User:Black flamingo11/talkarchive1

Hey, Black flamingo11, welcome to Uncyclopedia!

Welcome! Hello, Black flamingo11, and welcome to Uncyclopedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If not, the door's right over there... no, a little more to your left... yeah. Anyway, here are a few good links for people like you: Beginner's Guide Our Vanity Policies - why we don't care about your friends How to be funny and not just stupid If you read anything at all, make it the above three links. If you want to find out more about Uncyclopedia or need more help with something, try these: About Uncyclopedia and The five pliers of Uncyclopedia How to get started editing on uncyclopedia Help Pages - if you need help with a specific issue I hope you enjoy editing here and being an Uncyclopedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) or use the "sign" button () above the edit box. This will automatically produce your name and the date. If you want to write and don't know where to begin, consider contributing to Uncyclopedia's current colonization of the week, a group writing project to improve a single popular article. Anyone is welcome to contribute, so come help out! If the current colonization doesn't suit your fancy, then browse our rewrite and idea categories. We have lots of articles just sitting around for someone to improve, so don't be afraid - dive right in! Also, if you happen to know anyone who is Singaporean, tell me. I currently have a project going on and anyone is welcome to join, and help. Also, if you're feeling tired or something, just visit MyBrute for relaxtion! It's a fun game! If you need help, ask me on my talk page, ask at the Dump, or ask an administrator on their talk page. Additionally, the Uncyclopedian Adopt-a-Noob program is there to bring experienced editors straight to you. Simply leave a message on an adopter's talkpage to join. Again, welcome!

Now, being less formal, you will see the above message in a lot of users' talk page. However, that does not mean this is an automated message. Really, I had to click on your user talk, copy-paste this stuff, and submit it with my own fleshy finger. I'm not a bot. I exist. Now, for some "personal", "non-official" advice:

• You may think some stuff that appears everywhere here is cool, like Oscar Wilde, Chuck Norris, Kitten Huffing, Russian Reversal, and Mr. T. Those things are completely overused and not really funny anymore. Among us sophisticated intelligentsia, we call this phenomenon cliché. Whatever, these subjects are worn out, near death, and in dire need of being huffed. Just please don't mention them unless you have a very, very good reason. Or if it's funny. And I mean funny.
• Another thing we veterans hate is Random Humor. Don't put chicken from Mars in an article about George Washington. You can put it in an article about, well, Chicken from Mars. That's it.
• Humor is a subtle subject. People will tell you that talking about excretes is just bad taste - count me among them - and others will find this kind of stuff the
  pinnacle of subversive irony. Just stay calm, have a good look at HTBFANJS, and try to learn what works best. No one here will ban you as long as you don't impose your non-conformist ideas on already created stuff.
• Start pages in userspace, first. By that, I mean if you wanted to create a page called "Flappy woo-ha," instead of creating the page Flappy woo-ha, create User:Black flamingo11/talkarchive1/Flappy woo-ha. That way, you'll have plenty of time to work on it and it won't be deleted or ICU'd. You can start a page in mainspace, just make damn sure what you put there is long enough and funny enough to not get huffed.
• Never recreate a deleted article. Never redo a reverted edit. Never.
• There are a lot of links I just put on your page. This is the most important one. HTBFANJS is important, but the mybrute link is better.
• You can steal templates and welcome people, but don't forget to but the subst: inside the template. Like {{subst:Welcome}}. I used User:Zheliel/welcome. A lot better, it includes these fun linkies.
• And, finally, don't be afraid. We don't eat people. Usually.

Somebody has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic.

-zh/Singapore IS 4413:16 August 10

Welcome

Very promising start to your Uncyclopedian career, fellow Northerner. Your first article is very nice thus far - keep it up! :) --El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 19:44, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Yes you were

Get back in the cage damnit! On a slightly less serious note, I have done exactly what you asked (I think) and also very much approve of this new article as well. Get some more pics and a little more content then send it for Pee Review and bob's your uncle (perhaps you should do an article on that next ;)) --El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 17:11, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Actually...

Would you be interested in Alice in Sunderland? It's a cautionary tale about the sinful ways of the Northern working classes, I started ages ago but haven't recommenced yet. Collab? I reckon you'd excel at it, if you can get some kind of late-Victorian moralising tone right... --El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 17:16, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Haha awesome, don't worry about time or anything, I take ages to do just about anything. What I have done so far is here btw. --El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 17:31, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Alice

Just noticed you added some excellent stuff to the AiS article. Nice work, I really think we can make this into a featured article some day. I'm lacking inspiration to do the whole slog at the moment, but feel free to add what you want when you want and I'll comb through and add my own stuff at times. Some very nice touches in that background section (particularly the "rabbit hole" bit haha). Very nice. --El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 15:15, September 2, 2009 (UTC)

Yep, well there are a lot of things we can include really, we just need to make sure we approach it in the right way. We could even include the original Alice in Wonderland (or the gist of it) as a section in which Alice has her drinks spiked at a seedy Wearside tavern or something and suffers some bizarre hallucinations... --El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 16:01, September 2, 2009 (UTC)

Funkiest Samurai

Is good reading, my fellow oppressed Northerner. The made up quotes thing is awesome... --El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 10:39, November 5, 2009 (UTC)

Ta. It's just a little something to keep my writing muscles working. They can get awful flabby you know. Black Flamingo 11:01, November 5, 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

 There is a featured article beyond all featured articles known to man...  

At the sign-post up ahead... You have just crossed over into... the Thank You Zone. The Global Tourniquet says "Thanks for voting for my featured article"

Keanu Reeves

Whoa dude... I don't know how to use apostrophes. Thnx for your help! --Matfen 11:50, November 11, 2009 (UTC)

It's fine, I was thinking of peeing your article today, but then again I can't think of anything you could really do to improve it, so I wasn't sure if there was a point. Black Flamingo 12:00, November 11, 2009 (UTC)

Thnx for your review. I am very glad you liked it. I'm not looking to get it featured quite yet, as I've already got Alec Baldwin on VFH, and to be honest, some of the voters scare me with their way of deciding what should be featured. Maybe after that article has been failed for highlight, we could try with Reeves. For now, I need to get to work on the changes.

Both those pictures you disliked were one of the few left over from the old (awful) version of the article. I wasn't too fond of the basketball one either, I just thought some work had gone into it is all. I think I can turn around the heavy metal one with a different caption though.

I allegedly agree with allegedly removing the allegedly intrusive word "Alleged", as it allegedly ruins the flow of an article's grammar and alleged comedic timing... allegedly.

I also agree with removing Matrixism. That also was an idea left over from the old version of the article, and I was supposed to just be rewriting it as part of Conservation Week, so I felt a bit guilty completely removing it. Either way it's a bit laughless, was difficult to put into good english, and so I shall remove it, and I have other uses for the picture in it. However, I'm gonna get a second opinion from someone on removing the Restraining order section, because I thought I was a bonafide genius when I came up with that one. Then again, I have a habit of being extremely egotistical over my articles, so I shall check with someone else and if they don't like it either, I shall it delete it heartily.

I am ashamed to admit that i actually do have an encyclopedic knowledge of Keanu Reeves, (although not as large as I do for Christian Bale). Anyways, I still used Wiki for ideas and doublechecking, but mostly my knowledge is a side-effect of my mum finding him hot... Weird, I know. The Matrix was never the same again.

thnx again--Matfen 20:30, November 11, 2009 (UTC)

Robert De Niro

Love what I'm seeing so far on your userspace with Robert De Niro. --Matfen 12:49, November 16, 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, I owe a lot to your article on Keanu Reeves I think. Black Flamingo 12:51, November 16, 2009 (UTC)

Final Fantasy Football PR

My review might have been harsh but at the end of the day it's just a thorough opinion. There's no 50/50 article scientifically analyzed to prove the standard of solid gold comedy for the benefit of the pee reviewer and fairly often in VFH or VFD I vote against majority opinion. Some reviewers are Roget Eberts, Some are Harry Knowlesses. I'm guessing I'm one of the more stringent ones. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:33, November 23, 2009 (UTC)

A Fast and Furious Thanks

Yo BF

I have noticed and I'm rather impressed. Indeed I am too lazy and deficient in the creative department at the moment, but I'll think it over and add something when I can think of something to add. Seriously though, what you're doing is awesome and I hope we can continue with the VFH-worthy treatment. --El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 18:08, December 14, 2009 (UTC)

Comrad

Thanks to your vote Julius Malema is one step closer to becoming President of South Africa. Nice going. What a wonderful thing democracy is. Now surrender your property to the government and move along. Nothing to see here. Except the featured article on 14 Dec 2009

--BlueSpiritGuy 10:34, December 15, 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

'FROM THE DESK OF GUILDENSTERNENSTEIN'

Thank you for supporting my recently featured article.

Your support is greatly appreciated.

—Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 16:31, November 3, 2009 (UTC)

---

Mensaje!

Also, for butter even though it will probably fail ;) ~Formerly Annoying Crap 23:00, 18 December 2009

Red Flamingos

Thanks For Buying Our Book! Me and Elmo take bodily functions seriously and If you enjoyed Menstruation: A Guide For Men, be sure to check out these other books in our series: Why Is There Blood In My Toilet? BOOGER! (With Oscar The Grouch)

Thanks for participating in this noblest of adventures ;)---    21:31, December 31, 2009 (UTC)

A bouncy thanks!

Chuck would like to thank you!  For. finding his Story so firm, so round and so... attractive.

Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 17:57, January 3, 2010 (UTC)

I know it's late, don't bitch at me. Bitch.

I WILL FUCKING EAT YOUR FAMILY!!! Oh, and thanks for the vote :) --It's Magically Fucking Delicious

»» Back ² Tha Hood»» 20:53,4January,2010

Gangs of New York

Thanks for the suggestions, most of which I've acted on already. I think I've probably done all I'm likely to. --Sog1970 20:54, January 5, 2010 (UTC)

And thanks for the nom also. It really does look and read better for the review you did. --Sog1970 22:44, January 11, 2010 (UTC)

Best used in the Bedroom

~Formerly Annoying Crap 06:17, 8 January 2010

Thanks for review ;)

Well, thanks for the review but I think I should make some clarification. RomArtus has already changed this article a bit and I actually thought its grammar is correct as well as spelling. Those parts about Combustible bishops and interesting observation have been added by some other guy too. The independent work of two guys at the same article can result only in the weird joint of two styles and two ideas (that song in the end was not mine too).

Oh, and I don't live in England but Poland. And actually I've never been in a country where people speak any kind of the English language. I've heard from some peole here that my English is awful and I believe I speak like a retard or in the best case like a child :P.

Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 20:29, January 8, 2010 (UTC)

== Re:name=%2525253D

It's a bit weird name. First of all it's Polish language but I guess you knew it.

Ptok means bird but in Podhale dialect which is being spoken by mountaneers in Southern Poland. Normal version of this word is ptak. Ptok is spelled with short o.

Bentoniczny means benthic (benthic fish for example) - check [[1]) if you don't know the term.

So in the end my name means "The Bird that lives in the depths of seas" or "The Benthic Bird" (but with dialected "bird").

I created it by mixing ptok po góralsku (bird in Podhale dialect) i ryba bentoniczna (benthic fish) ( what gave ptok bentoniczny and ryba po góralsku (benthic bird and fish seasoned in mountaneers fashion). I imagine an alegory of my name as a bird that got both its eyes on a one side of head in a fashion similar to this of benthic fish

Well, that's the story. But I guess it looks awful for English native speakers with this digraph "cz" and this consonant cluster "czn" :P Don't worry. Polish is fucked up. Cheers ;) Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 23:18, January 8, 2010 (UTC)

Advanced Study Program

DON'T FORGET TO STUDY THESE MOVIES TOO!

Thanks fer voting  For. HowTo:Make a B-Movie Monster! --    11:58, January 11, 2010 (UTC)

THEN..............

Maybe Bormann has a copy of the Qur'an!--    15:50, January 12, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for review

Thank you <subject name here> for reviewing my UnBook.

I feel the need to clear up some of the questions you posed during the review, and maybe perhaps beg ask for help. So here goes.

Firstly, it's an UnBook because I wanted to do an Unbook. It's called Doctor Loo because, yes, Loo rhymes with Who. That's it. Nothing deep or meaningful about it. I wrote it because I wrote it. Sorry if you were expecting something more philosophical/interesting.

Secondly, why is the Doctor scottish. Because David Tenant is scottish. It was the only thing I could think of parodying, although I'm sure I can come up with other things eventually. I apologise for only focusing on the latest Doctors Tenant and Smith, but I have yet to get round to watching the episodes of yesteryear. Besides, going on the demographics of Uncyclopedia, most young'uns aren't going to know who Troughton or Baker are, let alone care.

Your suggestion for more pics will be difficult. I left no pictures for a reason. Despite a search through Uncyc I could not find any fitting to add. I'm lewd to request multiple pictures of toilets at the reefer desk, so unless I actually make them myself (and trust me I do not want to resort to this) I am at a loss for what to do about it.

I admit that the majority of the book is random and ugly to read and just generally all out OH MY GOD IT BURNS, but hey things like this happen when you start out with something. At least your review was decent enough to provide good suggestions without cutting satire and criticism. The improvements are gonna take me a while, particularly with life kicking me in the kidneys lately. So if you feel you can spare any time to helping out, that would be great. --Garionepsilon 18:57, January 13, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!

The doctor will see you now Oh, by the way, before we begin today's session, I'd like to thank you for supporting my recent featured article. Now, tell me about your childhood.--You know what the music means... Our time is up.

We want you!

Hello Black flamingo11, it has come to my attention that your reviews since joining Uncyclopedia have been of a very high standard and as such would like to invite you to join People for the Evaluation of Excrement and Influencing Nominations for Greatness. Membership will grant you several benefits, a groovy template to put... wherever you like and it will also make you eligible for the Reviewer of the Month award, which is a real award with votes and everything.

If this seems like your idea of a good time then simply add your signature to the Fresh Stains section of the committee page.

Also, before I forget, your reviews so far have been pretty impressive so you deserve this shiny award. I hope to see you around PEE review more in future.

Rejoice, Black flamingo11! You have been entitled to the
Golden Shower Award

For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

---

--ChiefjusticeDS 22:37, January 21, 2010 (UTC)

Ah, I just came here to say thanks for doing the reviews and then Chief beats me. How come he always beats me? It's not fair! (Seriously, thanks). King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  06:03, January 23, 2010 (UTC)

Teh Doggfather part VI minus IV

Hey dude, I made some changes to your godfather part 2 article, and just wondered if you'd finished with it. --Matfen 13:27, January 23, 2010 (UTC)

Joe Pesci

Dude! Nice article on De Niro! I'd do a review if I was qualified. But I can mention that it sounded a little bit too close to normal reality. Maybe mix him up with his movie parts, like I did with his pal, Joe Pesci -- not that my article is worth a shit! You know, he was also a Monster, a boxer, Al Capone, a bank robber, a Vegas casino boss, a hoodlum, and pal of terrifying Joe Pesci, etc., Just a suggestion. What the fuck do I know? But it was fun to read. You're almost there!--Funnybony 09:20, January 24, 2010 (UTC)

Just shooting-the-shit

“Seven! Seven bullets in this 6-shooter! Yeah!? Alright?!”

~ Robert De Niro taunts VC captors forcing him to play Russian-roulette

“Who the fuck are you guys?”

~ shell-shocked Robert De Niro on meeting his childhood friends in a Vietnamese Village

“If you cry, 'Michael! Michael!' one more goddamn time then I'll kill you myself”

~ irritated Robert De Niro to whimpering John Savage in a VN spider-cage

--Funnybony 17:05, January 24, 2010 (UTC)

“Jeez! What a bunch of shit! Messin' up my talk page!”

~ Black flamingo on Funnybony

Late thanks

An expression of gratitude We appreciate your discerning judgment and shrewd disposition in voting for HowTo:Write Colin Meloy Lyrics, even though the author is a ne'er-do-well and never pealed a steeple bell.

~ 18:06, Jan 24, 2010

Pesci Pee'd De Niro

I had to suck (as well as blow), or is it the reverse? Don't pay any attention to my crap. Cheers--Funnybony 18:49, January 25, 2010 (UTC)

BTW: Without exhausting the PEE, I could mention a dumb version of what I mean, just in case you want to take this direction. So MUCH could be said, but something like...

Luigi III (last name & birthdate unknown), while just a youth, was incarcerated for gangland murder during the great depression, until his release on August 17th 1943. Taking the false ID of a person he killed in prison, he became known as Travis Bickle. His first job, as a star-struck pimp-loving Taxi Driver was his first brush with fame, or infamy, and really embarrassed at having to get a Mohawk haircut, he again changed his name to Robert De Niro, and joined the US Army Rangers for duty in Vietnam. During his service he became so good at Russian roulette that he could win with a fully loaded gun. After leaving the Military, De Niro, took up boxing and was the first champ in history to fight in slow motion. Later he was discovered by Cary Grant who introduced De Niro to Hollywood, from there he took up a life of crime, during which period he was a hit-man, a Vegas Casino Boss, Car-bomb test dummy, and petty thief. His first big score was the Lufthansa heist, after which he retired to quietly run numbers in San Diego for the bosses back home.

This is crap. But just so you get the idea of how crazy you could really make this article. It’s such an important article, you don’t want to put what people already know.

But as it is it’s already fine, if not too literal. You da boss!!! Y/s--Funnybony 20:09, January 25, 2010 (UTC)

Sure! Had to clear that cue. My take is just my personal nutty taste in absurd. Like, I'd rather De Niro WAS all these crazy parts, rather than played them. But, your take is much more in line with what seems to pass VFH, so don't try to do anything different that you don't personally like. In other words, if you want a feature then please disregard my bull shit! When YOU think it is as funny as YOU like it, then please let me know and I'll NOM it for you. I love De Niro. Cheers!--Funnybony 06:52, January 26, 2010 (UTC)

Chris Rock

That was a f***in awesome review! It gave me so much scope for improvement, without making it seem like a piece of crap. I was going to give you the golden shower award, but I noticed ChiefJustice had already done so. Nice work! --Matfen 12:59, January 26, 2010 (UTC)

Robert De Niro

Dude! I'm ready to NOM it the very instant (or even way sooner than an instant) that you say it's ready! And thanks for mentioning that Godfather was up, I didn't even notice (how could I miss that!?? Perhaps the greatest movie of all time), so I'll go get a load of it tonight and vote too. Lemme know "when". Cheers!--Funnybony 13:25, January 26, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!

'FROM THE DESK OF GUILDENSTERNENSTEIN'

Thank you for supporting my recently featured article.

Your support is greatly appreciated.

—Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 18:45, January 26, 2010 (UTC)

---

Anne Hathaway

Hey Blackbird, Al sent me by to whore for my supper. I've changed alot since you last had me on January 14, I really have. Come on, ride me again, and I promise to 'stay' longer this time, if you know what I mean. Brrrr, it's cold. Come down here Blacky, keep me warm. Annie

Annie, my dear, what are you still doing here, your job is over. Oh, you like Black Avian more than you do me? He did "read" you again, yes, which was nice of him. You say he did more than 'read' you, and that's why you're staying? Fine, do that. I'll give Uma a call, how about that. Stop laughing! Bitch, I'm outta here. Al still chained 2:03 28 Jan. MMX

Hey Alice in Wonderland (see, you're not the only one who can make up silly names) leave my woman alone. Don't make me go upside your head. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 02:30, January 28, 2010 (UTC)

She'll leave you too, just wait. And when you meet her mum, just remem ber that's what's she's going to look like in 20 years, it'll send shivers through you, believe me. As for the name, I like it in a version, and should have thought of it myself. Cheers, Aleister in Chains|Aleister in Wonderland (that sounds really good) 2:38 28 Jan. MMX

I'm sure Mrs. Hathaway's a fine woman. By the way, you could also have Alison Chains. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 02:50, January 28, 2010 (UTC)

are you the funkiest samurai?

I like the website. It was pretty funny. :) • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Friday, 04:20, Jan 29 2010

No, never heard of him. But thank you! --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 10:20, January 29, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for Pedobear

Rejoice, Black flamingo11! You have been entitled to the
Golden Shower Award

For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

---

That was a very helpful review and very detailed. Thanks so much! DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 17:19, February 3, 2010 (UTC)

No problem. Thanks for the award. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 11:21, February 4, 2010 (UTC)

And another thanking

Under User has blessed you with cake for being friendly and/or useful. Eat it quickly before he changes his mind. Warning: cake prepared in an environment which also processes nuts, and contains lactose, gluten, ground glass and arsenic, which gives it a lovely tang.

But as I don't like the golden shower award, you get cake instead. Thanks for a review that confirmed many of my suspicions. I'm trying to make the thing a little more consistent in tone, and reconcile the two sections a little more convincingly. Hope you like it when its finished, but thanks for the help! --UU - natter 10:33, Feb 12

If I hadn't just eaten a large custard slice, that would have made me very hungry. Thanks. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 13:47, February 12, 2010 (UTC)

and another

Thanks for your help on pushing Anne Hathaway to the front page. you and I both know how tempermental she is, but now I must share her with other votrs. Danks again, Aleister in Chains 16:11 15 Feb. MMX

Chris Rock Episode V: The Crackers Strike Back

Hi BF. It took me a while, but I think I finally finished my Chris Rock article. I did most of your pee review changes (couldn't bring myself to change the Christian Bale pic), but I'm not sure if I've taken those changes far enough, or done them well enough. Do you mind double checking it? If you do have some more criticism, can you leave it on the article's talk page so I can find it easy. Thanks! --Matfen 22:29, February 17, 2010 (UTC)

Bobby De Niro is Ready

Hope this is better than last time! --Sir Skinfan13 Talk {< CUN RotM FBotM VFH ΥΣΣ Maj. SK >} 17:07 EST 18 Feb, 2010

Thanks!

Matfen thanks you for your vote! His article could not have been featured without you...

Big thanks to you for doing that first pee review, and making me feel less depressed about my writing! --Matfen 11:34, February 21, 2010 (UTC)

Chris Rock Episode VI: Return of the African Americans

I changed that sentence at the end of the film and TV section. What ya thinking? Ready for VFH yet? --Matfen 20:21, February 24, 2010 (UTC)

Fadda Murphy wants a talk with ya

The Fadda sent me to say ya get a few hundred years off ya stay in purgatory. Lots of time to fuck around. Anywho, thanks for the review, I'll implement some of the changes today but more during the next couple of days, and will write more then. Very helpful, appreciated. Ya. ~   :29 4 3, year of da Lord MMX

I've put the fadda up for VFH after implementing most of your changes. Kept the pics, but expanded the caption on the Ming pic to explain a bit more. The opening pic was the inspiration for the page, I thought of having Bishop Sheen, in the guise of Fadda Murphy, talking about something, and Mortal sin came quickly to mind. The pic of hell is the best we have, and even wikipedia doesn't have a pic depicting hell as a landscape, so I kept that. Other areas were expanded or deleted according to your comments, and Hiatus gave some good advice on the talk page. Thanks again, and I'd really like to have your take on the article as it is now and if any tweaks are needed. Al in Chains 14:06 7.3. de year of our lord mmx

Ya done good, reviewing an' all, and my sectetary Al says to thanks ya for ya vote (we could have bought da ting if it didn't work out da way we wantd anysways). Couldn't done it without ya! So, ya, thanks. Fadda Murphy and his lackey, Al de'Chain

Thanks!

Matfen thanks you for your vote! His article could not have been featured without you...

Couldn't have done it without you. Literally. I owez u cheezcake. :) --Matfen 11:24, March 15, 2010 (UTC)

'Ello matey

I like what you're doing with that curry rewrite, especially the section on Phall (I had one of those about 15 years ago that was so hot it gave me a nosebleed) and am looking forward to reading it once it's finished - can't see anyone having any objections to it replacing the existing article. :-) Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 18:33, March 16, 2010 (UTC)

Cool, thanks. I'm not too happy with it yet but will probably move it to mainspace once I get some pictures in. Oh, and the only phall I've ever had was from Wetherspoons so I'm not sure it counts. It was still bloody hot though. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 18:41, March 16, 2010 (UTC)

I doubt it. Phall only exists as India's revenge upon the British for the Raj. Wetherspoon's isn't owned by Indian people so they have no reason to make us suffer (although that doesn't explain why the rest of their food is so shit). Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 18:54, March 16, 2010 (UTC)

Review

Mind reviewing this? Please?--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 21:47, March 18, 2010 (UTC)

I'll see if I can get it over the weekend. Looks pretty good by the way. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 17:11, March 19, 2010 (UTC)

Could you, would you

Review this? (I know I have already asked you to do one, but only a few are active nowady's. I would ask cheif but he's taking a break this month)--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 01:14, March 23, 2010 (UTC)

I'm afraid I'm going to be busy for the next week. There are lots of other people you could ask if you want - User:Skinfan13, User:Hiatus Hernia, User:Matfen to name but a few. If it's still there in about seven days I might be able to get it. Sorry. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 17:58, March 24, 2010 (UTC)

Robert de Niro (again sort of)

Just popping by because I was hopping a while back to nom bobby for VFH after you were satisfied with the article, and I looked and saw that you haven't done anything with it since January. Just letting you know I'm still standing by for the VFH nod whenever you think the article's finished. --Sir Skinfan13 Talk {< CUN RotM FBotM VFH ΥΣΣ Maj. SK >} 02:11 EST 23 Mar, 2010

Yeah I kind of got a backlog of rewriting to do - new job, busy, etc. I had no idea you were waiting for me to finish so apologies on that - I will put it to the top of my to do list and let you know. Thanks Skinfan. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 17:54, March 24, 2010 (UTC)

no rush, tale all the time you need, VFH isn't going anywhere :) I think its pretty much ready the way it is, its just you really wanted that in-depth review so I figured I wait until you were satisfied with the final product. no big deal if it takes a little longer or you don't do much more, as long as you like it --Sir Skinfan13 Talk {< CUN RotM FBotM VFH ΥΣΣ Maj. SK >} 03:35 EST 25 Mar, 2010

True. There are just a few things you raised in your review that I think would help me finish it. Not that anything's ever truly finished on here. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 17:56, March 25, 2010 (UTC)

VFS

For your vote in VFS and as promised last time You have been awarded a Certificate guaranteeing you safe passage whilst inside those areas of Uncyclopedia under Zionist domination. Certificate also redeemable for one (1) free bagel at your nearest grocery - simply print out and present to the shopkeeper to claim your free bagel with the filling of your choice. Rabbi Techno

Bromance

Seriously, thanks bro. This is the first thing I've ever been nominated for, and just having that big shiny nom template at the top of my page makes me happy. I am proud that you took my nomginity. :) --Matfen 21:50, April 6, 2010 (UTC)

It was good for me too baby. Seriously though you deserve it, and I doubt it'll be long before you get a WOTM nom either. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 21:56, April 6, 2010 (UTC)

00:52 Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Be Man's Best Friend‎ (diff; hist) . . (+11,497) . . Black flamingo11 (Talk | contribs) (review done) [rollback]

Wow. You're good. Seriously, keep up what you're doing.--Sir ~HELPME~ ^{Count! Awards! Pee! Help!} 01:00, April 17, 2010 (UTC)

Thank you. Such encouragement makes me want to review more. Sadly however, I need bed. I need bed right now. I demand bed. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 01:36, April 17, 2010 (UTC)

Cheers for the above, I'll be on it eventually. I don't like the title either - but I couldn't think of a better one. I don't think "how to be a non-human cartoon hero" is any better. Any suggestions?--Sog1970 12:59, April 17, 2010 (UTC)

Hmm, that's a hard one. Like I said, I didn't find it to be a problem myself, just trying to give you as many ideas on how to make it better as I could. So you could just leave it if you wanted. Maybe you could do it as an UnBook, like it was Hong Kong's memoirs or something. Or is that shit? I dunno, I'll let you know if I think of anything --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 14:25, April 17, 2010 (UTC)

I think it's done. At least, I think it's better. I ditched Dynomutt - he wasn't a real animal any. Changed a few captions and pictures, built up the Rosemary thing and the need to be a superhero to be a good friend to humanity. I think it works better. If you've the time to look at the changes, let me know what you think. Thanks. --Sog1970 09:57, April 21, 2010 (UTC)

Oh yeah, and the pissing against wheels thing - my dogs always piss against the wheel of my truck, guaranteed, every time they get in or out of it. Maybe that's a Welsh thing...--Sog1970 10:04, April 21, 2010 (UTC)

Cheers, glad you like the changes. The sidekick thing - I was trying to suggest "mole" as in informant and that Karate killed him. It kind of looks like he stamped on himin the picture - i'll amend the caption somehow, I think. --Sog1970 20:15, April 22, 2010 (UTC)

For you

Rejoice, Black flamingo11! You have been entitled to the
Golden Shower Award

For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

---

Superb work on your last two Pee's, they were thoughtful, insightful and constructive it's all we can ask from reviewers, thus I bestow one of these upon you along with my vote for RotM. Keep up the excellent work. --ChiefjusticePS3 09:35, April 19, 2010 (UTC)

Coming from whom I believe to be the best reviewer on the site, that means a lot. Keep up the excellent opinions. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 17:19, April 19, 2010 (UTC)

CHIEF! YOU MISUSED AN APOSTROPHE! You're not supposed to pluralize words with apostrophes! --Sir ~HELPME~ ^{Count! Awards! Pee! Help!} 17:39, April 19, 2010 (UTC)

Ancient Uncyclopedia

Thanks much for the Pee. Cheers!--Funnybony    18:34, Apr 20

ebert

I like what you are doing with Ebert, lots of possibilities there. Reason I took notice was because the frat was going to do Ebert next month, after Tim Burton is finished (and Matfen has done a masterful job on that one). So now we will have to find other fields to plow. One thing I was going to go into on the Ebert frat page was his Great Movies list (well over 300 now, and I've seen all but half-a-dozen or so), so just an idea for a section of your page. Maybe in addition to Ebert's review you can have a couple of other film critics review the film, or maybe some smartass kid from a college newspaper, but just ideas winding down from anticipating our next project. Good luck on it, and I look forward to a yay vote if you put it up for vfh at some point. Yay! Al sans chains 23:27 22 4

Thanks for the ideas Aleister, I'll certainly have a think about it. And I apologise for stealing Ebert, but who knows, if I'm not happy with it I might come crawling back to you and Matfen for help anyway. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 09:38, April 24, 2010 (UTC)

Youse welcomes. Good progress on the page. If you do decide to open it up for the frat I'd suggest we keep what you have and then write several reviews of the "movie", in the styles I mentioned above and others (maybe Quentin Tarentino can write a review of Peter Jackson's film). You would keep what you have, and would gain lots of people working for weeks on other aspects of your page, membership in the frat (comrade brother!), and all you would lose would be half-a point in Hall of Shame accumulated-points. But no pressure, none whatsoever. Again, good work! Al sans chains

Tim Burton

Thanks for the very good in-depth review of Burton. Lots of work to do, none of us really edit sweeped the whole page. I'm the culprit responsible for Nighmare Before Festivus, which I had great fun with but which others disagreed (not knowing the Festivus-Seinfeld connection, keeping it real, etc.) Don't know what we will decide to do with the page, but we've waited for the review and you've done a nice one. Thanks again, Al sans chains 20:34 29 4

WAY TO GO FLAMINGO, YOU WIN!!! Seriously, you were the only one to notice the Depp in Carter thing. I made that typo, noticed it right away, but decided to leave it, waiting for someone to see it. No one did. I thought it was funny.

Also, I'm interested in which movie sections you liked/didn't. You only specifically mentioned a few, but you said that more were either real good or real bad. »» Back ² Tha Hood»» 20:41,29April,2010

Stop doing good reviews this instant, helpful person.--Sir ~HELPME~ ^{Count! Awards! Pee! Help!} 20:41, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

Right I've got a few answers here so here we go.

• Aleister - no problem, it was an enjoyable read and I hope I've been of some help.
• Cheddar - Apologies if I left stuff out. Other film sections I liked were Alice in Wonderland and Sweeney Todd. The fans being impressed by Jonny Depp doing a "funny dance" was great, etc. The only other one I didn't really like was Peewee because it made the film out to be way more fucked up than it is, but the rest were all fine.
• HELPME - I'll stop reviewing as soon as I win RotM--Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 20:55, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

To arms!

Good day loyal Peeing member, the management was wondering if you had noticed the state of the toilet recently, if not, why not? This is a call to you, as one of our better active reviewers, for a couple of reviews from you over the next few days. The queue is in the worst state it has been in for a little while and I would really appreciate you taking the time to do a couple of reviews. If you are able to help out then please review the older requests first.

What else do you need to hear? Get pissing! --ChiefjusticePS3 15:14, May 2, 2010 (UTC)

Hello!

Just wanted to tell you that I'm a huge fan of your salamander page for the PLS. I think it's hilarious. Good luck!User:Mrthejazz/sig 02:00, May 24, 2010 (UTC)

I'm glad you liked it. Frankly I was worried it was a load of shit. I enjoyed your entries too, the fish one in particular was really funny. --Black Flamingo 16:16, May 24, 2010 (UTC)

FYI

I have Read your submission and have recorded my first impressions. (I used helium balloons to make my voice more hilarious for the recordings.) Soon I will review the history and other stuff & junk to finalize a score for you and the other contestants. That is all.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  28 May 2010 ~ 06:22 (UTC)

Hello, good sir!

I just wanted to say that your Salamander article is one of the funniest things I've ever read here. Kudos! SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 17:08, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

Thank you. You know, if you wanted to show your appreciation you could always rate Vending Machine a litter higher in the best rewrite category. --Black Flamingo 17:23, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

Hmmm... If you had put half the genius you showed in salamander into vending machine, I'd have rated it #1. Don't take it personally, but I rated my category by how many lols I got, and VM was a tad lacking in the lol department. SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 19:18, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

No worries. I agree with your choices for that category anyway. --Black Flamingo 21:24, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

December 22, 2012

Hey there! Thanks for the careful and detailed review. Now I have more to do for sure. Do you think it would be better titled, Post Apocalypse? Cheers!--Funnybony    17:05, Jun 6

My pleasure, my friend. And actually yeah, I think the retitle might be a good idea. It sums it up better doesn't it? --Black Flamingo 17:57, June 6, 2010 (UTC)

OK, big changes resulting. Can you take another look at December 22, 2012.. and let me know? Thanks again and again. Cheers!--Funnybony    21:27, Jun 6

Wow, you've really improved this, well done. The narration is awesome. I'll give it a more thorough read through when I have more time and let you know if I have any more suggestions, but again, great work. --Black Flamingo 19:46, June 7, 2010 (UTC)

Yay!

You did another review! I can't do another until school's out (June 18), so you have to do a bunch of them now, slave.--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Sunday, 08:26, June 06 2010 UTC

Pah, school. I never paid attention in school and look at me now. There are some things they'll never teach you there sonny - like how to do a good pee review. Kids today, I tell ya. --Black Flamingo 19:46, June 7, 2010 (UTC)

Chicken

Salamander. Hi. Since Skinfan left me in charge again (the fool!) I edited your section of Chicken as we prepare the chicken for final cooking. Please have a look and see if I did okay, or took out any bones and sinew that you were particurily partial to. I took out the Adolph Hitler reference, not because it was inaccurate but because anytime Hitler's name is used anywhere now it seems random. Hitler would have either laughed himself silly or exploded uncontrollably if he knew that. Thanks. Al sans chains 21:27 6 6 MMX

Yep. Read them, liked them. I will defend the Hitler reference though; it wasn't random, it's true, he was both an evil man and a pioneer of eugenics, more so than Sanders. Still, if you don't like it I don't really mind. --Black Flamingo 19:46, June 7, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. And our boy Hitler, I know it wasn't random. Just that everytime his name goes onto a page it seems random. How about we use Ray Kroc in place of Hitler, about equally evil in my universe. I should work more on Chicken. But I'm chicken to, heh heh heh. Aleister Hitler (my real name) 20:05 6 6 MMX

Puritan Poetical Thanks

'FROM THE DESK OF GUILDENSTERNENSTEIN'

Thank you supporting my recently featured article.

Your support is greatly appreciated.

—Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 00:38, June 7, 2010 (UTC)

---

PLS money

Hey, drop me a line at electrified_mocha_chinchilla@yahoo.com to let me know how you'd like to receive your prize money. --EMC ^[TALK] 17:21 Jun 8 2010

Congrats! A nice page and a crushing, humiliating defeat of your opponents. You can get drunk and celebrate for several days now, I think it's mandatory. Aleister 3:51 9 6 MMX

Well, shit

Hey, if you sent me an e-mail, could you resend it? I dug around in my spam folder for an e-mail from you but I didn't find one -- I might've overlooked it or something. Sorry about the delay. I have a life and stuff. --EMC ^[TALK] 16:42 Jun 21 2010

Wow, what's that like? Sure I'll send it now. --Black Flamingo 16:44, June 21, 2010 (UTC)

What do you think?

Not in general, but of Chicken? Your new added funny was funny. COL (clucking out loud) Al 16:39 9 6 MMX

I think it's hilariously hilarious, except... I don't really like the Oscar Wilde quote. --Black Flamingo 16:45, June 9, 2010 (UTC)

Ah, then the Oscar Wilde quote must be fixed. The whole thing or just the tone of it?? It's up for peeing now, so someone will wet it. I put Hitler back, you were right, the history lesson is worth more than seeming random. Hey, a whore is passing by, I'll grab her. "Hi, have you read Al's HowTo:Reinvent the wheel, which has lingered on VFH for two weeks and just picked up steam? He really loves the page, and just asks for a reading, nothing else." Sure, whore, now begone, get off of this streetcorner. Street walkers, can you believe it? Callgirls are much classier. Aleister 12:33 11 6 MMX

p.s. Trimmed the quote, and removed Oscar Wilde's name. Oscar is joining the likes of Chuck Norris. In fact, wouldn't it be fun to VFD Chuck Norris and jettison his connection to Uncy for good? hee hee

I think if enough Uncyc users got together we could go and beat the shit out of him and put an end to the whole macho charade. And no I haven't read your article sadly. I don't read much on here these days. But since you asked so humorously... --Black Flamingo 19:04, June 11, 2010 (UTC)

We'd have to fight our way through Mike Huckabee first! I see you took that streetwalkers advice and looked at my page. Thanks. Your and HH's criticism helped, and I've added in what seems to be a lot more material, hopefully funny (jokes within the links too). I like the additions, and credit you guys for making me do some extra work. Thanks again, Al 22:57 11 6 MMX

Sir?!? Excuse me sir???

Are you enjoying the flight? Can I get you anything? Fluff your pillow? Cook your taco? Adjust your seating, airflow, overhead light or oxygen? Ok then, I salute you!  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  12 Jun 2010 ~ 05:08 (UTC)

Ok, I think I'm done

Do you think I'm done? ~ 15:24, Jun 13, 2010

Yeah I think that's pretty much perfect now. Good work. I'm sure it will do well on VFH. --Black Flamingo 15:30, June 13, 2010 (UTC)

Kate Bush

The old Kate Bush article was one of mine, sadly though it had gotten out of control with too much random over the last couple of years. Nice to see someone giving Ms Bush the makeover she deserves.... -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

Ah sorry. Perhaps I was too hasty there. I didn't know a serious user such as yourself (and a fellow Merseysider) had investment in it. The undo button's still there if you want to use it. --Black Flamingo 16:43, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

Not at all, the old version had lost its focus, as is often the case around here, and was in massive need or an overhaul. Nice work.... -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

Congratulations on the feature, btw. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

Your abusive comments on Why?:Reinvent the wheel. . .

Helped a lot! When you have a minute please take another look, as I vainly tried to add more funny and beef the story up near the start, as you beat me over the head about. It seems to have picked up steam on VFH in the last few days (only partially due to my unabashed whoring to Maniac, but the two IP's who most like the page have nothing to do with me, neither friends, foes, or relatives), so new life has been bred into both the page and the nom. Changed it to a Why? rather than a HowTo, per Funnybony's kind suggestion. It's alive! It's alive! Aleister in frames 12:21 17 6 MMX

Thanks for peeing on me (I hope your mom sees this)

Your review was just what I was looking for in the first go round. You gave some excellent suggestions and I think I have some work to do. Again, thanks for the input and if your mom does see this, tell her I said hi. --—John Lydon 17:31, June 18, 2010 (UTC)

No problem, it was an enjoyable review. And by the way, there's no way my mum will ever see this. She doesn't even know what computers are, never mind Uncyclopedia. --Black Flamingo 18:41, June 18, 2010 (UTC)

Your article got featured faster than mine

So, damn you! And damn those xenophobes! At least it's guaranteed a QFA.

But, I'm here because I wish to return the favour. How's Takeshi's Castle coming along? I wanna give a suggestion: Is there something preventing you from using images from Japanese gameshows? If I remember correctly (or more likely, not), from Helpme's review it seemed that he mistook it for a (real or hypothetical) Kurosawa film. Or, I, uneducated as I am, also mistook it for a (real or hypothetical) Kurosawa film until halfway through. Seriously, though, imo, using images of gameshows with a very pretentious caption will heighten the contrast between low brow gameshow and high brow Kurosawa. And I also think it's missing a section between the intro and the plot. But it's still hilarious, though. Stop taking so long with it. ~ 13:28, Jun 19, 2010

Well to be honest I thought it was finished. But your idea of having pictures from gameshows is a really good one and now I might have to do some more work on it. Sigh... At one time there was a another section in between the intro and the plot, about the development of the film, but HELPME recommended I remove it, so I did. Bad move, maybe?

And don't worry too much about X Japan. Personally I think it's better than my recent feature and PLS winner. I think the problem is that most people have no idea who or what they are so don't bother reading it (I do this a lot on VFH myself). But then I don't think knowing who they are is a prerequisite for enjoying the article. You probably just need to whore it more. --Black Flamingo 13:46, June 19, 2010 (UTC)

Well... I'll whore when it reaches the 20 day mark. Also, Roger Ebert is awesome. Why are you so talented? ~ 15:23, Jun 19, 2010

Probably because I take months to finish anything. But thanks! --Black Flamingo 15:28, June 19, 2010 (UTC)

I made a mistake? That's not possible.--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Saturday, 05:04, June 19 2010 UTC

Must have been the Chief hacking into your account again. --Black Flamingo 17:26, June 19, 2010 (UTC)

On second thought...I'll whore it when it reaches the 15 day mark. 20 days is too dangerous. Yoshiki would be proud. ~ 17:48, Jun 19, 2010

Bond Pee

Firstly, belated thanks. I didn't get round to doing anything until today as i've been shuffling paper for a couple days. Very helpful. i've changed it a bit, mostly along the suggested lines, I think. I'm still not entirely happy with the title but can't think of anything better. --Sog1970 11:18, June 22, 2010 (UTC)

Think I've probably exhausted all the Bond cliches that come to mind. Thinking of removing the How To tag, but I'm still uncertain about the title Bond Villain seems a bit bland. --Sog1970 13:32, June 23, 2010 (UTC)

Fuck it, Bond Villain was good enough. And I'm sufficiently vain to ask you to nom. Thanks, the pee was really helpful, and you were right -it isn't a how to. --Sog1970 22:19, June 23, 2010 (UTC)

Speakin' on featurin'

Do you have a reason for not putting yourself into the Hall of Shame, or are you just glad to see me. I counted, and you would be the 100th member of the Writer's Hall, and we've already made you a plaque. Aleister 11:27 22 6 MMX

Yeah, my reason was that I'd be totally unoticeable amongst a bunch of other people who have a tiny amount of features. If I had as many as you I might go add myself. Still that's kinda cool that I'd be 100th (unless that's a lie... I know what you're like). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Black_flamingo11

I did that too, just because I didn't add myself for awhile. But you're getting enough now to be noticed for WoTM and groupies and stuff. You are technically 100, but Funnybony made the Hall of Shame as co-writer on this:

so it depends on which one of you put your name in first. Thanks again for your vote on Tantra! Aleister 11:26 23 6 MMX

Post Apocalypse

Hey Blacky! Did you like the result of your December 22, 2012 Pee Review (and Al's editing)? If so, please vote for it on VFH.. it's worth a cyber BJ. Unless you are not happy with it, in which case, please vote YES anyway. Cheers!--Funnybony    20:50, Jun 25

Hey, don't take me down with the sinking ship, I know nothing, nothing. But I'd take Funny up on his offer anyway, he gives great cyber BJ's. You can feel the photons rippling. Aleister 20:55 25 6 MMX

Sure, I've been meaning to vote on that for a while. Need to give it another read though I think, haven't done so since the pee really. --Black Flamingo 21:31, June 25, 2010 (UTC)

Marilyn

Nice pic! You mind if I mess around with the caption? (heh heh) Marilyn is lookin' good. I like your comments on The Misfits, the analysis within the entire article might actually break some ground on analysis of some of the films and psyche stuff concerning her life. I never bought that "content-free" propaganda about this site. As for Marilyn, have you ever read my Dreaming page? I tie-her in there too. Al 17:12 30 6 MMX

Sure, make any edits you want. I'll probably just revert them anyway. And yeah, I have read dreaming before. Some of it, anyway. --Black Flamingo 20:33, June 30, 2010 (UTC)

Dark Science

Salute! Aleister 22:38 30 6 MMX

I'm totally burtn out man! And why are you online but not taking part? --Black Flamingo 22:40, June 30, 2010 (UTC)

Time was already filled up, I peeked in a couple of times. I played in the other one, and came away bruised and bothered. Dark Science is def. VFH material, but I love science and the newest scientific data, so I'm prejudy towards nerd articles. Al moments later

P.S. And by the way. . .

Al and Guildy thank you for your vote, this page loves you too. And only the fourth UnPoetia ever featured--thanks again!

Thank you

Thanks! I, HELPME, thank you for voting me to be ROTM for June 2010. Your support is appreciated. Now that I have ROTM, I have an excuse to do nothing, so I'm even happier! My master procrastination plan is working! YES!!!

It means a lot coming from someone who reviews like you do.--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Thursday, 02:24, July 01 2010 UTC

Yes, yes it does. But you deserve it. --Black Flamingo 15:35, July 1, 2010 (UTC)

May Upsilon Sigma Sigma collaboration

ΥΣΣ Collaboration: Chicken

This person was a principal contributor to the May, 2010 ΥΣΣ Collaboration, helping Upsilon Sigma Sigma create Top 50 Requested content.

---

thanks for the input for chicken! Looking forward to seeing you around for July's collaboration

-- Sir SF13 (Talk) GUN WotM RotM FBotM VFH SK Maj. ΥΣΣ 17:08 EST 1 July, 2010

WOTM

Ha! Glsd you were nominated this month, and next month should do it if you don't win this. Nach is like Cary Grant, never winning the big prize although he deserved it for a long time. Now, in his old age, he will be honored and hoozad. But what will put your win (this or next month) will be. . .Marilyn. Who could resist you after that? Ha! Al 22:34 1 7 MMX

And speaking of, time to pee on Marilyn? Besides that, do you think we should put the page up for pee review? If so, you do it. They hate me over there. Especially HATEME, I mean HELPME. Everytime I show up he creates a stink and a flamewar, and I always vow to hold my ammunition (about his dad and my neighbor's three underage sheep) for another day. Alei 21:53 3 7

No you do it. I don't have internet anymore (I'm logging on in McDonalds, oh the shame!) I give you permission to use my sig. --Black Flamingo 18:05, July 5, 2010 (UTC)

Yo

I love you, don't say it's over, IT'S NOT OVER - I'm back baby. --El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 17:32, July 9, 2010 (UTC) xxxxxxx

On a more serious note, kudos regarding the work you have done on Alice, she's quite the looker nowadays ;) --El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 17:33, July 9, 2010 (UTC)

I thought those edits might draw you out of hiding. And if she is a looker it's all down to your solid original concept methinks. One day we'll be finished my friend... one day... --Black Flamingo 22:14, July 9, 2010 (UTC)

Marilyn was peed on, call the police

I just noticed Lordarchadian peed all over Marilyn. A pretty good review, I haven't gone on the page to tweek it with his suggestions as yet. The IP thinks that's Mae West in the pic too, so maybe it is. She looks too young to me, thought it was Jean Harlow, because I think Mae West only got into films when she was about 40. Think we should VFH it after a few tweeks? It could be a good candidate, and Marilyn, if anyone, deserves a place in the sun. Aleister 18:26 12 7

Note on my page about her. But in essence, yes, after an edit sweep, let's let her fly. And the pic, I saw them as, left to right, Hayworth, Norma Jeane, Harlow, and I don't know the last one. Now a non-whore request that sounds like a whore. My page "Rolex" which is on VFH has picked up some criticism which I don't understand. Can you read the entire article and see if you like it? I heartily laughed at some parts of it, so am at a loss and need a good and new pair of eyes. Please extract yours and fed-ex them to me please. Aleister in Marilyn 1:00 14 7

Maybe Jane Russell far left. The eyebrows and the nose seem right. But she's a nobody cares now, so Eva Peron in the mix still works. And doesn't look like Harlow is there, from her pics. Mae West seems to be the consensus. Shakira? Aleister 22:38 14 7

p.s. there is a discussion on Sycamore's talk page about his comment on format.

Well,.... this is akward

My plans for world domination are nearly complete now that HowTo:Survive the Titanic was featured!Thank you for your part in bringing about the end of the world.

You, personally, averted the Apocalypse with your warm Pee & Vote

Post Apocalypse made it in to cue, thanks to you. Now there is no chance it will happen.

Much thanks--Funnybony    15:52, Jul 15

Your Monroe page

I see your MM page isn't picking up the votes, so we should be whoring it in a couple of days. I thought it was a very good page, and you came up with lots of new data and analysis while keeping it funny. Maybe it's like Monica's Diamonds & Rust which I think is one of the best pieces around now, but I guess I'm a fan of the '60s era, except for crappy things that the '60s brought the world, like drugs and stuff. Aleister 23:18 16 7

Oh sure, when it's doing badly it's my Monroe page. Yeah, I might go and bother the usual people who vote for my articles. I don't mind if it fails though. And yes, I will read Rolex, you can stop that now. --Black Flamingo 09:14, July 17, 2010 (UTC)

Just playing off the nom. I thought it was good enough to pass, but if it fails we can rework some of the sections after getting feedback from the naysayers. Sycamore didn't like the pic placement on top, from what I could tell from the discussion on his page, while I like big greeting pics on some but not all pages. And more jokes and funny, that can be arranged, maybe slapstick humour with Monroe hitting herself in the face with a pie while that music from Benny Hill plays in the background. Ha ha, heh? Enjoy your new pages, I peaked in for a moment at one of them. Aleister 10:13 17 7

Generally speaking, putting a pic there probably wouldn't work. But this is an article about Marylin Monroe, if anything it should probably be all pictures and no text. --Black Flamingo 13:38, July 17, 2010 (UTC)

I see your Monroe page may be featured tomorrow or the next day. It received some nice comments along the way. Nice work. And when the DiMaggion estate sends its goons around just don't answer the door and they tend to go away after an hour or so. Aleister 10:16 23 7

Pee Queue thing

So yeah, at least one person has bitched in the forums that the queue is getting lengthy - it must be time for action! I'm respectfully requesting that every active peeing member do one or two reviews this week to hammer that sucker right down. You may already have done some, I'm just copy/pasting this message on to your page, so don't feel slighted, just feel I'm lazy - you'll be right. But if you haven't done any, do you think you could rattle a review or two off this week? Let's show 'em what we can do when we can be arsed! --UU - natter 20:37, Jul 19

The template that I'll never change

'FROM THE DESK OF GUILDENSTERNENSTEIN'

Thank you for supporting my recently featured article.

I, like, appreciate your support, or something.

—Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 01:45, July 20, 2010 (UTC)

---

Dude

You finished with Roger Ebert yet? Me wants to nom. --Matfen 22:53, July 22, 2010 (UTC)

Nom? How exciting. I'm not sure if it's finished to be honest, but if you think it's ready then yeah I suppose it is. --Black Flamingo 05:28, July 23, 2010 (UTC)

Worth a shot. And if it's parodying his reviews, as well as himself, then I can't see what more people would want? --Matfen 09:46, July 23, 2010 (UTC)

Marilyn

Congrats! Gave a half-credit to Claudius Prime, who wrote most of the original page. He's almost in the Hall of Shame, only needs a half-credit more. I'll look over his pages, but his collab Anais Nin may be a good candidate. I like to get people into the Hall, one of my "things". Congrats again, Aleister 20:03 23 7

Couldn't have done it without you old bean. --Black Flamingo 08:28, July 24, 2010 (UTC)

My contribution was minimal to nonexistent. As I recall the only thing I did was suggest you make Marilyn a redhead. Did you do that? If so, I'd feel that, yeah, something. Aleister 14:19 25 7

Ebert

Nice feature! I'm wondering if you or I or someone (Wikia should be doing these things) contact the Chicago Sun Times if they can get word to Ebert to check out Uncy's main page tomorrow. If he hears about it he'd read it, just a matter of connecting communication lines to him. Aleister 14:17 25 7

Already done so. Could only find his answerman address to do so, though.

Dear Roger Ebert

I am an editor at a Wikipedia parody-site, Uncyclopedia, which focuses on satirical articles in wiki-format. While much of our content is internet troll-fare or unfunny (which we find difficult to suppress due to the high volume of contributions from our open-editing policy), the articles we do have that are good are featured on the front page. Tomorrow’s feature will be none other than the article on yourself, Roger Ebert. Many of the editors at this site are avid followers of your blogs and reviews, and feel that you would highly enjoy reading it. We also have quite a few excellent director articles you may be interested in, such as Ingmar Bergman, David Lynch, Quentin Tarantino, Tim Burton, Michael Bay, Sergio Leone, and I believe Federico Fellini is soon set to be pulled up to scratch by our resident film-expert.

en.uncyclopedia.co/Roger_Ebert

If you do decide to read this, we would be most grateful if you could send an e-mail back to me with your thoughts on the article, even if critical. Keep the excellent reviews coming, and I apologize for using the answerman email, as I could not find an address for general queries or messages of this nature.

Yours sincerely,

--Matfen 15:20, July 25, 2010 (UTC)

Whoa, you really did that? Awesome! I was planning on doing it myself but... you know... laziness etc. Good work Matfen. --Black Flamingo 15:31, July 25, 2010 (UTC)

Upsilon Sigma Sigma July Newsletter

Well guys, its been exactly 5 billion years since I last did a newsletter and I thought doing one would be a good way to get everyone back into the fold for August. Big things on the horizon for August for Upsilon Sigma Sigma.

First thing's first: Welcome to our newest brothers, Maniac1075 and Happymonkey39! Hopefully you guys will stick around and become regular contributors to our little project here!

Secondly, unfortunately there wasn't really a July collaboration. That's partly my fault from being absent most of the month because of work. The June collaboration, Taco, that got roughly finished and reviewed around mid-July will be our collaboration for both months. Go ahead and head on over to the collaboration page to vote on whether we send the article to mainspace or not and be sure to nominate an article for the que, also found on the collaboration page.

Third, some asshole (cough MadMax) redirected weird to odd, but bad news for him; we're doing weird as our collaboration for August anyways. This one is going to be epic guys, like Tim Burton epic. I'd like an 'all hands on deck' turnout for this one. We'll begin sometime around August 1 or second. I was thinking the approach for the article should be from the perspective of a high school misfit who's unaware how weird he is describing other kids as being weird. or something... Once the collaboration page is up and running we'll hash it out on the discussion page.

Lastly, and I know I constantly pound this, we all need to start doing requested articles individually. This is supposed to be a big part of USS, but our frat has morphed into mainly a collaboration group. Lets try and focus on those individual requested articles over the next few months.

Looking forward to ramping this thing back into gear with you guys in August!

Founder -- Sir SF13 (Talk) GUN WotM RotM FBotM VFH SK Maj. ΥΣΣ 21:37 EST 28 July, 2010

Thanks and stuff!

By the way, you should totally add yourself to the Hall of Shame User:Mrthejazz/sig 04:22, August 2, 2010 (UTC)

You're not the first to tell me this, but given that I'd be fairly low down (0.5 above you, I believe) I'm not too keen. When I have 40 I'll consider it. Maybe. --Black Flamingo 16:58, August 2, 2010 (UTC)

I don't know you...

...and you don't me. But I just saw your name on my watchlist and decided to click on it. And that's how I found myself wound up here. But you're relatively new here, which is I guess why I don't know you (I am forced to boast a little about being an older Uncyclopedian than you as your actual achievements far outweigh mine). I just randomly decided to browse back over Uncyclopedia today and since there are loads of new people I don't know, I thought I'd start here, by saying "hi". Sorry that I'm such a dick. Have a goodmorning/day/afternoon/evening/night, sir! - [22:31 3 August 2010] PlebYettie

does anyone know anyone...I mean really? -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

Nice to hear from you. You are actually familiar, I probably saw some comments or articles by you around somewhere. That's the funny thing about this place, you see people's messages and conversations and feel like you know them when in fact you've never even spoke. Or maybe that's just me. Thanks for your kind words and vote on WOTM by the way. --Black Flamingo 22:42, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

Oh and way to edit conflict me Mhaille. Though I guess you're right. I don't even know myself. --Black Flamingo 22:42, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

Mhaille you bring high philosophy to the masses. I would  nom and for you for a Nobel Prize for Peace (or some shit along those lines) but apparently that's not how they do nobel prizes. And pleased to here I'm familiar, most likely for fairly useless comments and/or usergroups or some sort of whoring drama perhaps? I haven't read all your articles but I liked them, so I figured I'd vote for you. Although the competition is really strong. Uncyc's got itself some really good new writers since I left. Dunno how it managed that, what with it being ugly, broke and disease-ridden. - [23:19 3 August 2010] PlebYettie

I'm glad our predecessors are as excited and enthusiastic about the site as ever. --Black Flamingo 16:07, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

Indeed, oh and don't forget that it's still not house broken. - [16:32 4 August 2010] TheYet•Talk

Thanks!

Thanks for the review on Katy Perry. You spent a lot of time apologizing for your own review for some reason, but I think you did say a few very helpful things that are going to help me focus my thoughts. I think you're right that a couple sections stick out like sore thumbs as being too explicit, and that the 4chan joke wasn't worded well. 4chan is a massively popular image board where there are some people who spend a lot of time posting Kay Perry "fake nudes"; my joke was indeed that Perry had created those herself. I'll make it clearer. Anyway, I really appreciate your thoughts, and... I'll get to improving it. Cheers! pillow talk 23:58, August 6, 2010 (UTC)

Glad to be of help. --Black Flamingo 08:50, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

And thanks for taking Tombstone. There could be no better Speaker for the Dead than yourself. No hurry either. Another thanks for correcting some of my grammar's. Could never get those hanging things right, not all's of them anyway's. Thank's. Aleister 11:40 7 8

A great review! Long, detailed, and helpful. Thank you! You peed on a Tombstone, which is something we all should do at some point (I think I've done it, on a Tomb-monument at least.) I'll work on the things you pointed out, later though, and it should make it a better page. What pees are for. A few of the things, the "I'd rather be in Philadelphia" quote is either on W.C. Field's tombstone or rumored to be. Princess Diana was planted on an island on her brother's estate, so I called it her "little fairy-tale island" (some people may get the reference, many won't, but for those who do it should be a good one regarding her private cemetery--maybe I should work in "her private cemetery on a. . ." hmmmm). The cemetery of the absurd started out to be the topic of the page, maybe I should make a separate page for Halloween or before (Either Cheddar or Happytimes and I talked once about having a Halloween contest in October, where we can put lots of Halloween pages up for feature during the week of Halloween) where I can use the Robert Johnson section. Did you get the Robert Johnson references, the numbers, and his real gravesite? Made me laugh while writing it. Oh, the HappyMonkey template was just sitting there, I'll move it. Thanks for the appros. stuff again, and an overall thanks. Before this gets as long as the review. . .Aleister 13:21 7 8

That all sounds good to me. I guess a lot of the stuff you're talking about is quite obscure, so you might want to explain some of it. --Black Flamingo 13:32, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Aye. A good idea. Your ideas seem to be all good ideas. And, weep, maybe the witch can go into the cemetery of the absurd page, an entire section of the cemetery can be set aside for witches to play in! The possibilities rebound in my brain like a billard ball. But before I leave this ghouly topic, thanks again, the more I think about your suggestions the better the article will become. (one more thang, the bolded captions just seem normal to me, for contrast and emphasis--but they have to be good captions for all of that. I'm noticing that many magazines use bold captions, so maybe it's not my drugs talking, but who knows) Aleister 13:43 7 8

Tombstone

Okey dokey dominokey. Have worked on Tombstone non-stop since I wrote you last, going without food or water, sunlight or life-sustaining blood. Have implemented most of your suggestions (kept the first line of the Winkler tombstone caption because Happytimes said it was one of the best lines when he judged the contest entry, so in the contest it was used as a factor. But who knows, maybe if you read it again you'll like the caption). Could you take a quick look when you have 90 minutes or so. I put the cleared-away brush on a user page and it almost looks like an article itself! Just a start though. Thanks again for a great pee review. Aleister 1:58 10 8

Thanks for looking. I'll tweek the Diana line again, the Princess still watches over us. Enjoy Bettie Page Day! Aleister20:13 10 8

Would you Pee me, please?

Hi, Black Flamingo! I'm an irritating noob who's been adopted by Chiefjustice ( I pester him incessantly, to the very border of insanity) and have written my first article. Chief said some very nice things about you, which I am sure are all true, and suggested that I ask your good self if you would review it (he's just fed up of me and just wants me to go away). Would you? Would you? Would you review it, please? (He also suggested John Lyndon, who Chief adopted on the very same day as me...... and now he's GRADUATED! He had no business getting out of the bloody COT and leaving me on my own in here - he's my sibling, for God's sake!!). Thank you.--Ohnogodnotagain 21:45, August 10, 2010 (UTC)

p.s. And, he's got badges, and everything!--Ohnogodnotagain 21:48, August 10, 2010 (UTC)

I'd be happy to help, although I am very busy with work on weekdays. I'm not saying I can't do it, just warning you in advance should I get delayed. If that's ok with you (and Chief too, I guess) then I don't see why not. I'll get started tonight, but first: what is the article you want me to review? --Black Flamingo 17:07, August 11, 2010 (UTC)

I appreciate your taking on my review when you're so busy, thank you so much. Sorry, it's the Field of the Cloth of Gold, it's my first, I don't quite know how it all works yet - please bear with me! I don't mind waiting, but I'll just run it past Chief first, and get back to you. Thanks again!

Hello again, I left a message for Chief and asked him if he would OK the above. He's very busy, too, and can't reply yet. I'm really sorry, but I'm too sleepy to wait any more, thank you for offering to start tonight, but I just can't stay awake any longer. I'll check in the morning what Chief says and get back to you. Nighty night!--Ohnogodnotagain 00:52, August 12, 2010 (UTC)

ALL HAIL THE DA-LEKS! NO MA-TTER HOW SI-LLY THEY MAY LOOK BE-ING HAILED!

Thanks for voting for Dalek! Sir MacMania GUN—[20:12 11 Aug 2010]

Quick pee review

Since you give me such good pee review, I can still feel it, here's a QPR. Cows come home. Cut the whole lead, off with its head. Start with the words "When I was a boy. . ." (even take out the "message from. . ." wording, just start off with the story). If you take my QPR advice, you would save the pics of course, but the first pic's caption should be in quotes, as if the cow is speaking. That is all. A score of 36 (one point removed for not bolding captions). Aleister 1:23 12 8

It's OK

Mornin! Chief says we can go ahead, just to put a note on the review request that I specifically asked for you and that it will be delayed (thereby saving you from the wrath of UU!) I looked under 'Pee Review' but can't find a review request form or anything. Can you tell me where to look for that, please? Just one thing, I'd like to tidy up the first bit of the article, but I can't get in anywhere to edit it, the button has disappeared for that section. I asked Ethine, but in honesty, I don't understand what she said to do to solve it. I only need to put in another piccie in and finish the quote. Can you help me do that before I submit it, please? Sorry to be a trouble--Ohnogodnotagain 07:23, August 12, 2010 (UTC)

Ok, the edit button thing - I'm not sure what the problem is, it seems to be there when I look at the article (in between the discussion and history tabs). As for submitting for review - at the bottom of the main Pee Review page there's a little box (like the search box) into which you can type your article name. Then hit "submit", which should be just under it. Then you just need to save the page. Hope that helps, I will look over your article now and see if any ideas hit me. --Black Flamingo 16:27, August 12, 2010 (UTC)

Noobiness abounds! Found the big edit tab - I never used that one, I edited each section with the little edit buttons. But then I must have... I found the little box and put everything in it, including what Chief said, and hit 'submit'. Thank you for looking now, I'd be grateful for any ideas, thanks for your (precious!) time x--Ohnogodnotagain 17:39, August 12, 2010 (UTC)

Whoops

I may have missed the joke on Cows and picked one of the two names at the start. I thought it was a mistake. I always think it was a mistake. When Jesus comes back in all His glory I will look at Him and think it was a mistake. Aleister 16:49 12 8

All my articles are like that. There are many hidden jokes. Still thanks for the tip, I think it really helped. Maybe you should try peeing sometime. --Black Flamingo 20:01, August 12, 2010 (UTC)

I have a Nemesis?

My neme-neme, ooh my neme-neme-neme...

Thanks for the Pee Review old villain. It really was a challenging article to write, primarily because what makes the humor also makes the annoyance. You should have seen the page when I first made it actually beige. You want to talk about unreadable. I can't do dark brown, though. That just ruins the joke, and I actually don't know how to set the background beige. For the record, everything from the section "Things that are either beige or have the word beige in them" is pulled from the Wikipedia article I sporked, with the exception of the language, linguistics and sign theory section. You're right on that one, by the way. I think etymology would better describe the section. I like how you describe that section as inconsistent, because by proxy that means that the Wikipedia article is inconsistent.

As far as the list of text being hard to read, I think I will add more "funny" colors, but I don't plan on taking anything out, because I'm honestly expecting the majority of readers to skim over that. The funny color names are kind of like a little Easter egg to me. Finally, on the pictures, the bowtie guy is actually a reference to the show "Imagination Movers", the character lives in an all beige room that's kind of boring. I figure it was worthwhile to keep him there and some would get the joke. All in all, thanks for the review, old friend.

Also, I don't know if you've been on WOTM lately, but I claimed you were my sockpuppet. You should claim that I'm your sockpuppet. It would be fun. User:Mrthejazz/sig 03:15, August 14, 2010 (UTC)

No way, I don't want to get my best sockpuppet found out. I'm glad the review helped, and wherever you go with the article I trust you know what you're doing. --Black Flamingo 08:07, August 14, 2010 (UTC)

I made some changes and put the article up for VFH. Let me know what you think! User:Mrthejazz/sig 03:13, August 16, 2010 (UTC)

I saw that you commented on VFH. Did you mean to vote for or comment? I'm sure it makes me sound like a whiny little bitch, but I'd hate for the article to die out early and not do as well as I've been hoping. Also, I've looked over the article yellow, and how the text is distinctly not yellow, and how it's the only color article so far that's been featured. I think people are so turned off by the readability that they think the article is lame. In other words, you were right. Do you think I should just change it to black text and be done with it? User:Mrthejazz/sig 03:51, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

Do whatever's in your heart. Like I said, I think it would work better with a beige background, but I also wouldn't know how to do that. I guess you could steal some code form an article with a coloured background? And yes, I did mean to vote for, that's why I updated the score (didn't I?) --Black Flamingo 16:18, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

My Pee Review

Thank you very, very much for your excellent review, I'm just stunned at the amount of time and care you have taken. I really feel that you know this article and have a complete understanding of it. Not having done this sort of thing before and lacking that wonderful thing that's experience, it was difficult to hold all the things together that should have been in there but your excellent suggestions, tips and guidance are going to make it easy for me to refine and improve it. You'll probably not believe me when I say I not only understand each point you make but also agree with them all. They're all valid, from the commas to the brevity and you've provided me with a great base to mould the article into something much better. When you said it, I could then see it. Sorry about the pictures, I knew they were naff, but I've only just learned how to actually download them! I shall go and polish it all up now. Would you be happy to do another review for me when I've made some improvements, please? Once again, thank you very much indeed for everything you have put into this. I really do appreciate it. --Ohnogodnotagain 16:56, August 14, 2010 (UTC)

Glad to be of help. And don't apologise for the pictures, I've always found them the hardest part of article-writing myself. Plus, they weren't even bad. Feel free to submit it to pee review whenever you want, but remember it's really for article improvement rather than just seeing what others think (you can just ask people that directly) - a lot of articles don't need more than one review in my opinion, so only submit it if you're still not happy with it. I will be glad to look at any changes you make. --Black Flamingo 17:08, August 14, 2010 (UTC)

Yes, of course, I don't need another review, I have all I need now to improve the article but I'd really appreciate it if you would look it over after I make changes, that would be good, thank you. It's clear to me now that the pictures, as you said, should reflect the studious stance of the narrator; he's just relating the events, not partaking in any comedy contained within them. You've given me the direction I needed on so many points, I feel I know what needs to be done and how it should look. Thank you, once again, for a most excellent review.--Ohnogodnotagain 19:04, August 14, 2010 (UTC)

Russo-Japanese Thanks

'FROM THE DESK OF GUILDENSTERNENSTEIN'

Thank you for supporting my recently featured article.

I'm considering changing this template, but it probably won't happen.

—Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 14:51, August 19, 2010 (UTC)

---

I don't think I can take many more of these, Guildy. --Black Flamingo 16:23, August 19, 2010 (UTC)

Advance Congrats

At five days away or so, I'm calling this one. Congrats on winning WOTM! Sure, there could be a mystery candidate that pops out of nowhere and wins, or I could have 5-7 holdout voters, but at this point, yeah, I'm calling it. Congrats man, you've earned it! User:Mrthejazz/sig 11:45, August 25, 2010 (UTC)

Never rely upon the masses to identify quality. But thanks ever so much for the vote and congrats, however premature they may be. --Black Flamingo 16:52, August 25, 2010 (UTC)

A special audio thank you

And apologies for any weird formatting issues.