User talk:Syndrome/archive1

Bannination

First, let me start by saying what a big fan I am of Santa Claus. Anyone who can evade authorities for so long and still maintain an army of elves my personal hero.

That's why it hurts me to see so much unorganized junk filling up what could otherwise be a very lovely biography. There are just so many sides to Santa that people don't know about, but it needs to be in a readable form before the information can be spread.

Look at how Wikipedia treats Cuba, for example. Cuba isn't nearly as interesting as Santa Claus, and yet it gets a disambiguation page, a dozen pages all to itself, and it's still as long as All Hallow's Eve. Let's face it, with Uncyclopedia, there's only going be a small chance that what you're reading is worthwhile, even less of a chance than you would have with Wikipedia. I just feel that it needs to be organized better before people will take the plunge and try to read it. If it's not so long, the losses of time and sanity from reading a potentially nonsensical article are cut.

I mean, look at the lovely way you axed Oscar Wilde. That's all I'm asking for, really. I know if I were to try that myself, someone would revert it right away without thinking. Templates are all I have to fight back, man.

Anyway, I'd appreciate it if you'd lift my ban just a little, because I'm rewriting North for the Poo Lit Surprise and by the time my ban expires, I will only have four days before the deadline. Four days. Think about that. --Syndrome 03:58, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Humm...since I've got an article up there as well, sounds like I need to extend your ban for four days to give my piss-poor writing a better chance...

To make sure I'm 100% clear....if you don't like an article, do something constructive about it. Taking an overly long, boring article and adding yet more shite to it does nothing to fix the problem - it just makes it worse. While you are correct in thinking that we'll get irritated if you blank massive swathes of articles, you can make it work if you're gentle and sensible about it. If you find articles that are too long and boring, follow these steps:

1) Check the history. See if any one logged-in user (especially an admin, as they can be overly protective sometimes) added a lot of content to it. If they did, drop a note on their talk page and discuss trimming it down.

2) If either it's all crappy anon-IP edits or the user(s) say chop away, (or they ignore you for a few days) start pruning, Gently. Kill the worst 50% of a section, leave the rest. Try to connect themes throughout the whole page. Make sure you're doing at least a moderate bit of rewriting as you go.

You can delete crappy stuff - you just have to be delicate about it. In fact, if it's a massive list of boring crap you're deleting, you'll find me on your side. That's one of my huge irritations. The other is people spamming fucking templates on a bunch of pages. So, since you you've been both poinient and thoughtful, I'll lift your ban, if you can promise that you'll make pages better instead of worse. However, because you mentioned the Poo Lit Surprise, I'll have to re-ban you until Saturday, so that you won't be competing with me. In fact, I need to go ban a bunch of people and delete their pages. Later. ~Sir Famine, Vandal♣er 21:48, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Why, oh why?

Are you creating user pages? ~ 07:21, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm doing no such thing. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.

To tell the truth (heaven forbid), I was reading this user page and I decided it would be cool if I could conjure a user to life as happened there. The results have been disappointing so far, but I shall continue to persevere and I shall not rest until I have made a user with my edits. For science! --Syndrome 13:30, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm afraid that I'll have to put that test to the end, since creating another user is sockpuppetary which is a bannable offense here. I urge you to find another field to test. Thanks. ~ 13:33, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Really? What if you create another user the way God intended? You know, have a baby, raise him for a few years, and then set him up with an account here? Are there any rules against that? Because if not, that's what I'm going to try now. --Syndrome 13:51, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

In that case, all the luck, I'll see you again in...hmmmm....2014 or so. ~ 13:53, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for pissing, and some other stuff

First of all, I would like to thank you for pissing on my article, HowTo:Not Die. Secondly, If you don't like me posting stuff like this on your chat page, or ever even bugging you about it, then just tell me and I'll stop bugging you to death. But anyway, about the article. I know you came up with the idea, and you were just giving me suggestions to get me moving to my own ideas, but do you think that it would be a good idea just to take your idea about making it a very "blatantly secret" face cream ad? Maybe I could like, get some picture of some dead person with FAIL! written at the bottom, and put a caption like "Notice that this person has failed at not dying. Also notice her severe lack of Aveeno© aging cream," or something along those lines. I could possibly take a picture of me drinking some beauty product by the gallon. As far as going on with things even the stupidest of people could figure out, I think that there are enough fairly funny articles that do this (see HowTo:Breathe), and I don't so much care for the emo thing. Oh, and I don't really know how to put on pictures, so I will have to figure that out, hopefully soon. Sorry if it sounded a bit grade school like, I'm only in 9th grade, so most things I write will sound slightly like that. Anyway, thanks for pissing on my article (it sounds really awkward to say that) and I hope to hear from you soon :)G man yo 11:10, 9 April 2008 (UTC) P.S. If you need a link to the review, here it is: http://en.uncyclopedia.co/w/index.php?title=Uncyclopedia:Pee_Review/HowTo:Not_Die&t=20080407185954

No problem, yo. I don't mind you asking me, and you can probably ask any admin too, unless they're in a bad mood, in which case they'll just ban you. I'll reply to your questions here so the whole dialogue is easier to follow. Anyway. Sure, you could go with the aging cream idea, and it's a good idea to have an image of someone drinking it. I don't think I would take a picture of yourself (it's not that it's against the rules, but I've never seen anyone do it before, and you're putting it on a wiki so anyone can edit it), but if you could photoshop (or get someone else to) a picture of a sexy model drinking it from a magazine ad or something, that may be a good sell for a product.

And I don't like the whole "FAIL" idea, because it reeks too much of Encyclopedia Dramatica and we try to avoid their over-the-top gross-out kind of humor. Of course, I'm not trying to tell you what to put in your article, but what I would do instead is get a photo of a soldier and caption it with something like "This person may not be alive right now." (Maybe I'm a little biased because I just saw Winter Soldier.) Understatement is key to comedy. You did read HTBFANJS, right?

As for the more technical aspects of how to open and close an article, I recommend you go to the featured articles list and look at how the featured HowTo articles do their intros and conclusions. They usually start with a second-person scenario, or a pitch on why you need to do this. That should be enough to keep you busy, but don't hesitate to ask if you have any more questions. Good luck! --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 13:11, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Okay, thanks, dude. I think I'm going to skip the sexy model thing, or at least get a more "modest" model, cause I'm a Christian and go to a Christian school, and that would NOT go over well if my teachers or parents found out about me posting a near-naked model on my page. I mean, i think raunchy jokes are funny, but if I wrote it, it would probably just get me in trouble. Thanks for helping, I'll try to fix it over the next few days :)G man yo 13:52, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Oh...Whoops! I forgotted about my article. If it's not already beleted, I'll belete it, work on it in word, and then put it back up if I ever get finished. Sorry bout that :P G man yo 06:13, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

New IM!

IM from dctrskull1990 to Syndrome

dctrskull1990 [07:40 PM]: hey dctrskull1990 [07:40 PM]: so uh dctrskull1990 [07:40 PM]: i saw you voted on that drug dealer article dctrskull1990 [07:41 PM]: heh dctrskull1990 [07:41 PM]: your probably wondering who i am dctrskull1990 [07:41 PM]: i'm the guy that wrote it dctrskull1990 [07:41 PM]: srsly i'm not shitting you dctrskull1990 [07:41 PM]: anyway dctrskull1990 [07:42 PM]: you're probably gonna end up bein one of those people i never take off my buddy list even tho we only speak once dctrskull1990 [07:42 PM]: which sounds kinda creepy and all dctrskull1990 [07:42 PM]: but its kind of like an honor you know dctrskull1990 [07:42 PM]: being on my buddy list dctrskull1990 [07:43 PM]: cuz i got a featured article on uncyclopedia dctrskull1990 [07:43 PM]: partially thanks to you! dctrskull1990 [07:43 PM]: so i guess all i'm tryin to say is dctrskull1990 [07:43 PM]: thx dctrskull1990 [07:45 PM]: and can we get one thing clarified right now dctrskull1990 [07:45 PM]: sorry to bother you like this, i'm probably wasting your time dctrskull1990 [07:45 PM]: considering you're NOT RESPONDING or anything dctrskull1990 [07:46 PM]: but lets just get this settled dctrskull1990 [07:46 PM]: like for peace of mind dctrskull1990 [07:46 PM]: you dont sell drugs do you Syndrome [07:51 PM]: Thanks for voting? More like thanks for nominating. Syndrome [07:51 PM]: Get your facts straight. Syndrome [07:52 PM]: Oh yeah, before I get too much into detail... Syndrome [07:52 PM]: You're not an undercover cop, are you? Syndrome [07:53 PM]: Haha. Syndrome [07:56 PM]: Seriously though are you? Talk Video Pictures Send files

• Skull • UotM | talk •

Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Scat

Thanks for the PR. I've made a few minor changes. Spikebrennan 14:06, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Write the Great American Novel

Hey, thanks for taking up the greatest pee review challenge... ever.   Le Cejak • <Apr 30, 2008 [2:09]>

Sorry, I'll try to finish reviewing it tonight in lieu of sleeping. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 02:28, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

That article will kick your ass in its awesomeness. You will die. ...sort of.   Le Cejak • <Apr 30, 2008 [2:38]>

Psh. That was nothing. I reviewed it so hard it'll make your head spin. You gonna need a chiropractor that specializes in untwisting necks now. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 12:42, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Rejoice, Syndrome! You have been entitled to the
Golden Shower Award

For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

---

“ Massage it in there. Oh, baby. ”

Thanks, Syndrome! That was a pretty good review for someone who died in the awesomeness of my article! I'll be back with the changes eventually. Maybe some questions, too.   Le Cejak • <Apr 30, 2008 [12:47]>

Cool, my first award! Thanks for disqualifying me for the "least awards" award. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 23:44, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

New Guy

Whats link to all administrators, whats difference between this and encyclopediadramatica.com – Preceding unsigned comment added by BWear (talk • contribs)

Hi BWear! You're probably looking for this special page that lists the sysops. If you leave messages on their userpages (or if you don't), please sign with four tildes (~~~~) so we know who you are. As for your other question, we at Uncyclopedia don't really talk about ED a lot because they aren't notable. I mean, they don't even have an article on Wikipedia. But the difference between us can be summed up in two words: distended anuses. For some reason, they really really like goatse over there, while we ban people for that stuff here. So Uncyclopedia writes about all kinds of stuff as long as its funny, while ED writes about internet-related stuff and they focus mainly on shock humor. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 04:00, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

I'm not dead! Just infrequent, because of frustration at the way repeated edits slowly erode some of the best content into less funny lameness. Still checking back sometimes though. --TheTris 23:08, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

RAHB

If you feel you have a genuine problem with someone's actions then I would advise you to speak to one of the more diplomatic Admins, Brad or Codeine or some nutter like that. I've not looked into what's gone on here to make any judgement but in most cases its just down to misunderstandings, usually on the part of both parties. Regardless of the right and wrong of a situation certain action on forums or people's talk pages CAN look like trolling, which is a bannable offence, so with that in mind I'd like to ask you to be more careful with your words in future. Consider this a gentle warning. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

To add a personal note to what Mr. Mhaille here has said, please don't get banned over something like this. You're too valuable a user to stoop to this level. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 18:09 Jun 8

Thanks to both of you. I tend to like to settle things personally, without being a tattle-tale and reaching for the authorities at the first sign of conflict (besides, I figure RAHB would automatically have admin support, being the more experienced user) but it's nice to know my options. I'll keep that in mind in the future, and I'll be more careful. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 18:22, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

For my own addition to this, I hope I haven't given you the wrong impression here. I can't see how anyone here would actually suggest you would get banned over retaliating to my own harsh remarks. Maybe that suggests you're right about the whole favoritism for experienced users thing. I don't doubt that in some cases it exists, and I certainly don't think it should exist. All users should be treated based on their own merits and not on their time here, number of features, amount of friends, size of their genitals, or any other silly preconception like that. Let me say that, despite my hostile words towards you, if you had under some bizarre circumstance actually gotten banned for just coming back at me with your own argument, I would have personally seen to it that you were unbanned as soon as possible (with what little influence I may have on decisions like that). As I just noted on my talk page in response to your acceptance of my apology, you should be commended for standing up for your own self after I attacked you like that. I hope this doesn't discourage you from making positive contributions to the site, I don't think it will as you seem to have a good head on your shoulders. Consider this a reiteration of my apology, but also an extension of my hand if ever you are unjustly treated as well. Similarly to how I defended Zombiebaron, not because of who he was, but because of the accusations against him (not just yours, he gets it a lot), I would defend you at any time if somebody had wrongly accused you of doing something bannable, not because of who you are, but because it is the right thing to do. (Hopefully this is the last essay-long comment I write for a while.) -RAHB 23:07, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Also, from your talk page messages, it looks like you've actually been here longer than me.....like, a year longer than me. O_o -RAHB 23:26, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Heh, I was beginning to think that making essay-long comments was just your style. But thanks for your vote of confidence; it's very Voltaire of you to defend my right to say things you don't agree with. Yeah, I joined Uncyc in the pre-Benson era, although I certainly haven't been active the whole time so a lot of people don't know me. I can see you've been productive in your time here, but as for me, well, I'm still working on that first feature. Sorry for any misconceptions I had about you. Now if you'll excuse me, I've got to get back to staring at my work in progress and waiting for an idea to come. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 05:11, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Hey, I'm human, and as such I have the capacity to be wrong. I think the reason that defending other people's thoughts is seen as so radical is that most people refuse to admit to the fact that other people can be right and they can be wrong. Admittedly it's not the best feeling at first, but I do believe we've gotten something accomplished by making peace. Keep brainstorming, a featurable idea is bound to come up eventually. If you need any help with writing or reviews or anything, I'd be glad to help out any time. Cheers. -RAHB 05:41, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for putting that image back on EPIC FAIL!, I knew I'd done something wrong there but I couldn't quite put my finger on it :P. Methinks that article needs more attention than people give it, since I got it featured it has a heck of a lot of crap tacked on to it by passing IPs. That's what I get for basing my asofyet only featured article on the idea of an internet meme, eh? --~FAG! +chatline "if it ain't broke, break it" (CUN·VFH)

No problem. I've been watching the page in case someone tries to add something stupid. Just be glad you didn't write an article on an even worse meme, like, I don't know, anything on ED. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 01:04, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Congrads! A pie!

         dQQQQQQQQQQQQb
    dQQQQp            qQQQQb
  dQp                      qQb
 dp                          qb
dp                            qb
qb                            dp
 Qb                          dpQ
 qQQb                      dQQp
  Q qQQQQb            dQQQQp Q
  qb     qQQQQQQQQQQQQp     dp
   Q.                      .Q
   `Qb                    dQ'
     qQb                dQp
       qQQQQb      dQQQQp
            qQQQQQQp

Yes, that's right! You received THE WELCOMING PIE! (I am pretty zonked right now, so SORRY for SHOUTING...!!!.!) --thematrixeætsyou, the ass kicker (talk) (flames) 06:42, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

The Fat Girl Pee Review

When I put the article up for Pee Review, it is in the sincere hope of improving it, and I found a couple valid suggestions in your review. However I was a put off by your jabs, including "Seriously, though, my guess is that you're satisfied with this article as it is." If I were 100% happy with it, why would I have asked for a Pee Review, and if I was shallow as you think I am I wouldn't have spent time reading the review itself, I only would have looked at the bottom score. So thanks for judging the article, and me as well. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 14:55, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Um, you're welcome? Sorry, I just woke up and I don't know what to say. I don't think you're shallow, or else you would have turned to Encyclopedia Dramatica as an outlet for your writing. I was trying to avoid the word girly, but my gist was that the article is too girly for me to dig properly. If anything, my review was self-deprecating when I said that you would ignore my suggestions because, well, I said I don't know what I'm talking about. I wasn't trying to judge you, but I wouldn't be a very good reviewer if I didn't try to have some sense of your motivation and where you were coming from when you wrote this. I hope that makes sense.
You can be satisfied with your work without being 100% happy with it. If anything, I was giving you a compliment that you fulfilled your vision (from what my poor judgment tells me least). But I'm sorry that my review offended you and I hope you find the rest of it useful. If not, you're more the welcome to resubmit your article, or revert my edit and pretend it never happened. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 17:35, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

OK, thanks for the reply. I think I will work on it and then resubmit it to Pee Review. But I do have to ask that in the future, when you do another review that focus on making it a tool by which the writer can glean useful information and not use it was a spring board for self-deprecating humor. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 19:56, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

But, Prettiestpretty, surely you must admit that if you take out the parts you don't like, the rest of the review is useful? --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 23:56, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

No, not really. Hugs, Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 01:34, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Aww snap. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 01:43, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Your words hurt me, Prettiestpretty. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 04:09, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

My Userboxes

Thanks for fixing them up. Would have used a table, but didn't know how to make them in Uncyclopedia-speak. --00Davo 03:54, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome. No one ever checks to see if anyone is using {{help}}, so you're lucky I saw it in only a couple of days. Next time you need help, it's probably better to go directly to me or an admin and ask on our respective talk page. Cheers. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 04:08, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Poo Lit Surprise

I'm sending you this because you are signed up to judge the Poo Lit Surprise. If you no longer want to judge or are incapable of, please tell me as soon as possible. If you're still good to go, here are the instructions:

First, read all of the articles in your specified category. Second, judge them. Judge how you like, as long as it's at least fair and based on merit (one suggestion would be to use the Pee Review format). Post your top 5 articles here. Hit me up on my talk page for questions, comments, or if these rules are not cognizant within you.

Thank you again for your valued participation in the balletic train wreck that is the Poo Lit Surprise! ~ Fnoodle (talk) (my creator) 00:29, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

You Call That...

A Bonner? Pfft! That's not a patch on me!

WHAT IN THE NAME OF BLOODY HELL IS THIS? (Victor Meldrew does not approve of this. At all) (Ever)

Here, have one of my old templates as a consolation prize (Bonner) (Talk) Jul 24, 10:16

QVFD

Hea dude... Please don't removed anything from QVFD [1] even if it was you who put it there... Just cross it out. If we don't do this it becomes a bit of a nightmare... Cheers. MrN 04:16, Jul 25

Righto, guvnor. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 04:17, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Ninjastar!

Aw shucks, my first ninjastar! Thanks. I'll tuck it away in my kimono next to my wakizashi. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)}

The first ninjastar is the best. I got my first for sorting out a pissing match between two clashing egos. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 22:38, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Who won? --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 05:03, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Apissing Dog, but it could be a ninja star

	Thank you, Syndrome, for voting Orian57 your Reviewer of the Month. However the egotistical beast that you have now unleashed is not grateful and meagrely expected the vote but would like to give you a condescending pat on the head. Good girl/boy
	Thanks for voting!

If you use your imagination. SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 08:57 1 August 2008

Judging

Just want to remind you that you are signed up to judge the Best Rewrite section of the PLS competition. You have until the 12th to finish, but you are one of the two people who haven't finished yet, so I thought I would remind you. You should judge the entries listed here, and post your results here. Let Dr. Skullthumper know if you can't judge for one reason or another. - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 04:12, Aug 9

I don't see it specified anywhere, so I'll ask here: When judging the article, should I take into consideration the article before it was rewritten and how much improvement has been made, and if the theme is the same? --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 07:07, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Hmm, I don't think it is specified, but I would say no to both counts, judge it as a new piece. Perhaps ask the other judges what they did though. - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 13:36, Aug 9

No, rewrites are based upon the newly written article. What happened before (IPs peeing all over the place, vandals taking a shit in the grammar district) is irrelevant. Also, about that judging thing - the due date is the 12th. Like, this month. And this year. Just so you know. :D – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 05:00 Aug 11, 2008

Power Ranger Talk

Blue Power Ranger thanks you for voting! So you liked my tale of displeasure, huh? That's nice. Hey, maybe I could write a book about it! Before long I'll be outselling Pelzer!

Oh about the yellow power ranger you mentioned. I looked it up and from what I read it actually sounded like she had a pretty hard life untill the power rangers (presumably during it too from the fact she left) and then died young. Or was that what meant? Also Have we spoken before much? You're not on my watch list is all. If we havent I'd like to extend my formal greetings. And finally, what was it you liked about the article? I've been asking because of the landslide vote it got, want to see what I'm doing right. SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 02:22 13 September 2008

Oh, I must have remembered the details wrong. I only knew that she continued acting before dying young. Anyway, I'm guessing your article was so popular because of the truth of its subject matter. Power Rangers were the best thing ever to my generation, but as we grew older, we realized how ridiculous all that gallivanting around in a silly suit and repeating the same predictable plot really is. So I suppose you touched a nerve with some readers.

Also, hi, I'm Syndrome. I know you as the gay guy who writes stuff. You can think of me as the nondescript guy who never accomplishes anything. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 05:47, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

We're probably much the same generation (I'm only 18) but oddly I never really watched Power rangers as a kid (my parents were insanly protective and deemed it too violent) I just started watching it when I was babysitting one time and came up with the idea (largly stemming from the fact that the season I watched had the blue one as a girl). It actually occured to me it might just be that element of nostalgia that I tapped into but thanks for the feedback! And I'm sure you've achived something. You've doen a couple of Pee's I think so that's good. Oh and teh yellow one did go on to have a couple of small parts but nothing major. Actually quite tragic. SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 06:02 13 September 2008

Late thanks...

...for some reason I thought I'd already come and thanked you for that piss. I guess I haven't. Anyway, thanks, I think it'll be very useful. /me toddles off to work on it - [07:39 20 September] Sir FSt Don Yettie

Action required

For the glory of her majesty is this week's Colonization. Your Uncyclopedia needs you!! You asked for it and now For the glory of her majesty is to be transformed by our band of rewriting brothers. It is your duty as an Uncyclopedian to join the invading army, go forth and spread the funny word. Good luck, my friend.

-- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  11:23, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

A FESTIVUS FOR THE RESTOFUS!

	Happy Festivus, from The Led Balloon and Jerry Stiller. Put up your Festivus Pole, air your grievances, and prepare for the feats of strength, for festivus cannot continue until I am pinned! Oh, and merry Christmas if you're into that sort of thing.
	It's a Festivus miracle!

- P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 20:32, Dec 21

Happy Holidays from all of us at SysRq Waste Disposal and Grinder Co.

Happy Giftmas. ~Sissie

sirsysrq @ 23:45 Dec 21

Here's Your Christmas Tree

Merry Christmas 2008 From Sawblade5

Here's a Potato Christmas Tree For You!
Caution the Grue protecting this tree!

---

----Pleb- Sawblade5 ^{( yell | FAQ | I did this )} 08:55, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, guys. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 20:13, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Hey, I know that name!

Syndrome! Where you been man? Good t'see you about. Stopping long? --UU - natter 20:38, Jan 8

Thanks for the welcome, W. I was in the hospital for parts of the last three months of 2008, so I didn't have the energy to contribute then. (Plus, I was a little put off by the whole .wikia thing, which I read up on.) And then when I got out, I was really behind on work so I had to (and still have to) try hard to catch up. But now I'm back in the routine of being on Uncyclopedia when I should be doing something more productive, I guess. I'm still not feeling very creative but at least I cleared out Category:Uncyclopedians looking for help (untouched since November -- for shame!). Anyway, I'm hoping to stick around, and maybe something good will come of it. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 20:51, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Untouched since November? And there's me thinking I helped a couple of users last week ;-) Sorry to hear you were in hospital dude, glad to see you back and stuff, hope you return to full power soon! --UU - natter 20:57, Jan 8

I'm not saying new users never get helped, it's just that no one ever checks to see who's using Template:Help. Anyway, I'm fine now, I just get out of breath easily until I heal completely. This shouldn't be a problem on Uncyclopedia, except when I get all hot and bothered from reading a good article. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 06:49, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Depleted Kitten Review

This was good in letting me know that the article needs a lot of work, but you're not really telling me how to improve it. I don't really think kitten huffing is particularly funny, so I can't really do anything except make up crap about it and hope I'm funny. I don't even LIKE the article! It's stupid. I just want it to exist, so that maybe someday someone will make it better. Besides, if I hadn't made it, there would have been a red link in the top paragraph of kitten huffing. Ryuinfinity 21:27, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

I'm sorry you didn't find my review helpful, but if your goal is to keep this article from being deleted, then mission accomplished. It's well-written enough to stay off VFD, and people usually vote keep on in-jokes, I don't think there's any danger. But even if it did get deleted, y'know, red links are really easy to fix. Just remove the link. If you've gotten what you wanted, I really think you should take my and Mnb'z's advice and move on to something better.

If you really insist on working on this, though, it's going to be hard. According to HTBFANJS (which you've read), anything can be cast in a funny light, but the problem is you aren't writing about anything, you're basically making this topic up as you go along. I can't really tell you how to make it funny because (a)the creativity has to come from you, and (b)I don't really think I could improve this. I mentioned that there are no jokes, so try going through it and consciously inserting some of the techniques listed in HTBFANJS#Some_basic_techniques_of_humor_writing. This will help make it seem like less of a "rambling fictional article that lacks humor", as Mnbvcxz put it. So good luck with it, but seriously, move on if you're satisfied. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 23:37, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Hidden Page :)

You found my hidden page!

You get this award!

		The Hidden Page Barnstar
		I award you the ultimate Hidden Page Barnstar for finding Zheliel's Amazing Hidden Page. Which you found. Amazing. » Zheliel Talk Contribs Cow »

Hope you like this.

I am a moron and I need help with my shitty article on Jonas brothers.

I'm not mad, upset, pissed, angry, or any combination of the four. If my attempt at an article with the Jonas Brothers is not funny enough- go ahead and huff it. I don't care about it and it's not going to improve. It'll only get longer and it's probably doomed anyways. I mean, like eight people tried to write it and were huffed.

You said it should be more truthful and less random- and random was one thing I was trying not to overuse. I failed. I'm a failure in both article writing and in conversation.

Although, I'll still consider myself significantly better than everybody else that tried. Why? Because it's true.

I TRIED to make it funny, but I guess it wasn't up to standard. Or was the work thingy put there because I forgot to put a WIP thing on it? I'm sorry I'm so stupid- I'm new to this site. I got kinda cocky when my Toucan Sam article stayed up- but who knows how long that page has?

Anyways, if there was a specific reason, it'd be great to know, or you can just go ahead and huff it because not much is going to change regardless of whether or not you decide to tell me what was wrong.

HOWEVER. If it's just not long enough please don't huff it yet. I'm a busy man, busy things to do. I'll get around to finishing it. As long as it's satisfactory funnywise, don't huff it yet!!

Or do I have to wait a week regardless? 'Cause it's not going to get any funnier and if it's not funny go ahead and huff it or do you have to wait a week to confirm I really don't care?

Oh I dunno. I don't know anything anymore.

First, let me apologize for tagging your article for ICU so early. It was only a few minutes old, and I should have waited until you were finished working on it. (But yeah, a {{WIP}} tag would have helped me see that you weren't finished.)

Now, I like your energy, but I think you need to chill and focus that energy on your article. The main thing that needs fixing is how it jumps around. None of the sections have anything to do with each other. I'd recommend that you start the article by giving a solid description of what they are, and then make sure that the other sections are related to that description. "Formed in the 17th century"? What does that have to do with anything? That's just random. Just make a good faith effort to improve this, and then you can remove the ICU tag yourself if you think it's ready. Or wait a week and then an admin will decide what to do with it, and the fate of your article will depend on how nice the admin is. Really, just try to improve it, and you can't go wrong from there. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 05:13, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll do some work on it when I have the time and let the administrators decide if it's good or not. Thanks for the help.

Oh, one more thing: pages are checked a week after you stop editing them, not a week after they're tagged. So you have all the time you want to improve your article, as long as you keep at it. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 19:30, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

HOLY CRAP!

It's 4th Annual Block Syndrome for a Petty Reason Day! GO GO GO!!! --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 23:33, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

How I wish I were an admin right now... --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 23:35, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

"Permission error"? What the fuck is going on? Why can't I ban this guy? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:39, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

...And now it's April 10th server time. Oh well. There's always next year. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 01:24, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

It's every other year banning. Sorry. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:01, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

You're right, of course. Sorry for getting ahead of myself. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 01:44, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

n

WHAT THE HELL DO YOU THINK YOU'RE DOING!?!? Do you realize that by supporting HowTo:Get Over Jenny, you are supporting insane, demented, homicidal stalkers everywhere? You should be ashamed. --CheddarBBQ