User talk:Under user/Archive 18

New Thing

HI UU! I fixed your equal signs. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 08:25, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

I sure hope that bad word I'm not allowed to use isn't UU.... Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 08:27, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

And I fixed 'em back the way I want 'em! ;-) --UU - natter 08:27, May 12

Also, well done for being a brand new despoiler for this page, joining an elite list! --UU - natter 08:28, May 12

NOOOOOOOOOOOO! I should have known. I went after the master of fixing grammatical errors. One day I'll learn my lesson. Also FU Edit Conflict. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 08:30, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Yeah...

Before you so rudely archived I was gonna ask you, You told me to mainspace the template that I used in the UnTweets, would this mean having to go through it and painstakingly change all the unmainspaced templates? or would they re-direct? Also thanks for teh vote! :) ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 12:58 12 May 2009

Well, the template wouldn't redirect exactly, but you could edit the page, copy/paste the source into Word or even Notepad, and do a find/replace to change all of the userspace template links to mainspace template links in one go. --UU - natter 13:26, May 12

Yeah, that's a sensible and utterly obvious idea. So for mainspacing it I'd just like to double check that "UnTweets/Tweetplate" would be the correct title? ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 13:35 12 May 2009

I'm not double checking for fun you know? I'm genuinely uncertain of myself regarding the issue at hand. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Orian57 (talk • contribs)

Didn't notice this bit - I don't see why not. --UU - natter 14:44, May 12

Oh and another thing entirely. Socky suggested I write the article Nursery (after he found a redlink to it in insomnia), much like you told me to write Neurotic. Well I actually want to but I want to write it as Joshy. So the question; is recycling the character a bad/acceptable idea? And would I get a feature out of it. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 13:20 12 May 2009

Nothing wrong with recycling a character, I'm sure I've seen it done before. As to whether or not you'll get a feature, that depends on how good you make the article, as always! --UU - natter 13:26, May 12

Oh ok, I just thought I'd run it by you because I've personally never seen the reuse of a character (unless you count "you" he's everywhere!). ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 13:35 12 May 2009

And Your Mom. --UU - natter 13:38, May 12

Oh and also, also, what do you want done with Gazelle? ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 13:35 12 May 2009

I wanted it reading, which you've done. Thanks. Anything else you choose to do with it would be your concern and none of mine. --UU - natter 13:38, May 12

Oh Ok. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 13:39 12 May 2009

But seriously. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 14:10 12 May 2009

Ja, I saw. Danke. I tend to leave a little time before weighing in on noms of my stuff. But I'm glad you like it that much. --UU - natter 14:44, May 12

HALP!!!

Its all gone terribly wrong!!!! ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 14:54 12 May 2009

I'm sure you'll find you're terribly mistaken! (Templates need to start with "Template:" in mainspace - I forgot that too). --UU - natter 14:56, May 12

Well I'm glad you cleaned up your mistake in a timely and calm manner. You're a good man. Not many would have remained cool in that situation. I'll get you a medal. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 14:58 12 May 2009

NP. --UU - natter 15:02, May 12

~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 15:08 12 May 2009

I actually didn't, Todd, but now that I've noticed I might aswell just leave it like that. Thanks, though. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 15:18 12 May 2009

It's more ironic and funny in broken condition. ^_^ --T. (talk) 15:20, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

I agree. Also: hi Todd, nice to meet you. --UU - natter 15:22, May 12

Yes actually I meant to say that too. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 15:23 12 May 2009

It's nice to meet you both. Pardon me for barging in, but I find that the banter on certain talk pages is often more entertaining than the stuff on the Forum.  :) --T. (talk) 15:27, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Ah, right. I can see your mistake - you'll be wanting Mordillo's talk page - it's a 24 hour fun-never-stops partay extravaganza over there! ;-) --UU - natter 15:29, May 12

Yes but this is far more middle class. More wine? ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 15:33 12 May 2009

I never drink wine. It's a proper single malt scotch or nothing. I will, however, relieve you of any canapés you happen to have about your person. --UU - natter 15:36, May 12

I do like Mordillo a lot -- he doesn't take himself (or me) too seriously, but I think you guys are hilarious too. And your modesty is a plus.  :) --T. (talk) 15:37, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Canopys? "Around my person"? Are calling me fat? /Runs into a dark corner and binge eats, crying ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 15:38 12 May 2009

And that's why homosexuals shouldn't have the vote. --UU - natter 15:43, May 12

I litterally don't know what you mean by that but it gives me a legitimate reason to use teh word Fascist! Wich I can spell now! ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 15:49 12 May 2009

Now if only you could spell which. ;-) --T. (talk) 15:50, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Yup... /Runs into a dark corner and binge eats, crying ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 15:52 12 May 2009

dogg

its kay that you deleted that my internet was down tho can i has a copy? bb – Preceding unsigned comment added by Bbgunbb (talk • contribs)

OK, first up, don't forget to sign talk page comments with the 4 tildes (~~~~) - it makes it much easier for me to tell who you are and what you're after. Second, from looking at your contribs, I guess you mean this? There it is, in your userspace, where it won't be deleted unless you ask. When you think it's ready, have a word again and if I agree I'll mainspace it for you. Have fun! --UU - natter 17:46, May 12

Of course he meant to say four tildes ~~~~ he's just a senile old fool. Aren't you UU? Yes you are, oh yes you are. :P ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 19:30 12 May 2009

Yeah, that was what I meant. Note to self: don't edit in a hurry on your way to footie. --UU - natter 20:16, May 12

It's all about balls with you straight boys isn't it? ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 20:24 12 May 2009

Tweet

Mr McElroy says thanks! his blog is teh funnies! 11:44pm May 14th from web tanks for teh voats! 11:45pm May 14th from web

~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 09:28 14 May 2009

Just wondering

Is there a record for the most in-depth reviews in a month? I'd just like to know, in case I was close to beating it. :P Saberwolf116 20:13, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Well my personal best is 19, which I think you've already matched. Try six in a day though, I did that once. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 20:47 14 May 2009

Well 4 in a day, one before midnight, then four, then another one just after midnight. But I hadn't slept so it was still a day really. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 20:49 14 May 2009

Also, User:Cajek/Pee may hold the answer to your question. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:50, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

We didn't really start keeping monthly records until about Feb of this year. That said, I think the best I saw was Mnbvcxz, who did over a review a day when he won his RotM (and has hardly done any since, as tends to be the case). --UU - natter 20:54, May 14

You hate football now? Good for you! I'm glad you've come round to the correct way of thinking, now to wean you off cricket. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 21:05 14 May 2009

Ya lots of people tend to slow down after 50 or they win RotM...that was the case with me too sorta I guess. I have been starting up again though! Did a few this month!    Tagstit    talk    contribs    awards   00:19, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

It's the curse. Once you win RotM you just loose all willingness to do reviews. What was once a feeling of good citizenship becomes a hateful chore. What once mattered becomes just numbers on a meaningless list. What was once your soul becomes just a black, metaphysical husk. I think we should nominate RotM for RotM and see if the whole of PEEING just collapses in on itself. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 14:46 15 May 2009

Yeah, everyone who wins RotM never does another review, or any checking or anything. Wait... --UU - natter 14:51, May 15

You're the exception that makes the rule. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 14:53 15 May 2009

What in all hell is an review? --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 14:50, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

It's when a daemon sticks his fingers up your arse and inspects you. Or "reviews" you. Or at least that's what it is in all hell. Around here is criticism of your latest funny. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 14:52 15 May 2009

I really didn't need to know how you spend your weekends. Either way. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 14:55, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

You have a fan on IRC

<DaBossmanFoSho> i rewrote da article fo australia and britain but dat muthafucka under user banned me yo fo real

Just thought you should know. XD Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 14:56, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

I don't think that's even a real person. He's just a figment of someones very poor imagination. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 14:57 15 May 2009

Yawn. --UU - natter 14:58, May 15

Edit summaries are to summarise! You don't just say in them what you say on the page. Do you know how much time I wasted scrolling down here just to read something I read 5 seconds before hand? Yeah that's right 5 seconds! I could have had a quick genital rub in that time and you robbed me of that. YOu motherfucker! ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 15:00 15 May 2009

An Australian, a Britain and a DaBossmanFoSho walk into a bar. They get banned yo fo real. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 15:02, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Fo real, moverfucker! ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 15:03 15 May 2009

And at speed, muvvafugga:

• (Block log); 12:13 . . Under user (Talk | contribs | block) blocked Da Bo$$man Fo Sho (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of Judgement Day (yawn)
• (User creation log); 12:13 . . Da Bo$$man Fo Sho (Talk | contribs | block) New user account

I'm not fucking about here... --UU - natter 15:05, May 15

I'm fucking about, just not in the way everyone would think. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 15:21, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

And I'm thinking, just not in the way everyone would think. --UU - natter 15:22, May 15

Well nobody thinks the way I do anymore, not since the accident. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 15:29, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

And I only think by accident. --UU - natter 15:34, May 15

That's what you think. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 15:41, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

A sentence with the topic word "think". Just to feel like I'm part of this conversation. :) ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 15:43 15 May 2009

UnSignpost May 14th

The Uncyclopedia UnSignpost

The Newspaper 4 out of 5 Dentists Agree On!

May 14th, 2009 • Issue 47 • And you will know our name is the UnSignpost when we lay our news upon you!

Wales Speaks Exclusively to UnSignpost! by UU It's the big one folks, the interview they all wanted, but we got: shy, retiring Wikimedia mogul Jimbo Wales has spoken exclusively to your UnSignpost. Wales (pictured right in happier times) took time out from his busy schedule of inserting further Liberal bias into Wikipedia to share with us his thoughts on the credit crunch, the Obama administration, the Pope's visit to the Middle East, and the future of Uncyclopedia, and the insight is literally devastating in its incisiveness. When pressed on these vital issues, Jimbo confided to us: "You kids get offa my pipe! Now, where's my lawn?" These are words that every user will interpret in their own special way - Jimbo, like all great orators, has the ability to make profound pronouncements that each and every listener will put their own unique spin on, so that it seems he is talking to them alone. Whatever pearl of wisdom you find in this oracular utterance, we are sure it is exactly what you were intended to find. Crowning Acheevement by UU UnSignpost co-editor, Imperial Colonization lynchpin and all-round star user Gerrycheevers has made Uncyclopedian history by becoming the first user ever to win all of the major monthly awards on the wiki: WotM, UotM, NotM, FPotM, and PotM. Plus RotM, although that's not really considered "major". This astonishing fact was pointed out by RAHB, proving quite conclusively that he must have no life whatsoever. When asked for comment, Gerry exclusively told us: "Well, I don't know what to say, really. I suppose my well-roundedness speaks volumes about my excessive amount of free time. My next objective will be to obtain a microphone and continue my quixotic quest to collect all of the awards". Rules < Funny: The Essay by UU Loveable Uncyc pyromaniac The Woodburninator, long known for his views on how "rules" and "funny" should relate to each other, has, in an alcohol-induced "moment of clarity", composed an essay on the subject. He encourages you to read it, and exclusively told us he questions the sexuality of everyone who doesn't. As a completely neutral wiki newspaper, the UnSignpost of course neither endorses nor doesn't endorse any of the views contained within the essay. It just agrees with some of them. Is it a Usergroup if there are no Users Grouped in it? by Joe9320 It has been about a year and a half since Uncyclopedia's once shining usergroup network stopped operating and became extinct. As ever in such circumstances, conspiracy theories have quickly sprung up to explain how this could have happened. Some say that when Chronarion left Uncyclopedia to focus on another project, he left it to the Wikia staff to do all the patrolling, which caused Uncyclopedia's domain name to be changed in October 2008, and the user groups were left to rot with no activity, like the Hittites did when they destroyed their own city and left. Others say that UNSOC killed off every other usergroup, from the Grue Army to UNATO, and had a monopoly on the usergroups. Whether the theories are true or not, the usergroups appear to have all but died. In January 2009, archaeologists from the Philippines dug through the ruins of the usergroups and found compelling evidence that there is still a small amount of activity in the UNSOC group, whose interim leader Necropaxx was heard to observe "UNSOC has about 3 or so active users right now; we just keep that gigantic list to inflate our numbers". The non-existent Cabal have not made any comment about this being a dastardly plan of theirs to ensure the "golden Age" of Uncyclopedia 2005-2007 remains sacrosanct. Because they don't exist, obviously.

Check out these pages! Rewriters, assemble! Confessions of a parody parodist Who needs publicity? From our logs: 18:42, 27 April 2009 Dr. Skullthumper (Talk | contribs) blocked I AM GOD (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of Judgement Day ‎(Zeus called. He wants his title back. Something about missing having an excuse for incest.) 21:58, 13 May 2009 Mordillo (Talk | contribs) blocked 75.47.141.62 (Talk) with an expiry time of Judgement Day ‎(seek the definition of life in the dictionary. Hint: it does not include so called venegance against humor wikis. Also, seek the definition of vengance. Creating wiki pages does not constitue as such.) 12:49, 14 May 2009 Under user (Talk | contribs) blocked 82.41.56.104 (Talk) with an expiry time of 1 day ‎ (don't blank pages, it's proof you have even less of a life than we do.) Biopic of the Week Colin "All your base" Heaney may possibly have the most annoying username to have to copy and paste into a Signpost biopic in all of Uncyclopedia. A mainstay in such helpful roles as VFD, Colin's accomplishments include contributions to the famed Al Gore colonization, having explosions in his sig that look rather cool when he signs a bunch of times in a row, and setting the record for most electrons used in a userpage and corresponding talk page. Go Colin! Cajek Sighting of the Week Co-founder of the UnSignpost Cajek was sighted this week in an alley behind his userpage, taking out the trash. He also updated his ban counter to a robust 117 and added electricity and magic to the iron fences surrounding the Cajek Mansion. Look for an exclusive fake interview with Cajek in next week's UnSignpost! Desperate Attention Seeker of the Week 00:55, 8 May 2009 RAHB (Talk | contribs) blocked Cajek (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 1 second ‎ (The) 00:55, 8 May 2009 RAHB (Talk | contribs) blocked Cajek (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 1 second ‎ (UnSignpost) 00:56, 8 May 2009 RAHB (Talk | contribs) blocked Cajek (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 1 second ‎ (Had) 00:56, 8 May 2009 RAHB (Talk | contribs) blocked Cajek (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 1 second ‎ (Better) 00:56, 8 May 2009 RAHB (Talk | contribs) blocked Cajek (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 1 second ‎ (Run) 00:56, 8 May 2009 RAHB (Talk | contribs) blocked Cajek (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 1 second ‎ (This) 00:56, 8 May 2009 RAHB (Talk | contribs) blocked Cajek (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 1 second ‎ (Series) 00:56, 8 May 2009 RAHB (Talk | contribs) blocked Cajek (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 1 second ‎ (of) 00:56, 8 May 2009 RAHB (Talk | contribs) blocked Cajek (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 1 second ‎ (Bans) 00:56, 8 May 2009 RAHB (Talk | contribs) blocked Cajek (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 1 second ‎ (Next) 00:56, 8 May 2009 RAHB (Talk | contribs) blocked Cajek (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 1 second ‎ (Week) (There were more. We got bored copy/pasting them. Find the rest yourself)

UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox

Hand-delivered by —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:54, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

I'm breaking all your rulez

HEY UU! Not only am I not putting this message at the bottom, but I'm putting it in the most illogical place of all: your little message thing. Plus, I'm going to misspell the following phrase: UDNER UESR   Le Cejak • <23:49 May 17, 2009>

lal!!! ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 23:53 17 May 2009

Is somebody ban hunting again? Well, not banning Cajek is the new banning Cajek. So I'm going to give you a good, stiff, non-banning. That'll learn ya! --UU - natter 08:15, May 18

Is that like how gay is the new black? Except that makes me slimming and good for high class cocktail parties as apposed to not being banned for mindless vandalism. This metaphor's all fallen to hell. Also nursery is drawing towards compleation, will you have the time to look it over or even review it later/tommorrow? Also, Yay! Feature, template will be on it's way. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 13:59 18 May 2009

Thanks!

Oi! My mate, Petie would just like to thank you! Why, only fuck knows, I’m just the messenger – don’t shoot me! Cos that’s the problem with you people, you’ve all got it out for us, just cos we don’t have jobs you think we’re like, or even are, the scum of the Earth! And we’re not, you know, we’re people too. Just because we don’t have your fancy foreign cars and, fuckin’, sued shoes or whatever. We’re only out of pocket because you’ve taken all the fuckin’ jobs first! If it bothers you so much why don’t you donate your job to Oxfam and we could pick it up for bargain prices? Eh? Bet you don’t like that idea though because then we’d be the ones looking down on you! you fucking, lazy, tax-stealing, jobless scum!

~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 14:31 18 May 2009

And now for a request (just so I can come back and thank you all over again)

Yeah, I finished Nursery and would totally appreciate specifically your input if you get time. :) ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 20:06 18 May 2009

Also I've written this UnNews, and wouldn't mind a quick opinion on that. Additionally (and least importantly, for now) I've started Snow White (can you believe we didn't have that already?) as a sort of corrupted modern-day version, like what P.P. did to Goldilocks. I'd just like some of your feedback, I'm worried that all this quantity coming out of me is impeding the quality. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 04:25 19 May 2009

Crikey. Er, I dunno when I'm gonna get time to take a good look - you know the way I review, I need at least half an hour to take a proper squint, and getting a full half hour to myself is gonna be tricky before friday. I'll get a minute here and there to ban, delete and do a little checking, but I can't promise any kind of review. I wouldn't worry about too much stuff meaning a lack of quality: 1. look at Cajek at his peak; 2. you're not on a time limit here, have a little patience and don't let go of them until you feel they're ready! Anyway, got to go do stuff now, promise to take a squint if I find myself with more time than I expect. --UU - natter 08:03, May 19

I have let them out when I thought they were ready, I'm just worried that I think they're ready too soon, if you don't have time to do a full review though that's fine. Any chance I could just get a quick thumbs up/thumb down opinion? if it's still up for review on friday I'll come harrass you again though. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 14:22 19 May 2009

Der Unwehr

Check this out, and join if you really want to: User:Guildensternenstein/Der Unwehr —Sir Guildensternenstein 21:40, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Seen it. Good luck with it. I just rewrite stuff as and when I feel like it - hell, writing anything seems beyond me at the moment! Besides, PEEING takes up too much of my time as it is, I tend to steer clear of other usergroups. That said, any initiative to improve some of our less stellar articles gets a thumbs up from me. --UU - natter 08:05, May 19

It's 1:30 in the morning

Go to bed, already. Or, as you English would have it, why don't you "schlep" off to the beddington?   Le Cejak • <8:32 May 19, 2009>

...Beddington upon Newcastle??? TALK PAGE WHORING (also, I hope I edit conflicted you)   Le Cejak • <8:35 May 19, 2009>

It's 9:34 - get to work, ya lazy bastard! (Transatlantic translation: get offa yer ass an' go hide from the boss!) --UU - natter 08:37, May 19

ONLY WEIRDOS WORK AT 1:40 IN THE MORNING!!! Also, I'm on break.   Le Cejak • <8:43 May 19, 2009>

ONLY WEIRDOS EDIT THIS WIKI! Got you there, haven't I? And what's a "break"? I seem to remember having such things in the dim and distant past, but my capricious mind often plays tricks on me. --UU - natter 08:50, May 19

The last time I edited this wiki, I was writing in the unsignpost, reviewing articles, writing writing writing writing awards people liked me took a break............... came back all of a sudden!! Oh man.   Le Cejak • <8:54 May 19, 2009>

Not following you. Hell, I find it so difficult to stay away from this place I even edited while in Australia on my honeymoon. Seriously, I need help! Tell me, o great and powerful mage, how does one cast this spell of "taking a break"? It sounds like much powerful juju. Will it make me cool? --UU - natter 08:57, May 19

Taking a break from Uncyc makes you uncool. I learned that the hard way: life suddenly became more serious and depressing without you and all these other people making me giggle. Sadly, I know that I work in bursts of energy, and that those bursts get shorter and shorter around here. On a happier note, Red Light, an article of mine, is being whored on your talk page. Ban me so I can sleep?   Le Cejak • <9:01 May 19, 2009>

you know cajek, i just moved all of my stuff into your office at the unsignpost secret headquarters, and now you're back and there's penguins and monocles everywhere. forget it! you can have it back! SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 13:58, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

can you fix this

User:3.141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399375105820974944592307816406286208998628034825342117067982148086513282306647093844609550582231725359408128481117450284102701938521105559(the_end)/sig – Preceding unsigned comment added by 3.141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399375105820974944592307816406286208998628034825342117067982148086513282306647093844609550582231725359408128481117450284102701938521105559(the end) (talk • contribs)

Yes I can. You're welcome. --UU - natter 11:29, May 20

Some advice about a rewrite/ article makover

I dont want to simply go and rewrite an article without being sure if its alright or not so i would kindly like to ask you if you can take a look at this article: User:Acrolo/Trip and inform me if i can replace the Trip article which contains a rewrite tag with this one? If not can you give me any good ideas as to what to title it? Lol its a tough one.

Your help will be very much appreciated, Thanks UU!

Acrolo 17:28, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

OK, my advice would be: get a pee review. Include in the review request a line about comparing it with the original, with the link. If the reviewer feels it's a significant improvement, move away! It will probably be an idea to request a review from a member of PEEING - Tagstit, Gerrycheevers or Orian may be decent bets. I'd check it myself, but I'm busy right now (everyone else on my team at work is on holiday, ill or getting married, the inconsiderate bastards) leaving me time for banning and deleting, but not the time I need to thoroughly check an article. Speaking of which, argh, work to do - got to dash! --UU - natter 08:24, May 21

"Decent bet"... not sure if that's more or less complimentary than the last thing you said about me. I'll add it to the "neutral" collumn, although that's still a negative, by the fact that it's not directly positive. You make me sad :( And talking of deleating, I left some of my old crap on QVFD, would you mind? ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 08:31 21 May 2009

ORESOME~! Thanks for the advice, and tell those selfish people at your work that funerals are bad excuses, because all they wanna do is eat nice food. I decided to make the article into a Why? article instead and it works out better.

KKthnx just thought id spam and let ya know

Acrolo 11:40, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Explosion ninja article

i would very much like a copy of my article back please. thank you for huffing it ):< --Doomlord106 19:23, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

UnSignpost

We don't have any articles for the UnSignpost yet. It seems Gerry disappeared a few days ago. While he may still show up, I'm kind of concerned about letting Gerry do all the work again. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:38, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Have a look at my reply to Acrolo earlier - I don't have time. In fact, I may not even have time for banning and deleting today, things are going fucking nuts! This may have to be one of our occasional missed weeks (hey, not like it hasn't happened before). Alternatively, you could fill out the flannel yourself, run an article or so, get Orian to write something, maybe beg a "from the desk of the Cabal" from Mordillo and throw something together. Your choice, but I have teetering mounds of work, and nowhere near enough time! Arrrrrgh! (I almost feel a second exclamation mark coming on, but nothing's that bad...) --UU - natter 08:53, May 21

I think I'm done now. How do you like it? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:29, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

I like it, actually. Thanks a bundle for making it happen! --UU - natter 20:54, May 21

I'll start delivering it within a few hours. (Have bits of stuff to do first.) —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:19, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Done. I desperately need to know how bots work. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:44, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

UnSignpost May 21st

The Uncyclopedia UnSignpost

In Pure Russian Fashion, The Newspaper That Reads YOU!!

May 21st, 2009 • Issue 48 • I've seen news you... people wouldn't believe

Glorious Cajek return story By Socky Something known as a "Cajek" apparently made some sort of return recently. According to eyewitnesses, he updated his ban counter, wrote a few articles, got some of his old articles deleted, did some nominating and voting stuff at VFH, and made several comments on user talk pages. This, seemingly, is about what he used to do, although few of our readers are old enough to remember his previous contributions to Uncyclopedia. Cajek exclusively told us the following: "Gotta go bye see ya". People disappearing, people reappearing, people with little time on their hands, bots unavailable By Socky & UU What happened to users like MrN9000, Dexter111344, GlobalTourniquet and DrStrange? Were they run over by a train? Did they suffer from a heart attack? Are they running from the law? Or are we just getting too worked up after a couple of weeks' absence? Whatever be the case, we here at the UnSignpost hope they are all right and will be returning to us in the near future. More recently, it has come to our notice that Gerrycheevers, Sonje and RabbiTechno have been missing for at least a couple of days. Perhaps there is a serial killer stalking and brutally murdering bright Uncyc talents? (Are we getting good at this whole "wild press speculation and fear-mongering" thing yet or what?) In the mean time, fortunately, several other users have made glorious returns to Uncyclopedia. As documented elsewhere, a Cajek is apparently back and doing stuff. MNM5150 has been doing some things around places, mostly the forums. Readmesoon has been spotted at VFH and a few talkpages. Yettie has been sporadically active. And Todd Lyons has been doing more stuff recently than he was doing less recently. A lot of users seem to be unable to contribute as their work/school requires them to spend their time on "useful" things. The more young adult users/little kids seem to be struggling with certain "finals", like Mahm00shA for instance. SysRq appears to be working on his graduation. Statistics show that Hyperbole's activity has been rather low, but recently increased dramatically. For how long this trend will continue is uncertain. UU has been here intermittently, but keeps proclaiming himself to be "busy". He commented "I don't have time. In fact, I may not even have time for banning and deleting today, things are going fucking nuts! [...] I have teetering mounds of work, and nowhere near enough time! Arrrrrgh! (I almost feel a second exclamation mark coming on, but nothing's that bad...)" He then proved himself to be a big fat liar by editing this story and various other bits of the UnSignpost. Additionally, while Wikipedia is being overrun by bots, they seem to have gone completely extinct on Uncyclopedia. This has led to our beloved Socky becoming partly mechanized in order to fill the role of paperbot. However, he is currently planning to get his bot operational so he won't have to tire his arse off every week. Porn! Porn! Pr0n! By Socky There has been somewhat of a controversy as of lately about the existence of supposed pornographic images on Uncyclopedia. Some support the view "Only if it's funny.", while others say "Meh." The controversy led Orian57 to put all his gay porn on QVFD. Optimuschris was quoted saying "I don't know what the fuss is all about, there's no porn on Uncyclopedia!" The discussion seems to have concluded in something like "If it's really bothering you and isn't funny in any way, delete it!" Mnbvcxz might also want to add that pictures showing prominent nudity could give rise to some legal issues, though he wasn't actually available for comment, so we can't really be sure. Usergroups! Usergroups! Usergroups! By Socky War is raging in usergroup land. IC, suffering major losses, has been grinded to a halt and was forced into defensive strategy, regressing to trench warfare. But UNSOC, with masses of new recruits, has declared an all out war against any potential competition. Meanwhile, a new powerful group has arisen, Der Unwehr, and they have established themselves as a force to be reckoned with. The Goa Tse Clan has gone into hiding and remains a mystery to most Uncyclopedians. "The End" is being foretold once more By Socky Since this UnSignpost issue almost didn't make it to the press, it was inevitable that there would be foretellings of "The End" and it being "near". On Forum:Count to a million, Orian57 was found stating "we could all die [...] then how stupid would we look?" A lot of users made somewhat eccentric speculations on how several issues were related to this "impending doom". Multiliteralist, Cajek and Optimuschris posted the following "articles" in response to a request to write something for the UnSignpost. Porn and the impending doom By Multiliteralist As we all know, the impending doom to all good things is caused by porn. This vile practice of drawing pictures of naked women has spread so wide among our young men that it is almost impossible to get them to do anything else. User groups and the impending doom By Cajek No wai, the impending doom is caused by user groups! Impending doom and porn By Optimuschris Our porn! The usergroups are coming, and with them...impending doom! Treasure these last few mumble with your porn for the end is nigh! First person article about porn and impending doom By Multiliteralist I was in a usergroup, watching porn. Suddenly I understood watching porn in a usergroup would do nothing against the impending doom. I got rather stuck, and forgot the reason. Later, I forgot about the impending doom as well. That's what watching porn in a usergroup will do to you. Suddenly I understood: if you are the first person in a usergroup, nobody can make you watch porn. My advice if you are in a usergroup and someone tries to make you watch some porn, avert your eyes! if you see porn, remember that the doom is impending. The perfect solution to problems with porn, usergroups, and the impending doom Form your own usergroup and make others watch porn!

Check out these pages! A "clever" forum topic? Has the world gone completely insane? What in the name of Sophia is a "clan"? Voting to close voting on a votey type thing? From our logs MOTHERFUCKING NIGGER LOVER SPECIAL: 21:34, 14 May 2009 Roman Dog Bird (Talk | contribs) protected "Nevada" [edit=autoconfirmed] (expires 21:34, 14 May 2010 (UTC)) [move=autoconfirmed] (expires 21:34, 14 May 2010 (UTC)) ‎ (Why is the fucking nigger vandal back? I figured he would have killed himself by now, the little waste of sperm......) 01:38, 16 May 2009 Roman Dog Bird (Talk | contribs) protected "ROMAN DOG BIRD IS A NIGGER FAGGOT WHO SUCKS MY COCK" [create=sysop] (indefinite) ‎ (Anybody else here a nigger faggot? Oh, wait, we all probably are. *goes back to eating his god damn fried chicken w/ Colt 45 on the side*) 05:49, 16 May 2009 Roman Dog Bird (Talk | contribs) blocked 89.212.236.6 (Talk) with an expiry time of Judgement Day ‎ (Fucking one trick pony. And stop accusing all of us of being black, you worthless little prick. You do realise how gay that makes you sound when you tell us to suck your dick, right?) 05:55, 16 May 2009 Roman Dog Bird (Talk | contribs) protected "UNDER USER IS A NIGGER FAGGOT WHO SUCKS MY COCK 24/7" [create=sysop] (indefinite) ‎ (Oh, you're a clever little cookie, aren't you? I can't WAIT for you to do this me. Too bad I might not be up at the time...oh well.) 06:08, 16 May 2009 Roman Dog Bird (Talk | contribs) protected "ROMAN DOG BIRD IS A NIGGER FAGGOT WHO SUCKS MY COCK 24/7" [create=sysop] (indefinite) ‎ (Oh, fuck it, I want to see what this little mongoloid can come up with instead, if anything. But seriously folks, in all seriousness, I'm as black as they get. A friend of mine told me this once.) 18:09, 16 May 2009 Roman Dog Bird (Talk | contribs) protected "Joseph Stalin" [edit=autoconfirmed] (indefinite) [move=autoconfirmed] (indefinite) ‎ (Yeah, Bill Cosby pounded me up my gay nigger ass last night. It was HOTT.) 20:27, 16 May 2009 Roman Dog Bird (Talk | contribs) blocked 89.46.52.10 (Talk) with an expiry time of Judgement Day ‎ (Please end your life right now. Go take one od your father's guns, load it, put it in your mouth, and pull the trigger.) 20:30, 16 May 2009 Roman Dog Bird (Talk | contribs) huffed "UNCYCLOPEDIA SUCKS!!!!!!!" ‎ (Oh God, first the nigger vandal returns, and then you're ugly ass shows up again to "torment" us with your worthless crap. You need to kill yourself as well.) 20:31, 16 May 2009 Roman Dog Bird (Talk | contribs) huffed "Talk:UNCYCLOPEDIA SUCKS!!!!!!!" ‎ (No, really. Tie a noose, put it around your head, hang yourself. Simple.) 20:32, 16 May 2009 Roman Dog Bird (Talk | contribs) protected "UNCYCLOPEDIA SUCKS!!!!!!!" [create=sysop] (indefinite) ‎ (Yeah, yeah, we know already, you little crybaby. What did we ever do to you? Oh, wait, all you can do is cry and moan and make pages with periods and then blank them. Speech is beyond you, I guess.) 20:33, 16 May 2009 Roman Dog Bird (Talk | contribs) protected "Talk:UNCYCLOPEDIA SUCKS!!!!!!!" [create=sysop] (indefinite) ‎ (And I've never been more serious about this whole suicide thing. I've been reluctant to tell you people to do so in the past, but I really don't care anymore. It's not like you're really going to do it. I'm sure you're having a blast doing this every day.) 20:37, 16 May 2009 Roman Dog Bird (Talk | contribs) huffed "Talk:UNNEWS SUCKS!" ‎ (I'm sure you're not as much of a lower life form as I think you are. You just love doing this, knowing how much it irritates us. Me especially, as I'm the only one willing to type out messages this long in response.) 20:40, 16 May 2009 Roman Dog Bird (Talk | contribs) huffed "UNCYCLOPEDIA SUCKS!!!!!!!!" ‎ (I wonder what else you'll come up with. Are you just going to keep adding exclamation points? You must be one of the angriest people on the planet or something. You're worse than Idi Amin and God combined.) 20:40, 16 May 2009 Roman Dog Bird (Talk | contribs) huffed "Talk:UNCYCLOPEDIA SUCKS!!!!!!!!" ‎ (And I'm sure shit like this has been done before. Originality certainly is dead. I mean, can you get any lamer?) 20:42, 16 May 2009 Roman Dog Bird (Talk | contribs) huffed "UNCYCLOPEDIA SUCKS!!!!!!!!!" ‎ (But really now, what if nobody deleted this shit? What if we let you and the nigger vandal just do what you always do? Would you assimilate the website so it's all the same shit? OH! What if you two got into a conflict?! That would be comedy bronze!) 20:43, 16 May 2009 Roman Dog Bird (Talk | contribs) huffed "Talk:UNCYCLOPEDIA SUCKS!!!!!!!!!" ‎ (God, just imagine you two going at it, two little twats who think they're the rebellious type going at it, with.....with......oh man....) 20:50, 16 May 2009 Roman Dog Bird (Talk | contribs) blocked 212.96.165.178 (Talk) with an expiry time of Judgement Day ‎ (Yes it does. You're a real rebel aren't you? I bet you've murdered many blacks before and beaten up various others. I am TERRIFIED of you.) 20:51, 16 May 2009 Roman Dog Bird (Talk | contribs) protected "Kentuckistan" [edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite) ‎ (You're talking about how we're nigger faggots like it's a bad thing. Well, if you keep talking about putting your dick in my mouth, that clearly makes you gay. Don't try to tell me you like women. You haven't said anything to prove this.) 22:19, 16 May 2009 Roman Dog Bird (Talk | contribs) protected "Ohio" [edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite) ‎ (Oh, so it's a domination thing, right? You can't possibly be gay since you're making me suck your cock, but I'm the one enjoying it since I'm a gay nigger, which is the type of person you hate. Right, okay, but do you like women? Y'know, with the vaginer?) 15:50, 17 May 2009 Roman Dog Bird (Talk | contribs) blocked ZooZoo (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of Judgement Day ‎ (Your mother is a nigger. You are what you hate.) 17:43, 17 May 2009 Roman Dog Bird (Talk | contribs) blocked 85.94.198.122 (Talk) with an expiry time of Judgement Day ‎ (TYLER LIONS!!! YOU KEEP GETTING BETTER AND BETTER!!!!! AND MORDILLO IS A JEW, MY NIGGER!!!!!!!) 17:50, 17 May 2009 Roman Dog Bird (Talk | contribs) protected "Maryland" [edit=autoconfirmed] (expires 17:50, 17 May 2010 (UTC)) [move=autoconfirmed] (expires 17:50, 17 May 2010 (UTC)) ‎ (Tyler Lions? Never heard a more niggerish name then that! Let's lynch 'em!!!!!!) 20:27, 17 May 2009 Roman Dog Bird (Talk | contribs) protected "Louisiana" [edit=autoconfirmed] (expires 20:27, 17 May 2010 (UTC)) [move=autoconfirmed] (expires 20:27, 17 May 2010 (UTC)) ‎ (Well, you're finally listening to me! But Hitler's been long dead! How the fuck is he going to take out Mordildo? Don't talk for my nigguh hitler, man.) 15:42, 18 May 2009 Roman Dog Bird (Talk | contribs) protected "Work" [edit=sysop] (expires 15:42, 18 May 2010 (UTC)) [move=sysop] (expires 15:42, 18 May 2010 (UTC)) ‎ (Yo nigga, imma gonna break free from deese chains and fill yo cracka ass up wit mah dick, honkey bitch) Biopic of the Week MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER is the token black admin. Known for his rampant homosexuality and love of sucking the cocks of racist vandals, he's forever spoiling the fun of innocent, hardworking vandals by deleting their masterpieces about their friends, and then adds insult to injury by banning them with excitable and lengthy comments. Bastard. He'll probably get lynched by the KKK before too long. Cajek Notice of the Week He was banned a couple times. No, seriously. See for yourself.

UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox

Brought to you by —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:32, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Hey UU

Do you know anything about bots? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:15, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

I know that if you find out how they work, I'd like to know... If I knew about bots, the Signpost would have a dedicated paperbot already! --UU - natter 08:18, May 22

Is there any regular user to ask about bots? I'll probably ask Sannse anyway, though she's not always around. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:27, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Not really - the only users who might know would be those with bots, and as we've mentioned, they're in short supply. MrN, Mnbvcxz, Skullthumper, THEDUDEMAN, they're who I'd ask, and they're not here. How dashed inconvenient. Manticore had Mantibot as well, but he doesn't seem to be about either. What a to-do! --UU - natter 08:30, May 22

I'll ask around a bit. Thanks for the help. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:37, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Doesn't anything piss you off?

I've already defaced your userpage twice (remember that toady thing?), plus I made fun of England (which I heard you're from) on your userpage, AND I make fun of England on a regular basis! Do you just have too calm an English demeanor? Is that your problem, buddy? /me begins pushing UU in tough American manner while my tough American friends are laughing at your accent   Le Cejak • <14:27 May 22, 2009>

/me knocks the crumpet and teacup out of your hands   Le Cejak • <14:32 May 22, 2009>

Hnu phnu phnuuurrgh what now? /me opens eyes, looks around blearily. Someone say something? It better be worth disturbing my nap for. Hello? --UU - natter 14:38, May 22

BRINT IT ON! ~ 14:57, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

You are standing on the brint of oblivion, Mr Dillo. You shall bear the brint of my fury. The next handshake I give you shall be slightly less firm than usual. Deal with it. --UU - natter 15:06, May 22

/me sits in corner playing the bag pipes; Amused by the American and impatial in seeing an Englishman being beaten. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 15:28 22 May 2009

Review

I've never had the honour of getting a UU review (not as far as I can recall anyway), but if you don't have enough time, I completely understand. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:57, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Well, I want to catch up with the checking in the time I have this morning, and then I'm out for most of the rest of the day, but with a bit of luck I may get time to look at review or so tomorrow. We'll see, but no promises (in case Mrs UU has any plans of which I am presently blissfully unaware). --UU - natter 08:55, May 23

Well, I managed to get time for one review today, but that was one of the ones Orian requested of me a few days back - if I get any more time over the Bank Holiday, I will take a look at this, but now I'm off to my sister-in-law's. Pity me! --UU - natter 19:15, May 24

Good luck with that. You have my pity. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:22, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Saberwolf did a nice review, but I'd like one more, just to be sure. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:50, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Whoops. Seems like someone already did the review. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:48, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Hello again

I've reserved a review for you here. I'll be looking forward to when you have a bit of free time to do the review. Cheers! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:48, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Holy shit I found it

I found the one pee review you did that was not in depth, and I think you'll agree: it's a very old one   Le Cejak • <9:17 May 23, 2009>

That wasn't the one scored on your list as such - that was done before you started the list, and was only like that because the article was already going great guns on VFH. I seem to recall the one in question was a 2 - 3 lines per box job about a month after you started the list. Hmm, this exchange isn't full of zing and zip, is it? Er. By crikey, you live in a different country to me, how frightful! How does one cope? --UU - natter 09:26, May 23

Well, a few questions: was it one of MY articles? Did I start scoring reviews done before the list started? I want to thank you for keeping up on the list-- it's keeping people in line in PR and ROTM. By my troth! England?! How droll! Does one still enlist the services of the queen blah blah blah crumpets???   Le Cejak • <9:30 May 23, 2009>

A few sort of answers: can't remember; don't think so. I'm just a mine of helpfulness this morning/afternoon/evening/night aren't I? And the list is just some kind of weird obsessive compulsion I curse your abominable name every waking hour for inflicting upon me. Anyway, I'd answer in more depth, old sport, but I'm expecting the 14th Earl of Bancesterford-Upon-Piddle any moment, we simply must do something about those wretched poor people in the field - it's putting Her Ladyship right off her fish course. --UU - natter 09:51, May 23

I...

...wrote a little op-ed thing for the UnSignpost. I left it in the Press Room. Let me know what you think. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 14:44, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Will do, when I get a little more time. Thanks Guildy! --UU - natter 08:53, May 24

Conservatives and datedness

Could you do me a favour and look at UnCameron? As a fellow Brit, would you be able to recognise the old news story that the Holocaust section refers to, or should I get rid of it? -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  22:18, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Well, to answer, I have an inkling of what it refers to, but regardless of whether it's the correct inkling or not, I think you should keep it in, as I like it - fits neatly and raises a chuckle. And those who do recognise it will get and extra chuckle, which is always a bonus! --UU - natter 08:52, May 24

Review question

I reviewed an article, however, it was huffed because Todd found out it was plagarism. It was still around at the time I did the review, so does it count? Saberwolf116 16:31, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Yes, you still did a review it still counts regardless of the fate of the article ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 16:59 25 May 2009

Definitely. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:43, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Oh yeah, you give the time, you get the credit, don't worry. I'm just here to check the queue now and then I'm off for an early night folks, normal UU service will resume tomorrow. --UU - natter 20:46, May 25

Slipknot

They're so funny. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 20:48 25 May 2009

Uhh? --UU - natter 20:50, May 25

You know the band? I Just randomly downloaded their album and it just makes me laugh when, I don't know why. I thought they would be the kinda thing you listened to. Anyhoo, hows UU? ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 20:53 25 May 2009

Trying to get stuff done so he can get an early night, but getting interrupted by some Scottish puff. How's Orian? (And Slipknot are a little full-on for me, I like a little melody - see that video on my userpage). --UU - natter 20:56, May 25

Oh, and was that review OK for you? --UU - natter 21:02, May 25

Orian is still single. Still unemployed. And still gay which is the reason for the first two ailments. No gay people around and people don't employ poofs because it's against the law! Can you believe that? Please believe that. I do.

Also that might be the reason that they're so funny, being so full on can you expect to be taken seriously? Also random hammering of drums drowns out my mother completely leaving me free to write. Seriously. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 21:06 25 May 2009

And of course. I'll try and sort it out later, after I've forgotten what I wrote. Means I can look at it like a new reader. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 21:06 25 May 2009

Jobs have this weird habit of turning up when you least expect them to - that's been my experience, at least. You'll find one, have patience, young padawan. Now, Mrs UU is tapping her foot impatiently, which means it's time for me to clear off the PC and let her have 5 minutes on Facebook before we get an earlyish night, so goodnight, sweet Prince! ;-) --UU - natter 21:18, May 25

Eugh! Stop trying to gay me up, paedo! And you misunderstand, I'm actively avoiding employment by hiding behind a law that's at least 40 years out of date. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 21:24 25 May 2009

Also, Also can you think of a reasonably contempory song that's worthy/deserving of parody? I'm just looking to get a featured UnTune sometime. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 23:15 25 May 2009

I struggle to think of reasonably contemporary songs. Comes with getting older. Reasonably contemporary to me is 90s indie music... Also, thanks for giving a bit of a hand with the list. You must have been really bored! --UU - natter 08:07, May 26

Oh I was. It was horrible. After that, I emptied my watchlist of users who I've welcomed but who never created a userpage. And then I went and whored something to Yettie with only the vague hope he'd respond but guess what -- He did!!! And then I made hot food. By myself without killing any body! I didn't think that was possible, but seriously you can put anything under that George Forman Grill thing and it's edible in ten minutes. Although I did forget to put the tray under the thing so now there's grease all over the work top And then I came and talked to you and it's ok that you forget songs. /Gasp ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 08:23 26 May 2009

I now have a very important question: Why does my eye hurt when I chew? ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 08:32 26 May 2009

Also, really sorry about that fuck-up on teh list. Oh well. My eye doesn't hurt anymore, though maybe that's because I'm not chewing. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 09:10 26 May 2009

No worries mate - glad of the help! As to your eye problem, I suggest never chewing anything again - eat nothing that hasn't been liquidised. Mmmm, steak smoothies! Also, do you reckon you could find some apt pictures to put on this pictureless article I found? For some reason I can't quite fathom, I have an inkling you may be the very man for this task. --UU - natter 10:17, May 26

/me eating bacon It's weird, it's like my eye socket is biting down, but only enough to hurt not actually cause damage. Also, Left 4 Dead is pretty awesome. It just arrived, I love this Amazon, thing you can forget your spending real money and then things just arrive! Awesome. Also man hugging I'll see what I can do. Even though I've never even been hugged. :( Also for some reason I've acquired a days old cat scratch on my inner thigh, no idea how it got there. except from some sort of cat, obviously. :S smilies make everything better... :) :D :/ :\ :| :'( ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 12:43 26 May 2009

Also, I don't know why nobody did this sooner but the full stop at the end of UnBooks:Tarquin Middleton: My Battle with Depression. Has been annoying me, is there any way you and your godly powers could fix it? ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 13:03 26 May 2009

Nah, the only way to fix something like that is with a move and redirect, and as it was featured under that title, I think that's where it should stay - there are far more annoying things about than that! --UU - natter 13:06, May 26

Yeah I guess, it's just when I send friends that link it never works because of the full stop, I think it's to blame. Also thanks for the vote! I'm so hoping to get that featured within May, then I can boast that I've had the same amount of features on may than in the whole of 2008. :D ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 13:12 26 May 2009

You're on a bit of a roll, aren't you? I wish more people were writing stuff instead of doing maintenance, setting up usergroups and the like... Oh, and if sending people the link doesn't work, you could always create a redirect page without it... --UU - natter 16:03, May 26

How, exactly, because my UnTweet doesn't work properly either. And yeah, I think people keep doing maintenance because it seems to be the only way to get UotM. Although it is good to get rid of the cyberbullying and shit, I don't really see teh huge importance of categorising pics and removing red links (in fact most cases of red-linkage can actually be useful in making people realise we're missing key articles like botox, dementia, stomach and F7). But, yeah. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 16:22 26 May 2009

Create another page without the exclamation mark at the end, called, for example, UnTweets:Mr McElroyLand. Make this page a redirect, like, for example, I have done. Try sending your friends the link to this page instead and see what happens. --UU - natter 09:03, May 29

I was told to come to you

I've heard you're the master reviewer around here. I really enjoy reviewing, so I was just wondering if you have any tips for a new person like me. Staircase CUN^t 15:48, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

"Master reviewer"? Nah, I just keep an eye on things to make sure people get the helping hand they're after! Most of the tips I'd give are in UN:PRG, but as you've asked nicely and all... Basically, just try to give the kind of advice you'd want to get if it was your request - don't be too negative and put the writer off, even if the article sucks, point out that lots of articles and authors start out that way - several of our most featured authors had really bad first articles. But always look to give some advice, unless the article is utter perfection! (And make it useful - just saying "make it funnier" is worse than saying nothing at all - if they knew how to make it funnier, they already would have!)

That said, if you enjoy reviewing, then welcome aboard - we really do appreciate people taking the time to help others out. If you have any other specific questions, give me a shout. And I'll let you know if I spot anything else I think you need to consider - I keep a fairly close eye on reviews. See you around the wiki! --UU - natter 15:58, May 26

By "King" I literally meant the head. No he's rubbish at actually doing reviews, we just let him keep a perfect record out of pity. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 16:06 26 May 2009

Well, thanks then! Staircase CUN^t 21:54, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

"Unless the article is utter perfection" Does this one count then? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:00, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

That's not a proper pee... Wasn't requested, for one thing! ;-) --UU - natter 11:06, May 27

Hmm. 'Kay. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:16, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks thank tank!!!

I have to thank you all again Because you voted for my page about my Nursery to get featured on the front page of the internet and that’s really awesome because Mummy got me a new toy! Although she did tell me never to pee in the sandpit again.

~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 08:45 27 May 2009

What is those Reeveeuws you speak of?

A certain young'n thinks for some reason that you know of this "reviewing" stuff. Do it. Do it now. You know you want to. I'll ban you if you don't. You'll unban yourself. But I'll ban you again. Also, good morning UU. ~ 08:02, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Oh jeeze, I think Socky's still expecting me to look at his Brookfield zoo thing as well, and I'm busy at work. Busy! Work! Still only person on team! I have time to delete and ban, and possibly check other reviews (takes less time, can be done in little chunks), but really don't know if I'm gonna get time to review before saturday. If I get time, I'll do Socky's first, then yours, OK? --UU - natter 08:17, May 28

Well, someone just nominated my article, so unless it fails VFH, it wouldn't really be a priority to get it reviewed. So don't feel obliged to do mine first. Though if you'd still manage to do the review, that'd be magnificent. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:02, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Question

Could I get away with using Joshy in a third article? It's just I've got a great idea for another why?. Also, I've just received a bottlecap fortune that says I will soon be complimented on my style so anytime you want to fulfill that, fire away. Also Also, good morning. And I have an exam today! I haven't revised. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 08:30 28 May 2009

It hurts when you ignore me, you know. There's also a conversation up there you've yet to finish. (to passing stranger) I don't know what to do with him half the time. Come on grandad, do you remember the way home from here? ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 09:42 28 May 2009

Busy. Look the word up. --UU - natter 09:48, May 28

Well that was a constructive use of your busy time. When you were telling me how busy you are you could have instead answered my question. Whatever it was. :P ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 09:58 28 May 2009

Well, there's nothing to stop you from using the same character over and over if you want to, but I'd be wary - from the VFH comments, quite a few people are tiring of the first person style, might be an idea to expand your horizons and try writing something in a very different style, you never know, it may work! If you don't fancy that much of a stretch, how about an UnScript? Just try something a little different and see how it goes. That would be my honest suggestion. And I can see how much quicker it would have been for me to think about it carefully, then type that than to just speed-type the 5 words I did type. Oh yes. --UU - natter 09:09, May 29

Yeah, but that would require effort. And I'm really terrible at the psedo-encyclopedic tone. Maybe I'll postpone it for a few months. As for an UnScript though, I've had this idea kicking around for a while (since Insomnia, in fact), does that title grab you at all? Oh and I finished Snow White, kinda crap right now but I did get a pee (which, for his first, was a really good one). Also before you replied here I started this and if anyone dares tell me it's in the wrong namespace I'll fist them. Any help with any of these would be great. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 12:52 29 May 2009

UnSignpost

What needs to fill the custom boxes on the right of the UnSignpost? --Docile hippopotamus 09:30, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Possibly nothing - they're there for possible padding depending on how long the main article is. All I have to do is come up with a main article and find 10 minutes free to write it! I may well dig up an old school feature, depending on space. --UU - natter 09:33, May 28

I have an idea for an article. Want me to write it? --Docile hippopotamus 09:36, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

What is it? I do have a couple of ideas, but if you have a better... --UU - natter 09:49, May 28

Your ideas will be better. Use them instead. --Docile hippopotamus 10:18, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Not necessarily. What is it? --UU - natter 10:26, May 28

It would be about Henchmen 24. There is a picture of Henchmen 24 on the bottom of Modusoperandis userpage. --Docile hippopotamus 10:30, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Ah, right. Well, we do try to keep the USP focus on Uncyc - particularly the main story, so yeah, I think I'll go with one of mine when I get a minute to write the bugger. However, if you work up something and drop it in the press room, and give it an Uncyc angle, I may well use it for next week. --UU - natter 10:33, May 28

ok. Adding "Who here ordered the pizzas?" by So So from Forum:The UnSignpost needs you!? --Docile hippopotamus 10:35, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks so much.

Thanks for voting for my article, Dear Diary. And do rest assured that I am not a violent or vindictive person, and that voting no would have in no way resulted in me abusing my administrative powers to crush you like a grape. ~ Todd Lyons

...and also for whimsical bans, that nice bio you wrote, and for being a magnificent bastard admin in general. ;) --T. (talk) 11:28, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

You are more than welcome! --UU - natter 14:39, May 28

Cajek ban

Worth adding another Cajek ban to the UnSignpost? --Docile hippopotamus 13:47, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Nah, I'm not into overkill. I may look to kill that section off now he's actually back. Besides, blatant space filler of the week is in the very best traditions of the Signpost, all the way back to the first issue. And I am nothing if not a traditionalist. --UU - natter 14:04, May 28

UnSignpost! May 28th, 2009

The Uncyclopedia UnSignpost

The Newspaper 4 out of 5 Dentists Agree On!

May 28th, 2009 • Issue 49 • The kind of news your momma warned you about

Going Portal by UU Under conditions of great secrecy, a select group of talented volunteers has been slaving away at the wiki-coalface, dedicating themselves to the selfless task of bringing Uncyclopedia a dedicated selection of portal pages. And now their tireless efforts are starting to bear fruit, with the first few being linked on the Main Page by noted twirly star of David, Mordillo. He proudly flagged them up as "new!", until Bradaphraser, more accurately understanding the IQ of the average Uncyclopedian, flagged then as "newd!" instead. What, some of you may ask, are portal pages? Well, rather than have us explain it laboriously for you (because that sounds like, you know, effort), why not take a look at the following highly sexy portals: Politics; Games; Science; History and Art. And with more to come including the intriguing concept of a Quaint portal from Cajek, one thing's for sure: there has recently been an increase in the number of portals on Uncyclopedia. What? Nile and Nile related articles invade Uncyclopedia! by Docile hippopotamus Actually, Nile and Nile related articles are not invading Uncyclopedia - we merely wanted to say that to see if you, the reader, were gullible enough to believe it. And you were. More like, "Nile and Nile related articles invade Uncyclopedia hoax!" Let's find out what Sir Edward Mahm00shA, professor of Egyptian history and archaeology at Oxford university exclusively had to say about this: "It is a lie. And Ra saw it was no good. And the band is with me. And they hath uttered not a word about invading Uncyclopedia. Verily! Ra hacketh off the phallus of he who lieth". See now? Undeniable proof from Sir Edward Mahm00shA that the band is chilling with him and have not even mentioned invading Uncyclopedia. We also asked the wealthy Egyptian and Babylonian antique collector Mr. Great Lung Sphincter of Nebuchadnezzar the 1st to comment and he exclusively replied: "Nile doesn't have any power. Now the Tigris-Euphrates, that's a different story". Not only does this tell us that the Tigris-Euphrates conspiracy theorists are cooler than Nile conspiracists, but that Nile could not invade Uncyclopedia even if they wanted to, and you should be afraid of the Tigris-Euphrates conspiracy theorists - very afraid. To sum it up, there is no Nile and Nile related articles invasion of Uncyclopedia, just as there is no cabal.

Check out these pages! A true Uncyc legend returns! Promise to make a vote, the whole vote and nothing but the vote Big audio dynamite From our logs: 19:47, 25 May 2009 Roman Dog Bird (Talk | contribs) blocked 88.208.208.132 (Talk) with an expiry time of Judgement Day ‎ (Yep, you're really trying, I see. Great, keep the laughs coming, Mr. Funny Man.) 09:37, 25 May 2009 Mordillo (Talk | contribs) blocked 209.146.77.35 (Talk) with an expiry time of 1 week ‎ (You meant "make love to me, she dog") 20:43, 24 May 2009 TheLedBalloon (Talk | contribs) blocked 41.154.2.5 (Talk) with an expiry time of 1 week ‎ (Vandalizing articles, smearing dog shit all over Todd Lyons's car, etc.) 10:48, 23 May 2009 Under user (Talk | contribs) blocked 210.211.138.192 (Talk) with an expiry time of 1 day ‎ (don't blank, I'm running out of insulting ban reasons.) Biopic of the Week Todd Lyons has been on Uncyclopedia forever. No, seriously, he started editing in 2005 - and he's still here! He cut his article writing teeth on Dwight Schultz, and went on to write a further 98 of the buggers, while nailing his first feature with Fecal E.Coli, which started a run of 18.5 front page appearances up to the recent Kinsey Report No. 3: Sexual Behavior in Hamsters. He's been an admin longer than most of our readership have been users. Put together. And he still has all his own teeth, he tells us! Blatant Filler of the Week This box here, which is blatant padding so the formatting of this issue looks about right. Cajek ban of the Week 22:16, 26 May 2009 Mhaille (Talk | contribs) blocked Cajek (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 2 hours ‎ (Unacceptable username: ...too few recent bans for my liking....)

UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox

The only newspaper to be delivered by MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 19:38, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Apostrophe-ectomy

Rabbi Techno Awards You The Platinum Apostrophe

For your bravery in the Battle of Grammar.
However, we still have work to do!
The Apostrophometer estimates there are still over ten
million instances of misused apostrophes on Uncyclopedia!
Up and at 'em, soldier!

---

Let's hope that not too many people noticed, eh? Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 09:47, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, I'm building up a collection of these! It just triggers a kind of allergic reaction in me, which seems to be the case for you, too. Do you think there is a treatment available for it on the NHS? --UU - natter 09:56, May 29

There ought to be for the people who don't know how to use then, not for us. I'm going to visit the missus' mother this weekend, she lives opposite a petrol station which has a big sign claiming that they sell something called Mobile Phone Top-up's - I shall spend the entire time in a state of unease and annoyance as a result. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 10:02, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

There is a proper, old-fashioned Cobbler's across the road from me - it proudly announces, in letters about a foot high on the side wall, "Repair's and Alteration's while you wait!" The amount of times I've considered a midnight expedition with a balaclava and a small tin of white paint is staggeringly large. --UU - natter 10:06, May 29

Official PEEING Business Which is Official and Important!

What do I do with this thing is it a no because of the peeing table or a yes because of the discussion?

Also I think the list is ridiculous. Or at least all the guff about average scores and average number of reviews the proles have done (or indeed us of the inner party). Why does it matter what our average score is? Does that prove anything? A low average score may just be because we only review articles that need help, or it may just be that we're harsh. A high could just be ass kissing. Worse the overall average is completely useless. What's the point of it, it does nothing but waste time you could be using writing articles. or doing whatever your job is. the percent of articles we have in depth is the only vaguely useful/interesting thing there. What say you to a little codicide? Or do you have a good reason for them existing that I've over looked??? ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 13:20 29 May 2009

As to the review by Sock - there's no advice to speak of in the actual review, so I'd give that a "no". As to the list, I find some of that information to be kind of useful. I'd explain myself, but I don't want to be typing for ages. I do sometimes wonder if it would be possible to streamline the process using some fancy code or some kind of templates, but I really don't know enough coding, and I don't think Spang would be inclined to bother, so it stays as it is for now. I may have a word with Cajek (who did, after all, create the thing) and think about an overhaul, but that's for the future. Got to dash! --UU - natter 13:46, May 29

But why wait for the future when you could have it today!? ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 13:48 29 May 2009

Damm your

fast rapes. My angst powers are fading, however my Barry White "love vibes" are increasing. Where will it end?--Sycamore (Talk) 14:04, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

I dunno - Bognor Regis? It's as good a place as any for things to end. --UU - natter 14:08, May 29

Hey

Just wanted to you know that when you check the reviews tomorrow, this was not a review, I just wanted to clear the queue because the article was blank. Will you count it against me? Saberwolf116 06:00, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Haven't we had this discussion? ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 06:05 30 May 2009

I really wouldn't call that a blank article, the minimalism is the joke. I've done honest reviews of more minimalistic stuff. --Mnb'z 06:12, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Well, despite your intentions, I have to count it as a "point missed" review - this article did have an point, somewhat like nihilism. It's difficult to know how to review such an article (as shown by the mixed opinions while it was on VFH) so I would have understood a short review with minimal advice, but yeah, this counts. I'm not holding anything against you though! --UU - natter 09:27, May 30

We care, UU

We care more than you could ever know.   Le Cejak • <17:58 May 30, 2009>

Of course I read your edit summaries! What kind of stalker would I be if I didn't? 17:02. leaves office, gets in car. and all that jazz. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 18:10 30 May 2009

Of course people read them, UU! They appear in RecentChanges for one thing. And we all care very dearly. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:21, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

o_0 --UU - natter 20:08, May 30

Suppose!? D:

WTF does that mean? I did my best! <hyperventalating>. Also I started this UnScript. Like the concept? Yes, no? ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 20:09 31 May 2009

I am about to have a bath. Get back to you tomorrow? (Actually, that's not a question). --UU - natter 20:11, May 31

Can I come? My laptop's insured. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 20:12 31 May 2009

A quick look (ignoring your last comment, as is my wont) says that I like the fact that it's something a little different for you. I'm not entirely sure about the concept right now, because it's early stages and I'm not sure where you're going with it. Give me a shout when you've got a fuller first draft so I can see where it's going, and I'll tell you then! (And if you think that'll be a waste of your time if I then say I don't like it; trying new things with writing is never a waste of time!) --UU - natter 20:48, Jun 1

well I hate it. I'll try and finish it later. And that last line seemed funny last night but in the morning, bit creepy. Like when you said "good night my Prince" so now we're even. I'll let you know when it's a bit more done. Thanks. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 21:13 1 June 2009

Hi, I am not here. Bye Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 21:16 June 1 '09

*Blows raspberry* ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 21:19 1 June 2009

you still angry? Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 21:21 June 1 '09

Was never angry, just a bit miffed, really. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 21:25 1 June 2009

then fucking vote for my article on vfh Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 21:29 June 1 '09

I will later. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 21:35 1 June 2009

Nope. Hate turned to loathing at about 7 this morning. It's not and never will work. I'll see if I can think of something else. I do want to do an UnScript though. All the cool people are doing them. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 06:02 2 June 2009

Just wondering...

If you could review my article on Pee Review. Unfomercials: New Shiatsu Massage Chair. You don't have to, it would just be very helpful, 'cos you're apparently the man in Pee Review. Oh, and thanks for moving my article to userspace. It's Me Bitches! Don't worry, I won't kill you.

Pee Review

Could you do the one I have with the UnNews? I would really appreciate it if you did. I was really into that article and threw it up for review, but no one has reviewed it so I have left it be. It doesn't need to be in depth, but I would prefer it that way. I need all the advice I can get, because VFH has been mentioned. Staircase CUN^t 07:05, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Honestly, I won't be getting much time this week to do reviews - most of my reviewing is done at the weekends. If it's still on the queue on saturday, I'll try to take a look then, but this is gonna be a busy week, so I can't promise anything. --UU - natter 10:00, Jun 2

Understood. Staircase CUN^t 10:02, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Idea!

For the UnSignpost, I thought it would be funny to have a piece along the lines of "Uncyclopedia Collaboration Bridges Way to Mid-East Peace," or something, the subject being the collaboration between our resident Israeli and resident Egyptian, respectively. Just an idea. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 05:09, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Sounds like a plan - you wanna write it? (Busy busy busy!) --UU - natter 08:04, Jun 3

I'm a complete freak, apparently

I'm now the victim of a brand new prejudice. I was hanging out with people I don't really like yesterday and found out that not only am I fat, jobless, Scottish, fag with horrible waves of acne but I wasn't born in the correct fashion, either. Apparently a caesarean section invalidates your right to personhood. It's a sign of weakness.

Just thought you might want to know. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 06:47 3 June 2009

I wouldn't worry - just being on this website already marked you out as a complete freak, and WotM nomination is about as freaky as it gets! --UU - natter 08:07, Jun 3

It just astonishes me that people actually care -- if anything ceasarean is better, it means I haven't rubbed against my mother's clitoris at any point in my life. Yeah fucking natural-birthed-incestuous-fucktards!

And I'm actually really proud of that WotM nom (my third, I'll have you know). Although this whole change of style thing I'm trying to do is kinda frustrating me. There's articles that need writing, such as caesarean section, Dementia and Why?:Cook a Biscuit? all of which I'd only enjoy writing first person, one of which would also require using a character for a third time and that'd piss people off, despite how good it would be. On the other hand I do have a couple of ideas for stuff, like UnScripts:The World-Wide Catastrophe Heading Straight For America and re-writing CSI both using the concept of "it's all the same" rendering it pointless and void of life. Having said that if I did do another one in my own style it could just as easily look tired and crap and everything I write is crap. You and Cajek are right, I should try something out of my comfort zone but you've given me this horrible sort of writers block where I have ideas, good ones, I'm just not allowed to use them because the public will hate them and call me unoriginal. And throw giant  Against. votes at my self-esteem. And now I'm wallowing.

Also Good morning! :D ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 08:41 3 June 2009

That's depressing. Thank you Orian, I'm now depressed. ~ 08:51, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Oh great now I'm depressed and guilty! Although I am sorry. :( ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 08:54 3 June 2009

Ain't anybody gonna feature the interview? Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 11:05 June 3 '09

No. Nothing I write will ever be featurable again! <wailing> All is GONE is Lost and gone and oh God the Pain! ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 11:06 3 June 2009

Seriously, though. I've decided I'll never work alone again, I'll do collabs. I have an idea for Big balls, you know, sexual innuendo, testes and dance balls. Wanna try your luck with me, orian? Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 11:13 June 3 '09

*Weeping over a bottle of cream soda* hic. No. It'll be terrible. Everything I touch turns to shit, horrible horrible shit. shit that was shat out after the consumption of shit infested with syphilis. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 11:16 3 June 2009

You can just write the three first-person thingies and keep them in your userspace for a while and when you got the inspiration for it, you can write those non-first-person thingies. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:18, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

*makes a noise like chewbacca* You don't understand! I have the idea but now I'm too scared to write them anywhere! And it's not just here, the novel's going all to hell and just... fuck... *sniff* ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 11:35 3 June 2009

Why are you scared? Is a girl threatening to rape you? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:40, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

No it's the opposite of that, rejection and ridicule. And what if I'm just not good enough? I don't have any qualifications for anything! I spent my school years convinced I was gonna be a writer and so I didn't try and then failed and I'm going literally nowhere, unless I get a decent amount of money together I'll be trapped in shitsville forever and die fifty years from now. Alone. Oh god. Is this a panic attack? I'm so sorry for sharing this with you guys. I've already ruined Mordillo. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 11:45 3 June 2009

Somebody say Shitsville?

Yeah! --UU - natter 11:52, Jun 3

*Sniff* You're so thoughtful. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 11:56 3 June 2009

Listen mate, you're a talented writer. And a funny one. Everyone goes through little creative blanks now and again - you know what might help? Look through Category:Rewrite, find something you can fix up, and have a go at it. Having something already in place, however crap, can spur the creative juices in a different way. That's what I've found anyway. Give it a go, it can't hurt. --UU - natter 12:06, Jun 3

Oh great. Turd polishing! Thanks though, I'm probably over reacting. It just seems terrible being nommed for WotM and then not producing anything. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 12:21 3 June 2009

that's good, coming from a turd burglar! ;-) Also, half of my features come from "turd polishing"... --UU - natter 12:28, Jun 3

Yeah I suppose. Might just spend the rest of the day murdering people on GTA or zombies in left 4 dead (Highly recomend that game by the way, I mean you won't like it but you should buy and then play it anyway.) :D ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 12:51 3 June 2009