User talk:Sycamore/Archive7

Posting

You posted to my IP, criticizing my edits. I haven't edited anything here recently. If you actually do have a criticism of my edits, be specific. Unlike your generic complaints, I actually put thought into anything I edit. Perhaps you posted a message to my IP by mistake. But I won't assume that. Yes, I know about the four-tilda policy.

I have not posted anything to your IP (that I can see). I asssure you that anything I do post is specific. Perhaps you are using a differet computer or IP at the moment. If possible could you leave a link to the message here so I can help there.:)--Sycamore (Talk) 12:33, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

AHAHAHAHAHAHahahaha

Saw your naked talk page and couldn't help myself. Sorry. ~ 09:50, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

That was quick...--Sycamore (Talk) 09:52, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

asdf

oletko jo tehnyt iltarukouksesi adfille? Sankari 13:51, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

I have no idea what that means?--Sycamore (Talk) 13:54, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

no opettele saatana suomea niin tiedät. i speak finnish!!!!!!!!!1111 Sankari 14:01, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

You may want to try this - they speak Finnish there and do whatever crazy stuff you do in Finland - is this an idea?:)--Sycamore (Talk) 14:05, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Why was the fake category box on the Classic Oscar Wilde Page Deleted

Is there a reason why the fake category box was deleted?--Mnbvcxz 23:38, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

The reason to have categories is to categorize - This is needed to keep the place running smoother and some of the maintenence jobs to be done - it would be preferable if you left this aspect of things alone, thanks.--Sycamore (Talk) 11:45, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Is there a reason why the page can't have a fact category box?--Mnbvcxz 00:28, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Add any further "Real" categories to that superb article you feel like - I ask that you keep the "Article subpage" category:)--Sycamore (Talk) 15:34, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

It's a good thing

...That that ridiculous Lazytown page was finally deleted and redirected.--68.217.132.151 00:47, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

...dude, seriously, lay off. I don't know why you keep doing this. Trying to pretend you're a different person, or a different user? Actually, I'm not even sure if you're trying. Also, by the way, I put the VFD tag on that page. Mostly because of the way you're acting, but also because there was a better page out there. Come back when your ban is over and try again. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 02:12, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

As Mr Monkey says - go be interesting somewhere else.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:28, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Articles by noobs

I've put construction templates onto UnNews:JD from scrubs gets stricken off medical record. It might have potential if the author bothers to come back and add more interesting content. How should I treat such stuff in future? Codeine gave me a Ninja Star. I try to live up to it and take a peek at Recent Changes from time to time. The trouble is I'm still a bit noobish. I don't know what to do with stuff that needs work to get it up to Uncyclopedia standard. Proxima Centauri 17:24, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

I would not put constuction templates on pages (thats generally speaking for the authors to do), I use ICUs - these are added like this {{ICU|~~~~~|sub=option}} with options like {{ICU|~~~~~|sub=encyclopedic}} for instance. However the article should ideall be tagged on the day of creation (although yo can tag within seven days, I have never done that though). For artices that are older you can use ones like {{Fix}}, {{Expand}} or {{Idea}}.

It is better to try and ICU though, and categorize if the article survives as once tagged otherwise poor articles tend to sit around (which is bad). Nice revert work by the way - I've seen you take down some real tossers. There is loads of stuff here (though you'll have to sift through until you find the stuff you want) UN:CP - you'll find loads of stuff you can do to help with the boring stuff. Hope this helps:)--Sycamore (Talk) 17:38, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

You briefly tickled the ivories, sir

Of the bastion of good taste that is BBC Radio 4. I know you are a fellow of refinement and I appreciate your improvements. If your bone is tickled then I am not so unself-centred and wary of the word "article-whore" to request a tiny tick in the appropriate VFH box. Yes, I'm really pleased with this, but there are a lot of Brit-centric, or even Brit-middle-class-centric gags in it, so it needs a bit of polish and support from fine upstanding citizens such as yourself. Asahatter (annoy) 23:46, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

I cantz do that...--Sycamore (Talk) 14:19, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Muchas gracias

As Manuel would say! I am humbled that you considered me for the WoTM; I really should get around to writing for Uncyclopedia again soon!....thanks again. --Knucmo2 23:17, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

No probs, probably save the muchas gracias for Manuels daughter though;)--Sycamore (Talk) 08:36, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

What part of "On vacation" do you not understand?

Sheesh! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 10:51, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Thats what paying attention in labs does to you...--Sycamore (Talk) 10:53, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

So, while you're on this vacation that is so vacationy, will you have a spare minute to do some paperboy work, or do I have to go shout at Manticore or someone? --UU - natter 13:06, Nov 3

I had a bit of a brain fry delivering thr last two - I thinks is a bots job:)--Sycamore (Talk) 14:24, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Was wondering if you had a bot style script set up to do it - by hand, I understand, I wouldn't even attempt it myself! --UU - natter 14:27, Nov 3

Seeing as its about eighty, you could maybe set up system for 2/4 people to do it manually - though there are three users with bots, it seems a little doo lally to have users do this?--Sycamore (Talk) 14:32, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Indeed - bugger the by-hand option. If I can't find a bot, I'll leave it. Cheers. --UU - natter 14:40, Nov 3

a few questions

hello sycamore,

i was wondering have you ever had any hassle with the fellows from wikipedia, about any copyright crap. the most of them seem to be highly opinionated and love blocking anything thats not mainstream they cant seem to give good reasons for this . have you ever put any of these sorry pricks down afew pegs ?? well done for an exellent page and ill be telling my good mates here in suoth africa all about my new find regards robert schmidt --Dwnndog 19:33, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Well, I have not really found the folks at wikipedia to be too awful, Copyright laws are usually disregarded here - though your writing should be your own:)--Sycamore (Talk) 19:38, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

UnSignpost: 3-ish November 2008

The Uncyclopedia UnSignpost

The Newspaper that won't leave you the same way they did!

November 3^rd-ish, 2008 • Twenty-Third Issue • Better than things that aren't as good!

Address Change: Return To Sender? For those of you with your heads buried in the sand, or who choose to concentrate on writing articles, or who don't ever look at address bars, or who don't care: Uncyclopedia's domain name has been changed by evil communist oppressors Wikia. If you are one of those people, here's a brief summary of the incident: Sannse tells us Wikia have decided the domain is changing. We don't get any say in the matter, but do get to suggest ideas for the new name. Lucky us. Fuck.Wikia.Com is a popular suggestion with all except Wikia. Lots of people get angry, Zombiebaron sticks his undead head in briefly, Codeine adds a Bill Hicks clip railing against the evils of advertising, lots of people sign a petition threatening something vague if the change goes ahead. The change goes ahead. There follows an uncoordinated response, during which some users go on strike and do nothing, some users open the wiki up to vandalism, and some users get pissed off about it. The UnSignpost goes on strike for a week in solidarity, and doesn't, for example, miss another week due to the laziness of editors. Oh no. The change is of such profound magnitude, it even brought Mooses out of self-imposed exile. Briefly. Sort of. The community decides an uncoordinated response isn't working, and tries to get its shit together. There are even attempts to elect a Cabal to deal with the issues. The self-defeating nature of attempting to establish an Uncyc Cabal is not lost on some. Skullthumper solves the problem. Sort of. If you aren't one of those people, here's an even briefer summary: Shit happened. People got pissed. The world has so far failed to end. More on this ongoing situation as we get it. Probably. Glorious return to form for MrN! The UnSignpost is pleased to be able to report that, after a two-month self-imposed embargo, popular poopsmith MrN9000 has made a glorious return to using underwear references in his daily conversation! The dam finally burst at 23.06 on Oct 22nd, and all those who know him could feel and share the relief, the release of that pent-up tension and the sheer untrammelled joy of their favourite user with a pair of tits in his sig. Fellow poopsmith and genial man-about-town UU said of the momentous occasion: "you what? MrN? Oh yeah, him. Good bloke. Knows his underwear". Then he scratched his nose reflectively and wandered off. MrN himself was unavailable for comment at the time of going to press/we couldn't be bothered to interview him (delete as you think applicable), but the UnSignpost fondly imagines he would have smiled enigmatically, raised an eyebrow quizzically, nodded appreciatively, and said "PANTS!" predictably. The pants themselves were also unavailable for comment.

Check out these pages! ALL CAPS v Ban Magnet. Modus gets vaguely irked. Did we miss doing a Hallowe'en issue? From our logs: 09:26, 20 October 2008 Manticore (Talk | contribs) blocked 121.217.149.137 (Talk) with an expiry time of 1 week ‎ (You're interrupting my essay writing. Unless you plan on writing my essay for me, fuck off.) 04:20, 22 October 2008 TheLedBalloon (Talk | contribs) blocked 210.15.244.104 (Talk) with an expiry time of 2 weeks ‎ (You, sir, have gone above and beyond the call of failure. Now that may sound like a compliment, but read it again, paying special attention to that last word. Yeah.) 18:03, 22 October 2008 Mordillo (Talk | contribs) blocked 208.70.120.2 (Talk) with an expiry time of 2 hours ‎ (Your friends do not interest us. Your sister does.) 04:57, 23 October 2008 Tom mayfair (Talk | contribs) blocked TheLedBalloon (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of Judgement Day ‎ (Intimidating behaviour/harassment: & Not The Good Sexual Kind of Harassment Either) Biopic of the Week Sexy, Pompey-supporting bureaucrat Codeine has probably banned you. If he hasn't, he probably will. Soon. Viewed as one of the most diligent and trusted admins on the site, Codeine has probably been here longer than you as well. And he'll probably be here long after you leave too. Deal with it. VFD kept article of the week French accent. Zo, you zink ze article iz zaveabeule? Zut alors! Well geurd leurck weez reewriteeng eet zen! Meurdeus, Preetiestpreeteey and 'yperbeule 'ave made a stert. Cajek ban of the week 00:43, 26 October 2008 RAHB (Talk | contribs) blocked Cajek (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 5 minutes ‎ (Posting in the forums. You know better than to get involved in the community. Now get back in your cage.)

UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox

Shoved through the letterbox for the one and only time by UU - natter 11:35, Nov 6

"Bugger the by-hand option" he says... Pain in the arse doing it this way, isn't it? --UU - natter 11:35, Nov 6

It is! - Next time tell me when and hopfully I'll be able to take down half which should be less painful:)--Sycamore (Talk) 13:03, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

um problem

ive got to improve my page 'how to be a racist' as you said "This page seems to be lacking in humor or satire" i need some help with it because ill be going home today so if you dont mind can you ask some people to help out or something like that.

cheers. Dolubasao Jabangway 15:05, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

OK - it needs a little more work, now the best way to improve an article is to get an idea of what a good one is, and find out ways to improve your stuff. Have a read of these, Beginner's Guide, HTBFANJS and Uncyclopedia:Best of. These should hopfully help out and you should be able to improve your article a great deal. If theres a specific problem, just come by again:)--Sycamore (Talk) 15:24, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

k thanks man, ill have a look if i cant complete it by 17th ill just improve it offline then put it on when finished cheers Dolubasao Jabangway 15:33, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

You can also create User:Dolubasao Jabangway/HowTo:Be a Racist - this means you can complete it in your own time, and then move it over whan its done.:)--Sycamore (Talk) 15:36, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

France pic?

You mind if I add this to the France article?

As scientists delve deeper into France, they find more and more new and amazing creatures...like this deep-Seine blow-fish.

It's stupid but I like it --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 04:32, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

I like it myself:) - having had a look over the article again, I don't persoanally think it would not fit too well (three looks right at this length) - I realize that this is a big title (having lots of links to it and revsions, indicatign popularity - also featured) however I feel that this version of France is pretty good - its focused and coherent unlike the the last one. Obviously it is extremely bad of me to try and run a monopoly - if you really like it I guess you can:)--Sycamore (Talk) 09:42, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Yeah I see, that's why I didn't just jump straight in :D --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 09:58, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

???

Hey, This is wise guy responding to your complaint about my quotes. I really don't see what is so bad about them. They're just stating the opinion of a wise guy (aka jerk) on a topic. Personally i've seen some worse quotes everywhere and was wondering what the problem was.

Quotes = bad, quotes that referecne yourself = really bad. Write an article, don't add shitty edits/quotes to many articles.--Sycamore (Talk) 21:05, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Ok I agree to stop but I want to clear stuff up. I wasn't referencing myself, I was referencing a "wise guy". I admit that I use it as my username but that was just because it was the approach I was taking. What was said is not what I believe or anything. But what really got me was the hate!!! Were they all really that bad? I thougt my crusade quote was rather good. Oh well wouldn't be the first time someone didn't like my sense of humor.--User:Wise Guy/sig 8:32, 11 November 2008 (CT)

For the people who maintain the site quotes are something trully despised - not you - don't take it bad. I have no doubt that you meant no harm with them and I hope you stick around, have fun:)--Sycamore (Talk) 14:39, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

No.

Alright, the dead bodies of US soldiers isn't funny, and uneeded. I tried tagging the article with a Offend tag, but it was baleeted. Uncyclopedia is for the lulz, dancing on peoples graves isn't lulz. Very clear. Im going to revert it in a few days unless you have a better point.

Cheers. Dacheatcode 21:00, 10 November 2008 (UTC) Dictating content is not your place, I assume you mean the America article - keep vandalising the article you will be reverted an ultimaly banned for some time.--Sycamore (Talk) 21:05, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Please submit comments to my talk page, it saves me time. Anyway, your comment confuses me; are you implying that only Mods can modify pictures/artwork that really doesn't belong there? There wouldn't be much of a community then, now would there? There have been some remarks from other people on the picture.

As for my apparent "vandalism," i assure you that this was not. Vandalism is adding to the article with pointless crap such as blanking, or the LOLOLTEHMONEKYELOLOL. These were hopefully constructive edits. The first time, I added an offend tag, as it was offending. Then i del33ted the contreversial picture. However, if you still thought that was vandalism, you could use the edit summary. Thanks. Dacheatcode 01:07, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Oh dear--Sycamore (Talk) 13:56, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

UnSignpost: 13th November 2008

The Uncyclopedia UnSignpost

Just like Grandma used to make!

November 13^th, 2008 • Issue 24 • So close to journalism you'll be hard pushed to know the difference!

Uncyclopedian does something vaguely noteworthy in "real life" In an unprecedented development, Uncyclopedian 15Mickey20 has made a foray into media activity outside of the internets. Mickey, Uncyc's tennis correspondent, has been seen on popular-with-students-and-pensioners UK gameshow Countdown, operating under the pseudonym "Martin". Mickey has so far failed to live up to Uncyclopedia's proudest traditions, by actually being quite good at the game. Indeed, at the time of writing, he'd won several games, including what he modestly described as "an awesome numbers game, beating Carol". He also shamelessly mentioned his connection to the site in a recent episode, leading to quite literally no extra edits to the Countdown article - still, thanks for the plug, Mick! Having spent time in the company of such notable international icons as Des O'Connor (no, we don't have a page on him, so there's no link), Paul Zenon (nope, nothing on him either) and Suzy Dent (spotting a pattern here, non-UK readers?) Mickey is now Uncyclopedia's most prominent celebrity, and it's surely only a matter of time before he appears on Strictly Come Dancing or Celebrity Big Brother, and has a lurid kiss-and-tell exposé in Heat Magazine. Various "...of the month" award candidates - November's in-depth analysis Writer of the Month: There's a bumper crop of WotM candidates nominated this month for your voting delectation. The UnSignpost's own Gerrycheevers is the early favourite, having established a significant lead over this week's biopic star Mrmonkey72, several-time nominee SysRq, inactive-for-ages-but-funny Nydas, dark horse Knucmo2 and the multi-featured and multi-talented An Ape that Only Exists on Thursdays. But! There is still time, your votes can still make a difference! (Unless you've already voted, natch). Uncyclopedian of the Month: Controversial nominees abound here, as serial ban collector Cajek goes head-to-head with Wikia corporate mouthpiece Sannse. The hyperactive one with the light blue sig is in the lead at present. But! As with certain other popular recent votes, there is a third candidate inexplicably attracting little attention - Dexter111344, a site maintenance and VFD stalwart. Who will win? Only you can decide (and all the other people who vote, obviously). Noob of the Month: No-one. Yet. Find a noob doing something vaguely decent and nominate them please! Otherwise the UnSignpost may just have to bring back the ultimate dead horse for yet more flogging and nom Rcmurphy again. Useless Gobshite of the Month: Kip the Dip is out on his own for this one so far. Having proved an exemplary gobshite for months on end, despite being cruelly denied the recognition of this award, the UnSignpost feels that his time is now, and is abandoning all pretence at unbiased journalism: VOTE KIP FOR UGotM!

Check out these pages! Mad for Uncyclomania! Logical Merge? Hyperdeletionism From our logs: 14:58, 11 November 2008 Mordillo (Talk | contribs) blocked 85.118.10.166 (Talk) with an expiry time of 3 months ‎ (idiots never learn. That's why they're idiots.) 08:09, 6 November 2008 Codeine (Talk | contribs) blocked 151.203.113.117 (Talk) with an expiry time of Judgement Day ‎ (Didn't your mother tell you not to use such bad language? Inbetween all those dicks she was sucking, I mean. ) 05:04, 6 November 2008 TheLedBalloon (Talk | contribs) blocked 75.46.44.68 (Talk) with an expiry time of Judgement Day ‎ (Yeah, I agree, this site is the worst. Tell you what, now you don't have to edit here ever again! Aren't I the best admin ever?) Biopic of the Week Mrmonkey72 is another stellar addition to the Uncyc ranks this year. This highly evolved simian's natural habitat seems to be UnNews, where he's settled with impressive speed, although he's not above writing the odd high quality article as well. And with a Foolitzer Prize and a WotM nom already under his belt, who knows how far he'll go? VFD kept article of the week Odd. Surely there's some potential here folks - one talented writer, or failing that anyone with enough time on their hands, might want to add copious sprinkles of funniness dust to this strange confection. Glorious Return of the Week Hey everyone, SysRq's back!

UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox

MrN9001 12:55, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Just passing

You might want to check the guidelines for using {{fix}} here. I think that means that if it's a notable subject (and the article is not total crap) it gets a rewrite rather than a fix. I noticed that RAHB recently kept Scouts after the WIP has expired, and you slapped fix on quickly afterwards. Not sure... Anyway it's probably not fair to through this back to the huff master wielding admins as it's escaped so recently... Have fun. MrN 23:11, Nov 15

Yea, anyway... Sorry to nag. I added some pics and a few more links and it's fine now. Probably does not need any sort of template on it. You might have added {{AAP}}... MrN 23:22, Nov 15

As you know I will aim to save more than I put up for deletion. I felt this one was pretty mediocre/obscure in potetial and poorly done - now the Fix one does not mean that an op has to delete it, but it does mean that new users think that it will. I prefer not to put articles in rewrite, it's the famous cry at the moment and theres now so many in the category. It makes sense to me to give plenty of time, but be a more keen to see improvemt in new pages?--Sycamore (Talk) 09:18, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Yea, I hear ya. Thing is, some admins are more deletion oriented than others. While say Led or Modus would keep it for sure, others might not. RAHB had the opportunity to huff it when the WIP expired and he choose to keep it too... I think of {{fix}} this way: If the article were put on VFD would it be deleted? If I don't think it would, I don't add a fix tag. Scouts probably would survive a VFD (that's only my guess obviously), so what's the point of sending it around the system again? Also as Scouts is a well know subject it's likely to get a fair amount of attention, and so will probably improve. If it were an article about a made up subject which only the author is probably going to edit then maybe it's a different story. Anyway... That's just my view. I'm sure ya know what you are doing. ;-) Oh, feel free to purge things from rewrite which should not be there. I did a pit of a purge of the category a while back, but it probably needs doing again.MrN 01:34, Nov 17

Cool, I'll be a little easer going with the Fix template - with Rewrite, I'll see if theres anything I can do with it:)--Sycamore (Talk) 13:08, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

a n00b i am

yes i'm brand new to uncyclopedia, but i adore sattire and get great grades at english, so would love to contribute. anyway, hello person and have a nice day!

Cool, have fun:)--Sycamore (Talk) 20:44, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Vortex

Any constructive criticism of my crap would be appreciated. I was rather proud of vortex because I thought the underlying theme was followable and I'm wondering how many heads I'm swooping over or if it's not "simple" enough.--DrStrange 14:36, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

I thought that was a fabby article. You've had a dire review, I would suggest re submitting it. I may e able to get rund to it for you, or someone more 'respectable' than that guy Meth will review it. I hope you have not been put off, you've been doing some great stuff:)--- 15:46, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

UnSignpost: 20th November2008

The Uncyclopedia UnSignpost

You'd be crazy not to listen!

November 20^th, 2008 • #100/4 • Sucking Journalism's Fat Wang. Badly.

UnSignpost Stumbles past 6 month milestone Uncyclopedia's premier periodical, the UnSignpost, has somehow managed not to fade away and die for over 6 months, which should probably merit some kind of special edition, but meh. In true UnSignpost fashion, the editors noticed this about 2 weeks late - the Signpost having been so gloriously conceived (and never was a word more aptly suited to this juvenile-as-all-get-out publication) by Dr. Skullthumper and Cajek back in early May. The first issue rolled off the presses on May 8th, bringing you such earth-shattering news as "Rcmurphy nommed for Noob of the Month again" and "Uncyclopedia F**king Doomed", as well as establishing Signpost tradition with "Spacefiller of the week" (something about Grand Theft Auto). The editor's office here at USP should probably have had a revolving door installed, having been occupied at various times since Cajek and Skull abandoned it by THEDUDEMAN, Gerrycheevers, Heerenveen and some other numpty - although this is small change compared to the number of delivery bots and boys that have thrust the latest issue, still warm, through your letter flaps. Over the months, many other contributors have helped to keep the UnSignpost in its deserved position of "only weekly-ish newspaper on the wiki" - possibly by being so lame that no-one wanted to bother doing another one. And, having brought you such shattering exclusives as "Wookiepedia Too Cool For Cajek", "Porn Wars End in Sticky Truce" and "RC takes home NotM", the UnSignpost shows no sign of speeding up. Maybe one day, the unstoppable forces of apathy will finally overcome those who still labour under the impression that people actually care about seeing block log entries and biopics arrive on their talk page weekly, and the UnSignpost will grind to a halt. But until then, it will continue to bring you all the old news you've already seen somewhere else, whether you like it or not! UnSportsPost By ace sportshound Enzo Aquarius. In response to quite literally some demand, your ever-topical, finger-on-the-pulse UnSignpost brings you all the latest sports news that's unfit to print! NFL - Detroit Lions lost again bringing their record-breaking award-winning losing streak to 9, with their last notable points scored in the 2004 season. Lions followers are confident their team can break through once the team's brains are reverted back to Windows XP Basketball Edition. Big thumbs up and grins boys! NHL - Unlike their Lion brethren, the Detroit Red Wings are in the lead, as always. Then again, their conference is full of NHL expansion filler, so what can you expect? But hey, San Jose is up as well, so uh...yeah...good for them. Good for them. NBA - LA Lakers are up with no losses in their belt, but anybody east of LA doesn't care anyways. Uhhh....132 points scored by New York...good job guys. Football/Soccer - See, there are so many freaking teams and conferences that you just can't keep track of all of them. Then again, Japan beat Syria 3-1. Talk about a non-stop action high-scoring game! MLB - Training time, the high-gravity chamber has been set, Goku will be pitching. It's also time to bring in the young blood who will only play 1 game in the 2009 season.

Check out these pages! Who judges the judges who judge the, er, turkeys?. Through the fire and the flamewars?. {{tl|merge}}?. From our logs: 23:37, 17 November 2008 Codeine (Talk | contribs) blocked 203.122.136.234 (Talk) with an expiry time of 1 day ‎ (Blanking is bad. Even in New Zealand, or as we like to call it "Australia Lite") 23:32, 17 November 2008 Codeine (Talk | contribs) blocked 90.208.113.67 (Talk) with an expiry time of 1 month ‎ (Browser hijack links piss me off. When I'm pissed off, I ban dickheads. You are a dickhead.) 09:37, 17 November 2008 Modusoperandi (Talk | contribs) blocked 70.19.184.109 (Talk) with an expiry time of 1 month ‎ (Those who can't do, critique. Poorly.) 04:13, 16 November 2008 TheLedBalloon (Talk | contribs) blocked 138.130.147.91 (Talk) with an expiry time of 1 week ‎ ( * 04:11, 16 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Santa Claus‎ (←Replaced page with 'FUCK OFF!') -- I know one kid who's getting coal this year...) Biopic of the Week What is it you look for in a 'crat? Is it diligent banstick wielding? Is it a list of featured articles as long as Spang's talk page? Is it having his own award, that he deigns to bestow on those he deems worthy? If it's any or all of these, Mhaille's yer man. If it's not, I dunno, try Olipro, or something. Cajek ban of the week 08:03, 16 November 2008 RAHB (Talk | contribs) blocked Cajek (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of a big dick ‎ (<Sawblade5> RAHB take care of http://en.uncyclopedia.co/index.php?title=Special:BlockIP&ip=Cajek) "Writer of the Month" of the Week. Last heard from in any capacity on this site in January 2007, Imrealized was your WotM for September 2006, with an unheard-of-these-days 19 votes (and Severian liked him so much he voted for him twice). And with a triumvirate of articles like Paradise Lost, Smells Like Teen Spirit and Rorschach Inkblot Acid Test, (not to mention WWJJD?) it's easy to see why. Cabal news of the week There is no Cabal news of the week.

UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox

MrN9001 20:50, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

DEFILEMENT!

Spelt wrong (probably) to boot! :P SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 11:17 23 November 2008

Noooo!:)--Sycamore (Talk) 11:18, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Tis tradition. and besides you don't want an empty tal page. If you did then the other kids would think you were weird and it'd stay empty forever, like the barren soul of a hermit. SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 11:20 23 November 2008

This talkpage would struggle to stay empty - I'm far too useful and I piss too many people off:)--Sycamore (Talk) 11:26, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Wow beatch what you tryin to say?SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 11:45 23 November 2008

For shizzle beatch I get lots of Jihadists. "Beatch" - that is so cool:P--Sycamore (Talk) 11:57, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Was it something I said?

• (diff) (hist) . . User talk:Spore.Addict‎; 14:55 . . (-36) . . Sycamore (Talk | contribs) (←Replaced page with '{{subst:welcome}}--~~~~')
• (QVFD) (hist) . . Nm User talk:Spore.Addict‎; 14:54 . . (+2,601) . . Under user (Talk | contribs) (welcome)

I didn't realise the slut list meant that much to you! ;-) --UU - natter 14:58, Nov 26

Yeah thats creepy, I did not do that intentionally I assure you:) - I think it happens when you use the JS and someone does it manually.--Sycamore (Talk) 15:00, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

No worries. Incidentally, this cunning distraction allowed me to beat you to Mordillo's talk page defilement. It's an ill wind... --UU - natter 15:01, Nov 26

You sneaky bastard:)--Sycamore (Talk) 15:02, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Perverts. ~ 15:03, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Well its not like Isreal here, its a long winter, you've got to think about something you know...--Sycamore (Talk) 15:04, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

You say it like that's a bad thing. --UU - natter 15:09, Nov 26

The problem is that lifes all about doing, I've been sat here 24 hours a-day for months waiting to ravish Mordillo's talkpage. Just as I was about to make penetration, I was delayed by a freak whoring accident. Thats not a good thing, thats sad--Sycamore (Talk) 15:13, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Tell you what, I'll give you a heads up before I archive next time :) ~ 15:14, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

UnSignpost: 27th November2008

The Uncyclopedia UnSignpost

Th-the m-m-most con-confident new-Newspaper in a wh-while

November 27th • Issue 26 • The newspaper it's tough to swat flies with

Uncyc shall go to the Ball! The seasonal tang in the air, the anticipation on the faces of Uncyclopedians everywhere... it can only mean one thing: The Aristocrat's Turkey Day Ball is upon us again! The popular annual celebration of all that's good about bad taste is hoping to provoke a slew of skewed satire and give those foolhardy enough to volunteer as judges a colossal headache. And a good laugh, of course. To whet the appetite, let's take a look at some of the cream of last year's competition: A bunch of aristocrats fucking. Awesome vid Pacific War The Bureaucrats (Joke) Why?:Use a wooden condom Yup, standards are that high, or low, depending on your point of view, sense of humour, religion, shoe size and taste in hats. So jump to it! If you can make the judges laugh even as they vomit up their own entrails, you could be in with a chance of winning the glorious title "Aristocrat en Regalia", as well as the undying jealousy of the other entrants you so satisfyingly routed. Or you might lose. Asked for quotes, organiser RAHB quipped "I'll probably get on it sometime tonight, if not tomorrow", while official judging type Modusoperandi added "my memoires are riddled with mind expanding shit". {{username}} claims millionth victim Stalking the articles, forums and userpages of Uncyclopedia like some kind of bad metaphor with legs, the notorious {{username}} template has claimed its millionth victim. The individual in question (who shall not be named because this publication is trying to write an article about {{username}} without actually using {{username}}) was innocently browsing through Uncyclopedia's debating rooms, looking in at the progress of such worthwhile literary endeavours as the incrementation project and the attention span test, when the vengeful template struck! "It was there, in front of me, an accusation that I was teh gheyz", the hapless victim told us exclusively. "Such hard-hitting slander had to be addressed, and addressed immediately, so I clicked the edit button, and launched into a passionate and vitriolic defence of my unquestionable heterosexuality post-haste!" Ironically, it was the length of this diatribe that finally revealed the subterfuge. "It took me some time to compose a suitable riposte, listing at length my many dalliances with members of the opposite sex, my subscription to Playboy and my utter distaste for the movie Brokeback Mountain - in fact it took so long that I was logged out from my account" said the sap. "So when I hit the preview button to behold my comeback in all its savage majesty, what should catch my eye but the <insert name here> message that betrays {{username}} abuse? I felt so embarrassed, the only logical course of action I could take was to sell my story to a newspaper with a global readership - you did say you'd pay me for this, right?" Shortly after this point, the interview was discontinued due to a disagreement between interviewer and interviewee. Asked for a final quote, we were told "fuck {{username}}, and fuck you too!" - a comment that speaks volumes about the suffering this terrible template is capable of inflicting on the unwary. {{username}} was unavailable for comment, and remains at large, ready to strike again.

Check out these pages! Don't be a dick? How do you measure up? "{{Oh dear}}"? Oh dear! From our logs: 12:14, 26 November 2008 Codeine (Talk | contribs) blocked 118.101.59.19 (Talk) with an expiry time of 1 day ‎ (Excess stupid detected. Initialising idiot smiting mechanism) 18:21, 25 November 2008 Modusoperandi (Talk | contribs) blocked 198.20.32.1 (Talk) with an expiry time of 2 weeks ‎ (You only sort of suck, now. Come back when your sucking ceases.) 00:13, 23 November 2008 TheLedBalloon (Talk | contribs) blocked MrN9000 (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of A power level over 9000 ‎ (Vandalizing Cajek's userpage. You should be ASHAMED. Also, Skull said this bantime actually works. Let's see!) Biopic of the Week Holy Cheese, it's Necropaxx! From humble beginnings (starting out as just another notch on Famine's banstick), cheery, Grim Reaper looky-likey Necropaxx has stalked his way through the site, creating quality features, a bunch of images, and a growing portfolio of helpful reviews. Just don't diss the cheese, OK? He worships the cheese. VFD kept article of the week Yam - c'mon folks, it's tuber humo(u)r. "A yam will totally kick your ass if you call it a sweet potato. I'm not kidding." Doesn't that just make you want to rush in there and give it the magic rewriting touch it needs? Unactioned image request of the week User:Sycamore/Mephistopheles - "I kind of want it to be a bit like Goethe's character Mephisto, but maybe with a "Sympathy for the Devil, Rolling Stones" quality - I'd really like something with the whole transformation from a poodle to the student bit or some of the character qualities here." for Sycamore. Anyone with photoshop feeling helpful? Cajek ban of the week 12:31, 24 November 2008 Sannse (Talk | contribs) blocked Cajek (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 17 minutes 21 seconds ‎ (What is this thing about blocking you anyway? And why aren't I in on it?)

UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox

MrN9001 21:10, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

W♥v

Thank you... I've always found it to be polite to thank people for the things they have done for you, especially when it is a vote for a fine literary work. People don't say "thank you" that much anymore. Instead, they say "thanks" or "tyvm". That frustrates me, because I don't know what "tyvm" is even supposed to mean. Thanks for voting.

sirsysrq @ 17:10 Nov 28

No probs, that was a very tidy article:)--Sycamore (Talk) 17:11, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Review

Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnBooks:Hot Japanese Girls - Colourblind or Unable to Speak English? - very unlike you to tag and then leave - were you leaving the expiry thing to do its work, or did you intend to go back to that one? If not, I may take a look myself shortly. Also: morning feller, hope it's a good one for you. --UU - natter 09:18, Nov 29

Whoops, I'd forgotten that one, yeah remove it and let it get a review. Yeah, I'm cool also good morning to you:)--Sycamore (Talk) 09:21, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Total Drama Island (The First Reality Show Without Reality)

PsychotypeD 05:42, 30 November 2008 (UTC) You apparently stuck an ugly label on this article, so tell me what's wrong with it? C'mon don't feel shy.

Its badly written and poorly formatted. Its also pretty random in bad way. It won't be deleted for a while, so have a read of this and maybe see if you can get a review here. Hope this helps:)--Sycamore (Talk) 09:30, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

PsychotypeD 19:34, 30 November 2008 (UTC) Yeah, now that you mention it... I look at it and it seems to be trying to do too many parodies at once. I will admit that this was my very first article and I was a bit nervous about getting things going. I'll see if I can get it going again (depending on if my brain can come back to it).

No probs - remember that time = good stuff. My first efforts were pretty awful and I find that any good articles I do still take a bit of time to get right:)--Sycamore (Talk) 20:05, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

I cannot tell if that is serious or not....

I might write one more article, and then i will be off, and if they are all deleted... i'll have gotten some good information. thanks! :) Emesee 09:03, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

It is very serious, quit creating crap that someone else has to clean up. This ain't nursery stud.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:32, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Incest

Please stop removing the Things Jesus Would Do category from the incest article as I am really bitchy this time of the month and getting tired of reverting it. Hugs! Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 17:55, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

mmm - I'm not the most diplomatic with women, so I'll just be honest. I don't really like wanted categorys being filled up, neither do I like categories of this kind - they complicate a system that should be simple - articles should be funny not categories (ideally, and you've only reverted it once). It would be very preferable and helpful to me if you could get back to me on this soon (when you're feeling better). thanks:)--Sycamore (Talk) 18:04, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

somehow, that doesn't surprise me. BTW, quit douching up the artemis fowl page!216.56.28.38 19:32, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

IRC

Can you hop over when you have the time? ~ Mordillo where is my FUCK OFF? 16:56, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

I'm there now:)--Sycamore (Talk) 17:04, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Damn...

...You're quick with the ICU! I was going to give him a minute or so to see if he added to it and then QVFD the bugger. Crap article, but gives me ideas for images. RabbiTechno 18:44, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

New article

Hi...umm ive just finished my first article (Hyperdimension Sandwich Maker) and i was wondering if u could proof read/suggest improvements/give advice for future articles? id be really grateful if you could find time to do that. thanks.... ...Flare. Flare 19:53, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Article's looking good. :-) RabbiTechno 19:57, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, looking good, you can submit it here and get a review and some tips. I've tweaked it a bit for now though:)--Sycamore (Talk) 20:00, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Might I suggest you add some images? RabbiTechno 20:02, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for your help ill try to find a few pics and then ill submit it. Thank you Flare 19:20, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

No probs, you can also request a picture here: UN:PIC (you might have to wait a bit though):)--Sycamore (Talk) 19:23, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Warnings

December 2008

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Uncyclopedia, as you did to The Metal, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. -- Doctapeppaman 18:16, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

I guess that works. --Doctapeppaman 18:21, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

UN:ABF...--Sycamore (Talk) 18:35, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

UnSignpost: 4th December 2008 (yea, we know it's late)

The Uncyclopedia UnSignpost

Better sign it.

December 4th • Issue 27 • Smiting the nail of news with the plastic hammer of truth

Sycamore: How does he do it? An UnSignpost Special Investigation Sycamore. What words waft gently into the back garden of your mind when you hear that word? "Tree", perhaps, or "unusual, propeller-style seeds", if you're of a naturalistic bent. Maybe (although we admit it is highly unlikely), the words "song by really obscure Scottish rock band Deckard" will sneak in under the fence. But for those of an Uncyclopedia nature (and let's face it, that should include all those reading this, or the paperbot's malfunctioning again), the words are likely to include: "Scottish"; "omnipresent"; "recent changes fiend"; "reviewer extraordinaire"; "categories"; "ban patrol"; or possibly "who?" if you're out of the loop. But who is this masked Celt? Well, since changing identity from MMACKNIGHT‎ in March 2008, he's racked up an impressive 18,000 edits (or he will have by the time this paper is actually delivered - it's hanging at 17.940-odd at the time of typing). Many of these edits have been thanklessly categorising pages, voting for deletion, reverting and ban patrolling - the kind of soul-crushing work, in other words, that would sap the will to live of the average individual, but not our Syc. His efforts have not gone un-noticed. Indeed, he's been re-nommed for Uncuclopedian of the Month, even though he's already won the award. And despite the understandable reluctance of the non-existent cabal to swell their non-existent ranks, there is a small but significant groundswell of opinion gathering that this should be followed by the bestowing of a Banhammer on the cheery Caledonian. All of this is interesting, of course, and handily fills up column inches in this week's issue, but it doesn't answer the burning question: how does he do it? Once again spending no expense on uncovering the truth, your fearless UnSignpost has the answers, and they lie in his welcome message, and a gratuitous stereotype of his nationality. Yes, Jaffa Cakes and Irn Bru are the fuel of choice of this salutary Scot, and it would appear that the chemical reaction of these two volatile substances in his bloodstream creates an energy level easily the equivalent of at least a small-to-medium Hadron Collider. This is sufficient to cause in him a state not unequivalent to that Scientific Holy Grail, perpetual motion. So there you go kids: that's how he does it! Warning: Your safety-conscious UnSignpost would like to point out that Irn Bru is only known to have this beneficial effect on Scots. Those from less tartan countries would be advised to steer well clear - don't try this at home, kids! From the Cabal's desk Greeting citizens. This post does not exist. We are not addressing you from this paper. We do not exist. We do not sit in dark corners, smoking expensive cigars and smirk when we see you make mistakes. Mistakes on this site do not exist. We do not watch your every step with our ban hammers poised for actions. Mainly because your edits don't exist. We are not tired by your petty dramas and wonder when will you write some new classics. Simply because you do not exist. You are not reading this post. We will not meet again next week. This was not the cabal's weekly address to the citizenry. Keep the peace, obey the cabal. The cabal is your friend.

Check out these pages! TKF v BHOP: an acronymious battle The inevitable bandwagon A history lesson, and RAHB's penis again From our logs BUMPER SPECIAL: 07:24, 3 December 2008 RAHB (Talk | contribs) blocked 92.43.66.7 (Talk) with an expiry time of 2 weeks ‎ (You've got to stop taking vacations like this. They get in the way of the valuable contributions you make to our site.) 00:40, 3 December 2008 Thekillerfroggy (Talk | contribs) blocked Fat hideous cunt (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of Judgement Day ‎ (Codeine why are you using socks to vandalize us) 18:25, 2 December 2008 Mordillo (Talk | contribs) blocked 71.146.0.222 (Talk) with an expiry time of 1 month ‎ (We love niggers. My best friend is a nigger. My wife is a nigger. And when I have a son, I hope he'll be a nigger rather than an IP) 19:57, 1 December 2008 Codeine (Talk | contribs) blocked 204.184.39.253 (Talk) with an expiry time of 1 week ‎ (Regardless of what your girlfriends may have told you, orgasms are real) 18:18, 1 December 2008 RAHB (Talk | contribs) blocked Codeine (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of a Country/Folk musician ‎ (When I see your name on my block log, I think of a song lyric by Townes van Zandt, if that means anything.) 18:03, 1 December 2008 Codeine (Talk | contribs) blocked RAHB (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of a penis ‎ (When I see your name in my watchlist, I think of penis. And that's not always a good thing.) 21:03, 30 November 2008 Modusoperandi (Talk | contribs) blocked Sycamore (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 30 seconds ‎ (That's for editing a year old topic and making RAHB think there was actually something exciting happening. Bastard.) 20:37, 30 November 2008 RAHB (Talk | contribs) blocked Sycamore (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 30 seconds ‎ (That's for editing a year old topic and making me think there was actually something exciting happening. Bastard.) Biopic of the Week There's beautiful, there's downright gorgeous, and then, beyond even that, there's Prettiestpretty. Blessed with writing talent to rival her boundless good looks, she has edified us on the delights of the Queef, the significance of the Colossus of Barbie, and much more besides. Long may she lend her grace to Uncyc! Forgotten and so-short-it-possibly-ought-to-be-a-template page of the week Tact: You know, maybe you should look into plastic surgery.

UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox

MrN9001 19:09, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Edits reverted on IB article

Hey Sycamore, why were my edits reverted on the IB article? You didn't give any reasons and I'm not doing anything wrong. For now I will put my edits on again. --Crazy george 02:43, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

If I revert I'll proabably have a good reason - In this case case you're adding what we call cruft, or crap: Quotes, lists etc - these are not our aims. As a second comment reverting like that is very bad. Before adding anymore stuff have a read of these: HTBFANJS, Beginner's Guide, UN:LIST. Hope this help:)--Sycamore (Talk) 08:56, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Might be a good idea for everyone involved to put edit summaries when they revert. ~ Mordillo where is my FUCK OFF? 11:57, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

No. You're not the boss of us. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 11:58, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

OK Modus, let's go over this again: when you get up, the first pill you take is on the left box. The left box. The side where you carry a watch. If you don't carry a watch, it's where your heart is. And in case you misplaced your heart again, it's on the side of the shoulder I kept poking you on that last field trip we did. Then, and only then you take the one on the right side, which is the complete opposite of the description I wrote just then. ~ Mordillo where is my FUCK OFF? 12:25, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

But one pill makes me larger, while the other makes me small! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 12:44, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Revert summeries for edits of this kind are hardly justifiable. If there is an issuie with reverts that are uncalled for, obviously a much tighter system of scrutiny should be the course. I am gonna have to disagree there - summeriries for this kind of eidt would be a waste of time and takje up my time on paperwork. If there is a revert that is questioned, the best way to leave a note and I'll either explain that this is kosher or I'll revert back if I have made an error.--Sycamore (Talk) 15:01, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Plus rollback doesn't tend to leave meaningful edit summaries, and a lot of vandalism reverting uses rollback for ease. Actually, that's how I remember it - all reverts that I consider vandalism have the standard rollback summary, anything else I tend to put an explanatory summary on. But then, I don't seem to get half the number of accusatory fuckwits that Syc does. Anyway, I'm just driving by here, making comments where none were asked for. Carry on. --UU - natter 11:08, Dec 7

But that's exactly the point. This guy was NOT a vandal. He added quotes in what seems to be done in good faith. Reverting vandalism? Sure, don't bother making edit summaries. Removing unnecessary content that was placed in good faith by a noob? A completely different issue. Take the extra two minutes to undo rather than rolling back and write down why it was reverted. Non of our time is more expensive than acquiring a new writer rather than scaring him off. ~ Mordillo where is my FUCK OFF? 12:24, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

On the plus side, both versions of the page kind of suck. Lists of more than six things are bad. On the other hand, lists of more than six things are bad. This isn't an absolute, by any means, but it's generally true, absolutely. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 12:35, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Okay, that's messed up

I did a search on that page for "archive", and it said "not found". Excuse my uncompetence. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 11:16, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Looks like you messed it up - the stuff I did links fine? Whats the deal?--Sycamore (Talk) 11:23, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

You put it there. I didn't see it. I searched. It didn't find it. I added it. Then you edited it...and I saw that it was there the whole time. It's like a ghost story, but nerdy. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 11:31, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

I love it when you talk dirty:)--Sycamore (Talk) 11:33, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

So, you love it whenever I speak. Noted. That's why I use my sexy voice when I do an audio. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 11:35, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Why have I not given you this yet?

Woo! Yay, go you! Under User has decided that you are "quite a decent sort", which is apparently one of his highest terms of praise! This is therefore a good thing, and in accordance with this, he's throwing a party down the manhole to celebrate. Look at him go! You're not invited though. Don't take it personally.

Let's rectify that appalling oversight right now. --UU - natter 11:10, Dec 7

Thanks man!:)--Sycamore (Talk) 11:15, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Cheers, matey...

..for 'Ban Patrolling' IP 206.207.175.161. I was just en route to do the same, you saved me the effort. :-) RabbiTechno 17:25, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

No probs, may Sophia be with you:)--Sycamore (Talk) 17:33, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Consider this your spelling intervention

You know that I love you like a brother, man, but seriously, get Firefox. It's got a built in spellythingy. Since I have FF, I know that "spellythingy" isn't technically a proper word. Bask in the glorious light of my knowingness! That's not a real word, either. Pity. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 11:27, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Also love here, I've shifted over to my mac which has a built in spellchecker - so there should be slightly less typos. As a side note do you think all the images look better when they are all moved to 200px?:)--Sycamore (Talk) 14:34, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Whatever works, man. I think that pics works best when shrunk to 1px. You have to make the reader work for it, I say. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 19:44, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Atheism

Please see User talk:RabbiTechno. 128.109.2.110 15:28, 10 December 2008 (UTC)