Keep |
- HELL NO, WE WON'T GO -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 04:55, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep With a side of FUCK YOU! --Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 04:58, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep-- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 05:44, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, this seems like something I would do if I became very bored. Something good. Something amusing. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 05:50, Jan 30
- Speedy Keep Less than a week old and it appears to be a new In Joke based on protection level. ----Pleb- Sawblade5 [citation needed] ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 07:08, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- STRONG STRONG STRONG STRONG KEEP--Æ 14:09, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- Uber Keep --MNM5150Talk Dirty To Me Failings 16:55, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- lol iz teh funnies Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 18:43, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- KEEP --Dexter111344 20:59, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- I lol'd -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 21:29, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- Now this is just getting silly --thematrixeætsyou, the (adjective) (talk) (flames) 22:13, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- For the in-joke! Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me! 23:12, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. --EMC [TALK] 23:56, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - Now VFD is just getting silly. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:07, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
- I deny nothing! Or do I deny everything? I don't know. -->:( 18:11, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. Conniving 03:29, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- You realize that Fisher Price wouldn't appreciate you supporting the deletion of his descendants? -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 05:11, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
-
- I disagree. We need these every once and a while. That's just how it works. We can't have delusions that Fisher Price, or Mr. Winkler, or any of these stubs for that matter, are once-in-a-lifetime "masterpieces". They're periodical and predictable, as sure as death and taxes. They're all shit, really. And are you going to hold that against this new shit-stub just because the article has a punch-line? -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 05:33, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- HELL NO! DELETE!!! - We do NOT need any more stubs. We already have enough! --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 05:14, Jan. 30, 2008
A relaxed delete. C'mon, Squiggle, you can do better than this. Bring your A-game back to Uncyclopedia. Ooo! Bring back the A-Team, too!. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:12, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- Comment: Modusoperandi's turned into Justin Lee Collins!
Also, meh to this. The wikipedia duck articles were better than this. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 07:47, 30 Jan 2008
- This is getting to the point of ridicule... Holocaust Denial and Holocaust Denial Denial were funny, and Holocaust Denial Denial Denial was ok... but I say DELETE this article! Javascap 13:38, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete --THINKER 17:53, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:52, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Deep down in places, you don't talk about at parties; you want me on that wall; you need me on that wall. mAttlobster. (hello) 22:24, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Be sure to check out the VFH for this too. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 05:39, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- Wups...it's less than a week old. QVFD it. Madness! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 13:46, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- Deleters, come on. It's the internet, it's Uncyclopedia (of all the places), and more importantly, it a joke. Lighten up and don't take it so seriously, and it contains humoristic value others. Another thing that aggravates me is that the "serious" people who can't accept a joke, decide to start flamewars and nominate these types of articles for deletion (when the truth is they do little to no harm). If they just leave it be and can enjoy a laugh, this drama would never happen, so SHUT UP. You'd be quite crazy not to keep.--Æ 18:56, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- What exactly is the joke? I'm not trying to start anything... I just don't get it. Is it that by saying "this is getting ridiculous" it's denying the article? Or a reference I'm not getting? :s I know the exact same joke (with a bit more content) was used in Duck (wikipedia article) (uncyclopedia article) (uncyclopedia article) (uncyclopedia article), though those articles were sadly deleted. It's lost on me anyway, and as there's no joke (that I can see) that isn't already in the 3 levels above it, I voted delete. It's good to know when to stop. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 20:36, 30 Jan 2008
- I'll try to explain to you what I found the funny. There is a joke present, you just might not find irt funny, and that's okay as I don't expect you to find everything funny that I find funny. These spinoffs have been going on for quite some time, looking through the history of Holocaust denial denial denial denial, I see it started out as a QVFD qwality article as well, but thanks to e|m|c for rewriting it. This started out the same way, even worse than that one, simply with the text "Now this is just getting silly." It is silly if you think about it, and for an article to simply to contain that text (unlike history and what it's about etc.) is funny and I giggled. Those are my opinons and someone might find it funny for a different reason.
- As for ending the series, this is the conclusion to the Holocaust denial series in IMO, think about it. --Æ 20:50, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- I found it funny because. if you look in the see also section of Holocaust denial, you see Holocaust denial denial, Holocaust denial denial denial, Holocaust denial denial denial denial, and, finally, Holocaust denial denial denial denial denial. The IP has made a brilliant, hilarious(IMHO), and pretty self-satirical comment on just how many of these fucking things we have. Frankly, now it's just getting ridiculous, all these Holocaust denials. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:07, Jan 30
- I suppose it's ok as an end to the series. Might be better if it was unlinked, and people only found it when they typed another "denial" onto the supposed last one. Or maybe not, whatever. Also, the talk of self-referential stuff makes me want to restore the duck articles, cos I reread them, and they're funny too. Hooray! • Spang • ☃ • talk • 21:25, 30 Jan 2008
- A lineup for the men's room? Outrageous! /me finishes beer, crosses legs. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:47, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- Sucks to your proper punctuation! Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 23:46, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- I'd have to agree. The joke isn't that it's a grammatically incorrect stub written by a know-nothing IP, unlike most of these things, and I don't think that putting a period in would harm the article's meaning at all, unlike, say, capitalizing "go eat shit fuckers", much less adding a comma to it. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 14:37, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
- Abstain. Could use a few improvements. Not worth deleting and certainly not worth flamewarring over. Get a grip. —Hinoa talk.kun 18:30, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
- I would like to point out that this VFD request may not be valid, from the lack of the VFD template. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
- I'm going to grant an exception; the page got protected. —Hinoa talk.kun 19:01, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
|