User talk:Hyperbole/chive6
archive archive2 archive6 archive5 archive3
Back[edit source]
After Mordillo bribed me with $6.32 and a small bag of peanuts from a 2003 transatlantic flight, I've decided to come back for a while.
16:48, July 8, 2010 (UTC)- Welcome back! Would you like some rape with those peanuts? —Pelozurian (talk) 16:50, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
- Not particularly.
- Oh. But I already bought the condoms... —Pelozurian (talk) 16:55, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
- Sounds fairly unremarkable to me. Even as we speak, I got a pocket full of rubbers and my homeboys do too. 16:57, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
16:51, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Oh. But I already bought the condoms... —Pelozurian (talk) 16:55, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
- Not particularly.
- You're back! I can have faith in the future of humankind again!
- What? Too hyperbolic? 05:12, 9 July 2010
17:02, 8 July 2010
- BTW, I'm a bit short on case, can I have my 6.32$ back? ~ 20:37, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
Dammit...[edit source]
By the way, I, emc, RAHB, and Ape were TOAST. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 17:02, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
- That would explain why TOAST's articles sucked so hard! No, no, I kid. I kid because I love.
- If Hyperbole leaves again does that mean TOAST will come back? I loved that guy. Hyperbole less so. -- big Ape (negate) (Riot Porn) 18:03, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Ape, if you want TOAST to come back, just log in as it.
- I'll fight you for your shoes. -- big Ape (negate) (Riot Porn) 20:47, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Since when do you wear shoes, you lousy beatnik?
- Bitch imma fuck you up nigger. -- big Ape (negate) (Riot Porn) 20:52, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
20:48, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Since when do you wear shoes, you lousy beatnik?
18:08, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
- I'll fight you for your shoes. -- big Ape (negate) (Riot Porn) 20:47, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Ape, if you want TOAST to come back, just log in as it.
- Hey welcome back! Have a cola on me!
17:13, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
- If Hyperbole leaves again does that mean TOAST will come back? I loved that guy. Hyperbole less so. -- big Ape (negate) (Riot Porn) 18:03, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
- I have shrunken your cola because I am a witch doctor.
- Woah. Dude. Can you, like, ya know, make things bigger? --EMC [TALK] 18:09 Jul 8 2010
- Nope. Witch doctoring is pretty much a one-way street.
- Dammit, I'm never going to be average... --EMC [TALK] 18:13 Jul 8 2010
- You'll always be above average in my eyes. -- big Ape (negate) (Riot Porn) 18:18, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
- At least until you get your cataracts taken care of. --EMC [TALK] 18:21 Jul 8 2010
- Nah, I like the sexy soft-focus effect. -- big Ape (negate) (Riot Porn) 18:25, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
- At least until you get your cataracts taken care of. --EMC [TALK] 18:21 Jul 8 2010
- You'll always be above average in my eyes. -- big Ape (negate) (Riot Porn) 18:18, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
18:09, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Dammit, I'm never going to be average... --EMC [TALK] 18:13 Jul 8 2010
- Nope. Witch doctoring is pretty much a one-way street.
18:08, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Woah. Dude. Can you, like, ya know, make things bigger? --EMC [TALK] 18:09 Jul 8 2010
- I have shrunken your cola because I am a witch doctor.
So, um...[edit source]
...welcome back Hype. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 22:42, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Shut the fuck up. He's not back, you dipshit. Quit yo' lyin'!! MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 22:44, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, Guildy! On an unrelated note, is it just me, or did Dexter accidentally take his meds twice today? 22:57, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Anyone who says Hyperbole is back is wrong. Hyperbole quit for good. He even nonsensed his password so he could never log back in. -- big Ape (negate) (Riot Porn) 23:00, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, I tried to do that, but it turned out I never gave Uncyclopedia my e-mail address, so it was impossible to reset it.
- Hype, tell these fools you're not back! They're getting my hopes up and stuff. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 23:04, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
23:01, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, I tried to do that, but it turned out I never gave Uncyclopedia my e-mail address, so it was impossible to reset it.
Now. . .[edit source]
. . .mainspace and VFH "Suddenly, Raccoons" and all will be well with the world. Aleister 2:58 9 7
- I, um, have my doubts about how that VFH would go.
- I really liked suddenly, raccoons...--DougalJabber at me. 09:24, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
- Lots of people do, judging by the comments scattered around. I found it very funny, but I like raccoons and have lived in close proximity to some (seriously). Then how about putting it on VFG if you don't want to VFH it because you have doubts (I've tried to keep VFG going during your sabbatical, and started a new archive page when the fourth one sunk under its own weight. Although a few of the old candidates should maybe be removed, and the Butt Poop template win has to be recoded to direct to a user page). Aleister 10:19 9 7
- Considering some of the other things ive seen you say on this site aleister im kind of scared for the raccoons. --DougalJabber at me. 11:00, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
- Lots of people do, judging by the comments scattered around. I found it very funny, but I like raccoons and have lived in close proximity to some (seriously). Then how about putting it on VFG if you don't want to VFH it because you have doubts (I've tried to keep VFG going during your sabbatical, and started a new archive page when the fourth one sunk under its own weight. Although a few of the old candidates should maybe be removed, and the Butt Poop template win has to be recoded to direct to a user page). Aleister 10:19 9 7
05:08, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
- I really liked suddenly, raccoons...--DougalJabber at me. 09:24, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
Garak[edit source]
Hey thanks for picking up that review. Guess I got a lot of work to do, and hope I can find the enthusiasm. Thanks again --Black Flamingo 17:00, July 13, 2010 (UTC)
- Hope it was helpful!! It's really not a bad start to the article. It actually got me interested in downloading a few DS9 episodes and seeing how they are... 17:17, July 13, 2010 (UTC)
40+[edit source]
So, 39.5 features, eh? Cripes. Unless you are suddenly struck with a crippling case of writer's block, or you abandon us again, it seems likely you'll become the fastest person yet to 40 features. Can I get a quote from you for the USP about that, and how little it means to you? --UU - natter 10:22, Jul 15
- Um, okay. "I'd like to say thank you to Uncyclopedia for voting to feature my many excellent, high-quality articles, including the drunken insistence that you accept a diseased poodle, the song about having sex with sporting goods, and the blatantly racist tirade about having to wait too long for a Pee Review. Writing 39.5 features has been literally the most important accomplishment I will ever have in my life. I look forward to continuing to service each and every one of you in the future." 01:30, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Oops! Apologies for not thanking you for your Sarah Palin column. You'll find it featured in the OP/Ed section for a while. Cheers! Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 11:14, July 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Groovy! Thank you, Zim! 01:31, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
I think you'll find he mostly wants to thank me. They all want to thank me in the end. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
I just hate how over glorified Kurt Cobain is[edit source]
That's all. That dude wasn't all that great and the idea of somebody (just pretending) to fantasize about preventing him from killing himself (and even worse locking the guy up to get him off of heroin come on now) is just dumb. It's like, get over it already, jeez. I don't think the author would ever want to do something like this, it's the concept of it. I'm just sick of hearing about the dude, alright? --Roman Dog Bird 02:01, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
- To be honest, I think your objection is... weird. But since it's not a really important part of the article, I went ahead and swapped it out for something else, just in case there are other closet Kobain haters among us. 04:42, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
Pee Queue thing[edit source]
So yeah, at least one person has bitched in the forums that the queue is getting lengthy - it must be time for action! I'm respectfully requesting that every active peeing member do one or two reviews this week to hammer that sucker right down. You may already have done some, I'm just copy/pasting this message on to your page, so don't feel slighted, just feel I'm lazy - you'll be right. But if you haven't done any, do you think you could rattle a review or two off this week? Let's show 'em what we can do when we can be arsed! --UU - natter 20:45, Jul 19
Thanks for getting that rubbish UnNews off the queue[edit source]
It was awful, and I was about to give it a scathing review myself. You got there first. Sir MacMania GUN—[22:04 19 Jul 2010]
No, I'm actually serious. I'm really not a good UnNews writer, because I find a real-life story and then minimally adapt it. (I remember another time I submitted an UnNews thing for Review. The reviewer was only slightly more generous, and even then unjustifiably so. Again, same thing: doesn't get that zany or find its own voice until the last dying breaths of the article.) Therefore, as you said, the concept is really weak, because the concept is nothing more and nothing less than the actual news story. Bleh. Then to add to that, this was one of the first things I wrote after I got back, so I hadn't completely gotten the hang of it back again. Ah well, can't do anything about it, and I'm just making excuses now. But I'm rambling.
I will say this:
- UK=Britain≠Great Britain (don't ask me why, I'm not so sure myself, but that's the truth as far as I know, unless anyone else can correct me)
- I keep linking to Captain Understatement because I find that there is no article on understatement itself. See? Red link. I promise I'll try not to link to the other captains, though, if I can help it.
- Gahh, reference humour! Sometimes I'll make a meaningful reference, like to some cartoon or other to highlight something that's so ridiculous it should be in a kids' cartoon show. Most times, however, I just make references to things I like, and I apologise, humbly, deeply, and sincerely for this. See? Doing it again.
- I was wondering about why all of a sudden people are using File instead of Image, but that seemed to be the standard now. As far as I know, the change doesn't seem to cause padding or whitespace.
Sorry to dump this post-mortem on your talk page, and thanks again. Sir MacMania GUN—[22:04 19 Jul 2010]
And may I strike myself down if I don't give you this, for a negative but still highly enlightening review:
For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.
Sir MacMania GUN—[22:56 19 Jul 2010]
- Thanks, MacMania!! I hate giving that kind of review - people can get really upset when I can't find any helpful suggestions to improve the article, but sometimes, you gotta know when to fold 'em. My userspace is a vertible graveyard of unworkable ideas I've abandoned! Looking forward to reading more of your stuff in the future! 00:07, July 20, 2010 (UTC)
For reverting vandalism to my awesome abuse corner of a talk page[edit source]
- You get a ninjastar. Good Karma went round the room there... are you feeling it too?--Sycamore (Talk) 22:11, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
- If by good karma, you mean whirling blades of vigilance, then, yes, I am indeed bleeding freely! Cheers! 22:12, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
You really, really need to mainspace "Suddenly, Racoons".[edit source]
Just sayin'. Saberwolf116 23:56, July 20, 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, it's mainspaced. Suddenly, Raccoons. Glad I could be of service! 07:40, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, you have your doubts about how the VFH vote would go. The users have pawned you and it looks like your 40th will be one of your most interesting pages to date. Kind of cool, eh? Aleister 18:53 21 7
- Honestly, I'm really glad that Palin UnNews failed. I was thinking "Oh, God, this isn't really going to be my 40th, is it?" Talk about limping over the finish line. 18:54, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, you have your doubts about how the VFH vote would go. The users have pawned you and it looks like your 40th will be one of your most interesting pages to date. Kind of cool, eh? Aleister 18:53 21 7
You don't know me, but I watch you sleep[edit source]
On a less creepy note, I just wondered if I could have your blessing to model an article after one of yours. I read this, thought it was the bee's knees, and wanted to do something similar. So I started out working on this. I'm sure the similarities will be obvious immediately. I won't main space it without your permission though because that's just how I roll. If you could, just let me know if your okay with being plagerized. Thanks and other half sincere closing remarks, --—John Lydon 14:20, July 22, 2010 (UTC)
- Looks like a cool article!! No, I've got no problem at all with you taking it to main space. If I was the kind of guy who got all worked up about his writing being his "property"... I probably wouldn't be writing for a wiki. Cheers! 15:06, July 22, 2010 (UTC)
Did you get my email?[edit source]
...hmmmm? ~ 15:11, July 22, 2010 (UTC)
- Your message prompted me to check my e-mail. (Yes, I check Uncyclopedia in the morning before my actual e-mail) And, sure, I'll get right on that! 15:12, July 22, 2010 (UTC)
Hey hype[edit source]
Is it ok if I rework your UnNews:Man hates Justin Bieber a bit? I was thinking of moving it to "Grown man hates..." so it can be about the incongruity of an adult harbouring deep resentment for a singing child (which I think is what you're trying to get at anyway). -- big Ape (negate) (Riot Porn) 21:02, July 22, 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, that was the point of the article. Sure, go ahead, have your way with it. 21:10, July 22, 2010 (UTC)
from irc[edit source]
I mentioned an idea for a magazine i have the first page posted on my user page the rest is getting touched up. I am getting it proof read outside of the site as it is all png files. the article will look like a scanned magazine. tell me what you think of the first page.Lordarcadian 22:24, July 22, 2010 (UTC)
Off-Topic Whoring[edit source]
I'm allowed to whore on my own talk page, right? I know some people have it watchlisted and all that.
Anyway, my band Big Remote [1] just posted a new song, and I'd be interested to see what Uncyclopedians thought of it... and also I want to whore it around.
Have a listen and tell me what you think, and I will be your bestest friend:
Done Running 05:48, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
- I would buy it. And that says alot, as I'm a pirate i steal all my music, movies, and programs. Lordarcadian 05:54, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, Lordarcadian!
- Considering it's not really my kind of thing, it's actually pretty cool, Hype. You guys can play, and I'd listen again. It's no All You Motherfuckers Are Gonna Pay, though. ;-) --UU - natter 06:42, Jul 24
- Thanks, UU! So, out of curiosity, what is your thing?
- Well, since you ask, this. Yeah, I know. --UU - natter 08:18, Jul 26
- Wow, for some reason I was expecting something very different from what you just posted. So, were you a Guns N' Roses fan back in the early '90s?
- Dunno about actual fan as such. Appetite was among the first CDs I ever bought... (Along with Angel Dust by Faith No More and Earth Vs The Wildhearts by that very band, since you ask). Mind you, I was of the age where it pretty much mandatory for me to own that album at that time. And I did see them live. Properly. Like, with Slash and Izzy and everything. But I never called myself an actual fan - I was far too busy being into the Wildhearts! --UU - natter 15:29, Jul 26
- I think we're pretty close to the same age... but I never bought Appetite. My allegiance at that age was to R.E.M., and later to Duran Duran, Tori Amos, Radiohead, and Death Cab for Cutie. Our bass player has a totally different set of influences; he was into obscure hardcore and "old-school punk" music. It's weird that the band even holds together. I'd never actually heard of the Wildhearts before today, but the second I saw them, I was very strongly reminded of G&R.
- Really? They were described as "the Beatles meet Metallica" in those days, which always gave me a chuckle. I listened to REM at the same time. And Duran Duran. Never was much of a one for musical pigeonholing. My MP3 player today threw up Jimmy Eat World, Slayer, Ella Fitzgerald, Charlie Parker, Tasmin Archer, Dubstar and The Pixies in about half an hour. Still like the Wildhearts the best though (and yeah, very few people have heard of 'em, such is life). I actually think the more diverse influences in a band the better, stops things from getting stale. Listened again, BTW. Your rhythm section's pretty good. Think my fave bit is the "ba ba da ba" bit. --UU - natter 21:35, Jul 26
- Yeah, those are fun. They're also the only time my voice appears on the track. I like that song a lot because my keyboard part is really interesting, but my girlfriend and our recording engineer have both said it's one of their least favorites. Then again, a guy who I despise who I once had to throw out of my house because he was squatting there and trying to sleep with teenagers felt it was our best work. Sometimes it's tough to tell if something is any good when tastes vary sooo broadly... 21:39, July 26, 2010 (UTC)
18:48, July 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Really? They were described as "the Beatles meet Metallica" in those days, which always gave me a chuckle. I listened to REM at the same time. And Duran Duran. Never was much of a one for musical pigeonholing. My MP3 player today threw up Jimmy Eat World, Slayer, Ella Fitzgerald, Charlie Parker, Tasmin Archer, Dubstar and The Pixies in about half an hour. Still like the Wildhearts the best though (and yeah, very few people have heard of 'em, such is life). I actually think the more diverse influences in a band the better, stops things from getting stale. Listened again, BTW. Your rhythm section's pretty good. Think my fave bit is the "ba ba da ba" bit. --UU - natter 21:35, Jul 26
- I think we're pretty close to the same age... but I never bought Appetite. My allegiance at that age was to R.E.M., and later to Duran Duran, Tori Amos, Radiohead, and Death Cab for Cutie. Our bass player has a totally different set of influences; he was into obscure hardcore and "old-school punk" music. It's weird that the band even holds together. I'd never actually heard of the Wildhearts before today, but the second I saw them, I was very strongly reminded of G&R.
15:15, July 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Dunno about actual fan as such. Appetite was among the first CDs I ever bought... (Along with Angel Dust by Faith No More and Earth Vs The Wildhearts by that very band, since you ask). Mind you, I was of the age where it pretty much mandatory for me to own that album at that time. And I did see them live. Properly. Like, with Slash and Izzy and everything. But I never called myself an actual fan - I was far too busy being into the Wildhearts! --UU - natter 15:29, Jul 26
- Wow, for some reason I was expecting something very different from what you just posted. So, were you a Guns N' Roses fan back in the early '90s?
07:02, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Well, since you ask, this. Yeah, I know. --UU - natter 08:18, Jul 26
- Thanks, UU! So, out of curiosity, what is your thing?
06:33, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Considering it's not really my kind of thing, it's actually pretty cool, Hype. You guys can play, and I'd listen again. It's no All You Motherfuckers Are Gonna Pay, though. ;-) --UU - natter 06:42, Jul 24
- Thanks, Lordarcadian!
raccoon[edit source]
Sorry so late was lost on my hard drive. congrats on the feature. Lordarcadian 23:17, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
Behind the Template[edit source]
Thank you for supporting my recently featured article.
I, like, appreciate your support, or something.
—Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 02:03, July 25, 2010 (UTC)
IMAGE COPYRIGHT VIOLATION[edit source]
THIS USER IS IN VIOLATION OF COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS PLACED UPON THIS SITE ACCORDING TO THE SITES OWN RULES AND GUIDELINES:
http://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/File:Clubgoers-raccoons.jpg
"You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. DO NOT SUBMIT COPYRIGHTED WORK WITHOUT PERMISSION!"
I will not stand for having my work misappropriated for amateurish internet usage. PLEASE REVOKE THIS USERS RIGHT TO POST ANY MORE COPYRIGHT INFRINGED MATERIALS OR I WILL BE FORCED TO SEEK LEGAL COUNSEL AGAINST THIS USER, THIS SITE AND ALL OTHER BODIES CONCERNED WITH THIS COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT. I DO NOT KNOW HOW THIS USER OBTAINED ACCESS TO THE IMAGE OR THE METADATA, BUT A LOOK AT IT WILL SEE THAT IT IS CLEARLY COPYRIGHTED.
THANK YOU. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Arivkin (talk • contribs)
- wut. --EMC [TALK] 13:46 Jul 27 2010
- I think Ms Rivkin means this. Sir MacMania GUN—[13:49 27 Jul 2010]
- Oh, and you lied to us, Hyperbole, since that's in Chicago's West Side, not Los Angeles. Also, the same question Hype asked: why are you concerned about just the composite, not the original? Also, no need for the caps lock; we have bold and italic font if you'd like to save your voice. Sir MacMania GUN—[13:52 27 Jul 2010]
- We're trying to get in touch with Ms. Rivkin right now. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 13:59, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
- Fuck her if she can't take a joke. Why not just find another image and do your raccoon magic on it, and replace her party-girl image that she (or he? gotta be gay if it's a he) holds so dearly. She should be flattered and happy that someone actually cares enough for her work to use it in a parody site, a fun site. Crybabies of the world unite. Aleister 14:09 27 7
- We (Ape, Dexter, and myself) called Ms. Rivkin and Time Out Chicago and confirmed that this is a legitimate claim, and that the works are copyrighted. She won't allow us to use the image (she's a freelance photographer, so what we're essentially doing is robbing her by using her copyrighted images) regardless of whether we attribute her or not. Best solution here is to delete them and use a different image. Nuff said about this one guys. --EMC [TALK] 14:12 Jul 27 2010
- By them you mean the party image? Which ones does she own and protects to her bosom> Aleister 14:15 27 7
- Both the image of the club and the one with the superimposed raccooons. --EMC [TALK] 14:19 Jul 27 2010
- Oh well. Hyperbole is creative enough to come up with a replacement. Ms. Rivkin should accept our sincere apology. Aleister 14:24 27 7
- Both the image of the club and the one with the superimposed raccooons. --EMC [TALK] 14:19 Jul 27 2010
- By them you mean the party image? Which ones does she own and protects to her bosom> Aleister 14:15 27 7
- We (Ape, Dexter, and myself) called Ms. Rivkin and Time Out Chicago and confirmed that this is a legitimate claim, and that the works are copyrighted. She won't allow us to use the image (she's a freelance photographer, so what we're essentially doing is robbing her by using her copyrighted images) regardless of whether we attribute her or not. Best solution here is to delete them and use a different image. Nuff said about this one guys. --EMC [TALK] 14:12 Jul 27 2010
- Fuck her if she can't take a joke. Why not just find another image and do your raccoon magic on it, and replace her party-girl image that she (or he? gotta be gay if it's a he) holds so dearly. She should be flattered and happy that someone actually cares enough for her work to use it in a parody site, a fun site. Crybabies of the world unite. Aleister 14:09 27 7
- We're trying to get in touch with Ms. Rivkin right now. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 13:59, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
Whoop, direction change. There is talk on Mhaille's page that all is legal and fine, since we are parody and all, so this is a first amendment case all of a sudden, as it should be. And lady, why don't you just be happy and use the use on your resume, it was a feature, and a landslide feature. Lighten up, and maybe even come here and write an article or two to get the real flavor of the place. We'ze all good people when you get to know us. Aleister 14:38 27 7
- Not legal in any sense. Refer to the fact that she has copyright which allows only recreations for parody, not superimposing raccoons and calling it fair use, because it's not --EMC [TALK] 15:44 Jul 27 2010
- You could be right, but I think there was a case for fair use. It would have been worth getting wikia's lawyers legal opinions (for free), but it's over now. Everyone shut up, this is distracting us from the important sysop elections. VOTE ROMARTUS -- big Ape (negate) (Riot Porn) 15:48, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
- No matter how many times I explain this to you over UnSkype, you don't seem to get it. I'll explain this one last time: Romartus doesn't understand the issues. I do. Vote EMC. --EMC [TALK] 15:49 Jul 27 2010
- Romartus is a leader not an understander. This wiki needs leaders.-- big Ape (negate) (Riot Porn) 15:55, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
- No matter how many times I explain this to you over UnSkype, you don't seem to get it. I'll explain this one last time: Romartus doesn't understand the issues. I do. Vote EMC. --EMC [TALK] 15:49 Jul 27 2010
- You could be right, but I think there was a case for fair use. It would have been worth getting wikia's lawyers legal opinions (for free), but it's over now. Everyone shut up, this is distracting us from the important sysop elections. VOTE ROMARTUS -- big Ape (negate) (Riot Porn) 15:48, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
- Well, it's been replaced with a new page. I wonder if Amanda Rivkin realizes that these talk pages are going to become one of the top hits for her name, and that when people Google her, they're going to see her TYPING WITH CAPS LOCK ON, misspelling words like "counsel," misuing words like "expropriation," and basically making a giant buffoon of herself. All in an afternoon's work for Amanda Rivkin, I guess. If I read this page, I certainly wouldn't want to work with her.
- Will post Google search results in a week to affirm this. It'll be lulzy. --EMC [TALK] 15:52 Jul 27 2010
- Also, it's pretty much the same thing you did to the Duckapple faggots. --EMC [TALK] 15:55 Jul 27 2010
- That's true, User:Hyperbole/Duckapple is the fifth result for Duckapple, and undoubtedly, Amanda Rivkin has just made a very public record that she is irrational, angry, litigious, and has a tenuous grasp on the English language at best. 15:57, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
- You guys are real dicks. Seriously. There's a difference in Duckapple fgts and people with legitimate copyright concerns. Removing the comments you all made is against the rules of Uncyc, but damn... Some of you need to realise that she is a real person with real feelings. And that there are things called liable and slander. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 16:05, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
- You're just being a faggot about this because you're e-mailing her back and forth. --EMC [TALK] 16:11 Jul 27 2010
- I hope you ride on the London Underground. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 16:14, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
- Dex, Amanda Rivkin's "legitimate copyright concern" has been addressed: the image is gone. But the fact that SHE CHOOSES TO EXPRESS HERSELF ON THE INTERNET WITH MISUSAGE WORD IN WEIRD TENSE AND THEN suddenly drops to lowercase for a while and THEN INSISTS THAT HER WORK IS TOO GOOD FOR AMATEUR INTERNET HUMOR BECAUSE SHE HAS A CAMERA AND SHE KNOWS HOW TO PRESS THE SHUTTER BUTTON AND SHE IS PROUD BECAUSE IT LETS HER GET NEAR A JOURNALIST'S DESK DESPITE HER TOTAL INABILITY TO FORM A COHERENT THOUGHT is a completely different issue entirely.[1] 16:16, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
- Atleast It's Better Than How My Ex Girlfriend Used To Type In The IRC That Shit Got Annoying --EMC [TALK] 16:35 Jul 27 2010
- Wow.
- Amanda Rivkin would be proud to know that she inspired the Photographer article. It doesn't feel quite finished, though. I think it needs work.[2] 17:46, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
16:48, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
- Wow.
- Atleast It's Better Than How My Ex Girlfriend Used To Type In The IRC That Shit Got Annoying --EMC [TALK] 16:35 Jul 27 2010
- Dex, Amanda Rivkin's "legitimate copyright concern" has been addressed: the image is gone. But the fact that SHE CHOOSES TO EXPRESS HERSELF ON THE INTERNET WITH MISUSAGE WORD IN WEIRD TENSE AND THEN suddenly drops to lowercase for a while and THEN INSISTS THAT HER WORK IS TOO GOOD FOR AMATEUR INTERNET HUMOR BECAUSE SHE HAS A CAMERA AND SHE KNOWS HOW TO PRESS THE SHUTTER BUTTON AND SHE IS PROUD BECAUSE IT LETS HER GET NEAR A JOURNALIST'S DESK DESPITE HER TOTAL INABILITY TO FORM A COHERENT THOUGHT is a completely different issue entirely.[1] 16:16, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
- I hope you ride on the London Underground. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 16:14, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
- You're just being a faggot about this because you're e-mailing her back and forth. --EMC [TALK] 16:11 Jul 27 2010
- You guys are real dicks. Seriously. There's a difference in Duckapple fgts and people with legitimate copyright concerns. Removing the comments you all made is against the rules of Uncyc, but damn... Some of you need to realise that she is a real person with real feelings. And that there are things called liable and slander. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 16:05, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
- That's true, User:Hyperbole/Duckapple is the fifth result for Duckapple, and undoubtedly, Amanda Rivkin has just made a very public record that she is irrational, angry, litigious, and has a tenuous grasp on the English language at best. 15:57, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
15:51, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
- Amanda Rivkin *chuckle* (Seriously though, that is one cool shot... I can understand wanting to protect one's work, but she should do it without the the dramatic asshattery.) ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* ~ ~ 31 Jul 2010 ~ 06:22 (UTC)
I love a golden shower[edit source]
Thanks for your review, Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:Faux Lesbian pipeline from Mexico stuffed. The joke is the way the jumble clearly does not fit together. I think the POV of the writer is a bit like Rosanne Rosannadanna or whatever she called herself, on vintage SNL. Cheers and thanks for the input! Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 00:23, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
Thanks[edit source]
...for the nom. It had been on Pee so long that I thought everyone had it infamy. --Sog1970 10:27, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
Do you remember me?[edit source]
It's Yettie. i just felt like coming back and checking up on some people. I might even write an article or something. Grand cross of the order, eh? - [14:59 3 August 2010] PlebYettie
- No....we all undertook a breakthru treatment so that we could blot you from our memories.... -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
- Pfft... who doesn't remember Yettie? How you been, man? (Or: How you been, girl?)
- And yet he never checks on his old dad. ~ 15:11, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
- Mordillo! I was getting to you next! You're my favouritest, I promise. Saving the best for last! But thank god, I was kinda hoping they would come up with something to help people get over the memories of they might have had of me...I have been great! How has Uncyclopedia been? How have the memes been? Are those new links I see on the left? - [15:25 3 August 2010] PlebYettie
- That great was maybe a little enthusiastic, but once you get over your addiction to places like this your life really opens up. :) Sadly I am now addicted to what is known as "real life" and kinda want my Uncyclopedia life back. The good old days when I had to mug old ladies to sponsor spending time editing and such like...- [15:27 3 August 2010] PlebYettie
- Mordillo! I was getting to you next! You're my favouritest, I promise. Saving the best for last! But thank god, I was kinda hoping they would come up with something to help people get over the memories of they might have had of me...I have been great! How has Uncyclopedia been? How have the memes been? Are those new links I see on the left? - [15:25 3 August 2010] PlebYettie
15:05, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
- And yet he never checks on his old dad. ~ 15:11, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
Orian is useless[edit source]
Orian said he would do this review. He hasn't. To be fair, I did sorta dump it on him. So I've decided I'd love to dump it on you. If that's okay? Is it possible? To do the review for me? Cheers if you can and an appropriate insult if you can't. - [22:06 6 August 2010] The•
- Hey Yettie! Sorry I haven't got to this yet. Things have been so crazy-busy. I totally plan to unless someone beats me to it.
- Hey! I understand, I remember being crazy-busy just a few weeks ago...Ah the golden era. And I doubt anyone will beat you to it, it's been on for over a week now! —SPIC WHORE Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [11:02 11 August 2010]
05:00, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, not pestering, I undertsand business and such. I'm quite busy too. Just wondering if you know if you will get a chance to do this anytime soon? Thanks again. Hope all is well with you, by the way, Hype. How is life treating you (and such)? —SPIC WHORE Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [17:57 13 August 2010]
- Ah, balls. Sorry it's been so long. I can't do it tonight because I have a casino gig. I might be able to do it tomorrow, but that's the pride parade, and there will a lesbian wet T-shirt contest during the afterparty, and I don't want to miss that. And then Sunday is my boss's wedding. But I will see if there's a place where I can slip your pee review in if I lube it up but good first.
- I don't want to get between you and a lesbian wet t-shirt contest...So don't stress over it. And a wedding? And a casino gig? My...you are busy. Unlike me. I'm just fake busy. Busy pretending I have a life outside of Uncyc. And so on. —SPIC WHORE Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [19:25 13 August 2010]
19:18, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
Finally did it! Sorry to keep you waiting for like two and a half weeks. That was bad of me.
17:53, August 23, 2010 (UTC)Monster Party[edit source]
Is on VFH currently. Thanks again for giving me creative license to rip off your idea. I also gave Dragon Warrior credit on the nom page. Anyway, thanks and stuff. --—John Lydon 12:34, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
I'm back, apparently[edit source]
To add more BUTT POOP!!!! to my userspace. --Mn-z 23:38, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
- I don't understand but poop. It makes my head hurt. —SPIC WHORE Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [02:05 11 August 2010]
- Its BUTT POOP!!!! All caps, exactly 4 exclamation points, and "BUTT" has 2 t's. Please respect the inside joke. To understand BUTT POOP!!!!, please try to read this article out loud in the presence of another human being with a straight face. --Mn-z 21:37, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
- Welcome back, old chap. Your incredibly pointless BUTT POOP!!!!-Elephants hybrid made me laugh.
- Ty. And I see you respect the BUTT POOP!!!! --Mn-z 01:34, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
14:49, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
I'm sorry, what?!!?[edit source]
You have HOW MANY features? You hold WHAT POSITION on the UN:HS?!?!? Dear god! Orian has 16 features! What! Dear God! What happened while I was away! Dear God! —SPIC WHORE Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [21:29 14 August 2010]
- Raccoons, for one thing. Sorry you missed that. Sir MacMania GUN—[22:17 14 Aug 2010]
- Dear god! 41 hype!! 41! How on earth is that physically possible? That's more than 40! More! —SPIC WHORE Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [22:22 14 August 2010]
- Once he reaches 42, the website will presumably implode. We must stop him by all means necessary. Sir MacMania GUN—[22:26 14 Aug 2010]
- And now we have 90 minutes of high budget, testosterone-fuelled Hollywood thriller! —SPIC WHORE Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [22:33 14 August 2010]
- Once he reaches 42, the website will presumably implode. We must stop him by all means necessary. Sir MacMania GUN—[22:26 14 Aug 2010]
- Dear god! 41 hype!! 41! How on earth is that physically possible? That's more than 40! More! —SPIC WHORE Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [22:22 14 August 2010]
Number one of the month[edit source]
Suddenly, Number One! Aleister 00:53 16 8
Russo-Japanese Thanks[edit source]
Thank you for supporting my recently featured article.
I'm considering changing this template, but it probably won't happen.
—Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 14:59, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
Help with my penis[edit source]
I've been working on Penis penis Penis penis penis penis Penis penis and I was wondering if you'd like to take a look. Puppy has already peed it. He didn't like it much and I doubt he's likely to change his mind. But as a mature writer who is open to criticism, I've decided to ignore what he said and ask your opinion. You criticised the earlier version on VFH and I'd like your thoughts on whether what I've done is enough of an improvement. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 16:04, August 22, 2010 (UTC)
- I don't like your penis, it doesn't appear long enough or as substantial as I would like. With a bit of work it could grow into something more impressive though. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
- Oh you guys in need of a penis? Here you go then: —SPIC WHORE Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [10:57 23 August 2010]
- Hey Mickey! So, I think about your article once in a while. There's a slot machine here called "Buffalo," where the goal is to line up five buffalo across the screen. And so, as the reels started coming to a stop, I'd superstitiously mutter "buffalo.. buffalo.. buffalo.. buffalo.. buffalo." Then, remembering your article, I began to mutter "penis.. penis.. penis.. penis.. penis." Hopefully, my drunken mumbling is not very audible. However, I need to stop playing that slot machine, as it has cost me hundreds of dollars.
- But, shit, the problem with this article is that it's so inaccessible. I mean, it's a spork of a truly obscure Wikipedia article, and I had to read that Wikipedia article three times and think about it for a day before I could even parse "Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo." So, I enjoy this, but it's expecting a lot of homework from the reader, and articles that expect a lot from the reader often don't go to feature.
- Plus, there's usually only so much comedy one can get out of a spork, and the two main sources of comedy here are 1) the comedy inherent in the original article, which is kind of cheating; and 2) the comedy in saying "penis" a bunch, which is... what it is.
- So, I don't know. Honestly, I'd say this is probably one of my favorite 50 Uncyclopedia articles. But would I vote for it for feature? Probably not. And can it be improved? Only a little, at most.
- One thing, though: the picture of what appears to be a mushroom - that's way too explicit for my tastes, especially in a nerdy article about English syntax. Also, you seem to have removed the joke that Penis, France is actually the proper name of Paris, France. I liked that joke.
- Really? I thought that joke was the worst in the article. The idea that Paris was actually called Penis didn't make any sense to me, even in a world where penis is a verb. I can definitely believe that there is a town called Penis, like there's Shit in Iran or Fucking in Austria. I also thought it was a logical and funny extension that its residents wouldn't like the sentence. Oh well.
18:04, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
- Oh you guys in need of a penis? Here you go then: —SPIC WHORE Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [10:57 23 August 2010]
- Are you talking about the penis tree or the anatomical penis picture? I have no particular attachment to the latter. I left it in when doing my rewrite only because I didn't have anything better. The penis tree seemed like a good idea following the pee review, although I thought it was a bit cheap and easy. I have no qualms about getting rid of either. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 21:16, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
- The joke that Penis is Paris was funny to me in an absurd kind of way. No, it doesn't make any sense to me either. Maybe that's why I laughed. I can see it your way, too, though; it's not a big deal. The picture I object to is PND.JPG, the anatomical penis picture. I think it's too explicit. I just don't like looking at cock. I won't even watch porn that has dicks in it. Come to think of it, maybe that's too much information. 21:20, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Are you talking about the penis tree or the anatomical penis picture? I have no particular attachment to the latter. I left it in when doing my rewrite only because I didn't have anything better. The penis tree seemed like a good idea following the pee review, although I thought it was a bit cheap and easy. I have no qualms about getting rid of either. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 21:16, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
Review![edit source]
Thank ye, it was worth the wait. While your review is, of course, excellent I think I'm gonna take your advice and simply leave the article alone. Leave it as "a perfectly decent UnNews". Thanks for the review. —SPIC WHORE Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [18:18 23 August 2010]
- Hey, no problem, Yettie! Once again, it's great to have you back. 23:21, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
Go raibh maith agat[edit source]
Thanks[edit source]
Thanks a lot Hyperbole I did not expect that a Pee Review would be so long, so thorough, or so helpful. -- ⦿⨦⨀ Phrage
Your song recordings are pretty funny too. They remind me of sarcastic Bill Bailey(Duck Song),Billy Connolly (Tell laura I love Her) and 2 Hugh Laurie ones ("Protest Song" and "Mystery") All on YouTube if you do not know them already. Another gem is Billy Connolly's "Ultimate Country and Western Song" written by Shay Healy and listed on youtube as MYGrannyFunny Song. The songs that Dave McSavage sings at the end of Savage Eye episodes are in similar vein-youtube again.-- ⦿⨦⨀ Phrage (talk) 10:40, August 26, 2010 (UTC)
Thank You[edit source]
This Greyscale Template Is a reminder of what good times the Good Old Days were. Sonic80 would like to thank the owner of this template for his/her vote for remembering the Good Old Days, Which are much better than the current days.. |
Pirate Lord__Sonic80 (Yell • Latest literary excretion) __ 19:51, August 29, 2010 (UTC)
You know what?[edit source]
If there's one less offensive article - the better, really. I shouldn't have thought that if muslim and Islam article is written offensive / making fun of, then the jews article should be so, in fact I admire such jews like Finkelstein and Chomsky, or like this guy. No need to fool me, I know you as a jew don't want the article "jew" to be written as offensive as muslim and Islam articles, and it's good if it's not written offensive at all (as it's currently now). I only wanted it because both Islam and muslim was written by jews, so of course I wanted "jew" article to be written with the same level of ridiculing / "humor", that's it. But to answer evil for evil isn't good. Dramadeur 06:14, August 31, 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, for fuck's sake, Drama. Let me just point out five things to you. I doubt my words will penetrate your tinfoil hat, but here goes:
- I don't give a shit about the comparative offensiveness levels of Jew, Islam, Christianity, etc. I didn't write a single word of Jew or Christianity, nor have I even read them all the way through. My job here is to write funny stuff. My job isn't to make sure we're being "fair" about religion, nor is it to make sure we have specific biases about religion. 95% of my edits have nothing whatsoever to do with religion; my best-known articles are probably Dragon Worrier, Suddenly, Raccoons, and I ate your Haagen-Dazs.
- In my opinion, my latest round of edits to Islam made it much less offensive, since I removed about 75% of the iterations of the assertion "Islam is a religion of terrorists" (because even if that does qualify as a joke, repeating a joke five times is simply not funny).
- I am not, nor have I ever been, Jewish. I'm the child of an atheist and a Protestant Christian. I've never been to a synagogue, I don't speak Hebrew, I can't tell you the history of Channukah or even spell that word properly. Like I told you, I'm a Unitarian Universalist. Further, I don't have any ill will towards any religion, nor do I even prefer one religion to another. I've found that the people of this world are pretty much the same regardless of what supernatural beliefs they do or don't have.
- I reverted your edits to Islam and Jew for one reason and one reason only: dumping an entire article into another article is a fucking stupid way to edit. It's as though J.K. Rowling's editor said "Hey, this script to Disney's The Sword in the Stone is also about wizards!! I think I'll just tack it onto the beginning of Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire! That's a good idea, right?" It was some of the dumbest editing I've ever seen, and the way you've actually tried to defend it is utterly incomprehensible.
- Finally, this may be repetitive, but just to drive the point home: my opposition to your edits has never about religion. If you had taken it upon yourself to combine UnTweets:California Gurl with Katy Perry, I would have reverted that jackass idea just as vigorously as I've been reverting your jackass contributions.
- I hope that clears some things up for you. 15:55, August 31, 2010 (UTC)
Look What I did[edit source]
here --Mn-z 01:24, September 3, 2010 (UTC)
Thank You![edit source]
This coupon is good for 1 Free Fist-Pumping Lesson. Courtesy of the Cast of Jersey Shore. Thank you for voting for HowTo:Understand Jersey Shore. |
Pirate Lord__Sonic80 (Yell • Latest literary excretion) __ 18:01, September 4, 2010 (UTC)
Party!![edit source]
err.... Monster Party that is.
He may be dead but Monster Party will live on thanks to your vote. Hooray for crappy video games! |
--—John Lydon 12:10, September 10, 2010 (UTC)
Hi Hyperbole![edit source]
I wrote an article for you. User:Mrthejazz/sig 21:14, September 10, 2010 (UTC)
Night of Broken Glass[edit source]
Alright, if it's your favorite article in all of Uncy, and I found it yesterday or something and it's in my top ten, let's nom the thing and get it featured. You do it, as your fave (I nommed one of my faves, Ape's Fluffy Bunny World, and it was featured) and you'll have my vlote. Aleister 00:50 21 9
- Sounds good to me. It's up. 00:56, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
Very Important Categorization Issue[edit source]
Does the pig in this image have womb newts? --Mn-z 23:10, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
- Funny, I just saw that you categorized it that way, and I thought "That's odd, I thought it was just a pot-bellied pig." Then I looked at it for a while, and shrugged, and realized I have far more important things to think about. Like the fact that I somehow became involved in a burlesque show and have to spend Saturday playing "Stand By Me" on stage while various girls are re-gluing their pasties or whatever it is that burlesque dancers do. I sort of wish any of this were a joke.
- By the way, you should read Jim Freklowski, if only for the Cosgrove factor. 23:13, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
- I have, on occasion, thought stuff was pregnant when it wasn't. That is how my mind works, i.e. perversely. --Mn-z 01:11, September 23, 2010 (UTC)
23:13, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
- By the way, you should read Jim Freklowski, if only for the Cosgrove factor. 23:13, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
I TOOK YOUR PISS, GOTT DAMMMIT![edit source]
Could you read the NEW and IMPROVED version? God, Uncyclopedia looks weird now. ~~HODIS, THE ANGRIEST PERSON IN THE WORRRRLD.
- I truly have no idea what you're talking about. 18:21, September 23, 2010 (UTC)
My sadness finding an outlet[edit source]
Betrayed. Stabbed in the back. Exploited. Ready to write a section on 9/11, looked at the page, feelings of surprise and astonishment fell over me as I found myself saying "Hyperbole" with the same emotion Jerry says "Newman". Seeing that the 9/11 addition was a work of art, I again said "Hyperbole", and used my shock to write a pale in comparison response, after which I cried myself to sleep, awoke once for a snack, and cried myself to sleep again. Aleister
- If it's any consolation, I find your response quite droll, quite droll.
- Drollness is highly overrated, so I tweeked the sojurn page a bit, and made a category. Your page, I never had heard of the 228 massacre before and read some of the wiki article on it. Thanks, honorable history teacher. Couldn't find anything about the West Ice incident though, is that a real reference? Now we need an article on the Sippy cup. Aleister 10:15 24 9
04:19, September 24, 2010 (UTC)
Your piss review. Ni-Hao Kai Lan.[edit source]
By time I read it, I changed almost all the issues. HOWEVER, the only thing left intact by that time was "Characters". I completely changed it to just include Kai-Lan, and to give it a more serious edge. The original intention, just to show you that I'm not a drooling idiot who discovered this site and thought cartoon characters being stupid was TOTALLY FUNNY, was supposed to make fun of celebrities. The beginning quote, which Lady Gaga said (Sans baby tear freebasing), was to illustrate this as non-serious humor. You were implying I came from the retard basket of thinking, glorified in the phrase, "Random is funny". Random is not funny. Situational humor IS. I know, I'm a newbie, and that means it's OK to think stupid things like that, but, mind you, i was born with a brain. That may've sounded catty. I apologize if it did. I write like how i talk, because i think that writing is emotion expressed into words. Fun fact, EVERYONE ENDS UP HATING ME FOR IT! Could you read Ni-Hao Kai Lan again? Also, you complained that i wasn't informative. I reworked the whole article to make that bit makes sense.
Article Whoring[edit source]
I rewrote Haruhi Suzumiya. Although its a bit bold, I think it is funnier than the previous version. --Mn-z 02:37, October 4, 2010 (UTC)
You have aided in the fight against the manholes...[edit source]
At this point, you may also want to consider checking your pockets so as to ascertain that everything is still there. |
You have been rewarded with a hug. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101010 - 23:32 (UTC)
A quick question[edit source]
Hey Hyperbole. I'm helping run a writing contest this month and one of the judges had to pull out of the competition. Would you be interested in taking their place? I need someone to judge both the Best Popular Culture-related Article the Best Uncyclopedia-related Article. I wouldn't normally ask someone to judge two categories but the Uncyclopedia-related needs to be judged by an older editor. MadMax 02:27, October 15, 2010 (UTC)
- I can probably do it. When is it? This weekend sucks - I have a concert, a LAN party, and my sister is probably going to give birth. Other than that, though, I should be good. 04:18, October 15, 2010 (UTC)
The deadline is the 17th. User:Multiliteralist said he could do the Popular Culture category so I hope that helps. :) I appreciate the help, thanks. MadMax 12:00, October 15, 2010 (UTC)
- I'll right, I've got a pretty light work day, so I can probably get it done this afternoon. 15:35, October 15, 2010 (UTC)
[edit source]
We in da Club is on VFH again. --Mn-z 01:23, October 16, 2010 (UTC)
- And I think the intro paragraphs need a rewrite. That section is not up to the Hype standard circa 2010, imnho. Aleister 1:25 16 10
- A'ight, I rewrote it. Let me know what you think. 18:45, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
HODIS on Islam[edit source]
Um, we have another customer--see my talk page or the article. Spıke ¬ 17:45 22-Oct-10
Lady Gaga Poker News[edit source]
Brilliant! Cheers!--Funnybony 18:11, Oct 24
- Thanks! :) 21:31, October 25, 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, so...[edit source]
That image you wanted? This could be a little harder than I'd thought, as I seem to have misplaced my tablet pen. I even checked my brother's apartment and my freezer; no luck.
Just thought you should know. ~ Lyrithya *shifty eyes* (words) (actions) -- 20101026 - 14:34 (UTC)
- Oh no! Well, I don't need it for... a month, if I'm optimistic about the mixing process, and six months, if I'm pessimistic about it. So... if you find it, and you still want to try, I would be eternally grateful. Hope you do find it!!
- Well, if all else fails, I'm sure I can come up with something... now what kind of electric field did they say the pens generated? *wanders off* ~ Lyrithya *shifty eyes* (words) (actions) -- 20101026 - 16:05 (UTC)
15:07, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
Belated hooray[edit source]
Runner-Up Writer of the Last 5.5 Years, Hand Place | |
I knew you'd say it eventually[edit source]
Did Sparta emerge from your penis also? 19:37, 1 November 2010
- That was merely my way of saying that the last section was better in its more Laconic form. But, to answer your question: yes. 19:39, November 1, 2010 (UTC)
Why hello there...[edit source]
I'm working on a spiffing new article that I felt I should inform you about, and one I hope that you would appreciate... -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
- I laughed my ass off at that. My girlfriend, however, wants me to give you her stern disapproval.
- I do love it when your girlfriend gives me her disapproving look. Could you ask her to do it wearing leather boots and holding a riding crop? I'm hopeful that despite the title the article will be a little more subtle than appears at first glance. :) -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
- She says you're a dirty bird, and she'll send you the picture later. 22:43, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
- Do you think it needs another section or do you think its ready to go now? -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
- Oh, that's very ready to go now. That's some truly fine work, Mhaille. I cracked up at Page 3. 20:41, November 11, 2010 (UTC)
19:09, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
- I do love it when your girlfriend gives me her disapproving look. Could you ask her to do it wearing leather boots and holding a riding crop? I'm hopeful that despite the title the article will be a little more subtle than appears at first glance. :) -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
Why hello there...[edit source]
I've just finished working on a spiffing new article that I felt I should inform you about, and one I hope that you would appreciate... 16:01, 7 November 2010
- I don't think your girlfriend will like it, though I don't really know her.
- You are a sick man, Socky. Sick, sick, sick!! This is the second time you've taken one of my articles and put more fucking in it. 19:17, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
- And I'm proud of it! 19:20, 7 November 2010
19:16, 7 November 2010
- You are a sick man, Socky. Sick, sick, sick!! This is the second time you've taken one of my articles and put more fucking in it. 19:17, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
Why hello there...[edit source]
I've just finished working on a spiffing new article that I felt I should inform you about, and one I hope that you would appreciate... Aleister 16:07 7 11 MMX
- I don't think your girlfriend will like it, although I don't really know her. Aleister 19:18 7 11
- "Ah, it's a beautiful Sunday morning. Let's just check my messages before I get in the show - oh, look! Quasi-racism , conjoined twins in an incestuous lesbian relationship, and an article about fucking the Virgin Mary!" I think she might like this one a little more, though. She shares the belief that life would be better if Mary was a dirty slut. 19:19, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
Why hello there...[edit source]
I just... okay, I was actually wondering if you were the one for whom I said I'd do something and then forgot. Were you, and if so, what was it, and don't even think about trying to take this somewhere kinky, because whatever it was wasn't. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101107 - 16:22 (UTC)
- Yep! That was me! I was wondering if you could do me a favor, and then you forgot where you put the things necessary to do the favor, and then you forgot who you were going to do the favor for, and then you forgot what the favor was in the first place.
- Neat. What was it? ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101107 - 19:26 (UTC)
- It had something to do with this. 19:31, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
- Ooooh... right. Yes. I'll get on that. Sorry... I'm a little too absent minded at times... *wanders off* ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101107 - 19:50 (UTC)
- It had something to do with this. 19:31, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
19:13, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
- Neat. What was it? ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101107 - 19:26 (UTC)
Why hello there...[edit source]
I just... okay, I was actually wondering if you were the one for whom I said I'd do something and then forgot. Were you, and if so, what was it, and don't even think about trying to take this somewhere kinky, because whatever it was wasn't. Aleister 16:26 7 11 (MMX)(UTC)(ABM)
- No, if my memory is right, I think you promised to send Socky your macaroni and cheese recipe. 19:14, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
Round about this time[edit source]
Someone should really serve up a combo breaker. I'll be interested to see who does. --UU - natter 13:07, Nov 9
- Won't be any of us, nuh-uh. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101109 - 15:41 (UTC)
Would you be interested in collaborating?[edit source]
I have started a new article, User:Sycamore/World Leader Cage Wars. I think that it could be pretty decent it's done right - I have a feeling some of your kind of humour would add a lot to this, would you like to work together on it?:-)--Sycamore (Talk) 14:33, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
- I'll see if I can take a good look at it this weekend... keep this between us, but oftentimes I'm really not very funny when it's not my own concept. And sometimes then, too :) 20:38, November 11, 2010 (UTC)
Dance.[edit source]
Yep you're the lucky user today!
BYEZ! --Dancing dude 03:42, November 11, 2010 (UTC)
- Um... thank you? 20:39, November 11, 2010 (UTC)
Current Heavyweight Chump of the World[edit source]
According to ring ranking at the Uncyclopedia Hall of Shame you are the rightful bearer of this standard. If you are ever superseded please give this to the new champion. Be proud of your title, or, toss it in the delete bin and throw a rotten tomato at the world. You’re the CHUMP – it’s your title now.--Funnybony 19:45, Nov 11
- Um... thank you? 20:38, November 11, 2010 (UTC)
Remote Control[edit source]
Did you still need cover art, or did you figure something else out? See, I finally got a new tablet pen, so... if you do, let me know. If not, cheers. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101130 - 00:32 (UTC)
- We're still looking for cover art!! I'd be thrilled if you could put together something... and really looking forward to seeing what you can do! Thank you!!
- I'll do that, then. Should have something for you by wednesday, and you can emit the appropriate d'ohs then, eh? ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101130 - 01:34 (UTC)
- I am anxiously looking forward to it! Thanks again, Lyrithya!!
- Oy, how should I contact you, anyhow? This talkpageness is getting silly. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101201 - 20:37 (UTC)
- Boy, that's a tough one. I'm definitely not going to slap my primary e-mail address up on the talk page for all the world to see. Hmmmm.... okay, e-mail me at my joke e-mail address, mr_sexyboy_69@yahoo.com - and I'll get in touch with you from my real one. 21:05, December 1, 2010 (UTC)
05:51, November 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Oy, how should I contact you, anyhow? This talkpageness is getting silly. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101201 - 20:37 (UTC)
- I am anxiously looking forward to it! Thanks again, Lyrithya!!
00:45, November 30, 2010 (UTC)
- I'll do that, then. Should have something for you by wednesday, and you can emit the appropriate d'ohs then, eh? ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101130 - 01:34 (UTC)
Whatcha thinking about?[edit source]
Due to the slowness of VFH, I nommed that and a few other articles. Just thought I'd let you know. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 20:28, December 22, 2010 (UTC)
- Rad! Thanks, Guildy!
- No problem Hype. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 00:54, December 23, 2010 (UTC)
21:54, December 22, 2010 (UTC)
HEY HEY![edit source]
HEY! BROTHER! now that I know you're my brother I'll come here every day and play with you. You're the best brother I ever had. You care so much about me. I'm so lucky to have you. --Mimo&maxus i am a cunt Hyperbole created this sig Bevanz provided the images 10:58, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Okay... I know what I said before, but this is just too weird. That's going on? ~ -- 14:28, 5 January, 2011 (UTC)
- I tried that once. He shunned me after the third date, ah, day. And I was going to come and chastise Hype for his vote on my goat page, but someone told me that he, you, were traumatized by a couple of goats as a youngster, so I understand. So that's why you're so touchy when the word "horny" is thrown about. Aleister 14:32 5 1 '11
- I am Hyperbole's paraplegic brother and he uses me in order to flirt with the ladies. --Mimo&maxus i am a cunt Hyperbole created this sig Bevanz provided the images 14:57, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Lyrithya, this is a little weird, yeah. What do you say we blow this scene and go play some Dance Dance Revolution at the bowling alley? I can get a double A on Jordin Sparks' "Battlefield," you know. I bet you look great in 1980s-style leggings. 18:00, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
- I tried that once. He shunned me after the third date, ah, day. And I was going to come and chastise Hype for his vote on my goat page, but someone told me that he, you, were traumatized by a couple of goats as a youngster, so I understand. So that's why you're so touchy when the word "horny" is thrown about. Aleister 14:32 5 1 '11
- Yay! Can I come too? --Mimo&maxus i am a cunt Hyperbole created this sig Bevanz provided the images 21:05, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
UnBooks:Let's take a walk in the city! on VFH[edit source]
Hey I just wanted to tell you, I changed some things about the article and was wondering if you would like to read it again. If your vote is still no then that's fine with me. Anyway, here's a list of things I did to it:
I made all the images 300px (except this one and this one which were much too big at 300px), I tryed to make the transitions much smoother, added two pages, a couple images, moved the page to a shorter name, and got it proofread (good this time).
So maybe you could read over the article again. And like I said, it you still don't think it's a feature that's fine. But don't be afraid to change to an Abstain, because anything helps. -- 01:53, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry man, still not my cup of tea. Still, kudos for trying, and good luck! --~~
dicks lol[edit source]
8===========D~ ~ ~ ~O:
- Also, I'm sitting here drinking cold coffee, playing spider solitaire, and listening to "My Name Is Jonas" by Weezer. Want to come over and join me?
- You know it, bro. That's the best song Weezer ever wrote. And coffee is a dish best served cold, and also not in a dish. 07:17, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
Mr. Bole[edit source]
Do you want to contribute to this at all? A couple of other users have pitched in already and it seems to be getting better the more people join in. Give it a look if you have time. --Black Flamingo 18:26, January 10, 2011 (UTC)
Kitten cookbook[edit source]
You have both cursed and blessed my life with your challenge, as I will now have to study up on parts of history I know very little about. I'm more of a recent-history and current events buff, but I expect to learn much about the ancient days of yore which will tie-into the patterns of expanding centralized power evident today. How go the things? Is your music where you want it to be? Do you use a yo-yo in your live performances, and if not, why not? Enjoy, Aleister 00:47 15 1 '11
- Er, is "kitten cookbook" really something that requires a vast grip on the subtleties of history? I thought it was about methods for eating juvenile felines. But, to answer your questions: no, my music is nowhere near where I want it to be, and the reason that I don't use a yo-yo in my live performances is that my previous attempts at yo-yoing have ended with my being struck in the genitals by a yo-yo. I have faith that you will rise to this grandest of challenges, young Aleister. 01:02, January 15, 2011 (UTC)
rewrite[edit source]
Hyperbole, Thanks for doing that. First though, I want to rewrite that and I dont mind removing ALL of the original text. It is going to be a rewrite. Second, im not a newbie according to the rules of the comp, I opened my account last summer (more than 3 months ago). Could you please undo that edit? I dont know how to get the text back to the way it was (it wont format back to the original). Thanks --Shabidoo 00:18, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
- p.s. a rewrite cannot have any of the original text? Wouldn´t that be a replacement rather than a rewrite? --Shabidoo 00:25, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
- I don't know whether or not you're allowed to use original content in a rewrite - you'd have to ask Sycamore. But you didn't enter the "Best Rewrite" category - you entered the "Best new article by a noob" category, which I'm pretty sure is original content only. But, these things are really all at Sycamore's discretion, so he's the guy to be talking to. 00:34, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
Todd Palin[edit source]
Perfect. The first pic was the one and only thing bothering me about the page, but it was a bother under the radar of paying enough attention to it to do something about it. Just this morning I found a good pic of a guy with his feet up, maybe that one could fit. In the pic he doesn't have a tie on, although I'm totally in favor of ties. Thanks for the vote but more for the discernment about the pic. Aleister 21:31 22-1-11
- p.s. New one has been found. What do you think?
- Ehhhh... better, although I still didn't like it. I would have preferred a hickish-looking picture of Todd himself. But since it's already gone to feature, I guess that's a moot point now. 01:27, January 25, 2011 (UTC)
Cheers[edit source]
Thanks for the review Hype. I'm not sure if its possible to implement your suggestions, because the whole point of post-structuralism is that it strips away everything concrete, so there probably is no way of building a bridge that way. I think, perhaps, its better to leave it an unanswered question. -- big Ape (negate) (Riot Porn) 00:24, January 24, 2011 (UTC)
Flint, Michigan[edit source]
I'm not seeing it--what part(s) did you find were awkwardly written? Spıke ¬ 00:48 25-Jan-11
- Well, let's start with the lede paragraph, which is a single sentence:
- "The City of Flint, Michigan is a desolate industrial wasteland whose abandoned factories, dilapidated retail stores, and empty residential neighborhoods covering the city give the amateur archaeologist fascinating hints to the days when Flint used to be a veritable spark plug in the American automotive engine."
- That is a massive sentence. I have a serious problem with the prepositional phrase "covering the city" - not only do I have no idea whether it modifies the last noun phrase or all three noun phrases, you just never see a prepositional phrase in that place. Consider this sentence with a parallel structure:
- "My car is a vehicle whose carbeurator, ignition, and spark plugs under the hood give it the ability to drive me to and from work."
- Don't you think that's - completely bizzarre? Subject, predicate, noun phrase, dependent clause, dependent clause, dependent clause, prepositional phrase, and then another verb whose subject is the three dependent clauses... Jesus Christ, that's fucked up.
- Also: What's with the phrases "fascinating hints to the days"? Hints are "about" something, occasionally "at" something, only very rarely "to" something. And "veritable" is an intensifier used to qualify a metaphor, not an announcement of a metaphor. You can say that Rahm Emmanuel is a veritable force of nature, but you can't really say that a cell is a veritable building block of the body.
- Instead of a 45-word sentence, why not try, you know, multiple sentences? Something like:
- The city of Flint, Michigan is a desolate industrial wasteland of abandoned factories, dilapidated retail stores, and empty residential neighborhoods. In these ruins, the amateur archaeologist can find fascinating hints about the days when Flint served as a tireless spark plug in the American automotive engine.
- And that's just the first sentence. Let's look at the third sentence:
- "Flint is located in the Mitten, as children in Michigan are taught to use the palm of their right hand (which at most times is covered by a mitten) to refer to points in the Lower Peninsula."
- What's with the word "as"? As usually means "because," like "I'm late for work, as my car broke down." But the reason that Flint is located in the Mitten isn't because children of Michigan are taught something in class! I can sort of tell that the sentence is trying to say something like "Flint is located in Michigan's "mitten" - a region named for the practice of teaching children to use the palm of their right hand..." But it doesn't say that. It's very, very confusing on first read.
- And then the bottom of that section:
- "Currently, this thumb is merely well-opposed. Mittens near Flint are placed in a drooped position, with the thumb extended until a car stops to give you a lift."
- All I can say about that is: what??! I don't know what "well-opposed" means. I'm guessing it means "opposable," but I don't know how something can be more or less opposable, let alone "well" opposable. And I don't have the faintest idea what the word "merely" is doing in there. In that second sentence, I understand that it's a hitchhiking joke, but I have no idea what "Mittens near Flint are placed in a drooped position" means. Seriously. No idea at all what the article is talking about at this point.
- That's just the beginning - but - do you see some of my concerns now? 01:21, January 25, 2011 (UTC)
You have been nominated[edit source]
YOU HAVE BEEN NOMINATED FOR MANIAC OF THE MONTH
You could win and have all the hot girls in the world. Or you could lose and have the fat ones.
|
-- Go Crazy 05:56, January 28, 2011 (UTC)
Before I forget[edit source]
Some little dude, I call him "dude" for short, complemented "A Fine Frenzy" and wanted me to tell you that he liked it and whatnot. So yeah, good job amusing somebody that you don't know. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 05:07, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
- Right on. Tell little dude I appreciate it.
- Hype, vfSog?! Al
- What?
- Who? Trying to cooly say go vote for Sog. I won by one vote, with Sog one behind, and Mhaille two behind. Low turnout. Aleister 00:51 2-1-'11
- Oh. But I'd already voted. For Guildy. Sorry...
- We tried. And . . .congrats on the best article of the year! What a great story the journey of that page turned out to be, and I mean that literally, it's a great story. To have to extend the poo lit category because the page wasn't good enough in the eyes of all the judges. Even they have to have a good laugh out of this now. Congrats. Aleister 1:45 2-1-'11
- Well, even though a 3-way tie would have been cool, I'm glad you took it. Congratulations! And yeah, I'm pretty excited to have scored a hat trick - top article of 2008, 2009, and 2010. I've slowed down a lot, though - my inspiration just isn't where it used to be. It's been an uncreative few months for me. Sigh. 05:46, February 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Just got back to this. The top pages three years running! Nice. I've never read Turing, will do so after this note. And thanks. You know, after winning that thing somebutnotall of the air is out of my bubble too, not uncreative but just not wanting to be as much, probably need a couple of weeks off but will take that later and not now (some good stuff in progress). I think that's natural, a site-specific Buzz Aldrin effect (when he got back from the moon he felt like that was it, what's there to do now?). You went away after the poo lit, then into your Horace period (which was great), so you did different things last year. One thing I wanted to do by coming here was to see if I could still write fiction, which I had been away from for awhile while doing non-fiction material. And then it turned out that this, as Funnybony explained to me, is an adult playground (and I guess illogicopedia is a playground for the crazed - I like it!). Then came the feature game, which was fun. Did you have a main reason for writing here, and did you accomplish it? Any more goals? And this year you had the curve ball things, like Raccoons. Well, this gets a bit long, so. . .Aleister 00:09 8-2-'11
- Well, even though a 3-way tie would have been cool, I'm glad you took it. Congratulations! And yeah, I'm pretty excited to have scored a hat trick - top article of 2008, 2009, and 2010. I've slowed down a lot, though - my inspiration just isn't where it used to be. It's been an uncreative few months for me. Sigh. 05:46, February 1, 2011 (UTC)
01:03, February 1, 2011 (UTC)
- We tried. And . . .congrats on the best article of the year! What a great story the journey of that page turned out to be, and I mean that literally, it's a great story. To have to extend the poo lit category because the page wasn't good enough in the eyes of all the judges. Even they have to have a good laugh out of this now. Congrats. Aleister 1:45 2-1-'11
- Oh. But I'd already voted. For Guildy. Sorry...
00:42, February 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Who? Trying to cooly say go vote for Sog. I won by one vote, with Sog one behind, and Mhaille two behind. Low turnout. Aleister 00:51 2-1-'11
- What?
19:16, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
- Hype, vfSog?! Al
Hello[edit source]
I haven't said hello for a while, so hello. Pup 12:43 08 Feb '11
Jim Freklowski[edit source]
Iwillkillyou reviewed Freklowski. The review should be featured, and I've already entered it into Category:Jim Freklowski. I think you agree that not a word of the original Night of Broken Glass article should be changed, if I was an admin I'm infinite-protect it. One of the treasures here, remember when you nommed it? Maybe a Suddenly, Raccoons, Freklowski edition? Naw, just dreaming. Enjoy the Super Bowl, I believe the Packers will win by six. Aleister 1:46 10-2-'11
- It has a couple of typos and he's right about the formatting, at least on wider screens... and some of the later ones could use a little expansion, methinks. Begs the question, though, is he familiar with any of the actual events, or seen the original article? I'd ask, but that'd require moving and I hate moving, so maybe he'll come here and answer. Or maybe not. ~ 01:56, 10 February 2011
- Ah, that really is a fantastic review. Yeah, actually, I think I'll remove the Wikipedia boxes. People who care enough can probably piece together what the historical tragedies are.
- You could also just put in smaller links... as in, not boxes. Single lines or something. And I really don't know what to make of that review... this vexes me. I'm terribly vexed. ~ 03:08, 10 February 2011
- Well, all you have to decide is whether it's "in-depth" ;)
- And then I have to justify it... urrgh. I hate the borderline ones. They require actual thinking. ~ 05:18, 10 February 2011
03:59, February 10, 2011 (UTC)
- Well, all you have to decide is whether it's "in-depth" ;)
02:57, February 10, 2011 (UTC)
- You could also just put in smaller links... as in, not boxes. Single lines or something. And I really don't know what to make of that review... this vexes me. I'm terribly vexed. ~ 03:08, 10 February 2011
An Article of Thanks From Me, the CLIT![edit source]
On this day of the current February 14, 2011, you have been cordially thanked by the none other Mr. Soot Gremlin, for a fine review of me article.. Good job! |
I know this thanks is late, but me wanted something better than a cookie. Cookies do tend to get stale, anyway. Bountiful thanks once more. --Mr.Soot Gremlin -Talk 01:37, February 15, 2011 (UTC)
Necklace of the Gods[edit source]
Thanks for your vote on Pearl necklace, and for considering a review (I didn't think anyone would take it, so just went ahead and nommed it). If you see anything that really needs work, please tell me, lay it on thick, as thick as a pearl necklace. Even if it gets featured there is, of course, time to work on it. I'm not one who puts things on pee just to self-nom, I've always taken reviews to heart and made use of them. I would very mucho appreciate any comments on UnBooks:The Old Man and LV - not asking for a review as much as a reading and comment at some point. That's a page I want to perfect, polish, and add to so it's one of my best if not the. Thanks again. Aleister 20:17 15-2-'11
- Briefly, I'll say there were a few things where the ambiguity broke down a little and it became a little too obvious that the "dirty" meaning was being favored over the "clean" one. I was going to say to take a wrench to those bolts and tighten them down a little. But... hey, it's FA-quality, I have no problem voting for it as-is. As for your UnBook, I'll have a glance when I get the chance. Hey, that rhymed.
- Agreed, I had that "minor uncomfortable but not enough to change it" feeling at those points, although I did want them to play out closer to the real thing near the end. The most obvious place was in the farmers bouncing pigs sentence, and I'll squirt oil on that one soon. Although from Funnybony's comment on the nom he hasn't got it yet (although he probably did. Maybe.) Thanks for all in all! Aleister 20:22 15-2-'11
20:18, February 15, 2011 (UTC)
Category[edit source]
Jeez, you'd better head over to Joe Biden. Some asshat added the category: People who didn't fuck your mother in the kitchen last night. This is intolerable, and I don't know what to do. Some vandal did try to revert it several times, but the asshat brought it back. I don't know, this is too edgy for me. Aleister 1:38 17-2-'11
- Shoot, if only we had some kind of policy. I don't know, I could take it to VFD, or I could scoop it out and take it to QVFD, or I could find out where you live and nonconsensually fuck you in the ear. Whatever should I do??
- My ear is virginal, but if you must. Hey, how about this timing, I just finished a news article and saw your post. Aleister two minutes later
- p.s. Did you look at the category page? I was inspired by your posts, so you are the spirit behind the creative juices which ran out of me, from orifices aplenty.
- Not every sarcastic comment Hyperbole makes needs to be turned into an inside joke. --Mn-z 01:30, February 24, 2011 (UTC)
- p.s. Did you look at the category page? I was inspired by your posts, so you are the spirit behind the creative juices which ran out of me, from orifices aplenty.
04:57, February 17, 2011 (UTC)
- My ear is virginal, but if you must. Hey, how about this timing, I just finished a news article and saw your post. Aleister two minutes later
Well[edit source]
At least one person understood my Scott Pilgrim quote, and only 1 minute after my edit too. Impressive.
05:18, February 18, 2011 (UTC)Admints[edit source]
To you and Zombiebaron: Thanks for thinking of me on the temp. admin page. One of the reasons why I wouldn't want it is I'm lousy at code, and figure that the admins play with charts and code books and trapdoors that I couldn't even knock on. So best left to the guys who can work the machinery. Plus I would feature things like a week ahead of time, and not ban people that should be banned (I like the 92 vandal, and would end up giving him all the good codes and keys in exchange for a ringside seat), and be hesitant to huff pages. But thanks though, for the nom and the kind words that I cut from the plastic on my computer and used to cut myself. Aleister 14:00 27-2-'11
- These are all reasons that I wanted you in the admin seat :P But... well, maybe in the future.... 17:17, February 27, 2011 (UTC)
Trig Palin[edit source]
You've done an interesting page, and what I'd suggest is adding your page, with some changes to fit the article, at the end of the Trig Palin page. So we'd have both, but led off with the original. Dexter and I have made a non-talked about vow to make the Trig Palin page more extreme every time someone tries to vandalize it by deletions, and we've done so, in the process shaping it up into a pretty good page. It can be worked on, by it did get passed on VFD as is. How does a meld sound, but not taking away from either page but rather combining the two styles in the same article, one after the other? I think it can be done smoothly, and then we can work on the parts we like best. (I will go add extreme to the page now because your suggestion to huff the page by renaming and nomading it may be called a spiritual vandalism, or a good excuse to extreme it more anyway!) Aleister 23:14 27-2-'11
- I just think there's absolutely no chance that a meld would work. It would look like that time a guy tried to merge Jew with Jew/Classic: all that came of it was an overlong article that was hideously inconsistent in tone.
- No, I really think we only have to options: either 1) My article is Trig Palin and the "extreme" article is Trig Palin/Classic, or 2) the "extreme" article is Trig Palin and my article is Trig Palin (retarded baby). I favor option #1, and Dexter and SPIKE have offered their support for it, but option #2 wouldn't kill me or make me cry or anything. 23:18, February 27, 2011 (UTC)
- I like the lead in the original, which pretty much covers the insults to retarded Trig and his family, and the speech to the convention section, and maybe a few other lines. Much of it can go. I think a meld would work if those were kept intact. I'm surprised and shocked that Dexter would support a wholesale huffing (because when a page goes "classic" it pretty much is gone for good except to the historians), Dexter, this is Dexter we're speaking of. Surprised. Shocked. Well, we can work it out, (I forget the rest of the lyrics to the song) we can work it out, something something something. Aleister 23:29 27-2-'11
- I'm actually thinking of having it be "Trig Palin (Offensive)" and "Trig Palin (Sensitive)" or something like that. Would that be a subtable compromise here? Any time someone vandalizes either it'll mean "Trig Palin (Offensive)" will get worse and worse. How 'bout it? MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 23:35, February 27, 2011 (UTC)
- I don't think that would solve the problem, because Trig Palin would have to redirect to something, and wherever it redirected, that would de facto become "the" Trig Palin article. (Plus, my article is anything but sensitive; there's just a lot less monkey-fucking in it.) 23:38, February 27, 2011 (UTC)
- A small disambiguation saying "Would you prefer the sensitive or offensive version of this article?" would negate making either the "default" version. Plus, words such as "sensitive" and "offensive" have always been objective, so to me it's a perfect description. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 23:42, February 27, 2011 (UTC)
- I don't think that would solve the problem, because Trig Palin would have to redirect to something, and wherever it redirected, that would de facto become "the" Trig Palin article. (Plus, my article is anything but sensitive; there's just a lot less monkey-fucking in it.) 23:38, February 27, 2011 (UTC)
- I'm actually thinking of having it be "Trig Palin (Offensive)" and "Trig Palin (Sensitive)" or something like that. Would that be a subtable compromise here? Any time someone vandalizes either it'll mean "Trig Palin (Offensive)" will get worse and worse. How 'bout it? MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 23:35, February 27, 2011 (UTC)
- I like the lead in the original, which pretty much covers the insults to retarded Trig and his family, and the speech to the convention section, and maybe a few other lines. Much of it can go. I think a meld would work if those were kept intact. I'm surprised and shocked that Dexter would support a wholesale huffing (because when a page goes "classic" it pretty much is gone for good except to the historians), Dexter, this is Dexter we're speaking of. Surprised. Shocked. Well, we can work it out, (I forget the rest of the lyrics to the song) we can work it out, something something something. Aleister 23:29 27-2-'11
Aleister, as well as being a great writer, you are one of those people who thought that "Margaret Thatcher--Cunt!" was a self-evident joke; likewise Dexter and even without hearing the first two words. The old Trig Palin article had no plan. You like it simply because it slaps at the Palins in the crudest possible way. The new one is funny, doesn't do the Palins any favors, and does not have to be an advertisement for the old one. Spıke ¬ 23:46 27-Feb-11
- Hmmmm, it sounds good, and if SPIKE is against it it must have merit. And we can illustrate the disambiguation page with examples of offensive pics and wording and the same for the sensitive sissy-boy stuff like you want to put under the honored name of Trig Palin. Then we can keep working on the articles and the disambiguation page. Aleister 23:46 27-2
- I agree with SPIKE. I suppose that solidifies things even more, eh? ~ 23:56, 27 February 2011
- Hmmm. This is shaping up to be a second-chance at VFD, unprecedented, a random drive-by shooting after the other guys already drove by. Dexter's idea seems very fair, although hopefully it won't create a precedent but a one-time solution. And I don't really care heart and soul about the page, it was just a fun place to play with Dexter when the vandals attacked it. Aleister 00:02 28-2
- I'm going to have to side with SPIKE, Lyrithya, and Hype on this one. The old version really isn't more offensive so much as it is crude. --Mn-z 00:44, February 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Hmmm. This is shaping up to be a second-chance at VFD, unprecedented, a random drive-by shooting after the other guys already drove by. Dexter's idea seems very fair, although hopefully it won't create a precedent but a one-time solution. And I don't really care heart and soul about the page, it was just a fun place to play with Dexter when the vandals attacked it. Aleister 00:02 28-2
- I agree with SPIKE. I suppose that solidifies things even more, eh? ~ 23:56, 27 February 2011
- Hmmmm, it sounds good, and if SPIKE is against it it must have merit. And we can illustrate the disambiguation page with examples of offensive pics and wording and the same for the sensitive sissy-boy stuff like you want to put under the honored name of Trig Palin. Then we can keep working on the articles and the disambiguation page. Aleister 23:46 27-2
lol. I was walking the dog, lol realiziing that you have written a very good page and of course it should replace Trig Palin (retard). Yours has a theme, a focus, and does credit to the site. If Dexter agrees, please make the change. Can we at least link to the retard page every time Trig's name is mentioned? And one of those tags on top? That would at least bring people who are sneaking about to the other page. Thanks, Aleister 1:03 27-2-'11
- I really don't see the need to advertise the "extreme" version. Like I said either, the page is more crude than offensive. It really doesn't insult Trig any more than Hype's version, and about half of it is about Sarah Palin, Bristol Palin, and more than a few insults directed at George W. Bush. Insulting Bristol Palin about her lack of chastity is a valid joke, but it should be done on a page about Bristol Palin. And Hype in fact has written a decent (abeit now somewhat dated) UnNews article on that subject.
- However, simply saying "Bristol Palin is a whore" or "Sarah Palin is a retarded bitch, her mother was a hamster, and her father smelt of elderberries" doesn't constitute humor in itself. I don't think anyone is impressed by a jumble of immature insults. I don't really think its more shocking than many other articles on this wiki, and its lack of an overarching plan actually takes away from its shock value. It really comes across a typical crude and vulgar ip-created hodgepodge, like thousands of other articles on the wiki. If I add "Glenn Beck blew Osama bin Laden's goat" or "PENIS!!!!!" to a random page, it doesn't make it more "extreme" or "hardcore", it just makes the page look stupid.
- That being said, I could live with the "extreme" version being a "classic" page. --Mn-z 02:51, February 28, 2011 (UTC)
Oi Cunt...[edit source]
I would hate for you to think that I don't agree with you completely that any fixed, group of people with the power to do what the hell they like with seemingly no comeback is not a good model for any society, even a virtual one such as this. The fact that a number of people can remain inactive for in some cases years, only to return and carry on like they've never left, whilst the people who have continued to invest their time in this project appear ignored, is only ever going to lead to resentment. We did discuss some time ago removing rights from inactive admins and having a facility were if people returned and wanted to pitch in a quick vote to agree/disagree would ensue. Any system that is in place does need to protect against those who would seek to abuse that system. Many people have separate "agendas" as such with how they view the place, and how it should function. People also have different methods of dealing with others. There have been a number of admins who have been more than gungho and have needed "a talking to" to calm situations. Likewise many users have been so fixed in their views that they cannot see or are unwilling to even consider that there are two sides to any argument and that compromises sometimes are the only option. Change has happened many times in fundamental ways in which this site functions, which is how things should be. To my mind there has never been an US/THEM approach and if there ever was I would be on the front line fighting against it. I have no interest in what someone did yesterday, its what you are doing today that counts. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
- Well, for my part, I'm sorry if I came on too strong with the "we need some new ops" speeches. I know it's kind of impossible not to read "the old ops aren't good enough" into that. And when I say I've never had a problem with the way you govern the wiki, I truly mean that - you're doing a kick-ass job. It's just frustrating to learn that "the books are closed" and that no one will ever rise to admin again except maybe at a glacial rate of one a year. I think it's a problem that needs correcting, but I'm willing to acknowledge that I might have been a little manic about the whole thing, and I'm sorry about that. 15:46, March 1, 2011 (UTC)
I'm sure you care a great deal about this...[edit source]
Reviewer of the Month February 2011 | |
I would just like to reiterate the fabulousness of your reviews, so here it goes: they're fabulous. --Black Flamingo 11:55, March 1, 2011 (UTC)
- I'm hoping some day I can have a whole boy scout jacket full of patches of men urinating. I'm pretty sure Boy Scouts of America looks favorably upon that kind of thing! Thanks, BF11! 15:49, March 1, 2011 (UTC)
happy monkey competition[edit source]
Hey Hpyerbole I still dont have a topic from you for the happy monkey competition. Coudl you please email it to me at happymonkeycompetition@gmail.com and Ill post you your topic at 4:55PM EST: Thanks --ShabiDOO 11:57, March 2, 2011 (UTC)
- Okie dokie. I did. 19:10, March 2, 2011 (UTC)
super happy monkey competition topic[edit source]
Hey your topic will be ready here at about five minutes before the start of the competition (5pm EST or 2200 UTC). HAVE FUN AND GOOD LUCK :) PISSING ALL OVER YOUR FACE --ShabiDOO 21:47, March 2, 2011 (UTC) --ShabiDOO 21:54, March 2, 2011 (UTC)
Giant Novelty Foam Hands[edit source]
Giant Novelty Foam Hands! Can you believe it? WOW! GIANT Novelty FOAM HANDS!!! BUY THEM NOW NOW NOW BUY BUY BUY!!!User:Mrthejazz/sig 03:30, March 4, 2011 (UTC)
You're Winner[edit source]
Per Forum:The Great Administrator Mixup: Vote for your temporary admins here, you now have admin powers for the duration of March. DON'T MESS UP I MEAN IT. —rc (t) 18:09, March 4, 2011 (UTC)
- Woo hoo! New tabs! I'll try very, very hard not to push the wrong button and break everything.
- I'll be sure to add some stuff to your js while you're not looking so you can break even more. ~ 18:37, 4 March 2011
18:24, March 4, 2011 (UTC)
So you have the powers[edit source]
follow them. Do not enter the role. Watch out Don't follow them, You told them to. So if you powers the Admin, you can turn on the system, and roll the wheel who knows? Maybe you'll learn the secret for yourself. - LOL vandalz
私にあなたの親族に従うと、トレッドのIFが動作しないのはしないことを引っ張らない出番管理者はあなたが死んでしまうフォロー - LOL vandalz