User talk:Mordillo/archive8

YES WE KNOW. EVERYONE IS GAY EXCEPT YOU. PLEASE CREATE MORE "X IS GAY ARTICLES"

Mordillo is currently busy bulldozing some "X IS GAY" articles.

Hello I don't mind you littering my talk page with any kind of verbal trash you may like. However, consider the following: I don't react very well to messages that include some, but not limited to the following phrases: fucktard, fuck, fucker, fuck you, how dare you, haxxored, fuck, fucked, gay, gay fuck, fucking gay, gay gay. You can nearly always get back a deleted article for improvement, unless it's cyber bullying, completely random or plain ugly. Try to leave your messages at the bottom, only because I'm a messy person, and I tend to miss on new messages. Thank you. Now fuck off, you're gay.

---

I never dun nuffin

Hum I appear to being accused of things I either didn't do or had edited from my memory, which seems like a wise thing to have done.

Please check the records in future in case I have had my long-term memory modified for the benefit of mankind. This happens frequently and the archives are released publicly and are accessible through the usual means.

Apologies if I did in fact do the things I do not think I did. --Weird Al 15:07, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

you asked me to talk when my thing was deleted =)

by the by i did talk i left a discussion page you, did not reply, this made me sad, you also deleted my (i think perfectly accetable article), please tell me why?!? ---> it is like you told me my baby, crying, was too loud, yet I, being it's mother, thought it may have been singing, not crying. please stop verbally bashing my baby, or i will have you locked in the dungeons, I am not amused, oh yes and please tell me why you deleted an i will fix it. and seeing as you were so quick to deleteit you'd better be that quick at talking back :@ :@ :@ =D xxx lots of love, Drmarsh ! 5th march xxx

You know what? You better learn how to ask nicely. Until you learn how to do so, your article stays dead. Create it again, and it's a ban. And this time, it's the final one. ~ 11:13, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

woopsy sorry, ok here goes. please mordillo unbock my article i promise to rewrite it as you wish. lots of love, drmarsh.

at when approximately can i rewrite the article to make it acceptable, if any time. lots of love drmarsh. 7th march by the way i acidently put 5th on the other comments sorry

thank you, possible hug if applicable

My signature looks great, i feel more entreched in Uncyclopedia than ever before, it's a lot beter than I though possible--Sycamore (Talk) 19:03, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

My pleasure! ~ 19:21, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

No problemo

Hey it's cool, it's just that it's just I get emails citing changes, its my hope that people who edit my talk page do so to bring up issuies with articles I edit rather than graft templates onto it, it's important to me that since have changed the work of others that should they want get a quick response, I don't want to star ignoreing my talk page because of niggly stuff like tildes-MMACKNIGHT wishes well.

UnNews magazine

Hey Zim, for this magazine,how about we blank the unnews main page for a few hours, only placing the magazine on it? I can do it for you if you'd like. ~ Mordillo where is my IN SOVIET RUSSIA, EXPLETIVE SAYS YOU!!? 12:32, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Actually, I like the asymmetry of a striking writers who continue to write as though it's another day... maybe another time? Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 12:39, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm just flattered that you think so well of my work! But I do like the juxtaposition of writers on strike and yet there being writing all around. Just lends itself to idea that there are SCABs running about. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 18:30, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Popped in and looked around

I like what you've done to the inquisition article - much more accessible without losing the funny in my opinion. In fact, give me a shout when you're happy it's ready, and I'd be happy to nom it. If, you know, you're bothered with highlight and that sort of thing! Anyway, yeah, thanks for a good chuckle on a sunday. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN

Thanks for that. As anyone, I think, I like my articles being featured <ramble>and didn't have one for a very long time</ramble> <pathetic anger>since it all turned into a popularity contest</pathetic anger>. But yes, thanks again for your feedback, I like it much better now myself. And if you like it enough, go ahead and nom it. ~ Mordillo where is my IN SOVIET RUSSIA, EXPLETIVE SAYS YOU!!? 09:20, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

PLS Judging

I'm sending you this because you signed up to judge the Poo Lit Surprise. If you no longer want to judge or are incapable of doing so, please tell me as soon as possible. If you're still good to go then here are the instructions:

First, read all of the articles and look at all of the images submitted. Second, judge them. Judge how you like, as long as it's at least fair and based on merit (one suggestion would be to use the Pee Review format). You, as the judges, have the sole authority to pick losers, winners, and disqualify entries, so please read the PLS rules carefully before judging.

Post your top 5 entries here for all categories except the Best T-shirt Design. For the Best T-shirt Design category just say which ones should be t-shirts and which ones should not be t-shirts.

Hit me up on my talk page if you have any questions and thank you again for your valued participation in the balletic train wreck that is the Poo Lit Surprise! --EMC ^[TALK] 23:27, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

The 10th of February. --EMC ^[TALK] 16:54, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

OK. ~ Mordillo where is my IN SOVIET RUSSIA, EXPLETIVE SAYS YOU!!? 16:55, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

aberdactyl colony being huffed

please allow this to be un huffed, im working to make it better, the first part was a rough draft that i did in five minutes.

Did TKF helped you with that or you need additional help? ~ Mordillo where is my IN SOVIET RUSSIA, EXPLETIVE SAYS YOU!!? 09:18, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Hei haloo?

Palvelu ei tunnu pelaavan. Saako täältä mistään kaakaota? --Sankaritar 12:09, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

You have mistaken me for someone who speaks...whatever language this was... ~ Mordillo where is my IN SOVIET RUSSIA, EXPLETIVE SAYS YOU!!? 12:21, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

...who was our dearest vandal. Tämä on Uncyclopedia, ei se kahvila. And for other people: (translation:) Oh hello? It seems that service doesn't work. Can I get hot chocolate anywhere? And my comment on that: This is Uncyclopedia, not the café. Thanks and goodbye! ---Black Eagle 19:09, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Black Eagle, puhutko suomea? :O Nämä sveitsiläiset eivät oikeastaann ymmärrä mitään kirjoituksesta, en tiedä ovatko he sekaisin, vaiko minä. No, eräs ystäväni, joita minulla on ainakin yksi kappale, kertoi että tämä on jonkun sveitsiläisen kahvilan wiki, ja tänne saa jättää tilauksia. Tavara toimitetaan kuulemma postissa 2 päivän kuluessa. No, lähetin jollekin tämän wikin käyttäjälle sähköpostissa kaakaotilauksen EIKÄ SE HOT CHOCOLAADE OLE VIELÄKÄÄN TULLUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!! FUCK*!1111!!!! --Sankaritar 18:31, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Ei, tämä ei ole kahvila. =) Älä pliis vandalisoi (tai trollaa) täällä, koska minä en voi palauttaa niitä muutoksia. Siis ihan oikeasti ystävän pyyntönä, kunnioitathan pyyntöäni? Nothing important. I think this discussion should be some place else... Black Eagle 20:48, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Whoops

Thanks, I forgot to add the VFH thing at the bottom. I was rushing to get the actual nomination thing done before my lunch. --Garionepsilon 12:34, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

No worries. ~ Mordillo where is my IN SOVIET RUSSIA, EXPLETIVE SAYS YOU!!? 12:36, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Time Crisis

Can you please restore the Time Crisis page you deleted and can move it into my userspace for a rewrite? I would gladly appreciate it. --Slavemaster2 20:36, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Voila. Since it was voted for deletion, make sure you improve it greatly before moving it back. Thanks. ~ Mordillo where is my IN SOVIET RUSSIA, EXPLETIVE SAYS YOU!!? 21:01, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

My intentions

My computer is screwing up to where I can't edit certain pages, including the voting one I moved. So for just one minute, could I move it back to that weird location? -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 09:52, Jan. 29, 2008

I'd rather that you didn't. What you can do is tell me how you want to vote and I'll do it for you. And for god sakes man, fix your computer! ~ Mordillo where is my IN SOVIET RUSSIA, EXPLETIVE SAYS YOU!!? 09:55, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! Next time I'll bother Zombiebaron. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 10:06, Jan. 29, 2008

No worries. If you feel like voting for any of my pieces currently on VFH, feel free to ask for help :) ~ Mordillo where is my IN SOVIET RUSSIA, EXPLETIVE SAYS YOU!!? 10:06, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

I appreciate the greeting. In order to be more well-liked, I have honed my greatest cooking skills and made you this...

A magnificent cake, compliments of Milton Waddams and Bat Fuck Insane lobsters everywhere. Enjoy your cake.

Mommyslittlelobster 14:31, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm throughly impressed! ~ Mordillo where is my IN SOVIET RUSSIA, EXPLETIVE SAYS YOU!!? 14:39, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Do you vote for many things?

Just wondering because the custom in Hikipedia is that we'll get at least a compromise by talking, not by voting. Sort of parodic sarcasm of the Wikipedia's democracy. Bureucrats rule! (At least in Hikipedia) Black Eagle 14:39, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

It really depends on what. Mostly we vote, since we have too many users to talk it out, we had some chaotic dramas in the past regarding some votes. Ultimately, the admins will take the decisions sometimes against the consensus if they feel that it's best for the site. ~ Mordillo where is my IN SOVIET RUSSIA, EXPLETIVE SAYS YOU!!? 14:43, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Izzy Stradlin

My Izzy article got deleted and it says you did it. It was still under construction, is there any chance i could get it back? Thanks very much. --Markeyriley 19:39, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Done. The reason it was deleted was that you stopped working on it and the ICU tag on it expired. Make sure you improve it before moving it back in. I don't have time to restore all the images at the moment, if you can't find them again, let me know and I'll restore them tomorrow. Good luck. ~ Mordillo where is my IN SOVIET RUSSIA, EXPLETIVE SAYS YOU!!? 22:00, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks very much. And I have the images on my PC, so thanks a lot mate :)

What should I do to improve it?

Dear Mordillo

It seems that i have been blocked in the chatroom ihave no life and would thoroughly enjoy getting the chat back yours truly theweelad or thelad

I'm afraid that you'll have to discuss that with Codeine, my knowledge with ban removals in the IRC is a bit limited. Sorry. ~ Mordillo where is my IN SOVIET RUSSIA, EXPLETIVE SAYS YOU!!? 07:34, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

VFH

Sorry for going over the limit, I use VFHS to nominate and the template wasn't posted on that page, so I didn't know that was in law.--Æ 13:22, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Gotcha. I'll place it there as well. It's all due to the sad situation of VFH and since no one is voting, just nominating...and nominating....and nominating.... ~ Mordillo where is my IN SOVIET RUSSIA, EXPLETIVE SAYS YOU!!? 13:28, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Re:Top 10

Yep, I've got it all planned out. It'll go similarly to how it went last year:

• Voting closes at Midnight GMT January 31st (or 7:00 PM today in my time). At that point the votes will be tallied and Honorable mentions (11th through 15th) posted while Spang's code and whatnot is prepared.
• We'll open discussion for... uh... what were we going to discuss again? Whatever we're going to discuss, it'll be open for discussion for Jan 31st - Feb 1st or 2nd, at which point consensus will be reached on whatever we were going to discuss.
• Feb 1st or 2nd, depending on how much discussion we actually needed: Queuing starts, going from 10th then 9th, 8th etc. For ties, flip a coin and queue whichever one first.

With each queuing, we add the article to the Official list. We don't put them all on the list to add to the suspense, even though anyone can just look at the voting page and figure it out for themselves. Still, it's the principle of the thing. This sound good? -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:32, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Sounds good! Except for the discussion part, I think we got a consensus, more or less, for what you described no?

Mexican

Yeah, I found it. Sorry, got a little carried away there, didn't I?

Jimmy the Hellhound 13:00, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Just a bit, but we all do :) ~ Mordillo where is my IN SOVIET RUSSIA, EXPLETIVE SAYS YOU!!? 13:04, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Brief opinion required

Hi there good sir, I hope I find you well, and in a fine mood as the impending weekend draws ever closer!

In my insecure way, when I start an article I'm not sure about, or which I think may tickle my sense of humour and mine alone, I like to get an opinion on it from someone whose work I appreciate. And as you would appear to fall into that category, could I trouble you to take a brief look at this, and let me know if you think it will work or if it's likely to be a waste of my time? A 30 second glance and a couple of words are all I require.

Ta and so forth. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 12:54, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

I like it! The beginning seemed to be a bit like this bit but as soon as I moved a bit into the text, I liked the way it's heading. If you want a more elborated review, let me know. ~ Mordillo where is my IN SOVIET RUSSIA, EXPLETIVE SAYS YOU!!? 17:23, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Many thanks - that was all I require. As ever, you are a gentleman! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 08:58, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

And not even English...now there's a an achievement.... ~ Mordillo where is my IN SOVIET RUSSIA, EXPLETIVE SAYS YOU!!? 09:41, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

In my experience that tends to increase, not diminish, one's chances of being a gentleman in this day and age... --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 10:54, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Top ten features

Just want to point out that when you feature a new Top Ten article, you have to alter the Main Page header along with it. As of right now, it still says "#10". -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 02:48, Feb. 2, 2008

Duly noted. Thing is, there is no automated change for that, and it has to happen on 00:00 GMT. Since I'm on GMT+2, it means that I'll have to that every day at 2am, so it will probably be delayed somewhat. ~ Mordillo where is my IN SOVIET RUSSIA, EXPLETIVE SAYS YOU!!? 17:21, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank You Sir

I'm too much of a lazy person to go around thanking everyone for the ANotM vote, but I figured that I would thank you for the nomination, and the torrent of audio-related compliments I've received from you over the past few months. It's good to know that my five minutes per week of babbling into a microphone is not done in vain, and that people do enjoy it, and you sir have shown great fan...ness, for my work. So thank you for nomming me for ANotM and for Goldstein a few months back, and taking time out of your life to listen to and enjoy my vocal endeavors. For those about to rock, I salute you... -RAHB 06:49, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

You know that it's out of sheer envy, my bits always sound like it's being recored by a drug addict who suffers from a very bad cold...:) ~ Mordillo where is my IN SOVIET RUSSIA, EXPLETIVE SAYS YOU!!? 17:24, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Mordillo is JEW

Hey fucktard, fuck there's a new message for you on my talk page fucker. What's that? Fuck you! How dare you insinuate I'm too lazy to bring it all the way over here. I haxxored your talk page! I'm gonna fuck your mum! You are fucked you gay, gay fuck. You are fucking gay. Gay gay!

I hope you appreciate how much effort it took to do that considering I've had like 7 hours sleep in the last 3 days. — Sir Manticore 09:56, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Aww, I didn't even get a ban. :( — Sir Manticore 03:02, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

EPIC FAIL!

With regards to the feature thing, can't it just be queued but not put on the 3 day thing? I don't want this to be the second time Uncyc totally fucks me about. Look at the page itself, it's got 26 for votes, 208% health, someone said it should be one of the top of 2008! Please? --~Fag x FS 14:20, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Never worry, I'm putting the health system aside for now, until we finish the top 2007 madness. You don't really think that we don't feature something with THAT many votes do you? :) ~ Mordillo where is my IN SOVIET RUSSIA, EXPLETIVE SAYS YOU!!? 17:28, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Just to you understand, I can't put it in the queue for technical reasons (as mentioned above) and I can't put the featured template until we put it in the queue, but seriously, don't worry, it's going to get featured. ~ Mordillo where is my IN SOVIET RUSSIA, EXPLETIVE SAYS YOU!!? 17:31, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Okay, sorry, and thanks :P --~Fag x FS 21:25, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

If you'd like, we could make it so that the VFH page is featured, but no queueing is done. That means the VFH page says "This article has been featured," and nobody else can vote for it, but no template nor featured article queue is set up. Rather pointless really, but it's an option.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:56, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

I did think about it, but it might create a very long backlog and I'm trying to avoid that...However, if I see that things start to get messed up around there, we might have to take that route... ~ Mordillo where is my IN SOVIET RUSSIA, EXPLETIVE SAYS YOU!!? 09:42, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

These seem to tickle your fancy...

UnNews:UnNews Sunday Magazine, February 3, 2008

Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 17:48, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Chav (Article)

I'm trying to get a block on this page to stop Unregistered Users/Noobs from editing this page, as the page is gradually becoming a bigger mess every week. I've already had to change it from a Medium Fix banner to a Hard Rewrite banner

Anything you can do? If you can, can you also let me know what's wrong/good about the article

Reply please,

Grue Hunter 18:28, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Question, did you start it originally and it deteriorated or just adopted it? ~ Mordillo where is my IN SOVIET RUSSIA, EXPLETIVE SAYS YOU!!? 18:42, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

X is gay

Just for you... X is gay Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 19:02, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

If it's just for Mordillo, does that mean I'm not allowed to like it? Because I do! ;-) --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 13:47, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh, aren't you sweet! Honey if you want to love that article, you go and love it! Its just that Mordillo's picture on this page has a caption that reads "Mordillo is currently busy bulldozing some "X IS GAY" articles" so I thought I'd create the Queen mother of said articles. You know what Dumbledore says, if something has a name, use it! Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 01:35, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

So I was the inspiration? I'm flattered! Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 01:41, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Sodexho

Hi this is Cradle of Borgir, we have put this article back on after it was deleted. Why did you delete this article? You sent us no message to tell us why you deleted it. Please reply soon.

Poop

Dam, my ban record is going through the roof! This new job is crap! Poop flying everywhere! Seriously though, do you think the message has been received by the other admins now? I was going to keep including something in my archiving message for a few days as some admins don't log on that often. MrN 13:35, Feb 3

I think it's OK now, since the more VFD active admins got the message :) ~ Mordillo where is my IN SOVIET RUSSIA, EXPLETIVE SAYS YOU!!? 13:46, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

HowTo: Overclock A LLama

Hey Mordillo,

Added another pic to the article as you suggested, plus kept the minor tweaks Mhaille added last night. Tell me what you think :)

--DisappearingBoy 00:33, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Kuh-RAY Z

Heya, A page I was making was huffed by none other than Mordillo, or perhaps a jihadist in the guise of Mordillo attempting to discredit that name by huffing an article I was trying to make. While it was nonsense, the sort of thing I was aiming for was sort of the Bat Fuck Insane sort of thing, and what resulted was much better than many other articles I've read. Please explain. Thank you! --Ryuken 18:15, 6 February 2008 (UTC) 12:16 Central Time, 6th February, 2008

Well, more or less what you said, it's bat fuck insane and completely random, and we have dozens of those. I can restore it to your space for further work but I doubt it will survive very long as soon as you move it back into the main space. How about writing something not random? Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 21:56, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Probably right. I'm working right now to clean up an article on Ghandi and possibly improve it, barring any more problems with Steve Job's shoddy products. Cheers! – Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryuken (talk • contribs)

Wiki Code

Is there somewhere around that explains how to make infoboxes simply? – Preceding unsigned comment added by UpTheDubs (talk • contribs)

Look at the edit help link left on your page. What I usually do is just get an infobox from an article and then change the code according to my needs. Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 13:57, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

What!?

You deleted my accurate entry on Christian music?! Suck my penis you fucktard Demon Hunter fanboi!

Hi + Question

Can I request bans here? User:Beer Barrals Should be bigger vandalized my article while it was under construction, this was not the wayward IP "supposedly funny" it was just ruining the article.

See here: http://en.uncyclopedia.co/w/index.php?title=Charles_III&diff=2794665&oldid=2793176

Thanks, keep up the good work. Sir DJ ~ Irreverent

Hya, I wouldn't call it vandalizing, I'd call it very bad taste (which he already shown in the past). I'd suggest you leave him a note on his talk page trying to solve it peacefully before calling in the cabal, which does not exist anyhow. If he starts a revert war let me know and I'll deal with him. Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 08:29, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Tanks

The Uncyclopedia Health Service gives you a human arm as a token of our appreciation for your vote. Use it as a doorstop, sex aid or nice side to dinner; enjoy. DJ Irreverent

WALLA WALLA DING DONG

SIR, YES, SIR! --Flying Ninja Monkey 08:55, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

As you were. Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 08:56, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

SIR, FIRST ARTICLE IS COMING ALONG NICELY, SIR! --| - F N M - | | - B a n a n a ? - | 20:09, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Your quite insane aren't you? Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 20:12, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Only the mad are sane in a mad world. --| - F N M - | | - B a n a n a ? - | 20:17, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Well spoken. Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 20:24, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Really old "nickname"

That wasn't my account, it was my friend's, and he lost interest and gave it to me but I haven't used it since September or October. --Kurgan 20:02, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

But Slavemaster was yours, and your latest change caused the real havoc. Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 20:06, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Let's never mention this again, eh?

--EMC ^[TALK] 20:42, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Mention what? Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 20:50, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Martial law?

Seeing as there's about 30 pages on VFH right now, do you think maybe martial law again might be a good idea? - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:38, Feb 10

I already asked AE to ease up. And since we nearly finished with the top ten, we'll start clearing up the VFH soon. Hopefully we won't need the martial law thingy. I don't really like it. Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 22:15, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, me neither, and I really would like to nom about 5 more PLS pages. But, I saw that there were like 30 pages up there, and decided that maybe I could wait for just a bit. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:23, Feb 10

Pics on Mohammad

On the Moham article, I thought the pictures were funny, specially the head up the ass one but you removed that and some others. I put them back in but then I reverted myself. The pictures werent making the article look good or something? Noob here. --Allahgator 15:44, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, I removed all pictures that I felt that didn't contribute anything to the article (especially the one with the head up the ass, that's a gross picture anyhow) and all sort of vanity pictures. They were breaking up the formatting, didn't have a great humorist value to it and that article has way too many pictures as it is, in my opinion. Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 16:00, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Ok then I trust your judgement. --Allahgator 17:37, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Just wondering

Is it normal for one to constantly remove reviews and comments from a pee review? I'm curious because I left a comment and it was promptly deleted without any explanation and it seems that he's never stuck with a single review and instead chooses to delete "bad" ones until he gets a good review. Then again, I could very well have no idea what I'm talking about. --| - F N M - | | - B a n a n a ? - | 01:46, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Normal...well, I wouldn't say it's unacceptable, although I would have contacted you about it. There are guidelines towards reviewing an article and your review was quite short and not according to the acceptable format. I think he is looking for a in depth review, not necessarily a positive one, but just a through one. You might want to drop him a line about it and read the guidelines review on the pee review main page. Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 11:36, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Although the review that subsequently appeared took much the same view, as did the comments I added to it. AE is quite keen to get himself a feature, and I think he sees this as his best shot, so he's really keen to get in-depth reviews. But I think it was a bit much to delete your comment without a reason - as far as I'm concerned, any feedback beyond "it sucks, make it funnierer" is helpful, and should always be kept in mind. Still, we'll see what he does next! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 11:53, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Maybe something needs to be said in the Pee Review guidelines about how to revert reviews, and doing re-submissions. I will have a think about it, and get onto it later... Unless UU beats me to it that is... MrN 12:30, Feb 12

For the record, I think that reverting a review is not advisable. I think that resub would be better. Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 12:33, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Got to agree with you on that Mr Mordillo sir... To me, a revert creates the impression that the reviewers comments where "without worth". Typically reverting anything around here is looked on as something of an insult. Now we all know that was not what AE was intending in this case, but it could appear as such to someone who did not know what the norm was for a PeeReview. I think I will change the review guidelines to reflect this... If you get a particularly bad review (eg this arikle SUX cok/gay/British), then it's OK to revert with a suitable comment, and then possibly a message left on the talk page of the reviewer. For me, I think if you want to re-submit a good faith review, you should go through the process of creating a new request. If you can't be bothered to do that, don't revert. Oh, you know I'm not complaining about you AE. This is not in the guidelines right now, so I hope you don't think I'm having a go. I will have to make the changes later though... I think my boss has got some crazy ideas about me doing some work or something... MrN 12:51, Feb 12

He is obviously demented. Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 12:55, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

For. Per MrN. Also: FU Edit Conflict! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 12:57, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

I wasn't able to reply last night. I was really busy. I reverted because I was looking for an in-depth review as the others have said. I wasn't looking for a brief comment from someone who missed the joke of the article (this is nothing to be ashamed of, people miss jokes all the time). In addition, the ranting was brought up on the past VFH so I tried to cut down the ranting, but I could only cut down the ranting so much as the exaggeration IMO is what makes the article funny. Obviously Fat Americans aren't much (if at all) a threat. As for not using an edit summary, I thought it would be dickish to use one, so I didn't use one. In the future FNM, please be patient, it might take a while for me to reply, but I will reply eventually. --Æ 22:12, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Isn't the point to be funny to anyone, no just people who understand inside jokes? And I did get it; I just thought it was more offensive than it was funny. I was commenting, not reviewing. You seemed to be ignoring me altogether. That's where my confusion stems from. --| - F N M - | | - B a n a n a ? - | 22:47, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

It's not really an in-joke even though it is a spork of a deleted article. I tried to make it so it is understandable to everyone, but naturally, not everyone is going to get or understand the joke. I didn't ignore you, I just disagreed with your opinion at first so I reverted though I shouldn't have done so per the discussion above. You did make a good point FNM and once again, I'll try to remove the offensiveness. --Æ 01:05, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Here, have this

Under User has decided you are a star. Therefore, please have this attractive constellation (that looks strangely familiar) to acknowledge this.

Why? Well, why the hell not? --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 16:49, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Hell! I'm a star! :) Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 18:14, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Just wondering...

Honey, sweetheart, snuggum booger lips...Is Gone With 'd Wind going to make it to Featured? She's been sitting out there with twenty plump luscious votes (fastest vote getter that I have ever written) for a while. Maybe after Rough Pubs??? Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 02:47, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Sure it is! Straight after rough pubs. I'll put in the queue today. Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 06:15, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

You are just too sweet! I could eat you alive, but you would scream a great deal. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 22:55, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

But it would be worth any second of it! Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 07:36, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Hey! I'm just wondering too!

Hey brotha man, just a quick inquiry: I've noticed this martial law thingie has been implimented once again. It doesn't really affect, concern or bother me, but I was just curious; how is it decided whether or not to impose martial law? Whats the criteria, I mean. I'm hoping that my latest will be up at some point, and seeing the big green header sparked my curiousity. --THINKER 18:20, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Everybody is wondering! :) This is a very timely measure to reduce the queue. We had over 30 articles yesterday and I'm trying to bring it back to reasonable sizes. The way it looks now, I'll probably remove it in a couple of days. Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 19:20, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Ah, I see. Sounds good. Hey good job to your people on getting that Hezbollah asshole, btw. --THINKER 19:25, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

That's quite an issue here actually, that guy was hunted down for twenty years, and before Osama he was the number one wanted on the American list. Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 19:30, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Hell yeah, its awesome stuff. I'd say plan a party, but then you know.. someone might like, bomb it. :(

That must make partying in Israel really hard man. How can I pick up smoking hot Israeli women when the night club is in danger of being bombed? Maybe we mark the door with pig's blood or something? Almost like passover? I don't know how you do it man. --THINKER 14:45, 13 February 2008 (EST)

Just common sense and thightened security. And we don't really get clubs blowing up here, you know. You should stop looking at CNN all day long. They be lying! Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 07:38, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Forum Post

Hey, I notice on Forum:Give Charitwo rollback? yew said yew needed to discuss my sig. What's wrong with it? Go ahead and discuss ^_^ --_^(sir)Fag!chat|pee|fail|vote! 09:03, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh, don't take anything I say seriously. No, Seriously. Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 08:29, 15 February 2008 (EST)

Especially that last comment... MrN 13:44, Feb 15

No, I was serious about that one. Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 13:49, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Hello again

Yeah, me again. I'm becoming a regular on this page, really. Still, there's worse places to be a regular. Anyway, just to check: the VFH queue has dipped back below 20, but that alarming green template is still in place. I've found something I wanna nom - will I get bannified if I so do?

Oh, and I hope you find the review handy. And I knocked up a quick image that I bunged on UN:PIC - see if you think it would fit at all.

And I've got one hour to kill before the weekend, and I suspect it will drag more than the rest of this week combined. Any suggestions? --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 16:00, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

I say that, and you're busy removing the templates. Don't mind me, just passing through. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 16:04, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, great minds think alike, that alarming green thing was just taken off :). As for the review - it was very helpful thanks! I just didn't get around to thank you yet. I was wondering, you think that if I add more sections it wouldn't be too long? As for the pic, it's a bit unfocused I think. Could you maybe take the one I used on the final section and put a silouhette of a person leaving on the glasses? As for the weekend - I say try coffee. And lots of it. It takes you time to brew, to drink and to absorb, and will pass the hour much better! Or, you could make that image :) ~ 16:05, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Also FU EDIT CONFLICT ~ 16:05, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

I honestly think the article needs one more section. Not a hugely long one, but one more nonetheless. The out-of focus point is fair enough, I'll try to do the silhouette one, but not now - too many people would notice me touching up a pic in the office right now. Also, that pic looks like my mate Hugo. Scary. Also also, yay for Mordillo classic! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 16:20, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

You mean the sig? Yeah, it's about time :) ~ 16:23, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

- OK, here y'go. It's kinda subtle, hope it's OK. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 05:17, 17 February 2008 (EST)

Is there anything even there? O_O ~ 14:50, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

'Course there is, just look a little closer.) I may have darkened it a little as well). Betterer? --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 16:54, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Blue X

Could you undelete it so I can work on it in my userspace? THX. ------TheDragonMan ^{Chase the Dragon!} 01:35, 12 February 2008 (UTC) 20:27, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Done. Make it good. ~ 22:19, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Um, about that...what could I do to make it better? ------TheDragonMan ^{Chase the Dragon!} 01:35, 12 February 2008 (UTC) 01:30, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, it's quite random at the moment. Random articles do exist here but they have to be really REALLY good in order to survive main space. I'd suggest starting with something less random or find a point for the big blue x and evolve the article around it. Also, you need to fix your sig. ~ 16:37, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Hmm, let's try my sig now...------TheDragonMan ^{Chase the Dragon!} 01:35, 12 February 2008 (UTC) 14:50, 16 February 2008 (EST)

Nope. You're spewing your code all over the place. Follow these steps:

1. Create a subpage for your signature - like: user:The Dragon Man/sig.
2. Add the appropriate award abbreviations and links. A complete list with details of how to add them can be found here).
3. Make sure that it conforms to the Signature Rules.
4. Go to your preferences page, and in the "nickname" box add {{nosubst|User:yourname/sig}}. Tick the "Raw signatures (without automatic link)" box, and you're done! Use the 4-tildes or signature button () to use your saved signature.

Give a call if you need help. ~ 20:57, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Done. And I don't like to talk about awards I haven't earned. ------TheDragonMan ^{Chase the Dragon!} 14:52, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Much better. ~ 14:54, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

There we go. ------TheDragonMan ^{Chase the Dragon!} 19:59, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

LoL

RE your latest huffing... I wondered how long that was going to take! Almost feel sorry for him. Almost. Well, not really actually. :) MrN 16:34, Feb 16

Just happened to be around to watch it :) ~ 16:36, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

DUDE!

Stop keeping the queue at +3! That's unhealthy for the poor thing; it'll get obese and bloated. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:22, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Just trying to beat you to it :) ~ 14:28, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

WMDs

Please explain why this article was deleted without any discussion. --Nonnullus Alio 00:26, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

First, I'm afraid there is no discussion, this is not Wikipedia if you haven't noticed. Second, it was deleted because of all the articles here, we are all about originality, not copying other people's work. ~ 14:33, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

How does my own work constitute copying? --Nonnullus Alio 18:27, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

You'd like me to believe that you are the original author of all the numerous versions of this article you can find all over the web? ~ 21:19, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

huff

Why you delete Tukul Arwana? Mxxxxxxx Azmi 11:18, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

You do realize that we're the ENGLISH version of Uncyclopedia? Hence, all articles must be in English. ~ 14:38, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

PLEASE vote on New Israeli Flag

There is a vote on a new israeli flag for the article on Israel, Please vote!
Oren neu dag 02:34, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

VFH questions

I know martial law is over for now, but are users allowed to remove noms? Currently, I haven't been remvoing articles unless they're invalid or have a score of -3. Are there specific guidelines on removing artricles? In the past, I've removed articles that are below 50% health, but I'm not sure if that's to high for removal (or if there's a higher number). Thanks for your time. --Æ 19:42, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

I usually remove articles that drop under 40% when we're going more or less above the 20 articles on the page. I don't remove anything that is above 14+-, even if the health is low, since this is the featurable margin, roughly. Golden rule, if you're not sure, don't remove, and leave it to us. ~ 20:03, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Nag, nag, nag...

User:MrN9000/VFD List... It's going to tie up VFD (and me) for ages if all this has to go through in the normal fashion... You know my views... I'm not in favour of random huffings, but these are all really short. I know gwax is sometimes is in favour of deleting articles without VFD and I just wondered if you had given it any thought... I could make a post in the dump if you think that's a good idea, or maybe you could... MrN 21:22, Feb 18

You're damn lucky Dr.S is still lent-ing.. --THINKER 15:38, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, sorry about that, I'm on reserve duty this week so I'm pretending to be a soldier again. Anyway, Like I told you on IRC, I'm against VFD-bypassing route. As long as the community is against FFW or V week, we don't need to bypass VFD. Even it the majority are complete crap, we still need consent to delete those and not to think that we (not you personally but a small group) can make those decisions for the rest of the site. What you can do, is post something about it on the dump and perhaps go for a massive delete of this list with the consent of the community - after some thought has been given to the articles in question. How does this sound? ~ 16:06, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Cool. Thanks for the reply. I have been away for a bit, so have not been on-line... I'm trying to figure out what to say in the dump. Maybe I will word it along the lines of "Here's a big list of possibly bad articles", and see what people think. I'm not really offering a solution to the issue... I will think of something to say... :) MrN 10:50, Feb 27

Your thoughts????

UnBooks:The Miseries of Uncyclopedia Life Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 23:04, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Christopher Meloni Thanks You!

Chris doesn't have a fancy graphic for you, but we hope you still a ceept this as thanks for making his dream come true! Thank you again for helping get Why?:Does Christopher Meloni not have an emmy yet? featured!--Dr. Fenwick 18:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Heh

Sorry about that. I think I ICU'd it while you deleted it. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 15:59, Feb 21

That was quite amusing :) ~ 16:01, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Feature! - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 16:02, Feb 21

Please stop supporting User:77.163.30.115

User:Link 486 and I have had enough of his atrocious edits by simply attempting to take over the lists of Celebrity Deathmatch episodes, and we're trying to stop him. He's ruining everything including my unfinished fights. he tried to "finish" the results for me, but he sucks at typing. Not me, not even Link. 77.163.30.115 is. Stop User talk:77.163.30.115 at all costs and not supporting him. XxPanzerOutlawxx 18:03, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Supporting? I'm not supporting anyone. I'm simply deleting IP talk pages filled with you both cursing him, to no avail. Next time you have a problem with an article, talk to an admin, you really think that cursing someone over the web will do any good? As for the issue at hand, I semi protected it till April. See if it helps. ~ 22:06, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

With all due respect...

What evidence do you have to allege that my adopted progeny Insignia is a sock of NXWave? If you havea reason, I would just like to know it.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:32, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Will all due respect:

• There is no way a noob knows that much about wikimedia. Think back about yourself when you were new.
• If that guy is a soldier, than I'm a Shiite. He cannot tell a tank from an APC, as per the pic on his talk page. There is no way a professional soldier will not know the difference.
• His never ending fixation with deleting stuff and with AE. He's been here what, three days? and already managed to get entangled with two different AE articles (I'm not condoning AE's behavior, btw, but that's beside the point).
• this.

Now, since it's inconclusive and as you know me I don't like banning before I'm absolutly sure, I wanted the chap to know that someone is watching him. If he's NXWave, than we blew his cover and he lost the fun of the game again, perhaps he will go and seek life finally. If he's not, well, that it doesn't hurt them to get a warning he doesn't even understand. ~ 09:01, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Okely dokely. I do have to say that his penchant for trouble with AE is suspicious. Knowing about Wikimedia can be chalked up to being a Wikipedia member first, but as you say, if it's not him then it can't hurt.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:28, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Sorry I'm late but I'm not a sockpuppet and I don't even know who this NXWave guy is. But I have statements to prove that I'm not a sockpuppet.

1. I edit Wikipedia a lot. Mostly under the Iraq War. And no, I edit anonymously.
2. What should we call it then, a moving armored vehicles on wheels. But seriously, an APC is a transport vehicle that is lightly armored and has machine guns on both sides and the top for some defense while traveling through dangerous areas. And if that was an APC, there would be a machine gun on the top. Depending on the model of course.
3. You misunderstand things. I voted against for a reason I didn't understand until AE told me some of the ropes, then I changed the vote reason to something a little less offensive. I did not fight with him in any way possible, I just complied. And the second article, well I nominated Alberto Gonzales for VFH cause I think it's one of his better works and has potential to be featured. And if you look at it, Fat Americans is a decent article with a good premise but the fat jokes makes it seem old. We haven't seen comedians talk about fatties have we?
4. Look. The military blocked everyone from accessing Uncyclopedia cause "They insult and mock our mission in Iraq."

Here are 4 reasons and I hope that you'd understand. Thank you. -- (talk) • (contribs) • (email me!) 22:11, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Other Nikkul account

Could you please just indef block my other account otherwise I will be tempted to misbehave with it. Please save me from myself Gaylord Nikkul - King of the gaylords 06:08, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Deletion

I was going to edit an award template I made, and saw it had been deleted. I was just wondering why so that in the future I'll know better. I'm new here, so I'm not entirely familiar with policy. Thanks! dji noch predo... 19:09, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, it was placed as a subpage for the awards page, which we don't usually do (makes it hard to find it) plus we have too many awards as it is. You can create a personal award a subpage in your space if you like. ~ 19:45, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Heeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeey but my article was kind of slightly funny in addition to being completely tasteless

Ok, I will be the first to admit that I am a sick, horrible, twisted expletive etc and so forth,

BUT ... it was satire!! maybe of the worst possible kind, absolutely tragic out of context, but satire nonetheless. – Preceding unsigned comment added by B0nafide (talk • contribs)

It might have been satire but it was a bit...too much of a satire...calling women "cum bags" are more ED style than ours. Can you try to rewrite it to be cleverly funny rather than...Eddish funny? ~ 10:08, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks Mordillo. Having my article featured makes me feel like a big man (that, and my .45 - I love that gun). If friends come to the site to see my work, how do they know it's me? Is there a place they can go to see that I wrote the original story? My ego is absolutely massive (I mean, sickeningly so) and I need it massaged in this way...

Oh, also, I'll be more cautious about my formatting...– Preceding unsigned comment added by WesMan20 (talk • contribs)

And about your posts signing...You can reference them both from the history of the file and you can also reference them from your own page, like I'm doing for my UnNews bits. ~ 14:56, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for unblocking me. I will post something on the village dump soon, to clarify some issues. Will love to get your feedback on that. IdoSet 09:26, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks Part II

Hey Mordillo. I was thinking that I wasn't expressive enough of how appreciative I am to have had an article featured so soon. You don't have to reply to this. I just wanted you to know that it was friggin' awesome... --WesMan20 15:04, 26 February 2008 (UTC)WesMan20

No problem. The next phase of your evolution is to get a feature on the front page. ~ 15:07, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

hey amigo, are u online?

Hey Armadillo, how are things? I hadn't been getting enough calls from telemarketers lately so I thought I'd post my phone number on the web and see what happened. Ohhh... my head... I'm never drinking again -- Sir Armando Perentie KUN FP 03:36, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, I tried

I tried calling, but my work phone won't allow it and my cell phone won't either. My home phone (lucky me) is currently being paid by someone else, so I have to get permission for that but it could take a few days. You could try calling me in the US at +1-347-731-9923 OR +1-216-862-7623...

Oh, I think the country code is 011. I'm not sure. Frankly, I'm not even sure if it was me you were asking to call :)

--WesMan20 19:48, 27 February 2008 (UTC)WesMan20

I'm flattered but it wasn't me, it was a mad aussie mate of mine, asking me to call him. As for the numbers, it's the number of characters added or removed from the articles you are watching. ~ 20:35, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

What's the Australian word for "embarrassed"?

Sorry 'bout that... --WesMan20 21:45, 27 February 2008 (UTC)WesMan20

Also

What are those numbers on my "Watchlist" page that have plus (+) or minus (-) signs in front of them (like +56)? --WesMan20 19:52, 27 February 2008 (UTC)WesMan20

Morning

Re: Open wider. I saw you reverting it there, but wondered if you've given it a full investigation. It was linked to Jeremy Chung Kang Liew, which you rightly huffed, and was probably cyberbullying. Open wider is by the same guys, and still mentions Jeremy in the text. My suspicion is that it's more of the same cyberbullying. It's also had an ICU removed on it. I'd appreciate your thoughts on this. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 11:50, Feb 28

Never mind, it's been Codeine'd. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 12:00, Feb 28

Suggestion regarding the Insignia != NXWave question

Since user Insignia would like to maintain his position that he is not NXWave, I have a suggestion. Perhaps you could ask Insignia to agree to adhere to the following 2 rules for a certain period.

1. No nominating articles for deletion.

2. No interaction in any way whatsoever with AE or his articles.

If Insignia is who he says he is, he might agree to this as a way of assuring people that he isn't a sockpuppet of an infinitely banned user. Why am I suggesting this ? I've been intrigued by the NXWave saga mainly because his unusual behavior seemed somewhat like narcissistic personality disorder at times which you don't see very often. My suggestion is therefore meant as compromise solution to avoid possible drama and/or a potentially interesting experiment in human behavior depending on how you see things. Any thoughts ? Sean.hoyland - tak() 12:09, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

I have a polite response for both of those.

1. I've nominated what? 3 articles for deletion and I think I did pretty good. I got MPAA kept, reverted, and protected so that no IP can ever touch this article and ruin it like before. And have you seen Pie boy and Goatopia. I stand my case, they're both horrible articles. I disagree with you taking away my privilege to nominate articles for deletion. Cause I nominate 4 articles a day and most of what gets nominated is crap anyway.

2.

“Ya know, I'm out. I came here expecting to read and write humor and enjoy, but it's not at all fun or funny with the everyday drama, trolling etc.”

~ AE

It's on the top of his user page now, but it's sad cause he never got to finish Alberto Gonzales, and no, I'm not going to finish it for him. I'm just going to leave it untouched. But seriously, I miss AE already. He had a good article, he knew what quality was around Unyclopedia and got what was unnoticeable articles that were good featured. I'm just basing this on his contributions, but I did leave a message on his talk page and I appreciate all the work he's done on Uncyclopedia.

I will not agree on the "No nominating articles for deletion rule." But I probally will agree to stay away from AE and his articles for a certain period of time. That I :can agree on. Also on a side note, I wouldn't want to be opening Pandora's Box would I? -- (talk) • (contribs) • (email me!) 19:48, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm afraid to say, Insignia, that if I decide to impose any restrictions upon you I will not be asking for your consent on those. I will not do so, at the moment, since I don't have cutting proof that you're NXWave, even though I'm quite certain that you are. Like I said, no restrictions shall be made but you can assume that I'm watching every move you're making here and if you are, in fact, NXWave, and when you slip, I'll be there to see it.

On a side note, Sean, thanks for your thoughts, but I'll keep the status quo for now.~ 20:24, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Erm....

Don't mean to bitch an' all, but you kinda featured your thing before mine and THE's even though we're older. In fact, I just have one request: can you feature and make July 4 the feature date per the previous agreement?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:12, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

As said in IRC, I wanted the date, and seeing we all have the same scoring, I used the special "say one more word and I'll ban your ass" clause. I promise to play with the feature code tomorrow for the America piece. :) ~ 22:15, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Audio

If you get it done soon rather than later, I've started one of them video things here. It's got some pics, but I can't "pace" them until there's an audio to sync them to. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 00:14, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Yessir. ~ 00:16, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

America!

I agree with your option #2. It satisfies Kip's condition and is the most convenient. So I vote option 2.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:35, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

I Vote Fish Penis. Also, this isn't my talkpage. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 21:44, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Loads of thanks

Thanks, Dad, for voting Ljlego in round #1 of VFS. It helped me pass through enough to be opped. And that may be irresponsible, but I got +sysop. Thanks a bundle.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 04:43, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Congrats sonny boy! ~ 08:06, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks be to you!

Thankings from Led Thanks muchly for the vote for me on VFS. Now to abuse my powers... 03:38, 1 March 2008 TheLedBalloon (Talk | contribs) blocked <insert name here> (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of infinite ‎(Muahahahaha!))

Thanks again for the votes in both rounds of VFS, and for generally being all-around awesome, - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 05:11, Mar 1

Congratulations Leddy! Now hold on, I gotta ban you for stealing my template ~ 08:07, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo

Hi! First of all, I would just like to ask for apology if my contributions was interpreted harmful for the Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo article. I would just like to clear it out that I am not 210.213.69.246 nor I support any of his actions. I am very sorry if this allegation reached to you one way or another. I also want to apologize for having Filipinos to be either judgmental or has crab mentality infecting Uncyclopedia, aside from just plain vandals. I hope this IP issue would not destroy my credibility as a registered user of Uncyclopedia.

I would just like to clear it out that I am not a vandal. Even though I am just starting in Uncyclopedia, I would also like to take care of my reputation. I am not also causing "drama" in this scenario. If my edits hurt you one way or the other, then I am sorry. I didn't expect that my simple edits will go a long, long way until explaining to your talk page right now. If you think my edits and contributions is wrong and inappropriate to the article, then ban me, please. I would rather take a ban rather than insults and demolition jobs from other users and contributors, especially Filipinos. Apologies. --Kapuso 10:05, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

No need to apologize. I didn't actually think you were a vandal (I didn't think that IP was one as well...). Just thought that you might settle this issue with the other Filipino users. This certain community within Uncyclopedia seems to be a bit sensitive, even more than us Jews :) ~ 17:36, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

I just want to clear it out that I do not intentionally insult or harm Filipino users in Uncyclopedia in my edits. I do not like what is happening within us and the Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo article. If these Filipinos are sensitive, I also want to stress out that I am also a sensitive person (obviously enough) that is also hurt of what is going around here. I would also like to take this opportunity to express my respect to Jews, Filipinos, and other races. I am not a racist, but I hope these people belonging to such race would be sensitive enough to others as well. And I hope these people would not show the negative traits of their race to other people as a sign of respect to their own race and to other people that would notice these traits as well. I also want to tell you that I am willing to cooperate and help fix this problem regarding the Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo article.

Just a question, am I prohibited to edit articles in Uncyclopedia in good faith especially if the article was created by me? Are there articles that specifically prohibits me from editing it? Thanks! --Kapuso 18:07, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Seems that is too late. Well, I would expect more and more criticisms because of the simple edit that I made. I am human, so it would be natural for me to be hurt. I really love Uncyclopedia, and it really made a memorable experience for me! I just like to ask a simple advice for you what to do next. --Kapuso 18:14, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

You're not prohibited from editing anything really, we only protect articles that seem to be a source for Drama. For this article, I'd say let the dust settle a bit and try to work on something else for a while. ~ 21:32, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

I understand the message you have sent to me. In any case, I'm purging most of whatever flak I have with Kapuso and offering my apologies to him as well. He can have the Gloria article, but I don't want to be accused of "crab mentality." Thank you. --MidwayHaven 02:53, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

London Midland

Why did you delete this article? It had the potential to be very funny with enough development! Fgw 21:00, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

It was five lines long and was deleted three weeks ago. You can start it over again and place a construction tag on it, which would leave you some time to work on it. ~ 21:30, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Late Thanks

OUI! Necropaxx's belated thanks go with you for voting positively on Siege of Bordeaux. Remember, les français ne sont jamais au dessus de dérision! Translate it yourself, je suis trop de fatigue.

• • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 00:43, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

UnNews audio

Great to hear your Australo-German-Italian warbling again! Cheers! Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 22:13, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Custom order by Modus. Thanks! Glad you like it! :) ~ 22:24, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Pee Review/Tattaglia

Am I mean giving this kind of review on Tattaglia? I am afraid that the user created the article would get mad at me. What do you think? I don't like making enemies from now on. Thanks! --Kapuso 03:39, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Floor

• huff puff* I'm trying to make it a good article, grampa! Don't delete it, yet! I'm sorry that it's not funny!   Le Cejak • <-> Mar 3 (14:27)

Yeah sorry!!! I didn't see it was yours, I already reverted and apologized on the talk page...~ 14:29, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Mahmoud How to

Hi (after the unsuccessful IRC session - who invented this thing??) - what do you say about putting together a video for the Mahmoud Ahmadinejad how to - I envision a series of open mouths trying to pronounce those impossible syllables... IdoSet 14:54, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Hmmmm...as long as it's not too...grotesque :). BTW, any chance you change your GUI to something more elegant/simple? It's a bit too overwhelmed with shiny buttons at the moment. ~ 14:58, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Thx - I'll check it out. You're invited to watch and contribute to the video I started for Modusoperandi's audio on Canadians. IdoSet 11:41, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Article Recovery Please?

Hellos. My article, Berylox, got nuked because I left "construction" tags on it when I had in fact finished it. I'd be very grateful if you could get it back. If it was actually deleted because it was awful then I shall try and get more "try to be funny and not just stupid" Practice into my schedule. Thanks. --Super Duck 18:26, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Done. I'd suggest you try and remove or update the "listy" part of it - that will improve it greatly. If you need feedback, you can post it here. Good luck. ~ 18:40, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Many thanks and I'll bear that advice in mind. I'll remove the "construction" for now until I get more time. --Super Duck 19:05, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Better leave it on, or you might get an ICU tag on it...~ 19:08, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

:-(

My last article called "The scariest song ever" was huffed by you. I'm not complaining or anything but i am interested in the reason for the huff. thanks.

It was a bit random and wasn't finished, personally I didn't find the whole "emo bands" approach funny as well. I can restore it so you can try to work on it more. You like? ~ 21:09, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

no it's cool

Ha, ha, ha, Remember Me, You Probaly Don't

I am the Ernesto De La Guerva and you blocked me however i understand as the block was legitimate. I was wondering if you could teach me how to properly use Uncyclopedia, be my mentor, take me under your wing ect. Is it true that you Jews control the world?

Kapuso Issue

I saw your comment in MidwayHaven's page. I am airing this to you just to give credit where credit is due - this is not a drama or anything.

If you check the Gloria page history, Kapuso did create the page. However, it was tagged for a rewrite that's why MidwayHaven and I (most of it was MidwayHaven's handiwork) decided to rewrite the material. Kapuso now owns the article and it's for pee review - to which 99% of the material there that he claims to be his are not. You can just see the difference in the handiwork when you compare MidwayHaven's version from Kapuso's 2006 version.

MidwayHaven decided to VFD and I suggested a permanent CVP the article to end the issue once and for all. We were quite surprised when the article was transferred to him.

Midwayhaven and I are active and well behaved editors here in Uncyclopedia, and our logs speak for itself. We spend our time in the shadows for quite some time just writing stuff. We broke our silence just now after Kapuso entered the scene. We were taken aback by Kapuso's arrogance and behavior on the revert war, insisting his edit (quite frankly, it is NOT funny, believe me, I know Filipino humor even if he claims what he's doing is Filipino humor). We let good edits stay in the article, just as long as it doesn't mess up the continuity of the humor. We even rearrange the format for others without damaging their additions.

This is where I'm going, if you are going to transfer the ownership, please transfer it to MidwayHaven. Or just kill the article and leave it permanently CVP'd to avoid further drama. That's what I did to the Philippines article when a certain user started a drama.

I personally don't know MidwayHaven but we've been in collaboration ever since he started and he's a good fellow Uncyclopedian. He knows what is funny and never mess up the work of others - he complements the existing material.

As for Kapuso, I'm a little bit suspicious about him. You just go on rampaging into the Gloria article after a 2 year hiatus. There's something not right about him, but I'm quite sure that he's the IP dude if you base the consistency and the uncanny resemblance (if not identical) of his edits. He is also the "Janice Lozada" sockpuppet (Dsweetheart08) that keeps recreating the article. I won't be surprised if he's the one doing the drama in the old Philippines article discussion page in 2007. I may be wrong.

I have aired this to squiggle, having mistaken him for an admin.

Just my two cents. Whatever you decide is fine by us. Just as long as Kapuso never screws up our article by adding nonsense. Don't get me wrong, he is open to edit our work anytime, as long as it doesn't mess the spontaneity and of course is should be funny. --Gilgal1(Talk to me bitch!!!) 11:14, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

You have several misconceptions here. There is no such thing as "article ownership" no do we transfer those rights between users. We, as community, usually recognize some rights of the original writer over the other editors, to an extent. This is usually based on being polite to each other rather than setting strict rules about it. What happened here, as I understand it, is that the article was VFDd, and Kapuso asked for a version to be restored to his space for some work, or just to keep it, and perhaps rewrite it, that's all. Putting something on pee review doesn't mean you own the article, it means you want some feedback on it. Even though it's usually done by the author, it's not unusual for other editor to ask for a pee review. There isn't much I can do at the moment since Kapuso isn't acting in bad faith, as far as I can see it, if you get into some sort of a dispute again, drop me a line and I'll try to sort it out, best if you just all stay away from each other. ~ 10:02, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

And, though I abhor drive-bys, I think Mordillo would agree that it would probably be best to stay away from that page as well, without discussing your edits with Kapuso. Also, I would suggest reconcentrating your efforts elsewhere to let this all blow over.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:35, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Yes we agree with that. We are staying away from his article because we have said our piece. But his sockpuppet (Dsweetheart08) still messes up with the Manila article. I just hope he does the same thing too. --Gilgal1(Talk to me bitch!!!) 09:05, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

How do you it's a sockpuppet? ~ 09:10, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Take a look at his edits, the links to the Janice Lozada article (which was recreated twice or thrice) and Gloria article, and his edits to the Gloria article that is in Kapuso's user page, and Kapuso's activity coinciding with the creation of Dsweetheart08's account. That's how I know it. The only way to know sockpuppets in multi IPs is the circumstances and similarity of the edits isn't it (correct me if i'm wrong)? The same way it was assumed that NXWave and Uncognito are one and the same? You know what, I'm not going to pursue this anymore. It's just futile arguing about this issue. --Gilgal1(Talk to me bitch!!!) 11:24, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Seriously Gilgal, chill the fuck out, I'm not arguing with you I asked a simple question. For some reason you and Midway think I'm against you two, which I'm not. As for the issue you raised, I'll check it. Thanks. ~ 11:28, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Artichoke of Mordillo

Mordillo, tein sinusta artikkelin, katso! --Sankaritar 11:20, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Translation: Mordillo, I made an article about you, look! --Black Eagle 20:09, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

School IPs

Is there a template that can be used to mark IPs as sharedIPs or schoolIPs on Uncyclopedia as there is on other Wikis? 74.4.117.0 19:13, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Nope. And I'm afraid that we won't be using that template anyhow. We treat the IPs the way they behave, even if they're shared. ~ 19:17, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Care to pop into IRC?

Would like to 'bounce' an idea off ya. MrN 20:15, Mar 8

Care to pop into IRC, it's not about the V week thing

No seriously. This really is actually about something else... MrN 12:49, Mar 9

I can't, I'm at work and IRC access is blocked :) ~ 13:05, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

You let em do that to ya? Shame on you! Cool dude, catch you later [1]... MrN 13:58, Mar 9

So what's this message is all about?

All? Only one of em was huffed. Check your stats, dog Cat lover69 10:06, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Ah yes, 1+1=2. Well, as you can see I wasn't overburdened with an abundance of education Cat lover69 17:28, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

VFH

I don't know that there's any need for removals of articles on VFH at the current time. It's running low again. Really ridiculously low. I blame Wikia, naturally.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:27, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Naturally, still, no need to leave articles which aren't going no where, and we're still don't need to feature articles at +9. ~ 21:10, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Unfortunately, I fear that without drastic measure we are going to once again have to revert to every other day features. And those will be at +9 or worse. I think it's time that Template:Featuredarticle was graced with a humorous appeal to voters. Sort of a parody of "Rock the Vote". I'll draft it if you like.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:15, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm thinking about maybe starting a VFH strike, instead of a featured article - put up a "this uncync section is now on strike" or "admins on strike until more votes are cast" or something. How about it? ~ 21:20, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

STRIKE! STRIKE! STRIKE! STRIKE! Heck no, we won't go! - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:21, Mar 10

Ok, here's my plan: How about we feature stubby in-jokes and one-liners until VFH gets up to speed again? That oughta get people running to VFH in droves. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:48, Mar 11

That might get a whole lot of drama involved. Let's just keep working as usual till we get below ten votes per article (hope we didn't get there yet, I didn't check the queue today :) )

This is not a matter to be spoken of in such venues.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:18, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Haven't the Jewish people suffered enough?

Well, I guess no. Regardless: the kaltura extension was taken off by Sannse. I think that writing there was a consensus to take it off is simply, well, eh... not true. I thought we agreed it was worth a shot. You (and other people) started expirementing with it. Videos were made. Efforts were invested. So what's going on? IdoSet 08:21, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

That was probably their best sketch wasn't it? WE ARE THE ISRAELI DELEGATION! :) Anyhow, you need to take that to sannse, who is a wikimedia staff member, and tell her that even though there was a wide against vote, originally, some people actually started working with it, You can state the work Modusoperandi and myself did for his Unnews bit. ~ 10:51, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Could we have the "Liverpool" article available to be edited again?

You're an Admin, right? The whole article is offendingly unfunny, and needs to be unlocked so that someone with a sense of humour and actual knowledge of the city can come up with something better. Keeping the article protected only sustains the existence of this disgrace to uncyclopedia. --Danny Himself 19:08, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Liverpool, or rather the "republic of scouseland" is only protected vs. unregistered users. Why do you need to lower the protection level? You shouldn't have any problems editing it. ~ 19:36, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

That's funny- the edit button wasn't showing up for me earlier, and I was logged in. Oh well. Thanks anyway! --Danny Himself 22:43, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

No worries. ~ 07:59, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

If you wouldn't mind stepping in.

I don't want to bring this up in Ban Patrol just yet, because I don't think this is quite ban-worthy yet. But checkit the contributions of my noob, Sk8R Grl, who seems to have lost her mind or something. Perhaps you could help me out here as to what I should do about this? ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 17:39 Mar 12

I will second the motion, whatever you choose to do. The user is getting out of hand, Sabba... (You need to teach me proper swears and curses in Hebrew, I'd need a few inserted <here>...) -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) Grammar Nazi, Mum , BFF & NotM, CUN , GMP . - Perkele! 18:04, 12 Mar

I left a warning on her tal page. What the hell happened to her?! As for the swears in Hebrew, let's start with the obvious: Zona metorefet (that would be - a crazy whore) :) ~ 19:10, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

So this Zona metorefet is getting on my <insert "nerves"/"patience" in Hebrew here>. Thanks for giving her a warning, Sabba. I appreciate it a lot. Feel free to pop in at my office to give me more lessons in Hebrew any time. It won't hurt for me to know a twelfth language enough to at least understand which one's the ladies' and which one is the gents' room if I visit Israel sometime in the unspecified future... /me hugs Sabba -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) Grammar Nazi, Mum , BFF & NotM, CUN , GMP . - Perkele! 19:28, 12 Mar

• THANKS! AND SORRY!

For helping with my Dude. . . still awaiting his answer as to whether we're still friends. And sorry for the mess, I undid all of it, I hope. -XOXOXO, Love ya! Sk8R Grl UnSis Dude Slut! 00:50, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Curious

Why you're so delete happy? Got an overly aggressive bot, or just plain jumpy? Phentos 04:54, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

You stumbled across a vandal which keep coming back. So first, I deleted the user page he so kindly created for you and then your post to him - no use for that since he is banned. Also, please sign your posts. ~ 10:04, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Seems logical. Phentos 04:55, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks.

For doing that. I'm not sure what you meant by phony dog poo (and I probably am an idiot for it) but thanks for bothering to do something.--Naughty Budgie 10:42, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

It's a quote from one of my favorite movies - "Top Secret!" :) ~ 16:49, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

I was going to ask you a question...

but I figured out the answer myself with some help and some very confusing anti-help. Just thought I'd let you know out of what is probably politeness but might be something else (I don't know (I confuse easily)).--monika 21:58, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Errr...what? You sound even less focused than I am :) ~ 23:30, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Yes. That's exactly what I'm saying. But now with more details (feel free to not read this part, seriously): I had reverted a revert you'd made under the mistaken assumption that you probably made the revert under the assumption that it wasn't what I wanted (alternative hypothesis that only briefly crossed my mind: you hate my Marty article), with the intention of after reverting and responding to the original of researching why you originally reverted. (Instead, and I was completely aware of this at the time, I should have first researched and then reverted, but I am a bad person.) However, shortly after my re-revert, MrN9000 thoroughly confused me by providing a completely nonsensical and wrong reason for your revert, which sidetracked and train-wrecked my research, but then, while I was dealing with that, U.U. did my research for me, as he seems to be less easily confused, unless he's only giving himself 10 seconds to make a judgment. Anyway, it's unimportant, and just offered as explanation for some needless edits. If you don't follow me (which is probably your best bet), it's also covered here where 2/3rds of the people involved are not me and probably make a bit more sense, even when they are wrong and confused. --monika 00:15, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

If I might just interject... I did apologise for the "wrong" reason given at the time on your talk page before you replied to me. Rather odd that you still posted the reply. After noticing my mistake it became obvious to me why Mordillo had done the revert, but I did not consider it appropriate (at the time) to discuss this matter, suggesting that you contact Mordillo in person. You now appear to have put the review back to the state which I suggested originally [2], and I wish you luck getting a better review. MrN 00:56, Mar 15

Sorry if I sounded like I intentionally didn't acknowledge that you figured it out and stuff. (You didn't explicitly say that you figured it out, just that you'd realized you were originally also confused. So I was confused.) I posted what I had written already because I was still kind of hoping for an explanation for what you meant by that line, since it seriously seriously seriously confused me. And I was also (see post script of post in question) somewhat confused why you'd think something as deliberate as adding in comment tags and a comment inside them was accidental. I am still confused. --monika 01:06, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

My reason for not mentioning the SOC in question was because this issue is of particular sensitivity, so I just referred you to Mordillo who has been dealing with it. Regarding why I removed your comment tags... I was just trying to help. It's the convention to use the Pee Table template, and I have not seen a review before which has not used it... I hope that you are now not confused. MrN 01:36, Mar 15

I'm still confused, but that might be partially the fault of my insomnia meds kicking in. The table I'd removed in hopes of encouraging the reviewer to review outside the box, as I was hoping for a different kind of review. I'd left it there commented out to facilitate using it anyway. And also to prevent confusion in case anyone thought I did it accidentally or without thought. I have a thing for deliberateness; it comes easier to me than clarity. --monika 02:47, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

My friend Joey article

The page got deleted some 5 minutes after I created it, while I was still making corrections to it. While I would appreciate more than 5 minutes to properly finish the article, there wasn't much lacking from it and now I'm just wondering why you decided to delete it. Was it just so badly written, shitty and humorless that you found no value in it? Or did you just believe the first sentence that said it was an article written about a friend, schoolmate or schoolteacher etc.? Unless it was deleted due to the first reason, I humbly ask you to read it carefully through and decide whether it has sufficient value or potential. 84.250.123.208 22:12, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Unregistered Rascal

Yeah, sorry bout that. At first glance it looked like another vanity article, which is clearly not :). Carry on, but make sure you improve it. I placed a construction tag on it to give you some time. ~ 22:18, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. Probably needs images, but I don't feel I can improve much on the text, unless I put it on Pee Review.

Well put it over there then....And you can use UN:PIC as well. ~ 22:29, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

VFH

Mister Mordillo, not too bothered about seeing it removed from VFH, but can I ask why just a few hours after Micky the Mong got another For vote it was removed from VFH? I thought there was something in place to give articles a chance if people are still voting on them? -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

The bloody health system it was, got all coughing and sneezing all over the place. It was way below the plausible chance of getting a feature in this round, even if we consider the currently poor status of the VFH. Let me checkit again. ~ 09:17, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Yep, sorry bout that, I didn't notice he had another vote just before the closing, even though it didn't do a lot of change with regards to the health system. If you think it still got a chance, feel free to restore it. ~ 09:20, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Not too bothered, but I think other people might be in the future. Should be some kind of stay of execution if an article is still getting votes, seems that the old system used to allow for articles on a "slow burn" far more? -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

I think that as long as the VFH is as slow as it is, we can adjust the health template again to let those burn a wee bit more. ~ 16:12, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

I say we go back to Darwin. I understood it perfectly well, and the only reason it was changed is this and some Village Dump post where it was almost unianimously changed. That is to say, I have nothing useful to contribute to this discussion.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:00, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

I do think it is worth mentioning that the person who started complaining about this proclaimed themselves "trite." Just a touch of humor in that.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:01, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

I think that the health system is perfectly fine, understandable and reasonable. If any of you think otherwise, post another forum at the dump and let the people decide. ~ 18:08, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Why do you keep deleting good, funny articles? If you want to do nothing but delete funny stuff, go to Wikipedia. You should only be deleting articles if they are very offensive or if they are just stupid rather than funny.

Please stop deleting good stuff

Why do you keep deleting good, funny articles? If you want to do nothing but delete funny stuff, go to Wikipedia. You should only be deleting articles if they are very offensive or if they are just stupid rather than funny.

I've never deleted anything that didn't deserve to be deleted. Even though we're not wikipedia, we have out own standards of quality. As for the good stuff in question, be more specific so I can be as well. If it's a general remark, it was filed under the proper file. ~ 07:31, 19 March 2008 (UTC)