User talk:Under user/Archive 29
GRAPE CAPE RAP[edit source]
TAPE--
10:31, June 7, 2010 (UTC)- Big mistake. I don't ask much on my talk page, but nice though it is to see you Doc (and it is good to see you), that is one of the things I ask people not to do. And I'm very serious. --UU - natter 10:36, Jun 7
- Sorry about that old bean! I actually didn't notice that part of your talk page instruction. I just saw the archive action on recent changes and knee jerked because someone always beats me to it. I was long overdue for my first ban but didn't want to actually offend anyone to accomplish that - so sorry! ;-) --
- I had something actually witty planned for UU's archive- oh well, I must watch his actions more carefully next time...-- On Monday, 03:25, June 07 2010 UTC
11:26, June 7, 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry about that old bean! I actually didn't notice that part of your talk page instruction. I just saw the archive action on recent changes and knee jerked because someone always beats me to it. I was long overdue for my first ban but didn't want to actually offend anyone to accomplish that - so sorry! ;-) --
VFH[edit source]
Since you're removing items, Death is both ineligable and has been renamed, and Padddy is working on the new version, so the entry is invalid in about six ways. Thanks. Aleister sans chains 12:06 6 6 MMX
Bah[edit source]
Sorry 'bout that. It seems i've forgotten where to stick various things in my absence. Read into that as you will. I'll make note to re-read all the shite and instructions we have at the tops of pages in case i've forgotten anything else!
Jun 9, 16:02I'm confused and terrified![edit source]
I was directed here upon learning that the article "Rowdy Rod's Big Bible-Based Book Of Birds N' Bees For Bible-Believing Boys" had been, as you folks say, huffed. Do I want a copy back? I guess I do, though I'm not really sure what the hell is going on.--WiWiJumbo 07:26, June 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Look here.... -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
Thanks there[edit source]
A smurf was about to make love to my behind, but you intervened just in time. I am truly grateful. Thanks for sticking up for me.
21:37, 16 June 2010- No worries, I am the Wiki's number one choice for anti-Smurf molestation protection. --UU - natter 10:37, Jun 17
So, When did you choose to become left-handed?[edit source]
Just curious cos, I mean, it's not really normal is it? Also, life? going good? Orian57 Talk 02:01 17 June 2010
- If the right side of the brain controls the left side of the body, then only left-handed people are in their right minds. Or something. I'm a weird lefty anyway - I write left-handed, and play pool left-handed, but play racquet sports and use scissors right-handed. It's like I can't commit fully to the left-handed lifestyle. And life is OK, if a little sombre right now - just attended my Gran's funeral (actually, she was left-handed too, now I think about it). Very proud that she got to meet her great-granddaughter before she passed away - she always wanted to be a great-grandmother. Sorry to be a bit of a bringdown, but you did ask. How's you? --UU - natter 10:41, Jun 17
- I eat my food with the cutlery in the wrong hands, but for everything else I'm righthanded. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
- much the same actually. My grandfather died recently aswell so I have to go to wales next week for his funeral. Still can't quite get back into the swing of this place, and I have a job now so I'm always tierd and grumpy. just thought I'd drop by though see what was up. sorry to hear about your gran. She must've had some really good innings, though, considering how old you are. :P Orian57 Talk 16:50 17 June 2010
- /hugs UU and Orian. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 16:54, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Orian dropped by and didn't even talk to me? I'm sad now...--On Thursday, 04:56, June 17 2010 UTC
- You said you don't want me touching you so here. /hands HELPME baby lotion and a box of Kleenex. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 16:59, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
- You touched that, so I can't use it. I don't want to get an STD.--On Thursday, 05:11, June 17 2010 UTC
- You said you don't want me touching you so here. /hands HELPME baby lotion and a box of Kleenex. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 16:59, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Dude. Losing people sucks (even though my gran was 95, she just seemed unstoppable). My thoughts are with you. As to getting back into the swing of this place, sometimes you click, sometimes you don't, you know? I've had a few periods when I seriously thought I'd done all I could here and wasn't going to come back because I couldn't get into the mindset. Then something happened, and I clicked again. And ended up writing some of my best articles, now I come to think of it. Don't worry about it, you're still the funny guy you always were, and you'll fire again, just don't try to force it! --UU - natter 21:34, Jun 19
I use left-handed mouse and touchpad. I play football prefering kicks by left foot. I open bottles with left hand. But I write with right hand and play darts with right as well. I was ambidexterous lacrosse and pool player. Am I weird then?. Sir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 22:53, June 18, 2010 (UTC)
- No more than me. Actually, that's not hugely helpful, now I think about it... --UU - natter 21:34, Jun 19
Hey[edit source]
I've been absent for some time. However, I've seen you had done a fantastic job with Mark Robinson. I laughed much. Great, great work. So, is it done yet? Let me know when it's finished. Cheers. (And sorry for my rusty English. I've seen that you sent me to learn to spell :P Well. Fast fingers :P)
Sir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 22:49, June 18, 2010 (UTC)
- Glad you like what I've done Ptok - I'm nearly there, hope to be finished this week. I'm enjoying it; as I said, I loved your ideas, and I'm trying to keep as many as possible. And don't you dare apologise for your English, it's very good for someone who isn't a native speaker (I speak not a word of Poloish, and until I can speak your language, I will never ridicule your abilities in mine). --UU - natter 21:38, Jun 19
So I was all like hey and you were all like bitch what's up and I was all like shooting you in the knee caps for calling me a bitch[edit source]
You remember this right? Just wondered if you were fit to apologise yet? Orian57 Talk 08:40 22 June 2010
- Never apologise, never surrender....what are you, French or something? -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
- I never apologise for anything. I'm sorry, but that's just the way I am. Also, what? --UU - natter 12:04, Jun 22
- Shup Nigga' I, like, aint taking no shit from you! Orian57 Talk 16:30 22 June 2010
- Oh, I finished ME2 a while back, BTW. You've probably forgotten all about it, but as I've had to steal short plays in between looking after the bairn, I'm only now on my second playthrough. And it's been improved a lot by the patch that speeds up the scanning, let me tell you. Also, as you suspected, none of my team died. I am somewhat of a perfectionist about doing everything I can first time round. And it is indeed a fine game. But a Human Reaper? WTF? --UU - natter 20:16, Jun 22
- oh brilliant! =D I still haven't got that achievment yet Jack and miranda fell out and then the miranda died. couldn't resolve it either because I'd been more "grey" with my choices. I've done a bit on my third play through as an evil woman so hopefully I'll get it this time because I really wanna see the proper ending. On an xbox break at the minute anyway. old one is threatening to die so I'm gonna sell it to someone and upgrade to the slim model which is out soon. will probably go back to ME2 and play the DLC bits. Haven't played it since it was patched either, so that'll be fun to see. Impossible to forget about though -- it's a complete epic. currently been playing my wii and going through the metroid prime series again -- fuck those games were immense! Orian57 Talk 12:08 23 June 2010
- with regard to reaper, I have no idea. I suppose the reapers in their infinite wisdome decided to model their scary monsters on the scariest monsters in the galaxy. Or some other pathetic sci-fi metaphor. did find it a shame that the bug men used to be the protheons though, I kinda liked them. Orian57 Talk 12:16 23 June 2010
- oh brilliant! =D I still haven't got that achievment yet Jack and miranda fell out and then the miranda died. couldn't resolve it either because I'd been more "grey" with my choices. I've done a bit on my third play through as an evil woman so hopefully I'll get it this time because I really wanna see the proper ending. On an xbox break at the minute anyway. old one is threatening to die so I'm gonna sell it to someone and upgrade to the slim model which is out soon. will probably go back to ME2 and play the DLC bits. Haven't played it since it was patched either, so that'll be fun to see. Impossible to forget about though -- it's a complete epic. currently been playing my wii and going through the metroid prime series again -- fuck those games were immense! Orian57 Talk 12:08 23 June 2010
- Oh, I finished ME2 a while back, BTW. You've probably forgotten all about it, but as I've had to steal short plays in between looking after the bairn, I'm only now on my second playthrough. And it's been improved a lot by the patch that speeds up the scanning, let me tell you. Also, as you suspected, none of my team died. I am somewhat of a perfectionist about doing everything I can first time round. And it is indeed a fine game. But a Human Reaper? WTF? --UU - natter 20:16, Jun 22
- Shup Nigga' I, like, aint taking no shit from you! Orian57 Talk 16:30 22 June 2010
Here's some personal info about me[edit source]
I'm 18. My real name is Carl. Um... I have like five or six hard drives that I'm not using. I'm watching CNN. My mother wants me to wake her up later. And I like you. A lot. No homo. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 11:55, June 22, 2010 (UTC)
- You say that like I didn't already know. Did you forget that, as an admin, I have access to Mordillo's unrivalled spy network, and as such know more about you than you do? --UU - natter 12:03, Jun 22
- Then can you tell me why she left me? MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 12:05, June 22, 2010 (UTC)
Nice edit summary ;-)[edit source]
I assume my recent contributions are unlikely to be deleted as vandalism on this project. I may contribute more, with purdy pictures in the near future. Does the project use categories? ;-) — Rt Hon. LRC (non-MSP) / Humbug! 13:07, June 22, 2010 (UTC)
- Categories? You need to talk to the expert! As to deletion for vandalism: as long as you don't break the rules, you should fit right in. --UU - natter 13:17, Jun 22
- Yes, you can ask me anything. Also, the answer is "yes." I'm glad I could be of help.
- Heh. Quite. Thank you for being more helpful than I usually expect from technical support. --— Rt Hon. LRC (non-MSP) / Humbug! 13:58, June 22, 2010 (UTC)
- You're obviously talking to the wrong people then. You need to talk with these guys. ~ 20:22, June 22, 2010 (UTC)
13:22, 22 June 2010
- Yes, you can ask me anything. Also, the answer is "yes." I'm glad I could be of help.
How's it going[edit source]
I havent talk to you in a while. I really don't see you alot nowadays.--DirectorWILLYOU 333 14:53, June 22, 2010 (UTC)
- That's at least partly because I haven't been here much - my new daughter now takes up most of my free time. How are you? --UU - natter 20:17, Jun 22
- I told you to wear a condom. But did you listen? No. Little bastard.--On Tuesday, 08:23, June 22 2010 UTC
- Bitch, get off my turf! Orian57 Talk 23:35 22 June 2010
- But it's so nice and artificial!--On Tuesday, 11:55, June 22 2010 UTC
- Get. Off. My turf. BITCH. Orian57 Talk 23:56 22 June 2010
- Did you even get my pun?--On Tuesday, 11:59, June 22 2010 UTC
- What pun!? Is this one of those american things when some one says you were being stupid you claim a non existent higher meaning that nobody understands because you're an idiot? Orian57 Talk 00:01 23 June 2010
- I don't think 'bastard' is a pun when you abduct a child is it? ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* ~ ~ 23 Jun 2010 ~ 00:10 (UTC)
- ooh hurra. child abuse jokes. I missed thouse. Orian57 Talk 00:13 23 June 2010
- Quick question: So you have six kids, UU? God your wife is such a whore. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 12:30, June 23, 2010 (UTC)
- ooh hurra. child abuse jokes. I missed thouse. Orian57 Talk 00:13 23 June 2010
- I don't think 'bastard' is a pun when you abduct a child is it? ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* ~ ~ 23 Jun 2010 ~ 00:10 (UTC)
- What pun!? Is this one of those american things when some one says you were being stupid you claim a non existent higher meaning that nobody understands because you're an idiot? Orian57 Talk 00:01 23 June 2010
- Did you even get my pun?--On Tuesday, 11:59, June 22 2010 UTC
- Get. Off. My turf. BITCH. Orian57 Talk 23:56 22 June 2010
- But it's so nice and artificial!--On Tuesday, 11:55, June 22 2010 UTC
- Bitch, get off my turf! Orian57 Talk 23:35 22 June 2010
- I told you to wear a condom. But did you listen? No. Little bastard.--On Tuesday, 08:23, June 22 2010 UTC
I'm doing fine, thanks for asking--If you're 555 then I'm 03:12, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
Twanks![edit source]
no really, i exist[edit source]
damn it's easy how two months can go by when you're meaning to really try to come back to uncyc the whole time. good to see you're around, anyway. 01:11, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Wow, I gotta stop eating cheese before bedtime. I'm hallucinating a Gerrycheevers, whatever one of those is. Perhaps if it were to write an article, I'd remember? (Hope you're having a good summer Gerry). --UU - natter 08:07, Jun 24
- I happened to drop by this talkpage and what do I see? I don't believe it! An actual Gerrycheevers! It's not just a creature of myths and legends, it's a real creature of myths and legends! Hi Gerry! 13:48, 24 June 2010
The UnSignpost Is Not Dead![edit source]
Now With 0 Trans Fat!
Jun 24th, 2010 • Issue 86 • Oh yeah, the UnSignpost, I remember that...
Conservation Week Approaches
Fancy watering Uncyclopedia's forestry? Want to be a good conservationist? Fancy taking up the rewriting sword of justice, and righteously smiting the dragon of shit writing? Actually, the hell with that, do you want to take a bunch of bad articles, and make them suck less? Then you, my friend, are in luck! Conservation Week 2010 starts on July 5th, and actively encourages users to scour the wiki (perhaps through judicious use of Special:Random, or possibly through exploration of Category:Rewrite or Category:Ideas or even Special:Lonelypages), find lame articles that they consider are taking up the very space which could be occupied by something less sucky, and then using their skill and judgement to turn those articles into shining examples of comedic writing. As this is a competition dedicated to simultaneously reducing the number of useless articles on the wiki and increasing the number of good ones, some naysayers believe it to be completely pointless - Uncyclopedia is the worst, they say, and no amount of well-intentioned competitions can change that. But were it to exist, the Cabal would probably beg to differ. They may call it something like "a genuinely good thing", and "a ray of hope, signalling that occasionally, even the most worthless dreck may be redeemed". So if you think what your userpage is missing is a template called the "Greasy Mechanic Award", then prepare to rewrite like you've never re-written before. Just don't forget to make your new version better than the original. Something summarizing the events of the last month or so It has been said by one of our esteemed administrators here at UnSignpost that if it wasn't reported in the UnSignpost, then it didn't happen. As there has been no UnSignpost produced for the last few days, due to one of the editors having a real life, and another one being lazy, there are several things that didn't happen. Yes, the loss of the UnSignpost for so long sent a shiver down the spines of many an Uncyclopedian. So much so that one member of the community decided that it was timely to look at a new way to produce the UnSignpost. One such idea was to release a monthly periodical in the place of USP. Although there has been several attempts by this reporter to obtain a quote from said insurrectional community member, to date no response has been heard. As part of the ongoing struggle to maintain our independent stance from Wikia, several members decided that it would be a wise idea to create a way to cash in on the popularity of the site. As such the UnShoppe has been created, where you may purchase any one of a number of Uncyclopedia-related pieces of merchandise. So far all purchases have been made by the individuals who created the store. However, if you are looking for the place to buy a shirt that shows that your nipples have been featured, that a wizard did something, whatever it was, and that you have an in-depth knowledge of who Dan Kwon is. There was a competition. Congratulations go to mrthejazz, who got the pun. Imperial Colonisation has taken a brief hiatus after the new head of IC became the old head of IC. He was an Australian, and his example has inspired the entire nation so much that the new head of Parliament for the country is now the old head of parliament. Congratulations go out to the new new head of IC. A strange bandwagon has been created by a drunken Bonner, who has challenged all and sundry to ask him anything at all. As such there are various forums dedicated to asking regular Uncyclopedian members things. These previously were known as user talk pages, but who can stand in the way of progress? And that's all that didn't happen. Although now it's listed in UnSignpost that means it actually did happen. Which suggests that by editing UnSignpost I have the power to change the past. If I could change anything about the past, what would it be? I had sex with a real person![1]
|
| ||||||
UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox
|
A new UnSignpost issue, another template spammed onto your talkpage, enjoy!
13:43, 24 June 2010Aid?[edit source]
Can you please help me with this article? User:Joe9320/Princess Daisy. You deleted this article, so I'm getting you to help me fix this up. 05:37, June 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Honestly Joe? No, I can't. I have no knowledge of, or interest in the subject, two vital prerequisites for me to write anything. Sorry. --UU - natter 09:01, Jun 25
Since your looking like a Chinese court with the bans today, how about a soothing read...[edit source]
Hey there UU, I hope you are keeping well and haven't gone on the traditional post-natal "Get the fuck outta here and pray to God that you dodge the child support bullet" and also remain ideologically pure. I wrote another abomination: Why?:Mads Mikkelsen does not speak one line of dialogue in Valhalla Rising, rather than have a full review any impressions would be very appreciated:)--Sycamore (Talk) 11:41, June 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Oh crap, I totally forgot about this Syc, I'm not ignoring you, honest. I'll try to have a look tomorrow or thursday - giving me a reminder nudge would probably help. --UU - natter 21:06, Jun 29
Cześć[edit source]
Hey, shall I put Mark Robinson on Pee Review queue or are you going to work on this in nearby future? ;) Sir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 21:20, June 27, 2010 (UTC)
- On a completely unrelated matter, I was in Poland this week for two days. I made you proud Ptok. ~ 21:30, June 27, 2010 (UTC)
The list[edit source]
Hi UU, just a minor matter. Next month I will be disappearing off on my holidays since the nothing I get up to most of the time exhausts me so much. The reason I'm letting you know is to see if you would be able to check Cajek's list for that 2 weeks or so, if you aren't able to and nobody else who knows how wants to, then I will just do the lot when I get back. Let me know. --ChiefjusticePS2 21:34, June 27, 2010 (UTC)
- Hey Chief, I might be able to do it while you're gone, since I'm pretty much a sure-in for ROTM. Of course, I might be getting in over my head, but I have LOTS of time to do nothing at all. I'm saying this because I think UU might be too busy- unless he's not.--On Sunday, 09:43, June 27 2010 UTC
- HELPME - that would be handy. How about you have a go and I keep an eye on what you're doing? I'll be sure to point out any bits you miss! --UU - natter 09:51, Jun 28
- Well, I have a review of my own that needs checking...so someone besides me should probably do that. I'd be happy to do it, otherwise.--On Monday, 08:13, June 28 2010 UTC
- HELPME - that would be handy. How about you have a go and I keep an eye on what you're doing? I'll be sure to point out any bits you miss! --UU - natter 09:51, Jun 28
come on feel the noiz can i play with madnes[edit source]
I win. ~ 20:57, June 29, 2010 (UTC)
- WELL?!?!? ~ 08:07, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
- You win, are you kidding? Necropaxx spotted what I was doing there months ago. If anything, you redefine the word "lose". --UU - natter 08:09, Jun 30
- What? When? How? I'll kick your ass! I also bet that I change a diaper must faster than you! ~ 08:18, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Probably do. But I bet I do a better job! --UU - natter 08:21, Jun 30
- That's an easy one, you don't have a tool you need to control as part of the changing. ~ 08:40, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Probably do. But I bet I do a better job! --UU - natter 08:21, Jun 30
- What? When? How? I'll kick your ass! I also bet that I change a diaper must faster than you! ~ 08:18, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
- You win, are you kidding? Necropaxx spotted what I was doing there months ago. If anything, you redefine the word "lose". --UU - natter 08:09, Jun 30
Hey dood[edit source]
So, I'd like to contribute to the USP (or whatever it's going to be), but I feel like just dropping yarns and letting the rest be handled. I'd like to write a biopic about Shandon sometime. And a few others things. So if it's fine with you, might I just drop them off on your talk page from now on? --EMC [TALK] 04:29 Jun 30 2010
- I'd prefer if you dropped them either in the press room or even directly into the latest issue (there;s alaways a link on my userpage). But I'd be glad of any contributions you have - lob 'em in and be thanked! --UU - natter 08:04, Jun 30
Mordillo's and your ban-fest[edit source]
Reminded me of a toy my eldest used to have. It was this plush star that when you squeezed it it played this tinny unrecognizable tune. It was one of his favourites, and I blame it for his lack of musical talent. It did what these toys invariably do and got stuck playing the same tune over and over. Tried hitting it to make it stop. Then jumped on it. Then hit it with a hammer. Then cut it in two with a pair of shears. Then dropped in a bucket of water and left it under the water for 24 hours. It still kept playing the same tune. If only they used that same technology on pacemakers... Nominally Humane! some time Wednesday, 09:39, Jun 30 2010 UTC
- Oh we have a myriad of noise-causing implements, without which it seems my daughter's life would not be worth living. I am currently at the "still able to tolerate them and find her enthusiasm for them cute" stage, but I suspect this will not last much longer. Also, how is it that her baby gym plays 3 different tunes when activated, but she alwyas manages to keep rattling it until it plays the most annoying one again and again? It's like she's discovered that extra rattling acts as a "skip back to most annoying tune again" function. It's unerring. --UU - natter 11:36, Jun 30
- I have that tune stuck in my head. MAKE IT STOP! I CAN'T TAKE IT ANYMORE! ~ 12:16, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Hey - at least yours aren't old enough to put on Frankie Valley and ABBA on your stereo. Nominally Humane! some time Wednesday, 13:18, Jun 30 2010 UTC
- I have that tune stuck in my head. MAKE IT STOP! I CAN'T TAKE IT ANYMORE! ~ 12:16, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
Fantasy (American) Football[edit source]
Wasn't expecting you to sign up. Don't get me wrong, it's cool that you have, though. Perhaps now, through inadvertently being exposed to American Football, you will realize its wholesale superiority to the pathetic game you Brits and the rest of the globe calls "football" that actually involves men kicking balls with their feet. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 13:14, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Oh I've had some exposure, if I'm honest. My school went through a brief but intense flirtation with it. Watched everything we could (and in the days before cable and the internet, damn that was hard), and even tried having a few friendly games over the local park with our limited knoweldge of the rules. These were of limited success, although my stellar career as a sort of de facto wide-ish receiver during this period included 5 catches from 5, three touchdowns and one big argument (over whether I was fully past the bag that marked the start of the endzone before being launched into orbit over the sideline by the biggest kid in the year - it was eventually decided I hadn't when he offered the argument that he'd twat me if I didn't agree with him). But that was *cough cough cough* years ago, and I never understood much of it then. I enjoy the pomp and circumstance for more than the sporadic action though - it always has baffled me, but in an interested kind of way. We'll see what happens. If a twelfth person signs up! --UU - natter 15:20, Jun 30
Judge For Nastiest Meanest Thing to Say Contest[edit source]
Hey man, I need a judge for this, I would do it myself but I already enter myself in the contest. Thanks--If you're 555 then I'm 03:11, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Uh, not my kind of thing man. I'm nice. Try Mordillo. Everyone knows he's a big meanie. --UU - natter 11:11, Jul 1
All the news that's unfit to print![edit source]
The Newspaper With No Ambitions, Goals, Hopes or Dreams!
Jul 1st, 2010 • Issue 87 • More news than something with less news than us
Things getting boring on the wiki? Time to write at speed!
We're still waiting for that, but until it arrives, Skull's hour-long writing contest will do nicely. Shamelessly pinching Cajek's idea of time-limited writing competitions (which brought us such classics as HowTo:Sexually Stimulate an Ant, lest we forget), but putting his own distinct spin on it, Uncyc's own mad Doctor challenged Uncyclopedians to write an article in a single hour that would survive VFD. Given Uncyclopedia's well-known exacting quality standards, this promised to be a tough task, but a surprising number of people were up for it. And so it was that a frenzy erupted across the wiki, and baffled Europeans and other users not around at the time awoke the next day to a slew of brand new articles, not all of which ended up being deleted. They liked the idea so much, they held their own a couple of days later. When asked to comment on his brainchild, the commotion and excitement it had caused, and the size of his penis, Dr. Skullthumper exclusively told us "Sure. I'll get on that. I swear". Things getting boring on the wiki? Time to start pointless drama! Giant evil multinational wiki-hosting conglomerate Wikia won a major victory last month, when a rebellion by a small but dedicated band of anti-capitalist radicals was brutally put down by a bunch of fascistic Wikia-collaborators. Or at least, that's what happened in the heads of Carlb, Roye7777777 and CartoonistHenning after they nailed their anti-Wikia manifesto to the metaphorical door of Uncyclopedia's metaphorical Wittenberg Cathedral. The 1,000-word anti-Wikia tract, despite the shocking and previously unknown revelation that Wikia was not in fact the wiki-hosting charity that it claimed to be, but rather a commercial company, failed to ignite a spontaneous revolt against Wikia among the Uncyclopedia community. A heated and sexually-charge discussion ensued, with strong arguments offered by both sides. However, it seems that some people were unable to grasp the enormity of the revelation that Wikia's motives were less than altruistic. Eventually, the thread descended into an all-out flamewar and a waaaaaaaaaaaaaahmbulance was called to treat the injured. "We may have lost this round," Carlb told UnSignpost reporters "but it is only a temporary setback. One day, the tyranny of Wikia will be no more. Our revenge will be the laughter of our children." It is rumoured that Carlb, Roye7777777 and CartoonistHenning will employ Black Bloc tactics at the next Wikia conference in an attempt to escalate the struggle against Wikia oppression. |
| ||||
UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox |
--ChiefjusticePS2 12:06, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
You know...[edit source]
We never did write fear and loathing. --Sog1970 10:53, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, Mhaille has been prodding me on that just this week, and added an idea or two. It's here, if you want to take a look and add to it. I hope to give it some serious attention at the weekend, family permitting! --UU - natter 11:00, Jul 2
- I did write a quick summary and then lose it. I'll see if I can find it. --Sog1970 13:33, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
You Have a very strong badness about you[edit source]
Says I. What you gonna do! Not ban me surely you wouldn't sink so low as to not ban me! Orian57 Talk 20:48 2 July 2010
- Er, what? Did your dad leave the top off his aftershave again or something? --UU - natter 06:52, Jul 3
Mind Voting for this[edit source]
Mind voting for this. Appreciate it!--If you're 555 then I'm 21:14, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
- OK, I was trying to be subtle last time, but here: Please do not whore your nominations. What I mean is telling everyone about something that is up for VFH, or anything else, really. In fact, UU even has something in his little talk header thingy asking people not to whore their nominations. Don't worry, it's a common mistake. I'm just letting you know that it's bad before you face UU's wrath.--On Saturday, 03:22, July 03 2010 UTC
- Alright, I understand. You really didnt make it clear at first, but now I understand. My aplogies, I din't know that is an unwise thing to do.--If you're 555 then I'm 03:49, July 3, 2010 (UTC)
- What he said. I do warn people nice and clearly at the top of the page there. If I find your article funny, I vote. When I'm active, I always check VFH. You'll have noticed that with your other noms... I know you apologised, but as I said, consistency is my watchword: everyone who whores on this page gets their ass banned. But I kept it short, because you apologised. --UU - natter 06:51, Jul 3
- Told you I wasn't a big meany. ~ 07:00, July 3, 2010 (UTC)
- I thought whoring was vandalism. Whats wrong with it?--If you're 555 then I'm 07:34, July 3, 2010 (UTC)
- Can I at least put crack whores on your page?--If you're 555 then I'm 07:42, July 3, 2010 (UTC)
- People find whoring annoying, and I can kind of see why. Sometimes I intentionally avoid a nomination or simply plan on voting later, and whoring is a waste of time and bytes. So, the moral of the story: Only whore to your friends, and if somebody has something along the lines of "no whoring you ugly loser fuck" on the top of their talk page, DON'T WHORE THERE!--On Saturday, 07:54, July 03 2010 UTC
- One of my biggest problems with whoring is that it can stack the deck quite heavily - people who haven't voted for ages suddenly go and vote for their mate's article because they asked them to, regardless of how good it is. And they ignore the other articles on the queue. I've seen some brilliant articles not featured at the same time as mediocre ones that were heavily whored catpulted on to the front page. Can't stop that, but I do not like it, and I'm not interested in being whored to as a result. If your article deserves my vote, it'll get it. End of. --UU - natter 08:53, Jul 5
- I thought whoring was vandalism. Whats wrong with it?--If you're 555 then I'm 07:34, July 3, 2010 (UTC)
- Told you I wasn't a big meany. ~ 07:00, July 3, 2010 (UTC)
- What he said. I do warn people nice and clearly at the top of the page there. If I find your article funny, I vote. When I'm active, I always check VFH. You'll have noticed that with your other noms... I know you apologised, but as I said, consistency is my watchword: everyone who whores on this page gets their ass banned. But I kept it short, because you apologised. --UU - natter 06:51, Jul 3
- Alright, I understand. You really didnt make it clear at first, but now I understand. My aplogies, I din't know that is an unwise thing to do.--If you're 555 then I'm 03:49, July 3, 2010 (UTC)
You Sir![edit source]
How about writing something together on Mass Effect? If I don't get someone to help me pull out of my laziness, Immma gonna never write no notin again. ~ 15:33, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Wow, that puts me in a situation. As one of my favourite writers on this site, the thought of you not writing again would seriously depress me. On the other hand, I've thought about a Mass Effect article and really, really can't find any spark of inspiration for writing one. I just can't think of any way I'd be interested to write about it. Perhaps you could have a word with Orian? He had previously told me he was going to completely rewrite that article and stop it being a pile of suck. Then he did nothing. I need a nudge to get me out of my rut myself, but I'm not sure Mass Effect is the one. Tell you what - I liked the idea of User:DJ Irreverent/Magic, and he asked me to collab on it, but we never really got going, then he vanished. How do you like the idea of that one? --UU - natter 15:57, Jul 5
- Yeah, that looks like a cool subject to work for. Will take my mind of the Trolopedia this place has become recently. Let me know when you wahtr to start. ~ 11:18, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
- Lies! I'm pretty sure I blanked the page and then never saved it. That was tottally a good start. Am up for trying to work some angles on ME, though I "did nothing" because my vaugue idea never fully formed and was rubbish anyway. seems everyone is just stuck rutting nowadays. I think I have an original Orian article that may work though: How's "UnBooks:Not Another Post-Nuclear-Apocolypse Novel" sound? I've read a rash of them recently so I can only assume everyone else has. Also I think I have a bit of a straight crush on Miley Cyrus. Am a bad person? Orian57 Talk 22:23 5 July 2010
- You have a straight crush on Miley? Sicko! Nominally Humane! some time Tuesday, 11:36, Jul 6 2010 UTC
- Sunds like a good thing. The article idea, that is. The crush - hey, whatever floats your boat, I guess. It would be worse if you had a crush on her dad. That would be wrong whatever your sexuality. --UU - natter 08:55, Jul 7
Please delete this article[edit source]
Can you please delete Fnord and redirect it to Fnord (car maker)? The two articles are too similar. 08:54, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
- What, you mean delete an article we've had since 2005, and replace it with a redirect to your pointless copy? No, I can't do that. I can delete your pointless copy and redirect it to the actual article, and you make any changes you want to the actual article, how's that sound? --UU - natter 09:01, Jul 6
- One is a PLS-nominated-but-lost article, the other is just old. Otherwise, delete pointless copy. The actual article is a copy of my one. 10:46, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
- Wrong. You article is a copy of an article that has been here for ages. With very few changes. In fact, you might as well just have made those changes to the old article and had done with it. As it stands, it looks like a copy, and that's it. Which is probably why it lost in the PLS. And the most logical place for the article is under the original title, not under your version, which is a logical place for a redirect. I'd probably make your changes to the original, transfer the PLS tag across to it, and delete your version and make that the redirect. I'm not doing it the other way. Clear? --UU - natter 11:16, Jul 7
- One is a PLS-nominated-but-lost article, the other is just old. Otherwise, delete pointless copy. The actual article is a copy of my one. 10:46, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
Sir I require your aid.[edit source]
My humblest apologies for this here interruption of you normal life, it has come to my attention that a previous article which I much enjoyed has been huffed by you, the note on it redirects me to this abode. The article in question happens to be Gantz-0, I would very much like a copy of it to be back. So how can this be resolved?-- ~ Hard to port!!! <font-size:9px;" color=red> Kamariel 06:03, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
- By suckling at the fruit of the magic anus. Orian57 Talk 18:32 6 July 2010
- Ignore the odd Scottish type there, I've restored the article and put it in your userspace here. I suggest you work on it a little there before moving it to mainspace - make it a little more presentable, and spend a little more time with HTBFANJS to make it a bit more amusing. Good luck! --UU - natter 08:53, Jul 7
- Sure thing, I'll get working on it right away, thank you for your help. -- ~ Hard to port!!! <font-size:9px;" color=red> Kamariel 19:20, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
- Ignore the odd Scottish type there, I've restored the article and put it in your userspace here. I suggest you work on it a little there before moving it to mainspace - make it a little more presentable, and spend a little more time with HTBFANJS to make it a bit more amusing. Good luck! --UU - natter 08:53, Jul 7
VFD[edit source]
Can you tell me why and how the "no editing" thing got on VFD? Did somebody put that there? I can't find what's causing the problem.--On Wednesday, 05:46, July 07 2010 UTC
- It wasn't. It was put on Sawblade5's sig, which was then put on the page, causing the lock. I've removed it from his sig and given him a little warning ban. Should take care of it. --UU - natter 08:50, Jul 7
- Ah - can't help but feel a tad responsible on that one. I pointed out to a few people in a few places how to do that trick - in fact it smells like my work, but in a bad way. I should have thought before screaming from the rooftops This is how to break Uncyclopedia. I apologise for any unintentional accessory to vandalism. Nominally Humane! some time Wednesday, 11:50, Jul 7 2010 UTC
RE: So, that biopic[edit source]
Done. And as Shandon's personal friend, this is more scathing and true than you may realize. --EMC [TALK] 13:17 Jul 7 2010
- How about Brad? He just recently retired. A posthumous biopic seems fitting for him. There are, in fact, many forgotten oldtimers who I'd like to write biopics about, including Tompkins (he lives in Iowa with me; we are a glum lot) and Sir Cornbread (he held my hand during my first few months of Uncyclopedia back in 06 and deserves some disrespect if you ask me). --EMC [TALK] 14:11 Jul 7 2010
Signpost: normal service resumed[edit source]
Because Uncyclopedia is no laughing matter.
Jul 8th, 2010 • Issue 88 • Hand-stitched for comfort
Conservation week: how's it going, and what is it anyway?
Conservation week has been running since autumn 2007, starting life in Jocke Pirat's userspace, and spending a confused few hours being called the rewrite-a-thon in an early attempt to get around the whole week-fortnight thing. The first iteration was a resounding success, and about 38 people signed up to rewrite over 50 articles (with Zombiebaron hilariously missing the point and going on a deletion spree instead), making the current iteration look like it has some work to do. However, there was no quality control at the outset - if an article was rewritten in any way, that was deemed good enough. Some of those early articles may well have been made worse, we just don't know (or can't be bothered to check). Quality control arrived later on, when erstwhile gentleman editor of this very organ Gerrycheevers stepped up to run the first 2009 CW, and ran the rule over all the rewrites personally, so that the attendant award was only bestowed on those doing quality rewrites. That task this year falls to Dexter111344, who has promised to be "harsh but harsh". Probably. So, with a prize on offer to the person with the most high quality rewrites, and plenty of time left in which to do said rewrites, the only question left is: "why haven't you entered yet"? We asked this question of one completely random user, and he exclusively told us "because I'm busy writing this week's issue of the UnSignpost, duh!" Image Request: A Retrospective
Established in March 2005 by a user called Machinecurse, this page has been the domain of most of the legends of Uncyc image manipulation at one time or another - as one 'chopper has left, another has arisen to take their place, in some kind of Potatochop Royal Succession stylee. Or something. Whatever, the likes of Paulgb, Zombiebaron, Seeker, Sonje and, more recently, KneeChee27 and MeepStarLives have slaved over hot image editing software to fulfil the esoteric image requirements of the Uncyclopedia populace. The response time has always varied on the page, as it largely depends on how active the 'choppers are at the time, how achievable the requests actually are, and how polite the request is. But for those with a little patience, it is undoubtedly a useful resource in the ongoing quest for that perfect image of Mario and Master Chief riding Pikachu down the Death Star Trench run. Or something. Have a look at the gallery to see some of the more recent work. |
| |||||
UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox |
Oh dear god, am I really doing this again? --UU - natter 10:49, Jul 9
- You know.....you could probably get away with making UnSignpost a weekly rather than a daily.....unless you can get a load more writers involved.... -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
Yet Another Worthless Award[edit source]
As YOU voted for BIBLE! to be featured on the front page,
this FRAMED, VERY RARE and HIGH COLLECTIBLE
JESUS AND LINDSAY LOHAN
issue of the magazine is YOURS TO KEEP!
Generations to come will thank you for this wonderful keepsake.
Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 11:30, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
I never really said this, so..[edit source]
I'm sorry. As an SK in PEEING, I should have known better than to book that for "a few days". I prevented others from being helpful. I won ROTM even, so I shouldn't do stupid things like this. I am held to a higher standard and I failed to live up to it.
And before you think I'm sucking up, you should know that I tend to beat myself up about stuff. The longer I go without apologizing, the worse I feel.
So, yeah. Sorry. Also, when you finally finish changing diapers all day, you should do a review! You don't want to take Boomer's title, do you? ;) (I know about all of this because I read award and talk archives in my spare time. I am a bored stalker.)--On Friday, 07:52, July 09 2010 UTC
- You. Are such a queen. (Although I know exactly what you mean, I routinely get chewed up by the worms of guilt). And it's "nappies". Seriously. Fucking Americans. Orian57 Talk 20:38 10 July 2010
- I couldn't work out what you two were talking about then, and then I realised that you meant crap-bags Nominally Humane! some time Sunday, 20:59, Jul 11 2010 UTC
- I said my bit, gave the ban, as far as I'm concerned, it's done with. Unless you do it again. And I see it. Of course, if you're that full of remorse, you could always do the review! As for me doing a review, I absolutely fully intend to, when I get time. But I take at least an hour per review, so as to when I'll get a full hour to concentrate on a review... don't hold your breath. I agree with Orian on the "nappies" thing though. Diapers is a stupid word, and always has been. --UU - natter 09:00, Jul 12
Help needed[edit source]
I'm just creating my first game, but I don't know how to create the subpages for the game. Do you just create a new page and link it to the article, or is there are a special way to do it? --Some Idiot 05:37, July 12, 2010 (UTC)
- Simples: you go to the main page of your game, which should be in the game namespace, for instance Game:Your Game Name. Then you go the the address bar of your browser and, after the name of your game, add the subpage name following a slash, and hit enter, giving perhaps Game:Your Game Name/Hit Cuddly-Wuddly Bunny With Bunch Of Daffodils. Then you hit the "create page" option, and voila! Basically, the subpage is done the same as userspace stuff and the like: Pagename/subpage. Clear? Oh, and that pic in your sig is a little too big. Have a look at UN:SIG and make sure it's no taller than 12px high. Ta! --UU - natter 08:56, Jul 12
Two things[edit source]
- You know that a song was written for Celine Dion - shame!
- I forgot the second thing.
Nominally Humane! some time Thursday, 02:17, Jul 15 2010 UTC
- I remembered the second thing... But you don't want to know the details. Nominally Humane! some time Thursday, 03:29, Jul 15 2010 UTC
- Funny - that's my attitude toward pleasuring a sexual partner. Nominally Humane! some time Thursday, 10:51, Jul 15 2010 UTC
Here's this thing[edit source]
My plans for world domination are nearly complete now that HowTo:Survive the Titanic was featured!Thank you for your part in bringing about the end of the world. |
– Preceding unsigned comment added by John Lydon (talk • contribs)
So...[edit source]
...the Pee Queue is backlogged to fuck. When CW ends, you should send out one of those rallying calls to all the members of PEEING so there aren't, like, 35+ articles sitting up there. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 15:53, July 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Is this you telling people what they should do again Guildy? ;-) Seriously, I had thought about it. I'm just trying to find a time when I can do a couple so I don't look like a hypocrite asking everyone else to! --UU - natter 10:11, Jul 16
- Naw, I gave up on the whole "trying to tell people what to do" thing ages ago. There are definitely way too many articles that need to be peed on, though. Saberwolf did just come back, but I feel if we left the duty of clearing out the Pee Queue entirely to him he'd resent it to some extent. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 22:57, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
Re one of your Top 10 of 2009 votes from January 2010[edit source]
Dear Mr/Ms Under user/Archive 29, Greetings. I am the lawyer for Arthur C. Clarke's estate. Last summer, following the listing of an article on this website (henceforth referred to as "Uncyclopedia"), namely the article titled 2001: A Space Odyssey, as a featured article, I and my assistant began to prepare a copyright infringement suit against you, and were about to file it in December 2009 when both of us were attacked violently by the user MacMania, who was imprisoned for his central role in this infringement, but had apparently escaped custody to exact revenge against us. Needless to say, MacMania was once again taken into custody, but we lapsed into a comatose state. However, now that we have woken up, we have found out, much to our chagrin and dismay, that you have further encouraged such infringing actions by selecting 2001: A Space Odyssey as the number 2 article of 2009, and that England once again failed to make the World Cup final. We must, of course, take further action, and would like to notify you that unless Uncyclopedia's administrators take action, we will press the following charges: 1. continued support, encouragement, and flaunting of copyright infringement; 2. indirectly causing severe physical harm to me and my assistant; 3. potentially providing shelter to Paul the Octopus, whose psychic powers clearly drastically demoralized the English national football team against the German team, which is an unspeakably criminal act. We will drop these charges only if you agree to furnish us with a Paul the Octopus voodoo doll* for our perusal. Please let us know if this is possible. Your obedient servant (strictly in a figurative sense) |
Better late than never, or at least that's the thought. (Sorry about the length of this, by the way.) Horribly belated thanks for voting 2001: A Space Odyssey into #2 of 2009! Sir MacMania GUN—[01:48 16 Jul 2010]
Another UnSignpost! Rejoice![edit source]
In Pure Russian Fashion, The Newspaper That Reads YOU!!
Jul 15th, 2010 • Issue 89 • Made with 100% recycled vuvuzelas
The 40+ club expands
We asked them all for quotes, and Mhaille exclusively told us: ""Go eat more shit, fuckers"...obviously I am excited to have reached the BIG 4-0, and am delighted that enough of my peers deem the quality of my work good enough to have reached that figure, although I have to say I'm a little pissed that at least 10 other of my articles are feature-worthy and are constant overlooked (lengthy bans will ensue, I'm sure), I am equally as proud of my featured images, as well as many of my other contributions that I hope that my peers feel have augmented the work of others. That I am still here after five long years, and still contributing says something about Uncyclopedia itself. What that is, I wouldn't like to speculate. But sometimes you have to in order to accumulate. Apparently." Which is such a long quote we're going to need at least one blatant filler box in the right-hand panel. Bastard. Meanwhile, Modus exclusively told us "It's not that myself and Mhaille have written so very many great and fantastic pages that have, and will continue to, entertain the people for years to come. It's just that Mhaille did. "I" am one of his many sockpuppets. He writes as "Modusoperandi" when he needs a page without a "foreign" accent. Look around. There are a bunch more Mhaille sockpuppets here, too. Hyperbole, for one. Mhaille is like a wet Mogwai." Which is more concise, and therefore OK. Finally, Hype exclusively commented: "I'd like to say thank you to Uncyclopedia for voting to feature my many excellent, high-quality articles, including the drunken insistence that you accept a diseased poodle, the song about having sex with sporting goods, and the blatantly racist tirade about having to wait too long for a Pee Review. Writing 39.5 features has been literally the most important accomplishment I will ever have in my life. I look forward to continuing to service each and every one of you in the future." Which was nice of him. So, the burning question now has to be: who will be first to 50? Modus obviously has the lead, but Mhaille is writing in greater volume than he has for some time, and if Hype keeps up the pace, he's probably a good bet. But they're not the only candidates - Sog is coming up the rails rapidly, and could reach the 40 mark even quicker than Hype - could he overtake the lot of them? The only thing certain is that with these guys around, Uncyc should be assured of some half-decent articles amongst the dross. World Cup over - Romartus struggling for UnNews inspiration
The scourge of Junior Uncyclopedia has discovered his muse in the planet's biggest sporting event, and has been cranking out UnNews articles on the subject at an alarming rate. Now, without Jabulani balls, biting tackles and Messi long shots to inspire him, what is there to inspire him to maintain such prolific standards? Suspicions abound that the Tour De France is passing him by, he seems far too English to care about the various draft and transfer shenanigans in the NFL and NBA and the like, and as the only story to emerge from golf's Open Championship so far is Tiger Woods changing his putter (wow, someone hold me back), that seems unlikely to unleash his inner news-hound. With a worrying lack of global sporting tournaments on the horizon, will we have to wait another 4 years for the next Romartus article splurge? Stay tuned to UnNews to find out! |
| |||||
UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox |
09:53, 16 July 2010
Luke Perry[edit source]
I enjoyed your Luke Perry article, and after running the page through that "Who Do You Write Like" and saw that you write like Moe Howard, am much impressed. It demonstrates what a good writer can do with a barren topic such as Mr. Perry. Nice work! Aleister 13:33 16 7
Weegee[edit source]
Hey although my page does say i joined in February, i only have really started with this site a few weeks ago.
I sort of feel that you were a bit harsh on me on my picture. I mean i was trying to make the thing look messy because that's how cat's face actually looks. I actually am good at Photoshop for my age but again i was in a hurry.
And i mean the i made the writing look better then the picture, because that was the whole point of it, it's not the picture it's the caption. And seriously, how does mine have -5 and the one below mine, which is stupid and terrible have +1!
And i know weegee and cats are common, but never together. Memes aren't original, but mixing them can be.
But anyways, whatever, just try to take it easy on the new guys will ya? --Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 18:30, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Hey, I was taking it easy - you should have seen the comments I got on my first VFP submission! People tend to be pretty blunt, particularly when they see a lot of jokey submissions (not unlike the one below yours, which is just a joke (and, as such, people are voting for it as a joke - they know it won't get featured; at least, I hope they do!)
- Also, you missed an older user called Zombiebaron, who would probably just have voted against for it being "text-based" - the idea tends to be that the image should stand alone as a funny image without needing text to make it funny. I agree that in the context of all your base, the text is an integral part of the idea, but that's the way it is.
- Further, it might not be a great idea to put up an image you did in a hurry, people do look for something to look half-decent if it gets featured. And that pic does look a bit slapdash. It does show you have a grasp of the basics, so that's promising, and hopefully you'll go on to create better work, but that, again, is how it is.
- Also, while there can be original takes on memes, just slapping two together doesn't tend to be one of them - people would look for a more interesting or subversive approach, which would probably get you a better response. Don't ask me what - if I had an idea, I'd be making it myself!
- Finally, good luck around the place, I'll always be friendly to new users with the right spirit, but I won't vote leniently for them - I'll try and help them if I can until they deserve the vote. Cheers! --UU - natter 19:23, Jul 16
- UU, in appeciation of you being so nice to Happymonkey, have one of these delicious cookies. Yummmmmm. These are some of the best cookies you can imagine. ummmmmm. Aleister 19:31 16 7
- Actually i just said it was a hash comment cause it was a conversion starter :P. I knew you weren't being rude or anything. And i do now understand why mine got so...well denied, i was kind of confused, i mean i thought it was kind of interesting. But what ever. I'm only 14 and pretty sure most of the common users around here have much more experience with photoshop than I. To tell you the truth Ive only used it for less than a year! On that photo i was trying to capture the tearing of the original memes face...it didn't work out too well. I started to remake it to make it look better however, i feel as i must show that i am capable of...photoshopping....besides i got 100% on every project in my Cyber arts class, two of them being photoshop. But whatever...wait a sec ALEISTER THOSE ARE MY GOD DAMN COOKIES, I'M GETTING TIRED OF YOU TAUTING ME WITH THEM THIS IS IT HAND THEM OVER...long story UU, bottom line is that cookie your currently eating is mine *grabs it out of your hand*...Mmmm, man these took forever to make!--Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 21:39, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
- UU, in appeciation of you being so nice to Happymonkey, have one of these delicious cookies. Yummmmmm. These are some of the best cookies you can imagine. ummmmmm. Aleister 19:31 16 7
Showdown for Cookies[edit source]
Hello there Under User. Congratulations! You have been chosen to be one of our not-so-special judges for the writers showdown that will be between Aleister in Chains and me Happymonkey39. This will be a showdown were we give each other a name of an unwritten article and we must write as much as we can in 1 hour and 15 minutes. Then our 5 judges will choose which article is better overall. A template on how it shall be evaluated will be given later.
This showdown will be held at 10:30EDT, please convert the time yourself. At 11:50EDT each judge will review each article and chose which he finds best. The user with the most votes wins. And yes the prize will be cookies, the loser must give 100 cookies to the winner on the users talk page.
So are you willing to be an unhonorable judge? --Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 16:32, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
(no longer) URGENT[edit source]
Main page vandals! They're ruining the Empire's defences! WikiaRox1337, JujuInTheSky, NotreDame1337. I'm sure you know about it already, but... Sir MacMania GUN—[01:15 20 Jul 2010]
- Cool. JujuInTheSky 01:16, July 20, 2010 (UTC)
Thanks![edit source]
For voting for Rolex. When it moved to the front page, time stood still. A day without ticks and tocks settled onto the world. All because of you! Thanks again, appreciated. Aleister 2:38 21 7
The r word[edit source]
I bet it happened to you or someone you know, thats the best way to put it. Or you just hate it because it spreads aids.If not, then explain--If you're 555 then I'm 00:39, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
- I can't speak for UU, but I don't like it becausse it is an annoying and overused joke. Also, I am butting in, sorry. Also also, could you check my review on Cajek's list, UU?--On Wednesday, 12:43, July 21 2010 UTC
- Instead of saying the word I shall say this "Forced Sexually Intercourse" At least Im not saying the r word--If you're 555 then I'm 02:48, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
- I can just see the ban coming from miles away...~ 04:50, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
- Ban me for that? He said dont say the r word, so what he going to banned me for? Plus its called free speech buddy--If you're 555 then I'm 05:46, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
- You assume that this is a democracy? You think this is air you're breathing? Hmmm....~ 05:53, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
- If it was ruled by me, it'll be a tyranny (Not Communism though. I despise Communist, they think they're all that but are truly a bunch of wussies) But Uncyclopedia has some sort of Democracy and some sort of Monarchy, so techinically I call that Uncyclopediacy. But the administators are a bunch of cruel, evil, money hungry tyrants (except you and UU). But we do have freedom of speech--If you're 555 then I'm 06:07, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
- That's what you think, serf. :-) Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 06:13, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
- You shall never silence me. NEVER!--If you're 555 then I'm 06:15, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, to be picky, freedom of speech does not guarantee freedom to speak on Uncyclopedia. --Andorin Kato 06:49, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
- That's what you think, serf. :-) Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 06:13, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
- If it was ruled by me, it'll be a tyranny (Not Communism though. I despise Communist, they think they're all that but are truly a bunch of wussies) But Uncyclopedia has some sort of Democracy and some sort of Monarchy, so techinically I call that Uncyclopediacy. But the administators are a bunch of cruel, evil, money hungry tyrants (except you and UU). But we do have freedom of speech--If you're 555 then I'm 06:07, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
- You assume that this is a democracy? You think this is air you're breathing? Hmmm....~ 05:53, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
- Ban me for that? He said dont say the r word, so what he going to banned me for? Plus its called free speech buddy--If you're 555 then I'm 05:46, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
- I can just see the ban coming from miles away...~ 04:50, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
- Instead of saying the word I shall say this "Forced Sexually Intercourse" At least Im not saying the r word--If you're 555 then I'm 02:48, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
- This is the worst topic start I have ever seen. *shakes head* Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 06:42, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
- Your mom--If you're 555 then I'm 06:43, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
- I would agree with Woody, but he used to live close to where I am and then he moved to Ohio, so I hate him now. So I echo IWKY's sentiments. Your mom.--On Wednesday, 06:44, July 21 2010 UTC
- Stalking Guildy's talkpage, I see. Well, if you ever find the right girl, you might understand. But, lets get back to the case at hand, which is this awful topic. Can we go against the usual no deleting comments, and just burn this entire thing? I'm For. it. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 06:51, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
- I agree, let's get back to the topic at hand, which is Woody's failure to use apostrophes. --On Wednesday, 06:53, July 21 2010 UTC
- I agree with HelpMe.And Woody, I did your mom--If you're 555 then I'm 06:55, July 21, 2010 (UTC)--If you're 555 then I'm 06:55, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
- BAH! Overrated. Next youll be wanting me to use commas to which I just wont do thank you very much. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 06:55, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
- I, disagree, commas, are, awesome, and, should, be, used, as, much, as, possible.--On Wednesday, 06:57, July 21 2010 UTC
- Too many commas! AAAAAAAHHHH!!!! Keep doing that and I'll r.... um I mean Forced Sexually Intercourse you and eat your fucking liver--If you're 555 then I'm 07:05, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
- I, disagree, commas, are, awesome, and, should, be, used, as, much, as, possible.--On Wednesday, 06:57, July 21 2010 UTC
- I agree, let's get back to the topic at hand, which is Woody's failure to use apostrophes. --On Wednesday, 06:53, July 21 2010 UTC
- Stalking Guildy's talkpage, I see. Well, if you ever find the right girl, you might understand. But, lets get back to the case at hand, which is this awful topic. Can we go against the usual no deleting comments, and just burn this entire thing? I'm For. it. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 06:51, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
- Since you ask, I'll tell you. Yes, it's happened to several people I know, actually. Including 2 ex-girlfriends, one at the hands of her step-brother. I've seen first-hand how much it completely destroys a person, and can wreck their whole lives. As a result, I fucking despise with every fibre of my being all these people who over-use the word. It represents something truly hideous, and the casual use of it all over the place diminishes that in many people's minds, as far as I'm concerned. I hate the over-use of the word and, while I can't stamp out its use, I can certainly ban with extreme prejudice any fucker who uses it on my page. That a clear and comprehensive enough answer for you? --UU - natter 08:34, Jul 21
- If you are answering awful, awful questions, I hear that your daughter poops a lot. Explain to me how the feces looks in great detail. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 14:35, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
- Ok, I understand UU, but do we have free speech on Uncyclopedia.? Yes we do.--If you're 555 then I'm 18:51, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
- No, we don't. Uncyclopedia is a private website; free speech rights only apply to the government. Too, this is UU's userspace, and he can control what's in it, especially with regards to disruptive edits. --Andorin Kato 18:53, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
- Dude, just a friendly suggestion. There's a difference between free speech and non-accountability for your actions. And also, most British peeps (not including UU here) couldn't give a stuff about the 50th proclamation of constipation, or whatever amendment this free speech concept comes from. --Matfen 19:41, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
- No, we don't. Uncyclopedia is a private website; free speech rights only apply to the government. Too, this is UU's userspace, and he can control what's in it, especially with regards to disruptive edits. --Andorin Kato 18:53, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
- Ok, I understand UU, but do we have free speech on Uncyclopedia.? Yes we do.--If you're 555 then I'm 18:51, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
- If you are answering awful, awful questions, I hear that your daughter poops a lot. Explain to me how the feces looks in great detail. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 14:35, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
But administators are still a bunch of cruel, evil, money hungry tyrants who care little for the weak, (except UU and Mordillo)--If you're 555 then I'm 22:07, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
So UU[edit source]
Good thing we have that collab going eh? ~ 10:12, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
Hey matey[edit source]
I just knocked up a quick "improved" version of the Giger counter image for that page, using his Baphomet painting which was the first one I could think of off the top of my head that could be easily changed into a handheld meter by chopping out the background. Now, I'm not the greatest photoshopper in the world, but I reckon you might be able to improve on it if and when you rewrite the article. What d'yer think? Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 13:04, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
Thanks, by the way[edit source]
For the Pee Review you did for UnBooks:Bad Romance. Very helpful! I put virtually all of your suggestions into the article. 19:39, July 21, 2010 (UTC)