Uncyclopedia:VFH/Epic Fail!

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

EPIC FAIL! (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: EPIC FAIL!	Score: 31 epic failures
Nominated by:	~Fag x FS 15:15, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
For: 34	SN+F it got a pretty great pee review, and all suggestions made for improvement have been taken on board and implicated. I personally am very proud of this article. --~Fag x FS 15:15, 29 January 2008 (UTC) Fror splendid work Fag. --THE 21:05, 29 January 2008 (UTC) For --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 21:16, Jan. 29, 2008 For I quite enjoyed it. I wish I could be more eloquent but there you go. Zarbag 22:27, 29 January 2008 (UTC) For Great work, I nearly shat myself laughing :D. I could give you a piece of the NotM pie if you like. Sir DJ ~ Irreverent For - Epic Win! -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 08:28, Jan. 30, 2008 For --Bassguy 09:39, 30 January 2008 (UTC) For. Chuckles. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 12:25, 30 January 2008 (UTC) For--Æ 14:02, 30 January 2008 (UTC)  For. --MNM5150Talk Dirty To Me Failings 15:56, 30 January 2008 (UTC) For - UnIdiot | Talk? | Theme - 19:43, Jan 30  For. Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) For Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 01:42, 31 January 2008 (UTC) For What a hoot that was.– Preceding unsigned comment added by Ljlego (talk • contribs) <-EPIC FAIL! For it's really really good! (even though imho it slightly ruined the fridge joke (the original idea was on illogicopedia :P)) -Testostereich 12:27, 31 January 2008 (UTC)  EPIC FOR! -->:( 18:18, 31 January 2008 (UTC) For Smoking. MrN 22:18, Jan 31  Speedy Feature For Get this one up on the front page already. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 02:22, 1 February 2008 (UTC)  FAIL. --thematrixeætsyou, the sexy beast (talk) (flames) 02:42, 1 February 2008 (UTC)  Well, now its a failed feature? ~Formerly Annoying Crap 02:52, 1 February 2008 (UTC) For Great! --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 03:48, 1 February 2008 (UTC) For epoch fail! -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 14:37, 1 February 2008 (UTC) Strong For -I laughed out loud reading this and everyone in my computer lab just stared at me but so worth it.--Gaberou 20:18, 1 February 2008 (UTC) For Epic Fail FTW! --Tiny clanger 20:27, 1 February 2008 (UTC) For Why not. --Dexter111344 22:01, 1 February 2008 (UTC) For Jellyfish! --DyslexicRetard 08:44, 2 February 2008 (UTC) EPIC FOR--Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 19:17, 2 February 2008 (UTC) Absolutely. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 19:29, Feb 2 Certainly pointless For -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:36, 2 February 2008 (UTC) EPIC PH♥RR What else can I say but thank you? ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF (@ 20:06 3 Feb, 2008) EPIC Fo®! --Lopsidedmepallamo 20:56, 6 February 2008 (UTC)  For. --General Insineratehymn 03:06, 7 February 2008 (UTC) GO--Moneke 10:59, 7 February 2008 (UTC) For 30+ Epic Failures! Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!)
Against: 3	Against Is something you should find on Dramatica not here in our precious gem. --Naimrod 12:01, 1st February 2008 (UTC) Oh, come on. Just because someone did an article based on internet humor for once doesn't mean we're suddenly ED. Plus, if this were ED, the formatting would be terrible, they would use "at least 100" at least 100 times, and Goatse would make a cameo as every image on the page. Also it wouldn't be funny. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 15:46, 6 February 2008 (UTC) EPIC FAIL You knew it was coming... -RAHB 07:36, 5 February 2008 (UTC) Epic middle? I must be missing something. --THINKER 15:48, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Perhaps change the title to all caps?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:59, 31 January 2008 (UTC) Done :P Yeah, it's better like that. ~Fag x FS If a VFH-responsible person is reading this, shouldn't this be queued up ready from after the top 10? It'd be silly to see this sit here and lose health --~Fag x FS 08:31, 1 February 2008 (UTC) Yea I am hoping this one doesn't lose all its health as I think it will be one of the top articles of 2008. I would renom this one if it fails to get featured status becasue of low health or getting quasi (Which doesn't make it eligible for top articles for Feb or for 2008). --—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 22:59, 1 February 2008 (UTC) It can't be a failed nom durring the Top 10 thing. The admins are supposed to be ignoring health--Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 19:17, 2 February 2008 (UTC) 233% Health :O Sir DJ ~ Irreverent How's that health looking now? • Spang • ☃ • talk • 00:59, 06 Feb 2008 300% exactly aparently O.o --(sir)Fag!chat|pee|fail|vote! 12:13, 6 February 2008 (UTC) This better make it or else I'm gonna feel really silly. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF (@ 14:30 6 Feb, 2008)

VFH

---

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.