz u cant lern 2 spel proporly -- Lollipop - 06:21, 16 August 2011
when things get simple
i have improved thomas mayfair User Time template
<div style="float: left; border: 1px solid #000000; margin: 1px;"> {| cellspacing="0" style="width: 238px; background: #E7E7E7;" | style="width: 45px; height: 45px; background: #E7E7E7; text-align:center;" | [[Image:Clock.gif|43px]] |style="font-size: 8pt; padding: 4pt; line-height: 1.25em; color: #000;" | This user has been on Uncyclopedia for <br /> '''{{#expr: ( {{{year}}}-{{CURRENTYEAR}} ) round 0 }} years, {{#expr: ( {{{month}}}- {{CURRENTMONTH}} ) round 0 }} months and {{#expr: ( {{{day}}}-{{CURRENTDAY}} ) round 0 }} days.''' |} </div>
this does the task that hes template did (i haven't change it) in a more simple way. -(๏̯͡๏)(ಠ_ರೃ)21:39, 19 August 2011
- Sorry, but I don't know what that is, let alone what you want me to say or do. ~ 22:14, 20 August 2011
TAW 2011
Hey Lyrithya,
I'm doing some last minute work on this year's contest and I just wanted to get some feedback from former participants.
- I recently redesigned UN:REQ, based on Wikipedia's version, since the page was very slow to upload for some users (myself included). I'm wondering though if it's a bit too large and also, perhaps, if it was better having everything in one place?
- I've limited the choices to three basic categories: UN:REQ, UN:VITAL and Wanted Pages. This is based on general feedback from last year which limits the number of judges and, hopefully, encourages more participants.
- I've added optional "challenge" categories. There isn't any need for judges since the goal is to complete the task itself. I thought it might be a fun idea and offered something different to other competitions. Do you think this is too much?
I don't know if you're participating this year but I wouldn't mind seeing one or two "returning champions" coming back this year (if only as judges). :) MadMax 23:15, August 19, 2011 (UTC)
- Well, I took a brief look at UN:REQ, and sure, it's big, but that's good, I think. More options, and thus more things to strike folks' fancy that way... not really any harder to look at with it in subpages, either; should actually make specifics easier to find that way.
- As I don't really remember what the setup was last time, I'll just say... uh... sure. Sounds good.
- The challenge is a little odder... it may or may not be a good idea; could just confuse folks and overcomplicate things, aye... or it could prove an interesting sidetrack for folks who are indeed up for a challenge. I couldn't say. O_o
- We'll see how active I am come the thing itself, but anyway I hope this helps. ~ 22:23, 20 August 2011
Thanks I appreciate it. MadMax 00:31, August 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Anytime, man. ~ 01:42, 21 August 2011
I don't have anything to say
I just wanted you to get an annoying box at the top of the page while you were doing other stuff. Hope you liked it! --UU - natter 20:57, Aug 20
- I dont have any particular comment to make, I just wanted to be one of those persons who write friendly but otherwise unhelpful stuff on your talk page :) Hey! --ShabiDOO 21:49, August 20, 2011 (UTC)
- Greetings, people of Uncyclopedia. I... uh... er, take me to your leader? ~ 22:24, 20 August 2011
It's been a while since I last edited this page and UU makes a convincing argument.
00:36, 21 August 2011- Are you their leader? ~ 01:41, 21 August 2011
- No. He's a sock. You must be looking for the one they call the Evil Zionist entity. He screens his calls these days, so it may take a while to get hold of him. --UU - natter 06:06, Aug 21
Actually, I now do have something to say. Or ask, more specifically. This. I'm after an opinion, but don't want a review, not even a quick one. All I need to know is: needs a lot of work, fair to middling but never going anywhere, or worth a speculative nom? Just wondering, really, since most of my articles that I thought were fair to middling but never going anywhere have now been featured, so I have decided I haven't a clue any more. Plus we've had some bad family news, so I'm not actually sure I have a sense of humour right now. Hey ho. Finally, hope you are well and all that. Toodles! --UU - natter 11:15, Aug 21
- What's shower gel? But people'll probably like it. Maybe. I don't know. It seems to have jokes, though, which is always good. Or is it? Bad news, while not fun to receive, can make folks better with humour, though, so there is that. Something about defense mechanisms or something. Still, sorry to hear there's been badness, mon. Take care. ~ 15:54, 21 August 2011
- I'm not actually sure. I think it's a cool, refreshing drink. At least, I hope it is. I also hope it's normal to hiccup bubbles. See what I mean about the humour thing? Anyway, thanks - seeing as it hasn't had a pee review or anything, would you mind making the speculative nom? I'd ask someone else, like Socky, but I'm on your talk page, I'm lazy, and I kind of like you. One of us must be weird. --UU - natter 18:46, Aug 21
- Or both. ~ 04:01, 23 August 2011
- I'm not actually sure. I think it's a cool, refreshing drink. At least, I hope it is. I also hope it's normal to hiccup bubbles. See what I mean about the humour thing? Anyway, thanks - seeing as it hasn't had a pee review or anything, would you mind making the speculative nom? I'd ask someone else, like Socky, but I'm on your talk page, I'm lazy, and I kind of like you. One of us must be weird. --UU - natter 18:46, Aug 21
I kinda drunk was
Sorry about that Mattsnow 11:26, August 22, 2011 (UTC)
- I didn't even read the article at the time. I thought it was another nom joke like Special Changes :S It is good! Mattsnow 13:23, August 22, 2011 (UTC)
- Well, arguably, it was a joke nom... but if I'd made the article worse, I'd still have liked to know, you know? Glad you like the thing, though. ~ 04:01, 23 August 2011
- And don't worry too much about getting drunk - it'd be better if you try to avoid doing that, at least avoid coming here when you do so if you're going to regret your actions, but... well, it happens. ~ 04:21, 23 August 2011
This user needs some help.
And I can't help. Here's the message, "Err I'm afraid I don't quite get it, what I mean is I caress the ambition to add this: User:Mattsnow/UnNews:Jack Layton passes away, even separatist Quebecers mourn to the template. (After removing it from my userspace) Basically, just the link to the template would be very much appreciated, since it is a timely UhHews and I don't remember it! (Or else, I'll keep this as a memory no problem really! I wrote that in an hour or so. Mattsnow 01:51, August 23, 2011 (UTC)" Please help Mattsnow! DJ Mixerr 01:57, August 23, 2011 (UTC) User:DJ Mixerr/sig
- Er great to see somebody helping! Thanks DJ, very considerate! Yes indeed, I needed some help and I feel I still do, I went on IRC, Lyrithya and I couldn't find you, but at least I managed to get the UnNews on the template in a decent way. Me being a perfectinist, I would have liked to get only a small portion of it in blue, and I guess it is child's play to you Lyrithya :D. Looking forward to talk to you on IRC, as... you know. Stuff Mattsnow 02:40, August 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Aiight. Which part, though? Blah, I'd come on IRC, but I need to get to bed. o_O ~ 04:01, 23 August 2011
Yay!
Andorin Kato has awarded you a cookie! Useful admins deserve cookies. Yes, they do. |
- Bite me. ~ 04:01, 23 August 2011
Final Solution edit/deletion due to incompletion
Hi I'd like a copy of the Final solution article back please. I am still working on it but I'm a little busy at the moment. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Apple the Great (talk • contribs)
- Done. Just be a dear and get a review when you're done, and feel free to move it back into mainspace after that. Also, please sign your comments on talkpage using four tildes (~~~~) in the future. ~ 04:01, 23 August 2011
Quotes
Can you check this Lyrithya as it appears to be corrupted with the Hitler text addition? Check Rosetta Stone for an example:-
“ | Error: No text given for quotation (or equals sign used in the actual argument to an unnamed parameter) | ” |
See Rosetta Stone for an example but it also appears elsewhere. thanks. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:38, August 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Update. Appears to have been fixed. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:39, August 23, 2011 (UTC)
- I protected the template, so it shouldn't happen again. Not on that one, anyway. ~ 12:27, 23 August 2011
- Thanks Lyrithya. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:30, August 23, 2011 (UTC)
- No problem. ~ 12:57, 24 August 2011
- Thanks Lyrithya. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:30, August 23, 2011 (UTC)
- I protected the template, so it shouldn't happen again. Not on that one, anyway. ~ 12:27, 23 August 2011
Hey You
Merm. --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა) 15:54, August 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Gron? ~ 12:57, 24 August 2011
- Very good. Very good indeed. In other news, do you happen to remember the name of that pee review contest where people have to do as many as possible in an hour or something. I can't seem to recall the name and it seems to be a good time to start it as pee review is backed up. --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა) 14:10, August 24, 2011 (UTC)
- You mean Pee Week? Might be a good idea, indeed. Meantime, I stuck a note regarding the lack of reviewers in the UnSignpost, but I doubt that'll make any impression. ~ 14:26, 24 August 2011
- I was hoping to try and keep things alive with the pee week, seeing as how september is close and it fits perfectly with the format. This is where I was looking to request your assistance as I assume I need to ask an admin to put the header on the top of the page like they did for that Summer contest and FFW. By tomorrow, I'll archive the last one, update a new one, and hopefully get it ready within a week before the 13th. If you're too busy though, I can go ask someone else, if it's too much trouble. Merm. --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა) 14:45, August 24, 2011 (UTC)
- It's because I just got a social life... sorry about that. --Black Flamingo 15:54, August 24, 2011 (UTC)
- At least someone around here has one. --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა) 17:05, August 24, 2011 (UTC)
- Let me know when you're ready for a thingy in the sitenotice. Or would that be overuse of the sitenotice? Or is that what it's for? ~ 23:47, 24 August 2011
- It's because I just got a social life... sorry about that. --Black Flamingo 15:54, August 24, 2011 (UTC)
- I was hoping to try and keep things alive with the pee week, seeing as how september is close and it fits perfectly with the format. This is where I was looking to request your assistance as I assume I need to ask an admin to put the header on the top of the page like they did for that Summer contest and FFW. By tomorrow, I'll archive the last one, update a new one, and hopefully get it ready within a week before the 13th. If you're too busy though, I can go ask someone else, if it's too much trouble. Merm. --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა) 14:45, August 24, 2011 (UTC)
- You mean Pee Week? Might be a good idea, indeed. Meantime, I stuck a note regarding the lack of reviewers in the UnSignpost, but I doubt that'll make any impression. ~ 14:26, 24 August 2011
- Very good. Very good indeed. In other news, do you happen to remember the name of that pee review contest where people have to do as many as possible in an hour or something. I can't seem to recall the name and it seems to be a good time to start it as pee review is backed up. --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა) 14:10, August 24, 2011 (UTC)
Lyrithya...
...Do something amazing! --Black Flamingo 16:15, August 23, 2011 (UTC)
- *collapses* ~ 12:57, 24 August 2011
ICU
Why did you tag my article as ICU when its a perfectly good article that I put a lot of time in. --Swayne16 05:38, August 24, 2011 (UTC)
- If you mean Assassin's Creed, the ICU was added for precisely the reason it says on the ICU - the article appears to be nonsense. Magic mushrooms? Roof runners? If you're implying that the games are weird, great, that's a reasonable thing to do, but perhaps you could make the connection more clear; as it is it's hard to tell just what the article really is about, if anything, and reading articles about nothing is not inherently entertaining. Not trying to disparage ye, but the article in its current state could really use some improvement, and hopefully this will help.
- On a side note, going around asking other admins for a second opinion isn't likely to be terribly useful when they aren't even active ones, but even if they were, admins are... dangerous folk. Bothering several of them can be a recipe for disaster. Oh, and new talkpage messages generally go at the bottom. Hence why I moved it. Just so it's all in order. ~ 12:57, 24 August 2011
- Swayne River, I took a quick glance at the page and much of it is very good. When an admin like Ltritia or however the name is spelled takes the time to criticize a full article, they usually have some points to make (or are just having a bad day on the golf course), and instead of fighting for your good page try and make it into a great page! It's possible. Litreriya hated my article on the Puddle of shit, and instead of doing nothing I added a section near the bottom "And then there's this..." which tied the page together and gave it a moral ending. Life is like that sometimes. Magic mushrooms teach us this. Aleister 16:06 20something-8-'11
- Actually, Funnybony pretty much summed up my main problem with that thing, which adding more of anything ain't likely to solve. ~ 01:29, 25 August 2011
- Swayne River, I took a quick glance at the page and much of it is very good. When an admin like Ltritia or however the name is spelled takes the time to criticize a full article, they usually have some points to make (or are just having a bad day on the golf course), and instead of fighting for your good page try and make it into a great page! It's possible. Litreriya hated my article on the Puddle of shit, and instead of doing nothing I added a section near the bottom "And then there's this..." which tied the page together and gave it a moral ending. Life is like that sometimes. Magic mushrooms teach us this. Aleister 16:06 20something-8-'11
ICU for "Psychopath"
I didn't recall submitting that particular article for general circulation. I thought it was just in my user space. Could you bring it back in my user space please? Phrank Psinatra 19:51, August 24, 2011 (UTC)