Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive213

This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.

Oskar Schindler

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Disintegrate and redirect to Schindler's Listcruft. Random, unfunny, and a waste of space. Saberwolf116 20:04, August 13, 2010 (UTC) Redirect. It uses its picture and many of its jokes, and achieves humor less well. Spıke ¬ 20:28 13-Aug-10 Delete.Falls apart after the time travel bit. --Count of Monkey Crisco 23:46, August 14, 2010 (UTC) Delete. What that guy said. points up ~ Arajlas shifty eyes (talk) (stalk) -- 20100815 - 14:39 (UTC)
Comments

The Chocolate War

Score: -2
Keep (7)	Keep. Not all war pages are alike. Some are good and interesting, and this is one of them. A little clean-up on red links to be done, but overall a funny and strange concept that is well presented with pics and ideas. Sometimes it is okay to study war some more. Aleister 10:43 11 8 I'll withhold, but red-links aren't the only problem. This article has a concept--morph the horrors of war to the non-horrible world of chocolate--but it's too aimless. Mentioning strife between dark and milk chocolate made me think it would draw parallels with real-world race rhetoric, but it dropped it. Just another rambling essay on war by a fourth-grader. Spıke ¬ 11:15 11-Aug-10 Fine. Since I'm in fifth-grade (i can count them on one whole hand) I'll play with it too. Aleister 11:40 11 8 Keep. Per Aleister. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:34, 12 August 2010 I concur with the above statements. Leutnant Herr Thatdamned followspot 23:39 Thursday, August 12, 2010 Now the page has been edited quite a bit, and is a different page than what some of the delete voters read. It's not a great page, a feature (although given time it could be), but imnho it is no longer a VFD page. And added work will improve it from here. Aleister 2:02 14 8 Change to keep. Examining this again, I conclude that it has been much improved and is definitely savable. I've removed all connections with the World Wars, so it should be fine. Saberwolf116 02:23, August 14, 2010 (UTC) bandwagon keep per above. --Mn-z 14:12, August 14, 2010 (UTC) Keep. because ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* (talk) (stalk) Π ~ ~ 15 Aug 2010 ~ 07:34 (UTC) Keep. I'd say this has been improved enough to keep. Wandering in toward the end for the win, mon. ~ Arajlas shifty eyes (talk) (stalk) -- 20100815 - 13:33 (UTC)
Delete (5)	Disintegrate. Candy + World War = ? Saberwolf116 10:21, August 11, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Life is a box of chocolates. This isn't. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 15:53, August 11, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Was a bit of a tough decision but I'm against it for two reasons. The first is that if you wanted to make an article about a chocolate war call it "The Chocolate War". The second is that if you can make an article about a chocolate war you can lazily make a war article about anything by replacing the names with referential names and inserting them into a real war story structure. Hey, look! I just wrote an article about the Owls vs. Dairy war where General Brie overran the 3rd Spotted Owl division guarding Hootania by using armor piercing yogurt! I can seriously write a thousand word article like that without even thinking. This sort of article is hardly funny, it's just lazy and stupid.--Count of Monkey Crisco 16:48, August 12, 2010 (UTC) Delete. I'm allergic to nuts -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 00:06, August 13, 2010 (UTC) Off the fence. Commendations to Aleister for ditching the nonsense year numbers, though when the opposing sides acquire initials (could be worse, could be acronyms) the intro is already taking itself too seriously. Al in the change summary admits he hasn't gone far enough; replacement of phrases with other phrases doesn't explain what Chocolate has to do with war--It still needs a real humor concept. Until then, it's firmly in the genre of Wacky War. Spıke ¬ 00:12 13-Aug-10 Dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks idkcsickdikciskcikdicksic** -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 06:21, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	SUDDEN DEATH - since it's a tie, this article has another 24 hours, so if you're reading this and didn't already vote, VOTE YOU LAZY SHITCAKE... or don't, and my vote will decide the tiebreaker. lazy jerks -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 00:05, August 13, 2010 (UTC) What are you talking about, Olipro? If its' a tie, it's kept. If it's +1 or +2, it's usually kept too. Even if it's +3, its deletion is not ensured. +4 is usually the number at which stuff starts getting deleted. It's been like that for a couple years now. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:36, 13 August 2010 Olipro bends the rules quite frequently, and nobody seems to care enough to call him out on it. Saberwolf116 19:51, August 13, 2010 (UTC) Many of the nay voters didn't see the changes on the page, including a title change. It's been edited heavily since they voted. Would this page now have been put on VFD? I would argue that it wouldn't have. Although the infamous BUTT POOP was huffed with a vote of 2 (4 to 6), a serious cause of concern for that controversy, certainly a tie or a low number, even a 3, should not end a page, especially if it picks up the votes of quite a few regular users. Aleister 21:09 13 8 +2 or 3 after a week indicates consensus leaning towards delete. At this point it's usually at the discretion of the admin to do whatever could be right. At this point, Olipro gave it more time instead of outright deleting it, so I don't see what's to complain about. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 23:36, August 13, 2010 (UTC) So an admin who hasn't been involved with VFD until recently decides to judge articles according to his own rules, and this completely undiscussed change is perfectly fine? Um, what? Are you serious? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:57, 14 August 2010 Fuck it, I'm writing a forum about this. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:59, 14 August 2010 Agree that we are seeking consensus, not just a tie-breaker; and believe it's easier to call our attention to the agreed rule before the article is incorrectly huffed. Spıke ¬ 00:46 14-Aug-10 BUTT POOP was 6 to 1 delete. It had some invalid after the fact protest votes. --Mn-z 14:12, August 14, 2010 (UTC) Ah the good old unwritten rules of VFD, one person sees it one way, another sees it another way. if you don't see it as a case of a tiebreaker (I currently do) then lets get some rules codified in UN:DEL and I'll be happy to follow it in that precise spirit. But don't start accusing me of breaking the rules when none formally exist. Personally, I think you're just gunning for a confrontation. -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 19:11, August 14, 2010 (UTC) Thanks a keep. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 14:06, August 15, 2010 (UTC)

Crazy Indian Man

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete. Helpful Hint: articles should be about something. --Count of Monkey Crisco 01:54, August 14, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Insanity was here first and it's still better. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 9:33 AM 8/14/10 Delete. This belongs back in author's sandbox. Spıke ¬ 14:18 14-Aug-10 Disintegrate. Randooooooooooom. Saberwolf116 14:32, August 14, 2010 (UTC) Gandhi would disapprove Aleister 19:59 14 8 Delete. Craptastic! If only writing like this was so easy!!--*RomArtusImperator ®** (Orate) 22:18, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	I suggested on the VFD review of Neoteny that an article about second childhood was not open-season on including stuff simply because it was childish. Likewise, Insanity, being mostly a collection of insane rants and stuff that is insanely nonsensical, adheres to a theme but is still total crap. Spıke ¬ 14:18 14-Aug-10

Plots to overthrow Castro

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Eradicate Every Mention of this Article Before it Becomes Airborne and infects the General Populous With Its Idiocy"Among the thousands of plots to overthrow Castro is a lemon." I think that that lemon and the whole article should be put where they belong - in the garbage disposal. Loopygrumpkins 00:40, August 14, 2010 (UTC) Deoverthrow--Count of Monkey Crisco 01:58, August 14, 2010 (UTC) "I have a great master plan." Let's huff this article; it's a Cuban Road Runner versus Wily E. Coyote, only not funny. Spıke ¬ 14:14 14-Aug-10 Viva la Revolution Castro himself would vote to overthrow this. Aleister 19:56 14 8 Delete. Has my vote as Rubbish Article of the Month.--*RomArtusImperator ®** (Orate) 22:07, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Bahamut

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. Bahamut is the Norse god of poetry and foreplay and was the result of Zeus impregnating a Taiwanese "girl" who went on to inspire the Norse-Jew Exodus!?! If that isn't enough, the closing paragraph of "Bahamut now lives in a quiet villa in rural Spain with his lovely wife Elissa McSursley. He does freelance work with a Finnish e-commerce company, and in his spare time he enjoys writing screenplays, poetry, novels, and short stories. He often gets summoned by "Final"Fantasy summoners... but he just doesn't care." really ties the noose around the neck of this one. Bahamut is actually the giant fish that the earth rests on in the Arabic mythology and the King of the Righteous Dragons in Dungeons and dragons. I spent and hour-and-a-half trying to find some way to make this article generally funny, but the only humor that I could come up with would cater to a very small crowd and I feel that, because of the obscurity of this topic, it could not make a generally "funny" article without coming off as randumb. Loopygrumpkins 00:18, August 14, 2010 (UTC) Delete. It's as though a learned professor of the Humanities had his brain go splat all over the page, a hash of memes from anthropology. Along with bad writing, as being summoned by summoners is simply inept. No one but Anons and page-blankers for the last two years. Spıke ¬ 00:32 14-Aug-10 ...What? Saberwolf116 04:43, August 14, 2010 (UTC) Delete. --Wilytank 14:27, August 14, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Junior Uncyclopedia Pre-Entry class.--*RomArtusImperator ®** (Orate) 22:10, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Communist Housing-Order House

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Vape. Also unfunny. Also sockpuppet-created. --Andorin Kato 19:23, August 13, 2010 (UTC) Piss on it. "Chinatown, Naziville," by the way, is the capital of the Meme Republic. Spıke ¬ 19:33 13-Aug-10 Delete. If just to clean up this nimrod's mess. --Wilytank 20:21, August 13, 2010 (UTC) Delete. --Count of Monkey Crisco 01:45, August 14, 2010 (UTC) Hahahahahahaha Saberwolf116 04:36, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Shred Guitar

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Vape. This article is teh suck. And it was made by a stupid sockpuppeteer. --Andorin Kato 19:20, August 13, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Article contains instruction "if you ever want to be an ausome guitarst." Joe-Cool Narcissism. Spıke ¬ 19:30 13-Aug-10 MetalHeadsRejoice --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 4:19 PM 8/13/10 I don't read Uncyclopedia to learn how to play the guitar, thanks. Saberwolf116 00:53, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Moravistan

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Disintegrate. How did this escape QVFD? It's crap. Saberwolf116 10:33, August 13, 2010 (UTC) "No one really knows." Stubby article that relies on foreign-language jokes, nonsense numbers (a drink that's 101% alcohol), and memes like Princess Diana. Template warns that "it's funny cuz it's true," and that's a legitimate style--but you have to work to make the truth funny rather than mere (twisted) recitation. Spıke ¬ 12:03 13-Aug-10 Delete. Written by a Bohemian? --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 12:11, August 13, 2010 (UTC) Ugh.** --Wilytank 15:48, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Law v. Order

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Disintegrate. Crappy, stubby, and altogether a waste of space. Saberwolf116 22:41, August 12, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Got no humor. Got no grammar. Stories of the form X sues Y push my hot button when they become UnNewses; they're invariably written so that the author, who knows nothing about what has to happen before X has a case against Y, can write about a melodrama playing out inside his own head. Spıke ¬ 23:40 12-Aug-10 Exterminate Even I'm funnier than this. Leutnant Herr Thatdamned followspot 23:43 Thursday, August 12, 2010 Delete. Written without wit or wisdom.--*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 06:14, August 13, 2010 (UTC) Delete.** It's hopelessly unfunny.--UnLaw 23:25, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Pooped by IronMan. Saberwolf116 22:41, August 12, 2010 (UTC)

Expert

Score: 4
Keep (2)	Keep. Remove the stuff that doesn't fit in and we'll probably have enough for a keepable stub left. But keep the Boxxy image. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:14, 12 August 2010 And even more so now that Aleister has done some serious pruning. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:38, 13 August 2010 Keep. anything with Boxxy in it. And what Sock said. Aleister 22:11 12 8 p.s. I did some widescale deletions. What's left can be picked through for good parts, and for the most part lots of it is now savable with a little work. Aleister 22:30 12 8
Delete (6)	Delete. Bad in an uncommon way. Though it has a few good lines it's a candidate for a 95% length reduction. It's main crime is inability to actually be about anything. I challenge anyone to decipher the subject of this article if they didn't know the title. It just jumps between unrelated category serving up well used jokes about those categories (which can usually be found in the actual articles for the category anyhow). It's also plagued by some hardcore ED/4chan ass kissing which means it belongs on ED! --Count of Monkey Crisco 16:10, August 12, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Everything the Count said, and more. Yes, it is about something; it's about Uncyclopedia versus Wikipedia, yawn. Uses every typographical trick in the book to fluff itself up. It belongs back in the author's Sandbox because it is essentially about him. Spıke ¬ 17:19 12-Aug-10 Delete. Plain bad.--HM (T) 19:57, August 12, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Ramble ramble ramble. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 06:17, August 13, 2010 (UTC) Oy. As a good underlying concept but is executed terribly, with no actual satire sparing one or two lines. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 23:28, August 13, 2010 (UTC) Disintegrate.** Calling people names does not a good article make. Saberwolf116 04:32, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Northern Territory

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	HATE HAET HAT Saberwolf116 03:40, August 12, 2010 (UTC) Delete. No kidding! everyone is drunk all the time? Trite humor and overuse of strike-thru. The photo will survive; it's used in many other places. Spıke ¬ 07:26 12-Aug-10 Delete. Not quite. --Count of Monkey Crisco 16:23, August 12, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Abuse rarely equals fun and this isn't. --*RomArtusImperator ®** (Orate) 06:19, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Zombie Defense

Score: -2
Keep (4)	Keep. Well, to answer the nominees comment, what you do is revert it to before the IP's got hold of it. Reverted back to its last 2007 edits by the original authors, and it looks savable. Aleister 19:57 9 8 Keep. Per above. —GOD DAMMIT WHORE Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [00:21 10 August 2010] {{rewrite}}. --UU - natter 10:34, Aug 10 Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:10, 11 August 2010
Delete (2)	Delete. Minus the screenful of quotes, some of the same problems as the version originally reviewed: a listy article of chatting and nagging the reader. Belongs in the HowTo namespace. Spıke ¬ 20:26 9-Aug-10 Delete. Leave this one to the zombies. Leutnant Herr Thatdamned followspot 21:40 Monday, August 9, 2010
Comments	Comment.. Voting has been reset due to the extensive surgery the article just underwent, if you voted previously, please review the article and decide where you stand now. -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 20:00, August 9, 2010 (UTC) Oli, please find a way to do this without deleting the previous debate. (Otherwise I'll forget what I said, take the opposite side, and embarrass myself.) For example, close out the old vote box and create a new one just above it. Spıke ¬ 20:26 9-Aug-10 Ok, I'll relocate all the comments to this part next time. Nonetheless, why would changing your side embarass you, you are supposed to RE-EVALUATE it, not blindly side with your old decision. -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 07:07, August 10, 2010 (UTC)

Assholes Anonymous

Score: 2
Keep (3)	Keep. Needs work but not irredeemable --Count of Monkey Crisco 18:33, August 9, 2010 (UTC) Keep. Can be saved, per the Count. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:51, 10 August 2010 Keep. Ya, there's enough of a foundation there to both build upon and edit well. Lots of good lines and sections, so all in all not a VFD page imnho. Just a few minutes of editing could help it quite a bit, and maybe someone will take it on at some point. Aleister 23:40 11 8
Delete (5)	NRV, despite the mention of testicular cancer. pillow talk 07:05, August 9, 2010 (UTC) Delete. A pointless vehicle for name-calling. Spıke ¬ 13:38 9-Aug-10 Delete. Nothing decent in it, and yeah, it's a magnet for lists, insults, cyber-wotsit and the like. Get rid. --UU - natter 10:32, Aug 10 Delete.Catnip for anons. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 11:27, August 10, 2010 (UTC) Disintegrate.** Really just a cyberbullying magnet. Didn't make me laugh. Saberwolf116 10:31, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	At this writing, all three Keep votes are contingent on someone stepping up to improve this article, and even Aleister sees bigger fish to fry. Spıke ¬ 13:11 12-Aug-10 This article has been summarily executed, if you loved it enough to want it in your userspace, leave a message on my talkpage -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 00:02, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Joseph Lanty

Score: 7
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (7)	Zzzzzzzzzz Saberwolf116 10:24, August 11, 2010 (UTC) Yeah, set the alarm clock to zero Aleister 10:46 11 8 Delete. Reads like total vanity. Isn't it? Spıke ¬ 11:17 11-Aug-10 Ugh. Dumbassery. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 7:29 AM 8/11/10 Delete. Vanity that survived since 2007. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 15:51, August 11, 2010 (UTC) Delete.**--Count of Monkey Crisco 19:48, August 11, 2010 (UTC) uh huh huh huh huh huh --Roman Dog Bird 23:18, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Theorem

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Hilarious. Saberwolf116 10:15, August 11, 2010 (UTC) Retarded. It says so. Conundrums, paradoxes, and disdain for them, may be clever, but they aren't funny. Spıke ¬ 11:12 11-Aug-10 Oooooooohhhhhh. --Roman Dog Bird 23:42, August 11, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Crappy. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Count of Monkey Crisco (talk • contribs) Delete. Nope. --Wilytank 15:41, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Sage Rosenfels

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	We get it. He sucks. Still not laughing. Saberwolf116 22:07, August 10, 2010 (UTC) "sucks asian cock" We get the message, you don't like this quarterback. But be a little clever about it. Spıke ¬ 22:16 10-Aug-10 Delete. I plead ignorance as I don't know who this but this is just tiresome abuse without any wit. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 06:37, August 11, 2010 (UTC) Delete*. Ranty ranty rant. --UU - natter 10:32, Aug 11* Ugh. I think we know who the bigger failure is here. --Wilytank 11:28, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Why?:Some guy pulled you over, dragged you out of your car, and beat you to death with your bare hands

Score: -4
Keep (8)	Keep. Laughed and laughed. This is really funny, and weird. Makes me glad to be alive, and to have hands. Aleister 10:32 10 8 Keep. I found this funny, in a weird way. --UU - natter 11:23, Aug 10 Keep. I sort of enjoyed it. Not my favorite article, but since I've voted keep on stuff I didn't enjoy at all, it would be weird not to vote keep on this. pillow talk 17:17, August 10, 2010 (UTC) What the Fuck? Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 17:18, August 10, 2010 (UTC) lol --Roman Dog Bird 17:27, August 10, 2010 (UTC) Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:41, 10 August 2010 Keep. Yes it's badly written, and mad as a cut snake, but I laughed. Myocardialinfarction 19:24, August 10, 2010 (UTC) Keep. I don't know how much my vote counts, since I'm the author, but I'm partial to it. I get that I'm not particularly funny, but I did spend a good amount of time on this doing my best. Larrythefunkyferret 18:52, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (4)	Delete. While technically an Uncyclopedia "Why?" it's really just some rambling story with no payoff, bad writing and nothing that funny in it. --Count of Monkey Crisco 06:50, August 10, 2010 (UTC) Delete.C'est terrible. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 07:21, August 10, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Author can't decide between second and third person--and has no point. Spıke ¬ 10:24 10-Aug-10 Delete.** Just doesn't seem funny, and it's not even well written. ~ Arajlas shifty eyes (talk) (stalk) -- 20100810 - 17:13 (UTC)
Comments	Kept --ChiefjusticeDS 19:50, August 11, 2010 (UTC)

List of Pokemon Episodes

Score: 7
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (7)	Why. --Roman Dog Bird 06:22, August 10, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Ours is not to reason why... --Count of Monkey Crisco 06:43, August 10, 2010 (UTC) Delete. "Just kidding." "Never mind." Ugh. Spıke ¬ 10:18 10-Aug-10 Lol Saberwolf116 10:24, August 10, 2010 (UTC) Obvious delete' is obvious. --UU - natter 11:18, Aug 10 No --Wilytank 12:38, August 10, 2010 (UTC) Delete. It's official- no one can write well about Pokemon.--HM (T) 18:56, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

This Guy Named Ted

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. Part Wibble, part randumbo, part googlymoogly. Written by "Captain Random" in 2006 and looks every inch of it. --Count of Monkey Crisco 06:33, August 10, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Blender full of crap. I trust this isn't in that category of shit articles that are beyond deletion for sentimental reasons. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 07:25, August 10, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Ted is either the author or a close friend. Nothing here for the rest of us, except nonsense year numbers. Spıke ¬ 10:20 10-Aug-10 Delete*. Colossal tosh. --UU - natter 11:20, Aug 10* Disintegrate. Saberwolf116 22:08, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Greased up deaf guy

Score: 7
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (7)	Delete. Oh, look. It's a little used throwaway joke from "Family Guy". The writers of Family Guy can't make this funny and they get paid a lot of money to try. The Uncyclopedia results are predictably bad. --Count of Monkey Crisco 06:39, August 10, 2010 (UTC) I'm not even going to look at it. Fuck Family Guy. --Roman Dog Bird 06:45, August 10, 2010 (UTC) Delete.Turd polishing. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 07:22, August 10, 2010 (UTC) Delete. There is no less promising concept for an article than to pick a character from someone else's comedy and ramble. Spıke ¬ 10:22 10-Aug-10 Delete*. Bad, bad, bad. --UU - natter 11:21, Aug 10* Kill. Doesn't even seem an article. Something on the guy might make for a decent one at some point, but this sure ain't it. ~ Arajlas shifty eyes (talk) (stalk) -- 20100810 - 17:15 (UTC) KILL This is an insult to a throwaway joke that I quite liked. It even has a goddamned Chuck Norris reference in it. For shame! Myocardialinfarction 19:27, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

wumbo

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. There was simply nothing to write about. --Count of Monkey Crisco 07:13, August 10, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Idea exhausted by the next word after Wumbo. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 07:18, August 10, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Author tries to document his own autism. Spıke ¬ 10:25 10-Aug-10 delete*. Wow, that was an easy call to make. --UU - natter 11:24, Aug 10* Wot? Interesting that such a page has lasted so long. ~ Arajlas shifty eyes (talk) (stalk) -- 20100810 - 17:05 (UTC) FUCK THAT SHIT--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 17:22, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain. Would an article like this fit well in Undictionary? --Wilytank 12:50, August 10, 2010 (UTC)

Neoteny

Score: -3
Keep (5)	Keep. Interesting idea adequately executed. An article done in the manner of the thing it's about. Deteriorates toward the end; is it vandalism? Such an article ought not be an excuse for just writing crap if it doesn't serve the goal. Spıke ¬ 21:10 6-Aug-10 Keep. What Spike said. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:01, 7 August 2010 Keep. What Sock said Spike said. See, even the author knew: "11:45, December 30, 2006 Nydas (an article which may never grow to maturity)" Why punish such good foresight? --KUN VFH POTM VFP(IMAGES⇔TALK) 04:17, August 7, 2010 (UTC) Keep. A very good page. I went back to the history and pulled up what the last section actually was meant to be, funnier me thinks. Also categorized the very good and cute pic, which isn't used anywhere else. Aleister 15:44 7 8 Keep. I'ma agree with them. Could be more consistent, but not really worth deleting, especially since it is what it is. ~ Arajlas shifty eyes (talk) (stalk) -- 20100810 - 17:31 (UTC)
Delete (2)	Disintegrate. Interesting idea poorly executed. Saberwolf116 20:46, August 6, 2010 (UTC) Weak Delete. I agree with wolf here, I think the concept is interesting, but it doesn't necessarily play out well. -- S f 1 3 16:58 EST 7 Aug, 2010
Comments	Neutral since I have some involvement (conflict of interest?) in editing the article, but if deleted, please userfy to User:Pentium5dot1/Storage facility/Neoteny. --Pentium5dot1 (semi-retired) t ~^_^~c 01:28, August 9, 2010 (UTC) Comment: In response to the second half of SPIKE's vote: It's part of the style, not vandalism. I previously put an HTML comment in the article saying that said sections were an intentional example of neoteny; should I have used {{SeeTalk}} instead? --Pentium5dot1 (semi-retired) t ~^_^~c 19:28, August 9, 2010 (UTC) No, that is the way to do it and I apologize for not looking at the source. In contrast, please don't have the visible form of the article explain its own humor. Suffice it to say, the last one-third of the article made me wonder whether any crap typed in here can be defended as exhibiting neoteny. Spıke ¬ 20:30 9-Aug-10 Regarding the disputed sections, ordinarily I'd say to ask the creator, but unfortunately s/he is no longer active. For what it's worth, those sections were not present in the first revision, but the article started out with a construction tag, and some people felt desperate to expand it. Perhaps replace those sections with material from Rubber Duck? Sorry for digressing from the scope of VFD. --Pentium5dot1 (semi-retired) t ~^_^~c 20:37, August 9, 2010 (UTC) Kept. --ChiefjusticeDS 05:55, August 11, 2010 (UTC)

Bake Pineapple Upside-Down Cake

Score: -2
Keep (5)	Weak Keep. The premise is funny but horribly mis-executed. A better approach would be to present a normal cake recipe, then have the final instruction be to flip the cake (with icing and all etc.) At any rate, this doesn't pass my test for NRD. -- S f 1 3 20:25 EST 6 Aug, 2010 Weak Keep x2. You know, when your article consists of only one real joke, you probably shouldn't use that up in the beginning. Smack a rewrite tag on this sucker, move it to the appropriate namespace, and then, most importantly, excise all references to LazyTown.--KUN VFH POTM VFP(IMAGES⇔TALK) 16:23, August 7, 2010 (UTC) Keep. Crap keep. Perhaps we need some better cake recipe jokes in here though. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 20:26, August 7, 2010 (UTC) Dunno about you but I thought it was really cute as it already is. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 17:12, August 8, 2010 (UTC) Cutey keep.** Same here; I like it how it is... does need a move, though. ~ Arajlas shifty eyes (talk) (stalk) -- 20100810 - 15:15 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Delete. So, basically, it's a recipe. And the hilarious joke is you need to turn it upside down. How I laughed. What's the point? Also not linked from anywhere and won't be missed. --UU - natter 10:20, Aug 6 Delete. Dumb. And nags the reader. Perhaps there should be an UnRecipes namespace, but it would probably contain variations on a single joke. Spıke ¬ 12:27 6-Aug-10 Disintegrate. Per UU. Saberwolf116 22:22, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Also, it might be a good idea to move this to the HowTo namespace if this is kept. -- S f 1 3 20:26 EST 6 Aug, 2010 Kept, moved. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 05:25, August 11, 2010 (UTC)

World War X

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Disintegrate. Another unfunny future war article spawned by an author's absurd fantasy. Saberwolf116 02:17, August 10, 2010 (UTC) Delete.Curious. Another World War article where Scotland has an important role. Over to you Sherlock. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 07:28, August 10, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Fatefully linked to in World War XI, which we deleted. Notable as part of a saga, war in the eyes of an author who knows nothing but science-fantasy movies. Spıke ¬ 10:17 10-Aug-10 delete*. a lame future war article. What* a surprise. --UU - natter 11:17, Aug 10 Delete. No one likes these articles anyway. --Wilytank 12:44, August 10, 2010 (UTC) Delete. No more war articles. --NoobPwnzer95 04:30, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Planes on a Snake

Score: 7
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (7)	Disintegrate. I honestly have no idea why we kept this last time. There is absolutely nothing worth saving in this pile of crap. Saberwolf116 00:23, August 10, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Ouch. --Count of Monkey Crisco 05:46, August 10, 2010 (UTC) Delete.. A title and lists. That's it really. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 07:30, August 10, 2010 (UTC) Delete. When you crack wise with the title, you break the impression that this is an encyclopedia and make your article hard to find. When you start an article with "Contrary to popular opinion," you mark yourself as a 10-year-old who's always been told how precocious he is. On the rest of the article, see above. Spıke ¬ 10:15 10-Aug-10 Delete*. Predictably, listy crap. --UU - natter 10:35, Aug 10* Delete the author also sucks big throbbing cock--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 17:24, August 10, 2010 (UTC) Delete. This is not a stupid, cliched concept. Nope, no way, not at all.--HM (T) 18:54, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

After the Fire

Score: 4
Keep (1)	Keep. Its [Template:Stub] is sufficient sanction, though it might benefit from quoticide, and perhaps actual clever writing. An article about a real band, with material based on real things about the band. Spıke ¬ 13:33 9-Aug-10
Delete (5)	NRV, despite the mention of testicular cancer. pillow talk 07:05, August 9, 2010 (UTC) Delete. A tired little slice of bandcruft. --Count of Monkey Crisco 02:36, August 10, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Short 'n' shit. --UU - natter 10:29, Aug 10 Delete.. Ash pants. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 11:38, August 10, 2010 (UTC) While a decent start, it's received so little love lately that... agh, I dunno. I guess delete*. Weakly. ~ Arajlas* shifty eyes (talk) (stalk) -- 20100810 - 18:11 (UTC)
Comments

Crayon

Score: 5
Keep (0)	# BLLLLLEEEEEPPPP (horn noise) Invalid Entry, no VFD tag, start over and please, categorize the three very good pics on the page before nominating again. All of them have no other uses on the site and no categories. Aleister 19:49 9 8
Delete (5)	Don't be fooled by the funny picture at the top: this article is horrible. Save the pic, perhaps, but lose everything else. pillow talk 06:57, August 9, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Perhaps fixable or amenable to an article with a real concept, but the current version was written by someone who is still doing schoolwork with crayons. Spıke ¬ 13:27 9-Aug-10 Delete. Piss-poor. --UU - natter 15:49, Aug 9 Delete. The concept and theme are fucking evasive. I don't even think it wants to be followed. --Count of Monkey Crisco 06:56, August 10, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Incoherent blob of idiocy lacking cohesion. ~ Arajlas shifty eyes (talk) (stalk) -- 20100810 - 17:57 (UTC)
Comments	VFD tag put on about 1:20 on the 10th. Aleister 1:25 10 8 Doesn't matter- it's on. I even added a category to every image, so you have no reason to complain.--HM (T) 01:29, August 10, 2010 (UTC) Slow down man, you're going too fast. Gotta make the morning last. Aleister 1:33 10 8

Pencil

Score: -5

Keep (5)

	Pencil.mp3 (file info)
	Narration by Spike, 3:28, 2.38 Mb

~~Keep, if~~ FIXED. This one has a concept: Morph pencil into torture weapon or ballistic missile. However, the list of acronyms is dumb, and is followed by Randumbo and my personal hot button, an encyclopedia cliché, "It has been proven by 18 non-existent historians that...." Spıke ¬ 13:25 9-Aug-10 Totally rewritten; try it now. Spıke ¬ 11:15 10-Aug-10

Keep. Spıke ¬ 15:54 10-Aug-10
Spike with the save! Aleister 13:04 10 8
Keep. OK, this can stay. --UU - natter 15:35, Aug 10
Good enough for jazz. pillow talk 17:18, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
Decent now, just a mite short. But whatever. ~ Arajlas *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100810 - 17:20 (UTC)

Delete (0)

~~Every bit as bad as its inkier brother. pillow talk 06:55, August 9, 2010 (UTC)~~
~~Delete. Nah, this sucks. --UU - natter 15:43, Aug 9~~

Comments

Kept --ChiefjusticeDS 18:24, August 10, 2010 (UTC)

Pen

Score: 5
Keep (1)	Keep. Yeh, it's probably gonna die. But the first sentence made me laugh, so that deserves a keep. —GOD DAMMIT WHORE Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [00:22 10 August 2010]
Delete (6)	For serious? pillow talk 06:41, August 9, 2010 (UTC) KILL IT WITH FIRE! Dear God, can I please have the minutes I spared looking at that article back? NRV. -- S f 1 3 02:44 EST 9 Aug, 2010 What a bunch of crap! --Roman Dog Bird 07:10, August 9, 2010 (UTC) Delete. "fourth sector reports this year confirm that..." A new encyclopedia cliché? Nah. Author is Joe Cool. Spıke ¬ 13:21 9-Aug-10 Delete. Oh no I've gone crosseyed. --UU - natter 15:36, Aug 9 Delete. 'Dumb' would well describe this... ~ Arajlas shifty eyes (talk) (stalk) -- 20100810 - 17:21 (UTC)
Comments

Auntie Harriet Tubman

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	NRV, despite the mention of testicular cancer. pillow talk 07:05, August 9, 2010 (UTC) Delete. "Children, today's assignment is to write a paragraph about Harriet Tubman." Randumbo.Spıke ¬ 13:37 9-Aug-10 Delete. Nasty pile of wibble. --Count of Monkey Crisco 18:24, August 9, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Oh wow, that's bad. --UU - natter 10:31, Aug 10
Comments	Harriet Tubman redirects here, and also deserves huffing. Spıke ¬ 13:37 9-Aug-10

Magic Marker Sniffing Day

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Well, the title seems promising, right? Right? pillow talk 06:59, August 9, 2010 (UTC) Delete. To the extent that huffing magic markers is an efficient way to get high, this is an article driven by the fact that me getting high always seems more interesting to me than it will to you. The photograph is unremarkable (please, Al, no category!) and is likely just a way to use us to get author's face published. Spıke ¬ 13:30 9-Aug-10 Delete. Oh dear. --UU - natter 15:51, Aug 9 --Roman Dog Bird 07:54, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Beaverage

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	NRV, despite the mention of testicular cancer. pillow talk 07:05, August 9, 2010 (UTC) Delete. It's got to be more than off-color to be funny. Is "testicular cancer" the newest Uncyclopedia meme? Spıke ¬ 13:40 9-Aug-10 Delete. The age of beavers? Well I found one that was five. --Wilytank 17:33, August 9, 2010 (UTC) Delete.--Count of Monkey Crisco 18:16, August 9, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Leutnant Herr Thatdamned followspot 21:42 Monday, August 9, 2010 Delete. Low grade unfunny.--*RomArtusImperator ®** (Orate) 07:33, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Popular Media Personality

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	NRV, despite the mention of testicular cancer. pillow talk 07:05, August 9, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Dumb article, about nothing. Spıke ¬ 13:34 9-Aug-10 Delete. Bollocks. --UU - natter 15:52, Aug 9 Delete. Australians should be banned from Uncyclopedia. --Count of Monkey Crisco 21:25, August 9, 2010 (UTC) Disintegrate. Saberwolf116 02:20, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Match Game

Score: 0
Keep (2)	Keep. Not a bad page with some really good pics uploaded just for this page (I added categories to them, come on guys, add categories when you nom pages). And any page on Uncy could be labled "cruft" of some kind. Not a good reason to nom pages, imnho. Aleister 22:57 5 8 Awesome! "Do what I say 'cause I said it. Do it now. Do it ____." ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* (talk) (stalk) Π ~ ~ 06 Aug 2010 ~ 01:49 (UTC)
Delete (2)	Extremely unfunny game show cruft. So unfunny, it ______s. Wild at Heart, he who cleans up (Yell at me) 18:50, August 5, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Stupid. Also, Al, at this rate, you'll get someone creating a BUTT POOP spinoff containing only one uncategorized picture.--HM (T) 02:29, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	I'll say, "Sucks," Gene. There must be half a dozen kids who read Uncyclopedia only during commercial breaks on The Game-Show Channel, and so I won't pull the trigger on this one--even though the humor relates not to anything in reality but merely to the fantasy melodrama playing out in the author's drug-addled mind--like certain UnNews stories. Spıke ¬ 19:07 5-Aug-10 Kept. Also, HELPME, it's gotta pass VFG, too. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 00:45, August 10, 2010 (UTC)

Johnny Olson

Score: -1
Keep (2)	Keep. Why huff it? It's not hurting anyone, and like Spike says, maybe his grandchildren show their friends this page, and look at it on Johnny Olson's birthday. Weep. Weep. Anyway, not that bad of a page. Aleister 23:00 5 8 Keep. Per ^ becuase that is just plain common sense. ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* (talk) (stalk) Π ~ ~ 06 Aug 2010 ~ 01:47 (UTC)
Delete (1)	Extremely unfunny and forced-randomness. Game show cruft. Wild at Heart, he who cleans up (Yell at me) 18:49, August 5, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	I don't know who writes an article about an off-air announcer for TV game shows who has been dead for 25 years. There are grammar errors and Section 1 is very gassy, but if someone really needed such an article to exist (his mother? his heirs?), it's not bad enough for me to kill. Spıke ¬ 19:01 5-Aug-10 Indifference <-- What I just said... -- S f 1 3 19:57 EST 6 Aug, 2010 Boring keep. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 00:43, August 10, 2010 (UTC)

UnScripts:Everyone Loves Rasputin

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. It doesn't link anywhere, has no pictures, and generally isn't that funny. I say be gone with it. -- S f 1 3 19:15 EST 7 Aug, 2010 Delete. Normally, I don't care what happens outside mainspace. Morphing Everyone Loves Raymond onto a personality that everyone doesn't love would be a winning concept in mainspace. The current short ramble is a loser anywhere. Spıke ¬ 23:21 7-Aug-10 Delete. Only the title is in interesting. Shame the rest is a stubby lame llama. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 12:45, August 8, 2010 (UTC) Disintegrate.** Saberwolf116 00:25, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Guy from the Ronseal Paint Adverts

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete. An article of quotes? No. ^{Pirate Lord}__Sonic80 (Yell • Latest literary excretion) __ 18:46, August 8, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Does exactly feck all for me. I'd rather have read the tin. Myocardialinfarction 20:01, August 8, 2010 (UTC) Eeek Aleister 20:35 8 8 Delete. Apart from the cameo appearance of Captain Obvious at the start, this entire article is Captain Obvious. Which points up a problem with every invocation of Captain Obvious: They are all telling exactly the same joke (which may be The Null Joke). Spıke ¬ 20:38 8-Aug-10 KILL IT WITH FIRE! NRV. -- S f 1 3 22:18 EST 8 Aug, 2010 Delete. Should have been strangled at birth. --*RomArtusImperator ®** (Orate) 06:34, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Invalid nomination, but since it's a little too late and everyone dislikes this so much, I'll delete it anyway. But don't forget the VFD template next time, Sonic. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 23:00, August 9, 2010 (UTC)

Haskodrome

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Obliterate. WTF? --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 3:41 PM 8/8/10 Die with dignity Now this page is what I see VFD being about. Pure random nothing, even the pic isn't worth saving imnho. I know of a more random page, but fear that if it's found it will be VFD'ed--it is a perfect blend of random. Aleister 20:33 8 8 Delete. The eyes glaze over. Spıke ¬ 20:39 8-Aug-10 Delete. Return it to the bowels of Hell from whence it came. Leutnant Herr Thatdamned followspot 01:24 Monday, August 9, 2010 Destroy Make this article suffer. NRV -- S f 1 3 22:16 EST 8 Aug, 2010 Delete. Seems to have been lifted in part from here:- http://dragonworld.gavinkelly.co.uk/history.html. Rubbish there and crap here.--*RomArtusImperator ®** (Orate) 06:33, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Space tank

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Disintegrate. Random, unfunny, and overall WTF. Saberwolf116 22:53, August 7, 2010 (UTC) KILL IT WITH FIRE! Go my minions... save yourselves [the trouble of reading this cruft and vote delete]. -- S f 1 3 19:05 EST 7 Aug, 2010 Delete. Flaming Armageddon is playing itself out inside this young mind, and he wants us to know it. Unfortunately, humor is not. Spıke ¬ 23:18 7-Aug-10 Ugh. --Wilytank 00:07, August 8, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Space padding. --*RomArtusImperator ®** (Orate) 12:47, August 8, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

28 Gays Later

Score: -4
Keep (5)	Keep. Change Chuck Norris to an anonymous person & I think the though of the character waking up in a deserted city to find nothing but "its streets littered with rainbow confetti and used condoms" to be the basis of a really funny article. ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* (talk) (stalk) Π ~ ~ 08 Aug 2010 ~ 00:06 (UTC) Edited and Keep. Per Happytimes, I think I saved this sucka. First reverted back to the last edit of the original authors (which included Prettiest Pretty). Then changed all the Chuck Norris and other meme names, and expanded it to include some funny bits /dons clown hair and dances on table playing straight off of gay. Please read again, thanks. Aleister 20:48 8 8 Keep. (Formerly Delete.) Key moment was when Al deleted the template and added a photo. Spıke ¬ 21:04 8-Aug-10 Change to keep. Excellent improvements. I asked Sonje to mess with the first image, and I definitely think this is savable. Saberwolf116 21:17, August 8, 2010 (UTC) Keepish This now has redeeming value and passes my test. -- S f 1 3 22:11 EST 8 Aug, 2010
Delete (1)	Disintegrate. So you found a word that rhymes with Days. Whoop de fuckin' do. Saberwolf116 22:51, August 7, 2010 (UTC) ~~KILL IT WITH FIRE! Ok. The presence of both Chuck Norris and Mr. T. fighting gay people in a single article was only inevitable, I blame the government. -- S f 1 3 19:09 EST 7 Aug, 2010~~ Delete. Article is a cheap knock-off on a film that has nothing to do with gays, on the assumption that sexual innuendo is inherently funny and doesn't require effort. Spıke ¬ 23:16 7-Aug-10 Delete. Junior Uncyclopedia. Special Class. --*RomArtusImperator ®** (Orate) 12:50, August 8, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Sonje made a new image. Automatic keep. Saberwolf116 01:35, August 9, 2010 (UTC) Kept --ChiefjusticeDS 07:04, August 9, 2010 (UTC)

World War XI

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Disintegrate. Another lousy and pointless future war article. Saberwolf116 02:56, August 8, 2010 (UTC) Delete...though I did like the idea of Planet Scotland.--*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 12:41, August 8, 2010 (UTC) "The war began on Cucumber πth." Incessant randumbo about phony history-of-the-future that no one cares about, except author, who evidently also wrote World War X. Am still receptive to the idea of group-deleting all after WW II. Spıke ¬ 20:30 8-Aug-10 I don't think so. --Wilytank 20:37, August 8, 2010 (UTC) KILL IT WITH FIRE! NRD. And as for Spike's idea of group deleting all future world war articles, I say For.** doing so past WWIII, depending on how good that article is. WWIII has relevance, or at least a purpose for existing. I mean, wikipedia has a WWIII article! -- S f 1 3 22:21 EST 8 Aug, 2010
Comments

Tuscan Whole Milk

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Disintegrate. I was going to revert an IP's edit, but then I realized the whole article is worthless. Saberwolf116 02:51, August 8, 2010 (UTC) Delete.. Someone with a grievance enough to write an entire article about this! Drink more alcohol perhaps. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 12:43, August 8, 2010 (UTC) Ugh. Not intelligent at all. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 3:43 PM 8/8/10 Delete. From the cutesy template at the top, to the dammin dammin history, to the Chuck Norris/Nuck Chorris at the end, the only concept here is to be cutesy. Spıke ¬ 20:26 8-Aug-10 Chug it As a vegan, am glad to vote nay. Nice moving milk template though. Dance, milk, dance. Aleister 20:39 8 8 KILL IT WITH FIRE!** I only needed to read the opening paragraph and see the giant block of in-article quotes to know that this has NRD. -- S f 1 3 22:23 EST 8 Aug, 2010
Comments

Master Chief

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete Though this might look like a substantial article - no effort has gone in to any of it. It's just Chuck Norris referencing crap. mAttlobster. (hello) 15:09, August 7, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Just a boring,dull mess. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 20:33, August 7, 2010 (UTC) KILL IT WITH FIRE!** NRD -- S f 1 3 16:53 EST 7 Aug, 2010 Delete. Random babble is rarely this tedious to read. "Master cheif was the one who helped us thru ww1 and saved us from the alian god ubbydubby and saved the world!" The article's final paragraph proves that no one is in charge here. And no, I don't want to click on your YouTube videos. Spıke ¬ 22:22 7-Aug-10
Comments

Children of Bodom

Score: -2
Keep (6)	Keep. A crap keep but at least this is tolerable if nothing else. If this is deleted, something even worse might appear. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 08:15, August 4, 2010 (UTC) Keep. Per Romartus. —Sir Socky** (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 07:24, 5 August 2010 Keep. Not all tht bad, with good pics (I didn't check to see if they are categorized) An IP has been working on it since it's been on VFD too. Aleister 9:09 5 8 Keep. I'm a fan of the band. I've been slowly re-doing the articles for the music I like since I arrived here at Uncyc. I'll add this one to my long list of potential rewrites. This is however, not a firm commitment to doing anything. -- S f 1 3 14:16 EST 5 Aug, 2010 Keep. Mostly per Romartus, but there is the possibility that SOMEDAY, SOMEONE will come to Uncyclopedia eager to see their favorite band sent up in style and we won't have anything for them. I don't see how the IPs getting to it would help anything. With bandcruft, it usually doesn't. --KUN VFH POTM VFP(IMAGES⇔TALK) 04:17, August 7, 2010 (UTC) Keep. Mostly for what the others said; not a good article, but I don't see how it's bad enough to delete. ~ Arajlas shifty eyes (talk) (stalk) -- 20100808 - 04:51 (UTC)
Delete (4)	Ugh. Vapid bandcruft. --Wilytank 13:54, August 3, 2010 (UTC) Disintegrate. Nothing funny to speak of. Saberwolf116 13:59, August 3, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Wow, that's a lot of cruft to read through to realise there's nothing worth reading. --UU - natter 15:19, Aug 3 No. Just no. --Thatdamned followspot Wait, what were we talking about again? 17:27, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Kept --ChiefjusticeDS 07:28, August 8, 2010 (UTC)

They Live

Score: 9
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (9)	Delete. Where is the humor in that? I challenge anyone to find any humor in those few lines of pus. Loopygrumpkins 20:01, August 6, 2010 (UTC) Delete. First-person rant, a charge that didn't exactly carry the day yesterday. Anyway, slap a Category on that photo and let's be done with it. Spıke ¬ 21:05 6-Aug-10 Disintegrate. Category added to photo. Now let's get rid of this dumb one-liner. Saberwolf116 22:31, August 6, 2010 (UTC) KILL IT WITH FIRE! NRD -- S f 1 3 20:01 EST 6 Aug, 2010 Obliterate. Should have been deleted way sooner. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:04, 7 August 2010 They Live But they seriously need to die. --Wilytank 00:40, August 7, 2010 (UTC) Terminate With Extreme Prejudice cause I was expecting fire-breathing Illuminati ants or something. Is it too much to ask for a zombie reference, even? Poorly titled stub fails to add anything constructive. --KUN VFH POTM VFP(IMAGES⇔TALK) 04:17, August 7, 2010 (UTC) AAAAAAAAAA Seriously, you guys? Not even one zombie reference? Should be destroyed just for "Bill Murray is Darth Vader". An insult to a movie that is acually quite entertaining. Myocardialinfarction 13:04, August 7, 2010 (UTC) Delete. They're onto us... ^{Pirate Lord}__Sonic80 (Yell • Latest literary excretion) __ 17:24, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

George Blasing

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Unfathomably Potent Eradication of Exterminating Quality WTF! Loopygrumpkins 20:01, August 6, 2010 (UTC) Weak Delete. Say no to encyclopedia clichés and nonsense year numbers. I'll flip if someone who knows something about George Blasing convinces me this article is funny. Spıke ¬ 20:56 6-Aug-10 KILL IT WITH FIRE! I am offended by the existence of this pile of shit. NRD -- S f 1 3 20:12 EST 6 Aug, 2010 Time Traveling Dildo. Saberwolf116 00:27, August 7, 2010 (UTC) May this article die 234568600 deaths! I know absolutely nothing about George Blasing, but this looks unfunny, i can tell from the dates and from having seen quite a few Allosaurus in my time.--KUN VFH POTM VFP(IMAGES⇔TALK) 04:17, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Robert Walpole

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. Strawberry Jam and masturbation..? ^{Pirate Lord}__Sonic80 (Yell • Latest literary excretion) __ 18:04, August 6, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Walpole invented walls and poles. Also, Jews. Yawn. Spıke ¬ 20:53 6-Aug-10 just. no. NRD -- S f 1 3 20:18 EST 6 Aug, 2010 Yes. Saberwolf116 03:22, August 7, 2010 (UTC) Stubbity Stub Once one of them "Magical Girls" perfects "the ancient art of masturbation" you can come and find me. Until then, Delete. --KUN VFH POTM VFP(IMAGES⇔TALK) 04:17, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Comment.. The illustration is of Sir Christopher Wren from an old £50 note - if anyone's interested. I think this is the second Robert Walpole article to get the electron bath.--*RomArtusImperator ®** (Orate) 20:23, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Hideo Kojima

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Vape. Short and not funny. --Andorin Kato 07:55, August 6, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Short 'n' shit. And Starfox? Kojima? WTF? --UU - natter 11:31, Aug 6 Delete. Although apparently about an anime producer, this article is classic extemporaneeous babble. Spıke ¬ 12:25 6-Aug-10 Game creator responsible for the Metal Gear series, and nothing whatsoever to do with Starfox. Since you ask. ;-) --UU - natter 12:46, Aug 6 Ugh. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 8:36 AM 8/6/10 How come people like this are always stupid. --Roman Dog Bird 21:12, August 6, 2010 (UTC) Kojima Kaminadesu It's a shame, because Kojima-san deserves his own article. Just not this one. At all. It's hard to see how you could mess it up given that the man pretty much supplies his own material. --KUN VFH POTM VFP(IMAGES⇔TALK) 04:17, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Fepia

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. Wow. Well, there's a quite a lot to it, but none of it is funny, and it's really hard to see the point of it. And nothing links to it except this nom. As it says itself: fepic ale. --UU - natter 12:41, Aug 6 Delete. Dumb article about a made-up country that no one cares about, with intrusive JavaScript. Return it to author's Sandbox. Spıke ¬ 13:50 6-Aug-10 Disintegrate. Per the paperclip. Saberwolf116 01:19, August 7, 2010 (UTC) Return To Sender Somebody spent an awful lot of time typing this up, and it has been quite a while since I've seen a reference (albeit misspelled) to Zoroastrianism on this wiki, but what you guys are saying is correct. The appropriate punishment is to send this back to his userspace and put some sort of restriction in place so he can't use Clippy anymore. --KUN VFH POTM VFP(IMAGES⇔TALK) 04:17, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

D for Deletion

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete. OK, it's been here since forever, but nothing links to it. It hasn't been edited in a couple of years. It's not funny. It's a block o'text. It should go. --UU - natter 11:17, Aug 6 Irony --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 7:39 AM 8/6/10 Delete. It sounds as though a page-blanker, in the style of Batman Comics, cannot undertake his crime until he explains to everyone the elegance of his nefarious plan. Or was author banned for blanking and is he explaining his side? Spıke ¬ 12:30 6-Aug-10 Delete. As above, with a 'who cares?'. I read it. It wasn't funny. I hope to save others from the same cruddy fate. Myocardialinfarction 19:38, August 6, 2010 (UTC) KILL IT WITH FIRE! The situational irony does not escape me, in fact it is delightful. NRD -- S f 1 3 20:20 EST 6 Aug, 2010 G is for Granted! --KUN VFH POTM VFP(IMAGES⇔TALK) 04:17, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Prohibition

Score: -4
Keep (5)	Strong Keep Spike, I've told you we have different senses of humour. I was laughing at the first sentence, and then at the pic, and then at the caption, and several times after that. There are moron random spots, and weak things, but those are pimples. I'll work on this one, it's a saver for sure. Thanks (really), I've never seen it before. Aleister 14:40 5 8 OK--Unlike Puddle of shit, I'll reconsider when you're done. Spıke ¬ 15:40 5-Aug-10 Keep. I like this article and think that it should stay, with some work done on it (as Aleister says he will). Thatdamned followspot Wait, what were we talking about again? 22:42, August 5, 2010 (UTC) Keep. Do what I say 'cause I said it. (Fix that first pic for goodness sake!) ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* (talk) (stalk) Π ~ ~ 06 Aug 2010 ~ 00:59 (UTC) Strong keep. I laughed, this must be the work of the Almeister -- S f 1 3 17:34 EST 6 Aug, 2010 Expand this into a full-fledged period piece. While I can't fault the creation of a more accurate expansion of the acronym MADD, Roaring Twenties can't do all the poor speakeasies and bootleggers justice. The Feds would have to do that. --KUN VFH POTM VFP(IMAGES⇔TALK) 04:17, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (1)	Delete. How can a total rant be so aimless? Spıke ¬ 12:18 5-Aug-10
Comments	Kept! --ChiefjusticeDS 07:46, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Defense of the Ancients

Score: 7
Keep (1)	~~Keep.~~ I didn't read it, I looked at the pic and checked if it was categorized and it isn't. Now check out this great pic and see if we want to toss it out without a category? Someone who knows categories a bit better than I do please add a few to this amazing graphic. Thanks. Aleister 23:21 5 8 You want to keep the whole article because of a single image? --Andorin Kato 23:30, August 5, 2010 (UTC) Until it gets properly categorized, then I'll change my vote. But not only are articles VFD'd, but uncategorized pics with no other uses are also cast aside into no man's land. This pic is worth placing in positions where it could be used by others. Aleister 23:33 5 8 Then put it in your userspace or something, that is no reason whatsoever to vote keep if an article sucks. --UU - natter 11:28, Aug 6 Hear hear. Down with casting votes without having read the article but merely looking at the pictures. Spıke ¬ 12:35 6-Aug-10 An up with people nomming VFD pages checking to see if the pics are categorized or used on a few other pages. An article is both writing and pics, no? Aleister 17:42 6 8 If you care that much about categorizing images, you could do it yourself. Just saying.--HM (T) 02:26, August 7, 2010 (UTC) Keep. Do what I say 'cause I said it. ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* (talk) (stalk) Π ~ ~ 06 Aug 2010 ~ 01:02 (UTC)
Delete (8)	Vape. Crappy writing, bad formatting, and I've never heard of it. Also possible vanity. --Andorin Kato 20:48, August 5, 2010 (UTC) ... --Wilytank 22:59, August 5, 2010 (UTC) Delete. This article is basically a long list, by which author hopes to score Cool points with his gaming frients. Spıke ¬ 23:09 5-Aug-10 Delete. Junior Uncyclopedia. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 06:22, August 6, 2010 (UTC) Delete*. Crap article, I don't care about the pictures. --UU - natter 11:28, Aug 6* Dumpster Now that the pic has found some categories and a home, I read the page, and wailed for a minute in frustration at the writing ability of the uneducated, and then came to vote. Great pic though. Aleister 17:39 6 8 KILL IT WITH FIRE! keep the picture, kill the article. NRD (outside the picture) -- S f 1 3 20:28 EST 6 Aug, 2010 Delete. While I'm pretty sure this is a good impression of how those who use Ventrilo and play DOTA speak and type, basic editing standards have been spat on here, and the humor is largely nonexistent. --KUN VFH POTM VFP(IMAGES⇔TALK) 04:17, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Added two categories to the Image. Aleister's right. The image is great, even if the article's bad. Myocardialinfarction 23:37, August 5, 2010 (UTC)

Family Feud

Score: -4
Keep (5)	Keep. Though it needs work, this one actually has a concept: Not just ridicule a game show by documenting what the author imagines might happen in an unreal episode, but morph the series into an Appalachian blood-feud. Spıke ¬ 19:12 5-Aug-10 Keep. I've read enough of it to vote For. An interesting spin, and since nobody else is rushing over themselves to do a Family Feud article, why get rid of it? i so confused. Aleister 23:14 5 8 Keep. Per the two gentlemen above. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:44, 6 August 2010 Keep. per the above above two. ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* (talk) (stalk) Π ~ ~ 06 Aug 2010 ~ 01:50 (UTC) Feeblest Keep until somebody has a replacement lined up in their userspace. Any online encyclopedia covering game shows in any capacity must have Family Feud. --KUN VFH POTM VFP(IMAGES⇔TALK) 04:17, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (1)	We asked you to name an unfunny game show article on Uncyclopedia. You said "Family Feud." Our survey said... ding! Wild at Heart, he who cleans up (Yell at me) 18:52, August 5, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Kept --ChiefjusticeDS 07:44, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Psycho Mantis

Score: -3
Keep (7)	Keep. I'll go with what I said last time. This is in keeping with the subject matter, not that bad, raises a chuckle if you are familiar with the subject, and isn't harming anyone. Could still benefit from some expansion, but I'm not seeing a deletion-worthy mess here. --UU - natter 13:32, Aug 3 Keep. Per UU. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:03, 3 August 2010 Keep. An interesting take on a game character. Can someone who is more knowledgable about the game than I am put some categories on the nice shiny pic on the page. Thanks. Aleister 16:12 3 8 Keep. A good start, and certainly better than a blank page. pillow talk 16:45, August 3, 2010 (UTC) Keep. I've read a lot worse. This is actually not bad. Myocardialinfarction 17:29, August 3, 2010 (UTC) METAL GEAR!? I can see how this might fall afoul of the Codeine's Mum guideline, but what doesn't? I'm not saying it's flawless, but if you've played the first Metal Gear Solid you'll understand this is a pretty funny imitation. --KUN VFH POTM VFP(IMAGES⇔TALK) 18:05, August 3, 2010 (UTC)"I am going deeper into your mind... into your soul. You like Castlevania, don't you?" See? Even throwaway jokes on the VFD page entry about this subject can be really funny. I think I'm going to put that into the article. Myocardialinfarction 14:03, August 6, 2010 (UTC) Strong Keep. --Matfen 07:16, August 5, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (4)	Delete. Not funny, sure it embodies the character but not in a very good way --++ 13:07, August 3, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Yeahno, kill it. Love, Delete. First-person rant. Best fix is to start over. Spıke ¬ 13:28 3-Aug-10 Delete.. Symbolic thumbs down. --*RomArtusImperator ®** (Orate) 17:57, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Keept -RA HB 19:04, August 6, 2010 (UTC)

Puddle of shit

Score: -1
Keep (6)	Keep. I could see lots of good writing on the page, and have started the editing process by deleting lists and polishing what was left, and by adding material. At some points I actually laughed, and was having fun editing. I'll do more on the page, inspired by the challenge of HELPME's comment. Aleister Have done quite a bit of edits, addits, pics and captions, etc. I'd contend that if this were any other subject it would be enough to save the page, as it is essentially a new article (but with the same time-honored theme) than the one VFD'ed. Edited in homage to the extended work of Maniac1075, who inspires such lesser talents as mine. Aleister 16:19 Your contention is undeniable. My vote is unchanged. Spıke ¬ 21:40 2-Aug-10 Keep. I don't really like the page, but if Aleister's editing it, watchlisting it, maintaining it, then I want to give it a chance. pillow talk 16:47, August 2, 2010 Gross! Watchlisting and maintaining? If it sticks around I'll just have to keep improving it then, until HELPME noms it for feature. Well, I made my own bed, so I guess I must lay in it. Aleister 16:55 2 8 Keep. We can save this shit! It's overflowing with potential... and corn---Maniac1075^{Complain Here} 21:19, August 2, 2010 (UTC) Keep. Obviously. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:28, 2 August 2010 Keep. BUTT POOP! --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 7:36 PM 8/2/10 Keep. I'm almost leaning towards the puddle of shit. Maybe someone could adopt this puddle of shit? (You can see some laughs reflected in it from some angles.) Myocardialinfarction 02:43, August 3, 2010 (UTC) I've adopted it, and plan to work to expand it and see if HELPME will nom it for feature. Aleister 2:51 3 8
Delete (5)	Delete. Is not good, and I don't see how this concept could possibly be.--HM (T) Disintegrate. The article is about as good as it's name --Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 03:47, August 2, 2010 (UTC) 03:45, August 2, 2010 (UTC) KILL IT WITH FIRE! A self-fulfilling title this is. --Yoda 02:05 EST 2 Aug, 2010 Delete. The concept fails. Al should go save something that deserves it. Spıke ¬ 07:03 2-Aug-10 Urg. What they said. points up ~ Apheori shifty eyes (talk) (stalk) -- 20100802 - 14:15 (UTC)
Comments	Al, I appreciate your cleanup and saving efforts, but I don't think this is the page for you to use them.--HM (T) Well, I honestly did see some good writing and laughs on the page. It needs edits and some storyline twists, and I started those because the good writing and laughs deserve as much of a save as a page on Eddie Munster or Dame Judith Dench or something. Aleister 6:20 2 8 More recent editing. Please take another look at puddle of shit. Wade in it, and see if it doesn't stick to your feet. Aleister 16:23 2 8 Keept -RA HB 19:03, August 6, 2010 (UTC)

Ray Combs

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Extremely unfunny crap. Wild at Heart, he who cleans up (Yell at me) 18:51, August 5, 2010 (UTC) Delete. As well as the problem with the other nominations in this series--that they appeal exclusively to kids whose Channel Selector knob has broken, marooning them on The Game-Show Channel--this article is indeed unfunny, and omits to ridicule the one thing Wikipedia says about Ray Combs that is patently ridiculous: That, while on a suicide watch, he managed to kill himself anyway, by tying together bedsheets. Spıke ¬ 19:15 5-Aug-10 Delete. seriously, it has a "joke" about a "fat guy going ape shit" arbitrary nonsense/commentary. -Drdisque 21:43, August 5, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Do I need to give an explanation? Thatdamned followspot Wait, what were we talking about again? 22:02, August 5, 2010 (UTC) Delete. This is just crap. --UU - natter 11:25, Aug 6
Comments

Bute Medical School

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Disintegrate. Basically a long, unfunny way of saying "MY SCHOOL IS AWESOME". Saberwolf116 02:25, August 3, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Utter, utter shite. Myocardialinfarction 02:43, August 3, 2010 (UTC) KILL IT WITH FIRE! It's not like the article is incredibly poorly written, but the author is a gigantic douche nozzle. -- S f 1 3 23:30 EST 2 Aug, 2010 Delete. Just bollocks. --UU - natter 11:18, Aug 6
Comments

Selengor

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Disintegrate. Unfunny and poorly written rant. Saberwolf116 20:18, August 4, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Endearing pidgin English written by a foreigner is just about the only funny thing about this article. Section 6 takes a nosedive into Rant; reviewers should assume it's vandalism and ask if article would be any good without it. (I say no.) Spıke ¬ 21:24 4-Aug-10 Delete. Randumbo respects no international borders. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 06:27, August 6, 2010 (UTC) Delete*. No good. --UU - natter 11:22, Aug 6*
Comments

Template:Expert

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Disintegrate. Unused template related to a recently huffed category. Saberwolf116 14:19, August 3, 2010 (UTC) --Magic man 15:16, August 3, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Seems pointless to me, especially round here. --UU - natter 15:17, Aug 3 It can go, I guess. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:46, 6 August 2010 May it rest in peace, or something' Aleister 00:48 6 8
Comments	For posterity, let's record the joke here (since it's not entirely bad): "This article is in need of attention from an expert on the subject. Please hold one hostage and make them fix this up. Kthx."

Rock Band (video game)

Score: -3
Keep (4)	Keep. It's not that bad, could use some images though -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 06:45, August 1, 2010 (UTC) Keep. Yeah, what he said. Aleister 14:44 1 8 Keep. I agree. I just googled it and the first hit was http://uk.media.ps3.ign.com/media/028/028566/imgs_1.html . Shurely there must be some over-the-top image gags around - even with minimal text this could get quite good. It's even more fun than Rock Band Myocardialinfarction 05:04, August 2, 2010 (UTC) Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:27, 2 August 2010
Delete (1)	Delete., this is a piece of junk, it reeks failure and has few funny jokes. Yes i did at one point add thimgs to it, but that was half a year ago, before i even used this site daily/at least once a week. It's got to go --Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 03:44, August 1, 2010 (UTC) As a user was recently banned for placing an animated GIF on this page, I think you are not allowed to sign your votes. Spıke ¬ 11:57 1-Aug-10 Not signing a vote is worse than signing with an animated gif (at least in his case), if someone wants to bust his chops over it, they can, I imagine the animated gif abuser was using a large (dimensions and/or filesize) gif. -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 14:48, August 1, 2010 (UTC) He was. I wasn't serious. Spıke ¬ 14:50 1-Aug-10
Comments	Kerpt. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 03:32, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

Template:Elephants

Score: -2
Keep (8)	Keep. I laughed. It stays. -- S f 1 3 21:02 EST 31 July, 2010 Keep. Hee hee. It reminds me to pick my friends pockets (or at least my "freinds" pockets). Aleister 1:06 1 8 p.s. Fixed the spelling and capitalization problems. Or should I have, maybe it was meant to be that way. Some of the voters liked the spelling. And I've put it on the Kleptomaniac page. Looks good there with the spelling corrected. Keep.. Already kept based on votes from IronLung, Socky, ThomasPynchon, and myself, and now we can throw Skinfan and Aleister into the mix. pillow talk 01:19, August 1, 2010 (UTC) On the forum you stated that you submitted this for VFD previously in the belief it should be deleted, what changed? -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 02:34, August 1, 2010 (UTC) So, I dug up the original VFD, you voted to keep it despite heavily implying on the forum to the contrary, very confusing. -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 02:44, August 1, 2010 (UTC) My memory, apparently, was not accurate with respect to this template. It wasn't part of the large batch I nominated. pillow talk 04:54, August 1, 2010 (UTC) Alright, since it's a contentious article it can have a few more days than the standard so that everyone can have a chance to vote -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 07:09, August 1, 2010 (UTC) The fact that it appears on User:Hyperbole/HyperVFD was probably my source of confusion. I actually had intended to nominate it for VFD - but once I saw that we were keeping so many worthless templates, I changed my mind and decided that if it made me chuckle, I'd vote to keep it. This is, in essence, my very favorite of the shitty templates. pillow talk 07:16, August 1, 2010 (UTC) Keep. I still like it. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:59, 1 August 2010 Keep. Elephants. --Wilytank 11:48, August 1, 2010 (UTC) Keep. It's a good article. My wife liked it and that is saying something. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Psycho Cowboy (talk • contribs) Are you sure you're not confusing Elephant (the article) with the the Template linked above? -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 17:37, August 3, 2010 (UTC) Keep. So bad it's ... well, okay it's still terrible. --KUN VFH POTM VFP(IMAGES⇔TALK) 18:05, August 3, 2010 (UTC) Keep. It made me giggle like a schoolgirl. Well, kinda.--Thatdamned followspot Wait, what were we talking about again? 17:31, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (6)	Delete. Hyperbole mentioned this template on the forums; it was apparently VFD'd previously but survived. It doesn't seem to be used anywhere and it's pretty lame, therefore, it deserves burnination. -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 00:48, August 1, 2010 (UTC) De-1337 I've always been of the sentiment that templates, be they award templates or article templates, ought to be used and relevant to certain pages or occasions to be in the mainspace. Seeing as how this has been ignored since the last time it was on VFD (over a year ago), and probably won't find a home on any articles since it's utterly irrelevant to anything and therefore purposeless in the mainspace, I'm gonna have to vote to delete this one. I do find it funny though, so I'll be taking it to my userspace. See how this works guys? --EMC^[TALK]01:06 Aug 1 2010 Delete. Not funny or useful.--HM (T) Delete. Fits a twelve-year-old's desire to warn or nag his friends, without requiring that he know what he is warning/nagging about. It is truly dorky. Save the illustration, and anyone who wants this sort of thing can code one up. It shouldn't be in Template space to encourage anyone else to do so. Spıke ¬ 02:32 1-Aug-10 Delete. One for Junior Uncyclopedia. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 10:03, August 1, 2010 (UTC) Neh.** -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 07:35, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	" Already kept based on votes from IronLung, Socky, ThomasPynchon, and myself, and now we can throw Skinfan and Aleister into the mix." I can't see what weight retroactive votes carry. You're welcome to invite them to vote on this now though. What do you think about my reasoning to delete this, Hype? (since you left the forum thread I figured I'd ask you here). --EMC^[TALK]01:24 Aug 1 2010 EMC, are you suggesting that I go around campaigning for a certain VFD vote? I don't think that's behavior anyone wants to encourage. As for your reasoning, I'm being asked to weigh the opinion "only useful templates belong in mainspace" against the opinion "anything which is funny belongs in mainspace." I can see valid arguments for both, but I incline to the latter. pillow talk 06:10, August 2, 2010 (UTC) Well, it depends on how you word it when you ask for people to vote on (not for or against) something for it be tasteless dickery (tasteless dickery lol). I've no problem with it. --EMC^[TALK]08:23 Aug 2 2010 You could say, "Hey, you voted on this before. It's up for VFD again. Here's a link to the discussion and the developments. Just wondering what your thoughts were or if you cared to weigh in," and that'd be fine. Saying, "Okay, so, they're trying to vote to delete this again. Go vote to keep it," is cheap whoring. --EMC^[TALK]08:27 Aug 2 2010 It's now used on the Kleptomaniac page and looks pretty good there, except the VFD template went along with it! Aleister 1:32 1 8 Fixed. --EMC^[TALK]01:35 Aug 1 2010 That's a keeper. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 13:12, August 5, 2010 (UTC)

UnNews:The Loch Ness Monster: New Scientific Discovery!

Score: -4
Keep (5)	Keep per longstanding consensus that deleting old UnNews is a lot of work for virtually no benefit. pillow talk 21:41, August 2, 2010 (UTC) Keep Switched me vote, aye. All of the above and below. Aleister 21:49 2 8 Keep. (Formerly Comment.) The article is crap, but it's inexpedient (as before) to start purging years-old UnNewses. 21:39 Spıke ¬ 21:51 2-Aug-10 Keep. I made it a little bit better, I think. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:33, 2 August 2010 Keep. per above. Trust me, this has no some redeeming value, but old UnNews is old news, and deleting old news is bad news. -- S f 1 3 23:27 EST 2 Aug, 2010 No redeeming value? But I worked on it! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:23, 3 August 2010 Sorry Socky, didn't mean to offend you :p -- S f 1 3 13:56 EST 3 Aug, 2010
Delete (1)	Poorly formatted, old, and unfunny. I could fix some of this, but there is no point. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 21:24, August 2, 2010 (UTC) ~~No wonder no one has been able to find her. Aleister 21:29 2 8~~
Comments	I fixed the formatting and I might improve it some more. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:33, 2 August 2010 Kept. ~ 08:05, August 5, 2010 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive213

Navigation menu

Search