Forum:Time for some new adminses?
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Note: This topic has been unedited for 6436 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.
Hello, and welcome to the "New Administrator Nominations" voting page. Here, Registered Users will be able to nominate current users for an administrative position. On April 26 all users receiving a nomination accompanied by at least two supporting votes will be transferred to a separate voting page where administrators will be eligible to vote on who we will op at this time.
Please keep in mind that any votes placed on this page will NOT be transferred to the final voting page, and therefore you should vote even if you don't necessarily want the user to be adminned. You may vote for up to three people max (if you nominate a user, that will count as a for and you will only be allowed 2 more for votes). There should be only one nomination for each user, and for God's sake, don't nominate yourself, you narcissistic prick. Sysops votes will count twice as much as registered users (as they will better know, from experience, which users have the qualities required to be a successful sysop). In the score counter, this will show up as 2 points per admin vote, and 1 point for user votes. If an op wishes to vote for moer than three users, they may split votes in half using weak for for two users each. Only administrators will vote on the final page for opping. A lot of thought has gone into the voting process this time around (even more than last time!).--<<
>> 21:01, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- Voting closed. it's April 26 in England, and Starnestommy told me it was ok to go ahead and close it now (seriously, though, I think we've gotten a good list of candidates at this point, so it should be good).--<<
>> 00:50, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
- Use Forum:Admin vote now, for those paying less attention. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 12:07, 26 Apr 2007
Nominations
Modusoperandi
Score: +15
- Nomination. A long-time user whose work at VFP is legendary.--<<>> 21:06, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- For. As long as he accepts this, which I'm not sure. -- herr doktor needsAbolt
[scream!] 21:31, 23 April 2007 (UTC) - For --GAMESPOT=666 22:57, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- For Good-natured, and above all, funny. -- Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:24, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
*For. Household name. goshzillacorrespondence 03:28, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- Not needed, changing vote. goshzillacorrespondence 16:25, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- For Probably the most critically acclaimed user of all time. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 03:55, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. Thank you. But that's easily Hardwick. Maybe STM. Or Procopius. Or Squiggle...--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:26, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- For - I think that if I was a girl and living in Canada, not necessarily in that order, I would have probably be courting him now. ~
08:56, 24 April 2007 (UTC) - Half of my for, -- The Zombiebaron 16:02, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
For. After all this time of him bullying me, I think i'll give him another note.--Sorry modus, the premier returned.--
20:38, 24 April 2007 (UTC) 00:43, 25 April 2007 (UTC)- F☭R, cause he giggles like a catholic school girl when he receives one of my stache rides.
23:48, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- My belly is sensitive. Let us never speak of this again. --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 00:50, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- For. --I have Yvonne Give me 10,000 to get her back 01:32, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- For 02:34, 25 April 2007
- For. -- Mitch
12:57, 25 April 2007 (UTC) - For A very funny chap. Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 19:58, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- For, because I already thought he was an admin before, and it would only make sense. --
TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 
20:54, 25 April 2007 (UTC) - For Hell yeah. He is the face of Uncyclopedia. OK, maybe the left shoulder...still, that's saying something. --Señor DiZtheGreat
CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 21:00, 25 April 2007 (UTC) - For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 22:39, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Cs1987
Score: +16
- Nomination: been here for quite some time and puts a lot of effort into cleaning up Uncyclopedia through the VFD and such. Probably has three testicles. --EMC [TALK] 21:08, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- Three testicles is confirmed. —Braydie 21:10, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- For. --~
21:13, 23 April 2007 (UTC) - For Every time I prowl Recent Changes, he always has reported or reverted something. --High Gen. Grue 21:29, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- yes please --
21:38, 23 April 2007 (UTC) - Crazy good. For. --
Contestant CUN -- VFH NotM Buzz Ctrbs 21:41, 23 April 2007 (UTC) - Jumping on the bandwagon. For. -- 22:41, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- For Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me! 02:33, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- For I've heard good things about this'un. —rc (t) 06:09, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- For Yep.-- 06:41, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- Support —Major Sir Hinoa prepare for trouble • make it double? 14:55, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- For -- Sir Mhaille
(talk to me) 16:13, 24 April 2007 (UTC) - Half of my for, -- The Zombiebaron 16:03, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- For He's like Braydie only he makes me cry less often. Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 19:54, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Mordillo
Score: +6
- Nomination. -- herr doktor needsAbolt [scream!] 21:15, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- Before voting For Mordillo, I pondered as to whether or not we should let another Jew (see: Zombiebaron) take a powerful position in Uncyclopedia. But then I realized he had an awesome Ninjastar of David for a signature, and I was inclined to say yes. --EMC [TALK] 21:50, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- For --GAMESPOT=666 22:57, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- For. I can vote more than once, hurrah! --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:19, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- For. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 01:08, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- For. One of the elders of Zion, at last.---Asteroid B612
(aka Rataube) - Ñ 18:06, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
One-eyed Jack
Score: +9
- Nomination. Picking up the slack. -- Contestant CUN -- VFH NotM Buzz Ctrbs 21:25, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- For. I think it's well-known that I admire this user, given my campaign to get him UotM.--<<>> 21:29, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- For, but they're all so good. Except that one bastard.../me looks in mirror. Oh, I can't stay mad at you!...But back on topic; OEJ is the best. He's got a World's Greatest Dad mug and everything. --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:14, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- For We need a relaxed admin for a change :) ~ 08:57, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- For.
t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 21:29, 24 April 2007 (UTC) - For.--Math Poet 00:06, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- For---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 18:06, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Tom mayfair
Score: +12
- Nomination. Communism worked for Soviet Russia; it can work here too. Plus his moustache tickles when he kisses. --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 00:07, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- For. And that's my third vote. Don't be jealous, I love you all equal. -- herr doktor needsAbolt [scream!] 02:32, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- For. t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 03:18, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Strongfor. And I counted it as two of my votes, please adjust tally if opposed. goshzillacorrespondence 03:24, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- Never mind; I reread the rules. goshzillacorrespondence 03:27, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- Strong For. Hell yeah!-- 06:40, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Read below.--Returned.-- 20:37, 24 April 2007 (UTC) 00:44, 25 April 2007 (UTC) - Heavily support —Major Sir Hinoa prepare for trouble • make it double? 14:57, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- Just as a reminder, Tom's status is currently wikibreak with "Their expected return date is not clear." —Braydie 18:28, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- Good point. I'll suspend my vote untill he returns.-- 20:36, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- RETURNS ^_^ 23:45, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- RETURNS ^_^
- Good point. I'll suspend my vote untill he returns.--
- Just as a reminder, Tom's status is currently wikibreak with "Their expected return date is not clear." —Braydie 18:28, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- For --GAMESPOT=666 22:25, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- For. -- Mitch 12:58, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- For He's all I never wanted to be. so sayeth Sliferjam ~ Talk * Sock * Jam * Gallery * Fearless Fosdick?
15:49, 25 April 2007 (UTC) - For: He gave me the reach 'round. --EMC [TALK] 20:05, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Strange but untrue
Score: +7
- Nomination & For - She reverts, she VFDs, she ICUs, yeah, she does pretty much everything here. She has also made more edits than anyone except Braydie for the past month. Seriously.
Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:31, 24 April 2007 (UTC) - For. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 03:23, 24 Apr 2007
- Yup. —Braydie 07:09, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- For the same reasons I think she is eligible for UotM. She's just all over the place. Plus, I have a grave suspicion that she smells better than Spang. ~ 08:59, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- For. 25/04 16:20
Insineratehymn
Score: +10
- Nomination. Why the hell not? t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 03:18, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- For. I thought he/she/it/them was an admin already. goshzillacorrespondence 03:28, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- For Same here, he welcomed me and everything Leatherboundbooks 03:38, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- For because we need newbie-friendly admins. --Ж Kalir, Awesome Author(alliteration affords additional awesome) 18:59, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- For, because I have one vote left. -- 23:39, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- Wait. You get more than one vote? In that case FOR. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 13:05, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- For -Han Solo (High Gen. Grue) Comlink Grueslayer
- For He already fits all of the requirements of being an admin, except the +sysop flag. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 19:13, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- For. Whenenver I see some vandalism and get ready to revert it, Insinerate always beats me to the punch. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 20:54, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Olipro
Score: +13
- Nomination and support —Major Sir Hinoa prepare for trouble • make it double? 14:57, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- For--Sir Silent Penguin
"your site makes no sence" The illusion is complete 17:52, 24 April 2007 (UTC) - Half my for, -- The Zombiebaron 18:06, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- For --Composure1 21:18, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- i guess -- 23:55, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R, & it's has nothin' to do with the fabulous sex either. 23:57, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- For <insert perverted Olipro-related joke here> -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 02:31, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- For even though I know his first act as admin would be banning me. :) Dark Apostrophe
(Click here to bitch. :)) 09:59, 25 April 2007 (UTC) - For. -- Mitch 12:59, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- For. Useless, vulgar and inappropriate; all time honoured admin qualities -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 14:42, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah... so if this pans out, does this mean I become your bitch? :P --Olipro Anchor KUN (Harass) 15:17, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- For I thought he was an admin for like 6 months. Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 19:51, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
EMC
Score: +6
- Nomination I really think it's time for him to be an admin.-- 22:52, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R, I'd do him. 00:00, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- FOR, This man has been with me since the dawn of creation. We were the same amoeba, I split from him, and naturally we hit it off. Ever since then we've been together. I bared his children, he stayed with me during the helsinky episode of 1915, and lord remembers that. He taught me everything, and more. "I taught him everything he knows, and more" He told me that special day, and for that, he needs to be the president. Or what ever he got nominated for! -Paniking Undead 00:07, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- For e|m|c is one of the better writers here. He knows what's crap and what's not. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 19:54, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- For. What Starnes said. 25/04 20:05
- For. What Heerenveen said Starnes said. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 20:54, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
High Gen. Grue
Score: +3
- N
&FHe started an anti-vandalism, anti-crap, and user help group. He might as well be an admin. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me! 03:01, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- If he does not think he is ready yet, well, it is his decision. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
- For I will be helping Uncy, that's what matters.. But let the votes decide. If I am voted for, i'll do it. --High Gen. Grue 03:31, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- Against <HanSolo> If I become a sysop i'm gonna ban all of you ... Maybe he's not 'old' enough yet. He/she/it may be a nice person, but doesn't have what it takes and doesn't deserve it... yet, anyways. so sayeth Sliferjam ~ Talk * Sock * Jam * Gallery * Fearless Fosdick? 15:49, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- For. I think he'd be a good admin, since he's committed to stuff, er, something like that. yeah. --Math Poet 16:20, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- For. I don't think it will abuse the tools. goshzillacorrespondence 16:27, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- Against. Opping him would be kind of queue jumping; also, not sure he's ready for it yet. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 18:56, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- As I can't vote, just a comment: no way! He still has a lot to learn. -- herr doktor needsAbolt [scream!] 19:00, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Against. Good, but not yet. 25/04 20:31Looked a bit more into it. For on second thought. Does more work than I realised. 25/04 20:42- Against - This person has about as much of a sense of humour as a corpse. He might have become a good WP admin, but not Uncyc. Dark Apostrophe
(Click here to bitch. :)) 20:50, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Mitch_1_2
Score: +5
- Nom and For. Lots of edits, lots of reverts and lots and lots of voting; general all round good guy who would benefit from the
absolute POWARRRRextra admin functions. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 15:01, 25 April 2007 (UTC) - For. i like him, so i thought i'd vote for him.--Math Poet 16:24, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- For -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 12:00, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Shandon
Score: +3
- Nom and For. A generally nice guy, his articles are great and having spoken to him, he seems happy to chip in... I think :) --Olipro Anchor KUN (Harass) 17:46, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. If I had another vote.... ah. Anyway, I strongly recommend voting for this candidate :) t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 20:39, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- For -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 11:59, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Squiggle
Score: +5
- --KATIE!! 20:36, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- For SQUIGGLE!!!111!!!11!!!!!1!!!1! --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 20:38, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- That's not how ya "!!!!!!1111!!!!", it's like: SQUIGGLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11111111111111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!oneoneoneoneoneoneoneoneoneoneoneone. —Braydie 20:44, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Miscasted votes/comments and other general insanity
Mordillo
- Nomination.
I haven't made my mind yet (Modus is also a strong candidate), so I'm just nominating for now.. For. Nov I've saw I have the right to two votes.
- As I said in the edit summary, your nom counts as a for. You have three fors total.--<<>> 21:35, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
One-eyed Jack
*Nomination. Same as Mordillo, see above. -- herr doktor needsAbolt
[scream!] 21:15, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- invalid nom: "only one nomination per user". This is really just a formality to make sure no one else does this. I'm pretty sure that someone else will nom OEJ soon.--<<>> 21:22, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Zerotrousers
*Nom+for. Possibly the best thing that has happened on the site so far. He not only writes Fantastic articles, he also makes the site a generally better place to be. I honestly don't understand why is not a sysop, or even beauracrat already.--
06:39, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- *Braydie crosses another off the list* —Braydie 07:11, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
ekashp
Score: -3.14159
- Nomination I nominate myself, in defiance of the nominating rules but in accordance with the Ignorable Policies policy. This is all based on the fact that I am more qualified than G.W. Bush or Dick Cheney, and look where they've gotten themselves! --Ekashp 03:41, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- Against Narcissic prick. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me! 03:44, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- Invalid. No self-noms. Can you read? -- herr doktor needsAbolt [scream!] 03:59, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- That was quick! It was a joke nom to begin with, stemming from the IRC discussion that everybody on the list will advance to the next round of voting, as it sits currently. --Ekashp 04:04, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- Invalid. No self-noms. Can you read? -- herr doktor needsAbolt
Nomination suggestions from those who already nominated/voted
Electrified mocha chinchillaNominated.-- 22:55, 24 April 2007 (UTC)- Orion Blastar
-- herr doktor needsAbolt [scream!] 21:58, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Tom Mayfair - zealous user, despite not writing so much - but this doesn't make any difference for an admin. -- herr doktor needsAbolt [scream!] 23:50, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
-- 00:47, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- (Raising finger with a Hellboy's blush) Me. Well, if Insineratehymn could do this and managed to receive votes... Actually, maybe not. We have stronger candidates - and too many of them. But, just in case I have a secret admirator... From Russia with love, HerrDok. -- herr doktor needsAbolt [scream!] 17:54, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Can we get more votes?
- /me counts on fingers. Un, too, fwee just aren't enough. --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:38, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- NEIN! --EMC [TALK] 02:46, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- *pout* --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:58, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- You realise up there at the top it says "...all users receiving a nomination accompanied by at least two supporting votes will be transferred to a separate voting page where the entire community will be eligible to vote." So everyone nominated so far is going to be put to that second page for voting anyway. How many more votes can you need?
- However, I also feel the need to point out that the rules also state: "Only administrators will vote on the final page for opping." So I wouldn't trust these rules too much. As much thought as Brad claims to have put into this voting system, it could have maybe done with a quick read-over before saving, eh? ;)
- So some clarification there would be nice, though it makes sense that the next step in admin-only, so we can cherry pick those who were going to be opped all along. Also if everyone's going to be allowed to vote again, having a second round makes no sense in the first place, as it would be exactly the same as the first. Anyway, didn't we agree last time to agree on a voting system before the next sysopping vote? Perhaps we should do that after this one, this time. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 03:34, 25 Apr 2007
- Hey, don't rain on my sunny day with your <airquotes>rules</airquotes> and <airquotes>logic</airquotes>. I just needed more votes to spread more love. Are you against love, Spang? --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 03:38, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- Against. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 04:07, 25 Apr 2007
- I get the feeling that this page was really just supposed to be a nominations page, and nobody was really supposed to get any more than three votes. Giving people additional votes now seems pointless. Leave that for the next round. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:33, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- And nobody is giving against votes, which sucks and is completely insincere, but quite comprehensible. -- herr doktor needsAbolt [scream!] 04:37, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- I get the feeling that this page was really just supposed to be a nominations page, and nobody was really supposed to get any more than three votes. Giving people additional votes now seems pointless. Leave that for the next round.
- To elaborate; being a sysop is never about love. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 04:57, 25 Apr 2007
- Against. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 04:07, 25 Apr 2007
- Hey, don't rain on my sunny day with your <airquotes>rules</airquotes> and <airquotes>logic</airquotes>. I just needed more votes to spread more love. Are you against love, Spang? --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 03:38, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Um, yeah... About everyone being able to vote next round... I kinda copied this from the previous page where only ops could nom so um... yeah, I suck. I'm going to fix that now. Only ops will vote on the final vote.--<<>> 12:46, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
And regarding the "we'll op the people we were going to op anyway" thing, the reason we have this nom page first where all the users nom and give reasons is so that the users can bring up good ideas (like the one about Cs1987 being an Aussie, and us having a shortage of ops from that timezone). So it's not QUITE so conspiratorial as it probably should have been.--<<>> 12:53, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Waitaminit...
From the rules above: "On April 26 all users receiving a nomination accompanied by at least two supporting votes will be transferred to a separate voting page where administrators will be eligible to vote on who we will op at this time." Two seems awfully low, considering that everyone's voting on admins right now. Is this another example of a bad copy-paste job or are we really going to transfer everyone over to the admin voting? —Major Sir Hinoa prepare for trouble • make it double? 16:33, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
