User talk:MadMax/Archive5

Zoe[edit source]

WHY YOU DELETE MY PAGE!? – Preceding unsigned comment added by UberEmo (talk • contribs)

I've restored the article to your userpage, however I'd suggest rewriting it. It reads a lot like a vanity/cyberbullying page which isn't very tolerated on Uncyclopedia. MadMax 19:49, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

MAXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX![edit source]

Hey man! It's great to see you around...Are you back? ~ 19:54, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Might be. At least on a once a week basis. MadMax 19:57, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Good to see ya! ~

20:00, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. :) MadMax 20:01, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

If I might add... HEEEEEELLLLLLLLLLLOOOOOOOOOO!!!!! Great to see you around the place Max. :) Mr N

20:29, Jan 22

Template: Infobox Company[edit source]

You know the Template:Infobox Company you created? What's the purpose of the Image Map field? I'm currently using it on one of the pages I contribute to, but I can't for the life of me figure out what to put there. Wolf ODonnell 13:41, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

The image map option is for an image of the restaurant itself, apart from the logo option. MadMax 19:25, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Okay, then. Thanks. Wolf ODonnell 17:54, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Schleswig-Holsten-Pils-Question[edit source]

Thanks !?!? for your interest in the Schleswig-Holsten-Pils-Question. I did say it was a work in progress so where is the 'confusion' as such. Never heard of this question ?? or should I stick linking everything to Sonic the Hedgehog instead. Hmmmmm !!--Romartus 21:08, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

It wasn't intended as a criticism. I'm kind of a history buff and I actually thought the article was pretty funny. I added the {{AOC}} template because its not exactly a commonly known topic. You can remove it if you'd like although you should generally link something, such as {{wikipedia}}, so people won't get confused (or nominate it on VFD in a worst case scenario). MadMax 21:30, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Help![edit source]

I need help with the SpongeBob article. I moved it wrong and got a few links messed up. Accont101 19:32, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

NP. Sorted. Mr N

21:50, Mar 7

max![edit source]

it's great to see you around again, max. i remember my first few edits, which were on my first article...you came along and slapped a category on it and were gone again so fast it made my head spin! SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:12, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. Hopefully, I should be online more during the summer. MadMax 20:16, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Something's wrong...[edit source]

See what I mean? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk)

GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:24, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

That's weird, it seems to be a problem with the front page rather than the article itself. I'll ask around on IRC and see if anyone's around. MadMax 18:29, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Ok, I can't connect to IRC for some reason. I'll try to look for another Admin on right now. MadMax 18:31, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. It'll be updated on the main page in a few minutes. ~

18:35, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Ah, thanks Mordillo. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk)

GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:36, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

UNNEWS SUCKS[edit source]

It's linked from a deletion log in the UnSignpost, there's really no need to recreate it. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:17, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

What's his thing thinhg[edit source]

Best picture insertion ever! mAttlobster. (hello) 23:08, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

NASA[edit source]

who's john sweeney? SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:49, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

He's apparently a reporter for the BBC. I assume there was supposed to be a link to a news story provided when User:Shadeofblue originally uploaded the photo. I was thinking of changing the photo later on if I couldn't find the story. MadMax 15:12, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

image hack-ups[edit source]

I believe some of the images that you restored were deleted because they were porn images that served little function. (Well, some of those were more "political" deletions, I believe that "cream girl" pic was deleted parly because it was uploaded by a 12 year old, we have worse.) --Mn-z 04:51, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Do you know which ones specifically? I always try to remove the links to deleted shock/pr0n images. Sometimes non-mainspace images show up on Special:Unusedfiles and get deleted as unused files which is usually the only time I undelete images. MadMax 13:43, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

I believe this one was deleted for being a porn image. --Mn-z 17:15, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

According to the deletion log, it was deleted as an unused image. I can remove it from Cream, but I generally don't like deleting images from userpages. MadMax 17:33, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Its not the worst pic we have, and I can live with it. I think it was deleted after a 12 year-old spammed it in a template in several articles. --Mn-z 17:39, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Tanks[edit source]

Hey Max. Thanks for the edit on my Etowah Cunty article :) It's my first article so I'm not really experienced. Not sure how you changed the Category, but it's much appreciated. It got tagged with ICU about an hour into it, but I wasn't finished with it until 4-5 hours later -.- Lol. I assume it was okay to remove the ICU tag? From what I gathered it was alright to remove the ICU tag when you thought the article was finished and had enough content. - Razgriz4977 01:25, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Sure no problem. I think it looks alright to remove the ICU now. In future, you might want to use the {{construction}} when working on an article fora long period of time. When your finished, you could put it up for pee review for a second opinion. Happy editing. :) MadMax 14:34, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi MadMax[edit source]

Thanks for being such a help in my first week, and for the compliment too! The Bristol Stool Chart isn't actually as high on my priority as it might seem, but thanks for the resources, it's a good start. Do you have any work you would like help/input on? I think the Haneke page will keep me occupied for a while, but I'm keen on adding to/editing/aiding with other pages while I'm still learning, it's all good. --El Sid

Well there's always plenty of things to do. :) I usually work on Category:Uncyclopedia maintenance and Special:SpecialPages which can definatly help you learn formatting if nothing else. There's also Gwax's timeline project which could use some help. I was really impressed with your list (very ambitious!) and I'm glad to see somebody interested in taking on some of these topics. You'd be surprised what articles still have yet to be created on Uncyclopedia. MadMax 15:01, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Must have forgotten to reply to you, sorry MadMax. Thanks for the kind words, I do my best, I think picking up these random clean-up jobs is good practice for me too :) --El Sid 16:08, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

COOL[edit source]

Thanks for fixing up Don Martin. And I made the phony URLs clear. Please take another look. I dare not submit to the Pee Review because they are just that. I cannot submit my own contributions. In fact, I have contributed all these pages and YOU are the first person to say a nice word.

unCyclopedia Pages by Rick Brown (HUMOR)

Much appreciated--Funnybony 12:45, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Wow, you've been busy! Its a pretty varied list too. Have you seen the Vietnam War Hoax article ? The Yardbirds are one of my favorite bands. I'm looking forward to future articles too. MadMax 05:25, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Page move[edit source]

Hey! can you please change the title of the Frost & Sullivan page to Feroze & Suleiman? Thanks. – Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.141.61.248 (talk • contribs)

Thunderdome Schmunderdome[edit source]

Thanks for the edit to Michelle Obama. Nice touch. --Wurstnachtmare 23:42, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Your welcome. Great article by the way. It's pretty rare when someone nails it on their first try. :) MadMax 23:48, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Much graces! --Wurstnachtmare 04:26, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

I see you adding a template to the useserspaced TYATUs[edit source]

Stop adding that one and start adding {{User:Uncyclopedian/Template:TYATU}}. The links may be broken now, but it's been updated to contain links to all of the subpages from the original mainspaced version, whereas High Gen. Grue's template only has those from "Season 1" and links back to his own userspace articles. To make things fixed-er, I'll do the honors of fixing the links in the template, then you keep doing what you're doing. Deal? -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 23:59, 8 July 2009

Sorry about that. Thanks for letting me know. MadMax 00:03, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, by the way. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me! 00:43, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Not a problem. I can't edit User:Uncyclopedian/UnScripts:The Young and the Uncyclopedians/105 without removing the <big></big> tags though. MadMax 00:45, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Dearest MadMax[edit source]

MadMax, you're in random areas! (hinted by the edit you made in User:Flutter/Images/6) —Flutter Tuwoolookie! | My History | Brute! 21:23, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Phoenix Nights[edit source]

Hey bud. Sounds like a decent plan. Unfortunately I'm not familiar enough with the shows to be able to do it justice. Waylon Smithers on the other hand... By Mykell - - Chat To Meh

You'd be surprised how many Simpson characters used to be around. Most of them ended up being deleted and redirected to The Simpsons. A List of characters in The Simpsons would be great if someone ever gets around to creating one. MadMax 01:28, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Bradford Riots - Changes[edit source]

Hi Madmax,

I've been looking at the Bradford Riots article, I've noticed 2 issues, one the commonwealth games link is broken, to be honest the joke would be funnier if you said the previous riot was over cricket as that is a game played by all 3 main communities in Bradford - http://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Cricket

Also you've changed Pakistan to Indian, locally this would be as, if not far more offensive as the Indian community was not involved in the real incident, it would be better to leave it simply as Bradford, or maybe change it to something vague like 'The Middle East'

Cheers... – Preceding unsigned comment added by Degeneration (talk • contribs)

Actually I reverted previous IP vandalism rather than making new material to the article. I protected the article because this type of vandalism has been ongoing and will very likely turn up on VFD in the near future. If you'd like to make your own version in your userspace (User:Degeneration/Bradford Riots) I'd be glad to replace it with the current version. MadMax 18:38, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks Max, I'll do that at some point this week and let you know. :-)

My Page[edit source]

Hey, I'm the author of the Emoe-Göatian Example, but I can't seem to think of anything to add to the page. If you could help me advance it somehow, it would be greatly appreciated. --The Hon Uncyclopedico KBE 17:53, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Interesting subject. :) Well I've added {{math}} and {{nowikipedia}}. I couldn't find a version on wikipedia, is it a parody of a real-life theory or is it original? I'll also try looking around on Special:Unusedfiles for a photo. You could also put it up for Pee Review if you'd like some suggestions. MadMax 20:54, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, it's original, but I've been having trouble expanding it. thanks for the links! i'll see if I can get people involved.--The Hon Uncyclopedico KBE 21:44, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks![edit source]

For the compliment and cleaning up my Al Franken article a little bit as well. I was worried that it would be too partisan and libelous, and I'm still figuring out the editing functions.STParker 22:38, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Well pretty much anything goes here as long as its funny. There used to be a great image of Stuart Smalley but I'm pretty sure it was deleted awhile ago. Anyway glad I could help. MadMax 06:33, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

It's that picture I put on ytmnd! And it's on my user page now! I'm all kinds of surprised...in a good way... – Preceding unsigned comment added by StupidBunny (talk • contribs)

Thanks to you...[edit source]

...I now know that I've used the word "classy" on no less than three pages. That's the kind of trivia that I don't need to know. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 04:34, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Well there you are. :) MadMax 08:36, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Yes, it's yet another useless fact that's overwritten something useful in my brain. This explains why I keep peeing in the sink. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 09:11, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Um...[edit source]

You made a red link Emo Rap. Planning to write about the subject you linked to? -- Style Guide 09:03, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

It was a broken link. Thanks for the tip. MadMax 14:00, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

?[edit source]

You've added some fairly weak material from previous versions of David Bowie and the BBC - it's not I want to discourage editing, but these did not seem constructive - adding content from crapper versions to reasonably good ones that have been re-written?:)--Sycamore (Talk) 20:20, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't know they'd been taken out. I found them on Special:Unusedfiles and thought they'd been overlooked or removed via vandalism. MadMax 03:58, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Clint945[edit source]

Cheers for fixing some of my formatting, i wasn't quite sure of how to write the code in properly. Finished the article now. Well... mostly finished anyway. Tell me what you think of it if you have the time :)

Looks good, although I'm the last person to be asking advice from. I'd definately recommend putting it up for Pee Review though. I've gone through and fixed some typos and formatting now that its finished. MadMax 04:32, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Crazy Frog[edit source]

Thanks for those touch ups im not very good at this --Ironic Youth 08:47, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome. It's a nice little article. Good luck on the Pee Review. MadMax 06:13, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Zinaldo[edit source]

Please restore it the real madrid bigsoccer forum is loving it.

I've undeleted the article but you should really work on improving it. Otherwise it'll just get deleted by another administrator when the {{construction}} tag expires. MadMax 06:13, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks[edit source]

for your maintenance edit on UnMysteries:The Mysterious Affair at the World War Two Convention. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 23:16, Jul 21

No problem. MadMax 06:13, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Further Thanks[edit source]

for your maintenance edits on my page Non-player characters. However, I was editing the page myself at the time; is there a tag I can put up to inform people of that fact? I thought the construction tag would be enough; apparently it wasn't. Thanks again. Snowyowl 15:57, November 13, 2009 (UTC)

The construction tag is usually enough but you should use {{contruction}} instead of copying the actual template code. I really liked the article by the way. :) MadMax 20:02, November 13, 2009 (UTC)

Regarding It's a trap redirect[edit source]

You redirected It's a trap to The Men in Blood-Stained Overcoats Who Stay Out of Sight, Waiting For Just the Right Moment.

Logically, the redirect should point to Admiral Ackbar, since that is the origin of the "It's a trap" meme. For comparison, Wikipedia already has a redirect from "It's a trap" to Admiral Ackbar. Is it okay if I go ahead and change this? Or do you have some special reason for this particular redirect target? In that case, might a disambig be possible? --Pentium5dot1 (semi-retired) t ~^_^~c 06:45, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Nope. Go right ahead. MadMax 06:46, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia:Requested Articles[edit source]

Whelp... Thats a lot of stuff added. A while back, I had brought it up on the forums to clean that page up, and got the go ahead from Rc, and a few others. So, I hacked that baby up. Personally, I think the list is a bit long, and people aren't likely to look at a lot of the stuff on there. What do you think? Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 16:20, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Its great to see someone finally cleaned up the page but there was a lot of good stuff removed in the process. There were a few sections that were litterally gutted. I didn't add everything back of course, there was some stuff that was never going to be created, but there were a lot of legitimate requests on that page before the cleanup. I can go through and remove some of the more non-essensial stuff but generally the unwritten rule of the page was to avoid removing legitimate requests. MadMax 16:27, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Sounds good. I probably got over excited, and started shooting off my deleter without warning. I brought this up, not because I don't trust your judgement (Obviously. You're Mad "Mad" Max). I just wanted you to know there had been some talk about it. Whatever, I'm having enough trouble formulating sentences today. Carry on with your usual hijinx. Woody On Fire!

Talking Woody Stalking Woody 16:46, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Don't worry about it. :) I did think the list was getting pretty long myself which is why I moved the templates to a subpage. You do bring up a very good point though. The list will start to become crowded eventually, even with legitimate requests. Maybe requests left over after a year or so could be moved to a larger subpage. Something like UnBooks:1000 Uncyclopedians Typing Hamlet perhaps?

What do you think of a userpage award for articles created from requested articles? It might be worth bringing up at Der Unwehr. Anyway, feel free to remove anything you really feel doesn't belong. I'll probably do some trimming myself today. MadMax 17:01, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

I think the real problem is that no one really goes to that page to look for them. The page has gotten stagnant. The same old ones are just sitting around on there for ages, and not enough good new ones come in. Taking it to Der Unwehr might be a good idea, but right now they are worried about rewriting instead of adding new pages. I think we should see what Guildy says. If not, yet another usergroup may have to be made, in order to get more people coming to the page to take a look at the requests. But I'm not a huge fan of usergroups myself. Woody On Fire!

Talking Woody Stalking Woody 17:21, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

I did mention the idea of an UN:IC/Der Unwehr collaberation to create new articles a few weeks ago. As I understand it, UN:IC takes a month for their collaberations. Maybe its possible the two groups could collaberate once every six months or a year? Hmm...we could try to get the page listed under the navigation or community sections. Some exposure on the main page might just be the thing. MadMax 17:55, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Well if you bring it to the community in the forums, expect downvotes and Forum BS. But I agree. Exposure is probably the most important thing for it right now. Woody On Fire!

Talking Woody Stalking Woody 18:13, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

I'll ask around and see if anyone has any ideas. In the meantime, I've created a test template. MadMax 18:29, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Lucky Charms[edit source]

How do you like my new Lucky Charms article that you just protected? Is it magically delicious? It's supposed to be a spoof of a wizard did it, but...--Almost Sir Random Crap

Actually, it was Lucky charms (a redirect) that I protected. Its been created quite a few times so it was great to finally link it to something. I did like the article by the way (nice picture!). Did you want the article protected? MadMax 21:06, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Yes, but I think it still needs some small cosmetic changes before only Sysops can edit it...I'm not sure.--Almost Sir Random Crap

Okay, protect it now if you want. See what other sysops think about it, though. This might get deleted, being very similar to A wizard did it.--Almost Sir Random Crap

I don't know, I thought it was pretty funny. :) MadMax 21:32, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Hey, do you think it's VFH material?--Almost Sir Random Crap

Well, one-liners usually are rarely featured. You also have to consider that there's a lot of similar articles too. If you're interested in trying to get it featured I'd think the key would be to show how this particular version is set apart from the others. You could put it up for Pee Review for some suggestions. On the other side of the coin you have say Michael Clarke Duncan, which survived two VFD attempts, so I think that its safe from VFD at least. MadMax

Image suggestions[edit source]

Thanks for those. I'm going through them... have already used one in the History section and one in the description of the Brown Kegs. Will see what else I can do. Cheers --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 12:56, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Glad I could help. If you need anything specific, please let me know. MadMax 13:01, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Blegh thanks[edit source]

Thanks for fixing my article. I hate wiki formatting. But, letting you know, i'm deleting some of the shit i put in. I think i overdid the nasty stuff. User:intake360 1:57, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

I nominated you for UotM, again.[edit source]

Why? Because I don't think you've been welcomed back properly, yet. That's why. Plus, you're awesome. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 18:26, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Lol, that's ok. I've already had my 15 minutes of fame. :) Besides, I haven't done anything realy outstanding this month. I'm sure's there's plenty of other people who deserve it more then me. MadMax 18:34, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

I know. But no one deserves it more than you. Well, no one deserves it twice as much as you. I'm namely trying to get the others to up their contributions by making them feel see your greatness. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 18:40, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks[edit source]

PsychotypeD 23:32, 29 July 2009 (UTC) Thanks for the tech help on the Green Goblin article.

Glad I could help. Its nice to see I'm not the only fanboy on Uncyclopedia. :) If you're interested, you can find a list of wanted comic book characters here and here. MadMax 23:41, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Another Question[edit source]

I am a little curious about this given that the article was at -1 when it got taken off VFH. Or am I stepping in where I'm not welcomed? *dons puppy eyes* Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 21:18, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Well I thought it was fairly even given the low vote count. Three to four with one favorable abstain. Still, I don't use the QVH tag very often so I could be wrong. MadMax 21:21, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the award![edit source]

Thanks for the award for Ricardo Montalban / Ricardo Montalbán! Miley Spears 00:49, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome. :) MadMax 00:53, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

PETA article[edit source]

I bet you're busy, but I've really been trying to fix the PETA article, which was stupid not funny. I tried to make it funny and stupid. Here's the changes -- http://en.uncyclopedia.co/w/index.php?title=PETA&diff=4019191&oldid=3893105 Any suggestions? Miley Spears 04:48, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Hmm..this has really gone downhill I last saw it. Usually, I'd suggest reverting to a better version and starting from there but that's kind of tough when an article has a long history like this one. I've looked through some of the history and there's some more or less decent versions, here, here and here for example. While not great, there's still some salvagable material there. I'll go through the history more closely and salvage some of the better material and incorporate it with you own. MadMax 05:02, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

You know, now that I think about it, there's actually two other articles on PETA (PETA (group) and People Eating Tasty Animals). It might be better just to merge whatever's there to either one of those articles. MadMax 05:18, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

I think People Eating Tasty Animals is funny but I don't know if it will merge it's totally different humor. Really I don't think PETA (group) is funny but that's just my opinion. Miley Spears 02:50, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

I reverted the article to its original version with some slight reformatting. I could then move the article to PETA Homepage or something like that. What do you think ? MadMax 05:34, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

When I read this I thought you meant you reverted it back to the beginning! Really I like the way it is now thanks for your changes. Of course I know it won't stay that way! Miley Spears 02:50, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Oh no, I reverted it a second after posting that version. You're work is still safe and sound. :) I could protect the page for you if you think there's still a vandalism problem? MadMax 03:00, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! But I think I'd rather give peeps a chance to do good edits and only protect it if it's a problem. Thanks again! Miley Spears 07:00, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

I have a question about your change to the article that was a test (Revision as of 05:29, 31 July 2009). Was this to see if your bot would automatically revert it back? Miley Spears 04:53, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Actually I just used the "undo/rollback" option in the edit history. The "test" in question was just to save that particular version in the history. MadMax 08:25, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

thank you?[edit source]

what was the reward thinger you left on my page about, i appreciate so dont get me wrong!--70.40.245.131 01:08, 1 August 2009 (UTC) forgot to log in this was from me --I am Justice! aka: Halsoft. 01:10, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Its a new award for editors who've contributed to UN:REQ over the years, usually by creating an article that someone requested (intentionally or otherwise). MadMax 01:19, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Oh my fucking god[edit source]

I fucking love you man! --Ericap 17:16, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Yellow[edit source]

Thanks - totally butchered my revert of that due to pure n00bishness, and you fixed it before I could advise someone.. The link on the front page goes through to yellow - action=edit as well. Can you do some magic on that? I don't think I can, and to be honest given how badly I just stuffed up yellow I'm afraid to try. Pup t 02:07, 2/08/2009

I protected the article itself, both editing and page moves, is that what you mean? MadMax 02:14, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Double Redirects[edit source]

Hi Max,

When you create redirects can you check that you don't create double redirects in the process? Thanks. ~ 16:25, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't realize the drop down menu listed redirects. I've fixed the ones in Special:DoubleRedirects, thanks for letting me know. MadMax 16:40, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

No problem. ~

16:42, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

(Ab)Normal Redirects[edit source]

Some of your recent redirects have been rather... baffling. I must ask, are you quite mad? Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 06:22, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Which ones specifically? I usually create them from Special:WantedPages so some title might seem a bit random at times. MadMax 06:23, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

22:29, August 3, 2009 (hist) (diff) N This page is a fake page caught between existence and non-existance only ever visited by you, Chuck Norris and several other scientologists ‎ (←Redirected page to What to do if you open your front door one day and there is a portal to an alternate dimension instead of what you expected to see, which was probably something along the lines of whatever is usually outside your house)
22:27, August 3, 2009 (hist) (diff) N People who are totally all like "we're the best" but their aLL gay and stuff and stupid s i hate them ‎ (←Redirected page to Writing articles while drunk)

These two come to mind. At first I was like "hey this is kinda funny I wonder who did them" but then I saw the name and I was like "whoa this is MadMax?" and then I was like O_o.

Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 06:29, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Lol..well sometimes I do get creative at night. ;-) These pages were linked to a few articles already so I thought I might as well create redirects for them. MadMax 06:31, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Well, as long as you're not just editing after a rousing shot of absinthe, keep it up. Some of these articles I didn't even know existed! It's like having Christmas again every couple minutes!

Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 06:38, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, a lot of these articles actually go back as far as 2005. There's some really great titles but most of them got VFD'd way back. MadMax 06:42, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Well, they probably deserved it, because they're not these. It's just the way things are.

Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 06:47, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Restore[edit source]

Could you please restore User:Electrified mocha chinchilla/Awards? I accidentally placed it in the QVFD while I was cleaning out pages in my namespace. --EMC^[TALK] 01:50, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks![edit source]

FROM THE DESK OF GUILDENSTERNENSTEIN

Thank you for supporting my recently featured article

Your support is greatly appreciated.

—Guildensternenstein

—Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 21:57, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

NoTM[edit source]

Could have given me more than 60 seconds to fix my own mistake!Pup t 10:36, 6/08/2009

Sorry force of habit. ;) MadMax 10:40, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

That's okay - I'm just asleep as I type. Check out the history here to see how much brain is asleep. Pup t 10:43, 6/08/2009

I've been there! MadMax 10:47, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Wheeeeeee.... Pup t 10:53, 6/08/2009

Offensive Image[edit source]

[[File:Mohammedlickingcock.jpg]] Could something be done about this?

Yeah i can't understand how this one got through the censors either, it should definitely be deleted--El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 17:36, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Hmm..well its kind of a tricky situation. There's ususally a little more leeway when it comes to user pages, although even using the image in an article (as long as it was in-context) would also be acceptable. There's been similar discussions over images, here for example, so its difficult to delete one image when there's plenty of others which are just as bad/good (at least, that's how I've always understood it). I'll ask User:Mordillo and see what he thinks but if you really have an issue with it, you could nominate it on VFD. MadMax 08:01, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

We have worse than that. ;) I doubt it would get deleted at VFD. Mr N

10:30, Aug 8

Thanks[edit source]

Our appreciation is not easily earned.

But you have achieved what few others ever manage:
The respect of the
Kosher Nostra.
You can rest assured that you henceforth enjoy our protection,
our support and a bed free of beheaded bagel crumbs.
La Kosher Nostra.

PETA Protection[edit source]

I got bit by a rabid kitten and lost my mind. You offered to protect the PETA article, and I declined. What was I thinking? It hasn't been vandalized yet since my last edit, but I checked through the history and found it's been vandalized many times. Protection just means only registered users can edit it, right? If so, could you protect it, pretty please? Miley Spears 15:29, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Dick Head[edit source]

Hey Max! I think I have a good one. Could you send me the code to put a redirect of Dick Head to Dead Dick. Much appreciated.--Funnybony 17:31, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

I created it for ya Funnybony. Take a look. "#REDIRECT Dead Dick" Mr N

17:37, Aug 21

---Dude, paradise is full of guys like you. Plus it's 6 foot and glassy point break ALL THE TIME, and the Sun in paradise has no UV rays to fuck you up. Thanks a-mil--Funnybony 16:58, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Don't I Deserve a Ban Pretty Please?[edit source]

I've been here 28 days now (if you don't count my first day), and I haven't been banned yet. Am I doing something wrong? I really think I deserve to be banned. I was in the Imperial Colonization project that rewrote the already featured article on God, and I unstubbed the Catsup article based on my own edits, and created Brooke Shields and Ricardo Montalbán even though both articles had previously been huffed, was nominated twice for Noob of the Month even though I don't qualify (I was here one day, then gone for a month and half, then came back 28 days ago so if you don't count the first day I've been here for four weeks), named myself a Member of the Order of Uncyclopedia, and right now I'm typing while topless. And I'm annoying you with this stupid request. If I don't deserve a ban, who does? So, can you ban me, please? Miley Spears who really, Really, REALLY wants to get banned (but not for too long) 05:37, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

I seem to recall a completely anonymous user getting you banned for 28 hours or something ridiculous. Pup t 07:46, 28/08/2009

A-ha!

10:38, 23 August 2009 Thekillerfroggy (Talk | contribs) changed block settings for Miley Spears (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 1 day (account creation disabled, autoblock disabled) ‎ (Blatantly justified circumnavigation of the rules)
00:22, 23 August 2009 Thekillerfroggy (Talk | contribs) blocked Miley Spears (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of Judgement Day ‎ (pointlessly productive, dedicated user)

God I'm good. Pup t 07:48, 28/08/2009

Template Idea[edit source]

Would anyone care if I added this template to those templates that have been deleted on VFD and restored for archival purposes? (And if you wondering, yes I know it would need to go inside a "noinclude" tag). I do believe the consensus is not to use archival templates, and I think this would help in making that clear to new users. --Mn-z 05:44, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Sure, that's a great idea. I've been using the {{archive}} template up until now but that works a lot better. MadMax 05:46, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

I found this template, which is now used in only 1 forum post. I would normally put it on QVFD, but I'd figure you'd just restore it for archival purposes. So to take out the middle man, I went ahead and put the "don't use in mainspace" template on it. --Mn-z 06:48, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

I usually try and remove red linked templates/images when I can but forums are almost always closed to editing. MadMax 06:54, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Mnb, how exactly do you know which template was ostracized? Also, isn't it supposded to be "damned" from mainspace? ~

11:03, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

They are ones that have been deleted, either via VFD or because there were unused, and restored because of archival use in forum posts or in userspace. I believe Madmax is the restorer of almost of those. The only exceptions are the {{crap}} template, which was userspace only per its instructions, and {{IBSAW}}, which I went ahead and added the template instead of going through the process of QVFDing it, having an admin delete it, then having Madmax restore it due to its archival use, and then adding the template after its restoration. As four the spelling, it appears your write. --Mn-z 20:24, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Max, why do we need to revive deleted templates for archival purposes? ~

10:56, September 6, 2009 (UTC)

Image thingy[edit source]

Hey MadMax. Could you restore File:Utopiaflag.JPG? I just restored an old revision of Utopia and apparently the image was deleted. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:36, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

End of the Internet[edit source]

I still think my making the End of the Internet a blank page was funny, but your redirect works really well. DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 04:07, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Sun Bees[edit source]

Hey thanks for the box! Why do I need to provide this? 05:41, September 2, 2009 (UTC)

No problem. The full template is here if you want to add more options. MadMax 05:47, September 2, 2009 (UTC)

I saw other bee articles were singular, like Bee and Bear Bee, so I redirected Sun Bees to Sun Bee. But I don't know how to transfer the history over. Could you help? Why do I need to provide this? 17:56, September 3, 2009 (UTC)

I just discovered something weird. When I did a search for bee, all I found with bee in the title was Bear Bee, Bee, Bee Gees, and Sun Bee. But I just found a link to an article called Flaming Bee. I have no idea why it didn't come up in a search. Do you? I wasn't trying to rip someone else off here. My article Sun Bee is a rip off of the 1975 movie Bug, where cockroaches from the center of the Earth have rear antennae they rub together to start fires. What should I do? Why do I need to provide this? 18:13, September 3, 2009 (UTC)

I think words 3 letters or shorter are often not found by the search engine, or at least they didn't used to be. The servers probably haven't updated their databases yet for the search engine. Or, it could be an old article that the servers haven't rechecked. --Mn-z 18:28, September 3, 2009 (UTC)

I just put Sun Bee up for Pee Review. Maybe I'll learn something. Why do I need to provide this? 05:40, September 6, 2009 (UTC)

Template:Special Æuml and Øuml[edit source]

Is that information dated? And, huh? --Mn-z 17:19, September 4, 2009 (UTC)

I think it was a utility template specifically designed for an article deteled last year. It's being used in the userspace now. MadMax 19:59, September 4, 2009 (UTC)

Mind if I put {{Dammed Template}} on it? --Mn-z 04:42, September 5, 2009 (UTC)

Sure. I don't see why not. MadMax 05:32, September 5, 2009 (UTC)

Delete[edit source]

Forum:Yahoo! Answers should get more Uncyclopedia'd‎. i need it deleted. It was a mistake to make it.--Bad Shroom 20:22, September 4, 2009 (UTC)

My stupid user name[edit source]

When I signed up here a few days ago, I tried some user names I liked that didn't work (somebody already had them, I guess), and at some point got the message 'Why do I need to provide this?' So I typed that in as my user name, and it worked. The problem is, it's long and nobody will remember it. I can't even remember it--I keep trying to sign in as 'Why do I have to provide this?' Is there some way I can change it, like make up a shorter user name then move my edit record over? I wouldn't care about completely starting over, but I wrote the Sun Bee article and somehow I got nominated for Noob of the Month (that's before I started the article). I still don't know why I got nominated. In any case, can I move my stuff to a new user name? Sorry for the hassle. Why do I need to provide this? 05:47, September 6, 2009 (UTC)

Why don't you ask Sockpuppet of an unregistered user if he has nay ideas? (4 more characters - I counted) Pup t 10:47, 6/09/2009

Talk with Sannse, she can change your username. She will make you read long contracts and sign over your soul to Wikia, but she gets the job done. ~

10:54, September 6, 2009 (UTC)

I'd leave it... you get used to the typing, and once you set up a short name (like Socky or POTR) it's all good. I still think YdoI suits. Pup t 11:13, 6/09/2009

Thanks for all the suggestions. I like Ydol except in some fonts it will look just like Ydo1. Why do I need to provide this? 13:26, September 6, 2009 (UTC)

For right now, I'm using the following signature. I hope nobody else is using something like it. If so, let me know and I'll change it. WHY??? 20:02, September 7, 2009 (UTC)

I always thought your user name was cool. ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*

(talk) (stalk) Π ~

~ 03:09, November 28, 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. I'm actually starting to get used to it, especially now that someone's made an article out of my name (it's still being worked on). King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 07:08, November 28, 2009 (UTC)

Brooke Shields is Where?[edit source]

Seeing as how Miley Spears is the one who welcomed me here, I thought I'd point this out. On the front page, it lists recently featured articles. Brooke Shields isn't listed. Can this be fixed? Why do I need to provide this? 13:28, September 6, 2009 (UTC)

Automated process, it's removed after a couple of days. Also, this is not my talk page. ~

13:55, September 6, 2009 (UTC)

I know it's removed from feature or yesterday's feature, but I mean from the list of recently featured articles. It looks like the recently featured section lists articles that were up a week or more ago, and not the most recent ones which aren't on the list. Why do I need to provide this? 04:44, September 7, 2009 (UTC)

I haven't figured out why, but if you look at Uncyclopedia:VFH/Featured, it stopped at September 2nd. And Template:Recently_featured seems to be treating the article on top of that list as the current feature, and listing the articles in positions 2-7 as previous features... even though it's supposed to list 12 articles? Okay, what's broken and whose fault is it? It's not like Uncyclopedia doesn't know about the recent features. They're listed on Uncyclopedia:Best of. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 06:46, September 7, 2009 (UTC)

Eh, I purged Uncyclopedia:VFH/Featured and it's up to Sept. 6th now, which is accurate because there's no feature for today. I obviously don't know what's going on so I'm going to stop spamming Mordillo's talk page now. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 06:50, September 7, 2009 (UTC)

Thank god it's not my talk page. The template my be borked again. ~

19:56, September 7, 2009 (UTC)

Category:Do not categorize question[edit source]

Is that a real category, or is it a joke? --Mn-z 03:32, September 12, 2009 (UTC)

Yes. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 03:25, September 14, 2009 (UTC)

Electrified mocha chinchilla is continuing to harrass me and I want it stopped[edit source]

I'm sorry I wrote this for the Forum:Imperial Colonization 3: The Revenge page so some of it might not make sense here. I'm too upset to change it.

Edit History: Forum:Imperial Colonization 3: The Revenge

04:24, September 12, 2009 (hist) (diff) Forum:Imperial Colonization 3: The Revenge ‎ (→Please stop)
04:17, September 12, 2009 (hist) (diff) User talk:Miley Spears ‎ (not funny)
04:16, September 12, 2009 (hist) (diff) User talk:Electrified mocha chinchilla ‎ (→Please stop reverting Forum:Imperial Colonization 3: The Revenge: new section) (top)

User talk: Electrified mocha chinchilla‎

Please stop reverting Forum:Imperial Colonization 3: The Revenge

I know you're an oldtimer here I checked. I'm still pretty new. I'm sure you're just joking. But you're insulting somebody you've never even talked to, and continuing to do it. I'm not a celebrity, I'm just a girl who's here trying to help. Other people have joked about me too, but they are people I've talked to here and people who helped me out. They started joking gently and saw if it bothered me or not. It didn't, so they did it even more, which was cool. Now they say I get drunk a lot, which isn't true, or have slept with over 900 guys, which totally isn't true. But that's OK because I joke back with them. After I get to know you, maybe I'll feel different. But I've never even talked to you, and you haven't stopped. Please stop, Ok? Thanks. CUN Cpt.Brooke Shields Miley Spears (talk) 04:16, September 12, 2009 (UTC)

Forum:Imperial Colonization 3: The Revenge (this he reverted)

Please stop

Electrified mocha chinchilla will you please read my comment on your talk page before you revert this again? I don't even know you, and I do not find this funny. Thank you. DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 04:24, September 12, 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Miley Spears

Please see my note on your talk page. I do not find this funny.

DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 04:17, September 12, 2009 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but unless that really is a picture of you, there's no offense intended. It's all in good faith. Also, Uncyclopedia is not censored. Cheers! --EMC^[TALK] 04:37, September 12, 2009 (UTC)

After all this, he reverted Forum:Imperial Colonization 3: The Revenge again and removed my comment asking him to stop.

People have teased me, but they waited to see if I thought it was funny before they continued. I've told Electrified mocha chinchilla over and over again that I do not find it's funny, and he is continuing to do it.

Some of you may think I'm just some stupid girl, but I will not be editing here again until this stops and this user is censured. DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 05:20, September 12, 2009 (UTC)

I took the liberty of stepping into this mess. If you'd like to see what I believe happened, checked Miley Spears talk page at User_talk:Miley_Spears#Miley_Spears_and_Electrified_mocha_chinchilla:_Miscommunication King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 09:52, September 12, 2009 (UTC)

uncyclopedia related questions[edit source]

Hi. I have a few questions about uncyclopedia that I would really rather not ask publicly. I was wondering if you might be around in the chat room later tonight or could drop me an e-mail at laura(@)fanhistory.com . Thanks!--LauraHale 01:43, September 15, 2009 (UTC)

Hi Laura. Sorry I haven't gotten back to you. I'm usually a lot less active during the summer. I actually haven't been to the chatroom in a while mostly because my computer can't connect using the options at UN:CHAT. The service for my college e-mail address has been down for a few months now so there might take awahile between responses. If what you're looking for isn't covered at Uncyclopedia:FAQ, you might want to try talking to one of the older admins like User:Mordillo or User:Sannse if it's a technical question. MadMax 22:09, September 24, 2009 (UTC)

THX[edit source]

With the protect for the Greece entry.Stupidis4eva! 20:16, October 12, 2009 (UTC)

Question[edit source]

What is the default template for the welcome template? I'm an RC fanatic. Hubblemeow 12:23, October 14, 2009 (UTC)

The most common one is {{Welcome}} although I think there's other varations at Category:Talk page templates. MadMax 12:25, October 14, 2009 (UTC)

Thank you, I appreciate your help. Hubblemeow 12:37, October 14, 2009 (UTC)

This[edit source]

made me giggle Mr N 23:19, Oct 15

Condo in my Fridge/Home on the Range and Beverly Hills Chihuahua[edit source]

Can you make these redirects to their sections on the page Disney please? It's under "The Current Crapfest" section. Thanks. Hypnotizinghypnosis 15:40, October 18, 2009 (UTC)

Any ideas to make these funnier? Beverly Hills I left the content that isn't at Disney anymore on the redirect page hidden, Condo is protected. Still, sysops can still edit that anyway. Hypnotizinghypnosis 00:14, October 19, 2009 (UTC)

Well, I'm actually more into maintenance rather than general writing. You could start an article on your userpage (ex. User:Hypnotizinghypnosis/Condo in my Fridge) and then submit it at UN:PEE. You could also leave a note at KP's talk page, the author of the Disneyland-series, although he hasn't been active for a while. Hope that helps. MadMax 22:35, October 19, 2009 (UTC)

Cyberbullying or Not?[edit source]

Please check out this article - it looked suspiciously like cyberbullying to me, and I left a warning message on the author's talk page. It is an extensive enough article I thought I would let an admin make the call instead of QVFD it. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 04:03, October 22, 2009 (UTC)

Doesn't pass UN:CM as far as I can see. QVFD. Pup t 04:07, 22/10/2009

Cyberbullying or Not?-Reply[edit source]

hi, i'm new to uncyclopedia, i wrote this article this and you huffed it.

I'd like to point out, as i did in it's discussion page that this is not just an article about a teacher that the rule was framed for. The person in question is a celebrity due to her obnoxiousness and her compulsive pathological need for attention and power. Could you please let the article stay online for a few days and see how many people visit/like it? This is far from just bad hate speech.

Also, please go through the article to see the kind of effort that went through for the creation of the article.

I understand that the context may not be of global interest, but it is of the interest of a large demographic section and i think even other people would appreciate the humour.

While I understand you put a lot of effort into writing this article, a lot of what you wrote was way out of line as far as satire goes. Even well-written satire about "regular" people can be deleted as vanity. I'm not going to give a lecture on "the evils of cyberbullying", although we seem to have a difference of opinion on what that constitutes, but that's not what Uncyclopedia is about. Personally, I have zero tolerance for cyberbullying in any form and I delete such articles on sight. I'd suggest you re-read Uncyclopedia's cyberbullying policies. MadMax 05:34, October 22, 2009 (UTC)

This is excellent. All I have to do is be obnoxious and compulsively pathological and I'll be elevated to celebrity status. I may even get onto Hey Hey it's Saturday, or David Letterman. And the best part is that I'm already halfway there. all I need to do is find out what "compulsively pathological" is, rather than two adjectives that essentially mean the same thing and effectively say that whatever this person does, they do it consistently, and I'll be sorted! Pup t 05:03, 23/10/2009

Smog[edit source]

I came across this the other day and according to its history, the page was protected right after creation. I am a little confused as to why this article is locked, though I'm slightly less so after checking its logs and seeing that it was once deleted (and was once, presumably, a crap page). My question is whether it's necessary for the article to remain under protection, seeing as how the deleted version was vaped in 2006. --Andorin Kato 02:36, October 25, 2009 (UTC)

Its one of those one-joke articles (e.g. Gullible, Fisher Price, A wizard did it, etc.) that doesn't really need to be edited. These types of articles are usually protected since they tend to attract vandalism. MadMax 04:38, October 25, 2009 (UTC)

Ahaha, gullible is hilarious. Alright, that seems fair enough. --Andorin Kato 04:41, October 25, 2009 (UTC)

Here's an article about you[edit source]

It says you're coming back. See it here King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 19:00, October 26, 2009 (UTC)

Rwanda[edit source]

I finished my article on Rwanda, and I noticed I hadn't gotten my award for writing a requested article yet. I am allowed or supposed to give it me myself? I just thought I'd ask you seeing as you already gave me one of them, and you did a minor edit on the Rwanda article. No rush on reply you're busy with conservation week, just thought I'd ask. thnx --Matfen815 22:01, November 2, 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I haven't been too active on Uncyclopedia lately. Although I'm usually the one that passes out the awards, anyone's welcome to add it themselves. The "Top 50" section is linked to Special:WantedPages and is automatically removed after 24-hours so submissions sometimes go unnoticed. MadMax 08:23, November 4, 2009 (UTC)

Papyrus Containing The Spell To Preserve Its Possessor Against Attacks From He Who Is In The Water[edit source]

Sorry for bothering you, but I'm trying to learn how things work here. Papyrus Containing The Spell To Preserve Its Possessor Against Attacks From He Who Is In The Water ended up on my watch list even though the article apparently didn't even exist. How did that happen? King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 22:35, November 20, 2009 (UTC)

No bother. :) I redirected it to A wizard did it. Since the page now exists as a redirect, it shows up on your watchpage. You can remove it by using the option settings in your watchlist. MadMax 23:37, November 20, 2009 (UTC)

Cool. I knew how to remove it, I just wondered why it ended up there. Apparently I put the wizard page on my watchlist for some reason (maybe I edited it; I don't remember but might check the history later). King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 06:10, November 22, 2009 (UTC)

So, you don't like an article of mine being on your watchlist? *sniff* • FreddAin't Dedd •

•

• 16:55, December 9, 2009 (UTC)

Oh, it's your article. Obviously, that's why I was watching it. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 19:23, December 9, 2009 (UTC)

F-Troop[edit source]

Hi Max

Thanks for some editing with the page of F-Troop, but it seems that's in the ICU so it needs to be done a little bit better. I may do some more editing, but if nothing happens it'll be back on the UN:REQ place again!

PS-Mork and Mindy needs to be expanded, maybe you can help me on that one too.MrCleveland 17:24, December 5, 2009 (UTC)

I'll ask around and see if anyone at Der Unwehr or UN:COLLAB want to try to work on it. MadMax 13:43, December 6, 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia logo[edit source]

Hi. The logo on The Babe Over There On The Right was meant as a joke,, as it is obvious that Wikipedia would not have such an article. Can I restore it as such? I don't know the policy on use of the logo. Thanks, Aleister in Chains 11:39, December 9, 2009 (UTC)

Sure, that's fine. You might want to insert a hidden comment  or use {{wikipediapar}} to link to a Wikipedia article so it doesn't get removed by someone else later on. MadMax 13:08, December 9, 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the template rescue, and more data about coding. Aleister in Chains 02:30, December 10, 2009 (UTC)

Mike Tyson[edit source]

Nice job. :) MadMax 20:34, December 9, 2009 (UTC)

Much appreciated, the encouragement! Expanded, it is--Funnybony 23:25, December 9, 2009 (UTC)

Clare G.A.A[edit source]

MadMax i appreciate what you did when u edited my page but i want to leave things in which you took out so i had to undo your work (sorry for that) but i want to edit it the same way you did but leave everything as it is, but i dont know how. I wanted to do this originally but i did'nt know how and i still don't. Could you please help me out Thanks Seányg

Sure, I'll see what I can do. The main problem though is that the images are "hotlinked", meaning the images are linked to a website rather than on Uncyclopedia, and they're taking up a lot of room. Is is possible you could upload them yourself? MadMax 02:12, December 20, 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply.Im afraid i cant because i just took them from the internet and have no way of printing them off to upload them myself. Could you do what you can to help me please and i'll go with that. I may add a picture or something but if i cant i'll stick with your editing. Thanks Seányg

Ok, I've fixed the images for you. Let me know if there's anything else you need. MadMax 01:02, December 24, 2009 (UTC)

FYI[edit source]

I awarded Necropaxx for creating a requested article. Technically, both of his names for the article were slightly different (it was requested as UnBooks:How to go fishing, and his was HowTo:Fish then changed to UnBooks:Gone Fishing), but close enough, right? King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 23:28, December 10, 2009 (UTC)

That's great thanks. I've been having trouble signing on and haven't been able to keep up with it. When you do award users though, could you update the stat page? MadMax 02:16, December 20, 2009 (UTC)

Will check that right now--if no one's already done it, I will done do it. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 21:50, December 21, 2009 (UTC)

Brainfade! I forgot I had notified Necropaxx about it, and knew he already took care of it. D'oh! King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 21:54, December 21, 2009 (UTC)

Bad Nigger Attitude[edit source]

Dude! After completing the Mike Tyson article to my own satisfaction, I was bound to write next article. All my life I had some African American-European friends. But none of them had BNA disorder. I tried to make this funny and ironic, but don't want to offend any anti-bigot-bigots. You you take a look and tell me, "Is it safe? Is it safe? Bzzzzzzzzzz, Is it fucking safe!??" Thanks. Your opinion means a ton to me.--Funnybony 20:39, December 15, 2009 (UTC)

Hmm...well when you're writing about a potentially controversal subject you should probably get some feedback (e.g. Pee Review) before you present a "finished" version. Is it safe? As with really any other topic, I think there's always someone whose going to find it offensive. There's plenty of articles like that on Uncyclopedia, Asperger Syndrome and Holocaust Tycoon comes to mind, but if its legitimately funny (or at least a genuine attempt at satire) than you probably shouldn't worry too much about it being "offensive". MadMax 03:43, December 20, 2009 (UTC)

Mike Tyson[edit source]

Dude! The idea was to have the facts listed, followed by "Unfortunately" or "Fortunately" only - to let the reader ponder WHY the fact is called fortunate or unfortunate. But some other writer added shit to each one and spoiled it. I don't have the power to revert (or do I?). Please do what you feel is best. You're the expert. I mean, the Nobel Prize is kinda like, almost, Uncyclopedian of the Year! Fucking awesome!!!--Funnybony 22:35, December 15, 2009 (UTC)

The author (well really anybody) usually reseves the right to revert unfunny changes so no problem there. You could ask an admin to protect the page from editing by new users and IPs until you're finished. Thanks for the kind words by the way though I'm definately not an expert humor-wise. :) MadMax 03:57, December 20, 2009 (UTC)

Template:Toasty[edit source]

Its transcluded nowhere and the only link to it is its vfd nom. --Mn-z 04:31, December 20, 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I thought it was being used on the Forum. MadMax 04:32, December 20, 2009 (UTC)

It was, but I decided to be italic and do a code sub. --Mn-z 04:41, December 20, 2009 (UTC)

Ah, I see. MadMax 04:58, December 20, 2009 (UTC)

Star of David[edit source]

Thanks for the thumbs up template. The article was actually created by Palewillow or some such name, and he left it as a stub but with the intersting idea laid out, but it was on the huff list. So I built on the bones and put the meat on it. It's a fun one to play with. Aleister in Chains 03:36, December 24, 2009 (UTC)

Okra:the killer whale[edit source]

Thanks for going over the page and making it better. I'll get round to finishing that picture at some point. Feel free to have a look or edit of an any of my other pages. Krankshaft21

Clare G.A.A[edit source]

Thanks a million its way better now thanks to your editing! Thanks again Seányg

Thank you[edit source]

For adding links to Spare change. You are a gentleman and a scholar. pillow talk 18:22, December 31, 2009 (UTC)