User talk:Lyrithya/archive11
Huggle
I mean rape! Damn, Lyrithya, you're a bad influence on me.
04:00, 3 April 2011- You're not allowed to rape, here; didn't you read the big yellow thing? At least, I think it says that in there somewhere... honestly, I haven't read it, either. ~ 04:09, 3 April 2011
- It's right next to the its-it's thing, apparently. What about "ITs" and "IT's", though? 04:26, 3 April 2011
The Singing Muffins
They have entered the Zombiebaron imagery contest.
-- Lollipop 16:11, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, I saw. ~ 16:13, 3 April 2011
- Do you like the picture? I'm adding it to the gallery. -- Lollipop 16:27, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
- Honestly, it's pretty bad. What program are you using, if you don't mind my asking? ~ 16:52, 3 April 2011
- It started out on MS Paint, then I finished it on Gimp. -- Lollipop 16:53, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
- Don't use Paint, man, seriously. ~ 16:54, 3 April 2011
- I finished it on Gimp. -- Lollipop 16:55, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
- Eh... ~ 17:01, 3 April 2011
- What I think, GIMP is much worser... That mouse looks just stupid. Cat the Colourful (Feed Me!!!) 05:22, April 4, 2011
- Eh, which one? It's gone through a lot of logos. More important is how the program itself runs. ~ 05:25, 4 April 2011
- What I think, GIMP is much worser... That mouse looks just stupid. Cat the Colourful (Feed Me!!!) 05:22, April 4, 2011
- Eh... ~ 17:01, 3 April 2011
- I finished it on Gimp. -- Lollipop 16:55, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
- Don't use Paint, man, seriously. ~ 16:54, 3 April 2011
- It started out on MS Paint, then I finished it on Gimp. -- Lollipop 16:53, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
- Honestly, it's pretty bad. What program are you using, if you don't mind my asking? ~ 16:52, 3 April 2011
- Do you like the picture? I'm adding it to the gallery. -- Lollipop 16:27, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
Lyrithya...
...Care to dance? I'll let you lead this time. --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა) 17:00, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
- Swords or spears? ~ 17:01, 3 April 2011
- Both, I feel lucky today. --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა) 17:06, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
- *grins slowly* ~ 17:09, 3 April 2011
- *Raises right eyebrow* --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა) 17:13, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
- *Attempts to stab Oliphaunte, loses balance, and falls into a tree* ~ 17:17, 3 April 2011
- *Throws rope to Lyrithya who grabs on, only to have Oliphaunte cut rope halfway up. Lyrithya falls back into tree. Oliphaunte laughs. --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა) 17:20, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
- Curse you... well, you won't be getting away with that so easily, oh no. Feel... my... wrath! *hurls a cat at Oliphaunte* ~ 17:38, 3 April 2011
- *throws conveniently placed salmon into Lyrithya's hands. Cat locks onto new target.* Mwahahahaha IRONY. --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა) 17:44, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
- *falls out of the tree as a result of being hit with a flying salmon* Dammit, man, those things are huge! What're you going throwing them, for? ~ 17:49, 3 April 2011
- Well, the only other kind I have is a Marlin. Be glad I even carry fish in my pockets on the weekends or else that cat would've killed us both! --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა) 17:56, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
- Actually... *points up* Looks like she opted for killing a squirrel instead, anyhow. ~ 17:59, 3 April 2011
- Oh, how nice. I hate those little bastards anyways, keep throwing nuts at me whenever I go for a stroll...*throws fish at squirrels*--Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა) 18:12, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
- Problem is, you've attracted a whole neighbourhood of cats! Or maybe I did that, with that attempt to... er... nevermind. Run! ~ 18:41, 3 April 2011
- Actually... *points up* Looks like she opted for killing a squirrel instead, anyhow. ~ 17:59, 3 April 2011
- Alright, but you still owe me a dance. *Waltzes away* --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა) 20:04, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
- Well, the only other kind I have is a Marlin. Be glad I even carry fish in my pockets on the weekends or else that cat would've killed us both! --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა) 17:56, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
- *does a merry jig* ~ 20:08, 3 April 2011
- *falls out of the tree as a result of being hit with a flying salmon* Dammit, man, those things are huge! What're you going throwing them, for? ~ 17:49, 3 April 2011
- No no, I mean with me, like a..nevermind... *grabs fish and dances away with it.* --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა) 20:34, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
- *throws conveniently placed salmon into Lyrithya's hands. Cat locks onto new target.* Mwahahahaha IRONY. --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა) 17:44, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, ah... enjoy your honeymoon, you two! ~ 20:43, 3 April 2011
- Curse you... well, you won't be getting away with that so easily, oh no. Feel... my... wrath! *hurls a cat at Oliphaunte* ~ 17:38, 3 April 2011
- If only... --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა) 22:52, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
- *Throws rope to Lyrithya who grabs on, only to have Oliphaunte cut rope halfway up. Lyrithya falls back into tree. Oliphaunte laughs. --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა) 17:20, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
- *Attempts to stab Oliphaunte, loses balance, and falls into a tree* ~ 17:17, 3 April 2011
- *Raises right eyebrow* --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა) 17:13, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
- *grins slowly* ~ 17:09, 3 April 2011
- Both, I feel lucky today. --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა) 17:06, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
RotM vote
Was your comment on RotM a "For?" Because it sounds like you wanted to vote for but didn't change the score. I only ask because I've instinctively counted the bullets to make sure my eyes weren't playing tricks on me every time I've gone to the page. 20:44, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
- If it was supposed to be a for, I probably would have said for. Although sometimes I forget. Although this guy is so bleedingly obvious a candidate that it doesn't matter terribly, anyhow... hmm... *wanders off* ~ 20:54, 3 April 2011
(Completely unrelated) The user below got me thinking. We should probably have some kind of essay/policy page or at least an addition to the UN:SIG page about time stamps and how to do them so you don't have to explain it over every single time. Just a thought. 21:55, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
- Eh, I can get that added. The problem, however, isn't that folks aren't doing the timestamps right, it's that they're not doing their signatures right. The thing does point to instructions, but indeed, they could be a lot better.
- Well, actually, that's not the problem, that's just a minor annoyance. The problem is when users can't actually figure out how to go into their preferences and change things... o__o ~ 22:33, 3 April 2011
Wow.... I got someone thinking. That is a first.--Jokerman 22:27, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
Excuse me
I am an n00b here unintroduced to you. I am Jokerman. I was referred here from a fellow editor because I am deficient in wiki-fu and can't get a proper timestamp, unless time froze. Help would greatly be appreciated. If not, oh well...--Jokerman 21:46, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
- Hello, hello. Proper welcomes and whatnot to you, then.
- Anyhow, proper timestamp, eh? Oh, I see... with the sig you made, how were you signing? Were you typing out {{User:Jokerman/sig}}, or using tildes? ~ 21:53, 3 April 2011
- I was typing out the sig template thingy.--Jokerman 21:54, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
- P.S. Interesting fake logo. Bananas are delicious.--Jokerman 21:55, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
- Eh, don't do that... put it in the thing for you signature in your preferences. Replace the contents of the inputbox in the signature section with {{subst:nosubst|User:Jokerman/sig}}, check the box that says it's a custom signature, save, and it should show up as you intend in the preview on that page. Anyhow, that done, just sign with four tildes like you are now an it will render.
- Mind, with what you have - please, don't use big text, and if you could make it shorter, that would be nice as well. I know, there are folks running around with longer, but they're... eh, special, if you catch my meaning. No need to make things worse, though. ~ 22:28, 3 April 2011
?
What is the coding for different options? I think I am using HTML instead of CSS and can't find the coding. <select>
<option>Volvo</option> <option>Saab</option> <option>Mercedes</option> <option>Audi</option>
</select> Gen. Fudgem0bile Head-butt unicorns
- <choose> <option>1</option> <option>2</option> etc. </choose>
23:48, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
- ahh, thanks Gen. Fudgem0bile Head-butt unicorns 23:48, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
What you didn't know about Mario & Luigi
Would you please read this and give it a spell and grammar check for me? No rush though; take as long as you like. Thanks. -- 00:37, April 4, 2011 (UTC)
- Urgh... ~ 03:52, 4 April 2011
Thank you
Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you. Mind if I ask how you vectorized it? I have GIMP but I don't know how to use it as I am significantly artistically challenged.
03:36, April 4, 2011 (UTC)- I used inkscape. It... killed... MY BRAIN! Seriously, I spent all day fiddling with NURBS in Maya and to suddenly go back to Bezier curves in a program with a completely different interface... urgh. None of the control vertices did what I expected, and none of the keys did, either... but then I started remembering, and all the NURBS got out of my brain, and I started doing ctrl+z instead of just z, and now we have ourselves a Zim! Yay! ~ 03:50, 4 April 2011
- O.O I don't know what any of that means. Oh well, I'll figure it out later.
- It means I'm out of my mind. But if you want to make vector images, Inkscape would be a program to look into. ~ 03:55, 4 April 2011
- I'll keep that in mind. It's exactly what I was picturing. The whole extra green pixels were getting to me, especially since I was making it bigger. Thanks again.
- Cheers. ~ 05:26, 4 April 2011
04:01, April 4, 2011 (UTC)
- I'll keep that in mind. It's exactly what I was picturing. The whole extra green pixels were getting to me, especially since I was making it bigger. Thanks again.
03:54, April 4, 2011 (UTC)
- It means I'm out of my mind. But if you want to make vector images, Inkscape would be a program to look into. ~ 03:55, 4 April 2011
- O.O I don't know what any of that means. Oh well, I'll figure it out later.
Sig Question
Do you manually add the small font span to the time stamp on your sig or can that be done on the signature itself? I don't know why the font size on the time stamp is annoying me, but it is.
And yes, I could pop on IRC and ask, but that would risk getting into a conversation and I'm waking up in 6 hours so I can't, y'know, risk that. ~
03:55, April 5, 2011 (UTC) <---See? I want this to happen automatically.- Eh, put the modification into the signature box thing in your preferences if you want to modify the timestamp - mind, you need to manually tell it to do the pieces of it so you can close the tags if you do do that, which means the date will be included in your base signature, which means you'll have to sign with three tildes. I mean... well, look here - that's my signature, and the code I use in the preferences box is there in grey - if you can't figure out what to do from that, tell me, but you should be able. ~ 04:05, 5 April 2011
- What the... Can you do it for me? I tried to do that, but something went terribly wrong... Check out the first version... I copied the stuff in your sig-place, changed the stuff with my names, but something went teribly wrong...
- User:Cat the Colourful/sig test. Yes. Here it is. Look at it. Yes. Look. And then come to my user talk to laugh ironically. Cat the Colourful (Feed Me!!!) 05:05, April 5, 2011
- And you have a cool bot. Your good... Cat the Colourful (Feed Me!!!) 05:06, April 5, 2011
- Eh, not the first ones; those are weird. The last one. But Cat, man, what are you doing? Yours is fine, anyhow, no? ~ 05:14, 5 April 2011
- ...Well, you are right. Mine sig is just fine... mine... is... fine... fain... Fi-Ne? Faineeee!!! Fi fi fi fi neneeenneeeeee!!!
- Eh, not the first ones; those are weird. The last one. But Cat, man, what are you doing? Yours is fine, anyhow, no? ~ 05:14, 5 April 2011
- And you have a cool bot. Your good... Cat the Colourful (Feed Me!!!) 05:06, April 5, 2011
FIINININIIJNNNNNEEEEEEEE!!!!
- Oh, sorry. I forgot my pills. But sometimes it`s just good to repeat the word fine. Even the whole day... Try it yourself! It`s really freshy. ...Freshy? Frrreessshhhh... Cat the Colourful (Feed Me!!!) 05:25, April 5, 2011
- Well, that's alright... wait, were you trying to make the timestamp in multiple colours? ~ 06:36, 5 April 2011
- Hmm, didn't think of that. Thanks! And double thanks for the 2.839 seconds I'll save over the next year; that fourth tilde really piles up. ~
- Cheers. ~ 13:38, 6 April 2011
03:57, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, Lyrithya, I tried. But I think that failed. Zombiebaron deleted the page already, when I asked. But yes, I tried that. Cat the Colourful (Feed Me!!!) 06:37, April 6, 2011
- I didn't realise that at the time, but it's definitely doable. And it does take one of the weirder workarounds like the first couple of options on my sig, too, so... anyhow, you want to give it four parameters, like so: 07:42, 26 March, 2024 (UTC), except need to subst the times, and to pass the parameters. This required another file to do so, however.
- Long story short, replace your entire signature in your preferences with
- {{subst:User:Cat the Colourful/sig sig/1|{{subst:CURRENTTIME}}|{{subst:CURRENTDAY}}|{{subst:CURRENTMONTHNAME}}|{{subst:CURRENTYEAR}}}}
- And don't use the subst:nosubst with this, because now the {{User:Cat the Colourful/sig sig/1}} is doing what that would do ({{nosubst}} is a template). And the {{User:Cat the Colourful/sig sig}} is the actual signature. (I asked Mhaille to hack up the test, fixed it, and renamed it. I hope you don't mind) ~ 13:38, 6 April 2011
- Uh-oh. That's what I did. The signature entry on my preferences page looks like this: {{Subst:Nosubst|User:TheHumbucker/sig}} <small>{{SUBST:CURRENTTIME}}, {{SUBST:CURRENTDAY}} {{SUBST:CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{SUBST:CURRENTYEAR}} (UTC)</small> TheHumbucker, who won't drop his signature in case it fucks shit up, at 19:42, April 6, 2011 (UTC)
- No, no, yours is fine; you're not doing anything overly crazy with it, so it doesn't require special handling. Sorry, this got a little confusing since you both are trying to do rather different things, but what you have is right. ~ 20:53, 6 April 2011
- Now, thinking for a while what the hell is preferences in finnish, found the little button next to my talkpage, everything is fine and fixed. So really, thanx a lot. I have cool colours in my time! Yay! 10:07, 8 April, 2011 (UTC) 10:07, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Hey... what is that? --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- over this 10:09, 8 April, 2011 (UTC) 10:09, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Now, thinking for a while what the hell is preferences in finnish, found the little button next to my talkpage, everything is fine and fixed. So really, thanx a lot. I have cool colours in my time! Yay! 10:07, 8 April, 2011 (UTC) 10:07, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
- No, no, yours is fine; you're not doing anything overly crazy with it, so it doesn't require special handling. Sorry, this got a little confusing since you both are trying to do rather different things, but what you have is right. ~ 20:53, 6 April 2011
- Uh-oh. That's what I did. The signature entry on my preferences page looks like this: {{Subst:Nosubst|User:TheHumbucker/sig}} <small>{{SUBST:CURRENTTIME}}, {{SUBST:CURRENTDAY}} {{SUBST:CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{SUBST:CURRENTYEAR}} (UTC)</small> TheHumbucker, who won't drop his signature in case it fucks shit up, at 19:42, April 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, sorry. I forgot my pills. But sometimes it`s just good to repeat the word fine. Even the whole day... Try it yourself! It`s really freshy. ...Freshy? Frrreessshhhh... Cat the Colourful (Feed Me!!!) 05:25, April 5, 2011
Markup
Hey lyri, I was wondering if you cold take a look at the markup of this article. I can't seem te get it right... Lock'd And Loaded ~CUN ~ (Shoot!) 09:03, April 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Mmm, I'll give it a look. What exactly are you trying to do, make it look like, or whatnot? ~ 13:49, 6 April 2011
- Thanks lyr :) I want to well.. have every image on a different side of the page, or... well. every image at the part where it belongs... or something, i just want it to be pretty! Every time I try to edit one bit to fit I en up crashing another.. and so on... Lock'd And Loaded ~CUN ~ (Shoot!) 16:45, April 6, 2011 (UTC)
- It's... it's... so simple, yet so eloquent :) <3 Lock'd And Loaded ~CUN ~ (Shoot!) 18:14, April 6, 2011 (UTC)
- The white space is really inconsistent, though... need to even that out more. Any ideas? I got nothing at present. ~ 18:18, 6 April 2011
- I was thinking of something like this. Also note my excellent handwriting. Lock'd And Loaded ~CUN ~ (Shoot!) 18:32, April 6, 2011 (UTC)
- But then again... maybe that doesn't work either with the text, I dunno.... maybe enlarging the text or something.... Lock'd And Loaded ~CUN ~ (Shoot!) 18:34, April 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Hmm... problem is, I'm not sure how to fix that. Everyone has different monitors, see. Could perhaps fix the width completely of the text; would you have any issues with that? Making the images smaller might work, too, and keeping it consistently one per section. Just switch them off side to side, then, and the formatting could work... could also stick it in a table and force the v-align to centre, which you probably have no idea what that means... ~ 21:47, 7 April 2011
- You're right, I have no idea what that means, but I totally agree ;), Do you like the article tho? Lock'd And Loaded ~CUN ~ (Shoot!) 08:57, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Not exactly my cup of tea, so to speak, but it should definitely appeal to some around here. So should the width just be fixed completely, do you reckon, a specific pixel value instead of a proportional to the screen pixel value like using percentages reveals? ~ 17:53, 8 April 2011
- I think a fixed article length would be the best solution but the thingy could be positioned in the middle of the screen using percentage values? or would that make the wikia engine blow up, so to speak? :) Lock'd And Loaded ~CUN ~ (Shoot!) 07:46, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Not exactly my cup of tea, so to speak, but it should definitely appeal to some around here. So should the width just be fixed completely, do you reckon, a specific pixel value instead of a proportional to the screen pixel value like using percentages reveals? ~ 17:53, 8 April 2011
- You're right, I have no idea what that means, but I totally agree ;), Do you like the article tho? Lock'd And Loaded ~CUN ~ (Shoot!) 08:57, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Hmm... problem is, I'm not sure how to fix that. Everyone has different monitors, see. Could perhaps fix the width completely of the text; would you have any issues with that? Making the images smaller might work, too, and keeping it consistently one per section. Just switch them off side to side, then, and the formatting could work... could also stick it in a table and force the v-align to centre, which you probably have no idea what that means... ~ 21:47, 7 April 2011
- But then again... maybe that doesn't work either with the text, I dunno.... maybe enlarging the text or something.... Lock'd And Loaded ~CUN ~ (Shoot!) 18:34, April 6, 2011 (UTC)
- I was thinking of something like this. Also note my excellent handwriting. Lock'd And Loaded ~CUN ~ (Shoot!) 18:32, April 6, 2011 (UTC)
- The white space is really inconsistent, though... need to even that out more. Any ideas? I got nothing at present. ~ 18:18, 6 April 2011
- It's... it's... so simple, yet so eloquent :) <3 Lock'd And Loaded ~CUN ~ (Shoot!) 18:14, April 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks lyr :) I want to well.. have every image on a different side of the page, or... well. every image at the part where it belongs... or something, i just want it to be pretty! Every time I try to edit one bit to fit I en up crashing another.. and so on... Lock'd And Loaded ~CUN ~ (Shoot!) 16:45, April 6, 2011 (UTC)
"What happened to the tree!?"
Do you mean the tree they planted in his honour? I guess it burned too; does it matter? Although if an explanation will convince you to vote for I will add one. --Black Flamingo 20:13, April 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Yes. ~ 20:34, 6 April 2011
QVFD
What was wrong with what I did? -- 00:30, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
- It made my hair frizz. ~ 00:32, 8 April 2011
H1
H1 is my favorite interstate in Hawaii. Mainly because it is actually an intrastate its not even inter-island. But in going over your edits, which proclaim H1 to be scary, I noticed you left behind an H1. I am trying to decide if it was a deliberate stylistic choice or an oversite. Not caring either way, I just want to say, I have driven on H1, and it is mostly better than driving on I-75--K3vin-Yak-Bak MUN,CM,NS 01:53, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
- What... what article is this? Oh, I see. I plead incompetence. And I can't drive, so... er... cake mix. ~ 02:13, 8 April 2011
- Loud Computer Voice that Counts Backwards Oh you found it. Nether Mounds --K3vin-Yak-Bak MUN,CM,NS 02:18, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
- It actually required looking. >.< On a completely unrelated note, why don't you transclude your signature template instead of just having it paste the contents? Change the subst: to subst:nosubst| ~ 02:21, 8 April 2011
- I have no idea what you're saying. Is this in my pesterfences? My sig file goes in like prince says a u t omatic when I do the tilde thing. --K3vin-Yak-Bak MUN,CM,NS 02:28, April 8, 2011 (UTC)(except when I don't)
- Yeah, in your preferences. ~ 02:30, 8 April 2011
- Hmm something s not right--K3vin-Yak-Bak MUN,CM,NS 02:39, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Do {{SUBST:nosubst|User:kevillips/sig}} it was close, but not quite. ~ 02:42, 8 April 2011
- For self proclaimed lazyperson, this seemed quite important, so I thank you, but see not much end result, or do I? accept snot K3vin-Yak-Bak MUN,CM,NS 02:54, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Not terribly important in your case, as your signature is fairly simple, but it still makes the source prettier, so I thank you for that. ~ 03:00, 8 April 2011
- For self proclaimed lazyperson, this seemed quite important, so I thank you, but see not much end result, or do I? accept snot K3vin-Yak-Bak MUN,CM,NS 02:54, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Do {{SUBST:nosubst|User:kevillips/sig}} it was close, but not quite. ~ 02:42, 8 April 2011
- Hmm something s not right--K3vin-Yak-Bak MUN,CM,NS 02:39, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, in your preferences. ~ 02:30, 8 April 2011
- I have no idea what you're saying. Is this in my pesterfences? My sig file goes in like prince says a u t omatic when I do the tilde thing. --K3vin-Yak-Bak MUN,CM,NS 02:28, April 8, 2011 (UTC)(except when I don't)
- Your welcome
- It actually required looking. >.< On a completely unrelated note, why don't you transclude your signature template instead of just having it paste the contents? Change the subst: to subst:nosubst| ~ 02:21, 8 April 2011
- now you will probably want me to
- put in tiny-tiny graphics.
- But what I willnot willnot do
- is put in tiny-tiny graphics
- just like you,
- I like my sig with texty text,
- not with tiny-tiny pic effects
- such doings make me vexed
- so do not dot not tell me to,
- put in tiny tiny graphics,
- Just like you
- Loud Computer Voice that Counts Backwards Oh you found it. Nether Mounds --K3vin-Yak-Bak MUN,CM,NS 02:18, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
K3vin-Yak-Bak MUN,CM,NS 02:54, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Why would I tell you to put a graphic in your sig? Only reason I have a graphic is because there still isn't widespread support for flipping text... or even text shadows, for that matter. *grumbles* ~ 03:09, 8 April 2011
- I was just being illogicapedian, one of my things is nonsense like that, and since I switched my once, I was joking about a power play, such that you'd tell me to do something else. Its all in fun. I am more about the rhyme than the reason. K3vin-Yak-Bak MUN,CM,NS 03:16, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
- I'm a terrible illogicopedian. I figure everything is sensible. In some way. Or it came from sense. In some other way. Or the dog ate it. I'm rubbish at rhymes, always the reasons, whatever they are. I'm actually quite logical, you know. Quite. Indubitably so. Lurg. Wait... ~ 03:56, 8 April 2011
- I was just being illogicapedian, one of my things is nonsense like that, and since I switched my once, I was joking about a power play, such that you'd tell me to do something else. Its all in fun. I am more about the rhyme than the reason. K3vin-Yak-Bak MUN,CM,NS 03:16, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Why would I tell you to put a graphic in your sig? Only reason I have a graphic is because there still isn't widespread support for flipping text... or even text shadows, for that matter. *grumbles* ~ 03:09, 8 April 2011
i was wondering why.....
I wonder why you put a ICU tempelate on my Fantard article.I see nothing wrong.can you tell me the reason?--FCUKSHITCUNT!!!!!!!!11111111 04:48, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Christ! I'd slap another templeate [sic] on your message to Lyrithya! Spıke ¬ 12:48 8-Apr-11
- It is very unencyclopedic, and the presentation is not such that it appears that there is a comedic reason for this, either. Hells, I'm not even sure what you are trying to say with the article... and what Jack said, really, and Spike, too - you really may want to look to your grammar, especially in the article. If you want more advice/in-depth analysis, however, might I suggest a review?
- That aside, could you also be a dear and use a real signature? As in, one that identifies who you are and includes a link to your userpage? ~ 17:18, 8 April 2011
- Ok,But about What i am trying to say,I am actually simulating the fantard as an kind of animal.--Fcukman 08:17, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Then doing what Kevillips or whatever the guy's name is should work well - mirror the setup of a wikipedia article on an animal, indeed. And thanks for adding a sig. ~ 12:08, 9 April 2011
Review my articles?
Hey Lyrithya, my two articles, Jonah and The Romanovs each received an ICU from you today. I am not mad, someone had already been telling me that they probably would be. Both are true now, but I hope they can survive the ICU. Can you please look them over again and tell me if I have to change them more for them to pass their review on the 14th? Thanks, and I read about your not liking bad grammar and I did try my best here, if I have screwed up on grammar know that I at least gave it my all...--Purple&Pink 05:58, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Mmm, they do seem better, and Socky already removed the ICUs, so I'll say this - what you do still need is more funny, both in overall theme, approach and presentation, as well as individual jokes. Present ironies, twists... and keep the reader's attention. If you want examples of what people seem to think are good, there are always the featured articles gathering dust, and you can also request an in-depth review if you want advices and specifics to yours. ~ 17:51, 8 April 2011
About the sig...
It`s awesome. Thanx! But there is one little problem somewhere, I dont know where. Well... look at this... 10:23, 8 April, 2011 (UTC) 10:23, April 8, 2011 (UTC) Why there are that timestamp twice? Why? 10:23, 8 April, 2011 (UTC) 10:23, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
- If you have a timestamp in your signature, just sign with three tildes: ~~~. The second timestamp comes because you called for it with the fourth tilde. Spıke ¬ 12:48 8-Apr-11
- What he said. ~ 17:54, 8 April 2011
- Oh, thanx. 14:05, 10 April, 2011 (UTC)
- What he said. ~ 17:54, 8 April 2011
Okay, so the sig doesn't like me...
So i tried to custom my sig's date/time stamp and everythings just weird now...see?:
there is no date and time! WhyAmIDoingThis?
- Your sig DESTROYS EVERYTHING! WE ARE DOOOOOOMED!--~ 19:07, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
- *smacks Mimo with a trout*
- Whyer, it's not working because that takes the time parts as parameters - anywhere where there be {{{}}} - as in, triple curly braces, that's a template parameter, something that the person using the template gives the template after a |. Look at the source of other templates and compare that to the functionality to see what I mean. Say, the {{q}} template...
- Annnyhow, read the section I linked you, or at very least do exactly what I say. Create a parameter passer like I made for the Cat, so you can give it parameters so it takes them properly: Purple&Pink 07:42, 26 March, 2024 (UTC)
- And then do that thing I told the Cat to do with your preferences. ~ 19:16, 8 April 2011
- Wow i think it works now...thanks a whole bunches :) Purple&Pink
- No problem. --~ 19:37, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Wow i think it works now...thanks a whole bunches :) Purple&Pink
Eh, not quite. I gave it a fix and left some documentation and instructions on the page, though. ~ 20:55, 8 April 2011
URGH!!!=
Why won't it work?!...Helpme? 21:19, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Because you're not doing exactly as I say. Put this in your preferences:
{{subst:User:Whyamidoingthis/sigpop/nosubst|{{subst:CURRENTTIME}}|{{subst:CURRENTDAY}}|{{subst:CURRENTMONTHNAME}}|{{subst:CURRENTYEAR}}}}
- And then don't mess with the functionality of it until you know what you're doing. ~ 21:33, 8 April 2011
Rebecca Black
<Insert Friday joke here>. So, because the article is pretty bad, is it okay if I make a new one and replace everything? Thanks. --- [talk] 21:24, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
- I'm too lazy to actually read it, but generally the practice is to write your version in your userspace, get a review to ensure that it's sufficiently better and/or get it sufficiently or more better, and then move it over. ~ 21:41, 8 April 2011
- Thanks! --- [talk] 21:48, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
- I second that; as I understand it (but only from reading UnNews), Black is an instant youth star, propelled to stardom by a YouTube video that went viral, who will Flame Out whenever people realize that she can neither sing nor write songs. The article was presumably dashed out to meet the fad, author JoeMonco is not one of the regulars here and his tastes run distinctly to Randumbo, his creation has been set upon by I.P.Anon, but it might be traumatic to roll a decent article right on top of it, so, yes, do go through the proper motions. An alternative is to write a parallel article such as Miss Rebecca Black. A more outlandish alternative is to propose that yours be the main article and the existing one take the weirder name; if you pursue this, please be cooperative about it. To boot, the fad might end entirely before you finish. Spıke ¬ 22:32 8-Apr-11
- Thanks! --- [talk] 21:48, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Rebecca is the worst singer ever, she at least needs a good article. So yeah, as long as there's a Friday she will still be popular. I'll write something, but I really think it needs to be published as Rebecca Black, over the new article. I can only imagine how many people wanted to see the Uncyclopedia article and were bitterly disappointed about what they have seen. --- [talk] 08:48, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
- How about, Pretend its two people with the same name, this article is about the 13 y/o hype machine, for the 13 y/o hype machine see Rebecca Black B which one is which is kind of moot. Mini wikiwars erupt over whether or not Namety Name the ball player deserves top billing, or namety name congressman does. This solution is funny because they are both the same person. Give credit to your reader to read that opening paragraph, whether its yours or not. I had the problem with my The Real Partridge Family article. I think most people going to the obvious page, can see the link to my page and will go accordingly. But who really cares?----KLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 09:01, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
- How about, when the start of your new page says you hope she dies soon, you leave the present article which doesn't hope she dies soon. Aleister 9:08 9-4-'11
- How about, Pretend its two people with the same name, this article is about the 13 y/o hype machine, for the 13 y/o hype machine see Rebecca Black B which one is which is kind of moot. Mini wikiwars erupt over whether or not Namety Name the ball player deserves top billing, or namety name congressman does. This solution is funny because they are both the same person. Give credit to your reader to read that opening paragraph, whether its yours or not. I had the problem with my The Real Partridge Family article. I think most people going to the obvious page, can see the link to my page and will go accordingly. But who really cares?----KLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 09:01, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Rebecca is the worst singer ever, she at least needs a good article. So yeah, as long as there's a Friday she will still be popular. I'll write something, but I really think it needs to be published as Rebecca Black, over the new article. I can only imagine how many people wanted to see the Uncyclopedia article and were bitterly disappointed about what they have seen. --- [talk] 08:48, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
- How about I write my own version of the page and we can see if it's better. If it is, we replace the sucky Rebecca Black one, and go on with our lives. - [talk] 10:28, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
- But thats where this thread started. Of course its a wiki, and you can do whatever, and it can be done or undone. But you stated what you wanted to do, received multiple ideas of what else to do, then restate option one. A much more efficient path would have been do do it, not tell anyone, and see if anyone notices. --KLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 10:48, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
- I hope not. - [talk] 11:40, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
Functionality of Signature files
“I don't know nothing about sig functionality”
K3vin-Yak-Bak MUN,CM,NS 21:42, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
- They're made out of cake. Cake and cheese. ~ 21:47, 8 April 2011
Oh hey...
It's a wiki, I can edit Lyrithya...'s talk page! --
21:46, April 8, 2011 (UTC)- So you can. ~ 21:47, 8 April 2011
Heres Your One Chance Fancy Don't Let Me Down
Against my better judgement, I let Why* Purple&pink Fancy up my sig file. I said, I would stick with it a week --KLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 05:29, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Be careful. It may have sharp edges. ~ 11:41, 9 April 2011
- The K Lips started out clear, now its blood. ----KLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 11:45, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Perhaps you should get that looked at. ~ 12:10, 9 April 2011
- sorry...i wanna figure it out at some point...how else to learn w/out experience? trial and failure, right? eventually success? but i get wot u mean...will refrain...--PeaChess (Chat) 23:42, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Come back to it later, man. Do little things. Look at other templates. You'll get there eventually, and suddenly it'll all make sense. ~ 23:56, 9 April 2011
- sorry...i wanna figure it out at some point...how else to learn w/out experience? trial and failure, right? eventually success? but i get wot u mean...will refrain...--PeaChess (Chat) 23:42, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Perhaps you should get that looked at. ~ 12:10, 9 April 2011
- PeaChess, so does this mean, I can tell you that u don't need to reregister to chat on irc? click the chatroom link in the left column or here ----KLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 23:51, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Huh? ~ 23:56, 9 April 2011
- Why are you having conversations with other people on my talkpage? Why must you make the yellow banner of friendship appear when it's nothing to do with me? Why?! *flails and runs away, sobbing* Although Olipro's being trying to find a way to block that from the channel, just so you know. ~ 00:17, 10 April 2011
- Huh? ~ 23:56, 9 April 2011
- The K Lips started out clear, now its blood. ----KLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 11:45, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Hi, Lyrithra, i am sorry that i keep on breaking sigs...will stop...i really am sorry that i am bugging you with this...--PeaChess (Chat) 00:20, April 10, 2011 (UTC)
- What's your point, man? ~ 01:57, 10 April 2011
- I just wanna say that i edited my sig and i don't think i broke a thing...Yea, happy...PeaChess (Chat) 03:12, April 10, 2011 (UTC)
- Mmm, you seem to have done that one pretty well, indeed - only thing, if you're using noincludes, put them at the end of the actual thing, not after a newline, or that newline will show up on all the other pages. I fixed that, mind, but it's something to note. ~ 05:56, 10 April 2011
- I just wanna say that i edited my sig and i don't think i broke a thing...Yea, happy...PeaChess (Chat) 03:12, April 10, 2011 (UTC)
What you didn't know about Mario & Luigi
I tried to change some things according to what you said. Anyway, if you still don't like it enough to go abstain or better yet for I understand. Thanks. -- 03:09, April 10, 2011 (UTC)
- I'll look. Probably. Unless I forget. Which I might. ~ 06:12, 10 April 2011
Your bot
Your bot appears quite busy at the moment... - Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 08:28, April 10, 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah... you should see here. It might... interest you. *shifty eyes* ~ 08:37, 10 April 2011
- That was quick. XD ~ 08:38, 10 April 2011
- I actually responded to your Forum before I read the note on your talk page... - Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 08:40, April 10, 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, nobody's that fast. And really, having a bot account without bot flags is just silly. ~ 08:42, 10 April 2011
- I actually responded to your Forum before I read the note on your talk page... - Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 08:40, April 10, 2011 (UTC)
- That was quick. XD ~ 08:38, 10 April 2011
UnNews:New makeup doesn't just stay on, it won't come off
Welcome back to UnNews! and your story leads today's edition. Would you take another look at the final paragraph? In any of its permutations, the reporter's defensive first-person doesn't read like news. Instead, there are many additional directions to take this concept in (an imminent competing product from Magic Marker?), and then drop the reader off a cliff. Spıke ¬ 12:38 11-Apr-11
- I was going somewhere with that... then I wandered off for a few days and forgot what, so... yeah. Any ideas what would work better, mon? ~ 15:37, 11 April 2011
There it is, in the parens above. Spıke ¬ 16:15 11-Apr-11
- I don't get it. ~ 16:16, 11 April 2011
One way to write a final zinger to an UnNews about an absurd new product is to give a hint that there are throngs of greater absurdities on the edges. I've given it a try in your final paragraph. Spıke ¬ 16:26 11-Apr-11
- I still don't get it. ~ 17:30, 11 April 2011
- Bizarre.
You posted the same thing at about the same time at me(I can't read timestamps. Sorry.). And Spike, as an unintroduced n00bish editor I say hello. Your political commentaries are rather compelling.
Ze article Very good. I rateth a four. Maybe I will grunt another story out soon. And what is the female obsession over make-up anyway? Good job writing the most amusing thing I've read today.--
13:35, April 11, 2011 (UTC)UnNews:Fox News dumps Glenn Beck
Yes, hello, Jokerman, and thank you for your contribution too. You picked a difficult topic and I didn't put the result on the Front Page, because: (1) It is too easy to take a ridiculous public figure and simply ridicule him. You must take his real-life persona and tweak it. It's generally funnier if you do it to someone you like, as in my Larry Kudlow or Tea Party. (2) Likewise, on a subject where opinions are so extreme, offering deliberately extreme viewpoints isn't funny because it isn't distinct from the real thing. Absurd charges and counter-charges are done in reality in dead seriousness. Nevertheless, good to read that you will come back for more soon. Spıke ¬ 14:17 11-Apr-11
- Indeed. I hope to be a good addition to the UnNews team. I keep up with current events and whatnot. My thanks for the advice and I will be back soon. Now, I have real life things to do....sucks. See ya tomorrow when I will have more material!-- 14:26, April 11, 2011 (UTC)
Following current events puts you in the upper half of UnNews authors--though, as we see, even someone who mostly only follows makeup can crank out a gem. Spıke ¬ 14:39 11-Apr-11
- The last current event I followed was that Michael Jackson murder. Some doctor cold-cocked him with vicodin or something, if I remember right, and they buried him in a sack of potatoes, if memory serves me. What's happened since then, I dunno. Aleister 15:18 11-4-'11
- Aleister, Stuff happened, then some more stuff, then they changed their opinion on some of the stuff and then tried to get more stuff. Oh and someone died. Hope this helps you feel part of the community. ----KLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 15:34, April 11, 2011 (UTC)
- I did overhear a guy on the street say that some people in Egypt threw a party that got out of hand, and some mummy was raped. That's the last I've heard of anything happening outside of my attention bubble (which only holds pizza, something to do with Uma Thurman, and where my next footstep takes me). But thanks for the update, that helped. Aleister 15:39 11-4-'11
- I can definitely confirm some stuff happened in Egypt and there are definitely mummies over there. ----KLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 16:06, April 11, 2011 (UTC)
- Aleister, Stuff happened, then some more stuff, then they changed their opinion on some of the stuff and then tried to get more stuff. Oh and someone died. Hope this helps you feel part of the community. ----KLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 15:34, April 11, 2011 (UTC)
- The last current event I followed was that Michael Jackson murder. Some doctor cold-cocked him with vicodin or something, if I remember right, and they buried him in a sack of potatoes, if memory serves me. What's happened since then, I dunno. Aleister 15:18 11-4-'11
Our Baby Dinosaur
Lyrithya, please see my answer at Uncyclopedia_talk:Imperial_Colonization#Credit_for_Dinosaur. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 20:39, April 11, 2011 (UTC)
- At the same place I added a response to your response to my response to your response to...whatever. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 06:18, April 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Eh, no need to notify me here. I'll see these things. Probably. ~ 06:33, 14 April 2011
- But I like spewing on your user page. Reminds me of old times. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 07:06, April 14, 2011 (UTC)
- It's not for a lack of things to spew... ~ 17:16, 14 April 2011
- But I like spewing on your user page. Reminds me of old times. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 07:06, April 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Eh, no need to notify me here. I'll see these things. Probably. ~ 06:33, 14 April 2011
VFS
I don't see how that matters. I mean...you nom'd admins... 21:41, 12 April 2011
- Yeah, isn't this meant to be serious? - Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 21:42, April 12, 2011 (UTC)
UnNews:Style
Thank you for your (partial) support; but this is now being duked out in the Forum too. Spıke ¬ 15:52 13-Apr-11
- There's a forum? ~ 15:53, 13 April 2011
Forum:UnNews Style Modifications. Also see User talk:Jokerman, which gave rise to the current round. The former is everyone who has been married to us too long and wants each other to change their values; the latter was very pleasant by comparison. Spıke ¬ 15:55 13-Apr-11
- ...uh. Can't we just dump you and TKF in a ring of Jell-o and let you fight it out, armed with giant spoons or some such? Leaving the policies and guidelines and whatnot out of it, mind; most of them are there for at least some reason, although aye, some cutting may definitely be in order in this case. Also, I'm not sure the signatures thing was the best example of an ignorable guidelines page, as, all joking aside, users do get banned over most of the things on there if they don't fix them. Disruptive, you know?
- I'm saying this here because looking at the forum page just gave me a headache. I'm afraid to actually read it. *mumbles about stroops* ~ 16:07, 13 April 2011
Well, having reverted TKF, you ought to drop in at the Forum just to say Hi. Spıke ¬ 16:12 13-Apr-11
PS--I didn't intend to say that UN:SIG is "ignorable." I intended to say that Froggy doesn't obey rules at all, so his concern with the rulebook is suspect. Spıke ¬ 16:14 13-Apr-11
- Ooo... I see. Anyhow, done. Thoughts placed. *shifty eyes* ~ 16:28, 13 April 2011
My new sig
How do you do a custom timestamp? -- Lollipop 22:23, April 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Pass it as a parameter into a signature file that takes it as a parameter and uses it, as in, {{User:Lollipop/somesig|datepart|datepart}}. To do this you need to use a custom {{nosubst}}, unless you only want to pass it as one parameter (like ColinAYB's, and no, I ain't typing his full username out), in which case you can use {{nosubst2}}. That make sense? ~ 04:47, 14 April 2011
- Does it look like I have a timestamp? -- Lollipop - 01:56, 19 April 2011
My list
- ahem* read the delightful sentence up top of this page and carefully explain why you ignored it :D - Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 06:47, April 14, 2011 (UTC)
- I don't know. None of the reasons I can think of make any sense. O_o ~ 06:50, 14 April 2011
- I added you to the list. - Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 06:59, April 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Whoo! ~ 17:16, 14 April 2011
- I added you to the list. - Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 06:59, April 14, 2011 (UTC)
While I can still give this to you
User:Why do I need to provide this?/Template:nonadmin
User:Why do I need to provide this?/sig17 07:38, April 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, don't worry; this should still apply for a goodly long while. Unless you're saying you'll be leaving and not coming back? *suspicious look* ~ 17:17, 14 April 2011
I have a surprise!
But I`m sure it needs the accepting answer from you. Well have I been a good boy? 11:47, 14 April, 2011 (UTC)
- Mmm, cats are always a good sign, but I'll give the grammar a fix later. Complementary Proofreading Service, and all, except I'm a mite rushed right now. ~ 17:20, 14 April 2011
Psychedelic music
How do you make a bot?
As you already know, a sockpuppet of mine was spared thanks to a corrupt admin's benevolence. However, to balance out the wrongs I have done, I want to donate my sock to the services of Uncyclopedia. So, how do I program it into a bot? Like an archiving bot, maybe, cause that's what I was thinking. --Scofield 13:31, April 15, 2011 (UTC)
- This should tell you more than you ever wanted to know. The policies may differ, but most of the technical aspects remain the same (or are very similar) between wikis. ~ 16:29, 15 April 2011
Smoking stapler
I love your image! Whats the inspiration behind it!? Its really great. --ShabiDOO 19:43, April 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, thanks... actually, one of my articles just needed a better lead image. And as some of us are painfully aware, anything can be stapled. Anything. ~ 04:27, 16 April 2011
- Anything? Lyrithya, are you the one who inspired the Blonde joke about correcting errors on the screen with White-out? Shabidoo: Eminently fair comments from you in the Forum. Spıke ¬ 10:38 16-Apr-11
- No, use a nailgun for computer trouble. By which I mean kidnap someone who knows how to fix it and hold them hostage until they do. ~ 16:35, 16 April 2011
- FYI, I am neither. Spıke ¬ 02:31 17-Apr-11
- *staples Shabidoo to Spike* ~ 02:54, 17 April 2011
- Anything? Lyrithya, are you the one who inspired the Blonde joke about correcting errors on the screen with White-out? Shabidoo: Eminently fair comments from you in the Forum. Spıke ¬ 10:38 16-Apr-11
What you have said to me over at Lollipop's
You do not ask me to leave? How the smeg can I fault you for that? I am not causing issue, just explaining myself to him, plus I really did create/edit pages like that Batman page since '07, sorry if I bothered you, that wasn't the point.
P.S: I never said he was a faggot; I was just explaining me and what I did to him, hell, I didn't even say anything at all to him about who he was, just explaining to him what I (me) did, and asking him if he could respond, and he did a few times, so fine, I'll give the bloke credit for that. Seriously, where did I say he was gay?– Preceding unsigned comment added by Meteo (talk • contribs)
- Huh? What? Who are you? What are you talking about? ...gorrammit, can you please, please, please, for the love of all things shiny, sign your posts on talkpages?
- If you mean something about whatever was going on that talkpage, I was doing my best to ignore it as it looked horribly inflammatory and whatnot, so, er... don't construe what I said as either support or opposition of you or what you may have done. I wasn't talking to you, mon, but to Lollipop, as that is, in fact, his talkpage. That's what they're for, after all, talking to the owners. For all I know, you're a wonderful writer who just tends to forget to sign. Or you could be a giant zombie salmon going to eat us all. You're not, right? ~ 04:20, 17 April 2011
- Chill, I didn't misconstrue you, and I was showing him, and a few other people, that I did do stuff on the page for years. And I knew at least partly that at least some of what you said wasn't QUITE at me. And who am I? I'm an asshole who is grateful that you're not like a lot of stupid dipshits on the internet, that's all you need to know about me, Well, I need to get going, so I can't (and to a lesser extent, won't) be chatting here too long. Bye. -Still Human, but your Salmon thing was fucking funny, in an energetic way which I sometimes accomplish. – Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.17.234.42 (talk • contribs)
- That's nice. ~ 17:32, 17 April 2011
- Chill, I didn't misconstrue you, and I was showing him, and a few other people, that I did do stuff on the page for years. And I knew at least partly that at least some of what you said wasn't QUITE at me. And who am I? I'm an asshole who is grateful that you're not like a lot of stupid dipshits on the internet, that's all you need to know about me, Well, I need to get going, so I can't (and to a lesser extent, won't) be chatting here too long. Bye. -Still Human, but your Salmon thing was fucking funny, in an energetic way which I sometimes accomplish. – Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.17.234.42 (talk • contribs)
N00b
Hi, I just enrolled here. I tried to vote for an article you submitted for deletion (it really is crap) but couldn't. Do you need to be an admin to do that? Thanks Mattsnow 06:52, April 17, 2011 (UTC)
- Naw, just need to wait four days after account creation to become autoconfirmed to edit semi-protected pages. A lot of the official pages are. Semi-protected, I mean. ~ 06:54, 17 April 2011
- OK, thanks. I got the practical joke thing lol. Would you be so kind as to tell me what code I need to enter in the "my preferences" section so that my talk page appears next to my signature? Not much of a |337 programmer here. Mattsnow 07:03, April 17, 2011 (UTC)
- Just a regular old wikilink... check the custom signature button and put [[User:Mattsnow|Mattsnow]] ([[User talk:Mattsnow|talk]]) or some variation in the boxy thing. ~ 07:05, 17 April 2011
- OK, thanks. I got the practical joke thing lol. Would you be so kind as to tell me what code I need to enter in the "my preferences" section so that my talk page appears next to my signature? Not much of a |337 programmer here. Mattsnow 07:03, April 17, 2011 (UTC)
If something sucks, can I count on you to give me a pointer? (I don't want to go through the un:aan boot camp! lol ) As a matter of fact, I would like to know how in the hell's name can I personnalize my signature like yours. Just give me a pointer, don't lose all your time on it. (ALTHOUGH YOU SHOULD!) Mattsnow (talk) 15:32, April 17, 2011 (UTC)
- Hi! Start here: Uncyclopedia:How To Get Started Editing#Signature templates. Spıke ¬ 16:28 17-Apr-11
- I generally don't read things, mon, so no promises. I plead... excessive laziness and/or rushing around too much. Anyhow, Spike has you covered with the links to sensible things I didn't even realise existed... which is good. At least someone knows. ~ 17:34, 17 April 2011
VFS
Hi, long time no see, Lyrithya. I don`t take those tunapills anymore, they made me sing Les Claypool. Anyway, I don`t have any idea that what the bloody paw is this so called VFS-thing. I mean, I remember that there was once this Votes for Sandwich (VFS), but I`ve never heard of this one. Could you be nice and explain? And why I´m not in this list? GWARH. 05:21, 18 April, 2011 (UTC)
- It's Votes For Sysops - for admins. It's how users become admins. Which should explain a few other things, but perhaps not... ~ 05:26, 18 April 2011
- So... so... *snif* I`m not... never gonna be an... admin? *crying loudly* 05:27, 18 April, 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, don't assume never, and don't assume you'd want it... but then again, users usually don't get into a sufficiently destructive state of mind for that until they've been here a few years. ~ 05:30, 18 April 2011
- Well that`s nice... I`m so... oh fuck...
- Oh, don't assume never, and don't assume you'd want it... but then again, users usually don't get into a sufficiently destructive state of mind for that until they've been here a few years. ~ 05:30, 18 April 2011
- So... so... *snif* I`m not... never gonna be an... admin? *crying loudly* 05:27, 18 April, 2011 (UTC)
- Not again... 05:33, 18 April, 2011 (UTC)
- Ooo, what's this? ~ 05:34, 18 April 2011
- It`s because those pills. (Or then because I listened it whole weekend) It`s Claypool`s Rumble of the Diesel, you see. We need article about him. Sadly I don`t have any ideas. 04:44, 19 April, 2011 (UTC)
- Did they taste like chicken? But anyhow, I have no idea who that is. I'm sorry. ~ 05:36, 19 April 2011
- Never mind. 05:46, 19 April, 2011 (UTC)
- Did they taste like chicken? But anyhow, I have no idea who that is. I'm sorry. ~ 05:36, 19 April 2011
- It`s because those pills. (Or then because I listened it whole weekend) It`s Claypool`s Rumble of the Diesel, you see. We need article about him. Sadly I don`t have any ideas. 04:44, 19 April, 2011 (UTC)
- Ooo, what's this? ~ 05:34, 18 April 2011
- Not again... 05:33, 18 April, 2011 (UTC)
UnReviews:Milk
Thank you for your a categorization. I am lucky to think of a couple - I think I did a couple, but your additions are great. I less than 3 them. --KLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 21:29, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
- On review, I didn't but I did categorize something today (I think) --KLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 21:31, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
- I thought Jack did that. ~ 21:32, 18 April 2011
- He did. I have edited a lot of new pages today, and remembered doing it on some, just not which --KLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 22:18, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
The furry ones? ~ 00:56, 19 April 2011
- I don't think I edited any furry articles today, I stayed mostly in my userspace working on a big reveal. I may have tweaked a little bit. I honestly need to pay better attention to what I do. You may be surprised I check my own contributions just to see what I have done --KLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 05:07, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
- What I mean is... were any of them... well... you know, mouldy? ~ 05:37, 19 April 2011
- I have my share of mouldy sandwiches, but the furry discussion caused me to revisit Fantard and I damn you for it. !!!! --KLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 05:49, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
- I don't think I edited any furry articles today, I stayed mostly in my userspace working on a big reveal. I may have tweaked a little bit. I honestly need to pay better attention to what I do. You may be surprised I check my own contributions just to see what I have done --KLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 05:07, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
Creating a Bot
I read the Wikipedia manual of bot creation, but nothing helped and my head is spinning from cornfusion. Please give an easy guide of creating a bot...and don't do it with HowTo. -- Lollipop - 00:34, 19 April 2011
- Learn to code
- Write bot
- ???
- Profit.
- 00:58, 19 April 2011
- Yup, pretty much; there really isn't an easy way about it if you don't know anything about scripting. ~ 01:02, 19 April 2011
- Still a little confused about this. So creatng a bot is different than creating a sockpuppet and calling it a bot? -- Lollipop - 01:05, 19 April 2011
- Bots are automated or semi-automated accounts that carry out specifically scripted functions. In other words, indubitably. ~ 01:08, 19 April 2011
- Still a little confused about this. So creatng a bot is different than creating a sockpuppet and calling it a bot? -- Lollipop - 01:05, 19 April 2011
- Yup, pretty much; there really isn't an easy way about it if you don't know anything about scripting. ~ 01:02, 19 April 2011
-- Lollipop - 01:42, 19 April 2011
- Sorry, man, but that image is just so ugly... ~ 01:44, 19 April 2011
- Like your face! (Gets high-fives) -- Lollipop - 01:46, 19 April 2011
- I have a very high threshold for what creeps me out, but those mouthy muffins did it --KLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 01:53, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
- How about mouthy lollipops? Do they creep you out too? You're talking to one right now in fact. -- Lollipop - 01:57, 19 April 2011
- Your energy and enthusiasm warms my heart --KLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 02:24, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
- I have a very high threshold for what creeps me out, but those mouthy muffins did it --KLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 01:53, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
- Like your face! (Gets high-fives) -- Lollipop - 01:46, 19 April 2011
- Lyrithya is a singing muffin though. So when she was an admin, and she claimed that the 'singing muffins told her too', it's actually her referring that she felt to delete it herself, with encouragement of VFD. -- Lollipop - 02:28, 19 April 2011
- You have to have admin access to create a bot. There are options for user-side scripting that does have some automated functionality - the QVFD tab and the Welcome tab are two that spring to mind - but again, you need to have scripting knowledge, and even then, you have to be careful that your script doesn't act in a malicious way, and there are certain safeguards wikia have put in place to deactivate potentially harmful scripts such as a spambot. In short, it's a pain in the ass, and the effort of creating and fine-tuning a script may not be worthwhile if there's not a huge need for the bot. If there is a pressing need, then User:Spang may have a bot he can tweak to a purpose, and there are a few other bots that float around here. Pup 03:01 19 Apr '11
- Owning a bot and being an admin have always have been, and shall continue to be, two totally unrelated things. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 03:22 Apr 19, 2011
- I'll leave the bot for now, maybe when i'm aloud to be an adopter for Adopt-A-N00b (which will be July, because I was last banned in January) i'll make a bot. -- Lollipop - 20:12, 19 April 2011
- The hell does "aloud" mean? 21:25, 19 April 2011
- I'll leave the bot for now, maybe when i'm aloud to be an adopter for Adopt-A-N00b (which will be July, because I was last banned in January) i'll make a bot. -- Lollipop - 20:12, 19 April 2011
- Owning a bot and being an admin have always have been, and shall continue to be, two totally unrelated things. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 03:22 Apr 19, 2011
- You have to have admin access to create a bot. There are options for user-side scripting that does have some automated functionality - the QVFD tab and the Welcome tab are two that spring to mind - but again, you need to have scripting knowledge, and even then, you have to be careful that your script doesn't act in a malicious way, and there are certain safeguards wikia have put in place to deactivate potentially harmful scripts such as a spambot. In short, it's a pain in the ass, and the effort of creating and fine-tuning a script may not be worthwhile if there's not a huge need for the bot. If there is a pressing need, then User:Spang may have a bot he can tweak to a purpose, and there are a few other bots that float around here. Pup 03:01 19 Apr '11
Lurg?
I just found the
by accident. There, I found your "Monday Mornings", called User:Lyrithya/Lurg. Seriously, friend? I thought you would have never... write... about... pages like that... that`s.. just... really... about MY monday mornings!!! What`s going on?! Why you write something with pure nonsense?!! 05:20, 19 April, 2011 (UTC)
- Mornings. It's because the mornings are universal, and they are universally bad, except when they are not. Do you understand? ~ 05:38, 19 April 2011
- I... think... so. Hopefully 05:44, 19 April, 2011 (UTC)
- In time cubism there are four mornings every day - stay the course - believe it. 'Time cubism, everything you know is wrong, everything you were taught is a lie. 4 Mornings 1 day believe it.--KLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 05:52, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
- Hey, I once readed about Time Cubism. Much better than my school books. And it has more sense than my books. 05:54, 19 April, 2011 (UTC)
- In time cubism there are four mornings every day - stay the course - believe it. 'Time cubism, everything you know is wrong, everything you were taught is a lie. 4 Mornings 1 day believe it.--KLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 05:52, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
- I... think... so. Hopefully 05:44, 19 April, 2011 (UTC)
Thanks
For your totally illogical vote for people who want to rub on other people, which is on the front page now. That page's light-of-day was a long time coming, and you pushed it up the nudge post a little more than it deserved. Thanks again! (and all the ED refugees need a place to sleep, and everyone's giving them your user page so they could erect their tents) Al 00:43 4-20
- Óle for the ED refugees. Theres space on my talk page for their tents as well :) I just pee reviewed one of their articles to make them feel welcome. Óle! --ShabiDOO 01:06, April 20, 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, man. Muffins. Also, what in tarnation does olé mean? Or óle or oĺe or whatever the blazes it is...ôĺè? ~ 05:22, 20 April 2011
- Ehm, óle is when something turned out good or great. Olé is when something is in the process and you are cheering it on. So, I should have said Olé infact for the ED refugees, cause they are in a process of coming to uncyclopedia and we have no idea how that will turn out. A few have already written interesting stuff ... on the otherhand, there was a link to a really bizzare and disturbing video which I find odd and puzzling. Though, thats change isnt it? So ... woooohooooo !!! --ShabiDOO 08:20, April 20, 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, man. Muffins. Also, what in tarnation does olé mean? Or óle or oĺe or whatever the blazes it is...ôĺè? ~ 05:22, 20 April 2011
Your bot
Hmmmmm... Noticing the high level of unwelcomed new users, perhaps you get your bot welcoming them again... - Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 04:08, April 20, 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, that apparently ain't a botty thing to do around here... whoops. But anyhow, you keep beating me to welcoming people; what do you expect? Also, my welcome script is broken. ~ 05:23, 20 April 2011
Hi again
Do you use HotCat? If so, please check out this page, and hopefully contribute it a bit? Hey, I last made a new article to main space for a long time ago! Are you proud? 07:16, 20 April, 2011 (UTC)
- Writing... what is this... writing? o__o Well, you've done better than I have, at least... Not really sure what I could add, though. What are you intending to do with this? Any particular direction? You saw my article on the categorisation topic, the Why?... that was what I came up with. >.< ~ 01:24, 21 April 2011
If random were funny
No, "random" is not inherently plural. The above correction, which I gave you on VFD, is one of the two remaining uses of the subjunctive in English. (You'll recognize the same in the phrase, "If I were you.") You occasionally see it in the present tense: "that he be," "if there be".... This slight complication of English is a nod to our history and ought to be preserved. Cat, Mimo, are you paying attention? Spıke ¬ 11:56 21-Apr-11
- English has a subjunctive? ~ 16:58, 21 April 2011
- I don't understand a word either of you said. Aleister 17:02 21-4-'11
- Something, Aleister. Something. *grins slowly* ~ 17:33, 21 April 2011
- I don't understand a word either of you said. Aleister 17:02 21-4-'11
I Need Your Help
I am a n00b, would you be able to assist me? --W.B.B.H 07:57, April 22, 2011 (UTC)
- That really depends... what with? No harm in trying, generally, though. ~ 16:33, 22 April 2011
The odd thing about it all is...
That image was part of an article concept I dumped due to being lazy, but only after having made the image. So I won something somehow for being lazy. Personally I think yours was better, and more likely to become a FA. Pup 04:28 22 Apr '11
- So you did already make the image? >.< ~ 16:33, 22 April 2011
Saskatchewan Civil War
You rang? (In the Change Summary.) As noted, I just moved this "contribution" of YouReadMyMind out of Saskatchewan, as it is, shall we say, a different type of humor from that of the host article. I don't object to the ICU. Spıke ¬ 23:38 22-Apr-11
- 2011
I wouldn't have done section heads plus NOTOC, as with my settings, the year number follows the section number: 10 1998 I would have done it as shown just above. Spıke ¬ 23:41 22-Apr-11
- I think you may be the only person on the entire wiki with those settings enabled. *shifty eyes* Although there are probably at least a couple of others... somewhere. But anyhow, that emulates an h...5? That's a bit low on the scale, not that it's the only option... but to be perfectly honest, the article doesn't really seem worth even a find+replace, for that or to use standard html tags, or whatever. ~ 23:45, 22 April 2011
You might talk to the author, though I proposed the division a week before I did it; he never replied but went on to edit the Infobox of Saskatchewan in ways I view as no better or worse than what was there. Spıke ¬ 23:50 22-Apr-11
- Done. If he does work on it, someone can fix the headers later. ~ 23:57, 22 April 2011
Answer about NoNamesLeft and Illogica
No, I'm not on Illogica (or whatever it is called), so it must be my evil twin brother! I'm focusing my energy on Uncyclopedia right now, I think that is enough for the time being! --NoNamesLeft 17:02, April 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Or random coincidence... but yeah, I know what you mean. Not that it'd make much difference at present, with half of Illogia down, but... ~ 17:40, 23 April 2011
WTF is the problem with Illogicopedia? It's been down for days. hasn't it? --Scofield 20:26, April 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Database issue, or so say the various forums, problem reports, help pages, etc, here, there, on Meta, on other Uncyclopedias... ~ 20:31, 23 April 2011
Mithraism
Hi Lyrithya. Thank you for noticing the article. Sorry the satire wasn't apparent in the first version. Anyway, I've now added quite a lot more text, as well as a picture, and hope the humorous intention is better realized now. I've removed the tag you put on it, but if it has to go on again, so be it... Kalidosa 06:05, April 24, 2011 (UTC)
- Mmm, does look better, though the humour in things can almost always be improved upon, just in general. But yeah, the tag can stay off at this point; they're basically just a way to make sure if people don't fix the things up, they don't clutter up the place, you know? A few tips, though - any ironies you can add about the thing can help. You have some decent jokes, but the more the better, and the really good articles are every line there for a reason, either making a joke, leading up to something, or setting the scene for one... Also, keep your speaker consistent... it gets a little confusing in places. Who is it? Why is it saying these things, think, would it say these things? Having a biased speaker can be a wonderful source of hilarity, but it needs to make sense. Anyhow, you can also request a more in-depth review if you want more specific inputs. They can be quite helpful, I've found. Hope that helps. ~ 06:29, 24 April 2011
- I've got a review. Your intro (the stuff before the table of contents) is your one chance to get me interested in your article. Don't tell me what a great deal you don't know about the subject, and don't send me to a footnote. In my opinion, don't use
strikethroughto suggest there is a difference between what you want to say and what you must say, until you've set this up so I understand what the dilemma is. - Despite all this, I read on, into Section 1, and once again the author is chatting with me about all that is unknown and what to do about it--a bad stand-up comic trying to crack wise with the audience about how he really has nothing to say--and, worst of all, how it feels to be a comic (or in your case, writer of hoax encyclopedia articles).
- In summary, the article needs a theme, and the only one it has is: You. One that jumps out at me is to assert in the intro how influential Mithraism was, and to reveal in the text (without the narrator seeming to understand the contradiction--in fact, the narrator should leave himself out of this) that it was really uninfluential: Has left no trace and its host country seems to be doing the exact opposite of its teachings. Spıke ¬ 12:56 24-Apr-11
- I've got a review. Your intro (the stuff before the table of contents) is your one chance to get me interested in your article. Don't tell me what a great deal you don't know about the subject, and don't send me to a footnote. In my opinion, don't use
- Thanks for the comments. The theme I've been trying to develop seems to have come across more clearly to Lyrithya than to Spike -- the "biased speaker" is the intended theme. It is not so much about Mithraism, as about the way a certain sort of person writes about Mithraism. And tries to stop others from writing about the ancient religion and its influence... The point of the
strikethroughis to imply that the article is the work of more than one speaker -- in other words, that this is a wiki in which a particular contributor is trying to overpower the voices of others... A rare event in wikis, I know... Anyone, I have just added a few words to the intro to make this point clearer. Kalidosa 21:08, April 24, 2011 (UTC)- Problem with multiple speakers, though, is the more there are, the harder it is to get it across what's actually going on, and if folks can't tell what's going on, it's doubtful they'll find it much good. If you don't keep them distinct, and instead do it like a normal conflicted wiki article or some such, it's more likely to just come across as another questionable wiki article, and there are too many of those as it is. The strikethroughs help, but really, they look more ugly, than anything. A few good examples of ones with multiple speakers that I can think of all use a more static approach, usually with a much more static layout in which the speakers aren't changing each other... those might give you some ideas of directions you could go with it... ~ 21:40, 24 April 2011
- Well, I probably only have 2 speakers, and one of them doesn't actually say very much -- it's more the voice of a "straight man" than an interesting character in its own right. I did have a look at your multiple speaker pages. They're good, but a bit different from what I'm trying to do. Ugly or not, it seems to me that the strike-throughs are in character -- the main narrator has a deep inner need to over-ride the other voice and tell it to SHUT UP. What I have done is added the words "Who wrote that?" after the 1st crossed out bit in the intro, to show that it's not just someone crossing his own drafts. I've also mentioned, or implied, that the main narrator has studied Latin and theology, to give more of an idea where he's coming from, plus reworded intro to give an early indication of the main bee he has in his bonnet regarding Mithraism and its possible influence on other stuff... Hope the page makes a little more sense now... I like the blue four-armed figure on your user-page BTW, Lyrithya.Kalidosa 00:00, April 25, 2011 (UTC)
- Don't explain it to me, mon... explain it to the readers - I mean, make it clearer what's going on in the article itself. You have the right idea, and you know what it is, which helps, as that way you won't be changing it randomly, but... well... cake. Or something. Damn, I'm tired... ~ 00:18, 25 April 2011
- Thanks for the comments. The theme I've been trying to develop seems to have come across more clearly to Lyrithya than to Spike -- the "biased speaker" is the intended theme. It is not so much about Mithraism, as about the way a certain sort of person writes about Mithraism. And tries to stop others from writing about the ancient religion and its influence... The point of the
- Oh my. Before you had the author expounding on himself. Now you have the author's multiple personalities bickering and wrestling on-stage. I feel that the page will succeed not by amusing the reader but by getting him to realize your clandestine theme: You are not writing jokes but riddles. Spıke ¬ 01:50 25-Apr-11
- Did you manage to read it right thru this time Spike? Do you have any constructive suggestions? Kalidosa 02:37, April 25, 2011 (UTC)
Tom Waits
You don't need to apologise for the review, there are some really helpful suggestions hidden away in your long, stream of consciousness ramblings. How are you finding Portal 2? Portal 1 is one of my top ten games ever. --Black Flamingo 13:33, April 24, 2011 (UTC)
- But it's what I do! I fail and then I apologise. Then I make a hasty exit and change my name and move to another province. As for Portal 2, it's... well, it's nice... a lot of it seems strangely familiar, though, and I don't mean just that it's more Portal... *rambles a bit* It doesn't really let down, anyhow. ~ 17:29, 24 April 2011
Dick test
What's wrong with this? It is all I wanted to write about the Dick test, and is just about as long as the article I found in the old encyclopedia. Take the tag off!!! Spıke ¬ 20:12 24-Apr-11
- But but but... you could write so much more! It feels like you've only scratched the surface... *mumbles* Fine. ~ 20:15, 24 April 2011
UnDictionary
I just felt like saying Jokerman is the new sheriff of crap town --KLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 20:18, April 24, 2011 (UTC)
Undictionary
- It could be worse, given that there were nothing but tumbleweeds there before. Spıke ¬ 20:25 24-Apr-11
- He's going too easy on it. ~ 20:37, 24 April 2011
- A discussion...about me? Too easy, Lyrithya? Well, someone's gotta be sheriff of crap town...--
- You're not deleting enough. ~ 21:41, 24 April 2011
- I don't wanna be too draconian on deleting stuffs though. And them damn spam filters are stopping me too! And I might have to delete half the dictionary or more to delete all the crap. All right, I'll get back to work. Being a sheriff is hard work. You get corrected on being too easy on stuff. Stops mumbling Wait, what?--
- What's this? An Uncyclopedia, shying away from deleting everything? Now, really, grow a liver! You can do it; I have faith in you! DELETE EVERYTHING! Wait, no... I mean... not everything... just... what needs it? You know? Ah, bugger... ~ 21:55, 24 April 2011
- Fine, I'll delete more, like all the teenage sex references and obscure numbry thingys I will never hope to understand. I got the POWAH!-- 21:58, April 24, 2011 (UTC)
- What's this? An Uncyclopedia, shying away from deleting everything? Now, really, grow a liver! You can do it; I have faith in you! DELETE EVERYTHING! Wait, no... I mean... not everything... just... what needs it? You know? Ah, bugger... ~ 21:55, 24 April 2011
- I don't wanna be too draconian on deleting stuffs though. And them damn spam filters are stopping me too! And I might have to delete half the dictionary or more to delete all the crap. All right, I'll get back to work. Being a sheriff is hard work. You get corrected on being too easy on stuff. Stops mumbling Wait, what?--
21:18, April 24, 2011 (UTC)
- You're not deleting enough. ~ 21:41, 24 April 2011
- A discussion...about me? Too easy, Lyrithya? Well, someone's gotta be sheriff of crap town...--
- He's going too easy on it. ~ 20:37, 24 April 2011
Pee Reviewing Bird is the Word
Thanks for giving my article such a throrough review. Emphasis on the 'rough'. But thanks for your constructive comments. I did some improving today. --SirBobo 17:58, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
- Heh, sorry. I seem to mostly do these when really out of it. And the article looks better already. ~ 22:29, 26 April 2011
VFD renom
Looks like I've gone and done it: nomming an article without placing the tag. I must have been extra-tired that day... >_< Anyway, should I nom CACCPD again right away, or should I wait until it's been a month? -- 22:17, April 27, 2011 (UTC)
- May as well do it now... I certainly wouldn't complain if you did, at least. ~ 00:26, 28 April 2011
- Okay, I renommed it. And sorry about the signature code thing, I was working on a custom timestamp (which, I now know, doesn't work if it's put into the signature page). I seem to be making more work for admins lately... How about a cheesecake!?
TheSlyFox has given you a cheesecake to show his appreciation! ...because even the Dark Side gives out cookies. |
- -- 05:57 April 28, 2011 (GMT)
- Shiny. And yeah, it happens... you can test them with the preview thingy, though - stick some text after and see if anything funny happens to it... indeed, you've figured out the timestamps, looks like. Just put that entire string in your signature dealy and poof... it goes *everywhere*. Although if you're going to use spans, you may as well work the small into the style attribute - font-size:10px; or some such.
- Also, I'm not an admin, but I'll gladly accept offerings of cake. Mmmm, cake... ~ 08:43, 28 April 2011
- You're admin-elect now!
- -- 05:57 April 28, 2011 (GMT)
- Epic Psychedelic Sax Guy!
- Congratulations! \^_^/ -- 01:08 May 1, 2011 (UTC)
- A... what? A.... AAAAAAGH! *runs around flailing* ~ 01:11, 1 May 2011
- Congratulations! \^_^/ -- 01:08 May 1, 2011 (UTC)
This category...
This is... Very... Interesting way to say thankyou. But, anyway, your welcome. Have you counted yet, that how many featured articles you have? You are damn lucky... 05:14, 28 April, 2011 (UTC)
- Heehee... thankses. I pride myself. And tenish, but don't tell anyone. And yeah, at least a few of those really shouldn't have been, but... er... ~ 05:18, 28 April 2011
- It`s too late, you mean? 05:19, 28 April, 2011 (UTC)
- Exactly. *grins evilly* ~ 05:24, 28 April 2011
- Evility is prohibited in my religion. Now go wash your mouth. 05:26, 28 April, 2011 (UTC)
- *bites Cat* ~ 05:32, 28 April 2011
- OUCH!!! 11:03, 28 April, 2011 (UTC)
- *bites Cat* ~ 05:32, 28 April 2011
- Evility is prohibited in my religion. Now go wash your mouth. 05:26, 28 April, 2011 (UTC)
- Exactly. *grins evilly* ~ 05:24, 28 April 2011
- It`s too late, you mean? 05:19, 28 April, 2011 (UTC)
In the event you prefer replies on your own talkpage
I'm replying here to tell you I replied on my own talkpage -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:44, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
- I actually saw that before I saw this, but alright... thanks for letting me know. No need in the future, mind. ~ 06:05, 28 April 2011
- Im actually not replying to anyone, but advising both of you that I dont have any message to reply to nor any particular wall to reply on, but none the less am writing something here in this exact place. :) HUGS --ShabiDOO 12:04, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Sometimes I reply, or wish others would reply, on random article's talk pages. Then use the what links here function to search for expected replies. --KLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 16:12, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Im replying to your reply, I hope very much that you also reply to this reply. And then link it to all the articles I ever wrote, and then I will maybe reply to that :) --ShabiDOO 19:45, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Sometimes I reply, or wish others would reply, on random article's talk pages. Then use the what links here function to search for expected replies. --KLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 16:12, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Im actually not replying to anyone, but advising both of you that I dont have any message to reply to nor any particular wall to reply on, but none the less am writing something here in this exact place. :) HUGS --ShabiDOO 12:04, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
Requested Articles Completed
Erm... So I completed a few requested articles. I was quite pleased when my first one got an award, which lead me to look at the Reqaward Statistics bit. I saw that the most created in one day was three and vainly thought "I can beat that" so I did 4. But only one other got a Reqaward. Still being noobish, I'm not sure why this might be. I had fun writing the articles, but its also nice to be acknowledged. I have recovered from my sorrow now and am willing to accept criticism. Also, how do I request a peereview on my articles? Engl1shman 08:14, April 29, 2011 (UTC)
- To request a pee review you just need to go to the main pee review page, head down to the bottom and type the name of your article into the box. All you need to do is just save the page it will create for you and your article will be added to the queue. As far as the reqawards thing goes, you will get the recognition for it when MadMax next takes a look (he usually sorts those out). Just remember that while we may appear to be a well-oiled machine that runs flawlessly we are all still only human and it's best not to anticipate that things will happen straight away. If you don't get the recognition after a while then drop MadMax a line and if he doesn't get back to you drop me one and I'll make sure you get the awards. Hope that helps. --ChiefjusticePS3 11:37, April 29, 2011 (UTC)
- It does help. May virgins and angels sing to you in your sleep. Engl1shman 11:58, April 29, 2011 (UTC)
- Wouldn't that keep him awake at night? Or whenever he happens to sleep... anyhow, yeah. ~ 15:48, 29 April 2011
- Its never kept me awake. Plus they are quite handy if your alarm clock doesn't go off, or if you can't find the light switch in the middle of the night. 91.108.3.88 15:55, April 29, 2011 (UTC)
- Wouldn't that keep him awake at night? Or whenever he happens to sleep... anyhow, yeah. ~ 15:48, 29 April 2011
- It does help. May virgins and angels sing to you in your sleep. Engl1shman 11:58, April 29, 2011 (UTC)
- I will start by saying I am not going to reread them. I think the instructions say, give yourself the award once the article is complete. As mentioned above, this is still largely a DIY. Want your new article in the new article list? Add it. Sure there are some wizbangy-stomp machinations that auto-do a lot, but not everything. This is a wiki, it all can be redone. You do not have the permissions to do anything that could really screw things up. Don't try. But when you get gentle corrections, take them to heart, because by and large, they know better than us. --KLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 16:00, April 29, 2011 (UTC)
Why did you put my article on QVFD
Honestly, Sum cawk is a work in progress. -- Lollipop - 02:33, 30 April 2011
- Like I said on IRC, if you want to start articles in mainspace, it's better to save them with more content, like it has now. There is a reason for the 'Putting this template on a page consisting of a few lines or worse will not save you and may actually get you banned.' line, after all. And like Jack said, userspace is good. A better place to start these, anyhow. ~ 02:51, 30 April 2011
- Thanks. -- Lollipop - 02:57, 30 April 2011
Pee Splashback
How's that? Good or amazing? --Black Flamingo 13:18, April 30, 2011 (UTC)
- Yes. ~ 15:15, 30 April 2011
You're an admin again
This wiki is screwed. -- Lollipop - 20:15, 30 April 2011
- 1st, if its true, congradulation. 2nd...was there some process we missed out on there!? 3rd..........god save the queen! --ShabiDOO 20:36, April 30, 2011 (UTC)
- I am? ~ 20:45, 30 April 2011
- Noooooooooooo...silly dilly willy you arent the queen :) --ShabiDOO 20:47, April 30, 2011 (UTC)
- I am? ~ 20:45, 30 April 2011
ʎɐs oʇ ƃuıɥʇ ǝuo ǝʌɐɥ ı
ʎɹɔ uıɐɹq ʎɯ sǝʞɐɯ sıɥʇ 'ʎɐs oʇ ƃuıɥʇ ǝuo ǝʌɐɥ ı --KLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 21:23, April 30, 2011 (UTC)
- Pfft. ~ 21:28, 30 April 2011
What the hell
Like seriously what the hell is it, with you and Dr. Skullthumper o_O -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 22:41, April 30, 2011 (UTC)
- What do you mean? ~ 22:54, 30 April 2011
- ☃ Snowman.. ~Formerly Annoying Crap 22:56, 30 April 2011
No editing
How do you do that tab with your archives? I'd like to know. I've also seen it in archived forums. --(talk) 01:12, 1 May 2011
- Eh, it's javascript... add a div or span or something of the id that triggers it to the page. I'd say which it is, but I forgot. It should be on those pages, or something, though. ~ 01:19, 1 May 2011
- I looked around on your talkheader, but I couldn't find it. Kinda like trying to find that squeaky noise in the basement, but you're not up to it. --(talk) 02:06, 1 May 2011
Congrats!
On becoming an admin! It's too bad you weren't made a poopsmith sooner, then you'd probably be an admin sooner, too! Anyway, good luck! -- 01:53, May 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, I think. I guess it's time to ban everyone who voted for me, too... ~ 01:58, 1 May 2011
- By the way, I've been meaning to ask you, what's rollback? Anyway, congrats again, miss
poopsmithadmin woman! -- 02:02, May 1, 2011 (UTC)- As I said before, this wiki is screwed. --(talk) 02:06, 1 May 2011
- Actually, speaking of, you may want to think about making a new poopsmith, seeing as there's an opening now. -- 02:08, May 1, 2011 (UTC)
- What are you all smiling at me for? Hopefully, it's a promotion --(talk) 02:09, 1 May 2011
- Actually, speaking of, you may want to think about making a new poopsmith, seeing as there's an opening now. -- 02:08, May 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Rollback quickly reverts the most recent edits by the last contributor to a page to the last edit by someone else, or some such. ~ 02:24, 1 May 2011
- Yes congradulations and everything. You owe me for voting for you. -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 02:29, May 1, 2011 (UTC)
- You'll get one. --(talk) 02:45, 1 May 2011
- Yes congradulations and everything. You owe me for voting for you. -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 02:29, May 1, 2011 (UTC)
- As I said before, this wiki is screwed. --(talk) 02:06, 1 May 2011
- By the way, I've been meaning to ask you, what's rollback? Anyway, congrats again, miss
Admin
Admin admin admin admin, admin admin admin admin, admin admin admin admin admin. Admin admin admin. 02:25, 1 May 2011
- Is there an admin in the house that does not wander of, shift their eyes, or nom nom cake? --KLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 02:30, May 1, 2011 (UTC)
- There would be if most users weren't so ignorant. --(talk) 02:35, 1 May 2011
So, an admin again. I knew it! Congratulations on this elevation to within an arms reach of a staff member, who could crush the entire site in their fist and laugh, but hey. . .you = admin = more parties on the site. Yay! Aleister 2:59 1-5-'11
- I applaud your optimism. o__o ~ 04:02, 1 May 2011
- Are you going to drag me from retirement kicking and screaming, only to find out I slipped away and left my cat by the keyboard, with snacks between the keys? -- DameViktoria 04:36, 1 May
- If the cat stays, it could be nice. Would that cat stay? ~ 04:40, 1 May 2011
- The cat is in Seattle, WA with Mr. Luvvy. Go ahead and get him. The rascal is a little on the chubby side, so you'd have to sign a paper in your blood stating you'll act as his personal fat camp trainer...
- I'm in Yurop for a visit... And going to browse for horses and ponies, despite not having the home for them yet. But since I can afford them, it's a little hard to not look... And thanks to the U.S. Embassy in my town moving office, my spring wedding got postponed in wait for my paperwork to come through, and a new preliminary date was set to late June. *rolls eyes* -- DameViktoria 05:11, 1 May
- Weddings are stupid nonsense anyways *leaves you two to your girl talk* 05:14, 1 May 2011
- I bet you'd look dashing in a nice dress...
- Ah, Luvvy, you make it all sound so glorious... until the truth comes out that things have inevitably failed somehow... stupid paperwork. ~ 05:26, 1 May 2011
- I'm gonna go pony shopping! Yay! (I can acquire and import pedigree horses for about $4000-4500 a pop, while they sell in the U.S. for 10k and up... So there's a good chance I'll start spending some of my money to bring horseys over from Yurop...)
- As the dress goes, it's custom made from hand embroidered silk, and as befits a Luvvy eloping, it's not a full length trained gown. It sort of covers my knees when I'm seated... Almost... :P
- Had I stuck in Yurop and stuck to my lordling BF a few years ago, I'd have had to do the big cathedral wedding with a trained gown, heirloom tiaras, horse and carriage, big ballroom reception... In stead, I'm eloping with an all but common "commoner", and even worse, American, and throwing my noble title out the window to be just another proverbial Microsoft widow. Ah, life! XD -- DameViktoria 05:50, 1 May
- Here's a good approximation of what I'm getting married in, sans the black belt... :P -- DameViktoria 14:41, 1 May
- Pretty... and you seem so terribly broken up about it all! ^^ ~ 06:01, 2 May 2011
- Weddings are stupid nonsense anyways *leaves you two to your girl talk* 05:14, 1 May 2011
- If the cat stays, it could be nice. Would that cat stay? ~ 04:40, 1 May 2011
- Are you going to drag me from retirement kicking and screaming, only to find out I slipped away and left my cat by the keyboard, with snacks between the keys? -- DameViktoria 04:36, 1 May
So I hear you've evolved into your next form or something. Congratulations; what kind of pokemon does that make you now? --Black Flamingo 10:08, May 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Well done Lyrithya. Now you won't have to run away from anyone and can stand proud with your frying pan.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 00:12, May 2, 2011 (UTC)
- I'm a tree. ~ 05:11, 2 May 2011
Congratufreakinglations!
You are now a sysop! Please use your tools well before the cavalry sentences you to a lifetime of horror in the Cajek academy! :P But seriously, congrats! :D -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a)
- Er... thanks. All of you. *gestures vaguely upwards* And GG, I'll do my best to avoid screwing the wiki entirely. Probably. ~ 05:13, 2 May 2011
Pic uploading
Hi I hope this message finds you well. If not well... Since I saw people adding categories to pics they were uploading today, I was wondering if it's mandatory to do so. I uploaded like 50 since I am here and never did that. But I guess I can go back and categorize some if need be. Mattsnow 02:36, May 2, 2011 (UTC)
- I have started doing it lately, because Its so bleeding hard to find existing images, and like with articles the category feature works well for that. Our hilarious license templates add categories all ready, but how helpfull is "copy middle images" when you are looking for boobies? --KLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 03:11, May 2, 2011 (UTC)
- LOL, I get it! It's like the smileys I used in Quebec article. They are so common I am pretty sure they are here somewhere, but where to look? So I re-uploaded. I'll lurk a bit and try to do my part to help sort the uncategorized pics, I am not too familiar with that part of the wiki at all. Anyway, I'll try to add at least one category for pics I upload from now on. Peace, Earthling Mattsnow 03:20, May 2, 2011 (UTC)
- I'd just like to know if it is supposed to give that result File:Amerindian.jpg before I start doing that on every pic I upload. Thanx Mattsnow 03:43, May 2, 2011 (UTC)
- Eh, folks like to do that, but nobody's really obligated to, even less so with images than with articles, but it can also be helpful, as folks say. But not templates, categories, as Kevillips did. I mean, if the templates actually fit and there's reason for them to be there, sure, (say, copyrights, NSFW, etc), then you may as well add those too. And they're right about HotCat; it also has a function for adding categories when uploading. ~ 05:17, 2 May 2011
- LOL, I get it! It's like the smileys I used in Quebec article. They are so common I am pretty sure they are here somewhere, but where to look? So I re-uploaded. I'll lurk a bit and try to do my part to help sort the uncategorized pics, I am not too familiar with that part of the wiki at all. Anyway, I'll try to add at least one category for pics I upload from now on. Peace, Earthling Mattsnow 03:20, May 2, 2011 (UTC)
- Err.. I just don't get the Hotcat thing for now, but I am gonna use your code with [[]]. If anyone wants to educate me with a pointer on that hotcat thing, please do so on my talk page. Thank you, inferior lifeforms Mattsnow 05:53, May 2, 2011 (UTC)
Eh...
I hope you have heard about the weekly competition inside here? I tried to explode the bank, and see what happened. First time, I tried to redirect the High-page into High (disambiguation), but... the links had gone. And I really want to write about high. So please... 05:10, 2 May, 2011 (UTC)
- You mean... you tried to move it? You want the disambiguation bage on the one labelled 'disambiguation', right? And then accidentally moved it back? Or did you already sort it out? Or not? Or something else? ~ 05:23, 2 May 2011
- Yes, I think that`s it. I want to write about high, but I can`t, because the disambigution (funny word, ain`t it?) is here. I tried to move it out of my way, but the disambigution page had, because of my moving, only one link to the page itself. Weird, sad, but true. 05:28, 2 May, 2011 (UTC)
- See my contributions to understand what happened. 05:30, 2 May, 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, that link, the redirect, is what it does by default when moving things... just overwrite that, next time. I moved it back to the other one without the redirect this time, but... er... I forgot what we were doing. ~ 05:33, 2 May 2011
- You did it right. I`ll continue writing it later. Maybe tomorrow. Or after tomorrow. Or next week. No. Not next week. This week. Medication. Must... Win... The... Competition... 12:22, 2 May, 2011 (UTC)
- 'Kay. ~ 20:49, 2 May 2011
- You did it right. I`ll continue writing it later. Maybe tomorrow. Or after tomorrow. Or next week. No. Not next week. This week. Medication. Must... Win... The... Competition... 12:22, 2 May, 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, that link, the redirect, is what it does by default when moving things... just overwrite that, next time. I moved it back to the other one without the redirect this time, but... er... I forgot what we were doing. ~ 05:33, 2 May 2011
- See my contributions to understand what happened. 05:30, 2 May, 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, I think that`s it. I want to write about high, but I can`t, because the disambigution (funny word, ain`t it?) is here. I tried to move it out of my way, but the disambigution page had, because of my moving, only one link to the page itself. Weird, sad, but true. 05:28, 2 May, 2011 (UTC)
Hey!
What did I miss, while away? O_o You seem to be all on top of things, with your new tinfoil admin hat and all. (Are you sure there's enough glitter on there? You look a lil nekkid wearing that...) -- DameViktoria 06:15, 2 May
- I'm a sparkly purple girl; I know my glitter. As for what's happened... hell, that I don't know. I mean, I probably saw it, but I can't remember. I'm sorry... just stuff. A lot of the usual, probably. People being assholes, people not being assholes, people coming, people going, all the while stuff getting created and deleted and fed through a pile of ferrets and/or cats... ~ 06:18, 2 May 2011
- Purple is overrated. Whileas pink... Mmmmm... *noms on Disney Princess Easter Egg wrapper foil* Yummmmm! Err... You forgot the half a dozen or so teething puppies! Any articles you've seen lately that could use some Luv? -- DameViktoria 06:29, 2 May
- Sparkly purple. There's a difference. Puppies, though... puppies... eeeeh. Dunno about articles, though... you may want to try someone who actually remembers things afterwards. >.< ~ 07:32, 2 May 2011
- Well it's still not pink! (And as a side note, you know you've seen me, if you see a pink scooter drive by, and get doused with sprinkle spray and rainbows... (Okay, so I really need that morning coffee I'm not having... I'm hallucinatifying things into being). -- DameViktoria 07:36, 2 May
- Neither is green, but that'll do nicely when properly used as well... and... er... o__o ~ 07:47, 2 May 2011
- Yes? Also: Entertainment! -- DameViktoria 08:19, 2 May
- AGH! Not more things to distract! *flails and runs away* ~ 08:34, 2 May 2011
- Then you'll love my pink-clad tapdancing chupachabras... Just a second... where did they go..? Err... They'll show up soon! -- DameViktoria 09:06, 2 May
- If the vampire rabbits got them... or would they get the vampire rabbits? Which would win? ~ 09:13, 2 May 2011
- /me spits out ear, wipes off BBQ sauce and tries to smooth it back onto bunny's head. Were these yours? I should be able to return them as good as new... Right after you look at that cute little purple butterfly behind you, and I swap this bunny over to a fresh one from Pet Smart... -- DameViktoria 09:22, 2 May
- Then you'll love my pink-clad tapdancing chupachabras... Just a second... where did they go..? Err... They'll show up soon! -- DameViktoria 09:06, 2 May
- Oh, don't fret yourself; they've been more an infestation than they've been pets. Good to see someone's finally put a use to them... tasty. ~ 20:50, 2 May 2011
- AGH! Not more things to distract! *flails and runs away* ~ 08:34, 2 May 2011
- Yes? Also: Entertainment! -- DameViktoria 08:19, 2 May
- Neither is green, but that'll do nicely when properly used as well... and... er... o__o ~ 07:47, 2 May 2011
- Well it's still not pink! (And as a side note, you know you've seen me, if you see a pink scooter drive by, and get doused with sprinkle spray and rainbows... (Okay, so I really need that morning coffee I'm not having... I'm hallucinatifying things into being). -- DameViktoria 07:36, 2 May
- Sparkly purple. There's a difference. Puppies, though... puppies... eeeeh. Dunno about articles, though... you may want to try someone who actually remembers things afterwards. >.< ~ 07:32, 2 May 2011
- Purple is overrated. Whileas pink... Mmmmm... *noms on Disney Princess Easter Egg wrapper foil* Yummmmm! Err... You forgot the half a dozen or so teething puppies! Any articles you've seen lately that could use some Luv? -- DameViktoria 06:29, 2 May
You plan to destroy the wiki...
You monster! Good job -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 08:55, May 2, 2011 (UTC)
- Or so I insist. It's more dignified than admitting it was an accident, right? ~ 09:11, 2 May 2011
- AAAAAAAAAA I've been joke banned!! Dark Jedi Mind Trick! Must... Resist... nooooo.... <zombie>It's good to be on the Dark Side again!</zombie> -- 04:45 May 3, 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry. My plant made me do it. ~ 15:06, 3 May 2011
- AAAAAAAAAA I've been joke banned!! Dark Jedi Mind Trick! Must... Resist... nooooo.... <zombie>It's good to be on the Dark Side again!</zombie> -- 04:45 May 3, 2011 (UTC)
But...
...I vandalized in good faith - where's my ban? Pup 12:12 02 May '11
- Yeah. Ban him. No reason, but he needs it. Maybe. 12:24, 2 May, 2011 (UTC)
- Most folks need it. Too bad for them. ~ 20:52, 2 May 2011
Image Update
I'm having a problem with an image (Pack-A-Punch.jpg) on the Nazi Zombies page. I recently updated the image, but the image featured on the page is not the current rendition. Can you tell me what has happened? Anyone? --Gamma 20:46, May 2, 2011 (UTC)
- Its not the problem it seems. We have been dealing with that lately. The wikia images are stored off site, and get cached by wikia and they do not update their caches quickly. But, you can for now trust it has been updated in the system and will show up soon. --KLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 20:49, May 2, 2011 (UTC)
- The images are on the images subdomain, yes, but the failure to update is part of a Wikia problem with caching in general, and they do not always fix themselves at all. Your best bet might be just to upload the image under a different name and delete the original, in a one-use case like this. ~ 21:09, 2 May 2011
Lyrithya
How do i take the block log off my watch list??? It basically flooooooooooods my watchlist with the 1000 times a day you are blocked and resurected (not that some of the reasons arent intertaining). --ShabiDOO 05:15, May 3, 2011 (UTC)
- From the looks of things, there isn't any way to hide logs in general, let alone a specific one. If it's just one user, you could try not watching it, however, although that would make seeing responses more difficult... you could also consider making how many things it displays on your watclist a bigger number. That way it wouldn't be nearly so spammy. ~ 15:06, 3 May 2011
Hey
Upon leaving a request to Rcmurphy for me to be granted rollback, he said to me, Lollipop and Black flamingo11, that if we could get one experienced user to vouch for us saying we deserve it etc. I picked you because you're the coolest admin EVAR! (Not sucking up), but anyways could you put a note on Rcmurphy's talkpage saying I should have it.
Two reasons I want it
- I'm grow tired of putting redirect's on QVFD after page moves.
- I want to revert vandalism faster.
If you do this THANKYOU, if you don't THANKYOU FOR READING THIS -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 07:20, May 3, 2011 (UTC)
- Emm... You want to be admin or something? If so... The admin should be me. I`m very experienced. Really. Hey, DON`T LAUGH!!! 15:54, 3 May, 2011 (UTC)
Meta article
Im glad you are still writing :) :). I liked it a lot. The images are also really good though they are a little cluttered in the middle and the article would be nice and shinny with a few little adjustments so they dont overlap (atleast as it seems to me :) --ShabiDOO 20:36, May 3, 2011 (UTC)
- My what? Incidentally, I haven't written anything since January. ~ 20:41, 3 May 2011
?
Do you play Guild Wars 2, if so what is your name? Gen. Fudgem0bile Head-butt unicorns 01:25, May 4, 2011 (UTC)
- Guild Wars 2 came out? When? ~ 02:31, 4 May 2011
- Ahh, my friend was talking about it and i thought he said 2, whats your username in the first one? Gen. Fudgem0bile Head-butt unicorns 03:26, May 4, 2011 (UTC)
- Mmm, why do you ask, anyhow? It's not that it'll help anyone, rarely as I log on these days. >.< You don't play it, either, then? ~ 06:45, 4 May 2011
- Ahh, my friend was talking about it and i thought he said 2, whats your username in the first one? Gen. Fudgem0bile Head-butt unicorns 03:26, May 4, 2011 (UTC)