Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/Archive248

What If?:I were stuck in a pinball machine?‎‎

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. Awful. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 07:46, July 29, 2011 (UTC) Agreeeed. --Black Flamingo 21:54, July 29, 2011 (UTC)  Burninate! Bleh. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 11:15 July 30, 2011 (UTC) A deaf, dumb and blind pinball wizard did it! --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 00:36, July 31, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Windows XP Pirate Edition

Score: 5
Keep (1)	Weak Keep. I kinda like it, actually. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 06:29 July 25, 2011 (UTC) Whut? I know this article, and when I read it back then, I liked it. I think the concept is great, and although the article does have weaknesses, I don't think that the execution is that bad. Admittedly, it doesn't read quite as interesting as it did the first time. Still, I don't think it's deletion-worthy. Also, I especially like the screenshot image. Schamschi, 20:14, July 30, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (6)	Something about this page expired, but I just didn't have the heart to delete it outright, seeing as it was huge and was labeled "stub." Still, the article itself is none too good. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:32, July 22, 2011 (UTC) Label it retarded, this article actually drove me to the point in which I thought thoughtless pirates were trying to sell me something. → (Der_Führerbunker--Wehrmacht Factories) 21:06, July 22, 2011 (UTC) Delete I want my life back. mAttlobster. (hello) 22:20, July 26, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Should walk the plank. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 00:08, July 30, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Actually, it's crap. Go ahead and burn it. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 10:26 July 30, 2011 (UTC) All things must pass. --Black Flamingo 18:19, July 30, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain. I don't know. It has an interesting concept and could get better if worked on. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 07:07, July 22, 2011 (UTC) A pox upon thy house, EpicAwesomeness, why steal'st thou my thunder?? ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver  (gabble) 23:03, July 22, 2011 (UTC)

Template:Japanness

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete. stupid template found on Domo-kun --Mn-z 04:19, July 30, 2011 (UTC)  Thermite ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver  (gabble) 04:40, July 30, 2011 (UTC)  DETONATE!! ???????? -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 11:00 July 30, 2011 (UTC) Yeah, go on then. --Black Flamingo 16:12, July 30, 2011 (UTC) Should have been in Japanese text (or at least Engrish)... --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 00:38, July 31, 2011 (UTC) 削除 まず第一に、ハイルキティのイメージは、ドイツのテンプレートで使用してはならないこと？とすべての第二、それは冗談1）だけ）ランダムと思われる2単語を逆にすると過度に使用です。 -- 01:46, July 31, 2011 (UTC) そうですね。マジック・マンの日本語はすごいですよ！僕も日本語を勉強しましたけど、君のほうが上手ですよね。 -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 11:53 July 31, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

La Linea

Score: -3
Keep (3)	Another contested FFW, except I rather like this one a good bit. But I wanna hear what you think. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:12, July 30, 2011 (UTC) A lot of stuff mixed together. I don't particularly dislike it, so Keep it is. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:18, 30 July 2011 On second thought I decided to rewrite it. You know, remove the randumbo and get it more in line with the actual cartoon, so yeah, I think this is more than keepable now. --Scofield & 1337 11:55, July 30, 2011 (UTC) You know, nothing of the original was actual randumbo. It was just a pile of one-dimensional things mixed together. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:00, 30 July 2011
Delete (0)	Delete. Too random. --Scofield & 1337 11:16, July 30, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Kept. --ChiefjusticePSX 11:53, July 31, 2011 (UTC)

Template:NSFPArticle

Score: -2
Keep (4)	Keep. God, we NEED this DESPERATELY. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:46, 28 July 2011 Keep. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) Keep There's no point deleting this. mAttlobster. (hello) 07:55, July 30, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Come on! It's cute! --Scofield & 1337 11:09, July 30, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (2)	We don't actually NEED this, do we? --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 07:32, July 28, 2011 (UTC) Delete. we NEED this DESPERATELY to be deleted. --Mn-z 04:15, July 30, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Wow, an inside-Uncyclopedia joke, based on a DIFFERENT inside joke. Yeah. And you wonder why Uncyclopedia doesn't get more visitors. ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver  (gabble) 08:31, July 30, 2011 (UTC) KEPT. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:27, 30 July 2011

Bagga

Score: 1
Keep (3)	At first I was like "What is this" but then I was like "What the shit is this" but then I decided it's kind of funny. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:03, July 27, 2011 (UTC) I believe...that Bagga are Punjabi people found in Punjab (India) and Punjab (Pakistan). Baggas are normally found among Sikhs, Muslims and Hindus. Baggas belong to the Khatri, Brahmins, Ravidasias and Jats tribes, warrior and farmer professions respectively from the North Indian subcontinent of Punjab. That's all I can find on Wikipedia about them. It must be true! ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver  (gabble) 00:01, July 28, 2011 (UTC) What the shit... indeed, but that's what makes it funny. The reader just has to check the Wikipedia article to get it. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 11:13 July 30, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (4)	Disputed {{FFW}} tag, but more importantly, what the fuck? – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 21:17 Jul 27, 2011 Delete. per above. --Mn-z 23:10, July 27, 2011 (UTC) Delete. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 14:36, July 29, 2011 (UTC) Delete. --Black Flamingo 21:56, July 29, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Kept. Per it making fun of a Wikipedia article. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:30, 30 July 2011

Bajillion

Score: -3
Keep (4)	Keep. So I contacted Mr. Ex about this page and he gave me permission to open a discussion on VFD. So here we are. While the page isn't hilarious, I remember working on it a tad and I believe it's good enough to be kept. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:29, 27 July 2011 I don't want it to die. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 06:43, July 29, 2011 (UTC) 2nd time round the VFD merry-go-round. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) Keep. This one looks stupid at first glance, but seems to have some intelligence behind it. I'm going to go against my deletionist nature and vote to... erm, not burninate. Someone who actually knows math should verify that the article's math is correct, though. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 11:08 July 30, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (1)	Delete. Lacks concept of any sort. And content, for that matter. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 22:57 Jul 28, 2011
Comments	Meh. It's certainly keepable but I think it needs to be continued. It seems way too short. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 17:00, July 27, 2011 (UTC) Sir: you do realize that's only 1036 weasels, don't you? ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver  (gabble) 00:55, July 28, 2011 (UTC) Well, seeing as no one seems to want it deleted, and the Fire Danger has risen to an EXTREME level, I'm putting out the fire and keeping this. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:45, 28 July 2011 Nomination reopened until we get some more goddamn votes. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 22:56 Jul 28, 2011 Hmm, okay. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 06:35, 29 July 2011 Well, it's been on here for 74 hours now and 5 people have voted, only one of those being a delete vote, so I hope nobody minds if I keep this again. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:37, 30 July 2011

Harry Potter (books)

Score: -2
Keep (5)	Keep., just for "portrait of Harry in his Golden Years" alone. ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver  (gabble) 23:29, July 26, 2011 (UTC) Keep., there are indeed massive amount of random stuffs, but I'm certain that after remove them, the article will still be fine one at core. The article once has clearer focus (though it's mostly "make the hell for its fan"). Too bad, some mods think HP fan has no ball and just spoiler will force them to commit suicide. After some dispute, an editor who closely tend the article leave. Then random stuffs were added, start by that random generate spoiler (good example that half-ass edit can ruin article). Keep., the Marxist section is hilarious. Seijana 04:10, July 28, 2011 (UTC) Keep. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) Keep. Not nearly bad enough. --Scofield & 1337 14:31, July 29, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Lacks any unifying concept, varies wildly from pointing out simple facts to making up total nonsense while missing that in-between state called "humorous", and well... that sums it up I think. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 17:49 Jul 25, 2011 Delete I didn't deserve that. mAttlobster. (hello) 22:22, July 26, 2011 (UTC) Delete. A Poo Pourri. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:41, July 27, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Kept, because after 99 hours, it's not looking like 7 delete votes are gonna appear out of thin air. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:42, 29 July 2011

:Category:People who didn't fuck your mom in the kitchen last night

Score: -4
Keep (6)	Truly hilarious. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:54, 27 July 2011 Keep Articles that fail VFD and keep getting nominated. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:58, July 27, 2011 (UTC) wonderful --Roman Dog Bird 23:54, July 27, 2011 (UTC) We really need to make some sort of VFD Immunity template. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:00, July 28, 2011 (UTC) I don't think that the category is terribly funny, but it's a valid category and, if used properly, might enhance an article, or even another category. Schamschi, 02:02, July 28, 2011 (UTC) Keep. If someone doesn't like the category, the only thing he has to do is not adding it to his article. Mattsnow 02:22, July 28, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (2)	Delete. (nommed because of a contested FFW tag). This is a category that doesn't categorize. Unlike most categorizes that don't categorize, this one doesn't rise to the level of canned humor. Rather, it is an inside joke that camps out in the footer of random articles. And the inside joke is that certain people don't like cracking wise with the navigational tools. --Mn-z 20:49, July 27, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Craaaap. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:02, July 29, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	BUTT POOP!!!! --Mn-z 01:55, July 28, 2011 (UTC) @Mattsnow: Categories are not part of an article. Actually, it's the other way round. Categories can only be used as a part of an article, which is what mnxxxxxxx describes as "footer listcruft". However, if using a category for this purpose screws up the coherence of that category or doesn't add anything valuable to it, then the problem cannot be solved simply by not adding that category to one's own articles. Admittedly, most of the stuff in Category:People who didn't fuck your mom in the kitchen last night is random shit – OK, all of it except for the article Eunuch and maybe the picture of Stephen Hawking, the joke behind which is rather evil, but still – but that's an entirely different matter. Indeed, the problem in this case could easily be solved by just removing Eunuch and the picture of Hawkings from that category, because then, the category would be coherent in that it consists of random shit only. However, if this is indeed the category's purpose, I might consider changing my vote. Schamschi, 02:54, July 28, 2011 (UTC) I get it, there's 2 way to look at it: categories are part of the humor and categories are dead serious. A writer can do both with his article, that's what I meant. This particular one could be added to a comedian's article as long as the category:Comedians is added too. Mattsnow 03:00, July 28, 2011 (UTC) calm down bro it's okay -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:21, July 28, 2011 (UTC) Actually, that's not really what I meant. Let's say you're editing the article Brian Peppers, provided it weren't a redirect but an actual article about Brian Peppers, and you think "lol, I'll add Category:Comedians for the lulz". You'll have to ask yourself if the category itself will profit from this addition. This might be the case if the category mainly consists of real comedians otherwise, because then, it might work as an unexpected joke for some people (provided they know who Brian Peppers is). But if similar articles have already been added to this category before, or if there's already another joke in this category, and the addition of Brian Peppers would not go together with that joke, then adding Brian Peppers to that category wouldn't be such a good idea. I think that's mainly what I meant. Schamschi, 03:46, July 28, 2011 (UTC) You know, the main focus of the wiki is having funny articles, not having well organized and non-cluttered category pages. I'm not saying the latter shouldn't be strived for, just that the former is more important than the latter. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:00, 29 July 2011 And kept, by the way. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:04, 29 July 2011

UnNews:75% of turkeys "addicted to cocaine"

Score: -2
Keep (3)	Keep Part of this Forest Fire thing. Don't know why this has been selected. The whole thing seems a little bit shit. mAttlobster. (hello) 14:50, July 26, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Yeah, this doesn't seem bad enough. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:00, 26 July 2011 Keeeeeeeep Bizzeebeever really needs to watch what he's tagging. Next time around I'll have a "tags revoked" chart as well so maybe people will quit doing this sort of thing. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 17:25 Jul 26, 2011
Delete (1)	Delete. Christmas needs to come early. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:45, July 27, 2011 (UTC) Seriously? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:50, 27 July 2011
Comments	Oooookay...I found this article to be a lame, run-on idea, which is inferior to just about anything, including this one that I found by clicking the Random UnNews button, or this one that Humbucker tagged. I apologize for not remembering that crap is encouraged here, so long as it has 8+ sentences and 3+ pictures, and that thinking otherwise just pisses people off. I think I'll just refrain from tagging anything as anything, from now on. ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver  (gabble) 22:49, July 26, 2011 (UTC) Probably for the best. mAttlobster. (hello) 22:53, July 26, 2011 (UTC) Sayyy...any you guys ever met a turkey? Addicted to cocaine? I ain't buyin'. Addicted to Quaaludes? Now that, I could see. ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver  (gabble) 08:09, July 27, 2011 (UTC) Sayyy... Did you bother checking the source? I'm having this idea that it'd clear a lot of stuff up. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:50, 27 July 2011 Sayyy...yes, actually, I did. Before I tagged it. THAT'S WHY I TAGGED IT: A potentially funny, but still lame idea, given a lame, run-on treatment. Shoulda been half as long, and, for instance...why did nobody quote the smugglers as "turkeyologists"? But anyway. Decision's made. ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver  (gabble) 23:49, July 27, 2011 (UTC) Kept by a clear majority. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:53, 27 July 2011 Yep. 3-1, with the original nominator abstaining..."clear majority". (You voted for Bush, didn't you.) Sorry, couldn't help myself. :) ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver  (gabble) 00:51, July 28, 2011 (UTC)

Worst 100 LOL Cats

Score: -1
Keep (5)	Keep. It does have originality in the order of the pics, the captions, and some of the images are sorta original (in the fact that got them from Flickr and turned into LOL pics.) Also, it is funny for those who like to look at cat images, and does what it sets out to do well. --Mn-z 02:37, July 26, 2011 (UTC) Keep Per my vote last time: I find this funny. mAttlobster. (hello) 09:57, July 26, 2011 (UTC) Keeeeeep. Cats make me LOL!. ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver  (gabble) 23:04, July 26, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Seriously. Why wasn't this article VFF'd instead of VFD'd? ~ TheHappySpaceman • The Happy Spaceman • Dan the Hedgehog • DanTahHedgehog • YouTube • deviantART • TheHappySpaceman.com • info • discussion • contributions 04:28, 07/27/2011 Keep. Because this page contains a sufficient amount of recontextualized unoriginal content not to be deleted. If someone wants to remove the non-recontextualized unoriginal content, go ahead, but that should still leave a considerable portion of the entries unscathed. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:25, 27 July 2011
Delete (4)	As Hyperbole put it the last time this was nominated, "this is imported humor - it's really not that much different from posting the script to a funny episode of Family Guy. Obviously it took a lot of work to compile these images, but I don't feel very comfortable with it in mainspace". I don't think we'll have lawyers breathing down our necks because we've stolen lolcats or anything, but come on - it's not our stuff, and captions on captioned pictures are sort of redundant. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 02:29 Jul 26, 2011 Deep dop doop wah doopedy doop -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 04:10, July 26, 2011 (UTC) Per above - not only is it not mostly original content, it's in fact mostly unoriginal content. That IPs edit it is hardly a redeeming feature, either; if these IPs can edit productively, perhaps you'd all be better off if they edited something else productively. 1234 ~ 06:40, 27 July 2011 What they said, particularly TKF. --Black Flamingo 19:21, July 27, 2011 (UTC) I must say, he makes a rather convincing argument. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:25, 27 July 2011
Comments	Comment. Just for clarification purposes, Mnbvcxz has said on my talkpage that two of the images (out of the hundred) are original (in the sense that a caption was added to them). – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 02:44 Jul 26, 2011 I mean that I know that last two are not commonly used as LOL cats. There may be other ones which are relatively "unique" to uncyclopedia. Also, the image list should be a bit cliche. --Mn-z 02:49, July 26, 2011 (UTC) But they still weren't made here, for the purpose of this article? – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 02:55 Jul 26, 2011 @Matt lobster - yes, I don't deny lolcats are funny to some people, but this isn't Uncyclopedia's content! To keepers, please explain how you can justify keeping unoriginal (read: stolen) content on Uncyclopedia, which is the real issue here, not whether the article is good or not good. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 17:18 Jul 26, 2011 Well, for one, it's not just a gallery of stolen images, it uses the images in a certain context that goes beyond, and at times way beyond, the "stolen" content. Let's take another example. AAAAAAAAA! mainly consists out of As and here and there a !. Now, both symbols are unoriginal (which may or may not be a synonym of stolen), but does this mean this article should be deleted? Does the juxtaposition of As and !s not transcend the simple nature of the symbols it's made up out of? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:56, 26 July 2011 Not really an apt comparison, as the letter "A" isn't content in and of itself, but something used to create content. People, other people, non-Uncyclopedians, put these pictures together. All we did is caption them a second time. A more apt comparison would have been the UnBook where someone took scans of The Bumper Book of Bunny Suicides and added captions to the photos, which was deleted because it was, in fact, someone else's stuff. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 18:42 Jul 26, 2011 There is some flow from mild images to pg-13/R ones at the end. While most of the images exist somewhere else on the internet, and a majority are LOL cats, the article is more than an "image vomit" or "icanhascheezburger light." Also, the article does seem to get a high number of help ip edits, which is another reason to keep it. -- Mn-z 22:53, July 26, 2011 (UTC) Sadly, this is something of a wasted concept. Somebody with MS Paint and a hundered cat pictures could make a smart, funny, satirical article in a matter of days. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 07:01, July 27, 2011 (UTC) Iz wiki, sofixit. --Mn-z 20:51, July 27, 2011 (UTC) Well, this has been on here for 42 hours. I think that's more than enough time for a consensus to arise. So yeah, kept. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:23, 27 July 2011

Sudden Infant Death Syndrome

Score: -3
Keep (4)	Oh, hell no. It's very dark but it's certainly funny. And let's face it, the other acticles here are on a whole different level of quality. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 11:16, July 26, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Yeah, I think this is more than good enough to be kept. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:31, 26 July 2011 Keep The joke is that the kid pisses you off so it gets murdered. Darker than Jesus...no the one that's not Jesus. mAttlobster. (hello) 22:26, July 26, 2011 (UTC) keep, stupid. Yeah, hi! Keep. Funny. Also, Dr. Skullthumper really needs to watch what he's tagging. ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver  (gabble) 23:04, July 26, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (1)	It's well-written, well-formatted, and there is a joke in there somewhere, but it just isn't all that funny to me. Is that enough for deletion? I dunno. That's why it's here. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 01:52 Jul 26, 2011
Comments	Kept and stuff -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:06, July 27, 2011 (UTC)

Nihilism

Score: 0
Keep (1)	You are joking, right – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 04:34 Jul 27, 2011
Delete (1)	Delete this now! and nom. It has absolutely no content. If they really want to see a page of nothing, why don't they just type in about:blank on their browser? (But if this fails VFD, then at least fix the CSS so "projects" on the sidebar doesn't show up.) ~ TheHappySpaceman • The Happy Spaceman • Dan the Hedgehog • DanTahHedgehog • YouTube • deviantART • TheHappySpaceman.com • info • discussion • contributions 04:31, 07/27/2011
Comments	No. Right there: No Featured Articles, No In-Jokes. There's no grey area here. It's all black and white. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 04:36, July 27, 2011 (UTC)

Nigger Dogshit Sandwiches

Score: -3
Keep (5)	strong keep per my gay nigger faggotry. --Mn-z 21:11, July 25, 2011 (UTC) Keep. If this gets deleted, I will forcefeed you a fucking Nigger Dogshit Sandwich. -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 21:14, July 25, 2011 (UTC) Keep. You know, I originally created this in an in-jokey fashion (some vandal combined Roman Nigger Dog and Vote For Sandwich into one and MrN9000 wanted someone to write an article on it), but regardless, I think there's a sufficient amount of humour/satire in it to be more than adequate to live. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:14, 25 July 2011 Keep. It's kinda weird for my tastes, but it's well-written and well-formatted, and that's enough for me to say it shouldn't be deleted. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 21:20 Jul 25, 2011 It's good man, it's good. I would also like to go on the record for saying "WHAT THE FUCK SLYFOX, ARE YOU, LIKE, TRYING TO DESTROY THIS SITE??? SOME PEOPLE WANT TO CREATE, AND ALL YOU DO IS CRUSH THEIR NIGGER DOGSHIT DREAMS." -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:25, July 25, 2011 (UTC) ........I like pie! *_* -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 08:34 July 26, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (2)	Delete. The FFW tag on it appears to be contested. In the interest of democracy, I am putting this up for an official vote. The page is absolutely horrid, but is it some sort of meme around here? I don't think it's well-known enough to stay, but I will let the blind hand of Justice do her thing (she's quite lovely, you know). -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 21:09 July 25, 2011 (UTC) Delete.. I say delete, its only purpose is to offend and provoke little weenie white American liberals. (You know, like me.) Other than the shock value of the title, there's nothing else funny. I take it from the votes above that Uncyclopedia is re-branding itself at "The New Encyclopedia Dramatica"? ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver  (gabble) 00:53, July 26, 2011 (UTC) So the only reason you dislike this is because it mentions niggers? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:02, 26 July 2011 Oh, yes. That, and the fact there isn't a single attempt at humor. Oh, and three other (non-Uncyclopedia) folks looked at it and said "I don't get it," so I'm not the only one. ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver  (gabble) 22:49, July 26, 2011 (UTC) Well, there are many attempts at humour in it, and while some of those may be hidden from plain view, there are others which are so blatant you'd have to be blind not to spot them. Additionally, non-Uncyclopedia folk might be less prone to get Uncyclopedia articles. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:10, 26 July 2011 Yes, well, I'd assume that most people who view Uncyclopedia aren't contributors, and as such, probably don't get "inside-Uncyclopedia" jokes. Especially not this one. Also, "blatant" or not...in-jokes aren't funny if only five people get 'em. ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver  (gabble) 23:26, July 26, 2011 (UTC) P.S. Yes, I'm blind, you bastard. Bring it up again, why don't you.
Comments	Aaaaaaand... It's kept. Surprise! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:23, 26 July 2011

Template:EnoughCowbell

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:20, July 25, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Time to let the cow alone. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:27, July 25, 2011 (UTC) Delete. canned clutter based on an 11 year old SNL sketch. --Mn-z 21:03, July 25, 2011 (UTC)  Burninate! The other one, yes. This one, no. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 21:20 July 25, 2011 (UTC) This one's kinda funny kinda but fuck templates, fuck em -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:55, July 26, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Template:Cowbell

Score: -3
Keep (5)	Keep. Guess what?... I got a fever... and the only prescription... is more cowbell. --Count of Monkey Crisco 18:07, July 25, 2011 (UTC) If Bruce Dickinson wants more cowbell, we won't be able to give it to him and he's going to be fucking pissed. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 20:22, July 25, 2011 (UTC) Keep. It's used in stuff and I don't see a reason to substitute it in all of those instances. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:06, 25 July 2011 Keep. I always liked this one. Aren't we allowed a little nostalgia? After all, just about all post-Frasier comedy TV sucks. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 21:23 July 25, 2011 (UTC) Can't have enough cowbell! --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 00:06, July 26, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (2)	no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:20, July 25, 2011 (UTC) Delete. canned clutter based on an 11 year old SNL sketch. --Mn-z 21:04, July 25, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	It's a keep. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:05, July 26, 2011 (UTC)

Pierre Fermat

Score: 0
Keep (2)	Keep. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) Keep mAttlobster. (hello) 20:26, July 20, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (2)	I'm either going blind, or this is drivel, and unworthy to slander the name of the Great Pierre Fermat. Ok, time for bed. ⇒»Bizzeebeever  (this user has been deleted) 12:12, July 20, 2011 (UTC)  I actually went blind reading this article. → (Der_Führerbunker--Wehrmacht Factories) 21:08, July 22, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Clearly no one gives a shit -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:25, July 26, 2011 (UTC)

KDY OMTZUH HUMF

Score: -1
Keep (3)	Keep. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)  Keep Nice idea, just add humor (or at least a link to the deciphering machine for the lazier among us). --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 20:13, July 20, 2011 (UTC) Keep mAttlobster. (hello) 20:26, July 20, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (2)	KILL. High-concept article fails its concept utterly. See comments. ⇒»Bizzeebeever  (this user has been deleted) 12:02, July 20, 2011 (UTC) Delete. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 16:38, July 23, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Ok, here's the thing. The Enigma device was an encryption method used by the Nazis...during WWII. What did the author of this article do? He took Wikipedia's article, and fed it through an Enigma-code generator. UNFORTUNATELY: He failed to take heed that the Enigma PROPER would spit out "words" that were all the same length. Also: ITS JUST THE WIKIPEDIA ARTICLE, ENCODED! I say Epoch Fail. Discuss. ⇒»Bizzeebeever  (this user has been deleted) 12:02, July 20, 2011 (UTC) Kept like a nun. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:49, July 26, 2011 (UTC)

Hilton_Head_Island,_South_Carolina

Score: 0
Keep (3)	Keep. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) Keep. Small doesn't mean shit. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:12, July 22, 2011 (UTC) Keep mAttlobster. (hello) 22:29, July 25, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Please tell me this is an elaborate prank by Wikipedians. OR ELSE EXPLAIN THIS JOKE TO ME IN DETAIL, BY 1700 UTC. ⇒»Bizzeebeever  (this user has been deleted) 11:41, July 20, 2011 (UTC) Uhh, I thought this article was about South Carolina, not Ohio... --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 20:17, July 20, 2011 (UTC) Eh??? -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 06:24 July 25, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Nope -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:47, July 26, 2011 (UTC)

Worst 100 "When I was young..." stories

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	I know it's FFW and all, but I think this belonges here more. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 08:10, July 22, 2011 (UTC) The eyes were burned out of my skull at 100. Obliterate.....god help my eyes → (Der_Führerbunker--Wehrmacht Factories) 21:01, July 22, 2011 (UTC) Obliterate. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 06:32 July 25, 2011 (UTC) Ready. Aim. Earth! No, wait. Ready, aim, wind! Dammit! Ready. Aim. Water! Yeah, that's it! ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver  (gabble) 06:37, July 25, 2011 (UTC) Nah, it's still missing something... I know, thunder! -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 21:37 July 25, 2011 (UTC) Delete. He who is without talent, cast the first Sharon Stone. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:23, July 25, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

HowTo:Keep_Americans_out_of_your_Country

Score: 4
Keep (1)	Keep. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) Keep. Ya mom. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 09:47, July 23, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (5)	Cruuuuuft. We have too many articles already on this shit (yeah, those are all separate links. Click one!). It's funny...up to a point...and only if the jokes are original and well done. Otherwise, it's firmly in the realm of Stoopit Not Funnee. ⇒»Bizzeebeever  (this user has been deleted) 11:54, July 20, 2011 (UTC) Per above. --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 20:15, July 20, 2011 (UTC) What? -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:19, July 22, 2011 (UTC) Delete. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 16:09, July 23, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Listy. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 06:25 July 25, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

What History?

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Burninate!. WTF IS THiS? I read the entire thing (don't ask). There's one funny sentence: "I say we cut him open and Take back all the sandwiches he's eaten!" I ask you again: WTF IS THiS??!?! ⇒»Bizzeebeever  (this user has been deleted) 11:32, July 20, 2011 (UTC) Where are the images? --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 20:19, July 20, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Panity (Pants+Vanity). Even more shocking is that it links to an article that was featured in 2005 and is worse. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 23:00, July 21, 2011 (UTC) Nooooope. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 16:53, July 23, 2011 (UTC)  Bleh. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 06:23 July 25, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Fairly sure this is supposed to refer to something specific, but I can't actually work out what? -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

Melting Pot of Friendship

Score: 1
Keep (1)	I may be a bit biased because I wrote the article, so... I'll try to be as unbiased as I can be. It's in reference to Ghost Talk True Capitalist Radio, and it's become ever so popular as of recently. I posted links to the videos to what they referenced. I thought that it was at least funny enough when put into context, but I realize that not everyone is going to get the "Melting Pot of Friendship" meme. If you can call it a meme, I mean. --TheTrueFreak 04:49, July 20, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (2)	Have a read, be the judge. Mattsnow 03:28, July 20, 2011 (UTC) Delete. I don't know what's going on here but just reads like crap to me, whatever the intention. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:32, July 20, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	I can't believe people aren't understanding this. This is a 4chan prank that's been going on for awhile, and it got really big last month. Right here: http://www.youtube.com/user/DarkRazorZ --TheTrueFreak 06:38, July 20, 2011 (UTC) Those who want the back story should visit KnowYourMeme. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 11:14 July 20, 2011 (UTC) I would say go to Swiss Drama with this but that site seems to be down for the moment. A whip round for new computers and legal fees may be needed there. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 23:10, July 21, 2011 (UTC) No insects -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 16:49, July 23, 2011 (UTC)

AAAA AAAA A AAA AAAAAA AAAAA AA A AAA AAAAAA AA AAAAAAA AA AAAAAA!

Score: -3
Keep (8)	It's bad that I knew every single word of this article just by seeing the title. Not bad for the article, bad for me. Also, Seijana: two of these? Ohhhhhh, you have NO idea. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:45, July 20, 2011 (UTC) Ohhhh! I get it now! – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 00:57 Jul 20, 2011 Good Job. Keep. Indeed, we should definitely de-cruft the My Sojourn category. Should we keep this one? Absolutely! -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 05:32 July 21, 2011 (UTC) This is true satire. -- The Zombiebaron 05:36, July 21, 2011 (UTC) AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! --ChiefjusticePSX 07:13, July 21, 2011 (UTC) AAAAA!!!--Count of Monkey Crisco 17:22, July 21, 2011 (UTC) Screw you guys who don't like to AAAAAAAA → (Der_Führerbunker--Wehrmacht Factories) 21:10, July 22, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (5)	The original AAAAAAA is awesome, this copy fails hard. Mattsnow 19:27, July 19, 2011 (UTC) Do we really need two of these? Seijana 00:41, July 20, 2011 (UTC) Wow, this one has spaces! o__o ~  Talk 00:52, 20 July 2011 (UTC) Delete. Since the original has an unfathomable preservation order on it, no need to keep this copy-crap version. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:33, July 20, 2011 (UTC) Thrill-kill. Being raped by a yak in the Canadian wilderness? still not funn-AAAAAAAAA! ⇒»Bizzeebeever  (this user has been deleted) 11:32, July 20, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Carpe Diem -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 16:48, July 23, 2011 (UTC)

Beard

Score: 2
Keep (2)	Keep I added the sentence "Chuck Norris is awesome" to the start of this article. mAttlobster. (hello) 12:29, July 18, 2011 (UTC) Lucky Number 3. It ain't that bad, anyway. --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 12:47, July 18, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (4)	Delete. Please? --Scofield & 1337 11:38, July 18, 2011 (UTC) Dleete. I second Scofield's thirds. ⇒»Bizzeebeever  (this user has been deleted) 12:56, July 18, 2011 (UTC) Anachronistic randomness with no trace of humor, I'm afraid. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 00:23 Jul 19, 2011 Yeah it's been too long. Turn that rewrite into a reboot. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 11:53, July 19, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	I was going to rewrite this, but I couldn't think of anyway to make an article on beards amusing, which is odd because beards are inheritly amusing. Actually, I've just thought of an idea: the motivations of those that grow different kinds of beards and what it says about them. I'm on it! mAttlobster. (hello) 10:01, July 19, 2011 (UTC) The story goes in the 10th century, the Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church went into a temporary schism about beards. In the West they were shaving them off and in the East keeping them on. In Taliban Afghanistan, it was compulsory for all men to have long beards. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:04, July 20, 2011 (UTC) No incest -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 16:46, July 23, 2011 (UTC)

Mother Fucker

Score: 2
Keep (2)	KEEEEEEEP! OMFG! MOTHER Fucker of Calcutta!! HAHAHAHA! The Sweet Blessed Mother Fucker! Ok, actually the only joke is...well, that she's a nun. BUT STILL! HAHAHAHA! ZOMG! KEEP it, but somebody PLEASE do something more worthy of this idea! ⇒»Bizzeebeever  (this user has been deleted) 12:56, July 18, 2011 (UTC) Keep. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
Delete (4)	Delete. I don't like this. I don't like this at all. --Scofield & 1337 11:29, July 18, 2011 (UTC) It has a concept. I like the concept. But then it goes off into random directions, eventually abandoning any trace of said concept by the halfway mark. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 00:21 Jul 19, 2011 Starts off ROFL, but then ends WTF. Someone needs to keep the ROFL going, and I think I might be the one to do it. ~  Talk 23:38, 19 July 2011 (UTC) Let humb have a go at it -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:10, July 20, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. To the deleting admin: please move this to my userspace instead of deleting it if this vote comes to that. ~  Talk 23:38, 19 July 2011 (UTC) No contest -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 16:46, July 23, 2011 (UTC)

ABAP

Score: 5
Keep (1)	Hilarious! Seijana 02:03, July 19, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (6)	Get rid of it ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:23, July 18, 2011 (UTC) Now just what the hell – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 00:19 Jul 19, 2011 Randomrandomrandom. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 02:23 July 19, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Bill Gates has nothing to worry about. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 23:06, July 21, 2011 (UTC) Truth or myth??? -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:07, July 21, 2011 (UTC) You may choose which you would rather live with:  Burninate! or Obliterate....→ (Der_Führerbunker--Wehrmacht Factories) 01:18, July 22, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Alert: If the option is to delete, make a subpage of my page and put it there. I'll se what I can do with it. → (Der_Führerbunker--Wehrmacht Factories) 01:20, July 22, 2011 (UTC)

Tickle Me Emo

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Hey wait, what is this article doing on VFD?! It's funny! No, the only reason it's funny is because it is a rip-off of MADtv. Everything that hasn't been stolen, on the other hand, is not. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 12:59 Jul 20, 2011 Delete. You're totally right... Plagiarism is not funny -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 23:52, July 20, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Bubonic. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:50, July 21, 2011 (UTC) Delete. per above. --Mn-z 22:52, July 21, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Big N' Tasty

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	WTF? Disgusting! -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 10:43 July 17, 2011 (UTC) Flush. . But I WANT one of those Sooper Dooper Pattycordion Cheesegasms from the picture. ⇒»Bizzeebeever  (this user has been deleted) 10:58, July 18, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Close, but not good enough. --Count of Monkey Crisco 17:26, July 21, 2011 (UTC) Kick -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:45, July 21, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	I like that your recent nominations have a theme. Mickey D's Corporation probably likes it too.  :) ~ T. (talk) 10:52, July 17, 2011 (UTC) Well, I figured since we just had the great exodus of all Sonic the Hedgehog cruft, this even larger collection of memey (and uglier) articles might qualify. Plus, McDonald's can now bask in the free publicity (though I'm not sure if it's the good kind...)! -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 11:03 July 17, 2011 (UTC)

Randomness

Score: 0
Keep (2)	For.Never.The funniest randomness ever.--Fcukman 08:59, July 17, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Intentionally bad. And that's a good thing. --Scofield & 1337 11:27, July 18, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (2)	Terrible page made redundant by multiple other existing articles on the same terrible, terrible subject. Die die die die die die die. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 08:42, July 17, 2011 (UTC) Delete. The article wins Shit bucket of the month in my view. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:29, July 18, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain. I kinda like it, but the text is all filler. If kept, it should be trimmed down. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 02:33 July 18, 2011 (UTC) Why do they even bother this in VFD? If they can delete this they can Delete Euroipods Or AAAAAAAA! as well.--Fcukman 08:42, July 18, 2011 (UTC) Why bother even keeping this -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:47, July 21, 2011 (UTC)

Blue Elmo

Score: 4
Keep (2)	What am I, some kind of alien!? No one seems to share my sense of humour! Seijana 06:56, July 17, 2011 (UTC) It's so random it's funny. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:26, July 17, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (6)	Delete. It has small structure, the jokes are childish, not even a chuckle. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! - 03:52, 17 July 2011  DETONATE!! -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 07:33 July 17, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Not even a feature for Kindergarten Uncyclopedia. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:17, July 18, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Nice conspiracy theory. Bad humor piece. --Scofield & 1337 11:49, July 18, 2011 (UTC) Nah man this isn't it -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 04:07, July 20, 2011 (UTC) Very No Though I'm slightly ashamed to be on the side that uses the phrase "Kindergarten Uncyclopedia" – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 13:14 Jul 20, 2011
Comments

Bosom of the Church

Score: 4
Keep (1)	Keep. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
Delete (5)	Short, man breasts, Jesus-related sex jokes. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 16:32, July 19, 2011 (UTC) ASPLODE! Mattsnow 19:29, July 19, 2011 (UTC) Seen worse. Not too many, though. ~  Talk 00:53, 20 July 2011 (UTC) Absolutely Pointless. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 06:09 July 20, 2011 (UTC) Delete. A few Hail Marys and cleaning the pope's lavatory should suffice for the author on this one. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:37, July 20, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Gravity scam

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	What. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 06:42 Jul 20, 2011 What the...H.P. Lovecraft, did you come back from the grave to write this article? If you did, PICK A BETTER PSYCHIC MEDIUM NEXT TIME. The one you used was on the fritz. ⇒»Bizzeebeever  (this user has been deleted) 11:32, July 20, 2011 (UTC) Unreadable. Gibberish, fake science and monsters, oh my! -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 11:18 July 20, 2011 (UTC) With fire. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)  Burninate! What am I reading? -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:17, July 21, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

End of Earth

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	The only good joke here is a rip-off of H2G2. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 04:53 Jul 19, 2011  Rubbish Punkband. Imageless, random, listy. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 08:21 July 19, 2011 (UTC) BAD ARTICLE IS BAD! Mattsnow 19:32, July 19, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Also, lists. ~  Talk 00:55, 20 July 2011 (UTC) In Soviet Russia... In this case, "by" should be "bye", even though I still don't understand how that got there... --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 05:51, July 20, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Armageddon randumbo. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:40, July 20, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Wangsta

Score: 4
Keep (1)	Weakish keep. I feel this could be salvaged, but not by me since the topic doesn't inspire me. I added {No Images} just in case this somehow avoids deletion. Mattsnow 19:38, July 19, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (5)	IP blanked this. Maybe it should stay blanked. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 00:17 Jul 19, 2011  Burninate! Japanese for "gang" is not usually 「ギャング」 (which is just an English transliteration), but 「やくざ」 ("yakuza"). But I suppose that's what happens when one relies on a dictionary... Oh, and this article sucks. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 02:31 July 19, 2011 (UTC) Bleh. ~  Talk 00:57, 20 July 2011 (UTC) Suburban homeboy -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:09, July 20, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Junior Special KKK. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:43, July 20, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Stilt-bottom

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Deltee. I...I...I...*sigh*. I considered this, and I went over the criteria...and I just can't see any reason that this is a "good" or "expandable" idea. It certainly isn't a new article, and it hasn't been vandalized... ⇒»Bizzeebeever  (this user has been deleted) 13:32, July 18, 2011 (UTC) It's a description of human beings, but classifying "feet" as "hands". How on earth could that be considered funny? – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 00:24 Jul 19, 2011 Eh? -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 04:06, July 20, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Piffle. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:46, July 20, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

2005 McDonald's Revolution

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Smite. It's time to get rid of all this McDonald's crap. Here's one of the earliest examples. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 10:35 July 17, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Not worth it. --Scofield & 1337 11:33, July 18, 2011 (UTC) HOLEY...this crap is almost as bad as the stuff I write! ⇒»Bizzeebeever  (this user has been deleted) 13:07, July 18, 2011 (UTC) Not the one -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 04:08, July 20, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Avril Lavigne is the widow of Colonel Sanders? Well who knew. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:56, July 20, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Culture

Score: -4
Keep (5)	I have to say I admire the speed that you managed to get this article on here. I restore it and start working on actually improving an article to give it a chance of a continued existence and within a couple of minutes you have it in VFD. The "disputed tag" that was offered as the justifaction of deletion in the first place stated that "If this page is not fixed in 30 days, it may become a candidate for deletion". If you could let me know if the policy of the site is now to delete as much as possible and not really bother with making things better I would appreciate it very much. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) This ain't too bad. That said, Mhaille is making the Andes out of an anthill. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 17:56, July 17, 2011 (UTC) Keep mAttlobster. (hello) 18:05, July 17, 2011 (UTC) strongest possible keep per somebody working on it. When have we EVER deleted an article that an established user was working on? --Mn-z 00:34, July 18, 2011 (UTC) Bandwagon keep --Scofield & 1337 11:51, July 18, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (1)	Deleted by Lyrithya for having an expired maintenance tag, then restored by Mhaille because... Mhaille likes restoring things sometimes? Anyway, this is officially a disputed death-by-tag, so it belongs here to resolve such. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 17:27 Jul 17, 2011
Comments	Quick note: This hasn't been brought here due to personal opinion of the article, but rather, it's a dispute that requires resolution. When an expired tag is deleted it can either a) be restored to someone's userspace, not mainspace, or b) restored to mainspace and subsequently brought to VFD. It ain't me. It's just that this needs resolvin'. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 18:00 Jul 17, 2011 I'd like to point out that the deletion was probably due to changing the various and sundry rewrite tags to "delete this if unedited for 30 days tag". Unless there was a recent policy change, the "fix" templates are "delete at admins discretion" not auto-delete. I don't think VFD can handle every disputed maintenance tag issue. --Mn-z 00:34, July 18, 2011 (UTC) No catch-all system can handle every dispute, but one that brings it to the voting users should be able to handle just about anything. I have no complaints about the new tags; rewrite tags used to sit on articles for several months and potentially years before someone just found them and VFD'd them. That was a bit counter-productive, I think. In this case, it was still up to the admins' discretion--it's just that two admins happen to disagree here. That said, I think we should all be mindful of the Dark Side of the Force and try to avoid drama here. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 00:44 July 18, 2011 (UTC) Hey mnbvcxz there's a Mr. Man on the phone for you. A Mr. Straw Man. He sounds mad. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 04:02, July 18, 2011 (UTC) Kept for some ungodly reason. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 04:07, July 20, 2011 (UTC)

Brainfuck

Score: 3
Keep (1)	Strong keep. 1 This seems to have been featured and 2, it's hilarious. Seijana 05:45, July 19, 2011 (UTC) That graphic in the logo is actually a fake feature (typed out in gibberish). If it doesn't have the template with Mr. Potato Head at the bottom, it wasn't actually featured--as far as I know. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 06:17 July 19, 2011 (UTC) Whatever, it's still funny. Seijana 06:22, July 19, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (4)	Most of this isn't even real Brainfuck. And what is has been broken by poor wikisyntax. Also, can we VFD that image of the guy bashing his head on the keyboard yet? – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 17:54 Jul 17, 2011 Wait what -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 17:56, July 17, 2011 (UTC) Muuuust...killll...article.... brrrraaaaaaaaaaaaains... ⇒»Bizzeebeever  (this user has been deleted) 10:58, July 18, 2011 (UTC) Were that text actually written in brainfuck, I would vote to keep it. But it's not, so it goes. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 02:21 July 19, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

McGriddles

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. Random. Very random. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 11:12 July 17, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Go away. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:01, July 18, 2011 (UTC) Delete.--Count of Monkey Crisco 08:11, July 18, 2011 (UTC) Spock: Captain, my Tricorder is detecting elements of Rank Amateurism, as well as Stupidium radiation. I recommend that we beam back to the Enterprise, and fire a shitload of photon torpedoes at this article until it has been neutralized. Kirk: Good idea. Two to beam up, Mr. Scott! ⇒»Bizzeebeever  (this user has been deleted) 13:05, July 18, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	I went through all the McDonald's articles and these were the worst offenders I found. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 11:23 July 17, 2011 (UTC)

Patrick Star

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. I've had my eye on this for sometime, but I've secretly loathed it. It hasn't gotten much better since the first time I've ever saw it. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 10:59, July 17, 2011 (UTC) Bye-bye. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 11:04 July 17, 2011 (UTC)  Burninate!Whoo....lives in a pineapple under the...[Insert something funny here. I'm too tired.] ⇒»Bizzeebeever  (this user has been deleted) 10:58, July 18, 2011 (UTC) I don't know if linking '74 drops on the head' to '75' was deliberate, but it's kinda funny. The rest is just pointless rambling. --Sloublues 23:57, July 18, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Grimace

Score: 3
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (3)	Burninate! This article describes the subject as a "purple pile of shit." One might say the same about this article. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 10:52 July 17, 2011 (UTC) Delete.--Count of Monkey Crisco 08:03, July 18, 2011 (UTC) Dissolve this with Purple Rain. F***in' amateur. ⇒»Bizzeebeever  (this user has been deleted) 10:58, July 18, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Big Mac

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Obliterate. "a big mac is like eating your death why not just take some lard and pour some shit with mustard on it put it on to buns that have been raped by Ronald fuckin mcdonald..." Shall I go on? -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 10:39 July 17, 2011 (UTC) Delete. A junk article about junk food. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:14, July 18, 2011 (UTC) Masticate, then expectorate. Then, buy a dictionary to look up ⇐those two words. ⇒»Bizzeebeever  (this user has been deleted) 10:27, July 18, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Love the heart attack comment, though. --Scofield & 1337 11:35, July 18, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Bogan

Score: 2
Keep (3)	Keep. Great starting point. It's undesirable for an encyclopedia parody to delete 'real' topics such as mainstream slang in this case.--Sycamore (Talk) 06:15, July 15, 2011 (UTC) Keep. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 07:48, July 16, 2011 (UTC) This is the shittiest piece of shit that I have ever tried to read but then I am a terrible person. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
Delete (5)	Obliterate. I've voted to delete some articles that were far better than this. This is unfunny, crufty, random and downright offensive. No redeeming value whatsoever. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 03:00 July 15, 2011 (UTC) Strong delete, is a bloated article rather than a "starting point" and the popularity of the subject is no excuse for a terrible article. Honestly, I wish people would stop using that argument; article quality and the article's subject are and forever will be two different things. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 22:52 Jul 16, 2011 This is the shittiest piece of shit that I have ever tried to read. Anyone who votes to keep this is a terrible person who should and probably will get permanently banned. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 08:25, July 17, 2011 (UTC) Delete. It's just a rambling mess and one of those 'this town/country/people' are shit variety that are invariably unfunny. This one joins that non-exclusive club. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:25, July 18, 2011 (UTC) Murderate Or cut in half and rewrite in English. If it's only funny to Australians, remember, only Australians speak Australian, mate! ⇒»Bizzeebeever  (this user has been deleted) 10:18, July 18, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	This article is Australian. I am not Australian, and know nothing about the topic. Therefore, I abstain. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 02:49, July 18, 2011 (UTC)

Bagel

Score: -1
Keep (5)	I'd say keep. It made me smile some. The beginning is really atrocious though. Mattsnow 17:35, July 14, 2011 (UTC) Keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 06:12, July 15, 2011 (UTC) Bandwagon Keep mAttlobster. (hello) 22:41, July 16, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Meh ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:27, July 17, 2011 (UTC) Not in great shape, but easily redeemable. Seijana 06:19, July 19, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (4)	Is this more random than funny? Or more funny than random? I'm not sure, so I'm bringing it here. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 17:28 Jul 14, 2011 Delete. It could be worth keeping if somebody wants to fix it up, but it's currently very crufty. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 19:04 July 14, 2011 (UTC) Put it in the toaster ~  Talk 00:01, 15 July 2011 (UTC) suck a gay dog's dick -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:43, July 17, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	How 'bout dis? I swept up a little. Lemme know. Inept. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 11:56, July 19, 2011 (UTC)

Blue Mage

Score: 4
Keep (1)	I kinda like this. OMG!!! It`s Cat the Colourful, Jesus Christ!!! 07:55 15 July 2011
Delete (5)	...the heck?--EpicAwesomeness (talk) 16:17, July 14, 2011 (UTC) Outside of the Navi section, which wasn't bleach-eyes-please bad, this was awful. ~  Talk 21:19, 16 July 2011 (UTC) Nerp. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:43, July 17, 2011 (UTC) The Na'vi part was the worst. Seijana 06:57, July 17, 2011 (UTC) up up down down left right left right B A Execute. Bleh. ⇒»Bizzeebeever  (this user has been deleted) 10:18, July 18, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain. Not as bad as Red mage. I don't know if it should be deleted or not, so... Mattsnow 17:46, July 14, 2011 (UTC) Same here. I dunno, I kinda like that bit about Navi, even if it is a little gamecrufty by our dubious standards. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 19:18 July 14, 2011 (UTC) Since this is probably going to be huffed, I was going to add that bit about Navi to the existing article, but as you can see, it is protected from being created. I can imagine it was constantly vandalized, but I wonder what approach a responsible author could use to write a proper article on Navi... Maybe it's one of those subjects that cannot be parodied successfully. </ramblings> -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 08:33 July 17, 2011 (UTC) I unprotected Navi. Do what you will with it, but try to be gentle. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:51, July 17, 2011 (UTC)

McDonald's Ice Cream

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Burninate! Okay, I get the joke: McDonald's food sucks. But geez, come on... -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 22:36 July 16, 2011 (UTC) Delete. (talk) 23:40, 16 July 2011 Just kill it. Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:13, July 17, 2011 (UTC) SHIT. made of pig fat?wtf?--Fcukman 01:57, July 17, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Do The Bartman

Score: 8
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (8)	{{construction}} removed on this, but it's too old for {{ICU}} – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 21:41 Jul 15, 2011 ..and that's why we use the QVFD. Playing Minecraft was more worthwhile than reading this random-<obscenity> <another obscenity>... --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 00:42, July 16, 2011 (UTC) --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 00:42, July 16, 2011 (UTC) Delete. (talk) 03:13, 16 July 2011  Burninate! Wow, that's awful. It just goes to show that a potentially good picture in itself does not always make a good article. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 03:15 July 16, 2011 (UTC) OUT ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 07:36, July 16, 2011 (UTC) Dismiss, with prejudice. Worst part is, this is an [actual thing] . An actual thing that is probably funnier than the article. ⇒»Bizzeebeever  (this user has been deleted) 09:37, July 16, 2011 (UTC) Kind of reminds me of the slow decent in quality of the actual The Simpsons show. Sad, really.--EpicAwesomeness (talk) 15:48, July 16, 2011 (UTC) Bandwagon delete. ~  Talk 21:21, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Paper Mario

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. Why is it always the Mario brothers articles that must suck the most.---   TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 14:59, July 14, 2011 (UTC) Obliterate. Many game articles are like that. Sonic-cruft, anyone? -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 17:21 July 14, 2011 (UTC) Delete. ~  Talk 03:35, 15 July 2011 (UTC) Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! ⇒»Bizzeebeever  (this user has been deleted) 09:47, July 16, 2011 (UTC) (This article is so bad, my sock puppet wants to vote "delete", too. Can he???)
Comments

Murder the shit out of

Score: -7
Keep (8)	It's fake! There are no 'facts'! No one has ever used the phrase! That's the point! It's a parody of encyclopedic entries on figures of speech! And if you vote to delete it after I've improved it....I know where you live! AHHH! I CAN HAZ VOETS! --Signed, the scum-sucking crufty idiot who wrote it, Bizzeebeever 06:03, July 14, 2011 (UTC) No! Don't delete it! It's funny! Isn't there some kind of law against deleting funny? --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 07:35, July 14, 2011 (UTC) Keep. I don't hate it sufficiently. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:49, 14 July 2011 Keep. Its not bad, it just needs work---   TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 14:47, July 14, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Because Bizzeebeaver knows where I live. Mattsnow 15:03, July 14, 2011 (UTC) Fine Author has done enough work on this entry since its nomination that it no longer looks like an Urban Dic entry. It's even funny now. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 17:32 Jul 14, 2011  Worth keeping now. But why did I use the explody template? because this article is now the bomb. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 18:01 July 14, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Better. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:59, July 14, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (1)	It's much more factual than funny, much like an Urban Dictionary entry. Not sure it belongs here. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 01:04 Jul 14, 2011 Delete. Who cares? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 01:05, July 14, 2011 (UTC)  DETONATE!! Because mere murder would be too good an end for this article. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 01:52 July 14, 2011 (UTC) Delete. (talk) 06:52, 14 July 2011
Comments	Note to closing admin: {{M is for murder}} is only used on this page, so if by some slim chance it gets deleted, that template should probably go too. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 01:08 Jul 14, 2011 Where is all this cruft coming from? No wonder QVFD is more active than ever. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 01:52 July 14, 2011 (UTC) I don' get it. My crummy li'l page gets nommed for huffing...and...and...BAGELS is still allowed to exist!?! Th' impunity! Bizzeebeever  (this user has been deleted) 15:28, July 14, 2011 (UTC) Typically the only reason for "X is allowed to exist" is that we haven't found X yet. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 17:30 Jul 14, 2011 Kept -- The Zombiebaron 05:00, July 15, 2011 (UTC)

Red Mage

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Yay! Crufty Oscar Wilde references and loads of freakin' sex jokes!--EpicAwesomeness (talk) 16:17, July 14, 2011 (UTC) delete. Apart from the opening template, not a smile here, it's awful. Mattsnow 17:39, July 14, 2011 (UTC) Spoony Bard!! And we all know what they say about bards, especially the spoony* ones... -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 19:14 July 14, 2011 (UTC) Ehh... Sucks. OMG!!! It`s Cat the Colourful, Jesus Christ!!! 08:02 15 July 2011
Comments	*If you're wondering what a "spoony bard" is, then it is clear that you are not well-versed in Final Fantasy cruft. If you get the joke, but are still wondering what it means... I haven't the foggiest. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 19:14 July 14, 2011 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia:The Caste System

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Is this a thing we need? Answer: No. It's in the Uncyclopedia namespace, which means someone might mistake it as truth, or at least a partial truth. And aside from that, it's a mess that even MadMax gave a bit of a snark about cleaning up. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 01:57 Jul 15, 2011 Delete. I'm afraid this really doesn't have any place here. We moved beyond this sort of thing years ago. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 02:18 July 15, 2011 (UTC) userspace As it is, it needs a hard rewrite, eventually I might do that. In the meantime, I moved a copy to my userspace and rewrote the chart. It also is currently lacking in spelling and grammar. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 00:56, July 16, 2011 (UTC) Delete. I tried to find a reason to vote for keep, but couldn't find one. Yet it shows promise and may just need to be rewritten.---   TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 01:34, July 16, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Ways to Annoy your Bathroom Mates

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Excessive fail detected. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 00:31, July 15, 2011 (UTC) POOOOOOOOP – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 02:01 Jul 15, 2011  DETONATE!! AAAAAA, my eyes! KILL IT before it reaches the eyes of another poor soul. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 02:24 July 15, 2011 (UTC) I don't even want to think about what kind of person could come up with all that... Seijana 07:52, July 16, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain - Perhaps it could be trimmed down, improved, and moved to "HowTo"? C'mon, don't tell me you didn't roffle at "Whoa! Easy boy!" Bizzeebeever  (this user has been deleted) 01:28, July 15, 2011 (UTC)

Spyro

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Looks like an IP wanted this deleted, but as we all know, IPs can't edit VFD. So instead I'm nominating it, cuz it sucks. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 23:48 Jul 14, 2011 Few images, lots of spelling mistakes, one Oscar Wilde quote, and a Russian reversal. --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 23:55, July 14, 2011 (UTC) Obliterate. A disgrace to a good game. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 00:10 July 15, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Embarrassingly Bad. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:25, July 15, 2011 (UTC) Delete. This picture is the best part of the article. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 01:01, July 16, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Damn, this article ruins a completely awesome game.---   TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 01:36, July 16, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Michael Moore Jr.

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. Shit ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 04:56, July 15, 2011 (UTC) Huffhuffhuff -- The Zombiebaron 04:59, July 15, 2011 (UTC)  My sentiments exactly. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 05:12 July 15, 2011 (UTC) Murder the shit out of it. I thought it was a Wikipedia article! Bizzeebeever  (this user has been deleted) 06:26, July 15, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	I'm unsure about this, the films section is pretty funny. Seijana 07:46, July 16, 2011 (UTC)

Ice Cream Flavors Not in the Top 100

Score: 7
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (7)	Delete. Shitty list detected. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 01:08, July 14, 2011 (UTC) Shitty list confirmed. Requesting permission to delete with extreme prejudice. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 01:14 Jul 14, 2011 Permission granted -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:17, July 14, 2011 (UTC)  Get rid of it. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 04:53 July 14, 2011 (UTC) Fire when ready (talk) 04:54, 14 July 2011 Delete. I like chocolate ice cream. I don't like this article.---   TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 14:49, July 14, 2011 (UTC) Ready... Aim... ~  Talk 03:34, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Comcast

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Oh, is VFD low again? Here, have this. I admit that the concept could well be funny - portraying a company as a religion - but the article itself, is not. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 21:11 Jul 11, 2011 Yeah. The only real jokes here rely on old TV commercials. When the reader has to dredge up an old meme to get the joke, it just loses the effect. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 04:58 July 13, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Imprimatur: Craphouse & Cobblers. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:30, July 13, 2011 (UTC) Big poopy Kill it.---   TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 14:45, July 14, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	To the admin who eventually deletes this: Can you move it to my userspace? I think I might be able to make a go of it. ~  Talk 16:08, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Jefferson Airplane (plane)

Score: 3
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (3)	Delete. An unfunny expansion of the only joke here: "Thomas Jefferson Airplane." -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 17:27 July 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. eh?---   TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 18:44, July 11, 2011 (UTC) What Iwillkillyou said. ~  Talk 16:00, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Why?:Are giant robots chasing me through the street?

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Terminate. Starts out decent, but it can't stop going off on weird tangents. It doesn't even answer its own title question. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 17:12 July 11, 2011 (UTC) Terminate. We shall never know---   TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 21:24, July 11, 2011 (UTC) Terminate. Per TheSlyFox. ~  Talk 15:58, 13 July 2011 (UTC) Delete. Burn it if it gets the que clean faster.--EpicAwesomeness (talk) 16:18, July 14, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. Could the admin deleting this move it into my userspace without huffing it, I think it's unfinished work and could be made descent! ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:12, July 12, 2011 (UTC)

Jean Claude Van Dyke

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. It's not even remotely funny, just annoying. This has got to go. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 17:05 July 11, 2011 (UTC) nope -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:31, July 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete. ~  Talk 13:53, 13 July 2011 (UTC) Delete.---   TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 14:44, July 14, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Five deletes, just kill it already.--EpicAwesomeness (talk) 16:19, July 14, 2011 (UTC)
Comments