Forum:Slappy's Angels; WTF?!

Forums: Index > Ministry of Love > Slappy's Angels; WTF?!

Note: This topic has been unedited for 5939 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

I remember Slappy Squirrel from Animaniacs but neither I, nor apparently anyone on the first couple pages of a google search, has heard of Slappy's Angels (except for the pages on Uncyclopedia). Delving into things a little deeper, it looks like User:Crablogger has created a rather large network of articles (~14) with hardly any link to general reality. I find it particularly bothersome and damning that he has decided to include himself in various sections of the articles as being in an S&M relationship with Slappy Squirrel. This is unfunny nonsense and vanity at best or some new form of FanFic porn at worst. I'm going to go out on a limb and say that I don't really think this is acceptable content for Uncyclopedia except perhaps within User:Crablogger's userspace. --Sir gwax (talk) 18:55, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Ah well, I trust your judgement on matters of S&M, gwax. Do whatever you want.--<<>> 21:01, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Either delete as vanity, remove the vanititious (new word! Woo!) bits from each page your self, call out Crablogger on his talkpage and get him to do the previous thing that I mentioned just before this thing right here, or VFD. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 21:37, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

I'm going to whore this idea again cos gwax is looking... I promise not to say another word about it again. Honest. /me ducks Modus' barrage of flying egg nog... MrN 21:47, Jul 17

I'll remove mentions of him from them, if that's what you want. I think we really only need two articles on this, one for Slappy and one for Skippy. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:55, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Honestly, I was thinking that the vast majority of it should pretty much be deleted outright or moved into his userspace. The reason that I posted here instead of doing it myself is because I'm around infrequently enough and have little enough time right now that I'd rather not have to deal with the likely backlash and drama of taking either of those courses of action. Either someone else will look into it, I'll forget it or it'll go on my Uncyclopedia to-do list that never gets done. --Sir gwax (talk) 22:53, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

It's all on my to do list. It'll be dealt with within the month. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:02, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Three and a half cheers for Dexter. Pip, pip, hooray! Pip, pip, hooray! Pip, pip, hooray! Pip, hoo! --Sir gwax (talk) 22:07, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

It's incredibly puzzling. I've seen a lot of things in my ~16 years on the Internets, but I have never seen an intelligent, literate person develop a sexual obsession with a non-human children's cartoon character that inspires him to write page after page of erotic fanfic on an inappropriate website. Nope. This one is a first. pillow talk 21:14, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Really? I was sure that we'd met earlier. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 22:18, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

I would not describe myslef as either intelligent or literate - however I have always had a thing for Jessica Rabbit - however I don't really write publically about it though.--Sycamore (Talk) 22:27, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

I see you as more of a Roger Rabbit guy, because of that bunny costume, you freaky perv. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 22:32, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

The awful truth that I am somewhat like Roger Rabbit has haunted my every waking moment.--Sycamore (Talk) 22:35, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

I'm more of a Judge Doom. The irony of hating Toons while being one myself is not beyond me. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 22:51, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

I remember him, he scared me shitless when I was little--Sycamore (Talk) 22:57, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

"Noids do not have sex with doodles." --Sir gwax (talk) 23:30, 22 July 2008 (UTC)