Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/Archive230

This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.

Trademe

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. I guess this is like the eBay of New Zealand. The article, though, is just a bunch of IPs saying that it sucks: no real concept or direction. pillow talk 21:14, February 22, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Imagine! a Web-based trading exchange has crappy products and con artists! Spıke ¬ 22:06 22-Feb-11 Delete. Coronium 10:59, February 23, 2011 (UTC) That's... just bad. 1 2 3 4 ~ 16:15, 24 February 2011
Comments

Mong

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete. Appallingly written, utterly devoid of comedic content, and only serves to attract cyberbullying of the lamest "john smith is a mong lol" kind. Kill it with fire. -- \|c\|o\|d\|e\|i\|n\|e\| 09:48, February 24, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Anyone who thinks this little compendium of cut-downs is innocuous, go back one version to see what Codeine is talking about. Spıke ¬ 11:08 24-Feb-11 Delete. Rancid. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 13:57, February 24, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Complete and thorough shit. --Scofield 14:47, February 24, 2011 (UTC) Yes. 1 2 3 4 ~ 16:39, 24 February 2011 Delete. Coronium 20:21, February 24, 2011 (UTC) Nobody cares about Mongs Mongs aren't funny. If whoever made it thinks it is, then they should start their own wiki called Mongipedia and let them do their crap. -- Lollipop** - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 21:14, February 24, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Link to diff mentioned above for illustrative purposes: http://en.uncyclopedia.co/w/index.php?title=Mong&action=historysubmit&diff=4984068&oldid=4984067 -- \|c\|o\|d\|e\|i\|n\|e\| 11:15, February 24, 2011 (UTC)

Graviton

Score: -5
Keep (5)	Copy-edited. This is not horrible nor totally stubby, though it goes back and forth in search of humor. Is it possible that Romartus would want to repair yet another of our particle-physics articles? I'll take the first stab. Spıke ¬ 16:41 21-Feb-11 Keep. I will work on it! Yay! --~ 16:56, February 21, 2011 (UTC)\ And knock yourselves out, I say. I say that. 1 2 3 4 ~ 04:16, 22 February 2011 Apparently being worked on or fixed or something. Someone close this. pillow talk 20:42, February 24, 2011 (UTC) Reluctant Keep. The article's been thoroughly rewritten, and there have been significant improvements blah blah blah...Coronium 23:37, February 24, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (0)	Delete.. Stubby, random humour. Kept 3:4 in 2007, due to the promise of a rewrite which didn't occur. Coronium 08:52, February 21, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. I said I will work on it but I don't really know what is this page about. It has difficult words for me. Could someone tell me what is this page about so I can find some images. --~ 20:04, February 21, 2011 (UTC) It's about a hypothetical subatomic particle which would explain the force of gravity. Coronium 21:55, February 21, 2011 (UTC) It's also a line of luggage from Samsonite, and a super-villain from Marvel Comics. I've added some pix; am sure Romartus will get more licks in, as the text is still all-over-the-map, but it's now clearly keepable. Spıke ¬ 22:09 22-Feb-11 kept - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 23:40, Feb 24

Template:Suicide Bomber

Score: 7
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (7)	EXTERMINATE! KILL IT WITH FIRE! - LOL vandalz Delete. Nothing links to it. Spıke ¬ 21:25 24-Feb-11 Delete.. Awful. Coronium 21:30, February 24, 2011 (UTC) Yes. 1 2 3 4 ~ 21:49, 24 February 2011 Eww. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 22:10, February 24, 2011 (UTC) Another leftover better suited for QVFD, I think. pillow talk 23:11, February 24, 2011 (UTC) Suicide Bomber! (talk) 23:13, February 24, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Trey Parker & Matt Stone

Score: 5
Keep (2)	This is nothing sublime but not worth deleting. --Shabidoo 21:34, February 22, 2011 (UTC) Keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 06:01, February 23, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (7)	Delete. If you want to read an article about men fucking men, well, here's one of them. pillow talk 21:22, February 22, 2011 (UTC) Delete. "The guy who wrote this article hasn't been funny once. Quite pathetic, as this site is supposed to be Humor-related." (From the article.) Someone start over. Spıke ¬ 21:56 22-Feb-11 Delete. Ugly, poor formatting, predictable. Coronium 10:57, February 23, 2011 (UTC) For per that faggot who left that "note" at the bottom. --Roman Dog Bird 18:54, February 23, 2011 (UTC) Yeah, what the note said. 1 2 3 4 ~ 16:21, 24 February 2011 Delete No laughs. mAttlobster. (hello) 22:20, February 24, 2011 (UTC) Ugh What is this shit -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:40, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Final Fantasy IX

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. The warning given at the start is reason enough. --Scofield 15:28, February 23, 2011 (UTC) Obliterate. The horror...The horror... Coronium 21:09, February 23, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Didn't we just?...Oh, that was Final Fantasy VIII. The last videogame you played is not necessarily of broad interest, and an article on it needs to be more than just a sardonic review; it needs a comedy theme. Spıke ¬ 11:14 24-Feb-11 Delete. Randumbo, unfunny, racist..crap. --*RomArtusImperator ®** (Orate) 14:01, February 24, 2011 (UTC) What Spike said. That, and it sucks. 1 2 3 4 ~ 16:35, 24 February 2011
Comments

Final Fantasy VIII

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	I pity the standards of Final Fantasy articles on this wiki. This one uses pretty much every tired cliche in the book-Oprah Winfrey, nonsense numbers, replacing a "c" with a "k". It's a real shame we'll have to condense the disambiguation page even further. --Scofield 15:48, February 22, 2011 (UTC) Basically just a list of characters with no real concept... unless random mentions of emoness and gayness count as a concept, but... eh. 1 2 3 4 ~ 16:39, 22 February 2011 It can go. pillow talk 21:38, February 22, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Dumb gamecruft. Spıke ¬ 22:01 22-Feb-11 Delete. Kruftwerk. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 09:05, February 23, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Someone. MAKE A BETTER CONSEPT!!! Cat the Colourful**
Comments	Comment. I think now wouldn't be a bad time to discuss the future of the general Final Fantasy article. I originally made it to replace another deleted page and served the purpose of a disambig page for all the other game pages. However, with all the individual game pages being deleted, it's slowly losing its purpose. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 12:25, February 23, 2011 (UTC) Move it to my userspace, I'll work some magic. --Scofield 15:21, February 23, 2011 (UTC)

Game:Life (with cheats) (and subpages)

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Boring -- The Zombiebaron 09:33, February 22, 2011 (UTC) Delete. - very little effort went into this. Coronium 10:48, February 22, 2011 (UTC) Delete. This is hopeless. --Scofield 14:22, February 22, 2011 (UTC) Smite. - Another n00b 15:33, February 22, 2011 (UTC) Incomplete, not funny, pointless... 1 2 3 4 ~ 16:36, 22 February 2011 Shit! pillow talk 21:41, February 22, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Game:Grue Master (and subpages)

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Do we really need this? We already have the monster epic Grueslayer -- The Zombiebaron 09:07, February 22, 2011 (UTC) Derivative, inconsistent formatting as well as content, not funny, doesn't go anywhere... 1 2 3 4 ~ 16:35, 22 February 2011 Delete. --Black Flamingo 21:08, February 22, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Painfully unfunny. Literally caused me pain. Ouch. pillow talk 22:50, February 22, 2011 (UTC) Delete. It's not so bad, but like Zombiebaron said, we already have Game:Grueslayer. --Scofield 07:27, February 23, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Game:Death Row (and subpages)

Score: 5
Keep (1)	Keep. This game is so bad, it's good. - Another n00b 15:30, February 22, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (6)	Another crappy game -- The Zombiebaron 08:44, February 22, 2011 (UTC) Delete. I agree, this is shit. Coronium 10:47, February 22, 2011 (UTC) Smite. This is just dreadful. --Scofield 15:54, February 22, 2011 (UTC) Oh, look... it's ~~Zork~~ 1 2 3 4 ~ 16:32, 22 February 2011 Delete. --Black Flamingo 21:01, February 22, 2011 (UTC) Delete. This game is so bad, it's FUCKING TERRIBLE. pillow talk 22:25, February 22, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Forum:What are Categories for?

Score: -5
Keep (8)	Snore MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 03:12, February 22, 2011 (UTC) Keep. I started this forum in earnest, not to "make the wiki lame," nor do I think that the other side is out to make the wiki lame. Some dickery ensued in the Forum, but none that argues for deleting the transcript. Spıke ¬ 03:23 22-Feb-11 Cheesecake? 1 2 3 4 ~ 04:15, 22 February 2011 Keep -- The Zombiebaron 04:32, February 22, 2011 (UTC) Keep. We can always depend to Mnbvcxz to become a parody of himself. His trolling has become a sophisticated art, I salut you Sir.--Sycamore (Talk) 08:53, February 22, 2011 (UTC) Keep Some things are stupid/annoying, but as I was involved in the misuse of categories, I do not find this stupid/annoying. mAttlobster. (hello) 09:18, February 22, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Since when did we nominate Forum discussions for deletion? --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 16:22, February 22, 2011 (UTC) Zombiebaron. -- 22:13, February 22, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Delete. the misuse of categories on this page will appear stupid/annoying to everyone except those involved in inside joke. I think this falls under fouling up the wiki and making it lame as opposed to funny >rules. The forum post is over 7 days old, and I am aware that forumspace nominations have been invalidated in the past. --Mn-z 03:11, February 22, 2011 (UTC) Diiiiiiiiiiiiiiicks -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 03:43, February 22, 2011 (UTC) Instead of removing Category:People who didn't fuck your mom in the kitchen last night from all pages and then QVFD'ing it, let's just remove all pages it's on from the wiki and then QVFD it. pillow talk 21:43, February 22, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Deleted, until somebody pointed me to the score over here. Fine, keep it. FINE.

Uncyclopedophile

Score: 2
Keep (1)	Keep --Shabidoo 11:34, February 21, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Delete. Pretty poor concept, lame execution, and basically duplicates content found in Uncyclopedophilia, which is a marginally better article. Coronium 08:46, February 21, 2011 (UTC) Delete and redirect. Uncyclopedia writing more obscure pages about Uncyclopedia is a poor concept, compared to writing about something that someone on the outside cares about. This article manufactures an obsessed character in order to cut him down. Merge if you prefer. Spıke ¬ 16:37 21-Feb-11 Aye, redirect; I'm not seeing not much redeeming value here, nor much of anything worth merging. 1 2 3 4 ~ 19:56, 21 February 2011
Comments	Both these articles are fairly comparable - they need to be merged. You should probably tag them with {{Merge}} or do this yourself.--Sycamore (Talk) 08:48, February 21, 2011 (UTC) I considered merge and redirect, but I couldn't find any content on Uncyclopedophile worth merging, and I've been told off before for unilaterally redirecting articles. Coronium 08:59, February 21, 2011 (UTC) It's better not to extinguish even such mediocre content unilaterally, though you might have been told off partly based on your newness. Spıke ¬ 16:37 21-Feb-11 'Redirected.' -- The Zombiebaron 08:56, February 22, 2011 (UTC)

Intahnet

Score: 9
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (9)	EXTERMINATE! Wow.... I didn't know an article could be that badly written. And What's With All The Red Links? - Another n00b 18:18, February 20, 2011 (UTC) Delete. No idea how to be funny. No one needs an article on the Internet spelled "Intahnet." Virtually unchanged (and hopefully unread) since 2005. Tag it, next time, Dillweed. Spıke ¬ 19:08 20-Feb-11 Delete. --Roman Dog Bird 20:07, February 20, 2011 (UTC) Uh. Bad. Urk. Lurg? 1 2 3 4 ~ 20:27, 20 February 2011 Good God man (talk) 21:24, February 20, 2011 (UTC) A 3 year-old could make a better article. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 21:32, February 20, 2011 (UTC) EXTERMINATE! --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 12:42, February 21, 2011 (UTC) NOT GOOD ENOUGH! cracks whip. --Scofield 15:04, February 21, 2011 (UTC) Delete. It Lacks teh funneh -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 15:05, February 21, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Asian Timing Syndrome

Score: -1
Keep (4)	Keep. I think this could be reworked into something good. Hell, I'll do it if this is indeed kept! --Scofield 08:37, February 20, 2011 (UTC) Keep. What Scofield said. --~ 09:26, February 20, 2011 (UTC) keeep – Preceding unsigned comment added by Shabidoo (talk • contribs) Keep. --Roman Dog Bird 17:46, February 20, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Delete. Short, random and unfunny. Coronium 14:08, February 19, 2011 (UTC) Either way, it's bad. 1 2 3 4 ~ 15:23, 19 February 2011 Please to delete, its stupid, unfunny and wasting my time by existing - The admirable Lord Frosty the Snowman 02:35, February 20, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Not short, not random, not entirely unfunny. The page title fails; it is dryly clinical and doesn't look like anything you want to read. The humor concept exists: national stereotypes of Asians as either manic or terminally lazy. (Did you forget Latin America?) Casting it as a disease is trite. The obscene rant at the reader in Section 2 isn't funny at all. Section 3 is listcruft and it is offputting that it's organized by skin color. Spıke ¬ 14:14 19-Feb-11 FYI: People from Latin America aren't Asian. -- The Zombiebaron 18:01, February 19, 2011 (UTC) You are right. But they are also chronically late--and in fact, they not only accept but initiate ridicule about it. One of Fujimori's grand reforms was a new "Peruvian Standard Time" of punctuality. Didn't take. Spıke ¬ 18:32 19-Feb-11 Late? What? You are lucky if someone shows up!!! ;) – Preceding unsigned comment added by Shabidoo (talk • contribs) I'm calling this 'ho kept. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 19:55, Feb 21

Game:Everquest! (and subpages)

Score: 9
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (9)	Oh god please make it stop -- The Zombiebaron 07:53, February 20, 2011 (UTC) Delete.. No plot or concept, and I got pretty quickly bored of being eaten by grues. Coronium 08:37, February 20, 2011 (UTC) Delete. The more you play it, the more awful it gets. --Scofield 08:43, February 20, 2011 (UTC) Oh, my... and why grues at all, for that matter? 1 2 3 4 ~ 16:37, 20 February 2011 Delete. --Roman Dog Bird 17:44, February 20, 2011 (UTC) Gruequest. Fuck this game. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 18:05, February 20, 2011 (UTC) Delete.. I wonder how anyone could have thought this was a good idea. pillow talk 18:18, February 20, 2011 (UTC) Delete. --Black Flamingo 20:53, February 20, 2011 (UTC) Delete. and burn the evidence! GEORGIEGIBBONS ^talk _{contributions} 21:14, February 20, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Game:The Room (and subpages)

Score: 3
Keep (1)	Keep it as a template. At least its complete, though rather short for a game and yes, boring, but templates usually are. Simsilikesims 06:38, February 20, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (4)	So boring. -- The Zombiebaron 10:54, February 19, 2011 (UTC) Nothing happens, nobody comes, nobody goes, it's awful! Oh, if only it even had that much to it... except that'd be plagiarism or something. But still, I think you get the idea. 1 2 3 4 ~ 11:11, 19 February 2011 Gruecruft --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 14:16, February 19, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Zork does the same thing in a much, much better way. --Scofield 14:31, February 19, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Aurora Borealis

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Redirect to Aurora. Randumbo and preachy; only illustration is hosted externally. Spıke ¬ 15:38 18-Feb-11 Redirect to Aurora. Per Spike. Coronium 08:50, February 19, 2011 (UTC) Delete and redirect. Per Spike. Nice work:)--Sycamore (Talk) 09:06, February 19, 2011 (UTC) Yup. 1 2 3 4 ~ 10:20, 19 February 2011 Said it all really - The admirable Lord Frosty the Snowman 02:37, February 20, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Redirected. -- The Zombiebaron 07:52, February 20, 2011 (UTC)

Aurora

Score: -4
Keep (4)	Aurora.mp3 (file info) Narration by Spike, 4:19, 2.98 Mb Keep. Is a real article with a comedy concept and a link to something in the real world (which the Northeast US did not enjoy last night because of full moon and persistent cloud cover). Too much sporked text and too many red links, but repairable. Spıke ¬ 14:23 18-Feb-11 Renamed from Aurora Sexualis and rewritten. There is still, also, Aurora Borealis, also in bad shape. Can you say "merge"? Spıke ¬ 14:30 18-Feb-11 No waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay! --Shabidoo 14:57, February 18, 2011 (UTC) Keep. I like the rewrite. Coronium 08:53, February 19, 2011 (UTC) Yup. 1 2 3 4 ~ 10:20, 19 February 2011
Delete (0)	Delete. Lame sequence of sexual puns, no real concept. Coronium 13:52, February 18, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Please learn from the creator Illinois Fred (who has been gone for five years). Sporking an article, changing all long words to a different long word, and replacing all numbers with a nonsense number, produces: Unfunny. Spıke ¬ 15:10 18-Feb-11 Kept -- The Zombiebaron 03:37, February 20, 2011 (UTC)

5318008 (Illuminati document)

Score: 3
Keep (2)	Keep. - Another n00b 22:14, February 17, 2011 (UTC) Keep. It's pretty ugly. And short at that. But I kinda like it. -- 15:04, February 18, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (5)	Big number, more random. 1 2 3 4 ~ 16:19, 17 February 2011 Delete. Huff 'em all. Spıke ¬ 22:18 17-Feb-11 Delete. Coronium 13:48, February 18, 2011 (UTC) SPARE NONE THE FUCKING BLADE!!!! --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 15:44, February 18, 2011 (UTC) WHAT WILYTANK SAID!!!! --Scofield 09:37, February 19, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

28599 (Illuminati document)

Score: 3
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (3)	...bliss generators? Guuh, perhaps there is some workable stuff here, but it's just a giant ugly list as it is. 1 2 3 4 ~ 16:19, 17 February 2011 Delete. Huff 'em all. Spıke ¬ 22:18 17-Feb-11 Delete. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 22:58, February 17, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

14075 (Illuminati document)

Score: 3
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (3)	Comparing Disney World to the third reich, are we? That could actually be a workable concept... but innit just code for something? And there's not a whole lot else, unfortunately. 1 2 3 4 ~ 16:19, 17 February 2011 Delete. Huff 'em all. Spıke ¬ 22:18 17-Feb-11 Ugh. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 22:55, February 17, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

13502 (Illuminati document)

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Back to seemingly random code again... still not really funny. 1 2 3 4 ~ 16:19, 17 February 2011 Delete. Huff 'em all. Spıke ¬ 22:18 17-Feb-11 Smite. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 22:53, February 17, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Coronium 13:48, February 18, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	I don't know which idiot screwed it up, but I've fixed the table's coding. --Scofield 16:58, February 18, 2011 (UTC)

07701 (Illuminati document)

Score: 3
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (3)	Ooo, a weapon! But where is the satire? Humour, funnies... etc? 1 2 3 4 ~ 16:19, 17 February 2011 Delete. Huff 'em all. Spıke ¬ 22:18 17-Feb-11 Obliterate. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 22:49, February 17, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

04933 (Illuminati document)

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Let's reformulate Coca-cola. 1 2 3 4 ~ 16:19, 17 February 2011 Delete. Huff 'em all. Spıke ¬ 22:18 17-Feb-11 more like Cocka-Cola --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 22:44, February 17, 2011 (UTC) Delete. If this had any sort of backstory, I would have voted "Keep". --Scofield 09:41, February 19, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

01449 (Illuminati document)

Score: 3
Keep (1)	Keep. - Another n00b 14:38, February 18, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (4)	Of course it seems to be referring to something - how many 'happiest places on earth' do we know of? - but putting something in code doesn't inherently make it funny. 1 2 3 4 ~ 16:19, 17 February 2011 Huh? --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 20:54, February 17, 2011 (UTC) Delete.. per above. Coronium 22:06, February 17, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Huff 'em all. Spıke ¬ 22:18 17-Feb-11
Comments

Template:Il-doc

Score: 5
Keep (3)	Keep It's meant to mock secret government documents and it does so just fine. Perhaps we could condense these into one article, but it certainly doesn't merit deletion. Secondly, when the Hell did it become okay to do blanket nominations like this? Oh wait, it isn't. Nominate them one-by-one or don't bother. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 05:04, February 17, 2011 (UTC) Keep. I find this an entertaining read. - Another n00b 21:56, February 17, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Just in case some good ones come along. --Scofield 09:44, February 19, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (8)	Essentially orphaned, these documents, nothing more than numbers, contain seeming randomness... presumably code for something. Is there anything here? 1 2 3 4 ~ 04:59, 17 February 2011 I agree with Lyrithya, totally meaningless set of numbers which is just confusing and wasting precious bytes on the wiki. - The admirable Lord Frosty the Snowman 09:39, February 17, 2011 (UTC) Delete. I recall a skit where a couple people troll a newcomer by saying they have reduced their best jokes to numbers, "telling" one another numbers, and laughing like crazy. That was funny. This article isn't. Spıke ¬ 11:59 17-Feb-11 Delete.. These illuminati "documents" are more cryptic than funny. Coronium 22:06, February 17, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Get's the same treatment as the rest of them. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 22:41, February 17, 2011 (UTC) Delete the template, condense the rest into a single page -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 22:49, February 18, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Give it a last cigarette, tie the blindfold and shoot at will. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 23:13, February 18, 2011 (UTC) Delete The darkness has fallen. mAttlobster.** (hello) 10:01, February 19, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Actually, Dexter makes a good point - I brought them here as a bulk because like a game and its subpages, they make next to no sense on their own, and deleting some without the rest would be arbitrary at best, but unlike a game and its subpages, a user may be less inclined to actually look at these, since the template really is a separate affair. Hells, people don't always look at game subpages, for that matter. On the other hand... there are a lot of them... 1 2 3 4 ~ 16:19, 17 February 2011 You need to specify what you want deleted, but we don't need an individual vote on each page, nor the possibility that the template will be deleted and some of its components will live on as orphans. Spıke ¬ 17:57 17-Feb-11 I did specify. But people are idiots. Think of the children! 1 2 3 4 ~ 17:58, 17 February 2011 Perhaps I should say "you need to spell out what you want deleted" in more detail than "these documents." Also, not refer to idiots; not even Dexter, who has very different standards from mine on what should stay and go. Spıke ¬ 19:08 17-Feb-11 Oh, I see... right. But is Dexter an idiot? He seems more strange to me than idiotic... then again, I'm also an idiot, so what do I know? Seriously, would a not an idiot have done that? points up 1 2 3 4 ~ 20:10, 17 February 2011 Comment.I've got a copy in userspace of all of this so I don't care. HUFF AWAY! - Another n00b 20:08, February 18, 2011 (UTC)

AAS

Score: 2
Keep (2)	Keep I like it. It's pretty funny. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 03:41, February 17, 2011 (UTC) Keep. It's stubby, but it's not damnably bad. Coronium 13:47, February 18, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (4)	This has a notion, I suppose, but even the author admitted it's entirely made-up and whatnot, and it does not seem to be going anywhere. 1 2 3 4 ~ 02:44, 17 February 2011 Delete. The big non-secret about acronyms is that they are not as creative as their authors think. They are groaners, whether those contriving to make the words fit are Uncyclopedians or Republicans (think U.S.A. P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act, the mother of all acronyms, and I don't remember what it stood for). You could lampoon the use of acronyms as a substitute for skill, but this author just throws a bunch of them as us--as uncreative as usual. Spıke ¬ 03:05 17-Feb-11 Delete. W.T.F.? Lol, get it?--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 03:47, February 17, 2011 (UTC) Delete. It's going to remain a stunted runt. An improvement would entail complete demolition which seems a bit pointless. --*RomArtusImperator ®** (Orate) 09:17, February 19, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Melbourne High School

Score: 0
Keep (1)	keep because there is no article to verify (none of the links leads me to anything that I can read, to say anything about anything) and well, better to assume good faith no????????????????????????????
Delete (1)	I deleted this article on February 17th after seeing it come up on Recent Changes, because I thought it was vanity. Then I got a complaint on my talkpage from Homeworld33, who claims that "its NOT just a vanity page. It'd almost be the equivalent of deleting the pages of Harvard or Oxford universities." So I undeleted it. And now I'm bringing it here, to VFD, because I still feel it should be deleted. -- The Zombiebaron 04:52, February 19, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	I am going to get behind your unilateral deletion by bilaterally deleting it again. That is clear vanity and clear awful. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 04:56, February 19, 2011 (UTC)

Aristocrats and baby chicks

Score: -10
Keep (12)	So let me get this straight, the two people who want to delete this don't have flash. Go figure. Look, this isn't just some vanity youtube video, it was made specifically for uncyclopedia. Don't deprive other people of good tasteless comedy just because you don't have flash and feel left out. This is no different than A wizard or euroipods. It's not like no work went into it. A whole shitload of work went into it. Don't believe me? You try downloading a video off of youtube, converting it into a different program, recording your own audio, syncing that audio with the video, recording a second audio of the baby chicks making their various little sounds, synching that with the video, exporting it, and then converting it back into a video that youtube can use. Can you understand why I might be unhappy now that you want to delete this? User:Mrthejazz/sig 02:52, February 17, 2011 (UTC) Don't get abusive. This site is a fake encyclopedia, not a method to hump our latest performances, whether your latest YouTube video or someone else's political manifesto or Master's thesis. The amount of work that went into it is not a factor. Spıke ¬ 03:10 17-Feb-11 Look, I did get irate and I already apologized. I'll own up to that. Still, at what point was I exactly "abusive"? Was it the part where I pointed out that neither the person who nommed this or the person who voted against it had actually seen it? You are literally criticizing my work going into it blind. It would be like me loading up one of your articles, reading the title, and saying "Well this sucks." VFD. Of course I'm going to be upset. I don't understand this hatred for videos anyway. We may be a parody, but there's no real place to put uploaded videos, and the internet offers that extra medium. If we're all about satire, then a video can accomplish that just the same as a traditional article can. My face isn't on it, it's not vanity. What is the problem here? User:Mrthejazz/sig 03:31, February 17, 2011 (UTC) I hadn't seen your apology. Abusive was writing, "just because you don't have flash and feel left out." Spıke ¬ 03:38 17-Feb-11 Obvious keep Mrthejizz put it best when he said "FUCK YOU!" Unfortunately, Mrthejazz has to be civil and give more logic to his replies than Mrthejizz does. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 03:17, February 17, 2011 (UTC) Strong Keep If it's against policy then it's the admin's jobs to do something about it. Not users'. (talk) 03:19, February 17, 2011 (UTC) Strong keep I am dumbfounded as to why this was even nominated for deletion. --EMC^[TALK]03:50 Feb 17 2011 come on --Roman Dog Bird 04:32, February 17, 2011 (UTC) Keep. And the Hot Dog Factory vid somewhere on Wonder Showzen is kick-ass too, but not made by "one of us" of course. And I personally like this page with just a little text, like Jazz and Dexter have fashioned, although I can see the quality of just leaving it be too. Aleister 5:54 17-2-'11 Uh. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 08:17, February 17, 2011 (UTC) Strong Keep or something. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:56, 17 February 2011 Absolutely fking keep I laughed out loud during the video. this is VFH material. - Another n00b 11:24, February 17, 2011 (UTC) Keep*. I've wanted to make an Uncyclopedia video for some time. Yes, the idea of embedding a YouTube video in an Uncyclopedia frame is weird, since the material is technically over there, not here, and so it doesn't feel like a contribution to the wiki so much as a pointer to a contributor's "other work." But unless we have another place to upload videos (can Wikimedia host them??), it's just going to have to be YouTube. And excluding the video format entirely just isn't good for the project. So... tl;dr: Keep. pillow talk 19:39, February 17, 2011 (UTC) Having videos on Uncyclopedia should not be discouraged. Ummm, the only thing I find remotely funny about this is ofcourse the last line (though you can barely hear it). But I can also imagine that the disturbing images makes people squeem and find that funny. That's more than good enough for me to vote against deleting (its not like this is VFH which Im sure would make an even more explosive, abusive, irrate, shocking, controversial and dramatic moment in uncyclopedia history that would be forgotten tomorrow). --Shabidoo 20:37, February 17, 2011 (UTC) Keep.* That video is really awesome. I can't see where the problem is. --~ 20:45, February 17, 2011 (UTC) Keep. per above and stuff. --Mn-z 21:55, February 17, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (2)	No article, just a video... which is all very well and fine, except I wasn't aware the Uncyclopedia mainspace was for framing videos... 1 2 3 4 ~ 02:24, 17 February 2011 Delete. Indeed I recently read someone in authority say that it isn't. And as I have Flash disabled, this appears to be an empty page. Spıke ¬ 02:34 17-Feb-11
Comments	Sorry I took that a little personal, but it's extremely frustrating to put a lot of time into something and then have somebody want to delete it either because of "some rule" or because they're unwilling to meet just a little in the middle to understand it. If you don't want flash or have it disabled, that's fine, but don't punish me for it.User:Mrthejazz/sig 03:09, February 17, 2011 (UTC) People, VFD is not a talk page. Read the rules, yo. There's a reason why that's there, namely to prevent users from pissing off one another if one user nominates a page by another user. So yeah, shut up and just vote KEEP. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 03:37, February 17, 2011 (UTC) Jack - so who decides policy? Who upholds policy? Who changes policy? Ultimately, the admins are just other users with a few extra tools and a whole lot more hassle; it's up to the lot of the folks, both sorts, to come to some sort of consensus or the entire thing falls apart. Yes, banning the naysayers or leaving angrily in a huff or whatnot are ways to come to a consensus, but... can't ban everyone. My point in nominating this, however, is not related to policy or effort, as I cannot speak to either. Indeed, it is a fine video, and fitting the ideas of Uncyclopedia, but that doesn't mean it belongs here as the entirety of a stand-alone article, either. If it indeed stands alone, then can it not do that where it is? This is a wiki, not a frame for our personal media - even UnTunes have more than just audio media on the pages. As I see it, like images in general, videos can make useful components in articles, or what passes for articles around here, but also like images, just pasting one on a page all by its lonesome does not make for an article. 1 2 3 4 ~ 03:54, 17 February 2011 Comment. So does this mean anyone can download from Youtube, YouPorn etc and add an uncyclopedian twist to it, it then becomes ok as an article (and as long as you have Flash too)? --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 09:31, February 17, 2011 (UTC) Anyone can do anything, in any medium, anywhere on the web. The real question is whether you can use Uncyclopedia pages as advertisements of your works elsewhere. Spıke ¬ 14:44 17-Feb-11 I did mean this website, sorry I wasn't clearer in my rhetorical question. --RomArtusImperator ®* (Orate) 17:15, February 17, 2011 (UTC) Comment. My heart goes out to that one percent that doesn't have flash. [1] Romartus does ask a valid question. Myself, I didn't just rip off some video. The video was made for uncyclopedia. Given the format of everything, youtube was a workaround. Can't we pwease have a widdle weniency?User:Mrthejazz/sig 13:47, February 17, 2011 (UTC) Kept. -- The Zombiebaron 05:06, February 18, 2011 (UTC)

Game:VMSCE

Score: 1
Keep (1)	Keep. This doesn't deserve deletion. - Another n00b 20:42, February 16, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (2)	I've tried to save this in the past but it's not an original concept and it's looking even more out of date. I'm giving up on it, and leaving it there encourages more clunky text-based games. Pup 08:32 16 Feb '11 Since this is mostly PotR's thing, far as I know, I'll just go along with what he said. Is that wrong? 1 2 3 4 ~ 17:41, 17 February 2011
Comments	Kept. -- The Zombiebaron 05:03, February 18, 2011 (UTC)

1927 in Tossbagia

Score: 3
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (3)	Eh? 1 2 3 4 ~ 02:41, 17 February 2011 1927 is a year that happened probably happened some time ago and intro loses me. Listcruft in scatologia. Spıke ¬ 03:02 17-Feb-11 Obliterate. Mindless nonsense. Coronium 22:07, February 17, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

۩

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Another n00b had replaced this with just the character itself, something which quickly looses its charm after the first few times, far as I'm concerned. On the other hand, what was there was a random, nonsensical stub, so now I'm all for chucking the entire thing. 1 2 3 4 ~ 02:15, 17 February 2011 Delete. Rather than create a character and ramble about it, this does so with a character of the alphabet, though I don't know whose, and am amazed that it renders on my PC. Another n00b's recent broadcast to a lot of people, doesn't. Spıke ¬ 02:33 17-Feb-11 Weak delete. Obviously, we have "Snowman" and "Sun," so why not Another n00b's "House". But on the other hand, we don't actually need Another n00b's "House," and, you're absolutely right, pages that just show us characters are not very charming. Not even the first time, really. Snowman is probably our worst feature, unless you count Senator or the first Euroipods. pillow talk 20:00, February 17, 2011 (UTC) Delete.. The article is pretty lame, and I'm struggling to see any possible developments. Coronium 22:10, February 17, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Oooh, ahhh!

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Short, repetitive, one of many articles lacking actual articliness about them, and unlike some, there doesn't even appear to be a joke save for that it exists. 1 2 3 4 ~ 02:08, 17 February 2011 Oooh! Someone saw AAAAAAAAA and said, "I can do that." But AAAAAAAAA is funny in a lot of different ways, and this one is only really funny based on an illustration--~~which was pirated from somewhere else.~~ Spıke ¬ 02:30 17-Feb-11 Weak Delete I can't see this getting any better, but if someone thinks they can write more I'll gladly switch. (talk) 03:05, February 17, 2011 (UTC) AAAAAAAAA! was only funny the first time. --Mn-z 03:37, February 18, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	The wheel of fortune pic is a great idea for a pic in an article. Has that been done before? --Shabidoo 02:42, February 17, 2011 (UTC) Yes--look closely at the lower right--on someone else's web site! Spıke ¬ 02:54 17-Feb-11 That's just the watermark for a site where you can make any wheel of fortune pic like that. I did one too. (talk) 03:05, February 17, 2011 (UTC) OK, then, not pirated, just manufactured. Spıke ¬ 03:12 17-Feb-11

Crap trolls

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	A short stubbly affair that manages to be random at best. 1 2 3 4 ~ 02:01, 17 February 2011 "Trolls that attempt to be trolls." In fact, it is the article that fails, starting with the intro. Nonsense year number, {{USERNAME}}, George W. Bush, and a list. Spıke ¬ 02:27 17-Feb-11 Delete. Utter rubbish. --Scofield 12:22, February 17, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Neither wit nor wisdom will improve this.--*RomArtusImperator ®** (Orate) 17:18, February 17, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Game:The Beatles' Career

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete. Shit. - Another n00b 20:45, February 16, 2011 (UTC) Weak delete. I didn't entirely hate what was there, but it was obviously completely unfinished and has sat in that state for about a year. pillow talk 21:20, February 16, 2011 (UTC) Strong Delete Seriously? I'll get Paul McCartney and Ringo Starr and get them to jumpn the fool that made the article. Then i'll get the ghosts of Lennon and Harrison. -- Go Crazy Awards ~ Contribs ~ Gallery ~ Piglet 21:24, February 16, 2011 (UTC) poop poop poop pooop --Roman Dog Bird 23:46, February 16, 2011 (UTC) Yawn! --Scofield 12:20, February 17, 2011 (UTC) Not worth the pages that contain it. 1 2 3 4 ~ 17:42, 17 February 2011
Comments

Selena Gomez

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Random, meme-ridden, cliched, and thoroughly unfunny. --Scofield 13:24, February 16, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Gomez should have a page here, but this one is miscoded and seriously dumb from start to finish. Spıke ¬ 13:44 16-Feb-11 Delete. DJ Mixerr 23:44, February 16, 2011 (UTC) User:DJ Mixerr/sig ?????????? --Roman Dog Bird 23:49, February 16, 2011 (UTC) Delete. I was in the process of remaking this article even before this was put up on vfd.--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 03:52, February 17, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Je (element)

Score: -1
Keep (2)	Well It's not good, but I don't think it's bad enough to delete. (talk) 20:41, February 14, 2011 (UTC) Agree --Shabidoo 15:56, February 15, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (1)	Delete.. The article's concept is basically that Jesus is a chemical element, and it goes downhill from there. Coronium 16:59, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	I've fixed the bizarre coding and red-links. The template at the end documents our many interpretations of Jesus; casting him as an element is dicey but not inherently bad. The article, however, is merely a long bunch of Fun Facts. Spıke ¬ 17:11 14-Feb-11 The concept is probably doable, but the execution is so poor that anyone wanting to rewrite would have to start from scratch. Coronium 17:16, February 14, 2011 (UTC) Kept. -- The Zombiebaron 09:06, February 17, 2011 (UTC)

Invasion of Wikiland

Score: 0
Keep (2)	Keep. I like it.--Sycamore (Talk) 16:14, February 15, 2011 (UTC) Keep. - Another n00b 22:58, February 15, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (2)	Delete.. It's basically The Pun Invasion of Uncyclopedia without the puns. Random and unfunny. Coronium 16:55, February 14, 2011 (UTC) Obliterate. Get this out of here. (talk) 20:40, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	I groan rather than laugh when Uncyclopedia writes about itself, including in this 2006 article. Did Ghelae write it to inform Wikipedia that its very best writers had declared independence? But the flag and the quotes in Middle English are skillful. Spıke ¬ 17:05 14-Feb-11 Someone save that flag, its truly awsome!!! --Shabidoo 20:28, February 14, 2011 (UTC) Kept. -- The Zombiebaron 09:06, February 17, 2011 (UTC)

Positron

Score: 1
Keep (2)	Keep. Our subatomic particles family is an institution, and it doesn't bother me that the humor concept here is unrelated to real-life positrons. Romartus has repaired several other articles in this family; perhaps he has something to contribute here. Spıke ¬ 15:35 13-Feb-11 Keep --Shabidoo 01:01, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Delete. Totally unrelated to positrons or humor. --Count of Monkey Crisco 14:57, February 13, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Not about the subject. No redeeming features. Coronium 15:08, February 13, 2011 (UTC) Romartus may have been volunteered, but I still reckon this might as well be deleted in the meantime. Stab me if you really disagree and I'll change my vote, though. 1 2 3 4 ~ 01:52, 14 February 2011 It will be sad story Lyrithya for Valentine's Day. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 19:06, February 14, 2011 (UTC) Perhaps, but I have to ask... is that a knife in your pocket, or are you just happy to see me? 1 2 3 4 ~ 19:15, 14 February 2011 ...Morton's fork, Occam's Razor, a Swiss Army knife and a Runcible Spoon, take your pick Lyrithya but I can happily leave all those behind as I am always happy to see you. --RomArtusImperator ®* (Orate) 07:09, February 16, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. I have agreed to be conscripted as per Spike's request. Like the 'I want a willing volunteer for this mission. Romartus, step forward...--*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 00:03, February 14, 2011 (UTC) Kept**. -- The Zombiebaron 09:04, February 17, 2011 (UTC)

Wherethefuckistan

Score: 2
Keep (3)	Amusing in the early stages. Not really bad enough. --Scofield 13:38, February 13, 2011 (UTC) Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 15:39, February 13, 2011 (UTC) Keep Not vanity at all. The names in the article are purposely some of the most common names in the English language for Fuck's-sakes. Secondly, the concept of the article is great and so is it's implementation. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:41, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (5)	Delete. No concept, and way too random and badly written to be funny. Coronium 18:39, February 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. I don't think the title is our humor, and the text is overt vanity. Spıke ¬ 21:23 11-Feb-11 Yeah. 1 2 3 4 ~ 18:00, 12 February 2011 Delete this stoned nonsense. What isn't random here is pure vanity. Maybe they should have named it Whatthefuckistan. Simsilikesims 23:36, February 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete.Like the Who's Becky Stan? (Uzbekistan) joke but less funny. --*RomArtusImperator ®** (Orate) 08:28, February 13, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Kept. -- The Zombiebaron 09:03, February 17, 2011 (UTC)

Contrary to unpopular belief

Score: 3
Keep (4)	Keep. If you remove some of the listiness, there's still a keepable stub left. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:31, 12 February 2011 Keep. Yeah I think there's funny in there. Listicide and work...--Sycamore (Talk) 14:27, February 12, 2011 (UTC) kip kip kip – Preceding unsigned comment added by Shabidoo (talk • contribs) Keep. Barely adequate, list needs work. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Count of Monkey Crisco (talk • contribs)
Delete (7)	Delete. A very listy interpretation of Captain Obvious... It's just that he is hilarious and this article is only tedious. --TheSlyFox 09:46, February 12, 2011 (UTC) I could care less. Take a cliché, one that, in my personal opinion, should never be used in Uncyclopedia. Negate it, to wring out the meaning and ensure that no one finds your page. Then fill it with blather and a list. Spıke ¬ 12:21 12-Feb-11 Delete.. This is just a list tacked onto a lamish introduction. Coronium 17:47, February 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Should be demolished, loaded into a skip and removed. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 08:24, February 13, 2011 (UTC) Delete.** Funerals are more humorous. - Another n00b 19:05, February 13, 2011 (UTC) And lo... nothing happens. Pffft. 1 2 3 4 ~ 17:29, 14 February 2011 Doesn't have much redeeming value in its current state. --Scofield 13:58, February 16, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	This could become a proper article. I'll sit out here and hope someone turns it into one. eyes Sycamore and Socky 1 2 3 4 ~ 18:12, 12 February 2011

UnBooks:Life EULA

Score: 4
Keep (1)	Keep – Preceding unsigned comment added by Shabidoo (talk • contribs)
Delete (5)	Delete. This may be a viable concept, but it's unacceptable in its current form, and since it's the work of a permabanned user, it's unlikely to improve. pillow talk 20:26, February 15, 2011 (UTC) Delete. I was unaware that he ever ventured off people's talk pages to other namespaces. This spork-and-randomize is as uncharming as most of the commercial adaptations of Christmas carols. Yes, the concept could work. Spıke ¬ 20:50 15-Feb-11 Delete.. Thirding "good concept, bad execution". --BLU Scoutgineer 00:27, February 16, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Sockhog. There will be a blizzard of page blanking by the said ex-contributor once he sees this has gone. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 07:15, February 16, 2011 (UTC) If we stay our hand because of that--"the terrorists win." Spıke ¬ 13:45 16-Feb-11 weak delete** Yes, this suffers from poor organization and bad writing. However, it has a lot of potential, and I'll flip if anybody decides to work on it. --Scofield 11:42, February 16, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	On second thought shouldn't we put this on IC? But it does seem rather dead to me.....--Scofield 11:53, February 16, 2011 (UTC)

Command & Conquer 3: Kane's Waffles

Score: 4
Keep (3)	Keep. This isn't bad enough. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:22, 11 February 2011 Keep. I'd go along with Dole Tintin on this. Just not bad enough,--Sycamore (Talk) 21:23, February 11, 2011 (UTC) I like waffles. 1 2 3 4 ~ 17:59, 12 February 2011
Delete (7)	Delete. Forcibly inserting the theme of waffles into something does not constitute parody. Essentially copying the lyrics of Phantom of the Opera (and adding waffles) does not constitute a clever theme. This is a bad concept badly executed.--Count of Monkey Crisco 12:17, February 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. In our sprawling slum of Command & Conquer articles (see the template at the bottom of the page), this article adds nothing--except waffles. Spıke ¬ 14:21 11-Feb-11 Delete. --Black Flamingo 14:55, February 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete.. Waffles are not inherently funny, and I'm struggling to find anything else in this article. Coronium 18:40, February 11, 2011 (UTC) WWWWWWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTTTTTTTT??????????????? too digusted to say anything--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 13:49, February 13, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Perilously close to incoherent nonsense. I can't distinguish the jokes I'm not in on from the utterly random. Dislike. pillow talk 20:32, February 15, 2011 (UTC) Delete Video game article. mAttlobster. (hello) 15:41, February 16, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Parents Music Resource Center

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	So, yeah, I'm all like, hey, I was rewriting this in userspace, and I was wondering if anyone would object to a big ol' replacement of it. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 06:02, Feb 15 Nope do it. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 06:05, February 15, 2011 (UTC) Let me tell you a little story, children... Do it. Replacement article at least has a point. Spıke ¬ 11:51 15-Feb-11 REIGN IN BLOOOOD!!!!!!!!!!!!! -- 16:07, February 15, 2011 (UTC) I don't think so. I'm a metalhead, and all I have to say about this is take it to blogspot. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 16:13, February 15, 2011 (UTC) Er yeah, I don't think there's any particular need to have this in the history. pillow talk 20:56, February 15, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	groovy, thanks all. shit's taken care of. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:20, Feb 16

Newton's fourth law

Score: -1
Keep (4)	Reverted (see Comments). Older version is adequate, though not formatted conventionally. Spıke ¬ 00:19 10-Feb-11 Keep And after a bit of editing by SPIKE, it is definitely workable. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:49, February 10, 2011 (UTC) Keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 21:26, February 11, 2011 (UTC) Meh. Fine. pillow talk 21:00, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Delete. Pretty much a list with a bit on the end that isn't terrible, but still deserves to go IMO (talk) 00:10, February 10, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Huh?--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 00:12, February 10, 2011 (UTC) Weak Delete. The reversion's better, but I don't really think this concept works very well, and the article still descends into randomness. Coronium 16:21, February 10, 2011 (UTC) Yes, despite my copy-edit and illustrations, the three renditions of the Fourth Law themselves are arbitrary and still lack a comedy plan. Better-chosen Laws might suggest absurd practical effects. Better ideas are welcome on my talk page. JackOfSpades, though, seems satisfied enough that he should strike out his vote and flip to Keep. Spıke ¬ 22:32 11-Feb-11 Meh, I just don't see the connection between "mad people move faster" and "fat women tend to stay in the same place". The law needs to be general and have funny applications if this is going to work well. I'll have a think. Coronium 23:10, February 11, 2011 (UTC) Per Coronium. 1 2 3 4 ~ 17:57, 12 February 2011
Comments	Nominators must examine an article's history to see if better versions existed in the past (also if a page is too new for VFD). I have reverted this page to its 29-Mar-10 edition, the last time a named writer touched it (the known-good Aleister in Chains); it has been all Anons since then, and all downhill. Spıke ¬ 00:19 10-Feb-11 Definitely better now. I'm sorry I missed this version.-- (talk) 03:47, February 10, 2011 (UTC) Abstain. Not quite good enough for a keep, but I will retract my delete. It does have potential now, I will admit. (talk) 22:55, February 11, 2011 (UTC) keeped - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 06:08, Feb 15

Hydrogen is Being Impersonated!!

Score: 0
Keep (7)	Keep. Its not huff worthy. There are funny moments and its not wretched. Keep- --Shabidoo 21:00, February 9, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Same as above. I'll add it to my rewrite list. (talk) 23:47, February 9, 2011 (UTC) Keep I read this the other day and laughed. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:24, February 10, 2011 (UTC) Strong Fuck All The Haters. This is gold painted shit-colored. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 07:20, February 11, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Not quite bad enough to embarrass us; not occupying any particularly valuable real estate; apparently may be improved in the future. pillow talk 23:31, February 11, 2011 (UTC) The folks want it. 1 2 3 4 ~ 03:47, 12 February 2011 I'd be happy to help Jack with the rewrite. --Black Flamingo
Delete (7)	Delete. Chemistry article written by someone with very limited understanding of chemistry or humour. It's not even about anything. Coronium 18:52, February 9, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Where to start? the title. Two exclamation points, inconsistent capitalization, nothing you'd ever type. No photos. Styled as a signed letter of correspondence, not an encyclopedia article. Sections take the form of a lecture from a professor who is clueless. (That could be funny--but this isn't.) Exclamation points. Red-links. Where's Chuck Norris when you need him?! Spıke ¬ 19:11 9-Feb-11 Delete. Snoresville U.S.A. Population:0. Nuke it.--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 22:47, February 9, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Absolute nonsense, not even mildly funny Pman 10:04, February 10, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Just rambling wibble. --Count of Monkey Crisco 11:07, February 11, 2011 (UTC) The problem's not in the writing; it's in the content. This page doesn't belong here. --Scofield 09:12, February 12, 2011 (UTC) Obliterate. - Another n00b 11:34, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. Keep only if rewrite is done as promised, though on my Periodic Table this still spells P.A.N.T.S in its current state. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 17:38, February 11, 2011 (UTC) I don't know how anyone can find this funny; elucidation requested. Coronium 22:09, February 12, 2011 (UTC) kept! - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon** (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 06:07, Feb 15

Misquito

Score: 7
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (7)	Delete. This article is so bad, it can't be saved. this page mostly contains Vagina Jokes. If you read this it is amazing this didn't go through QVFD - Another n00b 18:01, February 13, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Yes, nominator worked on it before bringing it here, but a restart from scratch is the best way. In which case, spell it correctly. Our Mosquito is currently a redirect to Creator of Mosquitos, which is currently horrible. By the way, the Mosquito airplane is used in South America for things that wouldn't normally come to mind. Spıke ¬ 18:11 13-Feb-11 Delete. All it is about is vagina jokes, your mom jokes, and sex jokes. A drunk mentally retarded 2 year old lemur could write something better. -- Go Crazy Awards ~ Contribs ~ Gallery ~ Piglet 19:47, February 13, 2011 (UTC) Delete.. per Maniac Mcpee....Coronium 19:54, February 13, 2011 (UTC) Delete. My eyes! My beautiful eyes!--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 23:04, February 13, 2011 (UTC) Oh, my... now that is just bad. Bad writing, bad attempts at ... well, badness... 1 2 3 4 ~ 02:00, 14 February 2011 Delete. Flush it. --*RomArtusImperator ®** (Orate) 19:03, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	I tried to fix this, but that would mean a full, from scratch rewite. The foundations of this article are far too shitty for that. - Another n00b 18:05, February 13, 2011 (UTC) Do not screw with the template when you nominate an article, n00b! You broke the clock! Spıke ¬ 17:40 14-Feb-11

Kinder eggman

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete. Based on a 30 second commercial this article required a theme to be forced upon it. The first section is unfunny and badly written. The second section relies on completely unrelated memes to attempt humor but it actually ends up being antifunny. There is a video clip, but Uncyclopedia is not some "best of youtube" collection. --Count of Monkey Crisco 14:47, February 13, 2011 (UTC) Obliterate.. My brain hurts too much after reading this. Coronium 15:09, February 13, 2011 (UTC) Obliterate.'K1ND3R!' - Another n00b 15:08, February 13, 2011 (UTC) Delete. This knock-off of Kinder Surprise is a thumbnail, random bio of a made-up character that ultimately settles down to Fun Facts, revolving around Satan, memes, and child rape. Spıke ¬ 15:55 13-Feb-11 Delete.Bin it up and shift it out. --*RomArtusImperator ®** (Orate) 00:07, February 14, 2011 (UTC) Agh, what? 1 2 3 4 ~ 01:54, 14 February 2011
Comments	I changed my vote. - Another n00b 15:21, February 13, 2011 (UTC) But not the vote count. Spıke ¬ 15:55 13-Feb-11

Between The Lions

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Shit Listy, unfunny, dead end, the list goes on and on. As I like to say, it's 2011 cruft. -- 14:36, February 13, 2011 (UTC) Delete. This looks like the minimum possible thought one could put into an article. --Count of Monkey Crisco 14:48, February 13, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Terrible. Coronium 15:10, February 13, 2011 (UTC) Delete. There is nothing here but one-liners, mostly one-sentence paragraphs, mostly with author's cut-downs of some aspect of the show, which makes me neither laugh nor care. Spıke ¬ 15:39 13-Feb-11 Ain't an article. 1 2 3 4 ~ 01:55, 14 February 2011
Comments

More Than Words

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete.. This article's humour doesn't progress past the assertion that the UN has declared it to be bestest. Coronium 12:14, February 13, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Author left the site in 2005, about two weeks after writing this. MrN9000 and Flavaflav tried to give it a literate start. It more advocates than amuses. Spıke ¬ 13:00 13-Feb-11 The Title Lied It's not More than Words, it's even lower than words, it's nothing, that's how low it is.--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 14:03, February 13, 2011 (UTC) Delete.--Count of Monkey Crisco 14:36, February 13, 2011 (UTC) What humour? 1 2 3 4 ~ 01:53, 14 February 2011
Comments

Levi johnston

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete.. Very short. None of the jokes really redeem it. Coronium 17:52, February 12, 2011 (UTC) Looks like a qvfd escapee due to a construction tag. Short, possibly vanity, not really funny... 1 2 3 4 ~ 18:17, 12 February 2011 Delete. Not vanity; this is the kid who knocked up one of Sarah Palin's daughters. It was an amusing minor scandal during the 2008 campaign; funny to those who think Republicans want to use the CIA to keep everyone from having sex, to find out that one of them does. But this thumbnail bio-and-smear adds no humor not found in the original facts. Spıke ¬ 22:05 12-Feb-11 It's missing something Oh yeah, needs more boobs--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 14:13, February 13, 2011 (UTC) -- 01:57, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Mamie Eisenhower

Score: 5
Keep (1)	Keep This is gold. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:12, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (6)	Ugh. Rape, beatings, orgies, and a place called "Jewsburg"? Not my idea of humor. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 14:41, February 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Ugh is right. It's childish and crude. Spıke ¬ 16:10 12-Feb-11 Obliterate.. Coronium 17:55, February 12, 2011 (UTC) Not sure what's supposed to be funny, here. 1 2 3 4 ~ 18:14, 12 February 2011 It's so bad it's scary. The author does not seem to realize that mere mention of rape and anal, combined with drugs, does not make this funny. Then again, perhaps the author was on drugs when this was written. That would explain a lot. Simsilikesims 22:49, February 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete.A curious choice of subject to dump a pile of crap on top of. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 08:21, February 13, 2011 (UTC) SUPER HUGE ULTRA EXTREME UBER SHITTY BIG POOPY Kill it and watch it suffer.--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic?** 14:15, February 13, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	It's the contrast that's funny. Could be worked on and fixed, and I'll copy it and maybe get to it someday, but a question I've had for a longtime is how does a huffed article return to mainspace? What are the rules on that? Aleister 13:54 13-2-'11 I believe it happens when someone re-creates the page, either by grabbing the code before it's huffed (Hurry!), or asking an Admin to grab it from the backup tape and put it in your userspace. Spıke ¬ 14:03 13-Feb-11 Have copied it. But I mean, like this huffed by an admin, or BUTT POOP!!!, etc., what's the process for their return? Aleister moments before the listing is locked. Fix it up in your userspace, then dump it back in when funny. (Using this technique to return a page substantially identical to what was VFD'd would be being a dick.) I've returned a couple of pages to mainspace after VFD, most recently Slot car (slightly renamed). The alternative, fixing an existing page before it can be deleted, retains the change history, which should be done (with page retrieved by an Admin) if you are doing less than a total rewrite. Spıke ¬ 16:14 13-Feb-11

:Category:People who will not kneel before Zod

Score: -5
Keep (8)	Keep You know, when you nominate categories for deletion, it only shows that you are actively looking for stuff to delete and not that you just stumbled upon it. That's not improving the site at all. Also, this is hilarious. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 04:41, February 12, 2011 (UTC) Keep. I find this funny. May add myself. (talk) 05:52, February 12, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Many people will not kneel before Zod (kneel is actually just knee with an L added, and Lois Lane or Lex Luthor would not kneel before Zod!). Aleister 10:27 12-1-'11 Keeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeep!!! BRBL BRBL BRBL BRBL!!! Wuff wuff wuff --Shabidoo 13:00, February 12, 2011 (UTC) Keep. As I brought up recently, I would rather categories were not brought here. That view has not changed.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:21, February 12, 2011 (UTC) It amuses me. Vaguely. Very vaguely. But still. 1 2 3 4 ~ 18:10, 12 February 2011 KNEEL BEFORE ZOD!!!! HA HA HO HO HEE HEE!!!!!!!!!!! --Roman Dog Bird 18:25, February 12, 2011 (UTC) Keep.. Uncyclopedia's not Wikipedia. We can have categories which are useless but funny. Coronium 18:27, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Delete. a typical category that does not categorize. --Mn-z 01:59, February 12, 2011 (UTC) ~~SO MUCH POTENTIAL --Roman Dog Bird 02:00, February 12, 2011 (UTC)~~ Delete. 'Fraid I will never use Uncyclopedia categories to find an article based on whether the subject kneels before Zod. Spıke ¬ 02:07 12-Feb-11 Delete. Don't we have enough of these already? --TheSlyFox 09:26, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Question Will Mnbvcxz be going around personally to empty this/and others category - it it's deleted?--Sycamore (Talk) 09:14, February 12, 2011 (UTC) Because I have never done massive amounts of categorization and de-categorization before. --Mn-z 13:03, February 12, 2011 (UTC) OK - simple question, simple civil answers will do.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:21, February 12, 2011 (UTC) @Dexter: I dunno; I've stumbled across categories a few times before... 1 2 3 4 ~ 18:10, 12 February 2011 Kneel before the speedy keep -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 18:51, February 12, 2011 (UTC)

Category:Men claiming paternity of Anna Nicole Smith's Daughter

Score: 8
Keep (1)	Keep MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 04:42, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (9)	Delete. A typical category that doesn't categorize. Also, it references an event that was resolved almost 4 years ago. --Mn-z 23:26, February 11, 2011 (UTC) poop poop poop pooop --Roman Dog Bird 23:28, February 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Spıke ¬ 23:30 11-Feb-11 Delete. Maybe funny at he time, a time which has passed. Now not funny but stupid. Aleister 1:49 12-2-'11 Delete.--Count of Monkey Crisco 08:43, February 12, 2011 (UTC) Terminate. Oh, please... --TheSlyFox 09:29, February 12, 2011 (UTC) Ugh. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 13:28, February 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete.. Catch up. Coronium 17:56, February 12, 2011 (UTC) If I knew the history, I might say keep based on the history. But I don't. So here's a spiteful, ignorant... er... wait, what? Huh? 1 2 3 4 ~ 18:06, 12 February 2011
Comments	Comment: Going back over the archives, a few people will have noticed that I flagged bringing obviously obsolete categories was less desirable. Did the decision over this really require seven/(now nine) contributers to vote on this? I ask again that categories are not brought up here unless there are "real" grounds for doing so. If in doubt please go to the lounge or to an admin--Sycamore (Talk) 14:26, February 12, 2011 (UTC) Since when did we have a rule against bringing categories to VFD? And unless I'm mistaken, poopsmiths don't have the authority to create such a rule. It appears the admins are counting category nominations as valid, since they are voting as normal, not invaliding the nominations, and not telling me to take them somewhere else. Until an admin says otherwise, I'm going to continue assuming that categories nominations are valid. Also, this nomination is contested, ergo it's not qvfd bad. --Mn-z 14:56, February 12, 2011 (UTC) Casting my automatic vote against categories that don't help anyone find any article takes less time than drama does. The suggestions that questionable categories either be (1) scooped out and quietly taken to QVFD, or (2) not deleted at all, or (3) brought to Sycamore at the Lounge for private justice, are confusing. I appreciate Mn-z's effort and do regard it as part of the process of improving the site. Spıke ¬ 16:11 12-Feb-11 Yes!! This is very confusing and needs a policy ruling beyond what Sycamore is telling us. For example, I personally hate Category:Axis of Evil-Doers. I hate it so much that I nominated it for deletion five months ago, where it survived, 6-5. Am I now being told I have the right to "scoop it out," to remove it not only from mainspace but from userpages, and QVFD it? Because it looks like that is what I'm being told, even though I strongly suspect such a thing would get me banned for dickery. WE NEED A POLICY. pillow talk 16:26, February 12, 2011 (UTC) I normally don't disagree with Hype, but I would say we actually don't need a policy on this issue. I believe the current policy of taking bad categories to VFD works fine as it. --Mn-z 22:21, February 12, 2011 (UTC) That would be a policy. And if that's the policy, I'm happy with it. But I don't want a situation where if you take a cat to VFD, the poopsmiths get angry, and if you scoop out a cat and take it to QVFD, the admins get angry, and if you take a cat to the lounge, you get angry because no one actually does anything. Some admin just needs to step in and say "This is how we're doing category deletions. People who are saying anything else, shut your fuck up." pillow talk 22:26, February 12, 2011 (UTC) Yes, we should have a policy. We are in two camps; one says that any category created out of a good sense of humor should survive on that basis; the other camp says that categories should not be the humor, they should direct you to the humor without stealing the show, and categories that fail to perform that function should be deleted. Without a ruling, we'll apply inconsistent standards based on who shows up to vote on VFD that day. Spıke ¬ 22:34 12-Feb-11 That is sort of beyond the scope of the policy issue. We are talking about procedural issues, not how we should vote. I believe that everyone is entitled to their own opinion and reasons for VFD voting, regardless of how mind-numbingly stoopid those reasons can be at times. --Mn-z 02:33, February 13, 2011 (UTC) Sort of beyond, sort of not. We don't need policy on VFD, which works fine, even though people seek to carry out different standards of quality. We do need a policy decision on what Categories are really for, as opposed to recurring debate on it here. Spıke ¬ 02:41 13-Feb-11

Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology

Score: 7
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (7)	Unamusing collegecruft, incorrectly ICU'd and hacked to bits by noobs, IPs and other vermin (like Chief, for example). I suggest we just kill it. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 18:16, February 12, 2011 (UTC) Apparently this never was good. 1 2 3 4 ~ 18:24, 12 February 2011 Yeah, just get rid of this. Coronium 18:26, February 12, 2011 (UTC) This should actually be on QVFD, if you ask me. --Scofield 19:11, February 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete. This one-paragraph piece of school-cruft never gets off the ground, focusing not on anything about the institution but imagining a visit by Oscar Wilde. Spıke ¬ 22:07 12-Feb-11 KILL IT WITH FIRE Strong delete. One paragraph, mentioning Oscar Wilde isn't enough to save it. Simsilikesims 22:47, February 12, 2011 (UTC) THEN OBLITERATE IT WITH LIGHTNING It's fun to watch--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 10:09, February 13, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. remember to check the older version before you decide. Older Version--Count of Monkey Crisco 15:01, February 13, 2011 (UTC) I did. Hence, "incorrectly ICU'd." :-) It is with great pleasure that I shall now release the Huffhounds. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 16:01, February 13, 2011 (UTC)

Waffles?

Score: 9
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (9)	Delete. Bad and stupid in a lot of ways. Dumb quotes, useless lists and random name dropping are the main theme. --Count of Monkey Crisco 11:53, February 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. A page name with a question mark breaks the encyclopedia canon. The writing would have to be really good to outweigh this. But this article is merely the personal ramble you would expect. Spıke ¬ 12:57 11-Feb-11 Bye-bye' There is also a Waffle page, so this can be redirected, and if there are one or two good lines in it they can be transferred. Pancakes are better, imnho. Aleister 13:18 11-2-'11 Delete. Does not satisfactorily answer the question its title posits. --Black Flamingo 15:00, February 11, 2011 (UTC) Obliterate. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 15:50, February 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Waffles? No thanks. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 17:34, February 11, 2011 (UTC) This is shit. Coronium 18:43, February 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete.** The liposuction template does not do justice to how crappy this article is. --Scofield 09:07, February 12, 2011 (UTC) Oh, my... now that is... not an article. 1 2 3 4 ~ 17:55, 12 February 2011
Comments

Timberminium

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Obliterate.. An incredibly strong substance made by combining wood and aluminium. Wait, what ? Coronium 16:25, February 10, 2011 (UTC) Delete. "An Australian engineering student (unnamed but assumed to [be] Adam something)" must have created this article, a vehicle for citations of Chuck Norris and the number 42. Spıke ¬ 16:40 10-Feb-11 EXTERMINATE! Although I did find it funny that the boiling point is less than the melting point. Although that was probably not intentional. (talk) 02:13, February 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete.--Count of Monkey Crisco 11:04, February 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 15:51, February 11, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Malcolm in Heaven

Score: 1
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (1)	Obliterate. I like to give new articles a couple of days but this is just....so...yeah. (talk) 06:31, February 11, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	We use ICU to give new articles a couple of days so... yeah. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 07:22, February 11, 2011 (UTC)

Hamburglar

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete.. Humour detector gave no positive readings. Coronium 18:47, February 9, 2011 (UTC) Delete. This villain of the Ronald McDonald troupe is dealt with, using utterly no comedy theme except scatology. Spıke ¬ 19:06 9-Feb-11 Delete. Bad way to parody the famous villain of McDonalds.--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 22:49, February 9, 2011 (UTC) Delete. I so love lists. (talk) 23:51, February 9, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Not funny, end of story. Pman 10:06, February 10, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Brave New World

Score: -3
Keep (5)	Keep. What Spike's saying--Sycamore (Talk) 18:24, February 8, 2011 (UTC) Scrubbed. Spıke ¬ 01:21 9-Feb-11 Stub??? Its not a stub. Its not worth deleting either. --Shabidoo 11:13, February 9, 2011 (UTC) Meh. It's ok, I suppose. Coronium 18:47, February 9, 2011 (UTC) Keep. It has family and a good life.--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 22:49, February 9, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (2)	Obliterate. I just got done reading the book and what is this? --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 18:10, February 8, 2011 (UTC) Delete. I'm also a big fan of the book, and this stub is simply not a useful part of any successful article on this subject. pillow talk 18:27, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Stubby and photo-less, but I found the writing clever (excepting Oscar Wilde quoted on the subject of Oscar Wilde quotes). Wilytank, as you just got done reading the book, you are the perfect candidate to nudge this page toward completeness. Spıke ¬ 18:23 8-Feb-11 Sturped. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 07:19, February 11, 2011 (UTC)

The Democratic Penguin's Republic of Antarctica

Score: -3
Keep (3)	Keep. I'll Clean it up. User:Mrthejazz/sig 05:02, February 8, 2011 (UTC) Okay. Better than the others already, not that that's really saying anything, but I say let the madman have his way with it if he wants it. 1 2 3 4 ~ 05:13, 8 February 2011 Keep. - Another n00b 20:47, February 9, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (0)	Delete. You didn't forget this one, did you? It's a fictional country--and a Soviet republic, a comedy treatment we've never seen before. Spıke ¬ 18:37 7-Feb-11 Rescinded. "Placement is treatment." Spıke ¬ 17:00 8-Feb-11
Comments	Uh huh -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 07:18, February 11, 2011 (UTC)

I Can't Believe It's Not Hitler

Score: -2
Keep (4)	Keep Joke nom is joke. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 17:07, February 7, 2011 (UTC) Keep User:Mrthejazz/sig 04:56, February 8, 2011 (UTC) Keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 15:04, February 8, 2011 (UTC) Keep. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 15:48, February 8, 2011 (UTC) Keep. User:DJ Mixerr/sig
Delete (2)	Delete.. All the humour in this article is basically built around this one image - . The concept that Nazism was some sort of food product is pretty lame, and the article doesn't treat it very well. Coronium 17:04, February 7, 2011 (UTC) It's horrible. Image or no, I say delete until someone competent can write a new one. 1 2 3 4 ~ 05:15, 8 February 2011
Comments	Yes, the image is all it's got, but it's so good that it needs an article as a vehicle for it; and this article will do, despite seriously deficient writing (ranting about Hitler, ranting about Bush, and ranting about rants). Spıke ¬ 18:34 7-Feb-11 Rant rant rant rant kept -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 07:18, February 11, 2011 (UTC)

The gospel according to Jim

Score: -2
Keep (5)	Poorly written, about nothing, but overall strangely coherent and it does do an odd job of jabbing at some literals. If that even means anything. I can't even tell. 1 2 3 4 ~ 19:15, 6 February 2011 As per above, this article really doesn't need to be huffed. --Shabidoo 03:11, February 8, 2011 (UTC) Keep. I don't think an original piece that is written fairly well needs to be deleted. → I am greatSoup? 23:26 8-Feb-11 ← Keep What's the problem here? MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:28, February 9, 2011 (UTC) Keep. I liked the title. -- Go Crazy Awards ~ Contribs ~ Gallery ~ Piglet 02:06, February 11, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Delete. Completely unfunny. Coronium 13:25, February 6, 2011 (UTC) Delete. A stoner sets out to write an extra book of the Bible. Like "Kapoutland," reviewed below, this is essentially bad vanity of no general interest. Spıke ¬ 16:23 6-Feb-11 Delete. Shred it. --*RomArtusImperator ®** (Orate) 18:32, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Capped. Or not, actually. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 07:17, February 11, 2011 (UTC)

Kingdom of Antarctica

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. Cruft in the vein of Empire of Antartica. Coronium 17:10, February 7, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Yes, this one too. Spıke ¬ 18:40 7-Feb-11 I don't even want to gnaw on this... it's poorly written, unfunny, rather meaningless... eggle. 1 2 3 4 ~ 05:12, 8 February 2011 Delete. Like the Empire of Antarctica, I was expecting more play on the differences between Emperor Penguins and King Penguins which I had thought would be the joke. Well never mind, wave goodbye and disappear will you? --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 08:02, February 8, 2011 (UTC) EXTERMINATE!** almost as funny as a list. (talk) 22:11, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Planet Quish

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. Another bad article from the Empire of Antarctica canon. A world of gibberish with a little history-of-the-future. Spıke ¬ 03:00 7-Feb-11 Delete. Remembered everything except the part which is funny and the part where I give a damn. --Count of Monkey Crisco 10:31, February 7, 2011 (UTC) gnaws on the article 1 2 3 4 ~ 05:02, 8 February 2011 Delete. What's it all about Alfie? --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 08:17, February 8, 2011 (UTC) Obliterate.** It's funny because none of this ever happened? (talk) 22:13, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Four branches of the United States

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete. Found via Special:Los Lonely Pages. This little piece of 2005-cruft is an example of mailing it in. And, regarding the Executive, the President no longer has to be white or bald, hah. Spıke ¬ 18:08 6-Feb-11 Delete.. Lame. Coronium 18:22, February 6, 2011 (UTC) Well, now that's just bad. 1 2 3 4 ~ 19:15, 6 February 2011 Ugh. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 20:49, February 6, 2011 (UTC) Delete. 'orrible'. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 17:34, February 8, 2011 (UTC) Delete.** B'aweted (talk) 22:18, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Kapoutland Pro Wrestling

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete.. No concept, bad execution. Coronium 13:22, February 6, 2011 (UTC) Delete. KPW has both a `.com` and a page mirroring this one on `ewrestling.wikia.com`. However, the more you read the latter, with its complete lack of detail on physical venues, the more it seems this is a fantasy league with fantasy characters. My best guess is it's fan-cruft by fans of the unreal. And our twice-removed parody is no good. "Now, you may be asking yourself, "Who gives a damn?" asks the second sentence of the intro, before launching into a rant against the reader. He gives us a long cast of characters, a table of fight results, and some snappy dialogue, but he really should have pondered his own question a bit more. This is a parody of a wet dream. Spıke ¬ 16:20 6-Feb-11 Delete. Someone has parked this here hoping no one would notice. --*RomArtusImperator ®** (Orate) 18:34, February 6, 2011 (UTC) What Romartus said. 1 2 3 4 ~ 19:09, 6 February 2011
Comments