Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive215

The Shoop Tank

Score: 6
Keep (1)	Week keep.-- (CUN) 10:28, September 10, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (7)	Delete. One of my least favorite memes rears its head again. Features old meme, unskilled sporking from wikipedia (including an instance where they forgot to change the words Sherman Tank), lack of theme and overall poor writing. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Count of Monkey Crisco (talk • contribs) Delete. per above, and you forgot to sign your vote. --Mn-z 22:36, September 9, 2010 (UTC) O_o Ow, my brain... ~ (talk) (stalk) -- 20100909 - 22:37 (UTC) No. Just... no. I agree with Count of Monkey Crisco. Leutnant Herr Thatdamnedfollowspot 00:10 Friday, September 10, 2010 Delete I cannot live in a world where this article exists. If this is the only way of ridding ourselves of these words, then I shall do my duty. mAttlobster. (hello) 08:20, September 11, 2010 (UTC) EXTERMINATE! Wrong on so many levels. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 9:03 AM 9/11/10 IMA FIRIN MY LAZER!!!! BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! – Preceding unsigned comment added by Iwillkillyou333 (talk • contribs)
Comments	Thoroughly childish, but it does what it sets out to do. Am not voting Keep because I doubt we want it doing what it sets out to do. Spıke ¬ 23:56 9-Sep-10

Hercolubus

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	More gibberish that is not worth the trouble to translate into English. --Mn-z 10:54, September 10, 2010 (UTC) Nay This proves that utter nonsense and random mutterings do not make a funny article, something that I have yet to understand. Leutnant Herr Thatdamnedfollowspot 23:22 Friday, September 10, 2010 Delete. Nonsense written about a nonsense concept. It doesn't even spell its own name consistently. The pidgin English is the only amusing thing about it. Spıke ¬ 23:30 10-Sep-10 Delete. I agree with the 3rd voter. It is a potential nonsense article written. DJ Mixerr 03:29, September 11, 2010 (UTC) User:DJ Mixerr/sig
Comments

Daniel Brandt (False Version)

Score: 4
Keep (2)	Keep. per my policy of supporting legal public humiliation against those who try to sue people on teh internetz. I'm not overwhelmed by the quality, but if we delete it, the terrorists win. --Mn-z 13:40, September 6, 2010 (UTC) Keep. per Mnbvcxz. --High Gen. Meganew (Stuff I've Done) (Chat With Me) (Get an Award!) FORCES ENLIST MUN 17:22, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (6)	Disintegrate. I'm not detecting any funny. Saberwolf116 13:15, September 6, 2010 (UTC) Plain and simple, it isn't funny. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 16:56, September 9, 2010 (UTC) Kerkill Unfunny. Besides, we have other articles about him. Why not improve those? MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 17:25, September 9, 2010 (UTC) Delete There is nothing about this article...there's just nothing. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:04, September 9, 2010 (UTC) Bad, redundant articles should be deleted, regardless of who they're about.--HM (T) 20:41, September 10, 2010 (UTC) Delete. It's a piece of shit. Mnbvcxz has correctly argued that an article on this subject should be allowed to exist. This is not that article. pillow talk 01:40, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain. Inexpedient to vote Delete, per Mnbvcxz; impossible to vote Keep. Spıke ¬ 16:48 7-Sep-10

Grassy Knoll

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. Combo delete from The Shoop Tank. Mostly wibble and bandcruft. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:36, September 9, 2010 (UTC) Delete. per above. --Mn-z 22:38, September 9, 2010 (UTC) Delete. And general dumbity, at that. ~ (talk) (stalk) -- 20100909 - 22:42 (UTC) Delete. This is ramble. Also, penis, urine, feces, anal, Jackson 5. You get the picture. The real Grassy Knoll, of course, was the location in Dallas where a mystery second assassin might have set up to kill JFK--He, but not it, is mentioned at the very end of this article. Also one of two hills beyond the fences at the ballpark in Lynn, Massachusetts, to which foul balls are sometimes hit. Spıke ¬ 00:00 10-Sep-10
Comments

UnNews:Man was dead and was not agreed

Score: -4
Keep (7)	Strong For. Firstly, this is as hilarious as the old UnNews:Guy Gets Crazy. Second: isn't there some sort of unspoken policy about deleting old UnNews? That we don't do it? -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 17:38, September 10, 2010 (UTC) Fuck that unofficial policy. If something sucks, it doesn't deserve existence. Saying 'it's just UnNews' is insulting to the news monkeys. -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 18:42, Sep. 10, 2010 I support TKF so long as I'm permitted to create UnNews:I Eat Apples With Mike Tyson. --Mn-z 20:28, September 10, 2010 (UTC) Keep Hilarious. Simply don't understand how funny is. Written in perfect way. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 20:49, September 10, 2010 (UTC) Cleep Laughed and laughed. Aleister 21:48 10 9 Keep. This is me making a stand. Right here, we've got someone trying a new type of humor. So what if it isn't in proper English? That's the beauty of it. If this article is deleted, then we are shooting down a style that could have enormous potential. Think about that. Loopygrumpkins 00:02, September 11, 2010 (UTC) Keep. I don't think it's funny, but once we start deleting old UnNews, we're in for one hell of a headache. pillow talk 01:38, September 11, 2010 (UTC) Keep. Per TKF & Hyperbole; if an UnNews item survives for more than a month before being put on VFD you can just go ahead and add a keep vote in my name from this point on.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  11 Sep 2010 ~ 04:39 (UTC) Keep. I think it's growing on me. Possibly literally. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100911 - 05:04 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Delete. Uncyclopedia is not where you hand in your ESL homework. I tried translating it from gibberish into English, but that made it even less funny. --Count of Monkey Crisco 02:15, September 10, 2010 (UTC) It's not English. As much as I cringe at spending time deleting an article from April, 2009 in our drive-by journalism subsidiary, this is crap. Spıke ¬ 02:27 10-Sep-10 Er, what?-- (CUN) 10:21, September 10, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	While I don't support crusades against users some of User:Plasnisk's other articles are also written in gibberish. --Mn-z 10:57, September 10, 2010 (UTC) Apparently a Spanish speaker who has not grasped the need to include pronoun subjects, nor how the passive voice works--Kind of endearing; easily fixed, and he does have a sense of humor. Spıke ¬ 11:36 10-Sep-10 Comment. A new type of humor? You mean Engrish? That sort of circumvents the entire concept of deleting things. From now on when we find a bad article let's just send it in a roundabout route through Babelfish and it'll be instant hilarity. I'm just crazy enough to do it to teach you a lesson! --Count of Monkey Crisco 03:19, September 11, 2010 (UTC) Re Hype: I can see your reasoning. However, if we establish a convention that UnNews is immune from VFD, we may establish a worse precedent. I.e. people will use unNews to get deleted content back on the wiki. --Mn-z 03:57, September 11, 2010 (UTC) Honestly, that doesn't bother me. I see UnNews the same way as I see userspace: not truly part of the wiki. pillow talk 04:57, September 11, 2010 (UTC) Kept --ChiefjusticeXBox360 08:04, September 11, 2010 (UTC)

The Conduct of Life

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. Article? Jokes? What article? What jokes? --Count of Monkey Crisco 23:29, September 9, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Moreover, what concept? Wikipedia says that Emerson did write a "collection of essays" by that name, but neither it nor our author have anything funny to say about it. I assume author was assigned to read the whole collection and elected to take some cheap shots. Spıke ¬ 00:11 10-Sep-10 Delete. Looks bad, and doesn't even make sense.-- (CUN) 10:23, September 10, 2010 (UTC) QVFD ICU tag was apparently removed when it was still needed. --Wilytank 21:10, September 10, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Paperclip Jesus

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. Combo Delete off of Janitor Man. Also relies heavily upon the recently deleted FedEx Pope. It's just a ramblin' wizard story with the additional burden of being about a superfluous variant Jesus. --Count of Monkey Crisco 23:22, September 9, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Yet another ramble about a made-up character. Spıke ¬ 00:05 10-Sep-10 Delete. I found this page when I first found Uncyclopedia, but i I didn't know about VFD. Loopygrumpkins 23:57, September 10, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Jesii, LOL --Mn-z 01:21, September 11, 2010 (UTC) Smite. --Wilytank 01:29, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Ploppy

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete. Combo delete from Metzonium Euanide. Nothing but '06 cruft, ramble and butt poop. --Count of Monkey Crisco 02:53, September 10, 2010 (UTC) Awful! I'll consider flipping if anyone can tell me what this is supposed to be about. Spıke ¬ 02:56 10-Sep-10 Ugh. --Wilytank 16:14, September 10, 2010 (UTC) Delete. BUTT POOP!!!! is all caps and has exactly 4 exclamation points. Please respect the inside joke. --Mn-z 01:35, September 11, 2010 (UTC) Delete. It's the four exclamation points that give it its sparkle. This article has no sparkle. pillow talk 01:37, September 11, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Ugh! This article has no funny in its value. Just nothing but BUTT POOP!!!!! DJ Mixerr 03:23, September 11, 2010 (UTC) User:DJ Mixerr/sig
Comments

Install a new operating system

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete. Depressingly bad, in so many ways... it's just... bad. Cleaning up the formatting and prose and ugliness would not help how utterly not funny it is, either. ~ (talk) (stalk) -- 20100909 - 17:18 (UTC) Delete. This article shows signs of wanting to be in the HowTo: space, but it isn't, and the chatty, first-person advocacy fails in mainspace. Spıke ¬ 17:41 9-Sep-10 Delete. Really not trying hard enough. --Count of Monkey Crisco 18:56, September 9, 2010 (UTC) Delete I don't care. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:00, September 9, 2010 (UTC) Weak delete. Feels unfinished, and User:Glassesboy hasn't been around much in three months. If he were to show up here and say he's interested in finishing it, I'd change my vote. pillow talk 20:20, September 9, 2010 (UTC) Delete. per above. --Mn-z 22:37, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain. I might be able to fix this up, since I've taken a liking to the HowTo format. I'm not sure how busy I'll be this weekend, so I can't promise anything. How long until the article sees the noose/firing squad/other method of death? Leutnant Herr Thatdamnedfollowspot 23:59 Thursday, September 9, 2010 18 hours minimum from this writing--suggest you copy the text to your userspace and prepare to install a new HowTo: article if you are successful. Spıke ¬ 00:13 10-Sep-10

123456789

Score: 8
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (8)	Disintegrate. Unless this is some strange in-joke of ours, I see no reason to keep it. Saberwolf116 10:42, September 9, 2010 (UTC) Delete. per above. --Mn-z 10:54, September 9, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Belongs in someone's Sandbox. Spıke ¬ 12:28 9-Sep-10 Obliterate. It would be good to see what equations made that number. But everything is totally randumbo. --Wilytank 14:53, September 9, 2010 (UTC) Delete...before it becomes a classic DO-NOT-DELETE article.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:23, September 9, 2010 (UTC) Denumerate.--Count of Monkey Crisco 18:44, September 9, 2010 (UTC) Delete The feeling you get from this article is that guilty post-Miss Millies bloaty flop-out. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:27, September 9, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Unless they're a historical in-joke, pages like this have to be put down.-- (CUN) 10:31, September 10, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Category:Negative Humor/Humour

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete. almost empty and apparently "negative humo(u)r" involves saying the word "not" repeatedly. It appears to be related to "lotsa spaghetti" and "mai boi" humo(u)r, as seen on youtube. --Mn-z 00:28, September 9, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Depending on a nearby vote, it will contain nothing in mainspace. Spıke ¬ 12:26 9-Sep-10 Delete. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:27, September 9, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Not even the good kind of near empty pointlessness. ~ (talk) (stalk) -- 20100909 - 17:22 (UTC) Delete.--Count of Monkey Crisco 18:57, September 9, 2010 (UTC) Delete Nobody cares about sixes. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:01, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Dylan Moran

Score: 0
Keep (4)	Keep. Room for much improvement but not that dire it deserves a date with the shredder. Cut back some hackish bits perhaps. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 23:28, September 5, 2010 (UTC) Keep Funny stuff. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 23:23, September 6, 2010 (UTC) Keep I'm related to him, on my mums side, thrice removed, long ago, or was that the milkman? Aleister 16:28 7 9 Keep Could be better - but then again so could ice-cream. It's too cold...too cold. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:07, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (4)	Delete. Moran is an excellent comedian, and this article is a load of shite. Myocardialinfarction 11:57, September 5, 2010 (UTC) Delete. The intro shows a promising concept: mistake the comedian for a statesman. The body of the article drops the concept and becomes just another hatchet-job. Spıke ¬ 16:13 5-Sep-10 Throw him out of the pub! Per above. Loopygrumpkins 23:20, September 6, 2010 (UTC) Kill. A bit too random for my tastes... --High Gen. Meganew (Stuff I've Done) (Chat With Me) (Get an Award!) FORCES ENLIST MUN 15:27, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Kept --ChiefjusticeXBox360 20:59, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

Not the number 64

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Disintegrate. I'm not detecting any funny. Saberwolf116 19:58, September 8, 2010 (UTC) I'm detecting potential funny if someone took it and gave it some love and made it really out there, but as that has failed to happen in five years... delete. ~ (talk) (stalk) -- 20100908 - 21:33 (UTC) Not funny. Not got a point. Not got a theme. Spıke ¬ 21:39 8-Sep-10 Delete. per above. --Mn-z 00:22, September 9, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Not even a nod to When I'm 64....--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:25, September 9, 2010 (UTC) Delete If it turns out voting keep would save the life of a rather mangy looking dog, then let the dog die. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:29, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Bernard Quill

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Kerkill Apparently vanity. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 12:32, September 8, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Yup, no Wikipedia page, and a 22-year-old is unlikely even to be an Australian authority on cheesecake. Apparent author (who created the name of Negri today) confesses to vanity and argues for deletion or renaming on the article's talk page. Spıke ¬ 13:38 8-Sep-10 Smite. As if cheesecake had authority. Even in Austrailia. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 2:33 PM 9/8/10 Delete.Troll bindweed.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:48, September 8, 2010 (UTC) HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA --Roman Dog Bird 19:31, September 8, 2010 (UTC) Delete. probably a valid QVFD candidate. --Mn-z 00:21, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Soda jerk

Score: -5
Keep (6)	Keep. It needs a rewrite in places, but it's a funny, if obvious, concept. In the 1940s, the guy who made ice cream sodas in the drugstore was called a soda jerk. The article is about how they were all jerks. Works for me, I guess. Probably needs a {{wikipediapar}} template in case people unfamiliar with the 40s miss the pun. pillow talk 22:31, September 7, 2010 (UTC) Keep. Per Hyperbole. It might need a stub tag or something, but it works as is. --Mn-z 22:45, September 7, 2010 (UTC) Keep. Thank you for the history lesson. Enough for me to vote 'Keep 'em coming, Sodajerk.' Aleister 23:07 7 9 Keep. The intro exactly captures it. The body of the article, though, wanders off into the usual randumbo about a made-up character, probably by Anon losing interest during high-school biology. Spıke ¬ 23:30 7-Sep-10 Keep. Per Hyperbole. I found it to be humorous, and, although there is a bit of biological rambling at points, this article is relatively unspoiled by Cliches. I couldn't believe that there was an article that didn't have any pointless quotes at the top! Loopygrumpkins 00:44, September 8, 2010 (UTC) VERY KEEP! The first paragraph is priceless. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 11:26 AM 9/8/10
Delete (1)	nom & del I've always hated this article.
Comments	By the way, this is technically invalid, since you didn't add the VFD tag. pillow talk 22:33, September 7, 2010 (UTC) Keept -RAHB 01:23, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

Category:Things George Bush didn't see since 1825

Score: 9
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (9)	Delete. Since George Bush wasn't born until 1946 (or 1926 if they mean George Bush Sr.), everything can go in this category. But perhaps they mean George Bush or George Washington Bush, the first black settler in Washington. Since the category doesn't specify I think our only option is to delete it and start over again from scratch. --Mn-z 21:52, September 7, 2010 (UTC) Delete The grammar makes me feel carsick. mAttlobster. (hello) 22:00, September 7, 2010 (UTC) Delete. As always with categories that don't categorize; plus, in this case, nonsense year number. Spıke ¬ 22:10 7-Sep-10 Blech.--HM (T) 00:12, September 8, 2010 (UTC) Delete. I think someone was trying to get at something, but I can't tell what. Loopygrumpkins 00:29, September 8, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Passed it's laugh-by date (if it had one) long ago. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:58, September 8, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Pointless and stupid and delete. Because. ~ (talk) (stalk) -- 20100908 - 14:54 (UTC) Anytime I can vote against George Bush, count me in. Aleister 15:03 8 9 Delete. --Wilytank 15:20, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Why don't we have a page on George Washington Bush? Loopygrumpkins 00:30, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Category:I was born with a hatchet and a juggalo face!

Score: 4
Keep (3)	Weak keep I've always like this Category. Nominally Humane! some time Wednesday, 03:29, Sep 8 2010 UTC Keep Fucking magnets how do they work. And I don't want to talk to a scientist! MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 12:36, September 8, 2010 (UTC) Pointless and stupid and... keep. I like it. *kitty eyes* ~ (talk) (stalk) -- 20100908 - 18:36 (UTC)
Delete (7)	Delete. WHAT THE FADOODLE!?! Epically pointless category. --Mn-z 21:46, September 7, 2010 (UTC) Delete. As always. Is appropriately assigned to Category:Categories created by people with too much time on their hands. Spıke ¬ 21:50 7-Sep-10 what the --Roman Dog Bird 22:09, September 7, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Wow.--HM (T) 00:12, September 8, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Loopygrumpkins 00:26, September 8, 2010 (UTC) Delete. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:32, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Boohbah

Score: 4
Keep (1)	Strong keep WTF?? This toy drives people crazy. A member of my in-law family hates them with a passion, and if you've ever played with one you will know why. The article catches this feeling almost perfectly. Aleister 23:10 7 9 Get rid of the toilet humor (Hint: There is nothing else) and I'll flip my vote. Spıke ¬ 23:26 7-Sep-10
Delete (5)	what's, uh, the point --Roman Dog Bird 19:21, September 7, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Utterly no humor here except toilet humor. Spıke ¬ 21:48 7-Sep-10 Delete. per above. --Mn-z 22:06, September 7, 2010 (UTC) Delete. The idea of the Boohbah has comic potential, but it might be better if we started with a clean slate, free of Communists, Dictators, the Marx Brothers, Prostitutes and Porn, and H.R. Puffinstuff. Loopygrumpkins 00:08, September 8, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Weird at best.--HM (T) 00:13, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Tom Delay

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Disintegrate. Rambling article about nothing. Saberwolf116 10:51, September 7, 2010 (UTC) Delete. The Republican power-broker formerly in the House of Representatives is still on the edge of public consciousness, but this article, its nonsense bio, and ridicule of Republican memes only briefly touches on reality and wanders off completely after two paragraphs. It would be easy to write a better article by simply misreading his Wikipedia bio--but, in my opinion, it's not worth doing. Spıke ¬ 13:30 7-Sep-10 Kill. I doubt this would even work on illogicopedia... but anyhow, it's just stupid. ~ (talk) (stalk) -- 20100907 - 15:44 (UTC) Delete.Total ballsacks. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:43, September 7, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Nonsensical. Loopygrumpkins 00:03, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Duck Dodgers

Score: 6
Keep (1)	Keep And the fact that none of you seem to be aware of the Duck Dodgers cartoon (both the 2003 show and the old Looney Tunes shorts) is quite disturbing. Anyway, this is a pretty decent start for any Duck Dogders article. I'd also like to reply the factual inaccuracy in the nomination - There was never an issue of "people stalking him". MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 12:49, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (7)	Alright, I know there was a taboo about deleting articles created by Crablogger about a year ago, but please hear me out. I don't have anything against this guy-I've never met him, nor do I ever plan to. However, the bottom line is that his articles are absolutely terrible and are a waste of space on this wiki. I know that there was an issue regarding people stalking him, but I don't think that nominating his articles for deletion counts as cyberbullying. Saberwolf116 10:49, September 7, 2010 (UTC) Weak delete. The article isn't hideous, but mostly amuses by turning the names of things into puns, like its title; and with nonsense numbers. It doesn't have a theme. Drama about author and his "cartoon fanfic stuff" drove him off the site two years ago, as seen on his talk page. To me, it's not his choice of subject but the lack of development in the article. Spıke ¬ 13:41 7-Sep-10 Delete. Just change Buck to Duck and that is all you have here. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:41, September 7, 2010 (UTC) Delete. per above. --Mn-z 21:57, September 7, 2010 (UTC) Delete. I don't think there's a taboo about deleting Crablogger's terrible articles; we're just not supposed to mention him in any other context. pillow talk 22:17, September 7, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Bad articles are bad articles, regardless of who the author is. Loopygrumpkins 23:57, September 7, 2010 (UTC) delete Elassint 00:34, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	It is probably easier to delete his stuff without mentioning him by name. I was able to nom a few of his articles without setting of a dramathon. --Mn-z 21:57, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

:Category:This is not a Category

Score: -8
Keep (9)	This is not a keep vote oh PLEASE don't delete this  For. 10,000 joke categories. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:51, 7 September 2010  For. It's a perfect fit for the article it lists. So it's a part of the joke and part of the page. Aleister 14:02 7 9  For. Exactly what Aleister said. And besides, would 10.000 joke categories really be so bad? ~ (talk) (stalk) -- 20100907 - 16:22 (UTC)  Oh. I see. Spıke ¬ 16:52 7-Sep-10 Keep MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 16:59, September 7, 2010 (UTC) Keep Pointless is the point. mAttlobster. (hello) 18:44, September 7, 2010 (UTC) Keep. I'm okay with it. pillow talk 22:36, September 7, 2010 (UTC) Keep. It's all just part of the joke, but it isn't because there is no joke and no article, which isn't. Loopygrumpkins 23:51, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (1)	I'm assuming that category is pointless. It is used only on This is not an article, and I hate single purpose joke categories (if we allow them, then we'd have 10,000 joke categories overwhelming the real ones.) --Mn-z 10:45, September 7, 2010 (UTC) Delete. It's obvious on its face that this category doesn't categorize. So let's delete it and leave it to the article to be funny. Spıke ¬ 13:31 7-Sep-10
Comments	Kept --ChiefjusticeXBox360 18:37, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Category:Articles with extra cheese

Score: 5
Keep (1)	Keep Like you didn't see this coming. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 19:54, September 6, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (6)	I'm going to go out on a limb here and say this category can safely be merged into Category:Cheese without. --Mn-z 14:30, September 6, 2010 (UTC) kill it & make it into.. CHEESE!! Delete. Category contains nothing relating to extra cheese; only to cheese in general, or not to cheese at all. Spıke ¬ 14:47 6-Sep-10 Delete. Agreed.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:44, September 6, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Sadly, there is just not enough extra cheese to satisfy the cat in me. Now where is my dinner? ~ (talk) (stalk) -- 20100906 - 21:03 (UTC) Delete.--HM (T) 00:13, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	You COULD add it to the Category:Cheese, but what about when you want to add more cheese, which category would meet your needs then? -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) Abstain. per Mhaille --Wilytank 21:29, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

International Keeper of Years

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Rambling mess about nothing. --Mn-z 14:22, September 6, 2010 (UTC) Weak disintegrate. I'm detecting a funny concept somewhere in here, but it's buried under memes and Chuck Norris. Saberwolf116 14:40, September 6, 2010 (UTC) "Well, do you have any better ideas? Yeah. That's what I thought." Actually, I do have one: Delete. Spıke ¬ 14:45 6-Sep-10 Delete. When I see ewoks, I reach for the delete button.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:46, September 6, 2010 (UTC) Smite. Loopygrumpkins 00:01, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Template:Ednonsense

Score: 4
Keep (3)	Lulwut? MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 19:51, September 6, 2010 (UTC) Keep. Useful for indication if something is a parody of the "rival" wiki's content or if something originated on that wiki. --Count of Monkey Crisco 04:19, September 7, 2010 (UTC)  What??? What is wrong with this template? It's creative, colorful, has a point, and is funny. Me thinketh the naysayers here are getting out the long knives a bit too often. Aleister 14:07 7 9
Delete (7)	Delete. Ugly, meme-ridden, references that evil wiki (not be confused with EBIL WIKIA), and is basically a, "please excuse this article for sucking" template. The only use for a template like this is to use its "what links here" page to populate your VFD hitlists. --Mn-z 14:01, September 6, 2010 (UTC) Delete. There are only six such pages left in mainspace. "patent ED fucktard nonsense....does not mean it isn't funny"--but in my experience, it always isn't funny. Spıke ¬ 14:11 6-Sep-10 Disintegrate. Stupid template that essentially encourages newbs to make nonsense articles. Saberwolf116 14:37, September 6, 2010 (UTC) String it up. Like you people said, most people on here don't think ED is funny. Therefore, anything bearing this template is most likely going to end up as deletion fodder. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 11:31 AM 9/6/10 Delete. Useless at best, and a problem for quality at worst.--HM (T) 15:47, September 6, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Expunge. Ex-sponge even! --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:51, September 6, 2010 (UTC) Logic "This article is patent ED fucktard nonsense.This, however, does not mean it isn't funny." YES IT DOES! Loopygrumpkins 23:58, September 6, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	I can't bring myself to care about this one. Just thought I'd let y'all know. ~ (talk) (stalk) -- 20100907 - 16:26 (UTC)

Category:Things that are evil

Score: 6
Keep (1)	Oh noes!! I'm so scared now! MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 19:52, September 6, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (7)	hang it, tis evil Delete. completely redundant with the more briefly titled category:Evil. I would suggest merging the two, and keeping the shorter name. --Mn-z 13:54, September 6, 2010 (UTC) Delete. The category combines murderers, cuisines, and Republicans. In short, another category that isn't used to categorize. Spıke ¬ 13:59 6-Sep-10 Disintegrate. Pointless category. Saberwolf116 14:44, September 6, 2010 (UTC) Delete.Things that are supercalifragilisticexpialidocious-not. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:53, September 6, 2010 (UTC) Delete. I'm sure there's someone who could find a reason to put every article on Uncyclopedia in this category as well as Category: Evil. Loopygrumpkins 23:54, September 6, 2010 (UTC) Delete. --HM (T) 00:13, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	I think an Category:Evil would we ok, but we don't need a dozen category redundant categories. I think a single briefly titled category on the subject would keep the incentive to write stuff like, "Mama Luigi gave Pikachu's PINGAS a promoshun OVER 9000 years ago to seize the Isle of Koridai" to a minimum. And will make policing it easier. --Mn-z 14:10, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

Category:Steve Ballmer's Hitlist

Score: 6
Keep (1)	Keep Can't you guys find bad articles to put on here? Maybe rewrite something? MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 19:50, September 6, 2010 (UTC) Re:Dex, iz wiki, {{sofixit}} by adding crap instead of protest voting to keep the wrong kind of crap. Protest "keep" voting isn't helping anything. --Mn-z 21:29, September 6, 2010 (UTC) I lulled. My contributions speak for themselves. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:32, September 6, 2010 (UTC) Rewriting stuff is actually more work than creating new articles. --Mn-z 22:03, September 6, 2010 (UTC) You're not making any relevant point. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 22:06, September 6, 2010 (UTC) Perhaps we are arguing past each other. Are you voting to keep this merely because its a category, or because you don't see how mind-numbingly awful it is? The latter I can live with. --Mn-z 22:56, September 6, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (7)	Disintegrate. Useless category and a byproduct of an old (not particuraly funny) in-joke of ours. Saberwolf116 13:25, September 6, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Per my theory that inside jokes don't need to be referenced on every mainspace article. --Mn-z 13:37, September 6, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Yes; make n00bs write funny stuff if they want to be funny. Spıke ¬ 14:01 6-Sep-10 Delete. --Wilytank 15:27, September 6, 2010 (UTC) Delete. One less category for sad nerds to add too. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:54, September 6, 2010 (UTC) Delete. What? Loopygrumpkins 23:50, September 6, 2010 (UTC) Delete. And also, going around VFD voting keep on every category and doing nothing else is stupid.--HM (T) 00:13, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

:Category:Axis of Evil-Doers

Score: -1
Keep (6)	Keep. Keep MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 18:53, September 2, 2010 (UTC) dicks -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:37, September 2, 2010 (UTC) Keep. ~ (talk) (stalk) -- 20100903 - 16:15 (UTC) Keep. I think it's funny how this is applied to users (and UnNews articles).  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  04 Sep 2010 ~ 03:44 (UTC) Keep. User:Mrthejazz/sig 14:54, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (5)	See the nomination below Taking an eight year old George Bush-related joke and applying it to celebrities utterly at random is one of the stupidest and unfunniest things on the site - and provides us with a lot of messes to clean up. pillow talk 15:27, September 2, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Incredibly stupid and pointless category.--HM (T) 19:34, September 2, 2010 (UTC) Delete. cliche overdone concept that was never funny to begin with is cliche, overdone, and was never funny to begin with. --Mn-z 21:24, September 2, 2010 (UTC) Delete. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:13, September 3, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Yet another category that doesn't categorize. Spıke ¬ 11:11 3-Sep-10
Comments	Kept --ChiefjusticeXBox360 08:11, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

:Template:AoED

Score: 0
Keep (6)	Keep. At minimum, it's redeemable. At maximum, it should be okay with a few tweaks. --High Gen. Meganew (Stuff I've Done) (Chat With Me) (Get an Award!) FORCES ENLIST MUN 18:36, September 2, 2010 (UTC) Keep. It's fine now. --Wilytank 18:51, September 2, 2010 (UTC) Keep MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 18:53, September 2, 2010 (UTC) Keep. I like how it's apparently so unlikable. That, and it doesn't seem to be hurting anything, stupid as it is. ~ (talk) (stalk) -- 20100903 - 16:13 (UTC) Keep. (But maybe just link everything to Special:random.)  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  04 Sep 2010 ~ 03:42 (UTC) Keep.I actually like this one.
Delete (6)	Please, please delete this. This template is cruft left over from an earlier life of Uncyclopedia. It has absolutely no satiric merit. It encourages hapless new users and IPs to run around typing things about how "evil" these people are - essentially, telling the same irrelevant joke about fifty different celebrities, thereby making Uncyclopedia more and more generic. Even now, there's a well-meaning but hapless new user running around adding a zillion articles to the "axis of evil-doers" category to match the template: Socky and I have reverted him on Katy Perry about five times now. I don't think this template is just idiotic; I think it's doing Uncyclopedia actual harm. pillow talk 15:25, September 2, 2010 (UTC) Delete, see above.--HM (T) 19:34, September 2, 2010 (UTC) Delete. What Hype said. It tends to spawn articles that describe how Mama Luigi invented LOTSA SPAGHETTI to take over the world and/or how Puff the Magic Dragon planned the holocaust. The "children's fictional character/internet meme/random person is EBIL!!!1!one!" format is really overdone to the point that the genre is beyond salvation. I really don't think getting rid of the template would cause the loss of any meaningful data. --Mn-z 21:22, September 2, 2010 (UTC) Delete. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:14, September 3, 2010 (UTC) Delete. With Hyperbole. Tagging an item as "evil" in practice means either "I don't like it" or I merely think it would be funny to say I don't like it. It wouldn't be. Spıke ¬ 11:13 3-Sep-10 Disintegrate. Saberwolf116 14:46, September 4, 2010 (UTC) Delete. For the love of God yes. -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 10:51, Sep. 5, 2010 Changed my mind. It doesn't seem so bad when you get all the crap like Mickey Mouse out and every other random name under the sun. Not sure if it's worth a keep though. I see the potential for it to fill up again. -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 16:17, Sep. 5, 2010
Comments	Why not just a large clean-up, and cut the template down by 80% or so? 90%? Maybe just enough to make it funny again. Alesister 15:31 2 9 Okay, Aleister... challenge extended. If this template was going to consist of only six entities... can you think of a funny six entities to belong to the "Axis of evil-doers"? Or would it still sound like shit a hyperactive fourth-grader wrote? Take your best swing at it... prove me wrong. pillow talk 15:46, September 2, 2010 (UTC) Well, you did improve it by deleting 90% of it, but I'd still like to improve the last 10% by getting rid of it... pillow talk 18:46, September 2, 2010 (UTC) Cut it back to a list, but not too funny. Maybe one more added to each list would punchline it. I'll think of some, and I bet MadMax can come up with some funny entries. And hey, I am a hyperactive fourth-grader, you big bully! Aleister 18:46 2 9 I just can't find the humor in calling something "evil." If it is evil, it isn't funny because it's obvious. If it isn't evil, it isn't funny because it's a bad joke. If it's neither evil nor non-evil, it isn't funny because it's random. For the sentence "X is part of the axis of evil-doers," I cannot think of a single funny value for X. Let alone fifteen. pillow talk 18:49, September 2, 2010 (UTC) I tend to agree with you. But you and I are both evil, and don't see the humour in it. We just live it, like the old schroll about a fish not knowing it's in water. Oh well. I still think MadMax could funny up a short list. Aleister 18:58 2 9 Kept. --ChiefjusticeXBox360 08:12, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

Bioinformatics

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Doesn't go anywhere. Disintegrate. Saberwolf116 21:58, September 5, 2010 (UTC) Delete. "Similar sequence of letters has to pronounced similarly." Again, written by a non-native English speaker; again, it doesn't matter. Spıke ¬ 22:02 5-Sep-10 Delete. per above. --Mn-z 14:12, September 6, 2010 (UTC) Smite. What? --Wilytank 15:28, September 6, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Per Spike. Loopygrumpkins 23:46, September 6, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Keranamu Malaysia

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Disintegrate. Unless I'm missing some super special hidden joke, this is crap. Saberwolf116 21:56, September 5, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Author's Change History begins: "Creating initial article based on stuff I made up at school one day ^_^"--He finished and I.P.Anon took over. Author uses a homespun template to admit that the article is unfunny and is a "piece of crap." That should be counted as one extra Delete vote! Spıke ¬ 22:08 5-Sep-10 Delete. per above. --Mn-z 14:14, September 6, 2010 (UTC) CENSOR The way I see it, this is just some disgruntled Malaysian criticizing his government in a way that no one understands. Loopygrumpkins 23:43, September 6, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Tony La Russa

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Disintegrate. This is the worst article I've come across in quite some time. Doesn't make a lick of sense and has nothing to do with La Russa or the Cardinals. Saberwolf116 14:42, September 5, 2010 (UTC) Delete. A fine opportunity to say things that supposedly relate to La Russa, also Darth Mario, Jean-Luc Picard, and the year 1822. But not uncommonly bad; Randumbo is quite common. Spıke ¬ 16:09 5-Sep-10 Delete. per mentioning Oprah, Darth Mario, Black Mage, and the illustrious International Keeper of Years in the first paragraph. --Mn-z 14:18, September 6, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Oprah, Darth Mario, and mentioning that 1822 doesn't exist. Get rid of him! Loopygrumpkins 23:36, September 6, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

665 (number)

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Disintegrate. Rambling, semi-coherent article that hasn't improved in the 4+ years it's been around. Saberwolf116 14:54, September 4, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Pseudo-intellectual and thoroughly dumb at the same time. The theme of the not-quite-mark-of-the-beast is not developed but only poked at. Spıke ¬ 15:48 4-Sep-10 Delete.Randumboling mess of an article.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 23:24, September 5, 2010 (UTC) Delete.A mess of dog shit. --Deliciously Whipped~(Kremé) 01:17, September 6, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Crusty punks

Score: 7
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (7)	KILL IT! Delete. It's tripe. Spıke ¬ 22:00 4-Sep-10 Delete. Wow! That's crusty! --Count of Monkey Crisco 02:44, September 5, 2010 (UTC) Eww... Saberwolf116 14:48, September 5, 2010 (UTC) Gah. Crust punks deserve much better. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 14:51, September 5, 2010 (UTC) Do you have a crusty ring around Uranus? --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 4:42 PM 9/5/10 9/5/10 Delete. This shit should have been QVFD'd frankly, but fuck it, it'll be due soon anyway -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 20:54, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Urban Combat

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Disintegrate. A very old article of ours that reeks of 2005 puns. Saberwolf116 16:33, September 4, 2010 (UTC) Smite. There are puns in this? I was too sleepy reading it to notice. Tonillero (talk • contribs) 17:00, September 4, 2010 (UTC) Delete. This isn't the ultimate showdown. --Wilytank 17:31, September 4, 2010 (UTC) Shit Enough Said.--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 17:35, September 4, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Wow, extreme martial arts between Uncyclopedia memes. The intro alone tells you there won't be any theme. Spıke ¬ 21:58 4-Sep-10 Smite. Make it die. Myocardialinfarction 10:30, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

North Carolina School of Science and Mathematics

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Disintegrate. Oh look, it's another long, unfunny article about a school noone has ever heard of. Saberwolf116 15:24, September 4, 2010 (UTC) Kill I live in North Carolina, and even I had never heard about this school.--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 15:37, September 4, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Imagine! A college that is actually a portal of hell in an alternate reality! and violates human rights! This school-cruft cyber-bullies the faculty by name. Spıke ¬ 15:53 4-Sep-10 Expel. Gives Hell a bad name. Tonillero (talk • contribs) 17:11, September 4, 2010 (UTC) Ugh. --Wilytank 17:37, September 4, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Why the hell is this here? Exactly. Myocardialinfarction 10:33, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Florida Marlins

Score: 3
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (3)	Disintegrate. Even after being reverted to the author's last edit, this still needs to be huffed. Saberwolf116 23:10, September 1, 2010 (UTC) "Sucks really, really, really, really bad." Given the short history of the Marlins, most of the year numbers are nonsense--except 2008, a section that confesses it's not going to give you any information. Author doesn't see the difference between writing humor and writing crap that convinces you he's trying to be funny. Spıke ¬ 13:40 3-Sep-10 Delete. Spike rather summed it up. In fact, I really dunno what else to say. ~ (talk) (stalk) -- 20100903 - 16:05 (UTC)
Comments	As awful as this article is, I wish we had an article for each US major-league team, particularly the teams of Major League Baseball. They are of intense interest to a small group of local fans--but it takes someone steeped in the actual team lore to make fun of it. Spıke ¬ 13:40 3-Sep-10

Vijay

Score: 4
Keep (1)	Keep. The grammar, syntax etc. people are complaining about is probably because the author is Indian and English isn't his native language, which I can't really blame him for. Also, there's someone working on it right now, so I don't think this is the right time to nom this. I don't find it that hilarious myself, but if I were more familiar with Joseph Vijay, I might've been somewhat amused. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:07, 3 September 2010 Yes, the author is surely Indian. But, happily, the question on VFD is not whether it is his fault that the article is crap, but simply whether it is crap. Spıke ¬ 23:25 3-Sep-10
Delete (5)	Delete. This is really just awful, and doesn't appear to be looking up. Love,   Delete. The actor might be ridiculous, but this short article, which doesn't quite achieve grammar, isn't funny. Spıke ¬ 11:26 3-Sep-10 Kill! Atrocious grammar, terrible sentence structure and variation, woeful flow, lack of proper content... overall, just a bad article. ~ (talk) (stalk) -- 20100903 - 16:31 (UTC) Weak Delete The worst part is the sentence structure. Otherwise, it isn't bad, just boring. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 12:39 PM 9/3/10 Disintegrate. Didn't do anything for me. Saberwolf116 14:51, September 4, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Invalid. No VFD tag. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:29, 3 September 2010 Let me correct the defect and reset the timer, a courtesy we often grant, and which this article deserves. Spıke ¬ 11:23 3-Sep-10 Well, all right. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:19, 3 September 2010

TurboDymoMan

Score: -5
Keep (7)	Niche. Most of the broken English in endearing enough to sound purposeful, plus some of the more well-translated jokes are pretty funny. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:29, September 1, 2010 (UTC)  Flour It looks like Ptok put a lot of work in on this, and he knows the culture of Poland enough that he can render it in English quite efficiently every once in awhile. He should have his say on this too, imnho. Ptok rules, well, over his corner of Eastern Europe at least. I've let him know this is on VFD, and maybe he can address and/or correct the concerns. Aleister 14:40 2 9 Keep I like it. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 16:47, September 2, 2010 (UTC) Keep. Deleting it on the grounds that the advertising campaign was only seen in Poland doesn't seem to me to be a good reason to remove it. Many advertisements, campaigns etc are only seen in a host country even when they share the same language. Not saying it's a VFH contender either but seems ok enough for me and a number of articles here do incorporate videos from YouTube. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:25, September 3, 2010 (UTC) Selfkeep but still keep - Yeah, it's not my best article. Probably it's closer to the worst ones but quite positive opinions of the people writing above this comment made me vote "keep". Well, TurboDymoMan used to be extremly popular in Poland last year. Even though he significantly lost his popularity, those commercials and slogans will be remebered for a long time in Polish minds. But of course if many people will say that this article sucks balls, then delete it. Sir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 21:42, September 3, 2010 (UTC) Very keepable. Probably as good or better than our median article here, if it were possible to arrange articles by quality. pillow talk 23:06, September 3, 2010 Keep. if just for the bizarre (to me) collection of adds.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  04 Sep 2010 ~ 03:15 (UTC) (UTC)
Delete (2)	Delete. Sucks 50% more than the worst thing on VFD. This article is thick with problems. It's an article about a advertising campaign shown only in Poland. It seems to be based primarily on plagiarizing and condensing jokes from that advertising campaign. After the setup (which relies largely on the included youtube videos) jokes fall into a stale, predictable pattern. Concept is groan inducing at worst and at best, stolen. --Count of Monkey Crisco 21:56, September 1, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Especially after the deletion of the YouTube cuts, I most agree with Lyrithya, a fact that amazes me. But unlike her, I'll vote. Sorry, Ptok, though it appears it will be kept anyway. Spıke ¬ 21:48 3-Sep-10 Correction: The YouTube cuts were not removed, I merely had Flash disabled last time. They are back, and I don't like it. It is not a funny article; it is a mostly deadpan report on commercials that were funny--although none of the rest of us ever saw them. Spıke ¬ 21:59 3-Sep-10
Comments	Comment. The entire thing can basically be summed up in two sentences. Hell if I know what they would be, though. Anyways, the fors make enough of an argument that I'ma not vote at all. ~ (talk) (stalk) -- 20100903 - 16:11 (UTC) Comment. If somebody is bored, he may try to correct "broken English" mentioned by Thekillerfroggy. I'm recently busy and nothing's gonna chane in the nearest future. Moreover, I can't speak English at all and I still wonder how the hell you can understand any word written by me :P That's irony not asking for negation :PYe... You think anyone would negate that... Noob Sir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 21:47, September 3, 2010 (UTC) I've converted the intro and Section 1 into English. Not convinced it's worth it to attack the big list. Spıke ¬ 21:59 3-Sep-10 Nice job. BTw - go on, you can do that. And I deny the responsibility for a bigger part of the list. IPs did it Sir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 22:17, September 3, 2010 (UTC) PS: how big advantage does it need to be keep? or what are the rules of keeping. I did not research the subject :P Then you missed some swell drama in the Forum in August. Ok, here goes 22:23 Done. Bottom line: The rules depend on who's on duty that night. Spıke ¬ 22:56 3-Sep-10 Thanks. Btw, it's not the big list in this article. Check out the Polish article and see how long the list is. (well, at least it used to be long 3 months ago but something may have changed, I haven't checked.) Sir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 23:26, September 3, 2010 (UTC) Kept --ChiefjusticeXBox360 07:49, September 4, 2010 (UTC)

Georges St-Pierre

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Obliterate. This is really just random, and boring. Meh, —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:41, 3 September 2010 He's gay! He humps his opponents. We get the message (twice, in fact, in the intro). Spıke ¬ 11:19 3-Sep-10 Smite. Dumbassery. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 11:22 AM 9/3/10 Just... stupid. Why people think this sort of thing is a good idea is beyond me. ~ (talk) (stalk) -- 20100903 - 16:27 (UTC)
Comments

Bhagavad Gita

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete and nom Ugly, juvenile, and doesn't appear that it will improve anytime soon. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 23:21, September 2, 2010 (UTC) Delete. It's all sex and crapping jokes, it has virtually no relation to the real book, and it quits halfway through. Spıke ¬ 11:17 3-Sep-10 Delete. Just not funny, immature and low class. While the latter isn't always bad, this just doesn't have anything redeeming to it. ~ (talk) (stalk) -- 20100903 - 16:25 (UTC) Not worthy of the name. It's bad on seven levels. Cows and yogis would stomp all over this article. Aleister 16:29 3 9
Comments	Repeatedly vandalized by IPs, I tried to find a better version, which there was around February 2009, but that version was still very listy and not very funny. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 23:38, September 2, 2010 (UTC)

Category:Voldemort's Weapons

Score: 5
Keep (3)	Keep We've been over this. Amusing category that isn't hurting anything should be kept. You know, in the States we protect from double jeopardy... It's actually in our Constitution. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 18:43, September 2, 2010 (UTC) Per Dexter. Some credible users voted to keep last time. I've never used it as a category, but many others have. Aleister 18:55 2 9 It's kind of bad to vote keep because others did. Just saying.--HM (T) 21:31, September 2, 2010 (UTC) Actually, I generally approve of that reason. But this falls under my "stuff that spawns bad stuff" exception to that rule. --Mn-z 21:41, September 2, 2010 (UTC) Keep. Random, useless categories are the best kind. ~ (talk) (stalk) -- 20100902 - 23:37 (UTC)
Delete (8)	Delete. This is just totally pointless. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 2:36 PM 9/2/10 Delete. Pointless joke categories full of articles unrelated to each other are a joke we should have left behind in 2006. pillow talk 18:59, September 2, 2010 (UTC) Eh. Never really saw the point in this one, specifically. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:05, September 2, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Category holds no useful information, i.e. there is no reason any random article should (or should not, for that matter) be in this category. Also spawns "X is EBIL!!!" style articles. --Mn-z 21:29, September 2, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Yeah, Mn hit the nail on the head. This just isn't funny or useful.--HM (T) 21:30, September 2, 2010 (UTC) Delete.--Count of Monkey Crisco 00:54, September 3, 2010 (UTC) Delete. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:12, September 3, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Yet another category that doesn't categorize. Spıke ¬ 11:09 3-Sep-10
Comments	I don't seem to understand your logic. I don't see how Food on a stick and Dr. Robotnik (I recently removed category from) are comparable. What exactly is the point here? --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 3:06 PM 9/2/10 The point is pretty obvious. Categories are meant to either help find similar articles to others or to provide one last little chuckle at the end of an article. To many, this does both. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 19:23, September 2, 2010 (UTC) I'm sorry - The Legend of Zelda: Phantom Hourglass is similar to Blue screen of death? How do you figure? It's a "little chuckle" to find out that that video game, or that software crash, are employed by Lord Voldemort as weapons against Harry Potter? How do you figure? pillow talk 20:51, September 2, 2010 (UTC)

Sink the Bismarck

Score: -2
Keep (5)	Fkeepetc. This page is pretty funny, and could be improved greatly. It at least keeps to the theme, and allows others to add on to the premise. Aleister 14:52 30 8 Keep. Per ^.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  31 Aug 2010 ~ 01:44 (UTC) Keep Saw Socky editing it, then read it. Pretty decent article which can definitely be expanded upon. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 09:34, August 31, 2010 (UTC) Keep. I corrected the misspelling, though in the article's defense, the song by this name features the same misspelling. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:36, 31 August 2010 Keep. per above. --Mn-z 10:49, August 31, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Delete. Meh, this isn't even funny... Just dead boring. Boooriiiiinng!!!!! --Zig 14:30, August 30, 2010 (UTC) Delete. It should be Bismarck so marked down for bad spelling. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:08, August 30, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Further expansion would only produce a cascade of irritating pastry puns. --Count of Monkey Crisco 13:23, September 1, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Comment.Still looks like an entry for Junior Uncyclopedia despite the corrected spelling. Don't see how it can be expanded either though I think in the hands of the Great Sog, this could be a very different beast. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:53, August 31, 2010 (UTC) Abstain. I'm kinda with Romartus on this, although it did make me think that sending-up the Johnny Horton earworm as Why?:We've Gotta Sink the Bismarck could be an idea with great potential.--KUN VFH POTM VFP(IMAGES⇔TALK) 20:24, August 31, 2010 (UTC) Kept --ChiefjusticeXBox360 14:26, September 3, 2010 (UTC)

Kansas City Royals

Score: 3
Keep (1)	Keep Another example of a nom without checking the history. I took it back to the original writer's last edit, or at least in the vicinity, and this removed much of the IP and random crap. Pleazse do not nom a page on VFD without checking back into the history and seeing if the page has been protected from IP's and such. Standard practice, or at least I've been told it was in days of yore. Aleister 14:48 30 8 It's still mostly random and unfunny. My vote stands. Saberwolf116 20:56, August 30, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (4)	Disintegrate. Almost as bad as the actual team. Saberwolf116 16:03, August 29, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Even after the revert, this is still a bad article.--HM (T) 21:43, August 31, 2010 (UTC) Scrap. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 07:37, September 1, 2010 (UTC) Delete. What isn't a list is generic gallows humor. It's a shame, because the KC Royals are a winning humor concept for any borderline funny writer: They are always one of the losingest, and lowest-budget, teams in baseball, because the State of Missouri can't support a second MLB team. The talk page says this article got NRV and was rewritten in 2006. Spıke ¬ 13:49 3-Sep-10
Comments	Comment. This is a good concept but childish in implementation. I would switch to keep if the article were "matured." (Still, demerit.)  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  31 Aug 2010 ~ 01:38 (UTC)

Coup of history

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	An interesting concept that goes nowhere. Disintegrate. Saberwolf116 23:23, September 1, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Becuz all my kickball bases belong to someone. --Wilytank 14:46, September 2, 2010 (UTC) Delete. I like how the short length lets me vote against it faster. --Count of Monkey Crisco 19:54, September 2, 2010 (UTC) Delete.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:15, September 3, 2010 (UTC) Delete. It sounds like a loser plans to vandalize unspecified Uncyclopedia pages via global-search-and-replace, but has a need to first explain to us the deliciousness of his misbehavior. Spıke ¬ 11:15 3-Sep-10
Comments

Rich tea biscuits

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. Mostly nonsense, no theme. --Count of Monkey Crisco 13:21, September 1, 2010 (UTC) Delete.. Dunk it and watch it dissolve! --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:40, September 1, 2010 (UTC) Disintegrate. Saberwolf116 23:15, September 1, 2010 (UTC) Obliterate. One gay ass tea party. --Wilytank 18:38, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

HowTo:Be a guitar hero

Score: 1
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (1)	Delete. Equal parts dickish and clichéd this article might seem passable to some. The thing is, we already have HowTo:Become a Guitar Hero, which is slightly better. --Count of Monkey Crisco 23:50, August 28, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. Actually some of the older versions of HowTo:Be a guitar hero might be better than any version of HowTo:Become a Guitar Hero. It's hard to decide which needs a huffing. --Count of Monkey Crisco 23:55, August 28, 2010 (UTC) Ain't going nowhere fast. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:19, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

Wabash Liberation Army

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. I'm going to guess this started as a wikipedia article that was deleted for being about a subject that was too insignificant. THIS DOES NOT BELONG ON UNCYCLOPEDIA. --Count of Monkey Crisco 08:18, August 30, 2010 (UTC) It would if it was at least funny, but it ain't. So delete. ~ (talk) (stalk) -- 20100901 - 03:33 (UTC) Per comments. This is a failed wikipedia article. We are not an animal, I mean, we are not a dump! Aleister 13:38 1 9 Delete. Vanity Tombola. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:33, September 1, 2010 (UTC) Obliterate. Fuck this article. --Wilytank 18:26, September 1, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. According to Wikipedia there were 3 attempts to create an article called Wabash Liberation Army in late 2006 where it got deleted as "not notable" and a "vanity group". In that same time period it popped up here.--Count of Monkey Crisco 08:28, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

Pearl necklace

Score: -2
Keep (6)	Keep. Per those bottom comments, and I've started to do some editing. Everyone could edit this, we can put it up to feature status in no time. Well, some time, maybe months. But it'll get there, someday. In the future. Aleister 11:56 1 9 Keep And I lul at those who don't know what a pearl necklace is. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 12:10, September 1, 2010 (UTC) And this site says it's content free. Look at all the users this page has already educated. Aleister 15:39 1 9 Keep. Just do it.--Sycamore (Talk) 12:12, September 1, 2010 (UTC) Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:42, 1 September 2010 Um. I guess... it's worth keeping. What with the fixupery and the fact that many just seem clueless, and all. But I sigh in Dexter's general direction. ~ (talk) (stalk) -- 20100901 - 13:45 (UTC) Grasp. Some spunky writers have blown new life into it. —Tonillero (talk • contribs) 17:09, September 1, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (4)	Delete. Tarnished and broken jewelry. --Wilytank 20:57, August 29, 2010 (UTC) Delete. This article is not about blowjobs persay. A "pearl necklace" is when a man pulls his organ out of the vagina before climaxing and sprays his semen on the woman's chest. That being said this article is similar to a blowjob because it involves a lot of sucking. --Count of Monkey Crisco 08:22, August 30, 2010 (UTC) W....What?--HM (T) 21:42, August 31, 2010 (UTC) Delete. I suggest a box of tissues. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:34, September 1, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	If I'm reading it right, this article is essentially about blowjobs, but with necklaces in its stead. It's a very strange concept, but I detect a smidge of potential in it, so I'll Abstain. Saberwolf116 01:57, August 30, 2010 (UTC) I'm with Saber on this one. Improve it & I'll change my vote to keep.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  31 Aug 2010 ~ 01:40 (UTC) Kept. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:19, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

Toyota Starlet Glanza

Score: 1
Keep (3)	Keep. This previous VFD survivor (3.5 to 1 keep) is a fine example of an article created in 2005. However I will issue a demerit here as it was evident from reading the article it suffered from vandalism & with a revert has been restored to a funnier version (note: IP 190.0.195.17's contribution could have a portion be incorporated again with a rewrite).  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  28 Aug 2010 ~ 06:23 (UTC) Keep with prejudice. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 06:29, August 28, 2010 (UTC) Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:56, 29 August 2010
Delete (4)	Delete. Combo VFD from Snapple. Started as a fairly nonsensical article in 2005. Since then it has acquired additional wibble. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:15, August 27, 2010 (UTC) Delete. per the ongoing auto-cruft clean up. --Wilytank 21:39, August 27, 2010 (UTC) Delete..Unless anyone wants to take this away and work on it. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:40, August 29, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Reads like the anime fanfics I had the masochism to subject myself to in younger days... *shudders* ~ (talk) (stalk) -- 20100831 - 23:27 (UTC)
Comments	No consensus. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 07:36, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

Obnoxious Plastic

Score: -3
Keep (6)	Keep. For this: "This alone wasn't such a problem, the harmful effects were limited to only 80% of children and the symptoms limited to hideous mutation and complete nervous system collapse."  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  28 Aug 2010 ~ 05:38 (UTC) Keep The history section definitely needs improvement, but this is salvageable. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 06:42, August 28, 2010 (UTC) Keep Not bad enough to delete. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 00:41, August 29, 2010 (UTC) Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:56, 29 August 2010 I think it's lovely. Now. Not so much before, but now it really is. ~ (talk) (stalk) -- 20100829 - 19:58 (UTC) Keep Fantastic title - the content has its moments too. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:06, August 30, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Delete. Non-biodegrabable nonsense from the 2005 landfill. --Count of Monkey Crisco 21:17, August 27, 2010 (UTC) Recycle --Elassint 00:04, August 28, 2010 (UTC) Delete. --Wilytank 00:35, August 29, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Kept --ChiefjusticeXBox360 07:07, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

JS2H

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. A vanity filled chronicle of website/forum dramatics. This would barely pass ED standards.--Count of Monkey Crisco 09:51, August 30, 2010 (UTC) Delete.This has been left lying around as a page? No sigs either?? Vaporize so i herd u liek bein in ur "vaginal area", hidin' pies --KUN VFH POTM VFP(IMAGES⇔TALK) 20:33, August 31, 2010 (UTC) Ugh. --Wilytank 23:21, August 31, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. Speaking of No sigs... --Count of Monkey Crisco 09:15, August 31, 2010 (UTC)

Fuk u americkan pigs

Score: -4
Keep (7)	Hold your horses! This is a moderately cherished injoke. --Matfen 09:01, August 30, 2010 (UTC) Keep I laughed, but I'm definitely removing Happytimes sig from the bottom. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 09:12, August 30, 2010 (UTC)   I'm ok with that. Keep Seek and you shall find. . .in-jokes. Aleister 14:40 30 8 Keep. Also, you made a page called The French Are The Best Nation Ever and you want to delete this? --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 5:01 PM 8/30/10 Keep. I'm fond of it and don't want to fix (/create a new abominable article) all the broken links deletion would cause.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  31 Aug 2010 ~ 01:27 (UTC) Keep. per abovez and whatnot. --Mn-z 10:47, August 31, 2010 (UTC) Keep, it's an in-joke.--HM (T) 21:40, August 31, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Delete. yes I'm still fairly new and yes I have some weird humor myself but upon stumbling on this abomination I'm going to risk it and say.. what the hell? do we really need this thing? --Uglychick08:38, August 30, 2010 (UTC) Delete. It's just a hack at the Ye Olde Ancient Fisher Price in-joke which has a preservation order on it. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:14, August 30, 2010 (UTC) but the Fisher Price phenom wasn't interactive, I think this is one of the most funnest things I ever done did when responding to vandalism. Delete. okay here goes - at risk of being unpopular (well more so) I'm saying delete because although funny wouldn't keeping this encourage more pointless vandalism? just a thought. (and yes I am aware of the irony of me voting against something with a username like this) --God's Penis 10:21, August 31, 2010 (UTC) The point of VFD is to vote on whether or not an article should be deleted. Articles that are funny/show promise should be kept. Just because an article "feeds the trolls" in no way means it should be deleted. It should only be deleted if it isn't funny. Everyone needs to lighten up and acknowledge this. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 10:30, August 31, 2010 (UTC) So, everyone has to lighten up acknowledge your opinion. (Aaah I'm violating my new "no rudeness" pact)--HM (T) 21:40, August 31, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Kept --ChiefjusticeXBox360 07:05, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

Volkswagen Borat

Score: -2
Keep (5)	Kleep Please take some time and go back into the history. Often the page is best with the last edit by the original author, or maybe one of two established users after the original author. When the IP's get to it, and it goes unprotected, meh. It's not the best page now, but not bad and has a automotive twist that some people may enjoy. Aleister 15:40 27 8 Keep Good page is obvious. Are we just deleting everything now? MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 16:19, August 27, 2010 (UTC) Keep.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  29 Aug 2010 ~ 03:46 (UTC) Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:56, 29 August 2010 Keep. No reason to delete EVERY article about an automobile type. This could use improvement, but looks like a good start. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 23:48, August 30, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (3)	This article is funny...NOT! Saberwolf116 11:20, August 27, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Too much rehash. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:03, August 27, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Not a good page.--HM (T) 00:45, August 28, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Kept --ChiefjusticeXBox360 18:44, August 31, 2010 (UTC)

1945 (number)

Score: -2
Keep (4)	Keep. I took out the pic, its caption, and the last paragraph, none of which had anything to do with the article. Now shorter and sweeter. The concept is funny, strange, and interesting. Maybe a little expansion, but it's actually pretty good as is. Short isn't always bad. Aleister 15:34 27 8 Keep. Agreed. Edited.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  28 Aug 2010 ~ 07:25 (UTC) Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:56, 29 August 2010 Keep MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 11:05, August 31, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (2)	Disintegrate. Short and shit. Saberwolf116 10:52, August 27, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Short isn't always bad, but this is ridiculous.--HM (T) 00:46, August 28, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Kept --ChiefjusticeXBox360 18:44, August 31, 2010 (UTC)

Snapple

Score: -2
Keep (4)	Keep. Yay for batfuckinsane, lisps and plain nonsense. (Most of the red links should have an article.) Please see the rewrite.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  27 Aug 2010 ~ 03:49 (UTC) Keep Yeah. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 10:51, August 27, 2010 (UTC) Quite. Doesn't seem that bad after the whatever that guy did to it. ~ *sqlorsh* (harass) (stalk) -- 20100827 - 12:19 (UTC) Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:56, 29 August 2010
Delete (2)	Vape. Yay for redlinks, lists and plain nonsense. --Andorin Kato 23:08, August 26, 2010 (UTC) Weak Delete A little too wibbly. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:08, August 27, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Kept --ChiefjusticeXBox360 10:55, August 31, 2010 (UTC)

Hoi Ping Chamber of Commerce Secondary School

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	A short article about a school with real names (That I'm removing now) of the teachers a student hates. Oh joy. This is real schoolcruft with comparisons to Nazism, even..--HM (T) 17:50, August 29, 2010 (UTC) Awesome! —fj0j3ddjoaw;rfjaew (r30qjd) 19:35, 29 August 2010 (UTC) Smite. This article is shit waffles. --Wilytank 19:56, August 29, 2010 (UTC) Meh. Saberwolf116 01:58, August 30, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Bamse

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. Unless any Swedes can knock this into shape. --Wilytank 00:39, August 29, 2010 (UTC) Delete. We could ask the former Mrs Tiger Woods. Elin has plenty of time (and Tiger's money) in her hands. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:29, August 29, 2010 (UTC) lolno. Saberwolf116 16:48, August 29, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Crap honey. --Count of Monkey Crisco 08:24, August 30, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Reconstituted International Peoples Church of Buffy the Vampire Slayer and the Scooby Gang

Score: -3
Keep (4)	Keep! (The "Scooby Gang" is a nickname given by die-hard fans to the cast of support characters in the T.V. show.) This may be the type of humor you need to be a little older to appreciate Saber. (Not that it's outstanding or anything, just a cultural reference from a little before your time.)  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  27 Aug 2010 ~ 03:49 (UTC) Weak keep Good references and good premise to a longer article, but too brief and relies too much on knowledge of references to hold of it's own accord. Keep but place on rewrite. Nominally Humane! some time Friday, 04:55, Aug 27 2010 UTC Keep. Buffy. But needs work and expansion. Aleister 15:25 27 8 Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:56, 29 August 2010
Delete (1)	What? Saberwolf116 10:38, August 26, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Kept --ChiefjusticeXBox360 06:53, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

UnBooks:Unleash the Focking Burgers

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. Bad concept held up by listcruft and verbal abuse. --Count of Monkey Crisco 00:06, August 29, 2010 (UTC) Delete. I wish I could buy a copy of this, just so I could burn it. —fj0j3ddjoaw;rfjaew (r30qjd) 04:44, 29 August 2010 (UTC) Disintegrate. So much hard work, so much suck. Saberwolf116 06:08, August 29, 2010 (UTC) Delete.A good excuse to turn vegetarian. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:37, August 29, 2010 (UTC) Delete. --Wilytank 00:41, August 30, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Bloom County

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Blah blah blah I don't like this comic strip blah blah blah. Saberwolf116 06:07, August 29, 2010 (UTC) Delete.. Unloved. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:28, August 29, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Love the comic strip - especially Bill the Cat - but hate this article. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 11:29, August 29, 2010 (UTC) Delete. --Wilytank 19:54, August 29, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

War of the worlds

Score: -1
Keep (3)	Extreme keep I quite thoroughly enjoyed this.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  25 Aug 2010 ~ 05:21 (UTC) Lulz, is there anything you won't vote to keep? Saberwolf116 10:42, August 25, 2010 (UTC) Ha ha. (Die in a fire.) *grin* Actually I vote about 2/3rds keep if you look at the history. (Mostly I don't vote for the ones that will obviously be deleted or my ratio would be about 1:1.)  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  27 Aug 2010 ~ 01:22 (UTC) Very keepable. And there are lots and lots and lots of good uncategorized pics on this page, and I don't have time to categorize them. Aleister 14:43 25 8 Not bad enough to delete. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 02:19, August 26, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (2)	Delete. This is one of the longest, most incoherent things I've ever seen an IP make. Redirect to the slightly better War of the Worlds. (And then tag that mess "rewrite.") pillow talk 18:52, August 24, 2010 (UTC) *Mindfuck* Saberwolf116 20:41, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Redundant, random, rambling, and something else starting with r that means boring Although there are a couple of sparks in here, there is a lot of filler and randumbo. What I would like is for this to be moved to User:PuppyOnTheRadio/War of the worlds, as I've been meaning to tackle War of the Worlds for a while, and for War of the worlds itself to redirect to War of the Worlds until I've finished User:PuppyOnTheRadio/War of the worlds and use that to replace the existing War of the Worlds. Nominally Humane! some time Friday, 01:43, Aug 27 2010 UTC Kept. --ChiefjusticeXBox360 14:50, August 29, 2010 (UTC)

War Against Secularism

Score: 4
Keep (3)	I categorized some but not all the pics, some very good pics on this page which would have no categories otherwise. The article itself has some good things in it, and can be cured with a little work. All I am saying, is Give War a Chance. Aleister 14:54 25 8 Keep. Unpolished but structured and workable. --Count of Monkey Crisco 09:56, August 26, 2010 (UTC) Keep Lots of great stuff here. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 19:25, August 26, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (7)	Delete. As long as we're tackling fictional wars, here's a shitty one. pillow talk 18:40, August 24, 2010 (UTC) Delete.. A severe case of randumbo. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:02, August 25, 2010 (UTC) Delete. I think we can count this up as a justified casualty.--HM (T) 19:20, August 26, 2010 (UTC) Weak Delete (.5) I don't find this much funny at all, but if rewritten (improved) I would change my vote.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  27 Aug 2010 ~ 01:26 (UTC) nah --Wilytank 21:06, August 28, 2010 (UTC) Delete Horrible. mAttlobster. (hello) 00:01, August 29, 2010 (UTC) Disintegrate. I can't get passed how poorly executed it is. Let it fry. Saberwolf116 06:01, August 29, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Bukkake Wars

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	OK, how about this one? Saberwolf116 19:46, August 27, 2010 (UTC) Ewww... --Count of Monkey Crisco 19:58, August 27, 2010 (UTC) Delete. --Elassint 00:01, August 28, 2010 (UTC) EXTERMINATE! Stupid, unnecessary, short, and unpleasant to read. NRV. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 4:51 PM 8/28/10
Comments

Trønderloven

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Fryktelig. Saberwolf116 03:17, August 28, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Dømkirke. --Wilytank 18:04, August 28, 2010 (UTC) Delete. --Count of Monkey Crisco 19:06, August 28, 2010 (UTC) kill Why is this still here?  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  29 Aug 2010 ~ 03:48 (UTC)
Comments