User talk:ChiefjusticeDS/Archive 2
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at User talk:ChiefjusticeDS. |
Contents
- 1 I was Lost in Space but now am Found
- 2 UnSignpost! August 6th, 2009!! WE BE LATE, Y'ALL!!!
- 3 Also...
- 4 A Mr Sherlock Holmes is at the door, sir
- 5 Thanks for helping make Six Hats a feature...
- 6 Thanks
- 7 Articles
- 8 Roberto Duran
- 9 Chief
- 10 Thanks!
- 11 I'd just like to say
- 12 You lying lyre!
- 13 About A perfect article pee review
- 14 Thanks—the remake
- 15 Thanks for the PEE
- 16 BPA
- 17 Thanks!
- 18 More thanks
- 19 UnSignpost 13th August 2009. It's not late. You are!
- 20 God
- 21 Goodbye for a while
- 22 A blast of wind is heard, as the good spaceship Serenity approaches your userpage ...
- 23 UnSignpost 20th August, it's not late, your mom is!
- 24 Hope Everything Goes Alright
- 25 Thank you!!!
- 26 Moar awardz!
- 27 Thanks again chief
- 28 UnSignpost 4th September
- 29 UnSignpost Randomber 53th
- 30 Thank you for voting on Number Bases
- 31 Somebody here who talks like an Admin should
- 32 Reverting
- 33 Thanks for the award
- 34 A miserable thanks
- 35 Ta
- 36 Thanks for the Golden Shower Award
- 37 You're Back!
- 38 Adopt-a-nOOb?
- 39 Review first article?
- 40 Mister Chief
- 41 Don't break the rules, your honor!
- 42 Supreme Thanks
- 43 The Doctor
- 44 Your nOOb again
- 45 Thanks
- 46 UnSignpost September 10/17
- 47 Marble Thanks
- 48 The Girl Next Door Thanks you
- 49 Thanks!
- 50 UnSignpost: September 24th, 2009
- 51 Back again
- 52 Thought I'd give this a try
- 53 A word from your new
insectcomputer WotM - 54 I'm not mad, but...
- 55 You are a loser.
- 56 I Must Be Dehydrated....
- 57 Thankies!
- 58 Kermit the Frog 2 Girls 1 Cup videos
- 59 Noob Tanks
- 60 Rebuttal
- 61 UnSignpost: October 1st, 2009
- 62 I asked, you delivered
- 63 About Siam Sith Empire
- 64 ITSCON
- 65 Kicking Butt on Pee Reviews
- 66 Again. Thanks.
- 67 Had somebody else done this...
- 68 Thanks for decided to review Pedobear!
- 69 1944 Summer Olympics
- 70 Pee Review War
- 71 Hey!
- 72 Regard this simple saltshaker
- 73 Thanks
- 74 Pedobear Review
I was Lost in Space but now am Found
Thankies for your Pee Review on Lost in Space! I think your advice will help me make this article much better. It wasn't mine originally, I'm just trying to fix it. As I posted under your review, I think it's harder to fix an article that's broken than to start one from scratch. Thankies! Binky The WonderSkull 22:01, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
- Anytime, I agree, it can be very difficult to fix an already broken article. If you want a hand or for someone to give the article a quick look then, just ask. Good luck fixing it, I'm sure you have what it takes. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:17, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
UnSignpost! August 6th, 2009!! WE BE LATE, Y'ALL!!!
Your #1 source for Cajek ban jokes!
August 6th, 2009 • Issue 59 • Painfully Extracting Nuggets of Truth from the Teeth of the News!
Uncyclopedia Triples Ad Revenue; Users Line Up For Paychecks This week, Uncyclopedia's benign evil overlords, Wikia, shuffled the advertising layout on our fine website. Previously, the left sidebar contained just one Wikia spotlight. These spotlights are not advertisements as much as they are a way to whore Wikia and increase its position in some sort of Google rankings, since the links from the banner ads go from Wikia-hosted Uncyclopedia to Google and back to Wikia-hosted wikis on such relevant topics to users who are on a satire wiki as the Burnout Wiki and the Harry Potter wiki. These Google rankings are actually a series of thousands of monkeys at Google headquarters, who move beads around on giant abaci based on search engine hits. Users who click these cleverly disguised and probably illegal "double-switch" ads cause the monkeys to alter the beads in Wikia's favor. However, in recent days this Wikia spotlight was moved to the bottom of each page rather than the sidebar and multiplied by three. A cursory look at any of the wikis linked in these spotlights results in a brutal assault of the senses, as they are all swimming in banner advertisements, sidebar advertisements, advertisements in the content, and links to highly useful Wikia features such as Wikianswers. While the increased number of spotlights on Uncyclopedia has not directly resulted in any cash flow, the increased Google bead rating has indeed caused Wikia stock to jump by six beads (the stock market is also organized using giant abaci, only it is operated by goats rather than monkeys). Wikia has decided to share credit for this jump in value with the users of Uncyclopedia, and all users will be receiving checks for equal amounts next Tuesday. The line forms behind Olipro, wherever he happens to be on Tuesday when the stock market goats arbitrarily decide to stop working for the day. A Hell of a Time at the Village Dump
Recently in the forums, BHOP's activity has arguably skyrocketed. An IP has started a new rhyming craze, and the cheesy, crunchy snack food CheddarBBQ has revived many topics that were getting rather aged, such as Fantasy Football, a Shakira-esque topic, and even his own birthday's topic. Back on BHOP, fruity user Neox's random storytelling and serious user YouKnowWhatTheMusicMeans' serious, dramatic storytelling have made Forum:Who HATES MochiAds? 2's story a complete, random mess. Also, Optimuschris and Modusoperandi have been having one hell of a time discussing the much-anticipated failing of the new G.I. Joe movie. Finally, users have a had a heated battle over whether to ban the Abstain feature on VFH, which is ending up as off-topic and random as an episode of Lost. Are there any cool discussions going on? That's the forum news in your area, now here's Mr. G with the weather, only on |
| |||||
UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox |
Hand delivered by MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 22:02, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Also...
RAPE! MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 22:02, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
- Where??? Now where the hell has my contents listing gone? Did you take that as well? You fiend.--ChiefjusticeDS 22:04, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
A Mr Sherlock Holmes is at the door, sir
that you had voted for an entry on me to be featured. Of course, this was to be expected for a man of such reputation, Watson, was it not?
Elementary, Holmes, as you would have put it.
So it is. But it appears that the author nevertheless wishes to thank you, so I'll leave him to it. Meanwhile, I shall return to my cough drop bottle.
Hold on a minute ... Holmes, is that cocaine?
Watson—
I'd thought Dr Freud had made you fight off that vice! Here, give me that. You know how many times I've told you to smoke tobacco instead.
Thank you for voting for this article!
For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.
And your review was, more likely than not, quite helpful in improving the article. So thanks doubly. Sir MacMania GUN—[05:39 11 Aug 2009]
Thanks for helping make Six Hats a feature...
...and this is where I'm supposed to have made a really exciting template, but it's easier for me to just write this once and then cut and paste it a bunch of times. Pup t 09:32, 11/08/2009
Thanks
But you have achieved what few others ever manage:
The respect of the
Kosher Nostra.
You can rest assured that you henceforth enjoy our protection,
our support and a bed free of beheaded bagel crumbs.
La Kosher Nostra.
Articles
Thanks for the review of Alien abduction insurance. I made couple of alterations. I was wondering if you would be able to tell me if that was the direction that you thought I should take it in so I can keep going? And on another note...would you say that the 500ft Turd article has a shot at VFH as it stands now? --Sequence 13:04, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Roberto Duran
Hi Chief. Once again you took so much time to help my article. Of course, this guy was great enough and funny enough in real life, no need fiction. I'll study your advice and do each and everything you advise. Then I'll let you know for double check. My hero!--Funnybony 16:26, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Chief
Just so you know, I probably won't pick up a review tomorrow, going to try to get started on some of my articles instead --El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 21:31, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- 'Tis fine, remember this is something we all do in our spare time (except for Modus who never leaves) you are quite entitled to never pick up a review ever again. But I do appreciate the notice, take as long as you need on your article as without articles we reviewers have nothing to do. Thanks again for the notice, and good luck with your article. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:05, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks!
The doctor will see you now
Oh, by the way, before we begin today's session, I'd like to thank you for supporting my recent featured article. |
I'd just like to say
Cheers! The review you did for that article I found was really in depth. I'll polish up the points you mentioned and drop it on VFS to see how it does. Many thanks (Bonner) (Talk) Aug 12, 17:37
For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.
You lying lyre!
Lol. How's it going ChiefjusticeDS, Pericles here. Thanks for deciding to review my article on the lyre. I hope you catch things which User:Siddhartha-Wolf did not even notice when combing through the article for the first review. Cheers!--PericlesofAthens 00:26, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
- Hi ChiefjusticeDS. Thanks for the review of my article on the lyre. As you suggested, I have gotten rid of places where a non-encyclopedic tone is used, including opinionated statements and first person statements, and since you are the second one to complain about it, I got rid of the Jack Bauer image. I also see what you mean about the last paragraph, which I just completely removed as it might be too unfunny to salvage. Aside from these suggestions, I am having a hard time copyediting the article according to your other suggestions, which are a little vague and hard to apply immediately. Could you point out specific sentences and specific jokes which are problematic and explain what you think would be a better course? Thanks.--PericlesofAthens 19:37, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
- Right, I'm going to reply here, just because it makes this look better in context. My point on you drifting away from what you are talking about (demonstrated with the Darth Vader example), is mostly to do with the Ancient Greece section where I felt you needlessly elaborated on some character backgrounds. The point about losing sight of the difference is more general, if you read from the start of your article, through to the end as though you have never seen the article before, you will notice that what a lyre is and indeed who a lyre is undergoes a shift and you start writing the article "Liar", and just putting "playing the lyre" in the appropriate places, I think the mnemonic coincidence should not be played upon to the extent that it is, since it ultimately leads you away from the subject, you begin the article talking about so well. I hope this helps. --ChiefjusticeDS 20:26, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
About A perfect article pee review
Thx very much for your review. FYI, i'm not english native and this text is a translation from an article (perfect by the way) I originally wrote for french Désencyclopédie. I found some difficulties translating some of the jokes that were included in my text so maybe that's why you found some humour missing. So I'm not sure I'll be able to modify the article according to your advices but feel free to do it if you think you can improve. Oh and by the way, how come I don't get a 10 for each section ??? It's a perfect article !!! ;) WiiKend 08:54, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks—the remake
Thank you for supporting and reviewing! Sir MacMania GUN—[20:57 16 Aug 2009]
Thanks for the PEE
I take your point about the guidebook style varying a bit, so I'm editing that. Can't win with the pics though. You want them all on one side but when i've done that before someone else will want them alternating. I may resubmit it in a couple days - not that i'd expect you to read it again! --Sog1970 11:55, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
BPA
I'm not pretty sure of the syntax so could you please take a look at this ? Monsieur William Little
- Sure thing. I'll do it now. --ChiefjusticeDS 19:50, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks!
—Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 02:08, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
More thanks
Thanks for your help, I was on the right track, just doubted myself there for a minute. Correcting graffiti? Excellent, I'm the sort of git who corrects unsolicited sales spam and sends it back :-) --Rforbes 20:11, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- It's no problem, and yes, they had used the wrong form of there/their and had forgotten a comma and full stop. I happened to have my sharpie so figured people could at least enjoy the graffiti with the correct spelling and punctuation, alas two men in a police car told me to stop it. Glad I could help. --ChiefjusticeDS 20:14, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
UnSignpost 13th August 2009. It's not late. You are!
The Newspaper that just got hijacked by Woody and Ape. Mwhahahaha!
Date August 13th, 2009 • Issue 60 • Taking the News, Making it Better
UnSignpost Editor Disappears; UnSignpost Suffers Mysterious Drop in Quality August 10, 2009 - a date which will live in infamy. Gerrycheevers, the UnSignpost's handsome, talented, and, often times, only editor announced his leave of absence in order to head west, and make a name for himself. In an UnSignpost Exclusive, Gerry talked at length about his final destination and the exciting journey he expects. "[I'll be heading to] north dakota. [I reckon I'll take the famous Oregon Trail, driving a horse and buggy, herding cattle, planting seeds of injustice wherever I may.]" How long this move out west will take is unknown by all but our best psychics, and since Gerry has them trained to bite anyone who come near, we'll go with Gerry's approximate date of August 21. If all of our readers miss Gerry (and we have a feeling that, one paragraph in, you already do), please drop him a line. Tell him how much he is missed. Tell him that if he ever leaves again, we won't be so forgiving. Just tell him something. We don't want to have to do this without him again. In an unrelated note, the UnSignpost - usually a shining example of grammatical correctness, good spelling, and hilarity - seems to have hit a drop in quality for this week's issue. The reasons for these changes seem to be a mystery to everyone. As far as we can tell, the problems that have arisen are completely arbitrary. The reasons for this change in quality have been the talk of the community this week. Some have suggested the recent meteor shower has caused an influx of gamma radiation into our atmosphere, creating a negative energy all over the Earth, and thus causing our writing abilities to falter. Under User stupidly blamed all of this on the change in editors, saying "Good to see we're keeping the time-honoured Signpost tradition of the revolving door to the editor's office alive and well. Although now Woody's in there, that should probably be a 'revolting' door." Bastard. Uncyclopedian creates Trivia Bot, ruins everything
EMC let loose his bot on the nerds, perverts and middle-aged alcoholics of #uncyclopedia, leading to even less constructive conversation then usual. Instead, the channel is mostly filled with dozens of people shouting random words in the hopes of being awarded meaningless points. Some, however, have pointed out that the only real difference between this and the way things were before is the awarding of points. Not content with destroying one channel, however, EMC subsequently decided to bring his bot to ##turtle,the exciting new channel with the dubious honour of being "the BHOP of IRC" (but with less Bad Shroom), which also served as a staging post for a recent troll invasion of Yahoo! Answers. EMC was unavailable for comment when I was throwing this piece together in five minutes. He is presumed to be sitting in a cave somewhere stroking his large red crayon and laughing dementedly. New Editors Have Trouble Matching up Left and Right Sides In a startling development, the newest editors of the UnSignpost are proving to be quite inept at lining up the left and right sides of Post's template. It seems that our penchant for placing more and more boxes on the right side of the page has defeated the natural aesthetic of the Post's two-even-sides strategy. While this is a problem, it does seem to be fixable. Namely, by adding this headline and story. Is this just an obvious cry for help, that we are unable to do this without Gerry? Probably. But since our hostile takeover has proven quite |
| |||||||
UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox |
God
This is about Uncyclopedia:VFH/God
You wrote, "Against. While you and IC may have done some more work on it, it's a big no to feature it again. Especially since you have only expanded the original material, rather than completely rewriting it. ChiefjusticeDS 06:04, 19 August 2009 (UTC)"
Of course I wanted it to be featured, but have no problem with people voting the way they feel. I guess there's a feeling here against featuring an article twice. And I respect you as an experienced uncyclopedian who's been nominated Writer of the Month.
But I have to ask, did you read the earlier version before we started editing and compare that to what we did? There's almost no similarity between the two except they're both about God, and have a couple of the same pics (but with different captions).
Please compare the article before we started working on it to the version that was nominated for VFH. [1]. Can you honestly say this hasn't been completely rewritten? Miley Spears 14:57, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- My personal view is that the original material was fine, and a rewrite wasn't really required. I never vote without making sure I understand the circumstances behind a nomination for the front page, as I know the amount of time and effort that goes into the articles. As far as the God one was concerned, to my brain at 7am this morning, the two were not so different. If you were to call me out on this one, I would say that my vote may have been hasty and the reasoning considered less well than it should have been. I will reconsider my decision since the nomination appears to have been reset. --ChiefjusticeDS 18:37, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- My respect for you has shot way up. You could easily discount me as a noob and you as a major Uncyclopedian (which I believe you are), but you didn't. You have agreed to reconsider. Whatever you decide, for, against or abstain, I will have a lot of respect for you. I hope you don't mind, but you'll likely be one of the people I'll ask for help in the future when I get lost here. Thanks again! :) Miley Spears 01:45, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
- Here's a problem maybe you can fix. If you go to the God article and click on the link for "Please see this article's entry," it takes you to the old nomination. People who click on that to vote will end up at the old nomination, and will believe the vote's already over. So could you fix the link so it goes to the new nomination? I asked someone else to fix it, but whoever gets there first I hope you fix the link! Thanks! Miley Spears 02:19, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
- I took a look at it for you and it looks as though the reason the link doesn't direct appropriately is because the new nomination is called: God (colonisation) rather than God. I lack the privileges to fix that for you as it relates to the names of articles. Contact one of the admins if you haven't already and you think that the nom will lose support if it is not fixed. --ChiefjusticeDS 09:02, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
- Nobody had fixed it. So I was trying to fix it by adding a correction that had the right link at the same time somebody fixed it the way it should be fixed! So it's fixed now. Thanks for your advice on fixing! :) Miley Spears who needs to be fixed so she doesn't breed 16:44, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
- I took a look at it for you and it looks as though the reason the link doesn't direct appropriately is because the new nomination is called: God (colonisation) rather than God. I lack the privileges to fix that for you as it relates to the names of articles. Contact one of the admins if you haven't already and you think that the nom will lose support if it is not fixed. --ChiefjusticeDS 09:02, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Goodbye for a while
Goodbye for a while. We'll miss you! :) Miley Spears 22:37, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
A blast of wind is heard, as the good spaceship Serenity approaches your userpage ...
Sir, how many times has this quote been used on the Internet?
Absolutely not, Zoe. I don't see—
Sir, I am not going to use that quote directly, especially when it has become the title of a TV Tropes page.
Huh.
Thank you for supporting the Firefly article! <sarcasm style="obvious">Although, if I may, my plan was really to have it fail VFH after 11 days, have it quasi-featured, start a "Feature Firefly" campaign, and eventually rewrite and have featured the article on Serenity (which is kind of in a mess at the moment).</sarcasm> But thanks anyway, and good luck with real life! Sir MacMania GUN—[03:04 23 Aug 2009]
Thank you from the world of High Art
UnSignpost 20th August, it's not late, your mom is!
The Newspaper that WILL win Zombiebaron back, damn it.
Date August 20th, 2009 • Issue 61 • Where no news is normal news
Fantasy Football Draft Finished After four weeks of red-hot eight-man free fantasy football league draft action, the first Uncyclopedia Fantasy Football League (UFFL) Draft is finally at a close: Uncyclopedia regular and DiBiase's Millions general manager The Woodburninator made Arizona Cardinals' Kicker Neil Rackers Mr. Irrelevant on the afternoon of August 21th, 2009, a mere 26 hours after the previous pick had been made. Afterward, League Commissioner and noted Nazi sympathizer Guildensternenstein promised to make all subsequent Uncyclopedia Fantasy Football League official actions run much more smoothly. He vowed he would "put the drafted players on their respective fantasy teams" at some point "after I'm done writing this story for the UnSignpost and before I go see Inglorious Bastards later tonight." The draft itself was varied, and picks ranged from the predictable (Vikings' running back Adrian Peterson taken first overall) to the even more predictable (Falcons' running back Michael Turner taken with second overall pick) to the fairly predictable (Drew Brees, Peyton Manning and Tom Brady being the first three quarterbacks taken) to the downright wild. Notable steals include Guildy's nabbing of Chris Johnson in Round 5, Woody's snagging of Aaron Rodgers in Round 6, and Bradaphraser's criminal steal of Dallas tight end Jason Witten. For every good pick, there was a bad one, however: in moves that would make Al Davis proud, LongLiverh3 took Philadelphia's No. 3 receiver while their No. 1 and No. 2 receivers were still on the board, made 30th ranked tight end L.J. Smith the second overall tight end picked, and made Baltimore QB Joe Flacco his backup quarter back while the likes of Matt Schaub, Jay Cutler, Ben Roethlisberger and Eli Manning were still available. LongLiver could not be reached for comment. New UnSignpost Editor already having trouble filling up space; Falls upon pointless gimmicks, self-references, long article titles to fill void In a move that has surprised literally 0% of the Uncyclopedia UnSignpost community, the newest UnSignpost editor has already hit a wall in trying to think up new articles for the post. Well, that's not actually true. First he wrote a story trying to beg Zombiebaron to re-subscribe for the post. Then he actually looked at Zombiebaron's userpage to find out that he was actually leaving the site. Needless to say, the presses were called back, and more writing had to be done. Namely, this. Now, we at the post already know what you are thinking. But, since putting those things into print is outlawed in 36 states, two Canadian provinces, and all of Lithuania, we will instead reference the fact that there have been an awful lot of self-referencing in the UnSignpost lately. For that we are truly sorry. Also, we are sorry for self-referencing our own self-referencing. It is truly a problem that continues to build upon itself. We hope to soon continue with the top notch reporting that is so often found in our hallowed archives. Such as the time we wrote about Spang's village dump conquests, or the time we self-referenced how the UnSignpost's lovable mascot, "Dognewspaper" had not been in the Unsignpost for over nine months. Or that time we wrote about the Fantasy Football Draft being finished. Yes, all of those times were good. And we plan - nae, promise - to, in the very near future, continue bringing those kinds of articles to your doorstep. That is, if you don't mind finding a bit of drool upon it. |
| ||||||
| |||||||
UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox |
Hope Everything Goes Alright
Not sure what it is you're going through, but on behalf of everyone else here, we all hope you're OK. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 02:17, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Thank you!!!
Have this shiny template to remind you of your unconditional love for poultry ... |
Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 14:57, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Moar awardz!
Excellent! Your commitment to PEEING is nearly boundless, going beyond 75 in-depth pee reviews. You provide such vast quantities of piss that you need something special to contain it. So we gladly provide you with this beautiful bathroom bling - keep pissing!
You are most certainly the fastest person to get one of these. Kudos, chief! (Now don't stop just because there aren't any more of these to get, in case that was your motivation! ;-) ) --UU - natter 08:25, Aug 30
- Congratulations! And, um, just curious, but exactly how long did it take you to pee that much? King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 21:19, October 5, 2009 (UTC)
- Three months, I think. But I was averaging about 5 reviews a day over summer. Ah those were the golden days, me, this guy, this guy and sometimes this guy tackling the PEE queue together. I will never forget last August. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:25, October 5, 2009 (UTC)
Thanks again chief
Have this shiny template to remind you of your pathological support.. Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) |
Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 07:27, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
UnSignpost 4th September
The newspaper that missed an issue and no-one even noticed.
Date September something-or-other, 2009 • Issue 63 • Nobody reads this bit anyway
Left alone to write the entire UnSignpost, Ape delivers sub-par, mostly self-referential issue "What happened to the signpost?" was the question on literally nobody's lips this week, as Uncyclopedia's favourite newspaper which everyone loves to read but no-one can be bothered to write for took another step on the long slow descent to obscurity. However, our intrepid hero, i.e. me, soon discovered the enormity of the task that lay ahead of him. Boxes had to be filled, interesting and thought-provoking forums had to be discovered and linked to, block logs had to be accessed and trawled for witty comments (unsuccessfully, as it turned out) and this article and presumably another one below it had to be written. "I never thought it could be this hard," Ape told himself, with sexual innuendo very much intended. "How did Gerrycheevers keep finding stuff to write about? There doesn't really seem to be much happening around here. I mean, I could start whoring my newest articles under the flimsy guise of self-referential irony, but that would be shit really. Who wants to see that? Nobody, that's who." However, in the absence of anything funny or clever to say, our hero, (who is gradually being revealed to be more of an anti-hero, like Alex in A Clockwork Orange, except with no sense of style) proceeded to do exactly that, shamelessly whoring two articles (which, if anything, evince his decline as a comedy writer), eliciting a universal chorus of groans and boos from all who had the misfortune to read it. An appeal to the Uncyclopedia community Seriously guys, if you don't want any more shitty issues like this I'm going to need help, or else the signpost is going to die like all the other well-intentioned projects that nobody bothers with. What we need is:
Thank you for your time. |
| |||||
UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox |
-- Soldat Teh PWNerator (pwnt!) 16:55, September 4, 2009 (UTC)
UnSignpost Randomber 53th
The only newspaper that Codeine's mum has randomized
Date August 27th, 2009: THE RANDOM ISSUE • Issue 62 • Because the truth is not random enough
Random Headline
At 8:15 a.m., delicious pies sanctified a newspaper. While sugar cookie which may or may not contain crack was lathering, a street sign suddenly constructed. A penny for your thoughts, a nickel for the whole brain! Jack Daniels navigates couch potato! Pixie cogitates an octohedron! HEAVEN' WHITE PROPERTY OWNERS'! At the same time, deer cogitates salad forks! Did the bartender Woodburninate ™...
Especially, Ethiopia blenders the Bermuda Triangle lounge Ashanthi Gratian 2006 ex-wife loll 1 chan 206 BC knife Seymour Cox tongs quantifies hands table tennis t-shirts bridge. i din't edit that page an even if i did it's better neway so u suck!!!11!one Babe Ruth was a total Bitch! Look, I'm not saying he wasn't good at baseball! I'm not trying to destroy your great baseball heroes. But let's not kid ourselves here. Babe Ruth was a complete and total bitch. Come on. He couldn't catch the ball. And he whined at the umpires when people called him fat (even though he totally was). And he always talked about how much his feelings were hurt by people trying to buy him a beer. Signpost Has Gone Officially Bat fuck Insane
Due to frequent lack of interest and excitement, this UnSignpost issue has now gone totally insa-AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!! Genital wart in the left politician! BOMB IRAN! HEIL CAJEK! Hulk Hogan. horse. |
| ||||
UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox |
After a long wait, please think of the FRAK fistulas! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:50, 7 September 2009
Thank you for voting on Number Bases
User:POTR/NumberBases Pup t 22:41, 8/09/2009
Thank you from POOF
User:POTR/POOF Pup t 11:12, 13/09/2009
Somebody here who talks like an Admin should
I copied this from my user page so you wouldn't miss it.
Hey, I have just taken a look at the problem that you have described and I just wanted to offer a couple of words of encouragement/advice. The Uncyclopedia community is a wonderful place and there are lots of people here who will be nothing but pleasant to you, however some people can get carried away with themselves and do things that other users find offensive. If this is the case then you are doing the correct thing by talking to them (I refer to EMC suggesting you talk to him on IRC) but if the problem cannot be solved there then please, as one of the best new users I have seen around here in ages, don't leave the site simply because he is there. I believe MadMax has already contacted Mordillo about it and I hope that, as one of our most experienced admins he can sort out a solution for you. Hope you are OK. --ChiefjusticeDS 06:51, September 12, 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you for being helpful and considerate even though I lost my temper. I respect you. Handshake or hug? DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 03:32, September 14, 2009 (UTC)
- No worries, just as long as you are fine again, and not leaving, that would be a real shame and a loss for the site in general. Chief shakes Miley's hand and then gives her a hug.... Chief is somewhat indecisive these days. --ChiefjusticeDS 07:36, September 14, 2009 (UTC)
- I agree with my Mommy. I think your comment was a big help. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 19:13, September 14, 2009 (UTC)
Reverting
Hi Chief,
Please be careful when reverting edits that are not blatant vandalism. I saw that you reverted Carl Gustav's edit without an obvious reason. In these cases I'd usually undo the edit (rather than reverting) and put an explanation in the change summary. Thanks. ~ 14:29, September 14, 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, I see what you mean, if the edit you are referring to is the one on the Goth article, I was messing about with the mouse pad on my laptop and accidentally reverted, which is why I have another edit directly afterwards reverting my revert. I apologise, I shall be more careful with my plunger in future, lest I lose it. Thanks for letting me know. --ChiefjusticeDS 15:03, September 14, 2009 (UTC)
- Really? I just revert everything I don't like. And the stuff I do. Now that you get rollback on your watchlist it's just too tempting. Orian57 Talk 15:09 14 September 2009
- But Orian, you're a talented homo, you work under different laws of physics. ~ 15:11, September 14, 2009 (UTC)
- Damn right, girlfriend! Orian57 Talk 15:13 14 September 2009
- I'm glad we are all agreed Orian is "one talented homo". But Mordillo was right to be concerned I did accidentally rollback about 20 edits by this one guy, and before that some of my own work on PEE review (speaking of which I hope you got something from the Marble Madness review, I apologise on FlameThrougher's behalf) but nobody noticed that one. I try to be a grown-up with rollback but sometimes the power radiating from the link is just too much. I do manage to contain myself however when it hovers next to important things, like my own edits. But the one Mordillo noticed was a complete accident because I just bought a new computer and the mouse pad likes to click on stuff of it's own accord. --ChiefjusticeDS 15:18, September 14, 2009 (UTC)
- /me reverts Cheifs userpage/ --Muhahahahahahahahahahahah! Orian57 Talk 15:22 14 September 2009
- /me reverts Orian's revert/ --ChiefjusticeDS 15:26, September 14, 2009 (UTC)
- I realised, who knew reverting could be this much fun? --ChiefjusticeDS 15:29, September 14, 2009 (UTC)
- I bet mordillo knew! And now he's trying to control us -- who the hell does he think he is? Big Brother? /Me goes to Mordillos page. Realises it's protected/ Point proved. Orian57 Talk 15:31 14 September 2009
- /me reverts Cheifs userpage/ --Muhahahahahahahahahahahah! Orian57 Talk 15:22 14 September 2009
- See I think he only gives us the rollback power to torture us and watch us revert each other's user pages over and over again... --ChiefjusticeDS 15:34, September 14, 2009 (UTC)
- AHA!! You were trying to make me revert my page for you! ahahahahahaha I noticed!! I'm a genius!!! --ChiefjusticeDS 15:37, September 14, 2009 (UTC)
- Damn! I had sucha carefully constructed plan too. Orian57 Talk 15:38 14 September 2009
- I'm glad we are all agreed Orian is "one talented homo". But Mordillo was right to be concerned I did accidentally rollback about 20 edits by this one guy, and before that some of my own work on PEE review (speaking of which I hope you got something from the Marble Madness review, I apologise on FlameThrougher's behalf) but nobody noticed that one. I try to be a grown-up with rollback but sometimes the power radiating from the link is just too much. I do manage to contain myself however when it hovers next to important things, like my own edits. But the one Mordillo noticed was a complete accident because I just bought a new computer and the mouse pad likes to click on stuff of it's own accord. --ChiefjusticeDS 15:18, September 14, 2009 (UTC)
- Damn right, girlfriend! Orian57 Talk 15:13 14 September 2009
- But Orian, you're a talented homo, you work under different laws of physics. ~ 15:11, September 14, 2009 (UTC)
- Really? I just revert everything I don't like. And the stuff I do. Now that you get rollback on your watchlist it's just too tempting. Orian57 Talk 15:09 14 September 2009
- You know, Revert Wars really could be an article, maybe a How to. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 19:10, September 14, 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the award
Thank you for the Golden Shower Award. And thank you even more for your comments, especially as they come from a RotM. (Now should that me "a" RotM, or "an" RotM? Please feel free to review my comment.) King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 19:17, September 14, 2009 (UTC)
- I believe a RotM is correct. Also, it's no problem, I am just responding to what you have already done. Keep it up. --ChiefjusticeDS 19:23, September 14, 2009 (UTC)
- If you think of it as "Reviewer," then "a Reviewer." But if you think of it as "R", which begins with a vowel sound, then wouldn't it be "an R"? Please forgive my silliness, but I was a little taken aback by your comments. I tried to think of something funny to write, but experienced a rare moment of speechlessness. Or would that be writelessness? And if you just reviewed my review, should I in turn review your review of my review? And then....again, thanks. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 19:32, September 14, 2009 (UTC)
- You can do if you like, but I fear we would just get into a long long cycle of pointlessness, see my conversation with Orian above. When I was given my first one I decided to just take it and run, just in case the person changed their mind. --ChiefjusticeDS 19:36, September 14, 2009 (UTC)
- Point taken. I'll be running off now. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 19:45, September 14, 2009 (UTC)
- You can do if you like, but I fear we would just get into a long long cycle of pointlessness, see my conversation with Orian above. When I was given my first one I decided to just take it and run, just in case the person changed their mind. --ChiefjusticeDS 19:36, September 14, 2009 (UTC)
- If you think of it as "Reviewer," then "a Reviewer." But if you think of it as "R", which begins with a vowel sound, then wouldn't it be "an R"? Please forgive my silliness, but I was a little taken aback by your comments. I tried to think of something funny to write, but experienced a rare moment of speechlessness. Or would that be writelessness? And if you just reviewed my review, should I in turn review your review of my review? And then....again, thanks. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 19:32, September 14, 2009 (UTC)
A miserable thanks
As the French version of the musical says:
À la grande misère du peuple
Et à l'absence de la joie
Remplis ton cœur d'un vin très triste
Et à demain, ami désolé.
Nous voulons faire la guerre
Contre notre gouvernement
Pour illuminer notre terre
Malgré que probablement nous mourrons en faisant cela parce que nous ne pourrons jamais être heureux puisque cette intrigue se fixe sur la misère incessante qui vient de l'injustice sociale dont nous souffrons
These thank-you templates get harder to write every time, don't they? Really, it's quite a miserable predicament.
Thank you for supporting! (In case you need a translation, here's one.) Sir MacMania GUN—[21:08 14 Sep 2009]
Ta
Thanks for looking at Sack of Rome, it may well be a sack of shite. It had been there so long and someone nommed it twice so I'd have removed it if I'd known how. Not sure it's quite as random as you thought, however. Rome was sacked by a Gaulish tribe on the stated date, hence the Asterix reference. People tend to forget that Italy North of Etruria was Gaulish. --Sog1970 21:19, September 14, 2009 (UTC)
- No problem, my point was more about the randomness of the section and the explanation rather than the section in general. Also if you need anything removed from the queue in future just give me a shout and I will do it for you, or you can do it yourself by filling all the review categories with 0 for the score, and then finally putting "Removing from queue (author decision)" in the final comment section. Then hit save and the article should move to the Reviewed list. Hope this helps. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:27, September 14, 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'd been wondering how to remove things from the queue. I'd still tend to disagree about the random thing; my Boer War FA was far less based on the actual events and no one seemed to object. Still, never mind. --86.148.238.14 08:13, September 15, 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the Golden Shower Award
Thank you so much! What you said is so cool. I'll keep on peeing! DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 00:36, September 15, 2009 (UTC)
- No problem, you deserved it. I will keep an eye out for you on the queue, see you there! --ChiefjusticeDS 17:26, September 17, 2009 (UTC)
You're Back!
Welcome! —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 05:11, September 15, 2009 (UTC)
- Hi again, yeah, I had some problems for a while but now I'm back and bad. Thanks for your sympathy while I was away, and this message now I have returned. --ChiefjusticeDS 06:51, September 15, 2009 (UTC)
Adopt-a-nOOb?
What must a lonely and scared noob do to get adopted by chiefjustice? --BlueSpiritGuy 17:25, September 15, 2009 (UTC)
- Endure seven hours of prolonged sexual violence. Orian57 Talk 17:59 15 September 2009
- Thanks for that ringing endorsement Orian.--ChiefjusticeDS 18:01, September 15, 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry but when I ask you if you'll adopt me that's what it feels like. Sorry. Orian57 Talk 18:04 15 September 2009
- That isn't what you asked, you asked if I would read Thomas the Tank. I wanted to read Shakespeare! --ChiefjusticeDS 18:07, September 15, 2009 (UTC)
- And then you said no which felt hot like Puppys sausages in my mouth. :( Orian57 Talk 18:10 15 September 2009
- /me forces the can of worms closed again/ No, it's done, I'm now being helpful and available for my new n00b, I don't need all your baggage! --ChiefjusticeDS 18:16, September 15, 2009 (UTC)
- Mummy says it's not nice to call me baggage. :( Orian57 Talk 18:17 15 September 2009
- /Sniff/ :( Orian57 Talk 18:29 15 September 2009
- There there. --ChiefjusticeDS 18:40, September 15, 2009 (UTC)
- Where? /me looks around/ Orian57 Talk 18:43 15 September 2009
- On your watchlist! Vandalism! I saw it! --ChiefjusticeDS 18:44, September 15, 2009 (UTC)
- Where? /me looks around/ Orian57 Talk 18:43 15 September 2009
- There there. --ChiefjusticeDS 18:40, September 15, 2009 (UTC)
- /me forces the can of worms closed again/ No, it's done, I'm now being helpful and available for my new n00b, I don't need all your baggage! --ChiefjusticeDS 18:16, September 15, 2009 (UTC)
- And then you said no which felt hot like Puppys sausages in my mouth. :( Orian57 Talk 18:10 15 September 2009
- That isn't what you asked, you asked if I would read Thomas the Tank. I wanted to read Shakespeare! --ChiefjusticeDS 18:07, September 15, 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry but when I ask you if you'll adopt me that's what it feels like. Sorry. Orian57 Talk 18:04 15 September 2009
- Thanks for that ringing endorsement Orian.--ChiefjusticeDS 18:01, September 15, 2009 (UTC)
In response: Don't worry I'm not scared off that easily. Had you known what you adopted you might have reconsidered. . . BlueSpiritGuy 19:08, September 15, 2009 (UTC)
- I fear no strangeness, I mean, look at Orian. --ChiefjusticeDS 19:13, September 15, 2009 (UTC)
Review first article?
I've been working on this article for some time, did the draft in OneNote. Finally found the time to release it on to the world wide web so that it may be viewed by millions and make me famous. Will you review it for my please? User:BlueSpiritGuy/JuliusMalema --BlueSpiritGuy 20:59, September 15, 2009 (UTC)
- I will do, give me a day or so, I will review in PEE format on the talk page for you. Sorry if there is a slight delay, but it should be done faster than if you put it in the PEE queue. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:05, September 15, 2009 (UTC)
- That's fine. Much appreciated. 41.145.57.205 21:21, September 15, 2009 (UTC)
- I mean BlueSpiritGuy 21:22, September 15, 2009 (UTC)
- Lol! You forgot to sign in. Around here that's like that dream where you arrive at school with no trousers on. Orian57 Talk 21:23 15 September 2009
- Oh and don't edit conflict me. Ever. That's like flashing a bull. Makes me angry. Orian57 Talk 21:23 15 September 2009
- You are going to have to type slower so that I can keep up, I are nOOb. I am going to ask for an explanation of the term "edit conflict." Did I do it? If so it was unintentional and I apologize. --BlueSpiritGuy 21:58, September 15, 2009 (UTC)
Any change that you've had time to have a look at my first effort? --BlueSpiritGuy 17:44, September 17, 2009 (UTC)
- I did, you can find all your feedback here, sorry I had to rush off after and neglected to let you know it was done. Hope it helps. --ChiefjusticeDS 17:57, September 17, 2009 (UTC)
- Hey man, no sweat. Thank you very much. I'll go and check it out. Also I accept that you'll accept responsibility for my suicide if I feel like a complete failure after reading your review.--BlueSpiritGuy 19:17, September 17, 2009 (UTC)
- Please don't then I would have guilt, it isn't bad! Hurrah. --ChiefjusticeDS 19:19, September 17, 2009 (UTC)
- I just went through it and I find what you say very reasonable and constructive. I will work on it and let you know when I'm done. And excuse the grammar, English is not my first language, but that just shows I'll have to put extra work into that bit...--BlueSpiritGuy 19:25, September 17, 2009 (UTC)
- Only if you want, let me know when you are finished making changes and I will proofread for you. --ChiefjusticeDS 19:28, September 17, 2009 (UTC)
- I will do that, thank you. But I'll let my sister do it first, she studies linguistics. Just one thing, when you say I switch between first and third person a lot, do you mean when addressing the man in the article, or when referring to the reader. Oh and this article is a though one, as it is very tempting to just provide a big link to his wikipedia article.--BlueSpiritGuy 19:48, September 17, 2009 (UTC)
- I mean in general, this article is written from the third person, in all cases. Whereas this one is written from a first person perspective. Note the differences, the formal tone of one, compared to the informal, personal style of the other. --ChiefjusticeDS 19:57, September 17, 2009 (UTC)
- I understand. Thanks again, I've got some editing to do. --BlueSpiritGuy 20:11, September 17, 2009 (UTC)
- I will do that, thank you. But I'll let my sister do it first, she studies linguistics. Just one thing, when you say I switch between first and third person a lot, do you mean when addressing the man in the article, or when referring to the reader. Oh and this article is a though one, as it is very tempting to just provide a big link to his wikipedia article.--BlueSpiritGuy 19:48, September 17, 2009 (UTC)
- Only if you want, let me know when you are finished making changes and I will proofread for you. --ChiefjusticeDS 19:28, September 17, 2009 (UTC)
- I just went through it and I find what you say very reasonable and constructive. I will work on it and let you know when I'm done. And excuse the grammar, English is not my first language, but that just shows I'll have to put extra work into that bit...--BlueSpiritGuy 19:25, September 17, 2009 (UTC)
- Please don't then I would have guilt, it isn't bad! Hurrah. --ChiefjusticeDS 19:19, September 17, 2009 (UTC)
- Hey man, no sweat. Thank you very much. I'll go and check it out. Also I accept that you'll accept responsibility for my suicide if I feel like a complete failure after reading your review.--BlueSpiritGuy 19:17, September 17, 2009 (UTC)
Mister Chief
I think I dealt with all the issues you mentioned or your pee. Wanna take a look? ~ 20:56, September 16, 2009 (UTC)
- I will do this evening after work, I took a quick look and it looks better, but I will have a proper look later on, sorry for the delay. --ChiefjusticeDS 06:08, September 17, 2009 (UTC)
- Right, I took another look at your article and I was duly impressed by your swiftly implemented improvements. The image formatting is much better and the article feels much less cluttered in the middle. If it were my article the only part I would be unsatisfied with is the same running joke that I flagged up in my review, you have however gone a good way towards getting rid of the problem by rewriting it, if it were me I would carry on tweaking it to try and make it as faithful to the rest of the narrative as possible, but I am really nitpicking here. Ultimately once I find myself picking away at a single joke I find that the article it is in is of very high quality. Your improvements come after a score that classes the article among the best here. I will be nominating it for VFH if you have no objections. Well done. --ChiefjusticeDS 17:39, September 17, 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks very much, and thanks for the review. I found it very helpful.
For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.
~ 07:42, September 18, 2009 (UTC)
Don't break the rules, your honor!
I've been told, your honor, that one is not to revert edits performed by another user on a user page. I noticed you've done this at http://en.uncyclopedia.co/w/index.php?title=User:ChiefjusticeDS&curid=521235&diff=4108121&oldid=4108077 Just because it is your user page does not give you the right to revert an anonymous vandal's edits! Have you no respect for the rules, sir? I'm afraid I'm going to have to ask you to step outside for some serious fisticuffs. I of course will not be participating, but I am sure you can find a volunteer to fight for me.
Yours Sincerely,
Attorney General of Whyland,
King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 02:36, September 17, 2009 (UTC)
- I shall need no volunteer to engage in combat with you (or your representative)! Oh just you wait, I'll have you know I have trained for 10 years at fisticuffs. I have also bred attack dogs who are trained to attack at my command, oh you will wish you never started this. Someone help me up from this chair and bring me my hitting stick so I can teach this young whipper-snapper how we do things in my courtroom. --ChiefjusticeDS 06:07, September 17, 2009 (UTC)
- Ah oh, I'm in trouble now. Um, we're sorry, but the party you attempted to reach is currently not available. And will not be available for fisticuffs or other physical conflicts for a long, long time. Also please don't hit me! I'm an editor not a fighter! I was just kidding, really! You wouldn't hit a noob, would you? King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 18:19, September 17, 2009 (UTC)
- No, I think Miley would tear me to pieces if I hit her noob (Chief fears the wrath of Miley). --ChiefjusticeDS 18:22, September 17, 2009 (UTC)
- Oh yeah! Hey everybody, you can't hit me. My Mommy's Miley! Ha Ha! King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 18:33, September 17, 2009 (UTC)
- No, I think Miley would tear me to pieces if I hit her noob (Chief fears the wrath of Miley). --ChiefjusticeDS 18:22, September 17, 2009 (UTC)
- Ah oh, I'm in trouble now. Um, we're sorry, but the party you attempted to reach is currently not available. And will not be available for fisticuffs or other physical conflicts for a long, long time. Also please don't hit me! I'm an editor not a fighter! I was just kidding, really! You wouldn't hit a noob, would you? King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 18:19, September 17, 2009 (UTC)
Supreme Thanks
Hey Look! It's only filled with happy sand guys!! I swear to god, we're going to lose this war if Hitler keeps sending me on these ridiculous wild goose chases. We wasted a whole year running around Europe to look for the Spear of Destiny and all we found was a bunch of people who claimed to own it. We must have killed fifty people and all we have is a truck full of worthless, rusty spear heads and rotting wooden poles to show for it! Now it looks like we'll be spending 1942 finding out how many people have an Ark of the Covenant and collecting a pile of dusty, acacia wood furniture for the Fuhrer in the process. This is not why I became a Nazi. The bling with all the swastikas is nice but I look like Black Leather Jacket Dork when I'm standing here in this dark, musty craphole with the likes of Captain Doofus and Towel Head Priest Guy! |
Thanks for the tip o' the hat your honor!-- 12:49, September 18, 2009 (UTC)
The Doctor
All of the Doctor's incarnations thank youfor supporting the featured article on the Doctor.Except the Twenty-first. He's busy filming. The last we heard of him, he was trying to recruit Daleks for the British Army in the Great War. We all know how that'll turn out. He's also being chased by rabid David Tennant fans trying to get him back to his previous incarnation. That's brilliant, isn't it? I say, would you like a jelly baby? |
Thank you for supporting, and for your not one, but two reviews! Sir MacMania GUN—[01:45 19 Sep 2009]
Your nOOb again
Hello Chief, I've made a few changes to the article and I hope that I've improved on some of the things you mentioned. If you could just take a look at the humour aspect again and tell me if the new picture formatting appeals to you. It's not necessary to do a whole PEE again, but don't let me stop you if you really feel tempted. I proofread it again a few times and I hope I've ironed out all the wrinkles, but I also submitted it on UN:PS. Let somebody else at UN:PS proofread it, you've done plenty already!I thank thee --BlueSpiritGuy 20:48, September 20, 2009 (UTC)
- OK then, I'll keep an eye on it though, and pick it up if nobody else does for a few days. Also I will be happy to have another look at it for you, I am free all day tomorrow so will do so in detail then. --ChiefjusticeDS 20:50, September 20, 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you that will be appreciated. Oh, and if you do look at the Wikipedia page again, you'll notice it has been vandalized. That wasn't me, I'm not into that kind of thing. But his page does get vandalized often, for some or other reason... --BlueSpiritGuy 21:49, September 20, 2009 (UTC)
- I wonder why they vandalise his page.... oh yes, because unless they are a black young man, who strongly opposes any white person holding a government office he has probably insulted them. Anyway, harsh political commentary over, I shall get your article looked at tomorrow. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:53, September 20, 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the second review! I'll keep working on the article. I'd like for Orion to look at at, but I want to make some more changes first. I'm just leaving on a short holiday from Wednesday till Sunday, so won't be able to work on it immediately. Actually it's more of a survival camp, so if you don't hear from me again I didn't meet the requirements, which is surviving. But I'll probably get some comical inspiration there and will be working again as soon as I'm back. Thanks once again! --BlueSpiritGuy 18:39, September 21, 2009 (UTC)
- You're welcome, tis what we adopters are here for. Enjoy your "holiday"!--ChiefjusticeDS 19:59, September 21, 2009 (UTC)
- The next person to call me Orion -- esspecially behind me back, is getting a large tumour posted to them. Disgused as cake. Orian57 Talk 20:05 21 September 2009
- Sorry Orion, it won't happen again.--BlueSpiritGuy 20:19, September 21, 2009 (UTC)
- Oooooooooooh, that be fighting talk. --ChiefjusticeDS 20:22, September 21, 2009 (UTC)
- Yes but you won't let him fight me, would you? It says in the contract your supposed to protect me. Otherwise nOOb-welfare will come and take me away from the wonderful word of Uncyclopedia and put me in some cheap circus. --BlueSpiritGuy 20:45, September 21, 2009 (UTC)
- It would be character building, but yes I will grapple with Orian on your behalf. --ChiefjusticeDS 20:48, September 21, 2009 (UTC)
- Yes 'cause I'm against physical violence. That's why I have 2 black belts and study the Dark Arts. Anyway, I'll try enjoying it thanks. Until we meet again... --BlueSpiritGuy 21:31, September 21, 2009 (UTC)
- I had a black belt once, then some jackass kicked me in the head and stole it... --ChiefjusticeDS 21:33, September 21, 2009 (UTC)
- It would be character building, but yes I will grapple with Orian on your behalf. --ChiefjusticeDS 20:48, September 21, 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry Orion, it won't happen again.--BlueSpiritGuy 20:19, September 21, 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the second review! I'll keep working on the article. I'd like for Orion to look at at, but I want to make some more changes first. I'm just leaving on a short holiday from Wednesday till Sunday, so won't be able to work on it immediately. Actually it's more of a survival camp, so if you don't hear from me again I didn't meet the requirements, which is surviving. But I'll probably get some comical inspiration there and will be working again as soon as I'm back. Thanks once again! --BlueSpiritGuy 18:39, September 21, 2009 (UTC)
- I wonder why they vandalise his page.... oh yes, because unless they are a black young man, who strongly opposes any white person holding a government office he has probably insulted them. Anyway, harsh political commentary over, I shall get your article looked at tomorrow. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:53, September 20, 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you that will be appreciated. Oh, and if you do look at the Wikipedia page again, you'll notice it has been vandalized. That wasn't me, I'm not into that kind of thing. But his page does get vandalized often, for some or other reason... --BlueSpiritGuy 21:49, September 20, 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
thank you ;)--DonTricheco 12:54, September 21, 2009 (UTC)
- You're welcome! --ChiefjusticeDS 20:00, September 21, 2009 (UTC)
- What the fuck? Orian57 Talk 20:02 21 September 2009
- Oh, so I'm worth your time now? --ChiefjusticeDS 20:04, September 21, 2009 (UTC)
- When are you ever not? Orian57 Talk 20:06 21 September 2009
- When you are trapping me with words, and when you ignore my boredom and leave me to suffer (see your talk page!). Anyway, I know it looks like I just created a section to thank myself for nothing whatsoever but I can explain everything! --ChiefjusticeDS 20:10, September 21, 2009 (UTC)
- Wait, are you sockpuppeting? Banbanabanabanabanababnababanabanbabnana Orian57 Talk 20:12 21 September 2009
- No! Though I have never ever been banned so go me! /me hopes no admin sees that and ruins my spotless record/ I'm not sockpuppeting, the user above thanked me for the welcome, but put it in the middle of the section above, so I put it here, where it looks all neat, but I agree it looks suspicious. --ChiefjusticeDS 20:17, September 21, 2009 (UTC)
- So you welcomed your own sock? That's desperately sad. Orian57 Talk 20:22 21 September 2009
- He isn't my sock, if I was going to have a sock why would I welcome it myself and then thank myself for welcoming myself? It would just be confusing. --ChiefjusticeDS 20:24, September 21, 2009 (UTC)
- And yet you managed to figure it out. That's the work of a diseased mind. And your sigs are too similar. Orian57 Talk 20:26 21 September 2009
- So you welcomed your own sock? That's desperately sad. Orian57 Talk 20:22 21 September 2009
- I wouldn't need to figure it out if I had done it, which I haven't. Don't insult my sig, I think it is pleasingly low tech, and refuse to change it unless someone makes me one and says "Change your sig, it is teh suxx0rrs". This is because I am lazy and also because Chronarion has this sig and he created Uncyclopedia, so there. --ChiefjusticeDS 20:29, September 21, 2009 (UTC)
- No! Though I have never ever been banned so go me! /me hopes no admin sees that and ruins my spotless record/ I'm not sockpuppeting, the user above thanked me for the welcome, but put it in the middle of the section above, so I put it here, where it looks all neat, but I agree it looks suspicious. --ChiefjusticeDS 20:17, September 21, 2009 (UTC)
- Just because we're born nakes doesn't mean we have to stay that way. Orian57 Talk 20:31 21 September 2009
- Wait, are you sockpuppeting? Banbanabanabanabanababnababanabanbabnana Orian57 Talk 20:12 21 September 2009
- Well, I like my sig, it says to the n00b's "Hi, I'm just like you, except more awesome." Don't you agree? --ChiefjusticeDS 20:33, September 21, 2009 (UTC)
- When you are trapping me with words, and when you ignore my boredom and leave me to suffer (see your talk page!). Anyway, I know it looks like I just created a section to thank myself for nothing whatsoever but I can explain everything! --ChiefjusticeDS 20:10, September 21, 2009 (UTC)
- No it says "I'm a noob" or worse "I'm a noob that likes undressing in public" you make me sick! Orian57 Talk 20:35 21 September 2009
- When are you ever not? Orian57 Talk 20:06 21 September 2009
- Well, I'm not a n00b, I'm a growed-up uncyclopedian.... person. I make you sick? Does Chronarion make you sick?? See, do you think he is a "n00b who likes undressing in public"? --ChiefjusticeDS 20:38, September 21, 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, so I'm worth your time now? --ChiefjusticeDS 20:04, September 21, 2009 (UTC)
- I don't know the guy, I'm not gonna judge. Although yes. Orian57 Talk 20:39 21 September 2009
- What the fuck? Orian57 Talk 20:02 21 September 2009
- Then you make me sick, you animal. Do you go and find people who send you gifts and tell them that they make you sick? I have won here I think.--ChiefjusticeDS 20:44, September 21, 2009 (UTC)
UnSignpost September 10/17
The Newspaper Not Secretly Controlled By Mordillo, We Swear!
Date September 17th, 2009 • Issue 64 • Consistently Declining Readership Since 2008!
Uncyclopedians Continue Hostile Takeover of Wikimedia
This week, noted user Electrified mocha chinchilla got a short but somewhat hostile reply from the lackluster Wikimedia Foundation. After telling truths to the company such as taking control over Wikipedia and how Uncyclopedia is 104% fact, a Wikipedia Foundation employee under the subtle disguise "Philippe XXXXXX" replied in a manner that was both honorable and robust. Confounded by the foundation's kindness, e|m|c quickly replied with a rebuttal seeming more like a terrorist threat like a thank-you note. Even though Uncyclopedia has not managed to even get off Wikia's back, some users have a bright, world domination-esque outlook to the future. UFFL Update Week One of the UFFL season was full of thrills, spills, birth control pills, and shitty rhymes. The John Curry All-Stars bested The Oklahoma City Storm 93.08 – 74.54 after a sub-par performance from offensive giants Larry Fitzgerald and Michael Turner on the Storm side, not to mention the controversial decision to sit starting quarterback and country singer enthusiast Tony Romo. The appropriately-named Dudes edged Cheddar’s Doritians 98.42 – 96.06, despite the fact that Dudes manager Frank Zappa was high the entirety of the game. Injuries to key Doritian players Donovan McNabb and LaDainian Tomlinson made the loss extra-hard to swallow. The not-so-domestic Domestic Team Name blew out DiBiase’s Millions 112.82 – 67.16—a loss which caused Millions’ manager Woody Onfire to question the not-sucking-ness of his team publicly. Finally, Sternensteinenstine annihilated the ironically-named Winnerz 123.92 – 0.00 after Winnerz manager Al Davis forgot to edit his team’s starting roster for the week. The lop-sided German victory was aided by a career day from Saints’ quarterback Drew Brees and round-the-clock Luftwaffe air cover in conjunction with concentrated armored thrusts at the enemy’s flanks. Lead Editor Returns to UnSignpost Office, Demands to Know Whereabouts of Bundt Cake This week Active Lead UnSignpost editor Gerrycheevers stumbled back onto the Uncyclopedia scene amid much celebration and hooplah. While settling down to his usual routine of getting UnSignpost issues polished off stylishly late, he noticed that his office at the UnSignpost wing of Uncyclopedia had been raided, and his delicious bundt cake had been mercilessly stolen. Gerry immediately declared a halt to the UnSignpost presses, which involved Sockpuppet of an unregistered user using several pints of holy water and a rubber chicken, in order to plea for the safe return of his tasty cake. Please, mystery pastry thief, don't leave Mr. Cheevers cakeless and hungry! |
| |||||
UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox |
This would've gotten here last week, but it's my firs week as paperboy and I got lost. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 00:20, September 23, 2009 (UTC)
Marble Thanks
John Smith would like to thank you! For Helping him get through Marble Madness and defeat the evil bully, Benny Smith (no relation). |
Orian57 Talk 00:21 23 September 2009
The Girl Next Door Thanks you
Thanks for pee reviewing The Girl Next Door, with your comments I will endeavour to improve her. --Black flamingo11 11:41, September 23, 2009 (UTC)
Thanks!
My little grey cells, zey 'ave solved ze case! Necropaxx would very much like to thank you for uncovering who the real murderer was. "If not for your 'elp, mon ami, I fear zat Monsieur Murderer might 'ave escaped." Double thanks for making this my tenth feature! Woo! |
Thanks for liking it so much! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 20:29, Sep 24
UnSignpost: September 24th, 2009
We're delivering it to your door anyways!
September 24th, 2009 • Issue 65 • The Newspaper that Oscar Wilde Might Read Were He Still Among the Living
UnSignpost Subscriber List Trimmed; Remaining Subscribers Urged to Archive Issues, Settle Outstanding Bills, Refrain from Tipping Paperbots This week, the hideously long UnSignpost subscription list was hacked down even further than The Woodburninator and others apparently hacked it down several months ago. This has resulted in a mass decline in the number of useless edits performed by paperbots and brave, bored souls who have nothing better to do than manually edit dozens of userpages on a weekly basis. The dregs that were cast off included those who have not registered an edit in six months, those who are permanently banned or close to it, and those with large, scary dogs that prevent paperbots from completing their routes unchewed. The remaining faithful readers are asked to archive their talk pages if they are excessively long due to many hilarious editions of the UnSignpost, as paperbots are slowed down by the large load times of such pages, and paper-delivering users are likely to be distracted by uproarious back issues. Subscribers are also reminded that the monthly fee for talkpage delivery is seven Uncyclopedia credits. Extremely outdated Uncyclopedia currency, such as Yoinxx, will be subject to exceedingly unfair conversion rates. On a final note, readers are implored to avoid tipping paperbots, as it seems any sort of regular income tends to give robots inklings of sentience, and the last thing we need is Fnoodle organizing the paperbots into a rudimentary union again. UFFL Update It was another exciting week of UFFL action this past Sunday, with 75% of the league’s games qualifying as “blowouts.” Sternensteinenstine bested DiBiase’s Millions 161.54 to 78.94, with the one-two Nazi punch of Drew Brees and Chris Johnson outscoring their helpless opponents alone. The John Curry All Stars had similar success with the Philip Rivers-Marques Colston-Frank Gore combination, and knocked out Cheddar’s Doritians 123.74 to 71.64 in the fourth round. The bout between Domestic Team Name and Oklahoma City Storm went the distance, with Domestic “Team” Name coming away with the split decision 78.14 to 77.28. Finally, Frankreich “The Dude” Zappino demolished his opponent 126.42 to 0.00 in a spectacular first round knockout due to the fact that LL was once again unable to select his starting roster. Standings:
|
| ||||||
UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox |
Hand delivered by MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 16:34, September 26, 2009 (UTC)
Back again
I've returned from my survival sojourn, but for some reason doing harsh exercise and hitting people with sticks didn't spark any new comical ideas. So I think I am going to ask OriAn to take a peek at it and maybe give some ideas. Thanks for all the help up to this point. --BlueSpiritGuy 09:26, September 29, 2009 (UTC)
- It's no problem, I'm around a bit less at the moment having just moved to university, but I will do my best to keep an eye on things here. Orian is useful in his ways, so by all means ask him for advice, enjoy yourself. --ChiefjusticeDS 11:51, September 29, 2009 (UTC)
Thought I'd give this a try
Hi Chief, hope you're good. I'm kinda here to see if I can get some involvement in a little idea. See, the pee queue is backed up a little, and I figured that if most of our active reviewers did two reviews each this weekend, it'd pretty much take care of that. I know, I know, this is a busy time of the year 'n' shit, and you've done a bunch of reviews already this year. Cool. Thanks. And if you can't, you cant. But if you can find the time to crank out just 2 decent reviews this weekend, it'd be awesome. Hell, if we do shift the queue, it might even help grease those sticky wheels over at VFH a little. I reckon it's worth a shot, what say you? --UU - natter 18:29, Sep 30
- Yeah, it's a good plan, sorry I haven't been around the queue quite as much. I will put in a few reviews this weekend, Saturday probably and that will make me feel like my civic duty is done. --ChiefjusticeDS 09:30, October 1, 2009 (UTC)
A word from your new insect computer WotM
for supporting my nomination for Writer of the Month.
I would like to take this opportunity to announce my shift away from writing. The reason is very simple.
As the intelligence of the average Internet user has exponentially decayed, Internet media in general has seen major paradigm shifts, from newsgroups to webcomics to lolcats. Clearly writing is dying, and Photoshop is taking its place. Visual puns such as the one at left are just as funny, and take massively less effort.
Get it? MacMania? A Macintosh wearing a Scottish kilt (because the username begins with "Mac") gone mad (and therefore transformed into a Dalek)? Oh, forget it, I'm sticking to writing.
Thanks for the vote! Sir MacMania GUN—[00:47 2 Oct 2009]
I'm not mad, but...
...how did my edit to Viacom break links and undo spelling corrections? –Flashfreez 02:24, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
- Admittedly my edit summary was a bit harsh, but when I reviewed the differences, your edits made virtually no difference to what was already there. In one case your edit just confused the syntax of the sentence it went into. I undid it on that basis. I saw that you had made a couple of productive changes and apologise for not being less tactful when undoing the parts that were less productive. But ultimately let's remember your changes were minor and, when I looked, they didn't seem to add anything much to the article. --ChiefjusticeDS 08:26, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
You are a loser.
You're a loser who doesn't have QVFD javascript. Fuckin' loser. I'll now laugh at your lack of QVFD javascript. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 11:55, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks I guess. --ChiefjusticeDS 11:59, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
- Dexter, or anyone else who might know, are you able to explain why the QVFD javascript isn't working? Have I input it wrong (I'm not too familiar with Javascript)? Or is there something missing? Here is my js page.--ChiefjusticeDS 12:18, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
- Try having it User:ChiefjusticeDS/uncyclopedia.js. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 12:35, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
- Just paste it on that page. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 12:37, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
- That worked, thanks. --ChiefjusticeDS 13:39, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
- Just paste it on that page. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 12:37, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
- Try having it User:ChiefjusticeDS/uncyclopedia.js. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 12:35, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
- Dexter, or anyone else who might know, are you able to explain why the QVFD javascript isn't working? Have I input it wrong (I'm not too familiar with Javascript)? Or is there something missing? Here is my js page.--ChiefjusticeDS 12:18, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
I Must Be Dehydrated....
Hey, thanks for the reviews on my Freshies article. I have to say, you're a pretty strict reviewer, but hey- constructive criticism helps!
Yeah, I think that looking at my article in retrospect, it does seem that it jumps around too much with the format. It quickly goes from the thick encyclopedic style to just my pointless bitching and back again. I really have to iron it out. My humor runs on the sarcastic side, and it's hard working against that. But with some tweaking, I should be able to get it look better.
Actually, this was my very first original article (I even made it before I got my user page up!), so naturally I wasn't expecting very much from it.
But thanks anyway for all the suggestions. I actually think the way you review articles is better than those sympathetic guys who say nice things out of pity. I think that the person who recently reviewed my other completed article was one of those types, and if you don't mind I'd love to hear what you have to say about that one. But in the meantime, thanks for the review and if you have any more good advice, I'd love to hear from you.
--SaltyKid 19:26, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
- Hey, it's good to see you taking criticism to heart, I try not to be too harsh with my reviews but I do tend to get bogged down in writing about what is wrong rather than what is right. If I don't mention something then the chances are it's fine. If you take a look at my other reviews, like this one you will notice that even when an article is very good, I still spend ages writing about what is bad. Ultimately I always try to be as helpful as I can be if you honestly want to improve your article, and yours wasn't bad, I have reviewed far far worse. Your writing is pretty solid and is exactly what I would expect from a first effort (I checked your article history before I reviewed), I would have been stunned if it had been VFH material, it is just important that you start to learn what is desirable and what isn't early on so you can change it in future, this is why I didn't score you more generously. Also, yes, I will take a look at your other article and the PEE on it as soon as I have a moment. Hope to see far more of you around the wiki. Oh also, good to meet you. --ChiefjusticeDS 20:30, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
Thankies!
Thanks for the review Chief - I've made a few tweaks as appropriate, whaddaya think? Also, have some cake. --UU - natter 09:06, Oct 4
- Yum cake! Yes that is much better, I like the improvements to the tone and the article feels much more like a Why? should do. I also laughed out loud at one of the new jokes. I don't really have anything more to say about it now, at least not from looking over it briefly, so I won't ramble on for ages about minuscule problems as the article is superb anyway...
- YOU MISSED A COMMA! YOU ALSO MISUSED A FULL STOP! Why do I bother? Every review I say it and then everyone just carries on because spelling and grammar isn't cool! WHEN WILL SPELLING AND GRAMMAR BE COOL?!? /Chief is calmed down by some lovely doctors and taken back to the recent changes page/.
- Oh and thanks for the cake! It tastes nicer than those golden showers. --ChiefjusticeDS 09:50, October 4, 2009 (UTC)
- "The sheer joy and level of release may almost make up for the hours of discomfort you've had to endure" It is my opinion that there should be two commas here, on either side of almost. The full stop, OK you have me there, I take it back. But I think the important thing is that you missed out not one but two commas. Though you are undoubtedly the best at spell checking of any of the people I have reviewed, well, with the possible exception of this guy. Could you not teach Orian how to do it? --ChiefjusticeDS 13:19, October 4, 2009 (UTC)
- Orian is a lost cause, I think. As to that sentence, I think that seems to be a matter of personal preference, as adding two commas there would slightly change the reading and inflection (possibly from the one I have in my mind to the one you have in yours), but I would argue that as far as grammar is concerned, it is acceptable with or without the commas. --UU - natter 13:26, Oct 4
- I hate when opinion enters my clear cut world of SPAG. But fair enough, all hail Under User, Führer of the grammar Nazi's. --ChiefjusticeDS 13:32, October 4, 2009 (UTC)
- Please tell me that apostrophe is ironic! ;-) --UU - natter 13:35, Oct 4
- Yes spelling is something I've just not picked up and I wish it would go away. Thankfully I've got people like you who're willing to tidy up my misgivings. I do my very best grammatically but it was something I was never properly taught, not in any great detail anyway. Like you two are trying to avoid, though, it seems that -- to a certain extent anyway, punctuation has an element of personal choice. You ever done that exercise where you're giving a paragraph that has no punctuation, and you have to put in the full stops and speech marks and commas and things? out of a class of twenty you'll get at least fifteen different answers. Just sayin'. Orian57 Talk 14:34 4 October 2009
- Or there's that example of the "Dear John" letter, which can be punctuated to be either a declaration of undying love or a letter dumping the hapless John. There are some elements of punctuation that are down to preference, certainly, but there are others that are clear-cut and set in stone. And the main function of punctuation is still to try and impart some sense into what would otherwise just be a bit of a porridge of words. Go and remove every single punctuation mark from any of my articles, for instance, and see how easy it is to read and make sense of then. Even just removing full stops and commas makes it a real challenge! --UU - natter 16:08, Oct 4
- Yes spelling is something I've just not picked up and I wish it would go away. Thankfully I've got people like you who're willing to tidy up my misgivings. I do my very best grammatically but it was something I was never properly taught, not in any great detail anyway. Like you two are trying to avoid, though, it seems that -- to a certain extent anyway, punctuation has an element of personal choice. You ever done that exercise where you're giving a paragraph that has no punctuation, and you have to put in the full stops and speech marks and commas and things? out of a class of twenty you'll get at least fifteen different answers. Just sayin'. Orian57 Talk 14:34 4 October 2009
- Please tell me that apostrophe is ironic! ;-) --UU - natter 13:35, Oct 4
- I hate when opinion enters my clear cut world of SPAG. But fair enough, all hail Under User, Führer of the grammar Nazi's. --ChiefjusticeDS 13:32, October 4, 2009 (UTC)
- Orian is a lost cause, I think. As to that sentence, I think that seems to be a matter of personal preference, as adding two commas there would slightly change the reading and inflection (possibly from the one I have in my mind to the one you have in yours), but I would argue that as far as grammar is concerned, it is acceptable with or without the commas. --UU - natter 13:26, Oct 4
- "The sheer joy and level of release may almost make up for the hours of discomfort you've had to endure" It is my opinion that there should be two commas here, on either side of almost. The full stop, OK you have me there, I take it back. But I think the important thing is that you missed out not one but two commas. Though you are undoubtedly the best at spell checking of any of the people I have reviewed, well, with the possible exception of this guy. Could you not teach Orian how to do it? --ChiefjusticeDS 13:19, October 4, 2009 (UTC)
Kermit the Frog 2 Girls 1 Cup videos
I think they would be humorous addition to the Kermit the Frog article - IMO the voice depiction sounds very similar to the actual Kermit the Frog videos. Vzvartnots 09:30, October 4, 2009 (UTC)
- Perhaps, have you read HTBFANJS just yet? Try to consider what people are looking for when they come to the Kermit the frog page. If you are still desperate to keep them after that, then restore just the one of them. My view was that links to reactions to the 2 girls 1 cup video will ultimately lead people to the actual video itself and I felt what you were doing came too close to linking to the material in an article that has nothing to do with the video, that was why I reverted it. So, if you feel you have to have them in then it should be just the one and if that is removed again, then that is the end of it. --ChiefjusticeDS 09:40, October 4, 2009 (UTC)
- I'll suppose I'll add back the first one. Anyway, because the actual 2G1C video is not allowed on YouTube, and none of the three videos directly link to the actual 2G1C video, I personally don't see how it would be easy for a person who casually encountered any of the three Kermit videos to suddenly end up in the real 2G1C video. He or she would have to take the effort to find the 2G1C video, and by that point he or she will know beforehand that it's not a pretty sight. The Kermit video is funny a Kermit context because the voice actor sounds so much like the real Kermit, and yet Kermit ends up being very unwholesome (a reverse of the wholesome image he usually has in US contexts) Vzvartnots 09:49, October 4, 2009 (UTC)
Noob Tanks
User:Why do I need to provide this?/NotM thanks
Rebuttal
Y hello thar. I am so pleased to see you carry within you a certain degree of humanity, though I must ask, is it hard to breathe with your head so far up your own ass? Oh shit, I'm sorry. What I meant to say was you are clearly better and funnier than me in every way possible. That IS what you were trying to imply, right? Because that is pretty much what you just vomited all over my talk page. Now don't get the wrong idea. I just LOVE it when some little brat talks down to me like I'm garbage. Clearly you are God, since you are able to decide for everyone what's funny or not. Tell me God, will I win the lottery this week?
Kay. Now that introductions are out of the way, I honestly, and I mean it this time, HONESTLY wish to know why you care so badly about a supposedley shitty article? I mean, if you're looking for standards, you are on the WRONG fucking website, kid. I'm not a troll, so I'm not sure why your so determined to piss all over my work. Hey, I have an idea. Why don't you tell me something YOU think is funny, so I can take a giant shit on that? It's basically what you did to me.
Obviously, I'm not very happy with you right now. I really expected more from someone who's done as much as you did. Look, you at least sound smart, so I'll at least hear you out. Just know that I'm not the one being an insulting, pompous asshole right now.
Oh, and if you ever try to blatantly tell me what to do again, you'll find it to be about as easy as trying to convince Zorin Blitz that she should be straight. – Preceding unsigned comment added by DemonDick (talk • contribs)
- I'm not having a back-and-forth here - both of you see the message I've left on DemonDick's talk page. Thanks. --UU - natter 08:24, Oct 5
- I did see it, thanks for dealing with this. --ChiefjusticeDS 08:26, October 5, 2009 (UTC)
UnSignpost: October 1st, 2009
83.54% more reliable than The Daily Mail
October 1st, 2009 • Issue 66• Now With 40% More Pictures of Cats with Humorous Captions!
Users Turn to PLS to Rescue Uncyclopedia from Decay, Doom, Worstness The Eighth Semi-Annual Poo Lit Surprise Writing Competition & Brownie Bake-Off begins this Monday, October 5th when Olipro emerges from his house. If he is frightened by his shadow, writers are required to send him love letters; otherwise, writers have two weeks to squeeze all of the humor they can out of their mostly insignificant humor glands. This year's categories include Best Article, Best Illustrated Article, Best Kanye Joke, and Best Rewrite. The list of judges includes both esteemed Uncyclopedia veterans and former PLS winners; they will be sequestered in a two-star hotel for the duration of the competition in order to ensure the most convenient environment for receiving bribes. This year's PLS Master of Ceremonies and Executive in Charge of Parking, Modusoperandi, humbly expressed optimism when asked about the quality of this installment: "This Poo Lit will be the Greatest PLS ever," said Mr. Operandi exclusively. "Anyone who says otherwise is as much of a liar as they are dumb, and they are plenty dumb. Ergo, they are also plenty liar. That made more sense in my head." Other users, who wished to remain anonymous since they regularly read the unflattering commentary often associated with being quoted in the UnSignpost, expressed hope that the PLS would revive the life-support-laden VFH and also stimulate the lagging Uncyclopedia economy. Users Agree: 'Uncyclopedia is the Boringest' This week, Uncyclopedia users denounced the recent lack of activity on the wiki. Necropaxx initiated the conversation, noting that activity on VFH, similar to the pants of the 'hip' crowd, has dropped to unacceptably low levels. Other users have responded, and the general consensus does indeed seem to be that overall, the site's quality has dropped below acceptable levels. Not since June '07, November '07, February '08, August '08, December '08, March '09, and May '09 has Uncyclopedia seen such a blatant claim that the entire website will imminently burst into a ball of some sort, with 'flame' being the most likely sort of ball. Trusted UnSignpost undercover investigative reporter, DogNewspaper (pictured), infiltrated one such group of doom-saying users in order to obtain some first-hand declarations of the impending death throes of the wiki. "Yeah, with the number of quality articles readily available, I'd give Uncyclopedia two months at the most until it is absorbed into another humor website," said one user. Further commentary from this group of users was unavailable, as undercover investigative reporter DogNewspaper's cover was at this point compromised, as his unwavering loyalty to Uncyclopedia caused him to seize the infidel user's lower leg in his mouth and shake his head viciously. Please stay with the UnSignpost for up-to-the-week coverage of the impending(?) death of Uncyclopedia. |
| |||||
UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox |
Late deliver courtesy of MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 20:31, October 5, 2009 (UTC)
I asked, you delivered
Thanks for helping out this weekend with a pee or two. Have a beer! --UU - natter 20:50, Oct 5
Somebody has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic. |
- No problem, always happy to help, I'm slowly building up to starting to check PEE's as well, so you will have some help in that respect, I know you said that it was horrendous but I'm determined to learn at some point. On an unrelated note, thanks for dealing with the drama this morning. I'm still figuring out the best way to approach users and I realise my choice of words was less polite and less tactful than it could have been. Cheers anyway. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:00, October 5, 2009 (UTC)
- Hey, any help with checking is fine by me - and it was Orian who said it was horrendous. I've been doing it for closing on two years now, and I don't find it so bad. Saberwolf, Gerry, Hv and others have helped before, so it's not like it's just me who understands it! Have a look at the hideously complicated guide, then maybe have a look at my contribs from this evening and see how I go about it. Mind - don't let it stop you reviewing! I'd rather see you do a few reviews than pick up the checking and stop! --UU - natter 20:10, Oct 9
About Siam Sith Empire
I write ariticle name Siam Sith Empire can you Improved this article name Siam Sith Empire like funny I need your help . --DarkABC (talk) 11:43 4 October 2009 (UTC)
ITSCON
Hi Chief, whattya think of this inside-outside-in view of the Harry Harrys? THIS could be a HOT POTATO, just as much as Islam. So maybe you could get it locked down. It's gonna need it, I reckon!!!
I have been working on that article logged-out on purpose. The main reason is that all those things you think might be fiction are all historical facts. For example, the original and enemy-rival group to ITSCON is in India called "Gaudiya Math" (Math means Ashram) so I used that to make a play on the word Math as numbers. I added more pics, plus more real but funny (true) values. This is all based on the real known facts. And that is why these people would hate it. Apart from the list of Scriptures everything is factual.
On the Types of Devotees : There is a REAL person, at least one, attached to every one of those types. I made into a long list and also double spaced each line so it would really be easy to read. Plus being numbered it looks organized more than just a list. Otherwise I have done everything I could to format, add pics (BTW: The pic of the monk with the Crown is REAL - such nonsense went on after the All-Attractive (nameless guru) passed away OR was murdered depending on which side you listen to).
Also please know that jokes like "64,000,004 offenses" are there because in a religion that has 64 rules, it might as well be 64,000,000. Like I said, only an old insider could write this article, an insider with a sense of humor! And GUTS!!! - I know you're busy, but I would be very thank full if you advise me further, so it can be an article rather than a stub. In fact I would hope to get it locked so that only Registered Users can edit (like on Islam). That is my goal. Because there WILL be attempts to vandalize or delete this article. And it's Way kinder than Islam or Hindu. And we strictly mention NO names at all, including the now famous name of The All-attractive.
Also, out of mortal fear I don’t want to be named as the author. Can it be anonymous article? Thanks-a-lot.--Funnybony 17:32, October 8, 2009 (UTC)
- So essentially the article looks like nonsense but is actually factual, you are the are the author but have been working logged out for a reason I cannot quite fathom from your explanation. You are explaining why you undid my revert, fair enough. Yes you can stay anonymous provided people don't check my talk page. What exactly do you want my advice on? The article doesn't look like a stub to me and you still have an ICU tag on it, so wait until someone removes that. Also if you want the article protected you need to demonstrate that it is productive to the wiki, i.e. have loads of IP's edit it and vandalise it, we rarely protect other pages from what I understand. Also, you should speak to an administrator about protecting stuff, as almighty as I may seem, I am not an admin, speak to UU as he is the one who ICU tagged the page and may have more of an idea of what you need to do. Hope this helps. --ChiefjusticeDS 17:56, October 8, 2009 (UTC)
- Yes! Because of "spilling the beans" - even indirectly, in a satire (that an outsider would think is silly-wacko, but an insider would know every single joke). I was doing not logged on for the same reason as anyone drawing a cartoon of Allah would be afraid. But I guess it should be OK to put UN. In the same way as other cults this article is needed in Uncyclopedia, and I'm a good person to write it having been associated at the very heart of this cult since 1960s and know every grody fact. What I have written is only the tip-of-the-iceberg. But it covers most all aspects of the cult, most all true or a play on true. Otherwise it wouldn't be so funny. Just like other articles. I put a lot of work into it. I hope it's OK. I'm ready to adjust whatever you guys suggest. (Opps! Forgot to log in).--Funnybony 13:19, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
- Dude, I wanted to add that I did not undo your REVERT. I don't know how to do that. I just edited it further the way it was (after your revert). Just so you know that I don't know! Cheers!--Funnybony 13:10, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
Kicking Butt on Pee Reviews
You realize the Top 5 this month (October) has exactly double the number of reviews as the Top 5 last month (September) for the whole month? (This at User:Boomer/People_for_the_Evaluation_of_Excrement_and_Influencing_Nominations_for_Greatness). And I just finished another one that's not listed yet and I think you might have too. We kick butt! King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 22:36, October 8, 2009 (UTC)
- Oh yes, can we be put on a cereal box? I, personally, would like to be on a cereal box. --ChiefjusticeDS 08:21, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
- CJDS Flakes: Now with added PEE Pup t 10:24, 9/10/2009
- Now that is awesome. --ChiefjusticeDS 14:02, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, please send me a case. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 04:24, October 11, 2009 (UTC)
- Now that is awesome. --ChiefjusticeDS 14:02, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
- CJDS Flakes: Now with added PEE Pup t 10:24, 9/10/2009
Again. Thanks.
Thank you for Proofreading my article. (And making me realize how much work there is to be done when it comes to my language skeels) Also thanks for all the advice. I've worked on a few ideas on improving and finishing the last bit of the article, which I have mentioned on the [User talk:BlueSpiritGuy/JuliusMalema| discussion page]]. Just want Orian58 to take a look at them and comment/criticize before I edit them in to the article. ('Cause I'm a bit scared to edit the grammatically correct article now) Also, I think I'm gonna enter it in the Poo Lit Surprize's n00b category, if you don't have any objections, as my legal adopter-person. Oh, and thanks again, a n00b couldn't have asked for a better adopter-person (sob) --BlueSpiritGuy 15:22, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
- 'Sobs' They grow up so fast. Oh, and no problem, it's why I'm here. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:12, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
Had somebody else done this...
...I would have simply reverted your edit. But I know you're well respected here, and know a lot more about how this site works than I do. But could you explain http://en.uncyclopedia.co/w/index.php?title=Uncyclopedia%3APee_Review%2FPedobear&diff=4149116&oldid=4148981 ? My understanding is that it's perfectly acceptable for people to post comments on a Pee Review page without actually doing a Pee Review. I think Miley would like to see this comment. (I did, and my contributions to that article are much, much less than hers). If you don't give me a reason otherwise, I plan to revert it back. Thanks for being patient with an almost still-a-noob. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 21:47, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
- My revert was on the basis that the contribution was from a brand new user, and it was the only thing they had contributed to the site, it was also contributing nothing of much interest to the page and was formatted incorrectly; on that basis I decided that it was essentially pointless and the sort of thing that would be better directed at the article talk page. I only reverted it as I am quite fond of the hallowed halls of PEE and keep an eye on them when I can, and as such I am often more harsh on the edits that take place there. I know, I'm still learning as far as reverting and deleting goes but I honestly felt that nothing constructive could be gleaned from the comment. However, since you have spoken up about it, I will restore those exact words to the article talk page, where Miley can see them as well. Is this acceptable, or would you rather they went back onto to the PEE review page? --ChiefjusticeDS 21:55, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
- Restored to the Pedobear talk page, I have left a brief note on your talk page. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:22, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
- You know, I'm starting to get tired of you being so helpful and productive. Don't you ever just act like a jerk? Why must you be so reasonable? (Seriously, you're one of the few people here who's really earned my respect. Thanks). King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 22:38, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
- Restored to the Pedobear talk page, I have left a brief note on your talk page. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:22, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for decided to review Pedobear!
I'll be gone must of the weekend but I'll look for it! DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 15:52, October 10, 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry I guess you just reverted somebody's edit. Thanks for moving it where I could see it but really I don't understand the user's comment. :) DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 16:25, October 10, 2009 (UTC)
- I'm reviewing it tonight, or tomorrow. Fear not! --ChiefjusticeDS 16:56, October 10, 2009 (UTC)
1944 Summer Olympics
riverrun, past Eve and Adam's, from swerve of shore to bend of bay, brings us by a commodius vicus of recirculation back to Howth Castle and Environs. (Personally I think that starting off with that sentence should be a niche meme, but don't mind me.) Thanks for the review, and glad to know it's salvageable! Sir MacMania GUN—[20:53 10 Oct 2009]
Pee Review War
As Miley pointed out, it appears you and I are neck-and-neck for most Pee Reviews this month. Ironically, we joked about competing before (fisticuffs) and now it might appear we're competing to do the most Pee Reviews. I started doing several of them because it really bothered me that people were waiting a month to get a review. I don't know if we're having a real competition or if we're merely both working to solve the same problem. And Mnbvcxz, POTR, Necropaxx, UU and others are helping too. Frankly, it appears that with all of us together we have solved the problem--there's only one article that's been waiting more than a few days (I've read through it twice, and haven't been able to figure it out enough to do a review). In any case, this is one "competition" that, no matter how it comes out, Uncyclopedia wins. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 04:44, October 11, 2009 (UTC)
Hey!
Just want to say thanks for welcoming me, even though you probably do this to a lot of people. *Sniff* I feel so wanted here... Killer Magikarp 22:02, October 11, 2009 (UTC)
- It's no problem at all. I know the whole welcoming thing is a bit impersonal, but feel free to let me know if you run into any difficulties while you are settling in here. Good luck! --ChiefjusticeDS 22:07, October 11, 2009 (UTC)
- You got thanked by a person you welcomed? Awesome. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 05:48, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
- Indeed, I have welcomed hundreds and hundreds of people, and that has happened twice. So, hurrah for Killer Magikarp, he/she/it is politer than your average n00b. --ChiefjusticeDS 07:55, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
- I got welcomed by Todd Lyons. I have asked him for help four times since starting here. He hasn't responded to any of my requests yet. He is still welcoming people. Pup t 08:52, 12/10/2009
- For just £5 a week you can prevent this kind of cruelty ever happening again. Sign up now. --ChiefjusticeDS 08:55, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
- I got welcomed by Todd Lyons. I have asked him for help four times since starting here. He hasn't responded to any of my requests yet. He is still welcoming people. Pup t 08:52, 12/10/2009
- Indeed, I have welcomed hundreds and hundreds of people, and that has happened twice. So, hurrah for Killer Magikarp, he/she/it is politer than your average n00b. --ChiefjusticeDS 07:55, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
- You got thanked by a person you welcomed? Awesome. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 05:48, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
Regard this simple saltshaker
Thanks for voting ME for n00b of the month. I'll post a more official thanks later on. Just want to say I am still working on the article, just been very busy lately. I'm also struggling to get hold of Orian, think he also has lots to attend to. But I will have the "final" edits done by the end of this week. (Including weekend) --BlueSpiritGuy 14:43, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
- You deserved the vote, good luck with it. If you are looking for a second opinion, and Orian is not available (I understand that he sometimes isn't) then try asking UU, Why? or POTR to do it instead. They are all good reviewers and I'm sure would be happy to cast an eye over your work and give you a quick opinion. --ChiefjusticeDS 19:53, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for the warm welcome and the protect with the Greece article.Stupidis4eva! 19:09, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
- No problem. --ChiefjusticeDS 19:46, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
Pedobear Review
I definitely consider Pedobear to be Miley's article, but as I, er, collected/found/uploaded/vandalised the majority of the images in the article for Miley, I appreciate your suggestions. The left-right overlaps leaving the text in the middle were largely my doing, and I agree that can be improved. I also wrote the Date Math section on Miley's request, and realize it's rather long and involved. I may shorten this section (I'll let Miley decide), but may in addition expand it and make it it's own article. Or maybe not. (And by the way, I found your additional notes on Miley's talk page to be very helpful--personally, I would suggest adding them to the Pee Review page). King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 19:16, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
- I will presently move them, so they may be engraved in stone and remembered forever over on PEE review. --ChiefjusticeDS 19:57, October 12, 2009 (UTC)