This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
Keep. An Alicia Keys fan would found some use of this. Though it does require more.--- TALKWhat's it like to be a heretic? 09:08, August 18, 2011 (UTC)
Why waste time with things like this? Cute enough to keep, and if someone uses it, what's the complaint? I dunno. A weird nom by Frosty, who usually isn't a hater, man, dude. Yeah. Aleister 18:08 19-8-'11
Keep. I don't see the point in not having it. -- 04:29, August 20, 2011 (UTC)
Keep.. Per MM Mattsnow 05:09, August 20, 2011 (UTC)
Keep There is no point in deleting this. mAttlobster. (hello) 09:37, August 20, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. If you want to keep userspace templates out of regular templatespace, just propose the creation of a usertemplate namespace. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM19:16, 20 August 2011
For the creation of a usertemplate namespace. Who's with me? -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.Rap sheet.[[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]]02:53 August 22, 2011 (UTC)
Nobody should care about Alicia Keys more than their own penis. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 22:16, August 18, 2011 (UTC)
Me says.... Delete. this shizzle! It makes me frowny! D: Mr. Person 01:45, August 20, 2011 (UTC)
Comments
Two users use this template: Boobnoob and Alicia Keys. Only Alicia Keys seems to have been active as of recently. This comment doesn't have a point, so thanks for reading! ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver (gabble) 19:07, August 18, 2011 (UTC)
WHERE WILL IT EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEND, WHERE WILL IT EEEEEEEEEEEEEEND --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 04:19, August 20, 2011 (UTC)
Keep., great concept, just needs a tidyup. Seijana 03:42, August 13, 2011 (UTC)
Somehow, I'm with both Seijana AND Lyrithya on this one. ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver (gabble) 07:20, August 13, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. Haven't "we" torn the site up enough? Almost every page has red links now, and articles like Paris Hilton (Person) and Fox "News" have been destroyed. Why? There are probably hundreds of good pages gone. Aleister 18:38 16-8-'11
The first line is worthy of keeping, IE is the #1 tool to download Firefox... but from then on, it just went way down hill.---Maniac1075Complain Here 10:45, August 14, 2011 (UTC)
*In my best Poirot impersonation:* Ze madamoiselle is indeed correct. The state of being annoying, like that of stupid, is equally unsuitable for ze humour. Case closed, Hastings! -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.Rap sheet.[[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]]06:40 August 16, 2011 (UTC)
170 hours. Is that like 3 weeks or something? Didn't VFD used to have voters and articles? --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 04:18, August 20, 2011 (UTC)
Wait a minute, I just read this and I liked it! Why was it deleted without any consensus? -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.Rap sheet.[[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]]02:02 August 13, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. Short, sweet, to-the-point. Oh, and Olipro, if you keep sticking the word "Harrass" out there in your signature, I may be inclined to take you up on the dare. ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver (gabble) 07:11, August 13, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. Okay, 1) this is too young for VFD, and 2) this is great. -- 17:09, August 13, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. I like it. MadMax 22:27, August 13, 2011 (UTC)
OMGGGGGGGGGGGGG IT'S ONLY A VIDEOOOOOOOOOOOOOO DELETE THE SHIZZLE!!!!!!!!!!! Me wishes for the crap to do I tragic death. Delete.--Mr. Person 01:53, August 20, 2011 (UTC)
Comments
What in fuck's name was that? Seijana 03:41, August 13, 2011 (UTC)
Normally this would be an invalid nom, as the article is under a week old, but apparently qvfd doesn't apply to admins' articles. I use the term 'article' rather loosely here, mind. 1234~16:45, 13 August 2011
C'mon guys, it's only a video. I suggest the shizzel to die a tragic death, maybe being forced to have sex with the likes of you. Delete.--Mr. Person 01:53, August 20, 2011 (UTC)
And who invited you to the cabal, Mr. I Can't Sign My Posts Correctly? Was it Lyrithya? I bet it's Lyrithya, she's always inviting all sorts of weird people. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 04:43, August 16, 2011 (UTC)
Actually, it was Socky who invited me. Nevermind that, I fix my sign, and my vote should be validated now.--- TALKWhat's it like to be a heretic? 05:52, August 16, 2011 (UTC)
Actually, now that it is signed, you should be able to either: A) unstrike it and change the score, or B) leave it as is and post another vote. Either way, it probably won't matter, since my vote makes five. Speaking of which... -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.Rap sheet.[[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]]06:28 August 16, 2011 (UTC)
Delete This, here, is as bad as it gets. mAttlobster. (hello) 21:11, August 16, 2011 (UTC)
Comments
Hmm, 9-0 in favor of deletion...this seems too even. I think we shouldn't be hasty. We should hold off until some sort of consensus develops. ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver (gabble) 21:05, August 16, 2011 (UTC)
I think that the definition of "stupid" needs to be compared and contrasted with the definition of "funny", as so many people are having a hard time with the distinction. For example: George W. Bush choking on a pretzel? Funny. George W. Bush choking on a pretzel, and inadvertently activating the "nuclear football", thus initiating a commensurate response by all nuclear powers of Earth, resulting in the destruction of all life on the planet? That's tragic comedy, but still funnier than this article. George W. Bush being fucked in the ass by Dick "My First Name Is Funnier Than Any Nickname Could Be" Cheney whilst choking on a pretzel? ...actually that still is funnier than this article.Tell you what: I'll sit around for the rest of the day trying to come up with concepts that are less funny than the whole of this article. It'll be hard, but I'll give it the ol' College Try. ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver (gabble) 22:41, August 15, 2011 (UTC)
Let's see if we can ONCE kill an article over the (repeated) objections of Mhaille.⇒»Biz E.B. Ver (gabble) 22:53, August 15, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. per above. --Mn-z 23:36, August 15, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Who's responsible for the idea that taking a whole bunch of unrelated stuff and throwing it together = comedy masterpiece? Really? Who is it? Is it people in their early twenties sitting around their university common room going on about how things are "random"? Is people who completely misunderstand the fact that the Goons, Monty Python and the Mighty Boosh actually attached jokes and clever ideas to surreal concepts? Is it the mentally ill? Who, we need to know! --Zarbag 16:00, August 16, 2011 (UTC)
I said I wasn't going to tag articles anymore, but I lied. (Disclaimer: Opera is my default browser. IT MADE ME TAG THIS.) ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver (gabble) 07:45, August 13, 2011 (UTC)
Burninate! Any Firefox user like myself hates cheap attacks against other browsers--except IE, which bloated enough to be exempt. I don't consider Internet Explorer's article to be cheap though; that's just stupid. -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.Rap sheet.[[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]]06:46 August 16, 2011 (UTC)
Sikon lurks our IRC channel under the nick "LucidFox", so you can still talk to him if you want. -- TheZombiebaron 16:54, August 12, 2011 (UTC)
On freenode yes, but not the channel. she's invaluable if you need some Russian translated, and stuff. and yes, She. -- Prof. OliproKUN(W)AnchorOpBur. (Harass) 20:22, August 12, 2011 (UTC)
Keep For the "L4e" section alone! mAttlobster. (hello) 17:33, August 12, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. I don't get it, but hey, that's never stopped me before. --AndorinKato 20:24, August 12, 2011 (UTC)
Parts of this are funny enough, it just needs a quick make-over to make it all seem intact with each other.---Maniac1075Complain Here 10:37, August 14, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (6)
What is this random crap? I'm not even sure if one section was meant to be there. One image, three quotes, and other unmentionables. --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 05:48, August 14, 2011 (UTC)
Delete, on the condition that maniac doesn't rewrite it. If he does, then obviously this'll change. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 16:28, August 14, 2011 (UTC)
Dleeet The man who wrote "Maybelline...why cain'tcha be true...oh Maybelline...why cain'tcha be true...you done started back doin' the things you use to do..." deserves to be mocked in a funny-and-not-just-stupid fashion. ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver (gabble) 21:23, August 14, 2011 (UTC)
I have the article saved offline, so I will do something new with it in future, till then, looks like its outta here.---Maniac1075Complain Here 05:09, August 15, 2011 (UTC)
This is an inside joke that ACTUALLY MADE ME...chuckle, at times. Arright, ya know what? Why don't some of you actually READ THE DAMN BOOKS, instead of just watching the movies — OR DOING WHATEVER IT IS YOU'RE DOING INSTEAD OF READING HARRY POTTER! wait, that includes "having a life", doesn't it...⇒»Biz E.B. Ver (gabble) 20:33, August 14, 2011 (UTC)
Junk like this gives us the reputation of being a "Crappypedia." -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.Rap sheet.[[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]]08:43 August 14, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. per above. --Mn-z 11:50, August 14, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. I haven't got a clue what this is supposed to be about. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 20:43, August 14, 2011 (UTC)
Burninate! I happen to know for a goddam fact that rednecks love onion rings. ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver (gabble) 21:09, August 14, 2011 (UTC)
Ugh. I detest these things. --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 02:16, August 15, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. I wrote this not that long ago, and then it was tagged during FFW. But I think it's good enough to al least have some sort of consensus before it's deleted. So if it's voted keep I'll mainspace it, but if it's voted delete I'll keep it in my userspace. Thanks. -- 17:13, August 13, 2011 (UTC)
Mainspace! I loved this when I first saw it, and I still love it. Also, BOOBY! -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.Rap sheet.[[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]]08:42 August 14, 2011 (UTC)
mainspace per above. --Mn-z 16:44, August 14, 2011 (UTC)
I don't see anything morbid about it, or offensive, but I fail to see the funny side of it either? A few Python references isn;t funny enough to say lets keep this around---Maniac1075Complain Here 10:42, August 14, 2011 (UTC)
GOD I FUCKING HATE JESUS ARTICLES. Also, delete. -OptyCSucks! CUN17:13, 14 Aug
Delete. not enough Jesi articles on the wiki. --Mn-z 17:14, August 14, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. But keep the picture captioned, "The relatively simple interface of Internet Explorer." and add it to Internet Explorer. ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver (gabble) 07:36, August 13, 2011 (UTC)
DETONATE!! Wow, it's pretty bad when you can tell an article's going to be terrible just by the title... -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.Rap sheet.[[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]]09:53 August 10, 2011 (UTC)
No no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no. NO!
Keep. It may be a bit incoherent, but it's funny. Besides, the first one never said anything about Horcruxes! --Scofield & 1337 09:02, August 11, 2011 (UTC)
Not quite sure about that first one, but a (crappy) sequel is obviously unnecessary. -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.Rap sheet.[[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]]10:05 August 10, 2011 (UTC)
Y'know what? Y'know what? I'm not even gonna waste a spell on this one. [Puts down wand]⇒»Biz E.B. Ver (gabble) 02:16, August 11, 2011 (UTC)
Penetration store? I don't know whether to laugh, cry, or ♪ "Hide my love away..." ♪ -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.Rap sheet.[[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]]17:14 August 8, 2011 (UTC)
KEEP I love this. If gets deleted can someone move it to my userspace. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:53, August 7, 2011 (UTC)
Hmm, all right. I say we remove the forum post from the category then attach it to Matt's userspace (not that his name should be associated with bitches, or anything...) *walks away nervously* -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.Rap sheet.[[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]]01:05 August 8, 2011 (UTC)
Bad articles lead to worse ones. I get the fact that it's a YMCA parody, but the article doesn't have a big enough portion... --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 05:26, August 6, 2011 (UTC)
Abstain. Y'know, this is a fair bit of surrealism. I like it, but not enough to vote "keep". Feelin' lazy 2day! ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver (gabble) 18:02, August 6, 2011 (UTC)
Encyclopedia Seijanica? Seijana 08:36, August 8, 2011 (UTC)
Huff the notable individuals list and it's reedeemable. Seijana 11:52, August 6, 2011 (UTC)
It has been improved somewhat. What it needs it links. Give it, it's 30 days and then we'll see. ~SirFrosty(Talk to me!) 11:13, August 7, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (3)
Delete. What a huge lump of fail??? ~SirFrosty(Talk to me!) 05:21, August 6, 2011 (UTC)
With Frosty On This One. Too dumb for redemption. ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver (gabble) 18:06, August 6, 2011 (UTC)
3... 2... 1... Sorry, but even with a {{Fix}} tag, I see little to no chance at redemption in its current state. -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.Rap sheet.[[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]]04:13 August 7, 2011 (UTC)
I feel bad voting down on this one, seeing as two admins helped it out long ago... but the site is vastly different from what it was four years ago. Therefore, I think it is finally time to lay this suffering beast to rest. -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.Rap sheet.[[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]]10:14 August 10, 2011 (UTC)
Ready! Aim! Spire! Wait....no, no, it's another word that ends in "ire"...it's on the tip of my tongue... ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver (gabble) 02:10, August 11, 2011 (UTC)
Comments
Is it really that bad? I know that the images suck for the most part, but this has always been one of my articles that I had slight affection for... at least in concept if not form. I understand the Harry Potter deletion frenzy, but I don't think it's one of the worst Harry Potter articles we've had. Although I'm biased, of course. Anyway, if it does get deleted, I request that a copy be preserved in my userspace. --AndorinKato 04:34, August 12, 2011 (UTC)
Sure enough, I caught this cruft red-handed. I'm all for tedious pop culture references, but to base an entire article on random Star Wars and Willy Wonka references is just bad. By the way, nonsense numbers, anyone? – Preceding unsigned comment added by TheSlyFox (talk • contribs)
We have three special weapons! No, make it four... no, five. See, everybody expects the Spanish Inquisition! -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.Rap sheet.[[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]]09:57 August 10, 2011 (UTC)
Malfoy's opening quote was hilariious, but as for the rest... DETONATE!!Seijana 10:00, August 10, 2011 (UTC)
Strong keep. Atten-hut! Alright ladies, are we gonna let the article die? And the reply I hear had better be "No sir!"or else you'll be doing the Assault Course all day until you're crawlin'! Seijana 11:47, August 6, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. Now I`m saying keep, but until I have to go to army after few years, I may chance my opinion. To the "Destroy everything! Gwaarh, gwaarh, I haet army!" kinda opinion. OMG!!!It`s Cat the Colourful,Jesus Christ!!! 08:14 10 August 2011
Delete (3)
This article isn't any better with the lists I gutted or the spam I stole from this thing's chest cavity. The autopsy showed no cause of death (or life)... --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 05:18, August 6, 2011 (UTC)
Y'know, I'm with Gamma on this one. I was chuckling a li'l bit, about halfway through, and then it crashed and burned, and my patience is too thin to deal with it anymore. Bad articles should die. Burn it. ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver (gabble) 18:01, August 6, 2011 (UTC)
Nom & Keep This page was tagged in the FFW, but I dispute it. While not a masterpiece, this article's actually quite a cute spoof of the Biblical legends and does not deserve deletion, in my opinion. Tell me what you all think so that we can make a decision on this one. --Scofield & 1337 12:42, August 8, 2011 (UTC)
weak strategic keep the last time we tried to delete the timeline, someone pointed out that deleting it would create thousands of broken redirects. I would, however, support a severe purging of the timeline in the vain hope that it come back less retarded. I would also tolerate a blanking the entire timeline and starting over, while leaving blanked (or very stubby) pages. --Mn-z 23:26, August 8, 2011 (UTC)
Obliterate. The text relies mostly on using "gay" as an adjective before every noun. Also, the previous deletion nom was voted to be kept by none other than NXWave. -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.Rap sheet.[[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]]21:39 August 8, 2011 (UTC)
Fuck Nintendo Wiiner and GaySexbox. Whatever. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 02:27, August 9, 2011 (UTC)
Delete Someone has issues --Zarbag 17:12, August 9, 2011 (UTC)
It's a parody of a Wikipedia talk page. The commenters are suppposed to be typical Wikipedians who are aware of the fact that this page is a parody. Keep. --EpicAwesomeness(talk) 06:19, August 6, 2011 (UTC)
Topic of Article? So, wait, I'm confused, what's this article about? -- 18:09, August 6, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (6)
Delete. Will someone explain the joke for me? ~SirFrosty(Talk to me!) 05:21, August 6, 2011 (UTC)
Burninate! Even after fiddling with it, I just don't see the humor in what's here. -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.Rap sheet.[[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]]02:32 August 7, 2011 (UTC)
Actually, the joke wears thin pretty fast and the original concept is predictable AND we already have like two more of these so, per TheSlyFox, Burninate!.--EpicAwesomeness(talk) 06:49, August 7, 2011 (UTC)
You all are idiots The page is supposed to be a parody of our (and Wikpedia's) tendency to create stupid templates. The "Avril's Butt" colored boxes are not actually templates, but rather coded colored boxes that look similar to obnoxious templates. --Mn-z 12:47, August 7, 2011 (UTC)
Ouch. That hurts to look at. -- 18:06, August 6, 2011 (UTC)
Yeah delete this. And don't claim "IN JOKE!!!!!" because no one ever found this funny besides mnbvcxz --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 19:57, August 6, 2011 (UTC)
It's so bad it's scary. I like in-jokes too, but this is not an in-joke. I've never even seen this until today. I suggest that any remaining links to these "templates" be redirected to a blank page. -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.Rap sheet.[[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]]02:08 August 7, 2011 (UTC)
Resistance is futile. Obviously, this nomination will be deleted by Lyrithya at some point. -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.Rap sheet.[[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]]02:50 August 5, 2011 (UTC)
I second that "Who cares". --Roman Dog Bird 04:51, August 5, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. Injoke category. Obvious keep. ~SirFrosty(Talk to me!) 22:16, August 5, 2011 (UTC)
Keep You just don't quite get it. mAttlobster. (hello) 23:12, August 5, 2011 (UTC)
Any more articles to add to the list? --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 23:55, August 5, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (3)
Delete. contested FFW entry. Technically, I'm supposed to talk with the guy who removed the tag and whatnot, however, since it's a category there isn't much to talk about: I think it's stoopid, someone thinks otherwise. Basically, this is a category that doesn't category with vanity. --Mn-z 22:09, August 4, 2011 (UTC)
This article is yucky. It makes me feel naughty. Me would like this to be deleted.Mr. Person 22:24, August 4, 2011 (UTC)
Some of the food puns are funny and relevant to the concept of the article, but the rest is completely absurd. FFW escapee. --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 02:28, July 31, 2011 (UTC)
Delete - It's a shame because it looks like some actual effort has gone into it, but it's just sub-zany, studenty random shite. --Zarbag 07:47, August 4, 2011 (UTC)
Keep., this is actually pretty funny. Seijana 07:38, August 4, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. I don't think it's that bad. Maybe people are confused because they think this is about American liberals, who differ considerably from European liberals. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM18:43, 5 August 2011
Burninate! As an Ultra Liberal, I object to this page's continued existence. Even the ACLU couldn't save this cruft. -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.Rap sheet.[[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]]21:11 August 4, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. We get it. They're not Led Zeppelin. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 12:00, August 1, 2011 (UTC)
I like Wolfmother. Well, actually, I'm sorta neutral on 'em. I do like that Woman song. But kill this with fire. ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver (gabble) 15:42, August 2, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Another 'this band/place etc is crap' articles that start and end with abuse without moving to the sunlit uplands of humour. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:15, August 2, 2011 (UTC)
Borderline FFW. Has a solid concept, but is it funny? Ehhhhhhh.... --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 16:35, July 31, 2011 (UTC)
Keep.. Wanking into the font... (oh, my.) Somebody stick an {{ICU}} on this thing, though. Too stubby. Could we have the history of Very Bad Deeds, perhaps? ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver (gabble) 12:09, August 2, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. I reverted this to a better version, but still not good enough. The sad part is this has been around since two-thousand five. -- 01:57, July 31, 2011 (UTC)
Where's the content? At least it has a reference. I'm assuming this was another FFW escapee. Correct? – Preceding unsigned comment added by Gamma287 (talk • contribs)
Detonate Twaddle, piffle, dreck, rubbish. Oh, you want more? Ok. [gets out the thesaurus] ...dross, drivel, poppycock, bilge, tommyrot, rigmarole, idiocy, prattle... I can go on, if you like. ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver (gabble) 14:30, July 31, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. An article that has already gone through VFD twice and survived. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
Keep If it's already gone through VFD once then we should keep it and love it. mAttlobster. (hello) 15:37, August 2, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (7)
Another fake America articles. These things usually suck anyway. I say delete all but the United States of America article. Usually these things suck, anyway... --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 01:05, July 31, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. per above, and I apparently missed this article in FFW. --Mn-z 01:28, July 31, 2011 (UTC)
H-Bomb in a Cobalt Shell. Yo, Gamma287: click here to see my (incomplete) list of America-related cruft. Oh, also: we should probably delete United States of America too...I've been working on it for three months, and it just makes it worse. ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver (gabble) 05:35, July 31, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. /me wishes for this non-funny article to perish in the flames or eternal darkness... Maybe give it a complimentary mango smoothie? :P Mr. Person 14:21, August 2, 2011 (UTC)
Kill it. The first VFD was from 2005 so it doesn't count, and the second was some 2009 so it's even less meaningful. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 21:40, August 2, 2011 (UTC)
Comments
Comment. just because it was kept before is not a reason to vote keep again. The nominations were years apart. --Mn-z 22:05, August 2, 2011 (UTC)
Redirected -- TheZombiebaron 05:13, August 3, 2011 (UTC)
Hey, whoa, I hate to be one of Those Guys, but...I fixed this up a little. Could be decent now, maybe. Read it before you delete it. ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver (gabble) 07:15, July 31, 2011 (UTC)
Well, I guess this one's going down, and hard. Put it in my userspace, will ya? (Gosh, there's no way to say that that doesn't sound dirty.) ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver (gabble) 14:20, July 31, 2011 (UTC)
Burninate! Their debut album was also Number One on the charts for 3.1415 weeks, and remained on the charts for 42 years!!!!!! -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.Rap sheet.[[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]]11:57 July 31, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. Added an introductory sentence to precede the image. Seems good enough to me now. --Scofield & 1337 12:05, July 30, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. per fixing, and vore --Mn-z 23:57, July 30, 2011 (UTC)
I think of these things as "lazy-ass pages", but I still like them.--EpicAwesomeness(talk) 06:11, July 31, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (3)
How this didn't even get tagged is beyond me. New FFW, like, tomorrow, guys --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 01:58, July 30, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. per lack of articles on Grues. --Mn-z 04:16, July 30, 2011 (UTC)
DETONATE!! Wow... motion for new FFW seconded. -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.Rap sheet.[[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]]11:03 July 30, 2011 (UTC) Seeing as I decided to make the changes Socky suggested, I will Abstain until I hear some opinions. -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.Rap sheet.[[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]]11:35 July 30, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. It's a pretty notable topic. However, the article falls apart right after the introduction is over. Sad. --Scofield & 1337 11:10, July 30, 2011 (UTC)
Apparently it's notable, but I don't like it. --BlackFlamingo 16:12, July 30, 2011 (UTC)
Comments
Improved or not, I stand by my vote. (Do you know how FUCKING long it takes to download an animated .GIF on dial-up?!?!?) ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver (gabble) 05:38, July 31, 2011 (UTC)
Bah! 56K is so, like, twentieth century... Like, really... I'm-a go paint my face now....... -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.Rap sheet.[[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]]11:39 July 31, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. It is too big and offends me. --Mn-z 04:14, July 30, 2011 (UTC)
Comments
Contesting dat FFW. A pretty useless template. But I kind of like it. It's small and inoffensive. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 04:37, July 30, 2011 (UTC)
I thought it was just passable for FFW, but still pretty weak for an Expand. So here it is. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:24, July 29, 2011 (UTC)