From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 | This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD. |
2004
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
 Delete. This one must have been hiding under the fridge. -- RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 22:42, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
 Weak keep It is certainly an oddity . The trouble with this one is how can it be improved ? Checking the log the writer has long gone so no good asking them. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 18:11, 12 June 2009 (UTC)- Keep. It's weird and if I'm not mistaken, about a first hand job. Seems to me that's what all poetry should be about. -OptyC Sucks!
 CUN21:20, 12 Jun
- Weak Keep. It doesn't bother me enough. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:38, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. "I know it's a crisp packet, but that's all I could find". As an UnPoem, it's OK. --UU - natter
 10:32, Jun 13
- Weak keep close enough kind of creepy. --Mn-z 19:23, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Delete You seem to have misunderstood the word comedy. Actually, fuck that. Get a psychologist *shudder* --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent
     13:06, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Weak Delete wrong kind of creepy. --Mn-z 16:46, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
*Weak Delete I might change my mind. -OptyC Sucks! CUN16:59, 12 Jun
- Bandwagon slap This is all wrong. mAttlobster. (hello) 13:03, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Although the subject of getting one's fancy tickled in turn tickles my fancy, this just doesn't seem natural or erotic. ImNotASunbeam 11:15, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
Kept MrN  11:18, Jun 15
|
| Keep |
- Weak Keep it has some funny stuff, and the concept is funny. It could use a purging though. --Mnb'z 04:42, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
- Weak Keep per Mnbvcxz and Hyperbole. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:15, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. There's funny stuff in there. It's not formatted great, but it shouldn't be deleted.
 Don   Puttano cHeDDs       22:26,10June,2009
- Keep Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 07:52, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
- Keep It's not electric, but it has potential. See what I did there? Yes? Still not funny? OK then... MrN 11:24, Jun 15
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
- Abstain. I swear, there's some funny stuff in that mess. What a mess, though.
 pillow talk 22:47, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 A stain per Hyperbole. Sire それは驚くばかりの性交である!! -4- (02:16 06-10-2009)
Kept MrN 11:24, Jun 15
|
| Keep |
- Keep. It isn't terrible, but my main reason is that no less than 209 pages link to it. -- Aethix ~ Talk|Contributions|My project
 13:42, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 Strong keep. Per Aethix. If you guys want to delete this, go ahead and change the grue template. Staircase CUNt 02:53, 8 June 2009 (UTC)- Strong keep. per above, it has a couple funny pics, and I don't think it will come back better. --Mnb'z 03:01, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. Admitted, more than half of this article is shit. However, without the utterly crappy part, this would be a short but keepable stub. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:04, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 KeepGreen per Aethix. We don't need another red-link, we could do with a rewrite though. Send it to the Der Unwehr. Don Puttano cHeDDs 22:29,10June,2009
|
| Delete |
- Delete. Unfunny. --Docile hippopotamus 09:50, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Super-Satan indeed. Sigh..--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 17:07, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
- Kerkill I'd say keep if it was just a picture of a really freaky pedo with a caption that said, "Run like hell. Cause I'm horny and coming for you. I'm huge.", but that isn't what this is. And I bet none of you would like that. Brings back bad memories. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 22:37, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
- DELETE Wouldn't it be nice if those who have voted keep bothered to read the article and voted on the quality of it rather than how many links it had to it. This stupidity is making this page pointless. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:53, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. If a lot of pages link to it, we can delete and recreate as a redirect. Possibly to HowTo:Fuck Off, or something not by me. But this is crap, and a bunch of articles linking to it is no reason to keep. --UU - natter 11:57, Jun 9
- Delete. I would run like hell from this article. Nameable • ((mumble?)) • 16:55, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. It's pants, I don't care what links to it. That's a stupid reason to keep anything anyway. -OptyC Sucks! CUN21:44, 11 Jun
- Delete and redirect - Okay, this one is crap too. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 07:49, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. And link to UU or Cajek or whatever --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 13:08, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete or at least ICU. Quite tedious, somewhat ugly and not funny. ImNotASunbeam 10:07, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. I'm redirecting it to HowTo:Fuck Off you
fuckers valued voters. Next time guys, creating lots of red links is not a problem. Don't vote keep based on that alone. MrN 22:05, Jun 15
|
| Comments |
- A possible redirect could be... A wizard did it. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 22:37, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
- I don't know if I've ever told you this, but I love you so hard. -OptyC Sucks! CUN21:48, 11 Jun
- I think ICU would be a good solution. It marks the page as in need of a rewrite, without hundreds of red links. Although it isn't all that bad, especially toward the end. Certainly not worth deleting for hundreds of red links. -- Aethix ~ Talk|Contributions|My project 19:11, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- Keep.. This has been around since 2005 ? There are probably writers on uncyclopedia who were not even born then. I don't know if this is much good but perhaps a removal of redundant links will let it rot away in peace in the bowels of this website. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 17:31, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
- Weak keep Per Romartus Don Puttano cHeDDs 22:35,10June,2009
- Keep.. Nameable • mumble? 19:20, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 07:41, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Just... MrN 15:42, Jun 15
|
| Delete |
- Delete. Unfunny. --Docile hippopotamus 09:50, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per above, goes nowhere. --Mnb'z 02:47, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Really unfunny. Redirect to 'Spunk'. mAttlobster. (hello) 15:40, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
Kept MrN 15:42, Jun 15
|
Maori
| Keep |
- Keep. I think its funny as hell, especially the part of maoris being like fungus and most of its true in my opinion, especially parts of stealing and living off benifits, maoris have stolen my phone from infront of me more than once -- Hardworking tax payer
- Hey, does this vote count? Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool
 01:00 June 14 '09
- Keep. not that bad, has some funny parts. I also am generally opposed to deleting because someone finds it racist. --Mnb'z 08:36, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Racism is fine if it's funny. IronLung 09:04, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- Highlighting and contrasting cultural differences can be funny but I don't think racism as such can ever be. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 09:22, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- Well said Romartus. mAttlobster. (hello) 23:34, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Delete. Okay, now I'm just angry. I don't care if this will come back worse, because this entire thing is a massive, unfunny, racist clusterfuck. At least if it comes back it'll be easier to ICU/QVFD to get it out of here. IronLung 06:49, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Bandwagon Delete I am generally opposed to anyone else having to read this pile of cock. 'The Maori came to NZ and founded the Colonel Sanders who then they worshipped for KFC' apparently. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:37, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Kerkill Unfunny. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 17:04, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete -OptyC Sucks! CUN17:42, 6 Jun
- Destroy. Unfunny pile of dickfuck. It's Me Bitches! Don't worry, I won't kill you.
- Delete - I rarely vote to delete articles these days, but honestly, this is awful. Remove the unfunny racism and random crap and you are left with virtually nothing. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 07:39, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete I felt uncomfortable reading it. Out of all the different routes it could have taken for comedic purposes, it attempted racist jibes; never a good thing in my book.ImNotASunbeam 10:01, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete No giggles from me. MrN 04:40, Jun 16
|
| Comments |
Abstain. A conditional abstain as I am minded to go for a delete on this. It needs a cleanup on the text and removal of casually offensive racism. If that is done it might stay. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 12:43, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- Just moronic. mAttlobster. (hello) 10:12, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Delete.. The word "Windows" followed by two letters is by no means a real joke in its own rights (unless it's "Windows XP", of course). A close examination of the content also reveals that the author(s) did not actually have much to say about the subject, either.--The Colonel (talk) 03:09, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. -OptyC Sucks! CUN17:44, 6 Jun
Delete. too obscure to keep as a stub. --Mnb'z 17:54, 6 June 2009 (UTC)- Delete, but be sure to save the images somewhere. --Pentium5dot1 (semi-retired) t~^_^~c 18:47, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete Unfunny leftovers from 2007. This has been wasting space far too long. Zen Rfanklib 02:04, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete. only if we can redirect the images to another Disney page ? --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 16:52, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
Culture of Lithuania
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
Abstain. Can it be car crashed into the existing article about Lithuania which looks a tad more coherent ? Otherwise it can go. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 18:40, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete and redirect to Christian. Short, ranty, redundant, and unedited since 2006. --Mnb'z 04:46, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- Craptain my Captain, let's do what Mnbvcxz suggests. IronLung 06:38, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. --Docile hippopotamus 23:06, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - Short and crap. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 07:57, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. And redirect. --UU - natter 17:29, Jun 12
 EXTERMINATE! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 07:28, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- I remembered the VFD tag this time. --Mnb'z 06:35, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- Deletified and redirectated. --UU - natter 10:22, Jun 13
|
| Keep |
- weak keep listy and gets random toward the end, but the list does have some basis in reality. (Not all lists are bad, especially those that have some link to reality and aren't blatant filibustering.) --Mnb'z 02:50, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. this has a good idea, and some good warnings. It just needs expansion. Staircase CUNt 03:11, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
Really, really weak keep. I hate lists. This needs some expansion to add some articley meat to its listy bones. Expand or rewrite tag please. --UU - natter 12:04, Jun 9 Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:08, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Delete. Unfunny. --Docile hippopotamus 09:50, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete.. It was just a list I have seen countless times on the Internet. And it wasn't even that funny. Nameable • ((mumble?)) • 16:57, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Per Nameable, this, this and this. All substantially funnier than it. Plus Witless Protection Program did it better and was featured. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 04:42, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. All excellent points, DJI. Get rid and redirect to Witless Protection Program. --UU - natter 10:47, Jun 10
 Smite. Per UU. Don Puttano cHeDDs 22:33,10June,2009- Smite. Per those three gentlemen above me. Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 22:35 June 10 '09
- Delete. Per Nameable. There's nothing original here, this predates the internet. -OptyC Sucks! CUN17:36, 11 Jun
- Strong Delete Per Nameable/DJI. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 07:44, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
- What UU said. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 07:30, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
Abstain. A list and nothing much else. Really it is a stub. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 17:24, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
- Deleted and redirected. --UU - natter 10:25, Jun 13
|
Mighty Morphin Power Rangers (future film)/Factual version
| Keep |
- Extremely strong keep When IMDb kept deleting my posts, I couldn't think of anywhere else to post about this project. I seriously don't consider it vanity; it's about my project, not me or anybody I know. This page should be allowed to stay. Period.
 PF4Eva, the President of Imagination Vote for me My tax returns 17:31, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- SUPER BANDWAGON KEEP - This is fucking hilarious: Power Rangers with an ‘Unrated Directors Cut’; ‘grim, dark, edgy, stylized’. The picture of Anthony Hopkins as this Zordan thing made me cry real tears of laughter. Daeg Faerch is going to play a foul-mouthed Power Ranger. The evil character of 71.158.220.124 is very well realised. Please keep it.mAttlobster. (hello) 15:34, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Delete This is just a sub-page. However, it is also shamelessly self-referential and extremely awful, jealously protected by the author and obsessively updated. Apparently, several wake-up calls about how terrible the article is "will not be tolerated". I propose a move to userspace. IronLung 02:51, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. per above, and vanity. --Mnb'z 04:44, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Vanity , vanity..all is vanity. Perhaps the writer should be asked to move the page elsewhere (their home page at best) before this gets electronically expelled. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 06:14, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Not only do we not care about you or your friends, we also don't care about your "project". -OptyC Sucks! CUN17:39, 11 Jun
- Delete.. OK, irregardless of who you are, what your project is, blah blah blah, it isn't funny, and that is what Uncyclopedia kind of wants to be. So someone move it to his userspace. Nameable • mumble? 19:18, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete redirect, keep as userspace page Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 07:55, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Can live on in userspace. --UU - natter 17:26, Jun 12
|
| Comments |
- You might want to talk to TheLedBalloon before making your decision, because hes got my back and he's taking care of vandals. He has helped me "jealously protect" the page. And those "several wake-up calls about how terrible the article is," that's called vandalism and libel. It's one thing to criticize my project or article, which I don't mind if you do; but it's another thing to make up crap saying untrue things that hurt my reputation and are not funny. PF4Eva, the President of Imagination Vote for me My tax returns 17:42, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- Well it is a vanity piece to me . If you pick up an encyclopedia and find an article written by a contributor who starts talking about his own project there you would think that a bit strange. It is also like you have walled off part of this wiki with your own sign "Do Not Trespass". This isn't Myspace. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 18:07, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- That article is a NOT an uncyclopedia article, it is more like a wikipedia article which fails notability guidelines. Such material should probably be put on other sites, like geocites or myspace. Uncyclopedia is not a place for informative articles of any sort, it is a humor/parody wiki.
- Also, don't make legal threats (an accusation of libel is a legal threat). I'm not sure if you by "libel" you meant "criminally libel". Words like "libel", "slander", and "defamation" are legal terms, meaning an unlawful act one can sue over. Accusing other users of such actions constitutes a legal threat. --Mnb'z 18:10, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- Moved to my userspace. PF4Eva, the President of Imagination Vote for me My tax returns 21:25, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
Invalid nom, dipwads. No VFD template. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 06:50, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
|
The Star and Eagle and Baseball and Mom's Apple Pie and Rocky Mountain Sunset and Liberty Bell and Iwo Jima Statue and George Washington's Head Spangled Banner, Yee-Haw!
| Keep |
- Keep. The worse bit is the name of the article. IF that can be trimmed to something less eye poppingly bad then it could be a keep. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 17:11, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Delete. Unfunny. --Docile hippopotamus 09:50, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
- delete Best thing about it is the title. mAttlobster. (hello) 18:58, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Funny title, nothing else. Zen Rfanklib 02:24, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. there is an UnTunes page of this, which an mp3 of the song. Therefore, we should delete the mainspace page which is in fact a wikipedia article of an uncyclopedia article. --Mnb'z 02:59, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. And redirect to the UnTunes page. --UU - natter 11:59, Jun 9
- EXTERMINATE and redirect. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:07, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
Acronym
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete. Unfunny. --Docile hippopotamus 09:50, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Looks like it was knocked up in ten seconds. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 17:13, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. per above. --Mnb'z 02:56, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
- Yuck --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 10:56, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. It's kind of an interesting idea, but it makes for an ugly, off-putting article that's such a colossal chore to read, and it's not funny, so it's not worth the effort. --UU - natter 12:01, Jun 9
|
| Comments |
|
PMS
Windows RG
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete.. This is apparently based on some Flash parody at Newgrounds. Not that I have much to hold against that particular website, it's just that there is simply no reason to write a loving article about it. --The Colonel (talk) 03:09, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. -OptyC Sucks! CUN17:44, 6 Jun
- Delete. Dull and dense. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 17:48, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. per above. --Mnb'z 17:49, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
- Flush pe above. Zen Rfanklib 01:17, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
|
| 'Comments |
|
Windows Vespa
Godmodding
L33T Nonsense
| Keep |
- Keep. the article is still on pee review, and the author was been working on it recently. --Mnb'z 04:55, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- Strong keep. -- Aethix ~ Talk|Contributions|My project 13:16, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Delete "The first example of l33t nonsense took place in the year 1337, the Year of the H4x0r3r Uprising, so-called because it was the year the h4x0r3rs went on their Internet Rampage and declared over 9000 websites to be SRS BIZ." Le Cejak • <3:48 Jun 05, 2009>
- Delete. A fly by night contributor who left a weird baby on the doorstep. You know what the ancients did with unwanted children. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 16:55, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- Kerkill It's crap. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 17:03, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. What Romartus so eloquently said. Zen Rfanklib 19:13, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- I took it off pee review, and the author was only around for one single day, may 26th. Le Cejak • <15:59 Jun 05, 2009>
- He was active from May 16th-26th and had a total of 302 edits. He probably is gone, but he is more than a "fly-by-night" editor. --Mnb'z 17:52, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
|
Windows XD
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete.. This is like the beginning of a Windows version of the Apple iEverything, but this time instead of a lowercase letter, we get to have all kinds of emoticons instead. --The Colonel (talk) 03:09, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
|
| 'Comments |
|
Windows_3.1_(demo)
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete.. I honestly don't recall a demo version of Windows 3.1 (getting old, maybe). But even if it exists, it simply does not deserve its own article. Not even on Wikipedia. --The Colonel (talk) 03:09, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
|
| 'Comments |
|
Windows OMG
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete.. The title says it all.--The Colonel (talk) 03:09, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
|
| 'Comments |
|
Windows for Cavemen
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete.. This article is apparently based on an old, photo-shopped picture of the NT BackOffice splash screen. To be honest, even the picture itself is kind of stretching it ("back" -> "prehistoric").--The Colonel (talk) 03:09, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
File:Barron11.jpg]] & [[:File:Barron111.jpg
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Kerkill Duplicate images, recently put on QVFD but were too old. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 03:33, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. assuming this VFD nomination is valid. --Mnb'z 04:32, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- Since when did QVFD have a time limit? I would say this is more an "admin judgement on QVFD" issue, than a VFD issue.--Mnb'z 04:32, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
One deleted, one keep'd. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:53, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- Both deleted and replaced with this. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:16, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- Band on the run keep I actually find this quite amusing. mAttlobster. (hello) 21:04, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Wrong namespace. This is a 2007 UnNews that's missing its template. Let's move it to UnNews:Fat People are Harder to Kidnap, slap an UnNews template on it, and do what we do with all old UnNews - ignore it. pillow talk 22:00, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Per Hyperbole it would make a decent unnews article if cleaned up a bit. --Mnb'z 04:54, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
Keep. It has basically a good silly idea and is written quite well. I am not sure where or why there is a Nigerian angle and it doesn't really make much sense in the overall direction of the story. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 06:52, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- Spackling ? Is that good ?? --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 05:56, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Kerkill Unfunny, created by a guy who was around for one day so I know it won't be improved any time soon, and delivers no laughs. Also, it looks like it was suppose to be an UnNews. Doesn't matter, though. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 20:43, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- Just cause I find it amusing doesn't actually mean it is. mAttlobster. (hello) 21:10, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Keep'd. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:39, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
|
The Raccoons
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
Abstain.Racoons are nice furry animals. Ok this is about a cartoon series of Racoons. It isn't offensive and it isn't funny either. So it is a borderline keep/delete. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 05:53, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- If it isn't funny, it's a delete...that's the WHOLE point. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:50, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
|
Frankleberry
The Other Sister
Treaty of Waitangi
| Keep |
- Keep. not that bad. --Mnb'z 08:38, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Delete. Offensive and racist and promotes racist lies, in the bad way. For the sake of my country, delete this article. IronLung 06:43, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Bandwagon Delete Random in a bad way. Genuinely stupid. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:33, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Incomprehensible pile o' shite --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 12:58, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Kerkill What? MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:51, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Short 'n' shit. --UU - natter 08:28, Jun 3
- Disintegrate. Per UU. Saberwolf116 20:32, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
Abstain. As above regarding the main Maori article. If actually both were replaced I wouldn't mind at all.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 12:47, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
Delete. Oh it has a watermelon joke ! Ha ha ha. So funny !!??!! --Romartus 07:31, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
Abstain.--Romartus 18:52, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keeperised. Also invalid due to no VFD tag. Yo. --UU - natter 08:25, Jun 3
|
| Keep |
- Bandwagon Keep Too many people like this article...ie me! mAttlobster. (hello) 11:37, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- Win! This is hilarious. I see no incoherence or memes so KEEEEEEEEEEEEEP --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 12:44, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- Strong keep. -- Aethix ~ Talk|Contributions|My project 13:21, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- This is pretty funny, actually Le Cejak • <22:56 Jun 01, 2009>
- Keep. Awesome concept, decent execution. --monika 23:18, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. Why would you ever delete this? Staircase CUNt 04:54, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Again. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 05:00, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. I am amused that the article never actually mentions what the plan was. pillow talk 22:02, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Delete remnant of a mostly deleted sagacrufty series. It was keep in '07, but that was before most of the rest of the series was deleted. --Mnb'z 04:32, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete.--Romartus 06:51, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
Kept. - T.L.B.  WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 22:03, Jun 2
|
Geoff Smith
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete. This must be a shit vanity project. Slightly too old for QVFD (how did it get missed?). IronLung 02:51, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- delete & ZOMG YOU FORGOT THE VFD TAG!!!1!11 which I added. (Seriously though, some people have voted keep merely because the nominator forgot a vfd tag) --Mnb'z 04:47, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Staircase CUNt 04:52, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Kerkill Well, there are a lot of Geoff Smith's, but I have no fucking idea which one this is talking about. Nor does it cause my laughter senses to active, though I now have this strange urge to kill babies... MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 05:34, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete. I guess Geoff Smith still laughs at this article. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 12:50, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Ta. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 13:06, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- Mnbvcxz, say my name. Don't be all ambiguous about it. The reason I did that way back when was because nobody was remembering to put the damn tags on. It's in the rules that it has to be done. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 05:04, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Your not the only person who has done that. --Mnb'z 05:17, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
|
Donald Duck
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Disintegrate. Umm, how did this get past ICU? Saberwolf116 00:11, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- it was written in 2005, back before we had much quality control. --Mnb'z 04:52, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Gone. First sentence made me throw up in my mouth a little bit? IronLung 00:44, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Kerkill But Saberwolf... Go re-read it. The version you put on here had been vandalised. Though... Now that I think about it, it was probably better. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:49, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- This is madness!-- Aethix ~ Talk|Contributions|My project 01:14, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- delete as per IronLung. Staircase CUNt 04:52, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- Reluctant Abstain leaning toward deletion this one is worse than the Daffy Duck, but I don't like deleting articles that notable. If it is deleted, I would suggest a temporary redirect to Admiral Donald Duck. --Mnb'z 04:52, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
|
Daffy Duck
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Disintegrate. Unfunny Crabcruft. Saberwolf116 15:01, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- This isn't the fault of that one guy who shall remain nameless per the ban threat of that one admin. It appears to be a bad noob article from 2006 that was little changed by the various later editors. --Mnb'z 18:24, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- Bleh.-- Aethix ~ Talk|Contributions|My project 17:07, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- Kerkill It has no redeeming value. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 18:48, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- Bandwagon Delete It's no good at all and if it's notable someone can write a better one. mAttlobster. (hello) 22:08, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Staircase CUNt 22:11, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- Abstain. listy and fillibustery. However, this topic is a bit too notable to be deleted, and it does avoid namedrop spam, rape, and gaymansex. --Mnb'z 18:15, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
|
Red Green
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete random nonsense that probably isn't going to be fixed. --Mnb'z 04:48, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Essentially a joke using different colours to highlight piffle. --Romartus 07:38, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. It's hard to write a funny page on something that's already (supposedly) funny. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 10:21, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete The main problem with this article is that there's nothing good about it. Apart from that it's absolutely fine. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:39, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Nothing worth bothering with. --UU - natter 11:40, Jun 1
|
| Comments |
|
Mammootty
| Keep |
Keep.. It needs an overwrite but I liked the bonsai joke. --Romartus 15:45, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. - Notable.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:40, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. It may be bad, but it's called a rewrite. Staircase CUNt 02:36, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- If you don't like it vote delete then someone can rewrite it. mAttlobster. (hello) 10:38, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. It can be rewritten better than this. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 02:13, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep.--Winston 04:16, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. This isn't even that bad. IronLung 22:37, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep.. Oh, I see. It's actually about Chai Tea. That may have been too subtle. Still: not that awful. pillow talk 06:53, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
Keep. a picture might help it. --Romartus 07:41, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
- 8 : 5 in favour. Keeptificaterised. --UU - natter 09:30, Jun 1
|
HowTo:Get fired by your boss and then kill him.
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete I looked at this and I said, "HowTo's" never were very funny. This is, like, the prime example of everything that people do wrong with HowTo's. Le Cejak • <2:30 May 26, 2009>
- Delete. per above. --Mnb'z 02:50, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete I hate this damn article. I HATE IT! mAttlobster. (hello) 15:00, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Delete. It isn't the badger's nadgers. --Romartus 15:43, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
Why would anyone want to fix this - even the title is inept. mAttlobster. (hello) 16:18, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Mohanlal
| Keep |
- You've got to be kidding... Saberwolf116 15:48, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. I don't know about Sycamore, but I'm certainly not kidding about this. Seriously. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:33, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. I wouldn't say it's a great article, but at least it's funny, and the randomness is somewhat coherent. -- Aethix ~ Talk|Contributions|My project 20:31, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. ~
 19:01, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. Why would anyone want to delete this? - - -
 Silly Angel Speak Contribs 11:07, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep I likey. That's why. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 17:22, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- bandwagon keep too many people like this one for it to be deleted. --Mnb'z 18:09, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Same as Mnbvcxz. Staircase CUNt 02:36, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Disintegrate. If any of you vote to keep this, please say why- this is horrible. Saberwolf116 15:05, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. This was kept in 2006. I fail to see why - seems random as buggering fuck to me. --UU - natter 15:10, May 22
- What's hilarious is that the guys who voted to keep it wanted to feature it...lol, the shit we featured back then... Saberwolf116 15:15, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Delete. per above. I don't think we would have featured this late 2006 when this was nominated for deletion. Maybe 2005, but not 2006. --Mnb'z 15:36, 22 May 2009 (UTC)- Delete I do hate deleting Class M planets, especially when class T's are so over represented. But I'm going to cry...real tears...I'm going to cry...I am...cry...mAttlobster. (hello) 19:49, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Smite. User:Zheliel/sigz2 04:43, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Can't see a valid reason to keep it. It is like emptying a tin of alphabet soup on the floor and then trying making sense of the resulting mess.--Romartus 10:34, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Yawn. --
 Roman Dog Bird  18:57, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Randumbbabble.--Winston 16:37, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- Good Lord! -OptyC Sucks! CUN17:35, 27 May
|
| Comments |
- This needs some cleanup and a few images, but not deletion. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:34, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Abstain. There's something in there, but it's buried under a deadly avalanche of random. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 06:27, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- Maybe of move to illogicopedia? I don't see anything under the random except more random. --Mnb'z 06:29, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- The random under the random is the good random. The line "This rekindled the debate in the favor of the so-called "lifers" and NASA, which was able to create 43,000 new jobs in such fields as cartooning, juggling, and kids' television series mascots." is the good random. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 06:33, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- I thought all random was bad random. --Mnb'z 17:57, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- No. Clearly you're unschooled in the finer points of random. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that you're an idiot. I'm simply stating that you are an uncouth, uncultured boor. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 18:10, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Clearly, I need to take some sort of web-class in randomology. --Mnb'z 18:14, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- A tie after more than a week. Keeptificated. --UU - natter 08:43, May 31
|
Sting Theory
| Keep |
- Yes, it is. Also, nice keep template. Saberwolf116 02:25, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Strong keep. How exactly is this bad? --MidwayHaven 03:40, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- It's incoherent and unfunny. Saberwolf116 03:42, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. Really a crap keep but at least we have an article on her ! --Romartus 15:42, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. - "Not the worst article in the world"--Sycamore (Talk) 09:41, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. - as per Sycamore. I don't see the reason for the delete. --Gilgal1
  (Talk to me bitch!!!) 11:10, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 Bless. always wanted to use this template. ~ 11:17, 29 May 2009 (UTC)- Strong keep. bandwagon keep, has too many supports to keep. --Mnb'z 18:11, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. Staircase CUNt 02:36, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Disintegrate. If we're going to have an article on the President of the Phillippines, this isn't it. Saberwolf116 21:23, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Roman Dog Bird 21:38, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 Obliterate. Agree with Sabertoothwolf.  (talk) 21:42, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- I don't get it. Saberwolf116 00:04, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Not the worst article in the world, but it didn't make me laugh once. mAttlobster. (hello) 15:06, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Delete. random as hell, and not notable, so it probably won't be cleaned up or rise from the grave even worse. If the subject was more notable, I'd say keep just to save the pics, but not for this one. --Mnb'z 05:39, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
Huh
ICarly
| Keep |
- Ahhhh!!! This article happens to be a favorite of mine! It's so preposterously bramblefucked that I think it's absolutely hilarious that it exists. I've even linked to it a few times. I would really hope that someone reconsiders. This one is so jaw-droppingly bad that it just makes me laugh out loud. pillow talk 23:38, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- Then save it to your userspace, lol. Saberwolf116 00:08, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Delete This is just a bramblefuck of an article. Le Cejak • <21:40 May 28, 2009>
- Delete. Block recreation for eternity--Sycamore (Talk) 21:42, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- Disintegrate. per Sycamore. Saberwolf116 22:14, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- God, who cares? I mean, really, what the fuck. Per Sycamore, case closed. -- Roman Dog Bird 22:51, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- Ugh. Do that thing that Sycamore said. -OptyC Sucks! CUN22:53, 28 May
- Kill. It sucks so bad it's impossible to figure out which are the bad edits. --T. (talk) 22:59, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. So... much... crap... can't... breathe... or... type... without... ellipses... -- Aethix ~ Talk|Contributions|My project 23:07, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
Vampirefreaks
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete So you hate a website. We don't give a shit. Also I like how they attempt humour by adding "fuck" and "fag" to band names. Hilarious. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 13:58, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. emo-cruft. --Mnb'z 15:31, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Per DJ. The chicks are kinda cute though. -OptyC Sucks! CUN22:11, 28 May
- :D -- Roman Dog Bird 23:12, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- Disintegrate. Keep the pic, though. Saberwolf116 05:17, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- Keep Geese, it ain't that bad. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 13:26, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Not great but definitely not delete-able. Per DJ, also, HI DJ! Le Cejak • <14:37 May 22, 2009>
- Keep. Good enough. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:36, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Mediocre User:Zheliel/sigz2 04:43, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. -- Roman Dog Bird 19:09, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. There are some bright spots here. It needs renovation, not deletion.--Winston 16:41, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Delete Shitty shit shit shit shit. Bad article on a great comic book. Colin
 ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 06:34, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. per above. --Mnb'z 07:13, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete THere are alot of celebrity duck references in this article, and whilst it is always worthy to engage with the Anatidae community, Howard's sticky end will not inspire your average duckling to become a better person...no a duck... mAttlobster. (hello) 13:43, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Kerkill MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 01:20, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete -OptyC Sucks! CUN22:56, 28 May
|
| Comments |
Abstain. I am Ducking out of this one. --Romartus 10:39, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Too close. Keep'd. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 00:33, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Delete & redirect to 
UnPoetia:You Twisted my Thing in Between
Weak keep It is certainly an oddity . The trouble with this one is how can it be improved ? Checking the log the writer has long gone so no good asking them. --
A stain per Hyperbole. 
Strong keep. Per Aethix. If you guys want to delete this, go ahead and change the grue template. 
KeepGreen per Aethix. We don't need another red-link, we could do with a rewrite though. Send it to the 
Smite. Per UU. 
Bless. always wanted to use this template. 
Obliterate. Agree with Saber
![28 File:Barron11.jpg]] & [[:File:Barron111.jpg](#File:Barron11.jpg]]_&_[[:File:Barron111.jpg){kind=link}
