Forum:Admin vote

Forums: Index > Ministry of Love > Admin vote (talk)

Note: This topic has been unedited for 6137 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

Yeah yeah. New admin vote. You guys know what we need in an admin. I'm putting the six candidates who had 50% or more of the leader's score from the nominations page here and we'll pick who we think is worthy. After talking it over with wolf, we decided that 12 nominees is too many to pick one or two admins from.

I'm thinking one or two people for this go around. We'll see who stands out from the crowd (75% or more of the leader's score). I'm thinking opping one person a month would be ideal, to keep up with usual turnover, but we can decide whether I'm full of it later. Basically, if we opped two people, we wouldn't need another vote before June, at the earliest. So one or two is what I'm looking at right now, but we know what we're doing, so we'll do whatever we feel like (if we follow precedent). ;p.--<<>> 02:13, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Oh, and I'm thinking we can end the vote on Apr. 28, but I guess that's up to bureaucrats, isn't it?--<<>> 02:16, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

How many votes do we each get? —rc (t) 06:11, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

I think we can all vote as much as we want, provided we all vote once on each user (no ballot-stuffing, kids). You can vote up or down and give your reasons for doing so. You can hold back your voting and only vote for one or two if you only want to op one or two, if you want, or any other type of strategy you want to use. If you guys think this is too open-ended, then we can do the only three votes thing again, but the main reason I put so many limitations is for the entire community, since it'd be harder to keep track of the votes with them. We're pretty responsible and not many in number, so I think we can vote how the feeling strikes us.--<<>> 11:53, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Note: as we really only want to op one or two people this go-round, it's recommended you only vote for on one or two people. You have the freedom to vote for more, if you wish, but it's counter-productive as we're wanting to choose one or two out of this group. Just a quick reminder (after talking with Pants about my previous note).--<<>> 12:00, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Vote closed. Hopefully, we'll have another one soon. (Maybe bring back VFS for the end of next month?)--<<>> 02:22, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Vote

Cs1987 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +5

• Nommed by users with a net score of +16.
• For. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 06:06, 26 Apr 2007
• For.--<<>> 12:01, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
• 4 --PantsMacKenzie 12:11, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
• For —Braydie 17:12, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
• For very active of late. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

Modusoperandi (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +5

• Nommed by users with a net score of +15.
• For. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 12:39, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
• For —Braydie 16:21, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
• For -- The Zombiebaron 16:23, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
• For -- I can't figure out why I hate him, so I guess that's a good a reason as any. Wait - I remember...long ago he mined my talk page for scavenger hunt items. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 04/26 21:34
• For.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 21:44, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
• For level headed, great contributor, great Admin as long as he doesn't give up his day job. :) -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

Olipro (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +Sysop (+8)

• Opped Take care of stuffs!! Doooo thiiiingsssss --PantsMacKenzie 01:51, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

• Nommed by users with a net score of +13.
• For. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 12:39, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
• Start of the Emancipation Proclaimation --PantsMacKenzie 16:14, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
• For -- The Zombiebaron 16:23, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
• It's a ghost! -- 17:05, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
• For —Braydie 17:12, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
• For increasing the number of gay jokes made by admins by 200%. —Major Sir Hinoa prepare for trouble • make it double? 20:03, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
• For.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 21:44, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
• For -- Made it to my good list, but I have no idea how. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 04/26 21:55
• Abstain - I love Oli to bits, and it would be great to have another Brit amongst the ranks, but if we are going to have a new sysop we need active ones. Sorry, mate. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
  • Comment. Indeed, my vote is cast on the assumption that Olipro will actually do something.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 23:02, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
    • You mean you want me to pull my weight? damn... guess I'll just have to do that then --Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 03:11, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Tom mayfair (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +2

• Nommed by users with a net score of +12.
• For worked hard for a long, long time. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
• For. —Major Sir Hinoa prepare for trouble • make it double? 20:04, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Insineratehymn (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +2

• Nommed by users with a net score of +10.
• For. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 12:40, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
• For consistant contributor and cleanerupperer. N00b friendly too. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

One-eyed Jack (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +4

• Nommed by users with a net score of +9.
• For - OEJ quietly gets on with cleaning up crap on the site, almost without fanfare. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
• For.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 21:44, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
• Strong For One-eyed Jack's name comes up often on Recent Changes, as he slowly but surely makes Uncyclopedia better. Plus, he's got seniority. -- The Zombiebaron 09:02, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
• For. I kept trying to hold myself to one vote, but I can't help but vote for this guy. He'd be a great admin.--<<>> 12:22, 27 April 2007 (UTC)