User:Necropaxx/UotY

Cajek (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 6

• Nomination - Aside from his obvious qualities as a writer Cajek doesn't get the respect he deserves for the work he does on Uncyclopedia. Always helpful to other writers both established and newcomers Cajek has been one of the real workhorses that has seen Uncyclopedia go from strength to strength this year. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
• For. Cajek doesn't just improve the site; he has a knack for encouraging others to get behind him and... oh, dear, that's turning into a sexual innuendo. pillow talk 21:07, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
•  F☭R 03:05, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Very Strong For Cajek makes this site very fun. He deserves very strong bannination it! --Pleb- Sawblade5 ^{( yell | FAQ | I did this )} 07:18, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
• For What they said. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 23:28, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
• For Only limited action by me lately, but I've seen him hard at work helping others.-- Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 05:07, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
• This is not an easy year to vote. There are quite a few here that I admire for what they did this year...in a non sexual way...or such. But I think that Cajek has initiated the Pee Review revolution which revitalized a part of the site that was dormant for...well...forever! I think Cajek injected us with new energies (as well as sexually transmitted diseases) which managed to make us look, if only for a short while as not being the worst. Unlike the majority of us Cajek cared. ~ 13:21, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
  • You guys are awesome: I love this place, sexually speaking.   Le Cejak • <14:09 Jan 16, 2009>

TheLedBalloon (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 7

• Nomination - Bloody funny, generous with his time, much as with Cajek so much goes unnoticed, I am going to struggle to choose between them. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
  • Wuv 10 years from now, I'll still remember my adopter's username. And his home address. Because I'm kinda weird.   Le Cejak • <17:16 Jan 01, 2009>
• For. IronLung 02:20, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
• For. An ever present, ever friendly, ever helpful admin, and great all-around guy too. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:29, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
• For. I love this man. Goddamn if I ever met leddy in a bathroom goddamn some shit would happen. Goddamn. -

  kingkitty ~Fuck you~

• For. He fixes things when I broked them. --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 03:26, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
• For Pretty much per TKF. Nothing else to say on that one. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 07:08, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
• For Looks like Mordillo is going to win (which I agree with), but I would like to make special mention of Led. Led's style of handling the crap, whilst not getting upset by assholes yet still continuing to write quality articles shows what a awesome dude this guy is. Another thing about Led... When he has made a mistake, he admits it. Twice in over a year I think it was. ;) MrN 16:12, Jan 9
• For There's nothing that Led can't do. Really. Try him. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 22:38, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

84.194.239.31 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Block (rem-lst-all) • Whois • City • Proxy? • WP Edits • Checkuser)

Score: 1 + 1 vote for the institution of IPotY

The hamsters will always remember us of his greatness.

• Nomination - 84.194.239.31 was the one that prophecy had spoken of, the one who would bring balance to the wiki. The awesome 84.194.239.31 was always there to state the obvious, out-grammar anyone and talk existentially. Maybe he's still there, lurking in the shadows, ready to act, to do what is necessary. 84.194.239.31, he was the coolest IP of 2008. He said "nobody has to worry about what happened to me" but still I wonder what happened to him. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 01:03, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
• For - I know I'm trowing my vote away, but I can't stand 84.194.239.31 not getting some of the credit he deserves. I wouldn't be able to decide who else to vote for anyway. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 13:31, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
• For the creation of IP of the Year and this guy being the first. 84.194.239.31 is a stellar chap, killing a rather pesky troll for us and being exceptionally helpful before vanishing off into the distance, preferring the anonymity of his searchable, easily identifiable IP address. This award should be saved for an actual Uncyclopedian, which means that the user must be a MUN at least, in my book anyways. However, this guy still deserves some recognition. (I mean it, IPotY would be awesome, can we make that happen?) —Sir SysRq (talk) 21:11, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

  Do you seriously believe that the almighty 84.194.239.31 can be traced by such simple mechanisms? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:45, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

  I don't know what it was that I was trying to say. Don't call me on this shit, I'm making it up as I go, man. —Sir SysRq (talk) 22:54, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

MrN9000 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 2

• Nom & for - A real workhorse, and he's everywhere - encouraging new writers, smithing, reverting, formatting, fixing, helping out and being a real gent. --UU - natter 09:24, Jan 1
• Near-woot The only reason I'm not voting for Pants is because that other guy from England, the one that lives under the ground and controls my thoughts, has been around longer, and helped me navigate this crazy website. GO N!   Le Cejak • <17:15 Jan 01, 2009>
• Comment. I just want to express my gratitude to MrN for being one of the most effective and essential Uncyclopedians to the site for the past year or so. Had Mordillo not been as awesome as he is, my vote would go here. I hold MrN in high regard as being one of the members who sparked a good chain reaction of users doing maintenance and helping to keep the site going, and think he was quite possibly the single most important user in that particular "revolution", as it were. As such, he deserves at the very least, this statement of praise. -RAHB 18:55, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
• For - hard choice for me to make this year, some fine contributors. His finer points are detailed by others above. The only thing I would add to this is that the work he does has been achieved without the "benefit" of admin rights, which speaks for itself. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

Sycamore (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 2

• Nom - Another absolute Trojan - a recent changes monster, reverter of shite, fixer of vandalism, fighter of fires and wearer of a stylish sporran. Probably does more work than you. --UU - natter 09:24, Jan 1
• For per above. --Mnbvcxz 21:41, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
• For. Since nobody will make him an admin. Harumph! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 04:06, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Mordillo (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +21

• Nom - He's the admin I see about the place the most, making the bans that need to be made, doing the big bad wolf stuff to keep fuckwits at bay, and generally being the controlling zionist influence on this wiki. --UU - natter 09:24, Jan 1
•  For. - He's good, plus a good admin too. Makes good articles. I fear that I'll be blocked if I don't vote for him. |Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Man on Fire CUN|IC Kill | 02:08, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
• PHWHORE And stuffs. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 02:28, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
• For. Diplomatic, a work horse, responsible, and as I've said time and time again, and will continue to say until the day the Earth stands still, he simply knows how to get shit done. -RAHB 03:19, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
• For. Tough call this year, but I'm voting Mordillo, per RAHB. 'Dillo's the man. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 14:06, Jan 2
• And I thought WotY was hard. Of the nine current noms, there are seven more than deserving candidates here (I'll let you guys work out who that is), and there's an argument to be made for every one of them. I've thought especially hard about voting for UU, then MrN, then Sycamore. Then I noticed a common thread among them - who is it that they all look up to in a way, and who they ask for help in a firefight? Mordillo. He's been on fire all year pretty much, and overall, I feel I have to vote for him. –—Hv (talk) 2/01 18:18
• For. Hard working, friendly, effective. Did I forget to mention Jewish? Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 18:21, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
• Four as per him being awesome. Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 19:12, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
• Yeah, he's cool. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 19:47, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
• For despite the whole Gaza thing... -- shaky Ape (jiggle) (Riot Porn) 21:13, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
• For, BECAUSE of the Gaza thing. Yes. What? Oh, I'm sorry I misunderstood. For anyway.--<<>> 00:59, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
• For Sure. Gramps earns it. It's now or never, considering how old he already is... -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) Grammar Nazi, Mum , BFF & NotM, CUN , GMP . - Perkele! 16:37, 7 Jan
• For. One of the best. And apparently his wife is cute too -- sannse (talk) 21:01, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
• For. Mordillo pwns spammers, and is an all around nice guy. --Meganew POST NOW!!! 23:22, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
• For. Always the guy who lays down the law and gets stuff done, without being too serious about it. - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 00:42, Jan 11
• W♥v. Hebrew boner. Level headed. Role model. Mediator. More dildos. Only one of these terms refers to Mordillo. And yes, it is "role model." Wait, all of those describe Mordillo perfectly. I think Hv did it for me, made me realize that everyone comes to one person time after time for advice and a little tough love. I don't know who that person is, so I'm basing my vote on userpage vandalism. Mordillo's page has seen more action than...er...Codeine's mum. Oh, and he's a Jew that controls the internet, something you don't see too much these days and therefore needs to be rewarded and recognized. Good work, Mordillo. —Sir SysRq (talk) 02:21, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
• Yes. He has shiny shoes. - [13:41 12 January] Sir FSt Don Yettie
• Bandwagon --EMC ^[TALK] 02:12, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
• Comment restored Boobs after it had accidentally been deleted for whatever reason.--Mnbvcxz 15:53, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

No agenda here, I just love boobs. ~ 16:03, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

• Dig I love this man. To the point that his girlfriend is seriously distraught by it. Could I be more subtle about it? Absolutely. Will I be more subtle about it? I think you know the answer to that question. You think I care what that bitch thinks? ;) --THINKER 01:15, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

That's my wife you're talking about! O_O ~ 10:29, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

• For he's pure gold and have you looked at the price of Au lately? Let's mine this bastard! --Kenvalyi 01:39, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
• Why not? -- REGRETTENENBAUMIS DEAD TALK! 00:51, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
•  For. Woo! Mord! go mord! Woo! woo... I'm going home ^{Pirate Lord}__Sonic80 (Yell  •  Latest literary excretion) __ 18:35, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Under user (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 9

• Nom - One word - awesome — Sir Sycamore (talk) 14:25, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
• For Can I vote more than once? How does this thing work? What does this button do? Oh sh-   Le Cejak • <17:12 Jan 01, 2009>
•  For. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 17:49, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
• For. Backed me all the way in numerous parts of the site in the past few months. --Nachlader 18:07, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
• For. He's like OnStar: always there. (groan) • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 19:51, Jan 2
• For. Parsat (talk / contribs) 04:09, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
• For - It's about time a non-sysop like myself got this award. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 08:58, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
• Damn right UU has kept this site running all year. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 10:29, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
• For helping out around the site and constantly peeing. --Docile hippopotamus 00:37, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
• For. Devoted enough to not only do my job for a year, but then take the title to go with it. Good people. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 01:06, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Modusoperandi (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 2

• Nom nom nom. He has flavor.--<<>> 15:15, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
• For. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 05:29, 02 Jan 2009
• For, as per myself. ~ Readmesoon 18:06, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Heerenveen (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 0

• Nom I just don't think he gets enough credit for all the stuff he does around here. Deserves at least a nom. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 17:23, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

A nomination just for the sake of nomination? --EMC ^[TALK] 02:14, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

No, a nomination for the sake of everyone saying, "Oh yeah! Heerenveen totally deserves this award. Seeing him here makes me want to vote for him, and whomever nominated him is a sexy, manly, awesome guy!" That's what I was generally going for. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 06:08, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

SysRq (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 1

• Nom&For I don't even know if Sys would approve of me nominating and for-ing him but I'm going to do it anyway. In my opinion he is one of the brightest lights on uncyclopedia : always funny, always friendly and compassionate as well as passionate (the speeches on WotY demonstrate that) and although my opinion probably doesn't count for much because I keep procrastinating myself on and off the site to the point where I'm shit at everything Uncyclopedia-wise, I still feel strongly that this guy deserves this award. —talk 11:45, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
• Man, fuck you. Thanks buddy, I appreciate the kind words. To say thank you, I am going to make a simple comment without bitching about you voting for me. —Sir SysRq (talk) 20:59, 7 January 2009 (UTC)