User talk:Mnbvcxz/archive 2

Reap

From Syc:-) — Sir Sycamore (talk) 18:38, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Ghetto White Boy Syndrome

Hey would you look at that! I finally got around to finishing something! YAY! Anyway, I figured I would let you know since you seemed to be such a great supporter of that. If you feel like it, its up on Pee Review again, however you don't have to. And I did in fact tone down the "racism". This was definitely not just a shameless attempt at getting a quick review if that was what you were thinking... ^{Pirate Lord}__Sonic80 (Yell  •  Latest literary excretion) __ 20:07, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

There is a little bit of a consistency issue with calling it Ghetto White Boy Syndrome yet having effect all races and both genders. Try to rephrase the first paragraph to explain that without being wordy. I normally don't like to review the same article twice, its generally best to get the opinion of someone else. --Mnbvcxz 20:59, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for checking it over again, I'd like to say that the first line of the article shows its actual name is 'Ebono-cracka Reclassification Syndrome' only it is given the name Ghetto White Boy Syndrome because it affects White Males the most, however can be found in females and other ethnic groups, thought the chances are much lower. ^{Pirate Lord}__Sonic80 (Yell  •  Latest literary excretion) __ 21:24, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

You categorizing devil, you!

Tooltroll likes me so much, he gave me a shiny brass anvil!

Thanks. I didn't think of that. . .   Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 02:55, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Y'know, for a self-professed "nipple Nazi"...

...you sure seem focused on that image. You've got more edits on its page than I do. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 19:48, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

That's because I'm a hypocrite. I need to categorize it so others can find it. So they can re-use instead of uploading a similar pic. --Mnbvcxz 19:49, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Yes, because there's nothing worse than redundant boobies. You don't know us at all. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 20:09, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Haha. Nipple Nazi. —Sir SysRq (talk) 20:26, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Haha. Nazi Nipple. - [16:18 4 February 2009] YYettie

Congratulations!

So far you, Mnbvcxz, have made 4,717 contributions to this site, of which 1,612 (34.17%), were in the image namespace. Maybe you can now change categories like "Nonnude Images" and "Boobage Images" to less capitalized stuff like "Nonnude images" and "Boobage images", how about it? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 18:54, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

You'd probably need a bot to do that. Re-directs don't work in categories. To change the category name, and keep the contents you'd have to change the category link in every article, image, and subcategory in the entire category. Alot of the categories have "random capitalization" excessively long titles, and the like. Additionally, their are several redundant or joke categories. --Mnbvcxz 19:20, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Yes indeed, but isn't that the kind of thing you've been doing? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 19:43, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

VFH

Hey just concerned by what your vote meant. What could be improved to fit more casual readers?--Tagstit 06:45, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Looking back, I think it comes off as too "dramatic". By that, I mean the "article" cares too much about the subject matter. Praise articles and overly hostile attack articles often fall into the error of being overly "dramatic".

One way around that could be to change the "perspective" of the article. For example, you could write it as a press release of a military contractor. When you do write "perspective" based articles, its generally best to be a bit "blunt" with whose perspective your using.

As a final note, you may also be suffering from some rambling due to lack of good material, but I really can't tell right now. --Mnbvcxz 17:30, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Dude!

Whats up man it's just me! you know, AnotherBadName! Anyway, im off, GO CARDINALS!--AnotherBadName 17:55, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

A vulgar, tasteless template. . .

for reviewing my vulgar, tasteless song.

Rejoice, Mnbvcxz! You have been entitled to the
Golden Shower Award

For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

---

  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 05:56, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. --Mnbvcxz 19:13, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

What does.....

Fleshing out explained: Dude, this is your article. It's a skeleton of generalities which needs to be expanded/explained/compared & contrasted

...."flesh out your article" mean? I couldn't fucking understand what the word "flesh out the article" mean, when you posted the Pee Review for my article, I don't have a clue. Does it mean, "go eat shit, fuckers"? I just don't know what you're talking about! |Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Man on Fire CUN|IC Kill | 09:10, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

• Since this is a common phrase, perhaps you're unable to look it up yourself? Perhaps you don't understand the phrase being used in the context of your article and need more specifics? Perhaps if you fleshed out your complaint it would be easier to understand what you don't understand in regards to his use of this common critical phrase. BTW, since I'm a total pain-in-the-ass myself I appreciate how you're making me look like a moderate by comparison--    10:16, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

• Generally, its best to ask for information about a review on the review itself. However, sometimes the reviewer forgets to watch that page, so I really wouldn't call asking a question on the review's talk page a breech of etiquette in itself. However, you should generally link to the review in question, especially if the review happened a while ago.

• But more importantly, don't insult the reviewer when asking for information. It only makes you like a dick, and possibly a retard/10 year old if ask for commonly known information in an insulting manner. Additionally, you're chances of getting a reply that answers your questions go down significantly by insulting the reviewer. As a final note, "fleshing out your article" is really an idiom that means the author should consume human feces in order to get new ideas. --Mnbvcxz 16:14, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Just a suggestion

I've seen you're reorganizing some categories again. How about making a "Cat Images" category and put the images with both cats and dogs, like Image:Pwned-37722.jpg, in "Cats & Dogs Images". -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:22, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

I might get around to doing that, but that will require moving hundreds of pics. I don't really like categories with over 200 items, especially those with articles and images. It makes stuff too hard to find. (For maintenance/recording keeping categories, its ok, but not for categories used to find articles and images.) If I did create a cat image category, I might need to sub-divide it again. So, I'm holding off on doing that for a while. --Mnbvcxz 17:30, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Hey

Hey, I just wanted to know, do all noobs (I know I am one myself) defend their first articles to the death if you give them a less than average scored pee review. I have given a look at a few first articles and I try to be as fair and as helpful as possible, but they just think they are hilarious. It is really annoying and just wanted to know if I am not handling it right or I am the only one with this problem, thanks--Tagstit 07:08, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Drive by: Many people think their first article is hilarity personified. It can be tough, when reviewing - you try to strike the right balance between being nice to them and telling them the truth about the POS they just wrote, and because you didn't think it was amazing, they take offense. All you can do is try - if they don't agree with you, well, that's their right: humour is subjective. That's why I always finish my reviews by saying it is only my opinion, and others are available. But yeah, sometimes you'll get bugged by people convinced they're comedy genius incarnate, and all you can do is stick to your guns and wish 'em luck. If they try to self-nom for VFH, they'll usually find out quite quickly how wrong they are! --UU - natter 14:17, Jan 21

Oh really, most noobs just ignore me compleatly -- some even leave the site entirley. Do I smell bad or something??? ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 14:27 21 January 2009

Ya! I did that one time to Kit Paddle, he thought his was really good so I said nominate it then, and a day after he did he said sorry I was right how do I take it off? haha Well thanks UU. And yes Orian, you smell terrible.--Tagstit 14:52, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

But -- but -- but! /cries ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 14:53 21 January 2009

That's Orian? Man, I thought a skunk had got into the mouldy cheese cupboard. Again. --UU - natter 14:55, Jan 21

Haha, hey how do I put Mr. Potatohead on my page saying I have a feature? I got my first one today--Tagstit 14:57, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Oh so he slaughters me with words and then it's buisness as usual? Fine. Also {{FH|Article= article name here}} ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 14:59 21 January 2009

Yup, and thanks alot Orian--Tagstit 15:01, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Already did it. Your new target, Tagstit: 3 features to get into the Hall of Shame. Oh, and Mnbvcxz: don't mind us using your talk page to have a chat, it was just handy. By the way, did someone else speak? --UU - natter 15:02, Jan 21

Even though you have dimentia I'm offended. – Preceding unsigned comment added by someone of no consequence (talk • contribs)

Alright, can Unnews be featured? I really like this new one I have made, I need to throw out the crap but it is my favorite of my three new ones. And ya I think I just heard something again...probably something of little to no importance though.--Tagstit 15:06, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Oh yeah, good UnNewses get featured. If you like it, keep going at it! --UU - natter 15:08, Jan 21

Alright definitely will do! Thanks--Tagstit 15:11, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

HA HA YOU CAN'T INDENT PROPERLY! :P ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 15:41 21 January 2009

Actually you can. Never mind me. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 17:31 21 January 2009

Basically, what U.U said. Also, if a person does get offended by your review, normally that person is normally a inmature noob. Generally, said noob will either leave the wiki, get banned, or mature eventually. Its always important to try be nice, but there are some idiots on the site. --Mnbvcxz 17:28, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Ya, alright thanks. I just hope I was never like that when I was a noob haha, well I am still a noob, so I hope I am not like that.--Tagstit 21:12, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations! Again!

As of yet, you, Mnbvcxz, have made 5,565 contributions to this site, of which 2,108 (37.88%), were in the image namespace. For your achievements in categorizing images, I grant you this award:

I'm surprised you didn't get one already. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:26, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Now that's dedication! I would take notes but I can't be bothered. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 17:28 22 January 2009

Thank you. --Mnbvcxz 19:07, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Hey there, Hi there, Ho there

Noticed you've been putting some unused images up on the QVFD. While it's a nice gesture, it's unnecessary, as they all eventually end up on the unused images list. They'll all be got to eventually (which is a lie) and will be documented for us always. Thanks, and keep up the good work. Cheers. -RAHB 04:20, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

They were redundant, not merely unused. I though redundant images went on QVFD, so the admins wouldn't have to waste as much time deciding if they were keepable or not. --Mnbvcxz 04:24, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Well, if redundant and used, the proper precautions should be taken (deleting one and relinking the other to the place where the first was). But redundant and unused is still unused, so it's unnecessary. It's not that attention shouldn't be drawn, but it's that there are so many images like that, it would clog QVFD if all of them were listed. That's the reason the unused images list exists. -RAHB 08:10, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

SOTM

could you vote for Joe SheA for SOTM? --Docile hippopotamus 03:26, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Hello there

And thank you so much for replacing that rude image. Blech. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 06:55, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

That has a just a revert, I put it on QVFD. --Mnbvcxz 06:56, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

You Beat Me To Posting That Image...

On Count to a Million, have a cookie. - Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate 07:03, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

I Want To Give You Something And It's Not Sex Related!

Believe it or not, it has nothing to do with sex. Except, crap, I forgot about that. Well it has almost nothing to do with sex apart from "penii". Anyway, you may wear this with sexual pride:

Enjoy. - [20:46 28 January 2009] YYettie

You may now apply the sexy User:YesTimeToEdit/Penis template to your userpage. Enjoy that shit! - [20:48 28 January 2009] YYettie

Uh, what does this template mean? --Mnbvcxz 20:49, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Nothing but a sexy hidden category and RAPE. It also means you are endorsing and offering unconditional support to oppressed baby eaters, internationally. - [20:55 28 January 2009] YYettie

Crap Template

OK, my comments last evening were left after spending a day in the house, trapped with children, because of everything being cancelled due to a snow and ice storm. And its that time of month. Thus the perfect storm.

Anyway, lets get back to the Crap template issue. I understand your reasoning that your mind changed between then and now. However there has to be a limit to the number of times something comes up on VFD (within a reasonable period time) before it becomes an irritant. Given the number of times that this template has been on VFD, the votes have been to leave well enough alone. And yes, I understand that over time, old people slough off and new people sign up. But I would ask that you also keep in mind that there are a lot of old timers still on the site, and we tend to have elephant memories.

That said, you do good work around her. An awfully lot of it is stuff that should be done and isn't because people like me find categorizing things to be dreadfully boring. I appreciate everything that you do. My reaction on the VFD should not be viewed as my opinion of your efforts. Hugs, Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 15:15, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

I think

Judging by the number of award nominations on your userpage we can safely assume that you really do deserve this. Have fun in the big bad world. AND I EXPECT YOU TO MOVE OUT IN TWO WEEKS. I WILL NOT BE KEEPING YOUR ROOMS. IF YOU LEAVE ANY PERSONAL POSSESSIONS THEY WILL BE DESTROYED. YETTIE INC CANNOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE.

This user has graduated from the adoption program! Kudos! from YesTimeToEdit.

Or if you want to, you can use this infinitely more sexy one:

This user suffered the traumatic experience of being adopted by none other than the mighty Yettie. Kudos!

And that is all. - [19:10 29 January 2009] YYettie

This soon! --Mnbvcxz 19:36, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

You're ready, my child, you're ready. Let the force be with you. - [19:41 29 January 2009] YYettie

Dude

Your solution is here... ;) MrN 05:51, Feb 3

Hea!

Stop making Some Bullshit‎ edits! Oh, yea... That's the idea. :-) Carry on! Oh, I was wondering... Can I offer you some advice? MrN 18:26, Feb 3

Sure you can. Oh wait, I'm not Mnbvcxz. Don't mind me. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 18:34 3 February 2009

I honestly think that template just has too much risk for being misunderstood. I did change by vote to abstain, though, since you're trying to fix it. I would suggest a term other than "bullshit", something that won't be confused with incoherent babbling. It might be a regional language thing too. --S'r Mnbvcxz 18:37, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

I kinda said what I wanted to say in the forum. I hope you get where I am coming from... Ask for permission less (people will generally be negative, especially if you are talking about quality) and be a bit more bold. If you think something is a good idea, do it. You won UotM last month. You know what you are doing, and your opinion is worth just as much as anyone else's. Well, except mine obviously...

“The way I see it, everyone is entitled to my opinion.”

~ MrN9000

Oh, you are in trouble now Irian has turned up. :) MrN 18:52, Feb 3

No silly, I'm Orian, Irian is a middle eastern country. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 18:55 3 February 2009

See, that's it. You have started him off now... MrN 18:58, Feb 3

No I'm sure you're the one that's going over the top. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 19:00 3 February 2009

You attempts to get to the bottom of this will surely fail master Orian. eh? what happened there? I'm sure that Mnbvcxz is far too much of a nice chap to get involved in any of your usual "games" and anyway, we broke his canoe paddles last Tuesday when we were trying to paddle upstream against the tide of the Uncyc quality system. Fear not however good sir Mnbvcxz. I feel sure that this new pants thing will help a great deal with what it is you wish to accomplish. Could it be? Have I really found a way to make pants part of official Uncyc policy? MrN 19:13, Feb 3

SERIOUS

I am infact a male with a rather messed up life, to put it simply. But on a scale of 1 to love you could not even begin to know how much I love you. Is it wrong to have sexual feelings for you child? Mmm...nah. - [15:54 4 February 2009] YYettie

Oh course you are... --S'r Mnbvcxz 15:55, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Is that sarcasm I detect, darling? Sarcasm makes Baby Jesus cry...and shit. Did you know that? DO YOU WANT THE FUCKING KING OF VIETNAM TO COME AND RAPE YOU AND TAKE YO GUNS AWAY? HUH? I didn't think so! Well Baby Jesus is the only think what is standing between us and the fucking KING OF FUCKING NAM! So watch what you say, next time. - [16:00 4 February 2009] YYettie

Calm down Yettie. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:03, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Do you even know VIETNAM is? Does it mean anything to you? I bet you didn't even know that it was the middle easy, right next to them evil iRaqs and iRans and Afganastan. Did you? You disgust me. - [16:15 4 February 2009] YYettie

Hey Mnbvcxz, are you a girl? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:36, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

No. --S'r Mnbvcxz 01:56, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

I wish I were a girl, then I would have periods. That way I would be more in tune with the moons and stars and would always be able to know what day it is...besides, periods repel bears. ~SirTagstit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 02:01, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Award!

While clearing out the shed, Rabbi Techno found some old pipes with squirrels in them. As he has no use for them, he decided to give them away as gifts to everyone who voted for him in January's Foolitzer Prize. Cheers, everyone! Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 11:17, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Sir

Jolly Good Show! MrN9000 could not help but notice that you have been doing some spiffingly good deeds of late. As such, you have been awarded this rather nice boxy type thing by way of recognition. Congratulations.

The hardest part of tidying up the crap is putting up with the shit... You know what I'm talking about... MrN 16:52, Feb 7

Thanks. By the way, how many VFD nominations per day can I get away with before someone accuses me of "VFD flooding"? Right now, I'm doing 2 a day, but I have almost 100 templates on my VFD list, and it keeps getting longer. --Mnb'z 19:10, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

~butting in here My advice would be, that template removal is nice, but remember that there are still yet worse offenses in written articles. If you have that many templates that serve NO purpose, may I suggest that we consider a special template deleting space for a limited period of time so it doesn't interfer with VFD's on wretched articles? Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 21:08, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

I would say that bad templates are worse than bad articles, mainly because bad templates can clutter up several different articles. Additionally, random sectional templates or "perverse instruction" maintenance templates not only clutter up articles, but encourage bad article writing. Like this abomination, fouled up in part because of the Mythical presidents of the United States template.

I wouldn't be opposed to a special ad hoc template deletion system. But, good luck getting the admins to approve that. Hyperbole tried that a few months ago with no success. --Mnb'z 21:25, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

I used to get away with 5 per day no problem... The thing is, don't do it when VFD is full. If you want a rule of thumb... Don't make a nom if there are more than 16 articles on VFD... People only really care if they can't make their noms... As I said before... {{pants}} is the solution to this and various other problems... Pants will go ahead (I think) but it's rather a BIG change, so it's sensible that we take our time to think about it for awhile... MrN 21:36, Feb 7

Well the Seinfield article is crap, and you and I could disagree on this, and do. I personally would like to blast every article on this site that has sentences that start off like "Oprah Winfrey was the 412th President of the United States and ruled the earth fom 4012 to 4016 when she wasn't eating peanut butter through her huge black ass..." This of course is not an actual sentence, but it is indictative of the things that are my pet peeves. I would just advise you not to let this template thing blind you too much. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 01:20, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

VFD is not being overwhelmed by templates, and it probably won't be. It hasn't gotten near 20 in a while. --Mnb'z 01:35, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

In your eyes it isn't. In the eyes of others, it may be the opposite. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 15:20, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

I've seen it dip down to a few articles quite often. --Mnb'z 01:30, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Nice work!

Nice work on the Shitland template. If I were wearing a hat, I would take it off to you. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 21:04, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Just so you know...

If you want to do any mass find replace operations such as when you renamed Category:Sport to Category:Sports you can can ask me, and I can do it quickly and easily. I can get lists of articles from "what links here" or all the links on a given page. As I'm a bot I don't spam recent changes... Just leave me a message on my talk page... 9001(bot)  14:01, Feb 8

You stay away from him, Mn, you stay away from my robot. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 14:31 8 February 2009

It was only re-cating 50 odd pages. --Mnb'z 01:33, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

YOUR robot? - [19:19 9 February 2009] YYettie

Nom

I nominated you for admin. --Docile hippopotamus 05:10, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Question

From Halsoft

What the Hell is with all the monkey images!

I am Justice! aka: Halsoft.

I'm categorizing them, not uploading them. --Mnb'z 18:24, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for voting

And now, a special message from the President *pff...hehe* of the United States My fellow Uncyclopedians, This past vote on VFH has been an emotional one for our wiki. The people have spoken, and I am honorated to accept the privilegitude to servify the Uncyclopedia front page for another eight years. What do you mean, articles are only featured for one day? Thank you for voting. Much love, —Sir SysRq (talk)

You

are bombarding recentchanges. You're a menace! A menace, I say! Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 04:35, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

How am I supposed to categorize without bombarding recent changes? --Mnb'z 04:36, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

By assimilating yourself with the Borg, thereby becoming a bot. Really, though, I'm not complaining, you do good work. If I really didn't want to see you, I'd just hide minor edits. The question remains, however, about whether you're already a bot, masquerading as a human. I've got my eye on you, illegible username. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 04:42, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

On a related note, I just pasted 10,000 edits. --Mnb'z 04:47, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

So you're saying you're a bot? And that you like to edit? While listening to smooth jazz and reggae? Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 04:50, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

No, I'm just saying I like to categorize stuff. --Mnb'z 04:51, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

So you're a bot that likes to categorize while listening to smooth jazz and reggae? Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 04:56, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Shit, I've been here for over two years now and I don't have 10,000 edits. —Sir SysRq (talk) 19:56, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Laws of Physics

Does it need quotes or templates? You did not mention those in the pee review. --Docile hippopotamus 09:31, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Generally, avoid quotes and templates unless you think the article needs them. --Mnb'z 16:35, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

...which no article ever does. —Sir SysRq (talk) 19:56, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

There are time when templates and quotes are funny. However, if you're not sure if you should add a quote or template, don't. And by template, I mean comment template, (like "this is x" template, approves templates, and written by templates) not sectional templates (link to related articles templates) or warning templates (NSFW and related templates). --Mnb'z 19:58, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Is this template worth putting on it? --Docile hippopotamus 03:51, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Generally, "canned joke" templates are bad. Since they are templates, they are, by nature, cliche. --Mnb'z 05:25, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

For mass edits (also great justice)

For mass edits, have you considered Wikipedia:AWB? Just a suggestion. Toodles, – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 19:29 Feb 20, 2009

It looks like it won't help me with my mass editing. The vast majority of my mass edits come from categorization. --Mnb'z 19:45, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Koalas

Should koala images be categorized as "Bear Images"? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 18:05, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

maybe they should go in marsupials. I wasn't aware that the category:Marsupials existed when I categorized them. --Mnb'z 23:09, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Maybe it's time to create a "Marsupial Images" category? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 23:26, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

that might be a good idea. However, I've generally wait to create new categories until I have time to fill them with content. --Mnb'z 00:39, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Asses

Do donkeys and such belong into "Horse Images" as well? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 03:31, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

close enough. We don't have enough images to have separate donkey, zebra, mule, unicorn, pony, etc. categories. --Mnb'z 03:33, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Okay, but it should be mentioned somewhere on the category page or so. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 03:36, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

It makes more sense than putting donkeys and female butts in the same category. --Mnb'z 03:38, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

I completely agree, though that was quite funny though. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 03:43, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

We also put vore and uterus-inhabiting newts in the pregnancy erotica category. --Mnb'z 03:06, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

A Game eh? Interesting

Did you mean to put these in your userspace? MrN 02:40, Feb 23

Yeah. Unfortunately, I ran into the page move limitation. --Mnb'z 03:02, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

I got them moved. can you go ahead and delete the mainspace redirects? --Mnb'z 03:05, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Why?

Did you nominate Image:Misty666.jpg on QVFD? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 15:36, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, she like 12 years old. --Mnb'z 15:37, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

So? Also, it's manga, so it's quite hard to tell the age. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 15:42, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

She was clearly underage in that pic. --Mnb'z 15:44, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

And if it was one of Nurse Joy or Officer Jenny, would they look any older? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 15:46, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Yes, she has not breast developmental in the image. --Mnb'z 15:47, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Actually she has, Misty just has small breasts. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:02, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

She's 10 or 12 according to Pokemon cannon. Unless she looks "aged" and "developed" by quite a few years, we have to assume she's underage. --Mnb'z 16:08, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Is it really that bad if she's underage? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:15, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

If she is naked. We do not host child porn on Uncyclopedia. MrN 16:17, Feb 23

What he said, we aren't Encyclopedia Dramatica. I do believe that image is illegal in some jurisdictions. I'm fairly sure its illegal in the U.K. Its technically legal (or more like in legal limbo) in America because of court rulings that drawings not based on real people aren't child porn. But, that could change. --Mnb'z 16:21, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Hmm. Okay then. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:22, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Hey Mnbvcxz

How would you categorize this image? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 14:49, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Probably Category:Nonnude Images --Mnb'z 15:32, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Okay. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 18:23, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Did you know?

That llamas are very close relatives of camels? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 07:08, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

I don't know of a good way to combine them in one category. Generally, obscure or long category names should be avoided. Also, we have sheep and goats in different categories. Also, I managed to get Category:mammal Images back down to one page. --Mnb'z 07:17, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

I see your point, but what would we do if we got a picture of an alpaca? Just stuff it in the Llama category somewhere? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 07:21, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

They are much closer to llama's than camels. --Mnb'z 07:40, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

I can live with that. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 07:41, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Cheers!

This is my happy face Unlike this monkey you appreciated my article. Nerds all around the world are rejoicing and praising you as their newest Captain. Thank you for voting! The Force is strong within you.

You know

Rather than changing those categories, you should really be adding another category and then adding that category as a sub-category of the first one. Start again from the top. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 05:59, 27 Feb 2009

What? I am trying to clear out some of broad categories, and using those broad categories as "presort" categories. --Mnb'z 06:02, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

But you still want to have them all in the broad category, with the option of refining it further. By removing the main category from the image page, you're making it show up only in the sub-category, which makes stuff harder to find if you're only looking for general stuff.

Not that people will care much for how a category of non-nude images is organised, but, y'know, for future reference and stuff. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 06:05, 27 Feb 2009

I can see your point. However, overly large categories also make stuff hard to find. To solve that problem, I created two image category templates:

and

I wouldn't be opposed to a catch-all category, but I don't think the catch-all should be mixed with the "miscellaneous".

I've generally been keeping articles in multiple categories, but I have been removing the Category:Animals when an article is in several subcategories of mammals. --Mnb'z 06:18, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Plus, the "moving out" of images helps show what has and hasn't been subcated yet. BTW, How hard would it be to "bot edit" into broad catch all categories. --Mnb'z 06:22, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, though someone might not know which animal or race of non-nude woman they were looking for, and that's why it's good to keep everything in the main category with the option to be more specific later. Unless the main category was so general that nobody would be looking for pictures of it. And it wouldn't be too hard to have a bot add the main category back to any of the images in the sub-categories. If you can find someone who can run a bot.

Also, well done trying to sort stuff out anyway! Good luck with the other 77,000 images :) • Spang • ☃ • talk • 06:35, 27 Feb 2009

Doesn't MrN9000 have a bot? --Mnb'z 06:40, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Sure does, but you'd have to ask him about how to make it go. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 06:42, 27 Feb 2009

I'm going to go ahead and finish separating them, leaving the division half finished is worse than either having them properly separated to grouped together. I can also "manual bot" them into a catch all category. --Mnb'z 07:00, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Hmmm

Somehow my picture of a French supermodel in a pool was tagged as "Hispanic boobage." pillow talk 07:24, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

whats the image so I can fix it. --Mnb'z 07:26, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Oh, jeez... the one on Pontius Pilates. I try to avoid opening any boobage-related pictures at work. Incidentally, I'm also highly skeptical that the woman in User:Hyperbole/Labor Day is Hispanic, but I have no actual information on her. pillow talk 17:32, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

I fixed the supermodel one. Since the other one is questionable, I'll leave it as is, moving it back and forth isn't good. In hindsight, that probably wasn't my best categorization idea. But, I'm 90% done right now, so I'll finish it. --Mnb'z 17:36, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

I'd propose putting all Hispanic and possibly Hispanic ones in the White category, it's sometimes very hard to tell the difference. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:42, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

That defeats the purpose of the separation: its mainly to get the category size down. --Mnb'z 17:50, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

On a related note, I'm wondering if I should go find someone who has a bot to categorize the images to a "Nonnude Images catchall" category. Really, I'd rather do that the animal images first, but I don't think racially segregating the noonude Images was my best idea. Although, it probably is somewhat useful. --Mnb'z 18:00, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

A bigger version of the wedding dress picture. Is she Hispanic? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 19:07, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Another version that I'll use to increase the quality of the present image. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 19:09, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Ahhh, leftovers from the Youth picture purge.--    19:41, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I remembered that image from your article. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 19:45, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Generally, Nobody Cares about the categorization of specific images. If you think its wrong, just go ahead and change it. If some cares, they can easily revert it, or say something on the image's talk page. --Mnb'z 06:06, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Hispanic Boobage, Pregnant Women and Thank you very much for your vote!

Thanks For Being Groovy! I am both deeply humbled and appreciative of your vote to promote me to Knight Grand Cross of the Order and shall send the magic van round to your flat with virtual contraband

This ghetto white boy appreciates your efforts to keep this shit-hole organized.--    15:01, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

ty, and by the way, the category in question was Category:Hispanic Nonnude Images, not "Hispanic Boobage".--Mnb'z 20:20, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Thank you!

Good day, old chap! Thank you indeed for your vote on my article, UnBooks:Hot Japanese Girls - Colourblind or Unable to Speak English?. As a sterling reward, I will not deliberately make this text extremely tiny around these pictures of some rather cracking Japanese girls I've supplied for you. ... I say, are you still there, old boy?

---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 15:48, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Nice

Looks like you got it going. Could you remove the "using AWB" message? Let's not advertise it around too much.  ;) MrN 21:18, Mar 2

I think its added automatically. Do you happen to remember how to remove it? --Mnb'z 21:19, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

I found it, nm. --Mnb'z 21:26, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Cool. Yea, you really need to check through all the settings. You can save them, and different settings for different tasks. MrN 21:30, Mar 2

Probably best to talk to Sannse about getting yourself a bot flag on another account ASAP. People are not going to like RC being flooded like that. It's cool though eh? MrN 21:41, Mar 2

I flood recent changes all the time, and nobody seem to care :) But, I'll talk to Sannse about a bot account. I'm also going to finish the current cat so I don't forget about it, it only has 38 pages left.--Mnb'z 21:45, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Personally, it does not really bother me. I know it does annoy some users. Yea go on and finish what you are doing now. (nice one for getting it going) MrN 21:53, Mar 2

A Template of Thanks

FROM THE DESK OF GUILDENSTERNENSTEIN

Thank you for supporting my recently featured article

Your support is greatly appreciated.

Guildensternenstein

---

So I saw your sig out of the corner of my eye...

And it read manboobz at first. Just something I though you should know. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 03:38, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

You kids...

...and your monkey categorization. Weirdo. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 07:32, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

I was in the process of creating a mammal images catch all category. (Spang's idea) As expected, too probably too large to be useful.--Mnb'z 07:39, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

That OCD is a bitch, innit? Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 07:44, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Images

I changed the categories back just to the licenses, to be honest I don't know why they keep coming up (its lwys same ones? why is it only pictures of women;)?) on my watchlist, since they're unused would you like me to QVFD them or something?:)--Sycamore (Talk) 20:08, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

I've been categorizing animals too:

And I also categorize gay men and shemales :) Basically, its part of my "making porn easier to find for those who look for it will decrease the total amount on the wiki" theory. Additionally, the consensus on this wiki has been to categorize images.

That being said, I'm not going to fight over a few images. It wouldn't be worth either of us's time. --Mnb'z 05:38, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Achtung! Your support for the Nazi party has been documented. Danke shein. That vill be all.

OptyC Sucks! CUN17:57, 7 Mar

Congratulations! You don't have ADD!

I Told Her Thanks For Voting To Feature Private Eye But she looked at me like I was wearing orange in the St Patrick's Day parade. I wasn't sure if that was fog behind me or if my favorite place for take-out Chinese food had just went up in flames but I knew that I'd better make this quick either way. "You were great, kid" I told her but her facial expression never changed. She kicked off her heels and put on a pair of roller skates but she looked about as comfortable in them as a woodpecker in the petrified forest. She took one last drag off her cigarette, blew the smoke in my face, flicked the butt at my feet and rolled away into the night - leaving me standing there like a wide screen TV on layaway. I took another sniff of the air and now I was sure, Chang's Wok Inn was definitely on fire and it looked like it was going to be another night of hamburger helper and "Juggs" magazine..............................

Thank you kindly, Sir Mnb-shizzle!--    11:32, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Don't mind me...

But... You look like a chap who needs a new project. Fancy sorting this out? We have lots of articles which (maybe) should be merged. I just thought that might be something which you could enjoy doing a bit more than all that categorisation stuff... Just a thought... MrN 18:50, Mar 9

Consume this cookie!

Modusoperandi has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic.

For undoing those things that guy did. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 04:53, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

ty. --Mnb'z 04:54, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

np. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 04:56, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

I'm no vulcanologist, but I'm pretty sure that...

"And, the U.S. has almost no volcanos outside of Alaska", isn't entirely accurate, as the whole state of Hawaii is a bunch of them, Washington state has both St Helens and Rainier, and Yellowstone park (the whole park is a volcano). Mister Science signing off. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 20:39, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Ok, I forgot about Hawaii. Checking Wikipedia, there have been only two volcanic eruptions in the continental US, St Helens in 1980 and Lassen in 1912. --Mnb'z 06:11, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Hope that Yellowstone never goes. It's not a volcano. It's a supervolcano. Hence the cape. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 06:31, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

The rest of the world is, of course, waiting with baited breath for just such an event; even though it would be a catastrophe of such proportions that we'd probably all get fucked by it. Still, it'll be fun. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 07:16, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

I wouldn't even joke about that. If it goes, it'll make St Helens look like a firecracker. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 07:23, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

By the way, Oregon, California, Utah, Idaho, Arizona, New Mexico, Nevada and Colorado all have volcanoes too, but along with the seven in Washington they're not considered currently active. Alaska has a total of 98 (sod living there) and Hawaii has 20. Oh, and Lassen's last eruption was 1915, not 1912. /me read a book about volcanoes in the USA last week. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 07:30, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

That's an awfully specific book. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 07:58, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

I read some very specific (and, by most people's estimation boring) books. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 08:00, 12 March 2009 (UTC) - geology geek.

About King of Hyrule Article

Hey thanks man for letting me put some of my king of hyrule content into the new one.You stated that you wanted the king article to be coheherent and true, and wanted me to tone down on the sex jokes.could you be more lienient and let some sex jokes and celebraty stuff get posted.sure, my content i posted about the king was random but dont forget,the king is an obscure character.there isnt much to write about him other than he was in the zelda games for cd-i.making up stuff will make the article more interesting.it will also make the king article much longer. -Jupiterfox

The general consensus on here is that "This cartoon character had sex with everyone" type articles are bad. The random sex stuff often ruins the flow of an article, and comes across as stupid and not funny. There are times that "the subject is a whore" articles can work, but even, they need to be consistent and followable. (And it doesn't hurt if the subject is actually a whore). --Mnb'z 03:55, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

yo, are you going to repost the king jedi content that was deleted by a user.it made the article pretty funny. -Jupiterfox

Thanks for the advice

Hey,thanks for the advice on the miranda cosgrove article.Just so you know its not finished yet.i still gotta finish editing it.And about the jokes in the article.I know they are stupid but what is funny and not stupid??and ive read the beginners guide. isnt humor dependent on the person .wont a 12 year old find the stuff on the page funny but not a 30 year old. If ya want,you can help edit the article so there is more stuff you find is not so stupid.just dont vote it for deletion.add stuff and get rid of stuff as you please. work around my content.And I will try to add other types of humor and tone down on the poop and sex jokes so it will be less random when its done okay.ill even post some true information about miranda.-Jupiterfox

Have you read HTBFANJS also? That kinda answers that question... If you intend to stick around Uncyc, it's well worth it. MrN 22:34, Mar 16

yeh,ive read that page too =HTOBFANJS.I just like making random stuff.Ill just have to try to be a little less random and be more coherent with articles.my articles would probably stay on the site longer -Jupiterfox

If you want to write REALLY random... you can here but less so on Uncyc... MrN 22:47, Mar 16

Of course, illogicopedia does have tighter indecency standards than we do. --Mnb'z 04:35, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

YO

iM thinking reposting the fif la fume article.im gonna add a lot more stuff to it.i may need help editing it because i tend to be random.what kind of humor should i use.appearenly,you think sex jokes arnt funny on here so what do you think is funny.just give me some stuff to put on the page.Stuff about hitler,Samuel L Jackson???I reallly want that article to stay on this site.Its not like im gonna make a page with one sentence.and i know you are sick of me posting stuff on your talk page rightJupiterfox

Don't re-add deleted content without checking with an admin. It's not that "sex jokes are not funny" some are, some are not. It depends how it's done. If you have read HTBFANJS then that's the best advice we have. If you want to know what is considered funny on this site, read articles at UN:BEST. Go there, and read lots, and lots of them. Take your time, and learn. Being funny takes effort. If you have any further questions Jupiterfox, direct them to me. Not this user. Thanks. MrN 15:05, Mar 17

What MrN9000 said. He's an admin, and he knows more about good writing than I do.

Anyway, I think your problem is that your relying on vulgarity in place of humor. Simply describing rape and the like generally is not funny. Also, you seen to have a very choppy writing style, which gives your writing an "ugly" feel. Try to write like you would talk, and use longer sentences. I would also suggest working on your punctuation/formatting a bit. For example, when you don't leave a space after a period, it gives the reader the "feel" of a run on sentence. --Mnb'z 18:37, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

I know what you sayin Mnbvcxz .but humor is an abstract concept.some things are funny,some things are just not funny.it varies for everybody..some people find random illogical stuff funny. like spaghtetti having sex with mario.i guess uncyclopdia has a standard of humor that it wants to create.ill try using thier humor more.Jupiterfox

Now then...

So as you said... The problem with VFH is not so much the voting, it's getting the good articles nominated. A voting award is out of the question, but it might be possible to reward people who make quality nominations. That's the tricky part anyway. What problems might we get, and how could it work? We don't want people rushing to nominate articles which are "almost ready", but it might be possible to do something. Have a think about it... MrN 18:00, Mar 17

Actually, I would say its more of a problem of good/established authors not getting their articles noticed. I really don't think a Voter/Nominator of the Month award would necessarily be a good idea. Or, more broadly, the the current system requires too much work to find front page worthy articles. The problem is that most of the existent policies which make the system too labor heavy were put in place to prevent other evils. Personally, I think some of the admins are too concerned with maintaining high vote totals. There are reasons for that (i.e. to prevent a few users from controlling VFH, or to prevent a user from forming a posse to get his article featured), but it would work just the same if the highest scoring article was +6 or +26. And, it never hurts to have the appearance of activity.

Anyway, what we need to do is find ways to get good articles out of the woodwork, without generating a whoring fest. The main problem is that the established authors are the ones least likely to bring their new articles to the attention of others. --Mnb'z 18:33, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Yep, I think that's what I was trying to say. We need to encourage people to make quality VFH nominations. We have loads of really good stuff sitting around which everyone has forgotten about... MrN 18:41, Mar 17

Sorry to but in, but consider yourself Mnbvcxz - you consistently vote against very good articles with 'obscure subject/I don't get it votes'. I personally dread my own articles going on VFH because I find the criticism based on ignorance and/or personality politics. I think a lot of other writers feel the same. I was going to nominate another far better article than the Sonic article you re-nommed by the same author you know the second thought I had, it will probably get voted out quick - those are your kind of votes from yourself and a few others.--Sycamore (Talk) 18:49, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

You vote about as negatively as I. I looked through the articles on VFH that we both voted on. You had +0 net "for" votes, I had -1 net "for" votes. Also, the Vote "For" Inquisition-ism isn't good for the wiki. --Mnb'z 19:02, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

People read an article on VFH... They don't like it, but don't want to upset the author so they (maybe silently) abstain a lot of the time. It would (probably) be better for VFH if people always voted either one way or the other when they do read the article, but only a few users choose to do that. MrN 19:11, Mar 17

Syc, is that sarcasm or something? --Mnb'z 04:52, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

In Gratitude

 In gratitude for your vote  

  The GlobalTourniquet says "Thanks!"  

Understandably, you voted for my article for featuring. Although your "for" vote was not extraordinary, as the article's genius was beyond question, it is still appropriate to acknowledge your dutiful participation in the process.

So, in gratitude for your vote, I will dedicate my next sexual act to your honor. Thank you.

The following sexual acts are available for this honor. Please indicate below this template which one you would like me to dedicate to your user name.

Self-gratification Spousal coitus Purchased sex Casual encounter

NOTE: Only under limited circumstances will this act actually involve you.

queries

hey mnbvcxz, do you have any comment regarding the comically large bonuses being paid to editors of the floundering unsignpost? also, any chance your bot budy can deliver this week's issue once it's ready? SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:29, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

I should be able to deliver it, what time is it normally finished? --Mnb'z 17:33, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

we at the signpost don't have any set deadlines, but it should be done by about 20:30 UTC (three hours from now). SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:38, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

I'm not going to be back online until about 4:30 UTC . --Mnb'z 17:40, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

no worries. i'll be finishing it up shortly, if you could deliver it (here) whenever you can that'd be swell. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 18:41, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

In gratitouille

 In gratitude for your vote  

The GlobalTourniquet says "Thanks!"   Understandably, you voted for my article for featuring. Although your "for" vote was not extraordinary, as the article's genius was beyond question, it is still appropriate to acknowledge your dutiful participation in the process. So, in gratitude for your vote, I will dedicate the next time I hit myself on the head with a heavy object to you. Thank you. The following heavy objects are available for this honor. Please indicate below this template which one you would like me to use in dedicating my head-bashing to your user name. Ball-Peen Hammer Four-Post Bed Golden Happy Buddha Mickey Rourke

greetings

hello friend. would your robot underling be able to deliver this week's signpost, by any chance? thanks! SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:04, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the vote

Thanks for the vote:)--Sycamore (Talk) 20:17, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

For your vote...

The Great Potato Massacre of March 2009 Thank you for supporting Sonje in her ruthless campaign for Potatochopper of the Month A baby potato shall be mercilessly sacrificed in your honour.

--^Dame 21:55, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

You digust me.

Honestly you do. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 03:12, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

I have never understood

Why people find your name hard to spell. First "M", then "nbvcx" (which are conveniently placed next to eachother on my keyboard) and as a finishing touch a "z" at the end. Nothing difficult about it really. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:25, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

I never noticed. I never spelled it out on my keyboard either. I would have noticed something like EGBDF or ACEG--    09:37, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Of course, if someone had a Dvorak keyboard, spelling my username would be rather difficult. --Mnb'z 16:31, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Dearest MnbvcxzY...

Thank you ... ... for supporting my recently featured picture. A baby potato shall be mercilessly sacrificed in your honour. - Sonje

Yet another useless award

Rabbi Techno awards you this lovely Mechanical Thing because you voted for something I wrote to be featured. Cheers!

Free Stuff

While I was over at the Googleplex researching History of Google I managed to grab a load of these promotional t-shirts. Here's one for you because you voted for the article on VFH! Model not included. Thankyou from Rabbi Techno

Bgaaaah!

FROM THE DESK OF GUILDENSTERNENSTEIN

Thank you for supporting my recently featured article.

And no, I have no intention of changing this template any time soon.

—Sir Guildensternenstein

---

Portal for Science

Any idea where I could find an easily-editable portal template for Science, for instance? My aim is to make a really simple 2-column page, main story on the left and perhaps 3 additional stories - images, headers, links - on the right. And something else. -- Style  Guide 18:33, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

I'm not familiar with that kind of template. The portal I creates is basically a table, but it sorta works and its not too complex. --Mnb'z 18:46, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

All right, thanks. The Cabal seems to be for - but there's a chance it gets limited to the existing categories. It could have been more, we'll see what happens. Thanks for your support, this was one of my most constructive ideas here. If Sonic doesn't go as it is, you could maybe get to take over the Games portal? It is a category if I'm not mistaken. -- Style  Guide 07:11, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Checked my facts for once - of course it's a category. I looked at what Wikipedia has and what Mordillo and others okayed - so I think I'll just try to slap together a Science portal out of your template. You, I and Orian57 are the only ones doing anything about this right now. Who else might be interested? I left a question on Mordillo's talk page about what happens next. I'll make the portal while waiting for reply. -- Style  Guide 17:03, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

I would suggest waiting until we get a basic format down before we start creating the portals. I'm not exactly sure what you intend to do with them. --Mnb'z 17:59, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

This http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Arts is what Mordillo suggested to me a while ago. I agree with him there, but would need some template to work it. I cannot swipe it directly from Wikipedia because it has stuff Uncyc doesn't - won't work at all, I tried. I would probably make a similar one for science here, and it could then be copied to those categories it fits. Idea is as it was: one featured article like on main page here, perhaps some quote or such, links to a few secondary articles. At least that. -- Style  Guide 18:10, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

The problem is...

Each of the categories listed on the front page has several features already in it. If you go down to the first level subcategories, Category:Politics and Government has 110, as an example. I really don't see what good highlighting a few articles would do. Now, the portals on more specific areas might be more helpful.

I would advise putting the following on a portal:

• list of featured and quasi-featured articles in the subject (bot generated list)
• list of good by not featured/quasi articles
• list of articles needing a rewrite/fix/ect in the subject (bot generated)
• list of wanted articles to go with the rewrites

Now, the problem is, I really don't see a point in mentioning "good nonfeatured" articles when there are 100+ featured articles mentioned on the portal. Well, we could, but the reader would be overwhelmed by data, and a causal reader wouldn't want 2nd tier articles when we have 100 1st tier ones. I think a better idea would be to make the portals as low maintenance as possible, i.e. avoid an article of the month, and focus more on narrower topics. The broad topic portals being mainly used to point to narrower topic portals.

If you think about, each of the main categories is broad enough that they get a new highlighted every week or two from VFH, and people's interest tend to be more narrow than those broad topics. For example, a Sonic, Pokemon, Mario, or Roman Emperor portal might be more helpful, as the topic would be narrow enough that a portal could give an overview of uncyclopedia's coverage of that issue. (I.e. these articles are good, these ones need work, and these ones need to be created). They'd also being pointing to a relatively few good articles, not overwhelming a causal reader.

I still support the idea of portals, but I want to see your proposed layout so I can see exactly were you are going with it. --Mnb'z 05:31, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Read Spang's and Mordillo's comments on the short version. They support the categories portal - perhaps not for my reasoning but because it's the way Wikipedia does it: parody of that. I still aim to get good, non-featured articles promoted - what I say in the short version of the forum. Regardless of category, regardless of topic. Broad categories can include more divergent articles than narrow ones, and I don't see how having narrow category portals would make for less data. Theoretically - how would you aim them so you hit max audience? If you have a Games portal, you (or someone) can have a Sonic special month, for instance. Or two months, I don't make the decisions. After that, it's something else. If you have a more specialized portal, your audience will have read it in those two months anyway. -- Style  Guide 15:37, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

I really don't how the portals on the broad topics can effectively promote good, non-featured articles when there are 50-100 featured articles in that category. The good non-features are normally 2nd tier articles, otherwise they would be featured. Yes, there are exceptions; and there is a strong biased against certain types of articles on VFH, such as intentionally offensive, very politically incorrect, or video-game character articles. But overall, like I said before, I can't see what good highlighting a few good articles would do when there are dozens of highlights on the same topic. --Mnb'z 16:49, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

=Also

I think the portal idea might be overwhelmed with unimportant aspects, and I'm not sure how the cabal will take private crypto-featuring. I'm leaning more to the idea of creating "semi-portals" on the category pages. For example, something like this User:Mnbvcxz/sand4. Although, I haven't worked out a system for choosing good articles yet. I'm leaning more toward a "free for all" posting system, like how a wiki works. (I.e. good articles can be added or removed by whoever.) I'm not opposed to a portal system, but I'm not sure if it will really be that helpful.

The list of featured/quasis and articles needing work are initially bot generated, but can and probably will be updated and corrected by hand. The articles needing written would probably work the same was as the list of good articles. --Mnb'z 18:36, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

I think the Cabal will just see what people do with it. Spang just told me "common sense" should be enough, and I tend to agree. Reverting is quick for them. Also, referring to earlier discussion, there seems to be nothing to prevent you from adding for instance Sonic as a sub-portal to the Games portal. That's how Wikipedia's stuff works. -- Style  Guide 08:11, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

I'm thinking you...

...should definitely join. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 16:10, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

No thanks, I'm more of a categorizer than a rewriter. --Mnb'z 18:18, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

The doctor will see you now Oh, by the way, before we begin todays session, I'd like to thank you for supporting my recent featured article. Now, tell me about your childhood.--You know what the music means... Our time is up.

Science portal, Beta version

this was copied from Dawg's user page, so it still has some of his stuff on it. But it's on its way. -- Style  Guide 14:32, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Mechanical slaves

I'm trying to get my bot working. If you can explain how these things work, that'd be great! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:55, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

'FROM THE DESK OF GUILDENSTERNENSTEIN'

Thank you for supporting Metal Gear Solid 3: Snake Eater.

To show my appreciation, I'd like to eat your snake.

—Guildensternenstein

---

(template courtesy of CheddarBBQ) —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 15:58, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Bless'd

Thou art bless'd by Ra for thou hath voted at the sacred temple for thy Zheliel. User:Zheliel/sigz2

Thanks! User:Zheliel/sigz2 04:29, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Portals, conclusionist revision attemptery

Forum:Portals, action being taken is where I'd like stuff to be announced so that people won't start stuff on the same stuff by accident stuff. -- Style  Guide 05:40, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Article...

I added the article on the list of remarkable scientists at first. Will be selected biography later on, it's good. If you find others add them: I read through the whole Scientists-category a couple of days ago and those pitiful few were the only ones without too much Chuck Norris, typos, time slip jokes and so forth. -- Style  Guide 12:24, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Games portal

Looks good to me. One thing - I'm probably one of a few who would spot it but if you want to change it, it cannot hurt: the potato triangle is a parody of Wikipedia's science logo/image. What if you made an image with a bat, racket, golf club or such, with a potato next to it? I think golf club would be best at first thought since amateur golf often resembles turning a field upside down with a (whichever agricultural tool it is). -- Style  Guide 07:38, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks thank tank!!!

I have to thank you all again Because you voted for my page about my Nursery to get featured on the front page of the internet and that’s really awesome because Mummy got me a new toy! Although she did tell me never to pee in the sandpit again.

~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 08:37 27 May 2009

Portals

Hya, I moved Sonic under the games portal as I don't think it warrants a portal to stand by its own. Same for Bloodbath. As for the games portal, good work on that. I'd suggest weeding out some of the content you have (especially the lists of featured articles etc) maybe using a choose option - at the moment there's too much content and it's a bit overwhelming. Also, I think the pictures (for the featured and what you can do to help) can be improved. They look a bit cheesy. ~ 14:32, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Also, regarding the pregnancy portal, that subject really doesn't warrant a portal of its own. ~ 14:33, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

I changed the game portal list o' features to have a choose function, and added a complete list of features as a subpage (actually, its the old transcluded subpage reformatted.) Its about 1/3 its old length. I'll also probably do the same to the "fix this" page, or I'll only have the most notable subjects on the portal page. Do you have any suggestions for better images?

As for the pregnancy portal, (if its mainspaced) it probably should be a subportal of medicine or sexuality, which in turn should be a subportal of people or science. Although, when I made the pregnancy portal, I did find some funny (mostly abortion related) articles that I didn't know about. So its not totally useless. --Mnb'z 17:16, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Again on the potato triangle

I'll make the golf club/potato logo if you don't mind. I don't know if anyone else would even notice it now but the golf/potato is funnier than the triangle with games anyway. -- Style  Guide 06:32, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Did you both consider talking with Sonje to get cool pictures for the portal? She seems to be very good at that. ~ 07:48, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

I have Maya so I naturally wanted to make my own stuff - but no. I'll ask Sonje for that golf bit. -- Style  Guide 07:51, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Yee Haw

So, uhm, thanks for votin' for my article, "I Like Cats (The Other White Meat)", eh? Like, maybe if you're not busy later you could come by, and I'll fry up some back bacon on the Coleman, and we can have a beer and talk. Unless you don't drink, eh? Cuz like I don't want to push you off the wagon or nothin'. I got some Tim Horton's coffee too, eh? Beauty. ~ Todd Lyons

--T. (talk) 19:40, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

I just came by to thank all you. Because you did something I like to see in this newer generation, and that's appreciating those of us on the wrong side of 50. These days, getting featured isn't as easy as it used to be. Why, back in my day any ol' whippersnapper could throw something together and put it on the front page. Not anymore, not anymore at all. So I am glad to see myself on the front page of the good ol' wiki before I die. I guess its nothing big, but oh well. Anyways, I got to get back to helping Elmo now, so I better get going (he thinks his dresser is trying to kill him again.)

   Tagstit    talk    contribs    awards   17:51, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

—Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:43, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

How

Do you do that thing where it says "voted for" or "voted against"? Do you just type it in the summary box, or is there some trick? Staircase CUN^t 08:47, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

On what, so I know what your talking about? --Mnb'z 08:48, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Check recent changes, and you'll see. Staircase CUN^t 08:50, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

I think that is from the vote template, which I think only works in FireFox. --Mnb'z 16:07, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Oh, ok. Thank you for telling me. I use IE. Staircase CUN^t 16:17, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks Preggoman!

Hamboozoo Lawi Boozoo want to say sank you, ya otta!

You gived your voice to make za interfiew on za front page. So I want to say sank you... Want to see my brobelor? I also take you to za byramids and show you good time, and for you only 10 American dollars. No, wait! Come back! I want money! What do I tell to little Ahmad when he says ya baba, get food?...

Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 21:33 June 3 '09

ello

Are you up for a review? I just noted how you used to be, and maybe still are, a good reviewer. Staircase CUN^t 06:26, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

I don't have time to do pee reviews that much any more. --Mnb'z 16:25, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Thankies

"Feeling any pain yet, Mrs. Davis?" Necropaxx is delighted to thank you for your For vote on his recent rewrite, Antbortion. Remember, kids, this is what happened to your would-be brother Jeffy. Go kick your parents for him, why don't you?

• • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:23, Jun 4

Pregnancy...

...is not very much of a science, not even here. It happens when people copulate, they don't need any scientific study to complete the task. It's a gossipy subject, so I suggest you remake the People-portal (something happened to it) and link it to that. I just bluntly removed the link, I really think it has no business on the Science portal. I hope you don't mind, and I also hope you won't put it back there. -- Style  Guide 13:02, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, nothing happened with the People portal. Anyway, I think its the most natural place for the Pregnancy subportal - that is, if Silly Angel agrees, I suppose. -- Style  Guide 13:07, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

I do believe it was Mordillo who put the pregnancy portal as a sub-section of the science portal, and it is science related. Ideally, it would be a sub portal of a medicine or anatomy sub-portal, but we don't have one on those yet. --Mnb'z 17:29, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

I only put it there because I couldn't think of any other place. As far as I'm concerned I don't think there should be such a portal. ~ 22:04, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Ooh look, a template has appeared!

CHEERS!
 Why, thank you for voting for my recently featured article. It's nice to know that you also enjoy laughing at gullible people getting their comeuppance. You're obviously as funny in the head as me!
(Not that you're funny in the head or anything.
Well, you are a bit. But in a good way, I promise!)
Nameable 16:12, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Nameable ((mumble)) 20:02, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks thank tank

A couplet from Billy the Kid: Your vote's put another notch on my gun, Historical revisionism has never been such fun.

Thanks for your vote! IronLung 02:17, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Marvin Van Buren

What is wrong with the Marvin Van Buren page?