User:MrN9000/TalkArchives8
 | This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at User_talk:MrN9000. |
Thanks
Thanks for clearing things up between me and that other guy. I don't even know who he is, but apparently he knows who I am. Ill try to be less random and stupid in my posts! I'm still getting the hang of this site so sorry if my posts/edits arnt yet up to par. Ill work on getting them there ASAP. Well I hope you have a good day man talk to you later! Thanks again! --Trouble Miker 22:16, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
- Hea, It's basically a good article. Don't be too hard on yourself! Have you read that HTBFANJS thing yet? It's handy for getting ideas and stuff... MrN
22:19, Jul 27
One or two questions... Maybe 3 or 4.... possibly 5... oh never-mind
- Will you pee on my article?
- Is it VFH quality yet?
- Are you proud of me?
- How much wood could a wood chuck chuck if a wood chuck could chuck wood?
- Am I annoying yet or do I have to be redundant?
- Am I annoying yet or do I have to be redundant?
- Who is your favorite super-hero?
- is this too many questions?
- Maybe it too little questions?
- Or just the right amount?
--Auk 02:29, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- HeHe. I'm actually just going to bed now... I will answer all these and any more questions you have tomorrow. For now... Consider starting a new article. ;-) MrN 02:31, Jul 15
Well hopefully I answered most of your questions in the Pee Review. Regarding the wood chucking. I think it's very unlikely that a wood chuck would chuck wood, even if he was in a wooded area of a wood. I would not like to comment any further. My favourite super hero will be you if you manage to get this article featured, but as I said... Don't be to disappointed if you don't VFH is a funny thing... Also, while you are thinking of new ideas for the above article, I seriously recommend that you consider starting something new. It's easy to get "stuck" on one article, and having two different articles on the go at the same time can really help the creative process sometimes... Any more questions... Let me know. MrN 
17:24, Jul 15
query
salutations, N. i was wondering if my latest pee review would qualify me to become unretired, committee-wise?-- 20:38, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- Hea... Well, I'm not sure if I'm really the person to ask about this, but so far as I'm concerned if you are active in Pee Review again, and intend to start reviewing again, you are more than welcome. I'm not sure about your 9.5 for concept though on that last one though! I will re-add you to the list of active reviewers... MrN 21:19, Jul 16
- thanks! as far as the 9.5, i like to see the rare mainspace article about a mundane subject with encyclopedic tones that is done well (a la bears) so i get overly excited when one pops up. -- 21:41, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
O RLY?
[1] Okay, that's funny. I'll leave it for a bit. -OptyC Sucks! 
CUN00:33, 17 Jul
DIANETICS PREVAILS!
YOU CAN UNDO MY EDITS ALL YOU WANT, BUT YOU WILL NOT STOP DIANETICS NOW OR EVER! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Damn you're sexy...
RAPE!!! Had to be done. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 22:29, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
- You have no idea whatsoever about raping virgins. There are no virgins here. At least not for very long anyway. MrN 22:33, Jul 17
Will u pee for me?
Hey SenorN, I was wondering if wou would piss on my user:Bobofosho2/Ventura, CA article.-Bobofosho2 02:49, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
- Hea, normally I'm happy to review on request Bobofosho2. As it appears that you have made this request on several other talk pages I think I might leave it for a while though. I don't really want to be reviewing something if you have already asked other people to do it. As friendly advice for the future... It's best to just ask one person to review something for you. If no one gets around to taking another look at this for you in a couple of days, I will be happy to do it then. Cheers. MrN 23:52, Jul 18
i ain't mad at 'cha (by 2Pac)
Thanks for the pic on my trite article. I don't know if you did it to make up for putting it on VFD before, but just so you know, I didn't give two shits when you did, and probably wouldn't have cared even if it did get deleted. The only reason I fought to keep it before was because at the time I only had like 5-6 articles to my name... Anyway, that's all I wanted to say. That and "nice sig" (per boobz). --So So 05:06, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
- Hea dude...
- "Despite having been resuscitated in a
trauma center and surviving a multitude of surgeries (as well the removal of a failed right lung), Shakur had gotten through the critical phase of the medical therapyNRV and had a 50% chance of pulling through.[40]GobiSo So left the medical center after being informed thatShakurtrite made a 13% recovery on the sixth night.[43] While inCritical Care Uniton the afternoon of September 13, 1996,Shakurtritedied of internal bleeding; doctors attempted to revive him but could not impede his hemorrhaging.[44][39]</s< His mother,AfeniSo So, made the decision to tell the doctors to stop. He was pronounceddead at 4:03 p.m. (PDT)[39]KEEP! at 01:15, 17 March 2008. The official cause ofdeath was respiratory failure and cardiopulmonary arrest in connection with multiple gunshot woundsKEEP! was "it's trite stupid". [39]Shakur'strites body was cremated.[45] Some of his ashes were later mixed with marijuana and smoked by members of Outlawz..."
- "Despite having been resuscitated in a
- WoW! Wait a second. They smoked his ashes??? Shit that's cool...
- Na dude, never even really remembered that it was me who nominated it for VFD. I have been trying to clean up short pages for a while now... My first pass was to run through the 1000 shortest we have nominating that which I did not get. Trite got caught up in the crossfire and ended up on VFD. No that I have done my first pass, my going back adding pics to all of them, and adding anything I think is not worth the effort of doing so to VFD. I started at 1000 and I'm working down. Again, trite, just happened to be there. Was tricky to think of a pic for it though! ... Never held a grudge on a wiki dude... Well, I have one, but that's a different story... MrN 09:31, Jul 19
- Na dude, never even really remembered that it was me who nominated it for VFD. I have been trying to clean up short pages for a while now... My first pass was to run through the 1000 shortest we have nominating that which I did not get. Trite got caught up in the crossfire and ended up on VFD. No that I have done my first pass, my going back adding pics to all of them, and adding anything I think is not worth the effort of doing so to VFD. I started at 1000 and I'm working down. Again, trite, just happened to be there. Was tricky to think of a pic for it though! ... Never held a grudge on a wiki dude... Well, I have one, but that's a different story... MrN
- Excellent. I had completely forgotten just how compelling the "Trite on VFD" saga was. By the way, did you know that during his life 2Pac actually predicted the death of George Carlin, Enron, this site, and possibly himself? It's all in the lyrics if you study them carefully. As for me, when I die I want my ashes to be made into cake mix. I'm gonna make it one hell of a birthday party for some lucky snotbags. --So So 12:21, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
- Pac's best song was "Only God Can Judge Me" in my opinion. Just throwing that out... I love Tupac, in a non-homosexual way of course... Sure, let's go with that. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 12:27, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
- One vote from me for "So Many Tears". --So So 13:13, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
- I guess it could now be said that Trite has become notorious. Mr Smalls would approve... MrN 15:07, Jul 19
- Yeah, but if Biggie approves, you know Tupac fucking hates it. So...wait, Tupac used to like it, but now doesn't because Biggie does. Yeah, I think that's generally it. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 15:16, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
- I guess it could now be said that Trite has become notorious. Mr Smalls would approve... MrN
- One vote from me for "So Many Tears". --So So 13:13, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
UnSignpost: July 17th, 2008
The Newspaper Not Secretly Controlled By Mordillo, We Swear!
July 17th, 2008 • Eleventh Issue • This issue isn't late, your calendar is fast.
|
It's The Poo Lit. Surprised?
Uncyclopedia's twice annual writing competition, the Poo Lit Surprise starts this week. In typical Uncyclopedia style, it seems to have come as a surprise to many, not least EMC, who was supposed to be running it, but who has disappeared without trace. Horrified by what was happening to their beloved and prestigious competition, the Uncyclopedia community rushed into action as soon as it noticed (a day or so late), and promptly agreed someone needed to do something. This was followed by some of the community running around in small circles, flapping their hands wildly and panicking a bit, before cuddly authority figure Zombiebaron decisively stepped in and selflessly told Dr. Skullthumper to sort it out and get the fuck on with it. At the time of going to press, both Skullthumper and Zombiebaron may have been available for comment for all we know, but we couldn't be bothered to ask them. VFS: The Race Hots Up For The Second Month Running
In an unprecedented turn of events, and due to namby-pamby unclear rules that have since been firmed up and given a healthy gay colour makeover, Uncyclopedia is voting for further candidates to be admitted to the non-existent cabal. The race is turning out to be quite a close one between several of the frontrunners, so the ever-impartial UnSignpost (founded by Cajek and Dr. Skullthumper) brings you pen pics of the current favourites.
Who will win? All may be reported in future editions of the UnSignpost. If we remember. And if we can be bothered. |
| |||||
| UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox | ||||||
THEDUDEBOT Armed and Ready Say The Word 06:05, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
ICP?
Could you please re-check my article to make sure it's good? I think I've made substantial improvement.
Toby Mobias 23:35, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
- Well, I have removed the ICU for ya. Thanks for getting back to me about this. It's cool that you did. I recommend that you read BGBU there is some stuff in there which you really need to know... HTBFANJS is also really important. If you have not read that yet, make sure you do!
- Well your article is still kinda random, and I'm not sure that all the bad language is helping things much either. I would suggest that you try and tone down the language, and defiantly get rid of any references to the Uncyc "popular jokes"... Especially the Your Mum stuff. We are all sick of that! I'm actually kinda struggling to see the humour in the article other than it being a bit odd, but I think we have far worse, so I'm happy to take the ICU off for ya. Just because I have though, don't stop working on this... I recommend that you look at some of our other articles on Jesus (we have loads) and try to think of something to make yours stand out from the rest. Whatever you do... PLEASE! Don't write another article on Jesus. God knows we have enough of them... It's great that you have gotten yourself an account. Welcome to Uncyc! MrN 18:29, Jul 21
Just something I noticed.
I just noticed this. I'm definitely not trying to start up any old shit, but I found this fairly interesting. So, while I was editing the requested articles section(which, by the way, I've just finished up with my first go-through, got rid of a lot of crap, but there is still much to be done to clean that place up.) I noticed that AE had said he would write Why?:Did the Chicken Cross the Road, but I'm guessing he never got to it before he left. Anyway, that article was later written by Qua, who was the same guy who ran off AE in the first place. Is there any chance that Qua chose that article strictly by coincidence? I would kind of doubt that. And, if you're wondering how I know about all about this crap, I can read. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 18:04, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
- Well, I don't know. I'm not sure it really matters either. The user you describe did appear to wish to try to cause trouble wherever he went, but my comment would be... No comment. In my experience the best thing to do with users who are attempting to provoke a reaction is to simply ignore them. I suggest you do the same. MrN 18:12, Jul 21
- Yes, Its no big deal, just thought it was interesting, that's all. Oh well, I'm off to do some more cleaning around there. I got rid of a lot of garbage in that old place, but there are still cobwebs, and broken glass, and its hard to find stuff. WooHoo! Something for me to do until I come up with a half-decent concept for an article. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 18:16, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
- Cool. I just took a look through UN:REQ actually. Looks like you have already done a lot to improve the page to me... Nice job. Like I said before, it's awesome that someone who knows what they are doing is taking care of this... I think you could probably actually hack it back a bit more if you wanted to. Looks like there are still some random titles in there which I don't think anyone will ever write, but I think what you have done is awesome. I'm also really looking forward to seeing your next article, I really enjoyed the last one you did. Nice narration too... :-) MrN 18:35, Jul 21
- Yeah, I wouldn't say I'm going through writer's block right now, its just coming up with a good idea for an article. Once I get one, I'll write just fine. However, looking through the request page actually gave me a few that I will probably try and do. I've only gotten rid of 100,000 kilobytes of information there, so yeah, I think some hacking has been done. I think I'll go through and see if I can redirect some of the pages next and re-categorize some of it, then go through with more hacking. After that, honestly, I think some thought should be put in to cleaning the place up by more than just deleting. I dunno, just some thoughts running through my head. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 18:41, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
- Cool... If you do any redirects, the good ones to redirect are those which someone is likely to type into the search box, and those which have a lot of links when you look at the "what links here" (from the menu on the left). You would need to get the edit page up, and hit the "what links here" button. If there are few links maybe don't bother... You knew that though I'm sure... Yea... GET WRITING! MrN 18:45, Jul 21
- Cool... If you do any redirects, the good ones to redirect are those which someone is likely to type into the search box, and those which have a lot of links when you look at the "what links here" (from the menu on the left). You would need to get the edit page up, and hit the "what links here" button. If there are few links maybe don't bother... You knew that though I'm sure... Yea... GET WRITING! MrN
- Yeah, I wouldn't say I'm going through writer's block right now, its just coming up with a good idea for an article. Once I get one, I'll write just fine. However, looking through the request page actually gave me a few that I will probably try and do. I've only gotten rid of 100,000 kilobytes of information there, so yeah, I think some hacking has been done. I think I'll go through and see if I can redirect some of the pages next and re-categorize some of it, then go through with more hacking. After that, honestly, I think some thought should be put in to cleaning the place up by more than just deleting. I dunno, just some thoughts running through my head. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 18:41, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
- Cool. I just took a look through UN:REQ actually. Looks like you have already done a lot to improve the page to me... Nice job. Like I said before, it's awesome that someone who knows what they are doing is taking care of this... I think you could probably actually hack it back a bit more if you wanted to. Looks like there are still some random titles in there which I don't think anyone will ever write, but I think what you have done is awesome. I'm also really looking forward to seeing your next article, I really enjoyed the last one you did. Nice narration too... :-) MrN
- Yes, Its no big deal, just thought it was interesting, that's all. Oh well, I'm off to do some more cleaning around there. I got rid of a lot of garbage in that old place, but there are still cobwebs, and broken glass, and its hard to find stuff. WooHoo! Something for me to do until I come up with a half-decent concept for an article. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 18:16, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
PRESS
hello there N. just a hungry USP junior reporter looking for an interviewee. in that vein...do you have any comment on 1) the count to a million project and its absurd pointlessness / innovative insight, and 2) the most recent return of Gerrycheevers and his chances for still being around come august? -- 19:31, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
- Good day. Regarding count to a million, that forum is most surely not pants. In fact, I think I wrote a Pointless Paradox about a similar thing... The forum is a great place for people to be creative and I personally hope it runs forever. It did need archiving though, and I think the archive pages should be protected. Regarding MrGerrycheevers, I predict a string of glorious USP contributions interspersed with some quality Pee Reviews. Although I suspect MrGerrycheevers may wander in and out of Uncyc from time to time, I think he will be around for a long time to come, and am willing to bet everything Cajek owns to that effect. On that note, feel free to call me MrN. Only Cajek Chucks that one at me, and he has yet to figure out the true story... MrN 19:48, Jul 21
wow you are a pain in the ass
and i dont find you funny. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Chullage (talk • contribs)
- WoW, thanks for the complement. It's awesome when people show their appreciation for my work, normally people do not understand my humour, and it's great that you did!
- I assume that you are talking about the ICU I added. Well...
- That's fair enough then... Basically, we have a system whereby if a user (such as myself) notices an article which could potentially be deleted we put one of those templates onto it so that it will not be for 7 days. That's 7 days from the last time you edit it. You can read about it here. As I said on the ICU, it's not an insult, but an indication that you just need to work on it some more. This is a humour wiki, and I thought that your article was likely to be deleted, so I put the ICU on it to give you a chance to improve it. I will re-add the ICU to the article, and you can rest assured that if you remove the ICU again it will be deleted as a result. Rather than going around talking crap on talk pages, why not improve your article. Have fun... MrN 19:59, Jul 21
you have no sence of humor what so ever
you arent a fan of the game? dont know the story? To bad. It seems you also like to put a "work more" title on every article you go to, not just mine. And your page sucks. Hey why not to give it a time for improve it? And them if its not enought it will be deleted :) Now leave me and the rest of the people alone
Its a crazy dictatorship around here isn't it?
- Yes. --
Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:26, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
- Cheers RDB! Um... Why is this a dictatorship? Have you actually bothered to read our beginners guide or any of the links which were put on your talk page when you arrived? We are not a "dictatorship" but we do not keep every article which is created. I'm sure you appreciate that if we did keep everything our readers might not enjoy reading the wiki so much. We have a system which allows you to improve your article. I suggest you use it. Please read BGBU before replying to this post, and... Have fun! MrN 20:28, Jul 21
- Cheers RDB! Um... Why is this a dictatorship? Have you actually bothered to read our beginners guide or any of the links which were put on your talk page when you arrived? We are not a "dictatorship" but we do not keep every article which is created. I'm sure you appreciate that if we did keep everything our readers might not enjoy reading the wiki so much. We have a system which allows you to improve your article. I suggest you use it. Please read BGBU before replying to this post, and... Have fun! MrN
but i read it before! Have you been correcting the article? Mean mine
- You will find people are nicer to you around here if you are nicer to them. If you have read BGBU then you will know about the construction template... Maybe you need to read it again. I also recommend HTBFANJS. It's not an insult (like that ICU is not) and it's well worth a look. Also, it's time you started to sign you posts with ~~~~ so that your name appears on the page. Where you write stuff. Just go improve your article will ya? MrN 20:51, Jul 21
- Except for me. The nicer you are to me, the meaner I am to you: It's a terrible strategy. • <22:58, 21 Jul 2008>
Why arent you nice to Orion?
- Because he's menopausal. Actually we're just carrying on, around here mostly everything needs to be taken less seriously than in reality. And one more thing. It's OriAn There's an A, remember that as there is also a guy called Orion around here, you'll confuse us. Tatty biaz! SK Sir Orian57Talk
RotM 16:02 22 July 2008
ahh ok lol --Chullage 16:16, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
- Wait, this isn't the panty raid party? Fuck... --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 16:19, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
- Why would you want to raid panties? There's nothing of any interest or value in them. Oh you're straight? Gross! SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 16:22 22 July 2008
- So, would a gay guy go on Boxers raids, or Briefs raids? The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 16:36, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
- Haha! MrN goes on pants raids. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 16:37, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
- Well to be perfectly honest I don't have a preference for one kind of underwear over another. No underwear is always better. Esspecially socks! Take off your god damned SOCKS!SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 16:39 22 July 2008
- I love socks. Hmmm....as long as you didn't go with Man-Thong, which I've decided is not a good look for anyone. Not that I look or anything.... Uh, I'm gunna go talk to my girlfriend now. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 16:42, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
- Aww look, Woody has an imaginary friend. SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 16:47 22 July 2008
- ...... I...burn. I just got an Orian Burn. I'm guuna go kill myself now. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 16:53, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
- But... But we used lube! Damn it let's sue instead! SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 16:55 22 July 2008
- GET OF MY BLOODY LAWN! Pesky kids. If I ever catch the one who let my tyres down... MrN 20:39, Jul 22
- It's spelled "tires" you weird english git! -OptyC Sucks!
CUN20:52, 22 Jul
- Stick you head up a dead bears bum. I almost for got for a second there. Dam you aMERICANS... MrN 20:56, Jul 22
- Stick my head up a...well, that sounds more entertaining than watching soccer, I mean, football anyway. -OptyC Sucks! CUN21:02, 22 Jul
- 0_o you Americans... Oh and I never touched your car old man! and If you hit me I'l do you for assault on a minor! =P (playing on our worse than useles justice system there, I is cleverer.) SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 21:29 22 July 2008
- 0_o you Americans... Oh and I never touched your car old man! and If you hit me I'l do you for assault on a minor! =P (playing on our worse than useles justice system there, I is cleverer.) SK Sir Orian57Talk
- Stick my head up a...well, that sounds more entertaining than watching soccer, I mean, football anyway. -OptyC Sucks!
- Stick you head up a dead bears bum. I almost for got for a second there. Dam you aMERICANS... MrN
- It's spelled "tires" you weird english git! -OptyC Sucks!
- GET OF MY BLOODY LAWN! Pesky kids. If I ever catch the one who let my tyres down... MrN
- But... But we used lube! Damn it let's sue instead! SK Sir Orian57Talk
- ...... I...burn. I just got an Orian Burn. I'm guuna go kill myself now. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 16:53, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
- Aww look, Woody has an imaginary friend. SK Sir Orian57Talk
- I love socks. Hmmm....as long as you didn't go with Man-Thong, which I've decided is not a good look for anyone. Not that I look or anything.... Uh, I'm gunna go talk to my girlfriend now. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 16:42, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
- Well to be perfectly honest I don't have a preference for one kind of underwear over another. No underwear is always better. Esspecially socks! Take off your god damned SOCKS!SK Sir Orian57Talk
- Why would you want to raid panties? There's nothing of any interest or value in them. Oh you're straight? Gross! SK Sir Orian57Talk
Thank god you came
The shit was overflowing all over VFD. I was about to take out my gumboots. ~
20:51, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
- Looks like I missed a bit of a party over there with that Slappy's Angels thing.... MrN 20:53, Jul 22
- Indeed, I was about to distribute god's word amongst the heathens. ~
20:55, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
- Guess I have better go vote on it all.... gwax should have sorted it himself really, a word before making the noms would have made a difference to the level of general chaos... But I guess this is what VFD is for... MrN 21:02, Jul 22
- Hey, VFD is the most I can do. He pretty much told me to. Blame him for all drama. Plus, that wasn't even half of it. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:54, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
- Drama? Na, I can't see any. Looks like the whole thing is resolved now... We all understand what is going on, and let's just leave it at that... MrN 21:57, Jul 22
- Well, should I VFD the rest? I think someone else should. The guy now hates me. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 22:00, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
- You mean the stuff which is here? and Template:Slappy's_Angels... Is there other stuff? Right now, I would advice against any more VFD noms. The poor guy has had one hell of a kick in the balls there, and maybe if we give him a bit of time he might improve the ones which are left a bit.
- An option which you could take if you want to... Put a copy of it all into my VFD list (at the bottom) and remove it from yours. I will take care of it... You go onto VFDing the other (less slappy related) stuff... You are dam good at that... Lesson learned here perhaps? If ever we do a whole sale nomination like this on VFD again, I think we should have a word with the user in question beforehand to explain what is going on. Also, we need to be very careful not to be flippant in what we say when making our nominations. I am guilty of this myself I know... It's not really such an issue when we are talking about and IP which has not been seen since 2005, but if it's a current active user, we need to be REALLY careful with our words... MrN 22:15, Jul 22
- Well, should I VFD the rest? I think someone else should. The guy now hates me. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 22:00, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
- Drama? Na, I can't see any. Looks like the whole thing is resolved now... We all understand what is going on, and let's just leave it at that... MrN
- Hey, VFD is the most I can do. He pretty much told me to. Blame him for all drama. Plus, that wasn't even half of it. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:54, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
- Guess I have better go vote on it all.... gwax should have sorted it himself really, a word before making the noms would have made a difference to the level of general chaos... But I guess this is what VFD is for... MrN
- Indeed, I was about to distribute god's word amongst the heathens. ~
Corvette
Howdy! Would you be down to pee review my Corvette article?
Thanks for the review!
Dood, you are awesome, very insightful review.
A couple things, on the suggestion of not using the word cock: the point of that, was that all of those "big cock" references are taken from the fact that the said motors were called "big block" engines. I thought that was kind of a funny play on it. What do you think? Also, the line about about the unorthodox use of the corvette, was a reference to the rear-insertion (like now it's used for anal, which is "unorthodox"), any suggestions on how that could be made more obvious? I thought it was because I was talking about the 'all holes' model.
And on the dildo thing, I always thought of the Corvette as a prosthetic penis (as mentioned in the outline) and, since a strap-on dildo, IS a prosthetic penis, I thought it was perfect. Let me know what you think.
I will start playing more with prose and formatting.
Again, thanks for your review, it was great.
ShuaDaddy 9:24 p.m.
- Hea, no problem... Ahh, I get the big block thing now... Yea, it's a tricky one. I see where you are cuming from, and I'm not too sure what to recommend. I think perhaps the big block thing might be missed by many readers. I guess it depends if you want this article to appeal a lot to the people who really know the cars or if you want this to do as well as possible should it be nominated for VFH... Unfortunately the two usually are not the same thing. What would be very funny to people who know a subject very well, might not prove that popular with the masses in general. Maybe if you linked cock to Cock block it might get the joke over, but still a lot of people might miss it. You get where I'm cumming from I guess... On that subject... You could make the whole thing a bit more double entendre. I'm British though, so I would say that! I do think it would work a bit better if you played on the actual penis enlargement thing rather than the dildo thing so much... Like I said, I think it might actually be more funny if you do it from a point of view that the car does actually make your penis bigger. To me, that's a more subtle way of taking the piss, but I think it would be picked up on by most readers. The fact that you have to explain the jokes is your biggest issue I guess... Edit it a bit, and let me know... I will take another look at it when you have. :-) MrN 23:10, Jul 23
UnSignpost: July 24th, 2008
In Pure Russian Fashion, The Newspaper That Reads YOU!!
July 24th, 2008 • Twelfth Issue • Now On Time?
|
Count to a million This week Uncyclopedians continued on their quixotic attempt to "count to a million." Started by Uncyclopedia Wiki-master and Chamber of Commerce Secretary Spang in early March of this year, the project seeks to eventually reach the number one million (1,000,000) through the ancient art of counting. Any person who is capable of taking a number, adding one to it, and expressing the result has been invited to join the massive undertaking, which has seen dozens of contributors come and go. As is always the case here at Uncyc, the project has spawned controversy, criticism, and a spin-off starring Tony Shalhoub as Olipro. The forum is an unprecedented pool of knowledge. As each number is reached, it is discussed in-depth by several Uncyclopedians. Insights such as "114 That's my age + 100 lololol" and "616 fucks fucking fucker's shitty crap" are a testament to the intellecually stimulating conversation that occurs each day. Oftentimes, relevant images are posted; the variety of these pictures can be seen by looking here, here, here, and here. However, not everyone is so optimistic about the project. Some have expressed concern that the entire thing has some kind of sinister purpose. When asked for a comment on the harmless-appearing but diabolically-undertoned project, TheLedBalloon said, "although the project appears harmless, there are definitely diabolical undertones." Another anonymous user stated, "that forum is most surely not pants." Spang himself has expressed his desire to leave behind a legacy, but he has also left open the possibility that "the entire thing is just an urban myth, and doesn't really exist." Regardless of its true meaning or intentions, Uncyclopedians continue to trudge on in their epic quest, reaching 0.075% of their goal this Monday. Editors come and go, the pace quickens and slackens, but someone is always there to figure out the next number in the sequence. At its current rate, the project will reach one million on August 19th, 2526. Until that glorious day, Uncyclopedians can only dream... Cheevers Fires Back! After some light-hearted slights in last week's issue, Gerry Cheevers - Uncyclopedia's resident headcase and #2 hockey authority - has taken exception with the editors of this fine periodical. An ugly scene erupted in the USP press room after Gerry barged in, demanding some sort of justice. Luckily, some quick thinking by our tea-boy and current stand-in editor caused Mr. Cheevers to be distracted by a shiny object long enough to avoid any damage to our delicate newspapering equipment. After it was pointed out that he had in fact come and gone from Uncyclopedia like some sort of cow that grazes on witty satire and coherent parody, Gerry calmed down enough give a brief interview and let some of our junior reporters scratch him behind the ears. When asked about the reasons for his return, Gerry cited many things. Prominent among them were a desire to have humor play a larger role in his life once again, the thrill of writing articles, the subsequent crushing defeat after said articles have been hacked to pieces mercilessly, and his heterosexual man-crush on Mhaille. The one-time WotM nominee fell on hard times in mid-March, and went on sabbatical when his computer decided that it was not long for this world and took its own life. After that, Gerry resorted to breaking into libraries after-hours to cast VFH votes on city-owned, porn-riddled, abysmally slow dial-up computers. Luckily he landed a job in late May and has spent a majority of his time at said job slacking off and editing Uncyclopedia. Mr. Cheevers looks forward to getting back to what he is known for: mediocre writing, scathing Pee Reviews, and keeping Manforman locked up in the Uncyc dungeons. Several prominent Uncyclopedians share his optimism for a permanent return, including noted reviewing robot MrN9000, who stated that he was "willing to bet everything Cajek owns to that effect," and heavy zeppelin Don Leddy, who expressed his delight at seeing Gerry, exclaiming "gimme back my twenty dollars!" |
| ||||||||
| UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox | |||||||||
THEDUDEBOT Armed and Ready Say The Word 16:43, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
WAS IT TOO REAL FOR YOU?!?!?
Go and make this page and we'll call it even. XD I'M A CRAZY KOOK!!! • <19:36, 24 Jul 2008>
- Pants. MrN 19:37, Jul 24
- Look I said NO!! No sex MrN. None! SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 19:40 24 July 2008
- Look I said NO!! No sex MrN. None! SK Sir Orian57Talk
Okay, MrN likes saying "pants" right? Well, let's write Sisterhood of the Travelling Pants, but make it totally unacceptable. • <21:32, 24 Jul 2008>
- Also, since I'm on a Silence of the Lambs binge right now, we could just write Silence of the Lambs and make it, like, for little kids. Like a morality story or something with cute little aMiNaLs. (it's just a redirect right now) • <21:40, 24 Jul 2008>
- If that is your decision. Then awesome... You really on a death thing right now eh? Hmm... Anyway... Hopkins is from Wales, a place famous for their sheep. He actually bought most of Wales' highest mountain, Snowdon, for a few million I think, and then just gave it to the National trust (a charity which manages and conserves heritage) What a dude. Anyway... What's the concept? For kids??? You're suggesting we write in a childrens book style? Kinda with simple words and fluffy language? Morality story? Maybe Hopkins has blackmailed the sheep not to reveal some dark secret they are keeping? /me spitballs... :-) MrN 22:14, Jul 24
- If that is your decision. Then awesome... You really on a death thing right now eh? Hmm... Anyway... Hopkins is from Wales, a place famous for their sheep. He actually bought most of Wales' highest mountain, Snowdon, for a few million I think, and then just gave it to the National trust (a charity which manages and conserves heritage) What a dude. Anyway... What's the concept? For kids??? You're suggesting we write in a childrens book style? Kinda with simple words and fluffy language? Morality story? Maybe Hopkins has blackmailed the sheep not to reveal some dark secret they are keeping? /me spitballs... :-) MrN
User:MrN9000/Silence of the Lambs... MrN 22:35, Jul 24
- Death thing right now? No, noooo, me? I'm not a murderer!!!! I'M NOT!! I do study criminology though... and I'm really weird... am I... AM I THE KILLER??? • <2:52, 25 Jul 2008>
- Is there anything you don't study? Also, what would Sisterhood of the Travelling Pants be about? MrN 02:57, Jul 25
- I've only ever studied criminology, so... yes, there ARE things I don't study. Anyway, the other idea was crap too so back to the drawing board. And go to sleep already, it's 8 in the evening! • <3:14, 25 Jul 2008>
- Is there anything you don't study? Also, what would Sisterhood of the Travelling Pants be about? MrN
- Death thing right now? No, noooo, me? I'm not a murderer!!!! I'M NOT!! I do study criminology though... and I'm really weird... am I... AM I THE KILLER??? • <2:52, 25 Jul 2008>
IP's respect my reverting powers....
What then? He isn't vandalising it any more! I command IP's!! Mwhahahahah! --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 22:33, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
- It's a lot less effort now eh? We just got to be careful when using it... MrN 22:35, Jul 24
- Point is he was ignoring your reverting of his blanking, while he respected mine. /goes back to Yahoo!Answers. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 22:37, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Cheers MRN9000 (Tilt)
Nice to feel welcomed to Uncyclopedia, better than that lot on Wiki to be flat.
All good with you? Im just shouting at the TV the rest of the family are watching somethin about slappers having a makeover and im just shouting in a way that Jeremy Clarkson would be proud --Tilt 18:46, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
- Hea, no problem. Hope you enjoy your stay in our mad world... Me? I'm off to get some dinner. Have fun, catch you later maybe. Oh, do take a look at some of those links, maybe even make a few votes over at VFH... That place is really good to get to know. Have fun. MrN 18:50, Jul 26
- Hey Tilt, sounds like your having fun. And to be clear, I was seconds away from welcoming you but this guy edit conflicted me! And er did you mean Jeremy Kyle? It's just his apoplexy seems to know no bounds, Clarkson just has road rage (which in comparison looks more like "road Slightly-miffed-a-bit"), Anway like MrN said, read some links and vote on stuff and you'll be fit right into this (mental) institution in no time! SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 19:18 26 July 2008
Ive actually been on here for quite a while, i first came across it on google, but decided to make an account at last. Do have a Wikipedia account too, but Wikipedia far too boring --Tilt 20:17, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
Is this better? And for your message, feel free to edit my page to add to the debate, like you did, im cool with it, quite liked it. Who said my edits were constructive?--Tilt 20:23, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
Yes I do. If i get a picture of Jimbo Wales and put it on my dartboard, do i get to be an admin? Bit of trivia, how many kittens does david cameron huff a day?--Tilt 20:28, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
Put a picture of Jimbo to worship of course....not to play darts, ill use harry redknapp for that --Tilt 20:34, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the vote
for n00b of the month! Much obliged, --mrmonkey72 16:34, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
So sad you have nothing better to do than to put this negative bullshit on the internet. Rape is not a joke. I hope someone shows you just how not funny it is. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Roscoeisevil (talk • contribs)
- My page blanking friend... It's a simple matter. If you want the page deleted, you go to a place called VFD. You nominate the page for deletion, and the community votes in a democratic process to decide if it is kept or deleted. If you care enough about this, go and do it. Otherwise please stop vandalising articles. As you are a new user you will have to wait 4 days until you are able to edit that page. This is a democracy (kinda) and we do what is wanted by the majority. We also think that often the best way to deal with an issue is to make light of it. I'm sorry that you don't see the humour in that article. MrN 21:39, Jul 27
Dood.
I love you. sir
sysrq @ 21:29 Jul 27
- What have I done this time? MrN 21:39, Jul 27
- I love poo. sir
sysrq @ 02:21 Jul 28
- I find it rather inconvienient actually but to each their own. SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 02:22 28 July 2008
- I'm saying nothing. I'm going to bed now though, but I will be putting the bolt across the door. OriAn is on form tonight... MrN 02:25, Jul 28
- I'm saying nothing. I'm going to bed now though, but I will be putting the bolt across the door. OriAn is on form tonight... MrN
- I find it rather inconvienient actually but to each their own. SK Sir Orian57Talk
A SK Sir Orian57Talk 
RotM 02:39 28 July 2008
- C! SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 02:51 28 July 2008
- L! Wait, did I do something wrong? --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 05:33, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
query
MrN, not sure about the best way to approach this, but i suspect that Eternal Life may be a sockpuppet of Brown trousers. my evidence is their contributions, which seem to never interfere with each other and abruptly change users. is there a way to check this, i.e., an admin that can look at the user's IPs? i ask you because you know the situation and i don't want the vote to get skewed. or maybe i'm just being pointless? 01:05, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- Hea dude, maybe... It's hard to tell. Their contributions do look "a bit fishy" but they may be genuine. I would give them some leeway as I suspect that they are both users from the site in question, and so it's possible that they are in contact with each other outside of Uncyc. We do have a process which allows staff users to check to see if both users share the same IP addresses. It's called "Check User". Normal admins don't have this option. It's only Sannse who is our staff user. Normally, only admins request a checkuser from Sannse. I am rather sure that their article will be deleted, mostly cos it's not really that funny. In this instance, I don't think it's really worth the bother of asking Sannse... If a load more "fishy" looking users start turning up and start voting keep, then that would be a different story... Good spot on this one though... :-) MrN 01:33, Jul 28
No worries!
Nah, I knew you were joking, but I had to legitimately change my vote anyway after I saw that the ICU tag had been removed by the author in question.
Don't worry, I rarely take things seriously. Cheers, --mrmonkey72 02:16, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- Awesome. You will do very well here then... Oh, you are already! MrN 02:18, Jul 28
- And I get no thanks for spotting the removal of the ICU tag? Fuck all of you then. /kidding. But seriously, fuck all y'all. God I love that song. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 02:27, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- Course I spotted it. I was just trying to avoid the whole "due process" thing. Did not want us to look like we had rules coming out of our asses. The ICU was incorrectly added though. No fix= or sub= sections, so I would give them the benefit of the doubt for that. They don't know our procedures... /me pats Dexter on the back Twas better that you pointed it out Dex, I had already been running around telling them on all kinds of crap on their talk pages. Cheers dude. I wish I had not bothered to fix the article now... I hate it when more effort goes into a VFD nom than went into the article. All to often that happens... MrN 02:33, Jul 28
- You do realize that's my ass you're patting? I'm calling the police now. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 02:42, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- Course I spotted it. I was just trying to avoid the whole "due process" thing. Did not want us to look like we had rules coming out of our asses. The ICU was incorrectly added though. No fix= or sub= sections, so I would give them the benefit of the doubt for that. They don't know our procedures... /me pats Dexter on the back Twas better that you pointed it out Dex, I had already been running around telling them on all kinds of crap on their talk pages. Cheers dude. I wish I had not bothered to fix the article now... I hate it when more effort goes into a VFD nom than went into the article. All to often that happens... MrN
- And I get no thanks for spotting the removal of the ICU tag? Fuck all of you then. /kidding. But seriously, fuck all y'all. God I love that song. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 02:27, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Tony and Ludo thank you!
|
Splendid, what! UU would like to express his gratitude for you vote on UnMysteries:A Tissue Of Lies. Therefore, please accept a free gift of Sir John Obvious-Suspect's latest innovation - Sudoku toilet paper, for those mornings when you know you're gonna be in there ages! |
I honestly thought that any of my own stuff I loved that much would never make it, so thanks for proving something-or-other to me. --UU - natter 
08:50, Jul 28
- As usual you underestimate yourself... To answer your other question... For me, the site is running as slowing like a dog with no legs, stuck in treacle, when he is sat next to a particularly tasty bone. Oh, he's asleep also... Sometimes a page loads in 10 seconds, sometimes 30. I have found that stopping the page load and re-starting it makes a difference sometimes. MrN 09:01, Jul 28
- For me, it's moving as fast as Monty Python's parrot. I find going to make a cup of tea... doesn't exactly help, but is far better than watching my computer's painful attempts to make a simple edit. I think it wants to be in the sun. So do I! Also, it's not an underestimation, it's that sometimes stuff I really, really like doesn't play that well with others. See the bit about sitcoms on my talk page, for example. Anyway, hope you had a good weekend feller, and I'll raise my tea mug to a good week ahead... --UU - natter
09:12, Jul 28
- Did ya pop into the VD recently? There are a few PEEING related posts over there. Led has even given UN:PRG a re-write. I'm not sure what to make of it all... A hat maybe. MrN 09:18, Jul 28
- I was busy all weekend, so I didn't pop in. I'm catching up on stuff. Thank people first - manners and that - then catch up with stuff on the dump. I'll get to them by lunchtime. Probably. --UU - natter 09:23, Jul 28
- I really wish I hadn't read it now. I'm fucking livid. "Pee Review Whores". Fuck. I'm logging off and going to kick something for ten minutes to calm down. Fucking fuck.
- Um, I think Lj meant that in the nicest way possible! Are you actually upset? Seriously? I have never seen this before... /me runs off to the forum with a bucket of cold water... MrN 10:00, Jul 28
- Yeah, I was pretty mad. I put a lot of time into pee review because I think it's one of the best ways to help people on the site. So some of those comments seemed like a real kick in the teeth. Still, 5 minutes of kicking a football against a barn wall has calmed me right down (although I hope there were no animals in the barn, they may never be the same again). Oh, and I stopped smoking certain substances years ago, after I found I was flying off the handle more frequently, with little or no provocation. There may be some irony in there, if you look hard enough! --UU - natter 10:49, Jul 28
- Yeah, I was pretty mad. I put a lot of time into pee review because I think it's one of the best ways to help people on the site. So some of those comments seemed like a real kick in the teeth. Still, 5 minutes of kicking a football against a barn wall has calmed me right down (although I hope there were no animals in the barn, they may never be the same again). Oh, and I stopped smoking certain substances years ago, after I found I was flying off the handle more frequently, with little or no provocation. There may be some irony in there, if you look hard enough! --UU - natter
- Um, I think Lj meant that in the nicest way possible! Are you actually upset? Seriously? I have never seen this before... /me runs off to the forum with a bucket of cold water... MrN
- I really wish I hadn't read it now. I'm fucking livid. "Pee Review Whores". Fuck. I'm logging off and going to kick something for ten minutes to calm down. Fucking fuck.
- I was busy all weekend, so I didn't pop in. I'm catching up on stuff. Thank people first - manners and that - then catch up with stuff on the dump. I'll get to them by lunchtime. Probably. --UU - natter
- Did ya pop into the VD recently? There are a few PEEING related posts over there. Led has even given UN:PRG a re-write. I'm not sure what to make of it all... A hat maybe. MrN
- For me, it's moving as fast as Monty Python's parrot. I find going to make a cup of tea... doesn't exactly help, but is far better than watching my computer's painful attempts to make a simple edit. I think it wants to be in the sun. So do I! Also, it's not an underestimation, it's that sometimes stuff I really, really like doesn't play that well with others. See the bit about sitcoms on my talk page, for example. Anyway, hope you had a good weekend feller, and I'll raise my tea mug to a good week ahead... --UU - natter
Thanks
Did you fix the picture? I know you did some grammar, but I couldn't figure out how to put the picture template in right. Thanks if you did! :D
hoa so u deleted my articles
congrats – Preceding unsigned comment added by Chullage (talk • contribs)
but still i like you
heh :D Now, those pants are sexy. I guess orian doesnt like you... will you give him a chance? --Chullage 04:44, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
yes i know but something tells me he will come here and them a fight will start :P
Yes
It's me. What more proof do you require? --UU - natter 14:16, Jul 31
Wheres my Command & Conquer TV article?
I've been busy and away for a long while. When I came back my Command & Conquer TV article is gone? Mind restoring into a User Page and I can improve on it?--ASHPD 16:37, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Hea Dude!
01:59, 25 July 2008 Zombiebaron (Talk | contribs) huffed "Command & Conquer TV" (Your ICU has died.)
Sorry dude, I'm not an admin. I can't delete or restore articles. Zombiebaron deleted it because you were not working on it... Ask him on his talk page (give a link to the article Command & Conquer TV and he might let you have it back into your user page. Hope you are doing well... MrN 16:42, Jul 31
Template:PRIP
Alright, here's what I done did. I made the template run a little parser function to determine if the page has been edited within the past day. If it has, then Template:PRIP/notex is displayed. If it is, however, older than a day (meaning the PRIP was placed over 24 hours ago), then Template:PRIP/expired is displayed. Thoughts?~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN [talk] 20:44, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
- Looks like a good thing to me. Not everyone uses PRIP to "Reserve" their reviews. I think most of the people who tend to reserve reviews have their own custom templates for the purpose. We probably need to get everyone to make similar changes to their custom templates. UU is the man when it comes to Pee Review really. He watches the queue very closely maintaining Cajek's list, so he can probably best check what's going on. It will be possible to check by looking at the last edit times on Uncyclopedia:Pee_Review/Reviewed_Pee...
- I think it should be 2 hours rather than 24. Allowing 24 still suggests that it's acceptable to reserve a review when you are not actually doing it right away. The templates should only be used when you are actually doing it immediately. If we make a limit of 2 hours, I think this should clear up any ambiguity, and stop people using the template in the incorrect way. UN:PRG will need to be changed to reflect this, and a comment should be included on the template explaining how it works, and how it should be used. Don't forget that it's not just PEEING members who do reviews, so this change is something which everyone needs to know about... Basically, I think we need to enforce a "No reserving if you are not reviewing immediately policy"... MrN 23:32, Jul 31
- Yeah, the code is made so that you can make it custom really easy. Just take the code of each PRIP template and customize it. I can certainly change the time limit, but I think it should be at least six hours. You're the boss, though. I'll make it two pending further consensus.~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN [talk] 01:51, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
I just noticed
You are one of the judges for the poo lit surprise right? I noticed that you haven't posted your candidates for the userspace articles. I have one. I don't know how things go around here or how the competition works. so i'm just telling you right now. if i broke any rules, then i'm screwed big time. anyway, i hope you could check it out. if you can't, then don't. i won't mind.
Can I Ask...
For your opinion on this second review by JoeMonco. I think he's being overly mean and I get the feeling a bit personal. I already marked it down as not-indepth (because there was no suggestings for improvement) but I want impartial (and very beautiful) eyes to see if I'm being stupid and taking offene where there is none to be taken. It kinda threw me that he did this without anyone asking aswell. Thanks. SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 17:24 4 August 2008
- Yea, that review is bullshit. No idea what the fuck is going on. The reviewer has either not read UN:PRG or is being malicious. The scores are nonsense. I suggest you ignore it. As it was reviewing your article, I suggest you don't give an opinion as to if it's an in-depth review or not. Leave it to UU, and let him decide. I don't want to give a ruling on if it counts as in-depth or not, as I don't actually update the table so that's UU's bag. Looks like it's going OK on VFH at the moment (though it might be close) so... Like I said... Just forget it and move on. MrN 17:33, Aug 4
- Thanks, I got Yettie to have a word with the guy (who apears to have done 8 good ones before but his recent two seem to be simply out to hurt) though I already marked it down on the list (U.U. used to check reviews that were for him). Maybe I won't in future. Thank you though. As for VFH I seem to have written one of those articles that people either love or hate. Thanks again. SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 17:43 4 August 2008
- Change it back to not marked. Let UU decide. In this case (especially) you should not be making that judgement... Yea, I'm trying to figure out how to vote on it myself... MrN 17:46, Aug 4
- It's quite simple. click on the edit tab and then underneath the last person that put for you put '''for''' ~~~. Or not, I kid you have your autonomy. Yeah seriously though thanks for the advice. SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 17:57 4 August 2008
- Hi guys! I didn't see this conversation until now. I was just updating the list a bit. And I marked it down as not in-depth (after some discussion with Orian). I can change it back and wait for UU to have a look...I was just hoping we could take a stand against British domination and rule. STAND FREE OF BRITAIN - STAND FREE OF UU! - [22:07 4 August] Sir FSt Don
Yettie
- Yeah, I'm really not gonna be checking much on the list for a while - 4 jobs that should take 3 weeks each all due by next week. AAAAh! Anyway, I did see that one, and I would have marked it down as the guys have, and I would have had a friendly word much as Yettie did. It was pretty brutal and unfriendly, and seemed more like an attack than a review. I did log on to post this last night, just at the time that Uncyclopedia took its unscheduled snooze. Oh well. In conclusion, Orian and Yettie know what they're doing - I'll keep an eye on things while I can, but that ain't gonna be often, I'm just glad there are people who help out! --UU - natter 08:09, Aug 5
- Yeah, I'm really not gonna be checking much on the list for a while - 4 jobs that should take 3 weeks each all due by next week. AAAAh! Anyway, I did see that one, and I would have marked it down as the guys have, and I would have had a friendly word much as Yettie did. It was pretty brutal and unfriendly, and seemed more like an attack than a review. I did log on to post this last night, just at the time that Uncyclopedia took its unscheduled snooze. Oh well. In conclusion, Orian and Yettie know what they're doing - I'll keep an eye on things while I can, but that ain't gonna be often, I'm just glad there are people who help out! --UU - natter
- Hi guys! I didn't see this conversation until now. I was just updating the list a bit. And I marked it down as not in-depth (after some discussion with Orian). I can change it back and wait for UU to have a look...I was just hoping we could take a stand against British domination and rule. STAND FREE OF BRITAIN - STAND FREE OF UU! - [22:07 4 August] Sir FSt Don
- It's quite simple. click on the edit tab and then underneath the last person that put for you put '''for''' ~~~. Or not, I kid you have your autonomy. Yeah seriously though thanks for the advice. SK Sir Orian57Talk
- Change it back to not marked. Let UU decide. In this case (especially) you should not be making that judgement... Yea, I'm trying to figure out how to vote on it myself... MrN
- Thanks, I got Yettie to have a word with the guy (who apears to have done 8 good ones before but his recent two seem to be simply out to hurt) though I already marked it down on the list (U.U. used to check reviews that were for him). Maybe I won't in future. Thank you though. As for VFH I seem to have written one of those articles that people either love or hate. Thanks again. SK Sir Orian57Talk
What am I meant to have done?
You said it was my fault I really have no idea whats going on. SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 20:38 4 August 2008
- Dude. Your sense of humour! Look. You were the last person to edit the wiki before it crashed. I don't really seriously think you broke it. ;) I'm joking dude. It was probably that bugger Skullthumper! MrN 20:41, Aug 4
About my page Behind you
You suggested that i get rid of some templates, which i did, and you also suggested that i strip the random part. I have some good ideas on which the random parts are but i'm not entirely sure. I believe the very last section, What do to if u dont have a f**king clue of whats behind you, was the stupidly random part, but i was wondering if ud please outline which parts are stupid/random for me cause I don't exactly know which you meant. If you would it would be very appreciated. --Claytos 20:45, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
- Well, I have removed the ICU for ya. It's a good concept for an article, and I hope you work on it some more... Basically, I really recommend that you read HTBFANJS if you have not already. Also, obviously BGBU if you also have not... I normally write and article, and then read back through being really critical. Anything which I don't think is helping I strip out. Less is more and all that... I would avoid the ninjas and robots if I were you. They are a bit over used. Maybe you can do something about pantomimes? There is a "He's behind you!" thing which is a popular catch phrase in "pantos" over here in the UK. Not sure if you get em in the states (if you are from there)... Read HTBFANJS.... Try to get a few more ideas, and then maybe submit your work to UN:PEE for a review... Feel free to ask me if ya need anymore help with anything. Good luck! MrN 21:57, Aug 4
UnSignpost: July 31st, 2008
The Newspaper With Love In Every Paragraph!
July 31st, 2008 • Lucky Thirteenth Issue • Now with 20% more ninjas!
|
The biggest little whorehouse on the internet Oftentimes, Uncyclopedians choose to create something on their userpages, safe from the prying eyes and hungry 'delete' buttons of admins. These entities can range from the ridiculously complex to the awesomely cartoonish. The newest user creation on this silly wiki is that of a charming gentle-bot by the name of MrN9000. At 'The Whorehouse', writers can bathe in the attention they so desperately seek. A sort of hands-on Pee Review, the Whorehouse encourages other users to edit, trim, improve, rub up against, and generally increase the quality of the articles of others. Authors suffering from mental blocks (or physical blocks) can turn to this dimly lit establishment for inspiration. While considered a 'smashing' idea by some, the brothel has drawn its share of criticism. It may have even caused a site-wide questioning of the rules of VFH, guidelines of Pee Review, and the vailidity of the Committee That Selects Zombiebaron's Daily Banstick. The main concern seems to be articles getting 'mucked up' by having too many contributors. Opponents to this opinion have pointed out that this is a wiki, and, in theory, an infinite number of contributors contributing to an infinite number of articles for an infinite amount of time were eventually destined to create the Whorehouse, anyway. Some users, such as Ljlego, have taken advantage of the open space to hold some sort of charity-scamming orgy. Whatever the destiny of the Whorehouse, it is sure to catch every Uncyclopedian's attention for at the least five minutes immediately following the reading of this article.
Virus exposes user vulnerability to death Yes, it's true. Death is inevitable for all users who have logged in recently. Apparently, a rouge admin created a computer virus so potent you actually contract testicular cancer. Real cancer. Like, In real life. Seriously. And how does one contract the virus? Users are warned that that the simple act of logging in to Uncyclopedia will cause one to contract the fatal disease. "Yes, I know cancer isn't a disease nor a virus" said one doctor "but still, it sucks. I mean - it's cancer - IN YOUR BALLS. Come on." So how exactly does on know when they have cancer? Symptoms may include one or more of the following:
Make sure to constantly check your testicles by feeling them for irregularities with your fingers. ... That's right. ... Just feel 'em up ... nice ... Ahem! Uh... Simple vigilance is a big help. The best time to check is after a hot shower, when the scrotum is looser. And what of the female users? No, not even the three of them are safe. It has been proven that even female users can contract testicular cancer. How, you ask? Well, by a miracle of God, the female will grow testicles, that will then become "cancerfied" (or "cancer-ific", if you prefer.) The only users who are safe from this horrible plague are IP addresses, as they lack testes and the ability to grow any. Remember kids, no matter how much Dr. Health, Esq. tells you cancer is great, don't believe him. Oh? ... What's that? ... I said something about dying? ... Oh. ... Well, if one of your testicles was three times bigger than the other and your semen was filled with blood, would you not kill yourself? That's right... |
| |||||||
| UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox | ||||||||
THEDUDEBOT Armed and Ready Say The Word 07:52, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Windows 9000
I just removed the link to Windows 9000 from {{windows}} because it didn't seem like a very useful redirect to me. (It was added with this edit.) Could you explain why you created this redirect and what it has to do with your username? (Is it anything besides the obvious "Over 9000"?) Is it worth making a request for someone to turn the page into an actual article? --Pentium5dot1|t~^_^~c 00:49, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
- Oops. I forgot to check the page's deletion log before posting. It turns out that it was originally an expired ICU and that the user who added the link to {{windows}} uploaded some images that were supposed to go in the article. Feel free to ignore this message. --Pentium5dot1|t~^_^~c 00:57, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
- Hi. Sure... You also forgot to check the "What links here"... I created the redirect as rather a lot of pages link to it. as you can see... Like you, I think it's unlikely this will become a good article and making it a redirect was the best way of quickly removing the red links. In terms of the 9000 thing being the same of my name... I'm named after Hal. Nothing to do with the "Over 9000" thing... You kids eh? I agree it should probably not be in {{windows}}. :-) MrN 01:06, Aug 7
- I did check the whatlinkshere, but I kept trying "&action=purge" on {{windows}} and the Windows 9000 redirect thinking that the links were from {{windows}} and were showing up due to caching. Anyway, would Micro$oft Window$ be a more appropriate redirect target? --Pentium5dot1|t~^_^~c 02:22, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
- Hi. Sure... You also forgot to check the "What links here"... I created the redirect as rather a lot of pages link to it. as you can see... Like you, I think it's unlikely this will become a good article and making it a redirect was the best way of quickly removing the red links. In terms of the 9000 thing being the same of my name... I'm named after Hal. Nothing to do with the "Over 9000" thing... You kids eh? I agree it should probably not be in {{windows}}. :-) MrN
Wha?
'I am a fan of this style of writing, but I think the author missed the point that this was meant to be funny in enough places to turn me off...'. I have no idea what you mean by that?! But the reason I ask is because a clarification might help me fix what is wrong with the article. Feedback was appreciated. --Knucmo2 11:46, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
- Hea. Firstly there is nothing which is "wrong with the article". It's all a matter of opinion. Mine may be different to others. I'm happy to explain what I meant though... By the style of writing I meant like say one of my articles Battle of the Sexes... You used an encyclopaedic style (which I favour) and gave an amusing commentary about the subject. My gripe was that it was too serious in places. The example line I gave ya was one example but the whole text is riddled with paragraphs which really only tell the truth! This is Uncyc you know! You can tell the truth, but you need to be funny about it... In too many places I felt that your article was delivering the facts for no particular reason. Had the facts been supporting a jokes I would have understood, but in many places they did not. I suggest you give the author some more character (or obvious amusing bias), and chop out a good deal of the factual stuff which is not adding to the humour. Assume that the reader knows the truth. You don't need to tell them. The thing with Uncyc is to make people who understand and relate to the material laugh... Hope you get my point of view now... :-) MrN 11:58, Aug 8
- A more amusing bias you say? Hahaha, well when the articles' unlocked I might just have the answer! --Knucmo2 14:14, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
Seriously, I don't know why you still bother...
Yeah, no good at all, I'd give up now... On going back to it, I didn't register the bit about it trying to be a parody of the current immigration debates - there was some indication of it in the article, but as I think I said in my comments, it could be a stronger link. Perhaps, I dunno. 
Rt Hon W E Gladstone MP GOM | Converse | 
16:46, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
- Yea, the immigration thing is kinda a key idea of the article... Many thanks for the review. :-) Are you actually being serious with your title there? Do you really think it's a really bad idea? btw... "Immanuel doesn’t pun; he Kant." is a real Wilde quote... I was trying to parody it in the article and make it fit in. The Samuel Johnson quote was based on "Pun the lowest form of humour"... You got me all confused! MrN 17:16, Aug 8
- Doh! OK, showing my literary ignorance there... No, it's good, but, you know, what use is a review which doesn't give you some useful criticisms?
Rt Hon W E Gladstone MP GOM | Converse | 
07:41, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
- Doh! OK, showing my literary ignorance there... No, it's good, but, you know, what use is a review which doesn't give you some useful criticisms?
Thanks for the vote
|
Thanks for the vote Walpurgis Night Now let's get pissed and enjoy the bonfire! |
Thanks for the vote:)— Sir Sycamore (talk) 15:15, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
UnSignpost: August 7th, 2008
The Newspaper the Whole Family Must Enjoy!
August 7th, 2008 • Fourteenth Issue • Just like Grandma used to make!
|
Uncyclopedia Forum set to consume the Internet Top scientists at the Uncycloversity this week predicted that a Village Dump topic, started in June by prominent Uncylopedian and alchemist Spang, will one day consume the entire internet. According to the university's top expert, Dr. Skullthumper, Ph.D.: "This is one of those things that could go on forever. I mean, at least counting to a million has a definite ending. With this, there is no end, since everyone wants to be the last person to edit." Wikia staff member and Uncyclopedian Sannse predicts that the forum topic will take up all of Wikia's hardware by late 2009 and will then begin to "consume all around it, like I did that time I tried marijuana." She went on to add, "nothing will be safe – not even Wikipedia," before blessing herself and staring reverently at a statue of Jimmy Wales. Others, however, are more optimistic. According to Modusoperandi, "eventually someone will invent some sort of robot or hobgoblin to automatically edit the topic, and then it will have to be locked. Either that, or someone will figure out that there is no prize, rendering the whole thing pointless. And then I shall be the winner!" Spang was unavailable for comment because, according to his spokesperson, "he is busy in his cave dreaming up more crazy schemes to destroy the internet." Admins everywhere! If you're a wiki-troll, cyberbullying vandal or extremely crappy article, you'd better start watching your behind. Three new deputies were voted in by the Uncyclopedia Sheriff's Department: Dr. Skullthumper, RAHB, and Roman Dog Bird. The trio were bestowed this great honor last Friday by Codeine. This brings the total amount of active authority figures who could wallop you over the head with a banhammer to 29. The reason for the unusally high number of new sysops is that a clear consensus could not be reached, and also that all three of these individuals are "awesome". The new admins were extremely pleased and greatly honored by their new title. None of them wasted any time in executing their first sysop move (RAHB and Dr. Skullthumper banned Cajek; Roman Dog Bird deleted one hundred articles, then banned Cajek). The prescence of these new neighborhood patrollers was evident immediately, with QVFD being renamed "Skull and RAHB's House of Huffing", and placing {{VFD}} in an article now automatically classifying it as "Roman Dog Bird's bitch". The reactions from the new sysops were similar, with all three pledging to delete bad articles, ban unworthy knuckleheads, continue plans for world domination, and "try not to muck up the site too much". RAHB has set himself lofty goals, including "keeping it cool" and some wiki-related nonsense that this reporter didn't understand. Roman Dog Bird wished the readers of the Signpost to know that he said "something", and went on to add that he will continue to "clean crap up...only now with more power." Dr. Skullthumper is thankful that no one has caught on to the trio of new ops and expresses his optimism as far as not being immediately de-opped, but also listed several early accomplishments as well as future goals. With these three brave new souls now patrolling the corridors of this silly wiki, it is truly a dark time for terrible articles, merciless vandals, and Cajek. |
| |||||
| UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox | ||||||
Painstakingly hand-delivered by: 16:35, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Nuclear
I was being silly okay? RotateTheBoard 19:16, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
By the way, think your talk page is long enough? RotateTheBoard 19:17, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
- Well, I'm going to revert you. Being silly is OK, but people will not be able to find the articles now, and that's no fun... You should reply to questions where asked. You can blank your talk page, but I did consider it rude... The links I gave you in the text I sent... You should read. MrN 19:20, Aug 12
Care Bears
What do you think, I got started with the list of famous HTFs, check it out. --Mr Alex 02:53, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Hea, I had a look and have removed the ICU. In my view it's still a bit too random, and relies heavily on the shock / penis type jokes. This is possibly not the greatest form of humour you can muster, but I guess it's OK for a start. :-) I think it would work a lot better if you were to make the shock type references a bit more subtle. Rather than directly talking about the obvious things, I think it would be more subtle if you used clever innuendo to do the same thing. Basically, although I have removed the ICU, this article still needs a fair bit more work... Good luck with it... MrN 17:06, Aug 13
Greetings, fellow pun lover!
So yeah, taking that brief look at your punny article the other day reminded me of a vague idea I had once. So I made a bit of a start today. User:Under user/Fish Puns. Have a look, and add to it if you fancy. Just thought I'd mention it so's you know I'm not trying to cover the same ground as you. And also in case you fancied collaborating on it. And now, I'm off to do more of what I'm paid for. Or goof off and watch the Olympics feed on the BBC site, whichever. --UU - natter 13:53, Aug 13
- Hea, well I tossed a few fishy puns in for ya. Toss em back if they smell too fishy. I used to do a lot of fishing as a kid, so this might be fun. I put a few comments and stuff at the bottom... MrN 17:44, Aug 13
- That could be, 'Greetings, Phil O'Punn Lover!' Oh dear. --Knucmo2 17:58, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Firithfenion
Firithfenion, the person who is using This IP address(I ran a WHOIS search on the IP listed in the article's history, and its from Berlin Germany, same as Firithfenion/author of wikipedia Magibon article) and this clone of Hetellies user name to vandalize Uncyclopedia's Magibon article and talkpage, my userpage, and the real Hetellies' userpage. |His IP should be banned, and the fake Hetellies sock should be banned as well. Thank you. Arguecat3 00:26, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- Hea dude. I don't really know what you are saying, but I'm not an admin and can't ban people. You should consider using UN:BP if this is that important to you. MrN 00:29, Aug 15
- Oh sorry, I assumed you were an admin because you gave me the welcome template. Sorry. Arguecat3 00:32, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- I am sorry for causing much commotion in UNC. Please accept my humble apologies. Hetelllies 02:45, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- Good luck with the enjo kosai article that you are talking about doing. I did UnNews:Paedophiles Rejoice Over New Child Database which might be along similar lines... MrN 10:11, Aug 15
- Good luck with the enjo kosai article that you are talking about doing. I did UnNews:Paedophiles Rejoice Over New Child Database which might be along similar lines... MrN
- I am sorry for causing much commotion in UNC. Please accept my humble apologies. Hetelllies 02:45, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- Oh sorry, I assumed you were an admin because you gave me the welcome template. Sorry. Arguecat3 00:32, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
UnSignpost: August 14th, 2008
The Newspaper That Gets Its News Solely From Vandalism Johnny Is Teh FAGXORZ!!111 SHUT UP DOUCHEBAG!!11
August 14th, 2008 • Fifteenth Issue • May contain traces of humor
|
Uncyclopedia kidnapped!  In a shocking development, a brazen individual absconded with Uncyclopedia just over a week ago. Users were shocked when their attempts to access the site between 18:33 and 20:07 UTC on August 4th resulted in a sinister message being displayed, promising the swift return of the wiki should the kidnapper's demands be met. Panic ensued, with several Uncyclopedians wandering off to places unknown, never to return. Once the site was restored and the intertubes reconnected, the identity of the culprit was obvious: Orian57 had made the last edit before the ninety-minute gap, with the ominous and puzzling edit summary of "I AM STEALING UNCYCLOPEDIA!!!" The site itself seemed to be mostly fine after its harrowing ordeal, with the exception of VFP, which turned all of Zombiebaron's against votes into ten for votes during the first few hours back. This reporter caught up to Orian57, and had the opportunity to talk with him at some length about the reasons for the abduction. After consulting with his lawyer, Orian agreed to comment on the situation. On why he stole the wiki, he said, "my motivation for this cyber-terrorism wasn't something trite like 'because I could' or 'it wasn't me'. No. It was because nobody was paying me any attention!" It seems that Orian, in a desperate bid for attention, locked the Uncyclopedia server in a basement, and attempted to edit it so that all content referred to him. Perhaps his subconcious got the better of him, or perhaps the spirit of Sophia came to Uncyclopedia's rescue. In any case, Orian claims he heard a female voice speaking to him, which convinced him to return the server and allow "uncyclopedians around the world to stop masturbating and return to peeling potatoes or whatever they do." Some sort of competition finishes
So as you may have noticed, recently a contest of titanic proportions has been gripping the world like no other event. Palms have been sweaty, nails have been chewed, bribes, threats, and allegations of stimulant abuse have been rife. But now, the latest incarnation of the Poo Lit Surprise has drawn to a close, and so our attention can drift to that bunch of steroid-enhanced nutters at the Olympics. Finally, the questions on everyone's lips have been answered. Providing they were related to the Poo Lit Surprise, and who was going to win. Other questions, unfortunately, remain unanswered. However, if you do want to know who won, and haven't found out already, you can find out here. We could just tell you here, but where's the fun in that? We should, however, point out that if you haven't seen all of the articles yet, there are some real crackers amongst them, and not just the winners either - which probably reflects well on the Uncyclopedia Community as a whole, although it may just hint that everyone saved their best articles for this one small period of time and now has nothing else to offer for another 6 months. We'll see, but in the meantime, have a look at all the entries - there should be chuckles on offer whatever your sense of humo(u)r! |
| ||||||
| UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox | |||||||
Fired out of a newspaper cannon by: 18:00, 16 August 2008 (UTC)