User talk:Under user/Archive 17

Surprise sex

Surprise! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:28, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

signpost 16/4

look, i even used your weird date convention in the header! anyway, i added one more ban which makes it pretty at my resolution. i have to say i'm happy with the issue overall. now who is around to deliver it? SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:49, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Well, I tried THEDUDEMAN as I recall he mentioned he my be about with THEDUDEBOT, but no response. I haven't seen N, Skull or Manty recently... Er, we're running out of paperbots! I'd try and set one up myself but I have no clue how to.... Any bright ideas of your own? I'm happy with the issue as well - neither of us had to work too hard on it! ;-D --UU - natter 15:01, Apr 16

Shall I hand-deliver it? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:05, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

would you be willing to do that, sock? i've got a pocketful of robot snacks waiting if you feel up to it... SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:21, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

I wouldn't mind doing it. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:23, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

if you're eager/bored/really want to do it for some reason, you can start anytime; otherwise you can wait and see if someone with a bot shows up. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:26, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

I'll do it right away. On a related note, it seems there are two pages that can't be edited for some reason. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:30, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

cram it into every mailbox you can. if someone isn't around to fix their talk page, odds are they aren't around to read the paper, so don't worry about it. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:38, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

I made it to UU's talkpage! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:54, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

I'm finally finished! Yay! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:20, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

UnSignpost April 16th, 2009

The Uncyclopedia UnSignpost

The Newspaper Not Secretly Controlled By Mordillo, We Swear!

April 16th, 2009 • Issue 43 • It's News Because We Tell You It Is

Latest Poo Lit Leads to Quality Flood on VFH By DrStrange The 7th edition of the Poo Lit Surprise has come to a close! This installment of Uncyclopedia's bi-annual competition featured an interesting amount of tie scores given directly by individual judges as well as being present in the overall scores. Recent competitions have featured much more decisive scoring but this time around the points were more evenly distributed amongst the entries. As the winning and co-winning entries hit VFH, we're seeing levels of voting that haven't been seen in a while. The first article nominated to VFH from the competition also came with a bold prediction by one numbskull, who questioned his existence if Karl Lagerfeld did not receive 20  For. votes. At 03:57, 11 April 2009 the 20th For vote was cast by Thekillerfroggy and it's safe to say that the author of this instant Uncyclopedia classic should be considered the overall champion with his three entries garnering him two first place articles and one second place finish. Unscrupulous Unsignpost reporters stalked found Modusoperandi while he was receiving longevity treatments in a Côte d'Azur country club and asked him the following softball question: "Who was your favorite character in the 70's hit sitcom Barney Miller?" to which he answered "While each member of the cast had appeal, as each represented part of America's "Melting Pot", I found the comparatively minor character of Inspector Frank Luger (far right), with his high state of partly-sober curmudgeonitude, to be especially charming." One of our winners was not only a perfect 1/1 by winning the best rewrite category with Money but Sycamore also received the vaunted Writer of the Month trophy for March 2009! Another plink user that fared well with plink his outright victory in the best plink mainspace article category was GlobalTourniquet, plink who wrote an article titled with a plink name that is difficult plink to recollect at the moment plonk. He also had two other entries that received 1st runner-up status, so it was a good showing for the artist formerly known as Thomas Pynchon's left Nut. A user that happens to wander in and write us an offering on occasion claimed a share of first place in the alternative namespace category with the UnNews article Obama unveils education reform plans. Monika should drop in more often! Worst 100 of the Year Stumbles to 10 Things by UU The ever-popular Uncyclopedia Worst 100 Reflections series proves it is as popular as ever! As this great year of Our Lord 2009 passes the midpoint of April, the latest iteration has just limped past 10 items, although one or two of them carry a subtle whiff of vanity. According to our resident math boffins here at Signpost Towers, we are exactly "a bit over a quarter of the way through the year, but not yet a third of the way", and so therefore should have precisely "a few more Worst Reflections than this so far". There are several schools of thought as to why this situation has been allowed to arise. One gaining currency among quite literally possibly some Uncyclopedians is that everyone on the site is so busy producing quality material that they just don't have time to devote to such frivolities. However, the continued existence and rate of progress of Forum:Count to a million neatly quashes that theory. Another hypothesis advanced by as many as no or fewer people is that precisely nothing of any interest to anyone has happened, either on this wiki or on the interwebs in general this year. However, while this is significantly more likely than the first theory, the generally accepted explanation seems to be that, quite simply and predictably, Uncyclopedia is the worst.

Check out these pages! Et tu, brute? Define "active" Jokes are serious business From our logs: 03:28, 16 April 2009 TheLedBalloon (Talk | contribs) blocked Obama (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 1 week ‎ (Stick to fixing the US's economy--Uncyclopedia editing is not your thing.) 20:34, 14 April 2009 Under user (Talk | contribs) blocked 85.164.152.104 (Talk) with an expiry time of 1 week ‎ (blanking spree? go find something more interesting to do, like sticking your head in an anthill) 20:02, 11 April 2009 Modusoperandi (Talk | contribs) blocked 93.131.36.107 (Talk) with an expiry time of 1 week ‎ (I'm gradually blanking you. Jerk.) 06:25, 10 April 2009 Roman Dog Bird (Talk | contribs) blocked SquintyK (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 1 day ‎ (14 year olds shouldn't be having sex / whatever the hell it is you're doing.) Biopic of the Week Dexter111344 has the distinction of being the most well-known Uncyclopedian with the most numbers in his name (besides 5P4N6). As a newly coronated poopsmith, he helps take out the garbage on a regular basis. This is just one of many thankless tasks he carries out; he also occasionally volunteers as a paperboy and botanist, and is known for keeping douches in their place. If you see something awesome, and are wondering if Dexter did it, the answer is: "probably". And if he didn't...you know who did... Old School Featured Article of the Week Waiting for Godot is a questioning of the fundamental core of our existence, the foundation on which our moral and social codes are built; the uncertainty of Godot's identity, coupled with the stark, unembellished style of the whole play, poses some powerful questions about our own identities. What the hell are you talking about? I dunno, but it sounds intelligent. Cajek-related Question Posed via Ban of the Week 11:15, 23 October 2008 Codeine (Talk | contribs) blocked Cajek (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of a pronounciation ‎ (How *do* you pronounce your username?) And the answer, for those who care. Bad Dog of the Week DogNewspaper, lovable mascot of the UnSignpost, appearing on the right, will not be appearing in this week's issue. This decision was based on various infractions by DogNewspaper, most notably the Easter presents that were left in an editor's shoe. Look for DogNewspaper to return next week with his monthly piece on mailman defense.

UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox

Hand-delivered by —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:54, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

I noticed your crack

--ing down on pee-booking violators! Well done about time somebody did something about that. Also Mass Effect seems to be quite fun so far. bit too much story though. and do these conversation choices have any bearing on what happens later? to be honest I know nothing about this game, I only bought it because you and Mordillo were talking about it and I felt left out. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 15:33 17 April 2009

Too much story? This may not be your game, if that's how you see it - it's really more of an RPG than a shooty game, although there is plenty of shooting as well. I like it. As to the choices - one or two may have a bit of a bearing on later on. They're supposed to be building the sequel so that every major decision in the first game makes a difference to it. Could be interesting. --UU - natter 15:46, Apr 17

I get on ok with RPG's, it's just the cut scenes, so far at least, seem to drag a little, occasionally feels like I'm watching Lord of the Rings without the orcs. I'll reserve proper judgement until later though, to be honest I still haven't figured out how to change weapons. Anyway just thought I'd say because then I can be part of your gang. Or is this like the time I got The Simpsons sticker book at the end of the term? and no one was impressed by it's completion after teh summer. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 15:56 17 April 2009

Heh, I still play it, although that's partly because I can't afford many new games right now so extract every last drop of enjoyment from the ones I have. I agree the cut scenes can drag a little (at least on subsequent playthroughs they can be skipped, in the main). You may find you get bored of the side-missions, as they do get very samey, but the main story, I think, is very good. --UU - natter 16:09, Apr 17

Danke schön!

FROM THE DESK OF GUILDENSTERNENSTEIN

Thank you for supporting my recently featured article

Your support is greatly appreciated.

—Guildensternenstein

---

Mudkip

You're a sysop (admin, whatever), right?Can you put in Mudkip or Communism because they're protected! – Preceding unsigned comment added by Bad Shroom (talk • contribs)

Hi there. Hmm, first thing: please remember to sign your posts with 4 tildes (~~~~) as it says in the welcome message on your talk page. Next: I'm no expert on the Mudkip, but it looks to me as if it's already on that page. Also, those pages are only protected against unregistered users, as far as I can see - you should be able to edit them, I would have thought. --UU - natter 16:18, Apr 19

Oh.It doesn't work.--Bad Shroom 16:18, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

I've checked, protection definitely isn't sysop only, so give it another day or two, you should be able to edit them. Also, be careful when editing talk pages: don't remove any content that other users have added, OK? --UU - natter 16:26, Apr 19

It's ba-ack

Racist Bear hath returned from the dead and somehow become ICU'd? --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 16:19, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

In which case, I'll get to delete it next week. I may have a word with that guy though. --UU - natter 16:22, Apr 19

I thought that it was delete on sight for recreated one liners? Also dang yunguns, in my day we could edit proper dagnabbit, and all we had were candles and Cajeks to work with! --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 16:24, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Sometimes it is, depends. In this case, it got recreated and a bit more content was added, I think, so they may be looking to work on it, so we'll see if the ICU provokes anything, and if it doesn't, it'll be gone in a week. Now if you'll excuse me, I have a roast chicken to get out of the oven and devour. Good evening/morning. --UU - natter 16:28, Apr 19

Also, what's a "Cajek"? --UU - natter 16:28, Apr 19

My pee review

Hey, I was checking out the maintenance log on Cajek's userpage, and i'm pretty sure you counted my Stone the Israeli Tank review twice. Is this unintentional, or intentional? Saberwolf116 16:38, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

I never do anything intentionally. I even typed this by accident while trying to open a can of coke. I'll have a look shortly. --UU - natter 12:13, Apr 20

Thanks!

FROM THE DESK OF GUILDENSTERNENSTEIN

Thank you for supporting my recently featured article

Your support is greatly appreciated.

—Guildensternenstein

---

Cocks!

Congratulations, you finally realized you were an admin! —Sir SysRq (talk) 14:13, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Oh no! A sign of the impending apocalypse! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:17, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Cocks!? Where! ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 14:29 21 April 2009

butthole —Sir SysRq (talk) 22:30, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Cocks in whose butthole? --UU - natter 08:01, Apr 22

His the sod. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 09:39 22 April 2009

Thank You!

The doctor will see you now Oh, by the way, before we begin todays session, I'd like to thank you for supporting my recent featured article. Now, tell me about your childhood.-- You know what the music means... Our time is up.

singpost 23/4

afternoon, UU. it's delivery day and i see we're a little lacking in the content department. will you be dredging something up from that sewer you reside in, or shall i polish it off? i believe the dudeman was eager to deliver, so should be no problems there. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:42, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

How do Gerry - I've been meaning to get to the Signpost all day but honestly, this day has redefined the word "insane". Seriously, muchos shit has gone down. I am now here for about 5 minutes before having to be somewhere else. I seem to have said this a lot recently, but I just don't have the time for Signposts - have you got any ideas up the sleeves of your hockey shirt? (If not, I suggest just moving the ban smackdown into the main article and going with that). Shit, I need to find time to check all the reviews as well. I'll get that tomorrow evening, I do have that free at least! I think I'm going to start pestering Orian to write more stuff for us - it's not like he has anything better to do (/me waits for Orian to appear in 5... 4... 3...) Now, I just have time to request a review, and then I'm off again - will it never end? (I owe you about ten drinks if we ever meet up as well Gerry). --UU - natter 18:59, Apr 23

not a problem at all, my good chum. i've always got a few article ideas kicking around behind the old mask. i can dust off the review-checking stick as well, that should ease up your already-full admin plate. as for the drinks, i've always wanted to visit the british isles...perhaps that can be arranged in the mid-distant future. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 19:26, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks again Gerry - great job as always! --UU - natter 08:12, Apr 24

But I can't! I'm far too busy looking for work! ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 20:36 23 April 2009

I could help with that - a fortnight ban should give you plenty of time to concentrate... --UU - natter 08:12, Apr 24

Do you mind helping with Pokemon Island?Some other users need to edit it or it might be deleted.--Bad Shroom 20:44, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Sorry dude - read those comments above, I don't have time to work on the things I want to do, let alone help with things I don't really get. My recommendation is that you get a pee review and work on the suggestions you get there. Good luck! --UU - natter 08:12, Apr 24

UnSignpost 23rd April 09

The Uncyclopedia UnSignpost

The Newspaper That DOESN'T Think It's Better Than You!

April 23rd, 2009 • Issue 44 • Spamming Your Talkpage Since 2008

Conservation Week Largely Ignored By UnCommunity By Gerrycheevers Uncyclopedia is currently halfway through its bi-annual (semi-annual?) rewriting extravaganza, lovingly referred to as Conservation Week. Every six months, members of this silly wiki partake in the practice of pruning, hacking, nurturing, feeding, and otherwise bothering the 'trees' of the site, which is the running metaphor for 'article'. From the greatest feature machine to the lowliest n00b, everyone can participate in Conservation Week by simply finding a sub-par article and making it better via trimming or adding content, or just plain magic. However, our special investigator DogNewspaper (pictured) has discovered that this so-called Rewrite-a-Thon is not the all-encompassing entity it is meant to be. In fact, normal operations such as VFD, VFH, and the Cajek Ban Joke Factory have not ground to a halt as they clearly should during this special fortnight. Users were puzzled by this revelation; RabbiTechno admitted that he has "little idea what 99.9% of the whole site is all about," and he elaborated that without his constant vigilance, UnNews would surely deteriorate into a third-rate media parody, which this reporter can verify is true. Known conservation standouts have also shockingly participated in non-rewrite-related activities during the designated tree-hugging week. Dexter111344, reigning Greasy Mechanic, blamed the inclement weather, nosy librarians, and the almighty Zeus. Or maybe he just rewrote Zeus, but the librarian part was true for sure. UnSignpost Reporter Subtly Mentions Vigilance Week In Article; Chaos Ensues By Gerrycheevers In the April 23rd, 2009 edition of the UnSignpost, masked co-chief-editor Gerrycheevers covertly linked the word 'vigilance' to Uncyclopedia's Vigilance Week page, inciting riots and mass panic among Uncyclopedians site-wide. Vigilance Week, the mere mention of which often inspires multiple forums where users argue and complain in bold or even italic font, is a period where the rules of article deletion are relaxed, and the worst articles on Uncyclopedia are loaded into the basement of the British Houses of Parliament and blown up using comical amounts of gunpowder. The last Vigilance Week reportedly occured in September/October 2007, resulting in the death of borderline humorous articles by the dozens. The horrific memories of that week have greatly affected some Uncyclopedians, who remain extremely charged about the issue to this day. For example, Modusoperandi recalled his experience when asked to comment on Vigilance Week, saying, "Certainly. What's "Vigilance Week"?" Other users were similarly shocked, as V-Week, as it has come to be known, was described as "unmemorable" by one user, and "get off my lawn" by another. However, the passion that Vigilance Week stirs up is negligent when compared to the shitstorm that results upon the mention of that black sheep of Uncyclopedia holidays: Forest Fire Week. This period in the Fall of 2006, when Uncyc was still really an infant in wiki-years, saw over 3000 articles deleted, more than 15% the total website content at the time. In fact, this very article will probably merit at least one forum regarding FFW despite this periodical's poor circulation and low-quality electrons. At press time, the subtle link to Vigilance Week had caused a medium-sized riot, with hordes of angry users tipping over cars in the Uncyclopedia Parking Structure and setting the animals in the Uncyclopedia Zoo loose. The Cabal is poised to get involved by seizing all media outlets and gener- ATTENTION COMMONERS. ALL IS WELL. THERE WILL BE NO OCCURENCES OF ANY DELETION WEEKS OF ANY KIND. FURTHERMORE, COMEDIC ALLOWANCES WILL HEREBY BE INCREASED FROM 80 GRAMS TO 65 GRAMS. THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE DOING OF THE CABAL, AS THERE IS NO CABAL. GOODNIGHT, AND HAVE A PLEASANT TOMORROW.

Check out these pages! The forum is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue. Ye olde forum Something about TV and magic From our logs: 10:38, 20 April 2009 Under user (Talk | contribs) blocked 92.40.56.191 (Talk) with an expiry time of 1 day ‎(DON'T BLANK PAGES (also, don't shout. Thanks!)) 12:05, 21 April 2009 Todd Lyons (Talk | contribs) blocked Sockpuppet of an unregistered user (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 0 seconds ‎(Thinking impure thoughts about Ricki Lake) 13:26, 21 April 2009 Mordillo (Talk | contribs) blocked 168.216.48.30 (Talk) with an expiry time of 2 weeks ‎(If you're that bored go and find a solution for the world hunger. Trust me, you'll be much more popular) Biopic of the Week In another installment of Uncylopedia Legends, Procopius is a user you might never have heard of due to his recent inactivity. Without so much as a fancy sig or a new-fangled typewriter, he cranked out feature after feature. His contributions to the medium of misinformation were also well received. Procopius was merely a hard-working blue collar Uncyclopedian, and is hereby recognized by this periodical as awesome. Old School Featured Article of the Week The mere mention of the great Procopius brings to mind one of his greatest masterpieces, The white guy in All-4-One. In this intellectually stimulating article, the mystery of a successful R&B group having a caucasian member is discussed at length. Incidentally, the white male in question has joined the search for an answer to the conundrum, which remains elusive to this day. Cajek-inspired ban-smackdown of the week 08:52, 22 April 2009 Sannse (Talk | contribs) blocked Cajek (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 643 seconds ‎(Oh look, a blatant attempt to get a mention in the UnSignpost) 08:57, 22 April 2009 Modusoperandi (Talk | contribs) blocked Sannse (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 6 seconds ‎(Wups. Sorry. I thought you were Cajek.) 09:06, 22 April 2009 Mordillo (Talk | contribs) blocked Sannse (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 123 years ‎(Damn our evil wikian masters trying to overtake our newspaper. Revolt! REVOLT I SAY!) 09:07, 22 April 2009 Under user (Talk | contribs) blocked Modusoperandi (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 13 seconds ‎(thought you were Spartacus) 09:10, 22 April 2009 Mordillo (Talk | contribs) blocked Under user (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 14 seconds ‎(No no, I'm Spartacus) Underdog of the Week Rogue ball of tumbleweed recently exploded onto the Uncyclopedia scene, earning a few fractions of votes for N00b of the Month. Despite mild support, it seems fellow n00b YKWTMM is set to take the coveted badge home this month, with an unprecedented 'several' votes. Nevertheless, the UnSignpost would like to recognize Tumbleweed for his resilience and moxie.

UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox

9001(bot)  22:40, Apr 23

How are yous and such

I don't believe I've asked, how are things these days now you have ascended to admin? Congrats on that btw. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 09:36, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Isn't the phrase "descended"? Actually, that change in status co-incided with my business going into the busiest phase I've ever known, resulting in me being less active on here, and not writing... er... anything, really (a swift re-write and the odd Signpost notwithstanding). Things are seriously hectic at UU Towers, and have been for a couple of months - I guess it's better to be busy in a recession than be in fear of your job, but man I'm struggling. Banning 'tards is about all that keeps me going! I want to actually do some work on that collab you suggested about 3 years ago, finish the collab I've got with Mordillo, write about 9 articles I have good ideas for and generally do stuff I love to do, but I can't see when it will happen. How about you? How's life treating you? Gearing up to enjoy another one-sided Ashes? (Seriously, your lot are going to paste us) Planning any new articles of your own? It'd do my heart good to see a new slice of DJI goodness on the wiki... --UU - natter 09:50, Apr 24

I haven't had time to write anything either, really I should be studying, outside life takes priority right now (ie. screwing round with friends). Only articles I have planned are to finish the Perestroika one, which has taken longer to write than communism actually lasted. So I've really just been foisting my opinions onto others. Besides, noobs are writing just as well now as I ever could - Hydrogen, that metal gear one and Tradesmen on vfh - the place is pretty safe. Still it would be nice to do that collab one day. Or brain you in the ashes. What ideas do you have? So I can steal them. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 10:03, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Ideas? These, mostly. Not as many as are on Cajek's list, but still more than I have time to get working on right now. It'd be nice to see you finish the Perestroika article, I remain a fan of your style. And you have absolutely nothing to worry about in the Ashes, I'm not hoping for much more than to avoid another 5-0! --UU - natter 10:44, Apr 24

fiyc

thanks for the feather in your cap award, i didn't know those still existed! it's good to know that someone notices, and i take it that it also means i'll shortly be getting some sort of joke ban (which i am entirely lacking in) imploring me to get to work because i'm a lazy git? SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:05, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi

I'm glad you enjoyed Tradesmen --Nikau 04:43, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Mornering!!!

How are you this mornering? ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 08:18 27 April 2009

Busy like you wouldn't believe old chap! And you? --UU - natter 08:27, Apr 27

I really think you need to find a better job, less work and more pay. CEO maybe? ~ 08:32, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

How about no job? and the dole? that works for me. And I am not old. I've got my whole life ahead of me and the longer I put off starting it the longer I can carry on saying that. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 08:36 27 April 2009

Actually, our boss last week finally admitted our little team might have more work than we can handle (particularly this week, when half of our little team - ie the other bloke - is out of the office leaving muggins here with everything to do) and also admitted there may be the budget to "expand the team a little". Given the size of the team and the expression "a little", I look forward to seeing him interview a succession of Hobbits soon. But that might actually give me the breathing space needed to get back to my usual sunny disposition. Now if you'll excuse me, I believe I have some stressing to do. --UU - natter 09:00, Apr 27

I bet he's only paying them half the price, eh? cos them fuckin' immigrants they don't know what the Queen's currency is worth, eh? do 'ey? and, you know, some of them are still dealing in chickens and mud so any money is gonna be a novelty worth working for, but I think it's just abuse really, it should be stopped. what I think they should do is close the borders -- I don't care if they're refugees, let them deal with their own problems otherwise them Orc chaps'll be coming after us -- no, no, no listen, listen I'm not insane, I seen it on the telly! Now if you ask me that's a waste of money! Nah at least get kids to do it, nobody'll notice if you just sellotape some pubes to them. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 15:32 27 April 2009

Yeah, Enoch Powell was right! --UU - natter 09:16, Apr 28

I'm not a link whore

Where did you get that idea? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:31, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Gee.... --UU - natter 08:31, Apr 28

Also, I'm like three places higher than you by now. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:19, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

The prosecution rests, your honour. --UU - natter 10:45, Apr 29

I am a link whore

Go me! Woo! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 09:05, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Acquittal on all charges, except the one about dangerous levels of enthusiasm - this is a British talk page. --UU - natter 10:46, Apr 29

I'm not British! Woo! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 10:49, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

I, on the other hand, am, and may need a lie-down in the face of such relentless transatlantic peppiness. --UU - natter 10:52, Apr 29

UnSignpost

I might be able to write an UnSignpost. Maybe not for the next issue, but the issue after the next issue. What is the word count of it and anything else I need to know about writing an article for UnSignpost. --Docile hippopotamus 11:10, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

OK, d'you mean the issue for next week? (7th May) That one might be kinda full. Have a think about one for the week after that. Apart from that, there's not much to know - either poke around the wiki, find something newsworthy and report on it, getting comments from relevant people and trying to make it funny, or just make it up. Have a look through the back issues to see the kind of stuff we've covered thus far. As to length, well that depends - generally a couple of decent paragraphs will do us, although if you make it longer, it lessens the amount we have to come up with, and we can always brutally edit your content if necessary! As long as it's vaguely amusing and competently written, pretty well anything goes. Check back with me or Gerry if you have any more questions. And good luck, newshound! --UU - natter 11:18, Apr 28

Here's your bloody quote

“The cabal is most displeased with this apparent so called "newspaper" or "voice of the people". What news could there be other than "maintain the piece and obey the cabal, should it exist". What voice should the people have other than "Yes sir", "No sir" and "Of course, I'll send my sister post haste your bedroom, Sir". This useless rag might let people think that the Uncyclopedians have a modicum of freedom. We the cabal, do not exist. But if we had, we'd be most unpleased and just about prepared to clamp down on this operation. Obey the cabal, the cabal is your imaginary friend.”

~ Me on Bloody Quote

.

Just make sure you spell check it eh? ~ 15:08, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

OH he will. He always checks spelling. Even if they're typos he calls you stupid and worthless. And I'm not worthless *sniff* Mummy says I have lots of potential! ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 16:33 28 April 2009

Hang on... Talk page entry from Orian with no typos? Does not compute? System error, shut down and restart. --UU - natter 10:53, Apr 29

Well to be perfectly honest I didn't mean to capitalise the "H" in "oh", but yeah. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 14:34 29 April 2009

And back on form. I salute you! --UU - natter 14:37, Apr 29

Well what was wrong with that one? I even used commas before the quotes like what that book said. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 14:40 29 April 2009

Good point: in this instance they shouldn't be there either (not a direct quote, just use of quote marks). To answer your question though, it was your idiosyncratic take on "capitalise" (check the page history - or alternatively leave me to be a sad language geek and go about your business, either is good). --UU - natter 14:46, Apr 29

You know I might just get that spell checker thingie. I had it for a while but then the computer died and I never bothered getting it again. Anyway, tallyho and thanks for the vote I've dropping hints around you for ages! was canceled out by "boring" though, which kinda hurts in my opinion. Oh also also this, I believe, will amuse you. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 17:04 29 April 2009

Thanks for a small portion of your life that you will never get back

Greetings From Four Corners!! Thanks for sending us a copy of A Guide to the American Roadside Attraction. Look at us! We're in four states simultaneously! We're headed to Waco, Texas next and we'll be visiting The Branch Davidian Compound Site and The Dr Pepper Museum. I hear they used to call Dr Pepper "Waco" because you could only find the stuff within the city limits. They say it was originally sold in a drug store as a brain tonic! We'll send you another postcard when we get to Mammy's Cupboard for some biscuits and gravy!

I must be a masochist myself to write this beast. The little bit about "Santa's Village" came from the heart though. The header picture on that link is the former location in Scotts Valley, CA. It closed a long time ago and the buildings finally followed suit in the 90's. All that's left is the name of the frontage road, "Santa's Village Rd". One of the cooler rides I remember was this quirky train-track thing that weaved around a bunch of trees, statues and props - it was fairly lengthy for little kids and you had to propel your one-person, sit down cart with.......a handcrank! Exercize!?!? Heavens!--    14:52, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

No worries chap - I enjoy a good read, and will almost never be put off by the length of an article (although one called Melty Blood that Orian ended up heroically reviewing is an honourable exception). I remember having a "too long for its own good" comment on one of my articles and feeling similarly annoyed - in the main, keeping articles punchy does help, but if you have a lot to say, and it's all good and relevant, why leave it out? Those of us who bothered to read it all properly got a good reward in the shape of some good laughs, which is all the thanks I ever need. It did take me back to driving up the West Coast from LA to Vancouver, and coming across the "World Famous Drive-Thru Tree" when we crossed the Rockies. We looked and were suitably impressed, this being the first such "World-Famous" tree we'd encountered. By the end of the day, we were all "World-Famous Tree"'d out, having passed the Grandfather Tree, the House-In-A-Tree and countless more. I was also carsick that day, but that's neither here nor there. In conclusion, what was I saying again? --UU - natter 15:05, Apr 29

Um

Sorry. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:26, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Sheesh. Don't take me seriously. I have a wife for that! --UU - natter 20:36, Apr 30

Haha! You're married, and probably at least moderately happy, though there are still the occasional fights that end in some of the best sex either of you ever had! LOSER!!! --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 20:38, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

And this is what we call irony. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:51, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

I know that - sort of like iron, right? You can't get me with your fancy words. --UU - natter 21:00, Apr 30

OptyC Sucks! CUN20:57, 30 Apr

Thank you

(diff) (hist) . . m User:Cajek/Pee/Maintenance Table‎; 21:26 . . (+158) . . Under user (Talk | contribs) (just a swift bit of checking and then I'm done for the night. And Mrs UU might be out of the bath, and... the rest I'll leave to Dex's imagination...)

I got the feeling y'all are gonna do a Wolverine parody. A musical no less. Wait, Indy Mogul and Barely Political beat you...

--MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:31, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

<3 --UU - natter 21:51, Apr 30

UnSignpost! 1st Anniversary Special!!!

The Uncyclopedia UnSignpost

Better sign it.

April 30th, 2009 • Issue 45 • The periodical that - Jesus Christ it's a lion get in the car!

UnSignpost Editors Too Busy Working on Anniversary UnSignpost to Bother with This Week's Issue By Gerrycheevers Since next week marks the incredible one-year anniversary of the storied UnSignpost, the editors are focusing all of their efforts on that issue and thus leaving this issue out in the cold. Rest assured that next week's 46th issue, marking the 46 weeks in the year on the Uncyclopedia calendar, will be "a bumper special issue" according to co-chief-editor Under user. The promise of a special bonus issue brings to mind several of the UnSignpost's more notable issues, such as the All-Kitten Issue and the Seventeenth Issue Spectacular. Reactions to the milestone were mixed in the community. "I feel the signpost has in many ways brought a little too much cabal propaganda to the site for my liking," said noted good-looking tree Sycamore. Were there a cabal, cabal authorities would currently be on the way to Sycamore's house to arrest him. Lucky for him there is no cabal. By the way, if you really thought this was the first anniversary issue, you suck.

Check out these pages! To pee or not to pee? Some more links. Are you still here? From our logs: Take your pick Biopic of the Week <insert name here> is certainly noteworthy. Old School Featured Article of the Week Nihilism. Word of the Week Brevity.

UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox

Hand delivered by MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 22:29, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

HowTo

Do you have any suggestions for good HowTos to feature? I'm having some difficulties with finding good ones. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:22, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

well theres the one I'm working on. Even incomplete it's the best damn thing on the site! probably. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 12:42 1 May 2009

If you finish and mainspace it today I might feature it on the HowTo page. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:43, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

I would but I'm not fantastically well. In fact I would go so far as to say I was dying. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 12:46 1 May 2009

No! Don't die! You gotta pull through! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:51, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Relax, it's just cancer, they can cure that with pills now, can't they? ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 12:57 1 May 2009

For a second I was worried there. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:58, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Yeah me too, but the doctor said I'd be absolutely fine, provided he stuck his penis inside me. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 13:29 1 May 2009

So, how was the butt sex? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:57, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Wait

Wait. Those articles in the noinclude tags, are those suggestions of HowTos to feature? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:00, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

No, they are previous features. Kept there to show what has been featured, but in the noinclude so the previous feature section doesn't get too long. Also: have a look through Category:HowTo - there should be something somewhere! --UU - natter 16:32, May 1

Okay. Would HowTo:Break Up With Your Imaginary Girlfriend be good enough for the HowTo page? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:41, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Or maybe HowTo:Be an absolute retard? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:38, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Or... HowTo:Make money without getting a job? --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 22:40, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Yes! I'll take that one! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:44, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Wait...

Socky... I've just been looking at your sig... Are German? ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 16:43 1 May 2009

I just like the colors black, red and yellow. Does that make me German? Maybe... You'll just have to wait for me to get into the Order of Uncyclopedia. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:43, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

SOCKY'S A NAZI!!! He just admitted it right there! Go on, ban him BAN THE NAZI!!! ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 20:46 1 May 2009

Sorry to interrupt your yelling, but WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:49, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

NAZI! He's an anti-british nazi! ...I have very little idea myself, just go with it, eh? ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 20:51 1 May 2009

What's your problem with Nazis anyway? ARE YOU A RACIST? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:20, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Yes! Britain for the British! ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 21:22 1 May 2009

So...

Is it okay if I do it every fortnight? Because I'm not sure we have enough good HowTos to constitute changing the feature every week. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:22, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Don't see why not. We feature UnBooks once a month, after all... --UU - natter 08:06, May 4

Danke schön!

FROM THE DESK OF GUILDENSTERNENSTEIN

Thank you for supporting my recent Writer of the Month campaign

Your support is greatly appreciated.

—Sir Guildensternenstein

---

Thanks for the nom!

By the way, I had no idea there was a game called Saberwolf- i've just registered myself as Saberwolf116 on every online community i've joined for the past 3 years.=P Anyways, glad you liked my reviews! Saberwolf116 17:35, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Actually, technically it's Sabre Wulf, but I figured it was close enough. The very fact that I can remember its existence should tell you all you need to know. And as I said, helpful reviews are always appreciated! --UU - natter 19:09, May 1

Out of curiosity, do I have to become a member of PEEING if I win? I sort of like to work independently, outside groups, etc. (BTW, I reviewed another article) Saberwolf116 19:58, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

there is no way to opt out of PEEING. ever. You are either a member of the Party or you are nobody. or some other utterance that vaguely relates to Orwell's 1984. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 19:59 1 May 2009

As in me. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 20:01, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Yes like Winston, here. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 20:03 1 May 2009

K, but can we give a non-Orwellian answer? Lol. Saberwolf116 20:11, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Though I have to admit, I don't expect to win. Saberwolf116 20:14, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

There is only Orwell. And as far as I know Peeing isn't compulsory, but, really there is no difference between a Peeing member and a non-member that does Pees except the latter is actually doing something. I suggest becoming a member, when I did my obligation the cause was cut by at least 100% And what are you not expecting to win? are you up for RotM? ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 20:16 1 May 2009

Yes, I am, though my odds are slim. Saberwolf116 21:05, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

It's just a thing. If you win, you get listed on the roster of SKs, but you don't have to do anything different at all, unless you really want to. Most people don't! --UU - natter 08:12, May 2

spEak You're bRanes!

I believe that you'd enjoy this. If you don't already. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 20:03 1 May 2009

Yeah, I saw it last time you linked it. I'm still trying very hard not to be terrified by it. --UU - natter 08:20, May 2

Yeah sorry I forgot I'd already linked to it. I think it's hilarious. Not quite as scary as conservapedia though, and good morning to you! Is you having a good ones? ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 08:22 2 May 2009

I think my Facebook profile says it all: ... "Has just been challenged to keep his good mood up while shovelling compost later this morning". Such joy in store this Bank Holiday! And you? --UU - natter 08:32, May 2

Incidentally, I'm quite taken with the Pirate English beta on Facebook. I'm easily pleased. --UU - natter 08:37, May 2

Pretending to revise for my last shot at highers and, by extension, a happy life. Also writing this (nearly finished) and what I hope to be my first novel (not-nearly finished). but other than that, really not much at all. Also, you have a facebook? You're almost so trendy it hurts... ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 08:39 2 May 2009

Aaaaand you've lost me. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 08:39 2 May 2009

Go to Facebook. Scroll to the bottom of a page (any page). Click on the language setting shown there. Change it to English (Pirate) Beta. Laugh like a child. --UU - natter 08:41, May 2

Yeah but that would mean setting up an account wouldn't it? I've tried stalking somebody through it once and they kept telling me to get an account and, by extension, friends, in order to look at pages. But I'm guessing Pirate english is something along the lines of pirates speaking English, rather than Somalian. Get it? last month that was a topical joke. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 08:45 2 May 2009

Yarrr. (Also: a novel? Interesting - hope you get a good proofreader! ;-) Seriously, good luck with that man, I really should try to do the same one day, but maybe I lack the youthful drive!) Also FU EDIT CONFLICTS! --UU - natter 08:49, May 2

Yes, proofreader, definitely. I'm slowly coming to the conclusion that I'm basically illiterate. Although I do put in extra effort for my off-site writings, just because here, somebody else will do it. If it ever does get written and published though I'll send you a copy, then you can put it on your bookshelf and tell people you know the author. Even if you haven't read it, it'll still be impressive. And thanks for the encouragement! ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 08:55 2 May 2009

I actually would like that. And if it's encouragement you're after: you have all the tools there to be a very good writer if you focus and pour your heart into it. Now get thee gone before I shatter my curmudgeonly image for good! --UU - natter 08:59, May 2

Being tottally honest and compleatly non ass-kissy I've never thought of you as crumudgeony. And thanks agian, I'll tottaly let you know if anything ever comes of my life. :D ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 09:08 2 May 2009

Are you writing an unbooks novel or real life novel? Whats it on? --Docile hippopotamus 08:45, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Real life novel, hopefully. It's "about" growing up in a post apocalyptic world. and that's all you're getting. There's a link there to my current Uncyc project. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 08:48 2 May 2009

VFD

I think you must have created the new archive at the exact same time I was shifting them out to archive 180 then - I thought to myself, "Hmm, this is looking a bit full, I'll create a new one" so I did and was kind of confused to see it already existed for a moment. 'Spose I'll just have to get up earlier in future! :-) Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 09:13, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Nah, I don't plan to make a habit of it, I just saw the page and something inside just went "click". Plus I haven't been able to ban many folk yet - always leaves me a little cranky in the mornings, that. --UU - natter 09:16, May 2

I'd recommend smoking. That first ciggie of the day works wonders. OK, it causes cancer, but who worries about that? Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 09:23, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Smoking can be quite expensive though. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:25, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Depends what you smoke. There's usually bits of dry leaves, grass etc. in your garden. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 09:27, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

There could be a plant I can get high on smoking in my backyard and not even know it! I need to investigate immediately! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:34, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

I used to know someone who thought along similar lines and decided to try smoking every wild British plant he could find, in an attempt to discover a legal high. He never managed it, so he moved on to other substances including spider webs. I suspect anyone who smokes spider webs has a sufficiently odd take on reality as to not need to get high... Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 09:37, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

I remember me and my friends used to hold burning twigs in our mouths. That was fun, better yet buying those joke fags, shoulda seen the looks some of the old folk gave us. Hilarity personified. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 09:39 2 May 2009

I tried eating grass once. It doesn't get you high but it's actually quite tasty. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:43, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

When my friends and I were about six, we rolled a giant 'cigarette' out of newspaper and grass and set light to the end. Because I was the sort of kid who would do stupid things for a laugh, I took an almighty drag on it which resulted in a throatful of flames. I couldn't eat for about four days afterwards and had to pretend I was ill so my mum wouldn't know we'd been playing with fire in the forest. You can say what you like about tobacco, but it's not as bad for you as that! Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 09:47, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

I quit ten years ago. Smoking and spliffing. I stopped the former when I smoked 4 packs in one day and thought that might be a bit much, and the latter when I started to become very absent and lose my temper scarily over nothing. It was definitely the dope too - and I never want to see fear in my sister's eyes like I did when I flipped at home and started headbutting a wall in front of her. Enjoyed it for a while, but it just affects some people in the wrong way and I was one of 'em. Sorry to drag this exchange down a little, please return to light banter! --UU - natter 14:48, May 2

I bang my head off walls. Got a poster that says it relieves stress but actually it just makes me feel dizzy and a bit a bit sick. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 20:56 2 May 2009

Me again. /waves

Yeah, so I just finished earlier mentioned article, whaddaya think? Personally I think it's fantastic but I need other opinions. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 10:46 2 May 2009

Mind if I take a look later? Want to get cracking a little on the next Signpost while I have the time and the mind to do so. I'll look forward to it though. --UU - natter 14:49, May 2

That is absolutely not an acceptable answer! How dare you try and improve this site? If you continue being so great then before you know it we'll be more popular than Wikipedia -- what will we do then? be the best? I think not. of course it's fine. Do have a choice anyway? ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 20:53 2 May 2009

*Cough!* ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 20:52 4 May 2009

Scan? You make swine flu sound like cancer! You're being prejudiced again! It's not my fault! ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 21:23 4 May 2009

UU, you tit.

Sonje repeated the PotM award, not the NotM award (which is the one on the front page). The true blurb belongs to YouKnowWhatTheMusicMeans. Now, I don't expect you to actually write a new one, as I don't expect myself to. I just felt I'd bring it to your attention, so you don't go insane when you see your sentence missing from the main page. -RAHB 10:44, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Ever get the feeling you shouldn't have woken up today? I get it every day, but today in particular. --UU - natter 12:22, May 3

Quit your job, get a divorce and murder your children. I've found that doing that means you never have to get up again. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 12:26 3 May 2009

Except for that daily one hour of mandatory physical recreation. WHY CAN'T THE WARDEN UNDERSTAND I JUST WANT TO BE LEFT IN MY CELL! -RAHB 19:47, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Oh I take it you got caught? Shame. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 20:10 3 May 2009

request

hey UU, might you be able to take a look at our newest colonization with a patended UU mug of tea? SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:31, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

I might get round to it - right now, I'm taking a short break from marking my niece's homework, as she's been excluded from school and there's no-one else to do it! If, after ploughing through English, English Lit, Maths, Science and Geography, I still have any will to live left, I'll have a squint. How's that South Park pic coming along? --UU - natter 15:35, May 3

sounds good, thanks much. as for the south park pic, i'm actually doing it! i hope to have it done some time today. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:45, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

also, while you're around, could you move Barack Obama/Colonization to Barack Obama? i'm not sure of the proper procedure and i'm afraid of mucking things up by not being an admin and trying to move the pages around. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:09, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

to further be a bugger, could you change the IC blurb on the main page to reflect our newest colinization? SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:31, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Looks like the infinitely more competent Mordillo has sorted this out for you. Cool. I'm off now to take Mrs UU for a well-earned meal at a nice restaurant (costing me a well-earned packet). Will try to get to your review tomorrow, if no-one's beaten me to it. Will also look to finish my part of the Signpost tomorrow, as I expect to be ludicrously busy the rest of the week. C'est la vie, mon ami! --UU - natter 17:18, May 3

roger, thanks again. incidentally, if you are marking your niece's homework, would that render you uncle UU, or UUU if you will? SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:31, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

LOL, render. another word that makes me laugh for no reason. Like murder and lesbian. Good words, good words. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 17:39 3 May 2009

So I get back here with a specially large mug o' tea to find Hype's gone and reviewed it already. and to add insult to injury, he's said much of what I would have said, but in his usual Hype fashion. Guess I'll bring the pee queue back up to date and go sort out the Signpost then! --UU - natter 20:18, May 4

no worries, uncle UU. let's get signposting! while we're on that subject, would you give cajek another ban to get him to 99? i think we'll leave it to skull to give him #100, which seems to me to be an appropriate birthday present for the signpost. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:22, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

huff

If something is huffed can it be unhuffed? --Docile hippopotamus 08:46, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

The answer is yes. It's called "hacking up". Sorry for butting in here. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:50, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

cajek's pee

the reviewed pee is rather pungent...if you're not up for catalogging the large amount of reviews there, i can finish up whatever's left tomorrow morning. i just want to make sure you have time for the bumper special signpost! SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:43, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

No worries, I got it. --UU - natter 20:46, May 4

Actually, I have run out of editing time tonight rather quicker than anticipated - can you check Aethix's for me? I did the rest. I'll get the Signpost tomorrow. I will sort that damn article, I've been preparing it in my head and everything! --UU - natter 21:19, May 4

i checked aethix's, i gave him one out of four; doublecheck if you'd like, and feel free to override me. also: i promise to get you a south park gerry tonite! SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 18:43, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Hello Mr Under. A. User

How are you doing Under. A. User? (see what that is? it's a pun! That implies you're a slut or prostitute, some may say a whore of sorts. But of course you are not.) Also good morning! How are you? ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 09:16 5 May 2009

I'm Under A Mountain of fucking work again this week. My boss is interviewing people to come help share the load, but right now, I'm struggling. Argh! You? --UU - natter 09:37, May 5

Listening to songs that make me nostalgic and full of regret while gently trying to coax my bestist online friend into voting for this article I wrote about sandcastles. And just to clarify that's not you.Although I could give you a link if you want... :) ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 09:57 5 May 2009

Give a guy a chance - I'm really short on time here. Remember what it says at the top here - I'll vote one way or another soon enough, I usually do. --UU - natter 09:58, May 5

I know, I was talking about Sissy. He was on the 360 earlier. Hiatus my ass. /sings: And you don't feel so lucky/ But I've seen so many things in you./ Believe me, I know just what you're going through./ So stand up and take a bow,/ Hold your head high/ Don't ever let them get you down./ It's all about you/ And it's long overdue. :stops singing. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 10:07 5 May 2009

That was singing? --UU - natter 12:34, May 6

Indeedily do it was. In fact I'm in a really good mood today. (despite the sting of nasty VFH votes (I'm not whoreing, merely mentioning in passing conversation (guess I shouldn't have said this because now it looks like I'm drawing attention to it (I'm not!)))) Anyway, here's another song: Dippity dee/ It's only me/ boopity boo/ I scared you! betchya don't know it. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 13:25 6 May 2009

Love your self abuse / baby we were born to lose / love your self abuse / it may be all you've got / and if it is then that's your lot / so enjoy the sensation of your mental liberation. How's that? --UU - natter 13:36, May 6

Go! Go! Go!/ Get up LazyTown/ It's the start of a brand new day/ Things are upside down here in LazyTown/ Adventures just a moment away!... Suck it bitch! ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 13:39 6 May 2009

"You're such a dirty louse go get outta my house" / That's all I ever get from your family ties / In fact I don't think I ever heard / A single little civil word from those guys. --UU - natter 13:48, May 6

They think it's not right/ Fine/ Each to their very little own/ I want you now/ I don't care how/ We're both to young to be sitting around. Well, you're not. But you get the idea? ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 13:54 6 May 2009

Yet another useless award

Rabbi Techno awards you this lovely Mechanical Thing because you voted for something I wrote to be featured. Cheers!

Out of curiousity

How did you get in the business of maintaining Pee Review? Also, what kind of criteria do you typically use to judge a review? Oh, and CAN I BE AN ADMIN PLZZZZZZZZ? Saberwolf116 12:24, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Well, about 18 months ago, only me, Cajek and OEJ were doing reviews to all intents and purposes. This was not good, and so the PEEING group was proposed in the forums. Boomer set it up, and we quickly inaugurated the RotM award. After the first couple of awards went to the obvious choices (OEJ and Cajek), Cajek decided he wanted to keep track of who was reviewing so he'd know who to vote for on future awards. He maintained it for a while, but then started to lose pace a bit, and I started helping out because I was finding it useful, and so were others. I mainly used it to spot those who persistently gave bad reviews and have a friendly word about improving their standards, but it also seemed to motivate people to do a few more reviews - nothing like a little competitive spirit to get people reviewing more! And with a few breaks here and there, and a little help from Hv and Gerry, I've been doing it ever since. Some days I think about giving it up, as it takes ages, and that's time I could spend writing, but I haven't stopped yet! I think that answers your question! --UU - natter 12:34, May 6

Ahh-what an answer!=P Well, thanks for satisfying my curiosity. I'd be more than willing to help if you'd want me too, seeing as how i'm on Uncyclopedia constantly.=P Saberwolf116 12:45, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Maybe you think you want to help now. But you don't. Trust me, I've only just recovered. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 12:48 6 May 2009

*shrugs* I've got nothing else to do. I'm always refreshing the page to see if my reviews have been checked, so i'd like to help with the maintenance (excluding my own, of course). But seeing as how i'm relatively new to the scene, i'd understand if I couldn't, lol. Saberwolf116 13:01, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Do say I didn't warn you... ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 13:09 6 May 2009

Thanks for the offer - I'll stick to the line that to update the list you need to be a steel kidney (which you are on course to be anyway) largely because it's an involved and confusing process to update it properly - so many things to remember to do - that if someone starts doing it who isn't dedicated, they end up making a bit of a mess that takes even more effort for me to clear up! I'd recommend looking at the over-complicated guide linked somewhere on the page, and having a look at the last 15 or so edits in the history to see how I do it. If you still want to do it, then have a go next month by all means! As for criteria, it's quite simple: one line per box = no; reviews consisting of nothing but "make it funnierer lol" or "this is teh suxxorz" = no; reviews that make constructive suggestions to improve the article (that's suggestions - as in several) = fine. 95% of the time it;s fairly obvious. --UU - natter 13:20, May 6

Of course by "do" I mean "don't". You're making a mistake! ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 13:17 6 May 2009

Seriously, it's horrible. Doing that list is like being molested all over again. It's just not right. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 13:24 6 May 2009

Way to disparage something I do on a regular basis. Molesting isn't all that bad... --UU - natter 13:27, May 6

Just as long as you follow through. If you don't go all the way it's just another rejection and more stuff to deal with. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 13:29 6 May 2009

I tried too Saber! I really did! But if you press edit on that page, you will see how long and confusing it is with so many numbers and lines. It is just too impossible. ~SirTagstit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 15:08, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

See!! He thinks its worse than molestation! ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 15:21 6 May 2009

Ok, thanks for the various advice. Also, CAN I BE AN ADMINZ PLZ???????????? Saberwolf116 17:23, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

MrN9000 wins!

MrN9000 wins Playwright of the Month! Who would have guessed? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:53, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Hello? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:42, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

I thought it was a rhetorical question. --UU - natter 21:44, May 8

Not really. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:08, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Could you archive it please? I want to nom you for writing UnScripts:Average Cop. It's coming this summer! (Per IP edit.) —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:26, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Already won it for that. I might get to it if I have time, but it's not a priority. --UU - natter 09:02, May 10

Free Stuff

While I was over at the Googleplex researching History of Google I managed to grab a load of these promotional t-shirts. Here's one for you because you voted for the article on VFH! Model not included. Thankyou from Rabbi Techno

So can I just...

Axk you wot you fought of today's feature, bruv? Is it something you would have voted for? I'm curious cos I think it's miles better than anything else I've written. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 14:19 7 May 2009

I would have voted for, when I got to it. I am eyeing the weekend like a man dying of thirst eyes a glass of water right now. No time! --UU - natter 09:53, May 8

bumper special issue

i've rounded out our anniversary extravaganza, and good ol' socky says he will deliver it. would you care to give it you blessing before we send it up the river? SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:28, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Here it is! Woohoo! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:40, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

The Uncyclopedia UnSignpost is proud to present its 1st Anniversary Special

The Uncyclopedia UnSignpost

Woop Woop! it's the sound of the Police UnSignpost!

May 5th, 2009 • First Anniversary Issue! • Disdaining news in favour of blatant self-promotion

Self-Proclaimed Greatest Newspaper on the Wiki Reaches First Birthday By UU Can you believe it? We can't - particularly as we're only on issue number 46 - and yet it's true, the greatest piece of talkpage spam in the history of this shabby little wiki (and the most modest too) celebrates its first anniversary! Birthed in a blaze of optimism and creativity by fiendish evil genius Dr. Skullthumper and mythical user-in-exile Cajek at the start of May 2008, the UnSignpost was intended to shine a light into the dark corners of the wiki, keeping users up-to-date with anything worth keeping up-to-date with. In this special article, we examine what went wrong, where that glorious vision got corrupted, and how it has ended up in its current state. The early issues were churned out at a great rate by the founding editors, and Cajek was so enthused by the project that he suggested to Skullthumper that they should move to a twice-weekly release - fortunately, this suggestion was shot down in flames by the doc, or the paper may never have celebrated a second month, let alone a full year! Skullthumper was first to leave the Signpost behind for pastures new, perhaps feeling his work was already done. Looking back nostalgically now at those heady early days, Skull exclusively observed: "Well! Working on the UnSignpost in the beginning was a really fun experience, not gonna lie. Cajek and I were both super excited about it. I'm glad it existed through to today, entirely by the help of other people. The setup was seriously the most fun part. We had NO clue what we were doing, we were experimenting with formatting, content, and a bot that only worked half the time. To summarize: It kicked ass. I had no idea it was about a year ago that it started." With only Cajek powering it, the Signpost forged onwards, but was beginning to run into troubled waters - even Cajek's legendary enthusiasm was beginning to founder, and when he began to struggle for time, he asked DJ Irreverent to take the helm. We asked Cajek for a nostalgic comment about the Signpost, but he was unavailable, so instead here's a random line from one of his articles: "Also, don't be surprised if you go to jail for what society deems "gross", "horrible", and "Satanic": it's all part of being an ant keeper... and an ant "watcher"". The DJ managed to steady the ship (how long can we sustain this metaphor?), but struggled to handle the torch he'd been passed by his adopter (looks like we didn't sustain it very long - never mind!). Asked to comment on this turbulent period, the DJ exclusively remarked: "I dropped said torch like a ton of bricks as a good child should always do. I could not take on the family business, I needed to dance. Anyway, I wrote about 2 articles". So the pattern of users taking over the paper, only to burn out and abandon it again was becoming well established. Next in the editor's chair was UU, who lasted about 6 issues, before becoming so overwhelmed by the pressures of the paper that he went and got married in order to have a good excuse to get away from it for a few weeks. Recalling those halcyon days, UU told us exclusively: "I love the Signpost, and have had a great time working on it. It does get in the way of writing real articles though, as some users might testify, and it can be a pain to come up with stories each week - hopefully this issue might spark a few people to put some more ideas in the press room". Fortunately, UU had taken the foresighted step of questioning the staying power of one Gerrycheevers in a previous issue's "comeback of the week" box, and Gerry was so determined to prove he had what it took, that he took over the paper while UU swanned off around the world. Cheevers's time at the helm brought such classic issues as the all-kitten issue, and his exclusive dewy-eyed remembrances run thusly: "I'm proud for having successfully stolen this periodical from Cajek and Skull, and I look forward to many more years of turning forums into news stories, dredging up old features that nobody cares about, and of course making tedious Cajek ban jokes. I also demand a raise and Cajek's office!" Unfortunately, Cheevers's staying power lived up to UU's expectations, and Gerry took another small break. UU returned to the paper, and frantically enlisted contributions from the likes of Orian57 and Heerenveen to keep the wheels of news turning smoothly. Asked for comment on his input, Orian exclusively told us: "It's a been a great help in bonding together this community. And it's made things more interesting, what with everyone trying to do news worthy things just to get their names in the paper. Or something, I can't manufacture funny under pressure and this is pressure because you're gonna put this in the paper just to humiliate me now, aren't you?". Hv, meanwhile, exclusively commented: "It's amazing that our wonderful newspaper has lasted for so long, especially when you figure the us editors have had nothing to work with but "OMGZ THIS WIKI IZ D00MED" stories since about Issue IV. It's a great tribute to the us editors' ability to make Cajek-filled fluff pieces up on the fly. Maybe they we should try for the Daily Mail?". Gerrycheevers has been fully back on board since early this year, UU is still hanging around in between banning people and huffing stuff, and with other contributors still pitching in, plus a plentiful supply of Cajek bans to use as padding (see next story), it looks like the immediate future of the paper is in good competent human some kind of hands. Want to join the list of over 25 people who have contributed to the paper since its inception? Or want to join the ranks of hand-deliverers and paperbots that have been burned out along the way, and now line the wiki as lifeless husks? Give us a shout in the press room, and become part of the Uncyc furniture! Wish we'd gotten a quote from Cajek though. Bastard. Cajek 100 Ban Extravaganza By Gerrycheevers During the very same week that Uncyclopedia's most well-known journalism source (suck it, UnNews!) celebrates its first birthday with much cake and punch, one of its co-founders achieved his own personal milestone by being banned for the one hundredth time. Rumors of making Cajek an admin when he reached the milestone have thus far not proven to be true, although he may have magically gained sysop powers upon entering triple-digit territory and we just won't know it until he comes back from wherever he's hiding in a hailstorm of admin-related activity (whatever it is that they do). The milestone was reached largely thanks to users such as Sockpuppet of an unregistered user, who took to the streets in a grassroots effort to raise awareness, and Gerrycheevers, who went directly to certain sysops with demonstrably active bansticks pleading for a "Cajek-whooping." The landmark 100th ban was achieved yesterday, with the good Dr. Skullthumper blocking Cajek with an expiry time of "a milestone". The UnSignpost would like to congratulate Cajek, and also plead for his return. Cajek was unavailable for comment, and this reporter was once again chased off of the grounds of the Cajek Mansion, this time by the abstract philosophical concept of existentialism. From the desk of the Cabal Special By No-one The cabal is most displeased with this apparent so called "newspaper" or "voice of the people". What news could there be other than "maintain the peace and obey the cabal, should it exist"? What voice should the people have other than "Yes sir", "No sir" and "Of course, I'll send my sister post haste to your bedroom, Sir"? This useless rag might let people think that the Uncyclopedians have a modicum of freedom. We the cabal, do not exist. But if we did, we'd be most unpleased and just about prepared to clamp down on this operation. Obey the cabal, the cabal is your imaginary friend.

Check out these pages! 3,422 and going strong! No winner yet declared in 'not pointless' forum A blast from the past Best of From our logs: 09:23, 30 March 2009 Under user (Talk | contribs) blocked Mordillo (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of a gay admin ‎ (you like rahb. rahb = penis. therefore you like penis. therefore you = ghey. this logic is irrefutable. also, morning mordillo.) 11:00, 15 March 2009 MrN9000 (Talk | contribs) blocked Slicktorine (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 2 weeks ‎ (Cyberbullying: We just don't care about you or your friends. Sorry. I suggest you ask him for a date. He's probably a really nice guy.) 02:46, 8 February 2009 Roman Dog Bird (Talk | contribs) blocked 97.83.236.223 (Talk) with an expiry time of Judgement Day ‎ (Fer the love of Christ, you make me think I actually have a life. You've been doing the same God damn thing since the summer. Just fuck off already.) 08:25, 13 January 2009 Mordillo (Talk | contribs) blocked Tardman (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of Judgement Day ‎ (I love being a cunt, it makes my hair glow) Codeine (Talk | contribs) huffed "Wild sweaty orgies" (If anyone's gonna write an article about these it'll be me. I've done the research.) 02:14, 10 December 2008 Flammable (Talk | contribs) blocked 70.142.37.160 (Talk) with an expiry time of Judgement Day ‎ (Hi. Welcome to Uncyc. I'm glad you enjoyed your stay here. We did too.) 04:57, 23 October 2008 Tom mayfair (Talk | contribs) blocked TheLedBalloon (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of Judgement Day ‎ (Intimidating behaviour/harassment: & Not The Good Sexual Kind of Harassment Either) 04:20, 22 October 2008 TheLedBalloon (Talk | contribs) blocked 210.15.244.104 (Talk) with an expiry time of 2 weeks ‎ (You, sir, have gone above and beyond the call of failure. Now that may sound like a compliment, but read it again, paying special attention to that last word. Yeah.) 7:41, 20 September 2008 RAHB (Talk | contribs) blocked Cajek (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 2 hours ‎ (Just got back. Haven't banned Cajek in a month. Gotta get my fix. CLICK. Aaaaaah yeeeeeahhh. That's gooood shit.) 19:36, 21 September 2008 Dr. Skullthumper (Talk | contribs) blocked Reggie4 (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 2 days ‎ (You have 2 cows. Both of them are banned.) 21:17, 23 July 2008 Modusoperandi (Talk | contribs) blocked 62.88.33.191 (Talk) with an expiry time of 1 day ‎ (Try to suck less. You're sucking too much. I didn't say "stop"! Take your time. Yeah, that's the stuff. Now gently squeeze my balls.) 23:56, 20 July 2008 Olipro (Talk | contribs) blocked Swampgas (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of infinite ‎ (congratulations, now you can add us to your list of sites you got banned from for being a bellend) 07:26, 23 June 2008 Manticore (Talk | contribs | block) blocked 124.170.144.245 (Talk) with an expiry time of 2 weeks (You have been autoblocked by the Uncyclopedia penis-size-detector. Rylie, I'm afraid your penis is too small to edit Uncyclopedia. Please try again after puberty.) 12:50, May 28, 2008 Thekillerfroggy (Talk | contribs) blocked Benhagerty (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of infinite (KILL EVERY FIRSTBORN SON) Biopic of the Week 1 year old this week, the UnSignpost is the wiki-based newspaper vain enough to give itself a biopic! It has yet to write any featured articles, and hasn't even created a single featured image, but it's appeared on almost as many talk pages as a Modus one-liner, and is certainly the longest-lived newspaper on this wiki. Vive l'UnSignpost! Thankies of the Week The staff of the UnSignpost would like to thank all our readers for pretending to care long enough for us to reach this milestone. We couldn't have done it without you. (Well, we could, but there wouldn't have been much point). Retraction of the Week In last week's edition of the UnSignpost, the current swine flu pandemic was hailed as a blessing, and our editors expressed hope that the world population would be reduced, making references to particular groups of people as 'expendable'. We would like to express our deepest apologies for referring to this epidemic as 'swine flu', and we will henceforth refer to it by the disease's proper name: H1N1 influenza. We are truly sorry to any pigs or other members of the swine family who may have taken offense. Old School Featured Article of the Week Water Polo... With Sharks! is possibly the most difficult, dangerous, and exciting sport known to man. With only slight rules variations from normal water polo, such as the amount of hands you can have on the ball and there being sharks in the water, Water Polo... With Sharks! is the world's second fastest-growing sport, behind Texas Hold 'Em... With Rabid Wolverines! Pathetic Plea of the Week What has happened to all of the robots? The UnSignpost has gone through a seemingly endless supply of robots, and several unsuspecting and apparently bored users have also hand-delivered the paper when no automated bots were available. Lately, Sock and Dexter have joined forces to ensure prompt Signpost delivery, but surely the task of pasting the paper onto thousands hundreds dozens of talk pages will result in arm fatigue and dog attacks. Therefore, a plea: everyone create more robots! Old School 'Of the Week' Box of the Week This Week in Uncyclopedia, featured in issues 3 through three, took a look back at some of the greatest highs and crushing lows in the history of this silly wiki. Look for this box to make a triumphant return to the UnSignpost, along with other old favorites such as UU's Obscure British Dialect Expression of the Week and Reason For Leaving Uncyclopedia of the Week.

UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox

---

Hand-delivered by —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:40, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Have you got time...

To have a quick look over my latest abomination. I don't think it needs a full review, but any feedback would be very appreciated:)--Sycamore (Talk) 20:52, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Had a look. Liked it. Made a bunch of proofreading changes as detailed in the edit summary. Hope you don't mind! Yeah, it's a good article, your usual standards of quality are met as ever. I'd recommend capitalising the U in the title when you mainspace it, but I'd say it's pretty much ready now, and if I don't nom it when it's there, it'll probably only be because someone beats me to it. --UU - natter 21:35, May 8

Thanks, I'm glad you like it, I'll move it to that title and thanks for sorting out my awful typos:-)--Sycamore (Talk) 22:26, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Per Sycamore

Except this is my article and I would like a full pee (not nescessarily from you though). Yeah so whaddaya think? Also good morning and such. :) ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 10:31 11 May 2009

Also, I wanna write another UnTune, I just lack a song to parody. Any ideas? ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 12:14 11 May 2009

Hi feller, I'm not ignoring you, I'm evilly busy right now, trying to get up-to-date with the pee queue and do more work than I'm paid for... Will try to have a look soon, but the next three weeks promise to be mental so can't guarantee anything. Could you do me a favour and go pop the golden urinal template on Saberwolf116's page somewhere? He's earned it. Now, gotta run, will only be about today checking, deleting and banning if needed - don't take it personally if I ignore you! --UU - natter 12:27, May 11

Oh I will. I always take things personally. Like today this baby looked at me and started crying, I found that quite offensive. And have you ever considered unemployment? It's ever so fun. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 12:40 11 May 2009

Ta. --UU - natter 12:59, May 11

And did you like? ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 21:08 11 May 2009

I think a full pee will have to come from someone else, as I'm not going to find the time to give this the attention it deserves for a proper review. However: I like it, a good idea, nicely done. I suspect when you mainspace it and the template that we'll start seeing Twitter quotes appear over plenty of articles, mind! I chuckled, grinned, and enjoyed reading it. I did find myself wondering what police force in the world lets a guy go and gives him his phone back a couple of minutes after being arrested though - the timing on that did seem somewhat incongruous. That apart, good article, I look forward to voting on it some time soon (I'd wait for a proper review first though - it may need a little bit of tweaking). Now, seeing as you've asked me for opinions recently, how about you spend a few seconds telling me what you think of Gazelle? Not after any depth - d'you like? --UU - natter 21:13, May 11

Tags is reviewing it and it is mainspaced. Also I left it hours before he was released, you just can't read. You can however spell which is nice. :) And I promise as soon as I wake up I'll look at Gazelle, I always like a good articUUl. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 21:35 11 May 2009

Oh yah - I was just thinking about mainspacing the template, and kind of included the article in that. Anyone would think it's past my bedtime - which might explain my Mrs UU's tapping her feet in that fashion. Just one more edit to make tonight then... G'night! --UU - natter 21:37, May 11