Forum:"Clever" Forum Topic
"Funny" comment. -Bored Uncyclopedian 15:34, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Distracting, off-topic comment concerning that thing I wrote that one time and the awesomeness thereof. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 17:43, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Pathetic "attempt" to carry on the running joke --CrabPope 18:40, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Porn spam in reaction to earlier mentioned "appropriate" image. —Sir Socky
(talk) (stalk)
GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:47, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Request that original image be deleted as spam. -OptyC Sucks!
CUN22:03, 19 May
- Whoring some new aritcle, a return of a long lost user, or other useless project-- 22:28, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Insert Zeeky Boogy Doog here... *BLAM*! 70.30.36.76 22:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Whoring some new aritcle, a return of a long lost user, or other useless project-- 22:28, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Request that original image be deleted as spam. -OptyC Sucks!
- Porn spam in reaction to earlier mentioned "appropriate" image. —Sir Socky
- Pointing out that a user's too-tall sig is messing with spacing thusly...
- Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 22:45, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 22:45, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 22:45, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Reference to UN:N. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:46, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Whoring of an article somewhat related to the previous reference. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:03, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Drive-by missing of point and completely unrelated observation. --UU - natter
11:08, May 20
- Reference to useless inside joke that hasn't been relevant since 2006 --174.102.132.245 20:48, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Whoring of an article somewhat related to the previous reference. —Sir Socky
- Reference to UN:N. —Sir Socky
Pointless attempt at getting back on topic
—Sir Socky
(talk) (stalk)
GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:10, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
Acceptance of the negligence of the topic at hand
Apparently random comment with subliminal whoring. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:23, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
Pitiful attempt...
...to promote my usergroup. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 01:31, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
"Attempt" to start a "header-marathon" "bandwagon"...
Insert new header here. Colin 
ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 06:42, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Deliberate failure to follow bandwagon. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 06:59, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
"NO U"
Additional taunting. -OptyC Sucks! 
CUN14:27, 22 May
I don't get it
I don't understand what we're doing, can you guys explain so I can look cool? - T.L.B. 
WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 03:39, May 23
- You're here. You can't look cool. Sorry. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:06, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
Vanity to top it all off
Double exclamation about me being here to improve this to infinity +1!! -- Style 
Guide 11:09, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Assertive statement about Chad's sexual orientations. Further assertion that I do indeed rule the school. -OptyC Sucks! CUN14:09, 23 May
An important issue is brought forward
A long discussion is anticipated. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:11, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Fake interest is expressed. -- Style
Guide 11:12, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment to let everyone know that a random stranger on the Internet laughed out loud upon reading something. --Concernedresident 11:55, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
Vote
Abstain. -OptyC Sucks! CUN14:07, 23 May
Delete. Malicious vote cast because the writer of the article reverted one of my edits made four years ago. --Concernedresident 19:42, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Whore. Concern for sanity, first person singular. -- Style Guide 07:43, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Patent UnConcern for previous poster's sanity, followed by stick poking of same. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:55, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Another "I don't get it"
Another "I don't understand what we're doing, can you guys explain so I can look cool?" —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:51, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Another "You're here. You can't look cool. Sorry." Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 13:06, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Generic "owned" comment, remarking on the whimsical and insulting nature of that last comment. --CrabPope 13:18, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- A serious comment on how this whole thing is completely pointless. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:45, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Pointed comment welcoming previous user to Uncyclopedia. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 14:15, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Debate
Discuss • <14:26 May 24, 2009>
- Dagnabbit, I'm agin it. -OptyC Sucks! CUN14:33, 24 May
- Now Ah'm fer it. -OptyC Sucks! CUN17:19, 24 May
- Angry post pointing out that Cajek wouldn't dare say such things in real-life since he'd get an arse kicking. --Concernedresident 11:35, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- Angrier post starting out with telling Cajek he shouldn't post, and then countering Concerned resident by saying Cajek would get an arse kicking anyways. S-984 22:31, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
Boredom
Example of boredom. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:34, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
BENSON MENTION
HE'S BETTER THAN YOU AND STUFF. BENSON
New Header talking about how this forum ties into VFH sucking
Undignified rant about VFH needing more votes, and how everyone who has added to this forum has been waisting their time, and everyone else's. Woody On Fire! 
Talking Woody Stalking Woody 20:20, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Additional assertation that Uncyclopedia has jumped the shark. -OptyC Sucks! CUN20:22, 26 May
- Apeshit rant about against votes. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:25, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Penis
Insertion of phallic non sequitur -- Sir Mhaille 
(talk to me)
- Reference to RAHB —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:54, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Suggestion that you take it back to 4chan. -OptyC Sucks! CUN14:35, 27 May
- Suggestion that OptyC is fail, and that he should go back to 4chan and watch hardcore gay furry porn with his child molester friends. S-984 19:41, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- Pointing out that OptyC obviously Sucks, and has no sort of fail in him. Woody On Fire!
Talking Woody Stalking Woody 19:42, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- Pointing out that OptyC obviously Sucks, and has no sort of fail in him. Woody On Fire!
Reminder
That we seem to do this joke at least once every few months. --The Acceptable 
Cainad 
(Fnord) 18:27, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
New Header
Most likely, just for the sake of a new header. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 04:02, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
New Subheader
To go with the shiny new header. -OptyC Sucks! CUN15:30, 3 Jun
New Subsubheader
As per above. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 16:04, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
Heder
"Yeah, there's like a butt-load of gangs at this school. This one gang kept wanting me to join 'cause I'm pretty good with a bo staff." ~ Napoleon Dynamite 16:27, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
New Header With Extraordinarily Long Title
n00b-style question involving confusion about above posts nd like "reli bd grammer" nd Xpletives nd shit. Nameable • ((mumble?)) • 19:43, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
New Subheader for the "New Header With Extraordinarily Long Title," because that header does not do the thing that it says it will, Namely, bring us a header with a long title. That header is an insult to ridiculously long titles everywhere. Though there are many many incidents of longer headers, this header is this size because it can be called "Extraordinarily Long" and not be lying to your face. Plus, I heard that the creator of "New Header With Extraordinarily Long Title," is a silly-face.
What? Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 14:09, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- Another "What?" —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:13, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- One additional "what" signifying my confusion towards the neccessity of an extraordinarily long subheader for the humorously misnamed "New Header With Extraordinarily Long Title" in addition to my general uncertainty about the significance of the fact that this silly topic is still being edited on a fairly regular basis. Followed by a "hmmm" which denotes my pondering whether this continued activity speaks towards the relative popularity of the topic's creator or the general malaise inherent in Uncyclopedia. A final grunt to show that in the end I really don't care all that much. -OptyC Sucks! CUN14:44, 13 Jun
- Agreement that header "New Header With Extraordinarily Long Title" did not live up to it's name, and agreement that "New Subheader for the "New Header With Extraordinarily Long Title," because that header does not do the thing that it says it will, Namely, bring us a header with a long title. That header is an insult to ridiculously long titles everywhere. Though there are many many incidents of longer headers, this header is this size because it can be called "Extraordinarily Long" and not be lying to your face. Plus, I heard that the creator of "New Header With Extraordinarily Long Title," is a silly-face." completes the job description much better. This, however, is followed by utter UN-AGREEMENT that the creator of "New Header With Extraordinarily Long Title" is a silly-face, for two reasons, including the fact that the creator of the header "New Header With Extraordinarily Long Title" is me (with reference to how I know myself to not being a silly-face) and also due to the impossibility of someone being a silly-face and also being able to spell "extraordinarily", which I have done many times.
- Followed by insinuation that Woody is the real silly-face, and this surely is an extraordinarily long comment. Nameable • mumble? 15:04, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- One additional "what" signifying my confusion towards the neccessity of an extraordinarily long subheader for the humorously misnamed "New Header With Extraordinarily Long Title" in addition to my general uncertainty about the significance of the fact that this silly topic is still being edited on a fairly regular basis. Followed by a "hmmm" which denotes my pondering whether this continued activity speaks towards the relative popularity of the topic's creator or the general malaise inherent in Uncyclopedia. A final grunt to show that in the end I really don't care all that much. -OptyC Sucks!
