Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive91

Harriet Miers

Keep	Keep It's pretty funny. And besides, pages about Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky aren't very topical either. Err... well... Monica Lewinsky isn't... Bill still is. People still remember Harriet Miers. And she's the only groupie Bush has. Don't take that away from him. Also, since it hasn't changed since the two previous VFD's, it is technically ineligible. --Dexter111344 02:55, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Keep. Starts off a bit weak, but the end is funny. What Dexter said about the topicality, too. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:21, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Keep - Not too bad. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 12:27, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Keep I've seen much, much worse around here. Quadzilla99 03:17, 23 September 2007 (UTC) Keep. Meh, it's not bad. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 11:49, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete	Delete - This had potential when it was first created, but now that Harriet Miers has faded into the dust, it no longer has potential and a good rewrite won't ever be able to happen--Sir Manforman 22:21, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 01:03, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments	I don't feel strongly enough to vote either way, though I would suggest if this nomination results in a keep that someone up the rewrite to medium level. However, I must point out {{wikipedia}}, which rather helps one when they don't get the article. I've put a couple on, to good response. Also, I suggest looking at the talk page of an article to see if it's previously been VFD'd fruitlessly recently.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:05, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Smokey on O'Reilly transcript

Keep	Keep. Are we reading the same page? Lines like "So you think hard working Christian Americans should be deprived the right to let their fires burn?" are too funny to not be untrue. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 03:41, 23 September 2007 (UTC) Keep and throw in a picture. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:59, 23 September 2007 (UTC) Weak keep Although I hope we don't suddenly end up with several more O'Reilly transcript articles. Quadzilla99 04:14, 23 September 2007 (UTC) Keep -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 04:51, 23 September 2007 (UTC) Keep. I didn't see anything that bad here. I actually chckled once as well. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 11:58, 23 September 2007 (UTC) Keep Meh, it's alright. --Dexter111344 16:04, 23 September 2007 (UTC) Doesn't suck that much. Ж Kalir, Wandering Hippie Salesman 21:19, 23 September 2007 (UTC) Keep. Do not delete. --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 00:22, 24 September 2007 (UTC) Keep It's not VFD material, but it definitely smacks of Family Guy-style humor. Random, deadpan, abstract. It's not laugh-a-minute but it does well enough on its own.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 01:58, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete	Delete O'Reilly: Look, most times when an article is bad it doesn't survive. Those are just the facts! Bear: Grrrrrrrrrrrrrraaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaalllllll O'Reilly is then eaten by bear. Note the lack of humor in this little tidbit. Imagine that, minus some of the particulars, and an entire damn page, and then you've got this page in a nutshell.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:39, 23 September 2007 (UTC) Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 03:21, 23 September 2007 (UTC) Delete It's midly amusing, but it's the kind of lazy style that doesn't deserve oxgen in the Uncyclopedia oxegen pod of oxegen oxegen. The Oblong Lobster 20:50, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Kyle gometz

Keep
Delete	Delete--Sir Manforman 12:26, 23 September 2007 (UTC) Delete - Passed WIP but not by enough. --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN • Capt.) 12:28, September 23, 2007 Huff --Jack Phoenix (Contact) 12:34, 23 September 2007 (UTC) Kill. Nobody cares. --RandomDie 19:13, 23 September 2007 (UTC) Kerkill 9 year-olds writing articles about what they want to do, random dates and all! --Dexter111344 21:16, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments

I just slam on the keyboard and magic happens

Keep	Fgsfds. See User:Codeine's talk page, apparently. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:03, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Lasfg8tn Per this. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 19:13 Sep 21, 2007 Keep this and the other. --Dexter111344 19:19, 21 September 2007 (UTC) dasf -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:01, 21 September 2007 (UTC) 'Keep!!11 adsfoj vds98vbycxz7698v xznvtz x768cvxzr!!! Elassint 01:43, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete	Skullthumper corrected me - blatant ripoff of Rolling your head on the keyboard--Sir Manforman 19:00, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Delete Why do people want to keep this? It should at least redirct to the head one. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 19:24, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Changed my mind for now. Can't decide which on I perfer. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 19:26, 21 September 2007 (UTC) I like this better than the other. It's more... satire-y. Which is to say it contains any at all. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 19:27 Sep 21, 2007 Delete or see below.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:09, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments	We only need one page, not 2, 1 page--Sir Manforman 19:02, 21 September 2007 (UTC) I read it, and no', I don't get why we need two pages on the same stupid thing--Sir Manforman 19:07, 21 September 2007 (UTC) If we're going to keep this, we need a retrospective.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:08, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Kept. MadMax 23:48, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia:Useless Gobshite of the Month - Again

Keep	Strong Keep as per before. If you get rid of UGotM, that's like getting rid of lipids. Sure, some people don't like lipids, but you need it to go along with all the other macromolecules that have been there since the beginning of existence. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:23, 20 September 2007 (UTC) Storong keep Look, If you can't take a joke... okay... just ignore it. Lemmee point this out to you:We are jackasses. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 23:30, 20 September 2007 (UTC) Keep. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) The Internet: Serious Business. ~ Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p. 20/09/2007 @ 23:36 Again? -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 23:38, 20 September 2007 (UTC) Keep, also, should the delete vote get higher then the keep vote on this, I recommend that we revert to the "Dead Award" status that we had earlier today. Also, I'd like to point out that Cajek's comment that it was already deleted today is to be taken with a very large grain of salt. Because it wasn't. -- The Zombiebaron 23:44, 20 September 2007 (UTC) keep --- UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 23:51, 20 September 2007 (UTC) Strong Keep So that some of us can dream. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 05:53, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Keep. Apparently, this isn't a good argument, but it's a joke, like everything else on uncyc. If you're taking it seriously, it's time to sit back and remember that this is the internet, not real life. Also, all of you are SO getting UGotM after this! P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 11:01, Sep 21 Keep Dont you understand!? This is the only thing I'll ever be good aaat!!!! Mr. Briggs Inc. 12:21, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Eh? KEEP This ain't going no where! --Dexter111344 13:00, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Keep BUT have it limited to admins as per Mhaille's instructions in the forum. - Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate 17:53, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Keepy, but make it mandatory that the nominees accept. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 19:15 Sep 21, 2007 Weak Keep If the Post nomantion bans does not disqulify a user is removed I think it will become more of joke a less a award for trolls.--Scott 22:11, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Keep - Let Famine win--Sir Manforman 22:42, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Keep - It's a joke people...Let's hear the laughs now -- (Bonner) (Talk) 22:57, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Keep - Delete it simply because a few people can't take a joke? Hell no! --General Insineratehymn 23:37, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Conditional Keep - Just don't flood it randomly like you have now. --AAA! (AAAA) 00:15, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Keep - Uncyclopedia will have no way of expelling it's dumb asses out of its many sewers without it. --Eiyuu Kou 00:18, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Conditional Keep - Until recently, most UGotM winners actually deserved it, but the recent nominations are all crap. I'll be fine with it as long as either no more nominations are allowed or the requirements to be eligible for UGotm are changed. --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN • Capt.) 05:15, September 22, 2007 STRONG KEEP - Use it for jokes, not actual people who deserve to be banned. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 14:28, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Keep Use if for people who deserve it, not for jokes. The Oblong Lobster 15:37, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete	It wasn't given a chance, Full-Protection - less than a single day, it is off VFD and temporarily locked. Than it is moved to a "petition." 13 users sign without a good reason, the best reason was "It's a joke, don't take it seriously", but how on earth is it a joke?? Meanwhile, the minority has "better" reasons to delete. And when it was on VFD, we reached "delete". I do not care that it was on for a long time, we've had things for long times, and eventually, we need to give them up. There is alternatives to deal with disruptive editors and this is not one of them, give it a fair trial, and delete--Sir Manforman 23:14, 20 September 2007 (UTC) THIS WAS ALREADY DELETED TODAY We already voted, the page died. --  Le Cejak • <-> 23:21, 20 September 2007 (UTC) Delete per previous vote. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:49, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Delete per previous arguments. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 04:53, 21 Sep 2007 While this page used to have a point, where someone who was bad enough to keep but not bad enough to ban got a jab in the ribs telling him or her to shape up, it has degenerated, rather consistently, into a page of bad vibes, drama and, yes, gobshitery. I never really liked this page, it's time for it to go. It's a bile-filled, festering trainwreck of a mixed metaphor and Uncyclopedia would be better off without it. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 06:10, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Give Dead Award status At least for a while, to give people a chance to calm down. Maybe reinstate it later if people promise to be good. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 08:29, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Delete, it has become something we should not be encouraging at this site. ~Sir Rangeley GUN WotM UotM EGA +S (talk) 12:36, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Very strong delete What is the point of an award meant to put down other users? Isn't that a violation of our golden rule, "Don't be a dick"? Seriously, selecting a "Useless Gobshite of the Month" is just asking for bitter flamewars to break out. This website will be much better without UGotM.-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 20:42, 21 September 2007 (UTC) De-1337 --EMC [TALK] 00:38, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments	CUN, can we please have real reasons why this should be kept or deleted? I don't get whatever the hell it is yer talking about. --  Le Cejak • <-> 23:26, 20 September 2007 (UTC) I gave a giant paragraph of real reasons the last time this was nominated (earlier today), and I don't feel this nomination worthy enough to do that again. So you can take your "real reasons" and SHOVE IT into a 401k, that way it generates more interest over time. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:35, 20 September 2007 (UTC) You don't need to call me "CUN" Cajek. It's a just a rank I acheived for writing a featured article. Also, I was explaining that earlier today, we reached a "delete" verdict this morining, and hear it is, back again. It was not given a fair trial so I re-nominated it--Sir Manforman 23:40, 20 September 2007 (UTC) Comment - I think Cajek is talking about the VFD verdict--Sir Manforman 23:46, 20 September 2007 (UTC) Manforman, I'd just like to point out to you that all of the actions that you describe being taken were taken under the assumption that the majority was against UGotM. I doubt that this page can ever be "deleted", per se, because so many pages link to it. The only answer is to have it as a "Dead Award", as it was earlier today. -- The Zombiebaron 23:47, 20 September 2007 (UTC) I guess you're right ZB, it should probably be a "dead" award.--Sir Manforman 23:49, 20 September 2007 (UTC) "Should", not being the optimal word, given the mass of "Keep" votes. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:19, 21 September 2007 (UTC) I'd like to see this get a full 3 days. And possibly put a note in the dump, as a lot of people are bound to not check VFD regularly. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 04:53, 21 Sep 2007 Watch, as I guaruntee you if this award is to be deleted or given dead award status some user is going to ressurect it in their userspace, although probably with a different name. ~ Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p. 21/09/2007 @ 11:43 $10 on TomMayfair's userspace. -- The Zombiebaron 13:39, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Just because a couple of users can't take a joke doesn't mean this should die. There are many more users who want to keep this than delete or end it. Oh and regarding that "We already voted, the page died.", that was on VFD for a few hours and only a few VFD regulars even got a chance to vote on it before it was killed. That's just plain fucked up. --Dexter111344 13:27, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Discussion can go on at the forum topic, so as not to take up too much space here. As for not taking a joke, I think the first line here covers a lot of aspects of what UGotM has become. It might be a joke to you, but if the people who "can't take a joke" don't want the award, it's not funny to force it upon them like what happens now. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 05:16, 21 Sep 2007 Acctaully, the first sentence of that page ("Bullying: what is it?") doesn't really apply to UGotM at all. It's more of a question, really. Also, nobody is forcing the award on anybody. I think since that one guy (who's username escapes me, at the moment) decided not to accept NotM, its become fairly accepted that you can choose not to accept an award, and instead give it to the person with the next highest score. Finnally, if anyone feels bullied, they should just talk to an admin who can solve the problem. -- The Zombiebaron 21:44, 21 September 2007 (UTC) You dodge any of my arguments against it with semantics about what is the first line of what I referenced, and then you say anyone is free to not accept the award after the debacle with manforman etc, when he clearly didn't want it? Ugh. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 03:14, 22 Sep 2007 Cri moar plz. --Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 15:21, 22 September 2007 (UTC) I'm sorry, I'm afraid I have no idea what "the debacle with manforman" is. You're going to have to speak more clearly if you want me to continue to make you look silly. -- The Zombiebaron 14:46, 22 September 2007 (UTC) I'm going to go ahead and jump right in here, regardless of how dangerous it might be to my "banned" status. Look, I don't particularly love UGotM. It's basically become a place where we borderline cyber-bully people, whether intentionally or otherwise. Part of the problem there is that people have lost track of what it's supposed to be. I don't think the "IT'S A DAMN JOKE!" is a sufficient reason to make people stop complaining that they got nommed. Another problem with it is that it seems to be pervaded with new people, which means people who don't know the concept behind it. It's not like it's very clear on the vote page. For all intents and purposes, reading it completely neutrally, it seems to be a legitimate page where users decide to mess around with people. I've been trying to cut down on my swearing lately, but this has become an absolute fucking nightmare. There has been a fair amount of controversy on the page as of late (at least two per month). Now, Zombiebaron (by the way, it was Anyone who declined NotM), don't make me go and link you to all the "debacles" that we've had so far. But they're there. I'm tired of watching this site, which I am very fond of, steeped in arbitrary controversy such as this. There is absolutely no reason why we should have to deal with all of this. As was the situation with Template:Featuredarticle the other night, sometimes the only way to fix a problem is to blank the source. And, as I've noted multiple times in this month alone, there has been a taut and somewhat unwelcoming atmosphere about the place recently. I don't know about any of you guys, but I think this could one of the major sources of the problem. I don't really like ranting the way I have, but I'm absolutely tired of this garbage. Bottom line, this is getting ridiculous. Currently, we have admins and users alike feuding rather heatedly over a page that is supposed to be a joke. All of them are users I consider to be useful. Therefore, we are tearing apart a tight-knit group of users that should be doing stuff that counts, not fighting over the fate of a vote page conceived in jest. I'm not expecting the adversity to go away, but I honestly don't think that this is helping matters at all. And that is simply unacceptable.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 15:18, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Very well put, Ljlego. Here's my two cents: We should unban Fonchezzz, let him win UGotM, infiniban him again, then put this silly award to death.-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 15:29, 22 September 2007 (UTC) In all due respect Leoispotter, that's the worst idea I've ever heard. -- The Zombiebaron 19:09, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Really? Worse than the idea of adding a small thermal exhaust port that leads straight to the reactor on the Death Star? Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:50, 23 September 2007 (UTC) Well, that exhaust port had a purpose. Namely, to be at the end of a long, poorly defended, hallway-style ditch. It's like those "Do Not Enter" doors that took you an hour to find in the first place. Except you don't ussually blow up "Do Not Enter" doors. -- The Zombiebaron 03:56, 23 September 2007 (UTC) If you look really closely, there was a sign reading deus ex machina beside the port. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:10, 23 September 2007 (UTC) Spang says this should be given a full three days, and it has got a full three days. The keep response seems overwhelming. Kept?-- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 06:07, 23 September 2007 (UTC) Kept, but be sure to make clarifications ont he apge as discussed.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 12:50, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Greatest men ever to live

Keep
Delete	Delete If you look past the pictures, it's a list with an introductory paragraph. This introductory paragraph, while not the worst piece of writing I ever saw, is certainly a far cry from "solid", "mildly humorous", or even "tolerable."-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:10, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 00:51, 23 September 2007 (UTC) Delete -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:56, 23 September 2007 (UTC) Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 02:35, 23 September 2007 (UTC) Delete Quadzilla99 03:13, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments

How not to write an article

Keep
Delete	Delete - 3 words: Waste of space. --AAA! (AAAA) 12:44, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Delete - We also have Bad Uncyclopedia Article. I wouldn't mind keeping one of them, but certainly not both. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:06, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Delete --General Insineratehymn 15:05, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Delete this one. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 15:41, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Kerkill The other one was here first. --Dexter111344 16:41, 22 September 2007 (UTC) DIIIIE! This is pretty much the same as Vandalism/example on wheels!. Therefore it's just another stupid clone page. --User:Banjo2e/SIGGY 17:32, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Delete Ow. Ow ow ow ow ow. My eyes hurt.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:13, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Delete. The problem with intentionally bad articles is that they are not good. And, hence, bad. And more-or-less unreadable. ----OEJ 22:00, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 00:52, 23 September 2007 (UTC) Delete Quadzilla99 03:13, 23 September 2007 (UTC) Feature -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 03:27, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments

The None Sense

Keep
Delete	Nom and Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 03:16, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 03:31, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Kerkill Also, this shows an original author can come back almost two years later and make the article worse. --Dexter111344 04:05, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Delete - Unfunny, poorly written. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:01, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Delete Oh, the places you will go when you're high! The title of this Dr. Seuss book I have just referenced is an example of good nonsense. This is almost like reading the inner thoughts of a 14-year-old with ADHD. Who knows, maybe that's exactly what it is. But in any case, it's poorly formatted, badly written, redlinked, and even commits the cardinal sin of fake-namedropping. This is when names are changed to "comedic" effect (often ending up being meh at best). It does that a lot.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:29, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Delete. As per previous comments. ----OEJ 22:01, 22 September 2007 (UTC) I see bad articles -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:21, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Jamie Buetel

Keep
Delete	Kerkill This is vanitycruft from what I can tell(No Wikipedia article nor Google results that told me who this is). It also isn't funny --Dexter111344 00:16, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Nobody cares -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 00:52, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 03:30, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Delete Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 15:13, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Delete I had this pinned as a keep and rework, but then I got on in the article. While I actually chuckled at "The first few years of his life were realitivly normal, that is except for his inability to socialize, or look normal," that's its peak, and it's not even that good. Therefore, delete.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:33, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Delete. Not very good, and about an apparently unknown subject: may be vanity. ----OEJ 22:11, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Delete Quadzilla99 03:56, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Jorb Day

Keep
Delete	Nom & Delete - Another unfunny stub -- (Bonner) (Talk) 22:18, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 01:04, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Kerkill --Dexter111344 03:23, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 03:28, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Delete - Crap in most respects. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 15:12, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Delete. "Emaculately" indeed. ----OEJ 22:13, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Delete Crappola, sorry. Quadzilla99 03:14, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments

The Great War No-One Really Remembers Anymore

Keep
Delete	Nom & Delete Unfunny mediocre shite -- (Bonner) (Talk) 22:11, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 01:14, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 03:22, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Kerkill Mainly a long and repeating list. Also, it idiotically throws Oscar Wilde in as the main character(Better than Chuck Norris, I suppose...). --Dexter111344 03:57, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Delete --General Insineratehymn 15:07, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Delete - Crap in most respects. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 15:10, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Delete Occasionally an article of such incredible awfulness come about, you hardly know what to do about it. This is not that article. I know exactly what to do with it. Throw it, with its imageless, meme-ish, and completely self-contradicting existence into the fires of She'ol. Right to She'ol!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:18, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Everybody was ugly and smelly. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:22, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Rolling your head on the keyboard

Keep	O RLY? And before you nominate I just slam on the keyboard and magic happens, read this. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 18:57 Sep 21, 2007
Delete	Blatant Ripoff of I just slam on the keyboard and magic happens--Sir Manforman 18:44, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments	Retracted nom--Sir Manforman 19:00, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Munchkins

Keep
Delete	Delete. Teh rubbishness. RabbiTechno 18:42, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 02:56, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Kerkill --Dexter111344 04:07, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Delete - Lacking in ideas and humour. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 12:18, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 12:29, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments

What The Fuck Is Grimace?

Keep
Delete	Nom and Delete Okay...Just no okay? I'll...Oh just look at the quote -- (Bonner) (Talk) 21:30, 21 September 2007 (UTC) What The Fuck Is This? -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:44, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Great title, awful page. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:55, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Kerkill Utter crap. Peter is my uncle thank you very much. --Dexter111344 00:20, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 03:19, 22 September 2007 (UTC) He's Ronald McDonald's artistic friend. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:22, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments

HowTo:Be 1337

Keep
Delete	Delete We already have better, longer versions of this: HowTo:Achieve leet, and L337. Only 3 pages link to it. Finally, it hasn't been edited since July, and it's only been edited 20 times since January. I'm tired of these leet jokes. and Oscar Wilde, and Chuck Norris!!! THEY'RE the ones that should be on gobshite of the month! --  Le Cejak • <-> 20:39, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:49, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Reduntant and bad articles are redundant and bad to the point of being badly redundant. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:23, 22 September 2007 (UTC) |>31373. Awful. Also, maybe you're confused. The Useless Gobshite of the Month discussion is here, not here. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 00:24 Sep 22, 2007 Kerkill This article is weak and is desperately trying to be 1337 but fails so miserably. --Dexter111344 02:48, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 03:18, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Wow

Keep
Delete	Nom & Delete - Unfunny stub -- (Bonner) (Talk) 22:16, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Wow - this is short--Sir Manforman 22:16, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Kerkill and redirect to WoW because this is so boring. --Dexter111344 00:03, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Brevity is sometimes bad. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:16, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 01:06, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 03:26, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments	Actually, the current contents of this could probably be put on Undictionary:W because it isn't that bad. That is, if anyone wants to do that. I'm lazy. --Dexter111344 00:07, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Euphemisms for homosexuality

Keep
Delete	Nom & Delete - Too listy and doesn't work -- (Bonner) (Talk) 22:14, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Kerkill Feeling the bone of this decision to make this, eh? Yeah, it doesn't work. --Dexter111344 00:35, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 01:12, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Gay – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 01:12 Sep 22, 2007 Delete. -- Mitch 03:24, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Delete --RandomDie 04:12, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Uh. No. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:49, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Delete Pretty Good Satan 05:52, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Cornell University

Keep	Rewrite. Ivy League deserves better quality, and deleting it won't do much good (it'd only encourage the creation of crappy IP microstubs). Plus, Dexter, I don't know where you live, but Cornell is definitely well-known enough to bypass UN:VAIN... -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:19, 18 September 2007 (UTC) I no me dat der edumurcation I tailz you wat! Oh, and, it just seemed like vanity to me because of the way the person had written it(i.e. Ezra Cornell (who was half black, half white, seven thirds Eskimo, and six quarters asian)). It doesn't really seem all that encyclopedic to me. Oh, and go Brown! Go Harvard! F-off Yale!--Dexter111344 00:28, 19 September 2007 (UTC) What He Said Don't you think that this article is going to be recreated if we delete it, no matter how crappy it is? --  Le Cejak • <-> 21:29, 18 September 2007 (UTC) Keep. Rewrite tag it. Could have been a good candidate for conservation week. Shame. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:49, 19 September 2007 (UTC) Keep Fuck it. I've changed my vote. --Dexter111344 03:28, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete	Delete --Sir Manforman 20:52, 18 September 2007 (UTC) Kerkill this vanity! At first, I was reading it and thought this is a great article. I quickly realized that I was reading the wrong article. Why do we care about this college? Oh, wait, we don't!!!!!--Dexter111344 21:04, 18 September 2007 (UTC) Delete okay, man4man convinced me. --  Le Cejak • <-> 22:45, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments	This is not bending the 15 rule limit as User is blocked is a red link--Sir Manforman 20:52, 18 September 2007 (UTC) Needs a rewrite. Not sure what else to do, here. --SirIsaac 21:03, 18 September 2007 (UTC) You are correct TKF, it is defintley not vanity, with it being an Ivy League. But the reason why I nominated it is because of the quality, the lack of effort the author put in. As for your point Cajek, if it gets re-created, we can CVP or DPP it. I can guarentee you the author of this didn't graduate from Cornell--Sir Manforman 22:34, 18 September 2007 (UTC) We can only hope they didn't graduate from Harvard. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:44, 18 September 2007 (UTC) Besides, saying "Just CVP this and that" is a bad thing to do. CVP and DPP grossly discourages rewrites, and should only be for the most extreme of vanity/worthless pages. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:22, 19 September 2007 (UTC) Now that's Harvard, and that's a doubtful story I must say--Sir Manforman 22:46, 18 September 2007 (UTC) Okay, I'll vote both ways... --  Le Cejak • <-> 06:17, 19 September 2007 (UTC) You can't vote both ways. Just put Abstain in the comments box and explain why your not voting to keep or delete it--Sir Manforman 11:32, 19 September 2007 (UTC) Kept. MadMax 08:06, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

HowTo:Strip A Wall

Keep	Keep. I see no problem here. Pretty standard stuff. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:14, 20 September 2007 (UTC) Keep per TKF. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:54, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Keep. Again, it's not bad. Certainly not worth getting rid of. Rewrite tag. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:17, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Keep --Dexter111344 13:05, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Keep - I created this and although it's not the greatest article ever, i'd call it my best and it's certainly not worthy of deletion -- (Bonner) (Talk) 17:25, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete	Not formatted very well. Also, it isn't that funny and contains way to many lists.--Sir Manforman 21:18, 20 September 2007 (UTC)</s?
Comments	Comment - maybe this should be tagged with {{Rewrite}}??? It's an OK concept, I like the pics, but it needs less lists--Sir Manforman 22:17, 20 September 2007 (UTC) The lists are vital to the structure, though. You need to be able to identify between unnecessary lists and necessary, even funny, shorter lists. You could claim HowTo:Beat the Odds is "too listy" with your logic. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:58, 21 September 2007 (UTC) After re-reading it, I found it wasn't VFD criteria and I have withdrawn the nom. This doesn't change my mind about disliking the lists, and I'll slap a {{Rewrite}} tag on it, This has potential to be better. --Sir Manforman 18:31, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Kapt -- The Zombiebaron 21:53, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

HowTo:Catch A Mouse

Keep	Keep - Surprisingly similar to several featured HowTos, just shorter. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:53, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Keep. I don't see anything objectionable. We're not deleting for not being VFH-worthy now, are we? --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:15, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Keep Could probably be expanded by a bit. Just leave it be. --Dexter111344 13:08, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Keep Surprisingly I created this one As well and i'd like to know why every article I've made had been nommed for deletion by Manforman. There is nothing wrong with this, leave it be. -- (Bonner) (Talk) 17:28, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Keep--Sir Manforman 19:28, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete	Way to serious--Sir Manforman 21:14, 20 September 2007 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 23:42, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments	Sorry about the nom Bonner. While it isn't my cup of tea, it seems that other people are digging it and I'll leave this alone--Sir Manforman 18:32, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Keeped -- The Zombiebaron 21:55, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

47 (the evil number)

Keep	Keep. Not too shabby. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:46, 18 September 2007 (UTC) Keep - better than I thought, tag with {{Rewrite}}--Sir Manforman 22:48, 18 September 2007 (UTC) Keep. Rewrite again. Has its moments. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:52, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete	Weak Delete I don't think anybody cares about this, and it aint that funny. I think that I could have linked that to nobody cares, but everybody does that nowadays. --  Le Cejak • <-> 22:43, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments	Cajek, nobody cares. "Weak" because the article has been edited recently. --  Le Cejak • <-> 22:43, 18 September 2007 (UTC) oooh crap: doesn't violate 15 rule, cuz 10 of those links are broken. --  Le Cejak • <-> 22:43, 18 September 2007 (UTC) You don't need to tell us unless it does break 15 :) -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:46, 18 September 2007 (UTC) NEVERMIND. (oh ok, thank you frog) What's the difference between ICU and Rewrite? Is one more desperate than the other? --  Le Cejak • <-> 22:53, 18 September 2007 (UTC) {{ICU}} is for articles less than 1 week old, {{Rewrite}} is for articles over a week old--Sir Manforman 22:54, 18 September 2007 (UTC) Cupt -- The Zombiebaron 21:58, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Cook Strait

Keep
Delete	Delete - VFD tagged more than a month ago. Crap in most respects. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:38, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 14:14, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Kerkill Short and unfunny. --Dexter111344 14:34, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Delete. Redlinks, no funny, stubby, dull. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 15:45, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 19:58, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Jermaine Defoe

Keep
Delete	Delete - More crap that has been on Rewrite/Hard for a fair while, but probably won't get rewritten anytime soon. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:36, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 14:12, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Kerkill per Cs. --Dexter111344 14:36, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Delete. Yeah, it's rubbish. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 15:43, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 19:56, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Orkin man

Keep
Delete	Delete. contains 1.3 "the orkin man is gay" jokes per second, none of them funny. --SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 08:28, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Delete. Per Gerry. And that picture disturbs me. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:08, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Delete - Random and unfunny. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 11:46, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 14:12, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Kerkill Even the Orkin Man deserves better than this stupid-ass shit. All of these gay jokes make me wonder, is the Orkin Man actually gay? I don't use gay as an insult, by the way. But, he has to be gay for any of this to be funny at least make sense. I doubt he had a sex-tape. --Dexter111344 18:01, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Bullshit -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 19:52, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Blue chocolate

Keep
Delete	Delete. random nonsense with some possible vanity thrown in. --SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 08:24, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Delete. Yeah, random tripe. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:07, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Delete - Random and unfunny. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 11:38, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 14:11, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Kerkill random idiotic, Paris Hilton name-dropping crap. --Dexter111344 18:05, 21 September 2007 (UTC) LOL Not funny for Uncyclopedia, but funny that it's too stupid for Uncyclopedia. Get it? Eh, I think I just confused myself. Just move to Illogicopedia, dammit! -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 19:30, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 19:44, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Sacosyphillis

Keep
Delete	Delete. unfunny and uses the word 'rape' far too many times. --SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 08:21, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Delete. Yeah, it sucks. Per Gerry. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:06, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Delete - Pretty much every joke on this is a bad sex related joke. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 11:35, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 14:11, 21 September 2007 (UTC) He rapes, and rapes, and rapes, and rapes And when he's done he rapes some more. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 19:42, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Ronald Jones

Keep
Delete	Who?--Sir Manforman 21:21, 20 September 2007 (UTC) Kerkill Not vanity, but it does suck. --Dexter111344 22:09, 20 September 2007 (UTC) Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 22:10, 20 September 2007 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 23:43, 20 September 2007 (UTC) Delete - Crap in most respects. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:55, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Delete. That's more like it. Unfunny, redlinks, a bit random. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:02, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Template: Martha Stewart Hotlisted Page

Keep
Delete	Delete. Recreated shit template -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 11:32, 20 September 2007 (UTC) Delete per TKF. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:36, 20 September 2007 (UTC) Delete Nobody uses it, apparently. --  Le Cejak • <-> 14:28, 20 September 2007 (UTC) Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:00, 20 September 2007 (UTC) Kerkill Too lavender... --Dexter111344 20:06, 20 September 2007 (UTC) DPP - I think when I was looking through the archives of VFD, I think I remember seeing this--Sir Manforman 21:12, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Raw Pwnage

Keep
Delete	Too Short and not funny.   Le Cejak • <-> 04:56, 20 September 2007 (UTC) Delete - It was written by Metropolis. Do I need any other reason? Oh yeah, it's also crap in most respects. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:10, 20 September 2007 (UTC) Delete. Unfunny stub. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 11:03, 20 September 2007 (UTC) lolMetropolis -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:11, 20 September 2007 (UTC) Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 19:58, 20 September 2007 (UTC) Kerkill Short, didn't take Brads advice after the Pee Review it got when it was created, and it's Metropolis's. Need another reason? Yeah? Ok, it has no images, it was abandoned, and has a stupid ass list. There's three for one. --Dexter111344 20:13, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Janitor Man

Keep	Keep I am Homeless Man! I have the power to THINK that I am flying (Hey everyone else has pointless delete messages!)! Mr. Briggs Inc. 21:06, 19 September 2007 (UTC) Eh? Keep - Aside from the last two lists (which I have removed), it's not too bad. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:12, 20 September 2007 (UTC) Keep. Possibly rewrite tag, but it's not beyond salvation. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:57, 20 September 2007 (UTC) Keep. Nonsense, this article has great potential. Mightywayne 15:56, 20 September 2007 (UTC) Keep Even with the lists it was pretty good. --Dexter111344 19:51, 20 September 2007 (UTC) Keep. Extremely not bad. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:53, 20 September 2007 (UTC) Weak keep per above votes. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:03, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete	I thought about re-writing it but it is to awful to do so--Sir Manforman 11:34, 19 September 2007 (UTC) Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:24, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments	Keeped -- The Zombiebaron 22:37, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

The Boony Doll

Keep	Extreme Keep - As an Australian, it would simply be irresponsible of me not to fix a page on an important Australian cultural icon. I'll remove the crap and expand tag it to encourage me to do something with it. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:58, 18 September 2007 (UTC) Conditional keep. If Cs does as he says. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 11:31, 18 September 2007 (UTC) Conditional keep. Ditto Under_user. See Wickedpedia's Boonanza article for relevant info. The pressure's on, Cs1987... ;) ----OEJ 13:30, 18 September 2007 (UTC) Conditional Keep - as per above. I have no idea what a Boony Doll is, but I assume it means something to our Antipodean chums. RabbiTechno 18:25, 18 September 2007 (UTC) Weak Keep maybe has potential.--  Le Cejak • <-> 19:51, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. What the fuck? --SirIsaac 02:47, 18 September 2007 (UTC) Wrf -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:24, 19 September 2007 (UTC) Delete Won't be expanded much, though an article on Boonanza or David "Boonie" Boon would be able to cover this and have other stuff to work upon. Also, make sure you link it to the article itself, not a redirect please. --Dexter111344 01:56, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments	Come to think of it, I probably won't be doing anything with this for a few months. It should probably be moved to my userspace. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:06, 19 September 2007 (UTC) Kepla -- The Zombiebaron 13:48, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

HowTo:Get a Dog to like you

Keep	Keep. Established author expressed good faith. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:41, 16 September 2007 (UTC) Keep Give it a week. --Dexter111344 03:27, 17 September 2007 (UTC) Keep but watch. Renominate if not improved on in the next week. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:56, 17 September 2007 (UTC) Keep per Cs. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:44, 17 September 2007 (UTC) Keep. Not template abuse as I originally suspected. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 23:11 Sep 18, 2007
Delete	Delete - unless the author can finish it. For the past month and a half, it was tagged with {{Expand}}, and today, the author removed the tag and replaced it with {{Construction}} without doing anything else.--Sir Manforman 20:20, 16 September 2007 (UTC) Kill. I'm usually for keeping anything labeled {{construction}}, but this isn't the proper way to use the tag. And additionally, the article sucks. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 20:31 Sep 16, 2007 Delete "You're dog doesn't run away...?" Kill it. RabbiTechno 23:04, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments	Sounds like writer's block. I've had it. It sucks. ----OEJ 13:32, 18 September 2007 (UTC) Kelp -- The Zombiebaron 13:35, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Great Expectations

Keep	Keep - A bit random, but not too bad. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 10:28, 16 September 2007 (UTC) Keep - but needs work. RabbiTechno 11:15, 16 September 2007 (UTC) Keep. Although it does need a re-write. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 14:34, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. Formerly Big Boss crap, now just plain crap. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 17:07, 15 September 2007 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 03:07, 16 September 2007 (UTC) Kerkill It claims O.J. killed his Pip's parents. O.J. didn't do it, damn it! Okay... maybe he did... What's your point?!? --Dexter111344 01:37, 18 September 2007 (UTC) Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:11, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments