User talk:Sockpuppet of an unregistered user/Archive1

                                                 

Welcome!

Don't mind me. I'm just here for the enem- I MEAN WELCOME! WELCOME!

Hello, Sockpuppet of an unregistered user/Archive1, and welcome to Uncyclopedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If not, the door's right over there... no, a little more to your left... yeah. Anyway, my name is RAHB, and I'll be your guide through the mystical land of Uncyclopedia. We'll begin the tour with a few helpful links for noobies:

• Beginner's Guide - A massive guide about how to be the best you can be at Uncyclopedia. I've honestly never read the whole thing in one sitting myself, but it is very useful if you're looking for help on a specific issue.
• Our Vanity Policies - This page details why we don't care about your friends, your school, your gay fourth period math teacher, or the homework he has you do, and in-jokes. DO NOT violate this policy.
• How to be funny and not just stupid - Our flagship link. This will tell you how to not get booed off the metaphorical stage that is Uncyclopedia. I STRONGLY suggest reading the entire thing through, perhaps more than once.
• Uncyclopedia:Best of - For a bit of inspiration. These are our featured articles. This is the kind of stuff we like to read around here.

Now that that's out of the way, take a look to your right, and you'll notice some more links, these ones are about help in general:

• About Uncyclopedia and The five pliers of Uncyclopedia
• How to get started editing on uncyclopedia
• Help Pages - if you need help with a specific issue
• User:RAHB/welcome - This is a longer version of this message, meant for giving you a more in-depth look at contributing.

At Uncyclopedia, writing articles is not a requirement, but I do recommend it, it can be quite enjoyable, and it's a good chance to let others take notice of your writing. To write an article, it's recommended that you start it in your userspace (for example, User:Sockpuppet of an unregistered user/Archive1/Article about stuff) so you can edit it at your leisure. If you decide to create it in the cold world of mainspace, make sure it is in accordance with the policies laid out above, and if you're not done put the "Work-In-Progress" template - {{construction}} - onto it as well.

If you have any other questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page, and also check out the link I mentioned earlier. Additionally, the Uncyclopedian Adopt-a-Noob program is there to bring experienced editors straight to you. Simply put {{adoptme}} on your Userpage to join. I hope you enjoy editing here and being an Uncyclopedian, and remember: Have fun with it. We are a humor wiki, so don't worry about taking things too seriously. We're here to have a good time and to have a good laugh. Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) or use the "sign" button () above the edit box. This will automatically produce your name and the date. Once more, thank you for your contributions and welcome! I'll be seeing you around. -RAHB 22:56, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Hello!

See above!User:Mrthejazz/sig 01:58, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Hello to you too. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:06, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Puppet

Alright, now that we've all had our fun on that VFH Nom, I'm going to be asking for a checkuser. It's pretty glaringly obvious that the IP involved was you, but I'm going to make sure. Now, I could go through with all the official biz, and then give you a ban. Or, you can come clean now, and promise never to do it again. Your move, Peterbilt. -RAHB 03:26, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Hey I didn't mean any harm, I just found that rule for self-nomination somewhat lame, and why do you think I'm called "Sockpuppet of an unregistered user". But OK, I won't do it again, though I honestly don't think you should ban someone for doing something as innocent as this. As a last note, if it gets renominated, I won't involve any of my alternative identities (IPs, other sockpuppets).
Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 08:10, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

I'll take that as a promise to never do it again. I'm shortening Tom Mayfair's ban, however, not getting rid of it, to get the point across. While you may think the self-nomination rule is "lame," it is a rule. And it's not like you couldn't have posted it up for review and waited for a review or for a week. It's very simple. Anyways, next offense is a permanent ban. But for now, you get a week. -RAHB 00:46, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Actually my sockpuppet nominated the article, while unaware of any self-nomination rule. When he was notified of his mistake, he was all like "Oh no! Now I'll have to close this nomination, get it in Pee Review, probably wait a whole week, and then renominate it! And all of that just because of this rule." (intensionally exaggerated) Ofcourse he considered the rule somewhat "lame" at the time, seeing how it was interfering with his plans, using the IP seemed like an "easy solution". Though it is very clear now that he highly underestimated the number of people who would "jokingly" pretend to be dicks, because of their familiarity and attachment to such rules, and who would thus completely ignore how my sockpuppet felt about it. Now it's all over, I'm sure my sockpuppet will more accurately take the rules into account in the future. An IP representing its sockpuppet 11:42, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Your username has the word "Sockpuppet" in it. Are you seriously trying to tell us that you did not know that what you did was not allowed and would provoke this response? You also said that you were aware of the rule about self nominations, yet you did both things. Why? To me, it looks like you are deliberately trying to push the boundaries of what's allowed on Uncyc for your own amusement. If you want to challenge authority, why not go do it in the real world, rather than on joke website which is run by volunteers who are only here to have fun. Dude, this is NOT cool. MrN 12:00, Aug 26

I'm saying that when he first nominated the article, he wasn't aware of such a rule. Mr. Monkey notified him that there was in fact such a rule. Panicking and being all freaked out, he made a mistake, and let the IP "renominate" the article, while it would have probably been better to just close the nomination. The rule I'm talking about is the Pee Review self-nomination rule, not a "no sockpuppeting" rule. An IP representing its sockpuppet 14:09, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

VFH Nomination Neglect

I noticed that almost no one even talked on your VFH nomination you made a few days ago. I brought this up on the chat channel, and the general consensus is that when you nominate something from an IP (or even just your username, Sockpuppet) it's suspicious. People don't want to vote for a suspicious nomination and then it's going to fall off due to low health.

You can clearly write and such, and I think that if you wanted to be taken more seriously, you should register an account that doesn't have the word Sockpuppet in it. So, yeah. That's it. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 00:53, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the vote

Thanks for the vote on France Now let's go strike again!

Thansk there:) — Sir Sycamore (talk) 13:53, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

{{Adoptme}}

There was good reason that was deleted. I have placed it on QVFD. It does not work. N00bs should contact someone from the list of available adopters. Trusting that this template will get them adopted is just not a good idea. If they want to be adopted, they should ask... Also, it's not linked from any "active" welcome messages. Not to my knowledge anyway... Thanks for trying to be helpful though, but you might try to find out why something as important as this was actually deleted next time. Have fun. :-) MrN 22:29, Oct 15

I actually figured that out already, but since it's used in so many pages (it's presently the "most wanted page" by far) and is used in a welcome message as recent as mine (OK, it's not really that recent, but still). Wouldn't it be a good idea to let it say something like

"This n00b thinks experienced editors will waste their time searching for potential adoptees amongst users using this template..." -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 19:02, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

hi

hello   – Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.96.4.36 (talk • contribs)

Censorship

Please do not censor images to your liking. Of course these images are crude and offensive, but many will find them humorous and/or useful in articles. You are not an admin, so please stop trying to be one. The real admins have no problem with these images used in context.--Uncreative Username 02:48, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

I'm not trying to be an admin, I'm just applying Uncyclopedian policy: shock images are forbidden, a bouquet of penises is obviously a shock image, the same with an ED admin raping someone. Actually you should be thanking me, since I didn't revert all your edits, only the ones I really found exaggerated. If not for me your image wouldn't even be in the article. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 07:44, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

That thing you did: don't. Both of you. If you become embroiled in a revert war, take it to an admin. We're all mature 'n' shit. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 11:45, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Okay, I handled it the wrong way, I admit that. My apologies. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 11:49, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

My first ban was for engaging in a revert war. My second was for engaging in a strip revert war (I got down to my socks and underwear before I was stopped). Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 13:02, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Very interesting. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 13:24, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

My third ban was for spooking my neighbour's cattle, causing them to give sour milk. That one was a witchhunt, I tell you. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 14:31, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

All the things you wouldn't mind doing to get some amusement. Okay, I'll try to be more careful when handling such issues next time. Also, it seems that Uncreative Username has uploaded some non-offensive images, hopefully it stays that way. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 14:38, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Everything offends someone. I, for one, offend a lot of people. "The best defense is a good offense", I say. Then I hip check 'em into the boards. Take that, Grandma! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 16:17, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

I suppose its that whole unwashed netted vest look that you go for. That and your raging alchoholism--Sycamore (Talk) 16:32, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Well, in reality, the meaning of words does not in so much depend on its supposed literal meaning, but rather on what it is commonly understood to mean by the group you're considered part of. So if something is described as offensive, that will in most cases signify that it is considered that way by the general consensus, and whether a minority of separate individuals find it offensive or not would be mostly irrelevant. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:45, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

You speak real smart-like. You must have some real good edjimacation. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 17:18, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Education? No, not at all. School sucked in the past and it still does today. I just have a mind of my own, some common sense and some experience. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:21, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

...and you bite the heads off chickens in the circus sideshow. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 17:38, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

No, I don't. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:40, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Really? I was sure I recognized you. I'm the guy that puts the heads back on. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 22:36, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

That must have been my long lost twin brother. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 22:53, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Intelligence...

Thanks Socky, that was some good ping pong! I hope we can get together again some time! -- Style  Guide 10:39, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Yup. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 10:40, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

ka: mo:

Only Wikia staff can add interwiki, you way of "redirect" would not work. You can contact the Wikia staff Sannse for interwiki. --Hant (Talk) - For your safety, China Free! - 12:35, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

I know it doesn't work, but at least people know where the sites are. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 12:36, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Here's Your Christmas Tree

Merry Christmas 2008 From Sawblade5

Here's a Potato Christmas Tree For You!
Caution the Grue protecting this tree!

---

----Pleb- Sawblade5 ^{( yell | FAQ | I did this )} 09:45, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Just passing...

Let's not feed the trolls eh?:)--Sycamore (Talk) 11:25, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, you're right. Sorry about that. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 11:26, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the nom

Dropping Gay Jesus it was probably the best thing to do as numerous people who do like it will abstain their vote. The non-wikipedia format will tank anything, no matter how clever, in VFH. There would have been a long list of pooh pooh votes and nasty comments.

After I did my research it became clear that while "Gay Jesus" had not been done, any Jesus humor would invoke the "not another Jesus article" mentality. The numerous incarnations of Jesus commenting in the article was a joke about that very saturation and the numerous silly Jesus' already in existence. I didn't plan on that going over anyone's head but apparently it did. Thank you for appreciating the humor.--    14:13, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Bore da

Alright, boyo? You voted for an article about me. This means that you're entitled to a free slice of laver pizza from Lloydios, the greatest pizzeria in all of Caernarfon.

IronLung 03:24, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Yet Another Award

You voted for UnNews:New Range of Low-Tech Personal Music Players Released on VFH which entitles you to this FREE copy of the 1921 hit single I Wouldn’t Take Her To a Dog Fight, 'Cause I’m Afraid She’d Win by Brigadier Billy Bell-Ende and his Jazz Rhythm Orchestra which is only slightly scratched. Rabbi Techno

Love the pic on

This;) Also why were you banned, I did not see any reason for it? — Sir Sycamore (talk) 15:52, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Because I won Sockpuppeteer of the Month, more as a joke actually, Thekillerfroggy thought it'd be funny to permaban me. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 15:58, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the pic:)

Celtic Ninja Star This person has done good deeds in the eyes of Sycamore

--Sycamore (Talk) 16:37, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the star. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:44, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

FFS

You are number one. The new number one. This has all happened before, and will happen again. Thanks for inadvertently playing the game! :D   Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 21:17, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

ICU's categories etc

Although help is apprciated you are doing a bit of a lousy job. ICU, must be done within seven days - check the history. Don't add shit categories that tenoisly have anything to do with the topics. I would prefer if these were left, as I do a number of other things such as decrufting in the process and tagging - what you are doing does not help. Thanks there:)--Sycamore (Talk) 13:48, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Um, sorry for the stuff I did wrong. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 14:03, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

VFH

When you're closing VFH noms please remove the VFH template from the articles as well. Thanks. ~ 16:26, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Yes, sorry. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:27, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

No worries. Stop being sorry. (For which the obvious answer would be - sorry) ~ 18:17, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Well, okay then. Sorry for the misunderstanding. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 18:19, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Consume this cookie!

Modusoperandi has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic.

For reasons I can't understand, trying to make Uncyclopedia, which is the worst, better. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 13:46, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Oh a cookie! Yum, yum. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 15:24, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Hola

In explanation. I've seen you around the site for a while now. Your edit on my article tonight reminded me just how much I remembered your awesomeness. This award is for the fact that in the majority of your run here at Uncyc, as Modus has said above, you have made an honest and genuine effort to make the site a better place. I've even disagreed with you on occasion, but I've always noticed that your loyalties are with the betterment of Uncyclopedia, and for that, you have earned my respect and my trust, and I think you should be proud of that fact. Continue to push even the most oddly pushed topics, as that is what makes this site great, and I think that you have become one of the more proficient editors in that field, especially as of late, and I thank you for that. I make this comment as I am drunk, but as they say, drunkenness only brings out the most sincere version of the person drunk. I also consider myself a very coordinated drunk, as you can see by my great grammar and spelling in this post. I digress, but I will sign off of this post saying that the site is a better place when guys like you are around, and I hope you stay with us for a long, long time, because you are the type of user that, even on occasion, really can make a difference. With the proper experience and development, I see you becoming an administrator someday, and one who can properly handle the tasks thereof. I am rambling, due to my drunkenness, but my last sentence will be a sum-up of what I've been saying: You are doing great things, and you should continue to do great things. Thank you. -RAHB 10:59, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

My very appreciative thanks for this nice award. So says the doer of great things. Woohoo! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 11:09, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

The thanks are all yours. Or mine. To you, at any rate. Whichever use of the word makes the most sense in making you the recipient of thanks. I look forward to further viewing your development. And as an added anecdote: While others saw your username as threatening, I laughed at it from the very beginning. I think it's hilarious. There. I said it. -RAHB 11:18, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

That's the way it was meant to be seen, though seeing me as threatening could be appropriate in some specific situations. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 11:38, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Pfft. It's a product of those who didn't understand the subtlety off the bat. An innocent mistake, but an unfortunate overlooking, to be sure. -RAHB 11:51, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Very much so indeed. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 11:53, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

That rollback thinggymebob

You probably know, but it's really only meant to be used in cases of obvious vandalism. If it's just a pants edit you should try to use undo, and give a reason for your revert. I normally find that looking at a vandals contributions and hitting rollback there is a quick way to do it. Have fun. MrN 00:12, Jan 27

Yeah, I figured as much. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 15:55, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Featuring

Please don't (try to) feature articles by yourself, leave it to the cabal. Thanks. ~ 16:01, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

I wasn't trying to, I was just closing the nomination. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

That what's I meant, when you close the nomination, it's taken off the normal queue and the admin that will come eventually might miss it and fuck the entire system. Even though some of us like fucking err...random things, it causes unnecessary hassle. ~ 20:14, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Well, next time I'll just alert the admin who featured the article. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 20:33, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Not following you. ~ 20:38, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

I'll let them know that they should close the nomination... Wait. Hmmm, not sure I'm following you... -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 20:41, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

You don't really need to notify anyone. I usually take care of that and if I'm not around, Led or RAHB usually take care of business. ~ 20:47, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Now I'm totally confused. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 21:00, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Let's apologize to each other, that always seems to work. ~ 22:08, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Sorry for all the trouble I may, or may not, have caused you and this site in general. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 22:11, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Sorry for putting you under all that stress with my ludicrous demands. ~ 22:13, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Well, you are a bureaucrat now. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 22:17, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

You're right. I'm sorry about that. ~ 22:20, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

There there. All is forgiven. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 22:23, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

I would like to comment on the use of my name in this section....Penis. -RAHB 09:47, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

And thus RAHB succeeds in fucking a random thing... -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 15:37, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Vandals

Report 'em to UN:BP, revert their shit, and leave it at that. Talking to them really gets us nowhere. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 19:52, Jan 28

I guess you're right. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 19:58, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

User:Sej

Yeh, I don't really check people's contribs before welcoming them. I just power through all red talk page links that I see. Also, I've never really had a good chat with you (mm...sounds sexy, huh? I didn't actually intend that to sound so man-to-man-emotional-chat-about-pornish). Hiy! - [19:38 29 January 2009] YYettie

Hiya! What's up with the double posting? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 19:42, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Hit me, I'm an idiot. It's because I have an incredibly bad ISP and my internet's been failing me all week. It must have been that, or er something, but it definitely wasn't human error or anything crappy like that, cause, wow, double posting sure is only for MASSIVE n00bs. - [19:57 29 January 2009] YYettie

Don't worry about it. No hard feelings. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 19:59, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Anyway, Mr. Sockpuppet. What's with the sockpuppetness? - [22:01 29 January 2009] YYettie

Well, I used to be an unregistered user, and registered myself a sockpuppet to do all the dirty work for me. But my IP was blocked and now I'm stuck in my sockpuppet. Oh well. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 22:08, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Stuck in your sockpuppet? That sounds like a horror film. Is it comfortable? - [22:10 29 January 2009] YYettie

It's not that bad, really. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 22:12, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Well, I was wandering if I could move in. I've always fancied living in a comfortable sock. A sock that does a bit of puppet work in its spare time and is owned by an unregistered user sounds extra appealing. - [22:17 29 January 2009] YYettie

There's not much room in here though. And I should first know whether you are really a girl. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 22:19, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

That's for you to assume, and for me to guess at. - [22:24 29 January 2009] YYettie

If I discover that you have a penis I'll cut it off! I'll make it bloody! I'll make it extremely painful! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 22:29, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

That sounds delightfully fun. You can cut if off with my lucky scissors! As for you, I'm guessing you have a penis. I could, in fact, call you a Penis Man. - [22:32 29 January 2009] YYettie

How about you guess where I'll stick my penis. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 22:34, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

A jar? For pickling purpose, of course. Strictly pickling. - [16:51 30 January 2009] YYettie

You guessed wrong! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:52, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

An ant hill? In an attempt to find out what your mate meant when he said it felt like ants all over his penis. - [17:01 30 January 2009] YYettie

No, no, no! Let's go back in time: I was talking about cutting off your penis and you said that would be delightfully fun. And if you also take into account what I said on the talk page of this image, you should be able to figure out where I wanna stick my penis. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:06, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

On a shelf? For safe keeping? - [17:09 30 January 2009] YYettie

Um, you can stop guessing now. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:12, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

I GOT IT RIGHT?! Do I win a prize or something? - [17:33 30 January 2009] YYettie

Hey dude, like, 'sup?

For a reason I can no longer remember, I decided to take a look at your talk page, oh, about 10 minutes ago. You get yelled at a lot. Or at least a large number of firm talking-to's. I've seen you around the site doing good things, though, so I'm glad you're here doing what you do. I don't often make posts of this nature, so I don't have any shiny ninjastars or templates ready and waiting to adorn your trophy hall like that fancypants RAHB. I just wanna say you're doing a good job, despite what some of these other friendly types may infer. They all like you, anyway. It's in their diaries. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 00:39, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Glad to hear it. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 15:06, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

I HAVE QUESTIONS

Q1, how do i make a signature like other people have? Q2, how do i make templates? Q3, if i upload an image how do i know if its copyright? Q4, what is with all these copyright/copyleft ect rules? AND THANKYOU FOR WELCOMING ME! --Poobear 00:54, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Signatures

Notice how some users have lots of cool colors and pictures when they sign on talk pages and in the village dump? Well, you can have that too, if you want! First, just create this page. In that space, put your code for your signature template. (If you need to, check out other users' signature templates for ideas on colors and formatting. (Don't swipe sig templates wholesale, but if you're clueless about ah yeah coding and need some code, you can take the base code from someone else and modify by changing colors, text and images)).

Once you have your sig template made up, head up to your preferences (very top of the page) and add {{Subst:Nosubst|User:Poobear/sig}} to the Nickname field. Check "Raw Signatures" and you're good to go. Now when you click the signature button or type four tildes your sig will automagically show up.

Keep in mind that there are a few restrictions on signatures. We're trying to keep things somewhat legible and uniform around here. Be as creative as you want, but please stay inside those boundaries.

Templates

Generally, everything can be a template, but templates to be used in articlespace should be in the template namespace (i.e. the title starts with "Template:") and other templates should generally be kept in userspace (i.e. the title starts with "User:"). Putting a template on a page is done by putting it between brackets like this "{{}}". If you put {{example}} on a page, the template titled "Template:Example" will be placed on the page. If you put {{user:whoever/example}} on a page, the template titled "User:Whoever/example" will be placed on the page. Even mainspace articles can be used as templates: typing down {{:good thing}} renders the article Good thing on this page: Good is/isn't/is a word concept idea cupcake assortment of English letters that can refer to:

• Sex: Pastime
• Good Old Days: Collection of nostalgic minutes
• Good Old Boys: Collection of nostalgic boys
• Jesus: Prophet, Messiah, Nominated for an Oscar
• People named Fred
• Bad: You know who you are
• Good Burger
• Good Charlotte
• Goodfellas
• Good Buy
• Good cop/Bad cop
• Good Electricity and Bad Electricity
• Good Graphics

This is a disambiguation page – which is just a quick and dirty excuse to create more Uncyclopedia pages. Hadn't you better get started today?

Doubleplusgood

Copyright and copyleft

Generally, you don't have to bother giving an image's copyright. But if you want to do it nevertheless: For example if you don't know the license, you can put down {{No license|Somewebsite}}:

No license selected: Unknown license!

This image has been uploaded without any license specified. The pitiful excuse by the uploader was: Found it somewhere

And if you know it is a blatant copyright violation, you can put down {{Copyvio}}:

This image might be a copywrong violation depending on how you use it.

However, using copywronged content for the purpose of making a parody is usually legal in the US. For example:

• Columbia Pictures Corp. v. National Broadcasting Co.
• Elsmere Music, Inc. v. National Broadcasting Co.

Let's hope that nobody cares enough to test this in court.

Conclusion

I hope this was helpful to you. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 09:21, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

tnx --Poobear 01:23, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Nice work...

I recently saw a situation where 189.24.127.83, an IP, has repeatedly blocked Neopets article. Nice work on the reverts. SPARTAN-984|Chat here|What I've Done 19:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Glad I could help. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 19:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Well thanks. Besides, the template was foreign language anyways, and the stuff it said is redlinked here but probably not where he comes from.

SPARTAN-984|Chat here|What I've Done 21:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Question about watchlist...

On my watchlist next to all the edits there is either a positive or negative number in green or red, respectively. I was wondering what these meant? --Colbert231 01:04, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Change in article length. Basically, how much material was added or removed, measured in bytes. --S'r Mnbvcxz 02:27, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks man. --Colbert231 05:23, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Somebody asked me a question and Mnbvcxz responded to it. How could I have missed this? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 10:49, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank you...

...for your vote for me on PotY. I really, really,really do appreciate it. Sending you good Karma and the following lucky lottery numbers: 4, 18, 23, 27, 30, 36. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 02:31, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

The pleasure was all mine. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 09:26, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

RAAAWR

RAAAAAWR. Gavin would like to thank you once more for sympathizing with him enough to vote for his book to be among the top ten books of 2008. Unless, of course, you happen to be a transsexual, in which case you are a freak and should not email him. Much love, —Sir SysRq (talk) 21:49, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Luckily, I am not some transsexual freak. Woohoo! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 21:54, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

.

Hiii... - Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate 06:50, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

AH FUCK IT'S THE FUCKING TAILS DOLL! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 15:48, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Bagels

Shalom! Yum! You've received a basket of delicious fresh bagels from RabbiTechno! Lekhaim! מזל טוב

Yum, yum. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 12:03, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Lol

I love how initially everyone was yelling at you and treating you like a SCUM LICKING BAG OF SHIT, and now you're a very respected user. What's your secret?Saberwolf116

I'd suggest something like "Go with the flow!" "Think before you act!" "Don't be a dick!" "Be funny and not just stupid!" "Be italic!" and some more stuff like that. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 00:33, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

UnNews

I was reading one of your UnNews a while back and it was funny. Could you show me all your UnNews? Just type them and link them on your talk page? --Docile hippopotamus 11:54, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

I made:

• UnNews:Wikipedia rejoices over crisis

and three UnNewses from the Ruffles the Tiger series:

• UnNews:Massacre at Brookfield Zoo (in reaction to the first Ruffles UnNews)
• UnNews:Japanese scientists resurrect tiger tyrant, anarchy ensues (to revive the series)
• UnNews:The Orange Beast opens transuniversal portal to destroy humankind, but Jesus and Santa save the day (the end of the saga)

Maybe I'm forgetting something, but I think these were all of my UnNewses. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 12:04, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Now that you're bringing up this UnNews stuff, I would really appreciate it if you would nom me for the Foolitzer Prize. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 18:40, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Mindreader. Thats what I intend to do. --Docile hippopotamus 00:54, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

It seems I didn't mention UnNews:Bettie Page rises from the grave earlier. I wrote that one too. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:17, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

On User:SysRq/2

That's a test page, in the future you don't have to worry about it. Thanks for the template cleanup though, I'm a lazy fuck, aren't I? —Sir SysRq (talk) 20:27, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Aren't we all though? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 20:28, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Check it out!

I figured out how you Cover up words like this from this Disscusion Page

Thanks who marked up there edit did it above! ?

P.S. Putting just Rogue the bat's head on other pictures makes them look WAY to creepy!!!

Nothing!!!

--Skate1168 (Talk) 01:11, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

That's neato. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 10:00, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Cheers!

Thanks for your edits on Star Tek Online! Always appreciated when people help me find those small spelling errors and such. Cheers! --kit 10:08, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Glad I could help. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 10:09, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

My category

It wasnt finished. Creating a good category involves sifting through like every article and picking good ones for it. Naturally, this takes next to forever. and besides - I think I did a good job of not flaming our ignorant-of-1995-techie-slang friend, mordillo. While still expressing my feelings on the subject. Apocalypse r 20:40, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

I can understand that, but still I doubt all that hassle about it was really necessary. Asking stuff in a friendly manner tends to pay off more. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 20:37, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Speaking of unfunny categories, did you know that we have a category called 'Aging Hippies', containing the pages 'Acetic Acid' and 'User:Zim ulator/Old User Page'? because we do. Apocalypse r 20:40, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Maybe you should inform Mnbvcxz, he's always busy with categories and trying to decide which category should stay and which category should be erased from history. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 20:50, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Sycamore was the one who cleared out some of our stupid categories. I was only clearing out the category redirects, which don't work. Basically, the problem is that the redirect doesn't categorize to the target of the redirect, instead, it creates a hidden category "under" the redirect. Right now, I'm working on clearing out the bad templates.

Due to how the deletion process works, its much easier to get rid of bad new material than bad old material. --Mnb'z 02:26, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

As a reply(you sent me to the edit confliction page) Yes, I know. I wasnt asking yet. Someday I will re-create it all at once, so it starts with everything in it. Apocalypse r 20:42, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

I think it would have been a better idea to tell that to Mordillo, instead of claiming he has no sense of humour. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 20:54, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

~ 22:56, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Hey it's Mordillo, in my talkpage. Welcome, oh great and mighty spinning star. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 22:58, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

He's my dad, he is! HAI! - [16:57 9 February 2009] YYettie

I HAVE ANOTHER QUESTION

Q1, how long does a talkpage have to be before gettin archived? --Poobear 08:26, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

That's all up to you to decide. In general, it should be quite long before you archive it, but not too long. Check out some other users' talkpages and their archives for some examples. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 15:06, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

how do i archive? --Poobear 02:21, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

You create a page you want to put your archived stuff in and title it something like "User:Poobear/Archive1" or "User talk:Poobear/Archive1" or whatever you want, but it has to be in your userspace. You copy-paste the stuff you're archiving in that page and then you remove the content from the original page. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 15:03, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Thankies

Going Down? Necropaxx would like to thank you profusely for reading his article and actually liking it enough to vote For. The picture on the right is exactly what you wouldn't see in an elevator. Sorry. :(

Thanks again! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:10, Feb 12

Glad to be of help. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:53, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Bear Images

I'm trying to keep the bear images (and other mammals that have their own category) out of the mammal images category. That category has 300+ images now, making it hard to find pics of the less popular mammals. --Mnb'z 18:50, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

If I spot an unnecessary "Mammal Images" categorization, I'll remove it. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 18:52, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for voting

And now, a special message from the President *pff...hehe* of the United States My fellow Uncyclopedians, This past vote on VFH has been an emotional one for our wiki. The people have spoken, and I am honorated to accept the privilegitude to servify the Uncyclopedia front page for another eight years. What do you mean, articles are only featured for one day? Thank you for voting. Much love, —Sir SysRq (talk)

Yes! Bush for president! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 21:52, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the help

thankyou. is theyre some way i can repay you? --Poobear 06:12, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

I'd already be pleased if you keep up contributing to Uncyclopedia in a constructive way. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 15:18, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

What are you doing?

Harrasing IPs even if they're vandals is not cool--Sycamore (Talk) 17:56, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

I was just trying to let him stop. I was getting quite annoyed with repetitively reverting him. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:58, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

I added him to Ban Patrol and a while later he was still blanking stuff (no admin had come online yet), so I tried talking to him. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 18:00, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Quick drive-by: (as I'm sure this is over by now but whatever) General protocol is to disengage from any revert war and just get an op. Don't try to fuck with him, just hold tight until the cavalry arrives. —Sir SysRq (talk) 18:34, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

/me arrives on top of a white donkey. ~ 21:57, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

That isn't a donkey. MrN 10:31, Feb 15

What is it then? A goat? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 10:35, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Cat Images

Are you taking any cat images out of the main category? I just want to know for consistency purposes. I think the "one big catchall" category might not work, I'd probably divide it into big cats, cartoon cats (with a garfield subcategory,), lol cats, and regular cat images.--Mnb'z 05:56, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

I took most "Garfield Images" out of the Cat Images category. Also, I think we can leave regular cats in Cat Images and subdivide some special cases in their own subcategory. Even if only regular cat images are found in the Cat Images category, it still "catches all" through its subcategories. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 09:15, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Did you?

Talk to 151.49.7.10 at any point? MrN 10:41, Feb 15

I tried to, but he reverted my edits to his talkpage. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 10:46, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Did you try pouring treacle down his pants? MrN 10:56, Feb 15

Well, no. But I did try to poor some melancholy in his brain. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 10:59, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Sorry Socky....

I took a look at yer userpage. You've been nominated to be banned. For how long I don't know... but I think that most people who go to FFS get banned. Sorry Socky, but if the ban is permanent, despite all you have done, your days as an Uncyclopedian are coming to an end. Sorry again Socky. </exaggeration> Just kidding dude. I hope you come out without a ban. Good luck! S-984 21:46, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

I hope he gets a ban. Hell, I hope I make ban again this round. I got one last round, and it was great. —Sir SysRq (talk) 21:59, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

What's so great about being banned? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 22:46, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

The sex. —Sir SysRq (talk) 23:05, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

How long will Socky be banninated for? S-984 03:59, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Probably forever. He's baaad. —Sir SysRq (talk) 04:04, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Damn it. <Stewie Griffin> Damn, damn, damn, damn! </Stewie Griffin> S-984 16:33, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

I'm baaad alright. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:34, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Baaad, baaad, baaaaaaad. —Sir SysRq (talk) 16:40, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Beware of MrN, he shags goats. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:17, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

I herd. (See what I did there?) —Sir SysRq (talk) 17:34, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Hmm... (Yes.) -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:36, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

( . ) ( . )

Hmm... Yes! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 20:31, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Ummmmm

I am unable to fathom why you spent time correcting many of the entirely intentional spelling and grammar errors on The Swedish textile industry is GAY. pillow talk 19:50, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, sorry about that. I've reverted my edits. I started correcting and got carried away. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 19:52, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Well, I mean, if you think some of the misspellings make it unreadable and generally less funny, that's another thing entirely. pillow talk 19:57, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Maybe some of the spelling errors make it more confusing rather than making it funnier, for some less intelligent readers that is. Overall, I don't think the misspellings make it relevantly harder to read or less funny. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 20:03, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

I think it's fine as is. Very Winkler style. If people find it unreadable, that's their problem. Also, while I'm here, I'll just say that I'm starting to warm up to this article. At first, I was just kind of hoping for another Winkler clone that followed the same formula and that was the only way this could be funny. But I think I like this way better. —Sir SysRq (talk) 20:17, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

I think the "... is GAY" meme could be even funnier if the subject was more widely known. Like "The Western fashion industry is GAY" instead of "The Swedish textile industry is GAY". -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 20:23, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Eh, I think the Sweedish textile industry had it comming. —Sir SysRq (talk) 20:27, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

You're right about that. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 20:28, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

press

hey sock, just wondering of you had any comment for the signpost concerning the impendind influx of product placement on uncyc? SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:08, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Maybe... Could you specify the issue a little bit more? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 12:21, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I got something: What? No ads? But how will we make money? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 15:29, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Users blanking their own user pages

Yeah, they can do that, you know? He blanked his page as an IP, and I reverted, telling him to log in if it was him. He did, so... y'know, if he wants to blank his talk page, it's his page! --UU - natter 15:03, Feb 20

Yeah, okay. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 15:04, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

In other news: have a good weekend dude! --UU - natter 15:08, Feb 20

Oh, thanks. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 15:08, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

WTF?

Are ya doing? MrN 10:10, Feb 21

I'm trying to find anything worth keeping in that China article. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 10:11, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

You don't need to save the article every time dude! Just view the changes. You are spamming RC really badly... MrN 10:13, Feb 21

Sorry, sorry. I redirected it, there was nothing worth keeping. Again, sorry. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 10:14, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Also, since it only was just one article, you can set RC to show the last 100 edits, instead of 50. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 10:17, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Also, also, if someone would be spamming RC with image categorization edits, it is possible to exclude the image namespace, so it doesn't have to bother you. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 12:48, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

WTF???

Why are you adding useless categorys to images?, non nude image to pictures of people - if people want a porn image database I'm sure there are more suitable sites.--Sycamore (Talk) 16:24, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Useless categories? 'Nonnude Images' is not the only category I've added. Admitted, maybe I somewhat overused Nonnude Images, and probably, it is a generally overused category. But if you really think I put a completely wrong category on an image, please revert my edit. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:30, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

I think it's useful. One can never have too many categories. —Sir SysRq (talk) 16:41, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

I agree. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:47, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

See, it makes it much easier to find certain images. What if I want non-nude images but I still want some hot girls in my article? Or what if I actually do want nude images because 4chan is down? —Sir SysRq (talk) 17:01, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

The erotic image categorization was mostly my work. Its purpose is to discourage the uploading of pr0n, by helping those who look for that sort of stuff find it. And, I did create several notices encouraging people to keep the boobage to a minimum. --Mnb'z 01:17, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

I saw what you did there

Way to go adding categories to pictures. Many of them needed that. Well done.--<<>> 00:47, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Bradaphraser has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic.

Thanks for the cookie. I'll consume it right away. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 00:52, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Wait. You gave me Somebody's cookie. What am I supposed to think about that? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 00:54, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Oh, you changed it to your username. Thanks again! It's delicious I tell you, delicious! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 01:06, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, the code on that particular template sucks, so I always have to check. I thought I had gotten one before, but after an hour or so of checking, it turns out I never got one. So I just used Mhaille's page for the code, instead.--<<>> 01:08, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

It appears you have to type your username in the template, but "name=" should only be used if you want it to show another name than your username but it destroys the link. Like this:

Sockpuppet of an unregistered user has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic.

The Great and Honourable Sockie has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic.

Hope that helps. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 01:16, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Well now I feel foolish. Thanks for the FYI, BTW.--<<>> 01:41, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

No problem. Always glad to help. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 01:44, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

What about you

You want to do shelob? – Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.36.108.27 (talk • contribs)

I doubt it. Not right now in any case. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 01:02, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Help a noob out?

I was thinking about contributing to Uncyclopedia in more ways than nomming every article I come across. So, do you know any articles that need a rewrite that are good for n00bish users?Saberwolf116 03:39, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

This is what Uncyclopedia:What You Can Do says about it:

Spruce up an article that is in disrepair

Handy with formatting? Help out an ugly article.

Good at adding links? Help out a deadend or red link article.

For an extra challenge, expand a short article, or fix up one that could use some help.

Articles that are found here have been promoted from +expand so that they can rest until someone picks them up and finishes them. Pick one up today!

Rewrite an article

There are many, many articles wanting a loving home. You can save them! Just browse through the list and if a title catches your eye, rewrite it so hard it won't know what hit it.

Help out a stuck article

There are plenty of authors who can't finish what they started, the ones who admit to being stuck need your help today! These articles sit while the rest of us dish out witty humor 24/7, so put your unsticking ability to work!

-Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 06:56, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Cheers =D

This is my happy face Unlike this monkey you appreciated my article. Nerds all around the world are rejoicing and praising you as their newest Captain. Thank you for voting! The Force is strong within you.

Hey, thanks yo. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 09:24, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Master of Puppets

Thanks For Being Groovy! I am both deeply humbled and appreciative of your vote to promote me to Knight Grand Cross of the Order and shall send the magic van round to your flat with virtual contraband

Gay Jesus has officially ordained you as the high priest of his Apostles as well.--    14:55, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Always glad to be of help. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:02, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Thank you!

Good day, old chap! Thank you indeed for your vote on my article, UnBooks:Hot Japanese Girls - Colourblind or Unable to Speak English?. As a sterling reward, I will not deliberately make this text extremely tiny around these pictures of some rather cracking Japanese girls I've supplied for you. ... I say, are you still there, old boy?

Also nominate everything in sight. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 15:35, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome. My eyes are really pleased with those Asian girls. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 15:39, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

RE: UnNews:Uncyclopedia Cures Cancer

no moving dates on UnNews articles, please. Cheers! Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 00:17, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Actually I didn't change the date, the original author did that. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:58, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

A Template of Thanks

FROM THE DESK OF GUILDENSTERNENSTEIN

Thank you for supporting my recently featured article

Your support is greatly appreciated.

~ Guildensternenstein

---

Those images look really creepy... -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 11:58, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Your welcome template

I like the look of it, mind if I spork it? ~Formerly Annoying Crap 11:29, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Oh, and I fixed the weird centering thing that was happening on this page for you ~Formerly Annoying Crap 11:38, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

You can use it if you want. And thanks for your help. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:38, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Achtung! Your support for the Nazi party has been documented. Danke shein. That vill be all.

OptyC Sucks! CUN17:50, 7 Mar

Sieg Heil! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:56, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

What do you call a fancy, high priced sock?

I Told Her Thanks For Voting To Feature Private Eye But she looked at me like I was wearing orange in the St Patrick's Day parade. I wasn't sure if that was fog behind me or if my favorite place for take-out Chinese food had just went up in flames but I knew that I'd better make this quick either way. "You were great, kid" I told her but her facial expression never changed. She kicked off her heels and put on a pair of roller skates but she looked about as comfortable in them as a woodpecker in the petrified forest. She took one last drag off her cigarette, blew the smoke in my face, flicked the butt at my feet and rolled away into the night - leaving me standing there like a wide screen TV on layaway. I took another sniff of the air and now I was sure, Chang's Wok Inn was definitely on fire and it looked like it was going to be another night of hamburger helper and "Juggs" magazine..............................

That's what I'd like to call you!--    11:15, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

I really liked the article, so it was the obvious choice. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 11:22, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Getting too keen?

??? - Its his talkpage, not yours to spam.--Sycamore (Talk) 18:44, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I made a mistake. I apologize and will see to it that it won't happen again. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 19:42, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Purim

Mad Mike "Moishe" Tyson does it, so you should too!

Yes - it's Purim already, so be like
Mike and eat some ears today!

It's the only time of year when being a Jew is fun!
Chag Purim Sameach from Rabbi Techno

---

OK, so you're not Jewish. Who cares? This is a great excuse to get drunk.

Well, I'm a little bit of everything, and I'll take any excuse to get drunk. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 15:42, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

You could always ask Mordillo to make you an honorary Jew. He has a template for that. I was given access to all Jew-related persecutions nine months ago or so. pillow talk 18:29, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

I'll think about it. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 18:46, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Well

that was quite helpful. I am much obliged. I think it should go without saying that I will now pester you for instruction on every single banal uncyclopedia problem I encounter (and that should be a LOT of banality). P.S. Why is it that whenever someone uses the term 'it goes without saying' they immediately SAY the thing that should go without being said? Goes without saying just how annoying that is... --NHP

Quite annoying indeed. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 21:56, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Goes without saying. MrN 22:00, Mar 10

Let's relax our level of enthusiasm with welcoming users

If they want to remove the message, it's their talk page. ~ 22:51, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Okay, I'll keep it in mind. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 10:27, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Today is a special day!

It may have started as a little turd, but you helped make it into an award winning pile! ~Formerly Annoying Crap 08:40, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Neon poop. Brilliant! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 10:29, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Oops...

Actually that was a mistake I forgot to log in... --I am Justice! aka: Halsoft. 14:29, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Hmm... Okay. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 14:36, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

You're no fun

Harumph! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 14:30, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Sorry. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 14:32, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

You should be. *pout* Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 14:34, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

*Pout* -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 14:35, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

If I see that pic again, I will do something stupid. Don't make me stupid. You wouldn't like me when I'm stupid. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 14:46, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Don't worry about it. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 15:02, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Personally, I'm against pictures. Not texty enough. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 15:15, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Personally, I'm against text. Too contenty. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 15:16, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

It's just...

There is probably a load of stuff you don't know about going on. It's all good, but just avoid getting involved when bans are being discussed. Thanks for your help with the other stuff yesterday... MrN 15:54, Mar 14

Okay. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:02, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

I guess I'll manage... I was pretty sure I knew what was going on though. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:08, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

You did not. Either way, hopefully I have made my point now. When we are talking bans... Keep away. Getting involved will win you no friends... On either side. MrN 16:17, Mar 14

Fine. Fine. You can calm down now. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:26, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Here, have a picture of some sausages. --MrN9000

Oh thanks. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:33, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia is the wurst. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user

Your welcome template is broken

Comments that appear after it don't appear after it, if you get my drift. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 18:17, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Its your welcome that was 'broken'. You need to subst: it if you want it to look presentable. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 18:26, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

I never said that I was doing it right. I merely pointed out that yours is broken. My comment after it should appear but doesn't. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 18:28, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Headers after it appear on the TOC but not the page, too. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 18:31, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

What are you talking about? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 18:33, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

See here? On the right, in green, is the stuff I added. Underneath that...it doesn't appear. It's like I've gone partly invisible! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 18:35, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

I see what you've added underneath my welcome message. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 18:40, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

I don't. Are you sure that you haven't poked a hole in the foundation of reality? Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 18:43, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

I think it's more likely you got a computer like Tagstit's. Do you see anything wrongly formatted on this page? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 18:47, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

A cursory glance says that page doesn't look wrong.

Okay, when I subst in the basic welcome template in place of yours, my post-welcome comment appears just fine. This basic troubleshooting, where post-welcome comments appear after one but not the other, leads me to conclude, as I concluded before with my earlier conclusion, that your welcome template is broken. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 18:52, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

It appears fine to me. How can it be broken? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 18:55, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

You use Internet Explorer don't you! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 18:57, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Lite Brite. It's pretty, but slow. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 19:01, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

There, I fixed it for you. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 19:00, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Not for me. For the internet. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 19:01, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

The problem was that your message ended up behind my welcome message. Mozilla Firefox on the other hand automatically places the text beneath the welcome message. A little "<br clear>" is the solution to the problem. I'll go change my welcome template so it won't mess things up next time. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 19:32, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

I use <br clear> as the solution for everything. That's probably the reason why I'm not a surgeon anymore. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 19:49, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Most likely, yes. You thin out the population too much that way. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 21:12, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

It probably didn't help that I tend to be drunk. Party! Woo! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 21:17, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Me too! I'm wasted. Woohoo! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 21:19, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

So much scrolling...

My OCD makes me want to archive your talk page for you. ~Formerly Annoying Crap 10:20, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Don't you have an "End" button on that keyboard of yours? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 10:23, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Not on the laptop :P ~Formerly Annoying Crap 10:25, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Maybe I'll archive it in the near future. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 10:26, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Here, do with it what you want :) :

Talk Archive: Archive01 - Etc...

~Formerly Annoying Crap 10:32, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Additionally, I answered your question at Kit's talkpage. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 10:41, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Just so you know...

When the thing you want to put in has an equals sign in it, put "1=" before it in the template (like I did). Also, preview. –—Hv (talk) 15/03 13:07

Okay. Sorry for the mess. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:09, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Thank You

Thank you for your support for the (FAILED) featuring of AFI. You will not be killed and/or molested today. --CheddarBBQ

Oh and congrats on being nominated for UotM and Banning. Quite an achievement. I hope you win.--Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 18:05, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

We'll see how things turn out. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:50, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Might I suggest a trade?

I spotted this, and thought that I've got a stump of my own in need of reviewing. I wondered if you would have a wish to do mine if I do yours? -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) Grammar Nazi, Mum , BFF & NotM, CUN , GMP . - Perkele! 18:33, 15 Mar

I'd really like to do your review (a quick read through makes it clear this is a very good article, I don't really see anything that needs to be fixed, I'd probably give it a total score of 40 out of 50) but I don't have much time on my hands right now, not to mention I'm a little bit unexperienced as far as reviewing is concerned. You're still welcome to do my review of course, though I understand if you won't. I'm sorry I can't help you with this right away. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:06, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

There's no better way to learn to do it than to actually practice doing it. It doesn't have to be a perfect review and doesn't have to be done immediately, but be warned, I may review your review and suggest improvements on a general level ;) -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) Grammar Nazi, Mum , BFF & NotM, CUN , GMP . - Perkele! 22:30, 15 Mar

Okay, thanks. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:31, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

I done didified the review. I'm also not the nicest critic around, but I do distribute hugs. But shhh... Don't tell someone, he'll ban you or me or both, he's jealous if I hug anyone else o_O -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) Grammar Nazi, Mum , BFF & NotM, CUN , GMP . - Perkele! 15:16, 18 Mar

I think it's a very good review. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:55, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Oh? o.O I just wrote it in a hurry. Felt it was lacking... the something... :/ -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) Grammar Nazi, Mum , BFF & NotM, CUN , GMP . - Perkele! 18:40, 19 Mar

Well, it's a bit short for an "in-depth" review, but I'm quite sure your suggestions will help me a lot. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:51, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

The article or review? I found the article to be so short I had trouble coming up with anything good to say at first, but I gave it some thought, though... -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) Grammar Nazi, Mum , BFF & NotM, CUN , GMP . - Perkele! 19:21, 19 Mar

Well yes, the article is really short. I'm really grateful that your review wasn't as negative as I initially expected a review for that article would be. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:27, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Oh trust me, if I intend to be mean, you'll know it. (meaning I'll run to Dad or Gramps and say you've pushed me so I fell and hurt my knee and cried because of you... -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) Grammar Nazi, Mum , BFF & NotM, CUN , GMP . - Perkele! 20:05, 19 Mar

Luvvy being mean? Is that even possible? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:18, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

I am cute... That much is for sure. But that's about it... -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) Grammar Nazi, Mum , BFF & NotM, CUN , GMP . - Perkele! 20:26, 19 Mar

You want a hug? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:33, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

I thrive on hugs ^_^ -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) Grammar Nazi, Mum , BFF & NotM, CUN , GMP . - Perkele! 20:44, 19 Mar

*hug* —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:45, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Awwwws... -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) Grammar Nazi, Mum , BFF & NotM, CUN , GMP . - Perkele! 21:02, 19 Mar

Glad you liked it. ^_^ —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:29, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

I'm too lazy to make a template...

But thanks for the vote on Driving in Bucharest, it's really appreciated. –—Hv (talk) 17/03 17:55

Okay, I'm glad to have seen it featured on the front page. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:58, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

In Gratitude

 In gratitude for your vote  

  The GlobalTourniquet says "Thanks!"  

Understandably, you voted for my article for featuring. Although your "for" vote was not extraordinary, as the article's genius was beyond question, it is still appropriate to acknowledge your dutiful participation in the process.

So, in gratitude for your vote, I will dedicate my next sexual act to your honor. Thank you.

The following sexual acts are available for this honor. Please indicate below this template which one you would like me to dedicate to your user name.

Self-gratification Spousal coitus Purchased sex Casual encounter

NOTE: Only under limited circumstances will this act actually involve you.

Don't get in over your head. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:37, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Well, it's just a quick "thank you" - if you don't want the dedication, you can just say so. I just thought it might be nice for you if I'm thinking of you next time I spooge. --Globaltourniquet - (was TPLN) 21:38, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

No, no, I'm very grateful. I was just joking. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:40, 17 March 2009 (UTC)