|
Great Shoop! This UnNews has to be in the 1-Spot! It is also visible on the Uncyclopedia main page. I cleaned up the grammar and gave it a shorter headline, shown above.
Unfortunately, the text itself doesn't read much like news. The only "news" is: Shoop artist creates neat graphic, going viral now on Google. In essence, you have written a story about yourself! It would have been more clever if you had looked at the current news and created a "news report" that the picture would fit. Let that be a challenge for your next UnNews, which I hope is soon! Spıke ¬ 23:02 25-Feb-11
- Cheers spikey!
  23:06, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
Our messages crossed on User:SPIKE/UnNews. By the way, if you are a photo person rather than a writing person, consider doing collaborations--Reach out in the UnNews:Newsroom (which no one reads any more) with a theme to see if anyone wants to help you with the writing.
Also, it would be cool if clicking on "Jello" reached your user page, while clicking on "Mold" reached your talk pages. That is the way a lot of signatures work, including mine. Spıke ¬ 23:08 25-Feb-11
 Reverend Zim_ulator says: "There are coffee cup stains on this copy, damnit! Now that's good UnJournalism."Welcome to UnNews, JelloMold, and thank you for contributing some crap, or otherwise attracting my attention. For a quick introduction about how you can write a decent or better UnNews article, please take a minute read our spiffy new Style Guide.
I am your humble servant (in your dreams), and if I may be of help to you, please leave me a note on my talk page.
Good things that can happen to you
You can win awards and prizes! You can become a better writer by subjecting your articles to the scrutiny of UnNews critique machine or UnCanninator shit article detection system. You can become a thorn in the side of Journalism as a whole. You can get promotions, ribbons, and free crockery! You can write stuff your mom would be ashamed to show her friends.
What happened to my article?
If you've submitted an article, and it's disappeared, I may have mercy-moved it to your user space. This means I've probably left a message on your talk page, likely in close proximity to this very message, explaining why.
Your article may have been tagged for ICU if it has significant problems meeting our criteria, or I may have deleted it because you did not register as a user.
Finally, maybe you just pissed me off. I mean, I know I'm a Roshi, and I'm supposed to be all "Zen" about everything, but I have bad days too, you know?
UnNews Audio
If you are interested in doing an UnNews audio, check this out.
UnNews UnFunnies
At present, I create UnCartoons for UnNews all by my onesies, for better or worse. Now, I will never claim that I am a good cartoonist. Fortunately, the internet provides us a way to do all sorts of things simply and easily. I found Stripgenerator.com, a great site to create cartoons with a minimum of talent.
- This document is an ongoing effort by me to enhance the obfuscation coefficient of Uncyclopedia; productive changes, and criticism are welcome. Cheers! The Right and Left Reverend Major Sir
 Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 17:38, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
Excellent concept; the second Oscar-based article of the day, but it takes it in a direction that Hollywood would not like it taken. Could read a little more like news, but you're on your own. In particular, it's time you do you own Heavy Lifting:
- The dateline should be HOLLYWOOD, California -- Both words can be links. If you don't know why, back up and read our Style Guide.
- There are certainly Sources out there for you to use, if merely a wire-service story on the real Oscars.
myway.com is a site I use to bring together the AP stories. I saw a story on Sheen's continued meltdown on this morning's TV at BostonHerald.com. Spıke ¬ 18:47 28-Feb-11
- Yeah I saw a bit of that new interview too.. I was hoping he wouldn't say something I'd then HAVE to include.. given that the article was nearly finished. I will include some sources bonsoir. 18:53, February 28, 2011 (UTC)
Now, I know he went on a rant, but I haven't studied his rant. Penis? Bat shit? Do these relate to things he actually said, or are you just amusing yourself by string together Uncyclopedia memes into a rant he might have said? And what was with the double dots? Triple dots...is legitimate, but mostly if you're Larry King...and quadruple dots....Technically, these mean that whatever was omitted includes the end of a sentence. Spıke ¬ 19:21 28-Feb-11
- I'm not aware of any uncyclopedia memes.. the 'penis' was related to the fact that that was the uncensored part of the rant. It needed a word for people to understand why it was censored.. I thought of others.. 'ballbag', 'testes' etc. I wasn't aware double-dots were a no-no, please be gentle! 19:31, February 28, 2011 (UTC)
Relax; I cannot ban you from the site, and today turned aside the votes of two Uncyclopedians that I should be given the power to ban people. But I did go to work on your double-dots. Spıke ¬ 19:39 28-Feb-11
- Ok.. but you should know I will find it hard to cut-out the double-dots.. I'll do my best but I'm just saying.. they're like an addiction y'know? By the way Charlie did use the term 'earthworm' which is funnier than anything I could put in his mouth.. except maybe a cactus 19:45, February 28, 2011 (UTC)
As you are still editing the piece, maybe you want to deal with some nitpicking:
- We are rumoured to prefer American spelling when writing about Hollywood or stuff in America (though no one's going to edit you for this).
- You are inconsistent in referring to "Charlie" versus "Sheen" in the article.
Cheers! Spıke ¬ 18:16 1-Mar-11
- They are both good points, I think I flip between Charlie and Sheen because it makes the story less repetitive on the brain. In this country the media often does it (I know.. the story is in Hollywood but it was reported over here).. so you'll get "hairy worker" later referred to in the article as "bearded bloke", it's not really an issue over here. I also added a reference to Mr. Two Beer's Ugly Wife because it's closer to an actual Charlie Sheen ramble. See I do listen to you! 15:38, March 4, 2011 (UTC)
On "hairy worker" versus "bearded bloke," I agree totally. If you use either, it's for embellishment, and you shouldn't use the same embellishment a second time. On "Charlie" versus "Sheen," however, most newspapers have a rule for this (at my local newspaper, however, it's surname except for wives and children--sometimes), so the casual reader looks at this and just concludes someone screwed up. Spıke ¬ 15:52 4-Mar-11
Wold you like a lollipop? -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 20:17, March 1, 2011 (UTC)
- nom nom 15:39, March 4, 2011 (UTC)
-- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 16:15, March 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Grape? Now you are spoiling me.. give me the box 18:47, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
- There is no box, only a shop. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 00:03, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
My laptop died on Monday and I've been without a pc for nearly a week now.. and I was going to be unselfish and contribute to pee review too...I think god wants me to be selfish :( 13:23, March 5, 2011 (UTC)
- How's your internet situation coming along? If it's fine then don't reply. --Black Flamingo
- laptop has gone to heaven, should be buying a new one on Sunday I hope.. Then on Monday the dudes at the pc garage should be able to copy all my documents from the broken one to the new one. Something will go wrong though so I reckon Tuesday I should be back. It's annoying I have many ideas that I now have to write on *spits* PAPER 12:48, March 12, 2011 (UTC)
-- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 00:48, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
When someone adds any kind of text to a pee review they are almost always booking the review unless they 1. Are asking a question or 2. Contributed to the article in question. Just some things to remember for next time you want to review something.  (talk) 01:02, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Pee part 2: The Reckoning[edit source]
|
|
I just peed on something you wrote. I apologize profusely for that.
I'll attempt to control my bladder in the future. No promises though
|
Pretty good Liverpool article, could use some work. (talk) 07:34, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
So, I came here to tell you something or ask something or something...[edit source]
But I forgot what. So... er... I'll just say hi, instead. Hi. 1234 ~  02:56, 7 April 2011
- Hi...It's probably nothing of note, as I haven't contributed anything of note in weeks 20:45, April 10, 2011 (UTC)
- Does anyone? 1234 ~ 05:01, 11 April 2011
- Ok good point, article-wise I have contribbed nowt then. I just thought of a question for you however...say I wanted to create an article on a celebrity (let's call him Paul Jones for no reason) if I type 'User:JelloMold/Paul Jones' into the 'create page' bit, is that then considered a 'draft'? Or at least more of a draft than if I just created the page 'Paul Jones'? 20:55, April 11, 2011 (UTC)
- Aye, subpages are a common way to make drafts to work on for as long as you need, but they're no more of drafts than ones in mainspace, ie, the latter. Only real difference is just that you need to use {{WIP}} tags while working on mainspace ones or they're apt to get deleted, although even then you can't leave them for over a week without finishing them. Sorry this took me so long to respond; I kind of... lost the tab. >.< 1234 ~ 01:31, 14 April 2011
- excellent, and don't worry I'll take thrice as long to reply as anything you can manage...I noticed subpages(?) aren't searchable either, which is probably a good thing. I just need a place to keep drafts so I can see what my stuff will look like on the site, without having to copy and paste everything from NOTEPAD 1st :o 20:54, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Heh, good, good. And yeah, subpages should be exactly what you would want for that, then. List them on qvfd when you're done with them, if you want to clean it up... Ick, notepad. 1234 ~ 01:29, 19 April 2011
- Notepad is hardcore. No spellcheck. No grammarcheck. No limits. Drink notepad 18:50, April 22, 2011 (UTC)
I moved the UnNews article "declares" to the new title "enforces" I also dropped to lower case to the way I think they like it. Not sure on Libya though. I left the fix up deletion of your old article to you as a way to practice. any questions, I'll be glad to assist. --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 14:42, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
- Cheers Klipz! I don't know how to delete articles...I've made a few I've wanted to get rid of and in the end I just delete all the text and then save it if that works :s I guess admins have huffed most of them by now anyway 15:19, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
- Oh right you cover that on spikes talk page...thanks...I think magic man's image of the floating island in my article should really be on the front page, I'm sick of seeing Gadhafi's crusty features. 15:39, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
- Great article. --Black Flamingo 19:52, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
- Cheers Blamingo! I'd write a longer reply but I'm just having a debate with Spike on his talk page at the moment :D 19:55, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
It's time for its time[edit source]
see User:Kevillips/Its vs it's wip, I am going to write a contrary view as well.--K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 20:18, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
- a contrary view to the correct usage of 'it'? Can't see much mileage in that myself mate but good luck 21:19, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for your review. I realized that I sounded less like a Geographer with a passive-aggressive hatred of Russian lakes, and more like a bratty middle aged woman complaining about the lake after getting food poisoning from some Borscht at a hotel in Irkutsk. I did some revisions, and (mostly) did as you asked. Can you tell me in my talk page if the article improved? I'm still re-editing it.--User:CandidToaster/sig 02:47, May 24, 2011 (UTC)
Here's the first one:
And here's the other:
Hope you like them. -- 03:26, May 24, 2011 (UTC)
I noticed you want me to make a sig for you, so i'll be at the task right away. I have an idea. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! - 01:45, 25 May 2011
- I'm scared... please continue! 17:57, May 25, 2011 (UTC)
- Is it some ungodly concoction of mushrooms and jelly? If so that would be awesome 18:04, May 25, 2011 (UTC)
- Hold yer horses. I got behind, so i'll be working on it today. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! - 21:36, 12 June 2011
- Lawlipop lawlipop oo lawli-lawlipop LAWLIPOP 22:24, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
- How do you like your new sig? -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! - 02:11, 17 June 2011
- LOL(ipop), it's been well worth the wait! I know it mite be a bit cheeky to ask for more at this point and I'm happy with the way it is but could you made it so the lil mushrooms 'pop out' of the plate of jello when u hover over it? If not it doesn't matter, it's freakin awesome. 20:30, June 17, 2011 (UTC)
- I'll see what I can do; but if not, are you fine with it? -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! - 21:00, 17 June 2011
- iT'S grrreat! In fact nevermind, I like seeing the lil mushies 21:11, June 17, 2011 (UTC)
Actually, wanna help rewrite this? I put some ideas on the talk page and have got some other users interested in joining in too. --Black Flamingo 20:51, June 14, 2011 (UTC)
 
-- 01:10, June 23, 2011 (UTC)
- You're very welcome magico! 20:49, June 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you for saying you're welcome. -- 21:08, June 23, 2011 (UTC)
Thank you tremendously[edit source]
For reviewing AND voting for UnScripts:The Single Caucasian Roommate, which happens to be my first ever feature! I really appreciate your support, especially since I was able to get a self-nom in early enough because of you review. --Scofield & Dudes 12:57, June 23, 2011 (UTC)
- No problem, made me laugh big time, especially when the therapist produced the diary for no reason. Don't forget to vote for my article! (if you like it that is), I am allowed to beg for votes on my own talk page aren't I? 20:48, June 23, 2011 (UTC)
That millipede rewrite[edit source]
That is boss laa. --Black Flamingo 21:50, June 23, 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the pee review[edit source]
I read your review and I wonder how generalizing affects the humor. I have improved the parts of the article that you didn't like, but I am confused how my usage of the words as usual affected the humor of the caption; I do know that generalizing is a tad annoying, but I don't think it's as big a problem as you think it is, not to be rude. It seems to me you missed a few of the jokes in the article, since I like my humor hidden a little. I have looked at another article you reviewed which you gave a higher score, and it seems to me that you might have a different sense of humor than me. Again, thanks for the review, and I'll be sure to improve the article more.--User:CandidToaster/sig 03:26, July 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah I considered that our sense of humour might be different and I forgot to mention it in the review. If you feel like the 'as usuals' etc are an important part of your style then by all means leave it in. I just found it distracting from the main concept, maybe I bang on about it a bit too much. In any case I think it's about time another user gave you a review to be honest. All I'd say is if a particular issue keep cropping up in lots of reviews maybe it's something you need to look at. But then again maybe not. I get flak from a few users for the length of my articles and 'deviating from the concept towards the end', I've tried to do something about the length, but I find the odd 'deviation' makes them funnier in my own opinion, c'est la voi 19:35, July 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Btw I'm sure I didn't give Lake Baikal a higher score did I? 19:35, July 1, 2011 (UTC)
- I'm talking about the article Peekaboo, which you reviewed. I personally believe it isn't very good, but you gave it an 8 for humor.--User:CandidToaster/sig 00:23, July 2, 2011 (UTC)
- Meh, I was probably feeling generous given it was my 1st review. I did give you 11 more points in total for Nazi Hover Tank than for Lake Baikal however. As I said, put it up for a 2nd review, now is a prime time to put something on PR because users are being urged to review the backlog. 23:16, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
|
Lollipop 
