From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD. |
Stir frying
New York Yankees
Keep |
- Keep. Granted, it's a terrible stub, but it's just gonna be recreated by an IP. I recommend Imperial Colonization. Saberwolf116 19:39, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Hopefully some one, some where can fix this Xxdsxxdemonic
- Keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 13:36, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Reluctant Keep I would say delete, but its just going to be recreated worse than this one. I would recommend either Imperial colonization or a stub &/or hard rewrite tag. --Mnb'z 17:04, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- EXTERMINATE! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:12, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Frankly, if you replaced this page with "The New York Yankees are a baseball team called the New York Yankees," it would improve it. pillow talk 19:49, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
In fact, I basically just did that. Now the article is coherent, but still merits deletion. Reverted back. pillow talk 19:20, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Dang, has anyone seen the history of this poor article? I say we do the humane thing and put it out of its misery. -- Aethix ~ Talk|Contributions|My project 20:53, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. --Docile hippopotamus 08:56, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- blanket delete on any version of this article in its history. this has been deleted 19 times. it's going to be back. that doesn't mean we shouldn't get rid of it. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:49, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:18, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- Kerkill Yeah. If this is kept, I'll leave. That's how bad it is. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:24, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Delete Don't vote based on how an article might be in the future, It's probably best to delete and protect it until someone funny has time to write something good other than a terrible stub as this was. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 10:42, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- As Hype appears to be doing --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 10:44, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- No, I'm really not. I'm a little amused by the fact that the article is now about how bad the article is, but obviously we can't leave it in that state. I can't write a legitimate article about the New York Yankees: the sum total of my knowledge on that topic is that it has something to do with baseball. pillow talk 17:03, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - It would be better to start from scratch with this. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 12:58, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- Smite. per '87 16:57, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete -OptyC Sucks! CUN17:17, 30 Apr
- Delete No one will ever fix this. Even so, get rid of this crap till then ~SirTagstit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 17:25, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Maybe it can be resurrected as an in-joke--Mnb'z 18:30, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Abstain. Looks like this article has been so hacked around that it was eventually reduced to stating the blooming obvious in the end. --Romartus 21:26, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- I'm absolutely fucking amazed that this is getting keep votes. I cut and pasted the Wikipedia page about the Miami Dolphins into "New York Yankees," and people are voting keep? So is the consensus that absolutely anything on this page, no matter how horrible, deserves to be kept? Because it's hard to imagine an article worse or less funny than what's up there now, unless it's what was there before I did that. pillow talk 14:23, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- You know what? I annotated how bad this is. I don't even fucking care if I get banned for vandalism. I want you all to take a good hard look at what you're voting for. pillow talk 19:17, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- i'm with you, hyp. and for the record, 'colonization will get to this' is not a valid reason to keep an article. speaking as the co-leader of that group, we have finished 4 articles in 2+ months, so don't expect us to jump every time you vote 'keep'. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 19:31, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- This. IC has quite a bit on it's plate already without adding crap like this. A fresh start would be far easier than colonizing this. -OptyC Sucks! CUN17:17, 30 Apr
- Also: this article is a poor candidate for IC because I'd wager that very few regular editors here know a damn thing about the Yankees. pillow talk 18:10, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
If this does get deleted please move it to User:Mnbvcxz/New York Yankees. I want to keep it for reference purposes. And Hype's notes are funny. --Mnb'z 18:30, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Feghaly
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Disintegrate. Saberwolf116 17:56, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Aethix ~ Talk|Contributions|My project 20:23, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. I read this a couple of times to understand why the writer thought this was funny. Well it isn't unless the idea of Lesbian cities in Scotland and Lebanon trading between each other makes you roll on the floor clutching your sides. This wiki certainly gets contributions from some very strange people.--Romartus 11:27, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Random piffle. --UU - natter 11:41, Apr 28
- wtf. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:57, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. --Docile hippopotamus 08:58, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- For fuck's sake, delete this! This is horrible. It's random nonsense about a made-up "weapon" named after an uncommon last name. I am having a hard time envisioning any page at all that the keep voters would be willing to delete. If I wrote a page called "BUTT POOP" with the content being "I eat apples with Mike Tyson," is that keep-worthy? Seriously. I want to know. Because honestly, I think that page would be better than this one. At least it's over fast. pillow talk 16:08, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per hyperbole --Mnb'z 17:16, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
Keep. I can't fault as regards overall structure and coherence on this stub. It isn't a disgrace like of a lot more deserving misfits to the slaughter here. --Romartus 19:56, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
- There's nothing wrong with deleting it so someone can start over. Saberwolf116 23:19, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
- St. Alfred was just made up on Uncyclopedia to tie in with Pastafarianism. If this gets deleted, no one would ever to think to start it over. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 03:57, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 13:35, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- Barely Keep full of jibber-jabbery, but if its deleted, it won't be recreated any better. Also, it might generate a "hole" in the FSM saga if its deleted. --Mnb'z 17:25, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. Meh, not that bad. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:27, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- Keept -RAHB 05:23, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Sugarglider
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Disintegrate. Some depressing observations followed by a list and that head exploding picture - not funny at all and nothing worth saving. Work is just as bad if you redirect to that. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 16:02, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- Disintegrate. Terrible article. Also, you stole my deletion tagline. Saberwolf116 16:52, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- EXTERMINATE! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:58, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete -- Aethix ~ Talk|Contributions|My project 23:44, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. I already have a job, man. I don't need a page on it (especially one that sucks. I alread have a job that sucks, man...). Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:13, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete.. This needs to be pink slipped as you say in the USA. Cashiered,fired, 'Sugared' (Brit Joke). We do need an article on this subject. No Book of Job either. More I suggest 'What is a Job ? ' --Romartus 09:02, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. --Docile hippopotamus 06:27, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Is Office workers a plausible redirect target? Or should this article be rewritten to be about the Biblical Job, in which case we need a disambig? (BTW, the Work article should probably be rescoped to be about the physics definition of work.) --Pentium5dot1 (semi-retired) t~^_^~c 21:28, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- Office workers is close enough. The biblical Job would, too, but good luck making it even vaguely funny. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:13, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- You could try Tradesmen, it's the only funny work article I've found. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 02:14, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- I go to work? Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:22, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- (arbitrary outdent) So we now have two possible redirect targets. Is that grounds for a disambig? --Pentium5dot1 (semi-retired) t~^_^~c 18:11, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Redirect to whatever you want, but I'm actually strongly considering writing this page. pillow talk 18:13, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Deleted, redirect to work -RAHB 08:17, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
|
The Nolan Sisters
Keep |
Keep. For viewers in Ireland and the UK ! It looks like this page has been vandalized at the bottom. Clean up but not deletion. --Romartus 18:20, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
I reverted it to a less crappier version. Thoughts? Saberwolf116 01:37, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- Keept -RAHB 05:58, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Network Ten
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete Should be renamed, Ivan the cumminator. Horrible stuff. ~ 08:09, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
- Oh dear oh dear, oh dear. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 08:10, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Crap in pretty much every respect. --UU - natter 10:37, Apr 24
Delete. See below. --Romartus 12:41, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
I am going to suggest I take this into protective care . Keep the page title and nothing else. Or will it easier just to cull this one ? --Romartus 09:58, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
- You want to write an article with this title? Start it in your userspace, we can move it when it's ready, and if we huff this version, no-one will be able to revert your new version to this POS. --UU - natter 10:37, Apr 24
- Also, there is actually a better version - Ivan the Terrible, Tsar of All the Russias. ~ 11:41, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
OK delete this and put a redirect to that one instead. --Romartus 12:41, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
- Deleted and redirected -RAHB 22:43, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Jonas Brothers
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Why? Why, God, why? And poor Beatle Paul would never say anything like that. He's in his sixties for Christ's sake! Hell, that sounds more like....like ME! HAHAHAHAHAHA (no, not at all, actually). Anyways, I don't know what's worse, this, or the real Jonas Brothers, whoever the hell they are (I don't watch television or listen to the radio, or whatever.). -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:25, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Aethix ~ Talk|Contributions|My project 21:49, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. --Docile hippopotamus 08:53, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Stupid-unfunny-random and the 'let's write ---- are a shit band. Oh that is really funny....' style of article . --Romartus 10:08, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I tagged this for ICU, then the original author talked to me about it on my talk page where he announced his intention to let it die, but since then it's been OVERRUN by IPs. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 21:12, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
- Added some minor changes to the article so the quote from Paul is now a quote from Hanson. They appeal to basically the same audience as Hanson, NSYNC, and (for those of us old enough to remember)Menudo and New Kids on the Block. Boy band - guys hate them, young tween (and immature teen)girls go ape over them. If the article is deleted, it probably should be protected from recreation since they are a popular topic right now. (Just wait about 2 years or so, they'll suffer same fate as other boy bands before them.)-- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 22:58, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
-
- A "girl"? An old girl maybe but I prefer the term "lady" or "woman". I was never the type to have crushes on people I knew I'd never meet in person. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 04:03, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
- That's so pessimistic. We might meet some day. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 04:25, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. A hex on this Hoax article. It's isn't good enough and is blocking a better effort 'shirley'. --Romartus 10:06, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Deletified and redirected. --UU - natter 10:21, Apr 24
|
Keep |
Keep. It is certainly an odd article but not one I would suggest for deletion. --Romartus 18:10, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- Keepted swiftly - let the {{expand}} tag do its work, huh? --UU - natter 09:28, Apr 24
|
Punch Me Elmo
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete.It's a stub but I doubt if anyone will want to finish this as you would have to get inside the head of the writer to make sense of it as it currently stands. Any volunteers ?? --Romartus 10:56, 19 April
2009 (UTC)
- Away with it! -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) Grammar Nazi, Mum , BFF & NotM, CUN , GMP . - Perkele! 17:58, 19 Apr
- Delete. --Docile hippopotamus 08:25, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
- speedy delete. crap. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:56, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Short and shit. --UU - natter 09:24, Apr 24
- EXTERMINATE! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Extreme crap. It gave me an idea for Pleasure Me Elmo though. -OptyC Sucks! CUN19:37, 24 Apr
|
Comments |
- Check out my proposed cleanup here and see what you think. I agree that it is really more of a stub. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 22:43, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
- Mary Poppins and Chuck Norris? I'd rather start over. pillow talk 16:51, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Template:Usacountry
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Pointless litter, adds nothing that at least five other templates don't already do. How did this survive for so long? IronLung 12:15, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
Delete. I go along with a delete. --Romartus 13:44, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- I'VE HAD IT WITH THIS MOTHERFUCKIN' IP CRUFT ON THIS MOTHERFUCKIN' UNCYCLOPEDIA! Saberwolf116 16:26, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Delete. An idea beyond the capabilities of the writer. Happens to me all the time. --Romartus 22:01, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Tie, keep'd. I'm tired of a something something plane etc. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:52, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Da Vinci code
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Disintegrate. The ugly stepsister of the recently huffed "The Da Vinci Code". Let's let them both rest in peace, shall we? Saberwolf116 12:04, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
- Well there's a list --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 13:25, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Something that is actually worse than the book itself. Needs to nailed on to a lavatory wall for everyone to take aim at. --Romartus 20:05, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
- Da Vinci Code: A Dumb and Dumber story <--- This is the only decent line / title in the article. Why do people like lists so much? I don't get it. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:36, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
- delete. wow this is terrible. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:00, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
- Eteled Aethix ~ Talk|Contributions|My project 22:00, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Zhao smile
Keep |
- Keep. Consistency? Never liked it. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 16:32, 13 Apr 2009
- Keep. ~ 19:53, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. Not entirely bad but a rambler . --Romartus 13:23, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keepish. Again, per Spang, although I would like to see some work done on the keepted Britain articles, decrufting, creation of those sub pages, whatever. --UU - natter 14:47, Apr 14
- Keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 16:52, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. Could be written better - and should - but a lot of work has gone into this. Would be a pity to delete. -- Style Guide 17:19, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. MrN 02:31, Apr 21
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
Kept MrN 02:31, Apr 21
|
Keep |
- Keep. There's a lot of ideas and material here that could be split off into smaller articles that can go into more detail than Great Britain can and does. History of Great Britain, Culture of Great Britain etc. There's room for a lot more stuff on Britain than one article, and this has stuff in it that could be good, that isn't in the colonised page. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 16:32, 13 Apr 2009
- Per Spang. ~ 19:55, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Possibly bits of it can saved/recycled. --Romartus 13:19, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keepish. Per Spang, I guess. I just hope it gets some of the work mentioned. --UU - natter 14:44, Apr 14
- Keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 16:52, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. If someone tries to force me to rewrite this, I will change my vote in a split second. -- Style Guide 17:22, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
kept. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 19:25, Apr 19
|
The Da Vinci Code
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Oh, how I want this article dead. Saberwolf116 17:45, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- I never vote to delete But delete this piece of shit.--Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 22:54, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- It must die. Aethix ~ Talk|Contributions|My project 23:24, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- Terrible novel / movie, equally awful article. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 23:28, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. I like the first quote, and maybe the first part of the first sentence, but that's about it. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 03:14, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Game:Pick Up the Phone Booth and Aisle/Dial huck Norris's phone
Mad Ninja Skillz
Chris Carrabba
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. This is a bitter-crude article. Anyone laughing out there ? Thought not. --Romartus 11:00, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
The Missing Link
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Seriously, this one of the dumbest
vanity articles I've ever read. Aethix ~ Talk|Contributions|My project 01:30, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- Disintegrate. How long does it take to get rid of every 2005 IP cruft article? You'd think we'd be done by now... Saberwolf116 01:37, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Delete. It won't be missed by anyone . --Romartus 21:58, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
911 Sequel
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. Writer doesn't seem to understand that if you going to be as ambitious
with a subject like this - the pressure to produce something good will be tough.This isn't. Marked FAILURE. --Romartus 09:36, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
- Definitely delete. Dsavi.x4 11:11, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
Crash American 11 into it. Saberwolf116 13:21, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
I noted that the article is dated 2006 and that Orion Blastar is a regular contributor. So perhaps this can be sent back home for a cleanup. --Romartus 09:56, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Strong Keep. It needs some work, but it's actually not that bad. Aethix ~ Talk|Contributions|My project
- All this needs is a little TLC --CrabPope 17:47, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. I can't pretend to know anything about this but I suppose it works for a gamer with a gnattish attention span. --Romartus 13:26, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keep CrabPope is gonna give it some love. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 23:17, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Is he really? I'll rewrite this for CW if no one else is going to. (Not really). --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 01:10, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. Needs lots of work, but is still funnier than some stuff I've seen on this site. Could use less pics, though, Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me! 02:31, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Hey fool don't auto-vote for me fool. Also delete. Something about listy stuff and picture spam, I wasn't really paying attention. Ж WHEEEEE! 19:03, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, whatever. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 18:08, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Randumb gamecruft. --UU - natter 14:49, Apr 14
- EXTERMINATE! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:55, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- Kill it. Flashfreez 03:06, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete.. Also, the guy who explodes the tank in that one pic looks like Jimbo Wales. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 18:00, Apr 16
|
Comments |
Draw. Keep'd. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:14, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Rather strong keep. I think it's a funny concept, the execution is coherent, and I enjoy the fact that it's so intentionally offensive that it would drive an IP into a frenzy. It needs work, sure, but I'd very much like to keep it. pillow talk 21:00, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
- keep. It had me at "enhance the experience for all parties". --monika 21:08, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. Meh. At least it's annoying IPs. -OptyC Sucks! CUN22:03, 9 Apr
- Keep. --Mnb'z 04:25, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
- Strong Keep, as per Hype. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:56, Apr 16
- Strongest possible keep! Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 17:50, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Delete |
Delete. It goes rapidly downhill and nowhere after the header. Pity. --Romartus 19:33, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
No clear victor. Keep'd. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:16, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Qweasd
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Exterminate. Aethix ~ Talk|Contributions|My project
- Disintegrate. 2006 IP cruft. Saberwolf116 12:34, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- D'leet. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 18:04, Apr 16
- ...the fuck is this? pillow talk 18:06, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. All I know there are 72,200 hits on google for this word. What do I know but I am pretty sure if we flush this one out - another will replace it and perhaps explain WTF it is all about as well. Sorry I am of pre-digital vintage. --Romartus 21:18, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Okay, I did a bit of snooping around and I don't think there's a reason to let this article live. Really, the best explanation you'll get is that the letters Q-W-E/A-S-D are together on a keyboard. Also, . --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 01:07, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- I am so making that my sig. Nah, not really. Saberwolf116 01:25, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Charles Tupper
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. Amazing how much shit has stuck to this site like an uncleaned toilet.--Romartus 11:25, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Charles Tupper (disambiguation)
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. --Romartus 11:24, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
AIDS
Keep |
Very weak keep. There are scattered funny lines in there, and a couple excellent pictures. Someone needs to take a chainsaw to it, but I'm not sure we should out-and-out nuke it from space. pillow talk 23:34, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- delete. unfunny, dozens of contributors, no redeeming versions in the history, giant lists. i could clean this up, but i'd rather have it deleted and redirected to AIDS (Space Program), which i've been working on, and which would also solve the issue of 500+ pages that link to it. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:14, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
- HA HA! AIDS! Oh, man! -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:55, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Delete.I quote: 'AIDS originally started when black people began raping chimpanzees. After that AIDS spread trough meatspin.' It gets crushed for that starter for me and really I wouldn't want to clean this up as it has the flies buzzing all over it. --Romartus 11:23, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- Disintegrate it and let's start over from scratch. Saberwolf116 12:28, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- D'leet as per Saberwolf. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 18:02, Apr 16
- Kay, fine. If you guys want to start from scratch, I'm not gonna play obstructionist. Or bowel obstructionist. Certainly not gonna play that. pillow talk 18:07, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
God Mode
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. Switch off. --Romartus 13:00, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Blanket Keep. I have several friends, all of whom are not Uncyclopedia members, and all of whom love the Ninja article. It may not be up to par to our "standards", but I can definitely see where they're coming from, and if my unregistered friends like it, I'd say a good chunk of other unregistereds like it too. With VFD, it may be okay to delete obscure stuff and very unfunny things, but we need to keep an eye out for our unregistered readers (which make up a huge chunk of our total views). -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 17:49, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Keep. I fear a Ninja attack if we delete too many of these articles. --Romartus 22:13, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Docile hippopotamus 02:47, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per TKF. --Mnb'z 04:21, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 03:49, 14 Apr 2009
- Keep. Harmless enough sub-page, I guess. --UU - natter 14:41, Apr 14
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- Keept Although if I may add in my two cents, this is Uncyclopedia, not WKRP in fucking Cincinnati. We're here to put out what's funny, and attracting more and more readers (especially those who would rather read less funny articles than our more "proud" content) should be one of the least of our concerns. -RAHB 18:52, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
|
HHO Gas
City of london school
Keep |
|
Delete |
- UN:DUMB --Gbing 21:17, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. At first I thought, "Wow, for something so terrible, it looks like a lot of work went into this." Then I realized that it was just a cut-and-paste job from Wikipedia that was heavily vandalized. That's no way to write an article. pillow talk 22:26, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
- Haff Doesn't cite its sources. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 02:48, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Delete. I seem to recall seeing this appearing on the site a few months ago. It looked crap then and hasn't been improved. --Romartus 13:30, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. From the talk page, looks like it was a spork that someone intended to work on, then others from the same college did what people do to pages about their school the world over and fucked it up royally, at which point the original creator gave up. Chalk one up to experience, folks. --UU - natter 14:52, Apr 14
- EXTERMINATE! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:55, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
The Former Great Britain
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. Perhaps the pix can be reused. --Romartus 13:20, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Blanket Keep. I have several friends, all of whom are not Uncyclopedia members, and all of whom love the Ninja article. It may not be up to par to our "standards", but I can definitely see where they're coming from, and if my unregistered friends like it, I'd say a good chunk of other unregistereds like it too. With VFD, it may be okay to delete obscure stuff and very unfunny things, but we need to keep an eye out for our unregistered readers (which make up a huge chunk of our total views). -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 17:49, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. It certainly isn't "A" material, but it's good enough not to wipe. Aethix ~ Talk|Contributions|My project 01:52, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Docile hippopotamus 02:47, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. per TKF --Mnb'z 04:25, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 03:49, 14 Apr 2009
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
Abstain. --Romartus 22:05, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Blanket Keep. I have several friends, all of whom are not Uncyclopedia members, and all of whom love the Ninja article. It may not be up to par to our "standards", but I can definitely see where they're coming from, and if my unregistered friends like it, I'd say a good chunk of other unregistereds like it too. With VFD, it may be okay to delete obscure stuff and very unfunny things, but we need to keep an eye out for our unregistered readers (which make up a huge chunk of our total views). -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 17:49, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Keep. What do I know about articles suitable for Ninja fans ? Nothing. --Romartus 22:02, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Docile hippopotamus 02:47, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. per TKF --Mnb'z 04:25, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 03:49, 14 Apr 2009
- Keep. Harmless enough sub-page, I guess. --UU - natter 14:37, Apr 14
|
Delete |
- Kerkill I'm not gonna lie. I didn't really read this. I skimmed through it. None of it seemed good. I don't wanna read it. Clinjas are angry at this. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 16:40, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- EXTERMINATE! Despite Thekillerfroggy's keep vote. Non-Uncyclopedians probably won't find these listy subpages in the first place. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:13, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Ninja/Path
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. Listy crappy. --Romartus 22:03, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. --Mnb'z 04:25, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Roberto Cheesefecker
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. O.N.R.V.
- Sign your vote, n00b! Saberwolf116 16:20, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Fromage A Faecal. No one will miss this article once it has been spiked. --Romartus 18:54, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Roman, a better delete tagline would've been "Roberto's mother was a bottle of bleach." Just saying. Saberwolf116 23:08, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- I actually think that's quite amusing........ -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 23:17, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- Mine or yours? Saberwolf116 23:24, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- Yours. I always pick out the stupidest sounding lines when I vote to delete. I wouldn't have used yours because it does amuse me for whatever reason. But, obviously, one line isn't good enough to save this article and........am I making any sense? Sorry, in advance if I'm not...... -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 23:30, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Tooth Fairy
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. Operation Tooth Fairy indeed. This crap has been stuck on Uncyclopedia for too long. --Romartus 22:20, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Blanket Keep. I have several friends, all of whom are not Uncyclopedia members, and all of whom love the Ninja article. It may not be up to par to our "standards", but I can definitely see where they're coming from, and if my unregistered friends like it, I'd say a good chunk of other unregistereds like it too. With VFD, it may be okay to delete obscure stuff and very unfunny things, but we need to keep an eye out for our unregistered readers (which make up a huge chunk of our total views). -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 17:49, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per Thekillerfroggy. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:55, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Too notable a subject to not have an article on - likely to be recreated worse than it is. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 17:56, 11 April 2009
(UTC)
Crap Keep. --Romartus 22:17, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
Kept MrN 23:03, Apr 11
|
Ninja/Skills
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- Comment. You know how I normally vote and stuff? Here, I'm commenting. This is a sub-page from the main Ninja article. It's basically a load of crap that was on the main article but got moved to a sub-page. If we delete this, we ought to think about deleting the main article too, and all the other sub-pages. Until that happens, I can't vote to delete this, as having it as a sub-page is at least better than having it as a shitload of lists on an already huge and listy article. --UU - natter 08:25, Apr 11
- EXTERMINATE ALL NINJAS! As per UU. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:41, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- OK then Socky: off you go make it happen. --UU - natter 09:31, Apr 11
- Dexter111344 is already making it happen. MUAHAHA! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:50, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Three caballeros
Whats His Name
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. A ludicrously bad article. Someone rewrote the lede to make it pretty clever, but after that, it's just the article's original torrent of diarrhea. pillow talk 23:10, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 00:09, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- Kerkill The idea is there, but then it transforms to utter shit. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 01:07, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- EXTERMINATE! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:42, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Shame, I kinda like the idea, but it's crap. --UU - natter 08:46, Apr 11
|
Comments |
|
Hunter x Hunter
NetBSD
Shuddy
The goliath chronicles
The Traveling Wilburys
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. This is pretty much my least favorite kind of article. Weird dates, Chuck Norris, pointless lists. Bleah. Nothing better in the history. pillow talk 22:48, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
- The most accurate representation of this band that I have ever seen. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 22:55, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
- Kerkill Bob Dylan will thank us. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 22:59, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Short, shit, bandcrufty... This can go. --UU - natter 08:10, Apr 11
- EXTERMINATE! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:39, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Placenta Shark
Michael Savage
CCHR
Keep |
Keep. Spelling errors aside it is at least originally unfunny. Not enough to dump it though. --Romartus 15:02, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Overmind
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Well, that's just not good at all. Also, the author is User:Overmind1071, so this appears to be vanity. pillow talk 22:43, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
- Kerkill This is shit. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 22:45, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
- EXTERMINATE! A disgrace to the Overmind! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:46, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
- Article of the Year. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 22:51, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - I'd say as vanity to just userspace it to the userpage, but user has been inactive since June 07. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 23:23, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Mewtwo
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. On the grounds that a room full of drunk centipedes with computer keyboards would have made more sense. --Romartus 09:42, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Disney Channel
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete 'SUP GUYS, I JUST LEARNED HOW TO USE THE WORD-CENSOR THING! LOL! IF THAT WASN'T FUNNY ENOUGH, LET'S THROW IN "SHIT" AND "NIGGER" EVERY 2 WORDS TO MAKE IT FUCKING HILARIOUS!!!! ;D sofia. 00:03, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
- Penis and Perv. shit, nigguh, dat's crazy!!!!!11 -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 00:09, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
- EXTERMINATE! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:09, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
- Kill this fucking thing with fire, hunt down the author, and smack him upside the head. pillow talk 00:32, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Moronic,offensive,stupid,crass,cobblers..I could go on. Nope.Stop it right here. --Romartus 09:38, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
- Hell That's the worst article I've seen. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 10:09, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Australian Civil War
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. Rubbish. A war that started in 1865 but - heh - let's change our mind half way down and start a century earlier. A Dunny burger bar . --Romartus 19:31, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Kit Kat Bar
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. Another crappy piece of nonsense written by someone on the run or with the runs. --Romartus 19:28, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
UnBooks:The Four Trials of Sir Uncyclopedia
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. A 2006 entry that has stayed here in this barebones state ever since ! R.I.P --Romartus 06:21, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Vengaboys
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. So, like, this dude (dudes? dudettes?) keeps blanking this article, thinking he (she?) has the power to delete it, but, uh, what is it? It doesn't look all that good and stuff, so........yeah. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 22:37, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Delete. I had to check wikipiddlia on this one . Well that entry is funnier and is supposed to be true and factual !
So vote to remove . I am pretty sure another fan/anti will scribble in the vacated space. --Romartus 06:18, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Crest of the Stars
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete A random unfunny story - basically an IP's fancruft --Asahatter (annoy) 09:32, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Unfunny and misbegotten . --Romartus 10:14, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Heroin
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. Needs to be slapped in the face with a frozen chicken and removed. --Romartus 06:24, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Kerkill Even the version MrN reverted back to has no redeeming value, and I really can't find a good version. I've looked. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 11:46, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- You will surely die, but HEY! Who Cares! You're High!!!! SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 18:47, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Freerunning
Keep |
- Keep No Pants. MrN 13:14, Apr 5
Keep. Assuming this isn't plagiarised, I think it's actually rather amusing. pillow talk 16:37, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- Wait a minute. Based on the dates, it looks like these guys may have stolen it from us, because it was funny. pillow talk 16:40, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keep It doesn't suck, and other people like it enough to copy it. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 18:52, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Per above. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 02:28, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- <squidward>Whatever.</squidward> -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 22:49, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Bastards making me change my vote... And thus giving me more work as a poopsmith... --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 22:52, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Hack it to bits. -- The Colonel (talk) 06:33, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete: Is this plagiarized from somewhere? (I know the Windows source code article probably is, and there is a precedent for deleting such things, as happened with "HowTo:Install Linux on a dead badger.") Also, "Word is about to crash. There is no chance of saving your document." seems like a bad pun on All your base are belong to us. --Pentium5dot1 (semi-retired) t~^_^~c 19:36, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
- EXTERMINATE! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:09, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
Kerkill --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 22:04, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. I'm pretty sure I've seen this elsewhere, and it's just nothing worthwhile anyway, to my mind. --UU - natter 10:35, Apr 6
Delete. You guys are right: it's stolen from here: [1] pillow talk 16:38, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Delete. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 01:06, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Abstain. Too short for an article - too long for a stub. --Romartus 13:34, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
- Eh? MrN 13:14, Apr 5
HEY GUYS I wrote a lead to this article and made it all pretty-like, so you can change your votes to for now. Also, don't forget to vote for me for UGotM! --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 02:27, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Kept MrN 23:07, Apr 7
|
Gerard Butler
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete.I can't imagine why I would write this and think it was any good ???
--Romartus 13:09, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|