Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/Archive234

Super Smash Brothers

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. We already have Super Smash Bros. We don't need this. Redirect. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 14:59, March 23, 2011 (UTC) Delete. This poorly written, red-linky Wacky War is a wasteland. So is the other one. Yeah, redirect, and save the final illustration. Spıke ¬ 15:13 23-Mar-11 Delete. (talk) 17:16, March 23, 2011 (UTC) What... what's supposed to be funny, here? 1234 ~ 07:36, 24 March 2011 Delete. An endurance. Go to a fiery future sad article. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:07, March 24, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

The Great Logic War

Score: -3
Keep (5)	Keep. Seems well enough written, although could use a clean up and a SPIKE through both hands and feet. And it may be based on something true, wasn't there a war with someone a few years ago or was that something else entirely? Aleister 18:17 22-3-'11 What the Hell is this here for? MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:00, March 22, 2011 (UTC) Keep. I like it; it fits with all the other in-jokes around here. But since it does need a bit of sprucing up, I would just put the Charlie Brown rewrite tag on it. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 01:33, March 23, 2011 (UTC) Naw, it's a'ight. 1234 ~ 07:35, 24 March 2011 Keep If we delete and forget about it, it will only happen again. The logic...the logic... mAttlobster. (hello) 10:49, March 24, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (2)	Delete. What a load of old shite. Doesn't reference anything apart randomly selected Websites which are used as hate figures in this article. Completely lacks originality. - LOL vandalz 17:50, March 22, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Concept was OK, execution completely lacking. 21:02, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	I disagree on the lack of originality; the intro--making it increasingly evident that the narrator is a bitter old veteran of the "conflict" who cannot keep himself out of his article--is unique. But this approach is abandoned in the body of the article, which becomes just another fable of wiki editors heroically battling against other wikis. Spıke ¬ 18:08 22-Mar-11 @Aleister: No, That was something else entirely. - LOL vandalz 18:20, March 22, 2011 (UTC) Ah, ok, I knew there was something. Did uncy fight with ED? Aleister 18:23 22-3-'11 @Aleister: If Uncyclopedia did fight ED, Uncyclopedia would have been DDoS'd. - LOL vandalz 18:27, March 22, 2011 (UTC) Kept. pillow talk 11:14, March 24, 2011 (UTC)

Accordion

Score: -1
Keep (4)	Fixed. though no humor added (except for the title of Section 1). Occasionally funny. Spıke ¬ 23:31 21-Mar-11 Keep. This is better-written than the average article and has a decent concept, even if humour is lacking. -- 15:53, March 22, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Haven't we been through this before?� I thought we would agree to keep the article?! Come on. DJ Mixerr 02:36, March 23, 2011 (UTC) User:DJ Mixerr/sig Actually, no. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:19, March 23, 2011 (UTC) Keep It's not too bad. And I find the speculation about TKF and Zombiebaron being Jews to be hilarious. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:58, March 23, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (3)	This in a strange article, in that it somehow accomplishes the feat of being really Jewish and really unfunny. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:32, March 21, 2011 (UTC) Just not funny. Mixing two mostly unrelated things together with an absence of jokes, especially in a style like that, really doesn't work. 1234 ~ 23:19, 21 March 2011 Delete it -- The Zombiebaron 04:34, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Goes back and forth between being about the musical instrument and about Jewish scripture. Is not listed on any of the navigational templates (I've removed {{Italy}} from it and vice versa.) Several paragraphs begin with dithering. I found it quaint but not funny; Jews might conceivably like it. Spıke ¬ 21:10 21-Mar-11 Apparently TKF's a Jew, but what of the others here? 1234 ~ 23:19, 21 March 2011 I'm not a Jew, but I got to second base with one once. pillow talk 21:53, March 23, 2011 (UTC) Abstain. Apparently, this is one of those articles that cater to a specific audience. I'm not Jewish and I don't get it, so I can't vote either way. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 02:00, March 23, 2011 (UTC) I'm not Jewish and I cleaned it up. Evidently Accordion is a book of Scripture (modeled after the Psalms) that tells the story of two messengers of God (Bern and Moskowitz) who, through word and song, try to convert the people from idolatry to monotheism. Their flutes are shoved up their asses, leading them to invent a musical instrument that can't be. Apart from that, it's just irreverent pseudo-Biblical-scholarship. Of course, the fact that I have to explain the humor concept.... Spıke ¬ 02:12 23-Mar-11 Famine, the guy who wrote it, isn't Jewish, either. But it strikes me as really quite odd that people are saying it could be good to Jews, considering evidence to the contrary sitting right here - TKF and Zombiebaron are Jewish, and they voted delete. 1234 ~ 02:56, 23 March 2011 Motion to strike Spike's vote as prejudiced. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 17:39, March 23, 2011 (UTC) Lyrithya, "people" aren't saying that, only I was saying that: that the original version was full of arcana that might be Judaica, that I didn't understand it but Jews might. Rather than call for an Uncyclopedia rabbinical council (though we have had one anyway), I changed the article's emphasis. Spıke ¬ 11:19 24-Mar-11 Kept. Did I mention that the Jew I got to second base with was very attractive? pillow talk 11:29, March 24, 2011 (UTC)

Final Fantasy 7

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. Just not enough good humour. 21:01, March 22, 2011 (UTC)  Burninate! Directions for use: 1) write crappy FF7 article. 2) Obliterate. 3) Rinse and repeat ad infinitum. – Preceding unsigned comment added by TheSlyFox (talk • contribs) munch on my scat --Roman Dog Bird 03:41, March 23, 2011 (UTC) Delete. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 14:56, March 23, 2011 (UTC) Delete. (talk) 17:15, March 23, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	I agree; utter shit. It's another one I've been thinking of rewriting, but won't vote keep until I get a few ideas. --Black Flamingo 21:47, March 22, 2011 (UTC) The problem with FF7 is that the concept has little potential for humor when in its purest form; it's all been done before. Someone needs to take this in a completely different direction. One about a highbrow piece of literature called Final Fantasy VII from the perspective of a stuffy nobleman would be unexpected. Then there could be an ending section on a possible video game adaptation (but because it will bring in all those fan conventions with all those costumed hooligans in drag, it will never happen!). -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 01:52, March 23, 2011 (UTC)

North Dakota

Score: -2
Keep (2)	RENAMED from North Daquota, to which North Dakota redirected. Fixed or something. Killed the lists, fixed the page title. Better than nothing. It was written in 2005, but it has been worked on since. Spıke ¬ 19:54 21-Mar-11 post-edited There's nothing spectacular about it, but it's an acceptable article now. 17:47, March 23, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (0)	Delete. 20:58, March 23, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Kept. Fixed or something. pillow talk 21:51, March 23, 2011 (UTC)

Goosetown

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. Support material for certain better established Uncyclopedia in jokes that neither need its support nor link back to it. Subject matter has no real world or popular fiction counterpart and last, but certainly the opposite of least, the article is not actually funny. The entire article lacks a reason to exist. --Count of Monkey Crisco 04:18, March 22, 2011 (UTC) Delete. In other words, a meme-filled wasteland. It sounds as though author is writing coded references to his own hometown--or that this is a vestige of the Duck World we moved against last year. Spıke ¬ 12:11 22-Mar-11 Delete. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 23:39, March 22, 2011 (UTC) lick my butthole --Roman Dog Bird 03:45, March 23, 2011 (UTC) Delete.Not worth a gander.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 14:54, March 23, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Bournemouth

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete.He changed the city's trolling industry over to the much more lucrative frotting industry, a move which upset the residents as they were born and bred trolls by this point. Han was later killed in a tragic cake-related accident, which was believed to have been orchestrated by the Chuckle Brothers. IT JUST GOES ON LIKE THAT. --Count of Monkey Crisco 11:36, March 22, 2011 (UTC) Delete. As "Ex-resident" says on the discussion page: "Surely these pages are supposed to be satirical? Most of this is simply random nonsense that could have been written about anywhere...." Spıke ¬ 12:25 22-Mar-11 Delete a) It's not a fucking city. b) This article is hurts my soul. mAttlobster. (hello) 12:42, March 22, 2011 (UTC) eat my balls --Roman Dog Bird 03:43, March 23, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Cyberbullying or the author of this is called Gordon. Either way it should be thrown out to sea.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 14:57, March 23, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Battle of Stalingrad

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Random and wacky-warrish. Kept in 2008 for some inexplicable reason. 16:58, March 21, 2011 (UTC) The Soviets fought worser than the German. Author(s) were playing Call Of Duty in class, when they were supposed to be studying that his' doesn't take an apostrophe, and thought it would be funny to have Stalingrad fought by memes teleported to the scene. That is trite, and there is no other humor here. Spıke ¬ 17:18 21-Mar-11 Delete. The introduction of Star Wars caused an internal concept collapse. There's no hope of saving this thing. --Count of Monkey Crisco 04:37, March 22, 2011 (UTC) Delete. I was going to abstain, because there's a consistency and underlying logic to the thing and so it doesn't really deserve the hated label "random" but there's a tiresome and undeniably studenty sense of wackiness (Hitler teaming up with Ronald McDonald, just imagine that!) and it's a bit "random" in the set-up even if it manages to stick with it pretty well. So a delete vote it is. --Zarbag 08:53, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Final Fantasy V

Score: 4
Keep (1)	Umm... For! Cat the Colourful (Feed Me!!!)Leave me alone... 06:17, March 21, 2011
Delete (5)	Delete. Crufty, listy, in-jokey, doesn't go anywhere. 21:17, March 19, 2011 (UTC) Delete. You're right. I should have nominated this. --Scofield 13:16, March 20, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Delete this I find it very unfunny even the beginning is very boring, But hey what do I know. --Bhind45 22:56, March 22, 2011 Where's the article? What happened to the {{ugly}}? 1234 ~ 19:32, 20 March 2011 Weak Delete. Not unsavable but not much worth saving and little will be missed. --Count of Monkey Crisco 08:20, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Stealth Rock

Score: 7
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (7)	Delete. Reeks of the stale scent of pokemon and cliché. --Count of Monkey Crisco 08:11, March 21, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Unoriginal, to say the least. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 11:45, March 21, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Can't believe it survived for 5 months without an ICU tag. --Scofield 11:46, March 21, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Article fits in a single screenful, exists to describe a single move in a video game, and does so by relating it to: Fucking and raping. What variety. Spıke ¬ 12:28 21-Mar-11 Delete. Stone it to death. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 14:48, March 21, 2011 (UTC) Goodbye. (talk) 17:05, March 21, 2011 (UTC) Can I delete this stupid stub yet? 1234 ~ 23:20, 21 March 2011
Comments

Game:Zork6 and subpages

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Smite. Do we really need Another Zork game? - LOL vandalz 11:38, March 20, 2011 (UTC) Uber-delete Per Another n00b. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 14:42, March 20, 2011 (UTC) That's a lot of nothing. 1234 ~ 08:46, 21 March 2011 Delete. The game itself would be good if only more than half of the links weren't broken. Clearly it's unfinished, and we really don't need another Zork. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 11:50, March 21, 2011 (UTC) Delete. (talk) 21:34, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Ammo

Score: -1
Keep (2)	Renamed--Ammo was a redirect to AMMO; now it's vice versa. Spıke ¬ 21:26 19-Mar-11 Fixed. A mix of competent and incompetent writing. I'll say fixable. First, kill the all-capitals; AMMO is not an acronym and this article doesn't claim it is. Not amenable to redirection to Ammunition, which goes in a different direction (confusion with bulleted-lists). Kill the listcruft; kill the clit-craft. Kill, kill, kill. Then keep. Spıke ¬ 20:33 19-Mar-11 Meh, pretty bad, but not bad enough to delete. That may be Spike's fault, but I can't be arsed to look. 1234 ~ 19:30, 20 March 2011
Delete (1)	Delete. Lists, vanity and the most desperate of puns, nothing more. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:24, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Meh. It's not great, but there's nothing too terrible about it either. The opening joke about the French made me smile =P 21:11, March 19, 2011 (UTC) Kept. Apparently it's been worked on. It's safe for a month. pillow talk 00:12, March 22, 2011 (UTC)

Sam & Max

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. This article's not too badly written, but there's barely any humour at all. -- 08:57, March 18, 2011 (UTC) Move to TFAODP. It's almost as if the author thought he was on Wikipedia... I would work on it, but I know nothing about this Taiwanese game. Methinks TFAODP is where it really belongs. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 10:01, March 18, 2011 (UTC) Delete. I detect attempts at humor. Attempts being the key word. --Count of Monkey Crisco 18:39, March 18, 2011 (UTC) Bah. Using actualities and utterly mutilating them would be better. The attempts are nigh unrelated. Like the thing thought that making stuff up is funny. 1234 ~ 19:26, 20 March 2011 Delete. Re-post to Wikipedia. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:59, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain. It's not terrible enough to delete it's just... well... as someone said before there's a bizarre lack of humour to the thing. --Zarbag 19:48, March 19, 2011 (UTC)

Malcolm in the Middle

Score: 5
Keep (3)	Keep It's got the 'Fix' on it so what the fuck are you doing? mAttlobster. (hello) 14:21, March 20, 2011 (UTC) The Fix tag is less formal than {{ICU}} (which the article also had, once). Fix was last added by JackOfSpades on 3-Mar. Any implicit promise that he had 30 days is outweighed by his tendency to remove tags rather than fix anything. Spıke ¬ 14:43 20-Mar-11 fix -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:44, March 20, 2011 (UTC) I see no reason why this should be removed from mainspace, as it is. Yes, it's terrible, and yes, the guy has a tendency to remove tags, but the tag is there, so we may as well let it cover the thing. Give the bloke a chance to work on it. Give him a ban if he removes the tag again without fixing it. I can keep an eye on it, and suspect there be admins willing to do the actual banning if need be, but meantime... 1234 ~ 21:04, 20 March 2011 On second thought, he already did and already got banned. 1234 ~ 06:46, 21 March 2011 Keep. I wrote him on his talk page and he did lots of work on this page afterwards. He changed many of the "shit" "jokes" to "pimp and whore" jokes. This is progress. I would like to see him change "pimp and whore" jokes to "the progression of classical music from its inception in 2499990000000000 B.c. until six zillion years from now with Chuck Norris" jokes to show that he's further progressing. But he did try, and the format, length, and pics of the page aren't that bad. Aleister 11:07 21-3-'11
Delete (8)	I know this has a {Fix} tag on it, but honestly, I really think we're better off just killing it before Bhind45 tries to remove it, or something. --Scofield 13:19, March 20, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Sorry, but this one--like the other "Malcoms"--is just not up to par. First attempts usually need extensive revision, anyway. Bhind is welcome to try again. Using Pee Review would probably make the new one a lot better. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 13:40, March 20, 2011 (UTC) Delete. - The admirable Lord Frosty the Snowman 06:25, March 21, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Déjà vu. Spıke ¬ 14:40 20-Mar-11 Userify This is the one he worked on the hardest. It doesn't belong in mainspace, but we can leave him this one in his userspace. (talk) 19:13, March 20, 2011 (UTC) PS Author took off the {{fix}}. (talk) 06:23, March 21, 2011 (UTC) Delete. This is one of the most embarrassingly horrible articles I've ever seen, it's a clear-cut case of tag abuse, and if Matt and TKF weren't voting keep I'd probably QVFD it right now for that tag abuse. pillow talk 07:29, March 21, 2011 (UTC) Delete Smells like the work of a 13 year old poopologist. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:42, March 21, 2011 (UTC) Delete. - Complete unmitigated shit. Author is also a naughty little fucker with no regard for the lay of the land. -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 10:08, March 21, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Simply no redeeming value. 18:43, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	The night of the long knives is upon us. Even though it's daytime. Aleister, blood in the water 13:28 20-3-'11 Aleister, these copies are the problem; our reaction to them is not the problem. Spıke ¬ 14:40 20-Mar-11 I'm proposing a hasty deletion, as Bhind45 is more likely to try to remove that tag without making any changes, hence setting the deadline back even further that it used to be. --Scofield 14:31, March 20, 2011 (UTC) He's serving out a two-week ban. We can take our time. pillow talk 07:30, March 21, 2011 (UTC) If you guys want to let it play out for a while, that doesn't bother me. But since the tag's been there a while, he technically has two weeks from today to fix it. If he just removes the tag, please ban him. As has already been said, he's now abusing the VFD system (speaking of which, if he doesn't put up a vote for them, when do we remove all those VFD tags he added to various articles?) -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 04:39, March 21, 2011 (UTC) Jack already did. 1234 ~ 04:49, 21 March 2011 So it turns out he was banned anyway... I would rescind my vote rescinding, but with all the delete votes, that doesn't appear necessary. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 19:55, March 21, 2011 (UTC) Userfied. Page can be found at User:Bhind45/Malcolm in the Middle. pillow talk 00:10, March 22, 2011 (UTC)

Cheers

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete. Yet another article on a sit-com by Bhind45 that uses the same one-two comedy punch as Married... with Children (listed below): Shitcruft and Fuckcruft. Spıke ¬ 11:57 20-Mar-11 Delete This is completely without merit. mAttlobster. (hello) 12:02, March 20, 2011 (UTC) Delete. I don't care if we have an UGLY template, I want to see this go NOW! --Scofield 13:07, March 20, 2011 (UTC) Delete. If you guys insist. (talk) 19:09, March 20, 2011 (UTC) Delete.Doesn't seem to have an article. 1234 ~ 20:33, 20 March 2011 Delete.Tonton Tourettes --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:01, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Man, you guys are giving Bhind451 some gut punches here, taking his total output one after another and huffing them. I left a note on his talk page trying to be friendly, what, should I invite him to the forum where we can all stab him? Okay, that could be fun, I'll sharpen my knife, which I call Ole Betsy. Aleister 12:37 20-3-'11 Yes, this latest was piling on, but it's just that his work is so...consistent. Spıke ¬ 12:40 20-Mar-11 He hasn't tried - that's the important point. It's not as if he's doing the best he can and we're all cutting him down; he's come on here, been crude, then started vandalising pages. mAttlobster. (hello) 12:57, March 20, 2011 (UTC) Et tu, Al-te? (talk) 19:09, March 20, 2011 (UTC)

Married... with Children

Score: 7
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (7)	Delete. Terrible article from the author of two recently deleted articles. Very similar to the other two, and had the ICU tag removed twice with no revisions. (talk) 05:56, March 20, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Unfunny ICU escapee. 08:59, March 20, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Maniac1075 has a much better version (and if you haven't read a maniac page yet and admired his chopping, it's probably a good example). I wanted to save this one, but then I made the mistake of reading it. Redirect. Aleister 11:08 20-3-'11 Redirect. If you really care about a person who types a space after an ellipsis; otherwise, just huff it. Spıke ¬ 11:52 20-Mar-11 The space was used to separate it from Maniac's page, at least that's my guess. Aleister Well, soon we won't have that need. Spıke ¬ 12:34 20-Mar-11 Delete The kind of badness that leaves me.... mAttlobster. (hello) 12:03, March 20, 2011 (UTC) Delete. SHIT, SHIT, SHIT! Don't you have anything better to say? --Scofield 13:04, March 20, 2011 (UTC) Not acceptable in its current state. 1234 ~ 20:31, 20 March 2011
Comments	And author spent last evening tagging six other pages with {{VFD}}, perhaps in retaliation for the VFD loss of Malcolm in Heaven and its equally ugly twin. If he should figure out where this page is, entire days of ours will be wasted. Spıke ¬ 11:52 20-Mar-11

Peaches Geldof

Score: -4
Keep (5)	Keep. Just needs some work, and there are a couple of nice ideas in there. --Zarbag 10:33, March 20, 2011 (UTC) Improved. Spıke ¬ 12:30 20-Mar-11 Keep Article is now good enough, but I fucking hate Peaches fucking Geldof. mAttlobster. (hello) 12:32, March 20, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Good pic, she's got raccoon make-up. Remember, the one-hour writing contest is at 18:00!Aleister 13:00 20-3-'11 It sucks. 1234 ~ 19:41, 20 March 2011
Delete (1)	Delete. Celebrity cruft. 21:46, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Kept. pillow talk 07:31, March 21, 2011 (UTC)

Banana

Score: 0
Keep (4)	Keep. Will only be recreated, in worse form. Slap a hard rewrite tag on it. Simsilikesims 02:47, March 20, 2011 (UTC) That's not a great argument. We could QVFD anything worse than this created. 08:58, March 20, 2011 (UTC) It would be *constantly* recreated, plus the subject is notable. Some randomness is not an excuse to delete the whole thing. The images should certainly be kept. Simsilikesims 19:10, March 20, 2011 (UTC) per simsilikesims. --~  09:10, March 20, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Some edits for format. The page is very savable with some time, just have to delete some of the stupid and change bonana to banana, with other tweeks. The pics do it justice, and I like the random throwing on the page of the pics which somehow seems to work. I dedicate my vote for this page to Romartus. Aleister 11:23 20-3-'11 Idea How about we replace the entire page with that dancing banana from Peanut Butter Jelly Time? -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 14:44, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (4)	Obliterate. Too much random, too little humour. 21:41, March 19, 2011 (UTC) "A Bonana...is the bowel movement of a gorilla." Truly an article into which you can (and author did) dump anything; including, in two cases, two copies of the same illustration. Spıke ¬ 22:08 19-Mar-11 Delete.. If we put a hard rewrite on it, it'll just encourage the idea that it can be rewritten piecemeal, whereas it needs obliterated utterly and then rebuilt from scratch. --Zarbag 10:30, March 20, 2011 (UTC) I'm sorry, but that's just disappointing. 1234 ~ 19:38, 20 March 2011
Comments	Kept. pillow talk 07:32, March 21, 2011 (UTC)

Template:WikipediaVandalism

Score: 5
Keep (1)	Keep Comedy genius. mAttlobster. (hello) 12:00, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (6)	Not used in mainspace. Only two transclusions in userspace, both which seem to be abandoned drafts. 21:38, March 19, 2011 (UTC) Delete. A sidebar sporked from Wikipedia, to which all its links still point. This is not even a joke template; it just doesn't belong on this site. Spıke ¬ 22:09 19-Mar-11 Delete.All of the above, plus the wikipedia links are broken, too.Simsilikesims 02:58, March 20, 2011 (UTC) Delete. What's it doing on Uncyclopedia?? -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 03:14, March 20, 2011 (UTC) Delete. This is not Wikipedia. --Scofield 13:16, March 20, 2011 (UTC) It's not that the links are broken, just that the WP: namespace there translates into an interwiki here. But yeah. 1234 ~ 19:35, 20 March 2011
Comments

Xaositects

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. This article is about some sort of class in Dungeons and Dragons. I can't see any really obvious humour or structure. 21:22, March 19, 2011 (UTC) Soax your head, Berk! Not quite English, encyclopedic, or funny. Spıke ¬ 00:27 20-Mar-11 Not the place for that... er... whatever it is. 1234 ~ 19:33, 20 March 2011 Delete. The fact that it's written in coherent English and isn't smutty sort of chased people off this nom, I think, but... it's not funny, and it smells strongly of some kind of vanity. pillow talk 07:34, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Gee Bee Jazz Foundation

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. 2005cruft about ??? --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:33, March 19, 2011 (UTC) Delete. It's not too badly written, but the humour's obscure at best. 21:13, March 19, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Spork-and-randomize. Gives the newspaper it is based on, as though it were an UnNews, for which it is not funny enough. Spıke ¬ 21:44 19-Mar-11 No point. 1234 ~ 19:31, 20 March 2011 Don't know how that was supposed to be funny. pillow talk 07:35, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Mars

Score: -1
Keep (5)	Ok, I've thrown together an intro and a first section, and will rewrite more over the coming days. So I'm going to go ahead and vote keep (oh wait, I just did). --Black Flamingo 02:59, March 20, 2011 (UTC) I'll watch. 1234 ~ 04:40, 20 March 2011 Keep. If that Flamingo guy wants it, I think I've seen some of his work now and then and he may be able to pull it back from the dead. Aleister 11:47 20-3-'11 Keep The flamingo really wants this kept. mAttlobster. (hello) 12:35, March 20, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Guys, there is articles that are there and aren't of a good subject. But you don't put pages that have encyclopediac value and VFD them. Stamp a rewrite template on them. You wouldn't put Barack Obama on VFD. You wouldn't put God on VFD (he'd kill you and close this website down if you did). I have a good point, unless if the article actually really sucks. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 14:46, March 20, 2011 (UTC) Have you been drinking? mAttlobster. (hello) 15:30, March 20, 2011 (UTC) May have hit his head. It wasn't me, though. The mallet is a coincidence. 1234 ~ 19:28, 20 March 2011
Delete (4)	So Random. --Scofield 10:50, March 18, 2011 (UTC) Delete and list on Requested Articles. Listy and poorly conceived. 11:45, March 18, 2011 (UTC) Delete.. We need a Mars entry but this isn't it by a long shot, listy and full of awful random humour. Best to trash it and start again. --Zarbag 19:39, March 19, 2011 (UTC) Delete.--Count of Monkey Crisco 01:12, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Or, maybe better yet, it could become a colonization candidate if kept, a frat candidate if huffed. Aleister 11:52 18-3-'11 Abstain. We don't need an article on MegaTexas; we ought to have one on Mars. This is equally disjointed but I don't mind it remaining in mainspace until someone can do better. (As a crap article inhibits some people from writing non-crap, I don't mind if it dies either.) Spıke ¬ 12:52 18-Mar-11 Comment - I really didn't want to see this go so have revised the intro. Anyone want to run with it? --Black Flamingo 18:04, March 19, 2011 (UTC) Kept. Yay, flamingo. 1234 ~ 19:28, 20 March 2011

:Category:Things Which Did Not Happen In 1927

Score: 1
Keep (6)	Keep Doesn't categorize? What the fuck does that mean! MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 23:54, March 17, 2011 (UTC) It's too broad to mean anything useful. We could put just about every article on the site in this cat. (talk) 23:57, March 17, 2011 (UTC) That's the point; congratulations, you have just deconstructed the joke. Seriously.... mAttlobster. (hello) 12:37, March 18, 2011 (UTC) Keep. In my wanderings around the site I seem to have felt a pattern of special love for 1927. Either things that happened in 1927 or didn't happen in 1927. It was a very important year and a turning point in many forms of artistic expression and other fields of endeavor. Not to mention the 1927 Yankees. So a category of things which did not happen in 1927 once again focuses attention on the importance of 1927 on the site. Mike Gazella would appove. Aleister 2:55 18-3-'11 This is silly, but it's a rather funny category to have on the articles with a year in their name (like the presidential elections). -- 08:45, March 18, 2011 (UTC) Keep One of my particular interests is things that didn't happen in 1927, so I use this one often. mAttlobster. (hello) 09:10, March 18, 2011 (UTC) haters gonna hate, 1927 gonna 1927. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:14, March 18, 2011 (UTC) Funny when used sparingly. --Black Flamingo 22:56, March 18, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (7)	Delete. Not funny and doesn't categorize. (talk) 23:51, March 17, 2011 (UTC) Delete or just replace with the category Category:Things which didn't fuck Dexter111344's mom in the kitchen last night. pillow talk 00:00, March 18, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Useless category amuses the author by abusing the reader. Spıke ¬ 00:17 18-Mar-11 Weak Delete Looks like pointless clutter to me, but... -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 03:55, March 18, 2011 (UTC) Delete. per my theory every inside joke does not need to be referenced in every article. --Mn-z 12:03, March 18, 2011 (UTC) This isn't an inside joke. Congratulations on the theory incidentally. mAttlobster. (hello) 12:41, March 18, 2011 (UTC) Delete. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 12:56, March 18, 2011 (UTC) Delete. It's a sacred cow that's past milking.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:17, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	I've trimmed the category of some of its nonsense links. Aleister 12:18 18-3-'11 This category is genuinely hilarious. The text at the top is brilliant. The delete voting here is particually ignorant. mAttlobster. (hello) 19:48, March 18, 2011 (UTC) I'm with the Lobster on this one. You have an incredibly interesting definition of "abuse," Spike. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:15, March 18, 2011 (UTC) Kept. pillow talk 18:19, March 19, 2011 (UTC)

MegaTexas

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete. Overlong, redlinky, unfunny private fantasy. Kept in 2009, 4-7. -- 09:02, March 18, 2011 (UTC)  Burninate! You must have read my mind, Coronium. I was going to VFD this today, but saw it had been voted on before, and that it gets a lot of attention. It's still awful, so I hope we get rid of it this time. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 09:46, March 18, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Unfunny, private joke for an audience of one, currently squatting in the mainspace. To improve it would mean setting aside a good few hours..don't see it as worth it. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:55, March 18, 2011 (UTC) Delete. I didn't even bother to read it past the first paragraph. --Scofield 10:47, March 18, 2011 (UTC) You're not missing anything; it just gets progressively more redlinky. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 11:10, March 18, 2011 (UTC) You should look at the entire article, as one of our jobs here is to see if there's anything in it to salvage. Spıke ¬ 12:50 18-Mar-11 A wholly-owned subsidiary of the planet Mars. Reader is informed early on that there is no comedy theme, nor indeed reason for a page on MegaTexas. Though not one-liners, the article is entirely unconnected Fun Facts. Spıke ¬ 12:50 18-Mar-11 Nil --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 12:52, March 18, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Bicycle helmet

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Ew... Very unfunny and just plain crass. NSFW, by the way. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 04:41, March 18, 2011 (UTC) penispenispenispenis --Scofield 10:55, March 18, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Also, penis. Spıke ¬ 12:57 18-Mar-11 delete. --Black Flamingo 23:02, March 18, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Silicon Dream

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Obliterate. Random fantasy nonsense. 21:03, March 17, 2011 (UTC) Delete. This is not quite English and not quite funny. Author Chrematorious successfully evaded the ICU police in November 2006, and then never contributed again. Spıke ¬ 21:26 17-Mar-11 Delete. (talk) 23:38, March 17, 2011 (UTC) ??? Umm, what? Is this a TV show or something? -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 03:53, March 18, 2011 (UTC) delete. --Black Flamingo 22:53, March 18, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Template:Cheese

Score: 6
Keep (3)	Keep If we delete the category 'Cheese', then we are no better than Jesus. mAttlobster. (hello) 22:58, March 17, 2011 (UTC) This is the template, which serves only to add 3 of the 65 pages into the category. No one is proposing deleting the category. Spıke ¬ 23:32 17-Mar-11 ♪♪ What a Friend We Have in Cheeses ♪♪ CHEESE! MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 23:49, March 17, 2011 (UTC) Useless, yeah. But it made me laugh. --Black Flamingo 22:53, March 18, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (9)	Delete.. Unfunny, useless, only three transclusions, two of which are in userspace. 21:00, March 17, 2011 (UTC) Delete. A single line of nonsense, plus inclusion in one category. Hardly needs to be a template. Spıke ¬ 21:28 17-Mar-11 ho ho ho you think you're funny do ya? Well you're not. -- 21:30, March 17, 2011 (UTC) Obliterate. Worthless. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 21:42, March 17, 2011 (UTC) A splode (talk) 23:09, March 17, 2011 (UTC)  Burninate! A bit of text that really doesn't need its own template. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 03:24, March 18, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Dangerously Cheesy. --Count of Monkey Crisco 06:07, March 18, 2011 (UTC) QVFD --Scofield 10:45, March 18, 2011 (UTC) Delete. more pointless than an average pointless template. --Mn-z 12:04, March 18, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Malcolm in the Shit Hole

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	The more irritating twin of the article below. 20:57, March 17, 2011 (UTC) Really shitty isn't it? Author thinks the TV show is shitty. Spıke ¬ 21:31 17-Mar-11  Burninate! Even more fancruft (or non-fan-cruft, in this case). -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 03:18, March 18, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Other than the quotes, this article is pure vandalism, and probably QVFD worthy. --Scofield 11:07, March 18, 2011 (UTC) delete. --Black Flamingo 22:49, March 18, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Both of these have ugly tags on them and should be deleted today anyway. (talk) 21:12, March 17, 2011 (UTC) An ugly tag isn't, as far as my brain can tell, an automatic huff. It just says that the page may become a candidate for deletion, meaning it may go on VFD. Aleister 11:11 18-3-'11 Chief and ZB routinely with huff articles with expired maintenance tags. (talk) 15:12, March 18, 2011 (UTC) Comment. I admit I did laugh at the title..shame the article gets no where near that promising header. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:41, March 18, 2011 (UTC)

Malcolm in Heaven

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete. Incoherent babble. 20:56, March 17, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Looks a lot like the other one. We nominated this before, and I informed editor Bhind45 on 11-Feb of what was said on VFD, and of my separate problems with the article. He tends to erase comments from his talk page, and repair tags from his articles. Spıke ¬ 21:35 17-Mar-11  Burninate! A pair of articles that are ugly, stupid, pointless and loaded with fancruft. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 03:16, March 18, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Shit. --Scofield 11:08, March 18, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Bizarre. The author managed to write an even worse version of his other article. The only way is er..down..--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:43, March 18, 2011 (UTC) delete. --Black Flamingo 22:45, March 18, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Yaz

Score: -3
Keep (7)	Keep. Not even close to bad enough. (talk) 20:55, March 15, 2011 (UTC) Keep. If J wants it, keep. I'm really up to my face with things being huffed around here. If someone doesn't like a section or if that section doesn't fit, why not just take the time to delete it and improve the article instead of voting to destroy the entire thing? Aleister 8:47 16-3-'11 I do whenever the author points me in a direction, as of course you do too. An article with no evidence that the concept is funny, such as this, doesn't even deserve your exasperation. Spıke ¬ 21:41 16-Mar-11 Doy -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:02, March 16, 2011 (UTC) Keep Why is this here? MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:44, March 17, 2011 (UTC) Bandwagon keep And yeah, this does have potential. --Scofield 11:13, March 18, 2011 (UTC) Bandwagon Keep Per above. mAttlobster. (hello) 12:28, March 18, 2011 (UTC) Keep. --~  15:09, March 18, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (4)	Delete. Article's concept is to treat the subject (a brand of birth control pills) as if it is a planet. The problem is basically that the contents and the effects of the drug are not well known, so none of the jokes are funny unless you painstakingly look them up...so it reads like any other fantasy planet article. 20:07, March 15, 2011 (UTC) Oh, I get it now. The author really should have read HTBFANJS, though. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 11:17, March 17, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Knowing that brand now, I can say that it relates to something, though not well. Except for a mention of hormones and "heat flashes," however, it is essentially ramble about a made-up place. The final section, on the religion of Yaz, was really pulled out of a bodily orifice. Spıke ¬ 21:45 15-Mar-11 Test the power of this fully armed and operational battle station!! Fire at will!! Seriously, it's yet another made up place, one in which the most recognizable feature is a pimple (of all possible things in the Universe, WHY THAT!?) and the most important people are Dr. Phil and Oprah. Strongest Delete Vote Possible. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 11:06, March 17, 2011 (UTC) GOD THIS IS FUCKING BAD!! -- 21:40, March 17, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Wait, the article is actually about something? O_o 1234 ~ 00:33, 18 March 2011 Kept and Spike can archive it. Or he could if he was... er... oh, shut up. 1234 ~ 18:43, 18 March 2011

Eddie Caputo

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. Short and shit. Older versions are long and shit. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:36, March 16, 2011 (UTC) Vanity? I don't know. Delete either way. (talk) 22:43, March 16, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Stubby - the missing eighth dwarf. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:56, March 17, 2011 (UTC) Delete. It's kaput-o. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 08:27, March 17, 2011 (UTC) Delete. All of the above. Spıke ¬ 21:40 17-Mar-11
Comments	Comment. He was a character from the Child's Play series apparently. --Count of Monkey Crisco 23:07, March 16, 2011 (UTC)

Frenchraisin Revolution

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. Nonsense year numbers, nonsense history, and a weak theme. Never answers the important question: Why raisins? --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:12, March 16, 2011 (UTC) Delete. (talk) 22:47, March 16, 2011 (UTC) Delete. This is very nearly Wacky War; and how many flavoured condoms were sacrificed to make Mister Potato Head wink in that illustration? Spıke ¬ 03:13 17-Mar-11 Delete. Nadgers. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:58, March 17, 2011 (UTC) Burninate No point in keeping this if we delete the Raisin Club one. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 10:57, March 17, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Anti Raisin Club

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete. Nonsense year numbers, nonsense history, lists and a weak theme. Never answers the important question: Why raisins? --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:12, March 16, 2011 (UTC) Delete. 1st sentence isn't bad, but goes downhill from there (talk) 22:45, March 16, 2011 (UTC) Obliterate. Simply unfunny. I don't think the concept could be expanded much beyond a few sentences without becoming redundant, so I say make it go away. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 02:36, March 17, 2011 (UTC) Delete. The topic is raisins. How many dumb and unrelated things can you write in two minutes? Spıke ¬ 03:11 17-Mar-11 Delete. A sliver of an idea, filled out with nonsense and bloody lists. Crap. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:00, March 17, 2011 (UTC) EXTERMINATE! OMG, RAISIN LOVERS ARE A BUNCH OF PRETENTIOUS FAGOTS WHO BUM FOXES AND MUST BE DESTROYED. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 14:20, March 17, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Fucked Up Wrasslin' Vol 1

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete. Irritatingly cryptic article about a wrestling event. 21:11, March 16, 2011 (UTC) The match was ended when the Jonas Brothers...beat the living shit out of them. What a fertile imagination! Nothing but lists. Spıke ¬ 21:43 16-Mar-11 Delete. Oooh, that is bad. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:40, March 16, 2011 (UTC) Sigh. (talk) 22:42, March 16, 2011 (UTC) Too... many... memes... Featuring Chuck Norris, the Jonas Brothers, Darth Vader and Lesbians. I'll change the channel, thanks. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 06:14, March 17, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Meddlin' kids. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:02, March 17, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Cardinal Jesse Ventura

Score: 6
Keep (0)	# Keep. I kinda like this one. It's know it's super-random, but since I devoted myself to the creedo of randomness, I actually find this type of thing funny in a juvenile sort of way. Although I admit it does need some photos and an excision of the T-Rex section. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 01:46, March 17, 2011 (UTC) Operation complete, T-Rex obliterated. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 01:51, March 17, 2011 (UTC) Paring down the list and deleting Sexual Tyrannosaurus is an unambiguous improvement. But I see you have adopted the creedo [sic] of crappy articles and have been drawn to the Dark Side of the Force. Teach you, I thought I had. Spıke ¬ 03:08 17-Mar-11 Did I spell that wrong? Oh, I guess I did. (So that's why Firefox was setting off alarms.) Well there, you see how crazy I am! And I had already turned to the Dark Side years ago, so don't worry. Not yours, the failure is. ;-) -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 05:56, March 17, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (6)	Delete. Random, imageless and ugly stub. 21:09, March 16, 2011 (UTC) A God Damn Sexual Tyrannosaurus. Just like me. I was preparing to explain "ugly" photos of Ventura by explaining that Ventura is ugly. But there are no photos here. Another thing there is none of is explanations of why the title refers to Ventura as a Cardinal, except once in the inexplicable final paragraph of the intro. Spıke ¬ 21:37 16-Mar-11 Delete. Cardinal? --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:18, March 16, 2011 (UTC) Delete. (talk) 22:41, March 16, 2011 (UTC) Delete. You're right, Spike, it sucks. I looked at it again and I guess I found it funny in a fit of randomness or maybe too much caffeine. I guess I'm just a sucker for conspiracy theories. Next time I'll just invoke greedo. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 06:00, March 17, 2011 (UTC) Delete.Readymix randumbo. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:04, March 17, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Jean-Claude_Van_Damme

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. Urgghh, too random for words. 20:13, March 15, 2011 (UTC) Weak Delete. I've seen random...er, but most of this is pretty bad. --Count of Monkey Crisco 07:37, March 16, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Some of the quotes at the end have potential, but on the whole, this is terrifyingly atrocious. --Scofield 19:50, March 16, 2011 (UTC) Er... give it a new theme and it'd probably become an entirely different article. One with a theme. 1234 ~ 18:21, 17 March 2011
Comments	Someone who cares, please give this a better theme than animated GIFs. Suggest perhaps that he was the ex-Governor of California. Spıke ¬ 23:07 15-Mar-11

Monk

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete. Nothing really redeems this stub in my opinion. 19:42, March 15, 2011 (UTC) Delete. (talk) 20:51, March 15, 2011 (UTC) Delete. It seems the author mapped monks into a role-playing game because he has no knowledge of anything outside the game. I reined in a few of the most flagrant deviations from the encyclopedia canon, but there is nothing much here but Fun Facts. Spıke ¬ 23:14 15-Mar-11 Delete. Defrock and furnace. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:06, March 17, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Not the most horrible piece I've read, but it's actually not very funny at all. --Scofield 20:34, March 17, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Bastard. ---I have a talking zombie 21:35, March 17, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	I.P.Anon added a final line of listcruft to it, just before it bit the dust. Like that was going to save it. Spıke ¬ 23:36 17-Mar-11

On Steroids

Score: 0
Keep (4)	Keep. This is actually a decent start for the Steroids article. It's a better start than what's there right now. We should delete Steroids and move On Steroids over to that space. pillow talk 19:28, March 15, 2011 (UTC) Keep. per Hyperbole. --~  16:04, March 16, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Too many weak reasons not too keep it, and to err on the side of the angels. Aleister 11:48 17-3-'11 Not too bad -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:26, March 17, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (4)	Delete. I was having a really hard time deciding whether I should nom this article or Steroids, but this article's got a stupid name and possibly slightly worse humour, so I'll slap a rewrite tag on the other one. 18:19, March 14, 2011 (UTC) Delete. The other one's better, and this one is almost empty. Merge what you can. Spıke ¬ 20:17 14-Mar-11 And then the scary man eats it... the scary man should, anyhow. There's so little, and he's so big. But where's the abuse? 1234 ~ 15:06, 15 March 2011  Meh. The other steroids is better, so I say get rid of this one under the pretext of redundancy. We could always put the "on steroids" stuff in the other article. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 08:34, March 17, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. I see what they're trying to accomplish. If done properly this article would be a dissection of a overused comedic simile X is like Y ON STEROIDS (example: a cello is like a violin ON STEROIDS). That joke, if you can call it such, wore out its welcome a while ago and is still a standby for lame comedy writers. If done right we could get a deconstruction of a joke that's past its prime, like The Aristocrats, unfortunately this is just a halfhearted, badly planned stab in the right direction.--Count of Monkey Crisco 09:26, March 15, 2011 (UTC) Carped. 1234 ~ 22:17, 17 March 2011

Poopie

Score: 7
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (7)	It's poopie. -- 02:55, March 16, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Vigilance. Spıke ¬ 03:11 16-Mar-11 Delete. The title is misleading. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 03:36, March 16, 2011 (UTC) Obliterate. (talk) 03:41, March 16, 2011 (UTC) In Jim Carrey Voice, Aaaaaaahl-righty, then. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 04:05, March 16, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Maybe we should flush it down to Illogicopedia. --Scofield 19:54, March 16, 2011 (UTC) BUTT POOP. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 20:28, March 16, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	U forgot the VFD tag, again. --Scofield 19:52, March 16, 2011 (UTC) Yes, clean up your pets' poopie and don't wait for the poopsmith. Spıke ¬ 21:38 16-Mar-11 Does this mean it has to be renommed? I volunteer. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 01:40, March 17, 2011 (UTC) No, it's been supplied. Otherwise, you'd see an even more intimidating Invalid nom. Spıke ¬ 01:44 17-Mar-11 *considers slapping an Invalid nom on it just to annoy everyone* 1234 ~ 04:02, 17 March 2011 Invalid nom. In unrelated news, I abused my temporary admin powers and deleted it. pillow talk 04:19, March 17, 2011 (UTC) It's much appreciated! -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 06:08, March 17, 2011 (UTC)

Ramsbottom, England‎

Score: -1
Keep (3)	Keep. Surely not original humor, but it's funny enough. Spıke ¬ 04:36 14-Mar-11 Keep. Rams bottom. Someone made a joke. hahahahahahahaha heeheeheeheeha haha huh? Aleister 18:03 14-3-'11 Keep. I don't hate any part of it. It's sort of OK. --Count of Monkey Crisco 00:27, March 17, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (2)	...okay, I honestly forgot why I added the VFD tag, and looking at the article would take effort, but I'm sure I had a reason. o_O 1234 ~ 03:59, 14 March 2011 Probably the apostrophe at the start of the second paragraph. Spıke ¬ 04:36 14-Mar-11 Delete. Stubby and not particularly promising. 17:25, March 14, 2011 (UTC) Kept. 72 hours and -1. pillow talk 04:20, March 17, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

St. Felcher of Tossbagia

Score: 5
Keep (1)	Weak keep. This is utterly juvenile and I don't like it very much. But it has a consistent concept, the prose is good, the comedic timing feels right... I feel like I'd be voting to delete this because it's not to my taste rather than because it's low-quality. pillow talk 22:19, March 15, 2011 (UTC) In the gutter on an even keel, as it were? Spıke ¬ 23:05 15-Mar-11
Delete (6)	General nonsense. Product having not read that thing. (talk) 21:04, March 15, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Poorly known brother of St. Cuntis of Jewbagia. 'Nuff said. Spıke ¬ 21:42 15-Mar-11 Delete. No point keeping as it can't be improved and the original author has left. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:39, March 16, 2011 (UTC) Delete. irritating. -- 17:01, March 16, 2011 (UTC) Delete. ugh. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 17:28, March 16, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Tedious. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:20, March 16, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

iGovernment

Score: 0
Keep (3)	Keep. I don't think it's bad enough. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:42, 14 March 2011 Keep Since when were stubs considered the scourge of the site? MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 17:23, March 14, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Aleister 8:50 16-3-'11
Delete (3)	Unless someone wants to write an actual article here, I say we snuff this. 1234 ~ 01:30, 14 March 2011 Delete. There could be a concept along these lines: force-fit government to the iPod/iPad. (In fact, UnNews (notably Funnybony) toyed with this when it came out.) This author knows little of the workings of government and his instant humor of preceding everything with "i" (or "u" in Arabia) is trite the second time he turns to it. Spıke ¬ 01:41 14-Mar-11 iDelete. So much iPod based humor on Uncyclopedia, so little good iPod based humor on Uncyclopedia. --Count of Monkey Crisco 09:29, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Kept. 1234 ~ 00:17, 17 March 2011

Triple Barreled Shotgun

Score: 1
Keep (2)	Keep. Strangely enough, I don't find this deletion worthy at all. --Scofield 14:40, March 13, 2011 (UTC) Not bad enough, there are probably thousands of pages worse than this one to aim at. Aleister 21:15 13-3-'11
Delete (3)	Groan-worthy nonsense about a hypothetical weapon. 14:04, March 13, 2011 (UTC) I laughed at "but now it can have three and the recoil can break your shoulder and paralyze you!" but everything else is so, so unfunny. This page isn't worth keeping. pillow talk 17:54, March 14, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Decommission and recycle. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:20, March 14, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Fixable. The concept is inherently good, but the current article provides virtually no humor beyond the concept. Some of the illustrations don't help either. Spıke ¬ 14:59 13-Mar-11 I once called PuppyOnTheRadio the Simon Cowell of this website. I must now say that I was thoroughly mistaken. The title belongs to you, Coronium. --Scofield 19:21, March 13, 2011 (UTC) Who's Simon Cowell ? If he's someone who makes impulsive and stubborn judgements about things you're probably right. 21:39, March 13, 2011 (UTC) Cowell is the guy who tells American Idol contestants they suck. I claimed the title a year ago on my user page. Spıke ¬ 22:07 13-Mar-11 Kept. Not enough interest in deletion to justify deletion. pillow talk 17:34, March 16, 2011 (UTC)

Executive Compensation

Score: 0
Keep (2)	Keep. This is an acceptable stub. 14:00, March 13, 2011 (UTC) Could be brilliant. Stumbles out of the gate with overlong quotes. His theories of causation are dumb and less funny than the real thing. An article that broaches the theme of Class Warfare has to stay playful and not preachy. Spıke ¬ 11:20 13-Mar-11 Keep. lol at the two pics and captions. Again, an intelligent page, well written in parts, and not nearly bad enough to huff. Could be worked on further, although not bad as is, imnho. Aleister 4:00 14-3-'11
Delete (2)	This could be brilliant, but the presentation of whatever it is is so poor I'm not even sure what it is. 1234 ~ 11:05, 13 March 2011 Delete. (Formerly Keep.) I gave a sardonic treatment to labor-management relations in Work (FA). I can't do anything with this, especially after an afternoon reading real people in my local newspaper make some of the same gripes about wealth disparity. This author just doesn't know why the boss should make more than he does--the boss can't know more, after all. Author couldn't make it funny--not with Bible quotes, not with <math>--and neither can I. Spıke ¬ 01:53 14-Mar-11
Comments	Kept. After three days, it is clear that no one cares about deleting this article. pillow talk 17:33, March 16, 2011 (UTC)

Shithead McFuck

Score: 7
Keep (1)	Keep. The title made me laugh. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 20:59, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (8)	Delete. Some strange conflation of The Usual Suspects and stuff a third grader thinks is funny. Mostly ramble from 2006. Exactly as good as you might expect and article called Shithead Mcfuck would be.--Count of Monkey Crisco 09:19, March 15, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Delete the living crap out of this. Thankies. ---I have a talking zombie 14:08, March 15, 2011 (UTC) It tastes like squicken. It's not supposed to taste like squicken... did someone get noodles in the playdoh? 1234 ~ 14:59, 15 March 2011 Delete. And the intro dithers about whether the article's subject exists or not. Spıke ¬ 16:18 15-Mar-11 Delete.Crap..I mean shit. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:22, March 15, 2011 (UTC) send it into nonexistence quickly please 18:11, March 15, 2011 (UTC) Titshugger Penishead McFucknutter it ain't. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:08, March 15, 2011 (UTC) EXTERMINATE! Pardon my French, but there is too much "shit" in this one to make it anywhere near worth saving. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 04:12, March 16, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Marcel Duchamp, master of ready mades

Score: 0
Keep (1)	Nom and keep What better way to whore an article than nom it for deletion? User:Mrthejazz/sig 06:00, March 16, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (1)	Delete. For misuse of the VFD page. --Count of Monkey Crisco 07:28, March 16, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Wrestlecrap.com

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. This article's only vehicle of humour is scatological. 20:17, March 14, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Ditto. Spıke ¬ 20:48 14-Mar-11 Delete. The real Wrestlecrap.com is a modestly funny showcase of bad storylines and gimmicks in pro wrestling and it's still thousands of times funnier than this. --Count of Monkey Crisco 09:44, March 15, 2011 (UTC) Eww. 1234 ~ 15:15, 15 March 2011 Delete. Some teen upset with something or other.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:24, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Unwhoregiven

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. Short, crufty, listy.... 18:14, March 14, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Battle of the battling memes! Spıke ¬ 18:22 14-Mar-11 Delete. Cobblers. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:08, March 15, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Kinda hurt to read. --Count of Monkey Crisco 09:36, March 15, 2011 (UTC) It's so boring. Mummy, where are the scissors? I could make things more interesting. Bloody is interesting, isn't it? Good blood. Not the bad blood. 1234 ~ 15:12, 15 March 2011
Comments

The Great American Ho-down

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. Irritating article about a fantasy wrestling tournament. 18:12, March 14, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Grade-school intro, then a load of one-liners. Spıke ¬ 18:20 14-Mar-11 Delete. Junior Wrestling Uncyclopedia --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:12, March 15, 2011 (UTC) Carrots! But... but it lied! There aren't any carrots! 1234 ~ 15:13, 15 March 2011 Delete. I can live without this. pillow talk 19:29, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Total Nonstop Action Snooker

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. Ugly and random article about a wrestling promotion. 17:39, March 14, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Supremely annoying. Reads like a child's fantasy wrestling league. pillow talk 17:45, March 14, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Bad fancruft. Gay, shitty, "sucks a lot of "balls". Get it?" Spıke ¬ 17:52 14-Mar-11 Delete. For those watching in b/w, the pink ball is behind the yellow. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:14, March 15, 2011 (UTC) What... get... ice cream? 1234 ~ 15:14, 15 March 2011
Comments

The substance left at the bottom of a squeezy bottle

Score: 3
Keep (2)	Keep. Not bad enough to delete, in my honest opinion. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:35, 14 March 2011 Keep MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 14:04, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (5)	Delete. This is a funny subject, but the execution is random and unfunny. 17:30, March 14, 2011 (UTC) Really just not coherent or funny at all. pillow talk 17:40, March 14, 2011 (UTC) Delete. What's in this bottle is gassy. Spıke ¬ 17:49 14-Mar-11 Delete.Tries too hard, gets too little out of it. --Count of Monkey Crisco 17:57, March 14, 2011 (UTC) I made it better or something. But whatever. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:58, 14 March 2011 I'm still going to rape you. pillow talk 04:20, March 15, 2011 (UTC) :O —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:16, 15 March 2011 But it is. It is what it is. What is it? 1234 ~ 15:20, 15 March 2011 Is this vote supposed to make sense somehow? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:12, 16 March 2011
Comments	Kept. Sorry guys, not enough delete votes. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:21, 15 March 2011 Meh, I feel a bit irritated that you closed the nom. only just after 24 hours when there were more than twice the number of deletes than keeps, and you were in the keep minority. Can't we give this discussion some more time ? 20:09, March 15, 2011 (UTC) Concur; it wasn't consensus by our rules, but it was moving in that direction. Let it play out. Spıke ¬ 23:16 15-Mar-11 I don't make the rules, you guys. Granted, I might abuse 'em once in a while. But really, the rules shouldn't dress so slutty. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:12, 16 March 2011 As far as I can see he did nothing wrong. The rules clearly state "Allow at least 24 hours before closing a nomination or deleting an article. Typically a +5 vote is needed to delete an article." -- 00:37, March 16, 2011 (UTC)

Eon8

Score: 11
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (11)	Delete. Sucks. --~  13:27, March 14, 2011 (UTC) Er... What? -- 15:32, March 14, 2011 (UTC) Delete. WTF? Is this page insulting my grandma's sexuality? NOT AGAIN! ---I have a talking zombie 15:36, March 14, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Animated GIFs and random numbers. If someone's going to tell me there's hidden significance: I don't care. Spıke ¬ 16:47 14-Mar-11 Er... 1234 ~ 17:04, 14 March 2011 EXTERMINATE! AGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHH! 17:31, March 14, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Giving computer programmers a bad name again. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:22, March 14, 2011 (UTC) Huh? --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 19:49, March 14, 2011 (UTC) DIE!!! Cat the Colourful (Feed Me!!!)Leave me alone... 07:04, March 15, 2011 Delete. What the hell is this? --Scofield 13:54, March 15, 2011 (UTC) Obliterate. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:16, 15 March 2011
Comments

Pope Cannon

Score: -2
Keep (4)	Keep. Not horrible, a few minutes work could do wonders (how long did it take to nom the page? hint, hint). Pope cannon. Aleister 11:57 13-3-'11 Keep. This is inane but quite funny. 13:09, March 13, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Not quite bad enough to delete, methinks. It does need work, though; good concept, bad execution. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 08:42, March 14, 2011 (UTC) Keep. That's actually pretty fucking funny. This is closer to an embryonic feature than to being delete-worthy. pillow talk 18:03, March 14, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (2)	A crazy and potentially amusing notion, it unfortunately doesn't do anything with it. It's just sort of there. And there's some stuff. Okay. 1234 ~ 09:36, 13 March 2011 A dud. The concept--kill the Pope with a cannon--fails. The execution fails too: Intro states the author's deliciously creative plan, and everything else is lists. Any repair would have to be a complete rewrite, and any time would be better spent anywhere else. Spıke ¬ 11:02 13-Mar-11 The concept isn't "Kill the Pope with a cannon." The concept is "Since the Pope has to travel so often, just build a cannon at the Vatican so you can fire him to various other cities." pillow talk 18:04, March 14, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Misses the obvious pun in canon v cannon. The Vatican has plenty of canons in their legal department. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:24, March 14, 2011 (UTC) I added a red-link for New Mexico's Pope Canyon. If our expert on armaments and Papism is on this one, I'll retract my opposition. Spıke ¬ 10:34 14-Mar-11 KEPT. 1234 ~ 14:50, 15 March 2011

Vector calculus

Score: 4
Keep (3)	Reworked. Vector calculus is a notable, real subject. I condensed the quotes; the intro is random and awful. But the sections, Grad, Div, and Curl--they should be comic-book heroes, and you've got an article. Spıke ¬ 01:33 13-Mar-11 I'm confused. Are you saying this would be a good article if it was completely rewritten? Cuz that's kind of the point in deleting it. (talk) 01:37, March 13, 2011 (UTC) I'm saying I'm working on it...that's all I'm saying.... Spıke ¬ 01:48 13-Mar-11 Spiked mAttlobster. (hello) 11:36, March 13, 2011 (UTC) Keep. This was good to begin with, esp. the quotes, and Spike is doing something with it. Aleister 14:17 13-3-'11 Oh, go on, then. 1234 ~ 21:46, 13 March 2011
Delete (7)	Delete. Unless there is something I'm not getting then this just random and stupid. (talk) 00:48, March 13, 2011 (UTC) Okay -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:46, March 13, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Ugly and unfunny. -- 08:53, March 13, 2011 (UTC) Tell me when you're done. Meantime, keep working, Spikey-poo. 1234 ~ 09:09, 13 March 2011 I'm done. I claim it is keepable--and, regrettably, I don't remember enough vector calculus to contribute more double entendres, which would help. I let stand two regions of the original goofiness; they aren't side-splitting but have a little charm. Spıke ¬ 10:54 13-Mar-11 Hmph. 1234 ~ 10:56, 13 March 2011 Delete. Vector calculus and soup? Those douchebags even ripped off Hyperbole's avatar image! This calls for a huff! --Scofield 12:09, March 13, 2011 (UTC) I am the douchebag who did that. If you can find a better avatar for the "Curl," feel free to substitute. Spıke ¬ 13:11 13-Mar-11 Not that one, Aleister! Something with curls Spıke ¬ 13:30 13-Mar-11 Delete. Per use of Hyperbole's avatar image. Why?:Why? Aleister 13:43 13-3-'11 Just not funny, sorry. I was hoping for a good Maths article.--Sog1970 17:54, March 14, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Vector calculus=/=funny --Count of Monkey Crisco 06:23, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	I changed my mind again. 1234 ~ 18:34, 14 March 2011 Keepable/better if I cut out the goofy stuff in the vicinity of the two bulleted lists? Spıke ¬ 20:51 14-Mar-11 It's more just the entire notion of the thing doesn't work. 1234 ~ 10:13, 15 March 2011 Kept. This whole nomination is a mess, so we'll err on the side of keeping it. If anyone feels strongly about it in a month, feel free to re-nom. pillow talk 19:31, March 15, 2011 (UTC) I appreciate that; went back and re-began the intro in a new direction based on misreading Wikipedia. Spıke ¬ 23:18 15-Mar-11