Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Robert De Niro (3rd review)
Robert De Niro [edit source]
Wow, since this queue's still so small, and since the last two reviews of this article weren't in-depth at all, I thought I'd submit this again. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 15:19, February 15, 2010 (UTC)
- That's my fault Flamingo, entirely, and I apologize for that atrocious review I did back then. I've since committed myself to becoming a good in-depth reviewer, and with your permission, I'd like to redeem that terrible review. It'll be probably longer than 24 hours however. If you don't want that, I understand 100%. --
- It's fine, we all did bad reviews once. I have noticed your hard work for PEE recently and would be happy for you to do it again. No rush. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 16:10, February 15, 2010 (UTC)
- OK, I've read through the article twice now, but since I have practice in half an hour and then evening formation, I'll get to this around 7-8ish. expect it done between 9 and 10 Eastern time. --
- Or tomorrow. The real world strikes again --
- I'm sorry, lots of personal shit going on right now. I'll start it now, but there's no way I can finish tonight, it will have to be tomorrow. --
- While I am in no particular hurry for a review, you may want to be weary of doing this too often as it annoys the PEEING bigwigs. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 20:23, February 18, 2010 (UTC)
- You rang? It isn't that much of a problem once in a while, it is generally best to avoid it, but nobody at PEE is going to get too upset if you take a bit longer with some. --ChiefjusticeDS 20:26, February 18, 2010 (UTC)
- Ah... In that case Skinfan, feel free to piss like an old man with prostate trouble.--Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 21:03, February 18, 2010 (UTC)
- haha, I'm actually finishing up right now, about a half hour more -- 16:03 EST 18 Feb, 2010
- Ah... In that case Skinfan, feel free to piss like an old man with prostate trouble.--Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 21:03, February 18, 2010 (UTC)
- You rang? It isn't that much of a problem once in a while, it is generally best to avoid it, but nobody at PEE is going to get too upset if you take a bit longer with some. --ChiefjusticeDS 20:26, February 18, 2010 (UTC)
22:29 EST 17 Feb, 2010
- While I am in no particular hurry for a review, you may want to be weary of doing this too often as it annoys the PEEING bigwigs. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 20:23, February 18, 2010 (UTC)
00:10 EST 17 Feb, 2010
- I'm sorry, lots of personal shit going on right now. I'll start it now, but there's no way I can finish tonight, it will have to be tomorrow. --
15:22 EST 16 Feb, 2010
- Or tomorrow. The real world strikes again --
- OK, I've read through the article twice now, but since I have practice in half an hour and then evening formation, I'll get to this around 7-8ish. expect it done between 9 and 10 Eastern time. --
11:03 EST 15 Feb, 2010
- It's fine, we all did bad reviews once. I have noticed your hard work for PEE recently and would be happy for you to do it again. No rush. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 16:10, February 15, 2010 (UTC)
Humour: | 8.75 | The way I review, I generally put the majority of my comments and suggestions in the humor section. This allows me to Initial ImpressionsSame as I said last time, I really like this article, it's very well put together and very funny. I like the running gag about De Niro's method acting as well. However, I do have some comments on what can be improved in my opinion and what you can add to make this a complete article. I'll also be sure to specifically point out what you do here that particularly works well. Section by SectionIntroductionYour introduction is solid. You give his real name, followed by his screen name and introduce why he is relevant. The one thing that stand out to me though is that you put 'convicted felon' in with his list of reasons why he is famous, but you don't really go into that aspect very much throughout your article. Your examples in the introduction about how De Niro uses The Method are also top notch: You list three examples that get progressively more farcical, this is a great technique. Overall, there isn't much in the way of criticism I can offer for this section, other than the bit about being a convicted felon. Early LifeI like how you use the breast feeding bit to subtly suggest that perhaps this may have been the catalyst for De Niro's exceptionally dedicated use of The Method, at least, that's how I see it after reading it twice. If that wasn't your intention, I suggest using a line or two to subtly develop this idea, I think it could be quite funny. Secondly, I really like your joke about his mom's significance, being the wife of a successful artist. One suggestion I have is to get rid of the final sentence in this section. It seems odd that someone like the character you've developed for De Niro here would have enough self-awareness to know he had 'big things' ahead for him. This would suggest that he is aware that he is in fact an actor. I think, based on my impressions from reading this, that you have shown that De Niro's sense of reality is completely unhinged throughout his career due to his One other thing I noticed that would be helpful would be to include a firm date for De Niro's studies of The Method. When you mention later that De Niro Tried out for every role for the Godfather in 1972, the reader is unsure if De Niro was a firm believer in the Method at this point or not. Early CareerYou do a very good job here with not being too descriptive of De Niro's behavior. You're letting the reader put two and two together about De Niro's method acting, and I really like that approach. Some problems arose from the text while going through a second time section by section. The first is this sentence; "the producers had already used almost every Strasberg-educated Italian-American method actor available." What you're implying here is that De Niro's behavior would not be exceptional to the makers of the Godfather Part II, in fact it would have be common on the set. This takes away from your joke about De Niro taking the method too far because you later assert that producers were very pleased with De Niro's dedication to his character and other requests. I will touch on this under concept. Mainstream SuccessYou touch on all of the important bits here, and do a good job with developing the core of your concept further. It is becoming increasingly obvious that De Niro takes his acting way too seriously. I think this is a good place to indicate that directors don't need (and maybe even don't want) a script for De Niro, that due to his extreme condition and circumstances, he simply lives out the character and all of his scenes and lines are completely ad-libbed. This ties in with the concept I outline below. More Successhere is an example of De Niro being aware that he is an actor, when he pays Scorsese a visit in the hospital. Your language and description of De Niro's behavior indicates that he is extremely aware that he is an actor, that he plays roles, and does not believe that past roles were actually a part of his existence. This concern of mine ties in more with what I have written in the Concept section. What would work here, is that due to his crime associations with Scorsese during his upbringing, and De Niro believing he is all of the roles he has played, he believes visiting his crime pal in the hospital is a good course of action, and brings the book as a gift. Scorsese gets the idea after reading the summary of the book's plot on the jacket and being around De Niro at the same time, knowing full well how to take advantage of De Niro's mental state. Now, I'm not saying that all of the above needs to be included or that in-depth, but these should be the unconscious conclusions the reader reaches after reading this section. De Niro shouldn't be wanting to get Scorsese's career back on track, Scorsese shoudl want to do that for himself by taking advantage of De Niro, this would be fairly funny imo. Here you employ the right idea along with the concept, with his Oscar acceptance speech; "De Niro said that he'd enjoyed his career as a boxer, but was looking forward to getting back to his regular job of organized crime." Here it is obvious that De Niro actually believes he is the character(s). Later CareerOk, what you have here is pretty good. A few problems result though. for example, "failed to match the success of his earlier work, and De Niro realised his career was winding down. Fortunately, he had a wild card that he'd been saving since the early 70s, something the cinema-going public had been screaming for since he'd arrived on the scene - Robert De Niro would make a film with Al Pacino. Heat was the result, a massively successful action movie directed by Michael Mann." Here De Niro is once again very self-aware, which breaks the mood you've set. What would be funnier is if movie producers decided to make a movie with De Niro and Pacino and simply had to convince De Niro that the plot of Heat was real. Pacino of course realizes and knows well what's going on with De Niro and uses it for his own personal amusement when they aren't filming. Just some ideas that stem from that. The same should be done with his directing stint: producers convinced De Niro that he was a director, so he became one. Recent WorkI think better conclusions can be made about my ideas for this section by reading bullet 4 of my list in the concept section. Acting styleThis is a good section to reveal to the reader the problems that De Niro has had and his total belief in being the roles he plays. This should be the section where everything is revealed pretty much in black and white so that readers who did not necessarily make the connection earlier that De Niro has, and always will believe he was the roles hes played, will be able to do so. This: "He is also known for the technique of "saying everything twice", which most people agree adds realism to the performance. He is also known for the technique of "saying everything twice", which most people agree adds realism to the performance. " was the one thing in the article I didn't like, it's a fairly lame joke imo that breaks the style of writing you've chosen. Personal lifeAs I say in the concept section, this needs to be expanded. I offer ideas below for what you might consider to include. SalaryThis is a good and funny section, but I find it's placement at the end of the article to be odd. I think putting slaray either before or after 'recent work' would be a good idea. Final Humor CommentsWhat you have here is fairly hilarious, and your writing style greatly improves this. Had this been written in a different manner, it's probably only a 7ish, but I really like the subtle style you've employed. |
Concept: | 7 | I really like your underlying concept here, of De Niro taking his roles way too seriously, but I see a lot of potential for smoother development of this concept throughout. You may not like my suggestions, and that's totally ok, but there a few things you can do that I think will improve this article. Here's my basic outline for how I see your concept being more fully developed.
just a disclaimer, my concept ideas are probably going to sound very serious, but I fully intend for them to be applied in the most humorous way possible.
That's basically my suggestion for making what you have already more unified. a one sentence summary could be; he's messed up in the head in childhood. he is a failure as an early actor, which caused him to learn the method. he becomes a hugely successful actor may have even been unintentionally brainwashed. Now, you need to also expand the personal life section. This is a good opportunity to touch on that irony I mentioned earlier, and how being totally brainwashed in The Method affects his daily life when he isn't making movies. Lots of potential here that I'll defer to you. The addition of a future projects section might also be a good idea in order to give the article an effective conclusion. You have a very strong foundation here. I may have suggested a bunch, but it would be very easy to make the above vision happen with every thing you have already but with a few minor edits. |
Prose and formatting: | 8 | From what I can tell, you have very few grammar errors. There are a few spelling problems, but nothing a little spell check won't fix. One particular example that comes to mind, however, was your spelling of organized as 'organised' at one point.
The sections are all well divided up and appropriately titled. As I've mentioned earlier, the addition of a section on future projects and moving the salary section to a more appropriate place in the article would be good ideas. (future projects could serve as a nice conclusion to the article). You may want to add some "spacing" at the end of the recent work section so that the "acting style" title isn't smushed against the image. This is of course assuming you change nothing else about the article, lol |
Images: | 7.5 | Your use of images is solid, but more average than extraordinary, which is fine. I really don't see an incredible need for massive photoshoping. The number of images you have is just about right, although you could probably get away with adding one more. if you choose to expand the article, the addition of an additional image will most certainly be a good idea. I'll go through each image and caption:
|
Miscellaneous: | 8 | my overall enjoyment from reading this article. |
Final Score: | 39.25 | I've included a lot here, but I'm dead serious when I say you should keep 95% of your material exactly as it is. It's very possible to implement some of what I've suggested with only a few well placed edits and section additions, rather than by retracting anything. of course though, if you do decide to go with what I've suggested, you will need to change some of the existing text, but I don't foresee any great need for drastic overhaul regardless of what you decide to do from here.
This article isn't ready to be featured though. it needs a better conclusion if not anything else. This is still an immensely entertaining read, and you've done a fine job here. Hopefully this was a much better review than my first one and has been helpful for you. As always, if you need to discuss anything about this review or anything in general, don't hesitate to drop me a line. |
Reviewer: | --ROTM! | 16:59 EST 18 Feb, 2010 If you found this review helpful, I would appreciate your vote for