User talk:Under user/Archive 13
I have seen the future[edit source]
And the future is the purity of your talk page defiled. ~ 12:06, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
RAPE!!![edit source]
RAPE TIME!!! Judge Adriano "Legal" Zarbi Talk! 12:09, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
- See, Mordillo was both speedy and classy. You were just... Better luck next time. (And let's try avoiding the "r" word on UU's talk page, eh? Ta.) --UU - natter 14:36, Oct 27
Damn I missed the party... :([edit source]
Erm yeah. So... Do you have any left overs? Sloppy seconds? Sir Orian57~Sweets~Talk 21:47 26 October 2008
- No, you is teh fail. Too late! Judge Adriano "Legal" Zarbi Talk! 21:49, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
- Says the person who failed just above... anyways, UUU doing anything of mild interestingmentness? -- 13:38, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- Not really, casting about for inspiration. Want to write something, having a hard time coming up with it. Rattled off something ranty and odd the other day, but nothing actually worth reading. Am considering stealing ideas from Cajek's dump or possibly mugging random strangers in the street and not letting them go until they give me a genius idea for an article. Not sure which would work better... I saw you working on something recently - didn't want to pry, so didn't actually look, but are you having fun? --UU - natter 13:46, Oct 31
- Yeah. Problem is I will get about 75% done and then hit a blank like my last 3 unfinished articles :( -- 14:01, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- That edit summary was a memory wasn't it from your disappointing tenth birthday...</paranormal activity> Sir Orian57~Sweets~Talk 13:49 31 October 2008
- You really need a girl/boy/whatever-friend -- 14:01, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- Not really, casting about for inspiration. Want to write something, having a hard time coming up with it. Rattled off something ranty and odd the other day, but nothing actually worth reading. Am considering stealing ideas from Cajek's dump or possibly mugging random strangers in the street and not letting them go until they give me a genius idea for an article. Not sure which would work better... I saw you working on something recently - didn't want to pry, so didn't actually look, but are you having fun? --UU - natter 13:46, Oct 31
- Says the person who failed just above... anyways, UUU doing anything of mild interestingmentness? -- 13:38, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
I hate haet hat you[edit source]
...as I now have the Top Cat theme tune on repeat in my head, where it will stay for a few days. Thanks for the ear worm. ;-) RabbiTechno 09:42, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
- Glad to be of service. Feel free to drop by tomorrow, when I'll have remembered the Hair Bear Bunch, Stop The Pigeon and other classics! (Also: nice to see you about the place RT) --UU - natter 14:39, Oct 27
I love loev lav you[edit source]
Hey mr User, Under. Have you tried my sweets (click sweets in my sig as I really can't be bothered linking right now) yet? Whaddaya think? Sir Orian57~Sweets~Talk 10:38 29 October 2008
- I am at work. Is it a safe link? If it's a redirect to your "under my mattress" page, or similar, and I get in all kinds of trouble, I will hunt you down, grind your bones to a fine powder and feed your favourite parts to my cousin's pet rat. You have been warned... --UU - natter 10:42, Oct 29
- Well, your bones are safe. It's, er, interesting. Man, folks must be weird in your neck of the woods. Round here they all just hide behind the curtains and pretend not to be in, like normal folk... --UU - natter 11:20, Oct 29
- (damn I wish I'd thought of that!) So that's a good weird, right? As for my neck of the woods I don't really know I stopped paying attention when the accent started to grate on me. I just wanted to bring Halloween to uncyc. So was slightly funny at least or just strange? Anyway, I'm off to prepare Christmas Lane. (actually that's not a bad idea!) Sir Orian57~Sweets~Talk 12:03 29 October 2008
- Yeah, it's chucklesome... --UU - natter 16:42, Oct 29
- You don't sound sincere. Also what do you mean by Wayyy? In the edit summary. Sir Orian57~Sweets~Talk 16:44 29 October 2008
- Sorry, if I say it in italics will it sound more sincere? Yeah, it's chucklesome. And I always put edit summaries, but occasionally they consist of the first thing that comes into my head. Man, you read too much into everything. Bet you're gay. --UU - natter 16:47, Oct 29
- Splinge... Is that like a fusion of the words sex and minge? Or am I reading too much into your psyche? Sir Orian57~Sweets~Talk 16:52 29 October 2008
- Sorry, if I say it in italics will it sound more sincere? Yeah, it's chucklesome. And I always put edit summaries, but occasionally they consist of the first thing that comes into my head. Man, you read too much into everything. Bet you're gay. --UU - natter 16:47, Oct 29
- You don't sound sincere. Also what do you mean by Wayyy? In the edit summary. Sir Orian57~Sweets~Talk 16:44 29 October 2008
- Yeah, it's chucklesome... --UU - natter 16:42, Oct 29
- (damn I wish I'd thought of that!) So that's a good weird, right? As for my neck of the woods I don't really know I stopped paying attention when the accent started to grate on me. I just wanted to bring Halloween to uncyc. So was slightly funny at least or just strange? Anyway, I'm off to prepare Christmas Lane. (actually that's not a bad idea!) Sir Orian57~Sweets~Talk 12:03 29 October 2008
- Well, your bones are safe. It's, er, interesting. Man, folks must be weird in your neck of the woods. Round here they all just hide behind the curtains and pretend not to be in, like normal folk... --UU - natter 11:20, Oct 29
Featured articles[edit source]
I’ve got Adam and Eve Pee reviewed. I took not of the review and reworked the article. Is it much better? Should I try and get it featured again?
How about UnBooks:The sad fate of the banned users who escaped into a Sock puppet? Is it worth putting that up to be featured? Proxima Centauri 17:18, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- Hi Proxima, I'll have a bit of a skim through those articles when I get a little time and let you know my thoughts. It will only be my opinion though - it's difficult to guess what will play well on VFH - but I'll give it a shot. Not entirely certain when that'll be, but I'll certainly take a look. --UU - natter 12:11, Oct 30
Thanks for the Blackface review[edit source]
I wrote the article, and really appreciate you doing the review. It confirmed my hypotheses about what works and made me realize what doesn't. The "rewrite" tag is no less genuine than when compared to an earlier review from March, when the article looked about something like this: http://en.uncyclopedia.co/w/index.php?title=Blackface&oldid=2880236. I'll see what I can do to wrap my head around the mess. 88.195.80.177 09:17, 30 October 2008 (UTC)Rascal
Thanks for the vote[edit source]
Your vote was very appreciated, and I am very grateful that you thought of me. |
From--Sycamore (Talk) 17:31, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
- No, thank you for doing so much work around here, particularly when I'm on and there are no admins about! ;-) --UU - natter 17:56, Nov 1
A Sandler thankings[edit source]
THANK YOU FOR SANDLER VOTE!
BlueYonder is very grateful that you decided to vote for his Adam Sandler-related UnNews.
He is so grateful, in fact, that he has forwarded the event of your voting to Adam Sandler as the idea for the premise of a new movie. Be assured that you will be played by Scott Halberstadt and that there will be plenty of jokes about the nature of your genitals.
Isn't that just the most poorly made template you've ever seen? Thanks, mate. BlueYonder - CONTACT
What is rollback and can I have it?[edit source]
Both questions I should know the answear to, undoubtedly. But like with "what are enzymes and why are they useful" I was off that day. SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 08:14 6 November 2008
- Rollback? Oh, it's a handy little wiki tool that lets you revert vandalism quickly. If you have it, you pop into a page's history, and you see it as an option beside the most recent edit. It reverts all the edits of the last contributor back to the last guy to edit before him. I think that makes sense - it feels like I'm thinking through treacle today. Anyway, yeah, if you do a lot of reverting, it's good to have. Codeine was dishing it out to those who asked nicely in a forum a while back, although policy before that was to get three admins to agree you'd be a good person to have it, then ask Codeine to bestow it on you. Either way, Codeine's yer guy. --UU - natter 11:02, Nov 6
A idea[edit source]
mmkay, if there were 2 people I'd like to make a collab with it would be Cajek and you and knowing my record of having an idea and getting nowhere with it, it would be great to foist some of the responsibility on someone else. You. I had a good idea a while back about satirizing the dwindling fossil fuel reserves by using the idea of Magic as some kind of substitute and having a ridiculously serious sounding article with kiddy pictures of magic. So basically yeah. I throw down what I throw down and you put down some ideas and it should start to look decent. -- 10:19, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
- That's a fucking awesome uncyclothingy symbol on this page :D -- 10:27, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
- Glad you like it.
- I'd utterly love a DJI/UU/Cajek collab. I also like the idea. There's just one tiny problem: I'm off work ill today, and I'm not skiving - my head feels incredibly heavy and spacey, to the point where I can't concentrate on anything requiring actual thought. I'm therefore doing dull maintenance stuff, and may well go back to bed. However, when I'm back in the saddle, I'll most definitely take a stroll over and have a look. For now though, I think I may turn my attention to daytime TV - my intellectual capacity has sunk to the level where I may appreciate it... --UU - natter 10:41, Nov 6
UnSignpost: 3-ish November 2008[edit source]
The Newspaper That Wonders What Happened To You. You Used To Be Cool.
November 3rd-ish, 2008 • Twenty-Third Issue • Better than things that aren't as good!
Address Change: Return To Sender? If you are one of those people, here's a brief summary of the incident:
If you aren't one of those people, here's an even briefer summary:
More on this ongoing situation as we get it. Probably. Glorious return to form for MrN! Fellow poopsmith and genial man-about-town UU said of the momentous occasion: "you what? MrN? Oh yeah, him. Good bloke. Knows his underwear". Then he scratched his nose reflectively and wandered off. MrN himself was unavailable for comment at the time of going to press/we couldn't be bothered to interview him (delete as you think applicable), but the UnSignpost fondly imagines he would have smiled enigmatically, raised an eyebrow quizzically, nodded appreciatively, and said "PANTS!" predictably. The pants themselves were also unavailable for comment. |
| |||||
UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox |
Shoved through the letterbox for the one and only time by UU - natter 11:14, Nov 6
The Unsignpost, and other things[edit source]
You deliver the UnSignPost? And mine was the last delivery? Haha. I was also wondering how you organized your userboxes so nicely. Take a look at my userpage and you can understand why I need help. I know you're probably really busy but if you could help me, that'd be nice. --GDawg816 19:02, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Alright! Thanks for your help! Hopefully I'll get around to it one of these days!--GDawg816|Give me a shout 20:15, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Yay! Check out my fully-functional userboxes! All thanks to you! And also, my new signature. I've just got one more little question. I've seen guys with signatures that have colors behind the text which is very cool. Just wondering if you know how to do that?? After this one, I promise I will never ask you about anything ever again!! --GDawg816 | Talk | GDawg816, he pwns all n00bz n roxxors all soxxors 19:37, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
MrN[edit source]
SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 02:16 8 November 2008
Bloke[edit source]
Does not exist. A problem me thinks... MrN 03:25, Nov 9
So anyway[edit source]
Who was that idiot above? What a plonker eh? He's obviously less of a man than me. By exactly one it appears... Anyway, as you appear to be the chap around these parts who is taking care of our fair newspaper these days I thought I would pop in and offer my services as your delivery agent. That MrN9000 tosser has finally gotten of his arse long enough to give me the necessary to actually start doing some useful things around the place, so if you need a hand delivering the paper next week... Just let me know.
- Regards:
- Your loyal paper boy... MrN9001 00:05, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- chuckles in an obviously sarcastic way* next week. we're lucky to get monthly now-a-days... SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 00:25 10 November 2008
- Well, y'know, honeymoons, catching up at work, illness, trying to find a paperbot... all these factors have contributed. I do intend to get cracking on the Signpost again soon, and so does Gerry, by the look of his userpage, so hopefully we'll be in a position to take advantage of another bot sooner rather than later. --UU - natter 09:34, Nov 10
- Also U.U. while I'm here some one added a quote to your fish article and I'm not sure if it's any good. can i rollback it? pleeeaaase? :D SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 00:25 10 November 2008
- I don't mind it, actually, not sure about MrN. But it may have to move - 3 quotes at the start of an article is too much. --UU - natter 09:34, Nov 10
- Well, the other two were actually genuine non-modified quotes that the actual person actually said. The new one is not. I say let Oriin uses his new rollback powers, still, I'm not sure... Oh, as it's not vandalism, Oriven, you should really use undo, and put a comment so that the other user does not feel like you have pissed on his chips too much. ;-) /me pisses on Oripn's chips... :P MrN 10:57, Nov 10
- I don't mind it, actually, not sure about MrN. But it may have to move - 3 quotes at the start of an article is too much. --UU - natter 09:34, Nov 10
I did, though, didn't I?[edit source]
I rock. sirsysrq @ 22:24 Nov 11
- Yes you did. And it is very good to see you back, my friend. Mind you, catching that handsome devil at the top - now that'd prove you rock! ;p --UU - natter 22:26, Nov 11
- Wow, that sure was a dick move, mentioning that one. But I'll forgive it. Let's stop talking about him. Let's talk about us. sirsysrq @ 22:31 Nov 11
- PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAASSSSSSSSSSSSSEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE! Could we make it more than the top 5 on the PEEING page? Thing is... People look at that and think... "Hmm, I'm never going to make it onto that list, why bother"... We all know who the great reviewers are, but is the point not to encourage new reviewers? Why not have the top say 15? That way noobs would feel like they have more of a chance of getting their name up in lights? What??? I said this before??? I KNOW! That's why I'm saying PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAASSSSSEEEEEE! (but longer) obviously MrN is only saying this as it's the only way he's ever going to get back into the list MrN 22:44, Nov 11
- Do we have fifteen good reviewers? Also I'm gonna do something about this whole doing nothing useful drive I'm on. Just not now. Later. I promise. SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 22:46 11 November 2008
- I'm talking about the total number of reviews. MrN 22:48, Nov 11
- As long as we're talking about PEEING, I thought I'd mentioned I'm in temporary retirement from PEEING. I'd change it myself but I'm afraid of breaking everything. Anyhow, continue. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 22:50, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- I'm talking about the total number of reviews. MrN 22:48, Nov 11
- MrN: I started expanding it, (the top 5 list, that is, not anyone's penis), but Cajek put a stop to it. I'm happy to have at least the top 10 myself. I was also thinking about having a top 5 in the last month table, although I'm not entirely certain how that would work, but I like the sound of it. --UU - natter 09:01, Nov 12
- There, I've done both: expanded to a top 10 and added a top 5 for the month (although due to the 3-way tie for 4th place, it's actually a top 6 so far). How's that? --UU - natter 13:05, Nov 12
- Hea, that's a lot better! I particularly like the top 5 for the month... I'm not sure if top 10 is enough though, it's still looking like a rather impossible figure to even get onto the bottom of table. Still, I guess having more kinda de-values it a bit. My preference would be for the top 15 of all time as I said, but hea... I don't have to maintain it, so I guess it's up to you. It is much better now anyway... :-) MrN 14:58, Nov 12
- There, I've done both: expanded to a top 10 and added a top 5 for the month (although due to the 3-way tie for 4th place, it's actually a top 6 so far). How's that? --UU - natter 13:05, Nov 12
- Do we have fifteen good reviewers? Also I'm gonna do something about this whole doing nothing useful drive I'm on. Just not now. Later. I promise. SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 22:46 11 November 2008
- PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAASSSSSSSSSSSSSEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE! Could we make it more than the top 5 on the PEEING page? Thing is... People look at that and think... "Hmm, I'm never going to make it onto that list, why bother"... We all know who the great reviewers are, but is the point not to encourage new reviewers? Why not have the top say 15? That way noobs would feel like they have more of a chance of getting their name up in lights? What??? I said this before??? I KNOW! That's why I'm saying PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAASSSSSEEEEEE! (but longer) obviously MrN is only saying this as it's the only way he's ever going to get back into the list MrN 22:44, Nov 11
- Wow, that sure was a dick move, mentioning that one. But I'll forgive it. Let's stop talking about him. Let's talk about us. sirsysrq @ 22:31 Nov 11
Face facts[edit source]
It's not nearly as good a film as you think. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 13:12, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Facts? How can there be facts about a subjective experience? Besides, it's clearly a far better film than you think it is. And furthermore: ner! --UU - natter 13:16, Nov 12
"(A) Big, beautiful, but plodding sci-fi epic…A major achievement in cinematography and special effects, 2001 lacks dramatic appeal to a large degree and only conveys suspense after the halfway mark." ~ Variety
- That pretty much sums it up for me. It is pretty (too bad I haven't seen it in the original 70mm on the big, big, big screen), and I do like it, but it's not a great movie. It's more of an experience. Take from that what you will.
- SCTV's 2009: Jupiter and beyond, however, was awesome. (Youtube might have it if you haven't seen it). Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 13:30, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
"I've seen this film at least 10 times, at least 8 of which I wasn't high on anything, and I really, really like it" ~ UU
- Which sums it up for me. And for me it is a great movie, partly because it's an experience, and even though I agree about the suspense bit - that's not what I like about it. But there you go. That's why you're you, I'm me, Uncyclopedia is the worst, and Cajek is banned on a regular basis. Why should the world ever work in a different way? --UU - natter 13:45, Nov 12
- At least we agree that Uncyclopedia is the worst. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 13:56, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Just to barge in uninvited, this is a Science Fiction film, I don't know what the other two are.--Sycamore (Talk) 13:48, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oh boy! Another movie that went on and on! Did you see the remake? It was just like the first, but with George Clooney! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 13:56, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Nah, I have not seen the remake - I'm not sure I want to.--Sycamore (Talk) 13:58, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- It's got her in it, so that you can break up being bored by getting lost in her giant doe eyes. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 14:04, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- I liked her in Ronin, as a rough Irish cow = Smashing great superb--Sycamore (Talk) 14:27, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Now that's a great movie. And it's got Sam Lowry and Harry Tuttle in it. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 15:37, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Ronin? Two great car chases, surrounded by a really quite poor movie. I saw it for free at the cinema and still think I was ripped off... --UU - natter 15:47, Nov 12
- I have to concur with Modus there.--Sycamore (Talk) 15:53, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Geez. It was a heist movie. I don't think that UU is quite over the "recent unpleasantness". Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 16:42, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not over Dave Lee Roth leaving Van Halen in 1984, if that's what you mean. --UU - natter 16:45, Nov 12
- Also, I think you're thinking anagrammatically. And yes, it was a shite movie. ;-) --UU - natter 16:46, Nov 12
- Agreed. nineteen eighty-four would have been much better with David Lee Roth as Winston Smith. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 16:49, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Anagrammatically? Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 16:51, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Also, I think you're thinking anagrammatically. And yes, it was a shite movie. ;-) --UU - natter 16:46, Nov 12
- I'm not over Dave Lee Roth leaving Van Halen in 1984, if that's what you mean. --UU - natter 16:45, Nov 12
- Ronin? Two great car chases, surrounded by a really quite poor movie. I saw it for free at the cinema and still think I was ripped off... --UU - natter 15:47, Nov 12
- Now that's a great movie. And it's got Sam Lowry and Harry Tuttle in it. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 15:37, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Nah, I have not seen the remake - I'm not sure I want to.--Sycamore (Talk) 13:58, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oh boy! Another movie that went on and on! Did you see the remake? It was just like the first, but with George Clooney! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 13:56, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Bladerunner. Now that's a movie. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:09, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
- I cannot disagree with you there. --UU - natter 09:12, Nov 15
- Hurrah! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 14:09, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
Face Facts[edit source]
Your nose is on your face, presumably. -- 13:24, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, I cut mine off to spite my face. I keep it in a glass jar on the mantelpiece. It makes a good talking point at parties. --UU - natter 13:29, Nov 12
UnSignpost: 13th November 2008[edit source]
Telling You Stuff You Already Knew, But With Different Words!
November 13th, 2008 • Issue 24 • So close to journalism you'll be hard pushed to know the difference!
Uncyclopedian does something vaguely noteworthy in "real life" Mickey has so far failed to live up to Uncyclopedia's proudest traditions, by actually being quite good at the game. Indeed, at the time of writing, he'd won several games, including what he modestly described as "an awesome numbers game, beating Carol". He also shamelessly mentioned his connection to the site in a recent episode, leading to quite literally no extra edits to the Countdown article - still, thanks for the plug, Mick! Having spent time in the company of such notable international icons as Des O'Connor (no, we don't have a page on him, so there's no link), Paul Zenon (nope, nothing on him either) and Suzy Dent (spotting a pattern here, non-UK readers?) Mickey is now Uncyclopedia's most prominent celebrity, and it's surely only a matter of time before he appears on Strictly Come Dancing or Celebrity Big Brother, and has a lurid kiss-and-tell exposé in Heat Magazine. Various "...of the month" award candidates - November's in-depth analysis Uncyclopedian of the Month: Controversial nominees abound here, as serial ban collector Cajek goes head-to-head with Wikia corporate mouthpiece Sannse. The hyperactive one with the light blue sig is in the lead at present. But! As with certain other popular recent votes, there is a third candidate inexplicably attracting little attention - Dexter111344, a site maintenance and VFD stalwart. Who will win? Only you can decide (and all the other people who vote, obviously). Noob of the Month: No-one. Yet. Find a noob doing something vaguely decent and nominate them please! Otherwise the UnSignpost may just have to bring back the ultimate dead horse for yet more flogging and nom Rcmurphy again. Useless Gobshite of the Month: Kip the Dip is out on his own for this one so far. Having proved an exemplary gobshite for months on end, despite being cruelly denied the recognition of this award, the UnSignpost feels that his time is now, and is abandoning all pretence at unbiased journalism: VOTE KIP FOR UGotM! |
| |||||
UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox |
MrN9001 13:01, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
crap from a user[edit source]
You might want to take a look at the rest of User:Pythonofdoom's contribs. He's leaving crap like this (which I reverted) all over the place and clearly needs a good whacking with a clue bat. Someone suggested I point this out to you. Longneck Bottle 14:50, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
- Uhhh, why me, in particular? I may have a bit of a word, but I normally leave stuff like that to the admins. --UU - natter 15:00, Nov 13
Thanks[edit source]
Sycamore has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic. |
For sorting out my horrible dyslexic English again on Yad:)--Sycamore (Talk) 12:36, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
- Sir does himself a disservice - another good article, and just a few niggles to clear up, which only pedantic gits like me and Hype would really be that bothered about anyway! (I'll keep the cookie though). --UU - natter 10:51, Nov 17
Heyo[edit source]
Hello, UU. Sorry to be so long replying, I have exams coming up and decided to study, this time around.
Anyway, I haven't heard I'm Sorry I Haven't a Clue, which is a pity because I just looked them up on Wikipedia and damn they have a great cast. I don't know if they broadcast it here in Australia. I'm guessing they do a similar sort of literary parody? --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 20:10, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
- I didn't think so - they just occasionally have a similar sort of spot of abridged classics. King Lear ("I'm thinking of spending more time with the girls" "You must be mad") springs to mind. But it's such a good concept, with plenty of mileage, that I'm surprised it's not been done on here before. Sterling work with it, anyway! --UU - natter 09:58, Nov 17
- I don't know who you are or what you're talking about but teh title "I'm thinking of spending more time with the girls" makes me laugh. I could probably use it in something I'm working with. Ta. Also I just cut myself while shaving and it won't stop bleeding so this might be the last thing I say. Savour it. SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 11:42 17 November 2008
Hi.[edit source]
While I am having this brief flurry of activity, I wanted to drop in and say hi. Sadly, I will not have much time to hang around and review and edit and suchlike. Sadly, I don't even remember where my bloody sig is, hence, the four tildes. I might be seeing you around if this poor weather dies off and suchlike... Warm Regards, ▀ĴαVắśСąР▀03:08 November 19 2008 03:08, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- JAVASCAP! Man, it's good to see you around, however briefly. Hope you're well dude. --UU - natter 08:59, Nov 19
UnSignpost: 20th November2008[edit source]
Good things come to those who wait. So does the UnSignpost.
November 20th, 2008 • #100/4 • Sucking Journalism's Fat Wang. Badly.
UnSignpost Stumbles past 6 month milestone In true UnSignpost fashion, the editors noticed this about 2 weeks late - the Signpost having been so gloriously conceived (and never was a word more aptly suited to this juvenile-as-all-get-out publication) by Dr. Skullthumper and Cajek back in early May. The first issue rolled off the presses on May 8th, bringing you such earth-shattering news as "Rcmurphy nommed for Noob of the Month again" and "Uncyclopedia F**king Doomed", as well as establishing Signpost tradition with "Spacefiller of the week" (something about Grand Theft Auto). The editor's office here at USP should probably have had a revolving door installed, having been occupied at various times since Cajek and Skull abandoned it by THEDUDEMAN, Gerrycheevers, Heerenveen and some other numpty - although this is small change compared to the number of delivery bots and boys that have thrust the latest issue, still warm, through your letter flaps. Over the months, many other contributors have helped to keep the UnSignpost in its deserved position of "only weekly-ish newspaper on the wiki" - possibly by being so lame that no-one wanted to bother doing another one. And, having brought you such shattering exclusives as "Wookiepedia Too Cool For Cajek", "Porn Wars End in Sticky Truce" and "RC takes home NotM", the UnSignpost shows no sign of speeding up. Maybe one day, the unstoppable forces of apathy will finally overcome those who still labour under the impression that people actually care about seeing block log entries and biopics arrive on their talk page weekly, and the UnSignpost will grind to a halt. But until then, it will continue to bring you all the old news you've already seen somewhere else, whether you like it or not! UnSportsPost
In response to quite literally some demand, your ever-topical, finger-on-the-pulse UnSignpost brings you all the latest sports news that's unfit to print!
|
| ||||||
UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox |
MrN9001 20:57, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
AFTERNOON UU[edit source]
It's that time of the week again. We can nearly escape our miserable office life and go drink senseless! ~ 12:26, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Yay! Except ... it's not payday 'til next week. Looks like it's someone else's round then. --UU - natter 12:32, Nov 21
- Yay! I don't have a job... SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 12:34 21 November 2008
Just out of curiosity...[edit source]
I'm thinking of becoming a tour guide, so how do I say "that's a bell tower" in Russian? Don't bother with that damn stupid alphabet they have where Bs are Ps and backward Fs are some consonant that sounds like coughing up phlegm, just render it in good old English. Much obliged. Asahatter (annoy) 21:42, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- I can only say it, not spell it. Phonetically, it sounds a little like "erta collar coin yer". No idea how it's spelled, although I think just two words and some mirror writing are involved. --UU - natter 21:50, Nov 24
- How do you say - these two guys with the black rain coats are FSB and you are under arrest and will be send to a Gulag shortly? Also. Russian? UU? ~ 21:55, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- That's the only phrase I know. It's a very long story. --UU - natter 21:58, Nov 24
- sounds like interesting one though. c'mon girlfriend, spill. SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 22:02 24 November 2008
- It's not. It's dull. Deadly dull. The really short version is: my Dad decided to take Russian as an O-Level while drunk (he started at a young age, which probably explains a lot). He quickly realised he was crap at languages and quit after a term. That's the only phrase he can remember. I found it funny, so I remember it too. There now, that wasn't worth the few seconds it took either me to type it or you to read it, was it? --UU - natter 22:13, Nov 24
- It was, since now we can strike off the possibility of your being Sikon reincarnated. Also, I have a friend that the only thing he knows how to say in Hebrew is "My hovercraft is full of eels" ~ 11:48, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
- It's not. It's dull. Deadly dull. The really short version is: my Dad decided to take Russian as an O-Level while drunk (he started at a young age, which probably explains a lot). He quickly realised he was crap at languages and quit after a term. That's the only phrase he can remember. I found it funny, so I remember it too. There now, that wasn't worth the few seconds it took either me to type it or you to read it, was it? --UU - natter 22:13, Nov 24
- sounds like interesting one though. c'mon girlfriend, spill. SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 22:02 24 November 2008
- That's the only phrase I know. It's a very long story. --UU - natter 21:58, Nov 24
- How do you say - these two guys with the black rain coats are FSB and you are under arrest and will be send to a Gulag shortly? Also. Russian? UU? ~ 21:55, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
User:SysRq/Andy Rooney[edit source]
Hey, so I've made a few changes to this bad boy since you last saw it. My English teacher has taken a good look at it and only had one correction to make, and I think I've followed your corrections as best as I could in the 90 seconds I gave to your opinion. Care to take another look or nominate it? I don't want to nom it myself, but I think it's nommable. I miss the excitement of having an article up for VFH, that's really the only reason I came back. Oh, and I missed you. Whatever. sirsysrq @ 14:58 Nov 25
- I like. But I'm not gonna nom something that's in userspace... --UU - natter 15:04, Nov 25
- Haha! bet you feel dumb and demeaned (sp? U.U.?) now don't you? SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 15:08 25 November 2008
- Gotta go get someone to huff the existing article first. But then I'll mainspace it. sirsysrq @ 15:22 Nov 25
- UPDATE: Done. sirsysrq @ 15:30 Nov 25
- UPDATE: Nom'd. (I do have a minor misgiving about the fact that the lack of headers and eyecatchingness makes it look a trifle bland, and possibly not enticing enough. but the writing, I think, is strong enough that I can't not nom it for that reason). Good luck bud! (And don't lie: you came back because you want that WotM award. You wwwaaaannnnnnttttt iiiiitttttttttt.....) --UU - natter 15:54, Nov 25
- UPDATE: Done. sirsysrq @ 15:30 Nov 25
- Gotta go get someone to huff the existing article first. But then I'll mainspace it. sirsysrq @ 15:22 Nov 25
- Haha! bet you feel dumb and demeaned (sp? U.U.?) now don't you? SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 15:08 25 November 2008
Typos?[edit source]
Wat tyops? R u sayign i Cn'ta splell? Also what's up in the land of the employed? Down here? Oh I'm watching the Peep Show box sets I bought. SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 15:51 26 November 2008
- Peep Show? I honestly think I'd rather be here, slaving over a hot PC for my evil corporate overlords... --UU - natter 15:54, Nov 26
Cöllab[edit source]
Remember what we talked about a couple of weeks ago? Vell, here it is. Got a couple of ideas that go with the initial concept. What do you think about it?
Also, start writing, Gunter. The fatherland needs you. ~ 15:55, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
- Ooh, that looks fun. I will have a go. Definitely. But not right now - as I mentioned elsewhere, I'm slaving over a hot PC for my evil corporate overlords. And this evening, I'm taking Mrs UU out for dinner. But definitely soon. Söön! --UU - natter 15:59, Nov 26
UnSignpost: 27th November2008[edit source]
Because Uncyclopedia is no laughing matter.
November 27th • Issue 26 • The newspaper it's tough to swat flies with
Uncyc shall go to the Ball! To whet the appetite, let's take a look at some of the cream of last year's competition:
Yup, standards are that high, or low, depending on your point of view, sense of humour, religion, shoe size and taste in hats. So jump to it! If you can make the judges laugh even as they vomit up their own entrails, you could be in with a chance of winning the glorious title "Aristocrat en Regalia", as well as the undying jealousy of the other entrants you so satisfyingly routed. Or you might lose. Asked for quotes, organiser RAHB quipped "I'll probably get on it sometime tonight, if not tomorrow", while official judging type Modusoperandi added "my memoires are riddled with mind expanding shit". {{username}} claims millionth victim "It was there, in front of me, an accusation that I was teh gheyz", the hapless victim told us exclusively. "Such hard-hitting slander had to be addressed, and addressed immediately, so I clicked the edit button, and launched into a passionate and vitriolic defence of my unquestionable heterosexuality post-haste!" Ironically, it was the length of this diatribe that finally revealed the subterfuge. "It took me some time to compose a suitable riposte, listing at length my many dalliances with members of the opposite sex, my subscription to Playboy and my utter distaste for the movie Brokeback Mountain - in fact it took so long that I was logged out from my account" said the sap. "So when I hit the preview button to behold my comeback in all its savage majesty, what should catch my eye but the <insert name here> message that betrays {{username}} abuse? I felt so embarrassed, the only logical course of action I could take was to sell my story to a newspaper with a global readership - you did say you'd pay me for this, right?" Shortly after this point, the interview was discontinued due to a disagreement between interviewer and interviewee. Asked for a final quote, we were told "fuck {{username}}, and fuck you too!" - a comment that speaks volumes about the suffering this terrible template is capable of inflicting on the unwary. {{username}} was unavailable for comment, and remains at large, ready to strike again. |
| ||||||
UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox |
MrN9001 21:19, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
W♥v[edit source]
Thank you... I've always found it to be polite to thank people for the things they have done for you, especially when it is a vote for a fine literary work. People don't say "thank you" that much anymore. Instead, they say "thanks" or "tyvm". That frustrates me, because I don't know what "tyvm" is even supposed to mean. Thanks for voting. |
You're old right?[edit source]
So you'll remember what the twelve days of christmas actually are, won't you? I'm pretty sure that's what my holiday event will be, so yeah; help a brother out? I might just change it anyway, but it'd be nice to know, you know? SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 02:10 1 December 2008
- Hey? I didn't offend you or anything did I? I hate offending people. If I think I've offended somebody it keeps me awake at nights. Stop keeping me awake U.U.! SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 23:22 2 December 2008
- So I'm really busy at the moment and forgetting things due to stress and senility. I wouldn't worry too much about it if I were you. Do you mean the various gifts sent by some idiot's "true love"? In which case, look here. If you mean when they are, it's Dec 25th - January 6th (also known as Epiphany, fuck knows why). If you mean anything else, my telepathetic skills have failed again. --UU - natter 11:22, Dec 3
- Yaya! Now I can sleep, except you insulted me -- god, what if I really am that insecure? That's probably why guys don't look twice at me: I'm too insecure. Either that or I'm too fat. The second bit was what I meant, thanks. Though I was kinda hoping they started a little bit before Christmas. Oh well they do now. I just have to write it all now. Hopefully it'll enjoy more sucsess than the halloween thing I did, which went largly unnoticed. And I hope things de-busy for you soon, wouldn't want the old ticker giving out and do remember to look both ways... SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 11:33 3 December 2008
- Hey, you're welcome. Also: an eye for an eye, amirite? You call me old, I call you insecure, and the world keeps spinning, la la la la laaaa... Also, in a kinda Norris/Russian Reversal fashion, traffic has to look both ways when I cross the road. --UU - natter 11:36, Dec 3
- What, to swerve at you if they see you? SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 11:40 3 December 2008
- No, silly. To see if there are any other pedestrians they can run over to make my crossing that bit easier. --UU - natter 14:38, Dec 3
- That's a bit selfish isn't it? But that's the thing about old people, they expect the world to revolve around them just because they've suffered 30+ years. People shouldn't wear hoodies because nobody did when they were young. If you must have earphones use both as just the one means you're only half listening and that's rude. Run everyone else over to make sure what's left of my life is easy. You're all the same. SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 14:46 3 December 2008
- Once again, you miss the point: other people shouldn't wear hoodies because they're not as stylish as mine, and it makes them look bad. --UU - natter 14:50, Dec 3
- Listen honey I'm gay. No straight man is ever going to out-stylish me. SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 14:52 3 December 2008
- Not straight men ;) —talk 15:12, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
- I don't understand sentence! Are you trying to Imply U.U.'s gay? Clearly he isn't: just look at that comb-over! SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 15:15 3 December 2008
- I think the word you were looking for is garish. It's an easy mistake to make. For you, obviously. --UU - natter 15:17, Dec 3
- Nope. Didn't understand that either. I must be having a blonde moment. SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 15:21 3 December 2008
- It was not a reply to your most immediate post. Perhaps I should have indented differently, but there you go. I will never out-garish you. Be proud. --UU - natter 15:24, Dec 3
- oh so you're living in the past. Sheer sign of dementia. sorry mr 50's but you have to live in the moment. Keep up. SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 15:27 3 December 2008
- My post meant that you wouldn't out-stylish me Orian ;P also, "blonde moment"? =O =O =O =P =H =W =L =Y =M =: =symbol I'm offended! —talk 15:29, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not sure I can deny the "Mr 50s" thing when I've just added a Goon Show clip to my userpage. At my age, you don't have blond moments, you have craft (can't remember a fucking thing) moments. --UU - natter 15:32, Dec 3
- oh so you're living in the past. Sheer sign of dementia. sorry mr 50's but you have to live in the moment. Keep up. SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 15:27 3 December 2008
- It was not a reply to your most immediate post. Perhaps I should have indented differently, but there you go. I will never out-garish you. Be proud. --UU - natter 15:24, Dec 3
- Nope. Didn't understand that either. I must be having a blonde moment. SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 15:21 3 December 2008
- I think the word you were looking for is garish. It's an easy mistake to make. For you, obviously. --UU - natter 15:17, Dec 3
- I don't understand sentence! Are you trying to Imply U.U.'s gay? Clearly he isn't: just look at that comb-over! SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 15:15 3 December 2008
- Not straight men ;) —talk 15:12, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
- Listen honey I'm gay. No straight man is ever going to out-stylish me. SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 14:52 3 December 2008
- Once again, you miss the point: other people shouldn't wear hoodies because they're not as stylish as mine, and it makes them look bad. --UU - natter 14:50, Dec 3
- That's a bit selfish isn't it? But that's the thing about old people, they expect the world to revolve around them just because they've suffered 30+ years. People shouldn't wear hoodies because nobody did when they were young. If you must have earphones use both as just the one means you're only half listening and that's rude. Run everyone else over to make sure what's left of my life is easy. You're all the same. SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 14:46 3 December 2008
- No, silly. To see if there are any other pedestrians they can run over to make my crossing that bit easier. --UU - natter 14:38, Dec 3
- What, to swerve at you if they see you? SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 11:40 3 December 2008
- Hey, you're welcome. Also: an eye for an eye, amirite? You call me old, I call you insecure, and the world keeps spinning, la la la la laaaa... Also, in a kinda Norris/Russian Reversal fashion, traffic has to look both ways when I cross the road. --UU - natter 11:36, Dec 3
- Yaya! Now I can sleep, except you insulted me -- god, what if I really am that insecure? That's probably why guys don't look twice at me: I'm too insecure. Either that or I'm too fat. The second bit was what I meant, thanks. Though I was kinda hoping they started a little bit before Christmas. Oh well they do now. I just have to write it all now. Hopefully it'll enjoy more sucsess than the halloween thing I did, which went largly unnoticed. And I hope things de-busy for you soon, wouldn't want the old ticker giving out and do remember to look both ways... SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 11:33 3 December 2008
- So I'm really busy at the moment and forgetting things due to stress and senility. I wouldn't worry too much about it if I were you. Do you mean the various gifts sent by some idiot's "true love"? In which case, look here. If you mean when they are, it's Dec 25th - January 6th (also known as Epiphany, fuck knows why). If you mean anything else, my telepathetic skills have failed again. --UU - natter 11:22, Dec 3
Hey![edit source]
Hey UU! Thanks for dropping a line! I'm just ambling on through university is all.
Hope everything is well! Mightydandylion (talk) Fk 23:19, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
- Awesome, it's a sighting of MDL! Hope Uni goes well for you dude. Drop in here if you're ever bored... --UU - natter 11:23, Dec 3
I was wondering...[edit source]
...if you accept Pee requests, I understand if thats a bit much though?:)--Sycamore (Talk) 14:32, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
- Is this for the Global Village thing? I've taken a couple of looks at it now and nearly slapped my tag on it, but I'm not entirely sure how to go about reviewing it - I believe you know the feeling. It's really hard to articulate my thoughts on it. Still, if it is, and you still want me to, I will have a look and do my best. If it's not, then sure! --UU - natter 14:36, Dec 3
Thanks there[edit source]
For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.
I'll be going though some stuff that you said there, thanks again:)--Sycamore (Talk) 20:09, 3 December 2008 (UTC)