From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. |
Keep |
- Keep Not great, but no need to delete. I would probably pee review this at about a 24 maybe? With high score to P&F and low to Humor (something like 4,7,8,0,5). If we should delete at PR24 and below, we would not have much content indeed (maybe that's not so bad?). No, no. Keep it. It's a good subject and I could improve it if we do. --TPLN 23:39, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- Keep MrN 23:52, Mar 2
- very keep - WTF?--Sycamore (Talk) 16:04, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- keep. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:05, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:44, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete looks like it was sporked from the website of the Unitarian Universalist church, or Conservapedia's liberal counterpart in a mirror universe. --Mnb'z 19:13, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- Deet. BZZZZBZZZZZzzzzt-- 23:29, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- My main issue is the bias. This article is basically an unfunny liberal rant. --Mnb'z 00:05, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Abstain. It is indeed an unfunny liberal rant. But then again, it might be a better starting point than a blank page. And it does have a rewrite tag on it, after all. In conclusion: I don't care. pillow talk 00:58, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- I tried a quick rewrite, making it less "liberal friendly" here: User:Mnbvcxz/Christian Left. Warning, that rewrite is NSFW, and probably stupid/perverted by some people's standards. --Mnb'z 01:29, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Absolutely stupid and perverted by my standards (I'm a walking liberal bias, see). But it is absolutely hilarious too. So I'm all filled with self-loathing. Seriously, that is as funny as can be, Manubbivicxez. Odd, unorthodox as Uncyc goes, and snarky as hell. But funny. I'd say move it to main. But then, DGNED. --TPLN 01:36, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Facepalm. I thought "Huh, mnbvcxz did a quick rewrite. I wonder if he just plastered the page with pictures of pregnant women. Ha, ha, ha." Then I saw I was right. pillow talk 18:05, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Like I didn't give you any clues. --Mnb'z 18:50, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Abstain. There is certain humour potential in the subject matter, but as it stands now, it reads like, gasp, WIKIPEDIA. --Curious Larry 01:58, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Comment - I don't think Mnbvcxz's version should be moved over, its just weird and creepy and not funny in any way.--Sycamore (Talk) 16:07, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Damn, I did it again. I laughed heartily at something that was not funny in any way. When will I stop doing that? --TPLN 17:06, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Sycamore doesn't like it, Sycamore is a liberal, therefore I have succeeded in reducing the liberal bias :) Seriously though, it probably is too creepy for mainspace. --Mnb'z 17:38, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, I know that. I even said it was "unorthodox", and I would say move it. I understand its inappropriateness for this place (I'm starting to learn the culture). But it is funny. And I'm probably left of Sycamore. Except when it comes to pregnant porn. Then I'm a goddam Republican - I say bring it on! --TPLN 18:17, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Keep --Mnb'z 06:12, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
- Keep MrN 13:28, Feb 28
- Research Missile Shield to prevent the bannukes from hitting. This has some of the funniest shit I've seen in a while, and I'd hate for it to go. S-984 14:20, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. Rewrite tag. --UU - natter 11:56, Mar 2
- Keep I can't help but think that some people just delete articles because they think it's fun to delete the work of others. I do think it needs to go easy on the n***** comments though.--Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods
- Strong Keep. More redneck jokes need to be on Uncyclopedia. It could also have a good share of KKK jokes. Anyway, I thought this article was a good idea like Niggerlodeon was. --Shock Jock 02:47, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Template:Association for better sex
Keep |
|
Delete |
- delete huge useless little used template. --Mnb'z 23:24, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Someone uses this?-- 23:27, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Mama always said, stupid is as stupid does. Well, this DOES stupid. --TPLN 23:41, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. MrN 01:24, Mar 3
|
Comments |
|
Time 4 Luv
United methodists
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Random thing that's been here ages with little to no improvement. Not linked from anywhere and not going anywhere. Get rid. --UU - natter 11:06, Mar 2
- Delete. Didn't make it through paragraph one before my eyes started rolling-- 11:45, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. I am overwhelmed by mehness. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 13:12, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- EXTERMINATE! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 15:53, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- delete --Mnb'z 17:52, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
50kings
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Schoolcruft/vanity. Been here too long without getting any better, no links to it, no point, get rid. --UU - natter 10:24, Mar 2
- Delete. Even though it won't change the fact that the 50Kings are way cooler and smarter than I will ever be.-- 11:52, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 13:05, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- EXTERMINATE! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 15:51, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete --Mnb'z 17:52, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
You Died
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Stubby thing - game template used in mainspace, but with no links to it, no real humour value, and no point that I can see. Get rid. --UU - natter 10:44, Mar 2
- Delete. The lesson that hits home, use it or lose it.-- 11:47, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 13:08, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. MrN 15:50, Mar 2
- EXTERMINATE! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 15:53, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
10,000 Gays (Left In America)
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Boring album article that degenerates quickly into the usual crappy tracklisting bit. --UU - natter 10:38, Mar 2
- Delete. That number randomizer is set on "kill" captain!-- 11:49, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Could someone delete Tool's entire back catalogue too? Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 13:07, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete MrN 15:52, Mar 2
- EXTERMINATE! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 15:52, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Template:DestroyedForSafety
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete grue based confusing wanna-be maintenance template. --Mnb'z 23:33, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 00:00, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. MrN 03:38, Mar 2
- Delete. Happy to see the back of pointless templates. --UU - natter 11:50, Mar 2
- Delete. That poor Grue looks confused! It's the mistreatment of animals for entertainment I tell you!-- 11:55, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep Keep it, it's really funny, some of the funniest stuff i've ever seen on this entire site, especially the trivia. User:Mowub 21:44, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per "my bad articles are better than non-existent ones for notable topics" theory. --Mnb'z 04:34, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- Keep/hard rewrite per above. Otherwise someone else will just make a version even worse than this. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 05:13, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- Keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 08:31, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- Keep MrN 10:39, Mar 1
- Keep. It's a notable enough subject that we need an article, even one like this. Anything written to replace it isn't likely to be much better. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 11:55, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. if only for the pictures and their captions =) --Kit talk 20:50 1 March
- Keep I second what Mowub said. --Naughtius Maximus F@H Woof! MeowMUN 23:14, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- EXTERMINATE! I'd like to forget this crap ever existed. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 21:03, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
- Awful. —Sir SysRq (talk) 23:46, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
- Just stop talking about the man already. Note: I am indifferent to the actions of Michael Jackson. Nothing said about him post-child molestation charges has ever been funny, though. My God. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 00:23, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- DOUBLE EXTERMINATE! -- 00:32, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- DESTROY I have never felt sick after just looking at an article...but...oh god it is too horrible to discuss ~SirTagstit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 07:25, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Trivia sections are almost always (perhaps just always?) crap. I'm sure this one is no exception (I haven't looked at the article in awhile, but it has pretty much always been awful). We usually aren't open to big lists with filled with nonsensical crap, by the way. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 00:40, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- I think this subject is too notable to not have an article for. It might be ok with some pruning and rewriting. --Mnb'z 04:34, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Kept MrN 23:40, Mar 1
|
Keep |
- Keep I found it quite funny. Anyone who gets offending by it shouldn't read it.--Mnb'z 06:11, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
- Keep -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 06:21, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
- Keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 12:08, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
- Keep.. Didn't strike me as racist at all - more a satire on a large, white-controlled business trying to appeal to an ethnic group and getting it all tragically wrong, rather like the BBC did here in Blighty when they first tried to make programmes for blacks and Asians. It's satire, and not bad satire either. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 12:34, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Per above. Could use a bit more humor about BLUE people though. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 05:18, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- Keep MrN 14:14, Mar 1
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- Yeah, I never got that. I got tired of looking at this and I don't care about past deletion attempts. —Sir SysRq (talk) 01:56, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
- Abstain. I am completely clueless as far as this article is concerned. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 12:14, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Kept MrN 14:14, Mar 1
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- Wouldn't this be ICU instead? —Sir SysRq (talk) 20:23, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, you're probably right. Consider it ICU'd -OptyC Sucks! CUN20:27, 28 Feb
Kept Noob. MrN 21:06, Feb 28
|
Blind Guardian
Plan B (operating system)
Rockport, Texas
Keep |
- Keep. Soz but I don't agree on this one. Sure its no VFH material but it aint that bad at all imo opinion. From the viewpoit of a random visitor - I'd rather see that page than nothing there (guessing none of you will replace that page with anything better) Not that great but better than Nada --Kit talk 14:35 27 February
|
Delete |
- Eww... I SAY TOWN, YOU SAY CRUFT! TOWN! - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 01:06, Feb 27
- CRUFT! --TPLN 01:09, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:31, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- TOWN! ...DAMMIT! SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:48, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. population is only 7,000 and change, village cruft. --Mnb'z 18:18, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- Delete We got to draw a line somewhere. MrN 18:20, Feb 27
- Delete. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:08, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Template:Jesus
Regular k
Keep |
token keep. another one i'd like to see kept based solely on the title, and for which i will take responsibility for. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:01, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- does that mean you going to rewrite it?--Mnb'z 16:44, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- ...sure. eventually. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:47, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- Wanna collab with me? I actually just started something in the edit box. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 02:03, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete. - unfunny and random. I may be missing something, but this seems like nothuing but Randomness.--Sycamore (Talk) 13:39, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. MrN 14:41, Feb 26
- EXTERMINATE! Damn Gerrycheevers, mocking me. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:49, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- delete. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:53, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Thought about it for a few days.....zoot-- 20:47, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- It's like the unspecial counterpart of the Special K from Kellogg's. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 13:47, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- Comment - Based on the currnet state of it, maybe you could move it into your userspace Gerry and delete this crap?:)--Sycamore (Talk) 20:38, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- sure, i only need the concept, i don't need any of this content. the milk's gone and made it all mushy. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:53, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- Ehhhhhh shit. I suppose this is why I ought to read the VFD nomination box in full before I go around starting rewrites. I didn't see that you wanted it deleted and sent to your userspace... and I should have discussed it with you before starting a whole new article. There are 3 things that could happen now: I discard my current rewrite and ask you again to collab, after which we will proceed on a joint concept; you start adding to my already going rewrite, assuming you agree with the concept; or we both start two seperate rewrites that will eventually fight each other to the death. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 04:01, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- i agree wholeheartedly with your concept. if you want to run with it, be my guest, i'll stand down. if you want to collab, i will work on it also. i only wanted it deleted because it wasn't going to be a top priority for me, and i am lazy, but now that you've started...momentum is the key to writing. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:46, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- Well, if you don't mind then, I'll move it into my userspace, and you're free to add whatever you want, I'd love to collab with you on it. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 20:54, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- LAME. This is probably a subject people could write a lot better article about, but what I saw here is a damn bad attempt at being funny. 03:55, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
- Delete The pun on rich in nutrients is quasi-clever, but it degenerates into listcruft and randumbness. Kind of a textbook bad Uncyc article. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 00:58, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete...delete.--Romartus 17:25, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- AWRG I agree with both Sofia and Mnbvcxz so I can't decide. Blah =P --kit 14:57, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Kept MrN 15:36, Feb 27
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete rambling "cancerous" legacy cruft from 2005 that isn't going to go anywhere. --Mnb'z 19:32, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- delete. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:34, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:38, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Kept MrN 15:29, Feb 27
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- delete archived maintenance template. I would suggest deleting so someone doesn't try to use it. --Mnb'z 16:44, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- delete. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:55, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Kept MrN 15:27, Feb 27
|
Laughing
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Someone popped a merge template on this for a merge to Laughter. However, Laughter is a decent article, while this is basically crap. I would therefore like to delete this and just redirect to Laughter. To avoid accusations of unacceptable power abuse, and becasue the queue is still low, I bring it here for you to decide. --UU - natter 10:01, Feb 27
- Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:30, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Looks well-justified to me. Down the drain it goes! --Kit talk 14:32 27 February
- delete. it's funny because UU is still at the point in the adminship where he is afraid to do stuff. i'll give it two months before he gets a taste for power and we all have manhole-cover marks on our wrists. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:50, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- EXTERMINATE! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 14:55, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- delete a typical "this is X" template, although more wordy, unfunny, and ugly than average. --Mnb'z 06:04, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- { Awful. IronLung 20:51, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- This one is mainly userspace, I think substing it would be OK. ~ 08:36, 23 February 2009 (UTC
- Abstain This template has a bit of historical value (Hurricane Katrina used to be a big deal) but it was created a couple of months after the fact, so I dunno. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 01:08, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Kept. ~ 08:48, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- keep! I personally love it. Especially the shit spelling. --noamshouseparty 14:59, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. Retarded enough to make me smile. IronLung 02:09, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- Hilarious! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 02:13, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- Keep i lurve ephelantz (Roachclipjonny! 21:54, 24 February 2009 (UTC))
- Keep. For sure. Hearty guffaws for me. It's the good kind of random. I'm using this template somewhere, someday. UPDATE: I just looked at it again and laughed out loud again. I'm coming back in twodays too see if I still laugh, and you know what? I bet you I will. --TPLN 19:05, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- Agreed. I have no idea why this made me laugh. It shouldn't. But it did. pillow talk 18:35, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- delete extra retarded. --Mnb'z 02:42, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
- lol -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 06:14, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
- delete Forgettable template... MrN 13:37, Feb 22
- Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:24, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- delete. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:07, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- Neh. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 03:37, Feb 24
|
Comments |
|
Template:Splintern
Black Satan
Template:MMR
Keep |
|
Delete |
- delete random sectional template, the kind just asks noobs to fill articles with random nonsense. --Mnb'z 17:09, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- delete MrN 17:10, Feb 25
- delete. coherent parody at its finest. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 18:24, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- EXTERMINATE! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 18:27, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- MMR is an acronym for "mild mental retardation," and this is mildly mentally retarded. pillow talk 18:44, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Template:Curse
Keep |
|
Delete |
- EXTERMINATE! When I look at this, I think like "WHAT THE FUCK!?" Seriously, get rid of this! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 08:26, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. It's all part of the "what the fuck" series of templates. The eyeball would have been pretty far down on my list of image choices for this one as well.-- 08:37, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- Delete --Mnb'z 17:08, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- delete. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 18:22, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- Vaguely gross. I don't like looking at it. pillow talk 18:35, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Template:Boring
Template:Kittenolivian provinces and territories
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete "this is X template." Pointless and colony-cruft, and there is already a sectional template {{Malaysia}} for Malaysian articles. --Mnb'z 18:26, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Kept MrN 14:27, Feb 24
|
Keep |
- Keep I think this works well on a number of pages. Maybe needs removing from a few, but it's got a good theme going. MrN 18:46, Feb 23
- Keep Yeah, I like its message and I think it has useful application. The whole anti-condom is pro-STD thing is not necessarily novel, but this is subtle enough to be funny I think. --TPLN 18:56, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Per Cajek. I mean, MrN. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 00:45, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:43, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- KEEP! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 10:29, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete. a big, flashy, "this is X" template, and really doesn't make sense. (How in the hell would std's fight condom use anyway, but I digress...) --Mnb'z 17:09, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Kept MrN 14:24, Feb 24
|
Keep |
- Keep. I like it. And it's more like a theme-related template than a "fix this" one. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 20:21, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Per above. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 23:16, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. ~ 08:35, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- Keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:23, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. MrN 18:44, Feb 23
- Weak Keep Yeah, it's not a maintenance template, and it doesn't work well except in an article or two (if it even works there), but I don't see how deleting this and substing it into the relevant pages is going to make any difference. Whether to have this in the template namespace or just in the articles seems like more of a question of personal style than anything else. Some programmers would prefer to hammer their program out in one file, and some would prefer to break it down into a bunch of subroutines, even if it's unlikely if that subroutine ever gets called to do anything else. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 00:53, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- delete Its one of those wanna be "fix this" templates that you can't really tell what its trying to say. --Mnb'z 20:10, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. First I was like hmmm but then I was more duh? --Kit talk 07:47 23 February
- Weak delete. Regurgitation of a tired old meme; hard to understand how it could improve an article. But if we do keep it - can we remove the "maintenance templates" category? It really isn't a maintenance template. pillow talk 08:49, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- delete. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:10, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. - Where does the moratorium on All Your Base not apply? I would rather err on the side of foolhardiness regarding this. Get it out. --TPLN 19:07, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- "theme" templates aren't good either. (Sectional ones are good, but not "this is X" templates.) --Mnb'z 00:58, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- If they take up an enormous amount of space they mainly make the article uglier, but this little one doesn't have that problem. It even serves as a 'nice' introduction to the article -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 13:07, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- If you have a few small templates on top, it still takes up a lot of space. Plus, "comment" templates are always cliche, and are often spammed by noobs, who think every article in a given subject should have a comment template. --Mnb'z 16:46, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Kept MrN 01:14, Feb 24
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Strangely random thing that I can't see the point of. It was created in October and hasn't been touched since, there are no links to it except this one, the author seems to have wandered off, and I don't see anyone else making anything of it, so shall we get rid? --UU - natter 13:31, Feb 20
Delete --Mnb'z 15:11, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete. It has no banana images to categorize. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 15:30, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
- delete. port it to ?pedia, it could certainly be a feature there. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:49, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
- Bandwagon delete -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 06:45, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Kept MrN 01:17, Feb 24
|
Russian carwash
I made this article all by myself. It was all my idea and I deserve all the credit!
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- Abstain for now. Obviously the joke here is that this is indeed an authentic Wikipedia article, and the author plagiarised the article on plagiarism and then claimed authorship. I don't know if that's funny enough to merit an Unyclopedia page. Then again, electrons are cheap and obviously the title of this article isn't exactly valuable real estate. I don't know. Maybe I'll get off the fence tomorrow. pillow talk 08:47, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- {{cleanup}} it might be funny-ish if cleaned up. However, if noone wants to bother cleaning it up, it probably should be deleted. --Mnb'z 16:48, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
|
The Matrix III Revolutions
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. - lousy film article. All the other Matrix franchise articles have been deleted. Garbage/Rubbish.--Sycamore (Talk) 13:58, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- EXTERMINATE! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 14:16, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- Deeeeeleteful. Thought: Matrix 4 Devolution featuring Neo walking around bored with nothing to do.-- 14:27, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. per above. --Mnb'z 17:04, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- uegh. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:31, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Epic Movie
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. - Listy/messy film junk. Its a poor topic to base an article on - and I don't see this going anywhere.--Sycamore (Talk) 13:13, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- EXTERMINATE! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 14:16, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- Delete.per above. As a side note, it looks like its related to some of crablogger's articles. --Mnb'z 16:58, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- delete. that's the biggest list i've ever seen. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:29, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Ugh. OK, OK. You guys win. Lists, even if they might be funny, just aren't funny. Is there a possibility though that this is ironic? Meaning, the article is almost as unfunny as the movie? No? Delete, then. --TPLN 19:11, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. It just doesn't work without 500+ on the list, like International Baccalaureate.-- 19:37, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Alliance Of The Fallen Turkey
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. - 2007 stub, little progress since then. I think its probably too random to be going anywhere.--Sycamore (Talk) 13:00, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- EXTERMINATE! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 14:17, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. on closer inspection, it appears to be a primarily 2005 stub. --Mnb'z 16:51, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- delete. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:25, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- delete. MrN 18:39, Feb 23
|
Comments |
|
Template:Rambling
Winston-Salem
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Another short and meaningless page in my opinion. --kit 14:52, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Don't forget to add the {{VFD}}... MrN 14:55, Feb 22
- Thought I did it; Silly me! thx for covering my back ;) --kit 15:01, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Viniggerville
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. - Lousy random towncruft, IP found this--Sycamore (Talk) 10:33, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
- Niggers. I'm tired. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 10:38, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. MrN 10:41, Feb 22
- Delete. Unfunny racism is...........just racism-- 12:02, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. --Mnb'z 20:06, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Ben 1.0
Template:Dear Leader
Template:Ballin'2
Keep |
|
Delete |
- delete confusing wannabe maintenance tag. Puts articles in the ugly category, but you wouldn't know that from looking at it. --Mnb'z 05:43, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
- Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 18:31, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
- What the hell does "ballin'" mean? Note: I am certainly one of the whitest people in existance, and I go everyday hardly understanding what my peers are saying. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 06:30, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
- Doesn't fly high enough. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 06:34, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
- delete MrN 10:18, Feb 22
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- delete. random, incoherent, no improvement since a pee from UU several months ago, not linked...and i am now terrified of santa claus. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:40, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- Delete --Mnb'z 17:47, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- I laughed - not. Is that the correct response ?--Romartus 22:38, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. my brain hurts (more than usual at least). --kit 17:45, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- It appears that the original author has been gone since November. --Mnb'z 05:34, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Kept No decision... MrN 10:17, Feb 22
|
Fred Durst