User talk:Lyrithya/archive09

In that case,

I'll try again. How's this? -- 04:14, March 1, 2011 (UTC)

Better. 1234 ~ 04:16, 1 March 2011

Great! And this?

-- 04:19, March 1, 2011 (UTC)

You would dare bring animation here?! 1234 ~ 04:20, 1 March 2011

I hate you. -- 05:25, March 1, 2011 (UTC)

I'll take that as a compliment. 1234 ~ 05:28, 1 March 2011

Dang skippy! -- 05:38, March 1, 2011 (UTC)

RE: So...

Suppose so. Why do you ask? -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 16:15, March 1, 2011 (UTC)

Can you not keep things on one page? Anyhow, I forget. 1234 ~ 16:16, 1 March 2011

Acknoledged for future reference! -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 16:17, March 1, 2011 (UTC)

Sorry. >.< 1234 ~ 16:18, 1 March 2011

What is your postal code?

I am making a specific email for Uncyclopedia for the UnTV channel I am setting up. What is your postal code? -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 22:35, March 1, 2011 (UTC)

I think not. 1234 ~ 05:25, 2 March 2011

Too late I already set up the channel. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 05:29, March 2, 2011 (UTC)

Have fun with that. 1234 ~ 05:33, 2 March 2011

Here it is... -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 01:00, March 3, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

Just noticed you nominated me for n00b of the month. I've noticed people tend to give pictures in thanks and I know that a picture is worth a thousand words, but also that less is more, so here’s 42/1,000 of a picture. ~  Talk 05:24, March 2, 2011 (UTC)

They do? At any rate, you seem pretty amazing, so don't thank me... just... be amazing. That's all. That's all we need. For now, at least. Your heart may come later. 1234 ~ 05:26, 2 March 2011

I heard it's in the mail. I ordered one a month ago and it was on backorder, so it still hasn't come. They sent me a link to this website and I figured it'd pass the time until then. ~  Talk 05:29, March 2, 2011 (UTC)

Wait, you... ordered a heart? Okay, now this might be a problem... *scurries off* 1234 ~ 05:34, 2 March 2011

"I have the heart of a young boy. I keep it in a jar on my desk." - Steven King ~  Talk 05:38, March 2, 2011 (UTC)

Not terribly useful like that, now is it? 1234 ~ 07:09, 2 March 2011

I'm pretty sure that's a Richard Mathewson quote (and maybe I got his name wrong too, the guy who wrote the original "I Am Legend"). Maybe Stephen King borrowed it, but is a Stephen come lately. Aleister 1:38 3-3-'11

World distracted, Rabbi Techno slaps a massive template on your talkpage

Bloody hell, man... that scared the blonkers out of me. 1234 ~ 17:20, 2 March 2011

Super happy monkey competition topic

Hey your topic will be ready here at about five minutes before the start of the competition (5pm EST or 2200 UTC). HAVE FUN AND GOOD LUCK :) PISSING ALL OVER YOUR FACE --ShabiDOO 21:47, March 2, 2011 (UTC)

What is EST? 1234 ~ 21:56, 2 March 2011

Also, that's disgusting. 1234 ~ 22:02, 2 March 2011

Eastern standard time. Lyrithya, monkeys pee all over the place. GOOD LUCK!--ShabiDOO 22:06, March 2, 2011 (UTC)

Tahnks a lot for the template. It looks AWWWWWWWWWWWWWSOME!!! (and the yellow was a special touch) --ShabiDOO 22:41, March 2, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

For the nom for RotM. Really appreciate it. I was wondering if there's a reason why I'm not in the table for peeing proletariat on User:Cajek/Pee any more. It says I was the last one to review something (right at the bottom there, hey look at that) but my name isn't in the actual table...No idea if that was you (I'm too lazy to check) was just wondering if there was a reason. – Preceding unsigned comment added by JackOfSpades (talk • contribs)

Oh, I think I... apparently I started to move you. And then... got sidetracked or something. Thanks for reminding me. Whoops. Right, now you're on the Stains one. *shifty eyes*

But that's just maintenance, really... if you want to join, you're free to. 1234 ~ 23:11, 2 March 2011

Opinion

Thanks for saying how your felt and putting it out there. I honestly don't care ever having to use pissing jokes again nor anything if someone really feels so strongly about it. But the way you said it was, in my humble opinion, mean even if someone else agrees, and its the only time anything has ever really itched me on this website. --ShabiDOO 01:01, March 3, 2011 (UTC)

I for one thought it was perfect. Monkeys in the high branches piss, and the piss has to go someplace and it often falls in the faces of the monkeys on the branches below. So it is a very literal expression. In fact I've done a long study of this kind of thing (true). Aleister 1:22 3-3-'11

Wasn't The Man Who Would Be King entirely motivated by sectarian anger about being peed on from upstream? Anyway, I thought "itch" was exclusively intransitive. But piss on it. Spıke ¬ 01:26 3-Mar-11

Sorry... perhaps I overreacted. All I really meant was that the repetition was... well, redundant. Regardless of what I or others find funny, perhaps vary these things a little more in the future? In this case, for instance, instead of just saying 'pissing in your face' twenty times, you could mix in some links to poop-throwing monkeys, some references to monkeys on their typewriters... and then perhaps urinating on the complete works of Shakespeare instead of appreciating it, if you really must involve more pee. Or something. More options could mean more likely for more folks to be amused by some of it, though, as well as being less annoying... 1234 ~ 02:19, 3 March 2011

But there are so many you have missed this week. Such as peeing on shoes, peeing on pants, peeing on legs, on laps. But, sigh, you are right, diversifimication is important with gags. I think we are going to have to take a time out, and think about things before we take over the world together.

PS you have a 2 hour extention cause of the topic mix up. --ShabiDOO 02:47, March 3, 2011 (UTC)

It's too late, anyhow. My cat already beat us to it. Perhaps this means we can skip straight to the trying to have each other killed part... 1234 ~ 02:48, 3 March 2011

Oh, and thank you for that, however it's not apt to do me much good, as those'll be about two hours in which I'll be in class, so no need to complicate things. But my current state of mind is telling me I should just go to bed. Blaaaaah. 1234 ~ 02:54, 3 March 2011

Okay, as you like. I also gave one to mimo, zombie and mr jazz cause of stuff too. I promise that you will parish before you can even try to kill me. Im just letting you know. No threats or anything. Its just that way. You will not even relise whats going on before you can even get within a metre of me. "just saying". Hahahahahahahahahahhahaha hahahaha ha ha ha ha. ha ha. Goodnight. --ShabiDOO 03:08, March 3, 2011 (UTC)

What, are you a priest, now, or something? And they never were any good with threats, either... but that still doesn't make any sense. Eh? 1234 ~ 15:09, 3 March 2011

Sure

Sorry about this. I wasn't sure how tall an image is supposed to be. I guess I'll... try... and stick with the code from now on but it doesn't really work when I press the save button. Any help would be greatly appreciated, and once again, sorry to waste your time. {{SUBST:Template:SUBST:nosubst|User:EpicAwesomeness/sig}} 17:15, March 3, 2011 (UTC

Wait, nevermind, works now, sorry.-- (talk) (contribs) 17:18, March 3, 2011 (UTC)

Ah, shiny. And don't worry about wasting my time; wasting is about all it's good for, anyhow. But yeah, if you can make image shorter... except... actually, I'm having an idea. *wanders off* 1234 ~ 17:22, 3 March 2011

OK... whatever you're doing, I might only see it tomorrow though. -- (talk) (contribs)

I already did it. It seems to have worked, too. I guess. 1234 ~ 17:55, 3 March 2011

An admin!

It looks like you and Puppy tied for the temporary admin slot, so we have four temporary admins. Yay! See my note on my talk page too. The dawn of the bots has arrived. Aleister 18:04 4-3-'11

You're Winner

Per Forum:The Great Administrator Mixup: Vote for your temporary admins here, you now have admin powers for the duration of March. DON'T MESS UP I MEAN IT. —rc (t) 18:08, March 4, 2011 (UTC)

*sob* 1234 ~ 18:09, 4 March 2011

Can you please ban Thekillerfroggy? He was so mean to me a few times. You can ban him for the entire month of March and nobody would notice, they'd think he was traveling or something. Ban Jimmy Wales too. Do it! Do it! Ban Jimmy Wales (but I guess all of that would be messing up. Tears of a clown.) Aleister 18:12 4-3-'11

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!! --Roman Dog Bird 18:28, March 4, 2011 (UTC)

I'll worry about joke bans later. I never was any good with those. 1234 ~ 18:34, 4 March 2011

Joke? Aleister 18:35 4-3-'11

All bans are jokes, really. 1234 ~ 18:37, 4 March 2011

We regret to inform you of an administrative error...

...the message above should have been entitled "You're Michael Winner," rather than "You're Winner." You see this? That's you, that is. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 18:32, March 4, 2011 (UTC)

Sexy. --Roman Dog Bird 18:33, March 4, 2011 (UTC)

Oh, har... 1234 ~ 18:34, 4 March 2011

So you have the powers

follow them. Do not enter the role. Watch out Don't follow them, You told them to. So if you powers the Admin, you can turn on the system, and roll the wheel who knows? Maybe you'll learn the secret for yourself. - LOL vandalz

私にあなたの親族に従うと、トレッドのIFが動作しないのはしないことを引っ張らない出番管理者はあなたが死んでしまうフォロー - LOL vandalz

Fred ate it. He's a werewolf. 1234 ~ 22:11, 4 March 2011

I'm Sure you

Like yoghurt? Everyone likes yoghurt. God himself loves Yoghurt. As guns was firing his final shot, his proclaim to the sack was That he like yoghurt. 83 of them, to be precise. The yoghurt and the liver of the general is 72. He booms on them all, and Julius Caesar. There ain't know yoghurt when your dead, which is why people aren't successful when there dead. - LOL vandalz

Not everyone; there's that one guy... and someone gave him raspberry. He tasted it. It was bad. 1234 ~ 22:11, 4 March 2011

Thank you

Thank you I was worried your the best admin. (^_^) you should be permanent Admin. Does everyone hate me? Would they Ban me as soon as spit at me? I'm paronoid now (0_0) and sorry my english isn't that good. - LOL vandalz

Mon, I'm an Illogicopedian, I'm a horrible admin, and cheesecake. The nonsense annoys some people, but I wouldn't equate it to hatred, and paranoia is healthy.

And english can improve. So how about some cheesecake? 1234 ~ 22:26, 4 March 2011

I hate Illogicopedia. My IP adress was blocked over there! and for what? their website is lame? they only have 150,000 Visits! Uncyclopedia has 22 million! which sound better? And Illogiopedia's motto, "In illogic we trust" is stolen from Encyclopedia Dramatica! (I have a Userpage on ED, by the way). - LOL vandalz

It's all relative. What you consider lame, I consider dear... and who cares how many hits it gets if there is something to it? There is something to all of these, though, but I prefer the madness. Roberto only interferes some of the time. 1234 ~ 22:32, 4 March 2011

Roberto is the reason i'm blocked. even though I was going to edit Illogicopedia but my IP adress had a 6 month ban (which is now infinite, for some reason) before I found the site. Roberto (And his sockpuppet Uncyclopedian666) Is my classmate in High school (Where both 15 so where responsible and NOT 12 year olds invading the Internet) and he says he got a virus there but it's clearly bullshit. I don't like Illogicopedia but I wouldn't make 100s of Vandal accounts and then spam attack it. - LOL vandalz

And please don't block me because I'm only 15, I've played Grand Theft Auto and all the rest, And PEGI has been ineffective at trying to stop me playing games, but I'm not Invading the internet, I'm not a vandal (though Roberto is) and I'm a well educated person. I have an A level in maths and I'm leaving High school in less than a year, so I hope you do not ban me for Stereotypical reasons on Teenagers. - LOL vandalz

You've played Grand Theft Auto? Isn't that an 18+ game? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:10, 4 March 2011

My parents don't mind me playing it so they buy it for me. What? everyone else does it. I got Grand theft Auto: Vice city when I was 11. - LOL vandalz

I'm glad you got banned at Illogico, because if I'm reading that right it's what brought you here, to the major leagues. But someone should revive you over there and talk to Roberto about it, then ban him from here!!! And tell me, how do you look up how many hits a site has gotten, either total like you said above, or daily, Thanks, I've been interested in that. Aleister 23:23 4-3-'1

2 options: either go to the bottom of the page and click "About" and you will find a part it should tell you. For example, youtube says it has been accessed 1,371,793,974 times as of 4th march 2011. Or you could just go to the ".info" domain and it will tell you their at the "About:<- website name here ->" of the website. I Hope this helped. - LOL vandalz

Thanks! Almost helped. The bottom of what page? I went to the bottom of this page and it says "About wikia" which was no help. I will play around with the other. Hmmm, the bottom of the main page? Thanks again, Aleister 23:36 4-3-'11

Roberto is the name of the database, or some such. If you classmate vandalised and got banned, though, why would that affect you as well? Do you live with the bloke, or something, or just not have a computer of your own? 1234 ~ 00:11, 5 March 2011

He lives down my street. I'm surprised he doesn't Cyberbully on Illogicopedia as well. - LOL vandalz

Hola

Te encontré :D --Dark delegation 06:05, March 5, 2011 (UTC)

Parece que sí, pero... bien, no sé. No tengo escusas. Me has encontrado y no puedo escapar! O, que horrible, que horrible; estoy acabado!

*mirada furtiva* Y nunca dije que podría hablar español. Solamente puedo intentar. 1234 ~ 06:26, 5 March 2011

Jajaja, Guonderful. :3 --Dark delegation 06:29, March 5, 2011 (UTC)

Y creo que te entiendo, pero... es como una de mías, esa palabra? Extraña. ¿Qué es? 1234 ~ 06:59, 5 March 2011

Now for something completely different

The next time you block someone (Preferably not me, I'm talking more along the lines of a vandal IP or as a joke to another Admin) Block them with an expiry time of A Bandersnatch . Just a suggestion.

Also, block me with an expiry time of 2 minutes, with the description being "Go and don't some work". I'm going to get Socky to do that. - LOL vandalz

I came back from the dead

I came back from the dead just to congratulate you, but I can't figure out who you are. It appears you could be ChiefjusticeDS, or Athyria, or even someone called Lyrithya. Heck, for all I know you could be me. I have so many sockpuppets it's hard to keep track of them all. (Also congrats!) King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  06:20, March 6, 2011 (UTC)

I'm Dexter. And I'd thank you for the congratulations, but this isn't a good thing. 1234 ~ 06:23, 6 March 2011

I now understand what it is you've been working on

That is a lot of pictures that we used to have and no longer do. Crikey. pillow talk 07:10, March 6, 2011 (UTC)

What? 1234 ~ 07:11, 6 March 2011

You deleted like half the fucking wiki while I was out eating everything Marie Calendars had. pillow talk 07:14, March 6, 2011 (UTC)

Oh... actually, it wasn't that much. You should have seen what Zombiebaron and I could do in an hour when we were working together... since the whole adminning thing, I've been at a bit of a loss, since reasonably I should be able to do it myself... except I'm a lot slower. 1234 ~ 07:20, 6 March 2011

H4H

Image of H4H: http://www.flickr.com/photos/thealp/3665912773/lightbox/

- LOL vandalz

OK I'll tell you what you want to hear

"03:00, March 7, 2011 Lyrithya (Talk | contribs) moved Http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/User talk:Why do I need to provide this?/archive9 to User talk:Why do I need to provide this?/archive9 [redirect suppressed] ‎ (Tell me that wasn't intentional...) (revert)"

All right, I'll tell you that wasn't intentional. I was just checking my logs and thought, "What happened to my archive?" I'm not even sure what I did. Guess that's what I get for not archiving for so long; I forgot how to do it. Thanks for fixing it! :-) King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  03:10, March 7, 2011 (UTC)

Oh, blimey... on the other hand, I forget every time, myself, and I do it about monthly, so you're not alone. Can't say I've ever done that, but I did mess up rather completely, once. Wound up spending the better part of an hour trying to figure out how to put the page histories back together. 1234 ~ 05:39, 7 March 2011

LOL

LOL --Roman Dog Bird 05:30, March 7, 2011 (UTC)

...and here I was hoping nobody would notice. 1234 ~ 05:40, 7 March 2011

Seriously stop it, the recent changes pages is filled with over 40 of your huffing ways - The admirable Lord Frosty the Snowman 08:00, March 7, 2011 (UTC)

Well, get me a DPL for listing unused images properly, or get Zombiebaron a batch delete that operates right off the UnusedFiles page, or Dr. Skullthumper a hack for his AWB, and this'll all be over soon enough. Chop chop. 1234 ~ 08:07, 7 March 2011

You couldn't have made it to 50? Pup 10:02 07 Mar '11

I only deleted about 400 this morning. Something about not having good lists... PotR, love, you're good with codings. Would you know how to make a DPL to list unused images? Can DPLs be embedded within DPLs? Any way to do it sectionally? Some other way? Or something else? Grar... or API, know anything about that? 1234 ~ 22:10, 7 March 2011

Dpl is a weak point of mine. I have tried to create a similar DPL in the past and it refused to complete parsing, so I'm not the one to ask. Spang is the DPL guru, but I was also wondering what text shows on an unused image page? Would google be able to pick that up? Pup 11:25 07 Mar '11

They say 'this file is not used on any page' or something like that. But it's the same across them, whatever it is. Real question is, how up-to-date would Google be, and would it really be any use for formulating a list of a few thousand thingies? Because that seems rather iffy at best. 1234 ~ 01:08, 8 March 2011

And there Roman Dog Bird was think 49 was silly, well I caught Lyrithya doing a clean 50. - The admirable Lord Frosty the Snowman 07:01, March 8, 2011 (UTC)

Although, the "how to take a screen shot" left in the google search is a tad embarrassing, no? (talk) 08:55, March 9, 2011 (UTC)

Stupid fucking laptop wouldn't let me take screenshots the normal way, *ahem* needed an alternative, and in my rush to exploit Lyrithya I forgot. - The admirable Lord Frosty the Snowman 05:11, March 12, 2011 (UTC)

You say you want DPL practice?

Now that you have the Power Cosmic, would you please carry out my request in the last paragraph of User talk:Zim ulator#This is American People? Spıke ¬ 00:36 8-Mar-11

Let me guess... typo you only noticed later? Why is that thing even protected, though? Rest of the stuff on the page ain't. Also, it's done, if you hadn't noticed. I didn't mean what I said. *shifty eyes* 1234 ~ 01:09, 8 March 2011

I believe you've done it, thanks. This was working fine until they changed MediaWiki versions; wasn't anything anyone did. I guess that the space was formerly included in the name of the month. It still bugs me that articles in this DPL are sorted based on page creation, and by author's local time. Headlines has been protected ever since the drama last August about reskin of the UnNews Front Page. Spıke ¬ 01:21 8-Mar-11

Oh, I see. So it was... not anyone we know. Weird. Or it could have just kept the things separate by default, but anyhow.

What order would be better? Might be doable. Emphasis on might. I plead incompetence. 1234 ~ 01:47, 8 March 2011

I've come to accept initial-creation-date. The previous system, not based on DPL, gave the date based on the article's declared {{Date}}, which was turned from formula into reality the instant you submitted an article to UnNews, but of course that requires that we look inside every file in the namespace every time someone wants the Front Page built. But I've complained in the Forum on creating an article for Wednesday UTC and having it dated Tuesday because it's still Tuesday here. I've read the documentation, didn't find anything to this level of detail, and don't think you'll get any farther or even find it a good use of your time. Spıke ¬ 01:56 8-Mar-11

What's wrong with looking inside the files? It's a bloody database - that kind of thing is what a database is for! But... eh. Hmm. Bloody strange. 1234 ~ 02:26, 8 March 2011

It's a database in any case. Usually, walking through a directory to get the names of the files, which you must do anyway, is sufficient to obtain the creation date of each. Reading each such file probably doubles the necessary disk accesses. DPL is essentially a language by which you get directory listings and force them to a desired format--not a language by which you get anything you'd like to happen. In the previous implementation, someone probably wrote C code to read every UnNews and interpret the {{Date}} template. The promise of DPL was to be faster and simpler; I just dislike this consequence, mostly because new articles that I might want to put on the Front Page don't appear at the top of the Recent news list. Spıke ¬ 02:38 8-Mar-11

It's all stored in tables... so what if it has to access one more field and rifle through the contents? For... every single thing... mon, if I ever get around to it, I will look into this, however idiotic it may be. I'm all for straining the servers, because I'm all for dishing some annoyance back at wikia after all the annoying things they do, never mind how many of them turn out to just be default mediawiki things. 1234 ~ 02:40, 8 March 2011

Deathlist

Aptly named. So many of the names in red look sooooo interesting. During the day yesterday and today, while I tried discussing your deletions, hundreds and hundreds have gone into the killing field. Even as I tried to negotiate a way to save a few hundred, they still are killed. I guess I'm the only one concerned about this, and that kind of confuses me, that nobody else is very concerned. It makes me look like a weird geek who likes to save pics of clowns with galoushes and tornadoes picking up dogs. The net result of my discussions with you is to save one good pic which ended up on Obesity and is now one of the funniest things there imnho. Anyway, you were the person who hated the Shatner pic on Science Fiction, again my fave thing on that page, so I guess you and I have very different points of view on pics. Or am I wrong? Have you been more selective because of my voice in the wilderness? Maybe. Hope springs eternal. Aleister 4:33 8-3-'11

Somewhat more so. Slightly. But as Zombiebaron said, it's more an issue of the overwhelming mess, than anything else. >.< 1234 ~ 08:13, 8 March 2011

Also... hate to burst your bubble, Aleister, but "Go be fat somewhere else" is an image macro I've seen on literally dozens of Fark comment threads. It's just 4chan/Fark cruft that drifted over here. I personally really try to shy away from using that kind of thing - if I had to choose between being moderately amusing and original, or being a dumping ground for hilarious Internet memes, I'd go with door #1. pillow talk 08:21, March 8, 2011 (UTC)

What is 'Fark'? 1234 ~ 08:27, 8 March 2011

My bubble is burst. I didn't know that, hadn't seen it before, and am not well traveled in 4chan fark territory. It shall be removed if you haven't already. Thanks. Thanks for killing the dream. Aleister 12:54 8-3-'11

It's a news aggregator that also holds Photoshop contests and tends to have a culture that's sort of 4chan-lite - half the bullying, none of the kiddie porn. pillow talk 16:19, March 8, 2011 (UTC)

So no relation to the Total Annihilation ARM unit? Dang... or... wait, maybe that was CORE. 1234 ~ 18:01, 8 March 2011

Thanks Lyrithya, or however you spell it

I just saw that you put The Old Man and LV onto the que, thanks. More importantly, I once again thought I'd caught all the misspellings and you come along and correct, what is it this time, 30? And I never knew goddamnit was spelled goddmmit (are you sure, the first one looks like the word to me, the second one doesn't, but I did google them and both seem to show up). Thanks for catching all the mistakes and once again saving me from looking like the complete moron. As I said in a summary note a couple of days ago, when the spelling came by it didn't pollinate me. Aleister 12:59 8-3-'11

Damn it is concatenated into dammit... hell if I know why, but it's the accepted usage. All I can really say is english is stupid. And don't worry, I probably missed some, too. >.< 1234 ~ 17:54, 8 March 2011

Could you please restore Marcel Duchamp, Master of Ready Mades?

You know, as an artist, Marcel Duchamp, Master of Ready Mades was very controversial. Was his work art, or just laziness? Was he a genius who was pushing the very definition of art, or was he simply a guy who was screwing with people? Much of his ready mades were not allowed in museums because of this fact. Now, years later, the man is still considered controversial. One could even say the art debates that he has inspired are a form of art in and of themselves. By deleting this article of course, you have in a sense contributed to his legacy. For that, I thank you.

However, I take offense at you labeling the article as "memey". Just because something is short or did not take a lot of work does not make something memey. To say so would be degrading Duchamps ready-mades themselves as "memey", for all the man did was turn a urinal upside down and call it a fountain. I am merely continuing in that tradition. If you still think it's not worth keeping, would you at least restore it and put it on VFD? I am sure that there are plenty of people on this site who would appreciate it, and I would much appreciate the gesture. After all, more than anything, I want to start a dialogue with this, hence the Pee Review.

While we're on the topic of Pee Review, I must say I was confused. Certainly you must agree that image review would not work in this case. The article itself is more than the image. It is the image with the text underneath as well as categorizations and a "see also" section. Besides that, I did not make the image, in much the same way that Duchamp did not "build" a urinal before turning it into a fountain. While the article is short, there is certainly plenty of feedback that one could give on it. To say that it's too short to review is ironically just the kind of feedback that one could put in the review.

Many thanks for your time, and I sincerely hope you at least consider restoring this. 72.178.158.9 14:56, March 8, 2011 (UTC)

I'll put in my two cents and say I support restoration. I'm more amused than annoyed by that page, at least for the time being. But, Lyri deleted it, so I'll leave it to Lyri. pillow talk 16:18, March 8, 2011 (UTC)

I'd have more hesitant, but we already have a perfectly fine article on the subject, and this one was also created with a {{PeeReview}} on it, as well as a link to a nonexistent retrospective. Made it seem more like the person was specifically trying to avoid deletion by using Pee Review and going for a status as a one-liner in mainspace just for the sake of having a one-liner in mainspace (Isn't that what UnDictionary is for?)... or was it simply trying to stir up drama? Either way, is that really what we want to encourage?

Person, you say you take offence at my labelling the article memey? You were the one who did that, not I - anything with a retrospective is already in the fluffy ground of in-joke/meme/self-reference, whichever one's which - that is what a retrospective is. And reviews are for improving articles, and for that, they need content to review. But the artist wouldn't have gone for a review at all, I suspect, unless to troll the reviewer, and our reviewers really don't need that, especially not from IPs. It's drama, and drama we have plenty of that as it is from all the ingrates already here... perhaps you might want to consider joining them? Er... I mean, creating an account. If you did, I would be more than happy to userfy the thing, after which discussion could more easily follow, and chances are you might be taken a little more seriously... maybe. 1234 ~ 17:39, 8 March 2011

I figured somebody would add a retrospective to an article like that sooner or later. I personally think it would ruin it, but I also was realistic and wanted to save somebody the trouble. I would have no problem removing the "retrospective" part as I think that would better preserve the purity of the joke. You are welcome to suspect what you like about me, but I can tell you that I personally wanted a review for pure reasons. I think there's plenty of content to review, and I think that people could easily suggest other methods to change the joke. I may not necessarily agree with what other people have to say, but I do respect all opinions, and I learn from all of them.

As far as the opinion that this would be stirring up drama, to that I can argue very little against. Indeed, articles like these do tend to stir up drama, just as putting an upside down urinal in an art museum creates drama. But there is drama for its own sake and drama for art's sake. Yes this would be controversial. All the more reason to keep it, in my opinion. I find it a little disconcerting that you would delete this just to keep people from arguing about it. If they don't like it, they don't. If they do, they do. The fact that they disagree over what is worthwhile is art in of itself to me. As far as me being an I.P. I cannot create an account because I am a privacy freak. I don't use any social networks, I don't use google, I don't keep any of my cookies, I try to avoid any webpages with the "like" button on them because they track you, I don't use flash, and I don't sign up for accounts for pages like this. My personal information is very important for me, and worth the right to only get half a vote, as well as the inablility to upload images. Please don't tell me that because I value these things you have an inherent bias against me. 72.178.158.9 18:12, March 8, 2011 (UTC)

That's nice. This isn't a forum, however - there forums and sites aplenty for discussion and whatnot; might I suggest taking it to one of those if what you are after are the reactions? Also, if you're concerned about privacy, revealing your IP really isn't the way to go. Just saying. 1234 ~ 18:19, 8 March 2011

That's also what proxies are for. Forums won't get me the article back. 72.178.158.9 18:23, March 8, 2011 (UTC)

That's also what accounts are for. 1234 ~ 18:30, 8 March 2011

mmm... yeah, I've got to say, I'd be a lot more sympathetic towards your cause if you weren't so bizarrely paranoid that you think creating a username would give some government agency the ability to track you down and attach a radio to your brain. Lyri's a well-known user here, and I cant even get any of her personal information, which is a shame, because I really wanted to order hilarious things on her credit card. pillow talk 19:44, March 8, 2011 (UTC)

Hello fellow IP (my IP number is Aleister). Signing up for an account asks nothing of your identity, just that you pick a user name. If it asks for your birthday or something, just make one up. No email needed, I don't think. You sound interesting and semi-intelligent, except for the paranoid thing (us Illuminati have our hands full already keeping track of the morons, let alone the semi-conscious and the jinns). And I'd like to see the page being discussed here, and ask that the title alone give the page some leeway and/or points in its favor for shortness and oddness. Aleister 20:55 8-3-'11

My presumption would be against a page consisting of only a photo and a caption, as the canon here is hoax encyclopedia articles--not cartoons. But you know what I take offense to?

• People who understand that their work may be considered worthless and attach {{Pee review}} or {{WIP}} or {{ICU}} or all three, in advance of any such judgement, in order to defend it (especially in the impermanent world of UnNews).
• People who introduce themselves to strangers with theatrics--
  • Of "taking offense." You surely disagree with Lyrithya's opinion of your work. How can you "take offense" to her opinion?
  • That by deleting an article she has inadvertently made a statement she might not intend to make
  • That she has uttered an irony that serves to contradict herself.

A request to restore the article and move it to VFD is above all a call for mass attention, that is, whoring, or especially getting someone else to whore for you. All of the above is tedious coming from within the "community." Coming from someone who, for whatever reason, avoids even establishing a presence here, is a waste of time. Spıke ¬ 20:45 8-Mar-11

It's clear I'm going to get nowhere here, so I'll stop asking. I just want to clarify a few things first:

• First, if I want to be private with my online activities, I think I have a right to that. I don't think it makes me paranoid, just careful. The more people know about you, the more they can use against you. You don't have to agree with me. I don't expect that. I just wish you would respect that decision. So you know, I have tried creating an account. I can live with giving a dummy e-mail, I can live with cookies, but I'm not going to drop my proxy, and for whatever reason, that's what I would have to do to do this. This site's all about free speech. I just don't feel I would have that as a user, not where I live.
• Second, my goal in creating that little article was not to create drama, (although I apparently have, unintentionally). What I mean is that if drama happens, it happens. It's not the end of the world, yo. Discussion can be good sometimes too. Are you allowed to put articles in I.P. namespaces? If so, why not just put it there? That would essentially end this whole thing. I'll keep this I.P. if you are in fact, allowed to do that.
• Finally, Spike. In my perception you are nothing but a cyberbully. I've seen your edits on this wiki when I was lurking and from what I can see, you love nothing more than pushing people around under the guise of playing helpy helper. On those grounds, I refuse to respond to any of your "points" you have to say, because it wouldn't help anything. You'd just keep spraying around more negativity. If you think that's a low blow, then I think you deserve it and somebody should have said it to you a long time ago.

Now then, I'm not going to try to stir up any more "drama" then I already probably have. I won't comment on here further, and I won't bother Lyrithya any further. For what it's worth, I'm sorry I asked. I know I'm off to a bad start, and I'm guessing that I'll probably get banned for what I said to Spike. Assuming I don't, what I'm going to do is create a nice, normal uncontroversial article, as drama free as I can make it, and move on.

69.195.136.34 06:21, March 9, 2011 (UTC)

I don't think anyone's going to ban you, proxy IP. Shit, I've made myself twice as obnoxious as you and eventually they made me a temporary admin. Actually, we'd very much like you to join the community. The fact that you're so argumentative suggests that you can probabily competently satirize, and that's a talent that we could use a little more of.

I'm really, really not aware of it being impossible to both surf in through a proxy *and* log in. I'm pretty sure it's completely possible. So the only layer of security you'd be giving up is the possibility that you could choose an account name that someone might recognize. And you could even get around that by letting me choose one for you: "User:Stephen Donald Westenchester." There you go. There really is zero security that you can achieve as 69.196.136.34 that you couldn't as Stephen Donald Westenchester. In fact, the username might even be *more* secure, since people would have no real way of knowing you were surfing in on a proxy. Why do you say you'd have to drop your proxy? Maybe you know something I don't know. Maybe you're living under some kind of repressive Draconian government. You seem to speak pretty Americanized English, but, hell, that's possible elsewhere. Are the Libyans going to cut your fucking head off if you log in without a layer of security and write an article about Marcel Duchamp? I doubt it, but it's your tête.

Yes, you're completely allowed to keep your IP, and no one's going to stop you. But don't expect to either A) participate in stuff like VFD; or B) ever really be considered a full member of the site whose opinion we value because we don't want to lose you.

As for SPIKE, well, he throws some elbows, but he does a good job. You get used to agreeing with him when he makes a good point and telling him to fuck off when he makes a bad one. (Hi, SPIKE!) pillow talk 06:34, March 9, 2011 (UTC)

Funnybony

Why are you vandalizing his talk page? Is that really the best possible use of your time right now? ;) pillow talk 21:24, March 8, 2011 (UTC)

I clicked the wrong thing! It was an accident, dammit. And actually, I stole a script off some website and will implement it... well, at the rate I'm going, sometime next week. But right now I need to do my coursework. Ta. 1234 ~ 21:29, 8 March 2011

Coursework, eh. Sounds like a barrel of monkeys. Enjoy! pillow talk 21:30, March 8, 2011 (UTC)

Lyrithya's finally got one too many buttons. Spıke ¬ 21:32 8-Mar-11

Which one? 1234 ~ 21:33, 8 March 2011

*ahem*... your coursework, dear? pillow talk 21:35, March 8, 2011 (UTC)

Huh? 1234 ~ 21:37, 8 March 2011

Do your homework! Don't make me slap you with a 45 minute ban! pillow talk 21:39, March 8, 2011 (UTC)

That wouldn't solve anything. 1234 ~ 21:43, 8 March 2011

Something about unused images

I get a freakin job and immediately miss what was apparently some awesome, face-melting event on IRC or where ever about deleting unused images that would've been so fun to lurk for. Now, I'm sure this question was brought up at some point - scratch that, I hope this was brought up at some point - but is this issue really that big of a deal? Uncyclopedia has loads of unused images, yes, and the number grows constantly. It's nigh impossible to search said images; another uncontested yes. But does this affect the wiki in any way? Does the space used by the loner pics make the site slower? I'm sure this is a dumb question, and that's why I'm putting it on your talk page as opposed to the forum, but I'm asking it because I haven't seen anyone else ask it yet and I feel that it's in everyone's best interest that it be answered, and well, before anyone spends much more time on the subject. ~  Talk 04:37, March 9, 2011 (UTC)

Eh, it's not terribly interesting. Three crazies trying to delete the wiki, that's all.

Anyway, no, it's not really hurting anything, far as I know... no more than all the stubs and dead-end pages and general bad articles are, at least, and we also try to clean those up. We have QA and VFD and all that whatnot for a reason, so what about pictures? Is some sort of order such a bad thing to want? The images heap is just a giant, ungodly mess in its current state and not helping anything, so why not make it potentially usable? Although with the images, there is also a bit of a legal concern, as well, as Hyperbole pointed out - fair use hardly applies if they ain't being used. We wouldn't get sued for the for the same reason nobody will ever find them and put them to use, but... eh. Order, mon. Isn't that enough? Don't you like stuff pretty?

Why does anyone do any fixy-uppy-cleaning things, anyhow? 1234 ~ 05:05, 9 March 2011

Deleting unused images is what separates us from the animals (talk) 05:32, March 9, 2011 (UTC)

I agree that it looks like crap (and with this project in general), but, playing Devil's Advocate here, is "order for order's sake" something to spend so much time on? I'll clean out or re-order a closet, but only if I'm going to use the space. Otherwise, it's just a waste of time so I close the door, forget about it, and fry some bigger fish with my time. Just something to think about. ~  Talk 15:24, March 9, 2011 (UTC)

Same question, though - why do anything maintenance-related here, or anywhere else? Same thing with going through new pages, why waste one's time with that? They're just a pile of random pages created primarily by idiots; no pressing need to get rid of them... and then why VFD the ones that survive? Why VFD anything, for that matter? Why delete stupid categories or pointless templates that so amuse IPs to tack onto things?

I'm not a writer, mon. Never was. When I do, it's like doing battle with the mongoose, but in a language that people speak, and I do enough battle with the mongoose for the sake of trying to put things in order as it is. And order is patterns, which may not seem like much, but it makes things more comprehensible, from finding a shoe in your closet to finding a shortcut to an application in your window manager's main menu to predicting the global economy if some whatever happens. A definable series is much easier to really wrap one's mind around than a compilation of raw data, and much more usable. Graph the data and then the pattern may show up, but you still need to go one step further to get a definition out of it, and you need that to really do anything with it. After that, the data is as good as meaningless; just complicates matters if one tries to keep it all, fit it all. Likewise, we have is a fairly unsortable pile of data, well... files, rather like those people who dump the icons for all their programs on their Windows desktop. It's meaningless and it complicates matters.

And yes, there is a very good chance that I am just babbling. 1234 ~ 19:06, 9 March 2011

One big unused image page

So here's my suggestion: how about breaking it up into sections to make things easier to find? (And remove as images are put on pages) Simsilikesims 07:16, March 9, 2011 (UTC)

Not a bad idea... wonder if it'd kill my computer to try to sort it with a stupid algorithm... 1234 ~ 07:38, 9 March 2011

I am a saddened potato

but I'm glad you're on our side. (talk) 08:37, March 9, 2011 (UTC)

Which side is that, exactly? Also, in the future, on ban patrol, could you be a dear sign your reports? It likes signing. And please use a * instead of a ' '. It like *s. With squiggles... it doesn't like squiggles. 1234 ~ 08:54, 9 March 2011

Will do. I saw someone using spaces the other day and just followed that. I thought it was supposed to be * but then again I'm pretty stupid. (talk) 08:58, March 9, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, mon. And dilly people, can't even follow directions... if there even are directions on the page. Have I ever even read it? Meh, that's why I always use the scripts. If they get it wrong, it's someone else's fault. 1234 ~ 19:08, 9 March 2011

Wait...so the robots have taken your job too? What is going on here?!!? (talk) 19:13, March 9, 2011 (UTC)

I am a robot. You will become one as well. You will be assimilated. 1234 ~ 19:14, 9 March 2011

Old Article

Lyrithya, whenever you have a channce (no rush at all) would you mind putting the Stupid Cat article that was hugged in 2007 on my user space? Pretty please? Cheeeeeeeeeeeers. --ShabiDOO 10:49, March 9, 2011 (UTC)

I'll hug it. 1234 ~ 19:08, 9 March 2011

Mon, it's just 'hello kitty' spammed a few hundred times. 1234 ~ 19:09, 9 March 2011

Award from UN:REQ

This user created Office Space, an article originally requested on Uncyclopedia:Requested articles. You're welcome!

Thanks

But lower it to no protection. Anybody should be allowed to edit my page. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:24, March 10, 2011 (UTC)

Dun... dun... DUN! 1234 ~ 00:28, 10 March 2011

Masturbating.gif

You huffed it! That was my cousin, and she was masturbating. It's the only picture I have of my cousin Agnes, who tragically was hit by a train while masturbating while laying on the tracks. In fact that's all she did, just wandered everywhere, hither and yon, and masturbated. I will miss seeing her in action. Sigh. Alesiter 4:06 10-3-'11

Well, the policy. I like the policy. I hide behind the policy. *tries to hide behind the policy and then realises it's a little too small, becomes horribly embarrassed, and runs away* 1234 ~ 04:27, 10 March 2011

I've got another cousin, Janet, who I've filmed masturbating since I posted the above. So I'm fine with Agnes gone. She was horribly unshaven, if I recall. I don't want to write things tonight, so I'm just wandering and categorizing. What are you doing? Aleister 4:35 10-3-'11

Being crazy, apparently. I've gone crazy. Oh, gods, I've finally lost it... 1234 ~ 04:56, 10 March 2011

Thousands of pics

Hello, the top thing still says thousands of pics will be killed on the 16th. I thought the consensus forming was that we'd do it in sections, with weeks in between, and maybe a better way to look at the pics. And the 1,000 that are listed on Special:Unusaed Files, why can't we still keep a thousand on there and take many of those off to make room for new ones. Maybe a couple hundred of those are still good, and hopefully we will still have a depository for unused images (I get lots of my pics from unused). Thanks. Aleister 4:06 11-3-'11

Socky is the consensus? Anyhow, Aleister, that wouldn't work... it'd take too long, and every day there are 20-50 new files uploaded, most of which don't get used, or the articles for which they are uploaded do not survive. No, it's pretty clear from here. We're all doomed. Doomed... DOOOMED! 1234 ~ 05:44, 11 March 2011

If I had my say, I'd do one small section, wait a week, and then do everything else. Measure twice, cut once. But... well... this project ain't my baby. pillow talk 06:37, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

Sounds exactly like what we did - Zombiebaron and I deleted a couple thousand before... then he got the master list from Wikia, told the community to save as many as they could in this week, at the end of which death and destruction ensue! That's what we did and what's happening. 1234 ~ 06:41, 11 March 2011

Well, Socky, me and probably others. And I was the one who suggested he get the master list, but I didn't expect a wholesale slaughter with almost no notice (like who is going to go through the entire list hitting on one item at a time to see what it is). I was just trying to make the project easier, not to unleash the hounds. And like I said, there is already a Special:Unused Files which contain 1,000 images, so at least those thousand should be saved for us to use. There seems to be something un-wiki-like about this decision. Aleister 22:56 11-3-'11

Aleister, stop fussing yourself; there'll be plenty left after. The master list is already outdated, what with deletions and new uploads, and what of all the red links? I suspect many of them do indeed exist, but under slightly differently parsed names... also, I just had a thought. I don't like it. I shall stab it. Graw! 1234 ~ 23:00, 11 March 2011

Fussin myself? First they came for the fussers, and I did not speak up. Then they came for the "Ah, man"-ers, and I did not speak up. Then they came for me. Please explain "there'll be plenty left after." It's my understanding that all of the unused will be huffed. Everything categorized, non-categorized, unused, all the 1000 on the unused pics page, etc, gone in an instant or lots on instantces. Do you mean new uploads? What's to stop someone from huffing those on a daily basis? Aleister 00:22 12-3-'11

Sorry, don't mind my wordage. This really does matter to you a fair bit... anyhow, what I mean is that everything on the page that the Wikia guy gave Zombiebaron will be huffed - and it's already out of date. Huffing the new uploads right away would be silly, though, as sometimes it takes folks a bit to actually put them to use, you know? Hmm... 1234 ~ 00:29, 12 March 2011

Sucer mon coq

Please ban this guy. He is vandalizing my userspace, check his contributions. I put him on Ban Patrol by the way. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 22:02, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

Oh, already did. O_o 1234 ~ 22:21, 11 March 2011

Thanks. As Zombiebaron said to me once, "you know you're doing something right when people start vandalizing you". By the way, who do you think it's a sock of? -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 22:27, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

Does it matter, considering the name and what it was doing? There isn't much reason a not a sock would do that, just in general. 1234 ~ 22:44, 11 March 2011

Some know-it-all insists it knows it all and yet doesn't make a new section header when responding on another page to who knows what

Don't worry, I know sign. I know about Uncyclopedia since 2006. It's because I had forget edit the Uncyclopedia. So, you don't have nothing to worry about with me (sorry for the bad english, it's because what I am brazilian). =D 189.81.8.152 04:17, March 12, 2011 (UTC)

Well, that's good. 1234 ~ 04:22, 12 March 2011

Daniel Tosh

Hosts Tosh.0 on Comedy Central. It's kind of like a sketch comedy program that also shows youtube videos and then makes fun of them. It sounds stupid, but it's kind of funny. (talk) 05:09, March 12, 2011 (UTC)

Ah. Sure seems to attract a few idiot IPs... >.< 1234 ~ 05:28, 12 March 2011

Science Fiction Thanks From the Alien Deviants at Imperial Colonization

Note I fixed this as per your suggestion--thanks! (Also notice the little time travelled signature....) King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  05:25, March 12, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, mon. 1234 ~ 05:27, 12 March 2011

Thanks (for something)

Thanks for the help. And I noticed your an administrator now? Congratulations. :) MadMax 09:35, March 12, 2011 (UTC)

Woo, something something.

And I am for the time being (we had a vote for temporary ops for this month). I fully expect to be deopped and permabanned at the end, of course, but thanks. 1234 ~ 21:15, 12 March 2011

Oh really? That's interesting. Well your doing an excellent job. I hope you stay on as an admin, but if not, I'm sure you'll definatly be considered at the next VFS. MadMax 13:30, March 13, 2011 (UTC)

Aww, you're so sweet, mon. Ah, but you assume there will be further VFSs... you never know, the way things are going. You never know. 1234 ~ 23:07, 13 March 2011

Please allow Ben to have a page on this wonderful site

For these reasons: 1) Ben = Funny; 2) I'm not Ben but have a vested interest in giving him celebrity status through Uncyclopedia; C) Codeine's mum KNOWS ben d. Inder (they have intercourse together; and 4) BEN = FUNNY. If you want proof of my credentials, see the Newfoundland Connection on the Latvia page. --DangerAhead 00:46, March 13, 2011 (UTC) Show Dick Some Respect

Aww, he's so cute when he thinks his article isn't vanity. (talk) 00:54, March 13, 2011 (UTC)

You also sort of destroyed any semblance of pity Lyr might have had for you by recreating your article without permission. (talk) 00:58, March 13, 2011 (UTC)

Look, mon, you already admitted it was vanity. Like Wikipedia, Uncyclopedia is not about getting folks notability, but for providing info on things that are already notable. Well, Uncyclopedia's more for mocking them mercilessly than the information, but whatever. Point is, nobody cares about said bloke.

Don't recreate it again. 1234 ~ 01:10, 13 March 2011

Huh?

What's this? --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 03:41, March 13, 2011 (UTC)

No! You fool! You've opened a portal into the mirror 'verse and doomed us all! (talk) 03:44, March 13, 2011 (UTC)

It's the mirror. Part of Uncyclomedia... anyhow, script updates it periodically. Seems to have been... not doing it of late, though. I've found the files repositories lacking. 1234 ~ 04:24, 13 March 2011

I shall colonize! Then burn down... --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 06:01, March 13, 2011 (UTC)

Er... have fun? O_o 1234 ~ 06:08, 13 March 2011

Please remove the block on the thunder bay page

Hello, I am writing because of a block on editing the Thunder Bay page: thunder bay. Several concerned citizens, community leaders and other interest parties have attempted to edit the content of this page recently because one of the sections is quite hateful and offensive. I can appreciate that someone who is not from this city would not realize how hateful the "entertainment" section on this page is but this is seriously hate speech, not comedy. As it is, this page details a very real and serious set of actions against specific groups in this community and encourages individuals to target a specified person--there is a long standing history in this community of treating sex workers, indigenous residents and those living on the streets as sub-human, attacking them in myriad ways causing serious bodily injury and, in some cases, death. I am new to using these wiki things and did not realize that one must replace deleted content with something else. Could you please remove this block so that we can clean it up and provide some genuinely humorous information about Thunder Bay? Please, I implore you, this is not comedy, it is a sick and hateful incitement to commit violence.

--Clark fitzgibbens 03:50, March 13, 2011 (UTC)

Oh, that? I haven't even read it. Doesn't really look like I'd want to, either. Anyhow, it's not so much a matter of removed content needs to be replaced as a matter of whether or not the overall thing is better afterwards. Blanking a page ain't better, and that seems to be the main tactic for some reason.

It's just semi-protected; unregistered folks kept messing with it, but if you really intend to give it an overhaul, just wait four days (to become autoconfirmed and thus able to edit semi-protected pages) and you'll be able to edit it yourself. You are also encouraged to make a copy in your userspace in the meantime and work on that. Good luck, I suppose, since if you can indeed make something better, it'd be nice. 1234 ~ 04:58, 13 March 2011

Your talk page is quite popular

So I'd thought I'd bring this here. The author of Malcolm in the Middle has a nasty habit of removing maintenance tags from his page (though strangely not from his other pages,) so I believe that a mercy move is in order. I don't think I'm supposed to do things like that though so I'll just dump it in your lap. (talk) 08:05, March 13, 2011 (UTC)

My lap feels dumped. ...oh, that? Again? *groans and ambles off* 1234 ~ 08:21, 13 March 2011

This user (Bhind45) also has a nasty habit of undoing comments on his talk page. The Chief Justice hasn't had a problem with this practice lately, but me, I know I have a history with this dude and I'd like to be able to read what it was without fishing through the history. Spıke ¬ 10:21 13-Mar-11

Well, I understand your frustration, but folks can and do remove stuff from their own talkpages pretty regularly. They're special, or some such. Granted, looking to the histories of things often says more than what the things themselves contain, so it is there. Among other... interesting bits. 1234 ~ 10:36, 13 March 2011

Beanie Baby

Mimo has just removed {{VFD}} as no poopsmith has serviced this in the days since it survived VFD. It needs a discussion page with a pointer to the archive, please. Spıke ¬ 11:26 13-Mar-11

ChiefjusticeDS is a horrible, terrible poopsmith. Well, not really. Actually, looks like he just forgot, which is reassuring, because it means I'm not the only one that does that. Anyhow, thanks for letting me know, mon. All better now. 1234 ~ 11:44, 13 March 2011

I'm back! And....

Default heading

Default text

Why u no trust me? Why u no understand I joke about socky? UN:SOCK jokes about socky. Sockpuppet of an unregistered user used a socky! U ban me 4 a week, and I go to IRC to get ban back to 1 day! I hate u Lyrithya, I hate u Lyrithya, I haeet u Lyrithya! (weeps inconsolably, expecting Lyrithya to hold him in her arms...) --Scofield 12:05, March 13, 2011 (UTC)

I sort of explained on my ?pedia talkpage. *gives Scofield a sundae* 1234 ~ 12:08, 13 March 2011

Mm...sundae!

Please excuse me I don't mean to be rude.... But tonight I'm HUGGING YOU! Scofield has deemed you worthy of a hug for some reason. Thus, you may now consider yourself hugged. At this point, you may also want to consider checking your pockets so as to ascertain that everything is still there.

--Scofield 12:24, March 13, 2011 (UTC)

21 articles on VFH?

Ban yourself immediately, young ladything. --Black Flamingo 12:09, March 13, 2011 (UTC)

I... I must comply. 1234 ~ 12:10, 13 March 2011

And trim it back to 20. You are creating too much work for me. Oh, I guess you can't. Spıke ¬ 12:15 13-Mar-11

Unban yourself. The language on the template says that when the count goes back to 20 you can add a new one. In the letter of the law you did everything fine except nomming a stupid article, an action which maybe in itself deserves a ban. Aleister 13:19 13-3-'11

Actually Aleister's right, it seems 21 is ok. The numbers are so close together, you can see why I got confused. You can unban yourself now. --Black Flamingo 12:28, March 13, 2011 (UTC)

Socky beat me to it, the bastard. 1234 ~ 23:03, 13 March 2011

First HappyMonkey winner

Maybe me? Somebody else wrote the original entry in the list of contests and named me the winner, and I've been called the winner on another page, so I guess perception is reality. From the judging of the contest I may have won, or tied with you, or neither (haven't really sat down with pen, paper, and supercomputer to figure it out). All I know is that I'm the only top page in the contest not to get featured because when I put the page up I never checked it again and some IP had vandalized it - vandalism which stayed almost the whole time it was on VFH (I was wondering why it was getting some weird criticism, but never checked the page! PWNED by an IP!) Aleister 13:16 13-3-'11

p.s. I just realized that maybe that IP's actions and my not checking the page cost me my 30th feature of MMX. I had to be satisfied with a measly 29. Damn the IP's eyes, and other parts.

Huh... and yeah, that was... silly. May have to renom that at some point, though. Perhaps when VFH recovers... 1234 ~ 23:02, 13 March 2011

Article request

May I have UncyclopediaTV back in my userspace? -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 22:53, March 13, 2011 (UTC)

Done. 1234 ~ 23:01, 13 March 2011

April Fools Reskin?

This seems like a good time to get started on a reskin for April 1st. I don't have any ideas though. -- The Zombiebaron 22:52, March 13, 2011 (UTC)

How about redirect the main page to funny websites. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 22:54, March 13, 2011 (UTC)

Olipro and I were already on it. I forgot what we decided, though. It may have been unicorn or banana-related, or something. 1234 ~ 23:00, 13 March 2011

Good. Also, it is worth noting that Todd Lyons is back. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 23:02, March 13, 2011 (UTC)

Can you make it look like Uncyclopedia is made of cheese? --Black Flamingo 23:04, March 13, 2011 (UTC)

o__o Yes. 1234 ~ 23:12, 13 March 2011

I have an idea. Uncyclopedia on drugs. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 23:26, March 13, 2011 (UTC)

You're not allowed to have ideas anymore. 1234 ~ 23:27, 13 March 2011

Nyaoowh! It was a good idea. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 23:28, March 13, 2011 (UTC)

Please no bananas or banana related. That's ?logic's symbol, not uncy's. Why not just a 700px goatse. That would be funny, like this: hahahahahahahahaheeheeheehahah hoh heeheeheehahaha. Aleister 23:31 13-3-'11

No. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 23:32, March 13, 2011 (UTC)

I was going to swap ?pedia's appearance and layout for Uncyclopedia's for the day, actually. I may just wind up enabling cross-server transclusion and doing that if all else fails. 1234 ~ 23:34, 13 March 2011

Please don't do that. Uncy is major league, ?pedia isn't as yet. It's a fun place, and you are an admin at both, but please keep them separate when it comes to main page identity. Aleister 23:38 13-3-'11

In general, sure. But for a prank, it could be rather amusing, especially considering how a good chunk of the populace there hate and/or were banned from Uncyclopeda... 1234 ~ 00:08, 14 March 2011

Ok cool. Let me know if you guys need anything from me. -- The Zombiebaron 23:41, March 13, 2011 (UTC)

Aaaargh! Zombiebaron, don't edit conflict me! -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 23:42, March 13, 2011 (UTC)

A better idea might help. But we may all be doomed in that regard. 1234 ~ 00:15, 14 March 2011

Better idea? Let`s make a resking called "Sophia World Wide". Like version of | This site, like the link to the talkpage would be linked by "Forum"-link. Stupid idea, but I just made something... Cat the Colourful (Feed Me!!!)Leave me alone...

I mean, that it could be "Sophie`s fan site", right? Cat the Colourful (Feed Me!!!)Leave me alone... 15:15, March 15, 2011

It could be a melon. Or a balloon. Or all the pretty wibbles in the world... 1234 ~ 15:18, 15 March 2011

Sophie... Melon?! Melon Sophie?!! Fansite to melon? Or Melon Sophie`s fansite? I`m feeling a bit confused... Cat the Colourful (Feed Me!!!)Leave me alone... 15:21, March 15, 2011

I think I'm a moose. 1234 ~ 15:22, 15 March 2011

Why do you feel so? Did you tell the doctor yet? Cat the Colourful (Feed Me!!!)Leave me alone... 15:27, March 15, 2011

What if you guys just blanked the main page or replaced it with some kind of vandalism? -- 15:30, March 15, 2011 (UTC)

Pretty cool idea... Actually wonderful for April! I really like the idea! And I like april! And cats! And mooses! YAY! Cat the Colourful 15:36, March 15, 2011

I already contirbuted a good idea, Uncyclopedia on drugs. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 15:48, March 15, 2011 (UTC)

Hi,

Sorry about that. I couldn't figure out how to take them off the list. Could u help? Snouffs

Oh, hello. No worries. To remove them, open the section on which you found them - then find the line that was the link you clicked on (I'd suggest ctrl+f for that if it's not near the top or bottom) and delete the entire line.

Also also, to sign, just use four tildes, like so, if you were wondering: ~~~~ 1234 ~ 02:05, 14 March 2011

Joe Pesci

You laughed at Joe Pesci’s joke and voted to make fun of him. So, you can only blame yourself.

Cheers--Funnybony    12:17, Mar 14

Happy Monkey Banner

Lyrithya, could you please help me getting the banner up or tell me who I can talk to. The results are in and its time to direct people to the articles for Happy Monkey. the banner is here User:Magic_man/happymonkey2 THAAAAAAAAANKS --ShabiDOO 19:39, March 14, 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, mon, but why a giant banner now, after it's all over? I can add a note to the sitenotice, or Zombiebaron can or some such, but I'd really prefer we keep the giant banners in reserve until there's actually another reason to pull them out. 1234 ~ 01:45, 15 March 2011

The whole point is to show the articles that are written off to people. The final results are done and the articles are ready to be read as a complete competition. Its the only time I really ever wanted the banner there. --ShabiDOO 01:48, March 15, 2011 (UTC)

Banners are huge, mon. We can't go pulling them out for everything... have to keep making them bigger and bigger for them to have effect. At least that's what the Wikimedia people seem to have found. 1234 ~ 02:34, 15 March 2011

Okay. It doesnt have to be a banner, but some announcement should be put up, not only to celebrate the winners but also to have all 15 participants articles advertised. Anything would be nice. Its your call. --ShabiDOO 02:37, March 15, 2011 (UTC)

I did put something up. 1234 ~ 09:41, 15 March 2011

If....

...wanting to see titties warrants an infinite ban then we would have like...3 people here. (Not contesting, just saying.) (talk) 21:47, March 14, 2011 (UTC)

What's that about? I've heard rumours that you are an admin who likes to put up features. May I point out that we have no feature listed for tonight. It's a sad day when no new feature goes up on the board. Put up something with titties please. Aleister 23:13 14-3-'11

Thank you, I didn't expect Mike Tyson to be featured next. Then again, he does have titties (bigger now since he started on store bought cookies). And what was that about, you infi banned a breast fetishist or something? I must know, I must. Aleister 00:20 Ides of March '11

She did indeed (talk) 00:29, March 15, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. I'd have to agree on this infiban, looks like some jerk did a sockpuppet just to sexually harrass (and worse yet, they ignored me and you!). Aleister 00:51 ides des march '11

This is not a mere breast infatuation, or I'd stand in front of him and shout out, "Arrest me first!" This is asking an Admin to get her tits out. Lyrithya is entitled to ban him--and, given his limited history, which I think includes keeping a private copy of an equally off-color article that the Chief huffed, we all might benefit from the move. Spıke ¬ 01:11 15-Mar-11

Spamming talkpages with stupid, creating crap and then immediately recreating it when it is deleted, sockpuppetry, and... er... let's call the last bit harassment, and on top of that it didn't do anything useful, banning it is certainly not something I'm inclined to lose sleep over. 1234 ~ 01:55, 15 March 2011

Poopsmith

I don't know how to poopsmith. Wait, that's not it. Well kinda. Category:Time Lords didn't have the VFD template taken off (doing now) and doesn't have the oldVFD thing on the talk page and I don't know where to look or what to do. Besides this. Thanks! (talk) 00:44, March 15, 2011 (UTC)

Apparently 2/3 of the 'designated' poopsmiths don't know how, either. Granted, I'm giving Sycamore the benefit of the doubt, since I haven't seen any evidence either way with him, lately, but Chief and I apparently both suck. As in, it was not the only thing that hadn't been properly archived. Anyhow, fixed now. Please let me or someone know if this happens again, eh? >.< 1234 ~ 01:57, 15 March 2011

Olay happy monkey

Thank you for your participation in the Happy Monkey Competition. Because of your writing there are now 15 more amazing articles on Uncyclopedia. PS if you want your pee review to be expanded into a formal 50point review, please let me know on my talk page and Ill get to work on it right away! OLÉ!!! --ShabiDOO 01:25, March 15, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, mon. 1234 ~ 01:58, 15 March 2011

A grue did it

I think it was a funny article. Either bring it back or put it on my userspace. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 02:52, March 15, 2011 (UTC)

Grue's are a little too meme-y and A wizard did it rip-offs are a little old. I very nearly didn't make A Grand Wizard did it and had an idea for a warlock did it with Charlie Sheen that I didn't do simply because there are a lot of those articles. Just my 2 cents. (talk) 02:55, March 15, 2011 (UTC)

Lolipop, GO FOR IT! If you think you can do something with it, giv'er a go. --ShabiDOO 08:29, March 15, 2011 (UTC)

[Insert grumbling here] 1234 ~ 09:45, 15 March 2011

I'm Sorry

Sorry I cut off of IRC so abruptly. I needed to do something important and I completely forgot. Again sorry! - くそったれ Talk contrib 07:56, March 15, 2011 (UTC)

Eh, it happens. But you still need to fix your sig. 1234 ~ 09:46, 15 March 2011

Um... I guess by that sentence there's a problem with timestamp. I've failed again. Why does nothing go right for me?? Σ(゜д゜;) - LOL vandalz

No, no, the timestamp was fine. It's your signature, now. Can't you just put '{{Subst:nosubst|User:Another n00b/sig}}' in the input box instead of whatever? It was substing it, I think. You want it to not subst it. The subst:nosubst'll make it not subst it. 1234 ~ 08:06, 16 March 2011

Telephone exchanges

SETI created a system that was designed to go through extraordinary multitudes of waves and to pick out certain wavelengths patterns. This was ideally to be used to try and find intelligent life. This was then sold on to ASIO (Australian Spying Is Outdated). There is no use for this on Earth with the exception of tapping into every telephone conversation simultaneously to pick out certain words or phrases that may be said as part of a conversation. To this end, it is imperative at every opportunity to say the words "Kill the President" when on a phone call. I would suggest though that you avoid doing this when talking to older uncles and aunts who are not completely compost mentis, as they get rather concerned. Oh, and I just thought I'd drop by and say hello. Hello. Pup 11:30 15 Mar '11

I don't remember the last time I used a phone... I also don't know what day it is, if I remembered to eat breakfast, how long this tea has been sitting here, or what we were talking about. Hi? 1234 ~ 13:22, 15 March 2011

That thing about the tea is concerning - I hate cold tea. Kill the president. How are you? Pup 03:03 15 Mar '11

He ate it. He ate it all up, and the fish smelled like kites. 1234 ~ 15:08, 15 March 2011

HowTo:Become a Master of Disguise‎

Hey, I changed some things up, added some things and took some things away. I tried to fix the prose except for where it was crucial for it to be that way. So... Maybe... You could... *Cough*Re-read it and see if you like it more now then before, and if so maybe change your vote to abstain or better yet for.*Cough* Thanks. -- 15:55, March 15, 2011 (UTC)

I'll give it a look whenever I get around to giving it a look, then. 1234 ~ 08:09, 16 March 2011

Okay, thanks. -- 15:27, March 16, 2011 (UTC)

*Irritates*

How long has it been since I've irritated you? *Disappears for another two weeks* --HM (T) 21:10, March 15, 2011 (UTC)

NOOOOO! Come back! 1234 ~ 08:09, 16 March 2011

No. Your face. Etc. --HM (T) 22:20, March 16, 2011 (UTC)

NOOOOO! Come back! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:46, 16 March 2011

Er... yeah! 1234 ~ 23:57, 16 March 2011

*Comes back, stabs Socky, leaves again* ):< --HM (T) 19:15, March 17, 2011 (UTC)

See, this is why I like you. 1234 ~ 19:52, 17 March 2011

Just wondering

Right now on Cajek/pee Shabidoo is listed as having 3 separate pees for Milton Babbit (article, talk page, secret rewrite.) Does he get credit for 3 pees? And if so can I review it again and also get credit for 3 pees? (talk) 21:22, March 15, 2011 (UTC)

Three articles, three reviews - looks fine to me. Whether all of Shab's are in-depth enough is another question though. As for youself, I guess it depends on whether you do three separate reviews too or one big'un. Black flamingo here, just wandering by. --Black Flamingo 23:22, March 15, 2011 (UTC)

What Flamingo said. It'd be nicer if the guy could just focus and do fewer, better ones, but so long as they prove useful to the guy, it doesn't matter terribly the form. *grumbles* 1234 ~ 08:11, 16 March 2011

Mike Tyson thanks yo’ sorry ass

--Funnybony    07:52, Mar 16

Agh! Flash! *flails and runs away* 1234 ~ 08:13, 16 March 2011

Think you huffed my image?

Well, I have others. And am constantly making more as the need arises. Spıke ¬ 10:23 16-Mar-11

Eh, we huffed a bunch of ones that shouldn't have been. Blame the idiotic list. But seriously, if something needs unhuffing, please say what. 1234 ~ 10:30, 16 March 2011

No, I'm kidding and nothing needs unhuffing. I have a copy of the master here, to which I add the necessary captions. Spıke ¬ 10:50 16-Mar-11

... *hits Spike with a frying pan* 1234 ~ 11:03, 16 March 2011

But you do seem to have huffed File:UnNewsBREAKING.png, which has broken the 1-Spot on the UnNews Front Page. This, and any File:UnNewsCAPITALLETTERS.png, are referred to in the source of {{Lead 2.1}} and included in a Front Page graphic when a parameter matches. The corresponding .gif files were an earlier effort that I had asked the Chief to delete; they can go. Spıke ¬ 11:41 16-Mar-11

We seem to have killed a few of your audios, as well. Should I hack those up, too? 1234 ~ 11:45, 16 March 2011

By all means. They are all masterpieces. Spıke ¬ 11:53 16-Mar-11

Yup, there are four red-links in User:SPIKE/UnNews_archive_2. Good shootin'. Spıke ¬ 11:55 16-Mar-11

{{notorphan}} is your friend. 1234 ~ 12:13, 16 March 2011

My friend or my enslaver. It seems that {{UnNewsAudio}} should add its victim to Category:Used unused images. Would you please check my work there? Spıke ¬ 12:28 16-Mar-11

No need, if you're using the file it with that. The template uses both a file link and a direct link, so it's fine. Things that don't wind up on the unnews pages and whatnot the normal ways, those you want to be more careful with. 1234 ~ 12:40, 16 March 2011

Also, that wouldn't do it, anyhow. I explained in an edit summary. Not sure why I thought that was a good place to do it, but that's another matter. 1234 ~ 12:43, 16 March 2011

I don't see why that wouldn't have worked to enroll the .mp3 file in the category. Separately, though, all these .mp3 files are linked to on one of my UnNews contributions pages in userspace. Spıke ¬ 12:47 16-Mar-11

The template goes on the article, it puts the article in the category... not what we're after, that. And that's a different kind of link. Files have... er... three kinds of links, I guess. Or maybe four... file links, page links, url links, and... I dunno. I think they're all on that template, actually, but the point is, only file links keep the thing from being labelled as unused. Does that make any sense to you? Because it doesn't to me. 1234 ~ 12:53, 16 March 2011

No, it doesn't. I used an argument with a variable so as not to put the UnNews in the category but to put the media file in it. Spıke ¬ 13:17 16-Mar-11

The argument put the article in the category and not the template, mon. The file's just a file that happens to be quasi-involved. 1234 ~ 17:16, 16 March 2011

Lyrithya

Could you please be a dear and look at the files you delete, next time? File:GrueatSpikeshouse.jpg was in an article when you deleted it. It's not my fault that the guy who putted it in the article forgot to take it off the list, so could you please bring the file back? --~  13:04, March 16, 2011 (UTC)

That's no grue, that's Rover! we've had him for years, must have got off his leash. Separately, there is another unhappy customer on the Chief's talk page. Spıke ¬ 13:21 16-Mar-11

The guy who put (irregular past tense of put) it in the article would be me. I was vaguely aware that Lyrithya was deleting stuff but I didn't know about a big list. In retrospect it has been a better use of time to pursue the handful of cases where we screwed up than scan a big list. Spıke ¬ 23:41 16-Mar-11

Hey!

Since you're an admin now (kinda) can you un-huff my images? Stupid Zombiebaron!

• Image:ZanaDark.jpg
• Image:ZanaJones.jpg
• Image:AlbanyEyes.jpg

~Formerly Annoying Crap 15:48, 16 March 2011

These too *sigh*

• File:Housemdfan.gif
• File:Houseicon.gif
• File:Houseicon15.gif

~Formerly Annoying Crap 15:57, 16 March 2011

Looks like Socky did them, but if you don't put them on a page or some such, they'll probably just get deleted again, love. Please do. Some of those are... particularly nice. *shifty eyes* 1234 ~ 17:25, 16 March 2011

"List aren't invariably bad"

You're completely right. However, I tend to exaggerate things that shouldn't be common practice, especially with new people. I'd rather be the bastard that was wrong and made the author write a good article than the hand-holder who was technically right but didn't make the author feel their work needed to be improved. (Although I occasionally turn into a fanboy.) (talk) 19:06, March 16, 2011 (UTC)

So you've never pointed anyone in the direction of a good list and compared it to their pitiful attempts as part of a greater endeavour to thoroughly crush their spirit? For shame, man!

But seriously, I wish certain... other people would do that. What you do, I mean. I also wish said certain people would read HTBFANJS before doing reviews. Argh... *mumbles incoherently* 1234 ~ 19:11, 16 March 2011

Not entirely sure what it is I do, but thanks. HTBFANJS is one of the most inspiring things I've ever read (#1 on the internet for sure) and if/when I leave this site I will always have my mental copy of HTBFANJS with me at all times. (talk) 22:04, March 16, 2011 (UTC)

The way I frame it for new users (such as Dave0311 early this morning) is to say that adding a list to an article will ruin the n00bie's promising life by consigning him to Undo every additional item added by I.P.Anon. It is not worth the few extra minutes it takes to tie together those list item into a paragraph of ideas that relate to one another. Spıke ¬ 23:36 16-Mar-11

You make it sound like you're not trying to torment them, though. What's with that? 1234 ~ 00:06, 17 March 2011

You misunderstand me; I am totally about tormenting Uncyclopedians. Spıke ¬ 00:12 17-Mar-11

Then why do you say things like that? How could you? 1234 ~ 00:13, 17 March 2011

PS: the Keep on iGovernment is correct based on the 3-3 vote, but I wish you would let it linger on VFD for a while after the decision either way, as notification, rather than move it immediately to the archive. Spıke ¬ 00:22 17-Mar-11

Maybe I should just leave the closing of things to other people. People who have nothing better to do. People who are admins. 1234 ~ 00:46, 17 March 2011

It pains me to remind you that, for fifteen more days--nah, forget it. Spıke ¬ 00:53 17-Mar-11

*shifty eyes* 1234 ~ 01:27, 17 March 2011

And don't leave nothing to other people; just do it a little slower, so we can see what you're doing without digging through the archive. Also, thanks for mercy-moving the Jan Brewer UnNews tonight. Spıke ¬ 01:36 17-Mar-11

Mmm, I can try, but... well, sure. Unless I forget. But it really would be easier to just leave it to all those overeager temps, especially if doing it separately, whereas lumping with the poopsmithing is one fell swoop, so to speak. 1234 ~ 01:45, 17 March 2011

Image restoration

Restore File:FlaxmereMale.jpg, File:IRC Epic Fail.jpg, and File:MerlinDown.gif, all of which were in use. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:42, March 17, 2011 (UTC)

The software be dumb. I blame the software entirely. 1234 ~ 00:44, 17 March 2011

Ask the lady nicely. Spıke ¬ 00:53 17-Mar-11

Your mother is a lady. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:59, March 17, 2011 (UTC)

Also, restore File:FORUM.png. Please. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 01:02, March 17, 2011 (UTC)

O_o 1234 ~ 01:18, 17 March 2011

Did you and Zombiebaron actually think this was a good idea? It was reckless and pointless. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 01:23, March 17, 2011 (UTC)

Was it? How so? 1234 ~ 01:27, 17 March 2011

To put it poetically: You tossed the baby out with the placenta. To put it in a way that has actual meaning: Wikia's list was full of crap and you ended up deleting several images that have been in use for several months and others that were in use prior to vandals removing them from articles while leaving a large number of actual unused images. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 01:32, March 17, 2011 (UTC)

Yes... but that's Wikia's fault. As for vandal removals, if someone reverts the vandals and finds that, they just have to get someone to undelete it. No biggy. As for the large number of actual unused images, it's not nearly so large as what was there. It ain't. 1234 ~ 01:40, 17 March 2011

Personally I think it was very pointy. Having said that there are a couple of images I was using - and one I uploaded but hadn't gotten around to using yet - that seem to gave gone bye bye, but I'll look into what's gone and restore the ones needed. Two issues I think I've come across - if the image was part of a <choose> or <select> then I don't think it was shown as an image being used. Second issue is that there are some images that are linked by full URL that also wouldn't have shown. Third issue, which I just remembered, is that if the images were part of the history of an article they are technically unused - but in cases like The truth about coca cola and Disassociative Identity Disorder the images in history are part of the article. I'm not sure how many images of this ilk have gone the way of the dodo, but I dare say that there are a few of them. I noticed at least 4 images when going through my emails that I know were used in one of the above instances. Pup 01:35 17 Mar '11

Well, those are another matter entirely - what do you people expect, not putting a {{notorphan}} on them? Yeesh. 1234 ~ 01:40, 17 March 2011

Oh, yeah, we all know to use some obscure code about orphans. The damage seems to be widespread and growing, and in the midst of this fiasco I cry tears for my fellow images. Then again, here was the biggest laugh of the day: "Lyrithya (Talk | contribs) huffed "Felix Shen" (content before blanking was: "#REDIRECT Obesity")" Aleister 3:53 17-3-'11

I don't get it. 1234 ~ 03:57, 17 March 2011

Just that it was very creative cyber-bullying of the guy to redirect his victim's name to obesity, that was funny, and then the matter-of-fact way the edit summary came out. In combination the two things broke me up. Kind of like this: hahahahahahah hee heeheehee haahaha huh? Aleister 4:11 17-3-'11

Oh. 1234 ~ 04:36, 17 March 2011

UnNews:Man steals free samples

Drunken bum jimmies his way into Costco, steals free samples, is acquitted as he "paid their full price." Anything remarkable here? Anything funny? Worth letting it sit there? Spıke ¬ 22:41 17-Mar-11

Personally, answering as though you asked me, I think it's slightly amusing and worth keeping. The idea of whether free things have value is not entirely without satiric merit... I mean, it's not the best UnNews I've ever seen, but it's certainly not the worst. pillow talk 22:57, March 17, 2011 (UTC)

I appreciate your input. Spıke ¬ 23:12 17-Mar-11

I'll basically agree, except I think it's disappointing as hell and in dire need of a proofread. But it has a notion and isn't too horrible. Just a massive disappointment. *bursts into tears* 1234 ~ 23:20, 17 March 2011

Thanks to you too. As I mention to Funnybony, I was disappointed by everything on UnNews today--especially his, as he's been around long enough to know better; finally rewrote his lead to have something to feature. Spıke ¬ 23:27 17-Mar-11

Isn't everything being unremarkable in a day inherently remarkable in of itself? 1234 ~ 23:35, 17 March 2011

Alas, not lately. Spıke ¬ 23:54 17-Mar-11

That bad, eh... O_o 1234 ~ 00:36, 18 March 2011

UnNews:My bracket is busted

Gets worse; Sonic80 files pure schmaltz about getting ridiculed for, and losing, a sports bet; and some guy called Spike finally sees an absurd news story--the US's belated decision to get involved in Libya--and writes a report that veers into Advocacy. Spıke ¬ 01:10 18-Mar-11

Why did I just read that? Why?! And I'm not reading this Spike fellow's one. I'm not. Too much already. Too much! *flails and runs away* 1234 ~ 01:19, 18 March 2011

But seriously, Spike's isn't so bad. Has a notion, is applicable... isn't it? Now I'm almost curious. 1234 ~ 08:43, 18 March 2011