Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/Archive245

Diane Sawyer

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	The formatting is ugly, the writing style is annoying, and it's not particularly funny. --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 22:38, Jun. 26, 2011 Delete. (talk) 23:10, 26 June 2011 --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 03:37, June 27, 2011 (UTC) It's so bad it's scary. KILL IT. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 08:44 June 27, 2011 (UTC)  Torch it. ~  Talk 13:08, 27 June 2011 (UTC)  Burninate! NOW! --Scofield & 1337 16:10, June 27, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

List of animals that don't exist, but should

Score: 4
Keep (1)	Keep. I could really fix this up and make this into a better article. Who's with me? -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! - 05:14, 26 June 2011 If this is a delete you can have it I'm sure, but seriously This faggotry has gone on long enough ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:22, June 26, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (5)	Delete. This faggotry ends now --~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 03:30, June 26, 2011 (UTC) --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 03:47, June 26, 2011 (UTC) yup --Roman Dog Bird 04:39, June 26, 2011 (UTC) Some of these could probably be moved to the bestiary, but most of them are just dumb and picking them out just... ugh. Maybe Lollipop'll be willing? *looks at him hopefully* 1234 ~ 16:41, 26 June 2011 Delete. (talk) 23:09, 26 June 2011
Comments

Chris Crocker

Score: 3
Keep (2)	Keep Maybe we have to keep some articles like this to please the 12 year old who are visiting the site, hooking them like crack. Plus, this buffoon is an Internet phenomenon. Not tyhat I find it hilarious, rest assured. Mattsnow 12:53, June 24, 2011 (UTC) Keep. But only if Meep does that thing he suggested. Hi Meep! --Black Flamingo 11:31, June 25, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (5)	This one gets the paddle because it smells like vanity and needs to take a shower. Bad, bad article. --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 04:20, June 24, 2011 (UTC) Delete Although, pot and kettle. mAttlobster. (hello) 07:44, June 24, 2011 (UTC) if not the whole article, then at least that quote section please --Roman Dog Bird 20:23, June 24, 2011 (UTC) Best lost it. 1234 ~ 02:48, 26 June 2011 Delete. *pukes blood* ---   TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 03:04, June 26, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Replace I say that if it is deleted we just replace the page with the iconic image, captioned beneath in big whiny text with "Leave Chris Crocker alone!!!", and maybe some of that jazz. Or not. --KUN VFH POTM VFP(IMAGES⇔TALK) 20:24, June 24, 2011 (UTC) That would work (if this discussion doesn't reach a consensus or if it survives the vote). --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 22:48, June 24, 2011 (UTC)

The Battle of Chickens

Score: -1
Keep (3)	Keep. See Romartus in the comments. He rewrote it all and it's good! Mattsnow 12:56, June 24, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Me likey the tapestry. And the article wasn't excessively hurting anyone. --KUN VFH POTM VFP(IMAGES⇔TALK) 20:27, June 24, 2011 (UTC) We can delete this next year. It's not too terrible now. 1234 ~ 02:48, 26 June 2011
Delete (2)	I sure saw a lot of randomized crap in there. Flush the commode please... --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 03:52, June 24, 2011 (UTC) Obliterate. It's a Final Fantasy wacky war. No other words need be spoken. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 04:04 June 24, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	I removed some crap and added lines. Perhaps it could stay now as it isn't a bad article as such. I liked the tapestry. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:41, June 24, 2011 (UTC) Kept -- The Zombiebaron 02:51, June 27, 2011 (UTC)

Chowder (cartoon character)

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	This show got cancelled for a reason, and the article is about as random as the character. How did Harry Potter references get mixed up in this? I can't find a better version either; it's pretty much the same across the board (except for spellchecking). --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 23:29, June 24, 2011 (UTC) yup, this show sucked balls --Roman Dog Bird 23:40, June 24, 2011 (UTC) Awesomely bad. --Black Flamingo 11:29, June 25, 2011 (UTC) Bad. 1234 ~ 02:45, 26 June 2011
Comments

The Civolutionary War

Score: 3
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (3)	Another fictional war article I found while searching terms involving highly-deletable articles. Puns are the only funny things in this article, and they weren't the funniest (or most numerous, for that matter). --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 23:04, June 24, 2011 (UTC) Bad enough for me. --Black Flamingo 11:39, June 25, 2011 (UTC) Just not funny, and really ugly to boot. 1234 ~ 02:46, 26 June 2011
Comments

Windows Hitler

Score: 0
Keep (3)	Keep. Sure, it's awful in parts, and okay in parts, but there's a lot of it. Someone or a few someone's did lots of work on this page, and trimning and editing are better honor them more than huffing it. Aleister 23:09 21-6-'11 Keep. Maybe revert to this version? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:45, 22 June 2011 Keep. Revert back to an old version. Not quite delete-worthy. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 09:05, June 23, 2011 (UTC) Keep Reverted to the version Sockster found, which is much better. mAttlobster. (hello) 12:52, June 23, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (3)	This is awful. --Scofield & 1337 15:41, June 21, 2011 (UTC) Delete. I can't decide if this is Windows Hitler or Windows Seven. Pick a redirect and attempt to call the party again. --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 04:19, June 22, 2011 (UTC) Delete. "Someone spent a lot of work on this piece of shit" is not a valid reason to keep. It's still shit. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 14:10 Jun 22, 2011
Comments	Abstain. I dunno... It's very crufty, but the images are decent. As Aleister said, some parts of it are good... I shall leave this to a more qualified individual. And I find that I am usually explaining Windows to the Geek Squad, so by that I mean less qualified. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 08:52 June 22, 2011 (UTC) As for the reversion thing, I did check the revision history of this page, but these older versions are still full of pretty flat and obvious jokes. I don't see much of a keeper or a decent parody here. --Scofield & 1337 13:10, June 23, 2011 (UTC) Actually, the pictures I liked the best were deleted in the revert... I really liked the "Version 3.1 7.0" one. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 01:24 June 24, 2011 (UTC) Bring the pictures back! mAttlobster. (hello) 07:10, June 24, 2011 (UTC) This seems kept. 1234 ~ 16:13, 25 June 2011

Russian Mafia

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. Random stuff about Nazi Mel Gibson and predictable lines like "They're coming for YOU!!" It may as well have been called "Noob Mafia." -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 03:47 June 24, 2011 (UTC) Delete. I don't think "von" is a stereotypical Russian's name. If you're going to use stereotypes of powerful Russians, please get them right. --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 03:57, June 24, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Unfunny paragraphs, unfunny lists, unfunny non-existent pics. The subject could be good though. Mattsnow 12:59, June 24, 2011 (UTC) Delete. What or who are 'Swedish Russians'? Rest of it was thrown against the wall to see what sucked. All of it. Randumbski. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:25, June 24, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

UnBooks:A UTP: Dating Adverts From Hyrule

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Vile memeism. I detest this horrible stuff, and the amount of sex jokes in this article outweigh the amount of humo(u)r in this article. Delete. --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 03:44, June 24, 2011 (UTC)  Sterilize. The sex jokes don't even qualify as jokes. I'd say the author desperately needed a hit of espresso. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 03:56 June 24, 2011 (UTC) Yes. 1234 ~ 04:20, 24 June 2011 Delete. YUCK!!! --Scofield & 1337 07:58, June 24, 2011 (UTC) Delete. (talk) 20:29, 24 June 2011 Vape & Rebake Concept could work, but you gotta keep it Zelda. Otherwise it's a yuky doody that reads too much like real personals might horrifically do. "You gotta do the cooking by the book. You know you can't be lazy". --KUN VFH POTM VFP(IMAGES⇔TALK) 20:32, June 24, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Tube

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. Oh, sweet Jesus. I know you may think of me as biased against all these Under/Overground articles but really, this is utter garbage and we already have London Overground which I cleaned up a bit a while ago. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 16:59, June 23, 2011 (UTC) Err, what? --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 03:00, June 24, 2011 (UTC) I don't think I've ever seen something so uneffectively random whilst still remaining largely on-topic... 1234 ~ 04:24, 24 June 2011 Delete. (talk) 20:30, 24 June 2011 Delete. Should be thrown in front of the next passing train. I think Rudy Giuliani got in the wrong carriage. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:32, June 24, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Seems too British for a Yank such as myself to be able to vote on. I say, is it tea time? Jolly good! -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 04:10 June 24, 2011 (UTC)

Template:New STPMO test

Score: 9
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (9)	????????????????????????????????? What the fuck is this random shit?????? -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 07:39, June 23, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Looks like an aborted idea. Should go. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:46, June 23, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Redundant redundancy. Don't we already have a template like this but cleaner? -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 08:55, June 23, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Wut? Mattsnow 12:58, June 23, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Unless somebody can tell me why we need this. --Scofield & 1337 13:08, June 23, 2011 (UTC) Holy shit. Holy shit. Holy shit. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:17, 23 June 2011 Disrespectful to templates.--EpicAwesomeness (talk) 16:59, June 23, 2011 (UTC) Hilariously Bad. This ED-cruft actually made me laugh at how awful it is. That's worthy of inclusion in my userspace hall of shame! -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 23:11 June 23, 2011 (UTC) STPMO must mean bad formatting ahead. --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 02:58, June 24, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Dsmvwlng

Score: 4
Keep (1)	Kp. Nt tht bd. You ctlly hv t thnk. Mattsnow 13:00, June 23, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (5)	BRNNT. Writing an article without vowels doesn't really make it funny; just unreadable. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 07:21 June 23, 2011 (UTC) Delete. nt fnny. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:53, June 23, 2011 (UTC) Delete. More suited to wackypedia or illogicopedia. Not sure which. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 09:07, June 23, 2011 (UTC) Lacks vowels. Also lacks humour or any real concept or even, really, readability. 1234 ~ 13:16, 23 June 2011 Yet another butchering of the English language. It's worse than leetspeak... --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 02:55, June 24, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

UnBooks:A UTP: Link Gets Pregnant and Dies

Score: 6
Keep (1)	Keep. pregnancy related. --Mn-z 00:17, June 25, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (7)	More YouTube Poop nonsense. These stupid memecruft articles are only funny on rare occasions (the same goes for YTP videos that are well edited). I thought humo(u)r was supposed to make a person laugh? That was pretty unfunny with no satirical purpose. --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 19:46, June 24, 2011 (UTC) no comment --Roman Dog Bird 20:21, June 24, 2011 (UTC) Roman Dog Baron (talk) 22:47, 24 June 2011 Delete. Yes please. --Count of Monkey Crisco 23:06, June 24, 2011 (UTC) Pregnancybaron -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:59, June 25, 2011 (UTC) Obliterate. Yet another Zelda-cruft article. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 02:37 June 25, 2011 (UTC) Burn, but don't delete the images yet. I need them. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 07:51, June 25, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	I hope Wilytank won't mind me using his template, but Ugh. The Philips CD-i creates so much fodder for junk articles around here... -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 02:48 June 25, 2011 (UTC) I do love watching these things get deleted. --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 03:04, June 25, 2011 (UTC)

Cremation Museum

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Obliterate. This thing is so random, I had to keep checking the (incorrect) title to actually see what I was reading about. "Cremation" somehow becomes "Creation," the museum "is an idiot" ( ...), and Hitler runs it for Emperor Palpatine. How this monstrosity escaped QVFD is beyond me. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 08:38 June 22, 2011 (UTC)  Cremate What was that filth? --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 01:23, June 23, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Rambling, and looks to be part of a broken series, from the redlink in the article. More ranty than funny. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 09:03, June 23, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Doesn't recover from confusing 'creation' with 'cremation' for no obvious comic effect. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:34, June 23, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Α&Ω

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	I assume this was only written for a specific purpose that Uncyclopedia wasn't made for. Whoever made this was either horny or bored. Possibly both. I dunno. I found no comedic value there. Also, a(n) wizard IP did it in 2005. So, I say Delete. to clear server space in this long, rambling speech. --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 04:13, June 22, 2011 (UTC) Flush. Needs immediate burnination. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 08:46 June 22, 2011 (UTC) I'm totally serious when I say this is TOO explicit for my tastes. I just think something this explicit has no comedic value at all. -DeathBySnowman (talk) 23:54 June 22, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Randumbo. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:38, June 23, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Emotional rescue

Score: 2
Keep (3)	I have mercy again. I think it's a poignant read, although not ROFL funny. A pic or 2 would do it justice. Mattsnow 10:52, June 19, 2011 (UTC) Mattsnow. This could be worked up into a really good page. Go, Matt, go. I added two pics. Not a bad article now, but needs work. Aleister 13:26 19-6-'11 I am unfortunately an asshole at expressing my emotions, and am therefore inapt to write anything about Emotional rescue, since I'd need it myself. :P Mattsnow 11:35, June 20, 2011 (UTC) Keep. I kinda like it. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:53, 22 June 2011
Delete (5)	Delete. What? -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 08:05, June 18, 2011 (UTC) Delete. I can see some sort of an idea here, but otherwise this is just some stupid psychologists-turn-knights adventure which doesn't even spoof the medieval legends nicely. --Scofield & 1337 12:29, June 18, 2011 (UTC)  Burninate! Is it Freudian, or is it Frasierian? I can't see it as being either one of those, since in either case, it would at least vaguely make sense. Redirect to rape or some-such. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 01:59 June 19, 2011 (UTC) Vigilance. 1234 ~ 09:11, 19 June 2011 --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 04:22, June 22, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Mehkept. 1234 ~ 18:55, 22 June 2011

Invisible Mosquitos

Score: 1
Keep (1)	Keep. Not random any more, the quote was the main random thing. Oscar Wilde isn't very smart sometimes. So I've edited, put back one of the original pics and caption, but won't do much more on this unless paid by the cabal who are again late with their check thank you very much. Aleister 11:39 17-6-'11
Delete (2)	Well, the template is right. This is really random, and not really a good sort, either. 1234 ~ 07:16, 17 June 2011 Umm, what is that? Oh wait, get the flyswatter. Smack! --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 14:52, June 18, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Kept. 1234 ~ 05:43, 22 June 2011

Responsibility Land

Score: 0
Keep (6)	Erm, I didn't think it was that bad. In fact, I liked it. Yup. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 11:06, June 19, 2011 (UTC) Wha? This is a great idea, and the page isn't bad at all at all. Needs some work, but farrrrrr from VFD quality imnho. Wha? Aleister 13:08 19-6-'11 Keep I like this. This shouldn't be deleted. mAttlobster. (hello) 18:24, June 19, 2011 (UTC) Keep. If anybody's willing to make this concept work. --Scofield & 1337 10:35, June 20, 2011 (UTC) Check it out again, I spouted fake ink on it. Aleister 23:11 21-6-'11 Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:14, 22 June 2011 Keep Also, 2007-cruft is definitely not a thing.~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN  [talk] 03:32, June 22, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (6)	Delete. 2007 cruft and not funny -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 08:39, June 19, 2011 (UTC) Smite. 2007-cruft indeed. It would be QVFD'd today. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 08:52 June 19, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Mattsnow 09:10, June 19, 2011 (UTC) Vigilance. 1234 ~ 10:07, 19 June 2011 Delete. Will not be improved. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:45, June 19, 2011 (UTC) Has been improved, maybe enough for a keeper. Aleister 10:48 21-6-'11 --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 04:15, June 22, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Elapsed time: 8828 hours LOLOLOLOL --Roman Dog Bird 05:26, June 22, 2011 (UTC) Kept --ChiefjusticePS2 10:26, June 22, 2011 (UTC)

The typing impaired teenager

Score: 1
Keep (2)	Weak Keep You see? We need to raise awareness about this topic. Yet, it could use some list removal and a move to a more less typing impaired title. --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 03:26, June 16, 2011 (UTC) It wasn't total crap. What's the deletion policy these days? Anything that a single person, with their single world view, finds unfunny? No, seriously. I dunno. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 11:12, June 19, 2011 (UTC) I think that's pretty much the gist of it. The community aspect comes into play with the voting part of VFD. That way, one person's opinion won't trump the rest of the site. I think everybody's nominated at least one article where they ended up being the only user to dislike it. In the case of QVFD, only week-old or newer rubbish articles are nommed there (see my quotes page for some examples). If an admin agrees, it is deleted on the spot. Otherwise, it gets an ICU tag. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 23:52 June 19, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Cool. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:50, June 15, 2011 (UTC)  BuRn1n473!!! The "stripper" picture is the only thing worth keeping here. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 20:24 June 16, 2011 (UTC) Nothing.... 1234 ~ 09:05, 19 June 2011
Comments	Kept. No consensus reached here. --ChiefjusticePS2 11:21, June 21, 2011 (UTC)

Roger Bruce "Willis" Chaffee

Score: 4
Keep (1)	I am merciful this morning. It's not too bad at all actually. And since it's short, no need for sections. And a couple of red links in an article is actually a good thing. Mattsnow 10:47, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (5)	Delete. What? -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! - 00:17, 19 June 2011 Delete. It looks like the only thing that saved it from QVFD was its length. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 02:05 June 19, 2011 (UTC) Too long? I think this article is pretty short, and unformatted (other than a picture and some Bruce Willis and/or Oscar Wilde quotes). --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 03:45, June 19, 2011 (UTC) Maybe not too long, but most of the stuff I see on QVFD is a paragraph or less. Articles of this length usually get an ICU instead of a QVFD from me. But yeah, I probably would have made an exception for this one. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 04:37 June 19, 2011 (UTC) This is too long. 1234 ~ 09:14, 19 June 2011 Delete. Bad. --Scofield & 1337 10:33, June 20, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Pt-br:Garça

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	This could very well be the greatest article on Earth, the problem is I don't know this language. Mattsnow 12:10, June 19, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Looks like it's written in Portuguese. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:38, June 19, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Unless someone can explain exactly why it's in the English version of Uncyc, I say get rid of it. While the one mentioned below is quite good, this one isn't even in the same area code as Unregistered User. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 03:29 June 20, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Per Mattsnow. --Scofield & 1337 10:36, June 20, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	You wanna see the greatest other-language article on earth? Just look at the pics, and link on the captions. Should have been featured lonnnngggggg ago, imnho. Aleister 12:58 19-6-'11 Oh, now I get that Quetzalcoatl thing or whatever it is. You're right, "gibber gibber gibber gibber gibber gibber Mexican Air Force gibber gibber gibber Felipe Calderon gibber gibber" is actually quite hilarious (though I can't really tell the joke properly). It really took some skill to put that together, I'm just wondering if it's real language or just Lorem Ipsum-type gibberish. One of us should VFH it one of these days. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 03:29 June 20, 2011 (UTC)

Gary Dicker

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Gary F-ing Oak. Football and Pokeymans; everybody's two favorite things rolled together into one random package. Fun for the whole family. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 10:06 June 19, 2011 (UTC) Hi, random stuff that apparently has very little to do with the guy... 1234 ~ 10:11, 19 June 2011 delete. Mattsnow 10:15, June 19, 2011 (UTC) Delete. It's based on a real guy, but makes too feeble an attempt to make fun of him, and is unlikely to be improved. --Scofield & 1337 10:46, June 20, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	I'd like to hear from someone who knows who this guy is. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 11:05, June 19, 2011 (UTC)

Invader Zim

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	I think it's time I stuck my neck out and said that this PoS should be replaced with my shiny new one (talk) 22:05, 18 June 2011 as long as we delete what's there, i'm cool with that (this show is for faggots) --Owns the whole series on DVD 22:27, June 18, 2011 (UTC)  Burninate the old one,  Feature Jack's version! -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 01:46 June 19, 2011 (UTC) Per TSF. -- 02:04, June 19, 2011 (UTC) Per above's per above. Oh, and edit protect it from IPs. I just hate it when they ruin articles... --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 03:49, June 19, 2011 (UTC) Yup. 1234 ~ 09:11, 19 June 2011
Comments

Lili (Tekken)

Score: 3
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (3)	Bleah! Gamecruft, and lots of it. Mostly random nonsense. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 10:20 June 19, 2011 (UTC) Sucks. Mattsnow 10:19, June 19, 2011 (UTC) NEXT! --Scofield & 1337 10:39, June 20, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Moved to my userspace. For obvious reasons. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:07, 20 June 2011

Thomas and Friends

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. No doubt this is the biggest dick magnet on the site its really stupid and full of jokes about penis size. -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 08:34, June 19, 2011 (UTC) Incinerate. Wow, that's quite awful. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 08:49 June 19, 2011 (UTC) 08:49, June 19, 2011 (UTC) Cruft. 1234 ~ 10:06, 19 June 2011 I'm just too lazy to read it all, but that looks bad. Mattsnow 10:16, June 19, 2011 (UTC) this joke has gone on long enough --Roman Dog Bird 19:07, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

UnNews:Peanuts

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	What? 1234 ~ 06:28, 19 June 2011 Delete. What indeed. -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 06:30, June 19, 2011 (UTC) Delete. The first few sentences show promise, but then it strays way too far into randumbo territory. It is essentially a good, but undeveloped concept. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 07:44 June 19, 2011 (UTC) delete. It will be missed. Where do you find all this crap? Mattsnow 09:14, June 19, 2011 (UTC) It's a bit, you know, generic. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 11:09, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

This is not Sparta

Score: 7
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (7)	Delete. Vigilance and very very very very very very very crap -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 08:42, June 19, 2011 (UTC) That sucks ass Mattsnow 09:08, June 19, 2011 (UTC) Neither is where it's going. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 09:21 June 19, 2011 (UTC) Bloody hell. 1234 ~ 10:08, 19 June 2011 This is poor. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 11:03, June 19, 2011 (UTC) Delete. This is not worth it. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:42, June 19, 2011 (UTC) I refuse to read this whole thing. But from what I did read I can tell it's carp. -- 23:08, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	When in Sparta, do as the Romans do! Wait... During my sojourn to Sparta, that crazy dude freaking threw me down a well! I can't believe it's not Spa-- *Foxy is shot* -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 09:21 June 19, 2011 (UTC)

Nelson Mandela's Bathroom

Score: 0
Keep (3)	Well written, referenced cleverly in other articles. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 11:39, June 15, 2011 (UTC) If it's good enough for Mandela when he has to go to the bathroom, who am I to put itching powder on his toilet paper? Aleister 11:49 15-6-'11 Keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 16:08, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Delete. Wacky diplomacy in wacky war style? The pictures don't seem to add anything to the article, and it doesn't seem to really go anywhere. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 08:17 June 15, 2011 (UTC) Mild Delete. Should not get away without several improve tags at the very least.--Count of Monkey Crisco 22:31, June 15, 2011 (UTC)  Burninate! Blah blah blah... Random. Any questions? --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 03:35, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Well-written, it's just that the concept seems rather weak to me. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 08:19 June 15, 2011 (UTC) This is one of NoNamesLeft early attempts. Just shows that polishing and more polishing help a page, and a fast and good writer can maybe grow with his experience here on VFD and go back to work on such pages. Aleister 3:36 16-6-'11 Kept. 1234 ~ 08:51, 19 June 2011

Bureau for Editing Time Itself

Score: 1
Keep (3)	Weak keep. I like the concept, but execution is lacking. I'm not planning on improving it though, so feel free to ignore this vote. Pup 09:31 15 Jun '11 Last time one or two people out of dozens said improve, others, like The Thinker implied "masterpiece". Aleister 12:10 15-6-'11 I have a good idea for this article. Maybe I could rewrite it?--User:CandidToaster/sig 16:02, June 15, 2011 (UTC) What are you kidding? I love this thing. Even the hexadecimal translates. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 18:31 Jun 15, 2011 The page you see is not the article up for voting. CandidToaster put up a totally different article, which is a very good page but it doesn't really have to use the same name as the old article which many people like (see its first VFD nom for comments) Aleister 3:32 16-6-'11 Oh. Wow. Someone should really do something about that. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 05:01 Jun 16, 2011 Keep Why is this nominated? mAttlobster. (hello) 20:49, June 15, 2011 (UTC) Also voted on the wrong version; if you still think this version should be kept, unstrike this. or put in a new vote or something. 1234 ~ 05:04, 16 June 2011
Delete (4)	Keep and improve, they said last time. It hasn't been improved. Still sucks, too. 1234 ~ 05:34, 15 June 2011 Obliterate. Since the article itself suggests we delete it, why should we disappoint it? -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 08:25 June 15, 2011 (UTC) I'm confused... I hereby vote to Delete. all versions including the latest one, with the exception of CandidToaster's much better rewritten one. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 05:16 June 19, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Stub it out. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:12, June 15, 2011 (UTC) Delete. I'm not impressed. --Scofield & 1337 07:26, June 18, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	In the spirit of editing time itself, The Thinker's comment last time: "KEEP I'd make improvements very sparingly. This is almost Houdini-like; Uncyc's own version of performance art. THINKER approves. --THINKER 3 February 2008" (Aleister 12:12 15-6-'11) All I know is that I love CandidToaster's rewrite, before it was reverted. If this whole thing is nuked, I propose the rewrite be reinstated to a separate article. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 05:18 June 19, 2011 (UTC)! Kept. And the toaster's one is on another name already. 1234 ~ 08:51, 19 June 2011

Anaconda Plan

Score: 0
Keep (4)	Took the unusual first step of reverting it, this time to the last edit by the original author. Added pics, and will clean up and edit a bit more, but it's actually fine as is right now, imnho. Aleister 12:46 15-6-'11 The truth of the matter comes out... and I'd say I didn't look back far enough into the history, perhaps, but it seems a fair amount improved even from that. But maybe it's just the scary woman with the snake making it seem that way... 1234 ~ 13:40, 15 June 2011 A certain somebody is taking it under its care, so I change my vote to keep. Mattsnow 19:03, June 15, 2011 (UTC)  For. sloppy in places, but good enough. --Mn-z 01:49, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (4)	It's really... random. 1234 ~ 02:34, 15 June 2011 ...too random. -DeathBySnowman (talk) 03:06, 15 June 2011 Too random for Uncyc, too long and tedious for Illogicopedia. Flush to wackypedia! -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 03:32, June 15, 2011 (UTC) Grr. 1234 ~ 03:35, 15 June 2011 #That's random. Too random. Mattsnow 03:36, June 15, 2011 (UTC) One day, a car crashed unto ur mon and some people laughed at the street and god killed them.LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL!!!!!11--Fcukman 06:35, June 15, 2011 (UTC) GFTO UNCYCLOPEDIA -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 10:29, June 15, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Kept. 1234 ~ 08:51, 19 June 2011

Great Schism

Score: 4
Keep (1)	Keep. It seems to be about the Greek Ortrodox Church being created and giving the finger to Rome, and various bored religious players talk to each other about it as it's happening. It seems pretty smart and well thought out. Held my attention. Aleister 11:14 17-6-'11
Delete (5)	Delete. Umm... I can`t simply understand this article. It`s too weird, and is this even about Great Schism? OMG!!! It`s Cat the Colourful, Jesus Christ!!! 09:33 17 June 2011 Delete. I don't get it either. I tried. Hard. Mattsnow 11:07, June 17, 2011 (UTC) Weak Delete. I dunno, it's too redlinky, chatty, as well as being too 2005-AIM-L33T-crufty for my taste. That and I'm too lazy busy repairing the Space-time Continuum to fix it myself. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 01:53 June 19, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Had potential, but was squandered on overdone l33t speak. -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 01:56, June 19, 2011 (UTC) This doesn't work. 1234 ~ 09:08, 19 June 2011
Comments	You forgot the VFD tag, dudes. Be careful to always put it on. --Scofield & 1337 07:24, June 18, 2011 (UTC)

Damp Rising

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. Clunky, joke free gamingcruft. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:34, June 15, 2011 (UTC) I'm assuming since Frank wears retarded clothes, he has a red helmet. How funny. --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 03:43, June 16, 2011 (UTC)  Crufty, crufty, cruft! -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 20:31 June 16, 2011 (UTC) Delete. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 21:55, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Stay Puft Marshmallow Man

Score: 3
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (3)	Delete. Marshmallow fluff stuffed with cruft. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:14, June 15, 2011 (UTC) I fucking hate rabbits. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 02:27, June 16, 2011 (UTC) Delete. So very random. I'm sad that someone would disgrace a movie like the Ghostbusters... --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 03:20, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. People have been disgracing Ghostbusters since that NES game from Activision. --Count of Monkey Crisco 03:25, June 16, 2011 (UTC) That was pretty bad, wasn't it? I'm gonna' go vomit... --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 03:32, June 16, 2011 (UTC)

St. Peter of Cottontail

Score: 3
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (3)	Virtual randomness.Did i heard of it before?--Fcukman 10:53, June 16, 2011 (UTC) The MacGregor threads seem like a good start, but it's nothing more than that and even a little less. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 11:46, June 16, 2011 (UTC) Smite. Random and way too short. Not that I mind short articles, but it could at least use a picture... -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 20:28 June 16, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Glacier

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Okay... so? 1234 ~ 02:35, 15 June 2011 Yup, this can go. -DeathBySnowman (talk) 03:04, 15 June 2011 Delete. Sheet ice is gay. Who would have ever thought. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:11, June 15, 2011 (UTC) Delete. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:37, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Speaking backwards

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	I actually came across the forward version of this and it's terrible. And we already have a sdrawkcab, don't we? 1234 ~ 07:07, 15 June 2011  Burninate! Incomprehensible and all-around useless. Should we delete the subpage that goes with it? After all, a subpage isn't much good without a... "super-page?" -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 08:22 June 15, 2011 (UTC) Yeah, not much merit. Also not very 'strine, despite what the author thinks. Pup 09:24 15 Jun '11 Delete.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:13, June 15, 2011 (UTC) --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 03:37, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Mount&Blade

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	I tried to qvfd this and the admin didn't appreciate. 1234 ~ 08:09, 14 June 2011 Delete.--Count of Monkey Crisco 09:07, June 14, 2011 (UTC) Put it where no sun shine Aleister 15:26 14-6-'11 Snacks -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:18, June 14, 2011 (UTC) Inconsistent and random. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 03:33, June 15, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Chutney

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete This was {{deadend}}ed. The guy added links, so I couldn't, in good conscience, delete it. However, it is absolutely terrible, so I'd like to delete it for that reason instead. Who's with me?~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN  [talk] 04:13, June 14, 2011 (UTC) Some links at the beginning is still pretty deadendy. Anyhow, where's your sense of vigilance, man? 1234 ~ 08:12, 14 June 2011 Skreleex -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:18, June 14, 2011 (UTC) Take a wikipedia article, and mix it well with some word salad, and you have this monstrosity. Worse yet, it mentions "gay" in the first paragraph in an article completely unrelated to homosexuality. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 03:35, June 15, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

That time I didn't appreciate your attitude towards my potato chip situation during my sojourn in Panera

Score: -4
Keep (10)	Keep - I don't appreciate your attitude towards my short sucky stub. -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 07:29, Jun. 12, 2011 Sorry Kip, but I just went in the history of the article, and you said "I hate myself" when creating it in 2010 lol. I only wanted to give you back the self-confidence this article prevents you from accessing. Mattsnow 08:09, June 12, 2011 (UTC) Confidence? Bah! I get by just fine masking self-loathing in arrogance. -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 08:25, Jun. 12, 2011 Keep. Quit acting like some emo kid, Mattsnow. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 10:18, June 12, 2011 (UTC) Keep I don't want Kip's self-confidence coming back and murdering my cat. mAttlobster. (hello) 10:31, June 12, 2011 (UTC) Keep. this isn't a stub, it is a form-based inside joke or something!! --Mn-z 12:17, June 12, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Have a heart, people. --Scofield & 1337 18:21, June 12, 2011 (UTC) These things just are funny. And also "Stub" is never a valid excuse to delete anything. Quality, not quantity. This is quality. The ability to seamlessly merge unrelated in-jokes is a talent that few excel at. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 06:04, June 13, 2011 (UTC) Keep. 'cause of large number of keep votes. Aleister 16:59 13-6-'11 Pandas. Pandas. Pandas. Pandas? -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! - 22:20, 14 June 2011 Potatoes. Potatoespotatoespotatoespotatoespotatoes! Now I've made myself hungry. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 05:37, June 15, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (6)	Short stub that sucks a lot. Mattsnow 07:07, June 12, 2011 (UTC) This is bad for a my sojourn, and I'd be all for deleting the majority of the things, anyhow. 1234 ~ 07:27, 12 June 2011 Delete. These things just aren't funny. -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 10:32, June 12, 2011 (UTC) EXTERMINATE! Need I say more? Why do these things grow out of nowhere? Can I ask more questions? --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 04:05, June 13, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Stubby McShortie: The Third Dwarf. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:02, June 13, 2011 (UTC) Delete. ~  Talk 23:08, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
Comments	This seems kept. 1234 ~ 08:20, 15 June 2011

UnNews:Header

Score: 4
Keep (0)	Keep this. And this. ~  Talk 23:15, 13 June 2011 (UTC) Redacted after heated discussion. ~  Talk 02:42, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Delete (4)	Apparently this and the things linked have no further purpose. Would anyone object to this and the linked items being deleted? 1234 ~ 12:13, 12 June 2011 Pointless... --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 03:54, June 13, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Obsolete -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 10:42, June 13, 2011 (UTC) Delete. However, if it should happen that this is somehow used, then move to the template namespace. You know, where we keep our templates. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 23:17 Jun 13, 2011
Comments

I think I am going to make an Article on:

Score: 5
Keep (1)	Keep. I like it -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 10:43, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (6)	Or is his one worse? Than that other one I just nominated, I mean. Or do they go together? Or should they? 1234 ~ 12:09, 12 June 2011 Delete. Scofield & 1337 18:26, June 12, 2011 (UTC) Each time that picture is duplicated, it gets twice as bad. --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 03:55, June 13, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Surprised this hasn't been tranquilised and then shipped to VFH for further 'entertainment. A Wizard Done It Eh? --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:11, June 13, 2011 (UTC) Delete. How do I get this graphic to duplicate? I want to show how much I think this article should be gone. ~  Talk 23:12, 13 June 2011 (UTC) Delete. Mattsnow 03:10, June 14, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Inbox

Score: -4
Keep (5)	Keep. Simply a work or art. -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 11:16, June 12, 2011 (UTC) I propose a rewrite in the style of Lonely Hearts Column, as Lyr suggests. I will try to come up with some ideas and urge you to do the same! --Black Flamingo 14:01, June 12, 2011 (UTC) Note - some ideas on the talk page. --Black Flamingo 15:13, June 12, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Can I get in on this rewrite? -- 15:21, June 12, 2011 (UTC) Keep. The dark bird will no this justice. Or unjustice, depending on point of view. Aleister 16:58 13-6-'11 Keep. Needs a bit more, not a deletion. ~  Talk 23:10, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
Delete (1)	It's a screenshot of a bunch of spam. Something like this could be good if written up with clever and not so clever things like Lonely Hearts Column, but it's literally just a screenshot of someone's inbox. 1234 ~ 11:14, 12 June 2011
Comments	This is a good idea if there was some sort of odd dialogue going on between the spammer(s) and the recipient of this stuff. It could work a bit like a page of tweets. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 05:58, June 13, 2011 (UTC) If anyone wants to add some ideas to the talk page, feel free. And then Lyrithya has agreed to do the formatting. --Black Flamingo 20:46, June 13, 2011 (UTC) Kept and I'll... uh... do the formatting, or something. I wish I wasn't so terrible at content. 1234 ~ 00:16, 14 June 2011

Smog

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Just doesn't strike me as funny. And might as well be put to a vote eithger way, considering what it is. 1234 ~ 11:09, 12 June 2011 -cough- Delete. Dang environmentalist hippies trying to make a statement... Also, Spellcheck. --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 04:12, June 13, 2011 (UTC) Delete. A ye oldie jokey not done very well here. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:00, June 13, 2011 (UTC) Penis -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 10:46, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

UnPoetia:Mecha-Bach

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	What? 1234 ~ 11:02, 12 June 2011 I'm torn on this, but am settling on delete. I enjoyed reading it, but it's not funny. --Black Flamingo 13:58, June 12, 2011 (UTC) This doesn't compare to the humor found in watching burning orphans... in Nigeria. That's not funny at all. --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 04:08, June 13, 2011 (UTC) Hmmmmmmmmm??? -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 10:47, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

11

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	This article strikes me as so ridiculous it is not even funny. At least that's my impression. 1234 ~ 11:25, 12 June 2011 Delete. You should have QVFD'd this. --Scofield & 1337 18:18, June 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Redirect to eleven. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:49, June 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Game cruft? Not funny. End of story. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 05:52, June 13, 2011 (UTC) Delete. What the fuck? How did this get away? -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 10:44, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	This is a reference to a song as per this explanation. I'm surprised that Kingdom of Loathing doesn't have this joke in some form already. --Sloublues 18:56, June 12, 2011 (UTC)

Your mind on drugs

Score: -4
Keep (7)	BEND Lambs dancing, grass moving, invincible. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:33, June 12, 2011 (UTC) WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE! Funnier with the tomato. -- 15:14, June 12, 2011 (UTC) Keep. As an in-joke. --Scofield & 1337 18:19, June 12, 2011 (UTC) Keep. You on drugs, or somethin'? – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 18:47 Jun 12, 2011 Keep. I can fix this up and make it the most fucked up page in fucked up history. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! - 03:58, 13 June 2011 Conditional keep if someone fixes up the image to make it flash and go crazy. It may already do that and my browser's just retarded, though. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 06:10, June 13, 2011 (UTC) Strong Keep -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 10:45, June 13, 2011 (UTC)  For. Very nice, thanks for finding it. Never saw my mind on drugs exactly this way. Should be a great addition to uncy's feature collection. Aleister 16:56 13-6-'11
Delete (3)	Just not funny... 1234 ~ 11:23, 12 June 2011 Delete. To infinity and beyond...no. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 05:54, June 13, 2011 (UTC) Where do these keep coming from? --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 16:52, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Kept. --ChiefjusticePS2 19:52, June 13, 2011 (UTC)

UnNews:UnNewsAudio/Releases

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	What's this for? 1234 ~ 12:11, 12 June 2011 Seems to me like an incomplete list of UnNews articles with audio versions. And hence I say Delete. --Scofield & 1337 18:25, June 12, 2011 (UTC) --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 04:25, June 13, 2011 (UTC) Delete. per above -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 10:42, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Ludocrisy

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	I just shot this beast and it didn't resist, it seems it begs for death. Unfunny. Mattsnow 04:58, June 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Crap -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 10:33, June 12, 2011 (UTC) Blah. 1234 ~ 10:53, 12 June 2011 Delete. Written in someone's sleep. A snore-bore. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:04, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

John Gruden

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Huff UnFunny article about a hockey player apparently (according to google). Classic load of shit throwing suck. Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 04:17, June 12, 2011 (UTC) Yup, nothing but... basically nothing. 1234 ~ 10:49, 12 June 2011 What? --Black Flamingo 13:55, June 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Short trousered abuse page. A variation on 'this town/club/person/admin etc is crap' style article which at least lays out its unfunny cards at the start. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:07, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Eminem

Score: -1
Keep (4)	Keep. -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 04:18, June 12, 2011 (UTC) Keep. It would be more suited to use a rewrite template I believe. There are some good passages. Mattsnow 05:02, June 12, 2011 (UTC) You know I respect you as a writer and as a person (to what limited extent I can say that), but I entreat you...where?~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN  [talk] 05:04, June 12, 2011 (UTC) The discography... :S I admit the rest is awful for the most part. Maybe it would be better to start anew, because a rewrite... Well, I based my keep vote on the fact it needs at least a rewrite since the guy is so popular. Mattsnow 05:36, June 12, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Fuck? Really? I rewrote this from scratch to make an article with distinct comical themes relating to the subject matter back when it was huffed about 18 months ago. Even if the current version is not good there's a 100% chance that some version I revert it to would be acceptable for me.--Count of Monkey Crisco 21:50, June 12, 2011 (UTC) Keep. I'll do some spellchecking later... --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 03:59, June 13, 2011 (UTC) Keep. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! - 04:01, 13 June 2011
Delete (3)	Delete Apparently this person finds Eminem painful to listen to now, as opposed to some earlier time. By contrast, I don't think there would ever be a time in my life during which reading this wouldn't be painful.~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN  [talk] 04:16, June 12, 2011 (UTC) Fires are good. They clear the rubbish aside and allow new growth to reach for the sky. 1234 ~ 10:38, 12 June 2011 One for UN:REQ. --Black Flamingo 13:50, June 12, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	I change to abstain. Maybe huffing it would be better than a rewrite. It is however certain we can't keep an article about such a star in this decrepit state. And we have to have one on him, for sure. Mattsnow 05:36, June 12, 2011 (UTC) Comment. Before you huff it check out this older version here. This is the version I did after the previous version was huffed. While I and a handful of vigilant Uncyclopedians have protected it from major vandalism I tried not to be such a pet project whore as to revert it to my version every time someone made a little change. If neither the original release version or the current version is workable for anyone, well, it's the people's will. If this does get deleted I'm going to stick exclusively to VFDing other people's articles because I have NO FUCKING CLUE how to write for Uncyclopedia. I simply can't cross the vast divide between what I and the average reader here finds funny. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:01, June 12, 2011 (UTC) Reverted to the version that The Count mentioned. -- The Zombiebaron 05:16, June 13, 2011 (UTC) Addendum: Don't be afraid to make it your pet project. The article is too high risk to allow it to be ravaged by awfulness.~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN  [talk] 05:20, June 13, 2011 (UTC)

YouTube Poop

Score: 5
Keep (1)	Keep. My poor little page! How dare you! -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! - 21:14, 11 June 2011
Delete (6)	Delete. It's a completely factual article with little of what one would consider "jokes". ~jcm 21:10, June 11, 2011 (UTC) Total poop -- The Zombiebaron 21:12, June 11, 2011 (UTC) Lacking anything of value, unfortunately. I'd say 'besides stuff of the thing itself', but the thing itself doesn't really have any value to it either. Not that it'd make a difference here if it did. 1234 ~ 10:36, 12 June 2011 Sorry Lol, but it is a bit messy and lacking in jokes/pics. --Black Flamingo 13:47, June 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete It's got the word 'noob' in it. mAttlobster. (hello) 16:38, June 12, 2011 (UTC)  Burninate! I think I may have (attempted) to review this once... --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 04:01, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	There are a lot of obvious typos and not much pics, you should focus on that, Lollipop. Mattsnow 05:11, June 12, 2011 (UTC) I corrected the typos in an act of kindness. Mattsnow 05:24, June 12, 2011 (UTC) Abstain. It is more or less a factual article, but then again I myself am partial to YouTube Poops :O --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 07:18, June 12, 2011 (UTC) Abstain. Don't know where to vote on this... -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 07:20, June 12, 2011 (UTC) Comment If this dosen't make it, move it to my userspace. An interesting note is that Happymonkey39, who has a contest named after him, made his final edit on this page. I remember him being very eager to edit the page. So just in case he returns, move this to thy userspace. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! - 16:28, 12 June 2011 Can you move this to my userspace? -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! - 04:03, 13 June 2011

PokeBitches

Score: 10
Keep (1)	Keep. :D Equivamp 04:22, June 12, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (11)	Delete. No, that's a terrible idea! --Count of Monkey Crisco 15:31, June 11, 2011 (UTC) Radioactive! Almost vanity like. --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 18:13, June 11, 2011 (UTC) lordy lordy --Roman Dog Bird 21:40, June 11, 2011 (UTC) NO Mattsnow 23:03, June 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. mentions numerous unwanted pregnancies but does not show images of said pregnancies. --Mn-z 23:51, June 11, 2011 (UTC) WTF? That's just disturbing. It seems as though it might work with extremely careful execution, but I wouldn't trust anyone without the skill level of Conan O'Brien to attempt it. I think we have a handful of such writers, but... why bother? -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 02:32 June 12, 2011 (UTC) KILL NOW -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! - 02:37, 12 June 2011 Delete. -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 04:18, June 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete I worry about the person who wrote this. mAttlobster. (hello) 13:52, June 12, 2011 (UTC) ... -- 15:53, June 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete. What a waste. --Scofield & 1337 18:23, June 12, 2011 (UTC)
Comments