Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/Archive256

---

Shemales

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Whut?  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Dec 13 '11 12:40 (UTC) Oh shit, that first quote is so funny! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:07, December 13, 2011 (UTC) Nix -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:00, December 14, 2011 (UTC) Nix is Latin for snow. The more you know! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 07:57, 14 December 2011 And unix, of course, is the Geek form of eunuchs.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Dec 14 '11 9:47 (UTC) That first quote is the only redeeming quality of this article. --$Fe^{+3}AlFe^{+2}$ 03:35, December 14, 2011 (UTC) I agree Bangkok sucks --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 15:23, December 14, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

People of the United States

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	More from the Americruft series.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Dec 13 '11 12:19 (UTC) "Americans are just plain stupid..." From that line alone, you know this article is going to suck. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:06, December 13, 2011 (UTC) Removed the above line (which was added by an IP) but the article still sucks. It hasn't changed much in a year at all. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 22:05, December 13, 2011 (UTC) This can take a hike. --$Fe^{+3}AlFe^{+2}$ 03:41, December 14, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Australian user sees nothing wrong with this. 2K12_DAN.VRS 00:51, December 14, 2011 (UTC) Well, I joined Uncyclopedia specifically to make fun of America, and I can tell you this article has nothing new to say. Also, I suspect everything after the intro and the first paragraph was written by a 13-year-old. Feel free to fix the "jokes" so they're actually funny.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Dec 14 '11 0:59 (UTC)

Porcelain

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	more shit. I'll guess this works.--fcukmanLOOS3R! 11:55, December 13, 2011 (UTC) Blah. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:05, December 13, 2011 (UTC) Really? 2K12_DAN.VRS 00:53, December 14, 2011 (UTC) Delete. -DeathBySnowman (talk) 01:25m December 14, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Big Brother America

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Is that TV show still on the air? ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Dec 13 '11 11:50 (UTC) I like the concept, but it's sooooo listy.--fcukmanLOOS3R! 11:53, December 13, 2011 (UTC) Much too listy. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:04, December 13, 2011 (UTC) suck. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 03:24, December 14, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	It's not so much "listy-ness" as lack of actual coherent content.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Dec 14 '11 1:00 (UTC)

United Provinces of Yugoslovakia

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Go away. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Dec 13 '11 10:03 (UTC) How do you guys find so many crappy articles?--fcukmanLOOS3R! 10:16, December 13, 2011 (UTC) I stand in one spot and swing a dead cat by the tail. Usually I hit three or four. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Dec 13 '11 10:30 (UTC) 1010101010. Best part of the whole article. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:00, December 13, 2011 (UTC) I think somebody got drunk one evening and did a bunch of these. 2K12_DAN.VRS 00:54, December 14, 2011 (UTC) Suck. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 14:09, December 14, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Broken VCR Player

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	WTF??? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) I would say that this could be funny if a Super IP (or maybe Hyperbole) had gotten a hold of it. But that would probably be a lie.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Dec 13 '11 7:13 (UTC) Delete. Nice idea but it hasn't worked here. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:26, December 13, 2011 (UTC) Wasted potential. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:59, December 13, 2011 (UTC) Per above. -- 13:47, December 14, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Template:FBI

Score: -6
Keep (7)	ha.--fcukmanLOOS3R! 11:46, December 13, 2011 (UTC) Not that bad... -- 13:51, December 13, 2011 (UTC) It's only used on one mainspace article but it is funny in the context of said article. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:58, December 13, 2011 (UTC) I think I could use this somewhere... --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 22:48, December 13, 2011 (UTC) The FBI told me to vote keep, or else I'd be in BIG BIG TROUBLE. 2K12_DAN.VRS 00:57, December 14, 2011 (UTC) Nothing wrong with this. --$Fe^{+3}AlFe^{+2}$ 03:44, December 14, 2011 (UTC) Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:11, 14 December 2011
Delete (1)	BFM ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!)
Comments	This one made me laugh, so I won't vote.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Dec 13 '11 9:06 (UTC) Just making sure you're aware of this, but if something makes you laugh, you can also vote to keep it. ; ) —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:47, 13 December 2011 Well, yeah, but an IP completely changed it, and I still dunno if it's really that useful.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Dec 13 '11 22:45 (UTC) Comment. Could be useful to have for Category:Federal Bureau of Investigation. MadMax 21:59, December 13, 2011 (UTC) Kept -- The Zombiebaron 05:53, December 15, 2011 (UTC)

Template:Crunk

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	BFM wut? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!)  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Dec 13 '11 6:14 (UTC) Move it to my userpage. -- 13:52, December 13, 2011 (UTC) Yeeeeaaah. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:57, December 13, 2011 (UTC) Delete.--Count of Monkey Crisco 00:15, December 15, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Template:Eyesbleed

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	BFM This templtes has the rather ironic same effect on me ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Eyebeams.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Dec 12 '11 10:05 (UTC) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 14:44, December 12, 2011 (UTC) Pretty bad template. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:34, December 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:10, December 13, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Template:Fat kid victim

Score: 7
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (7)	BFM. DO NOT WANT ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 07:21, December 12, 2011 (UTC) yuk yuk --Roman Dog Bird 08:08, December 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:09, December 12, 2011 (UTC) UN:N  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Dec 12 '11 10:06 (UTC) Suck. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 12:54, December 12, 2011 (UTC) OMG he iz so f@t! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:33, December 12, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Template:Muslim

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Cool story from. BFM ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 07:23, December 12, 2011 (UTC) haw haw --Roman Dog Bird 08:03, December 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:10, December 12, 2011 (UTC) Yawn. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Dec 12 '11 10:25 (UTC) This is soooooooo original. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:32, December 12, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Template:Fatty

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Ban from mainspace. HURR DURR, I'm twelve and I think fat jokes are still so funnee ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 07:15, December 12, 2011 (UTC) oh fookin' bleedin' bloody hell take this shit off --Roman Dog Bird 07:52, December 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:11, December 12, 2011 (UTC) Let's put this template on all shitty-listy articles, as a final insult, right before we delete them.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Dec 12 '11 10:26 (UTC) Frosty's comment. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:31, December 12, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Template:Article A splode

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Ban from mainspace. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 07:17, December 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:11, December 12, 2011 (UTC) {{SUBST:}} it onto Grueeater's page. He's the on'y one what uses it.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Dec 12 '11 10:30 (UTC) Another one of those templates. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:30, December 12, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Tom Fitzgerald

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	This is a bad. -- The Zombiebaron 07:08, December 12, 2011 (UTC) DO NOT WANT ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 07:11, December 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Never heard of this person. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:26, December 12, 2011 (UTC) Go away.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Dec 12 '11 11:52 (UTC) Is this even a real guy? -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:30, December 12, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Template:What

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Ban from mainspace. Its fucking ugly, thats why! ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 07:09, December 12, 2011 (UTC) I WISH TO PUT MY PANCAKE ON YOUR RABBIT!  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Dec 12 '11 11:54 (UTC) Crappy, useless template. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:28, December 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:11, December 13, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Tracy Partridge vs Gretl von Trapp

Score: 4
Keep (1)	Some very bizarre 2005cruft, which is a good reason to keep it. Enjoyable and creative, imnho. Aleister 15:28 12-12-'11
Delete (5)	Some very bizarre 2005cruft. -- The Zombiebaron 20:30, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. 22:01, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Shite. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:28, December 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete. well that's 12 seconds of my life i'm never getting back. -$Fe^{+3}AlFe^{+2}$ 01:38, December 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete.--Pudong 03:11, December 12, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Peter Tatchell

Score: 5
Keep (1)	Keep. An alright little stub. Granted it's silly but still amusing for those interested in obscure leftist politicians.--Sycamore (Talk) 20:34, December 11, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (6)	This is a bad. -- The Zombiebaron 20:24, December 11, 2011 (UTC) All those references to Hitler and gay sex with Satan really lack originality. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:38, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Agree with Zombiebaron's opinion. 22:03, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Terrible --$Fe^{+3}AlFe^{+2}$ 01:40, December 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete. It's bad. --Pudong 03:14, December 12, 2011 (UTC) Short, no pictures, GAY JOKES, stole a joke from South Park. You are the weakest link. Good-bye.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Dec 12 '11 9:56 (UTC) Wasn't there a South Park episode on how jokes aren't necessarily stolen just because The Simpsons did it already? I guess that could apply to South Park too. Well, unless it's really obviously stolen from South Park. I actually have no idea what joke you're referring to. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:00, 12 December 2011 The episode was about how stealing jokes from The Simpsons was OK, because The Simpsons stole all their ideas from old episodes of The Twilight Zone and The Outer Limits. Or something. (You and I just lost any of our remaining Kewl Points for remembering that episode.) Anyway, I was referring to the joke about "Hitler moving in with his gay boyfriend, Satan." (Dictator enamored with Satan? That's, like, the longest-running South Park joke. LAZY. LAZY LAZY LAME.)  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Dec 12 '11 11:06 (UTC)
Comments

International Velociraptor Attack Week

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	2006cruft. -- The Zombiebaron 17:24, December 11, 2011 (UTC) The name has potential to be funny but alas, it is not. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:13, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. 22:05, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Gotta agree with Xamralco. The page doesn't live up to its title at all. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:06, 11 December 2011 Perhaps an idea for UnNews but not for an article. --$Fe^{+3}AlFe^{+2}$ 01:45, December 12, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Hapsburgs

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	2005cruft. -- The Zombiebaron 17:16, December 11, 2011 (UTC) So many of our early articles were so bad. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:12, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. There's been an Aristocrat's Turkey Day Ball goin' on, but this article's a to-be-deleted motherFUCKer. 22:08, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. --$Fe^{+3}AlFe^{+2}$ 01:47, December 12, 2011 (UTC) I hope Romartus fixes this pile of bloody ballocks. He's the history dude, and we need a Hapsburg article. C'mon. Pleasey-weasie? Pretty please with cinnamon on top? ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Dec 12 '11 9:44 (UTC)
Comments

Pope Peter & the Moon Child

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	No laughs. -- The Zombiebaron 16:50, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Having a threesome with their cat, now that's comedy! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:11, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Uncyclopedia mightn't remember this article anymore. 22:10, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Failed Aristocrats joke.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Dec 12 '11 9:24 (UTC)
Comments

Ridgeway, South Carolina

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	2005cruft. -- The Zombiebaron 16:47, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Another crappy article about some town no one's ever heard of. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:09, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. If Nicki Minaj were a Uncyclopedia user, she'd delete a similar article. 22:12, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Unnecessary--$Fe^{+3}AlFe^{+2}$ 01:52, December 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete. --Pudong 03:13, December 12, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Moundarianism

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	This is bad. -- The Zombiebaron 16:35, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Not funny at all. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:08, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. -- 22:15, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete.--$Fe^{+3}AlFe^{+2}$ 01:53, December 12, 2011 (UTC) Waste of space.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Dec 12 '11 9:17 (UTC)
Comments

Template:Awesome

Score: 8
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (8)	unfunny, poorly formatted, from 2007 and did I mention unfunny? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) I really can't see any use for this. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:50, December 11, 2011 (UTC) ghey. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 13:53, December 11, 2011 (UTC) lolwtf -- The Zombiebaron 16:41, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Yeah, subst it in the userpages it's used in and then get rid of it. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:49, 11 December 2011 Great image, but I couldn't see this on a userpage. -- 17:52, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. 22:23, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Die stupid article DIE ...I mean, template! Wait, what article is this, again? ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Dec 12 '11 8:49 (UTC)
Comments

Template:A splode

Score: 3 + 6 BFMs
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Ban from mainspace (6)	Ban this from mainspace but don't delete it since many users use it on their userpage. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:48, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Yeah, ban it from mainspace but keep it in templatespace. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:19, 11 December 2011 Good idea, old chaps! *strokes oversized mustache* EpicAwesomeness (talk) 17:13, December 11, 2011 (UTC) What them folks. For some reason users love this shit. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:21, December 11, 2011 (UTC) *Points up* -- 20:26, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Uncyc was built on this template, damn it! Where's your respect for the veterans? *goes into seizure* 2K12_DAN.VRS 22:02, December 11, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (3)	This is still not funny ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 16:41, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Now with 6 BFMs. 22:15, December 11, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Removed from mainspace. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:55, 12 December 2011

Solomon Islands vs Sandwich Islands

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	2005-cruft. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:50, December 11, 2011 (UTC) tl;dr ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 07:14, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 16:41, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. 22:27, December 11, 2011 (UTC)  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Dec 12 '11 8:52 (UTC)
Comments

El Hormiguero

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Random and stupid article that calls this tv show a wikipedia hurricane. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 18:49, December 10, 2011 (UTC) nay. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 13:55, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 16:41, December 11, 2011 (UTC) More of the same unfunny silliness as the others, but I actually have to comment on this one becuase it doesn't have enough votes to just delete. 1234 ~ 20:31, 11 December 2011 Delete. 22:35, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. no redeeming value at all. --$Fe^{+3}AlFe^{+2}$ 01:32, December 12, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Template:Sonic

Score: 7
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (7)	This links to two pages, is it really that useful??? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) I guess not. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:54, December 10, 2011 (UTC) It used to link to more things, but at some point pretty much all Sonic articles were voted for deletion. So yeah, this isn't very useful anymore. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:44, 10 December 2011 oh shit i forgot about this --Roman Dog Bird 01:37, December 11, 2011 (UTC) No. -- 04:00, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 16:41, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. 22:42, December 11, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

2007 Wikipedia hurricane season

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	The article that started off the awful wikipedia hurricane series. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 18:49, December 10, 2011 (UTC) What is this I don't even --EMC [TALK] 19:34 Dec 10 2011 ?????!??!!?!? --Roman Dog Bird 01:43, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 16:41, December 11, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Subtopical Storm Angela

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	A stupid wikipedia hurricane article. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 18:49, December 10, 2011 (UTC) Fuck this shit. --EMC [TALK] 19:35 Dec 10 2011 plop plop plop --Roman Dog Bird 01:47, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 16:41, December 11, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Template:2007Hurricanes

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	A stupid useless template that links mainly to userpages and non-existing pages. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 18:49, December 10, 2011 (UTC) nnnghhh --Roman Dog Bird 01:50, December 11, 2011 (UTC) WTF? -- 04:01, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 16:41, December 11, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

UnNews:Parti Québécois gains support in Alberta

Score: 2
Keep (2)	It is dumb but I say keep-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 03:42, December 7, 2011 (UTC) Keeperit. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:55, December 10, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (4)	Horrible. Mattsnow 18:25, December 6, 2011 (UTC) That's a pretty lame excuse for an UnNews article. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:18, December 6, 2011 (UTC) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 03:15, December 7, 2011 (UTC) Obliterate. The horror! The horror!! -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 22:17 December 10, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. This was nommed on VFH back in 2007. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:04, 6 December 2011 And Zombiebaron voted for...-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 03:40, December 7, 2011 (UTC) I'm torn. Yes it's short, and crappy. But it also has the phrase "cock-juggling thunder cunt." Anyway, UnNews stories are just as transitory in nature as their legitimate brethren. Should all UnNews stories be deleted when they're no longer topical? I'm not asking rhetorically; I really want to know.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Dec 7 '11 3:57 (UTC) Sat long enough. Cat. 1234 ~ 17:42, 11 December 2011

Tykes

Score: 3
Keep (4)	Keep. Quite accurate if you live in the same country. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:24, December 5, 2011 (UTC) Keep. I'll trust Romartus on this one.-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 01:13, December 6, 2011 (UTC) Keep Nowhere near deletion. mAttlobster. (hello) 23:13, December 6, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Though it is a bit listy I think this is very funny although some of it is only humourous to the brithish who are a minority on this website. Cool I Get A Signature 18:41, December 8, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (7)	This isn't good. -- The Zombiebaron 16:47, December 5, 2011 (UTC) Short and listy. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:39, December 5, 2011 (UTC) Delete. I'd say 'listicide' but that would leave a whopping one paragraph. --$Fe^{+3}AlFe^{+2}$ 00:37, December 6, 2011 (UTC) Remarkably contentless -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:46, December 6, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Wikipedia has "Tykes", but it's just a redirect. Featured User 04:49, December 10, 2011 (UTC)  Listy list is listy. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 22:21 December 10, 2011 (UTC) --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 00:12, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Not for Black flamingo. --Black Flamingo 17:25, December 11, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Sat too long. Kept. 1234 ~ 17:41, 11 December 2011

Latios and Latias

Score: 2
Keep (6)	It has a rather... interesting approach. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:03, 4 December 2011 Its funny so keep it ^_^ OH NO NOT MORE DELETE WE NEED SUPPORTERS!!! ]] --Yuki 23:32, December 5, 2011 (UTC) More funny pokemon articles, i will make.--FcukmanLOOS3R!!! 03:23, December 5, 2011 (UTC) Needs cleanup and images, but not delete. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 03:30, December 5, 2011 (UTC) Keep. I think it's a unique approach (at least from what I've seen) and it should be kept. --$Fe^{+3}AlFe^{+2}$ 05:57, December 7, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Good people want to keep it. Fuck them all, but hey, why not? Aleister 15:55 7-12-'11
Delete (8)	It's a bunch of annoying, dumb fandom. "Ashy-kins! I love him so much~! ♥♥♥" Fuck you. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 16:41, December 4, 2011 (UTC) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 18:42, December 4, 2011 (UTC) --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 20:12, December 4, 2011 (UTC) Fandom? On Uncyc? That's a paddlin'. 2K12_DAN.VRS 03:07, December 5, 2011 (UTC) The only reason one would vote keep is because of the unique approach, but it has been done (to a better extent) in Fruits. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 03:27, December 5, 2011 (UTC) not funny at all -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:35, December 5, 2011 (UTC) Its awful so delete it *insert retarded anime face here* OH NO MORE KEEP WE NEED SUPPORTERS!!! ]] --Roman Dog Bird 18:50, December 8, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Fuck this article, no laughs found. Featured User 04:54, December 10, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	I've actually been working on a full rewrite of this for some time now. I'm ramping up production on it, so I don't really care what happens to this mess. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 22:12 December 10, 2011 (UTC) There's been more than plenty of time for people to come to a clear consensus on this. A majority of 2 is way too low to delete this. Kept. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:17, 11 December 2011

Der Frontseite Westliche Choralgruppe

Score: -4
Keep (7)	Keep. Added a few lines and illustrations. I think this can be kept now. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:30, December 6, 2011 (UTC) Keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:53, December 6, 2011 (UTC) Keep Don't know what it was like before. But it's SPOON! mAttlobster. (hello) 23:12, December 6, 2011 (UTC) Ya sure -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 13:27, December 9, 2011 (UTC) No longer short and shitty. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:37, 9 December 2011 Someone please close this nomination. Someone else may vote "delete" as a joke, and I shall be forced to maim them in a very original and piquant fashion.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Dec 10 '11 1:37 (UTC) Keep. --EMC [TALK] 19:55 Dec 10 2011
Delete (3)	Short and shitty. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:43, December 6, 2011 (UTC) Delete. This article has no redeeming qualities. --$Fe^{+3}AlFe^{+2}$ 03:11, December 6, 2011 (UTC) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 11:33, December 6, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. Does have a few good ideas here and this joke Hotdogs With Mustard Gas. Agree though it's underdeveloped.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:11, December 6, 2011 (UTC) Kept. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:49, 10 December 2011

Understatement

Score: -4
Keep (5)	A little more could help it. Like a much better conclusion. But other than that, it's just fine. Like, alright. Maybe okay. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 13:22, December 9, 2011 (UTC) SelfKeep. If you'd like to know what this article is about, just click the Wikipedia link. Also, I have no objection to the creation of a "Captain Understatement" article, though I don't think the hypothetical creation of one would make Understatement redundant. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:34, 9 December 2011 Keep. It's not that bad. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:05, December 9, 2011 (UTC) Keep. it requires a little work is all... not deletion material --$Fe^{+3}AlFe^{+2}$ 05:25, December 10, 2011 (UTC) Keep. --EMC [TALK] 19:31 Dec 10 2011
Delete (1)	Always disliked this article. Could be much better, maybe as Captain Understatement. --AmericanBastard 12:39, December 9, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Yeah kept. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:54, December 10, 2011 (UTC)

Wario

Score: -2
Keep (5)	Keep. Weaker stuff, but not really deletion worthy. I think notable topics should preferably be kept.--Sycamore (Talk) 11:18, December 8, 2011 (UTC) mario is currently in a terrist organisation with britriny spears --Roman Dog Bird 18:39, December 8, 2011 (UTC) Keep in accordance with Bizzeebeever's bet. We must reach FIVE! 2K12_DAN.VRS 00:36, December 10, 2011 (UTC) Keep. This article isn't bad enough to be deleted, as sycamore puts it. Featured User 04:47, December 10, 2011 (UTC) Keep. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:50, December 10, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (3)	I find this article terrible, but I bet five people vote "keep".  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Dec 8 '11 6:43 (UTC) That would be correct :D ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:51, December 10, 2011 (UTC) Another example of a bad gaming article. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:27, December 8, 2011 (UTC) Fixed the first third or so, but the rest is utter unsalvegable garbage. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 08:40, December 10, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Again... Remember your {{VFD}} tags so authors can come to stick up for their work etc.--Sycamore (Talk) 11:18, December 8, 2011 (UTC) Sure this is kept too. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:53, December 10, 2011 (UTC)

Crumpet

Score: -6
Keep (6)	Keep, but chop half off It's great up until about Adolf's Hitler's Death. Then it's stupid from thereon. 2K12_DAN.VRS 00:34, December 10, 2011 (UTC) Keep. requires a bit of clean up but it's okay --$Fe^{+3}AlFe^{+2}$ 05:19, December 10, 2011 (UTC) Keep.This anon did some really nice work. --Mimo&maxus 08:00, December 10, 2011 (UTC) Dat bastard better join. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 09:29, December 10, 2011 (UTC) IPs that save an article? I always knew they existed. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 14:24, December 10, 2011 (UTC) Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:26, 10 December 2011
Delete (0)	Delete.Big and stupid. --Mimo&maxus 13:30, December 9, 2011 (UTC) Dem crumpets is sexy! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:06, December 9, 2011 (UTC) tl;dr ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 03:25, December 10, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Kept. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:27, 10 December 2011

Neopets

Score: 4
Keep (2)	Not terrible enough.--FcukmanLOOS3R!!! 02:40, December 7, 2011 (UTC) The discussion board section made me grin. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 20:46, December 7, 2011 (UTC) Yeah, that would be the only thing funny in that article. And that's a "barely".  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Dec 7 '11 21:11 (UTC)
Delete (6)	What's good about this article? The Osama bin Laden jokes don't work anymore (got him!), the sexual comments are just weird, and everything else (and there isn't much else) is crap. I think it's time to give up on the fix tag and just delete this one. Themanfromscene24 17:52, December 6, 2011 (UTC) lol, neopets -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 18:06, December 6, 2011 (UTC) omg, it sux. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:17, December 6, 2011 (UTC) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 03:15, December 7, 2011 (UTC) George Bush, Osama bin Laden, huffing kittens, masturbating. And that's the first section. Another sad example of a parody article being longer than the subject being parodied.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Dec 7 '11 21:11 (UTC) Delete --2K12_DAN.VRS 00:39, December 10, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	If someone were willing to do a gut job on it to remove the crap, then it would be salvageable.--$Fe^{+3}AlFe^{+2}$ 06:08, December 7, 2011 (UTC) Congratulations, you've been nominated. [hands Ferric_AlFerrous a shovel and a machete]  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Dec 7 '11 21:11 (UTC)

Paedophile

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	GAY GAY GAY GAY GAY EpicAwesomeness (talk) 16:53, December 8, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Yeah, I mean this is isn't funny, and frankly I doubt it ever will be. This seems to be territory where little funny will ever be found. That's because everything is smaller.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:31, December 8, 2011 (UTC) MICHAEL JACKSON MICHAEL JACKSON MICHAEL JACKSON MICHAEL JACKSON MICHAEL JACKSON --Roman Dog Bird 18:28, December 8, 2011 (UTC) A perfect example of a terrible article. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:29, December 8, 2011 (UTC) A terrible example of a perfect article. Per Xamralco. --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 12:14, December 9, 2011 (UTC) lol no. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 14:53, December 9, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Panda

Score: -1
Keep (7)	Keep. Weaker stuff sure, needs re-work... not really deletion worthy.--Sycamore (Talk) 10:16, December 3, 2011 (UTC) Keep. if the crap were edited out of this so it's not as long as a freakin' book it would be all right. --$Fe^{+3}AlFe^{+2}$ 01:38, December 4, 2011 (UTC) It's got enough keepable stuff to save it from the guillotine. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:37, 4 December 2011 Keep. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 03:24, December 5, 2011 (UTC) Keep Some good ideas in here.mAttlobster. (hello) 20:30, December 5, 2011 (UTC) Keep! See above. Also, because some clever banana helped the opening.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  06 Dec 2011 ~ 07:16 (UTC) Keep. All of the above, and Panda is my cup of tea. And good people want to keep it. Fuck them all, but hey, why not? Aleister 15:57 7-12-'11
Delete (6)	Delete. See my theory on the snowball effect, located here. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 08:17, December 3, 2011 (UTC) EpicAwesomeness has a good point. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:11, December 3, 2011 (UTC) Xamralco has a good point. --Mimo&maxus 17:11, December 4, 2011 (UTC) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 18:42, December 4, 2011 (UTC) Delete. I must destroy ALL the pandas! 2K12_DAN.VRS 03:10, December 5, 2011 (UTC) Introduces dozens of unrelated concepts, all of which are uniformly awful. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:49, December 5, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	EpicAwesomeness - Please remember your {{VFD}} tags:0)--Sycamore (Talk) 10:16, December 3, 2011 (UTC) 155 hours of consensuslessness = Kept. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:39, 9 December 2011

Template:N00bsauce

Score: 3
Keep (4)	How about editing it slightly so that it labels the user/author of page as a n00b? It has some potential. --$Fe^{+3}AlFe^{+2}$ 05:30, December 3, 2011 (UTC) I like it. Feel free to ban it from mainspace, though. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:15, 3 December 2011 Keep. Better than Weaksauce. Should be used more often.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  06 Dec 2011 ~ 08:20 (UTC) Decent. -- 01:46, December 7, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (7)	What the fuck is this shit? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 05:35, December 3, 2011 (UTC) Ban from mainspace. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:06, December 3, 2011 (UTC) Ew. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 14:24, December 4, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Used in a single userspace. Can be subst'd. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:22, December 6, 2011 (UTC) This template does everything wrong. There is not one single redeeming value about this template. It is not amusing. It is not correctly formatted. It takes up far too much space with its bloated ugliness. It uses {{USERNAME}}. And it is not funny. Then again, that was a given with the {{USERNAME}} thing. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 08:21 Dec 07, 2011 Well, Skullthumper and SPIKE are ...sorta... back. Them Mayan calender makers musta been right. 2012 is the End.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Dec 7 '11 21:18 (UTC)
Comments

South Park

Score: 2
Keep (7)	no.--FcukmanLOOS3R!!! 02:37, December 3, 2011 (UTC) Very Keep. Some funny is there... Also I think major "Real Life " topics should be kept, and rewritten. I think IC is coming back, maybe we could put this on there?--Sycamore (Talk) 10:11, December 3, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Not bad enough. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:00, 3 December 2011 Keep Could do with losing about 60%. But there's some nice sexy action in this whore house. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:33, December 5, 2011 (UTC) Keep Not terrible.-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 21:08, December 5, 2011 (UTC) Keep! Brake angrily Kenny!  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  06 Dec 2011 ~ 08:26 (UTC) Keep. All of the above, and South Park is my cup of tea. Keep working on it though. Some good people want to keep it. Fuck them all, but hey, why not? Aleister 15:57 7-12-'11
Delete (9)	Delete. I love the show but this page is far too informative for Uncyclopedia. --$Fe^{+3}AlFe^{+2}$ 01:53, December 3, 2011 (UTC) Weak Delete. It's not that bad but there really aren't any funny jokes. I'd say it's mediocre at best. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:28, December 3, 2011 (UTC) This is one of those 2005/2006 pages that starts of small but becomes like a snowball rolling down a hill as it gathers more vandalism and cruft until it's one big forty kilobyte shit heap. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 08:15, December 3, 2011 (UTC) yes. --Roman Dog Bird 08:34, December 3, 2011 (UTC) Oui. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:51, December 3, 2011 (UTC) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 18:42, December 4, 2011 (UTC) Kill -- 2K12_DAN.VRS 05:12, December 5, 2011 (UTC) Start anew. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:44, December 6, 2011 (UTC) What TKF said. ~jcm 23:19, December 6, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	IC is coming back?  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  06 Dec 2011 ~ 08:26 (UTC) Why did we not wait for the {{fix}} to expire before going to VFD? At least, why did someone not remove the {{fix}} and drop a note on the talk page explaining the situation? --Pentium5dot1 (semi-retired) t~^_^~c 00:00, December 9, 2011 (UTC) Damnit Pentium, quit pointin out that we're all fools. (just kidding, keep doing it, we gotta stay on our toes.) -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 13:27, December 9, 2011 (UTC)

30 Roc

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	A bad example of being random just to be random. I'm too much of a fan of the show to settle with such a crappy article about it. Kill it with fire. ~jcm 23:18, December 6, 2011 (UTC) Quite random. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 23:55, December 6, 2011 (UTC) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 03:15, December 7, 2011 (UTC) Huff and start anew. --$Fe^{+3}AlFe^{+2}$ 06:22, December 7, 2011 (UTC) Delete. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:36, December 8, 2011 (UTC) Whuh... EpicAwesomeness (talk) 16:53, December 8, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Sight

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Not a good article. -- The Zombiebaron 03:37, December 5, 2011 (UTC) Stupid. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:21, December 5, 2011 (UTC) Delete. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:14, December 6, 2011 (UTC) Untrue. Mattsnow 18:36, December 6, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Trash. --$Fe^{+3}AlFe^{+2}$ 05:49, December 7, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

United States of Stop Drop and Roll

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	This should be moved to UnTunes...but maybe we can just delete it instead. -- The Zombiebaron 04:42, December 5, 2011 (UTC) And I'm like stop, drop, and roll! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:38, December 5, 2011 (UTC) Nah -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 18:06, December 6, 2011 (UTC) REMOVE <ARTICLENAME> --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 05:26, December 7, 2011 (UTC) Stop, Delete and Forget. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 20:42, December 7, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	This is funny in a stop drop & roll kind of way.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  06 Dec 2011 ~ 08:33 (UTC)

FORTRAN

Score: -2
Keep (6)	Keep. Looks alright enough...--Sycamore (Talk) 10:17, December 3, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Funny and playful from start to finish .and. written in the style of the thing it is about .and. full of inside jokes (Bacchus?). Even the digression to Super Mario is based on something real--read the talk page. Compare to the aimless drivel that nominator recently injected into North Dakota. Spıke ¬ 14:53 4-Dec-11 Keep mAttlobster. (hello) 15:13, December 4, 2011 (UTC) .Keep. .Because. . ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  06 Dec 2011 ~ 08:16 (UTC). Keep. I generally think it's a bad idea to delete articles by established users. Plus this ain't bad.-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 04:40, December 7, 2011 (UTC) Keep. SPIKE????? Spike is back????? There is a Santa Claus! And All of the above, and FORTRAN is my cup of tea. And good people want to keep it. Fuck them all, but hey, why not? Aleister 15:59 7-12-'11
Delete (4)	Delete. the page just isn't funny --$Fe^{+3}AlFe^{+2}$ 06:02, December 3, 2011 (UTC) This page is just boring. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:07, December 3, 2011 (UTC) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 18:42, December 4, 2011 (UTC) I believe that this page should be deleted because it is boring and isn't funny. It is incredibly dry and seemingly jokeless for long stretches; every joke the author does make is cliche and easy. Also, puns are not "inside jokes." -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:44, December 5, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Terms like "Boring" or "Isn't Funny" are pretty subjective (especially on their own). Are there more legitimate reasons why you think this contributers work should be deleted?--Sycamore (Talk) 11:42, December 4, 2011 (UTC) Ooh, it's 3 Keep vs 3 Delete! This is exciting! 2K12_DAN.VRS 05:11, December 5, 2011 (UTC) Aww, now it's not. Bah. 2K12_DAN.VRS 05:33, December 7, 2011 (UTC) Kept, apparently. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:07, 7 December 2011

Template:Drunk

Score: 4
Keep (3)	Keep. sure it's stupid but it could easily be posted on a page that's all over the place. --$Fe^{+3}AlFe^{+2}$ 05:36, December 3, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Good enough for the page with the same name. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 19:44, December 5, 2011 (UTC) Kee... ke... kee... ah fuck it... *hic* -- 01:48, December 7, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (7)	Delete. Useless ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Ban from mainspace. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:01, December 3, 2011 (UTC) Delete. --Mimo&maxus 13:03, December 3, 2011 (UTC) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 18:42, December 4, 2011 (UTC) Delete The execution of this reasonable idea broke my heart. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:32, December 5, 2011 (UTC) Per Lobster. Could be appropriate if the template itself weren't so bad. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:24, December 6, 2011 (UTC) Jesus fucking christ no. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 08:23 Dec 07, 2011
Comments	Comment. You know, almost every time I see a template nommed here and someone says it should be banned from mainspace, I wonder if the exact same point can't be made as the one I made when Template:Bat Fuck Insane was nommed. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:23, 3 December 2011  Meh.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  06 Dec 2011 ~ 08:23 (UTC)

Template:Coffee

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Poorly formatted and really stupid ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 05:01, December 3, 2011 (UTC) Move it to User:Simsilikesims/Template:Coffee, considering she's the only user that uses this on their userpage. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:00, December 3, 2011 (UTC) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 18:42, December 4, 2011 (UTC) Kill it -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:18, December 6, 2011 (UTC) Don't delete it, move it out of mainspace, I want it on my userpage. -- 01:50, December 7, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Parallax

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	This is bad. -- The Zombiebaron 04:22, December 5, 2011 (UTC) Wow, this is so not funny. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:34, December 5, 2011 (UTC) Awful. And here I was expecting Atlas Sound jokes. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:45, December 5, 2011 (UTC) What he said ^ -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 01:10, December 6, 2011 (UTC) Can't see how this can be improved without just simply deleting it. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:11, December 6, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Yeah Yeah Yea Yeahs (band NY)

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	I was gonna redirect this to Yeah Yeah Yeahs, but only one article links to this article and it is a userspace article, so I doubt that would be helpful. -- The Zombiebaron 04:11, December 5, 2011 (UTC) Wow, both articles are shit. And I really like the Yeah Yeah Yeahs.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Dec 5 '11 5:20 (UTC) Delete. Per Bizzeebeever. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:33, December 5, 2011 (UTC) Delete.-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 01:11, December 6, 2011 (UTC) Delete. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:13, December 6, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Petts Wood

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Suburbcruft. -- The Zombiebaron 04:08, December 5, 2011 (UTC) "Petts Wood"...I thought that was a masturbation joke. It is, isn't it? Please tell me there's no such place as "Petts Wood".  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Dec 5 '11 5:34 (UTC) Delete-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 21:12, December 5, 2011 (UTC) That's some pretty nasty petted wood. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:31, December 5, 2011 (UTC) Delete. It's a real, nothing much of a place in Kent. That's the end of the joke for this article.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:29, December 5, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Lolita

Score: 2
Keep (3)	Keep. Weaker material here... looks like a good starting point for a rewrite though.--Sycamore (Talk) 19:15, November 30, 2011 (UTC) Keep. I like this page, and am a lifelong pedo myself, so yeah, keep this cute kitten. Aleister 19:07 1-12-'11 Keep. Doesn't seem too bad. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:40, 4 December 2011
Delete (5)	Why the fuck this was kept in the first place I have no clue. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 17:55, November 30, 2011 (UTC) I don't know what the heck this is. If it's legitimately funny to somebody, could we at least give it a more descriptive title, so folks don't confuse it with the Nabokov book?  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Dec 1 '11 16:30 (UTC) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 16:26, December 1, 2011 (UTC) What is this? -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:24, December 2, 2011 (UTC) This isn't a good article. Being a good starting point for a different article warrants this, at best, preservation in a namespace. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:51, December 5, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	143 hours without a clear majority either way? Kept it is. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:29, 6 December 2011

Al Davis

Score: 0
Keep (3)	Keep. This ain't bad at all-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 01:03, December 1, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Not deletion worthy.--Sycamore (Talk) 22:53, December 1, 2011 (UTC) Keep. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:17, December 3, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Naturally, I came across quite a few awful articles while purging {{Grue}}. This is one of them. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:40, November 30, 2011 (UTC) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 16:42, December 1, 2011 (UTC) It's not funny and that constitutes a delete in my mind. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:27, December 2, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	I will abstain for now, but I think this article is lame, at best. I despise the Raiders, and I despised Al Davis before he died (God rest his poor ragged, hated soul), but I would've liked to have seen a better article about the old bastard.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Dec 1 '11 15:25 (UTC) No consensus means no deletion. I think we can all agree on that. Or not. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:50, 5 December 2011

Mudkip

Score: 5
Keep (4)	Keep. I think this is a bit shitty, but I suspect that quite a few people like this.--Sycamore (Talk) 15:18, November 30, 2011 (UTC)  I like this very much. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:36, 30 November 2011 I will make more funny pokemon articles.--FcukmanLOOS3R!!! 12:01, December 1, 2011 (UTC) As silly and dumb as it is, it does have what it takes to make people laugh and that's what we want right?? --$Fe^{+3}AlFe^{+2}$ 02:04, December 3, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (9)	h8 u, stupid meme-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 14:13, November 30, 2011 (UTC) It doesn't matter what others think, you think it's stupid, so vote delete. That's how I ended up naked on a train to Ukraine. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 16:47, November 30, 2011 (UTC) DEATH TO AME- mudkipz... --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 21:28, November 30, 2011 (UTC) So I heard you like deletion -- The Zombiebaron 16:24, December 1, 2011 (UTC) You heard wrong! : / —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:15, 1 December 2011 As stupid as the other deleted Pokemon articles. This shouldn't get spared. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 14:33, December 4, 2011 (UTC) Torchic is better than Mudkip anyhow. 2K12_DAN.VRS 03:40, December 5, 2011 (UTC) Delete Unforgivably bad. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:35, December 5, 2011 (UTC) On second thought, after reading this a second time, I realized that only laughed at the meme itself and the article really is just the meme written over and over again, so Delete. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:30, December 5, 2011 (UTC) ATTENTION: I hate to be Captain Obvious, but this article, as I'm sure EVERYBODY BUT ME knew, is nothing but a cut-and-paste of the original meme. See here. Therefore, I give my "kill" vote reason as "Unoriginal material."  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Dec 6 '11 0:06 (UTC)
Comments	Also Leoispotter remember to tag articles you nominate with {{VFD}}, cheers:0)--Sycamore (Talk) 15:18, November 30, 2011 (UTC) Oh, whoops. I'm a bit rusty at this whole wiki thing.-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 19:10, November 30, 2011 (UTC) This article is so incredibly stupid and retarded that I was laughing hysterically. This doesn't constitute for a keep though but considering that I laughed, I'm abstaining. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:22, December 2, 2011 (UTC)

Yogurt

Score: -1
Keep (5)	Keep. With the list gone, this is fine. Listicide should be the first question before bringing articles to vfd.--Sycamore (Talk) 15:07, November 30, 2011 (UTC) Keep Sycamore's list perversion has rescued this. Deviant! mAttlobster. (hello) 18:16, November 30, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Looks fine. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:38, 30 November 2011 Keep. could do with a little improvement, but this is in no way fit for deletion. Imnotanewb 16:02, December 1, 2011 (UTC) Keep. it has the potential to be funny if it were fixed up a bit --$Fe^{+3}AlFe^{+2}$ 02:09, December 3, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (4)	As the baron would say, "this is bad". Here here. --Black Flamingo 01:15, November 30, 2011 (UTC) Das ist nicht gut! Töten Sie es!!! -- Lt. Gamma287 02:21, November 30, 2011 (UTC) Shit list ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 07:18, November 30, 2011 (UTC) Not funny. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:16, December 2, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Kept. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:42, 4 December 2011

Ratzinger Z

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	This is bad. -- The Zombiebaron 00:28, December 2, 2011 (UTC) Yes it is. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:37, December 2, 2011 (UTC) Wow that's bad. --$Fe^{+3}AlFe^{+2}$ 00:44, December 3, 2011 (UTC) No. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 14:30, December 4, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Template:Grues Beyond this point

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete grues still suck ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Delete. grues do indeed suck --$Fe^{+3}AlFe^{+2}$ 05:34, December 3, 2011 (UTC) Ban from mainspace. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:05, December 3, 2011 (UTC) Don't we have enough grue templates? --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 14:26, December 4, 2011 (UTC) Actually, this is one of the few that hasn't been deleted/banned from mainspace yet. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:35, 4 December 2011
Comments

Puppy Luff

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	This seems stupid. Also, that one at the end isn't a puppy. I looked it up. "A puppy is a juvenile dog." That's what wikipedia says. I tend to agree. 1234 ~ 12:42, 3 December 2011 Luff this article or else you're a NAZI! Seriously though, this article makes no sense. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:15, December 3, 2011 (UTC) Ich bin ein Nazi, und der letzte Welpe war mein Liebling... --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 17:40, December 3, 2011 (UTC) Well, I guess I should break out the NSBM.Der Panzertoter 19:13, December 3, 2011 (UTC) HEIL!! i'm afraid I do not "Luff" this page. --$Fe^{+3}AlFe^{+2}$ 01:32, December 4, 2011 (UTC) Delete.--Mimo&maxus 17:04, December 4, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Whitespace (programming language)

Score: -3
Keep (8)	Keep I can see what this is trying to do. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:52, November 28, 2011 (UTC) Keep. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) Keep-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 19:11, November 28, 2011 (UTC) Daz funny. -- 13:01, November 30, 2011 (UTC) Keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 19:23, November 30, 2011 (UTC) Keep. too many good people want this saved to huff it. maybe i'll look at it someday. aleister 19:04 1-12-'11 Keep. it's a (somewhat) unique addition to Uncyclopedia. i say we keep it. --$Fe^{+3}AlFe^{+2}$ 02:12, December 3, 2011 (UTC) Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:21, 3 December 2011
Delete (5)	No jokes. -- The Zombiebaron 05:43, November 28, 2011 (UTC) ugh ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:58, November 28, 2011 (UTC) delete. Mattsnow 11:49, November 28, 2011 (UTC) Meh.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Nov 28 '11 15:23 (UTC) A lot like this and this. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:13, November 28, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	If you read the wikipedia page, you'll get it. Since Nihilism was first, this isn't as funny, though.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Nov 28 '11 15:23 (UTC) Kept. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:21, 3 December 2011

Vaccination

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Naturally, I came across quite a few awful articles while purging {{Grue}}. This is one of them. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:40, November 30, 2011 (UTC) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 16:42, December 1, 2011 (UTC) Very bad. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:29, December 2, 2011 (UTC) Delete. not funny at all --$Fe^{+3}AlFe^{+2}$ 01:56, December 3, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Éowyn

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Feh! -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:53, December 1, 2011 (UTC) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 00:30, December 2, 2011 (UTC) Short and stupid. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:36, December 2, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Something about Middle Earth and Stonewall Jackson. Rubbish anyway. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 16:51, December 2, 2011 (UTC) Delete. That's essentially just a massive text wall of retardation --$Fe^{+3}AlFe^{+2}$ 00:46, December 3, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Johor

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. this page simply isn't funny... nuff said--$Fe^{+3}AlFe^{+2}$ 06:14, December 1, 2011 (UTC) You really should include a link to your page in your signature, Ferric AlFerrous  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Dec 1 '11 16:29 (UTC) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 16:42, December 1, 2011 (UTC) Yep, it sucks. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:36, December 2, 2011 (UTC) Delete. A marginally better version of 'my/this town/my county/that country is crap' type of article but unless anyone has specialised knowledge, can't see how it can be fixed. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 16:55, December 2, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	This page looks half-completed, but not as icky as some of the others on this page. If somebody wants to fix the places where the author just quit typing in the midst of things, it might pass for a "real" article.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Dec 1 '11 16:29 (UTC)

Tie Certificate

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Naturally, I came across quite a few awful articles while purging {{Grue}}. This is one of them. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:40, November 30, 2011 (UTC) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 16:42, December 1, 2011 (UTC) Monkeys in suits, a give-away that this article is going to suck. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:33, December 2, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Doesn't explain the concept much before launching off into lists/short paragraphs that really don't improve it. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 16:58, December 2, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Template:Notcheesecake

Score: -3
Keep (7)	Keep It is probably not a good reflection on me that I find this funny. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:59, November 28, 2011 (UTC) Keep. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) I kinda like this one-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 19:13, November 28, 2011 (UTC) I personally think this is funny but I think that Template:Not Cheesecake qualifies for Qvfd considering it contains nothing more than a transclusion of this template and only one article (which is in userspace) uses it. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:22, November 28, 2011 (UTC) What Xamralco said. Word for word. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:46, 29 November 2011 Keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 19:22, November 30, 2011 (UTC) Phlegm Aleister 19:05 1-12-'11
Delete (4)	delete Template:Not Cheesecake while you're at it. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 09:33, November 28, 2011 (UTC) Hmm. USELESS. --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 11:38, November 28, 2011 (UTC) Remove from mainspace. (Not exactly a delete vote, but you know...) 1234 ~ 17:00, 28 November 2011 Ban from mainspace -- The Zombiebaron 19:26, November 28, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	It's worth pointing out here that, however zealous you are, 'quality' control can be counter productive to humour/humor and more likely to put potential as well as existing contributers off the site.--Sycamore (Talk) 19:22, November 30, 2011 (UTC) Kept. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:40, 2 December 2011

Chairman Grue

Score: 7
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (7)	Naturally, I came across quite a few awful articles while purging {{Grue}}. This is one of them. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:40, November 30, 2011 (UTC) Delete. When was the Grue stuff ever funny? --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:53, December 1, 2011 (UTC) I find this concept... ...tiresome.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Dec 1 '11 16:22 (UTC) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 16:42, December 1, 2011 (UTC) Yuck. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 01:12, December 2, 2011 (UTC) Terrible... --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 01:23, December 2, 2011 (UTC) Grues are overused. Hey, that rhymes. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:35, December 2, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Krypto the Superdog

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Naturally, I came across quite a few awful articles while purging {{Grue}}. This is one of them. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:40, November 30, 2011 (UTC) "RAPE...PORN...HUMP...JACK...SUPERMAN...RAPE." Yeah, thanks for that. Don't let the door cut off your dick on the way out, article.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Dec 1 '11 15:51 (UTC) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 16:42, December 1, 2011 (UTC) Per the resident "Beever." --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 23:20, December 1, 2011 (UTC) Rape is soooooooo funny. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:33, December 2, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

New Malden

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Naturally, I came across quite a few awful articles while purging {{Grue}}. This is one of them. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:40, November 30, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Written by a local, evidently not a Korean. Conclusion:Crap. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:56, December 1, 2011 (UTC) ZOMG THIS TOWN SUCKS DONKEY BALLS! HAHA! I AM SO ORIGINAL! I AM SO AWESOfuck you. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Dec 1 '11 15:48 (UTC) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 16:42, December 1, 2011 (UTC) Unoriginal, stupid, and poorly formatted. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:30, December 2, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Banjo-Kazooie

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Naturally, I came across quite a few awful articles while purging {{Grue}}. This is one of them. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:40, November 30, 2011 (UTC) Quote-cruft, list-cruft, and all-around cruft. (Incidentally, I hate the word cruft. It sounds like a vaginal sneeze.)  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Dec 1 '11 15:38 (UTC) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 16:42, December 1, 2011 (UTC) Cliche and unfunny. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:28, December 2, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Grue Galactic Empire

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Naturally, I came across quite a few awful articles while purging {{Grue}}. This is one of them. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:40, November 30, 2011 (UTC) Delete.-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 01:04, December 1, 2011 (UTC) I blame Star Trek for this article. Fuck you, William Shatner.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Dec 1 '11 15:18 (UTC) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 16:42, December 1, 2011 (UTC)  Grues! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:26, December 2, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

OperatingSystem: JewISH

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Yargh! Pup 12:20 30 Nov '11 Yikes! Kikes! --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 17:51, November 30, 2011 (UTC) Goodbye, article. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Dec 1 '11 15:35 (UTC) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 16:23, December 1, 2011 (UTC) Oy Vey. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:17, December 2, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Right out of the gate, the very title is a complete fail. (Hello? Fucktard author? Anyone home? "JewOS". Pretty fucking simple.) This article sucks so hard that my computer made a "whoooooooooooosht!" sound when I loaded the page. And then all the furniture in the room flew up to the screen and bounced off of it. There may be shorter articles. There may be articles with a worse concept. There may be more offensive articles (God knows, this one is tepid at worst.) But there is no article that achieves such things so completely, so spectacularly, as this one. I would say to the author, "Congratulations, you have achieved the very heights of mediocrity. You can only go up or down from here!" And then I would chop off his fucking hands with a rusty machete.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Dec 1 '11 15:09 (UTC)

Endangered species

Score: -3
Keep (5)	Check the history plz ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 07:34, November 30, 2011 (UTC) Keep. This looks much better now. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:21, 30 November 2011 Keep. The fuck? --Nikau 13:36, November 30, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Check stuff thoroughly or I'll call you a mongo. Nobody wants that.--Sycamore (Talk) 15:04, November 30, 2011 (UTC) Well, it ain't VFH material, but without a shit-load of Bizarro hanging off its butt, it is at least passable.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Dec 1 '11 15:12 (UTC)
Delete (2)	DELETE' Mattsnow 06:47, November 30, 2011 (UTC) tl;dr —fj0j3ddjoaw;rfjaew (r30qjd) 07:10, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Kept (also, an invalid nom, as no {{VFD}} tag was added) -- The Zombiebaron 16:20, December 1, 2011 (UTC)

INuke

Score: -4
Keep (5)	Keep. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 07:35, November 30, 2011 (UTC) iKeep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:23, 30 November 2011 Very Keep. This is good.--Sycamore (Talk) 15:06, November 30, 2011 (UTC) Keep-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 19:44, November 30, 2011 (UTC) Keep. This stays. Please. Imnotanewb 15:58, December 1, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (1)	Umm, what is the point of this? Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 02:26, November 30, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Kept -- The Zombiebaron 16:18, December 1, 2011 (UTC)

Template:Grue

Score: 4
Keep (3)	No.--FcukmanLOOS3R!!! 08:20, November 28, 2011 (UTC) Aw, come on! --Scofield & Friends 08:43, November 30, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Preferably keep it off unrelated articles though.--Sycamore (Talk) 19:23, November 30, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (7)	Bar from mainspace Grues and other shitty internet memes generate many bad things. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:17, November 28, 2011 (UTC) Bar from mainspace -- The Zombiebaron 08:26, November 28, 2011 (UTC) Template bad. Also, looks like only about 29 articles in mainspace use this.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Nov 28 '11 16:12 (UTC) Ban this in mainspace and remove it from any mainspace article that isn't about grues. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:16, November 28, 2011 (UTC) Ban entirely. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:56, November 29, 2011 (UTC) Banana. --Black Flamingo 00:26, November 30, 2011 (UTC) Kill it.-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 14:16, November 30, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	I've seen this everywhere in mainspace and userspace articles, but I want to finally knock over this template. -sigh- I'm gonna have to Abstain. --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 11:40, November 28, 2011 (UTC) Comment. Template:Domo looked a lot better, but that one's been FFWed. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:19, 28 November 2011 Abstain. Err... can't decide. -- 13:08, November 30, 2011 (UTC) Killed from mainspace. Delete on sight. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:37, November 30, 2011 (UTC)

Richard Simmons

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Not good. -- The Zombiebaron 20:24, November 28, 2011 (UTC) Groan. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:23, November 28, 2011 (UTC) WUT EEZ DIS SHEEUTT?!? --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 21:20, November 29, 2011 (UTC) Christ, that's bad. --Black Flamingo 00:26, November 30, 2011 (UTC) Gayness. —fj0j3ddjoaw;rfjaew (r30qjd) 02:28, 30 November 2011 (UTC) Delete. Remind me why people bother to give warnings about crappy articles when they know said articles are going to be deleted anyway? --Scofield & Friends 08:46, November 30, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Man Booker Prize

Score: 4
Keep (1)	Keep Captures a certain pomposity present in this award. Needs work. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:54, November 28, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (5)	Short and unfunny. -- The Zombiebaron 05:04, November 28, 2011 (UTC) Booker T. wasn't mentioned enough... Well, I'm assuming it is dif- Nah. An IP wrote it. Prrrrrooooobably... --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 11:49, November 28, 2011 (UTC) The author misspelled "eroticism", did not capitalize "Lydian", and employed "dishabille" in place of the more preferred form déshabillé. Also, the following is not a sentence, but a particularly-abstruse sentence fragment: "The semiotic writing illustrating the complex metaphors of post modern life and accurately counter-pointing, via the underlying harmonics, the true nature of idempotent reality." (Additionally, that's an improper use of "idempotent".) Unforgivable. However, I am willing to give Matt Lobster a swing at saving this bit of rubbish.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Nov 28 '11 15:14 (UTC) Aside from lacking pictures and content, its not funny at all. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:47, November 28, 2011 (UTC) As Xamralco. --Black Flamingo 02:28, November 30, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Theoretical Physicist

Score: -1
Keep (5)	I have a theoretical degree in theoretical physics. Not n00bish enough to kill, but slightly humorous. C- at best. --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 21:20, November 25, 2011 (UTC) I admit that more content would help but I quite like this. --Black Flamingo 12:51, November 26, 2011 (UTC) Awesome. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:40, 27 November 2011 Keep I've seen this. mAttlobster. (hello) Short and works. --Nikau 01:45, November 30, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (4)	It's amazing that this one-liner has survived nearly 2 years. -- The Zombiebaron 10:20, November 25, 2011 (UTC) In order for a one-liner to exist, it has to be an in-joke, or else really, really funny. This just isn't. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 17:50, November 25, 2011 (UTC) This is not funny. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:18, November 28, 2011 (UTC) Usually I would sat that an article like this only has three bad parts, the beginning, the end, and the rest of the article, but this is too short to qualify. Maybe move it to undictionary. Jonny appleseed 23:10, November 29, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Nov 25 '11 10:25 (UTC) Comment. I think all one line joke descriptions should be moved to Undictionary. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:07, November 28, 2011 (UTC) Comment. I think all ancient Romans who love Undictionary should go get a room with her.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Nov 28 '11 16:47 (UTC) It's a keeper -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 07:27, November 30, 2011 (UTC)

Alt-F4

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Very listy and unfunny. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 09:20, November 28, 2011 (UTC) delete. Mattsnow 11:56, November 28, 2011 (UTC) Delete Possibly by pressing Alt-F4. mAttlobster. (hello) 12:03, November 28, 2011 (UTC) As the French say, "Mon Dieu, c'est garbage! Quell horreur!" As the Chinese say, "誰他媽的是查克諾里斯，為什麼他在互聯網上？"  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Nov 28 '11 16:32 (UTC) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 19:26, November 28, 2011 (UTC) Lists. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:17, November 28, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

USC 13-10

Score: 6
Keep (1)	Keep This is a work of insane genius. If this gets deleted I want it in my userspace for posterity.-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 23:32, November 28, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (7)	What is this? -- The Zombiebaron 05:39, November 28, 2011 (UTC) HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM?????? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:57, November 28, 2011 (UTC) Tubby No! --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:58, November 28, 2011 (UTC) delete. Mattsnow 11:50, November 28, 2011 (UTC) Seriously, though. I thought it had something to do with the University of Southern California being victorious 13-10. And then I read it. Somebody tell me, what in the tit-raping fuck is this?  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Nov 28 '11 14:50 (UTC) Umm... What? -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:10, November 28, 2011 (UTC) lol no. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 19:16, November 29, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

User Account Control

Score: 5
Keep (1)	Redirected to Windows Vista until I bother to write a proper article. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 16:56, November 28, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (6)	This is essentially just a fancy redirect to a shitty userspace article. -- The Zombiebaron 05:23, November 28, 2011 (UTC) Oh wow. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:58, November 28, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Defenestrate. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:00, November 28, 2011 (UTC) Nobody wants tho read your userspace article... --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 11:43, November 28, 2011 (UTC) delete. Mattsnow 11:51, November 28, 2011 (UTC) What is this? -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:09, November 28, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

See's Candies

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Very random, and not in a good way. -- The Zombiebaron 05:09, November 28, 2011 (UTC) Sounds like a pedophilic fail. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:59, November 28, 2011 (UTC) Terrible... --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 11:46, November 28, 2011 (UTC) BLASPHEMY!!! Mattsnow 11:52, November 28, 2011 (UTC) Article is typical random shit. Kill.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Nov 28 '11 14:42 (UTC) Tis bad. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:07, November 28, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	There's an actual gourmet candy company called See's. Or there was. After about 100 years or so in business, they hit hard times.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Nov 28 '11 14:42 (UTC)

Pasketmheel

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Part Three of the Pasketmaul purge. A minor part of the great purges. --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 01:41, November 28, 2011 (UTC) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 04:49, November 28, 2011 (UTC) delete Mattsnow 11:53, November 28, 2011 (UTC) Garbage. Or, as the French say, garbage.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Nov 28 '11 16:23 (UTC) Delete. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 18:02, November 28, 2011 (UTC) The worst of the bunch. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:19, November 28, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

I just thought up a really good idea for an article, but now I can't remember it./Mint Jelly

Score: -3
Keep (6)	This article seems like it's part of I just thought up a really good idea for an article, but now I can't remember it. so I moved it to I just thought up a really good idea for an article, but now I can't remember it./Mint Jelly. I hope that's better. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 18:44, November 27, 2011 (UTC) Heh. Slightly Humorous. I agree with above... --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 19:20, November 27, 2011 (UTC) That works. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:15, 27 November 2011 Keepable as a subpage. -- The Zombiebaron 04:49, November 28, 2011 (UTC) It works for me. Still, Flamingo's sorta right that it's still missing something. Maybe if the author tried extra hard to think of nothing to say about Mint Jelly. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 18:05, November 28, 2011 (UTC) Keep Amusingly pathetic (or pathetically amusing?) Either way I likes it.-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 19:21, November 28, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Instead of the joke being what a terrible article it wound up being, the joke should be that it was so terrible it wound up deleted. 1234 ~ 18:33, 27 November 2011 Delete. In the spirit of UN:HTBFANJS#Use_In-Jokes_Sparingly, its problem lies in that it's only funny with reference to another article which in turn is a self-referential joke. That, in my book, is too tenuous. --Tristessa de St Ange 21:12, November 27, 2011 (UTC) It's a subpage now, though. It'd be hard for a subpage not to reference the page it's a subpage of. ; ) —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:44, 27 November 2011 Good point! --Tristessa de St Ange 01:25, November 28, 2011 (UTC) Yeah it helps Xam, but it doesn't change the fact that the article is severely lacking in everything. Sorry. --Black Flamingo 00:22, November 28, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Kept -- The Zombiebaron 15:03, November 29, 2011 (UTC) Hey fellows, have been busy and haven't been checking my crap lately. Is anyone against putting a redirect on the mint jelly page? I've heard this argument before, and I'm cool with whatever, but I just always figured that something on the Mint Jelly page was better than nothing. Just an idea. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 21:07, November 29, 2011 (UTC) I'd totally agree with you on that in most cases. I'm afraid this isn't one of them, though. If it makes you happier, this subpage is the first thing that shows up when searching for "Mint Jelly" (whenever Special:Search isn't failing to display the search results that is). —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:40, 29 November 2011

HowTo:Play Pasketmaul

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Part Two of the Pasketmaul purge. A minor part of the great purges. --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 21:14, November 27, 2011 (UTC) Die Pasketmaul Die! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:04, November 28, 2011 (UTC) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 04:49, November 28, 2011 (UTC) Delete Mattsnow 11:55, November 28, 2011 (UTC) The sad part is, Elephant polo is totally a real thing.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Nov 28 '11 16:43 (UTC)
Comments

GATAZ

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Unfinished article pile on a subject of questionable notability... I suggest we put this one back in the guy's userspace. 1234 ~ 18:55, 27 November 2011 I think we should just kill it all together. I don't see the humor in this refuse pile... --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 19:19, November 27, 2011 (UTC) What is this? -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:22, November 27, 2011 (UTC) The people on top of me speak the truth. Now get off me! --Black Flamingo 00:23, November 28, 2011 (UTC) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 04:49, November 28, 2011 (UTC) Kill this article, cut off its head and hands, drive it out to the desert, and set its corpse on fire. And then bury the bits in a bowling bag.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Nov 28 '11 14:39 (UTC)
Comments	It's Zagat back'ards, if you're dyslexic. Terrible "article", anyway.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Nov 28 '11 14:39 (UTC)

Tallaght

Score: 8
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (8)	Used to be a shitty stub, then an IP replaced it with the main page (?) in April and it went unnoticed. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 08:49, November 27, 2011 (UTC) I saw this page when I first came here and I stared at it for ten minutes trying to figure out why it looked like the Main Page, little did I know, it was just vandalism... But the actual, unvandalized article is even worse. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 15:49, November 27, 2011 (UTC) Nobody cares about whatever place this craphole is about... --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 19:22, November 27, 2011 (UTC) Whatever. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 20:13, November 27, 2011 (UTC) Delete. No meaningful content and no reasonable prospect of it being created. --Tristessa de St Ange 21:09, November 27, 2011 (UTC) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 04:49, November 28, 2011 (UTC) WHY HASN'T THIS BIN DELEETID ARREDDY.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Nov 28 '11 16:25 (UTC) Obliterate. I have no idea, Bizzeebeever. No idea at all. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:30, 28 November 2011
Comments

Pablo Neruda

Score: -2
Keep (6)	Very Keep. I like this one.--Sycamore (Talk) 15:43, November 24, 2011 (UTC) Keep. His face actually looks like that! : D —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:09, 24 November 2011 Yeah some of this is quite funny. --Black Flamingo 12:59, November 26, 2011 (UTC) I will cry if this is deleted. mAttlobster. (hello) 18:54, November 27, 2011 (UTC) Not bad. I don't want Mr. Lobster to cry too. Mattsnow 11:58, November 28, 2011 (UTC) Pablo Neruda deserves a better article, but this isn't bad enough to delete.-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 19:22, November 28, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (4)	I'm sorry. Can anyone tell what's going on? --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 13:59, November 24, 2011 (UTC) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 15:29, November 24, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Pablo Newhoda? 2K12_DAN.VRS 01:39, November 26, 2011 (UTC) DO NOT WANT ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:53, November 28, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain. This article doesn't seem bad, but I don't know who Pablo Neruda is. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:13, November 25, 2011 (UTC) Kept. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:31, 28 November 2011