From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD. |
House of Trouser
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Disintegrate. I'm speechless... Saberwolf116 03:33, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete and move to illogicopedia. --Mnb'z 03:44, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Pants ! --Romartus 15:39, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- *sniff* I miss MrN! Saberwolf116 16:05, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Where is Mr N? mAttlobster. (hello) 17:53, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 13:50, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Weirdest words
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete Too random for Illogicopedia, possibly. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 06:50, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete.. I was actually thinking keep at first, but changed my mind after reading more of the article. -- Aethix ~ Talk|Contributions|My project 13:36, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- Too shit for anywhere, possibly --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 13:55, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. --Docile hippopotamus 13:56, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- Kerkill Unfunny lists, bad concept, stupid, and it looked at me funny. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 13:59, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
People who are totally all like "we're the best" but their aLL gay and stuff and stupid s i hate them
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. This is an intentionally bad page which is, sadly, too bad to be any good. pillow talk 22:17, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- lyk dont you hate all those people who are all like were awesome but their actuallly assfaggots? --roman assfaggot 01:54, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. It's remarkably hard to write a page on how bad something is that isn't dragged down by the badness (whether actual or imaginary) of the subject, and I'm widely considered to be an expert on this matter as I have never written such a page; one that's written bad, but good. This page is what happens when you fail. Look at all the great writers in its history. Even they couldn't help much. This is why I stick to writing pages about ponies. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:40, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. per above. --Mnb'z 05:22, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Not gonna make a habit of voting here but I do hate this article. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 05:24 28 May 2009
|
Comments |
|
BFK
Keep |
- Keep It's not hurting anyone. (talk) 18:03, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- No offense Jack, but that's not really a reason to keep an article. What if a noob stumbled upon it in random search, and thinks "this is how I should write articles"? Things like that can accumulate. Saberwolf116 01:59, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. You nerds simply aren't nerdy enough to get this. Nerds. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 09:10, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Not a feature, but also not incoherent, so someone may find it funny. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 13:24, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep again, per DJ and MO Le Cejak • <14:40 May 22, 2009>
- Keep. Per all of the above. --UU - natter 15:11, May 22
- Per UU? Yes, per UU, as per per all of the above. User:Zheliel/sigz2 04:43, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. Admittedly this is of somewhat limited appeal, but to a programmer it's quite funny. Point the gun elsewhere.--Winston 16:47, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Disintegrate. Listy and unfunny. Saberwolf116 12:02, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. --Mnb'z 15:51, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Angry software engineer ranting; although I do like the idea of starting every line with a 'please'. mAttlobster. (hello) 18:31, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Is it Voltran or Voltron ?? Or just a Vole ??? It is for the cesspit. --Romartus 10:43, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I agree with what the SaberWolf is saying above - I think votes should be based on the quality of the article not whether it is liable to 'come back worse' or philosophical judgements as to whether it is 'hurting anyone'. mAttlobster. (hello) 13:25, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Kept. ~ 07:58, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Strong Keep Famine would ban you so bad, the first sentence is good enough. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 12:46, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 12:48, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. I've re-integrated some of Famine's lost text, for better I hope.--Winston 16:34, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- For -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 18:42, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- It doesn't weigh much. -- Roman Dog Bird 18:48, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- Per RDB --~ 14:00, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep This is nonsensical and stupid and very funny. mAttlobster. (hello) 15:07, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Disintegrate. More 2005 cruft. Created by Famine, yet no funny at all. Saberwolf116 02:36, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. --Mnb'z 03:59, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Abstain. It's a bit cheesy and dribbily. --Romartus 15:41, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keept -RAHB 00:52, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
|
I-am-bored
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. I'm bored of us having this vanity article hanging around. Spang and Skull asked them on the talk page to leave off using usernames and so forth, and mentioned it was borderline. Look at it - it's full of usernames and vanity, and for me it's way over the borderline. Let's get rid. --UU - natter 10:23, May 26
- Delete. per above. --Mnb'z 13:56, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- And not a moment too soon. ~ 13:59, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. This is not a good as articles that are better. mAttlobster. (hello) 14:58, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Disintegrate. Vanity. Saberwolf116 15:31, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Roger Rabbit
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. random as hell, to the point that substituting a random name for the subject would almost make as much sense. --Mnb'z 04:04, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. and start again.--Winston 16:28, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- lolCrablogger Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 16:42, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- Starring as Borat, in the movie, Borat. -- Roman Dog Bird 18:45, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- Disintegrate. Saberwolf116 21:18, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Antipasta
Soviet hats
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete God-awful. IronLung 01:26, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. per above. --Mnb'z 02:22, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete --Docile hippopotamus 02:33, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- What's a hat? -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 06:03, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. - Utter trash, ICU dodger--Sycamore (Talk) 10:48, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Per Socky. As always, save it in your user space IMO. -OptyC Sucks! CUN14:44, 20 May
- Oy vey. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 23:39, May 20
- Delete Wow, burn it - - - Silly Angel Speak Contribs 11:51, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete When a section starts 'It is believed by many', you know you're in trouble! Not 'you' literally...you know...the second person...BEER! mAttlobster. (hello) 13:27, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Disintegrate. DO NOT WANT Saberwolf116 02:41, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Mega Man XXV
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
Abstain. Strictly for the kiddies. --Romartus 10:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
|
St. Canard
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete and maybe move to wikipedia. I fail to see any humor or possibility for humor in this article. --Mnb'z 05:18, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Clearly this is the work of someone with a drink problem. I sincerily hope this aritcle's deletion does not exacerbate his condition. Get help. Find Jesus or Allah or one of them. mAttlobster. (hello) 13:35, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Smite. User:Zheliel/sigz2 04:43, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Serving it with an orange up its arse wouldn't have helped either. --Romartus 10:40, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Obliterate. (talk) 18:51, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Designate "Retired Award" status. Normally, I'd be the one to white-knight stuff like this, but this award seems to have run its course. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 18:05, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- Change protection level to [edit=sysop:move=sysop] and replace "Official Nominations for ..." to "Nominations closed until further notice" and leave it be. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:29, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- Disintegrate. It's long gone. Saberwolf116 18:31, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 18:33, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. pointless and perverse-incentive generating award. --Mnb'z 19:50, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- Welll - I guess if we delete this, that makes me the last-ever Sockpuppeteer of the Month. That's sort of neat. pillow talk 23:46, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- Close Noms. We've got too many unimportant awards. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 23:40, May 20
- NO! Sockpuppets are for Conservapedia not Uncyclopedia. mAttlobster. (hello) 13:29, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. per Mnbvcxz Le Cejak • <14:42 May 22, 2009>
- Delete. Sockpuppetry is inexcusable. Also, per what a handsome admin is about to say in the comments section. Four Tildes 14:47, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I'd say just close for further nominations without deleting it. ~ 20:46, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- I think that was what TKF was suggesting. Saberwolf116 21:51, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Jeez, can't nobody read? -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 01:56, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- The obvious answer is no. I'm typing this on mere intuition. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:47, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Abstain. Per some prophetic user calling me handsome up there. --UU - natter 14:48, May 22
Kept, locked and closed. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 08:32, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Who Framed Roger Rabbit
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. and maybe move to illogicopedia. Totally detached from reality. --Mnb'z 05:10, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. This article framed Roger Rabbit. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 05:12, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Disintegrate. Another one from my VFD list. Saberwolf116 11:42, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- I don't get it: Thought does that mean it should be deleted just because I don't get it?????? Yes...mAttlobster. (hello) 13:48, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Piffle. --UU - natter 14:56, May 22
|
Comments |
|
Give Me Dyclonine
LS-RP
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Shite. Drama incitement made by some lameass who got banned from whateveritis. Too old to huff on sight, so please vote below so I can huff this in a nice democratic manner. Thanks. --UU - natter 11:57, May 22
- EXTERMINATE! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:59, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Disintegrate. Saberwolf116 12:05, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- They'd probably feature this on ED Ha ha ha, random crap on the internet no one cares about. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 13:23, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- HIS FACE IS UPSIDE DOWN!!!! mAttlobster. (hello) 13:36, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep. First of all, it's not all that bad. Second, it's just an old UnNews (per Hyperbole). —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:08, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. If this is representative of the worst of Uncyclopedia, we aren't doing too bad. (Note: Uncyclopedia is still the worst) Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 18:02, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. Deleting old news articles is doubleplusungood. Don't give me that, "he who controls the present controls the past" garbage. -- Aethix ~ Talk|Contributions|My project 19:56, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. Because old UnNews is hardly ever looked at unless someone is stalking another user. (talk) 07:16, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. Per Modus and Jack. --UU - natter 10:48, May 19
- I would hardly call what I'm doing stalking, User:Dexter111344 did alot worse than what I ever did. --Mnb'z 16:31, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'm not convinced that one can stalk someone who left the wiki long ago. That's closer to archaeology than stalking. pillow talk 18:49, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep It's an excellent idea and nowhere near delete worthy. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 10:56, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Delete |
EXTERMINATE! This article had the potential to be funny, but the execution was, shall we say, lacking. This could be a funny UnNews, but I think a blank slate is better than this. Oh, and courtesy Crablogger. --Mnb'z 06:06, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. It has the idea but not the execution. --Romartus 14:43, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Copied from some sad forwarded email. mAttlobster. (hello) 17:28, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Abstain. Terrible but probably harmless. Old UnNews aren't really the same as shitty mainspace articles; the chance of anyone stumbling upon them really seems pretty minimal. Almost nothing links here, Special:Random won't visit it, and electrons are cheap. Y'know? pillow talk 15:30, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Abstain per a policy of not deleting unnews. --Mnb'z 15:08, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
Close enough. Keep'd. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 09:02, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Charge of the White Van Men
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Disintegrate. Random, unfunny, incoherent. Saberwolf116 12:07, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. --Mnb'z 15:51, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Obliterate. Get you gone. (talk) 18:01, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. For some stupid reason, I can't seem to focus enough to read it. It must really suck. -- Aethix ~ Talk|Contributions|My project 00:51, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Shite. --UU - natter 08:49, May 22
|
Comments |
|
Grand Theft Auto
Flash Gordon
Snake
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Just a list of cock. mAttlobster. (hello) 17:56, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Obliterate. Wow. (talk) 18:06, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. I'd suggest a list purge, but then it would be short enough for QVFD. --Mnb'z 18:17, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Unfunny listy crap. Lifty and Shifty 23:14, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Tourettes Guy
Keep |
weak keep it will only come back worse. --Mnb'z 17:49, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Weak Keep. What the stalker said. (talk) 17:54, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- The problem nominating something for VFD which fits all the criterea is that people vote keep with comments like 'it will only come back worse'. If it does then just delete it again or protect it like we used to do. I'm now throwing my toys out of my pram - but this page is now really really pointless. I see plenty of bad articles that qualify for VFD, but the critereon of judging whether they'll 'only come back worse' is not something I can really be bothered to judge.mAttlobster. (hello) 17:58, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Keep. Needs a cleanup and delistifying; ask an admin about unprotecting it. Saberwolf116 12:16, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. - seems alright enough to me, I'll fetch your gold taps later as well... after I've wanked off (from a secret vantage point) to your wife who is sun bathing on the patio.--Sycamore (Talk) 13:27, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. walks of egg shells, but not delete worthy. --Mnb'z 15:40, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Needs a rewrite though. (talk) 17:59, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Per the second part of what Sycamore said. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 18:36, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:02, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Meh, keep. It needs work, although I do like the edited wikipedia image at the top. -- Aethix ~ Talk|Contributions|My project 22:17, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete. This really isn't funny at all. If it is supposed to be ironic - then I think it fails miserably. --Romartus 12:14, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Has no point to it. What is this article about? mAttlobster. (hello) 18:29, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Invalid No VFD tag. Also, would have been kept anyway. -RAHB 00:46, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- We couldn't add a VFD tag; it's protected. Saberwolf116 01:38, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- For protected articles, VFD tags go on the talk page. --Mnb'z 04:38, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Weak keep. Not a good article, but probably not bad enough to justify all the red links that its removal would cause. pillow talk 20:54, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Redirect to Family Guy. Saberwolf116 21:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete TVcruft. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 20:41, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Disintegrate. Another article that assumes everyone knows who Stewie Griffin is. Saberwolf116 21:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Quite, we should just huff stuff that you personally have not heard of...--Sycamore (Talk) 21:27, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- It wouldn't matter if it was funny. Saberwolf116 21:51, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Abstain. I can see some of the best brains here have had a hack at this one already and recently. --Romartus 20:53, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
Keep'd. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:30, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Keep improved a bit by an ip, and its not that awful. Maybe a fix tag would be in order. --Mnb'z 05:30, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. It isn't looking very pretty in its current state but perhaps it will inspire an American based writer to come up with something funnier. I know the name but don't recall visiting any of their stores when in the USA. --Romartus 06:16, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- Known for it's mullet-clad legion of death rockers, Sears is planning a hostile ruthless takeover of all old ladies underpants. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 06:30, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Meh. Sears will likely be expanded anyhow, and it's not as bad as some of the other articles on here. Also, I want to get some votes off VFD so we can nom stuff again. Saberwolf116 17:43, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete Nothing but a big list and some unfunny crap. Lifty and Shifty 01:30, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- Hahaha. (talk) 04:42, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Hard to read & of exceedingly poor quality. --noamshouseparty 17:39, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
A week. No clear winner. Keep'd. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:50, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Child Abuse
Keep |
- Keep I don't like deleting articles merely because they are intentionally offensive. This one is weak, listy, and filled with red links, but I don't think this its one of those articles that stops someone from making a good one in its place. --Mnb'z 16:37, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Keep. It is a bit rubbish but not bad enough for crapfibulation . --Romartus 18:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete. I think this article should either go, or be done much more tastefully. --Chay <Contribs UNSOC Also> 23:21, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Obliterate. More Chinese Opera. (talk) 07:13, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Listy and shit. --UU - natter 10:55, May 19
- Disintegrate. Unfunny and red-linkish. Saberwolf116 12:05, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- No, thanks. Le Cejak • <14:55 May 20, 2009>
- Eh now that was unfunny --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 10:53, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete This isn't funny...funny it isn't. mAttlobster. (hello) 17:26, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Athlone
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete I want this page to die with fires. Fries, too. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 20:39, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Disintegrate. Also, remember to put the VFD tag on the page. Saberwolf116 21:20, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- D'leet • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 23:42, May 20
- Delete. --Mnb'z 04:39, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Obliterate. It's not bad, but it is towncruft. (talk) 07:18, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Great Purge
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. You are the Enema. --Romartus 20:50, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Space Jam
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete moviecruft from that one guy. --Mnb'z 13:44, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Just read the first line and you'll understand. --noamshouseparty 14:21, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. -OptyC Sucks! CUN14:57, 20 May
- Too bad this isn't as good as the movie. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 20:32, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. When I see Bugs Bunny or Daffy Duck mentions - I now think - 'Crap articles'. --Romartus 20:47, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Disintegrate. To it's credit, it did give me a link to a good article to put on my hitlist. Saberwolf116 21:23, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. I cried. IronLung 22:20, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
1982 GMC Custom Van
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Disintegrate. Granted, it's not completely incoherent, but it's not really funny, and the title is so specific no one will ever rewrite it. Saberwolf116 12:18, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. per above. --Mnb'z 13:44, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete and redirect to Shaggin' Wagon. -OptyC Sucks! CUN14:55, 20 May
- Delete. Crush. --Romartus 20:45, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Bwuh? Not funny. Lifty and Shifty 02:04, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Lemmy
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete with a little cleanup, this coud be a featured article... on illogicopedia. --Mnb'z 04:34, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Reading through this I see "Monster Magnet." The only other time I've heard of that band was in a bit by Mitch Hedberg. Now I'm sad... (talk) 05:52, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete.. I know an article will smell bad if it starts off with a lame start like Lemmy being born in 1567. Ok why not 1567 BC ? Or any random date ?? It is also dull. Shame these articles cannot be recycled as a cure for insomnia. --Romartus 06:24, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Disintegrate. Uhh...ok then. Saberwolf116 11:58, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Not funny. WTF? Lifty and Shifty 02:05, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Hey, I'll have less of this Illogicopedia-bashing, thangyewverymuch. Besides, this is too listy for Illogi. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 18:34, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Template:Club penguin
Keep |
|
Delete |
- O SNAP! -OptyC Sucks! CUN20:41, 20 May
- EXTERMINATE! Club penguin. WTF!? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:38, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Unused. On a related note, are unused templates QVFD candidates? pillow talk 20:56, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Disintegrate. And only if they're full of redlinks, Hype. In any case, this one has been regularly deleted anyhow. Saberwolf116 21:00, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
The Manbearpig
Plan 10 from Outer Space
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete moviecruft about an extremely low budge movie no one has heard about. Per my stalking of an inactive user :) --Mnb'z 05:41, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Is it just me or are these starting to get better? Or am I just going insane? (talk) 05:46, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Daffy Duck, Elmer Fudd, movie did terrible, blah blah blah blah pillow talk 06:11, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Daffy Duck again. Crablogger likes his cartoon characters. BTW - I have seen Plan 9 . It is so crap it's funny type of movie. Unlike this article.--Romartus 06:20, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Random, namedroppy bollocks. --UU - natter 10:43, May 20
|
Comments |
- Plan 9 From Outer Space is actually a very famous movie. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 05:44, 20 May 2009
|
Magical Mystical Mole
Keep |
- Keep some savable base material. --Mnb'z 00:55, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- Strong Keep. Short but good. -- Aethix ~ Talk|Contributions|My project 21:52, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep it. It's not awesome, but it's better than a lot of the stuff we keep around here. pillow talk 17:42, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
- Strong Keep. This is actually pretty good! What's it doing here?! --noamshouseparty 17:04, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Obliterate. is a link on African American, but it isn't funny and doesn't seem necessary. (talk) 23:01, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Delete. agreed.--Romartus 04:33, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Ten days, no clear winner. Keep'd. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:03, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Keep |
Keep. At least it shows twisted passion ! --Romartus 11:42, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Alice in Chains
Yellow Submarine Sandwich
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. article which is a parody of a parody of a Beatles album, in the form of Moviecruft. Courtesy Crablogger. --Mnb'z 05:59, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete.If it was funnier I would have kept it. But isn't it. --Romartus 14:42, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. For a crablogger article it isn't bad. For a normal article though... (talk) 07:18, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Random as anything. --UU - natter 10:50, May 19
- Disintegrate. Anything made by Crablogger should be QVFD. Saberwolf116 17:30, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Leviathan versus Behemoth
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Obliterate. I am so confused. (talk) 07:12, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Disintegrate. Huh? Saberwolf116 12:16, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- At first, I thought this article was called "Leviathan versus Beethoven." I was disappointed. pillow talk 16:21, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete -OptyC Sucks! CUN16:28, 19 May
- Delete --Mnb'z 16:38, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
The twang
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Disintegrate. Unfunny cruft. Saberwolf116 11:59, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete needs random template spam. --Mnb'z 16:40, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- EXTERMINATE! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:53, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Obliterate. Socky, I have reason to believe you make that template one pixel bigger every day. (talk) 21:08, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete What they said. Not funny. Lifty and Shifty 00:59, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep. I like it! Sorta... --noamshouseparty 17:39, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. If...if..we are going to keep any Crablogger articles then perhaps this could be the only one ?? A Welsh version of a Spaghetti western ??? That is at least unusual - as the great Tom Jones once sang sort of. --Romartus 06:24, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. I cleaned up the formatting. I does! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 06:21, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. But get rid of the cast lists. --UU - natter 10:38, May 19
- Changing to keep. I might have been a bit implusive in nomming this one on my quest to kill all Crablogger related articles. He was a terrible writer, but I think this one should be spared- the cleanup makes it bearable. Saberwolf116 17:37, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Change to keep per above. --Mnb'z 17:55, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
We kept a couple crablogger ones before. --Mnb'z 06:28, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Abstain. Needs a serious re-write. If that doesn't happen, let it go. -- Style Guide 18:11, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- I did a cleanup, (i.e. listcruft removal, red links), so its a bit less moviecrufty. --Mnb'z 16:49, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Keep'd. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Pocket PC
Hexadecimal
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete - This is just gibberish, which confused the less mathimatically inclined--Sycamore (Talk) 13:40, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- EXTERMINATE! Per Sycamore. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:53, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. This doesn't say anything in hex. It's some kind of weird cipher - there's a "key" at the end that suggests that "3E" is "H", "0C" is "C", and "FF" is "U". Well, that's just nonsense - no meaningful system would assign 63 to H, 12 to C, and 255 to U. Further, the cipher in the "key" doesn't seem to match the cipher in the rest of the "article," considering that all those Fs would just read UUUUUUU. I'm inclined to conclude that this is just a more-or-less random typing of letters and numbers. pillow talk 18:00, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete the stupid, RANDOM, unoriginal crap. -- Aethix ~ Talk|Contributions|My project 19:53, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Disintegrate. I'm getting sick of articles that are explained by their title; that got old about 2 years ago. Saberwolf116 22:17, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Flesh Gordon
Qwerty (country)
Keep |
- Keep. - Notable, needs rewrite, not summery deletions--Sycamore (Talk) 20:45, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
- Meh. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 03:22, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Who would even nominate this? Lazy bastards, do a 3 min rewrite & there ya go. --noamshouseparty 10:46, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. {{rewrite}}. However, Syc has got me thinking about how deletions could be summery - how about if I delete articles while wearing my shorts and wearing sunglasses? --UU - natter 13:51, May 13
- Keep. I was just thinking about a concept for rewriting this article today. I don't know the protocol or whatever, but I would like to move this to my userspace and work on it there as it may take some time. IronLung 01:24, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- I would have voted keep on notability grounds, but this article has almost nothing to do with the actual subject. It isn't even consistent with the other articles in its "in universe." On top of that, 85% of the article is a list. --Mnb'z 04:59, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- Abstain. It should really be called the Disneyland trials. --Romartus 23:28, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
- Almost deleteworthy because of the randomness it starts with. Uh. -- Style Guide 18:17, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keepted. --UU - natter 08:10, May 19
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- I'll Abstain from this one, because I've never heard of him, so I wouldn't get any jokes about him. CUN RA Talk to me _ 03:52, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- He was really, really gay. In the 70's on talkshows and early 80's on gameshows, that was considered funny. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 06:55, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- Rewrite. A couple of laughs - if they were made central this would be readable. I don't really mind that it's short. -- Style Guide 18:19, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
No clear victor. Keep'd. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 06:10, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
|
Keebler Elves